Slashdot Mirror


How Hot Would a Light Saber Really Be?

Datagod asks: "Has anyone ever calculated the temperature you would need to be able to slice through steel like it was thin air? How hot would a light saber really need to be? Also, I am assuming that at least some of the metal would be vaporized and the expanding gas would fling bits of molten metal at the saber wielder. Wouldn't your average Jedi be horribly scarred from all this."

79 of 410 comments (clear)

  1. 2nd post by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 5, Funny

    april fools! it's first.

    --
    -gjr
    1. Re:2nd post by cekerr · · Score: 5, Informative

      When I clicked on the link:
      "The House Subcommittee on Modern Intergalactic Weapons Development and Regulation"
      My Firefox browser was hijacked, endless screens opened up and somebody's voice came over the speaker saying I know not what. One of the screens was an unpleasant image.
      OK, I've been April Fooled. But I doubt it was the sort of thing slash.dot approves of and if it does, I'm disapointed.
      Yes, I know all sorts of clever people can hijack my computer via malicious links. But I had hoped for better standards around here.
      I'm now on the 4 hour virus scan/spyware checking cycle on my laptop. Just as well it's Saturday.

    2. Re:2nd post by RobbieGee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wife?!?! AHaha! Good one, you almost had me!

      --
      If you get this, we're 10 of a kind.
    3. Re:2nd post by boingo82 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Huh? Are there people here who actually RTFA?

      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
  2. Very hot. by blues_shuffle · · Score: 2, Funny

    Very hot.

    1. Re:Very hot. by kryten_nl · · Score: 5, Informative

      Very, very cold.

      As the anti-protons move at uniform speed and the temperature is defined by the relative speed of particles wrt the flow.

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    2. Re:Very hot. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 5, Funny
      Luke warm

      Luke warm maybe, but Leia in slave-dress is hot.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    3. Re:Very hot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      About as hot as me on a Saturday night when I've got my disco suit on and I'm all ready for a hot time with the chicks on the dance floor with the Bee Gees in the background as I show her my John Travolta moves and take her back to make out on my watebed with soft light from the lava lamp afterwards.

    4. Re:Very hot. by RazorX90 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A friend of mine is plagued by the following question:

      What happens when light sabers try to cut adamantium?

      I'll spare the details / speculation and leave it open ended...

      ...This of course makes me wonder what a fight between Wolverine and a Jedi would be like.

    5. Re:Very hot. by Vlad2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cowyboy Neal

    6. Re:Very hot. by BakaHoushi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about adamatium, but I do know in the SW Universe there exist metals that can withstand a Jedi's lightsaber. Cortosis, I believe it's called. Most metallic weapons in Knights of the Old Republic used them so you couldn't just mow down enemies, and Jedi Knight II had villains who made armor out of it. I don't know how, exactly, it resists a lightsaber, but it seems pretty good at it.

  3. Duh by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A real Jedi would jusst use the force to repel any bits away from him!

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Duh by coso · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mace Wendu: I don't want no muthafrakking metal bita coming at my muthafrakking eyes! I will not be some blind-ass
      Stevie Wonder jedi. ...and this the JEDI adopted OSHA standards.

      It is a time of great eye protection in the republic.

      Eyeprotection worn by leading scientists without the force powers to deflect metal bits from their eyes.

      They found the lightsaber:
      Was developed from an ancient bread-slicer / toaster.
      Contains 1.21 gigawats of power between recharge of it's flux capacitors.
      Ranges from 350F to 50000F (battery life may suffer from extended operation, and overheating may occur at high temperatures.
      Still makes a tasty grilled cheese sandwich in a pinch.
      It was a dark time in the Republic.
      Mainly because light sabers are really, really bright at high temperatures.
      So bright as to be blinding.
      Hence the recall. ........
      *sigh* and so the 100th episode of the Star Wars series aired... in gravity distorting 3-D.
      1138 left to go.

  4. Wickedlasers by cyber_rigger · · Score: 4, Funny

    Buy one and point it at a thermometer.

    http://wickedlasers.com/

    O.K. so these aren't really lightsabers.

    1. Re:Wickedlasers by kaan · · Score: 4, Informative

      omg for a second there i thought you posted a url to http://wickedweasel.com.

      *phew* that was close!

  5. Nanotechnology by Travoltus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A nanotech style light saber would be the best way to go. Nanites could burn through their target and work on a whitelist principle: a friend's DNA would be ignored.

    Quite literally you could ram your nanotech light saber through a hostage taker and the nanites would decline to harm the whitelisted hostage.

    I can't believe no one else thought of this. PATENT!!!!!! OMFG I am teh pwnz0r take that George Lucas!!!!!!

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Nanotechnology by cgenman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Be careful! The nanites might only attack foes, but even inert they would still be enough to (for example) knock a friend off of a sail barge.

      My personal theory about light sabers is that they're really just extendable swords, with lights added to let people know where the bad parts are. You know, like how smell gets added to gasoline, or the title "prequal" gets added to some of Lucas's movies.

  6. Light sabers are not hot by tuxlove · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Light sabers work at the subatomic level, disintegrating matter. However, heat is generated within resistant materials, giving the impression that the sabers themselves are actually hot. Don't the slashdot guys know this?

    1. Re:Light sabers are not hot by neoform · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, it's just a sci-fi movie right? These things don't exists, so why are you explaining how they actually work?

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    2. Re:Light sabers are not hot by jakethejuggalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      agreed. one of the tests to see if you built a lightsaber properly is to hold the blade near your hand and see if it emits heat. if it does not, you've built it properly. (i believe that was in one of the jedi academy books)

  7. As hot as... by killerface · · Score: 5, Funny

    not as hot as the pink on the site

  8. Use the Force... by aktzin · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Wouldn't your average Jedi be horribly scarred from all this."

    Not necessarily, Padawan. If a Jedi cuts through a door/bulkhead/vehicle with a light saber s/he could avoid getting splashed with melted metal by applying a subtle Force push along with the slicing motion of the saber. To Saber 101 class you should return, youngling. ;)

    --
    Quantum mechanics: the dreams that stuff is made of.
  9. The real question is really... by TeacherOfHeroes · · Score: 4, Funny

    More importantly, could a Jedi make a light sabre so hot that he himself could not wield it?

    1. Re:The real question is really... by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Sure. No one said Jedis were omnipotent


      I'm going off topic, but I think today's as good a day as any to do so... is it possible that at some point God renounced his omnipotence? As an omnipotent being, he would certainly have the power to do so... but of course he might not be able to undo it afterward, being no longer omnipotent. Perhaps he painted himself into a corner that way.


      It would certainly explain the steep decline in the quality of miracles these days...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:The real question is really... by bogjobber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also going off-topic, God can't renounce his omnipotence. It is part of his nature. That is, even for God there are limits and omnipotence is one of those things that just "is". So in a way, he's not completely omnipotent. Right now it's really late and it's been a while since freshman philosophy class so that's the best I can come up with.

    3. Re:The real question is really... by Ihlosi · · Score: 3, Funny
      I'm going off topic, but I think today's as good a day as any to do so... is it possible that at some point God renounced his omnipotence?



      Yeah. Nowaday, God logs in as a user instead of as root. It's so much more secure.

    4. Re:The real question is really... by rgoldste · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Scott Adams wrote a book, God's Debris, that explores your question of what happens if God gives up his omnipotence. I'll let you read the free ebook yourself, but the basic idea is that God, as a perfect being, gets bored of his own existance and tries to spice things up by committing suicide. In doing so, God created the universe.

      Wikipedia notes the parallels of this to Hinduism. When I read God's Debris, I was reminded of GWF Hegel's Philosophy of Religion, where God also empties himself of divinity in order to start time and create the universe because he realized that his pure existence is meaningless. Time is the progress of God, the spirit of whom is now extended in all matter, coming to 'realize' himself as God. So, in a sense, God is evolving.

      These theological moves (God is extended in the world and God is realized in the future) allow for dodging some thorny questions. For example, Can God create a rock that he can't lift? The answer is, for *now*, yes. But he might be stronger tomorrow.

  10. My calculations say ... by RubberDuckie · · Score: 4, Funny

    The light saber would need to be 6241 F to cut through metal. At that temperature, the metal would be separated into sub-atomic particles called 'fooltrons'. As I'm sure you are aware, fooltrons are far to small to cause damage to the human body.

    1. Re:My calculations say ... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Funny

      Incorrect. Nothing is fooltron proof.

    2. Re:My calculations say ... by buswolley · · Score: 4, Funny

      FoolTron --The adventures of Bush after getting transported into his computer.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  11. Mod me please? by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK, since today the weirdest stuff happens out here, can I get this comment modded up? Looks like there just has to ask. Thanks alot.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Mod me please? by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Funny

      If only I had mod points. I wasted them all just before the pink crap showed up.

    2. Re:Mod me please? by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's all good, today is not a good day to have mod points anyways, I guess.

      Seeing how the grand-parent got modded, I conclude that I hardly understand any logic in the modders mind anyways. Instead of considering using quasars for encryption, they should rather consider using /. mods.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  12. Afraid by Soulfader · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I don't know what the most frightening aspect of this topic is.
    • The extraordinarily detailed answers from people who spend a lot of time thinking about this sort of thing.
    • The retarded answers from people who don't spend a lot of time thinking about this sort of thing.
    • The retarded jokes forthcoming about people's pulsing hot lightsabers
    • The prospect of spending all day sifting through stuff like this looking for real news
    • The fact that I'm rather curious about this myself.
    I know very little of physics, Star Wars or other. So I shall link to the disturbing Star Wars-related musings of my friend instead.
  13. How hot? enough to burn the user? by Bananatree3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Looking at this comment I found, the author makes a good arguement: If the light sabre were hot enough to easily melt stuff, wouldn't it radiate so much heat that it would burn the user?

    1. Re:How hot? enough to burn the user? by matt21811 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to work for BHP (now Billiton) at the Slab and Plate product division. I worked in PC support and so didnt actually know much about the steel making. One day I had to visit the BOS (I stil dont know what it stands for), it was the area where they stored the slabs after they were poored. I got out of my car and was hit by a stifulling heat but I couldnt tell where it was comming from. I looked around and 40 meters away was a large slab, cooling in a neaby fenced yard. It was barely glowing red.

      If a light sabre is say, twice as hot as that then I dont care how small the sureface area is you are going to notice it if its less than 1 meter from you.

  14. What I want to know is by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Funny

    could you toast marshmallows with a light sabre. On the one hand, there's plenty of energy, on the other hand the energy doesn't seem to go very far from the blade. I'm sure if you just touch the blade to the marshmallow it'll just vaporize though. Perhaps a wise Jedi, skilled in the force, could do this. Or maybe force lightnight. I guess you could heat a rock with a sabre and then toast with that, but it's just not the same.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  15. Shadows by Bombula · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I remember getting scolded by some fanboys for suggesting that lightsabers should cast no shadows (apparently they must cast shadows since shadows were present in Episode 4...) because the cutting edge - whether plasma or whatever else - would need to be hairline-thin regardless of temperature in order to slice through things without causing unmanageable explosions of melted and vaporized target material.

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:Shadows by Ruie · · Score: 4, Informative
      I remember getting scolded by some fanboys for suggesting that lightsabers should cast no shadows (apparently they must cast shadows since shadows were present in Episode 4...) because the cutting edge - whether plasma or whatever else - would need to be hairline-thin regardless of temperature in order to slice through things without causing unmanageable explosions of melted and vaporized target material.

      Well, assume for a moment that it works. To melt metal one needs a lot of energy - so it likely comes from a nuclear source.

      1kg of steel has specific heat of 448 joules per degree Kelvin.

      Energy from fusion of hydrogen atoms is at most 8 Mev, the energy stored in Hafnium atom is 3 Mev - let's assume that the agent used has weight of Hafnium but produces 1 Mev per atom.

      Thus 1kg of energy agent stores 9e10 Joules - plenty enough to heat 20e3 tonnes of steel to 10000 degrees - cool !

      So, as long as I am having fun, here is a "complete" light saber design - just so that no one tries to patent something that obvious:

      • Handle - let's separate in two compartments - one contains energy agent and the other initiator that bombards that agent with nuclear particles.
      • In response to bombardment energy agent produces new particles in much greater proportion - this is a sticky point as single pass stimulated emission amplification is likely not that efficient - but then we have power to spare ! In fact this might be a feature as the handle will last very long time - the amplification medium will deplete slowly and from one end.
      • the particles are passed through moderator which limits their mean path in air to desired length.
      • put peltier element around the energy agent and moderator and feed the energy into the initiator.
      • initiator could be made as short pulse laser striking metal foil - these have been tested as tabletop devices already and should be capable to produce 3Mev gamma rays.
      • move the initiator around as energy agent is used up.
      The particle fountain would be very narrow - but it will heat up the air and that would produce the glow. Oh - and plasmas are opaque to light so there will be a shadow.

  16. All your answers ... by psergiu · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... are HERE .

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  17. It's not an issue of just temperature by xiphoris · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's an issue of temperature AND power.

    Consider this: how hot does something have to be to melt an ice sculpture? Well, a match would do it, except a match can't provide the power necessary to melt a significant amount of ice.

    You need the temperature necessary to turn steel into a vapor (look that up on a periodic table of elements); you also need the power necessary to turn some mass (per second) of steel into vapor. Anyone with a background in chemistry should be able to look up the required information on a standard periodic table.

    The equation will look like this:

    (Steel's specific heat) * (volume of steel to vaporize per second) * (temperature difference) = power necessary.

    1. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by heiders · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dunno about you, but I've never seen "steel" on my periodic table. Maybe I have the unpatched version...

    2. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by Troed · · Score: 3, Informative

      Steel the common name for the pure form of Iron

      Uh no. Steel is the name given to various Iron alloys. Iron is the name for the pure form of ... Iron. You got it exactly backwards.

      Yes, I'm a Mechanical Engineer.

    3. Re:It's not an issue of just temperature by d_strand · · Score: 2, Informative
      E=(1 * 449 * 2841) + (1 * 247000) + (1 * 6090000) E= 1275609 + 247000 + 6090000 E= 7612609 J
      Power = 7612609/10 = 761 megawatts

      Assuming your numbers are correct, your last conclusion is wrong.
      7612609 J produced over 10 seconds means 761260.9 Watts == 761 KILOwatts, not megawatts. Quite a difference.
  18. Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by GnoWay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always though it was funny that people did not buy into the success of the Ewoks in the last skirmish. They'll buy into death stars, light sabers, but then balk at the Ewoks.

    1. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by RsG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eh, suspension of disbelief only goes so far.

      It's been awhile since I watched the movies. I do remember that it wasn't just the ewoks that bothered me, in terms of suspension of disbelief. Most of what I found hard to swallow about the series was either science/engineering stuff ("laser" weapons that shoot bolts, a planet sized spacecraft with an unprotected vent leading down into the reactor), or plot holes. However, those can be excused if you take a step back and look at star wars as fantasy, rather than sci-fi. It may be unrealistic, but it's mostly internally consistant.

      What bothers people about ewoks is that they break from that internal consistancy. Here we have a mighty empire, ruling thousands of systems, with energy weapons, walking tanks and armoured soldiers - and they get their asses kicked by teddy bears with spears. How the hell are we supposed to see the empire as being this massive military superpower, when pointy sticks are all it takes to kick their asses?

      I think most people would have been fine with ewoks if they'd at least been carrying stolen imperial guns or something. It still would have been silly, but suspending disbelief would have been simpler.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    2. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by LouisZepher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I could be wrong here, but I immediately see a statement being made that says "technology bad, nature good" that one would often find in some fantasy-based video games. (Many say that Final Fantasy 6 is a prime example of this.) I can't say for certain whether Lucas meant this, however...

    3. Re:Probably about as hot as an Ewok is deadly. by Dmala · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think most people would have been fine with ewoks if they'd at least been carrying stolen imperial guns or something. It still would have been silly, but suspending disbelief would have been simpler.

      Funny, I seem to recall hearing that in an early draft, the Ewoks were supposed to be a space-faring, semi-technologically advanced race. I think it might have even been that they were supposed to be Wookies. Then when the toy sales blew up after the first movie, Lucas re-wrote them into an excuse to sell plush dolls.

  19. but... by bmecoli · · Score: 2, Funny

    What does this have to do with ponies? :( I want my ponies! DX

  20. The Holy Grail of lightsabers by Centurix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are of course running at room temperature. You think it's heat that cuts through this mental abstraction you call 'matter'?

    --
    Task Mangler
  21. Lightsabers work because... by Dracos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Light sabers (and all other Star Wars pseudo-science) work because Lucas has no idea how physics works in reality, and he doesn't understand that there is a point where suspension of disbelief can no longer support the premise,especially in an adult audience.

  22. I was actually asking a serious question... by Datagod · · Score: 5, Funny

    I submitted this as a serious question 24 hours ago (or so). Just my luck, the only time my question gets accepted its april fools, and the whole site is pink! LOL

    1. Re:I was actually asking a serious question... by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well for a serious answer, take a look at model number six over yonder http://www.geocities.com/deathcommando.geo/ls.htm it's my favorite possible lightsabre operational model. To sum up, according to this model, a lightsabre is a rapidly spinning charged superconducting field. Given this model, the cutting is caused not by heat, but by the shearing off of the electrons that bind atoms together, thus, heat is not a problem for the operator.

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    2. Re:I was actually asking a serious question... by maquah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To melt it, somewhere in the ballpart of 1515 C if it's 'mild' steel, the temperature depends on the mixture (alloy) of iron, carbon, chromium, the blood of sacrificial mice ... whatever else.
      .
      Can you melt steel with a laser? Yes ...
      .
      but melting it or vaporizing it [lots hotter - above the boiling point of iron], would, as a number of other people have noted here, involve huge amounts of energy, raise the temperature of the surrounding area and perhaps cook the laser-wielder, etc.
      .
      Probably the 'light' of a light-saber is something like ionic traces from the passage-through-air of some as-yet-unknown in the here-and-now power, as it vectors (y'know how things are in Hollywood) toward the steel ... and then the power released from dematerializing the steel flows BACK to the light-saber (it would need to be a self-recharging subatomic-powered weapon: running a gaget like that on a battery pack would be unwieldy)
      .
      Some people have considered the 'telekinesis' question, including why a person would need a light saber at all, if a master of telekinesis.
      .
      Using telekinesis as a weapon against living beings draws a the user into dreadful depths of the dark side ... it's not worth it.

  23. Pretty Damn Hot. by UnixRevolution · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A Lightsaber cuts pretty fast through materials like that. As for the metal bits we'll asume it propels them away from the user, somehow. As for the heat...a portable (55 amp) plasma cutter can cut 1/4" material at roughly 70 inches per minute. The plasma coming out is roughly 24,000 degrees, and is a stream traveling at 20,000 fpm. An industrial cutter can do roughly 1000 inches per minute. I wouldn't imagine its flame is any hotter than 30K degrees. a lightsaber, it seems, cuts WAY faster than that. I wouldn' t know how to estimate its temperature using the given info, but maybe someone else can.

    --
    You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
  24. so it depends by ridgecritter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    on how thick the light sabre active region is. If it's only a few molecules thick, the amount of material vaporized will be relatively low, given that most stuff it's slicing doesn't have very high thermal conductivity (limits heat spread away from the blade). It's too late at night to push the specific heat & volume numbers, but as a guess, if the active region could dump, say, 100KW minimum into a 10nm x 2" x 60" volume, there would be plenty of energy to immediately vaporize any material in that small volume. Since there's not much material being vaporized, there won't be much damage to surrounding entities (like the Jedi sword wielder) or fixtures. As for temperature, I think that will depend on the specific heat of the material being sliced, if we assume that the energy integrated over time being dumped into the material is constant. Something with a low specific heat (air, wood) will get to a higher temperature than something like water or flesh. Once you get over around 5000K, everything's a gas. Another way to determine the temperature would be to look at the emission spectrum of the air when the blade is energized. That would tell you how hot the air is within the blade active region. However, there seem to be big differences between the emission spectra of the Good Guys vs. the Bad Guys. That could complicate the determination of temperature. Just like the 4/1 Slashdot color scheme.....

  25. It's a plasma, contained by magnetic fields. by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful
    However, it's not a simple plasma. It would have to be a high energy density plasma, in order to look solid and act solid.


    The example I found of a Tocamac plasma is only red, but is 20-30 million degrees C. However, the lightsabers in the original (and therefore One True) Star Wars were white. This means they must be considerably hotter. The page I found on near-solid high energy density plasmas also talks about tens of millions of degrees - my gut feeling would be that to produce totally solid white plasma would require 40-50 million degrees C.


    Now, plasmas at that kind of temperature could quite reasonably be expected to slice through almost anything - steel included. Furthermore, anything that was vaporised would be repelled by the magnetic field and thus travel AWAY from the wielder. This does mean that if you are fighting someone with a lightsaber, you will get sprayed with high-energy plasma every time they hit something.


    There is one minor problem, though. Energy. If you want to maintain something at 50 million degrees, AND a containment field, a couple of duracel batteries won't cut it. Even lithium batteries will go flat very quickly. My guess is that the handle of the lightsaber, therefore, contains a wormhole linked to a gigantic anti-matter reactor.


    All you REALLY need to do, then, is find out where your opponent's reactor is hidden and turn it off. Their lightsaber will then be useless.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:It's a plasma, contained by magnetic fields. by Quaoar · · Score: 2, Informative

      A plasma doesn't behave like a black body, so the blade would not become "whiter" as the plasma got hotter. The plasma of choice would have a couple of visible spectral lines (depending on the gas you ionize), and making the plasma "hotter" would just make those specific colors brighter. You can doubly ionize and even triply ionize the gas, but these transitions typically fall out of the visible range.

      Also, the magnetic field by itself would just constrain the particles to the axis of the saber. There's no guarantee that the stuff you vaporize will fly away from the handle, it could just as easy fly towards the handle. I would guess that there's also an electric potential keeping the plasma from melting your hands.

      --
      I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  26. When using one, don't forget safety! by sirwired · · Score: 2, Informative

    Remember boys and girls, a lightsaber can be a dangerous weapon, and improperly used, it can hurt! Here are a few simple tips for Lightsaber Safety...

    http://www.atomfilms.com/af/content/your_lightsabe r

    SirWired

  27. delightful... by c0dedude · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've always found that reading slashdot on april fools is a good reminder that there are better things to do than read slashdot on april fools.

    --
    Since when has this country used intellectual elite as a pejorative term?
  28. I don't think it's the heat that does the cutting by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I always pictured the light saber to be something like tamed lightning. As it cuts metal, it doesn't melt it from heat but from the actual cutting action of really fast elecrons (or whatever) colliding with and knocking loose whatever the light saber touches. Except it couldn't be electrons because they'd be grounded out by the metal they're cutting, so it's some other sort of particle.

  29. You've got it all wrong by Robotech_Master · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's not the heat...it's the humidity.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  30. Re:Could Jesus microwave a burrito by mrpeebles · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Could Jesus microwave a burrito so hot that he himself could not eat it?"
    No, he could always eat the burrito, no matter how hot. He would just suffer while eating it. Horribly. For all our sakes. (And of course, since a Jewish man prepared the burrito, we Christians would hold the Jewish people guilty of this for the rest of time, or at least for a millenium or two...)

  31. Re:It may come down to the physics by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't think the light is part of the process at all. It's a red, green, or blue (or sometimes purple) herring. The light is probably added by whatever OSHA dealy they had a long time ago to show where the dangerous part is...

    But the real question is: where did lucas get a telescope powerful enough to record all of this?

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  32. Re:spoiler warning!! by nartz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Vader, that fawking guy, only wore the mask to hide his identity as an anarchist, wanting to overthrow the king...err...queen...

  33. Remember kids by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't use your light saber to open beer bottles
    Don't use your light saber to pick your teeth.
    Don't use your light saber to gut fish

    If you do any of these things, you might be a jedi redneck.

    Bubba-Boe-Bob-Bader: "Shoot, son come on over t' the dark side... it'll be a hoot"

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  34. How They Work... by ryanisflyboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Light sabers are pretty advanced pieces of technology. Let me try to explain how they work in basic terms.

    First off, you need to imagine a sort of 'shield' around the blade. It is this shield that actually forms the blade in to a specific shape and length. It uses micro-miniature deflector technology. It's all deflector technology these days. If you can picture a sort of transparent hollow tube you are on the right track. In fact, if a Jedi needs a non-lethal billy club he/she can simply switch off the fusion generators and start whacking you with the deflector shield. It won't cut your arms off, but it'll smart a bit. Now, last time I checked, if you've gone to the trouble to piss off a Jedi chances are he ain't gonna take the time to just beat you over the head with a deflector shield. He's just gonna slice you in two. So keep that in mind.

    Also, it's these deflectors that Jedi use to do that cool hand trick maneuver. They want you to think it's their hand throwing stuff across the room. Ever wonder what 'the force' is. It's just a case of misdirection: "HEY! LOOK AT MY HAND!" (As the Jedi switches his deflector on his saber to maximum using his left hand, down by his side.)

    Now that you have this sort of hollow tube shield deflector thing, fusion materials are inserted in to the tube. Then 'blaster' technology is used to ignite the materials and sustain a reaction. Blaster technology is pretty deep, and I don't have time to go in to it. Now, as you can imagine, it takes quite a bit of energy to keep such a reaction going. That's why you hear that cool 'whummm' sound as you move it around. You're holding a few megawatts of energy in your hands. It's also why you hear that crackle when you whack two of them together. Same tech behind the frekin' lightning bolt shooting out of the hands trick.

    The question was raised, why doesn't the superheated component of the saber just burn the crap out of the user? Well - deflectors of course. The deflectors contain the radiated heat energy to within a few inches of the blade. In fact, most sabers have a feature to adjust how much energy is radiated. This is handy if you ever find yourself stranded on an ice world. You just pop the thing in the snow, turn up the radiated heat, and you have a nice bonfire.

    You might be wondering, but Luke almost froze to death and he had a saber - what gives? Well - let's just say his saber was more of a 'hack.' You see, Jedi in the past have been burnt badly when Sith lords have used the 'dark side' to tweak the controls on their sabers turning up the radiated heat. You think Yoda was born looking that way?? No, saber radiated heat accident. Anikin really liked screwing with young Jedi by turning up the radiated heat when they weren't looking. Well, anyhow, one of Luke's "improvements" to his saber was to remove this feature. Oops. ;)

    So there you have it. Be sure to keep your eyes open for my O'Reilly book coming out soon: Light Sabers in a Nutshell.

  35. Consider oxy cutters and plasma cutters instead by dbIII · · Score: 4, Interesting
    These things don't exists
    True, and the headline shows an ignorance of basic chemistry. Any oxy-acetylene cutter doesn't have to be hot enough to melt steel - the steel oxidises and burns away - so some sort of device that ionises air would be hitting steel with a lot of hot oxygen and burning it away. An oxy torch that cuts through steel like butter has trouble getting through aluminium alloy despite it having a melting point around 1000k less.

    Plasma cutters are something else again, real and possibly far more like a light saber would be if such a thing was real. Heating up a gas and making it behave a lot like a liquid to burn things away leaving nothing but a clean cut and hot dust is the way the things work - all you need is high voltage electricity, appropriate electodes and a good supply of pressurised gas.

  36. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by rev_g33k_101 · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.starwars.com/databank/technology/lights aber/?id=eu
    br> Once unleashed, the power channels through a positively charged continuous energy lens at the center of the handle. The beam then arcs circumferentially back to a negatively charged high energy flux aperture. A superconductor transfers the power from the flux aperture to the power cell. As a result, a lightsaber only expends power when its blade cuts through something. So efficient is the blade, that it does not radiate heat unless it comes into contact with something.

    --
    "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore."
  37. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by rev_g33k_101 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In order to make a semi-solid beam of energy which could interact with both matter and energy would require containing a quasar and quantum singularity inside the hilt. The gravitational field would pull all the quasar's expelled plasma back moments after the quasar releases them. The speed of the returning plasma would form a chainsaw effect allowing it to cut through the matter with ease, while when being stopped by an opposing beam. A modulated gravity field would bounce allow for the reflection of energy beams.

    HA! try another one

    --
    "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore."
  38. Slashdot killed my inner nerd by SigmaEcho · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Normally, my interest in applying practicle science to the star wars universe would be astronomical, but reading the question in pink GUI made me realize what a nerd loser I was. Thanks a lot slashdot. :-(

  39. That's silly by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everybody>/b> knows that the real reason for lack of miracles is the decline of pirates... I mean, SHEESH.

  40. Re: "Particle" physics by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Funny
    But wouldnt the particles flying off [...] Im [sic] not to [sic] good at particle physics.
    I don't think the "particle" in "particle physics" means what you think it means.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  41. Re:How do you know it's not real? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Funny

    > All that exists is in the mind of God. To be in the
    > mind of God is to exist. God is omniscient, therefore
    > everything that's in a human mind is in the mind of God.
    > Therefore Narnia, Barsoom, and Middle-Earth exist, and
    > George Lucas committed genocide when he blew up Alderaan.


    If that's true then holy god there are a bunch of Angelina Jolie, Sandra Bullock, Rose McGowan, and Alicia Witt clones floating around Yahweh-space with extremely sore pussies.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  42. Re:I don't think it's the heat that does the cutti by Whiteox · · Score: 2

    That's simple!
    One's red and the other one is a whitey blue!
    Everyone knows that when a red light sabre and a blue light sabre connect, it sounds like 2 broomsticks hitting each other.

    You must've missed a few days at school....

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  43. Answer from a welder - steel melts at approx. 2500 by koelpien · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work in a shipyard as a welder. I can tell you that steel "melts" at approx. 2500 F. However, other metals such as aluminum and copper are welded at much higher temperatures, Of course, something like ceramic is much more "unmeltable" than metal, and we wouldn't want to think that you could fend off a lightsaber attack with a ceramic coffee cup. It's not just a matter of heat. Of course, lightsabering could be said to be more closely related to plasma cutting than welding. In simplest terms, plasma cutting is a process that uses a high velocity jet of ionized gas that is delivered from a constricting orifice. The high velocity ionized gas, that is, the plasma, conducts electricity from the torch of the plasma cutter to the work piece. The plasma heats the workpiece, melting the material. The high velocity stream of ionized gas mechanically blows the molten metal away, severing the material. Then again, welding and plasma cutting only works with conductive materials, like metal. You can't plasma-cut an arm off. The another issue is that both welding and plasma cutting require your material to be grounded, plasma cutting requires a source of compressed air, and an incredible source of electricity/ amps in a power source the same size, or smaller, than several of our "D" sized batteries. We do know, however, from watching "Empire" that they have portable welders, which they use (uselessly) to defend Hoth.

  44. Re:Could Jesus microwave a burrito by ThosLives · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's more concise to answer:

    "I cannot answer your question because it contains inconsistent assumptions."

    --
    "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
  45. Exploding Bodies by Detritus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Considering that the human body is mostly water, wouldn't it flash to steam and blow up when struck by a light saber?

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  46. I'm atheist, but there is an answer to that riddle by Eric+Coleman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can God create a rock that he can't lift? To give background information on this riddle, it is of the form where you have a card or piece of paper. On one side it says "The statement on the other side of this paper is true." On the other side it says "The statement on the other side of this paper is false." I'm not sure what the logical term for this type of paradox is called, but the God/Rock idea is very similar. The circular reference in the quoted riddle should be obvious. The solution to this riddle is not a question of God's power. As with most riddles the answer is found by using a vague or misleading definition of a word. The key term in this riddle is "lift." If God created a rock that consumes(replaces) all of spacetime then there is no concept of "up", therefore the rock can not be "lifted" in the normal sense of the term since "lifting" is relative to some other object. With this solution you have achieve a dual state instead of a nonsense state. If an entity can create this hypthetical "omnirock" then the free will of God comes into play. He can create a state where he can not lift the rock and can also create a state where he can by creating a smaller object in space move/lift the first rock; ultimately allowing relative movemnent. The final solution is that both states are possible and exist simultaneously. Look up 'Schrodinger cat' on google. QED