Slashdot Mirror


How to Avoid Mobile Phone Interference w/ Speakers

EnzoTen asks: "Everyone has been sitting at their desk rockin, jamming, or groovin to their favorite tunes. You are in a trance, getting work done... then... BZZZPT... BZZTP..BTT.. BZZZZZZZZPTT... the blood curdling noise of your cell phone interferes with your desktop speakers playing 4 times the volume of your music and it takes everything in you not to flip your desk upside down, or throw your mobile phone across the room. Is there anyway to avoid mobile phones interfering with speakers? Are there speakers available that are shielded from this type of interference?"

228 comments

  1. Never happened... by code+addict · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I can honestly say I've never heard of that happening before. I regularly carry a cellphone near numerous speakers and never had a problem.

    1. Re:Never happened... by hmhansolo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      happens all the time for me.. the only good thing is, is that if you are paranoid, you'll know when your cellphone talks to the tower.. you won't know what of your private information it is giving away.. but you'll at least know when it gives it away ;)

      --
      --hmhansolo --lnxmstr --gentooman
    2. Re:Never happened... by EvilMagnus · · Score: 5, Informative

      it happens to me with my ATT/Cingular GSM phones and affects both of my car stereo systems and my desktop speakers, but not my hifi/amp setup. It's not as annoying as the submitter describes, but it's a very audible, very noticeable series of clicks and burps. Lasts about three seconds, every ten, fifteen minutes. I assume it's interference from some kind of GSM syncrohnisation signal, but I'm not an EE. :)

      --
      -EvilMagnus
    3. Re:Never happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This happens with amplifiers, speakers, and CRT monitors if the phone is near them when the phone is actively sending data/voice.

    4. Re:Never happened... by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      It happens to me all the time, but some speakers are definately more susceptable to this interference than others. For example, I have used two different sets of standard computer speakers with my laptop. One has audible interference if my phone is within about three feet, but any farther than that and it doesn't. With the other set, it's noticable when my cell phone is within about six feet. If I have my phone in my pocket, or worse, on the desk next to the computer, it's ear piercing. Strangely, it doesn't affect the built-in speakers at all.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    5. Re:Never happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be awesome if Slashcode was intelligent enough to prevent first posts from being rated "Redundant"?

    6. Re:Never happened... by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This happens with amplifiers, speakers, and CRT monitors if the phone is near them when the phone is actively sending data/voice.

      If my phone has an active call and I move it near my keyboard, my keyboard stops functioning. Discovered this by chance one day while on hold.

    7. Re:Never happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      hey mods-
      do you know the difference between insightful and informative?

      (apparently not)

    8. Re:Never happened... by KurdtX · · Score: 1

      The story I heard was: that is your cell phone synching with the tower... you know, the "I'm here, what time is it?" message. I also heard that it only sends that message when switching zones, so if you're getting it every 15 minutes your phone may be between two towers and it's alternating between them. I only get the buzz when someone calls me or another GSM around me.

      --

      Kurdt
      I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
    9. Re:Never happened... by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      The tiny cheapass speakers hooked up in my bathroom get the sounds. My Promedia Ultra 5.1 system does not. I also believe that my home hifi does not (but thats not in the dorm with me).

      There are numerous other speakers that do this (my mini guitar amp does as well) but it seems that when it gets more expensive, the amplification unit is better shielded and this does not occur.

      --
      Bottles.
    10. Re:Never happened... by dscho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Slashdot comments at its best. Useless.

      If you do not recognize the problem, it just might be that you

      a) do not experience it -> cannot help.
      b) do not hear it -> cannot help.
      c) notice it, but do not want to help!

      In every case, it might have been a good idea to wait and see if more
      intelligent and/or helpful people chime in, and might provide an answer to
      the riddle. And until that time, just shut up. You probably will just look
      foolish if you try otherwise .

      I actually *understand* the physics behind that phenomenon, and alas, there
      is no better solution than what was provided in another response: put your
      cell phone at least one foot away from the speakers. The problem is Maxwell:
      in order to send a signal successfully to the next station (remember: this
      is most likely indoors, as speakers are less usefull outside, and thus, there
      is probably a wall, which has to be penetrated by electromagnetic waves) the
      cell phone has to "pump up the volume".

      The energy is degrading with the second power of the distance to the cell
      phone, so: putting it at double distance to the speaker (or the next
      station, for that matter) will lower the received energy by 75%. Same is true
      for the station, but that is farther away to begin with.

      educating people every day,
      Dscho

    11. Re:Never happened... by john_is_war · · Score: 1

      I've noticed it depends on the phone too. I had a motorola v505 and that would raise quite a ruckus. I now have a Sony Ericsson v800 and I've only heard a slight crackling once. I actually kinda miss the little heads up you get from the interference though.

      --
      Live life to the fullest. It's not that life is short, but that you are dead for so long.
    12. Re:Never happened... by jessecurry · · Score: 1

      I have a nextel that I usually place on my desk in front of my keyboard while I'm at the computer and it will cause crackles in my speakers as well as distortion in my monitor if I happen to be using a CRT. It's kinda cool because I know a second or two before I'm going to get a call or before someone will beep me.
      It really makes me wonder if all those times I've pulled my phone out of my pocket for no reason and had it ring right away were because my body could pick up on the same interference. I also used to live across the street from one of the towers that broadcast the local radio station that I listened to and I would often get a song stuck in my head for a few seconds and then turn the radio on to hear that song. I don't know... maybe it's all just an attribution error on my part.

      --
      Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
    13. Re:Never happened... by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      This is the only way I can tell a cellphone is ringing on someone's desk, so that I can hunt down the owner and tell them to answer it, as I am deaf enough to not be able to hear the ringer.

    14. Re:Never happened... by swmccracken · · Score: 1

      It's very common with GSM phones, at least the 900MHz band GSM phones here in New Zealand. (Only recently has our GSM provider used 1800 MHz - and another commenter suggests that it's only 900 MHz that's susecptable)

      It's so familar here, there was an advert on radio that played this very familar brrrrrtth brth brttttth followed by the traditional, Nokia, beep-beep beep-beep of an incoming text message. Every time you heard it you went to check your phone. Even if your phone wasn't that sort of Nokia. :)

      Telecom NZ's CDMA phones don't exhibit this.

      Besides, the old TDMA GSM standard is being phased out, replaced with the GSM UMTS 2.1 GHz standard, so the problem will eventually go away. (The new standard uses WCDMA underneath, replacing the traditional GSM-TDMA.)

    15. Re:Never happened... by ResidntGeek · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The energy's not "degrading", it's spreading. And I'm so proud of you for being able to *understand* the physics (really, the 7th-grade science) behind the problem. Did it take lots of hard work for you to learn light intensity is inversely proportional to the square of distance?

      Seriously. You're not as intelligent as you think you are, and I wouldn't advise you to act it.

      --
      ResidntGeek
    16. Re:Never happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really great to see that you know how to look down on the uneducated...conceitedly informing the droves massively uneducated slashdotters

      but nevertheless, credit is due for your informative comment

    17. Re:Never happened... by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      My sister got a brand new computer monitor and everyone in my family thought it needed to be replaced because it seemed to be having serious issues.

      We're halfway between two towers, and as an earlier poster said, some days every 10-15 minutes the phone generates interference, probably from switching towers.

      Some days, when her phone was near the monitor, the monitor would turn funny colors and have weird lines across it and flicker like CRAZY every once in a while. Solution? Keep phone away. =)

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    18. Re:Never happened... by shenanigans · · Score: 1

      Here's an example of what it sounds like, if you've never heard it:

      http://freesound.iua.upf.edu/samplesViewSingle.php ?id=9220

    19. Re:Never happened... by Eternauta3k · · Score: 0

      I'd like to know what school you go to. Here, we get physics from 10th grade onwards (sorry if 10th grade doesn't exist but I don't understand the US system) and I bet we won't be seeing light or waves. Hell, we probably won't see trigonometry till next year :(

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    20. Re:Never happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey mods-
      why do you bother modding AC's? not like you're going to improve their karma?

    21. Re:Never happened... by Seehund · · Score: 1

      Hey AC, even if the slashduh moderation system in reality is abused as a means to reward or punish opinions, and to reward or punish people, that's not its purpose. It's meant to be here for the benefit of the readers. If a post is informative, then it is informative regardless of who wrote it.

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    22. Re:Never happened... by Obvius · · Score: 1

      ..actually.....it's not intensity that's inversely proportional, it's amplitude. Intensity of a transverse wave is proportional to amplitude squared. So if anything, amplitude will decay with the fourth power of distance. If you're going to flame, get your physics right. 8-)

    23. Re:Never happened... by timster · · Score: 1

      That would be plain stupid, as the first post can quite easily be redundant.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    24. Re:Never happened... by EvilMagnus · · Score: 1

      That makes sense. It could also be the crappy antennas in the last two phones I've had.

      It doesn't happen at work because I'm sat right underneath a Cingular tower. But at home, when the signal can randomly plummet from 5 bars to 1, it could well be trying to sync up again.

      --
      -EvilMagnus
  2. please by LiQiuD · · Score: 1

    I sure hope so...this drives me nuts on not only my pc speakers, but the sub for my home entertainment system too.

    1. Re:please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Nokia 6061 and it does this every hour or so..

      I can't even throw my phone into the center console of my car, because it buzz my car stero.

      What the hell is my phone transmitting when i'm not receiving a call?

      My old Nokia never did that...

    2. Re:please by LordNightwalker · · Score: 5, Funny

      What the hell is my phone transmitting when i'm not receiving a call?

      It's periodically sending your GPS location to the government who's building a huge database of people's movements, to correlate against all sorts of crimes ranging from terrorist attacks and murders to petty theft and jaywalking.

      The RIAA has shown interest in this as well. They want access to the data so they can draw up a list of people who walked by a record store without stepping inside and buying a CD. They claim it's not only in their own interest, but for national security as well, since anyone found guilty of such a crime is a threat to the national economy, and therefore a terrorist. But don't worry, the government is protecting you and is fiercely negotiating with the RIAA on your behalf. They finally realised what a bunch of nutcases these RIAA folk really are, they're sick of being pushed around by some corporate lobbyists, and are now actively pushing for a rewrite of that RIAA bill that would change the wording from "terrorism" to a mere "theft". And it looks like they might even have a chance of winning this one...

      OK, and now for the serious answer: a cellphone tower can only support a limited number of simultaneously connected cellphones. It therefore needs to know exactly when a cellphone leaves its range, or disconnects from the network altogether, so it can free up its connection slot for use by another cellphone. Normally a phone communicates a disconnect to the tower whenever possible (for example if it's getting out of reach and connects to another tower, it then disconnects from the first and the connection gets transferred gracefully from the old tower to the new one, even in the middle of a conversation). However, if you just yank out the batteries, the phone gets utterly destroyed, you suddenly enter a cage of faraday or even an underground tunnel, ... the phone will have no time to notify the tower, so the tower needs to check up on supposedly connected phones from time to time to check that none of them are MIA. It's basically similar to an ICMP ping on the Internet. And that's what you hear over your speakers. Similar thing happens right before a call or SMS comes in, or when you dial out: there's two-way communication, and the RF interference the cellphone puts out is picked up by your audio equipment.

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
    3. Re:please by 4D6963 · · Score: 1
      It's periodically sending your GPS location to the government who's building a huge database of people's movements, to correlate against all sorts of crimes ranging from terrorist attacks and murders to petty theft and jaywalking.

      You may think you're joking, but that's no joke. I read yesterday about the Homeland Security having developped a GPS plugin for NASA's WorldWind http://alteviltech.com/blog/2006/03/31/department- of-homeland-security-can-track-you-by-youre-phone/

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    4. Re:please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont trust links that make the your/you're mistake.

    5. Re:please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is something that you don't-hear-about enough to wonder why. i'll bet those evil phone networks are behind it!

      anyway, afaik, it does not happen with sprint and verizon, which is a huge selling point for me.

    6. Re:please by pyite · · Score: 1
      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    7. Re:please by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      riiiiight. lol

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    8. Re:please by caseydk · · Score: 1


      Actually, that's more true than you think. A few months back in southern Maryland, some punk was suspected of arson, but he claimed to be at home... so they pulled the cell records and found out that he wasn't at home and happened to go to all the places involved. I believe he confessed then.

    9. Re:please by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1

      No, I'm perfectly aware that happens. That's not the purpose of the data your cellphone sends out though. Your cellphone just sends out ping replies, requests to connect to other towers etc... The fact they can trace you is just a side-effect. They know what towers you're connected to, and what your signal strength regarding those towers is. The main goal is to make sure you're still connected to the network; the side effect is they know pretty well where the hell you were at all times. It's comparable to an IP address: its main purpose is not to identify the person behind a computer; it's main purpose is to allow it to talk to other computers, and have them talk back to it and it alone. However, since your ISP keeps records on who leased which IP at what time, it could also be used to identify the real world entity hiding behind that IP.

      Anyway, you'd think criminals would get smarter, huh? How many times haven't we heard on the news how a criminal/terrorist got tracked by his cellphone? How many times haven't we heard about some service that lets you locate your kids by their cellphone signal? And still people bring their cellphones to a future crime scene where they're about to become the protagonist... It boggles the mind. ;)

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
  3. Ya by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

    Move your phone to the floor or behind you, i find 2 feet away from the speakers works.
    When I'm in the car, I dont put my phone in the phone holder anymore, I put it on the seat next to me.

    Also dont put it next to your alarm clock, thats a bitch to be woken up to that BZZZT screech.

    1. Re:Ya by CTalkobt · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the problem I have with putting the phone on the seat next to me is that when I'm running from the cops or the girlfriend I just pissed off the phone tends to slide around quite a bit and gets in bad places.

      Yeah, like under the break pedal so I can't stop and the car keeps moving and moving. That's the reason officer that I couldn't stop - I was hearing the buzzing noise from the cell phone when I was on speaker phone with my girlfriend - I put it in the seat - it slid off the seat and got stuck under the brake.

      Between the buzzing which was still going on, my girlfriend yapping on the speaker phone and Rush playing on the stereo and the road noise this car seems to want to let in I didn't hear you.

      Was I going too fast?

      --
      There's a gorilla from Manilla whose a fella that stinks of vanilla and has salmonella.
    2. Re:Ya by cmarks03 · · Score: 1

      I don't know... My phone is in the next room separated by a wall and 3 computers etc., and I still get the buzzing (though to me it sounds like beeping) on my TV... I first noticed it back when I got my first GSM phone. I just ignore it, and turn the phone off at night. It works for me. If someone needs to contact me at 3:00 AM, then they can knock on my damn door (and hope that it's loud enough to wake me up).

      --
      Peace, Chris
  4. Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Turn off your cell phone. :-)

    1. Re:Simple by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Or alternately, turn off your speakers.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Simple by fm6 · · Score: 3, Funny

      To really solve the problem once and for all, poke out your eardrums!

    3. Re:Simple by dotgain · · Score: 5, Funny
      Let me guess, you guys write KB articles for Microsoft.

      Symptom: When you use X, Y doesn't work properly.
      Cause: Due to a design deficiency in X, Y sucks when used in conjunction with X.
      Solutions:

      1. Don't use X
      2. Don't use Y
      3. Render yourself unable to notice the problem
      Keywords: omg bzzt bzzzzz
    4. Re:Simple by TheSalzar · · Score: 0

      To really really solve the problem once and for all, kill your self!

    5. Re:Simple by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that doesn't work, my cell phone will drive speakers that are off, unpowered, and unplugged... try again next time!

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    6. Re:Simple by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "Turn off your cell phone. :-)"

      Informative?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Simple by chill · · Score: 1

      "Turn off your cell phone. :-)"

      Informative?


      Because Slashdot doesn't have a +1 Obvious" mod.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    8. Re:Simple by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      I think it's the Nextel Blackberry's that are the biggest violator here. I have multiple cell phones (yes, a few); and I can always tell when the Nextel Blackberry is about to ring because I hear the buzz on my speakers before it rings.

      What providers are you using? What phone?

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    9. Re:Simple by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Actually, I forgot that this happens even when the speakers are turned off. It's been awhile since I had a cellphone that did this. On the other hand, my current cellphone causes my alarm clock to make a very very faint high pitched beeping sound when it's plugged in to charge (I can sometimes hear it when it's totally quiet at night and my head is near the clock).

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    10. Re:Simple by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Actually, I happen to think that whoever writes those KB articles is pretty good at their job. I've done that kind of work myself, and the point is to educate people about problems, solutions, and workaround, and do so clearly, precisely, and concisely. All of which these guys are quite good at. Which is, alas, more than can be said of most tech writing, at Microsoft and elsewhere.

      Of course, when you work for Microsoft, the problems are often lame, the solutions often don't exist, and the workarounds often amount to "turn off your computer". But that's hardly the writer's fault!

    11. Re:Simple by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      You forgot the most famous line from most of them: "This behavior is by design." Yes, folks, it's wacky and stupid, but in fact we meant to do it that way.

      But those articles have saved my bacon on more than a few occasions. Besides, the people writing those are just messengers. Best to shoot the guy that designed it in the first place. Maybe whoever takes his place will do a better job.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    12. Re:Simple by dotgain · · Score: 1

      I admit I came across as having a stab at the "messengers", but I do in fact agree with you, the articles are well written and usually very accurate and helpful when researching a problem.

  5. Wait, what? by DarkRyder · · Score: 1

    I've used a number of cell phones near many different sets of speakers over the years and have never encountered this problem.

    What model phone/speakers do you use? I'll have to remember to avoid them.

    --
    Unless, of course, scissors can't cut rock...
    1. Re:Wait, what? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's the system, not the phone. As has been noted, it's a GSM thing. That means that pretty much any make/model of phone will do it with the GSM variant (assuming there is one for that given model). If you travel quite a bit, it's pretty much your best bet -- some parts of the world only have GSM.

      The interference is a clicking, somewhat like a rotary phone (I now feel old). It happens when the phone is talking to the tower. I kind of like it as it occurs a second or so before an incoming call starts ringing. It also occurs at random (or maybe regular?) intervals.

      It bugged me with one set of speakers that were arranged such that it was fairly loud. I moved the phone, and it fixed the problem. My new speakers click more subtly, and I don't really mind it. I think it may have more to do with the volume settings on my computer and on the speakers than the brand of the speakers.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Wait, what? by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 1

      My old TDMA phones did it as well.

      Nextels do it as well, but the sounds is more like tssh tssh tssh tsssssssh tssh tssh tssh (longer when transmitting voice, shorter when transmitting silence).

      On the plus side, you always knew when your phone was about to ring because the buzzing would become more intense and increase in duration.

      --
      $ man woman *
      -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
    3. Re:Wait, what? by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      The problem is not unpowered speakers. The RF from the phone can't impart enough power into the wiring to drive the speakers.

      The problem is power amplifiers. You only need a small amount of RF to get on the low level signal lines and bam; it gets amplified. The thing with digital phones is that because they're a pulsed TDM signal there is energy (minimal) right down to DC which gets picked up, "demodulated" and amplified in your power amplifier.

      The solution is keep your damned phone away from anything with a power amplifier in it. In fact, keep it away from CDRs, hard disks, credit cards, PDAs, etc. There is enough field strength to actually flip bits in flash memory and on hard disks when talking about GSM phones!!!

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    4. Re:Wait, what? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Happens to me with my Cingular Motorola v180 when close to the speakers Dell sent with my Precision 340 workstation computer. I just put the phone on the back counter instead of under the monitor.

    5. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how do you flip a bit on a cd-r??

    6. Re:Wait, what? by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Just to confirm, every one of my previous employer's TDMA (800mhz band) phones would cause speaker pops within 3 feet, this ranges from nokia 2250's through 9200's to moto v60t and v120t's, not to mention various audiovox, kyocera, samsung, etc. The CDMA phones seem to be a little better behaved (850 and 1800mhz ), they only had to be within one foot of our bone stock dell speakers.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    7. Re:Wait, what? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      In flash memory? Are you sure? That sounds rather bad actually, a flash chip just died on me recently without me using it much, I was wondering why...

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    8. Re:Wait, what? by Zemrec · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute, cellphones have flash memory of their own that's going to be constantly bathed in the RF emitting from the antenna just a few inches from them whenever the phone is on. I've never heard of a cellphone's memory erasing or corrupting itself, so I call bogus.

    9. Re:Wait, what? by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Actually, it means that your speaker system is NOT properly FCC Part 15 compliant. You know, that little sticker all your electronics has on it? Believe it or not, you can (by law - if not in practice) get the MFG to repair/replace the speakers (good luck)

      I should be able to walk into the room with a 5 watt HT, and nothing should happen - I should also be able to run over a kilowatt transmitter next door with nothing happening. BTW, and if your neighbor is running 1500 watts of ham radio next do, and your hearing him? Most likely it's YOUR problem, not his

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    10. Re:Wait, what? by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      Part 15 only addresses (AFAIK), devices that broadcast. The speakers aren't broadcasting, they are picking up the "noise" from the cell phone. OTOH, the cell phones have a license to broadcast at certain power levels. It is conceivable the *phone* is violating Part 15, but as the speakers are the things being interfered *with*, they aren't violating anything. I would imagine they aren't.

      Of course, I could be very wrong, as my knowing about Part 15 is primarily based on a bit of chatter in commercial radio stations among people who know more than I. Feel free to correct me.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    11. Re:Wait, what? by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Part 15 covers both intentional radiators, unintentional radiators - AND susceptibility to radiators - basically, your non licensed device has to accept interference from any properly operating licensed device

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Nope by HeavensBlade23 · · Score: 1

    Never had it happen, nor have I even heard of it happening. Why would a cellphone interfere with multimedia speakers anyway?

    1. Re:Nope by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      The cables can pick up signals, which then get amplified. Some shitty speakers actually pick up radio at times.

    2. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why would a cellphone interfere with multimedia speakers anyway?

      So... other than audio, what types of media can speakers play?

  8. Cheap speakers by cynix.org · · Score: 1

    This only happens to non-magnetically shielded el cheapo speakers.

    1. Re:Cheap speakers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, I have a magnetically shielded speaker and a GSM phone, and I get this static noise, which is annoying, of course.

    2. Re:Cheap speakers by J.+Random+Luser · · Score: 1

      Genelec 1030 aren't exactly el cheapo, but any GSM phone will bore straight thru 'em. With 100 feet of balanced screened audio line feeds into a Sony HVR-Z1P camera, a GSM phone 10 feet away gives full level in the headphones. It's something to do with the spectral output of GSM phones in their status check and ring mode. Doesn't seem to do anything while actually talking on the phone, go figure. We are investigating what else might break in our venue if we put a blocking transmitter in to catch those who won't switch off.

    3. Re:Cheap speakers by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      It happens to my soundstick2's, and they're damn expensive speakers (over 110 bucks[american] for a 2.1 system)

    4. Re:Cheap speakers by heson · · Score: 1
      Sorry you got ripped.

      Price != Quality

      Maybe some properly shielded wiring might solve your problem.

    5. Re:Cheap speakers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or extremely expensive studio monitors.

      it happens to anything with built in amplifiers.

    6. Re:Cheap speakers by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      The problem is, even the best Mfgs often cheap out on RFI sheilding, figuring "the odds of it happening...." Thing is, we are seeing more and more RF sources.

      By FCC Part 15, any "Non licensed" device must both accept RF from any licensed service, and must not interfere with a licensed service. Your Cell Phone is a licensed service. In other words, if the phone is operating withing it's license class (and it almost certainly is), the problem is with the speakers - no matter HOW much you paid for them

      For that matter - let's say the phone company puts in a tower next door - or the fire department, or the police, of even a ham - and they come in over your speakers? Too bad. You have to fix the problem - and if you interfere with them? The can register a complaint - and YOU will have to fix the problem. Licensed services take priority over any non licensed uses

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  9. Sheesh. by Reeses · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sounds like you're getting Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) or Radio Frequency Interference (RFI).

    Both are the result of either bad or cheap shielding. Most consumer electronic devices should have at least some shielding.

    Look for frayed speaker wires. Look for cracks in your cell phone case (the one it's made out of, not the cool "leather" one you got when you bought it).

    Either get new speakers, or replace your cell phone. Or both.

    --
    Reeses
    1. Re:Sheesh. by onemorehour · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heh, no, don't look for cracks on your cell phone. Your cell phone is functioning properly when it's emitting lots of electromagnetic waves--it doesn't have to be cracked in order to do so.

      The issue is shielding--most likely in the wires to your speakers, but potentially in the power cord or the guts of the machine producing the signal out. If there's terrible internal shielding, dirty power or the EMI on the circuit board itself can cause this.

    2. Re:Sheesh. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It happened to me also when I owned a Nokia 6120 and placed it on my PC desk. Of course my the speaker wires were not a twisted pair and totally unshilded. Typical for PC speakers.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Sheesh. by (negative+video) · · Score: 1
      Most consumer electronic devices should have at least some shielding.
      "Should" being the important word. Most companies will gladly sell you utter shite if it will save them US$0.005 per unit in manufacturing cost.
    4. Re:Sheesh. by DeathToBill · · Score: 1

      I don't think the shielding on the mobile phone is going to do much good... it's got this ANTENNA thing that is supposed to radiate energy.

      --
      Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
    5. Re:Sheesh. by fush · · Score: 1

      heh, no. it's not the speakers either. They're just resonding to the signal from the amplifyer. The amp is the item porly shielded.

    6. Re:Sheesh. by mathew7 · · Score: 1

      That's correct, the speakers are not directly affected.
      I used at home an AIWA sound system (main unit+2 speakers) and it responded to my phone from 0.5 meters (that's about 20"), but when I borrowed my brother-in-law's Tehnics amplifier (used with the same speakers), it did not react to the phone even when the phone was left on the unit.
      Also, the volume of the buzzing (on the AIWA of course) did not change with the volume knob, so it stays the same volume no matter if the music deafens you or not (so when the volume is high, it's not that noticeable).
      My conclusion is that the op-amps have to be shielded, which is probably done only on the more expensive units.

  10. Re:Um...no. by McGregorMortis · · Score: 4, Informative

    This problem affects GSM phones much more than CDMA phones. GSM uses a time-division scheme, where the phones transmit in 570ns bursts, at a rate of around 217 bursts/sec.

    I have the same experience. It really is very, very annoying.

    One of the RF techs at my company apparently modified his computer speakers to filter out the noise. I'd like to find out exactly what it was that he did.

  11. Happens to me... by intekra · · Score: 1

    This happens to me all the time with my Cingular/ATT GSM Phone(s). RAZR V3 and MPX220 whenever it's within 2 feet of the Klipsch Pro Media Satellite speakers. Does not happen with my Sprint PPC6700 at all. Haven't had my phone(s) close enough to my home theater setup to notice if it affected that equipment.

    --
    [intekra] - [www.plex.nu]
  12. two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Faraday cage. Though this isn't practical it had to be said.

  13. so simple by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

    step 1. build a large box out of copper mesh screen (use wood for framing)
    step 2. place speakers, computer, and user inside mesh box
    step 3. leave cell phone outside of box
    step 4. profit!

    1. Re:so simple by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Even better: stick the *phone* inside the box, and leave the *user* outside. You can build a smaller box that way, and you won't be bothered by callers any more!

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:so simple by Isarian · · Score: 1

      Yay for Farraday cages! lol I wonder if someone already has a patent on those, though...

    3. Re:so simple by xenotrout · · Score: 1
      Yay for Farraday cages! lol I wonder if someone already has a patent on those, though...
      Faraday, I would hope, if anyone, had the patent.
  14. GSM by Detritus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It seems to largely be a problem with GSM handsets, so users of handsets that comply with other standards may not notice a problem. GSM uses TDMA, and has also been noted for interference to hearing aids.

    The solution is to properly shield the speakers and speaker wire. The speaker wire behaves like an antenna, coupling the signal into the audio amplifier, where it is detected and amplified. It's behaving like a crystal radio, a primitive type of AM radio receiver.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:GSM by danbuhler · · Score: 0

      GSM does NOT use TDMA, they are two completely seperate technologies

      %!@#*(!@ the amount of useless posts here on /.

    2. Re:GSM by Detritus · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yes, it does. You have to distinguish between TDMA (the technique) and TDMA (the standard, D-AMPS or IS-136). Both GSM and IS-136 use TDMA (the technique).

      See TDMA.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:GSM by klaymen00 · · Score: 1

      GSM may not use TDMA, but it is very similar to TDMA. Both technologies use time division as opposed to code division (ie. CDMA).

    4. Re:GSM by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From wikipedia:

      "In the 900 MHz band the uplink frequency band is 890-915 MHz, and the downlink frequency band is 935-960 MHz. This 25 MHz bandwidth is subdivided into 124 carrier frequency channels, each spaced 200 kHz apart. Time division multiplexing is used to allow eight speech channels per Radio frequency channel. There are eight burst periods grouped into what is called a TDMA frame. The channel data rate is 270.833 kb/s, and the frame duration is 4.615 ms.

      The transmission power in the handset is limited to a maximum of 2 watts in GSM850/900 and 1 watt in GSM1800/1900."

    5. Re:GSM by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      I've seen the same phenomemon with a Nextel phone. Entertainingly, the interference started before the phone rang.

      Options include shielded cable for the speakers and/or ferrite beads to clip around the wiring to squash RF on the line.

      The multiplexing scheme shouldn't make a big difference to the interference problem, certainly not compared to the modulation and the frequency. If you're interested in knowing whether GSM uses Time Division Multiple Access to keep users out of each other's way, check the GSM tutorial.

    6. Re:GSM by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I used to deal with these issues a lot when I worked with low level analog design. The input and output circuitry in the audio amplifiers can rectify any amplitude modulated RF that they detect. That includes the output of the cell phone if it uses a modulation that does not have a constant envelope. In the case of FM or a constant envelope modulation the bias point may change in the amplifier but that is not normally a problem or audible. In poor designs it is possible for the amplifier to go into oscillation and even self destruct.

      TDMA multiplexes by assigning a time slot for the phone to transmit in and at other times its transmitter is shut down. Turning the transmitter on and off is just another form of amplitude modulation and it is very easy for low frequency circuits to detect it. Systems that use QAM might also cause this problem but I would normally expect the amplitude modulation to be too fast for it to be detected.

      Solutions include shielding the input and output leads on the amplifier as well as designing the amplifier to be resistant to this kind of EMI. I have successfully wound RF chokes into the input, output, and power supply leads in the past to make existing equipment more resistant.

    7. Re:GSM by swmccracken · · Score: 1

      Slight correction - GSM doesn't necesarally use TDMA-the-technique. Traditional GSM does, yes. But the newer 3G standard is a GSM phone but GSM over UMTS. Which, in turn, uses WCDMA (a CDMA variant) over the air.

      Tus, the current design is GSM-the-protocol over CDMA-the-technique. (Any such phone is likely to be advertised as 3G and does things like real-time video calling.)

      (The 3G phones can fall back to GSM over traditional GSM TDMA however.)

    8. Re:GSM by scotty1024 · · Score: 1

      And in my experience with again, the Evil AT&T/Cingular mocked elsewhere for their interference in pure GSM, their UMTS phones spend most of their time jamming my iPod Bose Quiet Comfort 2 headphones when indoors where their UMTS can't reach the phone. Well of course that was before they upgraded their network and now my UMTS phones only operate in GSM (for 30 minutes before the batteries are exhausted).

      My Verizon e815 and 7130e though never jam my iPod Bose.

    9. Re:GSM by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      GSM uses TDMA, and has also been noted for interference to hearing aids. The solution is to properly shield the speakers and speaker wire.

      Ah, that's why grandpa wears a tinfoil hat.

    10. Re:GSM by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not quite correct.

      I'm 90% positive that the protocol for UMTS has no connection to GSM either.

      In short, UMTS is an entirely different standard than GSM, the only thing in common is the name, as UMTS is considered "3G GSM". The protocol is different, and so is the underlying modulation. (In the case of changing to CDMA modulation, you have to change the protocol to take full advantage of the new modulation scheme.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    11. Re:GSM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's bad form to comment on a sig, especially one that's a joke, but:
      Jobs is dumping Apple stock. What does he know that you don't?

      He knows his stock vested, so it was in his interests to sell the stock for tax purposes. That is all.

    12. Re:GSM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that you are the 6,322,212nd person to correct Dtardredge on this issue? Not that Dtardredge has enough honesty to correct his bullshit when people point out he is a liar or a lunatic.

    13. Re:GSM by swmccracken · · Score: 1

      Well, as I undersand it, UTMS is the whole protocol stack from airwaves to presentation and the higher level intfrastructure and authentication protocols are still more or less the same as used in traditional GSM.

      They certainly share more than just "name" -- as they both use the same SIM cards, the same network infrastructure (they both use the same
      things like "Home Location Register" and phones do transparently go from GSM to UMTS and vice versa in mid-call.)

      "UMTS combines the W-CDMA air interface, GSM's Mobile Application Part (MAP) core, and the GSM family of speech codecs." says Wikipedia.

      I think it's fair to say it's still GSM, just as Gigabit Ethernet is still Ethernet despite being very different on the wire to 10 megabit ethernet.

    14. Re:GSM by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      They most definately do not use the same infrastructure.

      UMTS operates in the 2.1 GHz band, which means that any UMTS installation will require new base stations and new antennas. In short, the entire infrastructure must be rebuilt from scratch.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  15. happens to monitors too by schweini · · Score: 4, Interesting

    i'm frankly a bit surprised that so many people don't know what you're talking about - i know it very well, and it even affects my monitors.i actually like it -you get to see how long the cell-tower to phone negotiating takes, since it starts happening a couple of seconds before the phone actually rings or receives a SMS.
    the solution, i guess, is simply to use more expensive shielded speakers, since that's what faraday cages do.

    1. Re:happens to monitors too by mcbridematt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just about everyone in Australia with a mobile phone (CDMA never took off here) has heard this sound.

      Some phones seem to be worse than others. My Treo 600 is notorious for causing problems with CRT's, while lower end phones aren't.

    2. Re:happens to monitors too by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      I've never had a problem with my speakers, but I have noticed the monitor thing. One day a heck of a long time ago I had my cell on and sitting right next to (almost under) my CRT monitor. I was plugging along for a little while, when suddenly the image on my CRT started to warp slightly. My first thought was "what the...?" my second thought was "but this monitor is only like 8 months old!" and then... my cell phone rang. Queue lightbulb above the head. It was kind of a neat warning actually, since it happened a good two or three seconds before my phone actually rang. Without knowing the possible ramifications of such interference though, I decided to now keep my cell on a nightstand or somewhere else away from other big electronic gizmos.

    3. Re:happens to monitors too by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1

      My Treo 650 only causes problems with the speakers but never my monitors. Of course if you are using a program for automatic email delivery or the sort of always on data connection type stuff then you get this buzz everytime the phone decides to check for new mail. Depending on which network you are with you will receive push data from your always connect programs at least every 15 minutes, as most of the time your phone isn't connected directly to the internet and is not accessible by straight IP and a few packets must be transmitted to keep your connection alive.

    4. Re:happens to monitors too by Wayne247 · · Score: 1

      i'm frankly a bit surprised that so many people don't know what you're talking about

      Really??? This *surprises* you? You know you're on the internet here, right?

  16. Re:Um...no. by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 1

    I'd be guessing it's a notch filter at the beat frequency. GSM transmissions are notorious for this. That, and the shout-first, whisper-later protocol..

  17. Re:NexTel by Yocto+Yotta · · Score: 1

    It's the GSM radio standard I think. I had this problem with my old ghetto T-Mobile Nokia phone, and I have this problem with my new Cingular Motorola phone. I don't recall what at&t operates with, but Sprint and Verizon are CDMA. Does at&t use SIM cards, or do you have to manually or OTA program them like the Sprint and Verizon hardware requires?

    --
    A B A C A B B
  18. Re:Um...no. by croddy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    He probably just replaced his audio cabling. The cable is the giant antenna that's picking up this signal, not the speakers -- and it's probably the signal going into the amplifier that's being distorted by the GSM data bursts.

    Cell phones probably aren't powerful enough to cause cancer, but they sure as hell aren't powerful enough to drive a speaker cone from across the room.

    But hey, why listen to me? This article by an electronics engineer was just a quick google search away!

  19. I have a suspicion... by funkmasterbillis · · Score: 1

    since this seems to be more prevalent on cheap speakers, it might have something to do with either bad shields or ground loops or both. do your seakers have a wire going from computer>one speaker, and then another going from right speaker>left speaker? I believe this might be the source of the problem. replacing it with shielded wire and (or using some sort of other shield) grounding the shield might help/fix it. IANAEE, just a tinkerer. I might be talking out my ass here, so listen to the guy that corrects me instead.

    --
    This adspace for sale! Inquire within!
    1. Re:I have a suspicion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah man :) ground loops are DC. Since any RF signals that make their way into the wire will do so through induction, it will show up as an AC signal (to show up as dc, the magnetic field would have to grow linearly indefinitely)... the cure for a ground loop problem in sound is a simple 1:1 transformer.

  20. Re:Um...no. by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Informative
    One of the RF techs at my company apparently modified his computer speakers to filter out the noise. I'd like to find out exactly what it was that he did.

    I moved my phone about 17 inches to the right. Worked fine.

    Seriously, just move the speakers and phone placement until they don't interfere with each other. A couple decades ago every bit of electronics you bought came with a piece of paper that told you to do this if you got radio or television interference. I always thought it was silly, but maybe that slip of paper needs to go back into boxes.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  21. mmmm Nextel... by Incongruity · · Score: 1

    Yeah, this ALWAYS used to happen to me when I had a Nextel phone, circa 1999 or so -- it was particularly bad with some car stereos. I've heard it ocasionally with various GSM phones, but always with cheap cheap cheap electronic radios, and never as loud as the signal from the old nextel. Basically, I'd suggest trying a different phone (if you're using a GSM phone and can swap the SIM) or a better set of speakers, as it really does seem to be device dependent (unless we're talking the old nextel phones -- didn't they recently switch frequency ranges? if not, then maybe the current ones are an issue as well).

    1. Re:mmmm Nextel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my car, listening to a weak station on the radio, I'd hear the phone bzzzt, bzzt, bzzzzt, through the speakers... until I discovered that turning on the headlights made the noise go away!

  22. Re:Um...no. by JacobO · · Score: 2, Informative

    In my experience this is the telltale sign of an incoming GSM call. There's been a couple of occasions when colleagues' cellphones have gone off and caused this interference on a speakerphone. This is is a faux pas since our parent company's cell network is _not_ GSM. Of course, this is not something I take seriously, rather I find it amusing.

    This definitely does not occur with the CDMA phones that we use (and our company prefers, for other reasons.)

  23. Better cell or more shielding by subreality · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are two places you can solve this problem:

    #1, get a better cell phone. With TDMA phones (GSM, D-AMPS, iDEN) you get a lot of noise as the transceiver switches on and off several times a second, transmitting at full power. iDEN phones (NexTel) have always been *by far* the worst about this, in my experience. If you get a CDMA phone (eg, Verizon), the phones on a cell share a common, continuous, low-level signal, which does not cause this kind of interference.

    #2, shield your amplifier. (In cheap computer speakers, it's built into one of the speakers, or the subwoofer.) Surround it in tin foil, and ground the foil. Other possibilities are poor grounding on the signal wire - replace it with a shielded wire, and ground the shield to your computer's case and where it reaches the amp.

    1. Re:Better cell or more shielding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect.

      Now there's hardly any interference at all when my phone rings or gets SMS.

      But now every time I listen to music, my speakers make a rattle sound when the bass hits.

      It almost sounds like the aluminium foil is rattling against the sub.

      I think what the OP (oh, and me) was looking for was an _effective_ solution...

      What part of this implementation am I missing that would allow me to wrap my subwoofer in aluminium foil...

    2. Re:Better cell or more shielding by subreality · · Score: 1

      I said wrap the amp, not the sub.

      If you can't find the amp, you shouldn't attempt this mod. Wrap the tin foil around your head instead.

    3. Re:Better cell or more shielding by wfberg · · Score: 1

      #1, get a better cell phone. With TDMA phones (GSM, D-AMPS, iDEN) you get a lot of noise as the transceiver switches on and off several times a second, transmitting at full power. iDEN phones (NexTel) have always been *by far* the worst about this, in my experience. If you get a CDMA phone (eg, Verizon), the phones on a cell share a common, continuous, low-level signal, which does not cause this kind of interference.

      While I'm there are differences in the amount of audible interference on speakers between the technologies, there are some issues with your explanation.
      1) CDMA phones do not transmit continuously. That would suck down the batteries in no time. When there is nothing to transmit, they don't transmit anything.
      2) The signal may be "low-level", but hey, GSM signals are "low-level" too; just outputting the maximum amount of RF power for the heck of it wastes too much power. No matter how "low-level" the signal is that your (CDMA) handset transmits, the closer you put your phone to any other sort of equipment, the higher the level of RF interference.

      What IS true though, is that CDMA is a spread-spectrum approach, much like wifi, ofdm, etc. Both GSM and CDMA phones will use just about the same amount of power to transmit, but in GSM that power will be delivered to a single frequency, whereas with CDMA its spread out over multiple frequencies. Think of housing 8 families in a bungalow home each instead of 1 high-rise appartment building. (But, just moving your CDMA handset a few inches closer to your speakers should be enough to compensate for this..)

      A CDMA phone can cause just as much interference as a GSM phone when you take into account variables such as distance-to-the-cell-tower and susceptibility to specific frequency bands. As a technology, it's to be preferred over TDMA in the general scheme of things, but lower short-range interference from transmitters isn't its main selling point at all.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    4. Re:Better cell or more shielding by jazman · · Score: 1

      > Surround it in tin foil

      This has the added advantage that aliens, the FBI or whoever, can't listen to your music.

    5. Re:Better cell or more shielding by subreality · · Score: 1

      1) I don't mean 24/7. I mean when data is actively being sent, eg, during a call.

      2) The average power doesn't matter. TDMA (including GSM) only transmits during its time slot, so it has a pulsing power signature (the carrier starting and stopping) at a frequency you can hear. In CDMA, the only pulsing is the coding, which is at the data rate - much higher than you can hear.

      Regardless of how it happens, though, the basic point is, TDMA makes speakers buzz, and CDMA doesn't.

  24. Buy better speakers by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 1

    I know exactly what your talking about, it happens all the time to my at school, the PCs we have have non-shielded speakers.

    But...I just realized, it never happens at home. I have a set of 5 year old Klipsch 2.1 Speakers, that I would assume have better than normal shielding.

  25. GSM ONLY by matthoh · · Score: 1

    This problem only happens on GSM phones, not TDMA, not CDMA, not AMPS, only GSM. I beleive it has to do with the widder bandwidth used by these phones and the type of modulation they use.

    1. Re:GSM ONLY by geniusj · · Score: 1

      Not only GSM. It happens a lot with iDEN as well.

    2. Re:GSM ONLY by rjmars97 · · Score: 1

      i have a CDMA phone (verizon) and i get this type of interference frequently on my computer speakers when my phone is nearby.

      --
      Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer
    3. Re:GSM ONLY by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      To simplify things for you, GSM uses TDMA - I think you're getting the underlying technology of the acronyms all messed up. AMPS uses FDMA, an analogue beast from the not so distant past, FDMA is still in reasonably common use, particularly in the satellite world. CDMA makes use of a spread spectrum transmission.

      The problem is indeed a result of the modulation method used by GSM, though the relationship to bandwidth is not so relevant.

    4. Re:GSM ONLY by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Happens with iDEN phones too, ala Nextel.

      Guess how I know.

  26. Depends on the carrier too by FRiC · · Score: 1

    In my country, we have three GSM operators, and the interference only happens with two operators. Strangely, one uses 900 MHz and one uses 1800 MHz. The one that interference doesn't happen uses 1800 MHz.

    1. Re:Depends on the carrier too by Drakino · · Score: 1

      Cingular and T-Mobile are the same way here in the US. A T-Mobile phone is likely to be on 1900mhz, while the Cingular phone is likely to be on 850mhz. My T-Mobile phone had to be sitting on top of speaker wires to do this, but my Cingular phone can do it from a foot away.

  27. I like it by RalphSleigh · · Score: 4, Informative

    90% of the time it happens just before I get a call/text, so I quite like the early warning.

    --
    Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
    1. Re:I like it by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1

      I agree. For me, however, it's a little more for text messaging. I work at a gas station, and I'm supposed to keep my phone on silent. However, my phone's vibrator isn't that wonderful. A useful thing for me is to place it relatively near the radio, I can hear the GSM blipping, which I will recognize as data going to my phone, but doesn't bother the customers. When I'm done, flip open the phone, and voilá!

      --
      Rawr
  28. Holy miss leading title Batman! by paco3791 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Seriously, I came to this post thinking I could get some answers on this slightly annoying issue and all I get is one, big, fat, question?!? Tell something I don't already know!

    1. Re:Holy miss leading title Batman! by Ben+Miller · · Score: 1

      Um - it is *ASK* Slashdot, dude...

      --
      [Remove SPAMPROOF from my email address to contact me]
    2. Re:Holy miss leading title Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You expected an article in the "Ask Slashdot" section to give you information? It works the other way around. Someone submits a question and the rest of answer. (HINT: IF YOU READ THE RESPONSES, YOU MAY FIND AN ANSWER TO THE QUESTION.)

    3. Re:Holy miss leading title Batman! by the_wesman · · Score: 1

      perhaps your time would have been better spent reading the comments rather than posting a gripe.

      I started to read this article with the same impression. I have this problem and it drives me nuts. After reading the comment (all the way down to your post), I understand what causes it and have some ideas on how can attempt to solve it. I plan to keep reading though, there may be some more good information.

      just a thought ;)

      --
      calling all destroyers
  29. It is not just speakers by PrvtBurrito · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hear this during press conferences all the time on live tv. It really isn't a bzzz, but more of a repeating, rapid blip-budup-budup-budup... Listen for it, it happens a lot. In san francisco, it used to happen near the cellphone antenna's on my old walkman.

    --
    Laboratree - Scientific collaboration based on OpenSocial.
  30. Re:Thanks for the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to post something similar about CDMA phones not doing this but you beat me to it and worded it better than I could of. I hope that this gets a + Informative mod soon.

  31. Easy by Feanturi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just wrap your cellphone in several layers of tinfoil. Problem solved.

  32. Re:You've gotta wonder by Omniscientist · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Preposterous. GSM's data burst frequency is in the range of human hearing. However, the signal isn't strong enough for you to hear, unless the signal is amplified somehow. The speakers and their cables allow the signal to pass through an amplifier, allowing you to hear it. The only way that would hurt us is if we had giant antennas connecting to amplifiers embedded in our ears, and becoming deaf from the loud noises.

    Kidding aside, the worry over cellphones is the damage that might result from the RF energy being emitted. However RF energy is non-ionizing radiation, so the frequency is way too low to do any sort of damage to your DNA. I believe it's media fueled hype, but I'm not an expert on the subject.

    Either way, the real danger that cell phones present are when someone happens to be using one and driving a car.

  33. Speakers by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Informative

    There a few different paths you might take. You don't say anything about the model or brand of speakers, that seems to make a difference. The cheaper ones might have insubstantial cable shielding at best.

    My home computer is connected to a reciever that powers separate speakers, I don't really get any problems.

    If you were really obsessed, you might get a higher end sound card with balanced audio out, with powered speakers with balanced inputs. If you have cheaper speakers with cheap built-in amps, then the long, unbalanced cable can act as an antenna. I've found that switching to balanced audio connections is the best way to minimize picking up stray noise on the analog, much better than getting "high end" RCA cables. Switching to XLR (balanced) cables drops the amount of noise significantly in just about any analog audio path.

    Or you could switch to speakers that have a digital inputs. That's probably a lot cheaper to get into.

  34. I asked this on the Cingular Wireless FAQ wikibook by Khopesh · · Score: 1
    From WikiBooks:Cingular Wireless FAQ#What's that Buzzing in my Speakers? we have a non-answer:
    GSM radio transmissions, particularly control signals (e.g., periodic mobile device registration, SMS message transmission), can induce audible interference (buzzing) in nearby speakers. (Hearing aids can also be affected.) The general issue of radio frequency interference (RFI) is exacerbated by the short pulsing nature of these time division multiplexed transmissions. The most straightforward solution is to separate the mobile device (e.g., cell phone) from the speakers; otherwise, shielded speakers and/or shielded speaker wiring may help.
    GSM (AT&T, Cingluar, T-Mobile) may be a codec, but it does something that CDMA (Verizon, Sprint) doesn't do ... the jargon above seems to be saying it is something like a barrage of messages patterned in a manner that happens to interfere with the magnets in some amplifiers. Shielded speakers don't help ... all decent computer speakers are shielded.

    My solution wasn't to turn off the phone, but rather to turn off the speakers ... and in my last move, I placed my bed table on the opposite side of the room from my computer (and its speakers), so that I can have music when my phone is charging. ... Sadly, this means I can't roll over in bed and hack on the computer.

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  35. Sorry but frankly... by Colourspace · · Score: 1

    Who cares? If it's that problematic turn your phone off. I'm recording music a lot of the time. At that point no phone call is important enough to leave its imprint on the audio stream. Otherwise it's a brief distraction secondary only to the phone starting ringing itself!.. Such a non story... TV capacitor whine bothers me more..

  36. tin foil hats by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 1

    If you make little tin foil hats for your speakers, it should reduce the interference from government spy sweeps. It might work for your cell phone too, I guess.

    1. Re:tin foil hats by 50m31sl4sh. · · Score: 1

      Just wrap your cell phone in tin foil - no radio interference and less risk of brain cancer!

      --
      Rediculous is ridiculous!
  37. Re:Um...no. by homer_ca · · Score: 1

    I am not an EE, but you can try putting a ferrite core on the speaker cable.

  38. Turn down your speakers by Khopesh · · Score: 1
    I mentioned that my solution was to keep distance between phone and speakers ... this is the common response. It is only half of my solution (oops, should have paused after proof-reading the preview) ...

    The speaker buzzing on my system is louder when the speakers are set to a higher volume. Therefore, I have my computer set to output at maximum volume (Wav/PCM and Master channels at 100%) and my speakers are set very low. The result is that there are still buzzes, but they aren't loud enough to give headaches to me or people in the next room (my Cingular-branded Motorola Razor is exceptionally good at interfering, perhaps because its output signal strength is stronger than the average cellphone).

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  39. Happens with CDMA and GSM, all Frequencies... by Caeda · · Score: 1

    I work in a cell phone store, and we're used to this. A lot of the times it's just a cheap set of speakers or a cheap component in the setup that picks up all the interference. It's a really annoying sound too. Most people should be able to get this to happen by setting their phone right next to a powered speaker (the kind that must plug into the wall and the computer) and dialing a number. Don't have the speakers on too loud when you do this. If you hear nothing, you have really good speakers. If you hear noise, your have normal speakers. :-D

    --
    ~~ Please keep your arms, legs, and outright stupidity inside the ride at all times. Thank You ~~
    1. Re:Happens with CDMA and GSM, all Frequencies... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i get some noise if i put my phone right next to the speakers, my girlfriend uses the cheapie OEM speakers and i have to shut off the speakers before making any calls, even a yard or two away my phone will buzz the speakers annoyingly loud.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  40. Not the phone but idiots running CB amps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have never had this happen with my phone (sorry, CDMA here) but I have had the morons running illegal CB amplifiers come through on my speakers. This happens even when the amp/speakers are turned off (!). I have had this happen in my house (usually when a dump truck is driving by) and where I used to work.

    I don't have anything against CB users but people running illegal amplifiers piss me off. I am a licensed ham operator and these idiots are a huge problem screwing up the bands (especially 10M). And when they come through my speakers it really is like this article describes, it almost blasts me out of my chair if I'm already listening to music (not as loud if my speakers are turned off).

    I hate those asswipes so much, I wish the FCC would nail them to the wall.

  41. T-Mobile vs Nokia by Sean0michael · · Score: 1

    I have experienced the dreaded update sounds as you describe. If you're looking for a service that doesn't interfere, I recommend T-Mobile. I have that phone on regularly and I never get interference with it. When my friends come over and have Nokia phones (I'm not sure who the provider is, but I think it's AT&T) then it gets quite annoying. T-Mobile should solve your problems (full disclosure: I do not work for T-Mobile or Nokia)

    --
    Funtime Candy Wow! - my plan for eventually conquering Japan.
    1. Re:T-Mobile vs Nokia by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Going with T-Mobile shouldn't fix your problem. T-Mobile uses GSM phone just like Cingular and AT&T. Well, it shouldn't fix your problem unless it's the use of the 850 MHz GSM band that causes the issue since I believe T-Mobile doesn't use that frequency while Cingular/AT&T does.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:T-Mobile vs Nokia by david_420 · · Score: 0

      YMMV. I have a Nokia 6600 phone, T-Mobile service and I hear this sound all the time. It was especially loud when I was using a Lucent headset phone at the call center I used to work in. I still hear it over my headphones (both pairs are made by Sony - one wired, one wireless). The sound isn't particularly loud over my headphones. Sure, it disrupts whatever I'm listening to when it occurs, but, like someone else mentioned, it is also an indicator that my phone is about to start ringing. For that reason, I don't really mind the noise.

  42. Wireless Router + Amplified Headphones, too by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

    I do get the problem with my speakers at work; generally when someone walks past with a cell phone, sometimes from my own.

    I also have problems with ticking sound on my headphones and speakers, which run through an amplifier (Surround sound headphones). This is directly linked to wireless being enabled on my wireless router. In this case, placing an empty foil snack bag (like a lays chips or quaker rice snacks bag) over the small headphone amplifier box fixed it for me. I guess that the box isn't well shielded, if at all.

    --
    Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
  43. Re:Um...no. by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    its possible that the RF is being picked up by the speaker cables and traversing backwards into the amp as well. Not a feedback loop, but just RF coming over the speaker cables and interfering with the amp.

  44. Re:You've gotta wonder by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    last I read, EM wave != sound wave, am I missing something?

  45. Re:You've gotta wonder by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    heh, I didn't read long enough to catch the 'kidding aside'.

    sorry!

  46. Technically.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    GSM is a TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) system. This means a single physical channel is divided up in time for multiple people to share. A single physical channel is just a frequency range, such as 890-890.2 MHz. Each physical channel is divided up in time into what are called timeslots. Timeslots are grouped by 8's into what are called frames. Each timeslot lasts 0.577ms, and a frame is 4.615ms. When your phone is communicating with the base it is assigned a single timeslot in each frame. This means it is transmitting ON off off off off off off off ON off off... and the ON's are spaced 4.615ms apart (the frame duration). 1/4.615ms gives you 216.7Hz, which means that if (when?) it is picked up by other electronics, it is most definitely in the audio band and you will hear it. The RF transmissions die off very rapidly with distance from the antenna, which is why moving the phone a small distance away is sufficient. What else... when you hear the interference before receiving a call/SMS, this is what is happening 1) one or more base stations broadcast "hey you" to the geographic region where your phone is (your phone is always listening for this) 2) your phone contacts a specific base station requesting a channel (AUDIBLE) 3) the base station responds, assigning a channel 4) your phone goes to that channel, authenticates, etc. (AUDIBLE) 5) phone finally rings / SMS is sent

    1. Re:Technically.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Left off the answer to the question! Since the problem is RF emmissions from the phone, you have only a few choices: 1) move the phone a sufficient distance away 2) shield the electronics well enough that they don't pick up the RF, keeping in mind that any cables may be acting like antennas. There may be audio equipment that is shielded well enough by itself - but on the phone side, if you use GSM, you will have this problem. As others have pointed out CDMA, which transmits continuously, does not have this issue. If you live anywhere but the USA, almost everything is GSM.

  47. Very characteristic of GSM by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

    GSM phones make a very characteristic kind of interference. It's rhythmic, brief, and I find it interesting to listen to. The obvious solution is to move your phone away from the speakers; about 1 foot is enough for me.

  48. Happens on my Cingular branded Treo 650 a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been plagued by this "feature" ever since I bought my Cingular branded GSM Treo 650.

    It happens at work with my older Atlec Lansing speakers very often. It also happens in my 2001 Honda Accord.
    In my Accord, turning off the radio makes the interference sound stop.
    With my Altec Lansing speakers, even turning off the speakers doesn't help.

    Since I live in the United States, I thought one of the purposes of our Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
    was to prevent radio interference. But I guess the FCC is too busy preventing adults from watching legal porn
    depicting other adults who chose to appear in those movies to deal with things like radio interference.

  49. dont change it by brenddie · · Score: 0

    thats how I know my phone is gonna ring ...... Music too loud to hear the ringer

    --
    The best test environment is production. - Me
    chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
  50. Same Problem - Really Expensive Speakers by crazyfreakid · · Score: 1

    I have the same problem all the time, but in a situation no one else here seems to have encountered: it happens in my school's Black Box Theatre. The buzzing noise will happen now and then, sometimes a few times in an hour, and drives us crazy. The speakers are top-notch (the theatre was only built 3 years ago), and it's impossible to control all the cellphones that the audience might bring in (aside from the obvious "please silence" announcement before shows). So what I'm saying is that it's not a trivial issue, in some cases. Any practical advice would be much appreciated.

    1. Re:Same Problem - Really Expensive Speakers by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Any active electronics, like amplifiers, should be in a shielded enclosure. In addition, add RF filters to every point where a cable (power, signal) enters or leaves a shielded enclosure. This sort of thing is standard for commercial grade equipment, but often missing on cheaper stuff. Shielded cables can also help prevent problems.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Same Problem - Really Expensive Speakers by thesp · · Score: 1

      I stage manage shows in Oxford, UK. We have had this problem ever since the networks moved over to GSM. My preferred solution is to make the following announcement at the start of every show, over the God Mike, and as the house-lights dim (so people are concentrating and not talking). For example,

      "Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome to tonight's production of Antigone. As a courtesy to the performers, crew and to your fellow audience members, we ask you to check that pagers, mobile telephones and other electronic devices are completely switched off for the duration of the performance, as these devices will interfere with the theatre's sound systems even while in silent mode."

      We repeat this after each interval. This usually does the trick.

    3. Re:Same Problem - Really Expensive Speakers by Pulse_Instance · · Score: 1
      Sounds to me like you might need to upgrade to quality shielded audio equipment, just that the speakers are really expensive does not mean that they are right for the stage. It is too much to ask for everyone at your shows to be turning off all pagers, cell phones and electronic devices, most people use these for convienence but some people are required to be reachable, whether they be building managers, doctors or anyone else who is on call but still wants to come watch the show and enjoy the music.

      Out of curiosity exactly how bad is it during a show if you do not make an announcement, and have you done tests with the equipment on and walking around with a cellphone or two to find out if it is just some cabling that might need to be replaced with a better shielded cable.

    4. Re:Same Problem - Really Expensive Speakers by thesp · · Score: 1

      "but some people are required to be reachable, whether they be building managers, doctors or anyone else who is on call but still wants to come watch the show and enjoy the music."

      Since when? Not in my book, they're not. All our shows run tue-sun, there's plenty of opportunity for them to come on their nights off. If you're on call, you shouldn't be undertaking an activity that requires you to be undisturbed for 2hrs.

      The big problems are:
      1. radio mikes
      2. outfits with their own kit/musicians
      3. higher power cellphones developed in the last few years, also wifi devices

      Aside from this, it's just not practical to recable a theatre last wired 10yrs ago to cope with 10-20 high-power microwave sources inside the auditorium.

  51. My phone does this... by Biomechanical · · Score: 1

    I have a Nokia 7650 (GSM) that interferes with the speakers whenever it's updating to the towers or a SMS or call is coming in.

    I've noticed though that depending on whether or not it's just an update of location, incoming SMS, or actual call, the pattern of the inteference and the volume differs.

    I've actually learnt to ignore the location update interference - it's never very loud -, use the SMS interference to let me know without looking that I've got a message waiting, and when the speakers go,

    Dit dah dah dit dah dit derrrrrr...

    I pick up my phone and answer it even before it rings. :)

    I suppose it could be annoying if you regularly get phone calls on your mobile, but my speakers - a cheap set of XMS 5.1 surround towers - seem to receive less interference from my phone when it's sitting about two feet to their left or right, rather than two-three feet in front.

    What you should do is figure out the "sweet spot" for the level and volume of the interference. Then you can think about using the interference as another audible indicator, or just move it out of range of the speakers. :)

    One thing to remember - I've noticed that it's not just the location of the phone which causes the volume of the inteference but also how loud your speakers are. This may seem logical to a number of people out there, but I never thought of it when I was first experimenting.

    --
    His name is Robert Paulsen...
    1. Re:My phone does this... by mhollis · · Score: 1

      I have a Nokia 6010 and it interferes with my Bose noise-cancelling headphones. Now these are some expensive headphones ($300 SRP) and I honestly think that Mr. Bose ought to have had his people design a cord that would not pick up interference from cell phones for that price.

      I also pick up interference from other people's cell phones and blackberry devices as well. While that interference is less than the kind I get from my Nokia in my shirt pocket with the headset cable nearby (or on top), I still hear it and it is an annoyance.

      Should airlines allow cellular calling in the air, this may actually cause damage to the ears while on board long flights -- especially if one's seat is located near the cellular station on the aircraft.

      --
      Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  52. GSM vs. CDMA by laing · · Score: 1

    GSM seems far worse in terms of causing interference to nearby amplified speakers than CDMA. I recently switched (2 years ago) from CDMA to GSM and suddenly everything I own is spewing buzzing sounds when my phone is nearby. This happens on amplified subwoofers, PC speakers, POTS telephones, and car stereos.

  53. see with most GSM phones and 802.11b transmitters by daniel422 · · Score: 4, Informative

    As an audio applications engineer for a large semiconductor company -- this is the single biggest compaint we have from customers using CMOS IC amplifiers. You will get it from almost any audio system that's near a cell phone (or 802.11b RF transmitter -- they have 50Hz packet rates that are audible from the 2.4GHz baseband signal).
    What ususlaly catches it is the speaker wires -- they act like giant antennas. 900MHz and up takes only a few centimeters to make a decent antenna, so long speaker cables are a prime target. The high frequncy (which you can't hear) couples on the output lines (typically) and goes back through the gain setting resistors on the amp to rech the amplifier input, where the packet rate (not the 2.4GHz to 900MHz baseband) is rectified and amplified. What you hear is the resulting buzz.
    Your cell phone itself doesn't shield this -- then it wouldn't work! The best thing to do is to shield your speakers, wire, and audio system it may be near. A faraday cage (as described by others here) will work great. Plastic-metallic shielding (like that used in anti-static IC or computer part bags) also works wonders.

  54. speakers don't matter by daniel422 · · Score: 1

    Actually, the speakers don't matter much -- it's the cable the couples the signal back to the amp (acts like a big antenna), it feeds back to the amps inputs, and the packet rate is amplified. This is 217Hz for GSM, and about 50Hz for 802.11b. Granted, the voice coil of the speakers could also act like an antenna, but usually it's the exposed speaker wires.

  55. Simple solution by dimss · · Score: 1

    1) Use better speakers with better shielding
    2) Do not use mobile phone

  56. Re:Um...no. by SeeMyNuts! · · Score: 1


    Okay, I have put an iron-based planetoid on lay-a-way with the Ferengi, but the shipping charge is enormous! Isn't there a better way?

  57. Makes me feel good .... by Hellboy0101 · · Score: 1

    about putting my cell close to my head. Nope, no danger there!

    --
    Because teenage pranks are fun when you're about to die!
  58. Re:NexTel by cloak42 · · Score: 1

    My TDMA phones would do the same thing.

    I don't experience the same issues with my Verizon CDMA phone.

  59. No no no!!! by daniel422 · · Score: 1

    This will NOT work with your speakers (and amp) unplugged! There is no way that RF coupling is strong enough current to drive an 8 ohm load with audible frequency components! I'm guessing whatever speakers you're hearing this from are still on even when they are switched off -- much like your television. This is quite common for many consumer electronics with audio (clock radios, etc.)
    And hey -- if I'm wrong and you've got a set of speakers that does (with no power) -- PLEASE message me the name and model so I can check it out. I work with these issues on a daily basis -- it'd be interesting to see something that refutes my experience. I've only EVER seen this as an amplifier issue -- where the high frequency coupling on the output lines feeds back to the input of the amp, thus being amplified (with enough current to drive a speaker load to an audible voltage). That's why we can generally kill these issues by putting ferrite beads and tiny caps to ground (pi-filter) right at the amplifier outputs.
    Any RF engineers out there?
    Calculations-wise, it doesn't seem like a huge amount of power would be necessary to do this: say a 5mV change in signal would be audible (at least very close) -- requiring only 0.625mA of current into an 8 ohm load (V=IR). That's 3uW of power induced on the line (P=VI). Pretty small, but I'm not sure how easy that is to do with an open circuit. I've never heard it -- only when the amp is on.

    1. Re:No no no!!! by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      they were a set of generic computer speakers at a place i used to work... the wall wart was just sitting on the floor, so they were obviously not powered up. i could be crazy, but that's how i remember it... i'm not about to go over and see what those speakers were though. :P

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  60. Use balanced cables&connectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Buy professional soundcard and speakers and use balanced wires & connectors.

    Systems with XLR or TLR connectors/output can remove all the inference. When cables have 3 wires inferences can be eliminated 2 wires are used for normal circuit (L/R) and one for zero level (X=0) signal.

    If inputs are L and X=0, inference is I then at the end of the output we have X' = I, L' = L+I.

    And it is possible to remove all inference with simple substraction
    X = L' - X'

  61. Glad to know I'm not the only one! by jackrabbit123 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This never happened to me back in the US but here in Iraq it happens all the time. I thought it was just the frequencies they use here. As far as I see it there are five solutions to this problem:

    1) Keep your phone away from your speakers
    2) Buy better shielded speakers
    3) Enclose your speakers in a faraday cage and ground the cage
    4) Enclose your phone in a faraday cage (note this may make it difficult to dial, oh yeah and it will negatively affect your signal quality too)
    5) Get a new phone

    Personnally, as stated above, I find it rather conveniant to get an early warning when I'm going to get a call. Besides, if you think of it as sounding like music they'd play at a rave it's not so bad. Bip bada-bip bada-bip bada-bip. Sounds kinda like techno.

    --
    War(n) - Gods way of teaching Americans geography.
  62. No speaker issues, but my moniter is another story by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 1

    I have a phone from verizon, and never noticed this issue, however I have seen that just before a call comes in, my CRT moniter kind of buzzes out and everything looks like its being shaken back and fourth for a second.

    But I never like getting calls anyways, so I chucked my phone out the window in favor of prolonging my moniters life.

    --
    Scott Swezey
  63. Better speakers fixed it for me by KingPrad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had this problem at work, where I had some cheap $20 speakers I bought at Office Depot or OfficeMax. The buzzing annoyed me so I took the speakers back and bought some $30 ones. Not too much more expensive, but a huge difference in quality. I still put my cell phone in the usual place, right next to the left speaker, but I've never had the buzzing problem since.

    At home I tend to put my cell on my desk next to one of the speakers. The speakers are just a $50 2.1 set I bought a few years ago. They've never done the buzzing thing.

    So overall, I have only encountered the problem with cheap speakers. Just a slight upgrade made a huge difference, not just with this problem but in sound quality and general sturdiness. Obviously there are a thousand phone models, and mine is just one of them. I thought I'd put my experience out there at least.

    --
    Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
  64. Re:see with most GSM phones and 802.11b transmitte by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

    Farraday cage is a much better idea than the one I had. Whatever you do, I suggest not trying to shield your subwoofer box with aluminum foil. That was a stroke of pure genius right there. No more buzzing sounds... As long as I didn't turn on the speaker...

  65. Placement both physical and angular by Luban+Doyle · · Score: 1

    I have a GSM-capable phone but it uses CDMA here in the US. Every so often it does check in with the local cell tower and I hear it on my speakers (even if the computer is shut off because I have externally powered speakers).

    I have found that if I turn the phone so that the face plate is parallel to the speaker wires, thus turning the antenna perpendicular to the wires, the buzz minimizes dramatically. However I have an internal antenna (Nokia). I haven't played with an external antenna phone in order to see what might work in terms of reducing buzz from one of those.

  66. Those Blinky Things by MoriaOrc · · Score: 1

    Is this in any way related to the signals that make those blinky cell-phone attatchments that light up when someone calls work? Maybe a stronger signal, since those seem to work with just about every phone and this only happens to a few.

    (as for some slightly useful information:)
    This doesnt happen to me (Samsung SCH-A650 - 2 or 3 year old filp phone - on Verizon) but happens all the time to my friends who use Cingular (and the phones it has happened to: Another Samsung flip, LG flip, Treo III, low-end Nokia) both on their home systems and in the car, although in the car it can serve as a big bonus where you might not hear the ring/feel the vibration because of music/motion from driving. Probably varies by a mix of phone, provider, and speakers.

  67. Simple solution by forgoil · · Score: 1

    1. Get a BT headset.
    2. Move freakin' phone out of beepedi beep distance.
    3. Profit.

  68. Re:see with most GSM phones and 802.11b by fbjon · · Score: 1
    Actually, this problem was solved a long time ago. It's called using a balanced signal, and it deals with just this type of induced noise. The only problem is that these are found on high-end equipment (pro, not consumer), and thus will be more costly. Studio monitors and microphones always use these.

    Fortunately, there's and even better solution today, which is to keep the signal path digital until the very last moment (inside the speaker), especially optical digital. That'll effectively remove any interference, but I'd guess it would be even more expensive.

    Cheap solution: use thick cables, with kick-ass shielding, and put a fine, separately grounded metal net over them.

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  69. Capacitive bypassing by dtmos · · Score: 1

    The solution isn't shielding, which is impractical to do effectively after the speaker system is manufactured, but capacitive bypassing. Put a 100 to 1000 pF capacitor (of appropriate voltage rating for the audio and DC voltage present) across the speaker leads as close to the speaker as possible. The capacitor bypasses the RF current of the cell phone away from the speaker, keeping the RF voltage (and its TDMA power variations occuring at an audio rate that are causing the interference) low.

    The value range is such that a capacitor in that range provides a low impedance at the RF (800-2000 MHz) while producing a negligable reactance at audio frequencies (below 20 kHz). (Capacitive reactance (in ohms) is equal to 1/(2*pi*f*C), where f is frequency in Hz and C is capacitance in Farads.)

  70. Re:see with most GSM phones and 802.11b transmitte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the speakers causing this problem are powered, you should first remove the signal cable to your computer and check if the problem persists. If it doesn't, the cause of your problem is likely to be the cable (replace with a properly shielded one or just twist with more than 1 full turn every inch it to test) or the sound card. If the problem does not go away when unplugging, the interference may still be caused by the powersupply, in case of wall-warts the cable connecting the power-suppply to the speakers, the wires connecting the speakers to each other, and of course the amplifier inside the speakers. For any of the wires, try shortening them, twisting them or replacing them with shielded ones (making sure that the shield is only connected to the ground connector on the source side). With a wall-wart stype powersupply, you can try some ferrite rings you most certainly have somewhere in a drawer, salvaged from old electronics, and twist the speaker side end of the cable around it a few times.

  71. The actual solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RF Chokes guys. That's what you want.

    As a few people have realised, it is high radio frequency (or RF) energy that is causing the disturbances. These cause tones at the packet rate in audio equipment, or can cause a "shimmering" effect on monitors. Now the thing about RF is that it is located far far above the audio band. So the RF energy can be removed from the leads to your audio amplifier using filtering, and it will have no (or negligble) impact on the audio frequencies.

    The simplest form of filter to remove high frequencies is a series inductor. This has a low resistance to low frequencies, and a high resistance to high frequencies. So clearly, this is what you want, but what does this mean in practice? Well a form of inductor that is used specifically for removing RF can be called an RF choke.

    You can find RF chokes on the power supply cables of most laptops. Just before the connector that plugs into the laptop you might find a little cylinder around the wire. This is in fact an RF choke. ..a ring of iron or ferrite material around the power cable, and coated in plastic.

    Wurth Elektronik are the best ferrite component supplier I know of. They know what they are talking about. The link below shows one of their RF chokes.

    http://www.we-online.com/we_web/emc/eisos/alg/kat_ layout.php?id=3

    If you felt like spending some money, you could get a few of these chokes (also called EMI suppressors) and clip them around the ends of all your audio leads, and hey presto, the problem would be solved. These are already built in to lots of equipment which is why some speakers and amplifiers dont pick up any mobile phone noises.

    But instead of opening your pocked to buy these, you can make an RF choke very easily. If you can find an iron ring, then just loop your audio cable around the ring a few times and that will suppress the RF energy too.

    Ideally you would use one of these: http://www.we-online.com/we_web/emc/eisos/alg/kat_ layout.php?id=13

    But any piece of iron will do, ideally in a ring. Even if it is not in a ring, like just a heavy bolt will do. Wrap your audio cables a few times around the iron, so it becomes a coil with the iron through the centre. This is a simple inductor and will give you some attenuation in the RF power getting in to your audio system.

    Now that i think of it, maybe if you have a few heavy iron washers lying around, they might work well as a primitive RF choke.
    I havent bothered to do any of the maths on this, ..i'm too hungover! So just give it a try and it should be some help anyway.

    -Vince

    *yeah, I am an RF engineer.

  72. An answer from an audio engineer: by AEther141 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Use pro-level gear that has balanced connections on XLR or TRS jacks. Balanced cables have three conductors carrying ground, the signal, and a copy of the signal 180 degrees out of phase. Any interference affects both signal lines identically, so when they are put back in phase at the other end, any interference will be phase cancelled as it will now be 180 degrees out of phase.

  73. Move the phone away from the speakers by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    Just move the phone away from the speakers. The transmission's power drops with the square of the distance.

    If the phone is a couple feet away on your belt and you still hear interference on the speakers, consider getting a different phone/carrier. Its also pumping that energy into your hip and other nearby sensitive areas.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  74. Why didn't I think of this? by Onuma · · Score: 1

    I work with TDMA and low to SHF+ bands of frequencies on a daily basis, with multiple media of communication. It never occurred to me when my cell phone buzzed the hell out of my subwoofer (it never bothered the satellite speakers) on my home PC that TDMA was the reason. I've always disliked the cheap-o method of Multiple Access, but now I really hate it!

    Well, I'm due for a new phone in a few months anyway...I'll just have to do my homework beforehand. At worst I'll just build a simple shielding around my sub and get new speaker cables with a better di-electric.

    Man I feel dumb for not thinking of this earlier.

    --
    What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
  75. Re:NexTel by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Nextel is not GSM-based, they use Motorola iDEN, which is its own standard.

    I believe that in terms of modulation schemes, iDEN is a close relative of GSM, and GSM phones are notorious for these problems.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  76. GSM isn't a codec by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    It's a protocol and modulation suite that happens to include a defined codec, often referred to simply as the "GSM codec", since it is the codec used by the GSM suite.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:GSM isn't a codec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Good to know, thanks! That explains a lot. ... All I knew was that it used the same frequency as other systems, which meant there was something else at work. Codec doesn't make sense, but "protocol and modulation suite" does.

      -khopesh

  77. Hmmmm.. by daniel422 · · Score: 1

    Hmm -- could be there was still some power left in that wall-wart. They can sometimes take very LONG times to discharge if the circuit is open (days even). I have a hard time believing the RF coupling could drive speakers without some sort of amplification -- just because my experience says otherwise (and I've looked at quite a few setups at my job -- it's one of our biggest problems with audio systems). The real test is if the speakers would do this as just a wire connected to a speaker driver. It sounds like you had a set of powered speakers -- so this isn't exactly possible. Interesting though. Anyone else definitely seen (err.. heard) this with unpowered speakers?

    1. Re:Hmmmm.. by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Could the transformer or amp circuit generate enough power from ambient RF to provide amplification? If it can take days to discharge, even small amounts of power might suffice.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    2. Re:Hmmmm.. by daniel422 · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I said in the first part of my post. That'd be the ONLY way it would work. If you had a speaker with a wire hanging off it (no amp) it won't work. If there is truly no power, then there is no amplification.

    3. Re:Hmmmm.. by Hungry+Admin · · Score: 1

      More likely, the phone was getting into the sound card on the computer, which was pushing an audio signal through to the speakers. Remember that the line-level output from the sound card will still drive speakers (headphones are speakers too) at an audible level. It's the same sort of amplifier circuit as the powered speakers, only at a lower power level.

      RFI (Radio Frequency Interference) is an insidious problem nowadays, due to the close proximity of poorly engineered electronics and "wireless" devices. ARRL puts out an excellent RFI handbook for treating even the most stubborn cases of RFI, but most computer jockeys won't be willing to apply the more effective means of RFI suppression.

      --
      Be who you are and say what you feel, because the people who mind don't matter, and the people who matter don't mind.
  78. Re:see with most GSM phones and 802.11b by daniel422 · · Score: 1

    Actually balanced amps won't work either. I've seen this happen with fully differential amplifiers as well as pure single-ended versions. The problem is that the signal doesn't couple uniformly, and with a differential amplifier -- the difference between the two signal lines gets amplified. It's also imperative that PC board layouts be done correctly to minimize RF coupling, since long, exposed, traces on the board can also couple RF. Smart manufactureres sandwich signal lines on the inner layers of boards (between power and ground planes) for extra shielding.
    Mostly, however, Pi-filters on the inputs/outputs to an amplifier board (with all signal lines from then on run inside the board), and shielding where the problems are really nasty is the only way to truly kill RF. The cheap cables with metal net should work great for that.
    Digital is great because of it's relative noise immunity, but you've got to turn it back to analog at some point -- and that typically means the speaker cables are going to pick it up (always analog -- even with class D amps). If your amp is in a metal box it should be safe from the outside regardless of design choices -- it'll only be the external wires that let signals in.

  79. Harmonic interference by billcopc · · Score: 2, Informative

    The source of this noise is the actual digital communication between your phone and the cell tower. There's nothing wrong with the phone, it's probably your speaker wiring that's picking up this signal as interference, as cheap wires have absolutely no shielding. If you don't know what kind of wiring you have, then you have cheap wiring :)

    The cellular signal is rather strong and because of the way it is modulated, it has tons of noise outside its nominal band, almost all the way down to DC. In plain english (well sort of) this means it's feeding square waves into your speakers. Square waves are the "loudest" waves due to their harmonic constituents, which is why the noise can scare you shitless compared to your regular music content. Square waves are that loud annoying "bzzt" family of sounds in techno music, like Benny Benassi :D

    Using better wiring will decrease the amount of noise picked up, but I find that even with extremely good wiring you can still hear a tiny bit of phone interference. I kind of like it because I have a rather potent car stereo and I couldn't hear the phone ringing if it weren't for the interference, but it is sufficiently dampened that non-audiophiles won't notice.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  80. Re:Thanks for the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, you beat me to my comment.

    Seriously, I would rather saw off my foot with a rusty spoon than go back to Verizon.

  81. I've always wondered how they get away with this by necronom426 · · Score: 1

    There are very strict regulations for emissions from computer equipment, so how it it legal for mobile phones to emit such ludicrous amounts of interference? I remember reading that several computer companies in the 80's had problems getting their computers (in plastic cases) past the regulations.

    When I worked with VT terminals I remember the screen used to completely freak out when a mobile phone rang, and the speakers on my PC would start buzzing. I was amazed that this was allowed, and still am.

    Can anyone explain?

  82. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  83. Don't use wireless? by lpq · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Original Poster didn't say if his office speakers were wired or wireless.

    I've never experienced radiowave interference on my wired speakers, but know my house (neighborhood?) is nasty on radiowave interference. I tried purchasing some FM-speakers, but they couldn't receive a clean signal
    across my living room.

    How is your network connection? Wired or wireless? Could it be the network signal being messed with before it hits your computer and you computer just amplifies and echo's out the interference?

    I strongly doubt it's in the speaker wires. While I remember a friend of mine in college would play tricks on guys living in the next dorm room, he had a ham radio license and foot long antenna. Still he had to be less than a foot to cause the interference you are talking about -- holding the antenna parallel to the speaker wire that ran along the edge of next door room. Any farther, or disorient the antenna (not parallel to speaker
    wire) and there was no interference. He only did a few times when they were cranking music too loud -- they thought it was a problem in their setup, so they stopped cranking it so loud...:-)

    However, a cellphone, given it's small antenna and the lower power (his ham setup ~10-30W; modern cellphone: max 3W), it would be hard pressed to generate the same interference.

    I'd look to other causes than a cellphone for interference in wired speakers.

    However, for 1/8th inch connector thin-wire computer audio, most of the wire I see is shielded. RadioShack sells shielded and unshielded audio cable in lengths up to 20-30 feet. It's not that expensive: less than 20 bucks for a 20 foot extension cord last time I bought some.

    Good luck.
    -l

  84. Easy. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Turn the damned thing off. You dont need it anyway.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  85. Different definition of "expensive," apparently. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    $110 for a 2.1 speaker system is not expensive. That's not even midrange. I'm not trying to be obnoxious here, but a good set of headphones will set you back more than that.

    That said, the cellphone-interference problem doesn't seem to be related to the type of speakers in use; there are other people in the thread using what I would consider to be high-end equipment and they're still experiencing problems.

    FYIW, I don't get this problem in my home system, I only get it in my car. I'll try leaving my GSM phone on top of one of my speakers though and see if it happens, just to check -- normally my phone is on top of the source equipment and it doesn't do a thing, and some of them are feeding unbalanced lines so I'd expect that's where the problem would occur.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  86. Noise sample by luder · · Score: 1

    You can hear that kind of noise here, just recorded for your listening pleasure.

    I called my own cell phone from another cell phone. My cell was right next to the speakers and the other one was about 1.5 meters away. The "bzzpt" starts before the call arrives and it is only displayed in the phone when it starts ringing.

  87. Built a filter by mwilliamson · · Score: 1
    Get out your old physics book and turn to the chapter on resonance and Q. Built a filter. Sell the mundane filter as a new high-tech "Cell-Phone Proof Speaker". Patent something equally as mundane...maybe the color of the wires you use in builting the circuit. Profit.

    Ok, seriously...add a little series inductance to the power and audio cables, and some parallel capacitance. You want to allow audio frequencies to pass...but nothing at much higher frequencies. The parallel caps allow high frequency A/C to short across while the inductors look like open circuits to the A/C.

    You can try just adding some inductance by wrapping the cords around a metal core. This can work quite well by itself even.

  88. Re:NexTel by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

    Nextel uses a highly bastardized hodgepodge of technologies to work. Part of the system IS GSM because you can take the SIM card from any Nextel and put it into a unlocked GSM phone, and use it for international roaming (you get charged out the ass, but it works)

    Not that it really matters anyways.... iDen will be gone in about two years. Good riddance...

    (I sell T-Mobile, Sprint and Nextel... and I hate Nextel.)

    --
    Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
  89. Immortalised on vinyl by DocTee · · Score: 1

    Try and have a listen to the record 'Mario Piu - Communication', it that actually samples the phone interference!

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00004T43 L/qid=1144591269/sr=8-2/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i2_xgl/203- 1975359-1528719

    I can't remember what it was called but there was another tune around the same time (98-99?) that sampled the 14.4k modem handshake.

    --
    - doctea
  90. Re:I've always wondered how they get away with thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    how it it legal for mobile phones to emit such ludicrous amounts of interference?


    Uh... what you call 'interference' they call 'signal'. How else would a cell phone work if it didn't emit an RF signal?

  91. That's easy: Turn it off! by ebbe11 · · Score: 1
    Everyone has been sitting at their desk rockin, jamming, or groovin to their favorite tunes. You are in a trance, getting work done

    Unless this state is something that happens to you unexpectedly, it should be a simple thing to turn your mobile phone off. That's what I do. If people calling really want to talk to me, they will leave a message such that I can call them back.

    --

    My opinion? See above.
  92. Funny shit by scott_davey · · Score: 1

    Last year I was at a local rock concert for the band Lamb. If you know this band, there are lots of quiet bits in their music. Anyway, in the middle of a really long track the music went into a quiet part, and everyone was in the mood, right into the music... then all of a sudden there was the all-too familiar BA-DUDU-BA-DUDU-BA-DUDU-BA through the speakers, twice as loud as the band itself.

    The crowd broke out of their musically-induced trance and burst into laughter, and it totally fucked up the rest of the concert.

    It turns out the sound engineer left his phone on the mixing console. Duh!

  93. Re:I've always wondered how they get away with thi by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

    It's not interference or noise - it's the signal that they are meant to transmit, and are licenced to do so by the FCC (or appropriate authorities elsewhere).

        The problem is with poor quality, unshielded amplification circuits and computer monitors working poorly when being near any RF source.

  94. Never had this problem by thelonestranger · · Score: 1

    I've never had this problem, my phone doesnt interfear with any of my audio equipment, however one of my friends used to have a TV that when his phone rang would lose its horizontal hold and go a bit crazy.

    --
    To err is human. To forgive is not company policy.
  95. Shielding for a pacemaker? by CarnivoreMan · · Score: 1

    I worked with a gal a few years ago who had a similar thing happen with her pacemaker. We all kept our phones off, but occasionally someone would forget, or a service man would be unaware and have his phone on. She would look up a second or so before the persons phone rang and immediatly walk away from the area. I never really talked to her about it, but I'd guess its the same type of interference.

  96. Not distance related, and it's TDMA phones, too by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

    I have two aspects of this to comment on, and it is actual information from experience. I have had this happen a lot with my cell phone interfering with the speakers of the guy I shared a cubicle with. Several people have proposed that the problem happens just because the phone is sitting right next to the speaker, and if you move it a little farther away, it fixes the problem. That is not correct. The signal does not drop off that quickly. I mean, it's communicating with a cell tower hundreds/thousands of feet away, so it's probably not going to disappear from moving it a foot away. In my case, my phone was on my desk, and my cubemate's speakers were about 5 feet away. The method of moving the phone does work to some extent, but it's effective based on positioning, rather than distance. While my phone was buzzing my cubemate's speakers, I could turn the phone different ways, and the buzzing would come and go.

    The other quick fact is about the types of phones. I've heard a couple of people say only GSM phones do this. Mine is a Nokia 8260 on the older AT&T TDMA network, so it also does it. From the other reports, it sounds like Verizon's network (CDMA) may be one of the few that doesn't, although I don't think we've heard from Sprint people yet, and I don't know what kind of network they use.

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  97. Nextel by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 1

    Nextel phones seem to be notorious for this - also, its not just pc speakers, tv's, radios, standard wired phones - if there is a nextel phone around when using one of these, you will usually hear interference.