Slashdot Mirror


World's Largest Pyramid Discovered in Bosnia?

kieran writes "Archaeologists have apparently begun to unearth a massive pyramid which had been masquerading as a hill in the Bosnian town of Visoko. At an estimated 722ft in height, it is expected to be 1/3 taller than Egypt's Great Pyramid of Giza."

88 of 501 comments (clear)

  1. The news they don't want you to know: by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny


    This 'pyramid' was actually discovered in October of last year, but all news was suppressed due to 'security concerns'...concerns that would appear to have merit, given Condoleezza Rice's bizzare change in appearance and behavior after she visited the site on a U.S. fact-finding mission.

    Dubya kree!

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:The news they don't want you to know: by Enrique1218 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Condoleezza Rice's bizzare change in appearance

      Oh really, did she get those teeth fixed? I can't believe a women so smart hasn't heard of braces! Mod me offtopic, see if I care. It needed to be said!!!

      --
      You don't have to be smart to use a Mac, you just have to be smart enough to buy one
  2. Location via Google Maps by byteCoder · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's not much resolution from this satellite image, but here's the pyramid's location using Google maps.

    1. Re:Location via Google Maps by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Funny

      We could not calculate driving directions between Redmond, WA and 43.978000N 18.178000E

            Coincidence? I THINK NOT.

    2. Re:Location via Google Maps by Itninja · · Score: 5, Funny

      Google Maps is awesome. I can hardly wait for 6-10 years to pass so I can see what they are doing today.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    3. Re:Location via Google Maps by MOtisBeard · · Score: 5, Funny

      What nobody seems to have realized is that, not only does the Bosnian pyramid sit directly over the center of the Earth, but if you draw a straight line between it and the Great Pyramid of Cheops (aka Kufu) in Egypt, then extend that line in the same direction, it will bisect the Earth into two exactly equal hemispheres. Obviously proof of either unsuspected high technology in ancient times, or the intervention of some space-faring alien civilization.

    4. Re:Location via Google Maps by LordOfTheNoobs · · Score: 2, Funny

      And a line between _any_ two objects on the earths surface will perfectly bisect the earth ( not accounting for the unsightly lateral buldge we pick up from all that obnoxious spinning ). The OPs' were obvious statements.

      I heard a great rushing of wind as I read through the responses to the OP. The rains must be coming...

      --
      They're there affecting their effect.
    5. Re:Location via Google Maps by imsabbel · · Score: 2

      And if you mediate a few more hours over that statement, maybe you will get the joke in the OP.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    6. Re:Location via Google Maps by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That "whoosh" you heard was the sound of a pretty decent joke flying over your head at high speed.

      --
      ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
    7. Re:Location via Google Maps by aquabat · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is ridiculous. It's obviously not a pyramid, but rather one corner of the timecube.

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  3. Color me dubious. by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a little dubious here - the lead of this project, Semir Osmanagic says (from abc) he sees astonishing similarities between the structures and Mexican pyramids dating back to about 200 AD, which also come in pairs, one believed to represent the Sun and the other the Moon.

    How can he know that with so little excavated? And his foundation has the rather fortean-timesish name of "Archaeological Park: Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun Foundation"

    There's a far better (and longer) article at the art newspaper.

    You can also the have a look at the photos of the hill (scroll down) in this bosnian forum (yup, looks like a pyramid).

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Color me dubious. by permaculture · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry fellas, he's just another nutjob:

      http://www.archaeology.org/online/features/osmanag ic/
      "Too bad that it is not a credible story at all. In fact, it is impossible. Who is the "archaeologist" who has taken the media for a ride? Why did the media not check the story more carefully? ARCHAEOLOGY will address these questions in depth in our next issue, July/August, but for now let's at least put the lie to the claims emanating from Visoko, the town 20 miles northwest of Sarajevo where the "Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun" is located."

      Read on about his wacky book, and it becomes clear the media's not doing their job. AGAIN!

      --
      Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    2. Re:Color me dubious. by stupidfoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How can he know that with so little excavated?

      Seismic imaging

    3. Re:Color me dubious. by qwijibo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Given adequate funding, anyone could unearth a pyramid. They're everywhere, just covered with dirt and rocks. The biggest curiousity is how the rocks covering the pyramid bonded with the rocks that make up the pyramid. The bonds are so strong that unearthing the pyramid almost seems like you have to carve it out of the mountain. This phenomena can't currently be explained by archaeologists.

      While that archaeology web site makes some interesting arguments, they're completely ignoring the possibility that aliens constructed the pyramid. This theory, made popular by the film Alien Vs Predator, has not been discredited by serious researchers. They simply dismiss the theory without so much as communicating with the aliens to get their perspective. It's simply not fair that the crack pot viewpoint is completely disregarded by the so called legitimate research community. It's discrimination and it's wrong. =)

    4. Re:Color me dubious. by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Kind of amazing to realize how much skillful PR matters in getting media attention. Dude found a pointy hill and is calling it a pyramid, but he knows how to get reporters interested. It probably doesn't help that Americans love all that new-age Atlantis Secrets of the Pyramids BS.

      A question for whoever knows. I don't know anything about geology, but I do know physics. How probable is the formation of pointy hill from geological perspective? I wouldn't suspect they are a geologocial impossibility but would need a couple of fortuitous conditions to form instead of the usual rounded hill, like a radial mudslide at the top or a pointy rock formation beneath the soil near the top -- something that would change the typical pattern of erosion. I'd wager there are even technical terms for pointy hills and round hills.

      --
      Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
    5. Re:Color me dubious. by Matimus · · Score: 4, Funny
      You forgot this choice quote:

      A couple of brief passages will convey the gist of Osmanagic's beliefs:

      Ordinary watchmakers repair our watches and put them into accordance with Earthly time. It is my theory that the Maya should be considered watchmakers of the cosmos whose mission it is to adjust the Earthly frequency and bring it into accordance with the vibrations of our Sun. Once the Earth begins to vibrate in harmony with the Sun, information will be able to travel in both directions without limitation. And then we will be able to understand why all ancient peoples worshipped the Sun and dedicated their rituals to this. The Sun is the source of all life on this planet and the source of all information and knowledge. ...And with a frequency in harmony, the Earth will, via the Sun, be connected with the center of our Galaxy. These facts become exceptionally important when we realize that we are rapidly approaching December 2012, a date which the Maya have marked as the time of arrival of the Galactic Energy Cluster which will enlighten us.

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    6. Re:Color me dubious. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "In fact, it is impossible."

      Now there's a red flag if I ever saw one. Maybe there's more to this story than the archaeological establishment wants to acknowledge.

    7. Re:Color me dubious. by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better watch out, those Galactic Energy Clusters are loaded with saturated fat!

    8. Re:Color me dubious. by dajak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Close to my house (in the Netherlands) there is a small, perfectly conical, very steep, and pointy hill in the center of one of the major iron age sites of the country, in an otherwise nearly flat landscape. People used to believe it was manmade, but it turned out to be made by a glacier and simply used by those iron age people as a lookout or motte or something. If the iron age people had any influence on its shape, it is only by removing sand and stones.

      If Illyrian remains from 12,000 yrs ago are found on and in the hill, this should suggest to any sane person that it is a natural hill, with caves in it. It certainly can't be younger than 12,000 yrs old. Mr. Osmanagic finds evidence contradicting his theory and interprets it as evidence the 'pyramid' must be at least 12,000 yrs old.

      I am considering announcing that we have proof of extremely advanced stone age and iron age civilizations in the North Sea near the coast of the Netherlands that were able to drain polders we today can't. The proof is irrefutable: fishermen have been collecting artifacts from these ages in their nets for as long as we have written history. It is a mystery how they did this without even having mills and engines.

    9. Re:Color me dubious. by jafac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He may be a nutjob.

      I certainly find the notion of commonality with Mesoamerican "pyramids" somewhat ridiculous - since the Mesoamerican "pyramids" were not really pyramids (both geometrically, and in the egyptian sense). The Mesoamerican structures were not used for burials. They were used as platforms for temples, and had a completely different method of construction and religious significance.

      I would think that this Bosnian "pyramid" (not geometrically a pyramid - the top is flat) more likely has more in common with the Egyptian/African pyramids (both in style, and religious significance) given the regional cultural influences.

      However, there are also "pyramids" in Greece, Spain, Italy, China, and the UK. The Greek pyramids were simply pyramid-shaped watch towers. In Italy, a Roman noble had one built as a tomb, inspired by Egyptian pyramids. In the UK and China, we're talking about a pyramid-shaped burial mound made of piled-up clay or dirt - again with a flat top.

      The significant things about this pyramid, are basically Osmanegic's claim of dating. He claims they're 12,000 years old. That's a little gutsy, considering that the area was likely under a glacier at the time, and there's no other evidence of any kind of advanced civilization anywhere near there. But when you go that far back in time, things get really sketchy, and evidence is mostly decayed or crumbled beyond any use.

      Okay, so let me be clear on this - I *do* consider Osmanegic to be a nut job. I *do* agree with some of the Bosnian archaeological community that he will very likely, in the process of unearthing his pyramid, destroy a lot of good medieval archaeological sites (there was a Crusades-era fortress built on the top of this hill). However, I accept that the evidence he's presented so far, on the shape of the hill, the presence of tunnels, and the unearthing of stone blocks, that this very well could be a real pyramid. I just really doubt that it's as old as he's saying it is. Older than the Egyptian pyramids? Could be. The Greek pyramid is about 100 years older. (though MUCH smaller). So we know that the Egyptians didn't invent the geometric shape (whoo-tee doo). But the size coupled with the date, is pretty significant.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    10. Re:Color me dubious. by brian0918 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reminds me of an MST3K: the scene is a bunch of fake-looking asteroids floating in space... "HONEY BUNCHES OF DEATH!"

  4. Wrong facts! by dada21 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The world's largest pyramid is soon to be discovered. I believe the link to this pyramid is here.

    Whoops.

    1. Re:Wrong facts! by Golias · · Score: 4, Informative

      See? See what happens? This is why there are no successful libertarian comedians.

      Investing in growth hardly implies a pyramid scheme anyway, but if you're anti-government, I don't expect there's any way to explain that.


      Quite right! Social Security is not a Pryamid Scheme. That's just silly!

      It's a Ponzi Scheme.

      Oh, and there are successful libertarian comedians. P.J. O'Rourke, for one, has about ten best-sellers. How many books have you published? Bill Maher also self-identifies as a libertarian, and there's little question that Penn Jillette is in the mix as well. Almost half of the episodes of Penn & Teller's "Bullshit" are straight-up libertarian think-tank critiques of society.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Wrong facts! by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There's no money in money either, just pieces of paper backed by the US Government.

      But there's value in money, so long as people are willing to accept it in exchange for goods and services. And I think you inadvertently made my point about T-bills. The government sells a T-bill for something of value (cash, the result of goods or services produced by somebody else). The T-bill has value only because of the government's promise to pay it back later. This is how the government borrows money. That's why it doesn't make any sense for the government to buy T-bills from itself! It's like writing yourself an IOU for five bucks, selling it to yourself for five bucks, and then spending the five bucks. All you're left with is an IOU. The five bucks is gone.If you need to spend another five bucks, you have to do what the government does, and rob the nearest guy with something of value.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    3. Re:Wrong facts! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Informative

      a rapid decrease in the number of taxpayers vs the recipients or rapid decline of tax revenue. The first, given the population growth and immigration dynamics is exceedingly unlikely

      You clearly don't know the first thing about the demographics of the situation. When SS was fist set up there were about 15 contributors for every retiree (and the age of eligibility was _above_ the average life span).

      Now there are 3 contributors for every retiree and the eligibility age is about 15 years lower than the average life span. With increasing life expectancy and declining birth rates, the problem is getting worse not better, and that will only accelerate. It won't be long until there are only two workers supporting each retiree, who is likely to collect for 20 years or more.

      Social Security is undoubtedly an intergenerational Ponzi scheme and the fat part of the pyramid is looking for their cut! And this doesn't even take into account that the alleged Trust Fund is really just a big IOU from Congress.

      Ladies and Gentlemen, the Mafia couldn't pull off a scheme this brazenly unfair.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:Wrong facts! by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The cause of the problem is the decline of revenue vs payouts due to the ratio of retirees to productive workers increasing, life-expectancy being merely one of the factors in that ratio, others, more important ones, being simply brain-dead policies resulting in overall decline of workforce vs the retirees.

      Back in the day, the ratio of workers to retirees (defined as over 65) was 25:1. Today, by the way, before the boom in retirees really happens (most of our old people were born back pre-penicillin, much less modern healthcare - look for the ratio of over 65 to under 65 to continue to grwo dramatically).

      To have a similar ratio today, we'd need a total population of ~850 million.

      So, you're suggesting that the problem could be resolved by allowing 550 million immigrants into the USA?

      Note that 550 million immigrants would imply that in about 30 years we'd triple our number of retirees (or do the immigrants not get SS under your worldview?)

      Which increase in retirees could be supported by allowing another 1.5 billion immigrants into the country.

      See the problem yet?

      Nothing we could do in the way of immigration policy, free trade (or lack of same), or anything else really, will keep the Social Security solvent without a dramatic increase in the retirement age. Which is NOT going to happen, since it is politically infeasible at this point. And will remain politically infeasible until the retiree's lobby isn't the biggest one in the mix....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  5. Another Book for Graham Hancock? by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I once read Fingerprints of the Gods by Graham Hancock which explored in depth the theory that ancient civilizations are linked by a possible master race. It is a very loose theory in that I ended the book more confused than anything and doubting not only Hancock but also the conventional history I learned in school. Whether that's good or bad, I can't really say.

    What I can say is that even if they were half baked theories they certainly were outside the box.

    In it, the position and building of massive structures (like pyramids) are very important to his theories. He linked the Egyptian and Incan/Pima cultures via structures and similarities in creation stories (the latter being quite weak). The worst part is that at the end he alludes to a possible alien influence in the matter of building these massive structures (because we can't understand what technology they used).

    With this (possibly) even larger structure, I'm certain that this will give him more ammo for another book.

    If you're interested in things like this, it's a good read. You can take pieces of it like the famous Pirie Ries maps that were coverd by Charles Hapgood. A similar theory is the also famous 1421 Theory. Be warned that many of these theories are unverifiable and can amount to simply someone's imagination running wild. They rely on events thousands of years old--a time darker than the the dark ages.

    Be caution that most of the links below Hancock's Wikipedia page are just rebuttles disproving him as much of his work is a bit hard to swallow.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Another Book for Graham Hancock? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We know how they built pyramids. Huge dirt ramps and lots of slave labor.

    2. Re:Another Book for Graham Hancock? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Informative

      Egyptologists are pretty certain the Pyramids werent built using slave labour, but using Egypts entire labour effort as a massive public works project to honour the leadership.

    3. Re:Another Book for Graham Hancock? by austad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fingerprints of the Gods is a great read, however, it does tend to get a little bit "out there" towards the end when it's talking about alien influence and the end of the world. Mr. Hancock does bring up some interesting points though.

      Part of what he is arguing is that the egyptian pyramids are far older than we think they are, and the hieroglyphs inside are basically graffiti which was places there by the egyptians. Parts of the pyramids at Giza which were not easily accessible are devoid of any markings, with the exception of a chamber above one of the rooms. However, there is a "typo" in what was found, leaving people wondering if the discoverer put the markings there either to make himself famous, or to support his theory on who built the pyramid.

      Additionally, there is water erosion on the Sphinx. That area has been a desert since around 7000BC, which would indicate that the Sphinx is far older than the 3000BC or so that it's currently dated at.

      Hancock doesn't help his case any by going around touting alien collaboration and end of the world nonsense. The Egyptology community has written off all of his ideas as nonsense. It's because of Hancock and people like him that the Egyptologists are completely unwilling to entertain any idea which goes against what they think is historically accurate.

      The fact is, whether or not the Egyptologists think we figured it out, we really don't know anything for sure. A lot can happen over 5000 years, including "graffiti" by egyptians which would lead later generations to conclude that the egyptians were the ones who built the pyramids at Giza. I'm not saying they did or didn't. I think that Graham Hancock and others have pointed out some very interesting things, and this needs to be taken into consideration and investigated instead of just writing it off as nonsense.

      The same goes for the alleged pyramid in Bosnia. This guy has been written off as a nutcase in the past, but it's completely possible he did stumble upon something of interest. I've been watching this Bosnian pyramid story since it broke last year. Excavations stopped at the end of last year, and just resumed mid-April. It will be interesting to see what they uncover. If this is a bunch of non-sense, we should know within the next couple of months.

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    4. Re:Another Book for Graham Hancock? by TrevorB · · Score: 2, Funny

      RIMMER: Of course aliens have visited Earth. Look at the pyramids! How else could the Egyptians have moved such massive stones?

      LISTER: They had whips, Rimmer! Massive, massive whips!

      (Side note: Agreed with the reply above that the pyramid labourers were likely paid)

  6. 8th wonder then? by ZSpade · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know it strikes me that if things this big can escape our detection on a daily basis, just what else are we missing that may lie right in front of us. I mean this is of utterly rediculous proportions and yet it escaped both our vision, and our history? I think this must be added to the list of world wonders, word wonders how we missed it!

    --
    Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
  7. Re:Oil by Yvanhoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am sure that a lot more funds are spent toward oil-finding than pyramids-finding.

    Also we consume less pyramids than oil. That makes finding them a lesser strategical objective.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  8. Maybe Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe they will finally find my Stargate so i can leave this silly little corrupt planet WOOT!

  9. But does it have a stargate? by madnuke · · Score: 3, Funny

    We have finally found the ancient outpost! Or it could be that Pyrimid from Aliens VS Predator....

  10. News for the gullible, stuff from last year. by pla · · Score: 5, Informative

    Always right on top of things, eh, editors?

    First: The Bosnian "pyramid" (a roughly four-sided hill where they've found nothing but a mound of dirt so far) hit the news last year, in Early November IIRC.

    Second, the fellow cho claims it a pyramid ranks right up there with Uri Gellar as far as credibility goes, according to Archaology last week.


    So +5 for topical, but minus a million for reporting on entirely the wrong end of the issue. They didn't just discover it, they just debunked the discovery.

    1. Re:News for the gullible, stuff from last year. by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

      What, you've never seen a bent spoon before? I have one in my own kitchen, which just further proves the almighty power of Mr. Gellar.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:News for the gullible, stuff from last year. by saintp · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Okay, seriously, that article in Archaeology is crap. Basically, here's what it says:

      1. If he's right about the time period, it's impossible.

      2. He's a loon.

      His personal views, of course, have nothing to do with the veracity of the story. And it's perfectly reasonable to assume that his wild-assed guess of 12,000 B.C.E. is totally wrong, while he's 100% correct about the pyramid's existance. Nothing in that article casts any doubt whatsoever on the pyramid itself -- only on the researcher. Ad hominem, anyone?

      Had you actually RTFA, you'd see that the reason it's back in the news is that the diggers found cut and polished stone blocks. Let me say that again, just for emphasis:

      They found cut and polished stone blocks.

      It sounds to me like the exact opposite of debunking is happening.

    3. Re:News for the gullible, stuff from last year. by AaronLawrence · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Second, the fellow cho claims it a pyramid ranks right up there with Uri Gellar as far as credibility goes, according to Archaology last week.
      That's all very well, but that Archaeology article spends all it's time slamming the person, not discussing his claims, and reads a lot like a personal attack. The guy may be a loon, but that doesn't mean we should dismiss this automatically.

      The pyramid announcement does seem very premature and is probably something else (or a fake) but I'd like to see some discussion of what he's found, which is not in that article.

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    4. Re:News for the gullible, stuff from last year. by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They found cut and polished stone blocks.

      You live in the US, correct?

      We Americans have a somewhat different view of what it means to find traces of a civilization than do Europeans.

      In the US, if you go out and dig in your backyard and find something man-made and more than a few hundred years old, you've most likely really found something of archaeological interest.

      In Europe, you can set up a dig just about anywhere and find crumbled bricks, broken pottery, or some other traces of very very old human civilization.

      Hell, for another recent news item to make my point, the UK Times Online reports that archaeologists just found an almost perfectly preserved Roman city in Spain - Which the Spanish felt so impressed by, they promptly turned it into a parking lot.



      And it's perfectly reasonable to assume that his wild-assed guess of 12,000 B.C.E. is totally wrong, while he's 100% correct about the pyramid's existance.

      I agree that ad hominem doesn't disprove the existance of a pyramid in Bosnia. But when the town loony raves about aliens landing in his back yard, you don't call NASA to disprove him.

    5. Re:News for the gullible, stuff from last year. by Mr+Z · · Score: 2, Funny

      How else would you make a proper Black & Tan?

  11. The guy is a loon... by mark0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... and if you have any doubt, take a look at this.

  12. this story was proven false already by spacerodent · · Score: 4, Informative

    this story is utterly false and the dude who discovered it is a crazy. Here is a link with handy details. http://www.archaeology.org/online/features/osmanag ic/

  13. Not very hidden. by Pedrito · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not going to point to a particular site, but if you do a google image search on the words: bosnia pyramid

    You'll find pictures of it. I'm kind of surprised nobody has considered the possibility before. If you see some pictures that give you a better 3D view of it, it very clearly has 4 slopes at 90 degree angles.

    Very cool find, though.

  14. European pyramid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is why Europe is, even today, a world leader in pyramids. You can outsource all the pyramid building you want to the israelites, but when you employ cheap slave labor, you get 1/3 less cubits.

    U send me pyramid 4 ur outsourced job plz.

  15. Re:How do you miss a pyramid? by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Funny

    How do you miss something like that for so long?

    The same way the idiot on his cell phone misses the red light and slams into you: inattention to your surroundings.

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  16. Is that a.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is that a pyramid in your hill, or are you just happy to see me?

  17. Official website by najt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can find large resolution photos and news on the Official website. Looks like they're still digging.

  18. Geraldo by gregarine · · Score: 4, Funny

    We should probably send Geraldo Rivera to investigate. His experience with Al Capone's vault makes him more than qualified.

    --

    I like traffic lights
  19. Much Bigger Pyramid found ... by rewinn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look to the left side of this photo. Frighteningly symmetrical, is it not? And it blows away the Bosnian pyramid as to size.

  20. Despite all the skepticism... by TheNoxx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And everyone pointing to the archaeology organization site naming him as a nutjob, guess what folks? It won't be debunked until they've fully excavated the site. Whether or not the man in charge is crazy or not has little bearing on the validity of his claims, particularly when the evidence would be a gigantic fucking pyramid. There isn't anything to debate, it's either there or not.

    Also, I'd say that a majority of the archaelogical society hates new findings that contradict their old theories, and can often go out of their way to ostracize and decredit people that publish or support findings that would invalidate all the time spent writing papers on any particularly well-accepted idea.

    --
    Ex nihilo nihil fit.
    1. Re:Despite all the skepticism... by TrevorB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I understand the sentiment, but this is science: Guilty until proven innocent. Until we see any kind of evidence other than "That mountain is pyramid shaped", this guy is worthy of ridicule in proportion to the size of the claim.

      Consider it a "hazing ritual" that *all* scientists have to go through when they make extraordinary claims that aren't (yet) backed up with extraordinary evidence.

      I'm a bit concerned about your meter for debunking. "Excavating the entire site", when the entire site is a *mountain*. It will never be debunked. This will probably fall into the realm of consipracy theory in a few years, probably when his funding is cut.

      As for hating new findings, I think I'd be pleasantly surprised. I'm not holding my breath though.

      For the record, my wife has a degree in archaeology. I would guess that archaeologists are far more defensive about known theories because there's been a fair number of charlaitians and hucksters in the past.

  21. Re:Oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm propose we mine cubes as they contain twice the pyramid amount.
    I'm calling Gene Ray,the cube specialist.

  22. Re:How do you miss a pyramid? by Belial6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or the way an idiot without a cell phone misses the red light and slams into you: inattention to your surroundings.

  23. Re:I hope that this doesn't turn out to be by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope that this doesn't turn out to be linked to some religion or other. All we need is another whacko group claiming to have the only true religion, and proof of its veracity in this pyramid. I truly do hope that this is built by, or inspired by alien visitors, perhaps stranded travellers or something. As long as its anything but more religious hype/tripe/your-fav-bad-thing-here.

    Because if your first thought upon discovering a pyramid is that it was "built by, or inspired by alien visitors" you are far saner, more rational, and down to earth than those religious "whacko group[s]"...

    --
    Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
  24. Wait for the Results .... by minairia · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Lots of people are debunking the discovery because the fellow who might have found the supposed pyramid is a wack-job. I think that the "Chariots of the Gods" stuff can be disposed off without, as it were, throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

    From the pictures on the web-sites linked to, it does seem reasonable to assume that there is something there. Geography is rarely THAT regular and it seems like the people digging have found evidence of blocks, construction, tunnels etc. These might be Roman or Ottoman era remains, or they might not.

    History is long and great periods are undocumented or forgotten. It seems absolutely reasonable that the ruins of great civilization could have gone unnoticed in Bosnia especially as this area has seen almost constant and vicious warfare for most of the modern era. I think it is very unfortunate that this discovery has been tarred with pseudo-science before real results have been developed.

  25. Duhhh by donutello · · Score: 2, Funny

    Between 27,000 and 12,000 years ago, the Balkans were locked in the last Glacial maximum, a period of very cold and dry climate with glaciers in some of the mountain ranges. The only occupants were Upper Paleolithic hunters and gatherers who left behind open-air camp sites and traces of occupation in caves. These remains consist of simple stone tools, hearths, and remains of animals and plants that were consumed for food. These people did not have the tools or skills to engage in the construction of monumental architecture.

    That just proves that they were built by a superior alien race. Duhh.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  26. Discredited Pseudo-science by bananaendian · · Score: 2, Informative
    Nothing to see here, move along.

    Seriously, why must we have to read on every populist or pseudo-science story out there? Are we competing with the New / American Scientist and Fortean Times? This guy is a nutter and his 'research' has been widely criticised and discredited.

    Is it too much to ask for the submitters and editors to do a simple Google/Wikipedia search on the articles and maybe include a hint of criticism and doubt when faced with such BS stories.

    --
    www.tribalnetworks.org - helping tribal people around the world to own their own means of high-tech communications
  27. The prophesy of AVP realized by teal_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Our discovery of this pyramid was orchestrated by the predators to lure us there so that when they revive the alien queen and she starts laying her eggs, there would be hosts for the face-huggers to implant their eggs. Once a few aliens are running around, down will come some teenage predators looking to pass their manhood ritual by trying to survive an alien hunt in the pyramid. It's all been foretold here. Beware if the predators lose though, they'll blow the whole place up.

  28. Crazy people are fun by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 3, Informative
    He's a crackpot. Archeology magazine is pretty much ripping him a new one. link

    For an example of his unique theories, here's an excerpt from his book, "The World of the Maya":

    Ordinary watchmakers repair our watches and put them into accordance with Earthly time. It is my theory that the Maya should be considered watchmakers of the cosmos whose mission it is to adjust the Earthly frequency and bring it into accordance with the vibrations of our Sun. Once the Earth begins to vibrate in harmony with the Sun, information will be able to travel in both directions without limitation. And then we will be able to understand why all ancient peoples worshipped the Sun and dedicated their rituals to this. The Sun is the source of all life on this planet and the source of all information and knowledge. ...And with a frequency in harmony, the Earth will, via the Sun, be connected with the center of our Galaxy. These facts become exceptionally important when we realize that we are rapidly approaching December 2012, a date which the Maya have marked as the time of arrival of the Galactic Energy Cluster which will enlighten us.

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  29. They mention the controversy elsewhere on MSNBC by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    On this page they mention the controversies surrounding the 'pyramid'.

    April 28, 2006 | 11:40 p.m. ET
    Pyramid problems: Is the tale of the Bosnian pyramid too good to be true? Last week, The Associated Press reported evidence that a 2,120-foot-high hill in central Bosnia-Herzegovina might actually be a buried step pyramid. This week, Archaeology magazine questioned the scientific soundness of the operation and its leader, amateur archaeologist Semir Osmanagic. Archaeology quotes experts who say there's little more to the project than "sensationalism and grandstanding," and worry that it may be damaging legitimate artifacts from medieval, Roman and Illyrian times.

    There's certainly a good deal of kookiness surrounding the story. Osmanagic, for example, links his pyramid theories to Atlantis and the Maya, while an online petition aimed at stopping Osmanagic's dig refers darkly to U.S.-orchestrated conspiracy theories. Stay tuned for further twists in the tale, and feel free to send in your comments after you read Archaeology magazine's report.

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
  30. Cautiously optimistic by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Insightful

    http://www.archaeology.org/online/features/osmanag ic/
    "Too bad that it is not a credible story at all. In fact, it is impossible. Who is the "archaeologist" who has taken the media for a ride?


    They said the same thing about the guy that found the lost city of Troy.

    Let the nutjob dig up the site some, then we'll know. I'm really not happy about "real" archeologist simply declaring that something is impossible.

    The train was declared impossible.
    Meteorites were declared impossible.
    Heliocentrism was declared impossible.
    Heavier than air aeronefs were declared impossible.

    The experts keep using that word, I do not think it means what they think it means.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Cautiously optimistic by Maru+Dubshinki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I like how you take the skepticism of a few experts, posit that all experts believed that, and promptly conclude that all experts cannot be trusted on anything.

      I would also like to conclude with a quote from the archaeologist concerned, from http://www.archaeology.org/online/features/osmanag ic/index.html:

      "Ordinary watchmakers repair our watches and put them into accordance with Earthly time. It is my theory that the Maya should be considered watchmakers of the cosmos whose mission it is to adjust the Earthly frequency and bring it into accordance with the vibrations of our Sun. Once the Earth begins to vibrate in harmony with the Sun, information will be able to travel in both directions without limitation. And then we will be able to understand why all ancient peoples worshipped the Sun and dedicated their rituals to this. The Sun is the source of all life on this planet and the source of all information and knowledge. ...And with a frequency in harmony, the Earth will, via the Sun, be connected with the center of our Galaxy. These facts become exceptionally important when we realize that we are rapidly approaching December 2012, a date which the Maya have marked as the time of arrival of the Galactic Energy Cluster which will enlighten us."

      --
      Enquiring minds want to know!
  31. The reason it stayed hidden so long? by mmell · · Score: 2, Funny
    It is made of the same type of rock and soil as the surrounding countryside, giving the appearance of simply being more earth.

    It's only after they excavate the soil and rock from around it that the true shape and size of the pyramid will be apparent!

  32. Leaps of faith by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I sorta like those Discovery and National Geographic programs that explore things from the past. Like the recent Judas Gospel. Fascinating stuff.

    What I however find most amusing are on the one hand the leaps of faith were assumption after assumption is made only to then conclude the end result to be fact. In this case it is assumed the document was found in a certain part of egypt. They then use the fact that the document is in a certain style/era to then claim that because they found another cave with artifacts in that style/era that it could very well be the cave.

    WTF? First off, just because the document was from an era/style DOES NOT mean it has to have spend all the time in a cave of the era/style. It could have been picked up before an buried somewhere else. Second of all just because some cave contains stuff from the same era that does not mean that the object must have come from that region.

    Oh look. A pair of mickey mouse ears. They must have come from florida!

    Eh? No? They could have come not only from one of the other disney parks but they in fact never have come from a park at all.

    Then there is the other side. The entire program is about how there are more gospels then there are known today. It is shown that a mere human decided wich gospels would be included in the new testament.

    It is even clearly shown that very simple political and marketting reasons lay behind the choice.

    So then what do people think about the Judas gospel. Well it is funny but the "real" gospels are somehow still more real and have something holy about them.

    WTF? Just goes to show that facts and believes have nothing to do with each other.

    But I suppose that if you have to answer the question why and how did the egyptians build the pyramids the answer "bored, lots and lots of people with no tv to watch" just doesn't cut it. Better to get some fantasy going. Star people! Yeah, never mind that amazing as the pyramids are they seem kinda primitive for a star faring civilization.

    I just go with the old prove for the fact that we have been visited by intelligent aliens in the past. They ain't been back. Smart move.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  33. 2,000 year old European pyramid by permaculture · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yo! I found a European pyramid!

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/stefz/115233678/

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyramid_of_Cestius

    As the photographer says:
    "What makes my head spin is the thought that this was built 2,000 years ago, as a copy of the Great Pyramid which was built 2,500 years before that"

    --
    Environmentalism is the new Victorianism. Everyone ties on a green corset and pretends we're virtuous.
    1. Re:2,000 year old European pyramid by Basehart · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Yo! I found a European pyramid!"

      Fuck that one, what about that giant pyramid right in the middle of Las Vegas?

      Photo

      People sleep, work and play in it without even realizing the historical and architectural significance even though it's RIGHT ON THEIR DOORSTEP!!

  34. Not Slaves by neoshroom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, a lot of recent evidence suggests that the pyramids where not built by slaves, but rather by paid workers. See below:

    http://www.harvard-magazine.com/on-line/070391.htm l

    __
    Elephant Essays - Custom Research Papers

    --
    Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
    1. Re:Not Slaves by Dunkirk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks for pointing to the article. I had heard this before, but had not read about it in depth.

      What's interesting to me, as a Bible-believing Christian, is how one academic can make his career on a hypothesis such as this. He's basically spent his entire life in the pursuit of undermining the thought that "slaves" built the pyramids. In support of this, the only two pieces of evidence that I can read from this article are 1) that some graffiti inside the pyramids referred to, perhaps, "holy" people that led the efforts, and 2) that the camp that housed the what-seemed-to-be-skilled laborers were well fed.

      Now, I understand his point about a civilization who wanted to honor their leader -- who, in terms of their religion -- represented an earthly vessel for the highest god of their pantheon. To me, that makes a lot of sense, and the comparison to an Amish barn raising seems apt, in that context.

      But I still don't see how someone can look at just the 2 previously mentioned pieces of evidence, and come away with a conclusion that, no, contrary to thousands of years of common understanding, slaves had nothing to do with the construction of not just the pyramids, but most of the massive structures of Egypt in general. (I love how the article leads with how this idea is "rooted firmly in the popular imagination." No editoral lede there, huh?)

      It would seem much MORE likely to look at this article and come away with a conclusion that the teams LEADING the effort -- who would naturally have been Egyptian -- would have made their mark on the buildings, and that the SKILLED laborers, whether they were Egyptian or Semitic, would have been well taken care of. They would HAVE to have eaten well to do good work. As far as the guy's initial supposition goes, he still hasn't figured out where "all the people" lived. He's still looking for where the rest of them lived. How can you not conclude that they must have lived in non-permanent structures, in what must have been sub-optimal conditions for living in a desert? Again, the actual evidence being uncovered (or NOT uncovered, as the case may be) points to slave labor factoring prominently into the equation.

      The reason I thought that it was really interesting to see an actual article on this was because it's rumbled around in the back of my mind for awhile, and I had forgotten it. The way it came up years ago, i.e. the way it was reported, I would have thought that they found the grave yard where they buried the workers, did some DNA testing, and PROVED their case. Not so. Now I've looked for myself, and, if this is the best evidence, then color me even more convinced of the story, uh, just about everyone has believed for, uh, just about all of recorded history.

      I think it's just another case of someone who wanted funding and a name, and came up with a shocking supposition to get them. Now he seems to be justifying the expense and the effort on the thinnest of evidence.

      --
      Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
    2. Re:Not Slaves by deacon · · Score: 2, Funny

      They must have called them grad students.

  35. God dammit by GuloGulo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "That's all very well, but that Archaeology article spends all it's time slamming the person, not discussing his claims"

    No, there's an entire paragraph on why it's impossible.

    BUT THAT WASN'T THE POINT OF THAT ARTICLE.

    The point, which you obviously missed, was that in the search for new and amazing discoveries, the media

    "ignores the truth and embraces the fantastic."

    This article was an indictment of the media's behavior, not an ad hominem attack on the guy and his results.

    "The pyramid announcement does seem very premature and is probably something else (or a fake) but I'd like to see some discussion of what he's found, which is not in that article."

    IT WASN'T SUPPOSED TO BE. The article, AGAIN, was a critique of the behavior of the media, and their willingness to embrace "fringe" characters in an effort to report dramatic findings.

    You completely missed the point, and yet SOMEHOW got modded up.

    --
    "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...
  36. Satellite Picutures, and and interview with lead by jakupovic · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have been following this story since October of last year, there has been a lot of information published and a lot of time spent on either side of 'piramidasa' and 'antipiramidasa' arguing whether the former pyramid believers and later pyramid non-believers are right. Here is a link to a satellite analysis of the region http://piramidasunca.ba/ajaxfiles/epodmeni/eizvjes taji/Geophysical%20Analysis.pdf

    At http://www.astreamagazine.com/osmanagic_serie_radi o_frm.html there are links to an interview with astraea magazine, good listen a direct link at http://www.astreamagazine.com/interviews/osmanagic /osmanagic_high.m3u

    At http://www.piramidasunca.ba/ you can find the official foundation site and more pictures, click on the British flag for english version :).

    Also googling "sarajevo-x piramida" will get you a link to a forum that's been going since last year, with posts mainly in Bosnian with some in English.

    --
    You always point your finger at the bad guy, but what if the bad guy points his finger at you?
  37. Oil and Archaeology by zogger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Both type efforts (archaeology and minerals/oil location) are benefiting from satellite remote sensing. We just recently had the lost city in guatemala found, the huge impact craters in the sahara, etc from satellite analysis (radar/photo). The impact craters were also helped by web based universal access, google maps helped amateur researchers there.

    As to the bosnian pyramid, it has long been known/suspected there in the locals handed down oral histories. It was more accurately RE-discovered. Just like when western scientists "discover" some new animal the locals have been *eating* forever and have names for.

    There's another interesting development off the coast of cuba, an alleged underwater city.

    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/05/05 28_020528_sunkencities.html

    similar off of japan

    http://www.abc.net.au/foreign/content/2004/s110720 3.htm

    (I am sure there are better links for those stories)

    It's an interesting topic. A lot of oral and written tradition from around the world all relate a period in history with a "great flood". It will be nice if modern tech helps us discover what really happened and add to our knowledge of the real "olden days", whichever way it shakes out.

  38. Why compare to Egypt pyramids? by Peyna · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why do they always compare to the pyramids in Egypt? While they might be the most famous, they're not the largest. Cholula, Teotihuacan and Cahokia are much larger in size and volume than anything in Egypt.

    Do people just have a hard time admitting that the people who inhabited the Americas before Europeans showed up might have actually not be inferior? Perhaps it's just more comfortable to imagine them as haphazard small groups of primitive people running around in the forest than to realize they had just as advanced civilizations and cities as Europe, but mostly difference in appearance. And that their technology, while it took a different path, wasn't necessarily "inferior" at all? /rant

    --
    What?
  39. Re:Maybe it was meant to be 45 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are Pyramids in Gaza? Quick! Tell the Palestinians they have a great tourism opportunity!

  40. Re:Center of the earth by SpaceLemur · · Score: 4, Funny

    It could exhibit plasticity lying somewhere between solid and liquid, like Silly Putty, which acts like a highly viscous fluid in a relaxed state, but solid properties under stress.

    But the point is moot anyway. The Earth's core is made of creamy nougat.

  41. Bah! by Otto · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's not solid iron. The Mole People couldn't live in solid iron. It's gaseous iron, at best.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Bah! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean there is a race of humanoids made entirely out of a traditional Mexican sauce?

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Bah! by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, they're perfectly ordinary people. It's just that there are 6.0221415 × 10^23 of them.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  42. It was not only well-preserved... by jd · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...but it was also one of the largest ever found and one of the most significant cities in the Roman empire, according to the article. Personally, I am of the opinion that since we only have one history and whatever is lost can NEVER be replaced, any destruction of our heritage should be treated as a crime of extreme seriousness. Ok, they need a car park. Let the archaeologists gather ALL the data, excavate ALL the ruins, build a complete virtual model and salvage what they can. THEN build your friggin' car park.


    (Mass transit is infinitely superior to cars, anyway, and any "socialist" worthy of the title should know this. Wiping out a key piece of history is also about as anti-social as you can get. Besides which, the city can't take up that much space. Build the car park UNDER it. Spain does have mining equiptment, right? It's not totally deprived of technology, however bereft of wits it might be. Then you can have the ruins AND the car park.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:It was not only well-preserved... by thrillseeker · · Score: 2, Funny
      I am of the opinion that since we only have one history and whatever is lost can NEVER be replaced, any destruction of our heritage should be treated as a crime of extreme seriousness

      My son was always trying to get out of cleaning up his room, too.

  43. Re:Maybe it was meant to be 45 by Sique · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can cut a sphere in half on EACH great circle. It doesn't have to be parallel to the equator or to a longitude. If the line Surface-Center is in the plane of the cut, it is surely cutting the sphere into two halves. The line Bosnia-Egypt then only fixes the acutal position of the plane.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  44. Keep your head ... by guysmilee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Keep your head buddy ... I just watch AVP and there some whacky stuff in those pyramids ... I mean the kinda stuff you could really lose a head over.

  45. project website by schizohead · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a link to Sam Osmanagics website:
    http://www.piramidasunca.ba/indexeng.htm

  46. Re:Good post, but.... by Jim_Callahan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, a thousand years of common understanding is definitely a reliable source of information. What have I been thinking, trusing empiricism and the modern sciences all these years? Clearly, I've been suffering from a brain fever, and need a good leeching to remove the black humours from my system.

    I spent far too much money on education, when all I needed was the five thousand years of common understanding gathering dust on my bookshelf. I mean, if you can't trust that the first woman was grown from the rib of the first man, sho was in turn formed from river clay, then what can you trust?

    Ok, I'm done now. It was really just that bit about the understanding that got me, the rest was quite insightful (though not informative, either the mods don't know the difference between the two words or they've recently moved from crack to LSD). Hope you aren't offended by the nitpicking.

    --
    ...it's really a sad day for America when we require a goddamn ACT OF CONGRESS to make our DVD players work properly. ~
  47. Amateurs and Nutjobs ... by willtsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Let's not forget that most of the really great discoveries are found by amateurs and nutjobs. The experts cannot be everywhere.

    The skepticism in the archaeological community is understandable, but there are being a little overbearing. All their models depend on having civilizations that create monuments, not monuments being evidence for civilizations. One need only examine the work of Shockley in regard to the Sphinx to see how aggressive the pros can get when their models are challenged.

    Now, the really great discoveries do come from amateurs and wackos. But only a few. Most of them are just plain wrong. So the experts are kinda right to express heavy skepticism. But I agree, let the man finance his dig. If he uncovers more and more cut stone blocks, the archaeologists will be eating humble pie, especially that Zawari guy who has consistently chewed Shockley's ass off and has to be "THE GUY" who discovers everything in Egypt now.

    The evidence for a lost "pre-civilization" keeps growing. We have found tobacco in ancient Egyptian tombs and a curious correlation of various mega-lith complexes around the world built in the image of the various signs of the Zodiac. If this is indeed a pyramid, it could be yet another in this pattern (along with the Pyramids in China). I don't think this the work of Aliens. It's just the work of an ancient civilization that rose, kept it's secrets too close to the vest then died off. And perhaps it WAS the Atlantians and Plato just did not have his details straight. The odds of various pre-cultures spontaneously deciding to build their mega-liths using a unique Zodiac sign over thousands of years is pretty low.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  48. Sure it makes sense ... by willtsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Social Security has a MASSIVE surplus and it needs someplace to invest it's money. Congress has a voracious need to borry money to mean general fund obligations and it's cheaper to borrow money from a trust fund than to incur debt from external entities.

    The fraud comes in when you include FICA revenues in for the caluculation of the deficit. The real deficit is quite a bit higher when you consider what the federal government owes to the Social Security Trust fund.

    If the Congress and the President can get it's financial house in order and pay down the debt (along with the debt service obligations), than the looming crisis is really a non-issue. But Bush seems really motivated to MAKE the crisis happen and then pretend he wants to stave it off with a plan that would DOUBLE the obligations of Social Security in the short term.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  49. Its not a pyramid. by mnmn · · Score: 2, Funny

    It just doesnt smack of a pyramid. They probably just tiled a hill or built many cobbled streets all over a hill. The Egypt pyramids sharply break the horizon, testament to the enormous amount of work required to move so much material there. If I were to build a pyramid in ancient Bosnia, I'd just tile a hill and present a huge bill to the king.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky