Slashdot Mirror


Honda Robot Controlled By Brain Waves

Dotnaught writes "Honda researchers to have developed a way to control robots using human brain waves. Using brain signals read from a person in a magnetic resonance imaging scanner, a robotic hand mirrored the movement of the human controller, spreading its fingers and making a 'V' sign."

137 comments

  1. I for one . . . by cashman73 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I for one welcome our new mind-reading overlords!

    1. Re:I for one . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not so fast! Rumor has it that putting tinfoil around your head stops the robots!

      Viva la resistencia!

    2. Re:I for one . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe me, we know.

    3. Re:I for one . . . by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      "I for one welcome our new mind-reading overlords!"

      I for one welcome the lack of originality on /.!

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    4. Re:I for one . . . by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      Originality be damned! I still got first post ! :P

  2. At least they aren't thinking for themselves... by FrontalLobe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    On the other hand... I'm sure AI would be more peaceful than some that would get their hands on the technology

    --
    -FL
    1. Re:At least they aren't thinking for themselves... by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      My God, you're right! With this technology, someone could poke both of your eyes at once. We must invent a robotic hand we can put up against our noses to block this weapon immediately.

    2. Re:At least they aren't thinking for themselves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you already can poke both of a person's eyes out tho...

    3. Re:At least they aren't thinking for themselves... by BeanahVulgaris · · Score: 1

      Personally, i love the cold unfeeling robot arm.... the new utopian ideal is for computer ai to sense our patterns and ideals and help us find the most stable and sustainable forms of society and resource use (long live the true republic! Its not dead yet!). And if years of listening to the wisdom of the gaming programmers (mainly chronotrigger) machines arent evil, humans make them that way (lucca). And go play deus ex if you lack a reason to embrace the idea of a globaly communicative AI system. In any case the borg will correct any flawed human ideas... very very soon.

  3. finally! by dwarfling · · Score: 3, Funny

    guess vulcan trekkies have robo friends ;)

    --
    /. what was first the slash or the dot ./ ?
    1. Re:finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that the Vulcan hand sign would be cool \\//, but unfortunately, it's just the V,, (index and middle finger parted, rest curled down).

    2. Re:finally! by dwarfling · · Score: 1

      it was planned , but R&D had some trouble, so this model will be a little late ...

      --
      /. what was first the slash or the dot ./ ?
    3. Re:finally! by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      When the robot starts showing the other sign, with only the middle finger raised, then we should start worrying.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    4. Re:finally! by Malakusen · · Score: 1

      "Time to die, Meatbag"

      "What did you say?"

      "Nothing, the mortal blood rushing through your ears must have caused you to hear things that aren't there. Meatbag."

      "What do you mea- *ERK!*"

      --
      Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
  4. Where's Mitchell Gant when you need him? by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I must think in... Japanese?!?!"

    1. Re:Where's Mitchell Gant when you need him? by Kuukai · · Score: 1

      And the Japanese must think in... German?!?!

      --
      Sendou Wave Kick!!
    2. Re:Where's Mitchell Gant when you need him? by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently you have to learn German if you want to become a doctor in Japan.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    3. Re:Where's Mitchell Gant when you need him? by DanHibiki · · Score: 1

      It's funny, because Shinji had to think in German when riding back seat in the 02.

  5. Unfortunately... by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...further trials resulted in the robotic hand trying to touch itself every other minute and repeatly making lewd gestures with it's middle finger.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Unfortunately... by Goblez · · Score: 1

      That's because you ordered the robot with the intelligence of a 6 year old ("No means No" ... "Ooooh! A Pool!"). You need to drop the flow to pick up a higher end model.

      --
      - Kal`Goblez
    2. Re:Unfortunately... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ..further trials resulted in the robotic hand trying to touch itself every other minute...

      So it was actually reading Michael Jackson's mind...

      --
      What?
  6. Science Fiction! by InsomniacMK5 · · Score: 1

    It never ceases to amaze me how we have made science fiction from the past possible. Although I am quite curious how "A.I." will play out in the future, I am excited to own my very own, personal, light saber.

    --
    Truth resides in every human heart, and one has to search for it there, and to be guided by truth as one sees it. But no
    1. Re:Science Fiction! by thebdj · · Score: 1

      It will obviously try to take over and kill us all....I mean that has to be the plot for at least a dozen sci-fi movies, a few of which were actually successful...

      --
      "Some days you just can't get rid of a bomb."
    2. Re:Science Fiction! by HarvardAce · · Score: 1
      It will obviously try to take over and kill us all....I mean that has to be the plot for at least a dozen sci-fi movies, a few of which were actually successful...

      The plots or the movies?

      --
      Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
  7. It's good to see they're making progress by something_wicked_thi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A while back, I remember reading that someone had invented a video game that was controlled similarly, but it took a while to train yourself to "think" properly. Having the robot mirror your own movement sounds far superior. If this continues to develop, I have some hope of never developing carpal tunnel syndrome.

    1. Re:It's good to see they're making progress by killqqq · · Score: 1

      That's why we need Newtype!!

    2. Re:It's good to see they're making progress by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Except that as developed, your "real" hands would be making the same movements as the robotic ones. No worries though. Once you do get carpal tunnle you can just lob them off and use the robot ones instead :).

      Seriously though, this could work wonder for quadraplegics and such, where their real limbs don't work anymore, but they can still make the thoughts that would do so if they did work.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    3. Re:It's good to see they're making progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I could make a robot that mows the lawn by mimicing me... mowing the lawn.
      Ok...

    4. Re:It's good to see they're making progress by Talchas · · Score: 1

      I know this sort of thing (using electrodes or something more invasive IIRC) has been done in monkeys for a while. They would have the monkeys use a joystick to hit a target, and if they succeeded they got some reward. Meanwhile they were updating the software to properly recognize the movements. Then they cut out the stick and ran it just on the readings. Eventually the monkeys learned that the stick wasn't need to move it.

      --
      As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century,free flow of information is the only safeguard against...
    5. Re:It's good to see they're making progress by Talchas · · Score: 1
      --
      As the Americans learned so painfully in Earth's final century,free flow of information is the only safeguard against...
  8. With mind-reading robots available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...can a Stephen Hawking Transformer be far behind?

  9. I was thinking of the sex market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honda could enter the novelty sex market with this, for sure.

  10. With this technology by donglekey · · Score: 4, Funny

    I could steal old people's medicine

    1. Re:With this technology by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      I could steal old people's medicine

      More importantly you could finally get that candy from the baby!

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
    2. Re:With this technology by donglekey · · Score: 1

      Old Glory Robot Insurance might not cover that though.

  11. Also found in the news: by EmperorKagato · · Score: 2, Funny

    Venture Capitalists fund $300 billion dollars into a project presented by an organization called NERV.

    --
    ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
  12. seems like they went backwards by musikit · · Score: 1

    arent the robots suppose to learn how to control the human brain?

    1. Re:seems like they went backwards by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Obviously they're only one switch away from that now....just change the direction of the device (point it the other way) and there we go.

    2. Re:seems like they went backwards by bblboy54 · · Score: 1

      No, no.... not yet! They cant control our minds until we are in The Matrix.

  13. So you don' t have to... by Codename.Juggernaut · · Score: 1

    When will honda start implementing this technology into their cars? I can't wait to get cut off in traffic by some jerk while his civic is flipping me off.

  14. basically... by newSlashUser · · Score: 1

    the robot is either saying peace or cursing you out? init?

  15. Prosthetics? by jizziknight · · Score: 1

    This would be really cool to implement in prosthetics. How awesome would it be to get a robotic arm that functioned just like your real arm that got ripped off by another robot when it's AI went nutso instead of a flesh colored piece of plastic?

    --
    Everything I say is a lie. Except that... and that... and that, and that, and that, and that... and that.
  16. Ironically by everphilski · · Score: 1

    The venture capitalists, ironically, were part of an organization called STEELE.

    1. Re:Ironically by everphilski · · Score: 1

      The venture capitalists, ironically, were part of an organization called SEELE. SEELE, fat fingers.

  17. Just what we need, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    More perverted robots.

  18. Let me guess... by Nos. · · Score: 1

    Not available in the USA.

  19. Who has a billion dollars? by Noishe · · Score: 1

    So now everyone can have their own robot controled by their brain. But there's a catch! (omg) You only need your own billion dollar mri machine!

    1. Re:Who has a billion dollars? by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, the catch is you have to have a brain. That should lower the uptake on this thing.

  20. Behind the curtain by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    FTA:

    In a video demonstration in Tokyo, brain signals detected by a magnetic resonance imaging scanner were relayed to a robotic hand. A person in the MRI machine made a fist, spread his fingers and then made a V-sign. Several seconds later, a robotic hand mimicked the movements. (emphasis mine)

    Afterward, a reporter who strayed too far from the crowd was warned by security not to look behind the curtain.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Behind the curtain by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed that. It could not possibly have taken that long to decode the brainwaves. At the very least this could mean that it wasn't making the gestures that generated the correct brainwaves. The person had to concentrate on something else afterwards before the robot moved.

    2. Re:Behind the curtain by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      It was a joke. Really.

      Actually, even if the recordation of the brainwaves controlling the motion was instantaneous (which is, apparently, is not - I'm a rocket scientist, not a brain surgeon) I would anticipate a good deal of postprocessing to get the motion reformatted from MRI raw data to motor controls. Actually, I think several seconds is pretty damned good.

      Of course, if the sister post here is true (1-5 seconds of delay for O2 variation sensing), we won't see this for any sort of useful controls in real-time equipment. Even for non-critical items (say, controlling your car stereo), the delay will annoy most people enough that they won't like it. Heck, the delay in x-10 lighting signalling (just a couple hundred milliseconds) is enough to put me off.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Behind the curtain by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      It could not possibly have taken that long to decode the brainwaves.

      Except they're not reading "brainwaves", i.e. EEG, but MRI. MRI readings lags brain activity.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  21. Technology upgrade! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    This is a siginficant technology upgrade from the roboroach. Still, I'll wait until SP1 just to make sure all the bugs are out of the system. :P

  22. From Ork by cpopin · · Score: 1

    ...then merging that "V" sign with the humans and spouting, "Nanu, nanu."

    --
    -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
  23. I've always thought... by Temujin_12 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...that it was only a matter of time until we started to see brain-to-machine mappings for communication. The possibilities are very exciting (coding with your brain anyone?). What scares me is when efforts are taken to have machine-to-brain communication. Call me crazy, but I prefer my own synapses to be the only source of thought in my brain. I don't even want to begin to think what it could happen when the machine segfaults (or gets hacked into) while injecting thoughts into my brain.

    --
    Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
    1. Re:I've always thought... by maxume · · Score: 1

      So, um, do you read stuff?

      That's interesting about the machine segfaulting though. I imagine the one that came from the 'It works, holy shit it works!' school of thought would fuck you mightily while the one that came from the "That's what I want it to do." school would do nothing harmful.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  24. Useless! by Garridan · · Score: 0

    They made a left hand? Who the hell uses those, these day?

    1. Re:Useless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should try it - it feels almost like somebody else is...

      oh, nevermind.

    2. Re:Useless! by mwilliamson · · Score: 1

      Uh, over 1/2 of my department is lefthanded. You minority freak northpaw!!!

  25. Ask and ye shall receive by spun · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  26. Tinfoil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is why I keep my tinfoil hat on at all times!

  27. Is it just me... by llvllatrix · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...or did that have giant fighting robots written all over it?

    1. Re:Is it just me... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I want my HAR fighting league! Sounds like 2097 wasn't such a bad estimate.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  28. I want my EVA! by Nicolay77 · · Score: 0

    Hey, not only 14 year old people have brain waves!

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  29. universality? by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, does the MRI interpreting algorithm need to be tailored to each user, or could an 'off-the-shelf' interpreter work for anyone?

    While I'm sure that bloodflow signatures for physical movements are similar between individuals, is there too much variability to prevent false recognition of a 'signal'?

    Any neurobiologists out there care to help out?

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:universality? by venicebeach · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So, does the MRI interpreting algorithm need to be tailored to each user, or could an 'off-the-shelf' interpreter work for anyone? While I'm sure that bloodflow signatures for physical movements are similar between individuals, is there too much variability to prevent false recognition of a 'signal'?

      At this point, it is surprising that they can even do it for an individual (discerning among these three quite similar hand movements). I am kind of skeptical myself. There is a lot of variability in fMRI signal even within an individual. I would guess the system is trained on a specific individual.

      Between individuals you have additional sources of variability; for example, the foldings of the cortex are quite different from person to person. I personally have a very unusual precentral gyrus on the left side. Activity maps are typically aligned to anatomical maps so finding correspondences between individuals has to deal with the challenges of anatomical variability.

      For gross things, it can be quite obvious what the person is doing. I can tell by looking at the activations in your brain if you are looking at something versus hearing something. But looking at a duck versus looking at a cow? Much harder. Making a V-sign versus making a fist? I've never seen a paper where someone reported being able to do this. It is theoretically possible, but difficult with a blurry MRI signal that aggregates over populations of neurons. You can certainly do it if you implant electrodes into the brain. Recordings from monkey premotor cortex, for example, find neurons that fire when specific movements are made.

    2. Re:universality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all the images I've seen for fMRI are averaged over many trials to pull the signal out of the noise. The signal is so small, I don't know how they would do this in real-time for one person, and forget about universality (at this point)

    3. Re:universality? by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not just the robot being able to interpret your brain waves, but your brain also adjusting to new interface as well. Take for example babies: they often don't have much control of their appendages, not just because of underdeveloped muscles, but the pathways to fine motor control have to be developed as well.

      This is also demonstrated to learning to use a joystick or gamepad. Anyone new to a different kind of interface needs to make certain adjustments and brain motor connections to accommodate a new way of manipulating things. I am quite adept at FSP games on the PC, for example, but when I started playing Halo on X-Box, I was running around like a drunken sailor. Overtime, however, my hand and mind became quite accustomed to manipulating the movements on the screen. So would it be with your mind controlling the robot.

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    4. Re:universality? by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Informative

      For gross things, it can be quite obvious what the person is doing. I can tell by looking at the activations in your brain if you are looking at something versus hearing something. But looking at a duck versus looking at a cow? Much harder. Making a V-sign versus making a fist? I've never seen a paper where someone reported being able to do this. It is theoretically possible, but difficult with a blurry MRI signal that aggregates over populations of neurons.

      I think this research is a follow-up to a study Kamitani & Tong published last year in Nature Neuroscience, where they decoded the orientation of edges a subject was looking at. Here's the abstract:

      Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain

      The potential for human neuroimaging to read out the detailed contents of a person's mental state has yet to be fully explored. We investigated whether the perception of edge orientation, a fundamental visual feature, can be decoded from human brain activity measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Using statistical algorithms to classify brain states, we found that ensemble fMRI signals in early visual areas could reliably predict on individual trials which of eight stimulus orientations the subject was seeing. Moreover, when subjects had to attend to one of two overlapping orthogonal gratings, feature-based attention strongly biased ensemble activity toward the attended orientation. These results demonstrate that fMRI activity patterns in early visual areas, including primary visual cortex (V1), contain detailed orientation information that can reliably predict subjective perception. Our approach provides a framework for the readout of fine-tuned representations in the human brain and their subjective contents.

    5. Re:universality? by venicebeach · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reference. I think there are a handful of papers in which they have extracted information about what someone is seeing from visual cortex, I've just never seen one in the motor domain...but maybe you will produce a ref for that as well. :)

    6. Re:universality? by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the reference. I think there are a handful of papers in which they have extracted information about what someone is seeing from visual cortex, I've just never seen one in the motor domain...but maybe you will produce a ref for that as well. :)

      Alas, I don't happen to have such a reference handy. ;)

  30. hmmmm by venicebeach · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've done some fMRI of motor movements... All these movements, the fist, the V-sign, would activate the hand area, premotor cortex, and some parietal areas... I am very skeptical that you could tell the difference between them. But if they can that is very impressive, especially to do it in real time...

    By the way, MRI does not measure "brain waves". It measures blood oxygenation changes, which are related to the firing of neurons.

    1. Re:hmmmm by Roger_Wilco · · Score: 1

      And there's one of the big problems with fMRI:

      By the way, MRI does not measure "brain waves". It measures blood oxygenation changes, which are related to the firing of neurons.

      It is quite likely that the BOLD signal and neural spiking are related. Everybody believes it, myself included. But there is still not that much evidence of the connection.

    2. Re:hmmmm by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I noticed in your URL that you're in BU's CNS department. How do you like it there? I almost decided to go there myself for grad school.

      It is quite likely that the BOLD signal and neural spiking are related. Everybody believes it, myself included. But there is still not that much evidence of the connection.

      What are your thoughts on the experiments by Nikos Logothetis where he did electrophysiological recordings of neurons and fMRI simultaneously (certainly not an easy feat). In his study he showed that the BOLD signal (at least in V1) is actually related more to dendritic inputs and intracortical processing than axonal spikes. Here's the abstract:

      Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal

      Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is widely used to study the operational organization of the human brain, but the exact relationship between the measured fMRI signal and the underlying neural activity is unclear. Here we present simultaneous intracortical recordings of neural signals and fMRI responses. We compared local field potentials (LFPs), single- and multi-unit spiking activity with highly spatio-temporally resolved blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI responses from the visual cortex of monkeys. The largest magnitude changes were observed in LFPs, which at recording sites characterized by transient responses were the only signal that significantly correlated with the haemodynamic response. Linear systems analysis on a trial-by-trial basis showed that the impulse response of the neurovascular system is both animal- and site-specific, and that LFPs yield a better estimate of BOLD responses than the multi-unit responses. These findings suggest that the BOLD contrast mechanism reflects the input and intracortical processing of a given area rather than its spiking output.


    3. Re:hmmmm by venicebeach · · Score: 1

      And to add on to FleaPlus's comment, I find this rather convincing as well:

      Mukamel, R., Gelbard, H., Arieli, A., Hasson, U., Fried, I., Malach, R., (2005). Coupling between neuronal firing, field potentials, and FMRI in human auditory cortex. Science, 309(5736),951-4.

      Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is an important tool for investigating human brain function, but the relationship between the hemodynamically based fMRI signals in the human brain and the underlying neuronal activity is unclear. We recorded single unit activity and local field potentials in auditory cortex of two neurosurgical patients and compared them with the fMRI signals of 11 healthy subjects during presentation of an identical movie segment. The predicted fMRI signals derived from single units and the measured fMRI signals from auditory cortex showed a highly significant correlation (r = 0.75, P 10(-47)). Thus, fMRI signals can provide a reliable measure of the firing rate of human cortical neurons.

  31. Mind Reader by tgpo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I really don't want a Robot acting out what's in my head. The mixture of honey, custard, cucumbers, and Captain Cruch cereal is deadly on robotic moving parts....just trust me on this one.

    --
    -tgpo
  32. Get ready for the robot wars... by dfj225 · · Score: 1

    Because that 'V' was for Vendetta.

    --
    SIGFAULT
  33. cool :) by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    i hope this interfaces with my orbiting brain lazor.

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:cool :) by HumanisticJones · · Score: 1

      As long as it runs on Linux it should interface with said orbiting brain lasers as well as your Beowulf Cluster of Atomic Supermen.

  34. like the monkey stuff from a few years ago by kaan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About 3 years ago, some scientists hooked up a chimpanzee and captured brain signals to control a robotic arm. Their results were quite a bit more impressive I think, because the robotic arm had full motion control, and was physically located several hundred miles away from the chimp. But still, this stuff from Honda is cool, because it's controlled by humans using mri, not wires plugged into your brain like the monkey stuff. I just hope they don't try to put brain controller stuff in their vehicles...

    Here's an article from New Scientist:
    http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn4262

    1. Re:like the monkey stuff from a few years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) No one hooked up a chimp to anything. There is little to no invasive research of this type applied to non-human apes. Monkeys are used.
      2) the "monkey" did not control robotic arms hundreds of miles away. The robotic arms hundreds of miles away were moved with signals made in the monkey's brain.

      Control implies closed-loop feedback, and those monkeys were completely unaware they were controlled something in Srini's lab in Boston.

      The researcher in question, Nicolelis, has more recent work in which closed-loop feedback is used, and also has some human trials going, but that is all more recent developments than the Srini-MIT-connection.

    2. Re:like the monkey stuff from a few years ago by venicebeach · · Score: 1

      2) the "monkey" did not control robotic arms hundreds of miles away. The robotic arms hundreds of miles away were moved with signals made in the monkey's brain.

      Sorry, what's the difference?

    3. Re:like the monkey stuff from a few years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can record from a monkey's brain, take the signal, and send it to you over the internet, and use an algorithm to have it produce text on your screen. All that requires is a signal from a monkey's brain and an arbitrary algorithm. But a brain-machine interface is more than that. It means the brain is coupled to the external world in a way that allows voluntary interaction.

      Now, if the monkey could voluntarily write Hamlet on your screen, that would be something. See the difference?

      BTW, you can now measure electrical fields with an MRI machine (in addition to BOLD). After all electrical fields in change are also magnetic fields according to some dude named Maxwell.

  35. Quirky Robots by MrSquirrel · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just pray the day never comes when robots learn our most dear secret -- THE SHOCKER. Once they learn how to please our women, we are doomed! What do our fleshy human bodies have to offer a woman that an indestructible killing/loving machine cannot?

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
    1. Re:Quirky Robots by FirienFirien · · Score: 1

      Semen?

      --
      Browsing with +2 to insightful posts and a higher threshold makes the average post seen seem a lot more ingenious
  36. Promising Research by sidfaiwu · · Score: 1
    I'm really curious about this device. Does the user have to actually have to go through the hand motions or is it sufficient to just think about moving your hand? I'm also interested in how this technology could be used for applications beyond mimicry. The article talks about using the technology to replace keyboards and cell phones, but how can it mimic placing a call? A cell phone is not a natural part of our body that we can manipulate directly with our minds like our hand is.

    Also, if they did develop a mind/computer interface, can you imagine how frustratingly slow many software applications would suddenly seem? GUIs would probably require some major overhauls in order to adapt.

    1. Re:Promising Research by venicebeach · · Score: 1

      Does the user have to actually have to go through the hand motions or is it sufficient to just think about moving your hand?

      That depends on where they are getting the relevant information from. Imagining a movement and performing it produce overlapping but not identical brain activations. If they can get enough info from just the overlapping areas then conceivably you could do that...

    2. Re:Promising Research by dmitrygr · · Score: 1

      A cell phone is not a natural part of our body
      Tell that to my 16-year-old sister

      --
      -------
      1. Enjoy your job
      2. Make lots of money
      3. Work within the law

      Choose any two.
    3. Re:Promising Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure thing. Just give me her number.... and a picture too. :p

  37. Gesture... by Procrastin8er · · Score: 0

    Can it perform a far more useful gesture, the bird?

    --
    Slashdot - Where the slash is most definitely to the left.
  38. It's probably just latency by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 3, Informative
    You have to remember how MRI's work:
    It has been known for over 100 years (Roy and Sherrington 1890) that changes in blood flow and blood oxygenation in the brain (collectively known as hemodynamics) are closely linked to neural activity. When nerve cells are active they consume oxygen carried by hemoglobin in red blood cells from local capillaries. The local response to this oxygen utilisation is an increase in blood flow to regions of increased neural activity, occurring after a delay of approximately 1-5 seconds.
    Add in some computing time to process the image and you've got your latency right there.
    1. Re:It's probably just latency by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Maybe it'll be like a Michael Crichton novel: They'll invent a working time machine and use it to go backward in time to remove the latency period, so they could use the resulting robots to build a theme park.

  39. New meaning to telecommuting by psyklopz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Imagine a world where you can go hook yourself into a robotic control chamber and somewhere on the other side of the world, your robotic counterpart begins to walk around, talk, do things, all based on your brainwaves.

    Meanwhile, video from teh robot's 'eye' are transmitted to a 3d viewer in front of your face.

    Forget star-rek transporters. Thisi s the next best (and plausible) thing.

    Very bad implications for crime and terrorism, though.

    1. Re:New meaning to telecommuting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's already been several Neon Genesis Evangelion references in the comments to this story, but I think you've made the first one to Ghost in the Shell.

    2. Re:New meaning to telecommuting by forkazoo · · Score: 1
      Imagine a world where you can go hook yourself into a robotic control chamber and somewhere on the other side of the world, your robotic counterpart begins to walk around, talk, do things, all based on your brainwaves.

      Meanwhile, video from teh robot's 'eye' are transmitted to a 3d viewer in front of your face.

      Forget star-rek transporters. Thisi s the next best (and plausible) thing.

      Very bad implications for crime and terrorism, though.


      I don't know that it would be that bad for crime and terrorism. Sure, the robot could carry a bomb, but it would also be a relatively expensive piece of equipment that most private citizens wouldn't own. I imagine companies owning the bots and control booths. Then, people just rent out bots for day trips, or business meetings, etc. Imagine the benefits to tourism, and rapid emergency response. The most qualified experts could "be" at the scene of a disaster in moments. Every firefighter in the country could take over every robot in a city if there was a bombing, etc.
    3. Re:New meaning to telecommuting by Leo+Sasquatch · · Score: 1

      It's called telepresence and it's commercially available now. Okay, it's not exactly C3P0 - more a webcam/monitor/speakers/microphone combo on a remote-controlled barstool, but it allows you to 'be' wherever that 'robot' goes and speak to the people at its location and hear what they have to say. Try: http://www.robodynamics.com/ and search for MILO under products

  40. More Links by vertinox · · Score: 2, Informative

    As per the discussion on Digg here is a video of the robot in action with the MRI:

    http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/honda_develops _bmi_robot_hand.php

    And all the other links that were related:

    http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/24/hondas-asimo-ge ts-mind-control-interface/

    http://www.japancorp.net/Article.Asp?Art_ID=12565

    The Japancorp has the most information than both the engadget and then Yahoo.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  41. Obligatory... by talkingpaperclip · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, Honda Robots control Brain Waves!

    I, for one, welcome our new shocker-wielding robotic overlords.

  42. I know what they are all thinking by sentientbrendan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    GIANT FIGHTING ROBOTS

    Seriously, why else has Japan dumped all this money into robotics and AI over the past 30 years? It's because everyone there grew up on Gigantor http://www.gigantor.org/ and Gundom, that's why. They are going to make giant fighting robots if it kills them.

    Really though, this is all just trying to fill a void after the death of Godzilla in the late 60's. Substituting one giant stompy thing for another.

    If you want to learn more about the life and times of gozilla and natures other lovable giant scamps, then I suggest you check out "Godzilla, Mothra, and King Ghidorah - Gaint Monster All Out Attack an A&E biography."

    1. Re:I know what they are all thinking by HumanisticJones · · Score: 1

      All they need now is a power supply for these robots that runs on pure Fighting Spirit and all my childhood giant robot dreams will come true.

  43. My kids couldn't ever use it. by CFD339 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They clearly don't have enough organized brainwaves to run the lawn mower.

    Kidding aside, I understand that during adolescence the brain completely reorganizes higher functions -- often shifting the center or processing for many of them to entirely different places.

    Exactly how would this ASIMO++ handle that?

    Oh, and what about blondes?

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
    1. Re:My kids couldn't ever use it. by llvllatrix · · Score: 1

      Blondes would have to go to Soviet Russia, where Honda Robots control Brain Waves.

  44. It certiably worked for by geekoid · · Score: 1
    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  45. So, here's the technical question... by caudron · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is it still called "masturbation" if the robot is the one doing it to you?

    Tom Caudron
    http://tom.digitalelite.com/

    P.S. I look forward to 15 years from now when my daughter reads this comment after searching on my name. What a proud moment in my history to share with future generations. :(

    --
    -Tom
    1. Re:So, here's the technical question... by BenHoltz · · Score: 1

      Try 5 years when google takes over the world....

    2. Re:So, here's the technical question... by esper · · Score: 1

      Yes, and in 15 years, your daughter will probably know the answer to the question, too. Unfortunately, the thread will be long-since archived, so she'll have to answer it for you in person rather than posting a comment here.

    3. Re:So, here's the technical question... by alienmole · · Score: 1

      When your daughter does find this, it'll trigger the Internet Child Protection Act of 2012, her computer will automatically notify Homeland Security, and you'll be shipped off to New Guantanamo, located on an artificial island off the coast of California.

    4. Re:So, here's the technical question... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Why is it goint to take your daughter 15 years to find this comment? Does she have some kind of mental or physical impairment that will make her unable to do a web search until she's 15 years older than she is now? Or are you keeping her locked up in a cage for the next 15 years with no access to the outside world?

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  46. Flipping off the Brits by austinpoet · · Score: 1

    The human was making a V sign with his hand. The robot hand looks more like its flipping off the Brits.

    1. Re:Flipping off the Brits by Rachel+Lucid · · Score: 1

      Great, now some Limey's going to smash their research up...

      I always figured the 'British bird' required an upward thrust of the arm.

  47. My reaction to TFA by HunterZ · · Score: 1

    I didn't appreciate it turning into an Asimo ad at the end. Also, it's hard to belive it works very well (or at all) when they report only being able to do one gesture with it. Definitely a cool idea though, and it's good if they're really making progress.

    Even more important than robotics would be the application to artificial/cybernetic replacement limbs. If they could miniturize the sensor technology to where it could be embedded in a hat, or (even better) just under the skin of the scalp, it could be used to provide decent motor control for an artificial limb.

    --
    Arguing about vi versus Emacs is like arguing whether it's better to make fire by rubbing sticks or banging rocks.
  48. Seig Zeon!! by CharAznable · · Score: 1

    With this technology I shall build an army of Zakus and I will defeat Amuro Ray once and for all!!!

    --
    The perfect sig is a lot like silence, only louder
  49. Movie references... by mangu · · Score: 1
    So many movie references, and nobody mentions Dr. Strangelove?


    Dr. Strangelove's unruly prosthetic arm is what always comes to my mind when someone mentions artificial limbs or humanoid robots. Besides, how can anyone forget a movie that has a character named "General Jack D. Ripper"? I guess I must be getting old... =8(

    1. Re:Movie references... by transparentsea · · Score: 1

      Dr. Strangelove. They're japanese. Think Ghost in the Shell.

  50. Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto by Loquax · · Score: 1

    Now I've got that damn song running through my head. I wonder what the system does when it enounters Stxy based brain waves.

    1. Re:Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto by NewmanBlur · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, the Japanese have also developed a superior version of Mr. Roboto.

      Strangely they left out the elements about Kilroy! Kilroy.

      --
      Per ardua ad astra.
  51. After the first demo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After the first demo where the robot made a "V" sign, the user made a fist and then extended his index finger to point. A few seconds later the robot made a fist and then extended all its fingers and made a "V" sign. lol.

  52. Great... by kurbchekt · · Score: 0

    Now I guess it's time to get some Old Glory Insurance before they come to eat my medicine for fuel...

  53. Nintendo's next console will use this... by jtnw · · Score: 1

    and then we can finally do away with controllers altogether!

    jtnw

  54. No... Score -1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tired.

  55. oh no! by ezwip · · Score: 0

    This power should never be placed in the hands of a woman. I dread the day that I walk into my house and the robot greets me by nagging non stop.

    --
    "I guess I'm gonna fade into Bolivian."
  56. 10 yrs ago... by mwilliamson · · Score: 1
    Some years ago a company came out with a product called "minddrive", and an assortment of computer games / tools. While not directly detecting brainwaves, it did detect skin resistance changes (due to sweat I suppose)...something that some people were evidently actually learning to control.

    Here's all I can find of it: http://www.raven1.net/minddriv.htm

  57. Could be bad... by ickies · · Score: 1

    There are some hand gestures that flash through my head that I'd rather not have a robot execute...

  58. Ok, so now... by bforsse · · Score: 1

    where can I pre-order my exo-skeleton?

  59. Obligatory SMAC Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think, and my thoughts cross the barrier into the synapses of the machine, just as the good doctor intended. But what I cannot shake, and what hints at things to come, is that thoughts cross back. In my dreams, the sensibility of the machine invades the periphery of my consciousness: dark, rigid, cold, alien. Evolution is at work here, but just what is evolving remains to be seen.

    -Commissioner Pravin Lal

  60. MRI? by ThePopeLayton · · Score: 1
    "signals detected by a magnetic resonance imaging scanner were relayed to a robotic hand"

    I don't know if this is a case of bad translation or bad reporting but MRI is not used to measure brain waves. MRI uses intense magnetic fields to detect the SPIN on a hydrogen atom, and then can be used to create 3D structures. The spin of an atom is a sub-atomic property which is NOT affected by chemical let alone cellular processes. Also the brain waves that are produced during synaptic activity are incredibly small and the magnetic fields being produced by the MRI machine would easy squash the brain wave signals. Thies recordings were most likely done with an EEG machine.
  61. well, not so portable though by toQDuj · · Score: 1

    given that your average MRI scanner is about the size of a room, uses a magnetic field of several Tesla and is severely susceptible to outside interference, I doubt that you want to take this in the real world.

    Not only will you have a doughnut the size of a truck on your head, you'll also be the major attraction to many cars, keys and fire extinguishers outside that become lethal projectiles as soon as they are caught in the magnetic field.
    On the other hand, the superconducting coils' need for liquid hydrogen means that you always have the hydrogen to keep your head cool under these circumstances...

    B.

    --
    Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
  62. IT IS A FAKE! by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 0
    The robot was not controlled by brainwaves at all. It is simply a japanese girl robot and it had a camera pointed at it. It could not do anything BUT make a v-sign.

    Japanese laws of robotics.

    1. A robot may not harm a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
    2. A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
    3. A robot must protect its own existence, as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
    4. A robot shall in the presence of the camera make a v-sign and strike a cute pose. If Rules 1-3 must be violated to do so then so be it. Cute Rules!
    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:IT IS A FAKE! by EtherC · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's real. I work right next door to ATR in Japan and have a number of friends that work there. I've seen the stuff they're working on - the BMI is just amazing (what they've demoed for the public is only a fraction of what they're capable of in the labs). I'm just glad to see they're making Western press. :)

  63. Privacy anyone? by damneinstien · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thinks this will remove all privacy whatsoever?

    Think about it. If Honda develops technology to read brain waves, the ability to read thoughts won't be far behind. And guess what comes with thought reading.. you guessed it! Thought police!

    I hope to god my tin foil hat works..

    1. Re:Privacy anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think they are using an MRI? It'll rip the tin foil hat clear offa your head!

  64. Honda robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Honda make cars anymore?

  65. Fembots! by achacha · · Score: 0

    So when is Honda releasing the Fembot that is controlled by brain waves... I have a lot of pronographic brain waves to "test" out!

  66. Sort of Old by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

    :D in past it has only been applied to animals, i think this is a first for decoding human thought patterns. Apparently i wasn't the only one jealous of the mouse that could control his water with his mind. However please take note ... This first phase of the project was controlling the animals long before we could read their minds :o ... i'm hoping no mind control stuff comes to humans :p but atleast it is a reward based control rather than punishment. Artificial bliss doesnt sound all that bad, probably addictive though (but who isnt addicted to bliss). I hope Sanjiv K. Talwar gets the deserved credit. super mouse: http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s948847.htm remote control mouse: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/05/05 01_020501_roborats.html

  67. the onion's behind the times... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but funnier:

    > exoskeleton which Hawking operates through slight movements of his left wrist