Slashdot Mirror


Huge Storms Converge on Jupiter

tpoker writes to tell us NASA is reporting that the two biggest storms in the solar system are about to collide on Jupiter. From the article: "Storm #1 is the Great Red Spot, twice as wide as Earth itself, with winds blowing 350 mph. The behemoth has been spinning around Jupiter for hundreds of years. Storm #2 is Oval BA, also known as 'Red Jr.,' a youngster of a storm only six years old. Compared to the Great Red Spot, Red Jr. is half-sized, able to swallow Earth merely once, but it blows just as hard as its older cousin."

205 comments

  1. Nice job, editors! by grogdamighty · · Score: 5, Funny
    The summary is spot on! (Ba-dum, chink!)

    But seriously, did anyone else think that Hollywood is going to use this as the background for The Perfect Storm II?

    --
    My other sig is funny.
    1. Re:Nice job, editors! by raehl · · Score: 2, Informative

      The summary is spot on! (Ba-dum, chink!)

      Except for the whole basic math thing.

      If one object is two earths wide, and another object is one earth wide, the 2nd object is one FOURTH the size of the first, not one half.*

      * Assumes objects are of the same shape and the shape is uniform in one dimension. Which should be pretty good assumptions in this case.

    2. Re:Nice job, editors! by rock217 · · Score: 1

      (Ba-dum, chink!)

      --
      Wah Sig!
    3. Re:Nice job, editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dr. Tony Phillips is intelligent, but not experienced. His pattern indicates one dimensional thinking.

    4. Re:Nice job, editors! by afaik_ianal · · Score: 1

      * Assumes objects are of the same shape and the shape is uniform in one dimension. Which should be pretty good assumptions in this case.

      No, sorry. The cross section of Earth is very nearly circular. The Great Red Spot is very eliptical, being only about half as high as it is wide. In this case, something that is approximately twice as wide as Earth, also has approximately twice the area.

    5. Re:Nice job, editors! by strider44 · · Score: 1

      I thought the one about how the cyclones aren't going to collide just having a near miss, even though they should be close enough to affect eachother, was more obvious.

    6. Re:Nice job, editors! by Kagura · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... able to swallow Earth merely once, but it blows just as hard as its older cousin."

      Mmm... incestulicious!

    7. Re:Nice job, editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:Nice job, editors! by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Watch it, making cracks about global warning is fightin' words!! I got modded down by some treehugger with no sense of humor last time I made a global warming crack.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    9. Re:Nice job, editors! by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      <Insert global warming quote here>

      These storms are so strong,

      How strong are they?

      They could actually make Al Gore move.

      Thank you, slashdot! Tip your waitress! Help her back up!

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    10. Re:Nice job, editors! by El+Torico · · Score: 1
      kimvette, you really need to stop fixating on the "global warming conspiracy" that you are obsessed with. You aren't funny.

      I'd mod you down too but I think it would be more productive to ask you nicely instead.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    11. Re:Nice job, editors! by CodeMonkey4Hire · · Score: 1

      If the two storms have the same elliptical shape, and one is twice is wide, then we're still looking at 4x. The area of an elipse is A=pi*a*b. So if the larger storm is twice as wide and twice as high, A'=pi*2a*2b, A'=4*pi*a*b, and presto A'=4*A.

      --

      Let's go Hurricanes!!! 2006 Stanley Cup Champions!!!
    12. Re:Nice job, editors! by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Actually I think blaming every storm on global warming is funny. You may not, and in that case what you ought to do is just pass my post by and mod up an insightful post.

      My problem with so-called "environmentalists:" When (at least partial) solutions are offered, like wind farms (re: nantucket sound wind farm), incinerators (burn trash to produce electrical power - proposed in the old Quonset Navy Base in Rhode Island, and one here in the Greater Boston area) get knocked down, moden nuclear power plants get knocked down, natural gas depots (proposed for Quincy MA and Fall River, MA) get knocked down. It's really more about NIMBY than solving problems. Everyone wants to solve the problem, but not if the solution is in their area. The proposed solution is to "stop using foreign oil" without accepting available alternatives. It seems that (at least the extremist) environmentalists want nuclear fusion NOW, and they don't want it in their own town/city/state/etc. and don't want it off shore either. There is no happy medium.

      The reality of the matter is we don't have practical sustainable nuclear fusion yet, we don't have perpetual energy machines, we don't have "zero point modules" from Stargate. Right now the basic solutions we have a nuclear, wind, and solar power, and in some localized areas of the country, geothermal. We need to use technology we currently have until the utopia of fusion becomes practical, because ther only alternative is to either call it a day and go back to living in tents, or to continue using fossil fuels until fusion is made practical and economical.

      Me? I consider myself a conservationist: I believe in not halting progress, but using resources wisely. I think we should open up the gulf and east coast for drilling, open up Alaska for drilling, and make it a criminal offense (where the execs and board of director seats are liable) for a company to not clean a spill if one happens, and a criminal offense to not make resonable efforts to leave the land in a hospitable state when the company shuts down and dismantles a pump or pipeline. I believe that we should keep oil-powered automobiles well-maintained (as an example: My car gets 27mpg combined with the stock EPROM profile and folks with sedans which get less fuel mileage criticize me for driving a "gas guzzler" until we compare real-world fuel economy. If I switch to the performance profile I get only 16mpg combined but when I drive that car I obviously don't run that profile all time), and I think that new homes should incorporate geothermal heat pumps and/or solar panels to reduce energy requirements. When I can afford to have my dream house built, I plan to have a photovolatic panels installed on the roof, and solar heating, using underground tanks as a heat sink for heat storage. It only makes sense to for each person to exercise personal responsibility - you can continue to enjoy things like cars, electric lights, heating and AC, etc. and NOT be wasteful. I'm no environazi, but then I am not the other end of the extreme; I conserve whenever I can, and exercise personal responsibility, and when proposals for things like wind farms or incinerator/power generators come up, I vote for those projects (unless there is a stink of political corruption involved).

      So, yes, I will continue to make wisecracks about global warming because there are already solutions, but self-proclaimed environmentalist politicians block those solutions at every turn, and expect the problem to be solved through either magick or to be solved by someone else in lands far, far away.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    13. Re:Nice job, editors! by afaik_ianal · · Score: 1

      Oh dear. Let me start again.

      The area of an elipse is A=pi*a*b
      Yep.

      So if the larger storm is twice as wide[...]
      Your doing well...

      [...] and twice as high
      Oh. I think I see the problem...

      Who said it was twice as high? To quote me, "being only about half as high as it is wide". Hmm... Let's try wikipedia: "The Great Red Spot's dimensions are ~24-40,000 km × 12-14,000 km.", and "At the start of 2004, the Great Red Spot was approximately half as large as it was 100 years ago.".

      Now, given that it has shrunk by 50% over the past 100 years, it is reasonable to assump it is currently at the lower end of the wikipedia range.

      So, let's use your formula: A(j) = 3.14 * 12000/2 * 24000/2. That's about 2.26e8km^2. We're good so far? (Just to explain, the "/2"s are because the formula is talking about radius, not diameter.)

      Now, we know that the Earth is nearly circular, and that it's radius is about 6375km (Amazingly, this makes the Great Red Ring about twice as wide as Earch). I'm sure you'll agree that the area of a circle is pi * r^2?

      Ok - so A(e) = 3.14 * 6375^2, which is about 1.27e08 km^2. Suprisingly, that is much closer to twice the area of Earth's cross section than it is four.

      Surely you didn't need me to work that out for you? Sorry if I sound a bit short - I'm just sick of seeing the same bad maths so many times in the wrong thread.

    14. Re:Nice job, editors! by Mahou · · Score: 1

      not to mention they called it Red, JR too. that's some nice family relations it's got going on there..

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    15. Re:Nice job, editors! by afaik_ianal · · Score: 1

      Gah - I can do basic maths, but I can't spell at this time of night. You'll work it out ;).

    16. Re:Nice job, editors! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Draw a circle. Now draw a square, that circumscribes the circle. Now draw another square, the same size.

      If you put the two squares together, you have a geometric figure that can circumscribe two circles, that is not four times the area of the circle. Yes, the storms on Jupiter are oblong, not rectangles, but I bet if you think about it really hard you'll get it.

      Thus endeth the lesson.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    17. Re:Nice job, editors! by TallDave · · Score: 1
    18. Re:Nice job, editors! by JohnPM · · Score: 1

      You could be making the same mistake they have made in assuming that there is no reduction in the height dimension. If the smaller storm is also half the height (not an unreasonable assumption in the extremely deep atmosphere of Jupiter) then it's actually one eighth the size.

      --
      Karma police, I've given all I can, it's not enough, I've given all I can, but we're still on the payroll.
    19. Re:Nice job, editors! by Mahou · · Score: 1

      wtf parent gets +5 funny and i get offtopic? fuck you in your fucking face you motherfucking fuckers

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    20. Re:Nice job, editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      afaik_ianal = as far as i know - i am anal

    21. Re:Nice job, editors! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your IQ goes down everytime I read your comments.

    22. Re:Nice job, editors! by Mahou · · Score: 1

      i know, i'm pretty sure it's been proven and the research published in peer reviewed journals that the more anyone posts on slashdot the lower the person's IQ becomes.

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
  2. Collide? by thePig · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article "There won't be a head-on collision. and the storms' outer bands will pass quite close to one another.
    I guess the summary was a little bit of a hyperbole. Esp. for an event that happens every two years.

    --
    rajmohan_h@yahoo.com
    1. Re:Collide? by jbrader · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're right, but they're expected to come closer this time then they have in the past.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    2. Re:Collide? by DavidHOzAu · · Score: 1
      they're expected to come closer this time then they have in the past.
      Which means that we'll get something like this:

      A shear line is an area in a low pressure trough, usually in the tropics, within which wind direction changes significantly over a relatively short distance. The area is marked by an increase in cumuluform clouds, often including towering cumulus, and rainshowers. It may become more active with thunderstorms, and the turbulence and circular motion of winds may assist in the formation of a tropical storm. A shear line is depicted as a line of red dots and dashes.
    3. Re:Collide? by helioquake · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, they aren't closer. It's the same as the last two encounter.

      What signifies about this particular encounter is that the small oval is thought to be intensified its strength recently (when its color changed from grey to red) and that just *might* cause a bit more interesting interaction between these two storms (when they pass by closely). It's a pure speculation based none other than intuition of scientists. Not based on a hydrodynamic simulation; just a wild ass guess on their part.

      Of course, they wouldn't say that. That'd make this whole thing, well, boring.

    4. Re:Collide? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      What signifies about this particular encounter is that the small oval is thought to be intensified its strength recently (when its color changed from grey to red)...

      Biggest damned mood ring I've ever seen.

    5. Re:Collide? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not based on a hydrodynamic simulation; just a wild ass guess on their part.

      Fluid dynamics, particularly on such a massive scale as storms on a planet like Jupiter, is still largely a matter of wild ass "guess"timates. With good reason.

      The basic equations of fluid mechanics, the Navier-Stokes equations, are a second order, non-linear system of partial differential equations. Atmospheric gases are also compressible flows. Couple this with aerosols, rotation of the planet, and mondo awkward boundary conditions due to the surface curvature; it's lack of a crust; and the lack of a defined "end" of the atmosphere, finally sprinkling a generous dose of chaos theory in to account for sensitivity to initial conditions.... and you've got a problem that is to all intents and purposes, completely unsolvable.

      And that's "just" the fluid dynamics problem. And the continuum hypothesis isn't the only way to solve it. You could use Lagrangian mechanics if one were so inclined.

      And these are just theoretical issues. We haven't even spoken about the practical difficulties. First and foremost, throw hope for an analytic solution out the window, because it's not going to happen. You've got to go with a numerical solution. Which brings up the next question of which numerical techniques to you use, and how accurately do you use them. You've got to factor in time, cost and cpu ability. You'll have to parrallelise the whole deal, and make sure it's accurate enough to remain stable for long enough to predict but you want but quick enough so that you'll get your answer before the actual event happens.

      And last, but by no means least, once you've got that data, how do you analyse it? How do you even present it? Remember, we're talking about 3d vortices here, embedded in a globe. How do you make sense of it all. What points are of interest? What events are key? What can you learn from all this? What size font should the image titles have? How will you make a paper out of all this!?

      Faced with such an operation, you're often better off performing a simulation when faced with a fluid mechanics problem, or in the case where simulation is impossible such as with Jupiter, just make a wild assed guess, sit back and enjoy the show.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    6. Re:Collide? by Orp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Congratuations. You've just described what I go through trying to simulate tornado-producing thunderstorms. Even the "how do I present the results" part. Something I deal with on a day to day basis. As far as presentation goes, I like raytracers to present scalar data and feature-detection software to find vortices. Throw in stereo viewing, animate the sucker and at the very least you've got some cool pictures and movies.

      --
      A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous, got me?
    7. Re:Collide? by VoidEngineer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree with you on most all accounts. What I would mention, however, is that meteorologists already do -pretty much exactly what you're describing. Weather simulations for earth effectively have to deal with everything you've just described; from chemical reactions in the atmosphere, to rotation fo the planet, to the awkward boundary conditions due to surface curvature, chaos theory, and the like. And you know what? Meteorologists will readily admit that the problem is mostly unsolvable. And furthermore, they have exactly the same numerical analysis solutions that you've described; and they have to resort to using supercomputers specifically designed to model weather simulations. If one looks at the most commonly investigated computer problems, historically, you pretty much wind up with weather, nuclear bombs, and chess.

      That being said, we enjoy a good 5 days of prediction of weather patterns nowdays. I remember when I was a kid, and the computers weren't nearly as powerful, and we only had 2 or 3 days of prediction. Now we have fairly good predictions for up to 5 to 7 days.

      Sure, initial parameters are different for Earth and Jupiter, although the problem isn't as intractable as you make it out to be. Societally, we have alot of collective experience modeling the types of problems you've described, and it would really only be a matter of modifying the initial parameters of our weather simulations to match those of Jupiter.

      Something which I, for one, expect somebody at NASA to have done already.

    8. Re:Collide? by neersign · · Score: 1

      Good thing everyone has their MATLAB scripts saved from sophmore year Fluid Mechanics/Dynamics for times like this, right?

    9. Re:Collide? by DrLungoon · · Score: 1

      "Fluid dynamics, particularly on such a massive scale as storms on a planet like Jupiter, is still largely a matter of wild ass "guess"timates."

      Yes, but they're educated wild-ass-guesstimates!

      --
      Some people are like Slinkies - Not good for anything, but you can't help smiling when you push 'em down the stairs.
    10. Re:Collide? by CodeMonkey4Hire · · Score: 1

      The interesting thing about these storms is that they are high-pressure storms, as opposed to hurricanes/cyclones on Earth, which are low-pressure storms. So would the shear line still be low pressure (Bernoulli's Principle?) or would it be high pressure?

      --

      Let's go Hurricanes!!! 2006 Stanley Cup Champions!!!
    11. Re:Collide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just a wild ass guess on their part.


      Now, to quote my Electrical Engineering Science professor: "Now, the first thing we need to do in this case is make a WAG, a Wild-Ass Guess or 'Engineering Approximation'..."

      There you have it. The NASA scientists are just doin' it by the book.

    12. Re:Collide? by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Informative
      Societally, we have alot of collective experience modeling the types of problems you've described, and it would really only be a matter of modifying the initial parameters of our weather simulations to match those of Jupiter.


      Codswallop.

      Hurricane forecasts on earth diverge the further out you get. None of them called the right turn Katrina pulled in the Gulf of Mexico before she first hit Florida. On 8/25/05, this was the forecast:

      This forecast is rather difficult since one of the more reliable models...the GFS...shows that the cyclone barely touches the East Coast of Florida before moving northward....while the outstanding GFDL moves Katrina south of due west across extreme South Florida and the Keys as a very intense hurricane. The GFDL scenario would be very dangerous for South Florida. This appears to be unrealistic at this time but because of the good past performance of this model...we must pay close attention to future model runs.

      Notice New Orleans isn't even mentioned?
      Those models had thousands of data point samples to work with including multiple flights into the heart of the hurricane and they still couldn't agree, let alone accurately forecast what happened to New Orleans. Those 'initial parameters' you so blithely dismiss have to be very accurate to make 24 hour forecasts, let alone forecast what's going to happen a month from now on a planet for which we have exactly zero weather buoys.

    13. Re:Collide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's lack of a crust

      "its".

      --
      Obcesive Speling Freek

    14. Re:Collide? by jeblucas · · Score: 1
      The basic equations of fluid mechanics, the Navier-Stokes equations, are a second order, non-linear system of partial differential equations.
      You can get a MEEEEELLion dollars if you make some headway on the Navier-Stokes Equations. They are a superbitch. I love that these equations were described 200 years ago and we know they describe fluids better than any other representation we have dreamt up, but they are totally unworkable. It's like magic.
      --
      blarg.
    15. Re:Collide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, just like the Schroedinger equation.

      Some day I hope to come up with an unsolvable equation that will hold all the answers.

    16. Re:Collide? by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      Is the fact that this storm has "intensified recently" an indication that there is "global warming" happening on Jupiter? Or at least "Climate Change"?

      Now that might be an Inconvenient Truth.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  3. Blows as hard as the older cousin... by eric_ste · · Score: 5, Funny

    And she could swallow earth.

    At 350Mph, that's what I call a massive blow job...

    1. Re:Blows as hard as the older cousin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      say hi to john for me.

    2. Re:Blows as hard as the older cousin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blows as hard as the older cousin...

      hmmm...must be in the southern hemisphere.

    3. Re:Blows as hard as the older cousin... by Major+Mayhem · · Score: 1

      I wonder how Earth feels about that.

      --
      Life freezes when the servers crash.
    4. Re:Blows as hard as the older cousin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOTHER Earth feels you should focus on your homework instead of reading suggestive comments on /.

  4. The Environmentalists Are Right. by bombadier_beetle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly, this is evidence of Jovial warming.

    --

    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    1. Re:The Environmentalists Are Right. by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jovial warming

      What, is that supposed to fill us with conviviality and good cheer? ;)

    2. Re:The Environmentalists Are Right. by aonifer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Jovial warming + Big Red Spot = Santa Claus!

  5. Re:Typo by slashflood · · Score: 1, Troll
  6. Oh, great. by HisMother · · Score: 5, Funny
    the two biggest storms in the solar system are about to collide on Jupiter.

    Crap. There go my weekend plans.

    --
    Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    1. Re:Oh, great. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Crap. There go my weekend plans.

      And I thought I was a sucker for buying Florida swamp land.

    2. Re:Oh, great. by JeremyALogan · · Score: 1

      Well, you're going to miss one jovial party.

      (insert rim-shot here)

  7. looting martians by legomad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Martian looters will be shot on sight.

    1. Re:looting martians by autophile · · Score: 1
      Jovebeast #1: ...and so our heartbleebs go out to everyone affected in the area of storm convergence.

      Jovebeast #2: Jove Bush doesn't care about Martian people!

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    2. Re:looting martians by cashman73 · · Score: 1
      And of course, don't forget, the new Jupiter will be a, "Chocolate Jupiter." ;-)

  8. In a related story... by jlowery · · Score: 0

    Astronomers are keeping a vigil on the Great Pee Stain, which they expect will soon merge with the Giant Skid Mark hovering over Uranus any day now.

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
  9. ahh by ezwip · · Score: 5, Funny

    Red Jr. is half-sized, able to swallow Earth merely once, but it blows just as hard as its older cousin. Ahh yes, I dated them in highschool.

    --
    "I guess I'm gonna fade into Bolivian."
    1. Re:ahh by cpsc2005 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ahh yes, I dated them in highschool.

      Ahh, so you admit to being a pedophile (Red Spot Jr., 6 years) and a fetishist (Red Spot, >300 years.)

    2. Re:ahh by aussie_a · · Score: 1


      Ahh, so you admit to being a pedophile (Red Spot Jr., 6 years)


      I like the way your mind works.

  10. I would love to see it happen by w33t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I LOVE astronomy. I think it is simply the most profound thing that we have been able to take the eye and stretch it to points beyond imagination. To look out into the cosmos is so humbling and awe-inspiring. Truly if one science has shown us simple magnificent beauty it is astronomy.

    Now having said that I will say that only one thing makes astronomy better - seeing these object in motion! Galaxies and nebula seem so unreal in hubble's photos - it's hard to fully comprehend what exactly they are - what they are really like. But when you view those precious few object we have been able to capture in motion, to me it is exquisite! Somehow, to me, it makes them that much more real, more tangible. And that is truly the dream of the soul - to somehow touch, taste, smell that which is so beautiful :)

    I hope these astronomers string together this phenomenal convergence into a movie!

    Jupiter's storms in motion
    Solar flares

    Do you have any other cool astronomical movie links?
    --
    Music should be free

    1. Re:I would love to see it happen by snottgoblin · · Score: 1

      "And that is truly the dream of the soul - to somehow touch, taste, smell that which is so beautiful :)"

      You do know there are depraved geeks around here dont ya?!

    2. Re:I would love to see it happen by w33t · · Score: 1
    3. Re:I would love to see it happen by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I LOVE astronomy. I think it is simply the most profound thing that we have been able to take the eye and stretch it to points beyond imagination...

      If I was a god I think I would want to piss you off for being too poetic. I would have both spots rotate behind Jupiter as usual, and then *nothing* come about the other side when they should rotate back into view. Zilch spots and zilch hints about where they went. It would be so much fun to F with people's brains. I wouldn't physically hurt my subjects, just puzzle the sh*t out of them for the shear fun hell of it. (I suppose the real gods knew this and that is why I am just a mortal. Curses, foiled again.)

      -T-

    4. Re:I would love to see it happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those links are great, thanks for sharing them!

    5. Re:I would love to see it happen by w33t · · Score: 1

      Your ideas intrigue me, and I would like to subscribe to your cult's newsletter.
      --
      Music should be free

    6. Re:I would love to see it happen by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I have to wait until they write scriptures about me :-P

    7. Re:I would love to see it happen by Skater · · Score: 1

      I loved astronomy as well, until I took an astronomy class in college. It was held in the planetarium, a good place to hold such a class, and I used to spend hours just reading the textbook, even chapters that weren't on the syllabus.

      But, the professor sucked ALL of the life out of that class with mindless, idiotic practices like demanding that we keep a notebook that he then graded, and I haven't had as much interest since. Reducing a student's interest in a subject has to be a teacher's ultimate sin, and I hope he's suffering in hell for it (assuming he has since died - I haven't checked).

      (By the way, if I wanted to see your sig, I'd have sigs turned on.)

    8. Re:I would love to see it happen by 80+85+83+83+89+33 · · Score: 1

      dude, how much w33t do you smoke per day? is there a Great Green Spot in the atmosphere over your area?

      --
      i disable sigs
    9. Re:I would love to see it happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I LOVE astronomy. I think it is simply the most profound thing that we have been able to take the eye and stretch it to points beyond imagination.

      No way, dude. Ninjas beat astronomy hands-down.

    10. Re:I would love to see it happen by NexusJedi · · Score: 1

      It would be so much fun to F with people's brains. I wouldn't physically hurt my subjects, just puzzle the sh*t out of them for the shear fun hell of it.

      I believe you've figured out what the hell's up with Quantum Mechanics.

  11. What I want to know... by wtansill · · Score: 4, Funny

    is what FEMA intends to do about this?

    --
    The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
    1. Re:What I want to know... by legomad · · Score: 0

      Nothing.

    2. Re:What I want to know... by wik · · Score: 1

      Reddie, you've done a heck of a job.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    3. Re:What I want to know... by clem.dickey · · Score: 1
      what FEMA intends to do about this?

      I hope FEMA re-hires Michael "Heck of a job Brownie" Brown to head up the onsite command center.

    4. Re:What I want to know... by Fex303 · · Score: 2, Funny
      What I want to know is what FEMA intends to do about this?
      Nothing for the next couple of years. Once they collide, everyone will insist that no-one could have predicted it.

      I'm sure there's a joke about horse shows here somewhere, too...

    5. Re:What I want to know... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Same thing they did during Katrina: Have long dinners and play guitar. Jupiter and Nero, how Roman.

    6. Re:What I want to know... by Skidge · · Score: 1

      is what FEMA intends to do about this?

      Not a whole heck of a lot. Standard Operating Procedure.

    7. Re:What I want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      george bush doesn't care about jovians

    8. Re:What I want to know... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Jupiter and Nero, how Roman.

      What do Romania and a CD burning software have to do with Jupiter?

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    9. Re:What I want to know... by cffrost · · Score: 1

      In FEMA's eyes, Jupiter is just as important as New Orleans.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    10. Re:What I want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FEMA will do NOTHING! You know why? Because George Bush doesn't care about Venusians!

  12. Re:Do the editors think we are that dumb? by helioquake · · Score: 1

    Is /. news for nerds or is it news for middle school dropouts?

    What are you complaining about /. editors for? The quote came from TFA. And from my experience in submitting, the editors rarely edit a submitted post (though there were times I hoped they would...).

    The original quote was written by a NASA PR rep. And he/she was writing it to the general audience in the U.S, not for slashdotters.

  13. Re:Do the editors think we are that dumb? by Roguelazer · · Score: 1

    Actually, their math is wrong. If the great red spot is twice as wide as earth is, then its radius is 12,756.3 km and the earth's is 6378.15. That means that the great red spot is an area of approximately 510950815.6266 square kilometers and the earth's cross section has an area of approximately 127737703.90665 square kilometers. As you can plainly see, the area of the great red spot is 4 times that of the earth. If Red Jr. is half the size of the Great Red Spot, then it must have half the area, namely, 255475407.8133 square kilometers. Thus, Red Jr. must have twice the area of the Earth and half that of the Great Red Spot. Da. Somehow, I think they meant that Red Jr. has half the diameter of the Great Red Spot. But whatever. :P

  14. If the two merge, will they call it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... The Perfect Storm?

    I just hope someone tells Clooney and Wahlberg before it's too late this time! :-)
    OH NOES!!!!11!!one!1

    j/k
    Wait

    No really. j/k

  15. Wise Man Say by isecore · · Score: 5, Funny

    When it blows on Jupiter, better cover Uranus.

    --
    I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
    1. Re:Wise Man Say by Terminus32 · · Score: 0

      Haha, lmao! I'd love to go skydiving from a shuttle into Jupiter's red spot! :-P

      --
      http://nathanlindsell.blogspot.com/
    2. Re:Wise Man Say by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      There's a nice new strap-on delta wing you may be interested in.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  16. I think we'll be sure to hear... by darkrowan · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... that our local news source will be running around the clock coverage of 'Jupiter Storewatch 2006'

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:I think we'll be sure to hear... by donutello · · Score: 1

      ... that our local news source will be running around the clock coverage of 'Jupiter Storewatch 2006'

      Anticipating looters already, are we?

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  17. Re:Typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bravo, and well played. :)

  18. "Wrath of Kahn" quotes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On a Tuesday?

    For shame!

  19. Re:In Soviet Jupiter... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    A Jupiter native who has to commute between "Big Joe" and "Little Joe" to get to work everyday. Now that sucks...

  20. Extraterrestrial weather reports? by howlingfrog · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't care about weather reports for cities 500 miles away, so why should I care about weather reports for a planet 500 million miles away???

    --
    The original Howling Frog is a fictional character and has no UID.
    1. Re:Extraterrestrial weather reports? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      It is more evidence of the effect of humans on climate change and global warming... ;)

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  21. Temporal issues... by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    Title: Huge Storms Converge on Jupiter

    Body: NASA is reporting that the two biggest storms in the solar system are about to collide on Jupiter.
    (emphasis added)

    Let's not jump the gun here... try to make subject/title lines more accurate please!

    1. Re:Temporal issues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Title: Huge Storms Converge on Jupiter

      Body: NASA is reporting that the two biggest storms in the solar system are about to collide on Jupiter.
      (emphasis added)

      Let's not jump the gun here... try to make subject/title lines more accurate please!


      You know, it's difficult to always put the titles in full context. But if you insist:

      Huge Storms Converge on Jupiter... next week.

      (Or next month, next year, or whenever the hell they're gonna happen.)

  22. Re:Do the editors think we are that dumb? by afaik_ianal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the great red spot is twice as wide as earth is, then its radius is 12,756.3 km and the earth's is 6378.15. That means that the great red spot is an area of approximately 510950815.6266 square kilometers and the earth's cross section has an area of approximately 127737703.90665 square kilometers.

    But now you can throw your maths right out the window, because you're using the wrong formula. From Wikipedia, "The Great Red Spot's dimensions are ~24-40,000 km × 12-14,000 km". It's not circular, sorry.

    At it's smallest size (which I understand it is close to at the moment - It has halved in size over the past 100 years), it is almost exactly 2 Earths wide, and is also 2 times the Earth's cross-section in area.

  23. Umm... by Davus · · Score: 5, Funny

    a youngster of a storm only six years old. Compared to the Great Red Spot, Red Jr. is half-sized, able to swallow Earth merely once, but it blows just as hard as its older cousin."
    I'm not sure what intergalactic law is, but over here, we call that "statutory rape".

    --
    The above is most likely humour. Slashdot foot icon goes here.
    1. Re:Umm... by alienmole · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, you're on Slashdot. If you were some bimbo news anchor on MSNBC you could get away with saying intergalactic. But this isn't even interstellar! It's in our own solar system, for crying out loud. The word you want is "interplanetary". Hey, and don't thank me - I kill jokes for free.

    2. Re:Umm... by Davus · · Score: 1

      But this isn't even interstellar!
      We're not talking about the Mars in the general vicinity of Beatlegeuse?

      --
      The above is most likely humour. Slashdot foot icon goes here.
    3. Re:Umm... by ChiPHeaD23 · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes, Beatlegeuse, a real pop star.

    4. Re:Umm... by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1
      ...you could get away with saying intergalactic. But this isn't even interstellar! It's in our own solar system, for crying out loud. The word you want is "interplanetary".

      You give me any of that juris-my-diction crap, and you can ram it up your ass.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    5. Re:Umm... by l0tu53at3r · · Score: 0

      ugh, its "cram", not "ram"...ugh!

      --
      ---Excuse the bad English, I'm American---
    6. Re:Umm... by l0tu53at3r · · Score: 0

      i found another mistake too, sheesh

      its "juris-my-DICK-tion", to be precise.

      --
      ---Excuse the bad English, I'm American---
    7. Re:Umm... by roystgnr · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're on Slashdot. If you were some bimbo news anchor on MSNBC you could get away with saying intergalactic. But this isn't even interstellar! It's in our own solar system, for crying out loud. The word you want is "interplanetary".

      I blame the Beastie Boys. Who knows how many young minds were ruined by that "intergalactic planetary, planetary intergalactic" lyric?

      At this point we should just hope that nobody thinks Jupiter is in "another dimension".

    8. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who knows how many young minds were ruined by that "intergalactic planetary, planetary intergalactic" lyric?
      I know mine was!

    9. Re:Umm... by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      It's in our own solar system, for crying out loud. The word you want is "interplanetary".

      Well now, that does depend on how jurisdiction is handled in the universe at large. Galactic Troopers can pull you over for exceeding warp 10 pretty much anywhere, but they refuse to hand out parking tickets in planetary systems, leaving that up to local enforcement. But, as the offence is taking place entirely on Jupiter (it's not Jupiter trying to engulf one of its own moons in some incestuous cataclysm), it wouldn't be a matter of interplanetary law either, it's more a matter for the local Jupiterian government to rule on. With the exception of Earth, the rest of our planets (except Pluto, but I'm not allowed to talk about that) exist in a state of anarchy, so that poor six-year old is all on their own unless we vamp up our space program immediately and mount a rescue operation. Won't somebody please think of the children??

    10. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which bimbo? Measurements?

    11. Re:Umm... by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Whoa...

  24. mmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mmm... Hyperbole...

  25. Discrimination, I tell you by patio11 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why does Slashdot always accuse Martians of looting but when Earthlings do it its merely "copyright infringement"? Discrimination, that's why. Why the prejudice against the Martians? If you prick them, do they not ooze?

    1. Re:Discrimination, I tell you by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it's entirely justified. You see, when the Interplanetary Crime Organization was formed the duties for planet-wide disaster related crimes were divided on a per-planet basis: Martians conned us into giving them a monopoly on looting, people from Mercury and Venus pillage and those from the outer planets commit insurance fraud. Earth was a bit late to the game and now we're stuck with gratutious copyright infringement.

      In case you're wondering which planet-wide desaster allows us to infringe Earth copyrights at the moment just take a look at the software, movie and music markets.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  26. Pretty Sweet "Amateur" Telescope ..? by popo · · Score: 2, Interesting


    What kind of strength/magnification do you need to see Jupiter in that resolution?

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    1. Re:Pretty Sweet "Amateur" Telescope ..? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Informative

      What kind of strength/magnification do you need to see Jupiter in that resolution?

      You are not going to get Hubble or Voyager level views. Many amatures now digitally enhence their images such that you see more in the photo than what the eye would see in the scope. One fairly recent technique is to take hundreds of digital images and then digitally average and realign the detail. The Earth's atmosphere wiggles and sometimes acts kind of like a magnifying lens. If you can capture these magnification spots when they occure and add them up, you get a nice photo.

      Anyhow, I would guess that you need at least an 8-inch reflector or 5-inch refractor to see the two spots with recognizable detail. It also depends on sky conditions and viewer training. It takes a while to train the eye to see detail on planets thru a scope.

    2. Re:Pretty Sweet "Amateur" Telescope ..? by alienmole · · Score: 2, Informative

      The answer is in the article - the photo was taken with an 11-inch telescope. If you're flush with cash, just go get one of these (Meade 12"), although you'll need to use it well outside of any big urban area, light pollution around cities kills viewing conditions. (You can get a similar scope for less money if you take more of a DIY approach, but then you have to learn much more about it. Scopes like Meade and Celestron are for people who just want to spend the money and get the results.)

    3. Re:Pretty Sweet "Amateur" Telescope ..? by helioquake · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a simple rule of thumb about magnification. It goes like this:

      If your telescope is 10inch (~ 250mm), then your maximum magnification achievable with your telescope is up to 250 times. You can increase the magnification as much as you like (by the choice of an eyepiece), but it doesn't mean a damned thing when you go beyond 250x for the 10in telescope (it's like examining a photo on a magazine with 10000x magnifying glass; i.e., it's meaningless). For a 6inch telescope (~ 150mm), the max is 150x or so.

      A 3in telescope is enough to see the Great Red Spot. For the small oval, it'd take a bigger telescope, I'd guess.

    4. Re:Pretty Sweet "Amateur" Telescope ..? by dasimms · · Score: 1

      I can tease out details on Jupiter in city-light polluted skies. The Great Red Spot (and sometimes Red Jr. is visible as well as many of the latitudinal dark and light bands. I can see this using an eight inch reflector (1200mm focal length) with a 9mm eyepiece (133 magnification).

    5. Re:Pretty Sweet "Amateur" Telescope ..? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Bah, for planetary observations, light pollution has little effect (especially for something as large and bright as Jupiter). OTOH, if you're going large aperture because you want to view low magnitude deep sky objects, then you're absolutely right, a dark sky is necessary to truly enjoy the instrument (though, a nebula filter can work wonders in an urban environment).

    6. Re:Pretty Sweet "Amateur" Telescope ..? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Whoops, make that *high* magnitude.

    7. Re:Pretty Sweet "Amateur" Telescope ..? by alienmole · · Score: 1

      True. My comment was much more because it was clear from his terminology that the OP wasn't familiar with telescopes, and since I was pointing to a $3000 instrument I wanted to make it clear that you wouldn't get full value from such an instrument if you live in, say, the New York metro area.

    8. Re:Pretty Sweet "Amateur" Telescope ..? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Actually, summing shots is to decrease the noise in digital photos. Perturbations caused by the atmosphere blur your image, they don't enhance it.

      Summing to decrease noise is a technique that may be used in pretty much all digital signal acquisition. We do it in MRI sometimes too.

    9. Re:Pretty Sweet "Amateur" Telescope ..? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Actually, summing shots is to decrease the noise in digital photos. Perturbations caused by the atmosphere blur your image, they don't enhance it.

      Perhaps that is debatable. Sometimes the atmosphere wobbling will coincidentally compensate for a shape flaw in your scope lens, for example. If you have image processing techniques that keep the few times it happens, then the set can be used to make something better than without an atmosphere. And there are many techniques for digital processing.

    10. Re:Pretty Sweet "Amateur" Telescope ..? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I suppose. I think you'd find it extremely difficult to do in practice. You'd have to know what was good and what wasn't.

      That isn't done currently.

    11. Re:Pretty Sweet "Amateur" Telescope ..? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I thought existing software will sharpen the multiple images and align them (because the atmosphere wobbles) using morphing-like technology to match features. The sharper images will result in more detail that can be enhenced upward. I wont dismiss the possibility that I misunderstood the description of such software.

    12. Re:Pretty Sweet "Amateur" Telescope ..? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      It sounds like what you're thinking of is deconvolution. It doesn't depend on multiple images, though it is very sensitive to noise.

      Deconvolution works by modeling the effect of things like a not quite perfect lens and trying to correct for them. That's what they did with Hubble before they added an actual lens to correct the problem.

      When people used to use film photography with telescopes the longer your exposure the dimmer objects you could see. CCDs changed all that. Electronic image sensors are VERY sensitive to light so long exposures are less important. Unfortunately, CCDs produce noisy images (and the longer your exposure the worse it gets). The solution is to use shorter exposures, but lots of them. When you average the multiple exposures together you get a sqrt(N) decrease in the amount of noise, where N is the number of images you stack.

  27. Premature by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The New Horizons probe will visit Jupiter early next year. If the merging waits another half year then NH could give us a nice look.

    New Horizons is heading toward Pluto, but will use Jupiter to kind of "slingshot" it faster toward Pluto. NASA doesn't want to pay for bigger rockets, so they cheat by stealing a small slice of Jupiter's orbital momentum. Let's hope Big Jup doesn't find out, because he is really really big and strong.

    1. Re:Premature by alienmole · · Score: 1
      Let's hope Big Jup doesn't find out, because he is really really big and strong.
      I have used an OOP simulation to determine that Big Jup won't be able to hurt our probe. You probably didn't notice that because you tried to do it with SQL. :-P
  28. WOW! by joeytmann · · Score: 1

    I can't remember the last /. article to recieve this many blow job jokes.

    --
    Insert funny smart-ass comment here.
    1. Re:WOW! by Makarakalax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I'm not alone in finding it sad that slashdot rarely has anything other than unfunny jokes attached to science articles?

    2. Re:WOW! by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Nope, you have more company.

      In fact, while on the topic of remniscising about the "old" Slashdot, let me also lament the total and complete disappearance of links to cool hacks/pet-projects done by regular folk in their spare time. Now all the Toys stories we seem to get are about, well, toys that you can buy, as opposed to those people have built (or could build). With the result that Slashdot discussions in general seem to have atrophied from being informed, to something of a worldwide whinefest on technology.

      I suppose I should end this with a "FACT: Slashdot is dying" message or something.

  29. Global Warming by ShakaUVM · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    We've never seen as large a storm as this ever before. Clearly the only possible explanation is human involvement!

    (Yes, global warming may be real, but the utterly non-scientific way it is presented in the media just sets my teeth on edge. Sportatic outliers will always happen. You can't EVER point at a single heat wave or hurricane and say that it is evidence of global warming. You have to look at trending, and the big picture. And yet on NPR in April they had three different scientists saying that Katrina was definitely caused by global warming.)

    1. Re:Global Warming by MosesJones · · Score: 2, Funny

      but the utterly non-scientific way it is presented in the media

      You don't have to watch Fox.

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    2. Re:Global Warming by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny
      Clearly the only possible explanation is human involvement!

      There was that RTG on Galileo...

    3. Re:Global Warming by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      The parent mentioned NPR. Fox has no monopoly on non-scientific media.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:Global Warming by christian.elliott · · Score: 1

      Or it could that little piece of statistical information you left out that states that Jupiter is over 300 times the size of Earth, and it's a gas giant. Don't compare apples to oranges.

    5. Re:Global Warming by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Or the fact that humans have never been there...

      The point is statistical anomolies happen all the time, with or without human involvement.

  30. Re:Global Warming/Cooling Same thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Gotcha covered!

    It doesn't matter. Global warming, global cooling - both at the same time! (e.g. google "global cooling")

    As long as man is bad, all is good.

  31. bah that's nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chuck Norris would beat those both with ONE roundhouse kick.

    1. Re:bah that's nothing! by alienmole · · Score: 1

      And then Jack Bauer would torture Chuck Norris until he confessed to whatever it is Jack wants him to confess to.

    2. Re:bah that's nothing! by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 1

      Chuck could take it

      --
      Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
    3. Re:bah that's nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chuck would like it.

    4. Re:bah that's nothing! by bronney · · Score: 1

      Whatever Jack is doing to Chuck this moment, he better not answer his damn phone because the moment he does, Chuck Norris will roundhouse kick Jack even when ziptied and send him back to CTU.

  32. Re:Do the editors think we are that dumb? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    They don't edit submitted posts?

    Really?

    Thanks for letting me know, see I am kind of new here and it could have taken me a long time to figure that out!

  33. Re:wow, just wow... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I think this post wins the "Please Get This Guy a Girlfriend Fast" award. (No, that is NOT "fast girlfriend".)

  34. Re:In Soviet Jupiter... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    A Jupiter native who has to commute between "Big Joe" and "Little Joe" to get to work everyday. Now that sucks...

    I know how you feel. From space, LA traffic makes a "Great Brown Spot".

  35. Global Warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I personally blame global warming for these super storms. People need to cut back on their motor vehicle use or other planets may suffer the same fate.

  36. couldnt help myself... by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I, for one, welcome our new red 350mph overlords...

  37. Ohh baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Red Jr. is half-sized, able to swallow Earth merely once, but it blows just as hard as its older cousin.

    Who's a lucky Earth then, hey!? Earth getting blown by Jupiter *and* it swallows!

  38. Re:Typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the journal entry of ShaneThePain:
    Once you open your mind to new ideas and possibilities, you will be a much happier person. Discovering fascism was the greatest thing that ever happened to me, I have never been more content with who I am.

    Talk about your cult mentality! Tom Cruise just called. He wants his inflated sense of selfworth back.

  39. converge vs. collide by anno1602 · · Score: 2

    converge, converged, converging, converges

    1. To tend toward or approach an intersecting point: lines that converge.
    2. To come together from different directions; meet: The avenues converge at a central square.
    3. To tend toward or achieve union or a common conclusion or result: In time, our views and our efforts converged.
    4. Mathematics. To approach a limit.

    So, according to that definition, if these two storms are about to collide, they have to be converging now. So the converging is in the present, the colliding in the fututre. Given what the words mean, there are no temporal issues.

  40. Re:Typo by edgr · · Score: 0, Troll

    pwned

  41. Storms not collideing by jonfr · · Score: 1

    The storms are not collideing, but they are passing close to each other. During that, it is propable that the smallar storm system is going to loose it red color, in worst case serano the larger storm is going to trow the smaller storm out of his current path. But it is hard to tell for sure what exacly happens, this is a wait and see thing.

    1. Re:Storms not collideing by godless+dave · · Score: 1

      You mean the title on this science article is misleading and sensationalistic? Imagine that!

      --
      "If it's real, then it gets more interesting the closer you examine it. If it's not real, just the opposite is true." -
  42. Re:^ THE ONLY TRUE COMMENT IN THIS THREAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow lol

  43. Fund raise by wolf369T · · Score: 0

    After the storm calms down, prepare for the biggest fund raise in the whole Solar System!

  44. Blowing, swallowing and cousins... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    My mind wandered off to an incest sex orgy for a moment there. :-o

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  45. KABOOM! by geoff+lane · · Score: 1

    Will there be an earth shattering kaboom?

    1. Re:KABOOM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh dear. That Earth creature has stolen the Uranium Q36 Explosive Space Modulator.

    2. Re:KABOOM! by mkw87 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, its supposed to be a big bang too I hear.

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
  46. Has Jupiter been ignited? by master_p · · Score: 1

    Of course not, but that's a popular conspiracy around the internet (2nd etc). Odyssey 2001 featured a 2nd sun made out of Jupiter, presumably by aliens that wanted to populate Europa.

    1. Re:Has Jupiter been ignited? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      2010. 2001 just had a homicidal computer and a lonely astronaut disappearing into a moon. The real fireworks didn't happen until nine years later.

  47. FEMA Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    FEMA has 1,300 disaster assistance workers pre-positioned, and re-instated FEMA Director Michael Brown has assured the president they are ready for the storm.

    "FEMA is not going to hesitate at all in this storm," Brown said. "We are not going to sit back and make this a bureaucratic process. We are going to move fast, we are going to move quickly and we are going to do whatever it takes to help victims."

    -w.a.

  48. this isn't the entire spectrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to look at the broader picture, where is jupiter itself aligned, where are its moons io, europa, etc. positioned. Also where are the rest of the planets? What about the eye on another planet, and is there any confusion going around where some planet may be at currently? Dew note the space shuttle is about to launch, hint hint. Uhm rather the space shuttle is going to the space station to deliver goods and services. Joy.

    Personally I say look at all the wonderful things in life on earth, like grass and sunflowers.

    Have a great weekend ya'll!

  49. FEMA will do nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you know? George Bush doesn't like gas people. . .

    (argh)
  50. While we're being pedantic... by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Storms are three-dimensional. If the depth varies as the size, then the large spot would actually be as much as eight times larger.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  51. An Inconvenient Truth About Jupiteral Warming by netsavior · · Score: 1

    If they don't stop driving their cars and Airconditioning their houses, soon the storms that they created with their wrecklessness will consume the entire population of Jupiterians. - Don't blame me I voted for Kodos

  52. Obligatory Futurama by lbmouse · · Score: 3, Funny

    Professor: "I'm sorry, Fry, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all."
    Fry: "Oh. What's it called now?"
    Professor: "Urectum. Here, let me locate it for you."

  53. The difference between like and love by justthisdude · · Score: 1

    She could, but perhaps she would spit the earth out.

    --
    "I love his boyish charm, but I hate his childishness" - Leela
    1. Re:The difference between like and love by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you know what they say, the skinny ones spit but the big fat ones swallow

  54. This just in by sharkey · · Score: 1

    When asked for an opinion on the upcoming collsion, the Great Red Spot had no comment. Oval BA had this to say: "I pity da foo' dat mess wit me! I'm hella bad, and sucka gonna get tossed!"

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  55. Maybe... by raehl · · Score: 1

    Depends if the storms have the same depth or not. On earth, they would, so it'd only be 4x. On a gas giant, who knows.

  56. On all counts by guet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Societally, we have alot of collective experience modeling the types of problems you've described, and it would really only be a matter of modifying the initial parameters of our weather simulations to match those of Jupiter.

    The problem being that Jupiter does not have a constellation of satellites collecting data 24/7 and a huge number of ground-stations recording weather conditions at regular intervals all round its surface.

    Without that data, what would you plug into your simulation, guesses?

    1. Re:On all counts by sploxx · · Score: 1

      The problem being that Jupiter does not have a constellation of satellites collecting data 24/7 and a huge number of ground-stations recording weather conditions at regular intervals all round its surface.

      Surface? I think this is defined as the depth in the jovian atmosphere where the pressure is @ 1 bar...

      Jupiter is a gas giant and therefore the atmospheric conditions probably (Discl.: I am not an planetary atmospheres scientist...!) need to be known to a depth which is obscured from the view of the usual optical instruments.
      And as Galileo is now part of this atmosphere, only Hubble and earth-based observations are possible at the moment.

  57. Hurricane season by philatelist · · Score: 1

    Well, hurricane season is underway with a bang!

  58. Our Protector by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
    Would you care if Jupiter's storms collided, formed an even larger, massive storm that eventually began erupting gas out of Jupiter into the solar system? This might lead to one of three possible endings:

    - Jupiter splits into two smaller, planets
    - Jupiter collapses and forms a second sun in our solar system
    - Jupiter loses all of it's matter and disappears

    You may not think even those are newsworthy, but think back to when that asteroid was heading towards Earth. It neared Jupiter, was pulled in and fell apart. I think Jupiter serves as a protector for the inner planets, and I think it may have been doing this more often and for longer than anyone can conceive.

    After reading the story about that asteroid being pulled into Jupiter, I suddenly made a connection to the Roman mythos. Jupiter (Zeus) was the god in charge of protecting (and directing) all of mankind. I know the ancient Greeks and Romans were stargazers, and it makes me wonder if they were able to see events such as an asteroid being "swallowed" by Jupiter.

    How many earth-destined bodies has Jupiter saved us from? We know of one that it missed; the one that ended the dinosaurs' reign. Again was this pure happenstance or was it "divine" intervention by Jupiter's course? Is it possible that our monotheistic and polytheistic religions with a prominent "Jupiter" god present are based upon the planet?

    Pur conjecture, I admit, but it definitely has me appreciating the outer gas giants. If something happens to Jupiter, Earth is at much greater risk of being hit by a wandering celestial body.

    1. Re:Our Protector by howlingfrog · · Score: 1

      Jeezus H. Christ! It was a joke! If I wasn't interested in astronomy, I would have just skimmed past the headline on the front page. I just thought it was funny that the article was essentially giving us a weather report for an uninhabited area.

      --
      The original Howling Frog is a fictional character and has no UID.
    2. Re:Our Protector by netwiz · · Score: 1

      Yes, what you've discovered is called "coincidence." There's absolutely no relation between the naming of the planet, the myths that surrounded the name, and any events arising from astrophysics.

      Jupiter's huge, but not _that_ huge. Failed star? Not quite. Were it some 200x it's current mass, sure, I'd call it a failed star. But it's not; it's just the largest gas giant in the system. We've found worlds 60x it's size.

      And it's no "protector of the inner worlds." Anything entering the system from outside the plane of the ecliptic isn't going to feel much. Oh, Jupiter'll have a gravitational effect, one that's utterly dwarfed by Sol. Also, Earth is on the other side of the system some 50% of it's orbit, so the gas giant won't have any beneficial effect at all during that time.

  59. Heh Heh by blake3737 · · Score: 1

    able to swallow Earth merely once, but it blows just as hard as its older cousin." I heard the same about some of the hiltons.

  60. Flamebait? by howlingfrog · · Score: 1

    Flamebait? It's a joke, people!

    --
    The original Howling Frog is a fictional character and has no UID.
  61. Global warming by WiggyWack · · Score: 1

    I believe the increase in the size of storms on Jupiter is due to global warming, caused by an increased release of greenhouse gases from fuel hungry aliens driving around in their gas guzzling Sports Utility Spaceships (SUSs).

    --
    Macintosh humor! MacComedy.com
  62. Mod parent up... by sean.peters · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a very important point. We're talking about a simulation of a chaotic system. It has to be fed ground-truth data - lots of it - on a regular and frequent basis, or it will diverge rather quickly from reality. And with no weather stations, etc, on Jupiter, there's no way to gather the data.

    Sean

  63. OT: watch this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and this is how denunciation will work once we are all under government surveillance.

  64. This Just In... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pat Robertson, of the 700 Club, is now saying that both of these storms are a Divine Retribution for the excess and sin of the Jovians. Also, he has advanced syphilis. Film at eleven!

  65. The same thing they do every storm, Pinky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...fuck all.

  66. When was the last time a probe survived Jupiter? by lightning_queen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is one major difference you seem to disregard in your comparison between Earth and Jupiter. On Earth, we know most of it's topography, we know what it's core, shell, and atomosphere consist of, we know how it spins and the general dynamics of its weather (with some exceptions, of course, but for the most part). With Jupiter, we know very little about it other than what we've been able to speculate. We speculate that it's a still-born star, so we speculate it has a mass similar to that of a small star. From our knowledge of what small stars consist of and what kind of gravity required to keep certain elements in an atomosphere, we can speculate the contents of Jupiter's atomosphere. We've even been able to see the top few layers with The Galileo Project, but the surface, if there is one, is still a mystery. So, not only do we not know what the surface is like, or how it affects the surrounding clouds and storms, but we're not even sure there is a surface. And we certainly don't know if these storms go all the way down to the surface. Who's to say the core even rotates? Or rotates at the same speed or in the same direction as everything else? This one's going out on a limb, I know, but space can already easily break many of the scientific laws that we've established (light itself breaks several of these), so who's to say that what goes on in the depths of a stillborn star goes against everything we consider to be logical?

    Meteorologists say that it's practically an unsolvable problem, and that's on a planet which they already know a lot about. With a planet such as Jupiter, there's simply too many unknowns. Everyone knows that the more unknowns you have in a problem, the harder it becomes to solve. The problem here is that, for Jupiter, the problem/formula is almost entirely unknowns.

  67. Blows just as hard as its older cousin... by SirBruce · · Score: 1
    Compared to the Great Red Spot, Red Jr. is half-sized, able to swallow Earth merely once, but it blows just as hard as its older cousin.

    Yeah, my girlfriend had a cousin like that, too!

    Bruce

  68. [...dialog snipped...] No, lieutenant... by alienmole · · Score: 1

    ...your men are already dead.

  69. More evidence of global warming by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

    This has got to be the spot-on evidence we need for Global Warming. See it is all happening right there on Jupiter and is directly correlated with our warming oceans.

    Okay, maybe not. But, hey, it sounds good!

  70. Re:Do the editors think we are that dumb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, and yes, in that order. I am both a nerd and a middle-school dropout.

  71. Re:Do the editors think we are that dumb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was that sarcasm? Sorry if everyone else on /. thinks you are a dumbass and treats you accordingly.

  72. typo by GrassyNoel · · Score: 0

    "Previous encounters in 2002 and 2004 were anti-climatic." He means anti-climactic. 'Climatic' means having to do with climate. Which this event is, so it's anything but anti-climatic.

    --
    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
  73. Neocons will rule the solar system by alienmole · · Score: 1

    That's pre-6/6/06 thinking. What you fail to take into account is that the neocons who rule Earth believe in preemptive enforcement of interplanetary law. This may be all happening on Jupiter right now, but once Big Red has eaten Little Red, we're obviously gonna be next! Pictures of these storms, along with a little vial of the same gases that make up Jupiter's atmosphere, are being shown to the U.N. Security Council at this very moment. In the interests of peace, we must declare war on Jupiter!

  74. Re:Are We Blaming Bush For This? by chawly · · Score: 1

    Where Mr. Bush is concerned, God is too far away to help even if He cared to.

    --
    How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley