Slashdot Mirror


The Physics of Superman

eieken writes "The physics of Superman mostly belong in the realm of comic books, but some scientists decided to give their input on the matter. The article tells of 'a scientific experiment in which a researcher put several chickens in a centrifuge and raised them in twice-normal gravity for months at a time. When they emerged, the chickens were stronger and had larger bones and muscles, and greater endurance. In other words, they were superchickens.' Do they have human sized centrifuges?"

93 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. Question... by crazyjeremy · · Score: 4, Funny

    But can the superchickens fly now?

    1. Re:Question... by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't these physicist have anything better to do than make super strong dizzy chickens?

      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    2. Re:Question... by Blymie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Chickens can fly, they just have their wings clipped to prevent this.

      http://www.omlet.co.uk/guide/guide.php?view=Chicke ns&cat=Chicken%20Care&sub=wing%20clipping

    3. Re:Question... by simdan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if they would have adapted their balance while in the centrifuge. Only to have it thrown off when placed on stationary land.

      Scientist, "Um, Frank? Are they all supposed to be walking to the left all the time with thier heads upside down?"

      Hate to see such a chicken lay an egg......

    4. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Almost all breeds of chickens (especially domesticated) cannot really fly... at least not like you see pigeons, doves, swallows, etc. fly. It is more of a semi-powered unstable glide and they can only maintain it for relatively short distances.

      The can "fly" just enough to get up into the relatively low branches of trees, over tall fences, gliding down from heights and of course as a method of faster escape at ground level.

    5. Re:Question... by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 2, Informative

      My chickens didn't have their wings clipped, and they could still barely fly. They could make it into 10 foot high branches without too much of a problem. They were also incredibly good at evading my attempts to catch them, flying into trees, decks, roofs...

    6. Re:Question... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 5, Funny
      But can the superchickens fly now?

      Not only can they fly, but they think nothing of beating up Klingon chickens. These chickens are so bad, they'll rip off their drumsticks and smack you upside the head with them. These chickens are so strong, you have to fry them in 40 weight motor oil. These are SERIOUS chickens.

    7. Re:Question... by swillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Chickens can fly

      Not really. Chickens can fly for very short distances and limited heights. They can get over fences and travel maybe 40 feet at a time. After one such "long" flight, they can barely get off the ground and prefer to run.

      they just have their wings clipped to prevent this.

      Chickens that are kept outdoors in pens without high walls have their wings clipped. I don't know what the minimum "safe" wall height is, but most unroofed outdoor pens I've seen use wire mesh about seven feet high. Smaller pens can use shorter walls because the chickens need quite a bit of horizontal room to reach their maximum height above ground. Wing clipping doesn't actually reduce their wings' lift much, mainly it just removes the ends of the primary feathers which are necessary for controlled flight. Chicken flight is pretty erratic and wild at best, and without those feather tips they just can't control it at all.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:Question... by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 5, Funny
      Chickens can fly

      Not really. Chickens can fly...

      'Nuff said.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    9. Re:Question... by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's called falling...with style.

    10. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The solution in three words: solid rocket boosters.

    11. Re:Question... by jlarocco · · Score: 4, Funny
      But can the superchickens fly now?

      Possibly, but in any case, here are some facts:

      1. Super-chickens are chickens.
      2. Super-chickens fight all the time.
      3. The purpose of the super-chicken is to flip out and kill people.

      Super-chickens can kill anyone they want! Super-chickens cut off heads ALL the time and don't even think twice about it. These chickens are so crazy and awesome that they flip out ALL the time. I heard that there was this super-chicken who was eating at a diner. And when some dude bit into a drumstick the super-chicken killed the whole town. My friend Mark said that he saw a super-chicken totally uppercut some kid just because the kid opened a window.

    12. Re:Question... by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 5, Funny

      A the risk of going off topic

      When I was at school one of the Biology teachers (let's call him Mr Mudie) was covering the topic of "Birds 'n Flight 'n Stuff" and he borrowed a quail from the city university. Quail tend to be more on the 'flutter' rather than 'soar' end of the flight scale. So, Mr Mudie has this quail in his hands and says (I paraphrase) "..and of course quail don't fly so well" and launches the bird high into the air...

      It went up..... ...and came down. With a thud and without a single solitary flap. Stone dead. Ooops.

      Of course, he proved his point - they don't fly so well

      --
      Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
    13. Re:Question... by packeteer · · Score: 3, Informative

      IHRC (I have raised chickens). Chickens with clipped wings can still make very high jumps when flapping their wings hard. They also can maintain a near verticle glide when jumping off of a high space. Chickens with clipped wings can often jump over fences or most high barriers they just cant maintain flight for extended periods.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    14. Re:Question... by Random+Destruction · · Score: 5, Funny
      They also can maintain a near verticle glide when jumping off of a high space.

      Me too. It's called falling.
      --
      :x
    15. Re:Question... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, however, super-chickens are *not* mammals...

      Chris Mattern

    16. Re:Question... by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

      A researcher is doing an experiment on frogs. He takes a normal frog, and yells "Jump, froggie jump!". The frog makes an amazing jump of about thirteen feet. Experimenter writes in his notebook, "Frog with four legs, jumps four meters."

      Then he chops of one of the frog's legs, and yells "Jump froggie, jump!" The frog jumps just about ten feet, and the experimenter writes in his notebook: "Frog with three legs, jumps three meters."

      He repeats this process twice more, with the frog jumping six, then just over three feet, and writing the results in his notebook. Finally he chops the last leg off, and yells "Jump, froggie, jump!" No response. So he repeats, "Jump froggie jump!". Still no response. Finally he yells at the top of his lungs: "JUMP FROGGIE, JUMP!". Still the frog does not move.

      So he writes in his notebook: "Frog with no legs is deaf."

      We can conclude that clipping the chickens' wings disables the inbuilt navigation systems that birds have; in short, a chicken with no wings has no sense of direction. After all, what is flying but throwing yourself at the ground, and missing.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    17. Re:Question... by emandres · · Score: 2, Informative

      If anybody didn't catch the reference, it's referring to Real Ultimate Power.

      --
      The only way to tell the difference between a hamster and a gerbil is that the hamster has more white meat.
  2. its that time again... by freemywrld · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it time to welcome our new super-chicken overlords?

    1. Re:its that time again... by JuzzFunky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does anyone know who was the first person to welcome our new overlords on slashdot was?
      ...just wondering

      --
      Unexpect the expected!
    2. Re:its that time again... by jdbartlett · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, but if you like, you can go through all 10,600 Google results for "welcome our new * overlords":

      http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aslashdot.org +%22welcome+our+new+*+overlords%22

    3. Re:its that time again... by g-doo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why did the superchicken cross the road?

    4. Re:its that time again... by sanman2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      To get to that phonebooth on the other side? :D

    5. Re:its that time again... by Gyga · · Score: 3, Informative

      Using slashdot search and ordering by date, and clicking next 30 I got http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?cid=441212 2&sid=41804 on Tuesday October 08, 2002. But it appears to not be the first. Google doesn't show all the results either. The one I link to does follow the simpson quote exactly. (talks of insects)

      A wider search of overlords gives the same post

      This one http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=7988&c id=736976 from Monday October 02, 2000 (I think) is linked from wikipedia. It offers apologies to The Simpsons. Wikipedia claims it is the first know use. (talks of fungus)

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    6. Re:its that time again... by AndroSyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one welcome our new joke playing out overlords.

  3. Web server by mh101 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like they should have put their web server in the centrifuge as well...

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  4. Obligatory by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's difficult to tell from this vantage point whether they will consume the captive earth men or merely enslave them. One thing is for certain: there is no stopping them; the chickens will soon be here. And I for one welcome our new centrifuge generated superchicken overlords.

    --
    ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
  5. No news... by benjaminperdomo · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Sayan of Planet Vegeta know it for a long time...

    1. Re:No news... by bsartist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speaking of Larry Niven - he wrote about the difficulties Superman and Lois Lane would have in an essay called Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    2. Re:No news... by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Informative
      he idea was that if you fell down on such a planet, you'd better have uber reflexes or you'd break bones in the fall.

      The ultimate high-g planet is the super-jovian Mesklin, in Hal Clement's Mission of Gravity. At the poles it was about 600g. The natives were centipede-like, obviously very strong and fast, but they had no clear idea of "falling". If you dropped something, it disappeared and reappeared on the ground, smashed or squashed flat. More extreme, the astronomer Frank Drake imagined life on a neutron star, based on nuclear reactions rather than chemical, microscopic and extremely fast. Robert Forward did a couple of novels using that idea.

  6. For more along the lines of the summary... by Nybarius · · Score: 5, Informative

    see the book "The Physics of Superheroes". It's about exactly what you would expect.

  7. I wonder where you approach the limit..... by groslyunderpaid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You could only get so much bigger (bones, muscle, etc) before it wasn't an advantage anymore, right? I mean, growing something in higher gravity so that it creates a stronger 'infrastructure' (for lack of a better term) would only be beneficial up to a certain point, at which point the weight of said 'infrastructure' would weight you down so as to defeat the purpose....

    1. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by BewireNomali · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed. Also, the increased density is in response to the forces from an altered environment. Assuming the organism to be adaptive, then those "powers" would slowly be lost in the earth's environment, no? Akin to the way astronauts lose muscle tissue when they go into space, no matter how much they exercise.

      --
      un burrito me trampeó.
    2. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by Raindance · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You've got to think that somewhere in the world atheletes are training using high-G centerfuges. For better or worse, legal or illegal, it'd be effective.

    3. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by naoursla · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually some professional athletes train in low oxygen environments to give them more stamina in normal oxygen environments.

    4. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by fossa · · Score: 2, Informative

      I recently read Human Acclimatization and Adaptation to Stresses. The article explains, unsurprisingly in retrospect, that altitude training has different effects on different people. Some are helped, some remain the same or worsen. But the majority of athletic improvement should be attributed to the other big condition of a high altitude camp: the absence of stresses of normal life. The article also suggested that an athlete often ends up unintentionally training less intensley due do the difficulties of low oxygen. Upon returning to sea level, the athlete is well rested not from any changes due to low oxygen but due to the unintentional taper, and thus improves performance. Another interesting fact mentioned was "with elite athletes, training effects are so specific that there is no beneficial carry-over of circulatory improvements in one activity to another". For example, improvements in running do not translate to improvements in cycling; I'm interested in a more in-depth explanation of that phenomenon.

    5. Re:I wonder where you approach the limit..... by localman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good point... of course it depends what context you're in. If your goal is to lift heavy things all things all the time, the extra bulk will be useful all of the time. More realistically if you need to move quickly sometimes, it would becomes a burden. So what's an advantage depends on the needs.

      In fact, since this study indicates our bodies strengthen and weaken based on the average load, I'll go ahead and guess that the size and strength we develop to is "about right" for our particular usage pattern. In other words, going about your day to day activities your body will adjust to "about right" muscle and bone strength, so as to handle most tasks easily and not waste too much effort building infrastructure that won't be needed often if ever.

      Of course, many of us seem to disagree with the natural results. Though in reality I sit at a computer most of the day and have little need for muscular development, I exercise a couple times a week to fool my body into thinking I need a little extra bone and muscle tissue.

      Cheers.

  8. No wringing their necks! by psyclo · · Score: 4, Funny

    My grandma used to kill chickens by twirling them over her head to break the necks, then throwing them down. Like to see her try that with a "superchicken"!
    Can't you just see it? Hank comes outside to find his wife, and there the is, cornered in the hen house. "Look out Hank! That one by the door knows judo or something!"

    --
    =======================
    Psyclo, the dark night.
    Mike, the computer geek.
  9. About Flying by MBCook · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That chicken thing is just weird. That must have been a while ago, I don't see how anyone could get the ethical approval to do something like that. Just how would you keep the chickens in for months at a time anyway? How would you feed them and such? Do you stop the thing for a moment, do what you need, then start it back up?

    That said, the article comments on Superman flying. I read somewhere recently (some list of facts about Superman) some interesting stuff. One of the things was that "Faster than a speeding bullet... more powerful than a locomotive..." stuff was not part of the original Superman comics, it was apparently made up for a radio show. But more interesting to me, apparently Superman COULDN'T fly. He was able to jump REALLY HIGH. You know, "able leap tall buildings in a single bound." At some point that somehow turned into flying (this was a bulleted list of facts type thing, so it didn't expand on these).

    There was a special on TLC, Discovery, Science Channel, or some such recently about the physics of Superman. I didn't see it (I'm sure it will be re-run), but I remember from a commercial that they said it would actually be MORE PAINFUL for Lois to be caught by Superman than to simply fall to her death. I don't know why, you'd have to watch to find out I guess.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:About Flying by ampathee · · Score: 2, Interesting
      it would actually be MORE PAINFUL for Lois to be caught by Superman than to simply fall to her death. I don't know why,


      I'd imagine that he flies upwards really fast, while she falls down at her terminal velocity. Then he catches her - with double or more the impact of her hitting the (stationary) ground - since the relative velocity would be so much larger.

      Like hitting an oncoming car as opposed to a parked one.
    2. Re:About Flying by kc32 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would assume it's because she's still alive to feel it rather than being killed instantly.

    3. Re:About Flying by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another must-read on the physics of superheroes is Niven's "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex". Unless you're heavily humour-impared though, please don't read it while dining on a bowl of soup.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    4. Re:About Flying by samu0086 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ampathee is exactly correct. The physicist in the show suggested that while Lois would travel at her terminal velocity downward, Superman would be flying at an extreme velocity in the opposite direction. He guessed that Superman would be flying at ~100x faster than Lois would be falling down, or 120,000 mph in order to grab her (since he had to run to a spot, change clothes into Superman, and fly to grab her all the while Lois is falling at 9.8 m/s^2). It would be awesome to see Superman accidentally slice Lois in half in an attempt to save her, they must save that shot for the Directors Cut.

      --
      Mild-mannered college student by day, DinoPark Tycoon by night.
    5. Re:About Flying by Dunarie · · Score: 2, Funny

      "The question is more how can YOU ethical approve eating chicken?!?!?"

      Cause they are tastey?

  10. Super Chicken? by jcostantino · · Score: 4, Funny

    Super Grover unavailable for comment.

    --
    Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
  11. Another weird thing about those superchickens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently they tasted just like Christopher Reeve.

  12. Yes, but... by patio11 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... it turns out super takes like chicken.

  13. That's not Superman... by cargoculture · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's Tom Strong.

  14. Dark meat vs. Light by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, did the superchickens have more dark meat on them, or light? Parts that get exercised (thighs) are darker than parts that don't (breast on a non-flying chicken). I can see this at Wegman's now, "boneless thighs from free-range, hormone-free, pre-centrifuged, SuperChickens".

    --
    the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
  15. Oh man, I am so old! by gooman · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you find yourself in danger,

    When you're threatened by a stranger,

    When it looks like you will take a lickin',

    There is someone waiting,

    Who will hurry up and rescue you,

    just Call for Super Chicken!

    Fred, if you're afraid you'll have to overlook it,

    Besides you knew the job was dangerous when you took it

    He will drink his super sauce

    And throw the bad guys for a loss

    And he will bring them in alive and kickin'

    There is one thing you should learn

    When there is no one else to turn to

    Call for Super Chicken!

    --
    "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
  16. Yea yea... by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Funny

    *mumbles something about welcoming centrifuge raised chicken overlords*

    --
    I hate printers.
  17. Please, think of chickens by hierro · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everytime you mod me down, a scientist centrifuges a chicken.


    Please, think of chickens.

  18. Just out of curiosity... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't feel like dredging my memory for the proper physics formulas, so maybe some bored physics student can help me out. Let's say I wanted to live in 2x gravity on Earth for a few months (or years), for the healthful aspects.

    So I build a huge centrifuge shaped like a bowl, with a track at a certain angle. You'd like to spin the track at a speed and angle such that I get a simulated 2x gravity, while having the angle such that my weight would be perpendicular to the apparent floor. You'd build walls perpendicular to the track (and a parallel ceiling) as well so that things would seem normal.

    So how wide would the track need to be, and what angle would you need, so as to have an approximately normal environment? Obviously if the ring is too small, you'll get different forces on each part of your body and you'll notice it. There's probably no good psychological data on what size you "need", so let's see some numbers at different sizes, and see what would seem reasonable.

    Also, is there any problem with this scenerio? I've never heard of it being done, which means maybe there's something I'm missing as far as practicality.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Just out of curiosity... by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problems are,

      accleration gradient - you don't want very much of one or your balance will be all screwy.
      coriolis "force" - a result of the transformation to a rotating reference frame. You want to minimize this as well, for balance reasons.

      Fortunately the solution to both is to increase R. Unfortunately, this limits where you can place your rotating habitat and increase the cost to power it.

      So some practical numbers: (i'm not sure how to do the coriolis part, but the rest is pretty easy)

      Suppose we took the land for the cancelled superconductiong supercollider in Texas. It had a radus of approximately 14 km. To get a net force of 2g, we need a rotational acceleration of 1.73g, since we already have gravity working for us. So you'd need to have a tangential velocity of 350 mph. The difference in acceleration between your head and your feet would be of the order 2e-5 g, so I don't think you'd notice much.

      Perhaps if your habitat was a well-lubricated train you could do it. Certainly there have been very fast electric trains before, and over much longer distances than an 80 mile circuit. I would suggest a hanging monorail design so you could achieve multiple accelerations without having to completely redesign the bank angle every time.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  19. Re:Humping Lois by schon · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about if he used a kryptonite condom?

    (cue scene from Mallrats.)

  20. Re:Larry Niven by emurphy42 · · Score: 4, Informative
  21. Feedback anyone? by MasterC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I assume by virtue of inclusion that the bit about growing chickens in higher gravity yields stronger muslces and bigger bones is of some surprise. Why would you not think biology has feedback? I know we humans like to pride outselves on things we invent but mother nature has been at it for many more years.

    Your respiratory rate is determined by the level of carbon dioxide present in your blood (not oxygen). Feedback.

    Your heart rate has a normal rate but can be altered by hormones like adrenaline (fight-or-flight response). Feedback....in a more long-about sort of way.

    Blood glucose levels plays a part in hunger which leads to eating which restores glucose. Feedback.

    Immobility or lack of exercise can lead to atrophy of the muscles but can be restored by using them. Feedback.

    Astronauts have to exercise in microgravity to also prevent atrophy. Feedback.

    So if a chicken grows up in high gravity then why shouldn't it have higher muscle strength and bigger bones.

    Nevermind the bulk of the /. summary is about the chicken when the chicken part is only at the end of the article, but thought I'd point it out. It seemed rather shocking to eieken to warrant dominating the summary about the chicken.

    --
    :wq
  22. Quoth Mitch Hedberg: by mpathetiq · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think a rotisserie is like a really morbid ferris wheel for chickens. It's a strange piece of machinery... "We will take the chicken, kill it, impale it, and then rotate it. And I'll be damned if I'm not hungry! Because spinning chicken carcasses make my mouth water! I like dizzy chicken. With a side of potatoes of some sort."

    1. Re:Quoth Mitch Hedberg: by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      With a side of potatoes of some sort.

      I believe the technical term around here is "hot grits".

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Quoth Mitch Hedberg: by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Mitch was a really funny guy.

    3. Re:Quoth Mitch Hedberg: by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude, grits are corn, not potatoes.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  23. Development of Supermans Powers Over Time by David_Shultz · · Score: 5, Informative

    For anyone interested in the development of Supermans powers as the series progressed, check out this website:

    http://www.johnath.com/~david/etc/superman.html

    As other posters have mentioned, yes, it is true that he started without flying ability -he could leap only one eighth of a mile. The development of his powers is actually quite staggering, going from what nowadays would be a lesser superhero, to being one of the most powerful superheroes in the combined comic book multiverse.

  24. In addition by phorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    I picked up the book "The Science of Superman" some time ago. Not a bad read, and it goes into the details of how Superman's powers might stem from the differential in intensity of the earth/krypton sun, gravity, etc.

    1. Re:In addition by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Informative

      the book "The Science of Superman" some time ago. Not a bad read, and it goes into the details of how Superman's powers might stem from the differential in intensity of the earth/krypton sun, gravity, etc.

      I don't know that book, but I know my superheroes.
      Did the book mention that originally, Supes was from the planet Krypton, where the gravity is 10 times that of earth, and therefore he was super strong and could jump really high, and super tough?

      As the years went by, he had more and more powers added to his repertoir, and so they retconed his origin to that of solar radiations giving him the ability to shoot lasers from his eyes, to fly and to see through objects.

      But at first, he was just a super-strong man, not the god he later turned into.

      P.S. The first time superman flew was to go punch some evil japanese spies that stole a plane.
      P.P.S. And that's when "and the American Way" was added to his list of things he figths for. Ah, propaganda, ain't it just so much fun?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  25. Whatever you do, don't swing a sword at them by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've heard rumors to the effect that if you attack them with a sword repeatedly, it will send a call out to dozens of other superchickens which will all attack you until you flee indoors or scroll to the next area.

  26. time travel by llZENll · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "If he was gone two hours (flying at the speed of light), by the time he returned the world would be over."

    Wouldn't he return in 2 hours?

    1. Re:time travel by Zygamorph · · Score: 3, Informative

      They're alluding to the time dilation effect in general and/or special relativity.

      Basically if you are travelling close to the speed of light relative to some other point ( say earth), then time slows down for you relative to the time flow at the other point. The effect is:

      sqrt( 1- ((v**2) / (c**2)))

      Where v is your velocity and c is the speed of light. So if you get really close to the speed of light time slows down for you a lot.

      I'm assuming that when they say comes back in two hours they mean from Superman's time frame and not the earth's.

      Its also sometimes called the twin paradox. Take a pair of twins, put one in a space ship and fly it close to the speed of light in a round trip that ends up back on earth. Their ages are now different even though they both travelled close to the speed of light relative to each other. See here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox for a better expalanation.

  27. Larry Niven is wrong by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, Superman Returns proves Larry Niven is wrong.

    His entire argument hinges on the assumption that the Kryptonian nervous system behaves just like the human immune system. Since Superman can see things and react in bullet-time or faster and he can sort out millions of audio signals independently, neither of which a human can do, Niven makes an irrecoverable mistake in his essay. In fact the speed of reaction Superman exhibits is faster than our neurotransmitters can even signal, so Kryptonian neurophysiology has to be completely different, perhaps optical or even quantum in nature. Given that he's powered by the Sun, I'd lean more towards an optical nervous system.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Larry Niven is wrong by Itchy+Rich · · Score: 4, Funny

      Given that he's powered by the Sun, I'd lean more towards an optical nervous system.

      I'd lean more towards getting out more.

  28. Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by clockwise_music · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In Melbourne (Australia), we have an amusement park named "Luna Park" that had a really cool ride called the Gravitron, that looked like this. It was essentially a human sized centrifuge, where you walked in, and lay down against a padded mat that was lying on the wall. Then the ride would start, the thing would speed up and the the g's would start building up and press you against the wall.

    Which enabled you to do stupid things like go upside down and have your face stretched. It was cool and my favourite ride at that age. Perhaps it contributed to my huge bone density and muscle strength of later years :)

    Not sure if it is still there... anyone know? Anyone remember this?

    1. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by D4MO · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I worked in one of those for a whole summer once. I was that dude in the centre with the speed button. So I basically spent about 12 hours a day spinning for about 4 months. The trick to not getting totally fucked up was not to move your head outside the plane of rotation. Move head left and right, fine, but if you moved up and down it was trippy. At the end of every ride, someone would always ask why I wasn't sticking to the walls...

      The amusement park was right beside a beach so I'd get chicks coming in with their two piece bikini's. At a certain speed of rotation, the panel you lean against would slide up. At this speed and force, a lot of the women couldn't lift their arms and hands away from beside them - they were as good as pinned down. It took me a few weeks, but I pefected tweaking the speed just right to have those panels slide up and down repeatedly. And in doing so, I managed to "jiggle" many a breast out from under a bikini top!

      Yeah, I'll go to hell, but damn, it made the job worthwhile ;)

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    2. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It took me a few weeks, but I pefected tweaking the speed just right to have those panels slide up and down repeatedly. And in doing so, I managed to "jiggle" many a breast out from under a bikini top!

      That's hilarious! You lucky bastard, that must have been awesome. Maybe that explains your fetish for abnormally flat breasts...

    3. Re:Human centrifuge - the Gravitron by mclaincausey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've never heard of a literate carnie, much less one capable of getting on the Internet. I call bull$hit!!

      --
      (%i1) factor(777353);
      (%o1) 777353
  29. Why we don't do this with people ... by IanDanforth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The attempt has been made to put humans in this kind of plus G environment. People loose so much bone mass during space flight the idea was to build as much bone as possible before leaving earth and then let people fall back to normal.

    Unfortunately our sense of balance is directly tied into G, specifically the acceleration of liquids in one G. When you're in a high G environment your inner ear believes that a small turn of the head is an increadibly rapid and vicious turn. What results is increadible nausea and an inability to function, and since it takes months at high G to build bone this idea is limited in its applications. While people are able to adapt relatively quickly to freefall this is not so easy with Hyper-G.

    -Ian

  30. Superheroes aren't science fiction by ObligatoryUserName · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It seems to be a common misconception that superheroes are science fiction. Like Star Wars, they're Science Fiction Flavored, but they aren't really stories about science.

    It can be a fun framework for discusion, but (stating the obvious here) realism is no more important to these stories than it is to Harry Potter or King Arthur.

    Talking about realism is more relevant when the story is science fiction instead of fantasy dressed up like science fiction.

    While I enjoy fantasy stories, it seems unfortunate they have eclipsed science fiction by appropriating the settings and conventions.

  31. The excerpt from the Great Mambo Chicken book by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want to read more details, use the "Inside Book" search on Amazon within the Great Mambo Chicken.

    From the search results link above, visit pages 54 and 55 - the sidebars navigate to the next and previous pages.

    No I have no affilate link in there (that I am aware of) - call me crazy.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  32. Man of Steel, Larry Niven's take by 0WaitState · · Score: 2, Informative

    No discussion of the Physics of Superman is complete without this analysis of why Superman can't have sex.

    --

    Remain calm! All is well!
  33. ObNiven by trawg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The obligatory reference to Larry Niven's classic "Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex" in which he describes some of the problems involved in a Kryptonian/Human relationship:

    http://www.rawbw.com/~svw/superman.html (first Google link)

  34. Yes... by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...but the chickens wouldn't know that. Besides, what you really want to do is spin them up, keep them at high speed until ready for the supermarket, then hit the brakes. The bones'll be large enough that you won't get fragments everywhere, it would be painless for the chicken, and I'm certain you could make a fortune selling the slow-motion video to students.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  35. Billywitchdoctor.com feel more comfortable... by k3vlar · · Score: 2, Funny

    You mean ultra-mega-hyper chicken? Shh! He is legend!

    --
    Unlike porn, which yada yada rimshot hey-ooh!
  36. I Had a Problem Set Like This Once... by SonOfFlubber · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I was an undergrad taking lower division Newtonian Physics my prof assigned a problem set along the lines of:

    "Superman: the man of steel. Faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, able to leap tall buildings in a single bound:
    1) Calculate Superman's kinetic energy to go faster than the bullet
    2) Determine the amount of work Superman would do pushing against the locomotive to make it go backwards 1 km on a level track
    3) Compute the impulse generated by Superman to leap a tall building

    Most of the class did OK, I got all the answers in the ballpark, but one student had answers that were an order of magnitude greater than anybody elses'. When the prof asked the student why his answers were so high, he replied "Well, it seems as if I used a higher mass than anybody else - you DID say that Superman was the man of steel, didn't you?"

    He got full credit.

  37. DragonBall Z, Goku and Vegeta by Soong · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They started training at 10 times earth gravity, and were well up over a hundred in just a couple villain intermissions worth of training.

    So yeah, train hard, get strong. (as long as you don't break yourself in the process)

    Maybe the interesting thing here is not that the chickens got stronger, but that 2g was within their biological limits.

    --
    Start Running Better Polls
  38. Wait... by S.P.B.Wylie · · Score: 2

    Can a chicken really do anything "in style"?

    --
    I give bread to the poor, they call me a saint.
    I ask why the poor have no bread, they call me a communist.
  39. Superman as an Energy Being by Bombula · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Whenever you hear one of these physics of Superman debates where they ask MIT physicists or whatever, the assumption is always that Superman has his abilities because he has a super version of a human body. So he's super strong and super fast because his muscles are super powerful, and so on. But if this is the case and he's constrained by the ordinary laws of physics, then everything about him from strength to flight to x-ray vision is totally implausible.

    However, if you escape from the assumption that he's some fancy biological being, then things change completely. In my mind, Superman is a being composed of energy. His appearance is just a convenient form, a shell. Kryptonian technology seems to be advanced enough for this to be plausible, and it also rids us of the unlikely coincidence that Kryptonians and humans happen to look exactly the same.

    Composed of energy and manipulating forces, all of Superman's powers become plausible - as energy, flight makes sense, speed makes sense, and strength could be the transmutation of energy into forces. With Kryptonian technology, it might be possible to create force fields of two dimensions (planes, or surfaces) or three dimensions (volumes, or zones), which you could also view as curving space. Then things like lifting a car by its bumper would make sense, whereas with human phyics you'd just rip the bumper of. And as for lifting continents, if the force required to lift a continent was applied to an area the size of your hand it would pass through any known substance as easily as we pass through air. Strength-by-force-field is the only thing that makes any sense.

    Kryptonite also makes more sense with Superman as an energy being. Maybe it gives off some weird particles that interfer with Superman's ability to transmute energy into gravitons or other force particles. Superman being solar-powered makes better sense this way too. And obviously heat vision, x-ray vision, and flying at cose to the speed of light make more sense for an energy being than for a material being.

    Well, that's my uberdorkiness binge for the day.

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:Superman as an Energy Being by CmdrGravy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think if you take your theory a little further and make the assumption that Superman is in fact a fictional character and lives soley in our imaginations where anything is possible regardless of any laws of physics, or anything else, you may get closer to discovering Supermans true nature.

  40. Old news by deathstar778 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Goku and Vegeta already did this a long time ago in DragonBall Z or GT... at 500G.

  41. As seen on Seinfeld by dizzy+tunez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does Superman have superhumor? Or, if he became a dad, would he then become Superdad?

    --
    "If you loved me, you`d all kill yourselves today"
    Spider Jerusalem
  42. Human centrifuges by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Do they have human sized centrifuges?

    Yes.

  43. No, but they do *FRY* pretty well by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Thank you folks, I'll be here all week. Don't forget to try out our potato bar, the finest in all Des Moines!

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  44. only one explanation why superman can fly by shadownine · · Score: 2, Funny

    The man has a serious GAS problem, you can always see him lean his but out just a little before he takes off. Same thing goes when he levitate, it's just one constant steady flow of but wind. If a person were on krypton then they would be able to smell the difference, but on earth superman's gas emits no odor. The same theory can be applied to his super speed, i'm still working on the other abilities.

  45. NASA Hypergravity Experiment by GoRK · · Score: 2

    Since nobody seems to have answered the original question of "Why aren't we trying this with humans?" -- The answer is that "We are. And it doesn't work that well."

    If you search for "NASA Hypergravity" on Google, you will find all kinds of data about the experiments, all kinds of crackpots talking about becoming super-strong or the like and this interesting Wired article written by one of the participants. If you don't want to dig too deep, check out the article. It's a pretty good summary from the inside out.

  46. KFC by Jobeson · · Score: 2, Funny

    15 years from now at your local KFC... Hi, yes I would like to order 1 bucket of Extra crispy Super Chicken

    --
    Well Im gona go do something... and by something I mean nothing but doing nothing away from my computer counts as someth
  47. Q: Do they have human sized centrifuges? by macraig · · Score: 2, Funny

    A: Yes, there's a ride a Magic Mountain in southern California, but I don't know that they'd keep it running for you months at a time, and it would cost you a bloody fortune in ride tickets and daily admission. :-)