Slashdot Mirror


The Thalamus - The Kernel in Your Mind

corbettw writes "This article on Yahoo Science News describes a new finding that explains how the thalamus is used by your brain to essentially boot your brain, and provide for central processing and control of all impulses going to and from the cortex. The article describes its function as an operating system, but from the description it actually seems closer to the functions of a kernel." From the article: "The finding, published last week in the journal Neuroscience, changes the way scientists understand nitric oxide's role in the brain, and it also has them rethinking the function of the thalamus, where it is released. The thalamus was thought to be a fairly primitive structure, sort of a gate that could either open and allow sensory information to stream into the cortex, the higher functioning part of the brain, or cut off the flow entirely. Godwin says the new research shows it's more accurate to think of the thalamus not as a gate but as a club bouncer, who doesn't simply allow a huge rush of people to go in or no one at all, but picks and chooses whom to let in and out. "

217 comments

  1. Disturbing by flibuste · · Score: 1, Funny

    I find the idea of a brain boot annoying. I just hope there's no Vista in there, but still hope to get a life.

    1. Re:Disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Godwin says the new research shows it's more accurate to think of the thalamus not as a gate but as a club bouncer, who doesn't simply allow a huge rush of people to go in or no one at all, but picks and chooses whom to let in and out. "

      Sounds like the Thalamus is more like IPtables, rather than a kernel.

    2. Re:Disturbing by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

      I would have pegged it as a firewall personally...

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    3. Re:Disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the Thalamus is more like IPtables, rather than a kernel.

      Only for dumb people. For smart people, the Thalamus is more like PF.

    4. Re:Disturbing by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      iptables is a firewall. So you're pegging it in the same place.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  2. I can think it now. by suso · · Score: 5, Funny

    it's more accurate to think of the thalamus not as a gate but as a club bouncer, who doesn't simply allow a huge rush of people to go in or no one at all, but picks and chooses whom to let in and out. "

    Thalamus: Whoa buddy, you can't go in.
    Neuron: But, I'm with her!
    Thalamus: Her? Yeah right!
    Neuron: Cortica! Cortica! Come back! We can be together!

    [meanwhile in the real world]

    John: Hey Bobby, catch... whoa, heads up!
    Bobby: Owwww!

  3. Drugs... by posterlogo · · Score: 3, Funny

    KERNAL PANIC!!!

    1. Re:Drugs... by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
      > Drugs...
      >
      > KERNAL PANIC!!!

      Knew I shouldn't have read the Nam-Shub of Enki out loud. Bloody buffer ovrflows. At least I got this nifty Sumerian-to-English plug-in from L. Bob Rife.

    2. Re:Drugs... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

      Depends upon the drugs:

      coke/crack/meth: KERNEL PANIC!!!!!!OMG!!!!Eleventy!!!!11!!
      alcohol: Kernel is really fucking pissed off and wants to fight!!!
      nicotine: Kernel laid
      THC: Kernel mellow
      LSD: Kernel trails, whoa purple sounds awesome and crunchy.....

  4. The "yeah, but does it run Linux" department by krell · · Score: 4, Funny

    "the thalamus is used by your brain to essentially boot your brain"

    Which now raises hope for those of us who want dual-boot flexibility.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:The "yeah, but does it run Linux" department by deviceb · · Score: 1

      yes well, you can boot at least 2 personalities at this point, & both do run of linux.

      --
      Kill your TV
    2. Re:The "yeah, but does it run Linux" department by MattS423 · · Score: 2, Funny

      We might have to wait for Book Camp for that one...
       
      ...and I hear theres no linux dirver support for the sense of smelll. (yet)

    3. Re:The "yeah, but does it run Linux" department by Jerf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Which now raises hope for those of us who want dual-boot flexibility.

      So are you saying you're bi-curious?

    4. Re:The "yeah, but does it run Linux" department by megaditto · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but it runs Linus, who happens to run Linux.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    5. Re:The "yeah, but does it run Linux" department by wyip · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well version 1.1 was recently released which added support for eye sight, among other things.

    6. Re:The "yeah, but does it run Linux" department by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      Of course running VirtualPC is like having schizophrenia, and remote desktop is either an out-of-body experience, or mind control.

      Blonde moments are, of course as a result of dodgy drivers.

      So long as the CDC don't manage to install a back orifice, we shouldnt worry too much.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    7. Re:The "yeah, but does it run Linux" department by Ninjaesque+One · · Score: 1

      It's already availiable, but the partitioning is so that you can't edit or even access one partition from another. You need a bunch of really esoteric software to do it, too. Usually, both of the partitions run simultaneously and compete for CPU, so you switch partitions randomly. Not worth the work, really. On top of all that, you need even more esoteric software to remove it, because of the non-accessing thing. I know of a guy who got it to work, though: his name is Henry.... Henry Jekyll.

      --
      Ninjas and pirates. How piquant.
    8. Re:The "yeah, but does it run Linux" department by Greg.Rodden · · Score: 1

      One boot for work. One boot for play. You could be the happiest garbage collector on the planet! *** that comment was in no way a deliberate or snide attack on the garbage collectors of this world, it's an important service people! ***

      --
      I have ridden the mighty moon worm!
    9. Re:The "yeah, but does it run Linux" department by VagaStorm · · Score: 1

      Dual-boot, I whant multi tasking, or atleast thae abilety to recive information(incomming stream from chick) and store it in cashe, while I do more important things... (anything:p)

    10. Re:The "yeah, but does it run Linux" department by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Dissociative personality disorder, not schizophrenia. Schizophrenia would be more like a buffer overflow.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    11. Re:The "yeah, but does it run Linux" department by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1
      "the thalamus is used by your brain to essentially boot your brain"

      Which now raises hope for those of us who want dual-boot flexibility.

      Actually, what I'm more interested in is virtualisation.
      No I'm not.
      Yes, we are.
      Shutupshutupshutupshutupshutup!
  5. Like the Internet? by MECC · · Score: 4, Funny

    FTP:"Your Brain Works Like the Internet"

    A collection of pipes moving pr0n around?

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
    1. Re:Like the Internet? by just_another_sean · · Score: 2, Funny

      A collection of pipes moving pr0n around?

      It's tubes man, tubes.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    2. Re:Like the Internet? by MECC · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah - I forgot.

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
    3. Re:Like the Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      MECC:
      A collection of pipes moving pr0n around?
      Sounds like my brain.
    4. Re:Like the Internet? by MojoBox · · Score: 1

      That's how my brain works.

    5. Re:Like the Internet? by llamalicious · · Score: 1

      Well, my pipe certainly moves around when there's porn involved.

    6. Re:Like the Internet? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      No! It's a truck! A big truck moving porn around.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  6. What some people need... by AltGrendel · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is a brain that will boot in the first place.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:What some people need... by another_fanboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      They boot fine. It's the BSOD that causes trouble.

    2. Re:What some people need... by uglydog · · Score: 2, Funny

      It says Keyboard not found. Press F1 to continue. What do I do?!

    3. Re:What some people need... by zephc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think its all the garbage that gets installed after it boots for the very first time.

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    4. Re:What some people need... by g1zmo · · Score: 1

      Or a boot to the brain.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
  7. Distro? by ChrisFedak · · Score: 1

    So...how long will it be until we can install Linux on one of these babies? Seriously though, this seems like a pretty exciting discovery, anything that helps Medical Science get a better handle on the consequences of changes in brain chemistry can only help with treatment of the scarier diseases like schizophrenia.

    1. Re:Distro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Work on this is actively being done.
      There's been quite some success in lower mammals:

      http://www.strangehorizons.com/2004/20040405/badge r.shtml

  8. Godwin? by computational+super · · Score: 5, Funny
    Godwin says the new research shows it's more accurate...

    But then they drifted off topic and started arguing about Nazis and Hitler and the discussion had to be ended.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  9. From: Andy T. by ettlz · · Score: 4, Funny

    From: Andy T.
    To: The Almighty

    I still maintain the point that designing a monolithic kernel in -3000 BC is a fundamental error.
    Be thankful you are not my student. You would not get a high grade for such a design :-)

    1. Re:From: Andy T. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      3000 BC? You must be one of them there fundam...finder...fadnama....radical christians.

    2. Re:From: Andy T. by ettlz · · Score: 1

      I'm an atheist, but that sort of kills the joke.

    3. Re:From: Andy T. by daveed · · Score: 5, Funny

      -3000 BC. That's like 1000 years in the future man!

    4. Re:From: Andy T. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      designing a monolithic kernel in -3000 BC
      -3000BC is still 994 years in the future.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    5. Re:From: Andy T. by ettlz · · Score: 1

      To all you guys pointing out the very obvious mistake of -3000 years BC, I ask that you take into account the wrap-around.


      All makes sense now, doesn't it? Eh?

    6. Re:From: Andy T. by failure-man · · Score: 1

      So the brain uses what, 11-bit integers then? What the fuck was whoever designed that thing smoking?

    7. Re:From: Andy T. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but mine came with the following documentation:

      HUMAN BEING: 8.4 GB of RAM. (Not entirely addressable by current operating system.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:From: Andy T. by Once&FutureRocketman · · Score: 1
      --

      "Research is what I am doing when I don't know what I am doing." -- Wernher von Braun

    9. Re:From: Andy T. by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      You might want to consider an upgrade; 8.4 GB is quickly used with the high-quality video and surround sound signals that are coming in ;)

    10. Re:From: Andy T. by BillX · · Score: 1

      He might just have been very, very bored.

      Imagine how much it must suck being in a situation where, if you wanted to make friends, you literally had to MAKE them...

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    11. Re:From: Andy T. by absinthminded64 · · Score: 1

      He would have dropped seeds all over the earth while he was burning.. .

      Oh. . thank you god!

  10. Netcraft confirms it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    BThalamusD is dying. I'd give it 80-90 years. 100 years tops.

  11. Oblig. by mistersooreams · · Score: 1

    So... can it run Linux?

    The answer is obviously yes, but only the even version numbers.

  12. My brain kernel's just fine... by Flashpot · · Score: 4, Funny

    but i'm paging out to my liver!

    --
    That which does not kill her only prolongs my agony.
  13. Brain vs. computer comparisons only go so far by andrewman327 · · Score: 3, Informative
    description it actually seems closer to the functions of a kernel.
    A reason to be even more afraid of Sony's rootkit!


    Anyway, this is an interesting article. This research has a lot of promise in coming years and decades as better understanding brain chemistry advances pharmaceuticals and medical treatments. From TFA: "This study shows a unique role for nitric oxide. It may help us to someday understand what goes wrong in diseases that affect cognitive processing, such as attention deficit disorder or schizophrenia, and it adds to our fundamental understanding of how we perceive the world around us."


    People have been comparing brains to computers almost as long as they have been comparing computers to brains. The Computational Theory of Mind looks at the mind (the brain's software as some have described it) in pretty a logical way, not too far away from computational reasoning. These comparisons are useful for understanding larger concepts but they generally fall apart when you get to the nuts and bolts of it. For example, the brain processes many shades of grey instead of a computer's binary perception. Neural networks and, to a lessor extent, quantum computing seek to emulate some of the processes of the brain.


    On an aside, if you are interested in learning more about machine intelegence, I highly recomend reading Ray Kurzweil's books.

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    1. Re:Brain vs. computer comparisons only go so far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      A reason to be even more afraid of Sony's rootkit!

      Beware getting a song stuck in your head. They will want to charge you a licensing fee for each time you hear it.
    2. Re:Brain vs. computer comparisons only go so far by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Neural networks and, to a lessor extent, quantum computing seek to emulate some of the processes of the brain.

      Aren't quantum computer binary too ? A group of qu-bit is capable of representing more values that the same number of bits but they are expressed in binary too.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    3. Re:Brain vs. computer comparisons only go so far by Kouroth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The software and hardware are interchangeable. The brain makes hardware and software changes to itself during operation.
      *Tangent*
      Some day we may make DNA to build cells for computational biomasses. Such cells DNA would not need to be nearly as complex as real living creatures. Even single celled creatures need much more DNA based information than any artificial cells. Artificial computational biomass cells would only need enough information for replicating on command, following operation instructions and continuation (aka living). Some day we may have enough knowledge to build such systems (creatures). A biomass computer is only the first step to harnessing a very powerful technology. We may even be able to make cells that can build new cells with new DNA that we program. That way we could experiment with out having to build such cells and DNA by hand.

      --
      Thermal depolymerization - Lazy recycling.
    4. Re:Brain vs. computer comparisons only go so far by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      The fact that a computer is binary or analogic (or digital with more than 2 states) is completely irrelevant to understand its behaviour. Knowing that it is a Von Neuman computer or a neural network is also almost irrelevant to understand its behaviour.

      Now, the difference from a network of a few hundred simple neurons and one of several bilion of very complex ones is quite relevant.

      You can't compare our brain with our computers, but you gave the wrong reasons.

    5. Re:Brain vs. computer comparisons only go so far by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      ISTR that neurons are, pretty much, either firing or not firing, on or off, and that, consequently, a brain "processes" shades of gray in a way substantially similar to the way your typical digital computer "processes" real numbers.

    6. Re:Brain vs. computer comparisons only go so far by radtea · · Score: 1

      People have been comparing brains to computers almost as long as they have been comparing computers to brains.

      And people have been using inappropriate analogies between the brain and the dominant technology of the day for even longer than that.

      Freud compared the brain to a steam engine, the visible motion of consciousness driven by the hidden fires of the unconscious. Later comparisons were made to telephone exchanges and electrical supply networks. I don't know if anyone ever compared the brain to the power loom, but it would be in keeping with the long history of imposing on the brain the metaphor-of-the-moment.

      The brain is almost nothing like a computer. My favoured analogy for the brain is a stagnant pond. Much of what goes on in our heads is about neuro-chemistry, not electrical activity. So think of the brain as the dynamically stable eco-system of a stagnant pond, a seething chemical soup that is capable of the most remarkable non-linear reactions to its environement.

      Does such a thing have an operating system? A kernel? Does it boot?

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    7. Re:Brain vs. computer comparisons only go so far by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Synapses are more than eigther fireing or not, they can fire with variable strength. And each neuron has several associated synapses, many in and one out.
          Whether or not the outgoing synapse is fire and how strong is determined by the imputs and internal 'settings'.
      Not a binary situation at all.
        Though IANA neurologist or anything related so my laymans understanding is probably a bit simplistic and not in complete alignment with the facts.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    8. Re:Brain vs. computer comparisons only go so far by tgv · · Score: 1

      While I agree that the brain is not easily comparable to a computer, the main processing in the brain *is* electrical: neurons interchange information (to use the computer metaphor) by electrical spikes. These then send of neuro-transmitters, which in turn causes changes in the electrical balance on another neuron.

      The closest thing to the brain's operating system would be your genes: that controls how connections are made, the balance between structures, the amounts of neuro-transmitters available, etc. For the rest, the brain is its own operating system.

    9. Re:Brain vs. computer comparisons only go so far by Egregius · · Score: 1

      You can express anything in binary. It also depends on which form of quantum computing you're going for, but most involve being able to represent more than 2 states with each 'transistor'.

  14. Human rights by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I wonder when the Hague will rule that freedom from mind-altering drugs and effects is a human right. It can't come soon enough.

  15. Yeah but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wait for it... Does it run Linux?

  16. Obligatory Homer Simpson Quote.... by Himring · · Score: 2, Funny

    Homer: Okay, brain. You don't like me, and I don't like you, but let's get through this thing and then I can continue killing you with beer.

    Homer's Brain: It's a deal!

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    1. Re:Obligatory Homer Simpson Quote.... by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Homer: Shut up brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-Tip!

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    2. Re:Obligatory Homer Simpson Quote.... by Himring · · Score: 3, Funny

      Homer's brain: Use reverse psychology.
      Homer: Oh, that sounds too complicated.
      Homer's brain: Okay, don't use reverse psychology.
      Homer: Okay, I will!

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    3. Re:Obligatory Homer Simpson Quote.... by punkr0x · · Score: 1

      Homer: Ah ha! I've got it! Brain, how can I ever thank you? Brain: Just don't bump me on your way out of the car. *bump* Homer: Sorry.

    4. Re:Obligatory Homer Simpson Quote.... by something_wicked_thi · · Score: 1

      6-fingered humans will outnumber 5-fingered humans by 2412....

      Shouldn't that be 1490?*

      Coat? I don't need. It's over 40 F outside.

      * Gung'f 2412 va onfr 12.

  17. orwell by User+956 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    This article on Yahoo Science News describes a new finding that explains how the thalamus is used by your brain to essentially boot your brain

    So that's what Orwell meant when he wrote: "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face -- forever."

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:orwell by Archtech · · Score: 1

      'So that's what Orwell meant when he wrote: "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stomping on a human face -- forever."'

      Stamping, actually, old man. Orwell was English.

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  18. embracing the overblown analogy for a moment... by pb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are you sure that it doesn't sound more like a bootloader, or a DHCP server, or a firewall/router, at the edge of the network, protecting the main Beowulf cluster, etc., etc....

    Ok, enough of that.

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  19. nitric oxide by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One interesting thing about this is that nitric oxide is produced in the sinuses. Does "proper" nasal breathing result in altering the concentration of this molecule in the blood and therefore have an effect on consciousness?

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
    1. Re:nitric oxide by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Are you setting up a "mouth-breather" pseudo-joke?

    2. Re:nitric oxide by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Are you setting up a "mouth-breather" pseudo-joke?

      Nah. Sorry if I was unclear. I was thinking about yoga, meditation, qi gong, and various martial arts, and their focus on proper breathing, which generally involves inhaling through the nose (and thus inhaling a bit of nitric oxide from the sinuses), and that these arts also focus on certain states of consciousness. I've always thought that the link between special breathing methods and altered states of consciousness was a pretty simple question of oxygen and carbon dioxide, now I'm wondering at the role of nitric oxide.

      As a kid, I spent enough time with stuffed-up nasal passages from allergies to not find anything funny about mouth breathing.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    3. Re:nitric oxide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, there are cavities within the brain that are called sinuses, so there's no connection with yoga etc. and breathing. A little googling turns up, for example, this: http://www.bartleby.com/107/171.html

    4. Re:nitric oxide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew my giant, easily infectable sinuses were good for something...

    5. Re:nitric oxide by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      No, there are cavities within the brain that are called sinuses, so there's no connection with yoga etc. and breathing.

      There are sinuses within the brain, yes, unrelated to the paranasal sinuses. It is however the paranasal sinuses that produce nitric oxide, not the sinuses of the dura mater.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    6. Re:nitric oxide by obdulio · · Score: 1

      It's called YOGA.

      --
      PENAROL: Seras eterno como el tiempo y floreceras en cada primavera.
    7. Re:nitric oxide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right snort gets the coke where it needs to be. No need to breathe. BTW I never knew cocaine had nitric oxide in it.

    8. Re:nitric oxide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, its called Pranayama, a subset of the pratice of yoga. The other 7 being Yama (Moral codes), Niyama (self purification), Asana (the physical aspect of yoga pratice), Pratyahara (sense control), Dharana (concentration), Dhyana (meditation) and Samadhi (Contemplation).

      Perhaps the pratice of yoga on a base level, actively engages the 'feedback' system from high order areas of the brain to the thalamus, refining sensory input at a subconcious level.

  20. Metaphor City by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The thalamus is a gate, a bouncer, a kernel, a bootloader, a chamber, a relay, a telephone exchange.

    I personally think that the thalamus is like a coathook. You can hang whatever metaphor you feel like on it.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Metaphor City by spun · · Score: 1

      The thalamus is not a coathook. It is a series of tubes.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:Metaphor City by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Would that be literal tubes or metaphorical tubes?

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  21. Help! by rackhamh · · Score: 1

    Can somebody tell me where to find the Ctrl, Alt, and Delete buttons for my brain???

    1. Re:Help! by Peter+Mork · · Score: 1

      No problem, they're labeled Jgr, Ms, and Tr (for Jägermeister).

    2. Re:Help! by techpawn · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, you need to press your nose, right ear, and left big toe at the same time... Poor bastard running windows...

      --
      Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    3. Re:Help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the local pub.

    4. Re:Help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is interchangeable with "smack"-"on"-"the_head"

    5. Re:Help! by rackhamh · · Score: 1

      No, that's more like yanking the power cord from the wall.

    6. Re:Help! by Peter+Mork · · Score: 1

      I concede the point.

    7. Re:Help! by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's spelled kinda funny: TEQUILLA.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    8. Re:Help! by Monkeys!!! · · Score: 1

      The action is to drain a bottle of tequila in one go.

      Well that's the hard reset anyway, solves 90% of all problems but can leave you with bad sectors in your memory.

  22. I'm pretty sure by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

    That the odds that someone compares this to something about the Nazis approaches unity.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  23. The better question is, what do we call it? by s20451 · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the summary:

    The article describes its function as an operating system, but from the description it actually seems closer to the functions of a kernel.

    Does this mean we should call the brain the Brain/Thalamus? It's unfair to give the entire package precedence over the kernel, as one is useless without the other.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Does this mean we should call the brain the Brain/Thalamus? It's unfair to give the entire package precedence over the kernel, as one is useless without the other.

      I used to study neuroscience. The thalamus is a HUGE bank of relay switches in the brain- all these trunk cables go into it from all over. Basically anything you're paying attention to involves some circuit going through the thalamus, and the way the thalamus works is what limits your ability to focus on multiple things at once. Once something becomes rote- like QWERTY typing or good guitar playing- the thalamus is no longer involved.

      I have epilepsy- really bad seizures- and my brain gets really messed up on restarts because it regains function piece by piece. Occasionally I'll be totally conscious (forming some long term memories again), and watching stuff come back online- I can hear, then I can see, then I can recognize things I see, etc. There are intermediate states where I can see but not recognize things. The seizures start in the right temporal lobe, so the right hemisphere is completely screwed up, but if my left brain works I can compensate with higher functions. Usually I'm looking for water fountains because my head is really hot and sweaty after a seizure. I'll find a water fountain and think, is this a water fountain? Well it has a stream of stuff that looks drinkable... it has a thing coming out the side that you can turn... it MUST be a water fountain! I almost pissed on my wife's chair once after somehow figuring it was a toilet. But without thalamic activity I'd never be able to patch right brain functions and send sensory information to the forebrain from the left side. If I'm able to pay attention to something at all, then there is some thalamic function. Recognizing it is a different task.

      The ability to form long term memories comes later and is a more distributed gradual process as areas of the cortex recover. I was in this cubicle working once... doing simple stuff like cleaning up someone's crappy code... then I started doing more mentally intense work, and I turned around after an hour or two and noticed my cubicle was a mess. Everyone said, "you had a seizure a few hours ago, don't you remember?"

      Recently my brain has been passing through a metastable fugue state after really nasty seizures where I have partial function, but it's not me yet- it's like someone else. I answer yes/no questions completely differently, I don't recognize my wife, I fight with people if they get in my way, and I don't know where I'm going but I'm going somewhere, sometimes out the door. Usually no new memories are being formed; I have to go by what people tell me afterward. Apparently I'm getting better at fooling people in the fugue state because my speech in the fugue is starting to almost sound normal even though I have only partial brain function. One of these days I'm going to regain consciousness in jail.

    2. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Funny
      all these trunk cables go into it from all over

      So, what you're saying is that the brain isn't like a truck, but it's actually a bunch of tubes? You can't just pull your brain up and load it and drive it away, 'cause it's tubes.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    3. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by charlesnw · · Score: 1

      This is a very eye opening look at the brain. I would like to chat with you offline. Please e-mail me @ charles@thewybles.com

      This subject interests me for a variety of reasons far to many to mention here. This is not a troll by any means.

      --
      Charles Wyble System Engineer
    4. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This sounds somewhat similar to some recreational experiences I've had with dissociative drugs, primarily Dextromethorphan, although much less pleasant! The brain is a complex web of interconnected systems, the world becomes radically different when elements of that system operate out of spec. Have you ever had "strobing"? That was always one of the more interesting qualities of DXM at certain dosages - it's almost like being in a dark room with a strobe light except there is almost a kind of buffering, it's really quite amazing the first time it happens. At higher doses the part of your brain that handles facial recognition goes completely out of synch, what's interesting is that everything else can still be recognized properly, but identifying faces becomes like the water fountain in your story ("I know she has blue eyes and blond hair, this MUST be Susan!").

    5. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      Well, that depends on the size of the package ;)

    6. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      wow. Sounds like descriptions of old world "possesed by the devil" type stories. Have you tried smoking weed to fight the seizures? I amm not a doctor though. It's like that guy who in like 1890 got a railway spike through his brain and became a complete asshole afterwards. This is probably the most interesting anecdote I have read all week.

      oh i found a link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phineas_Gage

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    7. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      I don't have anything positive to contribute, but I'd like to just say that that is a facinating post. To see your brain coming back online must be an unsettling and intense experience.

      Thank you for sharing this.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    8. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Surely your family and friends must have considered exorcism by now, what are you waiting for?

    9. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you read Stanislaw Lem's "Peace on Earth"? The protagonist has to deal with a "second personality" in his head (that controls half of his body) after his corpus callosum, which is responsible for negotiating between the left and right hemispheres, is severed. You might find it a very enjoyable read (not only because you might be able to relate to it, but also because Lem is a fantastic author).

    10. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, since nobody has patented it, and the source code is readily available (not that anyone understands it yet) we should probably call it GNU/Thalamus.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    11. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by SimplyI · · Score: 1

      I don't have epilepsy, but I have had similar experience as the brain reboot thing. Though, apparently for a much shorter length of time. And, I sometimes simply lose the ability to recognize things/make rational conclusions. One time this was happening, I had a burrito, but the burrito was too complex to eat. I knew that I had it for a reason, but it was a long time before I could figure out what it was and that I had intended to eat it. Though, that time I only actually came close to recognizing it. So, when I realized I had intended to eat it, I was still confused... Just went to sleep.

      Also, your description of the metastable fugue state is exactly what happens to me sometimes when I wake up. But, my speech isn't impaired(so far as I've been told) and people only figure it out after I say/do some really weird stuff(growling, walking on tables, being generally irrational, etc). Sometimes I wake up(finish booting out of it if I'm already "awake") to some interesting stories...

    12. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by Espinas217 · · Score: 1

      You should write a book or a blog about your expriences. It would be really interesting to read what you are describing in detail.

      --
      La vida no es una pastafrola. :wq
    13. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by talljuan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I do not have seizures, I can relate a little. Two years ago I had neurosurgery to remove a brain tumour. The first couple days in the ICU were difficult, not from any sensation of pain, but beacuse my perceptions of the world were so distorted by the trauma of the procedure. Whenever I opened my eyes, everything was like an offset double-image. Very confusing. By the third day, my brain had fully remembered how to properly integrate the inputs from each eye. Now, I am pretty much back to normal. The main thing that remains is that I lost about half of the peripheral vision on my right side (the tumour was on the left side of my brain), and a difficulty in maintaining concentration (a frequent result of having brain tumour/surgery, but have meds that help that).

      Anyways, best wishes for you in getting effective treatment!

      -j

    14. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      Bruce Perens probablu wants us to call it the NEU/Thalmus.

      (Just joking, Bruce! Just joking! We love you!)

    15. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does this mean we should call the brain the Brain/Thalamus? It's unfair to give the entire package precedence over the kernel, as one is useless without the other.


      No, it's not. By the way, GNU/Thalamus is the correct name.

    16. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by sjames · · Score: 1

      For whatever reason, some mornings I seem to wake up piece by piece. On one of the more extreme mornings, I heard a sound seemingly coming from everywhere at once. It's hard to describe but it sounded sort of like various cartoon sounds mixed with bells.

      As I was trying very hard to figure out what in the world could make such an odd sound, I suddenly realized it was the neighbor's dog barking in the back yard. Once I realized what it was, I couldn't possibly get myself to even see how I could have heard it the other way. I'm guessing the parts of my brain that interpret sound finally started working.

    17. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      The thalamus is a HUGE bank of relay switches in the brain- all these trunk cables go into it from all over. Basically anything you're paying attention to involves some circuit going through the thalamus, and the way the thalamus works is what limits your ability to focus on multiple things at once.

      So what you're saying is, the Thalamus isn't the kernel of the brain (a kernel would imply software which would imply the Thalamus is actually software and not hardware), it's a Programmable Interrupt Controller.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    18. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by mu22le · · Score: 1

      your experience is very interesting, I think it sheds a new light on the origin of schizophrenia (and somehow reminds me of a few Philip Dick's novels have you ever read them?)

    19. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by d3struct0r · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to say that was a fascinating post, and very informative. Props!

    20. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by mentaldingo · · Score: 0

      Fixed in CVS.

    21. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by Lars83 · · Score: 1

      A kid in my college dorm died from DXM. Good luck.

    22. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      I abused dextromethorphan ten years ago. I think I'm burned out on it.

    23. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It takes a fair bit of work to die from DXM itself, unless you're abusing pure powder to the point of total anaesthesia or doing something like juggling chainsaws while on it. The most likely cause for DXM-related mortality would be poisoning from other ingredients in combination preparations -- especially acetaminophen -- due to failure to read or understand the product labeling.

      I ingested 600mg of pseudoephedrine once via such a mistake. Not fun, but not nearly as life-threatening as playing with Benadryl/Dramamine.

    24. Re:The better question is, what do we call it? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what a waste of hypergraphia!

  24. I thought it was a series of tubes??? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    At least according to Senator Stevens it is.

  25. Dumbest article ever. by Noxal · · Score: 0

    Dumbest article ever.

  26. or the computer boots up like your brain ? by arkaino · · Score: 1

    I think its the other way round :-P

    cheers

  27. Norton Ghost by krell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This also brings us closer to the day when we can re-program our brains to a desired previous state. This is something you might want to do after (for example) learning Esperanto or how to speak very fluent Klingon, when you start to think that Jon Katz news items make perfect sense, having gone to see "Gigli" or "Star Trek 10", having seen the Goatse image one too many times (once is too much!) or getting infected with an embarassing Olivia Newton-John earworm: things you'd really not have in your wetware. Perhaps Symantec should roll out a new version of Norton Ghost. One that uses real ghosts, this time.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
    1. Re:Norton Ghost by zlogic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about watching one (good) movie, playing one (good) game, reading one (good) book all over again?
      After forgetting the plot and characters you'll get the same experience as reading/watching/playing for the first time.

  28. Research abstract by FleaPlus · · Score: 4, Informative

    I really wish submitters would include a link to the research paper, so we could actually judge the research for ourselves instead of relying on some journalist's interpretation. Here's the abstract for this paper, from Neuroscience:

    Diurnal gene expression patterns of T-type calcium channels and their modulation by ethanol

    The transient (T-type) calcium channel participates in the generation of normal brain rhythms as well as abnormal rhythms associated with a range of neurological disorders. There are three different isoforms of T-type channels and all are particularly enriched in the thalamus, which is involved in generating many of these rhythms. We report a novel means of T-type channel regulation in the thalamus that involves diurnal regulation of gene expression. Using real time polymerase chain reaction we detected a diurnal pattern of gene expression for all T-type channel transcripts. The peak of gene expression for the CaV3.1 transcript occurred close to the transition from active to inactive (sleep) states, while expression for both CaV3.2 and CaV3.3 peaked near the transition of inactive to active phase. We assessed the effect of chronic consumption of ethanol on these gene expression patterns by examining thalamic tissues of ethanol-consuming cohorts that were housed with the controls, but which received ethanol in the form of a liquid diet. Ethanol consumption resulted in a significant shift of peak gene expression of approximately 5 h for CaV3.2 toward the normally active phase of the mice, as well as increasing the overall gene expression levels by approximately 1.7-fold. Peak gene expression was significantly increased for both CaV3.2 and CaV3.3. Measurements of CaV3.3 protein expression reflected increases in gene expression due to ethanol. Our results illustrate a novel regulatory mechanism for T-type calcium channels that is consistent with their important role in generating thalamocortical sleep rhythms, and suggests that alterations in the pattern of gene expression of these channels could contribute to the disruption of normal sleep by ethanol.


    Curiously, I get the impression that the emphasis of the research is somewhat different from what was emphasized in the popular-press article.

    1. Re:Research abstract by mspohr · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Thanks for posting this abstract and link. Most articles in the popular press are written by idiots so it's good to go to the source.

      From the abstract, it appears that the thalamus does act as a kind of "pacemaker" (or "motivator" as in R2D2).

      The really important finding of the study is that this may be the path that alcohol uses to disrupt sleep.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    2. Re:Research abstract by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Hum... modulation by Ethanol...

      I'm glad to perform ethanol modulation experiments in my brain... ALl for science, you know...

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    3. Re:Research abstract by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I found myself wondering if this is also a clue as to why some people take a while to get their brains online in the morning, while others are fully functional from the moment they open their eyes.

      I'm the sort who boots and loads the OS in a matter of seconds, so I'm completely awake by the time my feet hit the floor. I'm also a "morning person" and am at my best when I get up with the sun. Occurs to me to wonder if this is really a single trait, generated by a thalamus with a higher CPU speed. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:Research abstract by phystor · · Score: 5, Informative
      As a neuroscientist I completely agree that it would be useful to present at least some simplified version of the actual findings instead of some nifty computer analogy to make it sound cool. The actual findings are in stark contrast what is being claimed by the news piece.

      The paper you link is a different one. This is the actual paper:

      Alexander GM, Kurukulasuriya NC, Mu J, Godwin DW. Cortical feedback to the thalamus is selectively enhanced by nitric oxide. Neuroscience. 2006 Jul 28 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=p ubmed&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=AbstractPlus&list_uids=168 76956&query_hl=12&itool=pubmed_docsum

      Indeed the area they study is somewhat mysterious: The thalamus provides separate communication channels for essentially all sensory information from the sensory organs (e.g. eyes) to the cerebral cortex. However, unlike most brain areas it appears that there is no transformation going on in the thalamus. So if there is no computation, it must be a relay! As much as much most neuroscientist find the idea of pure "relay" unsatisfactory we simply have no evidence for anything beyond it. Hence all the speculation. Unfortunately, the present paper sheds no light onto the thalamus mystery. The authos cut a slice out of a brain and study in isolation. Clearly you won't get much functional information about what's actually going on in this way. Then the authors dump a drug onto the slice to show that it differentially turns up the gain of one input and turns down the gain of another one. Nice, but we don't know if this is actually going on in the brain or how this chemical would get there. If --as the journalists claim-- this finding were to transform our ideas about the thalamus then it probably wouldn't be published in a third tier journal like 'Neuroscience'.

      So much for science journalisms.

      -phystor-

    5. Re:Research abstract by 19061969 · · Score: 1

      It's still interesting, though I'm speaking more or less from laymans terms. When I did my Bsc in psych, I wanted to look into the role of sleep and had a hypothesis about NO playing a role in synaptic plasticity during slow wave and (to a lesser extent) REM sleep (ie, sleep is necessary for long term memory formation and NO plays a major role in this). Instead I went into HCI. My mistake... Neurosciences benefit! ;-) But this paper seems to discuss how NO can selectively attune input (it selectively inhibits sensory responses - would it be a 'filter' for sensory information?). NO quite possibly plays other roles, but this paper seems to provide evidence to falsify my hypothesis. btw - I totally agree about the state of science reporting. In most cases, it's hopeless.

      --
      bang goes my karma... again...
    6. Re:Research abstract by wanax · · Score: 1

      Short answer is no.

      Your sleep cycles are regulated by two main features: environment (most importantly exposure to bright light when you get up), and circadian rhythms, which are a natural ~25hr rhythm generated in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of your hypothalmus (SCN), which is receives light signals and uses them to entrain your rhythms to a 24 hour day. The centers for controlling your sleep function mostly reside in the brainstem, although other areas such as parts of the thalmus and the pineal gland play a role.. all these areas appear to combine to function more like an on-off switch. The interaction of this switch and your circadian rhythms control whether you're asleep and how asleep you are. I should also note, that this switch is messy, and in a typical nights sleep, you'll have a fat tailed distribution of sleep length (ie. 100's of times asleep for a few seconds, once asleep for a few hours). The switching in and out is thought to modulate what sleep 'phase' you're in, which controls such things as the calcium channels in your thalmus (which can drive neurons when you're asleep but not when you're awake), whether you're undergoing REM and the strength of theta rhythms in your hippocampus, which appears vital in your ability to consolidate long term memory.

      Wake up grogginess is much more correlated with the sleep phase you wake up out of, whether you were in REM, whether you're being roused from a long or short bout of actual sleep and how close the wake-up time is to your current circadian entrainment. Your getting online faster in the morning is much more related to how strongly entrained your circadian rhythms are than having a fast or slow thalmus--note that your description of waking up with the sun is the exact time that's most advantageous to use the sun to entrain your circadian rhythms. I should note on cortical processing 'speed' most neurons are contrained by their RC constants
      (neurons are capacitors), which in most of cortex is typically limited to about 10ms (areas of the auditory system in particular, get these down to near 1ms using small cell bodies, specially maintained voltage differences that are energy expensive, etc). This is not something subject to interpersonal variance, it's basically the same in both humans and frogs.

      This paper's finding, is that ethanol can block T-type calcium channels turning on, which is thought to be vital in things like having a strong theta rhythm while asleep (which would, for example, be a reason why you have a really hard time remembering what you did the night before if you were fairly drunk, because your theta rhythms would have been compromised, inhibiting your ability to consolidate long term memory).

    7. Re:Research abstract by DragonWriter · · Score: 1
      Most articles in the popular press are written by idiots [...]
      That's perhaps a bit unfair. They are written by journalists, who have are often reasonably intelligent people who have spent many years studying journalism and practising their craft. They're just often completely ignorant of things besides journalism, including, all too often, the subject matter that their journalism addresses.
    8. Re:Research abstract by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's not performing any transformation then it is probably just a filter or suppressor. In that regard, I've always felt that certain Jedi mind tricks must work on the thalamus:

      Obi Wan: "You don't need to see his identification."

      Storm Trooper: "I don't need to see his identification."

      Obi Wan: "These aren't the droids you're looking for."

      Storm Trooper: "These aren't the droids we're looking for."

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    9. Re:Research abstract by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      In other words, the word "idiot," as the grandparent poster and many other posters here use it, means "someone who doesn't have the specialized knowledge I do (though I have little knowledge of anything else)."

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    10. Re:Research abstract by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      There is also evolutionary biology, where high initial awarness can be a survival trait if you are woken suddenly.

      In person against person situations seconds mean the difference between life and death. People have a very, long history of trying to sneak up on other people and trying to make sure they never wake up.

      I have found body temprature during sleep has a strong affect, whether I strongly remember dreams, whether I control my dreams or whether they a just vague reflections.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    11. Re:Research abstract by absurdimreducto · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's the correct paper. The original article can be found on the page below as a PDF: http://www1.wfubmc.edu/Nba/Faculty/Dwayne+Godwin.h tm Not beach reading...!

  29. Linus is it you? by steincastle · · Score: 2, Funny

    brain ... it actually seems closer to the functions of a kernel

    so... God and Linus invented the same thing?
    #@$&!!@# I always thought Linus is God =)

    1. Re:Linus is it you? by kernel_pat · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, I forgot Linus Torvalds invented the kernel. Idiot.

    2. Re:Linus is it you? by kantier · · Score: 1

      oblig. linus quote:

      My name is Linus, and I am your god.
      (can't remember where I read it, probably wikiquote)
  30. Book camp by krell · · Score: 2, Funny

    "We might have to wait for Book Camp for that one..

    Dilbert: "Why has Wally been barking, chewing the managers, and peeing on the flowcharts all day?"
    Dogbert: "He rebooted his brain with Cujo using that new 'Book Camp' software."

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  31. Imagine a beowulf cl... by SpeedyGonz · · Score: 1

    Nevermind . . . no pun intended either

    1. Re:Imagine a beowulf cl... by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      There's a name for a Beowulf cluster of brains: a conversation.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  32. nitric oxide's by McGiraf · · Score: 1

    hi hi hi hah ha HA hAH HAH hihi hihi wooooo he he hah ha ha

    1. Re:nitric oxide's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That would be nitrous oxide - N2O.

    2. Re:nitric oxide's by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      "That would be nitrous oxide - N2O."

      You are absolutely correct, I must have been on drugs when I wrote the prior comment.

  33. Researcher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Godwin says the new research shows it's more accurate to think of the thalamus not as a gate but as a club bouncer, who doesn't simply allow a huge rush of people to go in or no one at all, but picks and chooses whom to let in and out.

    Godwin also says that the thalamus is like Nazi Germany; it declares some people are full citizens and others are untermensch.

  34. Let's not forget the order by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not the brain that works like an OS, apparently it's the OS that has a similar structure to a brain (already).

    I guess we're on the right way to seeing higher intelligence emerge from machines in the next few decades.

    1. Re:Let's not forget the order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I guess we're on the right way to seeing higher intelligence emerge from machines in the next few decades.

      Just like in the 1950's higher intelligence from machines was just a few decades away?

    2. Re:Let's not forget the order by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      Then when can we expect to see higher intelligence emerge in the common population?

  35. Bouncer? by crotherm · · Score: 1

    Godwin says the new research shows it's more accurate to think of the thalamus not as a gate but as a club bouncer, who doesn't simply allow a huge rush of people to go in or no one at all, but picks and chooses whom to let in and out. "

    Why a bouncer. I thought we used car analogies around here...

    it's more accurate to think of the thalamus not as a bouncer, but a traffic cop, who doesn't simply allow a huge rush of cars to go in or no one at all, but picks and chooses whom to let in and out.

    There, now I understand it.

    --
    "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
  36. Isn't it more like a microkernel? by vadim_t · · Score: 1

    After all, it's got all that massive parallelism and capability of continuing working after parts are damaged and even routing around damage.

  37. login? by rolyatknarf · · Score: 2, Funny

    What happens when someone boots their brain and can't remember the password at the login screen?

    1. Re:login? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I know the answer to this, but I keep thinking "Permission denied" to myself when I try to remember the answer.

    2. Re:login? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd recover the password with crack

    3. Re:login? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They choke on their pretzel.

    4. Re:login? by Hasmanean · · Score: 1

      Then they just log as somebody else.

      Where do they get somebody else's passwords from? From the National Enquirer and magazines that ask the question "what makes (so and so) tick?"

      --
      Hasan
    5. Re:login? by egilhh · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard of biometric authentication?

      ~egilhh

    6. Re:login? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like modern Thinkpads come with fingerprint readers, so does your brain.

      Simply rub your eyes, and pick your nose a bit, and you're good to go.

      And to test this hypothesis, try picking someone else's nose ;^)

  38. ...and to add irony to it.... by krell · · Score: 1

    "How about watching one (good) movie, playing one (good) game, reading one (good) book all over again? After forgetting the plot and characters you'll get the same experience as reading/watching/playing for the first time."

    Specifically, imagine the biggest get-a-life fan of the Bill Murray film "Groundhog Day" who re-sets his brain after watching it every day so he can watch it anew the next day.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  39. Scary even to think about this by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know if I can trust any kernel to be compared to the brain, after all Windows gets the Blue Scream of Death and the Linux gets Panic Attacks, DOS has to be rebooted often to modify memory management, Unix gets segmentation falls and bus errors. This is terrible news, I think I am just going to walk around in circles until I stop thinking about this... Damn! It's a deadlock forced by a race condition! I just want to go to sleep.

    1. Re:Scary even to think about this by FST777 · · Score: 1

      You're clearly running Linux then. Just reboot yourself (make sure to type an -r after shutdown, not -p...), the panic won't return that easily. Oh, and if it does, consider filing a bug report, will ya?

      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    2. Re:Scary even to think about this by antdude · · Score: 1

      You already have these types of faults: heart attacks, seizures, illness, dumps, etc.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  40. Godwin is laying down the law here..... by krell · · Score: 1

    "it's more accurate to think of the thalamus not as a bouncer, but a traffic cop, who doesn't simply allow a huge rush of cars to go in or no one at all, but picks and chooses whom to let in and out."

    Since it is Godwin who came up with this, the traffic cop is dressed in a smart black SS uniform. And you don't want to be the one he sends away.

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  41. Damn! by martinultima · · Score: 1
    from the my-brain-starts-with-the-thx-noise dept.

    Dammit, you people must have known I set that as my wakeup track! (No, seriously, I did...)
    --
    Creative misinterpretation is your friend.
  42. Boot your Brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Approach, students. Close the circle at the feet of the master. You have come to me asking that I be your guide along the path of Ti Kwan Leep. But, be warned: To learn its ways, you must learn the ways of your own soul. Let us meditate upon this wisdom now. So:

    Aaaaaaooooommm......"

    1. Re:Boot your Brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  43. Relic Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is why the creature only ate the thalamus of the humans it killed .

    A mind is a terrible thing to waste... Especially if you're really hungry

    1. Re:Relic Reference by ShannaraFan · · Score: 1

      Damn, I was going to mention The Relic...

  44. Already exists ... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    This already exists, but in people it is known as dual personalities :)

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  45. So in other words.. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    PENN FROM PENN & TELLER: They're coming in from remote nodes. They're going after the Kernal!

    TONY SOPRANO'S SHRINK LADY: Colonel who?

    PENN: The System Command Processor, it's the brain.

    TSSL: Cancer, brain, brain, cancer!

  46. Wrong wrong wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The scientific paper doesn't say your brain boots like a computer; an ignorant journalist has misinterpreted it.

    Your brain doesn't boot. It never ever shuts down, at least, until you die. Once it shuts down, you AREN'T going to reboot it. At best, it goes into "sleep mode", which is quite different than your laptop's sleep mode. Your computer doesn't dream when it's in sleep mode, and your brain doesn't shut down when you sleep, not even when you're in a coma.

    When you shut off your brain, it doesn't EVER start back up again. It isn't a computer and is nothing whatever like a computer. It isn't elecronic, it's electrochemical. It isn't binary, it's analog. Thought is merely a series of chemical reactions.

    Some people think that if you make a complex enough computer it will become sentient. Yeah? How many more beads do I have to string on my binary abacus before it becomes self-aware?

    How many more years before the PETA idiots start campaigning for "machine rights"?

    Brains don't boot, computers don't think. Somebody needs to give the journalist the boot.

    1. Re:Wrong wrong wrong by Anon-Admin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thought is merely a series of chemical reactions.

      Which is why I think Ps. Cubensis and Ps. Mexicana mushrooms are so much fun. :)

    2. Re:Wrong wrong wrong by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      Thought is merely a series of chemical reactions.
      This seems counter to the rest of your argument; after all, if you can reduce brain activity completely into a series of reactions, then it should be possible to model those on a computer. Which would make the computer think exactly like a brain.
      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Wrong wrong wrong by markov_chain · · Score: 1
      This seems counter to the rest of your argument; after all, if you can reduce brain activity completely into a series of reactions, then it should be possible to model those on a computer. Which would make the computer think exactly like a brain.

      Why do you assume this is impossible?
      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    4. Re:Wrong wrong wrong by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      Some people think that if you make a complex enough computer it will become sentient

      Not unless it's organised just so. And we haven't really stumbled across the correct organisation yet. Chances are it could be a lot simpler than we think (after all, some incredibly complex and intelligent behaviour is exhibited by even a small brain - say, a Sparrow's - the image processing alone is awesome compared to what we can do with machines) - but we just don't know yet. An interesting book is Hofstadter's "Godel, Escher, Bach" which takes the view that yes, build a system with enough "neurons" and it will become sentient. I have a feeling that it's not just the number of neurons, but the way they link that matters. What isn't up for argument (I hope!) is that sentience doesn't require any sort of supernatural force. However, there are still eminent scientists who do believe that.

    5. Re:Wrong wrong wrong by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      You can't just pile stuff on it. It's not a truck. It's a series of rchemical reactions.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  47. Don't think this command by ehaggis · · Score: 0

    >fdisk -thalamus

    >shudown -h now
    (reboot)

    or else...

    >No operating system found.
    >Insert system disk and press any key to continue.

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
  48. Mod parent up! by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

    Wow, thanks for the link. I guess the paper I found was one by the same author last month in the same journal. I was wondering why the stuff in the paper was so different from what was being described in the article...

    Here's the abstract from what you linked:

    The brain somehow merges visual information with the behavioral context in which it is being processed, a task that is often attributed to the cerebral cortex. We have identified a new role of the gaseous neurotransmitter, nitric oxide (NO), in the early selective enhancement of corticogeniculate communication that may participate in this process at the level of the thalamus. Visual information is dynamically gated through the thalamus by brainstem neurons that release acetylcholine and NO. Using in vitro electrophysiology, we characterized NO effects on excitatory postsynaptic potentials and currents (EPSCs) elicited from retinal and cortical pathways in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the ferret. NO selectively and reversibly increased cortically-evoked postsynaptic responses, and this effect was mimicked by cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cGMP). Conversely, NO inhibited retinally-evoked responses independently of cGMP. We demonstrated that these differential effects were specific to postsynaptic N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors by studying treatment effects on pharmacologically isolated EPSCs from each pathway. We propose that when brainstem activity is increased during behavioral arousal or rapid eye movement sleep, NO may increase the relative sensitivity of relay neurons to corticogeniculate feedback. The net effect of these changes in synaptic processing may be to selectively suppress peripheral information while unifying data carried by reentrant corticogeniculate loops with the behavioral context in which the visual information is processed.

  49. Computers think like submarines swim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Edsgar Dijkstra

  50. A bouncer or a demon? by quoll · · Score: 1

    While less well known than club bouncers, I would think that the thalamus would be better likened to Maxwell's Demon.

    This would explain why all your body heat escape from your head!

  51. Level 7 in Tarzana California by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    When I was young, I hung out with an odd chap that was doing experiments in artificial intellegence. He was doing pattern recognition using an array of gold plated iron dendrites that he grew in solution of high pressure nitric acid. It seemed to be able to recognize geometric shaped at various angles. It is interesting that Dr Stewarts research used Nitric acid and the root article metion nitric oxide.

  52. Yeesh by jd · · Score: 1
    I know enough to know that some of the meds I take dangerously lower my seizure threshold, so have to take other meds to counteract that. One big danger for me is that a lot of meds do weird shit (I lost colour vision on Zyprexa) and the interaction is unstable and does shift - sometimes very dramatically. For that reason alone, I wish there was more solid research on seizures, brain chemistry and related meds. (How hard could it be to add some tracer isotopes to lithium salts, then use fMRI to see exactly what happens from start to finish?)


    I have not studied neurology, so apologies for any/all ignorance on my part, but it seems to me that we're only now learning some of the basic mechanics of the brain and are often restricted to a purely qualitative assessment of symptoms (and a purely qualitative assessment of the patient doing the initial qualitative assessment) to determine what is happening.


    That we understand the thalamus to any degree is impressive, if I'm correct in my understanding, but I can find no rhyme or reason for my understanding to be the way things actually work. We're far more technologically advanced, but in all of my visits to neurologists or pdocs, I have never seen any meaningful technology in use.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Yeesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      How hard could it be to add some tracer isotopes to lithium salts, then use fMRI to see exactly what happens from start to finish?
      Dead easy but not terribly useful. Watching the blinking lights on all the network cards tells you precious little about why the LAN just melted down. To be able to analyze problems, we need detailed information about how individual neurons work, how they interact with the glial cells and blood vessels, and the structure of the larger networks of neurons. Unfortunately the individual cells are fearsomely complicated, and the connection networks are even worse and change constantly. Another difficulty is that human brains have significant differences from even other mammals, so rapid progress would require a great deal of vivisection work on healthy subjects. (For some reason most potential subjects run away when you go after their skull with power tools.) This work will take a long time and cost a lot, but will eventually give solid answers about how the brain malfunctions.

      As a stopgap, large genetic studies will be more fruitful. What we need is for gene sequencing to come down to the $1000/person range--and it's getting there. Then we take detailed medical histories and sequences from a hundred each of normals, bipolars, epileptics, and migraineurs. Comparing their genes will tell us which ion channels, transporters, receptors, and so forth are "hot spots". Once we know that, it's straightforward to find drugs that target just those proteins. Right now we're stuck with "dirty" drugs that madly stomp on all sorts of stuff at the same time, which means bizarre and evil side effects. (The antipsychotics and antiepileptics are notoriously dirty. The tricyclic antidepressants, which I take for chronic migraine, are only a little better.)

      We're far more technologically advanced, but in all of my visits to neurologists or pdocs, I have never seen any meaningful technology in use.
      Indeed. Right now the best diagnoses come from a conversation and a basic neurological exam. fMRI scans might be helpful, but the cost is very high, and it's hard to catch an intermittent event that happens the day before a migraine attack or manic episode.

      Incidentally, I seem to remember that lithium acts as a sodium or potassium analog all over the body. It competes for the same transporters and ion channels, but acts just a little different. I think it also builds up in cells and changes their osmotic conditions (concentration of water versus everything else). The upshot is that it pushes many things a little out of equilibrium, putting them at new operating points where, for unclear reasons, they are less likely to oscillate.

  53. Sure thing by phorm · · Score: 1

    Glad to oblige:

    roman_mir:~# shutdown -h +2 'I just want to go to sleep'

  54. Brain A:> by Kelson · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of a classic:

    Brain A is not a system brain.
    Abort, Retry, Sleep?

  55. Great my version is unpatched by bxbaser · · Score: 1

    It has a huge security exploit.
    Ability to run arbitrary code, all it takes is beer and a female and you got root.

    At least in theory.

    1. Re:Great my version is unpatched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check the KB article on this - it says that this behavior is by design.

      Possible workarounds:
      If you're looking to avoid this altogether - isolate the process and mount the loopback device.
      If you're are about to IPC with a woman, then route your ip packets thru /dev/filter and/or set queueing discipline to delay all packets indefinitely until a pdflush command can be issued once IPC terminates.

  56. False:You boot at birth, shutdown when you die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The brain, like the heart, never stopps during life. You dont boot when you wake up and you dont shutdown when you go to sleep.
    The brain does not shutdown even if you are in a coma.

  57. thalamus = kernel by belmolis · · Score: 1

    This gives a whole new meaning to "microkernel". And what with microkernel now equivalent to "peakbrain", it looks like neuroscience sides with Linus against RMS and Tannenbaum. :)


    I run GNU/thalamus.

  58. Cruel joke... by FST777 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If this hurts your feelings, please forgive me... But have you tried formatting the thalamus and installing a better OS than Windows Embedded? I mean, sure, ThalLinux might boot up slower, but it's more stable, so it won't have to do that as much anymore...

    --
    Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    1. Re:Cruel joke... by Noishe · · Score: 1

      Fuck man, the guy posts a sensitive and amazing insight into his life and you tell jokes? wtf? do you not have a soul?

    2. Re:Cruel joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. An awesome soul.

    3. Re:Cruel joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh lighten up you anal turd. It's a fucking joke, not starving kittens for gods sake

  59. Re:or the computer boots up like your brain ? by RMB2 · · Score: 1

    Oblig:

    In Soviet Russia, thalmus boots brain

    --
    [/sarcasm]
  60. Obligatory by RMB2 · · Score: 1

    Just imagine a Beowulf cluster of these things...

    --
    [/sarcasm]
  61. Brain Farts..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 0

    Detective: So, Doctor, what caused this man to die?

    Coroner: Apparently, God created him as a Windows machine and he suffered a massive core dump. It's a chronic occurance in people loaded with Windows. We tried to ask God to fix the problem, but he says that it's normal. We, however, think that he reclassified the bugs as security features just to make the ship date.

    Detective: Um.....ok... so, what happens when a core dump occurs in a Windows person?

    Coroner: Well, their eyes turn bright blue, their body freezes up, and their bowels relax causing copious amounts of code to be evacuated from their body.

    Detective: How are you sure this was a core dump that killed him?

    Coroner: Well, the subject has bright blue eyes, a large amount of code in the pants, and facial trauma.

    Detective: Facial trauma?

    Coroner: Yes, facial trauma. It's caused by the person who was interacting with the subject when the core dump occured. The person isn't sure if what they said got thought to the subject, so they slapped the subject around, because they had the appearance of freezing up.

    Detective: What can people do to avoid these things?

    Coroner: (holds up a deer rifle)

    Detective: (blink)

    -----

    Sig Sauer

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  62. Re:From: Andy T. funy flaimbait by Bigos · · Score: 1

    Why there is no Funny Flaimbait moderation category on slashdot?

    My answer to you post would be that God was in a rush, so he created human monolithic kernel ver1.0. Female brain is apparently better at concentraiting on more things at the same time, so kernel ver1.1 shows the direction where the Almighty would eventually go.

    I wonder when the kernel patch will be available.

    Mat 24:36 But of that day and hour knoweth no one, not even the angels of heaven, neither the Son, but the Father only.

  63. Obligatory Marge Simpson Quote.... by Dorceon · · Score: 1

    Don't ask me, I'm just hair. Your head ended 18 inches ago.

    --
    What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
  64. Last Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This Godwin guy sounds like a Nazi.

  65. Hard restart by ockegheim · · Score: 1

    The brain also seems to have a 'hard restart'. When I was hit by a car and spun in the air, I remember flying but not landing. My friend saw me still for a couple of seconds, then I shuddered or had convusions that woke me up, as if a general 'move' command was being sent to every muscle in my body.

    Later in hospital I was dozing and had a flashback. I saw a violent flash, then the same shuddering or convulsing woke me up. It was as if the brain was protecting me from the trauma of the landing, but keeping me alert afterwards for whatever else might happen.

    Sorry, this may or may not have anything to do with the thalmus and nitrous oxide, but I've always wondered about it.

    --
    I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
  66. Terribly sorry to read this by theolein · · Score: 1

    I like your posts and you certainly have a very agile mind. I'm terribly sorry to read that you suffer from epilepsy. I wish you all the best.

    1. Re:Terribly sorry to read this by doc+modulo · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way, good luck.

      --
      - -- Truth addict for life.
  67. Where can I find out more? by cheros · · Score: 1

    You seem to be well informed, are there any places where I can find more on this? I'm presently researching some new ideas I have on neurofeedback (especially now transcranial stimulation seems to be promising) because I have a totally shot short term, um, memory (OK, bad joke).

    I'm now also getting totally screwed up sleeping patterns so I'm having a map done to see if anything happened (I once fell hard enough to snap my arm in 4 places, and problems have started since so I guess some sand must have shifted :-).

    And I do NOT want to go the chemical route, I want to fix this, not become another pharma shareholder sponsor..

    = Ch =

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  68. Monolithic kernel or interrupt controller? by skeldoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well.. I think the kernel analogy is far from precise. The kernel (at least the monolithic one) is a far too complex and massive system to be paralelled to the thalamus. I think interrupt-controller is a more suitable analogy. Shit comes in and shit goes out and control is being enforced (to some extent).

    Drivers in a kernel would in the brain be something like "control of muscular movement" (cerebellum, parts of cortex, somatic part of the peripheral nervous system, etc...), interfaces would be something like "riding a bike" (using all the "drivers" for muscular movement, balance, memorysystems for planning route, motivational systems for motivation, sensory systems for navigation and real-time collision avoidance, etc...).

    The Thalamus is (at least as I see it) an interruptcontroller issuing "interrupt service routines" on a regular basis, telling our brain that we are about to loose our balance or crash into the tree in front of us.

    The (brain) kernel is the abstract "mind"/"soul" "thing" that is a mental superorganism made up of all our brains organs.

    well... thats just my 2 eurocents.

    1. Re:Monolithic kernel or interrupt controller? by Hasmanean · · Score: 1

      Well any hardware in the brain would be like the BIOS of the brain. Religion and culture is the operating system.

      --
      Hasan
  69. Thalamus takes me back... by si618 · · Score: 1

    Am I alone in being reminded of the C64 game developer Thalamus?

    Stavros Fasoulas coding cool games, Rob Hubbard crankin out the music...such cool memories of the late 80's! Glad I can still remember some of them...

    --
    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion
  70. The thing which really gets me about the brain... by White+Shade · · Score: 1

    The thing that really gets me about the brain, that really messes with my head when i think about it, is the fact that due to nerve transmission rates, the amounts of time it takes for the chemical reactions and physical changes to occur in our sensory systems, and whatever other delays occur between outside world and perception from to the nature of the real world, what we perceive is actually the past.

    The delay might not be all that much, indeed the fact that we can function the way we do shows that our mental latency is pretty darn low, but we're always a tiny bit behind what's actually happening in reality around us.

    if you start thinking about the consequences of this, such as the perceptions during violent/sudden death (ie, a bullet into the brain or getting blown up), or even lesser things like walking into a wall or even just any interaction at ALL with the world, it's really quite awe inspiring to think about the fact that everything we feel, already happened. and, depending on more metaphysical things like the soul or the mind being separate from your body (which is another interesting concept indeed), it might be possible that you're actually already dead, you just don't know it yet. if you get blown up instantly, do you perceive it? or does your mind go away before those nerve signals ever reach it? or if your mind is separate, does it exist up until those signals reach it?

    maybe it's just me, but I find that pretty interesting.

    --
    ìì!
  71. Re:The thing which really gets me about the brain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you combine the "lag" on the sensotory input (speed of sound, light) and the time the nevrosystem uses to compile a mental image of that stimuli; yes, you can say that we always observe the past. But then again, time being relative and all, you might say that the "lag" is determined by the physical restraints imposed on every living (and nonliving) creature. In that mindset everything is in the past. The present is not a moving point on an axis. The present is a point beyond "the present". It is pulling everything forward (or backwards or upwords or whatever) or (more plausibly) not moving at all.

    And the fact that you just expressed a profound philosophical understanding just like that points to a theoretical capacity for an unlimited potential (of the human brain) (despite the restrictions in observing time). :P

  72. Folding@home by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

    Yes, that's why folding@home runs soooo dawn fast. Like the 20 thousand molecules for second we need to model a small part of the brain.

    No, that something can be modelled in a computer doesn't mean it can be modelled in reasonable time.

    Besides that, the computations are "reasonable aproximations". They are not exactly like the real thing.

    In that sense all the computers in the world are not enough to model a single neuron, unless you abstract some of the processes. And if you abstract something, you are not modeling the real thing, but just doing a mathematical aproximation with some formula. Which is nice, but you have to keep in mind the limitations of your modelling. You can't declare that the modelling is the "real thing" just because "it's science" and it's infallible.

    It's like the chapters in CSI where the modelling just don't fit the experimental data because they just missed some things that should be in the model from the start. They change the model and then it fits, but it's too late for the case.

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
    1. Re:Folding@home by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      No, that something can be modelled in a computer doesn't mean it can be modelled in reasonable time.
      So doing something slowly is the same as not doing it. OK...

      Besides that, the computations are "reasonable aproximations". They are not exactly like the real thing.
      So? If I made a copy of my car (which, of course, wouldn't be a molecule-by-molecule duplicate) the copy wouldn't count as a car. OK...

      It's like the chapters in CSI where the modelling just don't fit the experimental data because they just missed some things that should be in the model from the start. They change the model and then it fits, but it's too late for the case.
      What was the point of this?
  73. Too easy by markvp · · Score: 1

    While this study is the first to identify nitric oxide's role in the thalamus, elsewhere in the body it was already known to have an important, if somewhat different function. The molecule is actually integral to controlling blood flow and is, in fact, the molecule Viagra targets in order to increase blood flow to the penis.

    This makes it too easy for women to make a variation of a joke about blood flow that can be in only one place at a time...

  74. Re:The thing which really gets me about the brain. by 4latinos · · Score: 1

    the concepts borrowed from "The Human aerial, Dr. Robin Kelly, New Zealand":
    The fact that you can fool a kid or a cat of th existence of people insite a TV set explains that our brain is not the seat of conciousness, but just a received of higher frequencies.. things are just perceived as real, and, objects (like electrons in quantum physics) do not exist unless you look at them..
    ever heard of a popular saying, the beauty is to the eye of the observer..
    anyways, very nice insights into people's minds here in SD. except of course the jerks that compare anything man made to the brain

    also, I wanted to mention the behavioural changes that console games inflict into the brain. people get impaired for social interaction.. turm violent as if the frontal lobes were numb.. pre-conditioned just for the task of killing king-kong or whatever..maybe from the constant repetition of movements or scenes in those games? only withdrawing from it helps you regain slowly your more social skills..

  75. boot your brain by cogno64 · · Score: 1

    this was a good story... picked it up too

    1. Re:boot your brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  76. Speaking of Garbage Collectors... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    what would be the brain equivelant of the Garbage Collector(e.g. removing unused things)?

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  77. Re:what would be the brain equivelant of the GC ? by roguegramma · · Score: 1

    Garbage collection in the brain means parts of the network get low input and therefore also low output, after which their function slowly deteriorates towards noise, which simplifies their reprogramming. In general, its not good if reconnection happens to large areas of the brain. IANAN

    --
    Hey don't blame me, IANAB