Slashdot Mirror


Flash Drives Go To Work

feminazi writes "USB drive capacity is outpacing Moore's Law by doubling every year, evolving from tchotchkes to devices capable of addressing corporate needs ranging from mobile computing platforms to files stores with encryption and biometrics protection. SanDisk and M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers launched a thumb drive with an intelligent U3 chip that can store and launch applications. Lexar's premium JumpDrive Lightning thumb drive has the fastest data-transfer rates at 18MB/sec write and 24MB/sec read. And some are strong on the outside, too. SanDisk touts a drive built to withstand 2,000 lbs. of pressure. Computerworld tested that claim by repeatedly driving a Volkswagen Beetle over the ruggedized thumb drive. While the drive's body came away with a few scratches, there were no dents, and not a single lost file."

264 comments

  1. Beetle by 42Penguins · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure you can drive a Beetle over it, but so you know the bandwidth of a Beetle full of thumbdrives on the highway?

    1. Re:Beetle by just_another_sean · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bases on this post I vote for a new moderator category: Perplexing.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    2. Re:Beetle by jamie · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's an old joke. Not even a joke. More sort of a thing that some computer programmers say sometimes and nod wisely to make their point.

    3. Re:Beetle by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a joke based on an old measure of bandwidth- from back in the day when modems were so slow that the fastest way to transfer a megabyte from LA to San Francisco was to load a station wagon with tapes and drive there.

      Given a rough guess of 30,000 thumb drives, at 4GB per, on an 8 hour drive, you get 4GB/sec, give or take a GB, as the bandwith of a Beetle full of thumb drives.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:Beetle by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > Sure you can drive a Beetle over it, but so you know the bandwidth of a Beetle full of thumbdrives on the highway?

      Not bad. But it's nothing compared to what you get if you start by feeding a bunch of thumbdrives to a bunch of in order to get 'em past the security checkpoint, and fill a 777 with 'em. Never underestimate the bandwidth of a muthafuckin' 777 full of muchta*BLAM BLAM BLAM*

      (That's IT! I have HAD IT with these MUTHAFUCKIN' memes on this MUTHAFUCKIN' website!

    5. Re:Beetle by Scaba · · Score: 5, Funny

      From TFA:

      Computerworld tested that claim by repeatedly driving an employee's car over the ruggedized thumb drive. While the drive's body came away with a few scratches, there were no dents, and we didn't lose a single file.

      The article doesn't go on to mention how they then put the thumb drive in the employees car, set the car on fire and pushed it over a cliff. Miraculously, the thumb drive survived! Boy, was that guy pissed when he found out what they did to his car...

    6. Re:Beetle by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bases on this post. . .

      But you obvioudly workes it out. You appear to have perplexes your other redponsentd do far though. :)

      KFG

    7. Re:Beetle by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey, I resemble that comment!

      I was nodding silently whilst agreeing with the original poster and you come along and rumble me.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    8. Re:Beetle by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you use modern tapes or hard disks (who the hell still uses *sequential media*), then that's still more bandwidth than any backbone link on the net.

      Especially if you use the Boeing 737 version of old saying.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    9. Re:Beetle by RobertLTux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      depends on the following

      1 size and capacity of the drives
      2 useable volume of said beetle (rip seats out? boxes/bags the drives are in)
      3 current sanity/skill level of driver (adjust for injested chemicals/aural enhancements)

      Rip the beetle down to the shell and bag the drives , load the driver, put some good rock and roll in the tape deck and you could get some massive bandwidth

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    10. Re:Beetle by ePhil_One · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's an old joke.

      First, its not a joke, its an observation.

      Second, the grammar is scrambled, yielding a mixed up Metaphor. We know what he was trying to say, he just did a really bad job of saying it. Dubyaspeak

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    11. Re:Beetle by Peganthyrus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Bandwidth of a 737 full of tapes: 100% data loss when the TSA hears a rumor about a plot to blow up planes via bombs concealed in fake thumbdrives, and makes you throw every single one of them away at the security checkpoint.

      --
      egypt urnash minimal art.
    12. Re:Beetle by inKubus · · Score: 2, Funny

      We know what he was trying to say, he just did a really bad job of saying it

      I guess you're saying we mean what he knows.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    13. Re:Beetle by Arcane_Rhino · · Score: 1
      Hmmph.

      Thatth the latht time I read a potht from thomeone with a thpeach impediment.

    14. Re:Beetle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it's a joke because all it really indicates is a 'peak' bandwidth. More useful to evaluate how realistic it is is to compute sustained bandwidth. That duration would be how long it takes to drive across the bay, unload all the tapes, copy all the tapes to other storage, drive back, unload the station wagon, load new data onto the tapes. Sure there's lots of opportunity to improve the efficiency like copying the tapes off to other storage while the station wagon is being driven back across the bay, or limiting the number of tapes carried to the amount that could be could be copied in the same amount of time as a round trip in the station wagon would take, but in any case, sneakernet type deliveries is not efficient for sustained, reliable, bandwidth. cf RFC 1149, which is considered to be a joke in the format of an RFC.

    15. Re:Beetle by Baricom · · Score: 1

      He made a typo. You could change a single "s" to a "d" and the post would make perfect sense. (Note that the "s" and "d" are right next to each other on the qwerty keyboard.)

      While we're nitpicking, metaphors are not proper nouns.

    16. Re:Beetle by kayditty · · Score: 0

      According to the Beetle's specs of 12 cu ft luggage capacity and 27 cu ft cargo capacity, the number of thumb drives (at 4 sq in) comes out to 16,800 (approximately). This reduces the transfer speed (not "bandwidth"), over an eight hour drive (over five hundred miles, here in the US), to about 2.5GB/s. That's not particularly fast, but it can certainly be accounted for by the density of the thumb drive. As mentioned, a hard drive would result in a much better transfer speed.

    17. Re:Beetle by fbartolini · · Score: 1

      4 sq in? Does your thumb drive come with a crank start? :)

    18. Re:Beetle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man!

      I wish I had me some 2-d Thumb drives!

      That'd be sa-weet!

    19. Re:Beetle by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      But the latency sucks.

    20. Re:Beetle by nedaf7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      [SamuelLJackson]I'm sick of all these motherfucking thumbdrives on this motherfucking plane![/SamuelLJackson]

    21. Re:Beetle by smokeslikeapoet · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what if you only needed to transfer this amount of data once a month? Pay for huge freaking tubes every month. Or pay for a FedEx box to be shipped for roughly $20. BTW, the first time the drives don't work after being unboxed, FedEx insurance replaces them. Just don't delete the data at the source until you're sure it reached the destination.

    22. Re:Beetle by Secrity · · Score: 1

      In the early 1980's, an independant TV station in Boulder, Colorado (KBDI) didn't have a station to transmitter microwave link. They had used a VW to shuttle program tapes from the studio in Boulder to the transmitter on the mountain. Huge analog bandwith, with about 30 minutes of lag.

    23. Re:Beetle by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      Computerworld tested that claim by repeatedly driving an employee's car over the ruggedized thumb drive. While the drive's body came away with a few scratches, there were no dents, and we didn't lose a single file.
      TFA fails to mention that the employees thumb is now the size of a dinner plate, meaning he can no longer log in to his optically secured workstation even if he could get through gate security in the first place.

      The bright side is that he has become an exceptional table tennis player.

    24. Re:Beetle by Bloater · · Score: 1
      Not bad. But it's nothing compared to what you get if you start by feeding a bunch of thumbdrives to a bunch of in order to get 'em past the security checkpoint, and fill a 777 with 'em. Never underestimate the bandwidth of a muthafuckin' 777 full of muchta*BLAM BLAM BLAM*

      (That's IT! I have HAD IT with these MUTHAFUCKIN' memes on this MUTHAFUCKIN' website!


      "Storage On A Blog" - oh great... another one...
    25. Re:Beetle by torpor · · Score: 1


      cripes, its not just an old joke, its a practical operating state for many decent ops centers who empirically measure their backups in the 'spare safeguard bandwidth' category as well ..

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    26. Re:Beetle by oxnard · · Score: 1

      According to my B-S calculator that would be 806.4TB per liter downhill with a tailwind.

    27. Re:Beetle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You could change a single "s" to a "d" and the post would make perfect sense.

      No, because the "on the highway" is irrelevant. To complete the old saying, you need a distance, from which you might generate a time, etc. The original phrase implies the journey, the new twist removes the journey by giving it a place, "on the highway" (broken down, rusting by the side of the road while full of plastic encased memory keys). Take an old saying, toss in a typo, add a irrelevant bit, and you get "perplexing", what the original respondant said.

    28. Re:Beetle by Shanep · · Score: 1

      It's an old joke. Not even a joke. More sort of a thing that some computer programmers say sometimes and nod wisely to make their point.

      But the latency! Won't somebody please think of the latency?

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  2. Comdex 2000 by boristdog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I first saw these at Comdex 2000, I thought "These things will replace all removable media someday."

    Looks like they'll do even more.

    1. Re:Comdex 2000 by couchslug · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They are already large enough to hold usable operating systems like Linux.
      Damn Small Linux and CPXmini (a slick little Kanotix remaster) run fine from USB sticks. If you have the space, you can install a full distro and keep a storage partition for files you wish to save.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Comdex 2000 by lky · · Score: 1

      Or a full version of Debian with encrypted partitions.

      Check out: http://feraga.com/node/30

    3. Re:Comdex 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to like five years ago. The idea behind DSL is that it would run off a 50 MB live cd. USB drives hit that in the last century.

    4. Re:Comdex 2000 by vought · · Score: 1

      When I first saw these at Comdex 2000, I thought "These things will replace all removable media someday."


      And yet most computers still ship with a single, useless extra cost item. The floppy drive.

      Apple stopped shipping floppy drives in 1999 and everyone called them crazy. I think they saw the emergence of CF and digital memory cards for cameras and hoped those plus a network connection would obviate the need for a floppy drive. I also happen to think they killed the floppy too soon, but it was a bold step.

    5. Re:Comdex 2000 by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Indeed, but thanks to the people who worked on installing small distros (especially DSL) to USB flash drive, you can use the same techniques for larger distros. 1GB drives are cheap enough to fit the full live CD distro of your choice in "frugal install" mode. Those interested can check out the Damn Small Linux forums for more info.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:Comdex 2000 by ALpaca2500 · · Score: 1

      floppy drives are still absolutely necessary for at least one thing: installing windows onto non-IDE hard drives, for most SATA controllers and some SCSI controllers. for some reason, the only place the windows installer will accept drivers fro is from a floppy. i think this will be fixed in windows vista, a feature that's about 5 years late IMO.

    7. Re:Comdex 2000 by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Damn straight. I've got a 4GB drive (with physical write protect switch). It cost me $100. (I didn't bother messing aroudn with the Fry's $25 rebate).

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    8. Re:Comdex 2000 by dylan_- · · Score: 1
      Indeed, but...
      ...indeed not. The first flash USB in North America was released by IBM in 2001, and was just 8MB. 64MB wasn't released until 2003. Never believe the "correction" of an AC ;-)
      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
  3. Standard Flash Drive Durability by GeffDE · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's a great feature that SanDisk has a flash drive that can be driven over. However, I can't think of the number of times I have forgotten those little buggers in my pockets when they've gone in the wash and the number of time they've come out and still worked perfectly normally. I have got to say, in a day and age when things break if you look at them wrong, it's great that we have invented the 21st century's response to the swiss army knife.

    --
    It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
    1. Re:Standard Flash Drive Durability by hamfactorial · · Score: 1

      It's true, those little Cruzer Micros are very rugged and pretty quick with data transfer. I doubt I could whittle with it though, or open a bottle of wine. Top that, SanDisk!

      --
      Did you know subscribers can see articles in the future? Holy shit!
    2. Re:Standard Flash Drive Durability by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      Well SanDisk didn't do it but per your request... here you go!

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    3. Re:Standard Flash Drive Durability by hamfactorial · · Score: 1

      There's something surreal about a picture of a Swiss Army knife with a little USB plug hanging off the end. Thanks for the laugh!

      --
      Did you know subscribers can see articles in the future? Holy shit!
    4. Re:Standard Flash Drive Durability by Minwee · · Score: 1
      As an aside I recently broke the case of a flash drive and then left the whole thing in my pocket when I went to wash my pants. While unloading the drier, which was set to "Holy Freakin Hot Batman", I noticed the inner part of the drive fall to the ground. Just the PCB and USB connector.

      I plugged it in and it still worked just fine.

      A few years back the BBC tested a variety of memory cards by dunking them in Cola, nailing them to a tree and even handing them to a six year old boy with instructions to destroy them. Every one of them survived up to the sledgehammer and nail-gun tests, but even then most of the data was recoverable.

      What's the moral to this story? Don't write anything on a memory card that you don't want someone else recovering.

    5. Re:Standard Flash Drive Durability by stunt_penguin · · Score: 2, Funny

      BTW has anyone *seen* mine? It was small...... about thumb sized.

      I want one with GPS and a transmitter so i can track it's whereabouts :|

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  4. Why so much of USB? by 01arena · · Score: 1

    All of this thumb drives are USB-based, is that USB such a great-to-use (maybe easy-to-use) interface? Research makes the drives with more capacity, and possibilities, but it's not research to improve USB itself!

    --
    ciop ciop
    1. Re:Why so much of USB? by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      USB = UNIVERSAL Serial Bus

      Point is, just about every remotely modern laptop and desktop in the world has USB ports, a redesign or different format without backwards compatability would defeat the purpose of it.

    2. Re:Why so much of USB? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      They have been- most of these drives are now USB 2.0, and due to the way USB spec is written, there's nothing to prevent compatible improved speed to come out as fast as the chips can handle it.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Why so much of USB? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Firewire has less cpu over head and firewire 400 is faster then usb 2.0 480 megabits in testing.

      How long in till we start to see E-SATA drives and firewire drives? Hard disks will come with flash ram on them soon likely runing at speeds that use the full SATA 300 bus.

      Windows vista use of usb keys for VM sound like a bad idea when hard disks are faster and have less cpu over head. Some one should make internal SATA flash drives for that.

      Is there any work being done on usb 3?

    4. Re:Why so much of USB? by kylehase · · Score: 1

      I think the engineers are doing the right thing with USB 2.0 and Firewire 800, new speeds with backwards compatibility. As long as similar progress continues it should make the beeding edge guys happy and the old school usb 1 devices connected.

      --
      You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
    5. Re:Why so much of USB? by eldepeche · · Score: 1

      Is Firewire 800 backward compatible? I thought the plugs were different...

    6. Re:Why so much of USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the plugs are different but you can get adapters.

  5. Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressure by steven94585 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Running the drive over with a car is at most going to be only 20-40 psi(pounds per square inche), the tire pressure. Maybe if the whole car was balanced on one wheel and then drove over it.

  6. what is all this about? by skynare · · Score: 1, Funny

    i'm still satisfied with 1000 5.25inch flexible floppy diskettes, totalling 1GB of storage!!!!

    1. Re:what is all this about? by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      Me too. I've got a RAID array of floppies totaling 4TB. It beats a HD any day.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
  7. Who's got a what in the where now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'd wager that most of the non-yiddish population outside of the US hasn't heard of a "tchotchke" or a "tshatshke".

    Aparently it is a "A trinket; a knickknack" according to dictionary.com, and is of Slavic origin. It is also spelt Tsatske.

    1. Re:Who's got a what in the where now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived in NY for 2 years and I've never heard of this word.

    2. Re:Who's got a what in the where now? by dan828 · · Score: 1

      I'd wager that most of the non-yiddish population outside of the US hasn't heard of a "tchotchke" or a "tshatshke".

      Of course we have...He was that guy on Happy Days that was dating Joanie. Duh.

    3. Re:Who's got a what in the where now? by BobNET · · Score: 2

      I thought most /. readers would recognize it as the name of the restaurant where Joanna worked in Office Space (except there it was spelled Chotchkie's).

    4. Re:Who's got a what in the where now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was the Restaraunt from Office Space.

    5. Re:Who's got a what in the where now? by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      My family (central and eastern european origin) always pronounced it (bear with me) chachke (the e is as in Fedx), and we always thought it meant "little junks" as my mother would have put it.

      She was fluent in English, Yiddish, Russian & Polish.

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  8. 2000 lbs of pressure? by AaronPSU777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nitpicky I know, but pounds is not a unit of pressure. What you probably meant is pound-force.

    1. Re:2000 lbs of pressure? by Durrok · · Score: 2, Funny

      Farva: Gimme a litre o' cola. Dimpus Burger Guy: What?
      Farva: [Annoyed] A litre o' cola.
      Dimpus Burger Guy: [into mic] Litrecola? Do we sell litrecola?
      Thorny: Will you just order a large, Farva?
      Farva: I don't want a large farva. I want a goddamn litre o' cola!
      Dimpus Burger Guy: [to Farva] I don't know what that is!
      Farva: [slowly starts shouting] Litre is French for...
      [grabs burger kid by shirt]
      Farva: ... give me my fuckin' cola before I break VOUS FUCKIN' LIP!

      Heart supertroopers

      --
      I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
    2. Re:2000 lbs of pressure? by hamfactorial · · Score: 1

      A pound-force is still a pound. A pressure is a force per area, such as lbf/in^2 or lbf/ft^2. lbf/in^2 is commonly abbreviated as psi.

      The confusion about the US customary units is justified. A pound-force and a pound-mass are different things, which I think is dumb. I prefer to work with pounds-force and slugs, the analog to the SI kilogram.

      --
      Did you know subscribers can see articles in the future? Holy shit!
    3. Re:2000 lbs of pressure? by Moofie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Um, pound force isn't a measure of pressure either. It's a measure of force. It says so right in the unit.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:2000 lbs of pressure? by AaronPSU777 · · Score: 1

      I know, what I meant was for a 2000 lb volkswagen you would use pound-force, to indicate the force on the flash drive. Sorry I didn't make that clear.

  9. I hated the U3 Cruzer until I got rid of the U3. by Kyeo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A thumbdrive is nice, but the U3 software is one of the most godawful things in existence, and not uninstallable without an internal Best Buy program until recently. Ick.

  10. SanDisk touts a drive built to withstand 2,000 lbs by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 0

    Computerworld tested that claim by repeatedly driving a Volkswagen Beetle

    Shit, I own a 4x4.

    Guess I'll wait for a sturdier model...

  11. Swiss Army Thumbdrive by LunaticTippy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Surely you've seen this?

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  12. Why just USB (2.0)? Also: What I'd like to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see why we can't use Firewire (IEEE 1394) for these types of products.

    What I'd like to see next is a USB thumb drive with an RJ-45 connection with built in Wireless access point. Then we can have mini servers that I can move around offices. Sure, evil can come from it but instead of powering on my laptop I can just throw this device onto the network to retrieve files both quickly and securely without outside network access.

  13. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by spiny · · Score: 1

    why on earth is the parent post at +5 ?

    so if i ride over something on my bike (50psi in the tyres) I'll be exerting more pressure ?

    --

    Fry: heh, Yakov Smirnoff said it
    Leela: No he didn't.
  14. Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows outpaces flashdrives!!

    Otherwise, it would really be nice to boot up the OS from a quiet drive..

  15. PSI, pounds, etc. by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Informative

    2,000 lbs. of pressure

    2,000 lbs is not a pressure; there's no area. It's weight. This is basic high school physics...

    Computerworld tested that claim by repeatedly driving a Volkswagen Beetle over the ruggedized thumb drive. While the drive's body came away with a few scratches, there were no dents, and not a single lost file."

    A Neu VW beetle weighs about 3000lb. If the entire force applied against the road by one tire was applied to the device (for example, by putting a piece of thick metal on either side of the device and then running the car over the plate of metal), that's only 750LB. This is basic grade school math (3000/4.)

    I'd guess your average thumb drive has perhaps 1-2 square inches of surface area. The amount of pressure between tire and road is exactly equal to the inflation pressure of the tire, which is often around 30-35 PSI (Pounds Per Square Inch.) So the thumb drive never had more than 60-70lb put on it...

    1. Re:PSI, pounds, etc. by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 0
      The amount of pressure between tire and road is exactly equal to the inflation pressure of the tire, which is often around 30-35 PSI (Pounds Per Square Inch.) So the thumb drive never had more than 60-70lb put on it...


      so why not use a road bike instead? In that case, according to your 'basic grade school' math/physics, since the amount of pressure between the tire and the road would be the inflation pressure of the tire (120psi) a 14lb road bike would exert about 240 pounds of pressure on the thumb drive! If we generalize this enough, with nearly solid rubber tires inflated at 5psi we could make cars nearly float off the road, think of the fuel savings!
      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    2. Re:PSI, pounds, etc. by phorm · · Score: 1

      OK, so what they should have said is lbs/weight, but:

      a) Weight in a vehicle is not evenly distributed. The actual weight on the front-axle and rear-axle will differ depending on, for example, where the engine is located.
      b) Again, by weight, you're getting more than 60-70lbs. Otherwise a smaller object would be able to hold the car up easier...
      c) The inflation pressure of a tire, balloon, etc, is the pressure of air inside the tire. More air, more pressure as you're cramming more molecules into a smaller space. Changing the air-pressure in the tire does not magically decrease the overall downward-pressing weight of the vehicle.
      d) It's not a function of the size of the USB stick, it's partly related to how much weight the tire not touching the stick is already being. An underinflated tire might mean that more of the tire itself contacts the road, alleviating the pressure on the part that touches the thumb-drive, but you can't really figure those numbers out without measuring them. A very inflated tire might mean that most of the road-touching surface touches the USB-stick first, but again it's a function of the surface-area contact and not the tire-PSI itself.

    3. Re:PSI, pounds, etc. by imthesponge · · Score: 1

      The inflation pressure assumes full contact between the tire and road. If the tire runs over a 2 square inch device, the pressure will be greater.

    4. Re:PSI, pounds, etc. by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 2, Insightful
      2,000 lbs is not a pressure; there's no area. It's weight.
      No it's not. It's a unit of mass. If you want a unit of weight I suggest the pound-force.
      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    5. Re:PSI, pounds, etc. by jumpingfred · · Score: 1

      The pressure is not equal to the inflation pressure. Tires have stiffness in the sidewalls so the pressure will be somewhat greater than the inflation pressure.

    6. Re:PSI, pounds, etc. by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      In that case, according to your 'basic grade school' math/physics. . .

      Which is correct. A tire is a spring. When a car drives over something small all the something feels is the force required to depress the spring, because the opposing force is all it is applying to the tire. The weight of the car is actually borne by the rest of the contact patch of the tire with the ground, because the tire deforms around the something.

      Softer tire, less force on the drive, which can never be more than the spring rate of the tire at its contact point with the drive. For the sake of argument let's say 50 lbs./in. How thick is a drive? What is its area? That's the pressure on the drive.

      What happens if you put a softer spring on one wheel of a car? That corner of the car weighs less (and so does the diagonally opposite corner). You can test this yourself with a couple of postal scales and an R/C car. Or just sit on a stool with one short leg and think very hard about what you are experiencing.

      . . .the amount of pressure between the tire and the road would be the inflation pressure of the tire (120psi) a 14lb road bike would exert about 240 pounds of pressure on the thumb drive!

      Now you're being silly, but a bike with a rider on it would exert a much higher pressure on the drive, yes. Higher spring rate, less deformation around the drive, thus more of the weight of the bike/rider being borne by the drive, but never exceeding the spring rate until the tire is crushed against the rim.

      . . . with nearly solid rubber tires inflated at 5psi. . .

      A nearly solid rubber tire has a high spring rate of its own.

      . . .we could make cars nearly float off the road

      The very point of using pnuematic tires in the first place. With a nondeformable solid tire the drive exerts a force on the car equal to the weight of the car on that tire. Thus the drive lifts the corner of the car that distance. With a pnuematic tire the tire deforms around the drive, the drive only exerts a lifting force on the car equal to the spring rate of the tire, and feels an equal and opposite force, and the car remains firmly planted on the road.

      KFG

    7. Re:PSI, pounds, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats why I deflat my tires to 3 psi. them I can pick lift one side up with only a few fingers

    8. Re:PSI, pounds, etc. by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thats why I deflat my tires to 3 psi. them I can pick lift one side up with only a few fingers

      I just went out to the 4 door Accord in the parking lot. I was able to lift the front (heaviest) corner by about an inch with only three fingers.

      Because. . .the only force I have to apply is that required to compress the diagonally opposite spring. Go try it yourself. You do not have to lift the car against gravity, the tires and springs are doing that. You only have to rotate the car around its center of mass.

      Then go get yourself an RC10, a box of different springs and four postal scales. You'll find it's perfectly easy to set up a car that it would only apply a pressure of a few pounds per square inch on a run over thumbdrive.

      Got a bicycle? Make sure the tires are pumped up to recommended rate. No deform the tire by pinching it between your thumb and finger. That is how much force the tire can apply. Now deflate it to half pressure and pinch again. That is how much force the can apply now. Notice how much easier it is to pinch it now?

      It ain't rocket science, it's . . .well, spring science. If you compress a spring with rate of 100 lbs per inch one inch, it is exerting an opposing force of 100 pounds.

      Ever notice that bigger cars have bigger tires, or that skinny road racing bike tires run at higher pressures?

      To support the weight of the vehicle you either need to add more square inches or increase the spring rate by adding pressure, or the tires will not exert enough force to hold the vehicle off the ground.

      KFG

    9. Re:PSI, pounds, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A slug is the English unit of mass; pounds are force. It's an inherently bad idea to use the same word for two different units of measurement (like Wikipedia's Pound (unit of mass) and Pound (unit of force)).

    10. Re:PSI, pounds, etc. by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Using lbf instead of slugs is a bad idea for the same reasons that using kgf instead of Newtons is a bad idea. Why keep "g" in there at all?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  16. Real world Lexar Jumpdrive numbers by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is from the 512MB model /dev/sdb1:
      Timing cached reads: 2324 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1161.93 MB/sec
      Timing buffered disk reads: 76 MB in 3.01 seconds = 25.26 MB/sec

    Fast little thing

    Ask for other benchmarks and I will run them.

    1. Re:Real world Lexar Jumpdrive numbers by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      How about random read or write? I /am/ kind of curious.

    2. Re:Real world Lexar Jumpdrive numbers by bangenge · · Score: 1

      it might be hard to make repeatable random read/write tests, which is probably a reason why most disk manufacturers prefer to tout linear burst and continuous read/write results.

      --
      . o O ( TwO hEaDs ArE mOrE tHaN oNe... )
    3. Re:Real world Lexar Jumpdrive numbers by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Can you recommend a good linux based program that I can use for such testing?

    4. Re:Real world Lexar Jumpdrive numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About that Dragon Magazine archive on CD-ROM: I have that, too - got it for $10 from MicroCenter. It's really great, isn't it?

    5. Re:Real world Lexar Jumpdrive numbers by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Yes it is.

      Why don't you buy all they have and sell them on an aution site? They go for between 75 - 125 per copy.

    6. Re:Real world Lexar Jumpdrive numbers by Error27 · · Score: 1

      You're first number is not that significant. That's just RAM speed. 25M/s is pretty decent considering that it's a USB key. Normal SATA drives get around 55 M/s.

      Random reads will take the same amount of time because it's flash memory and the drive doesn't have to seek. Here's a script to verify. I put sdX instead of sdb so that it wouldn't work for anyone who copied and pasted directly.

      RUNS=25
      MEGS=10
      DEV=/dev/sdX #your USB device
      time for i in $(seq $RUNS) ; do
              offset=$(($RANDOM%500))
              dd if=$DEV of=/dev/null bs=1M count=$MEGS skip=$offset
      done

      # enter the time it took to run
      echo $((RUNS*MEGS/ time it took to run))

    7. Re:Real world Lexar Jumpdrive numbers by Error27 · · Score: 1

      Actually that's could be a bit of a bogus test as well. You're OS will end up caching the data instead of actually reading it the second time. It's hard to benchmark a disk that tiny.

    8. Re:Real world Lexar Jumpdrive numbers by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      That method has issues as well.

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.392487 seconds, 26.7 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.391372 seconds, 26.8 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.410098 seconds, 25.6 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.394906 seconds, 26.6 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.40433 seconds, 25.9 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.392172 seconds, 26.7 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.392876 seconds, 26.7 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.404992 seconds, 25.9 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.390455 seconds, 26.9 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.40194 seconds, 26.1 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.392678 seconds, 26.7 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.315456 seconds, 33.2 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.255469 seconds, 41.0 MB/s

      2589184 bytes (2.6 MB) copied, 0.103012 seconds, 25.1 MB/s

      1540608 bytes (1.5 MB) copied, 0.002666 seconds, 578 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.398341 seconds, 26.3 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.402639 seconds, 26.0 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.319091 seconds, 32.9 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.392314 seconds, 26.7 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.404708 seconds, 25.9 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.02038 seconds, 515 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.39404 seconds, 26.6 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.401426 seconds, 26.1 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.189261 seconds, 55.4 MB/s

      10485760 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.388963 seconds, 27.0 MB/s

      real 0m8.497s
      user 0m0.092s
      sys 0m0.632s

    9. Re:Real world Lexar Jumpdrive numbers by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      How long does it take to delete your porn collection from it? :D

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    10. Re:Real world Lexar Jumpdrive numbers by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Ask for other benchmarks and I will run them.

      Yeah, what's the full-stroke time on that bad boy? And how does it compare with random-seek?

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  17. 'Secure encryption technique' not available ? by Incadenza · · Score: 1

    Well, the news about encryption hasn't reached the Dutch military yet. They just managed to lose their THIRD unencrypted memory stick this year - this time in Afghanistan:

    Military 'forgets' another memory stick
    The Dutch has yet again lost a data storage device, this time at the military base in the Afghan province of Uruzgan. The commander reported a device was missing but no details have been released about the information it contained. Last month military chiefs advised their personnel not to use memory sticks until a secure encryption technique is available. Military and police personnel have lost several memory sticks with sensitive information in the last year.

    For an article about the previous two sticks: Officer lost memory stick with details of Afghan mission

    Could somebody pleas visit those army barracks with a very big clue stick ?

  18. Pressure vs. Trauma by daeg · · Score: 1

    Ok, it can withstand 2,000 pounds of pressure, but can it withstand being dropped? Sheer casing strength doesn't necessarily mean that it can withstand the shock forces involved in being dropped or kicked.

    1. Re:Pressure vs. Trauma by Bryant68 · · Score: 0

      That's a good point, but since a flash drive has no moving parts, it probably wouldn't affect it much.

    2. Re:Pressure vs. Trauma by gsn · · Score: 1

      No I know the distinction and agree with those who point out that the thumbdrive wasn't actually subject to mutch from the VW. I've dropped it quite a few times - its survived one 12 foot drop from the bleachers, several "Can't you catch idiot" tosses, and one fall through pant pocket and get stamped on. It shoudl survive usual wear and tear. It looks like shit and the cap that protects the usb connector is long mising but it still works - its a 128mb PNY thumbdrive (yeah its ancient) I picked up on sale at Walgreens. All said and done the things are certainly more useful and versatile than floppys or cds though I still sftp files, and mail them to myself just in case. I haven't tried kicking mine directly but I'll let you know when I decide to get a new one.

      --
      Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
    3. Re:Pressure vs. Trauma by wolf87 · · Score: 1

      The short answer is kind of. I have a Cruzer Titanium, and it can withstand being dropped onto hard surfaces - up to a point. On mine, the 2 pieces of the cases are in perfect condition, but the glue used to bind them came apart. The internals are still ok, but I had to replace it with a Cruzer Mini (little aluminum one). That's held up much better, between my klutziness and going through the laundry around 10 times.

    4. Re:Pressure vs. Trauma by Yehooti · · Score: 1

      Kick it all you want, you won't hurt it. But, don't put it on a railroad track. Mine came out from that test looking like a long flat cockroach that I'd just stomped. It didn't work any more.

  19. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by hamfactorial · · Score: 2, Informative

    Once again it's the attack of bad science! Not to mention a lack of regard for units.... Assuming all four wheels carry the same load (bad assumption) and the point of application of the load on the tire is constrained to a point (another horrible assumption), the pressure on the top face of the micro drive would be .25 * W_car (lbs) / A_disk (in^2). Note that this completely ignores St. Venant's principle, which is a nifty thing that explains how shear and normal stress is distributed along any given member. In reality, the stress wouldn't be uniform throughout the disk and would likely puncture the top of the drive before damaging the middle section.

    Forgive me for the pedantry, but being a mechanical engineering student, I'm always irritated when people talk about pounds of pressure or use a kilogram as a measurement of weight. Argh!

    --
    Did you know subscribers can see articles in the future? Holy shit!
  20. God, I hate that U3 chip. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On some drives, like the ones my college bookstore carries, you can't access the writable portion of the drive until after the U3 software is loaded into Windows. Hell, I couldn't even get past it using my Linux laptop.

    And the U3 software fails on virtually every computer on campus, because the computers are locked down in such a way that one cannot install device drivers using a normal student account.

    The real kicker? They're replacing all the PCs in the campus labs with ones without floppy drives. So even those poor kids with only a few hundred KB of data will have to use a flash drive, and us student assistants will have to support them.

    Already, I've had to tell too many students that yes, they can access their data from home with that flash drive. No, they won't be able to use that flash drive here. Yes, I realize their assignment is due in twenty minutes. No, there's nothing I can do about it; I don't have any greater a degree of access than they do.

    1. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by NMThor · · Score: 2, Informative

      I must agree. After mistakenly buying a flash drive with a U3 chip, I've sworn never to go back. I've had very similar issues using these drives in work computers. Another issue: at least on the flash drive I bought, the 1 GB is the sum of the writable part of the drive AND the practically unusable U3 partition! ARG...

    2. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    3. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by xenocide2 · · Score: 2

      The real kicker? They're replacing all the PCs in the campus labs with ones without floppy drives. So even those poor kids with only a few hundred KB of data will have to use a flash drive, and us student assistants will have to support them.

      Frankly, this is a good thing. Floppies are shitty. They havent improved as a consumer technology since like 1987; they're prone to failure and painfully slow. Ideally, students using your campus labs should be using something like a network drive, which has the benefits of large storage, redundancy, protection against power failures, and periodic backups. But even if that isn't available, easily accomplished or part of student practices, USB drives are still a generally better alternative than floppies. I just bought a gigabyte of USB thumb drive for 20 dollars online. You can purchase 128M for under 10 dollars, and I suspect your campus bookstore could get a bulk discount to get them even cheaper (whether they decide to share that with students is best rated "unlikely"). Point is, for about the same price as a pack of disks you could get a hell of a lot more storage that runs faster, less prone to failure, and easier to carry around. And if your school wasn't backwards ass, students would have easy access to network storage, both from home and on campus.

      Google searching suggests that there are removal tools for that u3 software stuff. I'm not sure if they work or if they'll work for you in an environment where no software is allowed to be installed. It might be easier to file a trouble report asking for the u3 drivers to be installed (assuming this isn't really device/vendor dependent). AFAIK, u3 only requires drivers for programs on the drive and password protected volumes.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    4. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1
      Frankly, this is a good thing. Floppies are shitty. They havent improved as a consumer technology since like 1987; they're prone to failure and painfully slow.


      Not disagreeing with any of that. Floppies are unreliable when properly cared for, and your average Kindergarten Education major shoves them in a backpack full of cookies and subway crumbs.

      Ideally, students using your campus labs should be using something like a network drive, which has the benefits of large storage, redundancy, protection against power failures, and periodic backups.


      They have per-student network drives. And some students use them. Unfortunately, those drives aren't web-accessible, or even accessible over FTP. (Though the non-IT geeks have been pushing for it for years...college IT departments have a lot of inertia.)

      I just bought a gigabyte of USB thumb drive for 20 dollars online. You can purchase 128M for under 10 dollars, and I suspect your campus bookstore could get a bulk discount to get them even cheaper (whether they decide to share that with students is best rated "unlikely").


      They don't share the discount, or they're getting a piss-poor one. Computer Club sells the same-size drives at a lower price, as a fundraiser. And we get a decent markup.

      The real problem with flash drives is that you need to unmount them before you unplug them. Many, many people don't. And sometimes their data gets corrupted.
    5. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      What computers and operating systems does your college make available to students which you say do not work with U3 smart devices? They should work just fine when plugged into a Win2k SP4 system as well as all WinXP flavors and DO NOT install or require any special "drivers" on the host computer, other than the built-in USB mass storage drivers from Microsoft. If those computers have the CD-ROM "AutoPlay" feature turned off (for security purposes or other reasons) it's no problem really -- simply open the "U3 System" drive and double-click on the "LaunchU3.exe" icon. If there is some other technology on those machines which is preventing applications from launching off the U3 device, then you should check with the college's IT department responsible for maintaining those machines, to find out why they have disabled such basic functionality. By the way, the writable user-storage partition of a U3 smart device is fully accessible WITHOUT the U3 Launchpad, unless you've assigned a password to that partition to protect it from unauthorized access. In that case, of course, you must run the U3 Launchpad application to unlock the partition. (duh...) So except for the initial access to unlock a password-protected device, you don't actually HAVE to use the U3 Launchpad. It works just fine as a standard removable USB mass storage device. If it doesn't we'd love to understand why not and help you work through any usability issues! BTW, the read-only CD-ROM partition uses only about 4 megabytes of the total available storage space on the device. So for current 1 Gigabyte devices costing about $50, which is comparable to about 700 floppy disks in terms of storage, that's less than 0.000004% of the total available storage and is comparable to the space required for a couple 8 megapixel digital photos. Putting it into perspective then, the overhead for the U3 technology is almost completely immaterial. In any case, SanDisk and mSystems both currently provide a U3 uninstaller which you can use to completely and permanently remove all U3 smart technology from the drive, permanently turning it into an ordinary flash drive with no U3 technology whatsoever. Yes, I said permanently. Did I mention permanently? Right-O, very good then... PERMANENTLY. (That means please don't ask us for a re-installer! Thanks.)

    6. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by SeaFox · · Score: 1
      On some drives, like the ones my college bookstore carries, you can't access the writable portion of the drive until after the U3 software is loaded into Windows. Hell, I couldn't even get past it using my Linux laptop.

      And the U3 software fails on virtually every computer on campus, because the computers are locked down in such a way that one cannot install device drivers using a normal student account.

      The solution is to remove the U3 software and make it a regular flash drive.

      You can get an uninstaller here.
    7. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Millenniumman · · Score: 2, Funny

      they're prone to failure

      That's why you always use floppies in a RAID array.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    8. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      The real problem with flash drives is that you need to unmount them before you unplug them. Many, many people don't. And sometimes their data gets corrupted.

      Thats not technically true. It's entirely possible to mount the drives as synchronous, so that writes are not buffered. Generally removing drives before requesting a buffer flush shouldn't be a problem unless you're copying a lot of information onto the drive. I suspect the same is true of your campus computer systems. In contrast most Linux distros I've seen prefer to mount drives async (turn on buffering) for the performance benefits on large writes. I've never seen data loss from surprise removal on Windows XP, and in fact the only time I've lost data is attempting to use the drive on a Mac OS 9's USB port that couldn't source the nessecary milliamps. The likelyhood of losing data from surprise removal in Windows seems pretty low unless your administrators have done something silly to the configurations.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    9. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tssk. we can't auto-install your so great U3 software on every computer we come to use and plug our USB key in, you know, we can't pollute friends computers with your U3 stuff if we are going to use some U3-powered software once or twice in their home - or if we forget to press the Shift key to prevent auto-installation. not to mention schools, offices, cybercafe where we will be skinned alive if we are caught launching your .exe. not your fault if XP needs some additionnal software to show your panel and manage some roaming data and application settings ? who cares : we do NOT own those computers, face it, we simply can legally not install some random applications or drivers here and there just to use your U3-powered applications.

      oh, and the auto-installation feature on XP and 2k SP4, without any confirmation needed ? and needing a reset ?!? it behaves like a virus or some stupid adware or spyware. now that is your fault.

    10. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      No device drivers? Odd. I thought that was what was killing it.

      The only other possibility is that the device tries to take two letter drives.

    11. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by ben+there... · · Score: 1
      The real kicker? They're replacing all the PCs in the campus labs with ones without floppy drives. So even those poor kids with only a few hundred KB of data will have to use a flash drive, and us student assistants will have to support them.

      What's so hard about opening Gmail and emailing yourself?

      2.7 GB of space accessible from anywhere. Nothing to lose, drop, break. A couple hundred KB would be almost instant to email on a college network.

    12. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Gah. Helps if I finish my thought.

      Again, the other possibility might be the way drive letters are in use on the systems at GRCC.

      The college I work at has a large number of letter drives assigned. The first partition of the U3 device comes up as the F drive. The G drive is a globally-assigned network drive that supports a large number of applications. If something tries to create the "next" letter drive, it tries to count up from the local drives already created. Since the G drive is in use as a network drive, the operation fails.

      We used to have that problem with normal flash drives, as the F drive had been assigned as a network drive. When flash drives became prevalent, they moved the F drive data somewhere else, so it wouldn't have to be disconnected before the flash device was inserted. Now the same thing may be happening with the G drive.

      Unfortunately, the same solution isn't as easy with the G drive as with the F drive; there are a much larger number of applications, with a much higher demand, on the G drive than there were with the F drive. Shifting the drive letters up doesn't seem to be possible; some roles on the network already have X, Y and Z drives. (Mostly instructors.)

      Drop me an email...if you can help me find a better solution for this, we'd both be better off.

    13. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Half the students that come through my lab don't even know how to use email. And learning how is not, unfortunately, a prerequesite to classes in departments other than Computer Apps. And not even for most Computer Apps classes.

      It's a community college. I'd wager at least a third of my student encounters are where the student doesn't even speak English fluently. Ninety eight percent of my student encounters are with students never used a computer before college, or only know enough to use AIM and Myspace.

      I wish that untouched two percent of students asked more questions. I really do.

    14. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      You hit the nail on the head; this is a case of drive letter masking. U3 smart device currently require two drive letters, one for the read-only fake CD-ROM partition (that's how the U3 Launchpad auto-runs when you plug in the device) and one for the writable user-storage partition. If two consecutive drive letters are unavailable, perhaps because one of them is being used for a network drive, Windows gleefully horks on the duplicate drive letter (instead of assigning it one that isn't in use) and thus the user-storage partition does not mount. That also means the host computer is not configured properly for use with U3 smart devices. FYI, U3 has no control over this -- it's a legacy "feature" of the Windows operating system. The solution however is simple: Either change the starting drive letter used for removable mass storage devices (e.g. using the Computer Manager utility, under XP right-click on My Computer and select Manage -> Storage -> Disk Management -> right click on U3 drive letter and select Change Drive Letter and Paths...) AND/OR change the drive letter assigned to the network volume (this may require your IT department or network admin to modify the machine's startup script). In any case, it appears the computers at your college are not properly configured to allow U3 smart devices to be used on them. Considering that by the end of the year it will be very difficult to find ANY USB flash drive which does NOT contain U3 technology, it would be advisable for them to apply the necessary corrections to those machines' configurations as soon as possible.

    15. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      But Sweetie Darling, U3 smart devices DO NOT install anything on the host computer. No special drivers, no special sauce... in fact our certification program (which EVERY application sold through U3 Software Central must pass) does not allow ANYTHING to be installed on the host computer. So... what was your point again?

    16. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why doesn't your product work under Linux or OSX? By work I mean support all features supported on XP.

    17. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      Because that would require three times the current engineering effort to port the code to two other operating systems. We're well aware of the need for cross platform support and are already working on solutions for those systems. But all of this doesn't come for free, of course... software engineering is both time-consuming and expensive, and each operating system comes complete with its own set of issues. So U3 and our manufacturers chose to focus on the world's most widely available operating system first (and that's the honest truth). I'm a Mac and Linux guy myself, and at the end of a hard day at work writing Win32 code, must resist the urge to scrub the Microsoft "taint" from my fingers until they bleed... (LOL)

    18. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does your product protect the host computer from having bad things done to it via the U3 apps?

    19. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      three times the effort, hardly. you do know there are free open source versions, right?

    20. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      Protecting the host computer from malicious software is ultimately the responsibility of the system administrator and the user, not the removable storage device. However, U3 LLC takes host system protection a few steps further with our certification program, which ensures that any software downloaded from U3 Software Central is completely safe to install and run from any U3 smart device under any Win2k SP4 or WinXP operating system. We also have anti-virus and anti-spyware software available for download. Some titles even come bundled with the device, and everal more software titles are already in the pipeline.

    21. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      Then please use them and stop trolling.

    22. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by dascandy · · Score: 1

      > Considering that by the end of the year it will be very difficult to find ANY USB flash drive which does NOT contain U3 technology, it would be advisable for them to apply the necessary corrections to those machines' configurations as soon as possible.

      Without U3 smart technology that runs only on fscking windows? Egad. dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd? that shit out of my sight.

    23. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      Aside from removing the U3 technology completely from the drive (tools for that are currently available for download) WHAT IF U3 smart device technology DID work on other operating systems? What features would you like to see and on which operating systems? I'd like to learn more about your likes and dislikes, especially objections to the technology as it exists today for Windows. For example, many people object to the factory's two-partition format, so if there were a way to repartition the drive into a single volume, would that address the concern? Is it the lack of control over the format of the device that's the core issue, or is it something more specific? Is regaining 4 Megabytes out of a Gig or two from a $50 device really making people lose sleep at night? Please, let us know!

    24. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by dascandy · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm against it being biased toward any operating system in general. If your technology doesn't, you just have a plain USB storage device with some pre-loaded Windows software, that's ok with me. That would be pretty equal to about any publically sold device, coming with Windows-only cd's.

      My preference would be that you guys make the hardware and that you leave the OS features to the OS makers.

    25. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by NMThor · · Score: 1

      Awesome! I didn't know that this existed, and now I can use my U3 flash drive with impunity :)

    26. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      What OS features should we be leaving to the OS makers? Could you elaborate?

    27. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by dascandy · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that your software attempted a form of orthogonal application persistence on Windows, like you save the state your applications are in and you restore it elsewhere without problems. That's an OS feature.

      If you're only hosting the user-folder on the USB stick, make a .reg script to do that.

      In any case, it should not require active software to run, since it's a hardware product of sorts that should just plain store files and nothing else.

    28. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      There is no funky "orthogonal application persistence" whatsoever, other than storing the application itself on the U3 smart device, right alongside the user's data.

      The U3 Launchpad (contained in the read-only CD-ROM partition) provides the user interface for launching applications installed on the device, password protecting the user data domain, and accessing the secure "cookies" area (among other tasks). It is not required to use the device as a removable mass storage device, nor does it install anything on the host computer (no special drivers, no special sauce...)

    29. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh beavis did I forget to mention I went out to buy a USB pen drive or flash card from a well-known brand and not a lookalike thingy polluted with "U3" software that proves to be useless, curbesome and even illegal to use and install ? more than often the U3 logo is too small and undistinguishable from unpolluted items. really.

      also don't lie with claiming you have "manufacturers" working for you, you are just parasites much like AOL was paying Microsoft to include a AOL icon on each new Windows desktop. it is not much about windows-only support, it is about imposed, unwanted bundled crap in place of a legitimate product, much like winmodems and winprinters (ah, and the sooner S3 goes out of buisness, the better)

    30. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > But Sweetie Darling, U3 smart devices DO NOT install anything on the host computer. No special drivers, no special sauce...

      oh my God, you are just fucking outright lying. you deserve a bullet in the head just for that.

      > Considering that by the end of the year it will be very difficult to find ANY USB flash drive which does NOT contain U3 technology, it would be advisable for them to apply the necessary corrections to those machines' configurations as soon as possible.

      right ! behold, be ready for the invasion, we bribed every manufacturer !

      scumbags, nobody want your crap, honest, no more than they welcome AOL icons, CDs and other adware/spyware.

    31. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by glazed · · Score: 1

      The 4GB does not bother me, the fact that I bought a simple storage device and get some stupid little utility with it is what bothers me. It does not even say on the packaging of these units that they include extra crap software.

      At least the NASCAR jump drives tell you they have a preinstalled race schedule and driver profiles. Then there is nothing to irritate me when I plug it in and Dale Jarrett pops up in my face - I was specifically TOLD.

      Until the U3 uninstall came out I was pissed at the store for not allowing me to return the item and just tossed it aside. Stuck with my old Imation with a quarter of the capacity.

      Now...I actually *use* the former U3 equipped jumpdrive.

    32. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux in its default configuration absolutely loathes, hates and detests writing anything to disk ever. Linux will only ever write something to disk if (1) it needs to do so to free up some RAM in order to avoid swapping, (2) the filesystem on the device is being unmounted, or (3) you asked it to with sync. The filesystem abstraction is good enough for read operations to be serviced right out of the cache without the data touching oxide. At the other extreme are OSes which don't even return from a fwrite() system call or equivalent until the data has actually been written to disc, read back and verified OK against the cache. Somewhere inbetween are OSes that will decache a file when another process tries to read it, in order to service the request from disk.

    33. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      I'd like to learn more about your likes and dislikes, especially objections to the technology as it exists today for Windows.

      The problem is that one of your advertised features can't work. From your website:

      Access your personal workspace wherever you go without lugging a laptop .. When you're done, simply unplug the U3 smart drive and walk away knowing that your personal information leaves with you.
      That is impossible. The user either trusts the computer, or doesn't.
      • If he does, it's because it's his own laptop, and he doesn't need your product.
      • If he doesn't (because it's somebody else's computer, running god-knows-what spyware and keyloggers) then there's no way for him to know that his personal information is still only on the flashdrive.

      Your product may be useful and convenient; I really don't want to flame it. But your webpage shouldn't be saying things to try to make prospective users think that a U3 chip somehow solves privacy concerns when using untrusted machines. That's misleading, and I shudder to think that anyone I care about would mistakenly rely on it.

      There's really no easy solution to that concern. If you want to sell a product that does what you advertise and that I might buy, then instead of putting a chip inside storage devices, you need to make a whole securable computer (with keyboard!) that I can fit inside my pocket. :(

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    34. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are using funky "orthogonal application persistence". You are tricking the operating system into thinking you are a CDROM drive just so you can use autoplay.

      Granted, it is not your fault that autoplay is not supported on USB flash media natively in microsoft, however, it is not up to drive manufacturers to trick the system into doing what you want to do.

      And your claims that it will soon be hard to find USB flash drives without U3? I realise you work for U3, but that is a fantasy. Without major imporovements then the U3 platform is as good as dead. There are PLENTY of manufacturers out there who aren't switching to U3. Kingston, Lexar, Crucial, PNY. These companies are among the largest. SanDisk is the only major who has swiched completely, and they are already seeing tremendous marketshare decline with their new U3 version of the cruzer.

      U3 software should be a software package that works on the flash drive, not firmware that cannot be removed without special tools, and if it is removed, cannot go back to factory state. No startup time like it currently uses. No fake CDROM drive. One partition. 100% compatibility -- even on locked down systems. I don't care if the U3 software doesn't work in MacOSX and Linux. But you know what I care about? That in MacOSX the thin mounts as a CDROM drive and then constantly prompts you to insert the CD! This is BROKEN. It doesn't just NOT work in mac, it BREAKS in Mac. Because there is no disk in it. This trickery in the hardware is a major problem. And this is the type of stuff the parent poster is talking about.

      Let the operating systems support autoplay on flash drives, not the other way around. Everything else U3 supports could be done completely without special hardware on the drive: encryption, data sync, launchpad, portable applications. And all the other things U3 brings to the table: working with software developers to be U3 comaptible, building an online database with sales ability, etc.. Why do you need a FAKE CDROM drive to accomplish this? And that fake CDROM drive is what is screwing people up. Flash Drive manufacturers have been shipping encryption and data sync apps on their drives for YEARS. I commend U3 for making this universal. But the baggage it brings along with it just is not worth the trouble.

      And the Launchpad is skinned! Why? so you can wait longer for it to start up?

      Short of removing all specialty hardware which tricks the OS, slimming the launchpad into a transparent stub which literally has 1 function: to launch programs (a potentially trivial program, but somehow U3 turned it into a full blown application that is Yet Another Useless and Bloated Background Tray Application) and making the host drive a 100% standard USB flash drive (ie, no special firmware, no special chips, no special tricks) then deployment on college campuses or enterprise settings en mass will never happen.

    35. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      "I'd like to learn more about your likes and dislikes"

      Likes:
      1) Built in software for encryption and data sync (no more 3rd party utilities that all work differently)
      2)ability to install programs onto the drive (though this is already possible on regular UFD's)

      Dislikes:
      1) Requirement to fake a CDROM drive and break other OS's and break locked down windows.
      2) Skinned and bloated launchpad. This thing should be the bare minimum. The same functionality could be done in negligable amount of ram and CPU time with off the shelf toolkits. This thing is just plain bloated and takes forever to come up. And the splash screens are idiotic.
      3) The extra partition which cannot be erased and software must be removed with a special program
      4) once the software is erased, you cannot go back to the factory state
      5) every feature on the U3 platform could be accomplished using standard USB drives, except the faking of the CDROM device. So why not just preload software on standard drives?
      6) The U3 drives are not standard UFD's and thus have compatibiity problems in other operating systems (such as MacOS X which tries to mount an empty CDROM drive).

      "especially objections to the technology as it exists today for Windows."

      Objections:
      1) launchpad skinning and splash screens and bloatedness
      2) partitioned drive. Should be a 100% standard UFD, not a complicated fake CDROM

      "For example, many people object to the factory's two-partition format, so if there were a way to repartition the drive into a single volume, would that address the concern?"

      I don't think so: because the drive should come from the factory as a standard UFD with just some software on it.

      "Is it the lack of control over the format of the device that's the core issue, or is it something more specific?"

      It is the lack of UFD compliance out of the box that is the issue.

      "Is regaining 4 Megabytes out of a Gig or two from a $50 device really making people lose sleep at night?"

      Nobody cares about 4 megabytes, even on a 256MB drive. But the fact that the drive is not a standard UFD out of the box, and has a ton of tricks built into it just to get it to function, and that you have to wait for the launchpad to load up. This is what the problem is.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    36. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the read-only CD-ROM partition uses only about 4 megabytes of the total available storage space on the device. So for current 1 Gigabyte devices costing about $50, which is comparable to about 700 floppy disks in terms of storage, that's less than 0.000004% of the total available storage and is...

      Woah there, slow down on the zeroes. 4 MB out of 1GB is about 0.4%.

    37. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      You seem to lack an understanding of U3 technology, but I'm sincerely amused by your intellectual retort nonetheless. Bravo! :)

      Seriously, if you insert a U3 smart device and run some U3 certified apps, then eject the device, you'll find nothing was installed on the host. The host's resources were merely used to execute the application from the U3 smart device, or temporarily from the host's hard drive for greater performance and stability if necessary. (Mainly because operating systems don't appreciate having the device on which an executable resides physically disconnected while the executable is running... it's similar to jumping out of your car at 60mph, but with severe digital road rash occurring on both the host and the removable device.)

      It's a popular misconception that the connect progress dialog (which pops up when you insert a U3 smart device) is some sort of "auto-installer" and that it's putting "drivers" on this computer. Sorry to disappoint, but no special drivers are involved and no software was installed on the host. Upcoming releases of the U3 Launchpad even include a feature to disable autoplay for this device, so that nothing will disturb you when you plug it in.

    38. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by castle · · Score: 1

      Huh? No special sauce, yet something is run temporarily from the hosts hard drive?

      The host's resources were merely used to execute the application from the U3 smart device, or temporarily from the host's hard drive for greater performance and stability if necessary.

      Does it use some unknown quantum computing feature to generate a schroedingers partition on your drive to install to?

    39. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      No special sauce is required to copy a file to the host's hard drive when a U3 application is launched, or to delete it when the device is removed. No schroedinger partitions are required; the temporary files are located in the U3 directory of the logged-in user's Application Data directory.

    40. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      Note to self: slashdot AFTER coffee!

      You are correct, U3 technology uses roughly 4,000,000 bytes out of 1,000,000,000 which is 0.004 or four tenths of a percent of the total storage.

    41. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And while you are at it, how about solving world peace and AIDS too?

    42. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      Okay... "orthogonal application persistence" = CD-ROM partition (???)

      You're correct that Windows' AutoPlay mechanism is only supported for CD-ROM drive types, so until Microsoft updates Win2k, XP, and Vista to provide some other mechanism to get things going upon insertion, there's really very little we can do. Vista will give system administrators more control over whether or not removable mass storage devices are allowed to connect to the host, but it doesn't address any autoplay functionality.

      I'm with you on the single partition flexibility constraints. This is the sort of valuable feedback we can take back to our engineering and management teams to improve the user experience. IMHO the manufacturers' uninstaller utilities should also be reinstallers and/or re-partitioners. There's really nothing mysterious about dividing a single physical disk into two or more partitions. Hard disks have supported that for decades.

      Regarding Mac OS X, none of the Macs we use around here exhibit any problems with U3 smart devices. Two volumes mount on the desktop just as they do in Windows, except that Mac OS X doesn't suffer from the drive letter masking bug present in Windows. I'd like to learn more about the problem -- what version of Mac OS X is prompting you to insert the CD? That info would help us track down and address the problem.

    43. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      Actually the packaging does clearly state that U3 software comes with the device. But I'm glad to hear that you are now able to use the device as you wish. That's the goal, after all.

    44. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if you are here to winge, go do it somewhere else. This gentelman is trying to help you. If you have a real problem with OSX and you want it fixed, publish the tech details.

    45. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Frankly, this is a good thing. Floppies are shitty. They havent improved as a consumer technology since like 1987; they're prone to failure and painfully slow.

      What happened in 1987 in the World of floppies? Verbatim started coating floppies in Teflon? Those were the days. Back when Verbatim were actually a decent brand.

      BTW, most of the 5.25" and 3.5" floppies I have, going back to 1991 still work fine. But yes floppies suck. It always seems to be the most important disk that suddenly gives you the "this disk is not formatted, do you want to format it now?" message. I've also had thumb drives suddenly become completely devoid of a filesystem though (Apacer) and I always unmount and wait for the light to go out, before removing them (even though in XP you supposedly don't have to).

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    46. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Shanep · · Score: 1

      Access your personal workspace wherever you go without lugging a laptop .. When you're done, simply unplug the U3 smart drive and walk away knowing that your personal information leaves with you.

      That is impossible. The user either trusts the computer, or doesn't.


      Very true. I mosty use OpenBSD (and OSX) and decided to set up a basic bootable OpenBSD (i386) install on my 4GB Corsair Flash Voyager, so that I could avoid spyware, software keyloggers and general walware on Internet cafe machines, etc, by booting my own OS (just text mode is fine for me). But the realisation that hardware keylogging keyboards and dongles are way to cheap and easy to get, made me not bother. That and the fact that I am yet to find a PC which actually will properly boot from a USB flash drive. My $5,000 VAIO does not and niether does my GF's $3,500 Thinkpad, even though it tries (not even DOS will boot after using Corsairs own "make bootable" util).

      Fact is, like you say, I either trust the machine or I don't. Both situations negate the need for that benefit from U3 or even a persons own boot environment.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    47. Re:God, I hate that U3 chip. by Shanep · · Score: 1

      I'd like to learn more about your likes and dislikes

      I'm not interested in taking my apps with me, so I'll just tell you what I want. I want a thumbdrive with which I can:

      1/ Encrypt/Decrypt with a small executable on the thumbdrive that does not need to be installed elsewhere or require admin privs.
      2/ Sync the thumbdrive when I choose.

      3/ Most importantly, these two things I want to be able to do between Windows and Mac OS X machines.

      Linux, BSD and Solaris would be a huge bonus. If you build and support the Windows and OSX software and make it open source, Linux, BSD and Solaris will quickly follow and you won't have to support it. But I assume you're in the business of making money with software and have made U3 stand out by allowing people the ability to take their apps, configs and unfinished work with them. Since you sell software to hardware companies, I'm assuming you're not interested in making decent open source crypto/syncing software, since there are so many other companies doing crypto/sync already (badly). You thus might not stand out all that much, even if you did provide the only decent solution.

      I personally would love to see a free light Windows app which can deal with Apple's (encrypted) .dmg's in a simple manner. And then multi platform sync software to go with that.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  21. Moore's Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's stupid to say that flash drive capacity is expanding faster than Moore's law since Moore's law has to do with technical limitations, not giving the market what it demands.

    What I mean is that a few years ago, it was probably technically possible to build bigger flash drives, but the demand wasn't there, so nobody bothered.

    This is just speculation of course...

  22. OT: s/resemble/resent by hummassa · · Score: 0, Troll

    resent = feel bitter or indignant about
    resemble = be similar or bear a likeness to

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:OT: s/resemble/resent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's a common non-mistake. A sort of ironic joke: he means he resents it, but it describes him perfectly so it resembles him. As far as I know, it comes from Looney Tunes, but I could be way off.

    2. Re:OT: s/resemble/resent by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      I believe your correct... Daffy Duck if IRC.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    3. Re:OT: s/resemble/resent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're seriously anal. Don't bother explaining the multiple meanings of that one.

  23. Flash drive news by Strix+Varia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this really news? Flash drives have been around a while now, and I seem to remember hearing about cars being driven over them almost a year ago. Didn't Corsair do that already?

  24. U3 or portableApps.com by Lord+Prox · · Score: 2, Informative

    U3, huh. Why, when we have got Open Source goodness recompiled to run on flashdrives. ProtableApps.com. Fresh baked ClamWinAV Firefox OpenOffice Gimp Gaim and more.



    Bless PortableApps.com

    1. Re:U3 or portableApps.com by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      The PortableApps software works very well on U3 smart devices. However, U3 smart device technology goes well beyond merely running an application from a removable storage device. It provides a unified framework under which U3 aware applications execute, a built-in software update mehanism for all applications installed on the device, secure "cookies" and related technology to support software licensing and encryption of user data, a Start Menu style interface for launching apps installed on the device, and much much more.

      "It's not just a hamburger, it's a three-course meal in a nice restaurant with pleasant wait staff and soothing music... all for the price of the burger." Metaphorically speaking that is.

  25. You CAN boot Linux from a thumbdrive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can boot Linux from a thumbdrive, if you use a lightweight distribution such as Knoppix. We're using that to implement a portable system for psychological testing. The operating system, tests, and the data collected are stored on the thumbdrive (the data is encrypted, of course); the data is uploaded to the central server whenever you boot onto a system that has an internet connection.

  26. GP is correct by LunaticTippy · · Score: 5, Informative
    so if i ride over something on my bike (50psi in the tyres) I'll be exerting more pressure ?
    Yep. Think about it.

    If a unicycle tire is at 50 psi with 100 lbs on it then there has to be 2 square inches touching the road, assuming the tire is flexible. A rigid tire could have less area in contact, but tires are flexible.

    If you still don't understand, try googling or take a look at how to weigh a car by measuring surface area here

    Oh, and a 100 lb woman in stiletto heels can exert over 1000 psi if she balances on her heel. We're talking about weight per unit area. Even though it is counterintuitive, you will exert more force per unit area on your bike than a bigrig full of i-beams, assuming you have higher pressure tires.
    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
    1. Re:GP is correct by lostboy2 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and a 100 lb woman in stiletto heels can exert over 1000 psi if she balances on her heel.

      Wasn't that covered in chapter 12 of Sex Tips from a Dominatrix? I think the term "thumb drive" has a completely different meaning in that industry, too.

    2. Re:GP is correct by Al+Mutasim · · Score: 1

      The flexibility assumption isn't quite right. The tire's pressure relates to both the weight it supports and the stress within the tire itself. Counter example: an inflated tire (bicycle or car) held up by its rim with XX psi in the tire and 0 psi against the outside world.

    3. Re:GP is correct by tygt · · Score: 1
      The PSI of the tire has nothing to do with the pressure of the tire against the pavement, but the pressure within the tire itself.

      Consider if the unicycle weighs, say, 14 pounds, and the rider is a /.'er weighing perhaps... 186 pounds (generous here - he's 5'8" probably), we have 200 pounds. Depending on the tire dimensions and air pressure, I'll give the tire a 1.66"x3" contact patch (the tire flattens somewhat on the ground), which gives us 5 sq inches of contact. The unicycle is exerting 40psi against the ground in this case (200 pounds over 5 sqin).

    4. Re:GP is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did have a woman accidentally (really accidentally) step on my foot with her stiletto (or at least very pointed heel) on an airplane. Her heel deformed my shoe and smashed my toes enough to draw blood. It was heck of painful but she was really nice and she got the flight attendants to get an bandage and ice for my foot. It was so strange to have to limp off the airplane to an awaiting ambulance.
      As for the flash drive being able handle 2000PSI the true (scientific) method is through an pressure control vise (this is the name of it when I went to school a long time ago) which you apply exact pressure between two plates up to the pressure you want. I don't know to many things that really can take 2000PSI.

    5. Re:GP is correct by non-sequitur · · Score: 0

      No, the pressure in the tire IS the pressure of the tire against the pavement(except in the theoretical case of a tire that is not deflected).

      Without getting into the math of it all - which the GP and others covered well enough, think about it this way:

      You described a unicylce with a 200lb/5sqin contact patch, and accurately stated it exerts 40psi against the ground.

      Now, if you add weight to it - the tire flattens out - creating a larger contact patch - and maintains the 40psi.
      If you add pressure - (with constant weight) - the tire's contact patch reduces - due to the higher pressure in the tire.

      You see it every time you inflate your tires, you just aren't accepting the GP's scientific explanation. (don't worry - lot's of people have trouble accepting it at first).

    6. Re:GP is correct by tygt · · Score: 1
      So you're saying that if my road bike wheel, with 120psi in the really really small tire, is balanced on my finger (contact patch about 1/2 sq inch) then there's 240psi on my finger? Doesn't feel like it, feels like the 2# wheel on 1/2sqin, or about 4psi - where does the 120psi come into the pressure on the ground?

      If said 120psi tire on the wheel was on the moon, and it was resting on the ground, it would weigh only 1/3#, and the contact pressure would then only be 1/6psi.

      The contact pressure has nothing to do with the pressure in the tire.

    7. Re:GP is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has everything to do with the maximum contact pressure per area. The maximum pressure per area is determined by the pressure in the tire. If the contact pressure per area exceeds the tire pressure, the tire will deform until the contact area increases and equilibrium between contact pressure per area and tire pressure is reached again. The numbers will not be exact due to the rigidity of the tire wall etc., of course, but they are good enough for back-of-the-napkin estimates.

      Here's a set of example numbers for a rough demonstration of the math:

      Contact area per tire ~6x8 inches = 48 inch^2.
      48 x 4 tires = 192 inch^2 total contact area
      assume 25 psi (a pretty average number) x 192 inch^2 = 4800lb vehicle, or an average pickup truck.

      Increase the weight (e.g., load something into the bed) and the tire will deform (flatten out) until contact area is increased such that the contact pressure per area remains in equilibrium with the internal tire pressure. Lighten the load and the opposite happens. Deformation either way, of course, is limited by the tire walls and rim.

      This is why, for instance, it is sometimes advisable to let some air out of your tires before driving on sandy ground, such as at the beach. Decreasing internal tire pressure decreases contact pressure per area by forcing your tires to flatten out and increase contact area, thus hopefully preventing you from sinking into the sand and getting suck.

    8. Re:GP is correct by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Oh, and a 100 lb woman in stiletto heels can exert over 1000 psi if she balances on her heel.

      Tell me about it. My flat has mainly wooden flooring and the both the hall and the kitchen have been utterly destroyed by girls in heels. The floor looks like one of those sealed puzzles with the ball bearings.

      Can't complain though...who'd complain about chicks in heals? :-)

    9. Re:GP is correct by Infoport · · Score: 1

      glad to see that other people caught this too!
      They would have done better by putting a steel plate over the drive and running over the plate (or board, something that does NOT give under pressure too much)
      If they could have concentrated all of one wheel's force, they could have at least gotten closer to 1/4 of the weight--which brings up another problem = a New Beetle weighs MORE than 2000 lbs (but MUCH less than 8000lbs)

      An "original" Beetle weighs under 2000lbs, my '68 is around 1800 or 1900.
      The 2006 New Beetle cabriolet automatic weighs 3258lbs.

      So if they stood a New Beetle (which is definitely what is shown in the picture) on one tire, it would be MUCH more than 2000lbs, but if they concentrated all of one wheel's force while evenly on all four, it would STILL only be around 800lbs.

      Infoport
      ---
      Better know your VWs before advertising thumb drives around here! ;-)

    10. Re:GP is correct by non-sequitur · · Score: 1

      You're missing the fact that in your example, the tire does not deflect. In fact, you finger does, and so it bears the weight based on you finger's pressure.

      In all real loaded circumstances, the tire deflects (as Anonymous Coward correctly points out to you in :
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=194476&thresho ld=0&commentsort=0&mode=thread&pid=15939260#159393 66

      Unless the tire deflects, it's not performing it's critical function (it may as well be a rigid wheel).

      Just to return to reality - in the article cited, the vehicle was a VW beetle. At 32psi (or whatever it was - 40psi?), it exerts no greater force on the thumb drive than any (loaded) vehicle with the same tire pressure. It wouldn't matter if it was a Hummer, an 18 wheeler, a Cadillac, or a Yugo. Once deflected, 40psi is 40psi.

      The contact pressure IS the pressure in the tire.

  27. magic BS numbers! by phorm · · Score: 1

    Running the thing over with a car might not be 2000 pounds of pressure, but PSI in a tire is not equivilent to the pressure underneath the tire, it's the internal air-pressure inside the tire in terms of pounds/pressure per square inch of volume inside the tire.

    You can test it by driving a car up on top of your toes... 30psi should be a piece of cake if your statement is correct.

    1. Re:magic BS numbers! by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and by measuring the distance between molten chunks of chocolate in a microwave oven, you're actually measuring the speed of uwaves, not the speed of light.

      Hint: go read some physics.

      Let's suppose the air in the car's tyres is at 200 000 Pa, and the car weighs 1000kg, and for simplicity we'll assume g=10 ms-2. (If you're going to do proper science, you might as well use proper measuring units.) Now the weight of the car is 10000 Newtons and the only thing supporting it is the air in the tyres. So, since every action has an equal and opposite reaction, you must have 10 000 Newtons pressing upwards on the car through the air in the tyres. And since the pressure in a fluid acts equally in all directions, you have 10 000 Newtons pressing down on the road through the air in the tyres. We know the pressure of the air in the tyres is 200 000 Pa, so the area in contact with the road must be 10 000 / 200 000 = 10 / 200 = 0.05 m2. If we multiply that by 10000 we get 500cm2, or 125cm2 per tyre, which is not unreasonable.

      Try it with figures for your own vehicle.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  28. Oh my god by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Adopt SI units... Please!

    --
    Deleted
  29. Hmmmm .... by powerlord · · Score: 4, Funny
    Not bad. But it's nothing compared to what you get if you start by feeding a bunch of thumbdrives to a bunch of in order to get 'em past the security checkpoint, and fill a 777 with 'em. Never underestimate the bandwidth of a muthafuckin' 777 full of muchta*BLAM BLAM BLAM*


    Thats a great idea for a movie!

    ThumbDrives On a Plane!

    That's IT! I have HAD IT with these MUTHAFUCKIN' memes on this MUTHAFUCKIN' website!


    That's what I'm talking about! :D
    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    1. Re:Hmmmm .... by dascandy · · Score: 1

      Don't have a credit history, only a debet history, is that ok?

  30. Does Moore's "law" even apply here? by Inverted+Intellect · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Moore's famous "law", previously a handy rough predictor for the maximum obtainable complexity of ICs (integrated circuits, e.g. CPUs) is often unappropriately applied to fields which it has nothing to do with, e.g. the maximum capacity of HDDs. Does it apply in this case?

    1. Re:Does Moore's "law" even apply here? by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      Thank you. That was one of the most informative posts on /. all day long. I hate it when people use Moore's law in totally unrelated ways. For some reason, it bothers me even more when people think Moore's law is all about CPU speeds.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    2. Re:Does Moore's "law" even apply here? by qikink · · Score: 1

      Moore's Law may or may not apply, pending the size of these drives. Recently they did start putting out actual Miniature drives, however, almost all flash drives are not a physical disk, so whether Moore's law applies or not, it is important to make the distinction between storage on a disk, and solid state storage. I'm not quite as savvy as I should be, but I believe solid-state storage would be governed by Moore's Law.

    3. Re:Does Moore's "law" even apply here? by panoplos · · Score: 1

      Yes, because you cannot have flash without transisters.

  31. For those that missed it, and need speed by RootWind · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is Anandtech's last year USB Flash Drive Roundup: http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=2549&p=3
    It seems to be still relevant almost a year later. No faster models have come out from any of the major brands that I am aware of.

  32. I call that a defect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being able to smash a drive with a hammer is a feature when you hear "Open the door! FBI!"

    1. Re:I call that a defect by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Just pack things with thermite. Much easier.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  33. mod parent up (n/t) by Xiph · · Score: 1

    nt

    --
    Blah blah sig blah blah blah irony blah blah
  34. New File Compression Scheme by pkiesel · · Score: 5, Funny

    No word on how much compression was achieved by driving the Beetle over it? A rather inefficient method in any case.

    1. Re:New File Compression Scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha!

      That gives me some ideas for lossy compression schemes for Britney Spears CDs.

    2. Re:New File Compression Scheme by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Ineffecient!?!? That Beetle is compressing ~8Petabytes to the gallon...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:New File Compression Scheme by Speare · · Score: 1

      They're still trying to iron out the bugs. They'll run it through the wringer in no time flat. So don't be a fly in the ointment.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  35. pain in the rear by p51d007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    BB had the 1 gig's on sale so I bought a few to add to my toolbox. I found reformatting didn't get rid of U3, then went to the sandisk website and downloaded the uninstaller. Must be hidden somewhere on the drive, but at least the uninstaller trashed U3 for good :)

  36. No permanently attached storage by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    On desktops anyway. No hard disk... Simply not required with 8Gb->32Gb USB drives available.

    --
    Deleted
  37. Nice feature, but that isn't the weak point by oscartheduck · · Score: 1

    It's sure nice to know there's plenty of stability in that direction, every flash drive I've ever broken or damaged has been along the join between the USB adapter and the body of the drive. One time I was sweeping, I picked my laptop up and put it on the couch, not noticing the flash drive was in it, and when I was puitting the laptop back on the floor I bumped the drive on the windowsill and bent the damn thing.

    If they could make the link between the USB adapter and the drive itself a little more robust, that'd be great.

    --
    How to use coral cache: http://slashdot.org.nyud.net:8090/~oscartheduck
    1. Re:Nice feature, but that isn't the weak point by desenz · · Score: 1

      I can relate to that one. I recently picked up a 2GB Cruzer Micro at radioshack($50, after rebates:( ) Its got a retractable USB plug. Might help, as long as the retracting bits don't fail. Seems pretty sturdy for now.

    2. Re:Nice feature, but that isn't the weak point by kfg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If they could make the link between the USB adapter and the drive itself a little more rob

      Ever change the crystal on a radio device? These things only have two little wire pins sticking out of them. Very delicate.

      The crystal inserts fully into the radio and has a plastic "cloth" pull tab stuck onto it to get it out again. Simple, elegant, bullet proof once installed.

      KFG

  38. How to remove the U3 software by Bilestoad · · Score: 1

    In some environments that U3 popup every time you insert the drive isn't appropriate. See http://www./ u3.com/uninstall - I like mine much more now it's gone.

    1. Re:How to remove the U3 software by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

      Link Fixed the link for you

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    2. Re:How to remove the U3 software by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

      Just FYI... due to popular demand, upcoming U3 smart devices and U3 Launchpad upgrades will include a user preference to enable/disable the U3 Launchpad AutoRun behavior (that big annoying dialog that pops up when you plug in the device, which is also now much much smaller and less distracting). However, those who've used the U3 uninstaller will not be able to restore U3 functionality to their devices.

    3. Re:How to remove the U3 software by GreeboNZ · · Score: 1

      What, not even with dd?
      (I'm not trolling here - I've just never come across one of these drives before)

    4. Re:How to remove the U3 software by Bilestoad · · Score: 1

      Thanks but I have no regrets. U3 software gave me precisely nothing I wanted - and the opt-out approach has made my willingness to give any future incarnation of it even a glance very unlikely indeed.

  39. Not only that... by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 1

    but you can buy them anywhere. Some even come with useful data on them already.
    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?story Id=5338506/

  40. Yes by arrrrg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Moore's law is often stated regarding the decreasing cost of a single transistor, or (equivalently) about the number of transistors per device of a given cost. Since flash RAM is constructed using a particular form of transistors (with an additional isolated gate that will hold a charge or lack thereof), Moore's law seems to (roughly) apply. In any case, flash is much closer to an ordinary IC than a hard drive.

  41. It's still often faster in the real world by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    We have a research group here that does JPEG 2000 compression research. As you might guess, this generates staggering amounts of data. They don't transfer it over the network to other places, they FedEx harddrives. Turn out, with the amount of bandwidth the campus has and the slice they can easily get, 1TB is about the crossover point where FedEx overnight becomes faster. They usually FedEx a box with like 2-4TB worth of external harddrives in it, and get a similar box in return.

    Sounds kinda silly, but really works out better overall. It's cheaper too, than it would cost to get the university to buy more bandwidth and dedicate it specially to them.

    1. Re:It's still often faster in the real world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That research group should move to a university that has sufficient bandwidth for their research.

  42. Nitpicky again by viking2000 · · Score: 1

    Nitpicky I know, but pound-force is not a unit of pressure. What you probably meant is "pound is not a unit of force".

  43. Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll run over a bed of nails and my tires will be just fine, because they always stay at 30 PSI.

  44. Mod parent _UP_ by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    Sweet. Now I can fix the flash drive (with their permission) rather than tell them to buy a different device. (I hated only having that option. Since I'm president of the computer club, and computer club sells non-broken flash drives as a fundraiser, it's a conflict of interest.)

    Thanks.

    1. Re:Mod parent _UP_ by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      Sweet. Now I can fix the flash drive (with their permission) rather than tell them to buy a different device.
      Just make them aware that the U3 uninstaller will repartition the flash drive and erase all the data on it. Definitely a no-go for those "My assignment is due in 20 minutes, I need to print this now now now!!!" people. Other than that, the uninstaller seems to do exactly what you'd expect. I picked up a couple of 2 GB Sandisk Micro thumb drives from Best Buy on Wednesday since they were on sale for $45 each. Quite a steal for a drive with an MSRP of around $85. Works just fine now and the CD-image partition is no longer there so it doesn't autorun anything on Windows.
  45. Re:Why just USB (2.0)? Also: What I'd like to see. by generic-man · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's one FireWire flash drive. Although the speeds might be faster, I like USB better just because *everything* has a USB port nowadays, but many computers (like my Dell desktop and Dell work laptop) lack FireWire ports.

    The idea of a home server that doesn't need any computer per se is in its infancy: 160 GB HD, iTunes sharing, BitTorrent client, all self-contained so you can set it and take your laptop with you while your home connection continues to download all your favorite Creative Commons licensed Ogg Tarkin video files. I like it!

    --
    For more information, click here.
  46. "Shit, I own a 4x4." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I bet the only time you ever take it off-road is when you accidentally reverse it into your mom's flower garden.

    But I'm sure you plan to go off-roading sometime soon, right? Or maybe up those difficult skifield access roads...right?

    There needs to be a tough and rigorously enforced license endorsement for SUVs: to own one you should have to prove a genuine need.

    1. Re:"Shit, I own a 4x4." by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      Why should there be such a license? Sure, Lincoln "Navigators" and the like are sort of irritating (in that they are never used for, and probably aren't capable of, navigating rough terrain), but why should you have to need an SUV to get one? Why not require people get the cheapest kia/hundai, w/o air conditioning or anything else unnecessary? That's all most people "need".

      Let people get the car they want.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
  47. Re:Why just USB (2.0)? Also: What I'd like to see. by flooey · · Score: 1

    I don't see why we can't use Firewire (IEEE 1394) for these types of products.

    Firewire is both more complex on the electronics level and more expensive in licensing fees. Since the basic premise of these things is generally that they're small and cheap, USB is the more common choice. Plus, practically every machine has at least one USB port, whereas a lot of machines don't come with Firewire.

    What I'd like to see next is a USB thumb drive with an RJ-45 connection with built in Wireless access point.

    You'd need an external power supply to use it without it being connected to a computer, which would mean both a cord and the space for a power transformer. That probably wouldn't work out well.

  48. At least make an attempt to understand by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Moore's law.

    idiot.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  49. USB drive = dongle? by Darth+Cider · · Score: 1

    Software companies have to be eyeing USB drives as a medium to thwart piracy. Either flash prices drop and the whole software package goes onto the drive, or the DVD/CD distribution gets packaged with a USB-drive dongle. How can Adobe, for example, sit idly by when its entire library of titles can be found on every single Hotline server? (Just visit tracker-tracker.com) Knee-jerk response? Adobe benefits from piracy. Boardroom and shareholder response? Piracy hurts the bottom line and has to be stopped.

    My first computer, a Power Mac, came with a 256 MB hard drive, for which I paid over 200 bucks. I was amazed at the time that hard drives were so cheap! Now I'm kooky with amazement that USB drives are so cheap. A 256 MB USB drive costs about 20 bucks at Wal-Mart--i.e., the 1993 dollar equivalent of a McDonald's Happy Meal.

    Whether it's double Moore's Law or anything close, the falling cost of USB drives is reaching that critical kind of tension when things can snap and people start talking about paradigm shifts. Not that anyone remembers reading Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions--it came out on paper, after all.

    1. Re:USB drive = dongle? by rcastro0 · · Score: 1

      My first computer, a Power Mac, came with a 256 MB hard drive(...)

      You probably have no idea how unimpressive that sounds here at /.

      My first computer, a ZX 81, came with 2kb of main memory and stored data
      and programs in a cassete tape at a 300bps rate.

      My first computer with a floppy drive, an Apple II Plus, stored 127 kb in
      a 5 1/4 inches floppy.

      My first computer with a hard drive, an IBM PC XT compatible, had a 10 MB
      Winchester.

      My cell phone today (a SonyEricsson K700) has more memory than that first HD.

      --
      Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
  50. Not to mention versitile... by BSonline · · Score: 1

    http://http//www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/tools/6b3b/ / There are so many ways these devices are being used. I find file storage a welcome addition to anything I keep on me. Now, where is that file... in my phone, my pen, my thumb drive, or my knife?

    --
    PS: That is what part of the alphabet would look like if the letters "Q" and "R" were removed.
  51. Re:'Secure encryption technique' not available ? by anakin876 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if these military personnel were told not to use flash drives, but were not given any other way to accomplish the requirements of their duties. I.E. "You can't use that to do necessary task 1A" "But I have no other way of doing that task!" "too bad - you figure it out"

  52. If you want to get rid of U3 by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Informative
    You can get the official instructions for removing U3 here. Click "support" and scroll down to question #6.

    One thing this is annoying about that--they recognize that Mac and Linux users might want to get rid of U3 (their survey that asks why you are getting rid of it includes using Mac or Linux among the answers), but the software to remove U3 only runs on Windows.

    It did not work under Parallels on my Mac. I had to really boot Windows to run the U3 remover.

  53. Sandisk Cruiser Titanium by acidrain69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    STAY AWAY FROM THIS DRIVE IF YOU ARE GOING TO KEEP ANYTHING REMOTELY IMPORTANT.

    We purchased 3 of them for our IT staff in the local office. All 3 failed within 3 months of ordering, and 2 of the replacements failed after that (within a month of replacement). We had them switched out for some Cruzer Micro and Minis, and have been fine ever since (several months now).

    My theory is the metal on the case. While strong, I think the metal in the case conducts static and shorts into the flash chips or USB controller inside. I don't even know if titanium conducts or not, and Sandisk denies there is a widespread issue with these drives, but go read the amazon.com forums on this product and you will be scared off.

    It's a shame. They are a wonderful design, no caps to loose and the drive slides inside the case to protect the USB connector. But it's useless if you can't trust it. One of mine worked one second when I had it plugged into a laptop, then I dismounted it, walked 10 ft to my computer, plugged it in and it was DOA. I think it may have been the static from the carpet, I had it hanging around my neck. You're better off with a plastic one and just back it up periodically to protect against loss or damage.

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
    1. Re:Sandisk Cruiser Titanium by failedtoinit · · Score: 1

      I agree, we got a batch of them for our Desktop Support guys. 100% failure rate within a couple months, whereas the Kingstons and Memorexes have stood the test of time!

  54. Am I the only one... by paulmer2003 · · Score: 1
    Computerworld tested that claim by repeatedly driving a Volkswagen Beetle [CC] over the ruggedized thumb drive. While the drive's body came away with a few scratches, there were no dents, and not a single lost file."

    Who can remember picking up a beetle with like 3 other people and moving it? They weigh nothing. Try going over it in like a Ford F350 dually and ill be more impressed......
    1. Re:Am I the only one... by Andyvan · · Score: 1

      FYI: They're referring to a "modern" Beetle, which weigh considerably more than a "classic" Beetle does.

      My apologies if you were trying for funny.

      -- Andyvan

  55. burning out USB? by louzerr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At work we're seeing a larger number of motherboards where the USB suddenly fails. It only seems to happen to those using drives or palm sync devices.

    If the enterprise uses flash drives more, will we end up replacing more motherboards as well?

    --
    "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" -- "Step Right Up", Tom Waits
    1. Re:burning out USB? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      If the enterprise uses flash drives more, will we end up replacing more motherboards as well?

      I guess so... Until somebody realizes that PCI USB2.0 cards are a lot cheaper than motherboards...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:burning out USB? by proxima · · Score: 1
      At work we're seeing a larger number of motherboards where the USB suddenly fails. It only seems to happen to those using drives or palm sync devices.

      My hypothesis would be static discharge. There was an issue way back when with the Palm V and its charging cradle frying ungrounded serial ports. With drives and Palms, you have frequent plugging in; given where people stash their flash drives (pockets, bags), I imagine building up a static charge is certainly possible.

      A properly wired USB port should be fine (just like serial ports before), I would think.
      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    3. Re:burning out USB? by smart_ass · · Score: 2, Informative

      We've seen this too, but only with specific chip sets, and only ever on the "extra" USB ports. The ones on the back that are directly attached to the motherboard have all been fine, however the ones on top and front of case have the problems. I believe it is some sort of grounding problem. As such we have blanked out / disconnected those other ports and have yet to have any fail.

      --
      Ouch ... did I just say that.
  56. Storing and launching apps? Wow! by noidentity · · Score: 1
    SanDisk and M-Systems Flash Disk Pioneers launched a thumb drive with an intelligent U3 chip that can store and launch applications.

    Hmmm, storing and launching applications, I seem to remember something else capable of this... oh yeah, any operating system with any kind of disk storage! Does this chip do something to prevent launching applications? Would make sense as nowadays the digital "enhancements" are always just restrictions on what you can do.

  57. Re:'Secure encryption technique' not available ? by Monkeys!!! · · Score: 1

    Could somebody pleas visit those army barracks with a very big clue stick?

    With their track record, you wouldn't get it back

  58. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most of the "engineers" reading here are not the "engineers" you (or I) consider to be real engineers. People typing at a keyboard and causing a display to show something are not engineers. 'Architect' might be a better description.

  59. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Running the drive over with a car is at most going to be only 20-40 psi(pounds per square inche), the tire pressure.


    No kidding. I once saw a puppy get rolled over by a jeep/SUV thing.

    This pup was, unbeknowst to me, following me down the road. By the time I heard it, we were a considerable distance from its home. So I began to walk back, as the pup would not take a hint. After a few metres, I heard the sound of the oncoming jeep. So did the pup. He wasn't too bright, and, spooked and leashless, panicked and began tearing down the road as fast as possible, towards home and away from the jeep.

    He just kept running, and the jeep just kept coming. The pup was zigzagging back and forth all over the single lane country road. The jeep continued onwards, straight and steady, not altering its course in the slightest. The driver must have been a grade-A asshole. Anyway, as I watched, the jeep finally caught up with the puppy. He was right in the middle of the road, but at the last second dived right just in time to be firmly rolled over the the jeeps right front tire. The jeep continued on its way, without altering speed.

    As I watched, transfixed, the pup rolled to its feet, staggering and wobbling, its neck craned rather sickenly to its right, head pointing upwards. It let out these awful drawn yelps, over and over, its eyes looking right at me, head still craned upwards. It slowly began to stagger back towards me, neck still crooked, looking like the living dead.

    Anyway, after a few seconds, it stopped yelping, turned its head back into a normal position, and padded back over to me, tail a little droopy, but wagging. I must have gawped at it for about ten minutes, fully expecting it to suddenly and theatrically resume its death agonies and loudly expire. It just sniffed at the ground.

    Taking that dog back to its owner to tell them their puppy had just been run over was one of the most surreal expieriences of my life. True story.
    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  60. They last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can speak from experience on how rugged the SanDisk thumb drives are. I lost my first one in the parking lot at work for a few days and when a co-worker found it, it looked like it lost a fight to a few tires. But it still works like a charm.

    The one I bought to replace it when I thought it was gone for good also found a way to escape me and was run over and sat out in the rain overnight (it rained all night) and again still works without any issues.

    In short - the SanDisk Mini survived being run over and the SanDisk Micro survived being run over and sitting in the rain.

  61. Drive a Beetle over it? by icebike · · Score: 1

    I hate to rain on their parade, but the beetle, regardless of its weight, will exert no more than the tire pressure per square inch on the thumb drive.

    Assuming 32psi in the tires, and a thumb drive size of (say) 1 inch by 3 inches, the total weight born by the thumb drive would be no more than 96 pounds.

    Far from the 2000 pounds claimed.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  62. Encryption? by rrohbeck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yup, a truck full of tapes (or disks, it you have *good* packaging) is still the standard way of doing high volume data vaulting. If you need to move multiple TB per day (nothing special for a large datacenter), you don't want to pay for that amount of bandwidth unless you absolutely have to, i.e. you need online access.

    That's why tapes keep falling off the back of a truck and get lost every now and then. Bummer if there's credit card records on those tapes. That's why hardware encryption is getting a lot of attention recently.

    TFA mentions encryption is passing; are there any standard USB drives with encryption yet? How is the password transmitted to the drive? I sometimes have a bad feeling carrying company data and sources around all the time. I keep the USB stick attached to the company badge so I won't lose is easily, but still...

    1. Re:Encryption? by cb0nd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that truecrypt does a very good job at this.

      I haven't used it all that much (ya know, while thumbdrives are easy to lose, I don't really care if someone sees how bad my assignments for the Operating Systems class really are), but I think it does a pretty decent job even in different environments.

  63. that's cool by misey · · Score: 1

    yeah

  64. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wife backed our Jetta onto my foot once, and then stopped it there when I yelled at her. (She claims it was accidental :) It wasn't comfortable, but it didn't break my foot either.

  65. Re:Why just USB (2.0)? Also: What I'd like to see. by kraut · · Score: 1

    > You'd need an external power supply to use it without it being connected to a computer, which would mean both a cord and the space for a power transformer. That probably wouldn't work out well.
    You can get power over ethernet these days...

    --
    no taxation without representation!
  66. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by chaffed · · Score: 1
    I had to read your post twice. At first glance I read a bad Yakov Smirnoff joke.
    In soviet russia thumb drive drives over you

    Or something to that effect...
    --
    What could possibly go wrong?
  67. So survived a small tire pressing on it... by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
    ... but every thumb drive I've tried has busted when on a keychain for more than a few months.

    It needs to take a lot of abuse, and getting squished by a few hundred pounds of stationary overhead pressure from a car tire doesn't qualify as a lot of abuse.

    How does it hold up in the real world?

    --
    //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  68. As grandpa simpson would say... by glimmy · · Score: 1
    Adopt SI units... Please!


    My car gets forty rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I likes it!
    1. Re:As grandpa simpson would say... by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1
      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  69. Flash density growth vs Moore's law by Xygon · · Score: 1

    It looks like flash is outpacing Moore's law, a perception reinforced by marketing and reality by the manufacturers of NAND, such as Samsung's roadmap images http://www.samsung.com/Products/Semiconductor/NAND Flash/index.htm.

    In fact, the densities of nand units has continually doubled for several years, but only loosely tied to Moore's law. Moore talked about the doubling of the transistor densities, but if you do some simple calculations of the gate width and silicon lithography nodes, it is not truly following a doubling -- at least not at the same size.

    Traditional lithography nodes scaled in 72% increments, which in two dimensions, is 50% scaling. If you track the NAND lithography nodes, they're moving at smaller and smaller increments. 90/70/60/50/45... these are not 72% increments, and thus, though the density is growing, die size is continually increasing.

    The SLC to MLC moves jumpstart this a step; however, don't expect this to go on much longer.

  70. How about washing in washing machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i accidently washed my SD card in washing machine and i dried in in air for two days.
    After that, i was hoping it wont work at all. But to my surprise, it has all the data intact.

  71. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by evilviper · · Score: 1
    My wife backed our Jetta onto my foot once, and then stopped it there when I yelled at her.

    It's a JETTA... Why didn't you just pick the little thing up, and toss it around a little?
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  72. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by timeOday · · Score: 1

    Ha! That was our family car for a good two years after we had our third child. Small on the outside, big on the inside, and that goes for the trunk too. Less so for the newer, rounder body style though.

  73. woahz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of those!

  74. I, for one, by Iron+(III)+Chloride · · Score: 1

    welcome our new flash drive overlords.

    --
    Cogito, ergo sum, fosho!
  75. May I suggest by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    ...that you submit an Ask Slashdot article?

    Make sure to work on your formatting, though. Use the Preview button, and don't use the Submit button until it looks right.

  76. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by lewi · · Score: 1

    "Maybe if the whole car was balanced on one wheel and then drove over it."

    I'd rather see them pull off this stunt with the car riding on the rims...

  77. Re:Why just USB (2.0)? Also: What I'd like to see. by Foodie · · Score: 1

    Because you need to pay Apple royalties for every Firewire interface you build.

  78. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I beg to differ.

    I am a software engineer, not in the sense that I write software as a living, but in the sense that I have an actual engineering degree and the only thing between me and being a professional engineer is an ethics exam that I didn't bother taking. While the term "Software Engineer" has lost most of its meaning, there are actually software engineers out there that have real engineering training.

  79. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by maxume · · Score: 1

    Be sure to tell the hundreds of millions of people that weight themselves in kilograms that they are morons.

    Or realize that you are being incredibly inane, whatever works.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  80. Re:'Secure encryption technique' not available ? by porter235 · · Score: 1
    Could somebody pleas visit those army barracks with a very big clue stick ?

    Sounds like what they need is a very big GLUE stick!
  81. linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure you can drive a Beetle over it, but can it run linux?

  82. Brainiac covered this by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

    The UK show, Brainiac, did a data storage test a few years ago. The show has now made it to the USA, but perhaps not this re-run.

    From memory, they tested CDs, harddrives, flash drives and a few others. They fired them out of a blunderbust, dropped them, drove over them and I think they even cooked them in a pie.

    After all this, the flash drive was the only one that still worked. IIRC the contacts were a bit flakey though.

    In terms of data recovery, a mangled flash card is probably way ahead of other kinds of storage. Recovery of a harddrive requires a clean room and specialist equiptment. You could rejuvinate a physically broken flashcard by removing the actual eeprom and putting it on a new (compatible) card and it would be as good as new.

  83. Re:Why just USB (2.0)? Also: What I'd like to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well - to more companies than just Apple. $0.25 per end user system to the '1394 licensing authority', which includes Sony amongst others.

    You might have to give apple a bit more money if you call it 'Firewire' - that's their mark.

    Compare this with USB, who don't charge royalties but do charge for membership of the USB consortium ($4,000 per member per year) which is the only easy way to get access to all the specs.

  84. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by Skynyrd · · Score: 2, Informative

    My wife backed our Jetta onto my foot once, and then stopped it there when I yelled at her. (She claims it was accidental :) It wasn't comfortable, but it didn't break my foot either.

    There's a large difference in teh weight on the front tires vs the weight on the rear tires of a front engine/front wheel drive vehicle. Assuming you care, you could find an old car magazine or road test, and itt'll list the weight balance, as well as the weight of the car. Being run over by the back wheels of a 80's econo-box (not saying that's what the Jetta is) is nothing.

    On th eother hand, I have a heavy duty truck with tools, equipment, a utility bed and a Diesel engine. On DOT certified scales, theh front end (front wheels on the scale) weighs 4300 pound, while th erear wheels only put 3200 on the ground. Yup, each front tire is putting a ton onto the ground. That would hurt your foot.

  85. Re:I hated the U3 Cruzer until I got rid of the U3 by U3+DTS · · Score: 1

    Could I ask you to please elaborate on your statement "the U3 software is one of the most godawful things in existence" -- what exactly is so "godawful" about it? Honestly, we'd really like to know!

  86. Re:'Secure encryption technique' not available ? by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

    This sounds like sam fisher is at work...

    --
    Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  87. Re:Why just USB (2.0)? BECAUSE ITS FASTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmnn.. so Firewire is faster?...

    From the Kangaru firewire flashdrive specs:

        --- Data Transfer Rate --- 400Mb/Sec ---

        Last time I looked, USB2 was 480 Mb/sec.

        Of course there's a 800Mb firewire spec, but are there any flashdrives supporting it?

  88. Re:Why just USB (2.0)? BECAUSE ITS FASTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm more likely to get 400 Mb/sec from a Firewire drive than 480 Mb/sec from a USB2 drive.

  89. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    What they are measuring in kilogrammes is really their mass {which is a property of an object which relates to how much matter it contains, and is measured in kilogrammes}, not their weight {which is a force exerted by an object due to gravitational attraction, and is directly dependent upon its mass, and is measured in Newtons}.

    At least, if they were using a beam balance, they would really be measuring their mass {assuming that the value of g is the same for the person being weighed and the counterweight[s]}. If they were using a spring balance, then they would actually be measuring their weight {in Newtons} and dividing it by some assumed value for g to convert it to an approximate mass. g is about 10 ms-2 over most of the Earth's surface; and not too far off pi ** 2 for that matter, which is handy sometimes for quick pendulum calculations: T = As Near As Damn Is To Swearing 2 * sqrt(l).

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  90. Re:Running over with car not 2000 pounds of pressu by maxume · · Score: 1

    I actually do understand the difference, my point was more or less that it doesn't matter much, especially if you are staying inside the gravity well of a planet, something which most people tend to do.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  91. U3 hatred elaborated... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  92. Surface area by phorm · · Score: 1

    Yes, but that doesn't mean that the 40 psi in the tires is the same amount of pressure on the device. That, again, is a measure of the pressure of the air within the tire itself. It also applies to balloons, bike tires, etc. Having X psi in a car tire and the same psi on a party balloon doesn't mean the party balloon could support the car.

    And yes, there is a minimum pressure the tires must be to hold the weight of the car, but 40psi in the tires does not mean 40 pounds of pressure per each square inch of the device's measurement... again, this is the in-tire pressure.

    So, since every action has an equal and opposite reaction, you must have 10 000 Newtons pressing upwards on the car through the air in the tyres

    Here's partly where things go wrong, as ome of the air in the tire is helping exert the upward pressure on the vehicle, but the weight is also being born by the superstructure of the tire itself and other factors. You could have a 40psi tire or a 50psi tire, but that doesn't directly increase or decrease how much the items underneath are bearing by 10 psi (if you put a scale underneath, increasing or decreasing tire pressure does not make the scale show a different measurement. That's weight, which I think is where the article got a bit wrong using PSI instead of pounds). Again, the downward pressure is not a direct function of the internal psi, because the equalization of force up and down are not only absorbed by the air, but the rubber and others, but what you are measuring is just the pressure of the air against the outer walls (which in themselves must exert force back against the air in retaining shape).

    1. Re:Surface area by ajs318 · · Score: 1
      And yes, there is a minimum pressure the tires must be to hold the weight of the car, but 40psi in the tires does not mean 40 pounds of pressure per each square inch of the device's measurement... again, this is the in-tire pressure.
      Maybe things aren't equal if you insist to measure them with your stupid units; but if you use proper measuring units, things make so much more sense. The pressure in the tyres {200 000 Pa in my example} is the force in Newtons acting on each square metre of the surface of the tyre. That must be balancing the 10 000 N weight of the car exactly, since the car is not going anywhere: if there was an unbalanced force acting in some direction, then something would move.
      ome of the air in the tire is helping exert the upward pressure on the vehicle, but the weight is also being born by the superstructure of the tire itself and other factors.
      No. Tyre walls have almost no compressive strength -- they would just collapse if you tried to squash them. They have tensile strength. What you have to do is stretch them first {by filling the tyres with air at a higher pressure than the air outside}. Then they will have an apparent compressive strength -- because "squashing" them when they are already stretched is really just stretching them less.
      You could have a 40psi tire or a 50psi tire, but that doesn't directly increase or decrease how much the items underneath are bearing by 10 psi (if you put a scale underneath, increasing or decreasing tire pressure does not make the scale show a different measurement. That's weight, which I think is where the article got a bit wrong using PSI instead of pounds).
      If you put a pair of scales under each tyre, all the readings will add up to 1000kg. They may not all read exactly 250kg because the weight of the car probably is not perfectly evenly distributed. You're right that increasing the pressure of one tyre will not change the reading on the scales {except to the extent that the weight will be redistributed a little, but this will be negligible}, but it will reduce the amount of tyre in contact with the surface of the scales. More Pascals of pressure in the tyre as shown by the manometer attached to the tyre pump will manifest themselves as the same number of Newtons {which come from the weight of the car, which hasn't changed; multiplied by some constant due to weight distribution, which hasn't changed so as you'd notice} distributed over fewer square metres {smaller contact area}.

      You will find, if you place scales under each wheel, and measure the surface area of each tyre which is in contact with the scales and the pressure in each tyre, that the tyre pressure in Pascals will be equal to the mass showing on the scales in kg., times g, divided by the area of contact in square metres.
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  93. Hmm, what exactly is "premium" about those drives? by Shanep · · Score: 1

    "Lexar's premium JumpDrive Lightning thumb drive has the fastest data-transfer rates at 18MB/sec write and 24MB/sec read."

    I had my heart set on a 2GB Jumpdrive Lightning, since it was one of the fastest USB thumb drives around and it looked really strong. I was going to order one, but could not find a place with stock, so I continued researching by looking at forums and user reviews. I was pretty quickly put off the Jumpdrive Lightning, since many people were complaining that not only the plastic inside the steel cap breaks, but also the plastic between the steel casing and PCB also breaks. Causing some people to find that when they pull their Lightning out of their computers, the steel case just slides off and the PCB and thus drive remains connected to the computer.

    So much for the tough looking drive! So I decided to check out the forums for the SanDisk Titanium...

    And some are strong on the outside, too. SanDisk touts a drive built to withstand 2,000 lbs. of pressure. Computerworld tested that claim by repeatedly driving a Volkswagen Beetle over the ruggedized thumb drive. While the drive's body came away with a few scratches, there were no dents, and not a single lost file."

    Do a search for "SanDisk Titanium static". A LOT of people from different forums and review sites, have really bad things to say about the SanDisk Titaniums. Way, way, WAY too many people for there not to be a problem. Like the Lexar Lightning, but much worse. So a broken SanDisk thumb drive, killed by a single touch, can have its broken electronics protected from a pressure of up to 2,000lbs! Wow!

    I ended up getting a rubber 4GB Corsair Flash Voyager. Which has a 10 year warrantee and although there are some people with failure complaints in the Corsair forums, it seems like a low number and as Corsair points out, they sell very many units and have few complaints. In forums where people are speaking badly of the Lexar Lightning and SanDisk Titanium, there is lots of praise for the Corsair Flash Voyager. When someone does complain about the Voyager, Corsair promptly requests the person fill out a form to have the drive replaced. The customers seem happy. I bought my 4GB Flash Voyager for cheaper than the 2GB Lexar or SanDisk models.

    I have also seen some review where they drive over a Flash Voyager and it survives (just). They also boil it, and even bake it with their pizza! It survives the boiling, but fails after they rinse it under water after the pizza baking. But it then comes good once they remove the rubber and dry it. Personally, I don't plan on driving over it, boiling it, baking it or using it as the sole storage of anything important. Thumb drives should be used for moving data or backup and not relied upon.

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  94. USB EVDO Modem by Sprintmodem · · Score: 1

    Hi all - found this cool website that sells Mobile Broadband modems - http://www.usbmodem.alwaysbethere.com/ - Their price is low ($250 w/ activation) - Have anyone seen anywhere with a cheaper modem? My friend has one of these and he uses it a lot when he travels as neither of us have a PCMCIA slot in our computer... Any thought on where else to get these?