Slashdot Mirror


Philips Shows Light Emitting Clothing

Paul Cobbaut writes "From Physorg: Philips Research intends to impress the visitors at this year's IFA (Internationale Funkausstellung) with a world-first demonstration of promotional jackets and furniture featuring its innovative Lumalive technology. Lumalive textiles make it possible to create fabrics that carry dynamic advertisements, graphics and constantly changing color surfaces. Here is the Philips Press Release." Obviously, all Devo videos will need to be reshot using this valuabe new technology advance.

191 comments

  1. and of course by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 3, Funny

    The possibilities for the PRON industry abound.

    Now they can show it all before they take it all off.

    1. Re:and of course by carlvlad · · Score: 0

      Wait, on one hand we got TRON , and on the other hand, we got PORN. True ?

    2. Re:and of course by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1, Funny

      I won't comment on anything involving Porn or hands - because that would be crass and wrong.

    3. Re:and of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope I'm not the only one thinking they are not mutually exclusive...

      Right?

      Oh, OK. Nevermind.

  2. Tron Suit by tompatman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sweet! Now I can build the perfect Tron suit that I always dreamed of! Hopefully, no one will think I'm weird when I wear it to work...

    1. Re:Tron Suit by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the great thing is you can switch it of at work. That way, you can still look really cool on the bus, and nobody at work will be any the wiser - unless you get that pretty secretary at work into the stationary room on her own. That is when the hypnotic function comes into play.

    2. Re:Tron Suit by gatzke · · Score: 0, Redundant
    3. Re:Tron Suit by kinglink · · Score: 1

      What makes you think you're going to be the only one.

      At least this way you'll have a rival for when you want to do a race on those little motor scooters for children.

    4. Re:Tron Suit by atticusfinch1970 · · Score: 1

      That'd be great! Unless you work in a photolab....

  3. Light pollution by ms1234 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Like there is not already too much light pollution in the world. And advertisment .. and lightboards .. and .. and ...

    1. Re:Light pollution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Like there is not already too much light pollution in the world. And advertisment .. and lightboards .. and .. and ...

      With that jacket you can constantly inform us about that opinion of yours without needing to open your mouth.

      As soon as the resolution increases you'll even be able to show example chapters of your book on you clothes and have a little mascot playing the smallest violin in the world to it using the build-in speakers.

      Isn't that great?

    2. Re:Light pollution by legoburner · · Score: 1

      Just think of the sort of appearance that an AOL door-to-door salesman would have. (shudders)

  4. Not Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sweet! Now I can build the perfect Tron suit that I always dreamed of! Hopefully, no one will think I'm weird when I wear it to work...
    Oh no, of course they won't think you're weird ... you work in IT right? I think that's kind of acceptable.

    What might be annoying is if you wear a helmet with LEDs the whole time and you paint a line behind you (the same color as your glowing suit) while making speeding noises. You then insist that no one can cross those lines lest they are destroyed. Now that would be annoying.
    1. Re:Not Weird by ATMD · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, +1 Funny :)

      One of these days the powers that be will bestow some mod points on me...

      --
      Nobody else has this sig.
  5. Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oooh, there is one big market waiting for this. Who cares about advertising, visibility is even more important. Dayling running can be made safer with clothing that shifts geometric patterns and shifting colors. Ads on the clothing could be used to reduce the price so people actually wear it... and if not ads then perhaps some customizable imagery would be good to.

    Still, the safety aspects are hard to ignore with stuff like this. If the power use is low enough then self lighting (pulsing/blinking) emergency gear would be another great application (think of aircraft seats, lifevests, etc). Get lost in the woods then at night a tent or even your jacket if woven with this material could be set to flash etc.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      ...or take it to the other end of the spectrum: add a camera (in the lapel or somewhere) and you've got yourself perfect camouflage every time.

    2. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by otie · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Ads on the clothing could be used to reduce the price so people actually wear it...
      Oh please. They'll charge you more for the privilege of wearing their adverts.
    3. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by EdMack · · Score: 1

      Ads will make clothing cheeper? I ALREADY pay far to much money to display brand name logos! This really needs a Soviet Russia joke.

      --
      puts ("Python r0cks\n");
    4. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by cHALiTO · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Ads on the clothing could be used to reduce the price so people actually wear it...


      Ehm.. those already exist, and they actually make the clothes *more expensive*. Like, check out the price of a white T-shirt, then go see the price of a white T-shirt with Nike logo on the front... by wearing it in pubilc, you're freely advertising for Nike.. wait.. not freely.. you PAID for it!

      (I know, I know, trademark, status, quality perception. etc etc.. but I still can't stop thinking that when something like this happens, there's something really wrong with this world =P)
      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    5. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by jb_nizet · · Score: 1
      Ads on the clothing could be used to reduce the price so people actually wear it...
      In fact, people are usually paying more to wear clothes with ads: t-shirts with a big Ni*e slogan, sweat-shirts with an Adid*s or Reeb*k logo, etc.
      I'm pretty sure being transformed into a moving light-emitting ad would make lots of people feel super-cool, and they would be ready to pay for that :-(
    6. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by WoLpH · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "Ads on the clothing could be used to reduce the price so people actually wear it..."
      Have you seen clothes lately? Everything has brands (imho advertisements) on it, sometimes even _very_ big logo's with slogans and everything.

      For example, look at your monitor, do you see the brand on it? Or you keyboard, mouse, whatever, everything is branded these days, so all of it is already advertisement.

    7. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Safety yellow bike jersey: $20

      Black bike shorts: $30

      "Official" Cofidis Jesey and shorts: $160

      Getting me to wear Cofidis Jersey: Pricel. . . well, actually; about $50k a year ought to do it.

      KFG

    8. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... even your jacket if woven with this material could be set to flash ...
      I flash people all the time, without wearing any fancy, high-tech clothing.
    9. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by indifferent+children · · Score: 4, Funny
      I ALREADY pay far to much money to display brand name logos! This really needs a Soviet Russia joke.

      Or a joke about the differences between 'to', 'two', and 'too'.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    10. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dayling running can be made safer with clothing that shifts geometric patterns and shifting colors.

      Bikers don't need it, they already have lights. Runners can be made safer by getting the hell off the road. Runners piss me off, with their damned "runner's high" they're worse than junkies. At least junkies don't shoot up in the middle of the highway!

      Ads on the clothing could be used to reduce the price so people actually wear it

      You mean, like the nike ads on that cheap clothing now? What, it's NOT cheap, they want an extra twenty bucks for a Tshirt with a nike swoosh on it?

      These things are going to cost an arm and a leg (at least at first).

    11. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by Meccanica · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ads on the clothing could be used to reduce the price so people actually wear it.

      Oh god. NOOOOOO! I can't stand it... I don't want to see FLASHING! AD! BANNERS! on people!! I got away from them on the internet (firefox + adblock) but there is no way to protect yourself from throngs of joggers wearing DISCOUNT ELECTRONICS and FREE ONLINE GAMBLING etc.... I know, I know, but it's still a terrible idea. Advertising will always want to be flashy and eye-catching in some way. Hopefully people will have enough sense to stay away from the whole idea... but I wonder... by providing free clothing to the homeless, Corpoation X gets free ad space in return! Actually, that's kind of sad, now that I think of it.

      More importantly, you mean people don't wear clothing unless they have some sort of price incentive? Where do you live? Thousands of slashdot geeks have to know!

      --
      You live and learn. At least, you live.
    12. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by Peldor · · Score: 1
      Ads on the clothing could be used to reduce the price so people actually wear it...

      Are you kidding me? The bigger the ad, the more likely you paid extra for the 'privilege' to wear it. It used to be a 1/2" alligator or polo horse. Now it 6" tall letters that proudly proclaim you shop at GAP or wear Tommy.

      We're walking billboards already. No need to light those billboards up too.

    13. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Ehm.. those already exist, and they actually make the clothes *more expensive*. Like, check out the price of a white T-shirt, then go see the price of a white T-shirt with Nike logo on the front... by wearing it in pubilc, you're freely advertising for Nike.. wait.. not freely.. you PAID for it!

      Wait though...

      Here is the real deal: they agree to sell you the expensive T-shirt for less than cost, in return for which you agree to let them change some part of the T-shirt, e.g. the logo or the company catch phrase, or maybe even the entire back surface. They may even give you the T-shirt for free -- like GMail. However the T-shirt will come with a EULA or Terms of Service.

      Imagine that you're walking down the street, and your T-shirt reacting to a wireless command, the back of your Nike T-shirt displays an advertisement for a buy one, get one free deal on Nike shoes at a store on that block.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    14. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by arclyte · · Score: 1

      Somehow I think it'd cause more accidents if the guy on the bike in front of me was wearing a shirt that was constantly shifting geometric patterns and colors. I'd think I was having a bad acid flashback or something. i understand your point, I just hope they wouldn't design it to look like my itunes visualizer.

    15. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      Ok, now I'm scared.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    16. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh, imagine if this material instead of displaying useless slogans would instead be like some sort of twisted "mood" ring that would over time display who you really are?

      If we could only get everyone to wear it then maybe Bush and co. could find the "real" terrorists.

      http://www.theonion.com/content/node/30570 [theonion.com]

    17. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by Slippy. · · Score: 1

      A new excuse is heard on the bus. "I was trying to grab the monkey! Honest!"

      --
      -- Life is good. Tastes like chicken.
    18. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by LuxMaker · · Score: 1

      We could make clothing that is telemetry activated that we sell to our enemies. Clothing for their uniforms and other gear would be appropriate. If we go to battle with them we can just turn it on. :)

      --
      I regret that I only have one mod point to give per post.
    19. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by linguizic · · Score: 1

      I've been wating for someone to say something like this:

      I for one welcome our new flashing neon pantyhose wearing overlords.

      --
      Does this sig remind you of Agatha Christie?
    20. Re:Motorcycle, bicycle, and jogging safety... by PMuse · · Score: 1

      Who cares about advertising, [user-beneficial application X] is even more important.

      You're new to this capitalism thing, aren't you?

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  6. Useful for safety wear? by Mille+Mots · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a bicycle commuter (somewhat rare in this Midwestern, Rust Belt, automotive driven state), I can see where Lumalive would be useful for safety gear. Instead of hanging a handful of 'blinkies' off the back of my bike, my whole back could be one big flashing signal. Perhaps a glowing 'slow moving vehicle' triangle of a square foot or so would be more attention-getting than what doesn't work now (lights, high-contrast clothing, evne high-viz yellow jackets don't help half the time).

    1. Re:Useful for safety wear? by rjmars97 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      if you already use reflective vests and the strobe LED lights, it seems the problem is more with the attention span of the drivers than your visibility.

      --
      Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer
    2. Re:Useful for safety wear? by dk-software-engineer · · Score: 5, Funny

      As a cardriver, I will WANT to hit you, if you are wearing a bright flashing jacket. Blinking LED's are annoying enough. It's not a safety issue. If blinking stuff is safer, LED-lamps is enough. Bicycles are not supposed to blink, you are not an ambulance.

    3. Re:Useful for safety wear? by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Informative
      Actually, I think this type of visibility is a bad idea. If you are driving at night, and something has bright flashing lights, the ONLY thing you can see is the flashing lights. Everything that you could see before now becomes invisible, because your eye has to re-adjust to the bright object. Either that, or the bright object burns into your retina and now you can't see anything else. Either way, this makes it more dangerous for the driver.

      Other examples:
      - Near my home there is a school. The added super-bright flashing LEDs onto the standard reflective pederstrian sign. Now, whenever I drive by it at night, I am momentarily blinded just as I approach the school crosswalk.
      - Ever see the school buses that have the strobe lights on top? Not so bad during the day, but on an early cloudy winter morning those things are dangerously bright. It makes me blink twice as much to avoid looking right at them.

      Instead of hanging a handful of 'blinkies' off the back of my bike
      Do yourself a favor: Turn your blinkies around so they shine against your back. This will illuminate you so people see you, rather than shine a light into the driver's eyes. Face the LED lights toward the person on the bike so that the cars see a person on a bike, not "Hey, look at that cool...! "

      Reflectors also work well because they are softer light and they only reflect what is sent out.
    4. Re:Useful for safety wear? by Zenaku · · Score: 1
      Um, wow -- Listen, I Am Not An Optimologist, but I think you might have some kind of night-blindness. A reaction of the severity you describe to the flashing lights on a pedestrian crossing sign, or to the blinky lights on a cyclist (!!!) is not normal.

      I'm not trying to criticize or challenge your sincerity, honestly -- it's just that these are pretty common uses of flashing lights, and while the brightness is noticeable (kinda the point), I don't think most people are affected enough to feel impaired by it in any way.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    5. Re:Useful for safety wear? by cduffy · · Score: 0

      Blinking all the time? Sure, I agree that that's a little much. Blinking to indicate intent to turn or brake? That, on the other hand, you already get from other vehicles -- doing the same thing for a cyclist shouldn't be offensive.

      Hmm -- one could easily work in some mechanism to detect when the cyclist is making the hand gestures associated with a turn or stop and augment those with said blinking, if one doesn't want to wirelessly connect to controls by the handlebars. For that matter, if this clothing were programmable via a standard wireless interface (yaaay, Bluetooth!), that would leave a lot of room for folks to make periphreals (like cyclist safety gear) which the clothing could be paired to. I could also see teens wanting to pair their clothes to their iPods (to flash to the beat of the music they're listening to) -- or to a system which uses ambient noise for the same purpose. Or a little wireless control that lets them set the color to associate with their moods. Or a Bluetooth-enabled mood ring. Or...

      Well, anyhow, there's potential.

      Now, if the PTO just wises up and allows these off-the-cuff suggestions to be used to demonstrate obviousness...

    6. Re:Useful for safety wear? by BenJaminus · · Score: 1
      Blinking LED's are annoying enough

      There is safety potential. I notice a massive improvement in the conduct of cars following me (on a motorbike) when I wear a horrible flourescent jacket. Something like this would be great, ok, not to blink the whole time but to display messages... I'd program it to read "back off, you're dangerously close" when necessary (or alternatively - "I can stop in the half the distance you can").
    7. Re:Useful for safety wear? by fotbr · · Score: 1

      I don't think he's talking the blinking lights on the pedestrian crossing sign, but instead the big marquee type sign showing upcoming sports games, parent-teacher-conferences, etc etc that schools are using. The kind that look like they belong in Las Vegas on the strip, not sitting in front of a school. If those are the signs he's complaining about, then I understand -- they can be annoyingly bright.

    8. Re:Useful for safety wear? by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, I am talking about the lights on the pedestrian sign. But these aren't the regular bulbs used in traffic lights - not the two alternately flashing yellow light bulbs. This is an array of ultra-bright yellow LEDs that go around the sign. Ultra-bright LEDs are nice in flashlights, on key chains, and at raves. They are not appropriate in a pitch-black environment where they go from all on to all off. It is like shining a flashlight straight in your eyes.

      I don't have a problem with regular light bulbs. But over the past few years I've seen strobe lights and ultra-bright LEDs and halogen lights in places where it isn't appropriate. They seem really nifty until you are driving down a back-woodsy road and somebody's halogen headlights on high-beams hit you in the face.

      My mother-in-law can't drive at night because she has night blindness due to cataracts. (She just had them removed, I should ask her if it has helped). But don't optimiize the lighting so that only people with good vision can see you. That kinda defeats the purpose. :-)

    9. Re:Useful for safety wear? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Darned if you do, darned if you dont.

      There is a goodly number of cardrivers that just
      dont see cyclists unless you have an extraordinary
      amount of light coming off of you. Broad daylight
      and I have been run off the road by some people.

      Just dont get me started about the woman in the van
      who took the time to tell me that I should not ride
      at night, because her husband was legally blind, and
      could not see me.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    10. Re:Useful for safety wear? by Luteus · · Score: 1

      I alternate between a motorcycle and a bike to commute to work. A solid steady single red light is almost invisible to the average driver who is always looking for two red or white lights. People just completely zone out. When I brake on the motorcycle I flash my tail light 3-4 times before actually braking. That little blinking red LED tailight on my bike is the only thing that will get through the mindless zombie driver's thick skull and let him know I exist from a distance. They're meant to be annoying. I think a constant pattern or color changing jacket would work great. People would figure out which pattern and color combos work the best.

    11. Re:Useful for safety wear? by jackbird · · Score: 1

      Remember in Driver's Ed, when they told you to look at the line on your side of the road instead of directly into oncoming high beams? Works for signs, too.

    12. Re:Useful for safety wear? by dk-software-engineer · · Score: 1
      There is a goodly number of cardrivers that just dont see cyclists unless you have an extraordinary amount of light coming off of you.

      Adding more light won't help, at least not in the long run. There is a few possibilities:
      1. They still don't see you
      2. You will have a disproportionate amount of light
      3. Most likely: Both

      Broad daylight and I have been run off the road by some people.

      Exactly. Once you have your reflectors and blinking leds, adding more light won't help. You need blue blinking light and a siren to be noticed by the rest, and even that won't get all of them.
    13. Re:Useful for safety wear? by MisterBates · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with you to some extent however, there are some signs that merely use retrofreflectivity that can be too bright; No LED's required. It is not always the case that the signs are blindingly bright that you find yourself squinting, rather they are too bright for their surroundings. Like trying to find extrasolar planets. It's not that a particular star is blindingly bright to look at through a telescope, but it is too bright to see any surrounding objects.

      In looking at the photo attached to the press release, the lighting scheme doesn't appear to be overly bright.

      Once the fad dies down (recall all the neon clothing in the 80's?) it looks like there will be a huge market for it in safety gear. As a cyclist, I would certainly welcome it being built into my jerseys.

    14. Re:Useful for safety wear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (or alternatively - "I can stop in the half the distance you can")

      Good idea, except for the fact that you can't.

      You've got a 10-15% advantage over most cars, if that.

      From 60-0mph, a GSX-R 750 stops in about 118 feet.

      A C-5 Corvette stops in about 125 feet, and that's pretty average among sports cars. Even a minivan, a Dodge Caravan, stops in 159 feet. Many performance sedans will match or beat the Corvette.

      That doesn't even consider upgraded brakes that will stop a Nissan 350Z in 95 feet, or a C-5 Corvette in 87 feet. There are no brake upgrades that will stop the GSX-R faster; gravity's force on the front wheel is already the limiting factor.

      According to the NHTSA, a typical automobile brakes from 62mph to zero in 144 feet.

      DON'T go out on the street thinking you've got a huge braking advantage over the four wheel vehicles, because you don't.

    15. Re:Useful for safety wear? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      My point was that car drivers need to pay attention, yes.

      Lights can help that. Unfortunately, it needs to be something
      distracting. I think a shoulder holster with a large gun in it
      would help more. With some reflective tape on it, so it is
      obvious it is a gun.

      Course, maybe there are people who have licenses and shouldnt.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    16. Re:Useful for safety wear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SUVs stop quicker than you think, too.

      A stock 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will go 60-0 in 125 feet.

      Modern vehicles are far more capable than thirty years ago, when that "I can stop in half the distance" saying was popularized, but even thirty years ago, it wasn't true in most cases.

    17. Re:Useful for safety wear? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Except, you're supposed to actually be able to read the signs. Not fun when they're so dazzling that they induce night blindness even for folks with normal vision.

      That's a problem with newer emergency vehicles - ultra-bright LEDs are now SO bright that the LED-based strobes are actually more dazzling than the xenon-based strobes. Part of it is because the LEDs are so directional, but part of it is just that they're just so bright and those strobes include a whole array of them pointed in the the same direction.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    18. Re:Useful for safety wear? by SageMusings · · Score: 1

      Also don't foregt,

      Unless you are equipped with anti-lock brakes on your bike, applying necessary braking power just short of lock up on a motorcycle is very much an art form requiring a lot of practice and excellent feel for the bike. It takes considerable skill to achieve that minimum braking distance.

      With my skills, I believe it takes me about 15% longer to stop on my bike than the avergage 4-wheel vehicle. I try to compensate by not following too closely and scanning the brake lights of cars ahead of me. My only real advantage is the ability to somewhat increase my available stopping distance by using the room between the cars in an emergency.

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
    19. Re:Useful for safety wear? by typical · · Score: 1

      >It is not always the case that the signs are blindingly bright that you find yourself squinting, rather they are too bright for their surroundings.

      Good point. I wonder if a light sensor could be incorporated to adjust the brightness of lighted signs.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    20. Re:Useful for safety wear? by cg · · Score: 1

      I find this hard to believe. Why would it take you longer to stop a smaller vehicle?

      Do you just have a rear brake (chopper style)?

      Maybe more practice is a good idea, as it is really quite hard to lock up the front wheel on a sport modern bike. Now if there is water involved, and cars have ABS, all bets are out the window.

      Of course, the safest thing to have on a bike is the distance between you and everyone else.

    21. Re:Useful for safety wear? by SageMusings · · Score: 1

      Well,

      I am sure you are aware that 75% of the braking power on a bike is in the front wheel. The rear wheel is effectively "unloaded" when all the weight shifts to the front. This make locking the rear almost trivially easy.

      Now consider that a car has four points for a friction contact patch. The bike effectively has one. It is easy to overwhelm this contact patch and modern bike brakes are very powerful, which makes them even more prone to lock-up if you grab too much brake too quickly (As in a panic stop). Riders know they have to squeeze on braking power in a gradual, controlled manner. Because of this and fear of a front wheel lockup, most accidents occur without the rider ever applying full braking force. It is a fine balancing act requiring skill to master.

      I know my skills are minimal to average. A professional can stop in a much shorter distance than a normal street rider.

      So, yes my vehicle is smaller (496lbs) but I have only one good contact patch for all my friction. Nearly any car on the road has a better braking advantage than a motorcycle. If I am in a lean (turn) matters get worse. I now have to share that friction between holding me on the road and stopping the bike. In a situation like this, I could easily "halve" my braking ability.

      When you are on the road and see me or another motorcyclist, know that I may have an advantage on speed and precision but my braking is on a par with you. Cheers.....

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
    22. Re:Useful for safety wear? by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      My greatest hate is blue-tinted high output headlights... it's like they somehow fog up everything they shine near, while simultaniously blinding you if you should glance at them by accident.

    23. Re: Useful for safety wear? by gidds · · Score: 1
      But it's not just a matter of attention, is it? Isn't it also import to let people know WHERE YOU ARE???

      Personally, I find those blinking lights much, much harder to localise. Instead of the impression of a single, moving object, I just see a succession of stationary ones. Making it almost impossible to accurately judge speed, distance, size, or any of that sort of thing.

      Flashing lights in ADDITION to at least one fairly bright, steady one would work quite well. But I'm fed up with stupid cyclists who seem to think that annoyance is a decent substitute for visibility. (Come to that, I'm also fed up with stupid cyclists who think that they have every right to terrorise pedestrians, avoid traffic lights, or perform other highly dangerous acts with impunity. I guess there are stupid people using every form of transport, and I'm sorry that they reflect so badly on you careful cyclists.)

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    24. Re:Useful for safety wear? by cg · · Score: 1

      Very well stated reply, thank you.

      While all of those statistics and facts seem accurate, I would offer another question. Consider the fact that the majority of 4+ wheel vehicles on the road are not sports cars, or possibly not even cars, leading them to have more weight on the same small contact patches (albeit 4 of them).

      I would also be curious as to the average reaction time for emergency braking on a bike vs. a 4-wheel vehicle. With all of the available distractions in "cages" these days...

      With all this in mind, your statements may still hold true. Practicing defensive riding (SIPDE) and honing your skils (track days, riding courses) are probably your best bets for safety on the road.

  7. Like In Snow Crash by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You could have windbreakers with the name of a gang on them that turn black on command. Or suits that dazzle everyone letting you escape. Active camaflauge. There are so many uses of this technology.

    --
    Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    1. Re:Like In Snow Crash by AaronDunlap · · Score: 1

      Yet another innovation predicted by that novel. It's like a latter day "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea"

      --
      Relax... You're soaking in it." -Madge
    2. Re:Like In Snow Crash by SageMusings · · Score: 2, Funny

      Better still,

      You can wire your jacket to your personal GPS and have the jacket change gang colors depending on the neighborhood you just entered. Imagine a gothic-text MS-13 sprawled across you back...... ...look it up....

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
    3. Re:Like In Snow Crash by OzeBuddha · · Score: 1

      Better yet, hook this technology hooked up to a heart rate monitor. This would be the biggest hit with the trendoids in japan, imagine a large red heart on your chest pulsing in time to your heartbeat - pretty lady walks by, sees your heartbeat increase..

      Your running shoes could change colour depending on how far you have run or how fast you are running (similar to the nike/ipod technology) or your basketball shoes could turn bright orange if you have just jumped really high. The list is endless really, the marketing people should have a field day as long as the technology is not overpriced and can't be easily copied in china.

  8. Feedback? by slackarse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can we get this clothing to accept user input? I've always wanted to play pacman on my chest. 2 player battleship anyone, I play my front, you play my back?

    --
    Come to Australia so we can strip search you and rob you of your internets, pr0n, rights and freedoms.
    1. Re:Feedback? by inputsprocket · · Score: 1

      Try Elekson for their pressure sensitve fabrics. You can even integrate iPod controls into the sleeve!

    2. Re:Feedback? by inputsprocket · · Score: 2, Informative

      make that Eleksen

    3. Re:Feedback? by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      A couple of Austrian artists are way ahead of you.

    4. Re:Feedback? by indifferent+children · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'd better have good security if you want to avoid the "Kick Me" worm of 2008.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    5. Re:Feedback? by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      You could play Pong instead..... http://www.we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/0088 83.php

      Layne

    6. Re:Feedback? by caffeinatedOnline · · Score: 2, Funny

      I play my front, you play my back?

      Is it just me, or is there something very wrong about this statement? ;)

      --
      The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel...
    7. Re:Feedback? by idontgno · · Score: 1

      I'm worried that it might be some kind of stealth GNAA troll.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  9. Tron Guy by Odin+The+Ravager · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I bet this guy is happy

  10. Big corp only think about ads by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 2, Funny

    But it can be a very cool tech.

    Imagine these clothes are sold with a wireless interface in the future, which IMHO is a reasonable idea, geeks in school could learn to hack them and write "kick me" on the back of the violent kids while staying at safe distance.

    1. Re:Big corp only think about ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Withe brain implants, we could communicate like cutlefish, flashing symbolic patterns that reflect our moods and intentions as we meet others.

      Nice.

  11. They're not alone by inputsprocket · · Score: 4, Informative

    They're not alone - try Luminex for fibre optic threads in clothes and Elekson for pressure sensitive fabrics....

    1. Re:They're not alone by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Anyone else making fiberoptic imaging clothing? The Luminex looks cool, but it's just abstract "effects" lighting.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  12. oh my god. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 0

    I can just imagine the neds trying to impress each other with their new shell suits on the street corners on friday nights.

    Thank you for this advance in fabric technology Philips.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:oh my god. by mikael · · Score: 1

      In case anyone wants to know what a NED (officially, a non-educated delinquent) is, there are a few websites:

      Glasgow Survival, and

      The Nedumentary

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  13. Re:Useful for safety wear? -- Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    From the article, there didn't seem to be much implication of safety wear.

    In fact:
    On jackets containing the Philips Lumalive fabrics dynamic advertisements, graphics and constantly changing color surfaces can be displayed
    Is one of the captions of the picture. They seem to just be concerned with better advertisement on people's bodies for brand names. Yuck. Or perhaps just the showy aspect of this. It's quite possible that these lack the power to produce lights bright enough for safety gear. Remember that a reflective jacket these days uses the driver's headlights to reflect a pretty bright light.
  14. It has to be said... by Noryungi · · Score: 1

    Slashdot T-Shirts!!!

    Imagine proudly advertising to the entire world that you are a complete nerd! Yay! ;-)

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:It has to be said... by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Imagine proudly advertising to the entire world that you are a complete nerd! Yay! ;-)

      I suspect most people around here are looking for ways of NOT advertising the fact that they are complete Nerds.

      It's hiding that fact that's difficult. ;-)
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  15. Light emitting clothing? by uberphear · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why, I thought that was nyl-on impossible!

    ..Sorry.

  16. Wow... by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Funny

    That guy with a glowing @ on his back looks so hip, like he's totally part of the Internet Revolution!

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Wow... by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Agreed. I would TOTALLY buy something if he were advertising it.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Wow... by smitty97 · · Score: 1

      Its the guy from nethack! He escaped the dungeon!

      --
      mod me funny
    3. Re:Wow... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Wow indeed. LARP meets nethack.

      I hope thay have purple LEDs. I wanna play the Wizard of Yendor.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  17. I can't wait until this is free by niceone · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't wait for this - google can now give it away as Adword supprted clothing.

    I think I'm going to patent "Pay per Prod" quickly.

    1. Re:I can't wait until this is free by indifferent+children · · Score: 4, Funny
      Adword supprted clothing

      Maybe not. They've had enough trouble with click-fraud, that they might not want to open the 'inappropriate touching' can of worms.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    2. Re:I can't wait until this is free by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think I'm going to patent "Pay per Prod" quickly.

      I think some ladies in Amsterdam have prior art on this.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:I can't wait until this is free by uradu · · Score: 1

      Better yet, it will spawn an entire garment hacking subculture, where you get your ad-supported clothing for free but hack it to not actually display the ads. We will get whole new generations of hacking-your-XBOX/TiVO/etc-is-immoral whiners.

    4. Re:I can't wait until this is free by dragonbutt · · Score: 1

      I think I'm going to patent "Pay per Prod" quickly.

      Can you shut these things off with a Q-Stick stolen from the Bar?

      --
      it was like that when I got here.. I wasen't here when that happened... second shift musta done that....
  18. Is this a safe technology? by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

    The google ads alongside the article were about Areva or Chernobyl. Is this fabric radioactive?

  19. Does this mean... by AslanTheMentat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ....I can finally get to work on my teletubbies Hallowe'en costume, complete with working belly screen?

    Now, I wonder where I can find stock footage of that monk incinerating himself in protest from the Vietnam Conflict?

    1. Re:Does this mean... by Pahroza · · Score: 1

      Just google "self immolation vietnam"

  20. Sweet! by Gryle · · Score: 2, Funny

    I predict bed-sheets with built-in mood-lighting.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
  21. Internationale Funkausstellung by antonyb · · Score: 1

    How disappointing :( I was really hoping that the Internationale Funkausstellung would be some Parliament/Funkdadelic style gathering of Interplanetary Funksmanship. Now that's a group of people who would be in to light emitting clothes. ant.

    1. Re:Internationale Funkausstellung by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Huzzah! If the thing can do VGA - then this would be a nice clothing video tag for the Funk crew:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMxGZmGrxAM

    2. Re:Internationale Funkausstellung by owlnation · · Score: 1

      Judging by their poor website it could be anything at all... Very pretty yes - and not at all overloaded with information, or in fact any information that would encourage anyone to visit. It has very typical German marketing style - "It is here. You may come. If you want"

      Which is a missed opportunity since I live about 15 miles from Berlin Messe and am interested in the subject matter. They are lucky Slashdot picked up this story...

      If by any chance anyone from IFA is reading this... "Willkommen in" translates as "Welcome to", and not "Welcome in" - very common in Dinglish, but not in English.

      Oh, and good luck with the exhibition, I think you might need it...

  22. Also handy for back to school by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

    Now you don't have to waste time getting your friends to apply text to your cloating with post-it notes:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/87457200@N00/22709103 7/

  23. Someone had to do it by WoLpH · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Someone had to do it by TimothyTimothyTimoth · · Score: 4, Funny

      It would certainly seem that it is too late for the guy in the picture.

      --
      It doesn't matter which ape activates the Monolith
    2. Re:Someone had to do it by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank god he's crouching.

  24. Marketing disaster by morie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Leave it to Philips to invent some great technology and then blow the marketing. They have a great history of doing that.

    Come on, if even slashdot can come up with applications that are far more marketable then "advertise on my back", why can't Philips ?

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    1. Re:Marketing disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, 'make the perfect Tron costume' would really sell it to investors.

    2. Re:Marketing disaster by mhazen · · Score: 1

      Come on, if even slashdot can come up with applications that are far more marketable then "advertise on my back", why can't Philips?



      I'm not sure anyone here has really come up with any applications more marketable than advertising. If you think they have, you're likely underestimating advertising expenditures. In an age where even packing materials are printed with marketing material, it's a massive source of revenue.
      --
      Rock is dead. Long live scissors and paper!
    3. Re:Marketing disaster by morie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a marketeer, I disagree.

      Advertising sells to advertisers, but it is questionable wether you want to position your hi tech invention as a marketing gimmick. It degrades the value of your product and also the Philips brand value. advertising is big business, but advertising media are usually under enormous strain to lower prices

      Safety was mentioned often. It is a great market. Safety related product are in a high price range and people are willing to pay. Also, they reflect in a positive way on a company.

      Another, more basic problem: they try to sell the technology, but they may want to sell produts instead or develop products together with strategic A-brands. With selling only the technology, they risk cross contamination between two markets. F.i., the press release mentions ads as well as a couch. Different products, I hope. I for one do not want my couch to display ads, even if I don't mind if some of my clothes do. You do not want to create the impression that you sell blinkin' ad-couches!

      One word in defence of Philips: Their last marketing campaign was classic and inspired: the Senseo(r) coffee maker has changed coffee making in the Netherlands profoundly and seems to be catching on in other european countries as well. Not sure wether it was the Philips marketeers or those of Sara Lee/DE in this case though.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  25. Wait a second . . . by Slithe · · Score: 1

    Did clothing manufacturers start making clothes from dark matter without telling anybody? No wonder there are so many emo's around!

    --
    ---- "XML is like violence. If it doesn't fix the problem, you aren't using enough."
  26. Ads everywhere by tontammer · · Score: 1

    Ads here, ads there, ads everywhere.. But i must admit this is indeed a unique way of going about it. Wonder what will be next..

    --
    the world is spherical
    1. Re:Ads everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll have to start carrying a can of spray paint to cover people's annoying ads.

      Let's hope they don't start integrating sound into them.

  27. not new or innovative at all by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Back in the mid 90's Prof. Thad Starner and some of his grad students at MIT did a jacket like this for visual feedback as a part of the wearable computing research they were doing.

    an array of LED's just below the outer shell so they shine through, exactly like how they did it. But they were also using conductive threads as well as other tech that made it not only feedback but to control it by touching certian embroidered spots composed of the conductive thread as a sewn on keypad.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  28. thrilling by Techmaniac · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Imagine Ben Stein's voice as you read:

    Craptacular

  29. Burning man by ameline · · Score: 1

    Burning man and burners will be the largest consumers of this product. Just as they are curntly the largest group of users of LiveWire.

    (Burning man rocks -- I wish I could go this year, but I can't make it.)

    --
    Ian Ameline
  30. Laser Tag... by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    Now, to add some photosensitive materials, and you get a kick butt game of laser tag that can show where its been hit.

    --
    meh
  31. Can you blame Google? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Honestly, where else are you going to find terms that match with glowing things that aren't supposed to normally?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  32. Stick it by MECC · · Score: 3, Funny

    This could potentially bring an end to the expression "Stick it where the sun don't shine", if my shorts can illiluminate such dark corners of the universe.

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
    1. Re:Stick it by LuxMaker · · Score: 1

      Or is that a light in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

      --
      I regret that I only have one mod point to give per post.
    2. Re:Stick it by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      not really. as we know it is a place in lancre.

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
  33. Anybody taking bets... by thewiz · · Score: 2, Funny

    On how long it will take for someone to dress-up in a glowing green outfit and pretend to be an alien?

    I'd say about 5 minutes.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
  34. Shirt Hack by NeonDemon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its going to be great to see a virus spreading though your local GAP.

  35. Blah. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Interesting
    But get in on it quick, because as soon as this blows up, people will tune it out. The older folks might still remember when lettering on a t-shirt was unusual enough for a second glance from anyone on the street, but how many people pay attention to what strangers are sporting on t-shirts these days?

    Times Square's glitzy neon lights were revolutionary in its day, but information overloads like that are quickly tuned out to the point where I would guess the percentage of people who work or live nearby who could actually name more than three or four Times Square ads from memory to be very low. As is all I can pull off the top of my head are Coca-cola and the big steamy Cup-O-Noodles, even though I've taken regular walks through the area for roughly 12 years.
    Fabrics like drapes, cushions or sofa coverings become active when they illuminate in order to enhance the observer's mood and positively influence his/her behavior.
    Because nothing positively enhances my mood like tons of stupid blinking flashing crap made to distract me and sell me things.
    1. Re:Blah. by Peredur · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dunno about that. Every time I see a female walking about with "These are Real" on her shirt, I always look twice.

    2. Re:Blah. by mgblst · · Score: 1

      but how many people pay attention to what strangers are sporting on t-shirts these days?

      Are you kidding me. What better excuse do you need to look a girls brests than if she has something written on them. One of the greatest invention for men since sunglasses. All hail the tshirt writers!

    3. Re:Blah. by PermanentMarker · · Score: 1

      Hmm but how about light emiting silicone.. A large tshirt logo "light's your night" :))

      --
      I know you're out there. I can feel you now. I know that you're afraid. You're afraid of us. You're afraid of change.
  36. Sequins for the digital age? by hummdinger02 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The thing that concerns me most about this would be the potential application in reviving disco. Then comes roller disco and then Kryogenics is used to bring back the decesed members of the Gibb family. AND IT ALL STARTS with the sequins for the digital age.

    1. Re:Sequins for the digital age? by superyooser · · Score: 1

      This is the and tags for clothing.

  37. So why do you buy the branded clothing? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My jeans cost £3. Look, no badge, no brand. Equivalent Levis, £40.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:So why do you buy the branded clothing? by Fusen · · Score: 1

      except they won't be the same quality, and don't even try saying they are ;P

  38. Cant' wait... by famebait · · Score: 1

    -for the wave of UFO sightings

    --
    sudo ergo sum
  39. Advertising on Shirts. Brilliant! by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

    Now we can put ads on shirts how awesome is that. There are several bands out there that I wish I had shirts for. Thank you Philips.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
    1. Re:Advertising on Shirts. Brilliant! by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Actually it is pretty easy to make your own printed T-Shirts with whatever design you want. I used these directions and have made several of my own designs.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  40. Or I'm just an idiot. by fotbr · · Score: 1

    Ok, he IS talking about the signs on the pedestrian crossing. Its too early to think.

    The other signs are annoying though.

  41. Brighter isn't always safer... Target fixation by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People tend to drive the direction they're looking.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Target_fixation

    --
    Deleted
  42. Mobile hacks by Velocir · · Score: 1

    How long is it onna be before people use their mobile phones to hack other peoples clothes?

  43. If I... by caffiend2049 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    have to wear a fat winter vest-jacket to have a @ on my back, I am totally out.

    A complete color change capacity would be great, though. No more shopping for the perfect tie to match each suit. Just think about it matching hard enough and ....voila!

    --
    Pandering to the lowest common denominator would be less frequent if more people were prime numbers.
    1. Re:If I... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't think too hard... you might get color changing underpants too.

    2. Re:If I... by Joebert · · Score: 1
      A complete color change capacity would be great, though.

      Especially if it goes wireless & someone figures out how to patch it into police radio.
      I could fit more cash in my dufflebag if I didn't have to carry thoose extra cloths.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  44. Speaking of Innovative Clothing by viewtouch · · Score: 1

    What we really need in clothing is a new type of clothing that can capture the kinetic energy of our movements, then makes that energy available to the devices that we carry with us and are embedded in our clothing. It would be much like the lights in the soles of our footware that light up with every step except that it could be stored in our clothing, then directed toward the devices we carry with us and wear as they need them.

    There's no question this will happen. The only question is: Will it be patented or not. Mabye the best practical use of the Slashdot database is that it contains lots of ideas first disclosed here that can be used to disqualify patent applications, thus speeding the free pursuit of the development of the ideas into products or services for the real world by preventing those who would implement them from being obstructed by patents.

  45. Mithril Mail Lite by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I think we're looking at * T-shirts, not specifically /. T-shirts. Because we can change the images, why would we let the logo-owner "own" the shirt, limiting which logo we can display?

    One shirt to display them all, one T-shirt to bind them, one T-shirt to play them all, and in the darkness remind them.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  46. Camo by aod7br · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the best use for this would be camouflage. Imagine a cloth equipped with a pocket cam and CPU that tries to mimick the enviroment. Of course it would work better if it had passive lighting (like electronic paper).

  47. Here comes mediatronic clothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just the beginning of a world where every possible surface we have will eventually display advertisements... Ever read Stephon's The Diamond Age?

    Once we have mediatronic paper and chopsticks, it's all over.

  48. No Ads by teoryn · · Score: 1

    Quit thinking there are going to be ads everywhere just because they put a screen in a shirt. If you haven't noticed, we can print stuff on tshirts already, and sure you see some branded shirts, but you don't go railing off on how bad society is because people wear their free microsoft tshirts. And anyways, since the display can be changed companies won't have a way to make sure their ads stay on the shirts.

  49. "dear god, ..." by MarauderIIC · · Score: 1

    from the dear-god-do-i-hate-august dept.

    Shouldn't you be able to figure that out for yourself, Hemos? Why are you asking Him? :)

    --
    "Hm. I'm entitled to ramble on about something everyone knows." - Captain Picard
  50. Five minutes or several weeks? by overshoot · · Score: 1
    I'd say about 5 minutes.
    You've obviously never tried to decipher the user documentation for Philips products.

    Keep in mind that their own management can't get their own products to work.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  51. I'm with stupid by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Funny

    This will revolutionize the "I'm with stupid" t-shirt industry - now the arrow can always point in the right direction

    1. Re:I'm with stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question is, is our stupid-detection technology up to the challenge?

    2. Re:I'm with stupid by lylfyl · · Score: 1

      This will revolutionize the "I'm with stupid" t-shirt industry - now the arrow can always point in the right direction


      Up?
    3. Re:I'm with stupid by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1
      now the arrow can always point in the right direction
      They already do.
  52. Re:Useful for safety wear? - Not by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
    I'd program it to read "back off, you're dangerously close" when necessary (or alternatively - "I can stop in the half the distance you can").

    Did you RTFA? It took an entire back to show an "@" sign. Put all those letters on your jacket and you will have everybody on your ass (literally) trying to read WTF you put there.

    Maybe change it to: "If you can read this, you're too close"

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  53. they are already busy with interactive textiles by Tjeerd · · Score: 1
    Philips is already busy with interactive shirts as you can read http://www.gizmag.co.uk/go/4527/ here. And that's already a year ago:
    Photonic textiles can also be made interactive. Philips has achieved interactivity by incorporating sensors (such as orientation and pressure sensors) and communication devices (such as Bluetooth, GSM) into the fabric.
    --
    To repeat what others have said, requires education, to challenge it , requires brains.
  54. How many pieces of Flare? by slashbob22 · · Score: 1

    Of course this solves the problem with being asked to increase the amount of flare. If ever confronted, you would just have to connect your vest and update to include more. To futher increase the tackiness: include the menu on the vest as well.

    --
    Proof by very large bribes. QED.
  55. Invisibility by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

    Now all they need is a camera on each side of the outfit and to display the pictures captured on the opposite side, and you have invisibility-wear!

    1. Re:Invisibility by MisterBates · · Score: 1

      What if I attack you from the side, where the front and rear images don't match up with what is on the other side of you?

  56. No apologies here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a motorcyclist, I will never apologize for being too visible.

    1. Re:No apologies here by dk-software-engineer · · Score: 1
      As a motorcyclist, I will never apologize for being too visible.

      Fair enough. But would you apologize for having so annoying lights that I can't judge the distance to you? Would I feel bad if something happened because I was disturbed by your flashing chistmas tree?
      Here in Denmark people has been stopped by the police because they were "too visible", and told not to drive the vehicle until the superfluous lights were removed.
  57. Cheap jeans are better than designer labels. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    In terms of quality, the cheap jeans are higher quality than the designer jeans because they fit my purpose better.

    They fit well, the are equally hard wearing and look just as good as the designer pair, in fact nobody can tell the difference without looking at the labels.

    e.g.
    http://www.fashionunited.co.uk/news/archive/jeans1 .htm

    Scroll to the last story. However, you feel free to just go on paying the 2000% markup. If you ask nicely they'll stamp "gullible" on your forehead at the till.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Cheap jeans are better than designer labels. by nizo · · Score: 1
      If you ask nicely they'll stamp "gullible" on your forehead at the till.


      I bet they will make me pay extra for that too won't they??

  58. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  59. Re:Useful for safety wear? - Not by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you honestly think the idiot driving the Hummer way too fast cares whether she is tailgating you? If you stop in half the distance she can, she will just flatten you and she probably won't even notice.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  60. Halloween..... by Joseph+Hayes · · Score: 1

    ...will never be the same. Imagine the possibilities :)

    --
    "The irony when tending a flock of sheep is the dogs you put in place to protect them are genetically mutated wolves"
  61. What's Wrong With People? by E++99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shouldn't these people have been working on the cure for the common cold? Or legos that are don't get stuck together as badly, or something else?

    1. Re:What's Wrong With People? by viewtouch · · Score: 1

      You know, if you ask people how you 'catch a cold' a lot of them would say that if you are too cold, and especially if you get wet and cold, then you catch a cold. A few short generations ago virii were unknown to us. Want to help defeat the common cold? Join Stanford's Folding Project.

    2. Re:What's Wrong With People? by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      Avoiding the common cold is fairly easy - what makes it difficult for most of us is the fact that most people have rug rats and go to work. Basically, to avoid the common cold - stay away from others who have it, wash your hands regularly (and use one of those anti-germ hand sanitizers after touching common surfaces, like doorknobs, if you are really paranoid), keep your environment clean (you wouldn't believe how crappy some people live - absolute squaller, I have seen - yet they don't understand why they still get sick), and eat good meals (ie, cut back on the fast/convenience foods and make a good meal). Eat a multi-vitamin every day (most people are undernourished in the vitamin dept). Stay away from small kids as well. For most of the year, you won't get sick (I am only sick maybe once or twice a year with the cold, and I can't remember the last time I had the flu). When you do, it will be short (In my case, I tend to get better after a day or two).

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    3. Re:What's Wrong With People? by E++99 · · Score: 1
      Join Stanford's Folding Project.
      http://folding.stanford.edu/
      Hey, that's pretty cool! (And probably a lot less futile than SETI@home.) Okay, now I have two potential solutions for the common cold, and bupkus for stuck legos.
    4. Re:What's Wrong With People? by viewtouch · · Score: 1

      If you're looking for a team to join, how about Tech Report, # 2630

      later...

    5. Re:What's Wrong With People? by TigerNut · · Score: 1

      Or legos that are don't get stuck together as badly, or something else? Buy MegaBloks or those crappy Tonka BTR blocks. Not only are they barely compatible with Lego(TM) blocks, they're barely compatible with themselves.

      --

      Less is more.

  62. Saw this at raves back in the 1990s. by Animats · · Score: 1

    Used to see gear like that at raves back in the 1990s. "E-shirts" (t-shirts with electroluminescent panels displaying changing patterns) are still available. And who could forget the LCD belt buckle. Nobody wears that stuff any more, of course.

  63. Hackers by fractalVisionz · · Score: 1

    I'm just waiting for the time when "Kick Me" Is written across someones back via a hack!

  64. Re:Useful for safety wear? - Not by FST777 · · Score: 1

    Now why is the Hummer driver a she?

    I'm surely lacking some info here...

    --
    Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
  65. I am thinking a very by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    special necktie for the office Christmas party. Seriously: Novelties, safety, team uniforms (ads), kids' clothes... Underwear? Probably not on the first date. Great for corporate swag though. Put me down for a necktie.

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  66. What's Wrong With This Picture by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    The very first application they mention in the article is advertising. That should come as no surprise based on how many idiots are more than willing to walk around like billboards for clothing companies. But... this is far worse. Can you imagine how many stupid people will jump at the chance to run around with the Sprint or Verizon logos and accompanying video ads playing non-stop on their clothes just to get "free" minutes or a "free" phone? Or what about "free" DSL, Satellite or Cable? Where is the dignity in that? I'll bet the same fuckers who sell out their friends and family to DirecTV or some long distance company to get "free" credits will jump all over the opportunity to be a walking ad. Disgusting. Humanity is vile.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  67. Hi-res Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh great, now they're going to to have the 'TSAA', to protect the tee-shirt artists from shirt emulation.

    Here is the hi-resolution version in case anyone cared:

    http://www.research.philips.com/newscenter/picture s/downloads/ldm-lighting_14-0_h.jpg

  68. Ancient History by mrs+clear+plastic · · Score: 1

    This is ancient history. I have been doing this type of stuff for years.

    www.well.com/~allyn/newpictures.html

    --
    Cleara
  69. Re:Useful for safety wear? - Not by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    The one who almost ran me over in her efforts to get around my Vespa so she could run a red light was a she.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  70. good luck police... by the_odin · · Score: 0

    (Officer into his radio)
    "in persuit of perp.
    ..suspect wearing a red.... no.. yellow... no... blue....

    ..........He's wearing a jacket... don't ask about the color."


  71. Uncle Enzo will be happy by Dave+Emami · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The binocular guy nods, reaches up with one hand and presses a lapel switch. The next time he turns around, a word is written across his back in neon green electropigment: MAFIA. The older guy turns away; his windbreaker says the same thing. Hiro turns around in the middle of the gangplank. There are twenty crew members in plain sight all around him. Suddenly, their black windbreakers all say, MAFIA. Suddenly, they are all armed."

    --

    "The Greens lynched a hacker in Chicago. Last month, but I think the body's still hanging from the old Water Tower."
  72. What kind by kahrytan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article forgets to tell us WHAT KIND OF LED? I highly doubt it is an actual LED since they are to big. If it's fully integrated into the fabric then it could be a Organic LED or PLED (polymer led).

      What do you think the LED is?

    --
    \
    1. Re:What kind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What do you think the LED is?" ...Zeppelin?

  73. a look into the future by WeAreAllDoomed · · Score: 2, Funny
    Lumalive textiles make it possible to create fabrics that carry dynamic advertisements, graphics and constantly changing color surfaces.

    so, i can look forward to a future in which a typical walk through town will involve punching dozens of people in the face as hard as i can?

    --
    free software, open standards, open file formats, no software patents.
  74. Time for the Scramble Suit by ThePhin · · Score: 1

    The psychedelic equivalent of identity-obscuring shadows/pixellation and voice distortion for whistleblowers on television news magazines, the scramble suit was introduced by Philip K. Dick in his novel "A Scanner Darkly". Give it a few years before somebody does this for Halloween, now...

  75. custom atrwork for jackets by the_odin · · Score: 0

    This would be a cool technology.
    I'd like to draw my own designs.... have it cycle through some of my artwork.

  76. Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who sees the camouflage potential here? Think Predator (the movie)...

  77. Oh, the possibilities... by TheSpinningBrain · · Score: 1

    Why should something like this be restricted to clothing? Maybe it could be used for one of those pull-down window view screens like from Back to the Future Part II.

  78. Is anyone else thinking by minion · · Score: 1

    That these would be a fun think to remotely hack? I wonder if they can be programmed via wifi... Oh, the possibilies of public embarrassment! :)

    --

    -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
  79. Sofa Covering Induced Happiness by danpsmith · · Score: 1
    Lumalive fabrics feature flexible arrays of colored light-emitting diodes (LEDs) fully integrated into the fabric - without compromising the softness or flexibility of the cloth. These light emitting textiles make it possible to create materials that can carry dynamic messages, graphics or multicolored surfaces. Fabrics like drapes, cushions or sofa coverings become active when they illuminate in order to enhance the observer's mood and positively influence his/her behavior.

    I don't know about anyone else, but I don't want my sofa covering to influence my behavior at all...

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
  80. The Uses are Endless by SevenHands · · Score: 1

    Porno convention anyone?

  81. SAR applications? by Buckler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hm. The first thing I thought when I was the article was that this would be great for large-scale search & rescue operations. Piles of "plain vanilla" uniforms could be instantly programmed to display the rescue operative's name and unit on the back, color-coded. A flick of a switch could cause the uniform to blink an "I've found a survivor" pattern, to draw attention. Why are these guys only thinking of ad space?

    1. Re:SAR applications? by Kpau · · Score: 1

      There are any number of useful applications for this besides f**king marketing logo banners... but I have to admit the first thing I thought of was "the ultimate tshirt" with my sarcastic "message of the day" on it. Now thinkgeek can sell memory modules for shirts after the actual shirt gets sold (after which the hacks would fly).

  82. When I'm old... by TheSpatulaOfLove · · Score: 1

    I can see it now. In order to subsidize my prescription drug benefits, I'll have to wear one of these that says: "Another happy Viagra customer!"

  83. Re:Tron Suit - spelling nazi by Edisaloser · · Score: 1

    Most rooms are stationary...unless you get lucky with said pretty secretary and the earth moves for you!

  84. Re:Tron Suit - spelling nazi by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    Most rooms are stationary...

    Speak for yourself! Obviously you're not a carney.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace