Slashdot Mirror


Firefly Marathon on SciFi, September 18th

kulakovich writes, "Hot on the heels of Stargate's cancellation, the SciFi Channel is running an entire season of Firefly starting at 8am (Eastern) on September 18th. This news is fresh from yesterday's posting on the Whedonesque blog. Start making space on the PVR!"

319 comments

  1. For who? by xzvf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't anyone that remotely cares already have the DVD?

    1. Re:For who? by sporkme · · Score: 1

      --or at least havent they watched one of the repeating streams (ess.tv)? I've seen all of the episodes once and some twice, but this is one series that could and should have survived a few seasons. Reruns are one thing, but I do wish someone had stepped up to the plate for this. It was similar to/as good as/better than Stargate.

    2. Re:For who? by kentrel · · Score: 2, Funny
      but I do wish someone had stepped up to the plate for this. It was similar to/as good as/better than Stargate.

      LOLROFLMAO!!

    3. Re:For who? by Uizu · · Score: 2, Funny

      I take it you haven't seen FF then...

    4. Re:For who? by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      For Doctor Who?

      Seriously, for somebody who might get hooked on the programme...

    5. Re:For who? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      There is nothing like watching a show, and knowing that 1000s of other people are also watching it. Knowing that you aren't the only one, that somebody else somewhere is enjoying the same experience, adds something. You must have felt it. It is like going to the movies, but the movies are the size of the USA, and the food is cheap.

    6. Re:For who? by nrlightfoot · · Score: 1

      I haven't watched Firefly yet, and I'm thinking about watching/recording the entire season on the 18h.

      --
      what sig?
    7. Re:For who? by smchris · · Score: 1

      Doesn't anyone that remotely cares already have the DVD?

      I suspect the hope is that they haven't.

      Firefly II!!!
      Firefly II!!!
      Firefly II!!!
      Firefly II!!!

    8. Re:For who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must really love those home shopping channels then.

    9. Re:For who? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      You must really love those home shopping channels then.
       
      I actually hate all tv, but can't be stuffed doing anything else when I get home. Really need to get more motivated.

    10. Re:For who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It was similar to/as good as/better than Stargate.

      Now them thar's fightin' words.

    11. Re:For who? by mcneely.mike · · Score: 1

      Now that news is real shiny!

        You're gonna watch it with us, right Grandpa?

      --
      soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
    12. Re:For who? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      even if you have the dvds set it up to record anyway. Then at night before you go to bed hit play on each one. Let it run all the way through with comercials playing. It just may skew the PVR ratings of the show enough to make programs like firefly more likely to show up in the future.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    13. Re:For who? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Nope, I "might" want it but have only caught bits and pieces of a couple of episodes. Looks interesting but I want to see a full episode or two before I buy the DVD set.

      Yeah, I know, I could download them instead of waiting for it to be aired again, but. . . *shrug* I knew Sci Fi would eventually air it. :)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    14. Re:For who? by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      "Doesn't anyone that remotely cares already have the DVD?"

      How in the sweet name of the messiah did that get modded that high?

      Anyway, yeah, "clear those PVR's"... Why? Anyone who wants to see the show has. Some hardcore browncoats will sit down and watch, but most people won't bother.

  2. Theres just one.. by Lispy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "an entire season of Firefly" - Not to say THE entire season! ;-/

    1. Re:Theres just one.. by rtyall · · Score: 1
      "an entire season of Firefly" - Not to say THE entire season! ;-/
      I was under the impression it didn't get a full season shown, they stopped filming half way through and even then didn't originally show all the episodes.
    2. Re:Theres just one.. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      "an entire season of Firefly" - Not to say THE entire season! ;-/

      Not even that. They're only showing 11 of the 15 episodes.

    3. Re:Theres just one.. by halenger · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is quite an important comment to note. If you look at the episode list side-by-side with the Wikipedia entry (section with the episode list) ... or if you just know all the episodes and the order etc ... you'll note two things: a) They've decided that, shockingly, order does matter! They have gotten it right there. b) They've decided that the full season shouldn't be aired. While they have gotten the order right they've ditched the last four episodes: 11. "Trash", 12. "The Message", 13. "Heart of Gold", 14. "Objects in Space" (thanks Wikipedia). I really don't see them building this up to a big four episode finale. Unless the 18th is some public holiday in the US, then they're really not giving it a chance. Give it a Saturday. Get new fans. Make more money (DVD sales). Even split it over a Saturday and Sunday. *shrugs* Oh well.

      --
      Padraic
    4. Re:Theres just one.. by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      At least they're showing them in order.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    5. Re:Theres just one.. by pjtp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not even that... it's 11 out of 14.

      They are missing:

      Trash
      The Message
      Heart of Gold
      Objects in space

    6. Re:Theres just one.. by 70Bang · · Score: 2, Informative


      FireFly Episode List

      Season 1
      1. 1- 1 1AGE01 20 Sep 02 The Train Job
      2. 1- 2 1AGE02 27 Sep 02 Bushwhacked
      3. 1- 3 1AGE05 4 Oct 02 Our Mrs. Reynolds
      4. 1- 4 1AGE06 18 Oct 02 Jaynestown
      5. 1- 5 1AGE07 25 Oct 02 Out of Gas
      6. 1- 6 1AGE03 1 Nov 02 Shindig
      7. 1- 7 1AGE04 8 Nov 02 Safe
      8. 1- 8 1AGE08 15 Nov 02 Ariel
      9. 1- 9 1AGE09 6 Dec 02 War Stories
      10. 1-10 1AGE11 13 Dec 02 Objects in Space
      11. 1-11 1AGE79 20 Dec 02 Serenity (1)
      12. 1-12 1AGE79 20 Dec 02 Serenity (2)
      13. 1-13 1AGE10 UNAIRED Heart of Gold
      14. 1-14 1AGE12 UNAIRED Trash
      15. 1-15 1AGE13 UNAIRED The Message

      Feature Movie

      F- 1 30 Sep 05 Serenity

      IMDB Episode Guide

      Season 1, Episode 1: The Train Job - 20 September 2002
      Mal and his crew pull a train robbery.

      Season 1, Episode 2: Bushwhacked - 27 September 2002
      The crew of Serenity stumble upon the ruins of a transport ship and decide to search the vessel for any salvageable goods, only to discover that the ship is not entirely deserted.

      Season 1, Episode 3: Our Mrs. Reynolds - 4 October 2002
      A woman claiming to be Mal's wife appears aboard Serenity.

      Season 1, Episode 4: Jaynestown - 18 October 2002
      The crew pulls a heist in a town where Jayne once robbed the local magistrate, making him a local folk hero, and a target for the local police.

      Season 1, Episode 5: Out of Gas - 25 October 2002
      When Serenity's life support system fails, Mal orders the crew off the ship - but he stays behind.

      Season 1, Episode 6: Shindig - 1 November 2002
      After scuffling with one of Inara's clients, Mal is challenged to a duel.

      Season 1, Episode 7: Safe - 8 November 2002
      While visiting an outlying planet, Simon and River are kidnapped by local villagers in need of a doctor. Meanwhile, the rest of the crew are forced to seek medical help from an unlikely source when one of their own is shot.

      Season 1, Episode 8: Ariel - 15 November 2002
      When the crew of Serenity arrives on the core world 'Ariel', Simon realises it is the perfect opportunity to sneak River in to an Aliiance medical facility and find out what they did to her. In return for the crew's help in getting them in to the facility, Simon helps them organise an operation to steal valuable medical supplies.

      Season 1, Episode 9: War Stories - 6 December 2002
      Wash feels threatened by the bond between Mal and Zoe. In order to see for himself how the two work together Wash demands that he goes on a mission with Mal to sell the medical supplies instead of Zoe. Unfortunately, Niska has found out where Serenity is and captures Mal and Wash and tortures them as revenge for their failure in the train robbery mission they took from him.

      Season 1, Episode 10: Objects in Space - 13 December 2002
      The crew of Serenity consider ways to deal with River as her illness makes her a danger to them. That night, a bounty hunter named Jubal Early, who has been tracking Serenity since it left Ariel, invades the ship in order to try and take River and Simon. Early gets the crew in lock-down and it seems that River is the only one who can stop him.

      Season 1, Episode 11: Serenity - 20 December 2002
      In the first half of the original pilot episode, the crew of Serenity takes on several passengers and make their way to another planet to try and sell goods they salvaged from a wrecked ship. Their efforts are impeded, though, when Wash and Mal realize that there is an undercover alliance fed on board. In the second half of the original pilot, Simon struggles to save Kaylee, and in turn River and himself while Mal, Zoe, and Jayne attempt to unload the cargo from the salvage to a trigger-happy mayor of a border moon.

      Season 1, Episode 12: Heart of Gold - 4 August 2003
      Serenity responds to a distress call from Nandi, an old friend of Inara's, who is running

    7. Re:Theres just one.. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      I swear, TV people are incapable of recognizing anything good. Episode 14 was, in my opinion, the best one out of all. You have to show it, especially if you want to drive people to the movie.

      "Am I a lion?"

      Then again, maybe the first 10 are enough to drive people to the DVD for the last 4, which will drive them to the movie, or that's the plan.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    8. Re:Theres just one.. by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      "Objects in Space" was probably the best episode of TV SF since "City on the Edge of Forever" (the BG episode "33" was produced after "Objects in Space").

    9. Re:Theres just one.. by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Objects in Space" wasn't even the fourth best episiode of the series. "Out of Gas" was the best episode of Firefly ever.

      The best episode of sci-fi television ever? Well, that would probably be "Kobol's Last Gleaming" from Battlestar Galactica (okay, technically, it's TWO epsiodes) followed for close 2nd and 3rd by "33" and "Hand of God" from the same series. Firefly's "Out of Gas" would rank 4th. "Whispers," an episode of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine ranks 5th. Honorable mentions include "The Inner Light" and "The Measure of a Man" from Star Trek: The Next Generation, "Flight of the Phoenix" from Battlestar Galactica, and "Jaynestown" and "Serenity" from Firefly.

      Damn, I have no life.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:Theres just one.. by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      This is likely because the last time SciFi ran a Firefly marathon (about 2 months ago, I believe), they started on the 5th episode from the beginning, and ran everything up to and including "Objects in Space." In other words, all 14 episodes can't fit between the hours of 8 and 6, so last time they showed the last 10, and this time they're showing the first 10.

      As for the weekends, well that's their original movies/miniseries time. And as much as people might say about "Boa vs. Python" and its ilk, it's almost pure profit for them, and people DO watch. I was reading an interview with the writers of those flicks in Wired a few months back, and they said it perfectly: "Sometimes after a long work week, people just want mindless scifi." Plus, it's been well established that Friday 8-6 is their marathon time. Just be happy it's not The Hulk or Quantum Leap this time. Nothing wrong with those shows, they're just the usual Friday marathons.

    11. Re:Theres just one.. by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      They're actually not showing the entire season. They're just showing up to "War Stories," leaving a few unshown, including what most people consider to be the best episode (Objects in Space).

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    12. Re:Theres just one.. by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      You mention no classic star trek, no Dr Who and you expect to be taken seriously ? I mean I LOVE BSG, but come on.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    13. Re:Theres just one.. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Oop, I was confused, I thought Objects was the last episode. That's the perfect one to end the marathon with, and SF aside it's way up there in my top TV episodes ever.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    14. Re:Theres just one.. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Classic Trek was garbage. It was a predictable, melodramatic television Western at its worst. It didn't even compare favorably to other shows from its time (I could name at least a dozen episodes of "The Twilight Zone" that I'd put ahead of the BEST epsiode of TOS ever). It might warrant a footnote along the lines of "Hard to believe that the roots of a great series like DS9 began with a series that featured William Shatner getting his shirt ripped off in a fight in every episode."

      As for "Dr. Who," I never watched it much. What I saw of it looked pretty goofy and predestrian, though.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    15. Re:Theres just one.. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1
      Damn, I have no life.


      At least you have good taste.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    16. Re:Theres just one.. by kulakovich · · Score: 1

      ~ trying to convey the hope that it will be one season among many, eventually!

    17. Re:Theres just one.. by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      There's that one episode of original Star Trek where a world with two countries is at war. They fight with computer simulations, and send any people "hit" into incinerators. This destroying of only people and not infrastructure preserves their "civilization".

      SPOILER
      Kirk, in the end, destroys one of the country's main computers. The leader tells him that the other country will think they're going to really attack. There will be real war. Kirk says fighting a "real" war will let both countries realize why wars should not be fought without purpose, and should be ended as quickly as possible.

      Good stuff. :-)

    18. Re:Theres just one.. by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      The episode with the tribbles was also great.

      Not all sci-fi has to be uber-serious. Sure Dr Who and Trek might have been a bit goofy and cheesy, but they also had good plot lines and interesting points.

      Dr Who has had some great episodes with the "new" series. "Bad Wolf/Parting of the ways", "Empty Child", "Dalek" and so on. Are they the best episodes of all time ? No, but they are good. I would say "Remembrance of the Daleks" IMHO was one of the best Dr Who episodes along with "The Five Doctors", and yes they are among the best sci-fi episodes in history. (IMHO, this entire discussion is all opinion of course)

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    19. Re:Theres just one.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "great series like DS9"

      Have you even SEEN the series?

    20. Re:Theres just one.. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      The last time was on July fourteenth. I know this because it was on the same day that season 10 of Stargate premiered.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    21. Re:Theres just one.. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Best Star Trek ever.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    22. Re:Theres just one.. by mikeron · · Score: 1
      Best Star Trek ever.

      Agreed. But I also liked TOS - I still get shivers when I reflect on Spock's parley with the Horta. Best to worst: DS9 > TNG > TOS > Voyager > Enterprise. I'm sure everyone is rivetted.
    23. Re:Theres just one.. by mikeron · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about episodes, but the scifi moments that stand out most for me are the end of the the ST:TNG season 3 finale The Best of Both Worlds, Part I, and the beginning of the BSG episode Downloaded, in which Alternate Baltar is first seen.

      I have some life, but it's a slippery slope, isn't it?

    24. Re:Theres just one.. by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      I'd say DS9 2-6th seaons > TOS 1,2, and first half of 3rd season > Rest of DS9 > TNG 3-6th seasons > Enterprise 4th season > Voyager 4-7th seasons > TNG 1 and 2nd season > rest of TOS > Animated series > rest of Voyager > rest of Enterprise. And I don't think that highly of the animated series.

      If I had continued my listing further, I might have come up with DS9's "Far Beyond the Stars" as the next-best episode of TVSF. "Whispers" I probably underrate because it reminds me too much of Dick's "Imposter" (though it's much more in the spirit of the story than the film *Imposter* - and that's probably the most PKD-reverent film adaption of his stories, though of course *Blade Runner* is the best).

    25. Re:Theres just one.. by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      I'd rate "Out of Gas" third for the series, behind "Ariel." "Kobol's Last Gleaming" was very good, but not as good as "33". For TNG, I'd say "First Contact."

    26. Re:Theres just one.. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      The thing I really liked about "Whispers" wasn't so much the story itself as the WAY it was told (and, yes, that draws from PKD too). It's a great example how much you can change a story simply by changing the storyteller (i.e., how dependent the story is on the perspective).

      It's funny that Dick, who often wasn't that highly thought of among his contemporaries, has had such an impact on modern sci-fi TV and cinema. Putting aside the mostly abysmal direct adaptations of his work (which, in true Hollywood fashion, always eschew the dark PKD ending for the lame happy ending), Dick has also indirectly influenced some of the best TV/film work of our time. "The Terminator" and the new Battlestar Galactica, as examples, were obviously heavily influenced by "Second Variety." And "Blade Runner" (the only decent direct adaptation of his work, once you dump the tacked-on happy ending) still influences the look and feel of almost every sci-fi series and movie today.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  3. Errr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *An* entire series? Shirley THE entire series?

    1. Re:Errr by wizzdude · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, but don't call me Shirley. I can't believe I just did that.

      --
      Mod me down now and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine
    2. Re:Errr by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I can't believe it either but you made me giggle like a schoolgirl, so thank you.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  4. An entire season? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THE entire season you mean? Or am I missing something here? *here's me hoping!* :)

    1. Re:An entire season? by foxhound01 · · Score: 0

      Actually, there's a few episodes missing, so its neither AN or THE entire season.

      --


      Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
  5. +"new" would be really nice... by Beolach · · Score: 1

    It'd be awful nice if the word "new" was inserted between "entire" and "season"... but this is cool, too.

    --
    Join moola.com, play games to earn money.
    1. Re:+"new" would be really nice... by sbrown123 · · Score: 1

      1. Stargate SG-1 is no longer being produced.
      2. SciFi channel is looking for replacement.
      3. Firefly has a huge following.

      Eurika! (not to be confused by the other SciFi program with same name). SciFi decides to create new Firefly seasons to fill SG-1 gap.

    2. Re:+"new" would be really nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Eurika! (not to be confused by the other SciFi program with same name).

      It's easy not to be confused. The name of the program, and the correct spelling of that word, is Eureka.

    3. Re:+"new" would be really nice... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      "Eurika! (not to be confused by the other SciFi program with same name). SciFi decides to create new Firefly seasons to fill SG-1 gap."

      You know? That is just mean to say. That gets so many hopes up it's not even funny.
      FF is my single favorite series, followed closely by DS9 and DrWho.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    4. Re:+"new" would be really nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "huge" you mean so small as to not justify the cost of making the show, then, yes, it has a huge following. If by huge you mean the meager world wide boxoffice Serenity did, then you got HUGE!

      Face it, the audience just isn't there to justify making more episodes. The movie didn't make its budget back at the boxoffice - and that's NOT a good sign. Sure, the DVD sales were brisk, but studios want their cash back on opening weekend, not months after DVD release.

      And, it costs money to make a sci-fi show with an ensemble cast. Rightly or wrongly, if a show doesn't draw the audience, it won't get made.

    5. Re:+"new" would be really nice... by Rifter13 · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. SciFi has put FF in a few nice time slots, and supported it. Unlike Fox. I am not happy with Sci Fi cancelling SG1, though, I admit, I understand it. I am still not happy that they canceled Farscape a season early. But, they could really restore my confidence, if they brough FF back. Though, with the agreement with Fox... it may be many years before we see Firefly on TV again. I liked the movie, but in all honesty, I really liked the show better. I would much rather see 20+ 1 hr episodes a year, than 1 2-3 hour movie every-other year. :-) Though, a movie is better than nothing.

  6. A whole season? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "An entire season..."

    That's great, except that, well, there IS only one season.

    1. Re:A whole season? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "They said it did well on DVD" - Teal'c

    2. Re:A whole season? by luckyguesser · · Score: 1

      I think that's: "It allegedly did very well on DVD"

      --


      The power of Christ compiles you.
      A Random Blog
  7. Start making space on the PVR! by shmlco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Start making space on the PVR??? How about buying the damn DVDs and in the process convincing the powers that be there's a market for good SciFi?

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    1. Re:Start making space on the PVR! by itscolduphere · · Score: 1
      Start making space on the PVR??? How about buying the damn DVDs and in the process convincing the powers that be there's a market for good SciFi?

      TPTB at SciFi already know there's a market for good SciFi. Duh. The problem is that Firefly originally aired on Fox, who will do everything can can to sink a decent SciFi show in order to prove their belief that there isn't really a market for good SciFi.

      So why buy the DVD? It looks like it's put out by 20th Century Fox, so I imagine there is some chance that the money from the purchase will just go into the coffers of those that cancelled it. That'll teach 'em...that they can crap on SciFi fans and we'll still give them our money, that is.
    2. Re:Start making space on the PVR! by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      I'm gunna take a wild guess here and suggest that some of that money will go to Joss Whedon, royalties and such, and seeing as he is prohibited from accepting money directly, that's about the only way you can pay him for making such an interesting series.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:Start making space on the PVR! by gibodean · · Score: 1

      Would you mind explaining what you mean by Joss being "prohibited from accepting money directly".....
      You mean, he hasn't got the rights to sell it, fair enough.
      If you mean I can't go up to him in the street, say to him "You're a legend, I loved firefly, here's some cash", then that's hard to believe.
      He visited a pub in Sydney last year and talked to his fans, some of whom bought him a pint of beer. Was that wrong ?

    4. Re:Start making space on the PVR! by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, he has a curious contract with Fox. People tried to independantly fund him to create a second series of Firefly and he told everyone that he couldn't even accept gifts. Buying him a pint would be fine, buying him a porsche would not.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:Start making space on the PVR! by rmoehring · · Score: 0

      But... I already own the series and film on DVD, I don't want to buy it again!

    6. Re:Start making space on the PVR! by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      How about buying the damn DVDs and in the process convincing the powers that be there's a market for good SciFi?

      Personally, I was curious about the show at first, and then I got increasingly sick of people trying to plug it everywhere on the net and all the "Joss Whedon is my master now" crap.

      One would think it's had it's chance to be popular already, what with the rabid fanboys and somehow managing to get a movie made...If you like it, great, just don't try to force it down everyone else's throat.

    7. Re:Start making space on the PVR! by tinkerghost · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Actually the PtB know there is good sci-fi, what they havn't figured out is how to get good sci-fi to interest enough people to attract the advertisers.
      Look at it this way, what makes for a good sci-fi show?
      • storyline - both a theme and a per episode storyline are what pulls people into a show.
      • character buy in - you have to like the characters - or hate them - either will do.
      • character interaction - the more intricate the character interaction, the easier it is to buy into them
      • character development - 2d cutouts of people just aren't interesting to watch for an hour - they have to have a personality & then develop the quirks as time goes on.
      Note that cool special effects don't make the list. Twilight zone had very few special effects, all the focus is on the people - the sets & the special effects are just window dressing that highlight the people in the show.
      Now look at what advertisers are pushing - 1 season reality shows where they change the cast every season. Big brother, Fear factor, Survivor etc. The studios love them, they are dirt cheap to produce - the cast get's paid next to nothing, the sets are primative, and post production is just editing the raw film - no special effects to add, no foley stage work. I don't know the numbers, but I wouldn't be surprised to see that a season of Big Brother costs less than half of one of Firefly. As a studio, if I can make an extra half mil profit per episode by showing junk reality shows as opposed to quality sci-fi, junk it is. As an advertiser, I'm not going to pay that extra half mil, unless you can show me some truely awe inspiring viewership.
    8. Re:Start making space on the PVR! by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

      You know, except for the fact that they fly around in a spaceship, it sure seemed to me that FireFly was more about fiction than science fiction. One might even call it a western (much more so that Star Trek, the original Western in space).

      The SciFi aspect was more in Serenity, where they dealt with those crazies they mention once in the first 1-2 episodes. SciFi usually has some passing attempt to explain technology, not random people with old mass-thrower weapons that happen to transport cattle, and don't seem to know the basic rules of a western (like never leaving an enemy alive to stab you in the back next episode).

      (Yes, I watched every episode + the movie because they were recommended, and I didn't enjoy much about the episodes except the occasional one-liner; the movie had its moments. B5 or BSG are much better, IMO).

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    9. Re:Start making space on the PVR! by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I did enjoy the show but I have to agree. It reminded me of "The Outlaw Jose Wales" in space.
      Good show but nothing ground breaking.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    10. Re:Start making space on the PVR! by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      And you never thought to satisfy that curiosity by renting the DVDs on NetFlix and seeing if the enthusiasm was maybe actually justified?

      It really is a very good show. Don't let rabid fanboys turn you off to a show that's definitly worth your time to watch, or at least to judge for yourself.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    11. Re:Start making space on the PVR! by shmlco · · Score: 1

      It was about a specific group of people in a future "what if and when" type of environment. Good SciFi is ALWAYS about the people, even when it's as hard core as it gets. Even "The Cold Equations" would be nothing if you didn't care for the girl and the pilot.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    12. Re:Start making space on the PVR! by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      And you never thought to satisfy that curiosity by renting the DVDs on NetFlix and seeing if the enthusiasm was maybe actually justified?

      A bit. To be honest, the whole premise of the show reminded me a lot of Cowboy Bebop, but without the quirky bits and kung fu-jazz aura that made Bebop so great. Combined with the aforementioned rabid fanboys, that pretty much sapped the desire to watch it...I may grab a torrent of it sometime soon and give it a try after all though.

  8. "An entire season"? by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

    so that'll take, ooh, a couple of hours?

    I kid, I'm a huge Firefly fan, but the wording of the summary is a /little/ bizarre ...

    (suppose I should take this opportunity to pimp the UK Browncoats Forum. Consider it pimped)

    --
    "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    1. Re:"An entire season"? by Barts_706 · · Score: 1

      I don't see either "Heart of Gold" or "Objects in space"... guess it is not 'the entire' series then.

    2. Re:"An entire season"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but the wording of the summary is a /little/ bizarre ..."

      This is because we seem to have yet another new editor that, in grand Slashdot editorial tradition, doesn't know how to edit.

      I'm still trying to figure out how I can get a job where I don't actually have to perform the primary functions for which it exists.

  9. NOT Cancelled! by Jaruzel · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Hot on the heels of Stargate's cancellation


    I know technically y'all like saying 'cancelled' but on the basis that SG-1 ran for 10 seasons, I'd hardly call that 'cancelled'. It's more accurate to state that 'it ended it's run' or 'completed' or simply just 'finished'.

    When something gets canned after just the first season (Firefly), then THAT'S 'cancelled'. ;)

    -Jar.
    --
    Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    1. Re:NOT Cancelled! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      re: 10 seasons of Stargate SG-1

      I'd hardly call that 'cancelled'. It's more accurate to state that 'it ended it's run' or 'completed' or simply just 'finished'.

      Or:

      1) exhausted itself
      2) ran out of steam
      3) long since jumped the shark
      4) shot it's wad
      5) went down hill seasons ago
      6) went out with a whimper, not a bang
      7) finally traveled through that giant Chaapa-ai in the sky (yeah, I had to look up the spelling)
      8) Outgoing wormhole established!
      9) one too many episodes of Wormhole Xtreme!
      10) and they still haven't gotten it on?! Oh right, he's Air Force, not Marine (See the hill, TAKE the hill, dipshit! Two l's for lloser. The one-l'd O'Neil from the movie woulda bagged Carter long ago...)
      11) Ten is a good season to die. (Oh wait, wrong series.)
      12) never did meet the Furlings...(for real)
      13) finally ran out of ex-Star Trek/Farscape/Andromeda actors to guest star (shoulda hooked up some Bablyon 5 peeps)
      14) Hardly any Lexa Doig - good riddance to ya, ya bastards!
      15) hey, aren't those Replicators just Lego Mindstorms?
      16) sometimes the very old (tv shows) don't do as they're told (and die, already).
      17) already re-used every other sci-fi tv show/movie plotline in the history of sci-fi/fantasy.
      18) Atlantis will still suck
      19) Budge. I don't know why they keep reprinting him...

    2. Re:NOT Cancelled! by nihaopaul · · Score: 0, Troll
      When something gets canned after just the first season (Firefly), then THAT'S 'cancelled'. ;)

      It takes a real man to appreciate Firefly and how well it was done, as in most art forms it was not about what was done but what was left up to the imagination.

      The sheeple test
      • Voted for bush
      • Have no imagination
      • Use myspace
      • Get caught in viri marketing
      • Prefer reality tv shows
      • Disapprove of Firefly
      • Believe in the war on terror
    3. Re:NOT Cancelled! by dunkelfalke · · Score: 4, Funny

      It passed on! This series is no more! It has ceased to be! It's expired and gone to meet its maker! It's a stiff! Bereft of life, it rests in peace! If you hadn't nailed it to the TV channels it'd be pushing up the daisies! Its metabolic processes are now history! It's off the twig! It's kicked the bucket, it's shuffled off its mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisibile!!

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    4. Re:NOT Cancelled! by theStorminMormon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, and that was definitely 10 seasons too many.

      What is it with sci-fi fans that they turn off their sense of critical appreciation when they turn on the sci-fi channel. Stargate, Star Trek: Voyage, Farscape - the reason sci-fi shows don't stand a chance with the mainstream is that sci-fi fans have their standards set so low! You transport your average sci-fi show to any other channel and it's revealed for what it is: Hercules or Xena with lasers and spaceships.

      As an actual sci-fi fan, this upsets me. Then truly good shows (like Firefly) don't make it even when they should. Even I didn't really make time to see it when it was originally on Fox because of all the crappy sci-fi shows I'd seen before (clearly that was a mistake on my part).

      As long as sci-fi producers can make money by hiring chimpanzees to write stupid shows acted by mannequins the quality will never improve.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    5. Re:NOT Cancelled! by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      I think I broke your test:

              * Voted for bush [check]
              * Have no imagination [no check]
              * Use myspace [no check]
              * Get caught in viri marketing [check - I Love Bees]
              * Prefer reality tv shows [uncheck - only project runway!]
              * Disapprove of Firefly [uncheck - wife and I bought the boxed set on our honeymoon, watched Serenity the day it came out, etc.]
              * Believe in the war on terror [check]

      Sorry.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    6. Re:NOT Cancelled! by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1
      I think you forgot
      This show is no more
      It has ceased to be
      It is bereft of life...
      Stargate is an ex-show!
    7. Re:NOT Cancelled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about

      20) Totally Sucked

    8. Re:NOT Cancelled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know technically y'all like saying 'cancelled' but on the basis that SG-1 ran for 10 seasons, I'd hardly call that 'cancelled'. It's more accurate to state that 'it ended it's run' or 'completed' or simply just 'finished'.

      Howabout, "it was Schiavo'd".

    9. Re:NOT Cancelled! by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's somewhat less attractive now that it's all corpsified and gross.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    10. Re:NOT Cancelled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think I broke your test

      No, it just means you're 85% sheeple.

    11. Re:NOT Cancelled! by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh well gee, I just got called a name by an AC.

      That's never happened before.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    12. Re:NOT Cancelled! by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      Kneejerk rebellion is the same as kneejerk conformity. I thought most people figured this out in high school.

      If you're looking for genuine independence, you're more likely to find it with the people that don't fit into any of your tests perfectly. Of course, you're not looking for genuine independence. You're looking for a bunch of non-conformists who look and think just like you.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    13. Re:NOT Cancelled! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      On the upside, Battlestar Galactica seems to be doing okay. It's the only serious sci-fi still on TV.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:NOT Cancelled! by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      I watched most of season 1. I thought it had some issues, but at least it was trying to play by the rules of a "serious" show. I thought that some aspects were overblown, but it was so, so, so incredibly refreshing to see sci-fi at least aim high. I'm not sure about the whole sexy-psylons aspect, but it might have worked out OK. I mean, it's not even in the same league as Stargate, and it pains me that some people can't tell the difference. Watching Stargate and then Battlestar is like watching Hamlet performed at a middle school and then by an edgy professional group. I may not agree with all the choices of the professionals, but at least we're not watching middle schoolers fart and laugh on stage any more.

      If I had sci-fi channel where I live now, I'd still be tuning in.

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    15. Re:NOT Cancelled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Firefly, but have to admit, it's a western with lasers and spaceships.

    16. Re:NOT Cancelled! by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      THIS is an EX-series!

    17. Re:NOT Cancelled! by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      The one-l'd O'Neil from the movie woulda bagged Carter long ago...)

      Errrrrr... well yeah the guy from the movie was a lot tougher than the one in the series, yet... I still can't imagine him tea-bagging anyone! He'd probably just shoot him instead.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    18. Re:NOT Cancelled! by kulakovich · · Score: 1

      Hah!, Ouch! and, Well put. Just trying to drive up interest. More than "Hey. There is stuff."

      kulakovich

    19. Re:NOT Cancelled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as firefly had many years ago.....

      One died of old age, the other of crib death...

    20. Re:NOT Cancelled! by drsquare · · Score: 1
      I know technically y'all like saying 'cancelled' but on the basis that SG-1 ran for 10 seasons, I'd hardly call that 'cancelled'. It's more accurate to state that 'it ended it's run' or 'completed' or simply just 'finished'.


      There seems to be a paradigm in America that if a show is any good, it has to run for years and years each, season having dozens of episodes. The thought of a show merely 'running its course' after a few years, or just having half a dozen or so episodes a season is looked up with horror.
    21. Re:NOT Cancelled! by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      19) Budge. I don't know why they keep reprinting him...

      Because even though most of his work is shit, his dictionary is shit-hot.

      (I got that from a top-notch Egyptologist).

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    22. Re:NOT Cancelled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, *TWO* replies from you - did I strike a nerve? (Whoda thunk that someone who voted for Shrubya could only see things in black and white, rather than as a percentage?)

      I think you'll have to try harder next time.

  10. fresh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This news is fresh from yesterday's posting on the Whedonesque blog.

    dude

    1. Re:fresh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here...

  11. How is this news? by utnapistim · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not to flame or anything, but I don't get the Sci-Fi Channel (wherever that is).

    How exactly is this news?
    I mean ... I understand it's cool and everything, but this to me is more local news than slashdot front page.

    I'm sure I'm not the only one having no contact whatsoever with Sci-Fi Channel.

    --
    Tie two birds together: although they have four wings, they cannot fly. (The blind man)
    1. Re:How is this news? by sporkme · · Score: 2

      From the channel's website, http://www.scifi.com/help/channelfaq/

      2. How do I get SCI FI?
      The cable "universe" has been estimated at around 74 million homes, and almost all of them get SCI FI. Keep telling your cable provider what you want to see. One way to get word to your cable company is to write them at the address printed on your bill. A useful list of companies can also be found at the TVinsite/Broadcasting & Cable trade-magazine site, along with links where available. We are aware of the few cable affiliates in the country that don't presently carry us and are doing everything we can to get them to do so. International viewers might be able to pick up SCI FI by satellite. SCI FI UK /SCI FI Europe is available to those across the big pond, but although they used to be part of this company, we have no affiliation with them now. Furthermore, SCI FI Europe has its own programming schedule and always has.

    2. Re:How is this news? by CloudsSpaz · · Score: 1
      I agree.

      Where are my frontpage Desperate Housewives posts? Now that's info my RSS feed could stand to recieve.

    3. Re:How is this news? by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      Don't complain. Where I live, there is no legal way of viewing FF (but I got a perfectly fine french dubbed version anyway), or btw and despite my nickname, Invader ZIM. I really hate zoning...

    4. Re:How is this news? by utnapistim · · Score: 1

      Ummm ... maybe I should have been more speciffic: I am an international viewer, and my cable company doesn't provide SciFi channel. I am also in no position to purchase a satelite receiver at the moment.

      It would have been nice if I had access to it, but I don't, and I'm sure there are others in the same situation.

      As such, my point of view stil stands: it's local news.

      --
      Tie two birds together: although they have four wings, they cannot fly. (The blind man)
  12. Who is this marathon for? by rdwald · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll agree that Firefly is awesome and all, but who hasn't already seen every episode? It seems that by now, everyone is in one of two camps with respect to Firefly:

    -- Has seen every episode, many multiple times, and has seen the movie.

    -- Has not seen every episode, and doesn't plan to.

    Who will watch the SciFi Channel's marathon?

    1. Re:Who is this marathon for? by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      I hadn't seen it before a short while ago, as I didn't have the DVD, didn't want to watch the movie without seeing the series, and didn't have cable... Assuming I actually had cable, I might have been interested in this. But I went with the old standby, and copied my roommate's TV-rip.

    2. Re:Who is this marathon for? by POWRSURG · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm an oddball that never watched it when it first came out and never planned on buying the DVD, but have found Josh Whedon's run on Astonishing X-Men over at Marvel to be entertaining (though not great, like so many fanboys claim). I made it my intention to watch it and Baboylon 5 (thanks to JMS' runs on Amazing Spider-Man, Book of Lost Souls, etc.) if I ever was informed of a network airing either series from the beginning. Given that I already have Mondays off, it looks like I'm going to have my day planned for the 18th.

    3. Re:Who is this marathon for? by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      I've seen a few episodes here and there and got dragge to the movie when it opened last year. I think I'll set my DVR to record them all and watch them at my leisure. Just because I haven't seen them yet doesn't mean I never want to.

    4. Re:Who is this marathon for? by DangerAwaits · · Score: 1

      Well, for me: - Seen every episode, I think, but not sure. - Didn't see the movie when it came out, so I'm going to buy the DVD, so - It might be good to brush up on the episodes first

    5. Re:Who is this marathon for? by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I'm part of a demographic or what but I've never seen an episode of FireFly, haven't seen Serinity (yet, soon as it's on a movie channel I have I'm watching it) but I do want to see them. I'll probably watch 2-3 of the episodes during this marathon and that might convince me to buy the DVD so I guess the Sci-Fi marathon is for people like me, too lazy to watch the show the first time, too cheap to buy the DVD's without knowing that I'll like it, and without a friend who's even heard of the series.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    6. Re:Who is this marathon for? by DestroyAllZombies · · Score: 1

      I'll certainly TiVo it. I knew people who raved about it when it was on, but I didn't feel like watching it back then (so sue me). I saw the movie and enjoyed it, so now I'll watch. I know this is the non-standard way for things to go, but really, the movie can act as advertising for the series and not just the other way around. I suppose I'm jumping on the FF bandwagon ;)

      --
      This login name for sale.
    7. Re:Who is this marathon for? by Rifter13 · · Score: 1

      I know several people that have not watched Firefly. Most are planning on watching it, but have not, yet.

    8. Re:Who is this marathon for? by fallen1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, I for one _would_ watch the entire marathon except for one thing - it is on a FRIGGIN' MONDAY! You know, when the majority of people have to work. WTF is up with that asinine programming choice? How about making it a marathon on Sunday when the majority of people are off? Now I either have to use up a vacation day as I'm out of sick days and comp time, or get "sick" over the weekend and miss a day of work. This is piss poor scheduling on Sci-Fi's part - and they know it.

      I met both Alan Tudyk and Summer Glau (yummy!) in person at DragonCon this past weekend and they were down to earth, glad to talk to the fans people. They mentioned a possible movie #2 but would not say "Yes, there will be" (of course) and Alan specifically stated that if there was one, everyone would be in it. Possible prequel movies is what he said. Now, that being said, even if I liked the show and the cast and wanted to support them by watching the marathon is it worth risking my job or using up what little vacation time we Americans get? The risk job? No. Using vacation? Maybe.

      Oh, the poster above missed a third option: Those who haven't seen the show (due to time and/or money contraints) but really want to.

      --

      Dream as if you'll live forever.
      Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
      ~Anonymous~

    9. Re:Who is this marathon for? by amigabill · · Score: 1

      I'll agree that Firefly is awesome and all, but who hasn't already seen every episode?

      Irrelevant. I've seen all the Dark Angel episodes, own the DVDs (first season only, second season really sucked) but still watched their marathon for this one this past Monday. I watched the Scifi Monday 4x episodes of Stargate for a few years, but it didn't take that long to go through them all, and I've now seen some episodes lots of times each. Just because people have ealready seen it doesn't mean they won't watch it again. Heck, last Friday's Stargate marathon showed the 1960's time-travel episode I never saw before, and I still only saw the last few minutes of it. Maybe not everyone has seen every single Firefly episode either? I saw most of them, but I don't think I saw all of them, and it seems there was one or two that never even aired in USA. Or should I shut up and finally watch the Firefly DVD set I got for christmas last year?

    10. Re:Who is this marathon for? by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      I would fit into the category of people who are interested in this marathon. I've heard all the buzz about Firefly here on Slashdot, but I haven't got around to seeing it, mainly because it's not at the top of my list of things to do.

      I am still interested in seeing it, and I don't know any Firefly fans who have the DVDs. So that makes this marathon very interesting to me.

      If I remember when I get home, I'm going to set my Tivo to record all the episodes and watch them at my leisure. Then I will possibly go rent Serenity if I find the series interesting enough.

  13. Shiny by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I really hope this series gets either a spin off or a (preferably) another season or ten.

    Come on EVERYBODY NOW!
    Take my love
    Take my land
    Take me where I cannnot stand

    I don't care, I'm still free
    you cant't take the sky from me

    Air Guitar Solo

    Take me out into the Black
    Tell them I aint commin' back
    Burn the land and boil the sea
    You can't take the sky from me

    There's no place I can be
    Since I found Serenity
    But you can't take the sky from me

    daka-daka-daaaawww And Horses!

    http://signal.serenityfirefly.com/

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
    1. Re:Shiny by inkswamp · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you dig the Firefly opening, check the links below out. An indie folk group took the theme and turned it into a full-length song (and they did a pretty damn good job with it) using the theme as their chorus and adding some very well-written verses.

      http://www.cyphertext.net/escapekey/Mal_studio.mp3

      Other songs by the same group, here:

      http://www.cyphertext.net/escapekey/songs.html

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    2. Re:Shiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Shouldn't that be Air Violin Solo ??

    3. Re:Shiny by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can't play a violin...

      --
      In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
    4. Re:Shiny by Xentor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tsk tsk... The solo is after the SECOND verse.

      --
      "The amount of intelligence on this planet is a constant. The population is growing." -Cole's Axiom
    5. Re:Shiny by farker+haiku · · Score: 1

      Their servers were called fireflies due to both the design and the distinctive glow as they caught fire.

      --
      Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    6. Re:Shiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, anyone got a mirror of this? Hell, even rapidshare would do...

  14. Say what? by Blacklotuz · · Score: 1

    They must have spend millions on market research to have determined that we 'nerds' prefer B movies about giant insects and episodes of RAW to SG1 and Firefly, so who do they think will be watching this marathon at 8am on a Monday? Those of us with DVRs, who've probably already recorded it or bought the DVDs?

    1. Re:Say what? by KutuluWare · · Score: 1
      They must have spend millions on market research to have determined that we 'nerds' prefer B movies about giant insects and episodes of RAW


      I agree Sci-Fi has made some seemingly stupid moves in its lineup (WWF RAW is heavy on the fiction but kinda light on the science...) But the B-movies you so roundly criticise are one of the reasons the network is still on the air.

      When Sci-Fi first started they had very limited options for what to air. They could purchase rights to old sci-fi shows in syndications, which they did, becoming the place to go for Star Trek, Dr Who, Battlestar Galactica, Knight Rider, and just about every other 70's and 80's sci-fi show in the world. But that only gets you so far. They could also produce their own shows, and they did that too. Stargate being the clear example. But that costs a LOT of money.

      A third option was to go find old, campy, and cheap sci-fi movies to put on the air. When they started airing some of these old movies, they noticed viewers actually watching them. So, someone at the network got the bright idea of filling all the gaps in their airtime with their OWN cheap movies. It probably costs less to make a year's worth of b-movies than a season of Firefly, with comparable viewership numbers. They saved a lot of money in production costs, made lots of money in advertising ("lots" being relative, since they are a niche cable network), and stayed on the air.

      --Kutulu
    2. Re:Say what? by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      You will bow to the great film god Ray Harryhausen when you mention B movies about giant insects.
      The man pretty much single handedly developed the special effects industry.

    3. Re:Say what? by HolyCrapSCOsux · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen firefly. (It was on before I got my Tivo). Is it like/the same as Serenity?, Are there differences?

      --
      0xB315AA8D852DCD3F3DCA578FD2E0BF88
    4. Re:Say what? by mfrank · · Score: 1

      It's the TV show "Serenity" was based on. It's 14 hour long episodes, the last of which takes place about 8 months before "Serenity". No real differences. If you like "Serenity", you'll like "Firefly".

  15. Shock horror! by Don_dumb · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sci-Fi Television network, decides to show a science fiction program.

    Wow, I dont know if I can go on now, my vision of the world has changed so much.
    This shouldn't even be an article on a local version of /. let alone the global one.

    --
    If this were really happening, what would you think?
    1. Re:Shock horror! by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Sci-Fi Television network, decides to show a science fiction program.

      Really? I thought they were the shitty B-movie, ECW wrestling and Law & Order network....

      (at least until BSG comes back maybe?)

  16. If it's popular on Sci-Fi can we expect more? by FalconDelta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it's great that Fierfly is going to re-air, but how many times are we going to be able to watch those same initial episodes without wanting so much more? My hope is that they will air the pilot that they failed to air the first time. I know it's probably too much to hope for, but they should really get the cast and crew back together for some more episodes. I don't think it's too far gone yet to do so. I had fun listening to the firefly podcasts people were making. I think the series has a potential similar to starwars if it were developed further. They created the possiblity of a large universe with lots of characters, plot elements, and scenarios. All in all, I can't wait to see what happens.

  17. Uh no, that would be.... by myowntrueself · · Score: 2, Informative

    That would be 'the entire *half* season'.

    It never made a full season.

    14 episodes. Ok *slightly* more than half a seasons worth.

    "My john thomas is gonna pop off and fly around the room theres so much tasty in here!" -- Jayne.

    I imagine that the network executives would have choked on their caesar salads hearing that line... they couldn't cancel fast enough.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    1. Re:Uh no, that would be.... by sukotto · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good thing they didn't understand the Chinese lines.

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
  18. How many more fans can it get? by saikou · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I'd think that everyone who could possibly have liked the series already seen it.
    Those who are fans have bought the DVD sets too.
    Is there really a big turf to expand the number of fans?
    Or could they have asked for the same "promotional mini-series" 3-4 minutes each, just like what they did with BG?

  19. Re:Firefly?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also the Spacecowboy thing didn't appeal anyone outside the US.

    Yeah, some people felt nuclear armageddon would be the preferred fate for humanity over cowboys in space. Yuck.

  20. Lets hope they get the episode order right n/m by oSand · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You can take you lameness filter and shove it...

    1. Re:Lets hope they get the episode order right n/m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but you can't take the sky from me.

  21. Order by Spad · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Will they be airing the episodes in the right order?

    1. Re:Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the fuck wouldn't they? They're not Fox. And read the article. And DIAF. kthxbye

    2. Re:Order by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Will they be airing the episodes in the right order?

      RTFA.

    3. Re:Order by Cesa · · Score: 2, Informative

      From TFA:
      This time around, they're starting with "Serenity parts 1 & 2" and ending with "War Stories." The eleven episode marathon starts at 8am (eastern).

  22. Re:Firefly?? by apharmdq · · Score: 1

    I dunno, Cowboy Bebop was pretty darn popular outside the US, and it definitely had the whole "Space Cowboy" theme going . . .

    Besides, good writing has a universal appeal.

  23. Even smarter by kamapuaa · · Score: 0, Troll

    You can also just download the bittorrent. Free, no commercials, how can you go wrong?

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:Even smarter by ZombieSquirrel · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not illegal to download the series, as long as you Tivo all the episodes and promise to spend three hours watching just the commercials. It's true, I looked it up.

    2. Re:Even smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you happen to look it up in your gut?

  24. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 1

    when one of the most competent charachters is black? And married to a white man? And no one has a problem with it?

  25. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by shmlco · · Score: 1

    I can see a bit of the historical parallel, but.. racist?

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  26. FINALLY Cancelled! by Blaaguuu · · Score: 1

    I know technically you're saying 'cancelled' but on the basis that Firefly ran for only 1 season, I'd hardly call that 'cancelled'. It's more accurate to state 'it was ended prematurely'.

    When something that should have been ended 9 or so years ago is finally laid to rest, then THATS 'canceled'. ;)

    --
    My hand touched her hand. Her hand touched her boob. By the transitive property, I got some boob! Algebra is awesome!
    1. Re:FINALLY Cancelled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the new terminology:

      "Cancelled" - never aired an episode
      "Terminates short" or words to that effect - aired more than zero episodes but did not reach a natural conclusion
      "Completes its journey", or simply "Terminates" - reaches a natural conclusion

      So networks can now say:
      "FOX is sorry to announce that Firefly will now be terminating at episode 11 due to operational difficulties. FOX would like to apologise for any inconvenience this may cause."
      or
      "We will shortly be arriving at the end of season 10 of Stargate SG-1 where this show will terminate. Viewers are asked to leave all their baggage behind when we arrive at the end of the series, and are advised to change for Stargate Atlantis. Once again, season 10 of Stargate Atlantis will be our final season."
      or
      "B7 Enterprises wishes to apologise that the Blake's 7 revival has been cancelled due to shortage of resources. Potential viewers are asked to leave their hopes with us and await further announcements."

    2. Re:FINALLY Cancelled! by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      Your terminology is missing a word.

      "Yanked" - finally pulled from the air that which never should have been there.

      As in, "At long last, Stargate has been yanked."

      OK, OK, I'm trolling. But it's still true.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
  27. Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by TekReggard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a foreword, this comment is happily placed near the top so people can see it. It really only has to do with the overall subject.

    --

    Okay, so why is this so important to fans that own the DVD, have seen it, or can watch video streams or any other option that would mean they don't have to watch it on TV [regardless of ownership // commitment] ...

    Advertising.

    What is probably one of the biggest parts of financing a TV network is securing advertising that pays well. If you buy the DVD, or watched it before, etc... yes you have made a commitment and helped them out. The problem is the same as with newspapers. They make SO MUCH of their money off advertising they would rather give away the newspapers in some situations to customers who don't want to pay than deal with their issue. Networks work similarly. If the show can't produce good advertising [TV spots in the tens of thousands] and they have one that can [TV spots in the hundreds of thousands] they will do what is financially the smart decision, even if viewers who are watching like the current content.

    I could bet a good chunk of money that somewhere up there some people are watching this very carefully to see how it goes. They made a movie that did alright but not outstanding, but... it did good so it shows promise. The DVDs have sold well, but not in bundles... again, good but not outstanding.

    What they're probably looking for is what kind of viewership they have during the marathon. This is the kind of event that could tip someone's opinion on their network into saying... hey... lets put together another season. This will get us viewers = dollars.

    -TK

    1. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by JeremyALogan · · Score: 1

      Ok... I'll admit that when the show first aired and there were stories about it on /. almost daily that I didn't give a shit. I didn't watch it at all and I didn't even give it a chance until it was out on DVD. Eventually I bittorrented the TV shows and I watched, maybe, half of the first one and was hooked. It wasn't long until I owned the boxed set and Serenity. I've also gotten quite a few of my friends "hooked". The question, in my mind, is what do we have to do (in the real world) to convince the networks to sponsor more episodes/seasons AND (maybe more difficult) convince Wheedon to make them? There have been a number of home-grown movements to try and resurrect the series, but they were met, mostly, with yawns. How many people have to watch this marathon and how do we let Neilson know that it's HOT? I'd love to see more!

      (Sorry about the rambling)

    2. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      What, does this mean I have to take my fingers out my ears and actually watch the ads?

    3. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by harrkev · · Score: 1
      The question, in my mind, is what do we have to do (in the real world) to convince the networks to sponsor more episodes/seasons AND (maybe more difficult) convince Wheedon to make them?

      I love the show, but I am not a "rabid" fan, so I could be wrong on this. But the impression that I have is that Wheedon WANTS to make more. He just needs a network to pay the bills.

      Of course, with the "cast changes" that occured as a result of the movie (I am trying not to spoil it for those that have not seen it), that might change the dynamic of the eventual 2nd season a bit, though. I am not sure how the actors feel about making more.
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    4. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Give it up, browncoat, it ain't coming back.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by solitas · · Score: 1

      It's also extremely important to fans to have the show on their digital cable boxes because the devices can be polled - a 'watch' is counted as such whether you're really sitting in front of the tube or not.

      I program my box to start-up for all the shows in which I have an interest (the box only draws about 30 watts) and if I'm not around I just punch-off the power button on the set itself (or be running a DVD thru the other A/V port, or a split-off signal of another channel thru the set's RF port). Viewer-counts are what make the cable companies and producers/underwriters take notice.

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    6. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1
      Of course, with the "cast changes" that occured as a result of the movie (I am trying not to spoil it for those that have not seen it), that might change the dynamic of the eventual 2nd season a bit, though. I am not sure how the actors feel about making more.

      Actually, I think it would be pretty easy to just have the hypothetical (and greatly desired) second+ season set between the end of the first season and the start of the movie. It's pretty obvious that quite a bit has happened between the two, and there's a lot of material that wasn't addressed at all in Serenity. For example, looking into Book's past with his obvious military experience, and of course further explanation of the "blue-hand" men.

      The fact that there is already an established "end-point" to the storyline would give the writers something to work toward, and avoid the problem I've seen with so many serialized shows: That of "We wrapped up the major plot arcs at the end of the last season, so now what? Do we bring in more powerful enemies? Do we start focusing on previously minor characters? Do we throw in a 'Two years later-' graphic and start with the same characters in new situations and roles?" (a la BSG)

      I completely missed the series when it was first on. I bought the DVD sight-unseen based solely on the recommendation of a good friend of mine and was sucked right in. Whatever happens to the series, I'll be watching the marathon. I know I could watch my DVDs any time, (could anyway, if I wasn't always loaning them out to bring in more converts) It would be great to see the resurrection of one of the martyrs of the Geek community.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    7. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by mfrank · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, Whedon had seven seasons plotted out. The movie pretty much covered seasons 2 and 3.

    8. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Whedon wants to make more, but he refuses to work with Fox. As Fox still owns the ip, this puts a damper on it's resurrection outside of the movie scene. The movie failed mainly because there was little to no advertising for it before it debuted in theaters. Hell, I barely saw a single commercial for the DVD release. The poor advertising killed it as it wasn't a corny movie that would benefit by SoaP style fan generated hype. That it did as well as it did at all is rather suprising then.

    9. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      You are absolutly right. Buying a newspaper doesn't pay for the newspaper. It is only a disincentive to take one and not read it. You are more likly to read it if you spent $.75 or $1.00 on the paper than if you were just to pick up a stack of 10 freebies. This gets them more eyes on sending out less papers than it would for them to send out far more papers for free.

      Those that don't understand economics are doomed to hate the world.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    10. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Aaah, fuck it. I'll pull an Evo Terra" here: WASH DIES!

    11. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      Actually, revenue in newspapers is also closely tied to real (i.e. paid) circulation. Giving away papers lowers that actual circulation (beyond a certain amount) so papers have to charge lower fees for the ads they sell. It's an ugly circle that ends up leaving ink all over your fingers :)

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    12. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by Forge · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of problems with good quality SciFi shows on TV. I'll explain them here the best I can. I'll compare them to the queens of long run. Soap operas to clarify.

      #1. FX costs money. Every time Serenity lands on a new planet or SG1 steps through the gate you spend as much on Special Effects as you would for a whole season of "The Yong and the Restless".

      #2. SciFi Fans are few. It's true. Sure we can pack 10,000 StarGate fans into a convention center if we realy tried. However in real viewership SciFi lags behind cop shows and soaps.

      #3. As if the numbers problem wasn't bad enogh, Advertising dolars spent for SF spots do not generally bring good returns. The reason is simple. The more intelligent/educated (not necessarily related traits) a person is the less influence advertising has on buying decisions. For the SF fan market you have to figure out what they want and tell them you are now selling it. Soup fans will happily let you tell them what they want.

      #4. Politics. Good SciFi shows will deal with real social issues in an "it's so out there" way. What's really disturbing is that our favorite writers are falling into the trap of simply deciding that certain things we see everyday don't exist in the univers they created.

      My favorite example of this. AIDS in the Stargate universe. It simply doesn't exist. How many people in the real world who passed all the right security screens and have high level clearance are now infected with HIV? How many of those would take the decision Sam's dad did when the facts are presented? Meanwhile on SG1 there is the ongoing plot-line that the Tocra have a shortage of hosts.

      And don't get me started on that bracelet thing which turned 3 members of SG1 (didn't work on Teal'k) into SuperHeroes.

      FireFly being set in the far future (post terrestrial exudes) gave it the chance to dodge that sort of issue without forcing us to ask why. However the Reavers worry me. How savage can you get while still maintaining complex machinery?

      And yes. Firefly dose lay it out that an old ship will simply drop out of the sky if you don't keep fixing things as they break.

      PS: What has become of BSG? Last season I saw ended with Cylons marching through the streets of a new human "city" while the fleet in orbit was out of medical supplies (Thanks to the climate on the planet below)

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    13. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by ArmyLT · · Score: 1

      I haven't found this mentioned, but I do think that the DVD sales can be incredibly effective. Sci-Fi should just look at "Family Guy" for a reason to bring this show back. In the case of that show, it was the DVD sales that made the corporation take another look at the show, and finally bring it back.
      Also, I don't think that the companies have enough faith in their own start-ups. It seems like REALLY good shows like this get chopped their first season because not enough people have been exposed to this. I personnally never heard of this show until it was on a re-run marathon like this one. Then, I sat and watched four episodes in a row. The DVD sales get the word out, and can build enough popularity for the show to be brought back, and be an immediate sucess.

    14. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Another interesting thing about the movie, it wasn't very good.

      Firefly is a great premise and the acting is pretty hard to mess up but overall the movie wasn't gripping, was confusing and just wasn't that good and reviews reflected that.

      Yet people went to see it, they're probably wondering what they could accomplish with a good movie based on that I.P. (Disclaimer been playing too much "The Movies").

    15. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by blzabub · · Score: 1

      #2. SciFi Fans are few.
      Yeah that "Star Wars" thing really went nowhere. There is no marketplace for Sci-Fi entertainment.

    16. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by beaverfever · · Score: 1

      According to you and others there is a duty to perform a role and fulfill obligations to somebody so they will make more tv shows.

      Why should I have to work so hard to make a positive impression on someone who is trying to sell something to me? There are some mixed up priorities here. We're talking about entertainment here, not religion (although I do realise we are talking about sci-fi fans). I want to see new shows, not an endless parade of reruns.

      Next: wouldn't high numbers watching reruns of old shows only tell advertisers that they can continue to get away with broadcasting reruns? If nobody watched, then perhaps that would send a signal that people are finally sick of watching endless hours of Star Trek, Andromeda and other reruns and new product is required.

      Sci-fi fans' habit of watching the same shows time and again can work against their own best interests. The false expectations derived from propping up shows with false viewership as you suggest will only lead to producers and advertisers being disappointed again in the future, further eroding the development of new sci-fi product.

      Finally, what if fans took all that time spent watching reruns, got a second job and mailed the extra pay to the producers, instead of watching the same shows over and over? I think this would be a more productive use of fans' time and sense of obligation.

    17. Re:Why this is extremely IMPORTANT to fans. by solitas · · Score: 1
      Next: wouldn't high numbers watching reruns of old shows only tell advertisers that they can continue to get away with broadcasting reruns? If nobody watched, then perhaps that would send a signal that people are finally sick of watching endless hours of Star Trek, Andromeda and other reruns and new product is required.

      Might you understand that if nobody watched the reruns that the compaies MIGHT think that nobody gave a f**k about the shows anymore, at all?

      I do not advocate propping-up a show ad infinitum; I merely suggest that it be done for the first couple of rerun cycles so that it appears there are viewers who did not see it the first time and, hopefully, it will provoke the production companies to create more new material for subsequent seasons. They're taking us for a ride with the advertising: let's take them for a ride drumming-up the numbers for more new material. The show's already cancelled, so what's to lose? If one more season can be created then maybe, MAYBE, viewers WILL pick up on it on their own and promote interest in continuing it even further. That they will swear-off creating new sci-fi altogether just because one show may tank seems a bit unrealistic - especially since they're hardly creating GOOD new shows NOW anyway.

      Finally, what if fans took all that time spent watching reruns, got a second job and mailed the extra pay to the producers, instead of watching the same shows over and over?

      In my post I said nothing about watching the show - just making sure that there was a way for the time to be counted for the show.

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
  28. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck?

    Time to put down the drugs and come back to the real world.

    It has a southern tone, but absolutely no racism. Some elitism based on a class society established between rich (inner planets) and poor (outer planets), but no racism. They speak a combination of Mandarin and English for God's sake. They have two main black characters. About the only thing possibly racist is that the casting didn't have nearly enough Hispanic or Asian actors, and that is purely because in America the studios tend to only put in white Caucasian and black people and think they have diversity :)

    You are either trolling or an idiot. If you're the first, I'm sorry I bothered to respond. If you're the second, you're probably one of those dumbasses who want 'manholes' renamed as 'personholes', or refuses to chain harddrives in a master-slave relationship - in which, case you're a lost cause.

  29. Maybe it will revive the series? by Barts_706 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know it may come as a shock to nerdy Slashdot community, but there are people out there who hasn't seen Firefly yet. It is aimed at them and also the devoted fans who will take any excuse to see the series again.

    I hope Firefly might acquire some more interest, enlarge its fanbase, and maybe one day we might see the continuation.

    Anyways, this seems not too probable and (judging by "Serenity" movie) it might be better if there was no follow-ups, if they are to screw the ambience of the series.

    Still, one can only hope. I really liked it a lot.

    1. Re:Maybe it will revive the series? by Tim_sama · · Score: 0

      It's true. I'd heard a lot about it, but I had never watched it until recently. I was hooked from the first episode, and I just finished watching all the episodes for the first time 2 days ago. I think there is a very large audience for Firefly, the problem is that Fox did absolutely jack to promote it, and for that reason most people have never even heard of it. If I had seen commercials for it when it was actually on, I definitely would have watched it regularly during its initial run if I had just known about it. I really hope it gets picked up for some straight-to-DVD releases. The show has way too much potential to just let it go to waste.

  30. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you seen the show, and do you know anything of the Civil War and American history in general?

    Well I don't since I don't live in America

    You know far more about the Romulan Neutral Zone than you do about the real history of the actual country you live in.

    Fixed

    In summery I don't have a clue what your on about

  31. Typical for Sci-Fi Channel by Belgand · · Score: 1

    The thing is, this is actually a pretty typical move for the Sci-Fi Channel. Due to a lack of material (largely since they seem to spend most of their budget financing terrible B-movies) they will often fill just about every day of the week with a long 5-8 hour block of one show. Often this seems a bit random and haphazard as they do have a decent library of older shows and they sometimes take the time to revisit a series they haven't aired in a while. Since they bought the rebroadcast rights to Firefly they're simply doing a big block of Firefly episodes.

  32. I think Ben is going bonkers... by spammeister · · Score: 1

    And likewise all the actors from Farscape and Star Trek they seem to like keep hiring and firing them.

    --
    I tried to think of a good sig, and this wasn't it.
  33. I'm not sure it deserved a ROFLOMGWTFBBQ by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    but Stargate and Firefly are pretty much completely different shows.

    --

    +++ATH0
  34. Careful by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I'm as much of a leftie as you are, but there IS a conflict between us and the movement of violent Islamic extremism. Saying "you shouldn't believe in the war on terror" doesn't make any sense to a large majority of folks out there, and it isn't even really what you mean.

    Apropos of nothing.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Careful by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Saying "you shouldn't believe in the war on terror" doesn't make any sense to a large majority of folks out there

      That's because they're not smart enough to realize you can't wage war against something just because it's a bloody noun.

      "War on nations harboring terrorists." - Ok.
      "War on terrorists" - Weak, but passable.
      "War on terror" - Bullshit politico-speak.

    2. Re:Careful by Holmwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's because they're not smart enough to realize you can't wage war against something just because it's a bloody noun.

      Like a war on piracy?
      Or a war on slavery?

      The Royal Navy conducted both rather successfully (along with other countries). I admit, neither Fox News nor MSNBC nor CNN recently covered them.

      Back to the topic, Firefly is unusual, politically. It's hard to think of an SF show that's that libertarian. Most are either Utopian quasi-socialist/progressive (e.g. Star Trek), or have a strong military background coupled with a government ranging from progressive to conservative, but almost never libertarian (BSG, Stargate, B5...). Many feature a rebellion against a totalitarian regime, (Star Wars) but all the rebels typically want to set up a conventional big (though nicer) government of their own ("The New Republic") rather than just fly free ("You can't take the sky from me")

      Firefly suggests, almost heretically, that excessively centralized government itself is part of the problem, despite the good intentions of same.

      Holmwood.

    3. Re:Careful by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Like a war on piracy?
      Or a war on slavery?


      Precisely. I never said our current crop of asshats invented it, but that doesn't make it not complete BS.

      It's hard to think of an SF show that's that libertarian. Most are either Utopian quasi-socialist/progressive (e.g. Star Trek), or have a strong military background coupled with a government ranging from progressive to conservative, but almost never libertarian (BSG, Stargate, B5...). Many feature a rebellion against a totalitarian regime, (Star Wars) but all the rebels typically want to set up a conventional big (though nicer) government of their own ("The New Republic") rather than just fly free ("You can't take the sky from me")

      Farscape. Both Firefly and Farscape had at least a semi-totalitarian regime (The Alliance and the Peacekeepers), and the crews in neither are particularly interested in the politics beyond "keep my ass in one peice."

      Of course, I loved Farscape even more than Firefly, so that's in no way meant to be a detraction.

    4. Re:Careful by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      I dunno, mate. Piracy is still thriving off of the Horn of Africa and off the coast of Indochina. Granted, pirates nowadays wear t-shirts and carry machine guns, but they still exist.

      Piracy in the Caribbean was eliminated by the lack of profitable targets as much as by Spanish or English naval patrols. After all, most of the famous pirates started off as privateers, state-sponsored pirates who eventually turned against their backers. IIRC there are still cases of piracy in the Gulf of Mexico to this day, but on a miniscule scale.

      Although certain pirate nests have been successfully defeated with naval forces, those were concentrated actions. Nowhere was there an attempt to elimate piracy once and for all.

    5. Re:Careful by ChronosWS · · Score: 1

      Oh, the fight is still ongoing and the pirates are definitely losing. As you can see here our efforts to raise the global temperature, thereby killing off pirates, as met with substantial success. Unfortunately for us, however, we will soon feel the lash of his noodly appendage for annihilating his chosen people.

    6. Re:Careful by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      You forgot Anarchist-loonies: Farscape!

  35. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Have you seen the show

    Several times. It was a good show, though I've gotten tired of it.

    and do you know anything of the Civil War and American history in general?

    I know the highlights.

    Firefly has absolutely no racist content. It does use the post-Civil War South as the setting, but it uses it the way it uses spaceships as horses. They're slightly different. The sci-fi version of the Civil War is a libertarian vs. authoritarian fight with the obvious parallels filling in mythology gaps. The genesis of the backdrop is not "I wish the south had won", it's "no one is ever 100% right".

    One of the consequences of the Civil War, while obviously doing some fantastic things for human rights, was a reduction in states' rights. And that is the part taken for the show. In the US case, it was a trade worth making. In the show's case, what is exchanged for the elimination of states' rights is never made clear, so it's assumed to be something unworthy.

    But again, there is no racism in the show. You need to learn what "sci-fi/fantasy" means, and not judge a guy based on a story that doesn't say what you've decided it probably says. If the setting had been based on the War of 1812 and starred guys with British accents, would you assume they hated America?

  36. Better not screw up Wonder Woman film... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate Whedon, especially his script dialogue. His characters all seem to congeal together; they speak the same style over and over again. For example here's some typical lines:

    "blah blah blah! OR blah blah blah..."

    "BUT blah blah blah? Oh..."

    He better not screw up Wonder Woman...

    - sigh

    1. Re:Better not screw up Wonder Woman film... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capt. Malcolm Reynolds: I've staked my crew's life on the theory that you're a person, actual and whole, and if I'm wrong, you'd best shoot me now...
      [River cocks the gun she is pointing at Mal]
      Capt. Malcolm Reynolds: Or, we could talk some more.

      hahahaha it's true!

    2. Re:Better not screw up Wonder Woman film... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He uses conjunctions such as "but" and "or"? That hack!

  37. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christ. Are you one of those idiots who think the civil war was about slavery? The civil war was about trampling on the rights of the states, and of strengthening of the federal government. Slavery was just a lame excuse (just like terrorism, war on drugs, etc.) for the powergrabbing, the mere thought of the south being able to continue using slaves had they survived the war is laughable. Get a clue, retard.

  38. What Sci-Fi Channel??? by dltaylor · · Score: 1

    I switched to the channel listed on my guide, but they has "rassling", or something simliarly weird (definitely fiction, but hardly "sci").

    What is the current name of the cable/sat. channel that specializes in "Sci-Fi" (outer space exploration/warfare/..., off-worlders visiting/invading, comedy/action/drama with elements of those)? Nearest I can find is Showtime Beyond, but a lot of that is lame.

    BTW, what ever happened to "Space: Above and Beyond"?

    1. Re:What Sci-Fi Channel??? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      BTW, what ever happened to "Space: Above and Beyond"?

      Best. Show. Evar.

      I really long for the days when sci-fi didn't, you know, suck. (Of course, by the end of the first season, S:AAB was working pretty hard on crossing that line.)

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    2. Re:What Sci-Fi Channel??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the only season right?

    3. Re:What Sci-Fi Channel??? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      They made a christmas special episode where the aliens decided not to kill them because of the 'spirit of the season' or something equally moronic. Plus the acting sucked and the show didn't make much sense in the first place... but the christmas episode is where I said "no more, this show bites."

    4. Re:What Sci-Fi Channel??? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      I agree 100% that the later episodes were moronic. It was really sad watching the show go from "Who Watches the Birds?" to episodes like the ones you are talking about. The continuity of the universe started to fall apart, the characters started to get silly, and the plots got downright stupid.

      When I'm talking about S:AAB, I'm referring to the great episodes before the show went into it's death-throes. I assume most other people are too (just as saying "I'm a fan of old-school Star Wars" shouldn't ever be interpreted a "I love the Star Wars Christmas Special").

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    5. Re:What Sci-Fi Channel??? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Well, look, if the show sucks, it gets cancelled. I loved Sliders, too, but by the second season it was well into wacky-ville and I began to hate the show and turn it off.

      I guess my point is to lament the shows that have a consistent quality and get cancelled despite it. If the cast/crew/writers of the show can't keep up the originality longer than 12 episodes, it *deserves* to be cancelled, IMO.

    6. Re:What Sci-Fi Channel??? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      If the show starts floundering on it's own, then you're right. But that wasn't the case with S:AAB. It started out strong, but from the very beginning Chris Carter had it in for the show because two of his best writers created it. He wanted them back for the X-Files. Remember, this was at the heigh of X-Files mania and Carter was basically god at Fox.

      Since S:AAB was actually getting god ratings he couldn't just have the show yanked, however, so he started having it preempted on an almost random basis. It was practically impossible for me to know if S:AAB was going to be on when it was scheduled to.

      He also applied all the pressure he could to get his writers back. I think it was that presure, and possible the early loss of the original writers, that led to the decline in quality of S:AAB. I believe if Carter hadn't messed with it, the episodes wouldn't have started. In the end, we'll never know, but if S:AAB had started to suck without outside intervention, I wouldn't have blamed Fox for cancelling it at all.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
  39. Re:Firefly?? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Outlaw Star, too. Firefly struck me as a nifty live-action combination of them both.

  40. Re:What Sci-Fi Channel??? S:AAB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Out on DVD! Rejoice! You can watch it whenever you want, advert free! :)

  41. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by Somatic · · Score: 5, Insightful
    > I can't see "Firefly" as anything other than southern/racist propaganda for the wrong side in the Civil War.

    Yeahbutwhat?

    A show where one episode (Shindig) opens with Mal starting a bar fight with some guys... because they were slave traders?

    Where one of the crew is a hero to an entire town of indentured servants because of his (ok, misunderstood) actions? (Jaynestown)

    A show where most of the episodes revolve around personal freedom? (River's in Objects in Space, the whores in Heart of Gold, the indentured servants in Jaynestown, Saffron's in Our Mrs. Reynolds (till the end, anyway), Simon and River's in Safe and Ariel, Mal's in Out of Gas, and the list goes on with many moments in every show?)

    A show where the entire premise is, arguably, about freedom?

    The crew of Serenity were on the losing side of the war, and that's where the similarities end. Comparing Firefly/Serenity to the South in the Civil war is one of the more whacked out things I've ever heard.

    --
    My script don't crash! She crashes, you crashed her!
  42. Shouldn't that be... by FFCecil · · Score: 1
    "...the SciFi Channel is running the entire season of Firefly..."

    I understand that the one season they made was so good it could count for more, but unfortunately that's not the case.

    *sighs*

  43. S:AAB inspired LOST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole LOST character-centric episodic concept reminded me of an episode of S:AAB - #13:"Who Monitor's The Birds?"

    The whole episode is basically centered on the character Cooper Hawkes, showing flashbacks to his early time at the secret InVitro academy.

    The way he handles his present situation, and the choices he makes as a result, is reflected closely albeit in a different fashion in his flashbacks.

    Although there is little dialogue, when used it's used for great effect - actions speak louder than words.

    A truly classic episode, perhaps of the best episodes of any Sci-Fi series ever produced. They don't make'em like that anymore, except maybe LOST... ;)

  44. A little off topic, but an important point. by ZJVavrek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Okay, you made a great point about trying to show the popularity of the show by boosting viewership. Unfortunately, I don't have the SciFi channel, so I can't help out. However, a point continues coming to mind:

    How do networks determine viewership? Say a million of us tune in to watch the Marathon, half even stay for the entire thing. What is the process by which the networks discover this fact? I'm trying to figure out how much it matters what show I'm watching if I don't have some sort of Nielson box in my house.

    Regardless, I'm very glad that enough of the popularity has gotten noticed so that it can be re-aired. And probably in the correct order, too. (This is /., you think I rtfa? Probably was in there, wasn't it?)

    1. Re:A little off topic, but an important point. by daff2k · · Score: 1

      Have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nielsen_ratings about how those ratings are calculated and how the networks know who watched what for how long.

      --
      And which parallel universe did you crawl out of?
    2. Re:A little off topic, but an important point. by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      I have read that page, and the process seems highly flawed to me. Especially considering that of all the people i know, not one has ever been a rater.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    3. Re:A little off topic, but an important point. by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Exactly, and now you know precisely why TV is full of crap.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    4. Re:A little off topic, but an important point. by Soygen · · Score: 1

      Yup. I don't know a single person who has ever been a rater, either. It makes you less surprised, at least, when a good show goes down the crapper because of the "bad" ratings.

    5. Re:A little off topic, but an important point. by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I've never known anyone as a rater either. Has anyone here on slashot ever even known someone as a rater?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    6. Re:A little off topic, but an important point. by schon · · Score: 1

      Round about 1998 or so, my wife and I participated for a couple of weeks (in Canada.)

    7. Re:A little off topic, but an important point. by rifter · · Score: 1

      What's funny about this is that we have the technology to truly gauge who is watching, but we are not using it. To a certain extent cable companies will use the ability to determine what channel you are watching at vairous times and for how long to catch cable "thieves" but they do not regularly gather that data for less nefarious purposes, like ratings.
      It would be nice if the cable companies gathered that data and then were able to send it to be aggregated by the networks to determine true viewership. It would be dead simple for them to do this in a way that did not identify the viewers, though experience shows that companies will go out of their way to misappropriate and misuse data like this. Either way privacy enthusiasts would be annoyed and slashdot would demonize the cable companies, but it would be a solution that provides better data.

    8. Re:A little off topic, but an important point. by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 1

      About ten years ago or so my family were raters for Neilson for two or three different weeks.

      --
      Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
    9. Re:A little off topic, but an important point. by spx · · Score: 1

      OMG, your on /. and DONT have Sci Fi?@!?@#

    10. Re:A little off topic, but an important point. by SquierStrat · · Score: 1

      Go to pick up a probably and statistics text book and start studying this thing called a normal distribution.

      --
      Derek Greene
    11. Re:A little off topic, but an important point. by mikeron · · Score: 1
      Go to pick up a probably and statistics text book and start studying this thing called a normal distribution.

      The problem is that a show like Firefly will have a niche audience. So, sampling average viewers is inaccurate, as a whole lot of scifi fans will watch Firefly and *cough*Stargate*cough*, while a tiny percentage of overall viewers will watch those shows. In other words, the weight given to that segment of the sample is far smaller than it should be.

      SciFi has been running scifi.com related campaigns for Atlantis and BSG lately, and I would deduce - logically - that they've been getting good data from that, but some of the statements made by executives have rendered said logic inapplicable. They seem to have rejected my reality and substituted their own.
  45. Why Did This Even Get Posted? by Captain+Smirk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Someone tell me why this is even a Slashdot story? The SciFi channel runs marathons every weekday, running a different series every day. This will not be the first time they've run Firefly. Firefly was a sub-standard show that only managed to attract a handful of nerds and wasn't even able to stay on the air for an entire season, despite being the pet project of the network president. It is no wonder the movie bombed. On the other hand, maybe I'm just bitter that Fox cancelled Dark Angel (a superior show that had already lasted two complete seasons and was drawing decent ratings) to make room for this garbage. By the way, you can also find Dark Angel on the SciFi channel.

    1. Re:Why Did This Even Get Posted? by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

      hmm. I see what your saying and in response I would like to invite you purchase a step ladder (for which your will be reimbursed) in order to facilitate your jumping up of my butt.

      --
      In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
    2. Re:Why Did This Even Get Posted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thrashing on Firefly, because you're upset they cancelled Dark Angel? I'm at a loss for words here.

      Are you out of your MIND?! Have you even watched the show? And I don't mean skimming chapters in your DivX player while moping about how Jessica Alba won't respond to your letters.

      Seriously, you are in the minority here, man.

    3. Re:Why Did This Even Get Posted? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 0

      So... do you actually dislike Firefly or are you just mad they canceled the show you liked before that? 'Cause really, I can see people not liking the show (the combination Western/sci-fi theme isn't for everyone's taste) but I think it's just not possible for someone to watch the show with an open mind and not realize that the writing, acting, and directing are all superb. It's not even on the same playing field as most sci-fi series (see: Stargate).

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    4. Re:Why Did This Even Get Posted? by Captain+Smirk · · Score: 1

      Good one, Timberwolf0122!
      But in order for there to be enough room for me to fulfill that request, you would first need to remove your head from that orifice.

    5. Re:Why Did This Even Get Posted? by Captain+Smirk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      When it first came out, I didn't watch it mainly because I was bitter about Dark Angel.
      Recently, however, I tried watching several episodes on SciFi to give it a chance. There are a lot of redeeming aspects of the show, but I felt the character development was poor and the plots were just not that engaging. The show just didn't make me care enough about any of the characters - which is why I believe it never really became a mainstream hit.
      And I agree at least in part with your comparison to Stargate - the acting on Firefly is superior. But the characters on Stargate are more likeable, which accounts for that show lasting for 10 seasons.
      Of course, it's all subjective.

    6. Re:Why Did This Even Get Posted? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, it's all subjective.

      Well, yes and no. It's not like there's going to be a "right answer" to questions of quality in a TV Show, but I think that this doesn't necessarily mean that some shows aren't better than others. Contrast "FastLane" and "24". I don't care what you're subjective tastes are, one show was actually pretty tight in terms of plot, writing, acting, etc. and the other just sucked.

      So maybe the characters on Stargate were "likeable". I thought so. I just didn't care. The acting was so INCREDIBLY awful, and the plots so stupid, and the dialog so reminiscent of Star Wars 1-3 that the show literally just hurt to watch. It wasn't remotely believable even with suspension of disbelief because there wasn't any internal consistency. It was just a train wreck of hoaky cliches and corny, derivative, fluffy action. With just the barest hint of pseudo-philosophy/religious commentary now and then as pure decoration.

      As far as Firefly goes, I think you really need to watch the show from the pilot. The first time I started watching the show was randomly in the middle of its original run on Fox and I was like "WTF?" I felt exactly like you - I couldn't figure out the characters. They seemed kind of... off. And so I didn't care. Firefly is good drama precisely because the characters are paramount. If you don't care about them, the show is meaningless. And a lot of people never cared about the characters.

      But it turns out the reason for this is that Firefly is a much more closely-knit show than most episodic entertainment. You really do need to understand the character relationships because they are not stereotypical. Just look at Wash and Zoe. You've got the battle-hardened wife, and the more gentle husband. It's gender role-reversal (from a traditional American standpoint) but it's not farcical comedy or even social-political posturing: it's a genuine relationship. This isn't something you're going to pick up on if you pick up the show in media res. You have to actually see Zoe and Wash together to really get it.

      I fell in love with the show when someone got me to watch the pilot first. I'm serious - that's what you need to do. Find someone that owns a copy (or bittorrent it, I don't care) and just watch the pilot first. This is the real reason the show never caught on. Everyone that watched it was forced to see the episodes completely out of order, and stuff doesn't make sense that way. Not only are the relationships genuine, non-stereotypical, and complex, but they are fluid. The relationship between Simon and River with Jayne is completely different before and after the episode "Ariel" (and the line: "Also, I can kill you with my brain.") The same is true of many other characters as well.

      I'm telling you man, I'm no huge fan of Joss Wheddon (never did get into Buffy) but with this show he created a masterpiece. Please do yourself a favor and check it out from the pilot onwards. After you see the first episode or two (in order), you won't need any more convincing. If they're airing the pilot first during this marathon, then that will do. Record it, watch it later, whatever. It won't let you down.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    7. Re:Why Did This Even Get Posted? by Captain+Smirk · · Score: 1

      I'll take your advice and try to catch the pilot if I get the chance. Who knows, maybe it'll change my mind.

    8. Re:Why Did This Even Get Posted? by Captain+Smirk · · Score: 0

      moping about how Jessica Alba won't respond to your letters

      For your information, she has responded to my letters ( a restraining order counts as a response, doesn't it?).

      Seriously, you are in the minority here, man.

      Maybe I am in the minority here, but the ratings of both shows would indicate that most viewers agree with me.

    9. Re:Why Did This Even Get Posted? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      Glad to hear it. If you think about it afterwards, drop me an email and let me know how it goes. It'd be great to have yet another Firefly fan on Slashdot.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    10. Re:Why Did This Even Get Posted? by D-Cypell · · Score: 1

      I'm telling you man, I'm no huge fan of Joss Wheddon (never did get into Buffy) but with this show he created a masterpiece.

      Just out of interest, did you follow Buffy from the beginning? If not, you might be having the same problem here.

      I was a huge fan of Buffy and Firefly and more recently (after many years on my 'todo' list) I am starting to work my way through Angel. The writing in Buffy (especially series 1-3, before Wheadon became less involved) was just as intelligent as Firefly. I would probably describe both series' as 'masterpieces' but for both you had to have an understanding of the characters and environment. It takes a few episodes of Buffy to see past the, "Beverly Hills 90210" setting and into Joss' Genius. The blending of fighting real monsters and fighting the 'monsters' of going through adolescene is sublime at times. One particular episode in season 3 called 'The Zeppo' (after Marx brother) is especially inspired here, placing the end of the world as a subplot (with about 5 mins of total air time) to the struggle of one of the group to find their identity. Truely excellent.

      If you are ever in a position where you are looking for a series to follow, give it another try. Series 1 is excellent but does still have the characters 'finding their feet'. Once you get into season 2 and 3, I can guarentee very good entertainment.

      I may soon be in a position to recommend Angel too, but I am only about half way through season 1 right now.

    11. Re:Why Did This Even Get Posted? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      I keep trying to watch Buffy from the beginning because of how much I like Firefly. I've rented the Season 1 Disc 1 DVD from Netflix at least twice now, but I don't think I've actually managed to finish all 4 episodes yet. It's just so painfully campy. Mind you, if campy is what you're going for, I can enjoy that. I love the movie version. The show just seems to be occupying a very strange middle ground between "The Mummy" and "Aliens". Both are good, but you really shouldn't mix the two.

      But I've heard from other friends that it really is worth watching, so I'm sure that I will rent it again and give it another go.

      As for Angel - I've only seen part of one episode, but it was so belligerently awful I couldn't watch more than 30 minutes. Again, I may try it at some later date, but it reminded me of "Charmed" (the stupid show with the 3 witch sisters) more than anything else.

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
    12. Re:Why Did This Even Get Posted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep trying to watch Buffy from the beginning because of how much I like Firefly. I've rented the Season 1 Disc 1 DVD from Netflix at least twice now, but I don't think I've actually managed to finish all 4 episodes yet. It's just so painfully campy.

      That was my reaction to most of the first season, and I could barely get my girlfriend through it for the same reason. Get 6-8 episodes into the second season, though, and you really start to get into it. It's still campy, but not in the same "bubblegum" way as early Buffy; it becomes charmingly quirky.

    13. Re:Why Did This Even Get Posted? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

      charmingly quirky sounds intriguing. I will make another attempt and stick with it into the second season. Thanks for the encouragement (assuming that I actually start to like it by then!)

      -stormin

      --
      The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
  46. You DID forget to take your pills today? by Barts_706 · · Score: 1

    ...didn't you?

    Just admit it.

  47. HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    This particular marathon doesn't mean all that much, but starting on Sept. 24, Firefly will be broadcast in high definition on UHD, which is going to be awesome.

    http://www.tvweek.com/page.cms?pageId=212

    1. Re:HD by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1
      This particular marathon doesn't mean all that much, but starting on Sept. 24, Firefly will be broadcast in high definition on UHD, which is going to be awesome.
      It depends, if it was shot with the right equipment for HD then yes it will be awesome. But if it was just shot using ordinary equipment, then I'm hesitant to watch it. I've seen shows broadcast via HD that were not shot for HD, and it looked like total garbage. Sure, it filled up my whole screen (which was kind of nice) but the picture quality was poor even after they tried upconverting it at the broadcasters.

      I'm not saying this will happen here, I don't know enough about the show when it originally aired to know if it was shot using HD equipment. I'm just saying if it wasn't then prepared to be disappointed.
    2. Re:HD by Avatar8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      THAT is one of the best things I've heard in a while.
       


      I'm not so excited about the 9/18 marathon since it's a work day, I've seen them all and I have the DVDs, but seeing Firefly in HD will be awesome. By the look of the DVDs, I think the HD quality is there just not visible.


      Thanks for this news.

    3. Re:HD by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Informative
      if it was shot with the right equipment for HD then yes it will be awesome. But if it was just shot using ordinary equipment, then I'm hesitant to watch it.

      Since HD *is* ordinary equipment these days (has been since the 90's), I don't think you'll have a problem. You see, television is shot with movie equipment because it's cheaper. The cameraman just keeps in mind that they'll be cutting off the edges to convert the film to Pan and Scan. So he's careful not to stick anything in the sides that the viewer might actually want to see.

      Unfortuntately, that does have some side effects. While Babylon 5 was shot with 16:9 cameras, the sides of the shots often contained crew or stage equipment that couldn't be shown on film. So when they converted it to HD, they had to make a decision about each scene as to whether they could use the negatives, pinch the Pan and Scan, or black out the lower and upper areas of the Pan and Scan conversion. The result is that B5 in HD is a mixed bag.

      Thankfully, studios have become more cognizant of 16:9 for television since then. As a result, shows like Stargate SG-1 are easily transferred to DVD in 16:9 rather than the 4:3 they were broadcast at. Getting back to Firefly, it was also transferred to DVD in 16:9, so any broadcast of the show in HD should look just fine. (Actually, it should look GREAT because of great camera work and the awesome special effects by Zoic Studios - the same studio currently working on Battlestar Galactica.)
    4. Re:HD by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between HD and a widescreen. I'm not talking about the "stretching" effect that some shows have suffered, but the picture quality itself. From what I've been told, the actual equipment used to shoot/store a HD scene is different than your run-of-the-mill equipment.

      In any case, some HD broadcasts I've seen were simply the station trying to upconvert a 16:9 480i shows to "Hi Def." In other words, a blurry pixelated mess that is obvious to distinguish between a true HD show.

    5. Re:HD by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1
      From what I've been told, the actual equipment used to shoot/store a HD scene is different than your run-of-the-mill equipment.

      If they're shooting with a Betacam, then they need to upgrade to an HDCam. (Available since 1997.) However, anything done on 35mm (like Firefly) can be digitally resampled to create a high-def print. You'll be happy to know that UHD has done exactly that. :)

      In any case, some HD broadcasts I've seen were simply the station trying to upconvert a 16:9 480i shows to "Hi Def." In other words, a blurry pixelated mess that is obvious to distinguish between a true HD show.

      That's just laziness. The station is basically taking what it has on hand (16:9 NTSC film) rather than getting an HD copy made from the masters. Of course, they need the studio to actually produce such a copy, so I imagine that HD broadcasts are often unavailable. :(
    6. Re:HD by D'Eyncourt · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of glitches that can be seen on the Firefly DVDs that were cut out the broadcast. I think in episode 6, "Shindig" near the start you can see someone reach up out of the lower right-hand edge of the screen to grab and pull the front end of the dune buggy-like cart being driven off of Serenity's ramp.

      Later near the end of the same episode (I think--sorry, don't have my DVDs with me) Wash has completed a difficult job of flying Serenity with nothing in his hands. As viewed when broadcast, you only see Alan Tudyk's head and shoulders with his arms going off-screen.

    7. Re:HD by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1
      However, anything done on 35mm (like Firefly) can be digitally resampled to create a high-def print. You'll be happy to know that UHD has done exactly that. :)
      Cool :)

      Then I'm gonna try watching them. Fortunately my provider picked up UHD a few months ago.
  48. Digg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this? Slashdot, turning into digg? Slashdot hasn't been plagued by the FireFly zombies has it?

    1. Re:Digg? by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 1

      If you had seen it you'd probably be a zombie too. Stay back! It's just that good.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
  49. Happy Birthday Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for remembering my birthday, SciFi Channel. Seriously.

  50. Re:Firefly?? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

    Yeah, spacecowboy is purely a US phenomena.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cowboy_bebop

    "The series has also been broadcast by the anime television network, Animax, across Japan, East Asia, Southeast Asia, South Asia, Latin America, and other regions,"

    "A poll in the Japanese magazine Newtype asked its readers to rank the "Top 25 Anime Titles of All Time"; Cowboy Bebop placed at number two on a list that included Mobile Suit Gundam and Neon Genesis Evangelion.[1]"

    -stormin

    --
    The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
  51. Re:Firefly?? by luckyguesser · · Score: 1

    heh... i've watched cowboy bebop and firefly all the way through, and i love them both. i've often described both shows to friends like this: "Cowboy Bebop is space cowboys. Firefly is cowboys in space."

    --


    The power of Christ compiles you.
    A Random Blog
  52. Praise be! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Lord baby infant Jesus, we thank you so much for this bountiful harvest of Firefly episodes on the SciFi channel. I just want to take time to say thank you for Joss Whedon.

  53. Why? by egburr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Start making space on the PVR!"

    Why? I'd much rather watch them on DVD so I don't have to mess with skipping commercials. Don't all the Firefly fans already have it on DVD?

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Why? by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Don't all the Firefly fans already have it on DVD?

      Heck, they have it on DVD, their friends have it on DVD, they use Firefly discs as place settings at family dinners, they bring copies of it to baby showers, they even reshingle their houses with it.

      All those guys in the funny brown jackets are turning Firefly DVDs into the AOL Coaster of this decade.

  54. Re:Firefly?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because cowboy bebop was actually a pretty good show.
    I've tried to watch Firefly a couple of times but it's just like all the other sub-par scifi shows out there, bad acting, bad sfx, bad costumes/set. I really don't understand the charm of this show, can somebody please explain why this show is worth watching? What am I missing? Honestly if I get some good reasons I'm gonna try again, hell I might even buy the dvd box

  55. How is this news? by sam*stsw · · Score: 1

    The SciFi channel airs marathons every weekday. This isn't special, it's just Firefly's turn. They do the same thing for Buck Rogers, Kolchak, Galactica 1980, etc.

  56. So What? by bigbigbison · · Score: 2, Informative

    They are playing 8 hours of Amazing Stories today. Friday they are playing 8 hours of Outer Limits and yesterday they played 8 hours of Andromeda.
    Marathons of shows is what they do. That they are playing Firefly means nothing. It doesn't mean that they are going to pick it up any more than it means they are going to start making new episodes of the Incredible Hulk starring Bill Bixby. Sadly, they are both dead.

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  57. .oOo. by BKervaski · · Score: 1

    Firefly rocks.

    --
    - Bill
  58. Re:Firefly?? by dctoastman · · Score: 1

    To be fair, Cowboy Bebop was more of a Western/Sci Fi/Kung Fu. If Mal had learned some Shaolin style, Firefly would probably still be on the air.

    In all seriousness though, I think that Cowboy Bebop wasn't as Western as Firefly. When I first started watching Firefly, my mind always drew comparisons with Trigun.

  59. Re:Firefly?? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying it's "as Western", I'm saying that it also had "spacecowboy" elements. Kind of like how almost every episode ended with the text "see you, space cowboy" onscreen.

    -stormin

    --
    The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
  60. Because it's Firefly by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 1

    You don't get it: it's Firefly! This alone makes it newsworthy.

    --
    There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
  61. Advertising by digitalamish · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just read this little insight about TV a few days ago (maybe here on /.) that completely changed how I look at TV. Programs are made for the advertisers, and we the viewers are just the product. When it comes right down to it, the sucess or failure of a program is determined by the advertising revenue, not really viewership. It's the amount of viewers that draw the advertisers which pays the bills. Bascially only DVD sales and 'webisodes', which are marketed directly to the viewers, are the only place the advertisers are out fo the process.

  62. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by Ruvim · · Score: 1

    I would compare it more to an Independence War gone wrong, with British Empire beating US forces.

  63. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by Homr+Zodyssey · · Score: 1

    A post that is obviously insulting to something that most Slashdotters love. Followed by a response that insults all of the aforementioned Slashdotters -- without providing any evidence to support the claims. 1 + 1 = Troll.

  64. Do what now? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    Have Scifi snuck hidden cameras back into my house? Bastards.

    All I know about this show is it made me a lot harder to Google.

  65. Summary wrong. by High+Jumbllama · · Score: 1

    It's not an entire season. It is the first 11 episodes.

  66. Um who cares? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 0, Troll

    I just find it extremely fascinating that their are total rabid fans of something that existed for one season that wasn't even very good. I can TOTALLY understand Star Trek because even with the horrible effects, the stories at the time were different then anything else on tv and were actually good. Of course, I was never a huge Joss Wheadon fan, but come on....cowboy clothing on a space ship??

    Personally, I wish that SciFi would show more classic stuff as well as repeat their good stuff more often (BSG is hardly on except when the new ones are coming out).

    And then there's that wrestling thing....

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:Um who cares? by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cowboy clothing on a space ship doesn't make sense to you? Here's how it works. The value of clothes is based off what people will pay for them, not so much the material: fashionable clothes will always cost more than functional clothes, even if they're made out of cheaper stuff. Spaceships, though, get cheaper and cheaper, like cars (except the fancy one). One hundred years ago, if people had been watching science fiction, they would have been saying "bum clothing, with a TV and a car and a refrigerator?" The point is, poor people will always be wearing crappy clothes, but as technology advances, you can buy stuff like TVs, cars, or crappy spaceships without breaking the bank.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    2. Re:Um who cares? by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Personally, I wish that SciFi would show more classic stuff as well as repeat their good stuff more often

      Get a DVD player and a Tivo. Some of us want new content - not repeats.

    3. Re:Um who cares? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am on your side with that! On the other hand, when new content isn't being made, I don't mind sitting down and watching classic scifi series like Buck Rogers and even Star Trek: TOS. Put it this way, I would rather watch repeats then ECW!

      --

      Gorkman

    4. Re:Um who cares? by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Buck Rogers is sooo bad. Personally I can't believe I actually watched that as a kid.

      Sci-Fi misses the boat so often it's ridiculous. Cheesey movies that have EXACTLY the same story every time. You would think BSG would show them that their demographic is a little more edgy than ECW.

      Personally, I just joined Shatner's DVD club, to supplement my SciFi needs.

    5. Re:Um who cares? by darrylo · · Score: 1
      Cowboy clothing on a space ship doesn't make sense to you? Here's how it works. The value of clothes is based off what people will pay for them, not so much the material: fashionable clothes will always cost more than functional clothes, even if they're made out of cheaper stuff.

      That's not the argument though: the argument is that a particular piece of clothing, coupled with a particular, arguably "small-population" cultural style, can exist in such an unchanged fashion.

      Cheap clothes? Yes. Cheap cowboy clothes? Unlikely, as the "cowboy culture" is fairly small compared to all of the other cultures on this planet, and the chances of it emerging, UNCHANGED , in the future, is laughably miniscule. We're just as likely to see cheap desert nomad clothing, or cheap African clothing.

      And horses??? While that might be possible, it's much more likely that "powered vehicles" will exist if spaceships also exist. The reasoning is that, if there exists a (cheap) powerplant that can lift a massive spaceship off the surface of this planet, that powerplant can also be used to extract hydrogen for a hydrogen engine (this is just an example: there are other cheap, but not necessarily clean, powerplants for vehicles). If people can afford a cheap spaceship, they can certainly afford a cheap vehicle (if for no other reason that the scrap metal value of a spaceship is much more than the scrap metal value of a vehicle).

      While the future might have cheap clothing and cheap spaceships, they won't have unchanged cowboy culture, complete with unchanged cowboy clothing and unchanged nasty cowboy drawl. Whatever it'll be, it'll probably be some mishmash of existing cultures. And, please note that Firefly people just threw together existing cultures, without mixing them: for example, there were 100% cowboys, and 100% "asian women" (geishas?). They didn't have a 40% cowgirl, wearing 55% asian clothing and a turban (this is a poor example, but you get the idea).

      Anyway, even though it annoys the h*ll out of me, I still like Firefly.

    6. Re:Um who cares? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Actually, animals in frontier sci-fi is a common theme. They are (relatively) cheap, self-repairing, self-replicating, can be bred as a business, don't need to have very high technology everywhere (which fits very well into the "outer rim world" phenomenon of Firefly), and may be more economic to "operate" on a world with lots of grass, etc. but relatively little refined fuel/highly machined parts/whatever. Consider the episode Ariel; flying cars, cleaning robots, computer consoles on every street corner... and no animals. Then consider Jaynestown, where indentured laborers are used to dig clay because they are essentially free, while the overlords live in fancy houses that have technology to prevent ships from taking off if they don't want them to. Or Heart of Gold, where women resort to prostitution because they can't afford anything better, but the local crime lord has hovercraft and handheld beam weapons that can burn through almost anything.

      As for "If people can afford a cheap spaceship, they can certainly afford a cheap vehicle" what makes you think Mal couldn't? I'm sure he could have bought himself far more than the hovermule he used in the movie. However, he is obviously from, if not a core world, at least one of the less extreme rim worlds; the weapons used in the war are proof of that. The cheapness of Serenity is fitting with the pay a soldier receives, the fact that it flies at all is fitting with the fact that he was in a war, with some success, against a culture with the kind of technology you see on the core worlds.

      How many people do you think can afford ships even that good? Consider the boy in the pilot episode sitting on a bunch of crates of chickens for sale... Consider the superstitious tribal village that kidnapped Simon; they can't even afford relatively trivial medicine, but they can swap some grains they grew for a piglet from some farmer's sow's litter. A horse is probably an expensive thing by their standards, but it's the sort of thing a rural economy can support easily. A spacecraft, or even hovercraft, though? Not bloody likely.

      Returning to the clothes issue, real cowboy clothes were mostly a practical matter. Denim is durable and long-lasting, leather is plentiful on the frontier, wide-brimmed hats keep the sun out of your eyes and help prevent sunburn, bandanas have any number of uses, etc. The conecpt of similar clothes appearing on the "new" frontier isn't unlikely at all. Consdier lso that the languages which have survived are (American) English and Chinese, and seeing pieces of American frontier culture on the rim seems reasonable. "Cheap African clothing, or cheap desert nomad clothing" is impractical because they aren't IN the desert, and they don't seem to have antelope to kill for furs (assuming you meant bush clothing). As for the mix of clothing, take a good look at the people in the larger frontier towns... you'll see every sort. As for the drawl, I didn't notice it on many characters, but where they did have it, is it really so very unlikely? Relativley uneducated people living a "slow" (active, but not frantic) lifestyle may well adopt a slow, drawn-out speech.

      On of (in my opinion) the coolest things about Firefly is just how good the story universe is. When you consider just how big planets are, just how many are in this system (that's about the only thing that bothers me with regard to realism), just how far apart they are, and the fact that as best I can tell nobody has FTL travel... it's entirely believable that the widely scattered outer worlds should be neglected almost to the level of 1800 Earth frontier. Compare the most advaned cities in the first world, where nobody would dream of using a horse, to the mostly isolated African and South American tribes, where they lack the capability to make cloth. The variety of settings in Firefly really impressed me.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    7. Re:Um who cares? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Buck Rogers bad?? Apparantly you did not value seeing Erin Gray in skintight outfits! :D

      Buck Rogers was at least as good as the new BSG is now. I think 10 years from now when the younger generation has fond memories of the current BSG, many will say it sucked!

      It's all a point of view thing.

      I watched the trouble with tribbles lastnight and the story itself was quite good ...still. Sure, the effects sucked but they did not have computers then that could do the effects. The STORY is the important thing.

      --

      Gorkman

    8. Re:Um who cares? by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Buck Rogers' stories were OK, a bit trite and underdeveloped by today's standards. Interesting how that was a 1/2 hour show at the time, no space opera like that would be attempted in a 1/2 hour time slot these days. The bad thing was the writing and composition (not sure what the technical term would be). A robot named Twiki? The same shots of the city EVERY TIME. A constant theme for many late 70s early 80s shows seemed to be the cutesy characters and using the same shots over and over (and over and over). In that way it reminds me of the original BSG with the kid and the stupid robot dog. I like the old school effects - that's one thing about the new BSG, effects are minimal, they just aren't as obviously repetitive. Many of those old action/adventure shows (BSG, Buck Rogers, Dukes of Hazzard, A-Team, etc...) had great stories but they were either written for kids or the viewing audience was that much less sophisticated at the time. That's probably one thing Star Trek TOS had going for it. People were killed, alien romances were common place, there was real conflict and real issues at stake. During the kinder, gentler 80s the gritty issues were replaced by cute robots, kids and guns that never actually injured anyone.

  67. Does anybody realize... by pulse2600 · · Score: 1

    ...that Sept 18 is a Monday, not Friday? Talk Like A Pirate Day is the 19th, and that's a Tuesday. Arrr!!!!

  68. cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but relatively pointless. I myself am new to the series and even I have the DVDs. Sci-Fi is just eating time with this, but hey whoever hasn't seen firefly (2 people) will enjoy it. Let's get this shindig started.

  69. Interest Gauging? by Ruvim · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it's a first step in a process of bringing the series back on SCI-FI? THe do need something cool now that SG1 is gone.

  70. Have you read the Confederate Constitution? by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    No more states' rights than the US Constitution, but it does enshrine slavery.

  71. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by tinkerghost · · Score: 1
    Actually it's not, think about reconstruction etc, and you do have a lot of similarities. Check the prices, the styles, you really do have a lot of parallels, and they are not coincidental.
    • During 'reconstruction' there was a large part of the US govt that wanted to punish the South for the assasination of Lincoln.
      Serenity is set in a period following a civil war, with a strong centralized govt, that seems to have an attitude that the browncoats still need to be taught why they were wrong.
    • Insane Taxes were used during reconstruction to begger most of the wealthy members of southern society. Carpetbaggers were able to come in and reap huge profits because they got govt subsidies paid for by special taxes against the southern land owners. In Firefly it seems smuggling is profitable not just because the product is illegal, but because it's got obscene import taxes on it.
    • flat out harrasment of former soldiers - check
    • placing unelected officials in charge of some of the southern states. Seems to also be the case w/ Firefly
    It's one of the major reasons people from the south moved west during that period - they were looking for their freedom. Just because someone can draw parallels to the US Cival War, doesn't mean that it's about the same excuses. The cival war was never really about slavery - not at it's heart - it was about Federal vs State authority. It just happened to be slavery that catalized the issue.
  72. Please Watch the SciFi Channel. Please! by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

    Or next thing you know, it'll become the "All Wrasslin, All the Time" channel... at least, that is, until it morphs into a cooking channel.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  73. Why you won't see any more Firefly made... by Churla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ol Mr Joss there has a formula. Look at Buffy, look at Angel, and look at where Firefly was heading. He was planting seeds in teh first 11 episodes for several aroty arcs all of which would take a season on their own right.

    a) What did they really do to River? (i.e. operative comes to hunt River down)
    b) How do we "fix" River so she can be a normal girl/woman? (i.e. deprogram her once the big issue is out of her head, leading to..)
    c) Where did the reavers come from?
    d) How/when will Dr Tam and Kaylee hook up (possible the jumping of the shark moment)

    Those were basically 3-4 SEASONS of episodes, once you sprinkled in the side arc and humor episodes. Instead the series got cancelled. But then he got to make a movie. Realizing this was probably the last hurrah for Firefly he packs ALL of A-D into one movie.

    To pick up Firefly now would effectively be about season 4 or 5. By that point in a Whedon series you have started to add in the "random new bigbad for this season" and have started killing off loved characters randomly (which he ALSO crammed into the movie already, maybe we're on season 6).

    In other words.. don't hold your breath.

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
    1. Re:Why you won't see any more Firefly made... by Rifter13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot: Who in the hell is Book. He has a LOT of insider knowlege. There is another season, there.

      You also forgot, Mal and Inara. Kind of like d, above. :)

    2. Re:Why you won't see any more Firefly made... by Churla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good point about Book. But I am willing to place bets Book would have been the foreshadowed version of what would happen/become of the operative they sent after her in the movie. Basically Book is a glimpse 15 years into the future of the operative. (Whedon loves the occasional "it's all a big circle" story)

      As a side note, it pissed my wife off to no ends with what happened to Book in the movie. I thought she was going to build a pipe bomb for Mr Whendon after the untimey demise of a certain other character...

      --
      I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
    3. Re:Why you won't see any more Firefly made... by Rifter13 · · Score: 1

      Yea, my wife and I were not happy about that, either. *sigh*

    4. Re:Why you won't see any more Firefly made... by Churla · · Score: 1

      I have dual replying....

      But I was mentioning this with a buddy at work. He came up with a completely Whedonesque explanation.

      Early (from Objects in space) and the operative (from the movie) were clones from a batch. Take a wild guess who the original/prototype of the cloning would have been.

      --
      I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
    5. Re:Why you won't see any more Firefly made... by Ezel · · Score: 1

      argh! Spoiler-alert! I know it's an old series but I still havn't seen it!

      --
      Prosp long and liver.
  74. Firefly (in HD)starts on Universal HD on Sept 24th by gc3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Firefly will start airing on Universal HD (in HD obviously) on September 24th @ 9PM ET (SERENITY - PART 1 & 2).

    More importantly, Universal HD also airs the new Battlestar Galactica in HD on Sunday's at 8PM ET and 11PM ET.

    http://www.universalhd.com/

    George C.

  75. Happy birthday to me by amigabill · · Score: 1

    That just happens to be my birthday. Thank you SciFi!

  76. Re:Firefly?? by dctoastman · · Score: 1

    I was just alluding to the fact that Firefly may have been "too Western" (in multiple ways) for some people. Plus, I find people to be a lot more forgiving of "anime" in general. Especially the retards who equate anything Japan with quality. (Not saying anything against Cowboy Bebop, it is an excellent series with a very solid story laced throughout.)

  77. Don't PVR, BUY THE DVDs!!! by multimediavt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you EVER want to see this show resurrected (I certainly would), then PVR recording the marathon is not the way to go. Buy the DVDs!!! They're not that expensive, you get all the shows, plus a few extra goodies, and the studio execs get a reason to talk to Joss Whedon about bringing it back! Money talks, PVR-ing just puts another coffin nail in.

  78. Re:Firefly?? by theStorminMormon · · Score: 1

    The original point was this: Also the Spacecowboy thing didn't appeal anyone outside the US.

    If you're just saying it might have been too much of a Western thing, I suppose that's different. I don't really know enough about Firefly's reception outside the US to comment. I just wanted to point out that Westerns may have originated as the prototypical American genre, but that doesn't mean other people don't appreciate the genre.

    I find people to be a lot more forgiving of "anime" in general

    Understatement of the year! I've never been a fan of anime, but my friend has been getting me to watch a bunch during lunch at work. I'd seen a few in the past (e.g. Akira) and thought they were OK. I realy liked "Nausicaa", but that didn't seem to be "anime" by most people's standards.

    So we started with Cowboy Bepop and I like it a lot. Then we watched Trigun and I nearly strangled him. The first episode has to be the most painful 25 minutes of TV I've ever sat through. The rest of the series was very uneven, with some good parts but also incredibly poor animation, worse dialogue (we're talking subtitles, not dubbed) and even more pathetic attempts to use Christian symbolism the writers clearly didn't really get. The sad part is that my friend, who'd seen it through anime-tinted glasses originally, can't seem to like it as much as he used to having seen it through my eyes.

    We're onto Macross Plus now, and it seems OK, but I think that - like with a lot of sci fi - the nerds just completely lose their sense of critical appreciation when you throw eye-candy their way (defining eye-candy as either nubile young anime girls or even just spaceships and kung-fu). Same thing for intellectual fodder - the candy seems to be enough for most people. Kind of depressing, really.

    -stormin

    --
    The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
  79. I think you are way off about the DVD sales by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just checked again on the list of bestselling DVDs on Amazon. The Firefly set is ranked at #59. That may not sound impressive, except consider the following:
    This is about as low as I've seen its rank, as the interest is gradually fading. They update this list HOURLY, and I've checked on it quite frequently over the past year or so. It sat consistently in the top 20 for most of that year. The other thing is that DVDs come and go from that bestseller list frequently. The ones on there now are not the ones that were there 3 months ago, or 6 months ago, or a year ago. And yet Firefly has been on there all that time, mostly in the top 20. The Serenity movie was hanging in there about 10 spots lower than Firefly through most of that time.

    There are some pretty impressive amounts of sales going on for it to sit in the best selling list that long. Also, I don't think the point is lost on the network people that this show has managed to build up a following much bigger after it was gone and off the air than it ever had in its short life. That shows that it's not just the hype and publicity and TV ads for it that are keeping up interest for it. It is actually people being introduced to the show by friends and loving it and telling others about it--THREE YEARS AFTER IT WAS CANCELLED!

    I have been listening to a podcast about the Firefly universe called The Signal. One of the things they broadcast was an interview with Jewel Staite, who played Kaylee. She mentioned that the rights deal they signed for the making of Serenity options the cast for a trilogy of movies. Joss and Universal's deal to get those rights from Fox included that they cannot make more of the TV series for 10 years (from the cancellation in 2003). They do, however, have full rights to keep making movies. Also, if it does well, they could offer to buy out the remainder of that 10 years from Fox if they really wanted to.

    If anything is going to float this boat, I think it will be the very strong DVD sales, which are already showing. They could even make more episodes to release straight to DVD. That probably wouldn't qualify as a TV show, so they could do that without running afoul of the Fox deal.

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    1. Re:I think you are way off about the DVD sales by mfrank · · Score: 1

      This is the time of year when TV show DVD sets are released, to get people interested in the new season. Notice how many of those DVDs on the best seller list are just-released episode sets? In a couple months Firefly will be back up to 20 or 30.

  80. OH COME ON.... by no_pets · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Come on, most people that care already have the DVDs and Firefly is just another great sci-fi show that was cancelled just like a bunch before it. On Labor Day Sci-Fi ran marathons of Dark Angel which was my favorite show back in the day just as Firefly was. Guess what, Dark Angel isn't going to be making a comeback and neither is Firefly. Yeah, sure maybe in 20 years they will remake it just as they did Battlestar Galactica but I'm not going to sit in the basement with my 20-sided die and wait.

    I've seen Firefly a bunch on my DVDs but I'm to the point now that I probably won't bother to take it off the shelf and pop it into the DVD player to see it *BUT* if I'm flipping channels and it's on I'll probably watch. *AND* if it's a marathon *AND* there isn't anything else on Sci-Fi probably just gained some extra viewers for that day.

    That is it. No conspiracy, no ulterior motives to bring back the series or even another movie. *PERIOD*

    --
    "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
  81. SciFi the new Spike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both the SciFi and G4 networks seem to have abandoned their original mission, and now seem to want to be Spike TV for the still-living-at-home set. G4 killed the Screen Savers, went all gaming, all the time, then started playing stale frat-boy left overs like the Man Show. SciFi never really focused on much of anything, but with the wrestling crap seems intent on moving past its geek audience to something more advertiser friendly. With 500 channels, why does all cable programming have to converge to the same half dozen formats?

  82. Why can't people use common sense? by doodlebumm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Advertising is the reason that the studios want to have DRM-and-no-commercial-skip viewers for their on-line-available content. I'm not opposed to having the commercials in the downloaded versions. I think that if they were smart, they'd have 5 second commercials (not long enough to skip, but short enough to not be bothersome) or "really good commercials" that people want to watch. It's the obnoxious commercials that we all hate. If there were 24 5-second commercials sprinkled throughout an hour and 2 really great commercials that were worth watching, they could probably sell the time for much more, because people would probably see them, instead of channel surfing for a few minutes, or getting up and going to the frig or potty. Four extra minutes in a 45 minute show would be fine. Everyone would win. The advertisers would have their commercials seen. The studios would get their advertising money. The people would get their programming. If they charged people $1.00 for an early download of the show (before the free version is made available, like two days before - If you just have to see what happens on Lost before the rest of the office), that would supplement things a little more, and people would not have to shell out $3.99 for a show, and they wouldn't have to use a DRMed, crappy, viewer. And they could use Windows, MacOS, Linux, iPod, PSP, whatever...

    Can't people use a little common sense to come up with alternatives for the current tv model that isn't working for everyone? Give everyone what they want, but do it so that no one is feeling the pain. Common Sense!!!

    1. Re:Why can't people use common sense? by Randseed · · Score: 1
      It's the obnoxious commercials that we all hate.

      Head-on! Apply directly to the forehead!

      Head-on! Apply directly to the forehead!

      Head-on! Apply directly to the forehead!

      *gunshot* *sparks fly*

  83. I know this must be redundant but I couldn't .... by mofag · · Score: 0

    ... find it elsewhere so I'll say it: Its not the entire season of Firefly. There's five episodes missing. Does anybody know why this is?

  84. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out this link. It has a line by line comparison of our constitution and that of the CSA. Few rights are granted to the states, but many are taken away, not the least of which the ability to ban slaveholding. State's rights, while a true cause for some, is much more often an excuse to allow laws in some states that can't gain traction in the federal government. (see abortion) Those same people will turn around and when it's convienient, attempt to pass federal legislation for issues previously defined as "states rights" issues. (see gay marriage)

  85. B7 by GileadGreene · · Score: 1
    Back to the topic, Firefly is unusual, politically. It's hard to think of an SF show that's that libertarian.
    There's always Blake's 7. Of course, Firefly was influenced by B7 (Joss Whedon apparently watched B7 while he was at university in the UK), so I guess it's not surprising that there're some parallels in themes.
  86. Why I said PVR by kulakovich · · Score: 2

    Because I have the boxed set, and too many people to loan it too.

    And because the more people that see it and enjoy it, the more likely this momentum will continue to build and there will be new seasons.

    Let's face it: Some shows have had more seasons than they should, while this show was put down with many years ahead of it. Sure, it wasn't for everyone, but Joss has left it open to a little creative re-working. There are character openings, and an opportunity to make Serenity a little less goose like in profile.

    To be blunt: if SciFi wants money, they need to invest in this show. Buy it off Fox, and spin three seasons of Joss's production payroll. Look at the Trek phenomenon's origins as a lesson in profit if nothing else.

    kulakovich

    1. Re:Why I said PVR by Rifter13 · · Score: 1

      In all honesty, friends have had my copy of Firefly for more time, than it has spent at my house. Firefly has legs, they just havenot really been given the opportunity to stretch.

  87. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
    Comparing Firefly/Serenity to the South in the Civil war is one of the more whacked out things I've ever heard.
    You have to be blind to fail to see the comparison, even down to the design of the clothing, the accents and the music.

    A show where the entire premise is, arguably, about freedom?
    So you think the people fighting for the South thought they weren't fighting for freedom? Do you imagine that when some redneck sticks a Confederate flag onto the side of his pickup it's saying anythig other than "I'm free to stick whatever the fuck I like onto my truck"?

    The world isn't this simple black and white place. It's prefectly legitimate for writers to draw on the romanticism of the antebellum South without themselves becoming...oooohhh...completely evil.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  88. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by Darkfell · · Score: 1

    actually, i believe that it parallels the war of independence much more
    than the civil war. brown coats as compared to red coats, the colonies
    fighting for their freedom, it speaks for itsself. the show certainly dips
    into a southern feel with the speach patterns, and slang but your statement
    of racisim is pretty much retarded. the show almost continuously preaches about
    personal freedom. oh and not to mention the highly empowered black woman
    who married the wimpy geek of a pilot white guy who worships the ground
    she walks on. even if it is littered with bodies.

  89. Firefly Chinese != Real Chinese by jiawen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the only people who understood that Chinese were the scriptwriters... The Chinese in Firefly makes no sense. See my corrections and notes.

    1. Re:Firefly Chinese != Real Chinese by CompGeek01 · · Score: 1

      Or buy the DVDs and find out that the woman who translated *is* fluent in Chinese and has friends living in Taiwan (IIRC) who helped her use current slang and vocabulary. I'd rather believe that then someone who claims to be "basically fluent in Mandarin".

    2. Re:Firefly Chinese != Real Chinese by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      It's not the people who wrote the actual Chinese, it's the fact that the actors weren't fluent and basically botched the pronunciation.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    3. Re:Firefly Chinese != Real Chinese by jiawen · · Score: 1

      There's this thing called modesty, see...

      You can, of course, believe who you want to believe. But please don't try to use the Firefly version of "May monkeys fly out of my butt" with any Chinese people. Or at least, don't say anything to me when they run away screaming from the crazy laowai who speaks such bizarre Mandarin...

      See, the thing is, Joss asked her to translate what he wrote, not to come up with cool original phrases in Chinese. Those things may have made some sense in English, but Joss' nifty turns of phrase don't make any sense in Mandarin. She may have used some slang, but quite often, she was trying for a literal translation of Joss' cool English, not going for the feel of the words. Firefly's scriptwriting sounds great in English, but when you translate literally, it loses its cultural context and sounds... well, bizarre. If I said to you "You're just cutting the boat where you lost your sword" or "You're as beautiful as Yang Guifei" or "Don't be so motorcycle", you'd probably have very little idea what I was talking about. It's not that those aren't completely appropriate phrases in Mandarin, but in English, they lose context and therefore lose meaning. Joss Whedon is an amazing writer in English, but if you take his words and literally translate them into Mandarin, they frequently make no sense.

      Look, I love Firefly. It's one of my favorite series ever. Serenity is also up there. But I recognize that it has faults, as does everything. I'm not trying to say Firefly is crap. It isn't. But their Mandarin was poorly handled. If you can't accept that, I think you have too much invested in your love of Firefly.

    4. Re:Firefly Chinese != Real Chinese by sukotto · · Score: 1

      In one of the DVD commentaries, Joss said that they did their best to use modern street Chinese as spoken in Taiwan (? Hong Kong?) using everyday slang and swearing.

      Perhaps the reason it's so hard to understand is because it's from a different region than yourself and/or non-fluent actors reading from a phonetic script?

      Not understanding any Chinese other than "San Yut Fi Doh" and "Sheh sheh" (sp?) I think I'll be bookmarking your site :-)

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
  90. It's not really that great a show. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Myth'd every episode, but only got through the first 3 or so before the premise got boring and the acting stale. Why exactly do people like this show so much? I don't get it.

  91. Why this is news: Starflight, Privateer, Echelon.. by kulakovich · · Score: 2

    This is news for Nerds. Stuff that matters.

    If you have derived enjoyment from the space opera/trading game genre, then you will most likely enjoy Firefly - and you may not know that until you read it here. Joss Whedon has done a terrific job capturing the nature of these games, intentional or not. There are many other reasons to enjoy Firefly, this is just one. That SciFi is making a boost on this show again is worthy of note if you are science fiction fan of any sort.

    kulakovich

  92. Why? Because neeboo nungba dee'enboh jee'en d'ola! by kulakovich · · Score: 1


    "You can not stop the signal." =)

    kulakovich

    /guessing that simplified didn't show up but the pinyin did
    //found at serenityfirefly.com

  93. Meh. Unless.......... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    Why would I want to watch this when I have all the eps on DVD, so I can have them:
    * in the creator-intended viewing order
    * commercial-free
    * with digital sound (though DD5.1 mix like HBO series' would be nice)
    * with extra features
    * with episode commentaries
    ?

    Unless, of course, SciFi is gauging whether or not to bring the series back into production.

    Hmm.

  94. No Problem by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    I don't have a problem with sci-fi enthusiasts clinging to older sci-fi some of it was indeed brilliant but I think it's sad when I hear them avoiding new franchises out of love for the old ones.

    I don't like people complaining when the universes differ, that's part of sci-fi.

    Anyway Eureka and Battlestar Galactica will be back soon...

    And for action sci-fiers there's Dark Angel which many Firefly enthusiasts in particular seem to feel is totally anaethema.

  95. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by curecollector · · Score: 1

    brown coats as compared to red coats

    Shouldn't that read "brown coats as compared to the Continental Army"?

    Other than that, I completely agree with you...

  96. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I can't see "Firefly" as anything other than southern/racist propaganda for the wrong side in the Civil War.
    May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.
  97. An entire season of Firefly? by Sikkukut · · Score: 1
    First off, it's not an entire season--there are four episodes not being shown ("Trash," "The Message," "Heart of Gold," and "Objects in Space"), three of which were not aired originally, if memory serves. Second, an entire season? There's only the one... not even complete, at that. You have to rub it in?

    See, browncoats aren't rabid... we're just pedantic.

  98. Both shows are good by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    but the only similarity is that Morena Baccarin is in both.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  99. Re:Racist, south-loving swill by Sikkukut · · Score: 1
    actually, i believe that it parallels the war of independence much more than the civil war. brown coats as compared to red coats, the colonies fighting for their freedom, it speaks for itsself.
    Except... Firefly's browncoats were the colonists, whereas history's redcoats were the colonizers... And the browncoats lost, whereas the American colonists won. So really, the main similarity is that one side in each conflict was referred to by the color of their coats.

    Meanwhile, Joss has specifically cited reading Gettysburg as an inspiration for Firefly ("That, of course, made me think of the Millenium Falcon, because most things do."), and the parallels with ex-Confederates moving West to start anew are quite obvious.

    That said, in the world of Firefly, slavery is at least tolerated by the ruling authority, and it isn't racially motivated. Indeed, race is never explicitly or even implicitly mentioned in Firefly, and slavery is never linked with the war in any way. So while Firefly is obviously drawing on American history, dismissing it as Confederate appologia is absurd given the racial and gender equality presented in the show.

    One of the things I love about Firefly is that it has adherents all over the political spectrum, and I've heard it dismissed as hopelessly biased both to the left (sexual freedom, distrust of the "rich and fancible") and to the right (guns as way of life, distrust of big government). It's interesting to note, of course, that Serenity got a lot of really positive reviews on Libertarian web sites...

  100. Marathon? by BryanL · · Score: 1

    Marathon? More like a 5K.

  101. I have not seen Firefly, and I will not watch. by indigozeal · · Score: 1
    I've had enough of the damn program through the internet - someone's browbeating everyone to watch and worship it in every other message-board thread online. I know Firefly as the program of choice of shrill, threadjacking zealots; why would I watch?


    I understand you want more viewers, but you Firefly fans are making yourselves into the Jehovah's Witnesses of the Web.

  102. Re:Firefly?? by mikeron · · Score: 1

    Thin ice, my friend.

  103. "an entire season of Firefly" by Eil · · Score: 1

    I think you mean the entire season of Firefly.

  104. Why I won't be watching by beaverfever · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really enjoy good sci-fi, but I will not watch anything which is sci-fi just for the sake of it being sci-fi. I am more interested in a quality piece of entertainment than in indulging the genre itself.

    I watched a bit of Firefly because it was hyped so much, but to be honest I thought it was just as clichéd as 95% of the rest of the sci-fi tv shows/movies out there and I gave up on it. Perhaps it was marginally better or marginally more imaginative than most shows, but when a genre's fans start celebrating slight improvements or changes as if they were quantum leaps of imagination, then I think there is a problem.

    Besides Firefly itself, sci-fi fans keep looking backwards (which funnily enough goes against the premise of being a sci-fi fan), and sinking more and more time and money into the old standards like Star Wars and Star Trek. Think about this; Star Trek/Wars are still at the pinnacle of sci-fi creativity, and they are 40 and 30 years old respectively. At what point do Star Trek/Wars become inherently too old? By its nature, sci-fi shouldn't be stuck in the same creative rut as the western movie genre is. How long will it be until really new ideas surface?

    Sci-fi publishing is in marginally better shape with some creative ideas being presented, but there doesn't seem to be the same crossover from printed fiction to cinema in sci-fi the way there is in mainstream fiction. Why is this? Do sci-fi fans read?

    For myself, an important part of sci-fi is imagination, and sci-fi tv/movies are no longer imaginative (there is some product which has imaginative concepts but suffers from poor plot/production/other dismal flaws). Sci-fi is a sick animal with its head up its ass, eating its own shit, proclaiming how delicious and nutritious it is. I would think more sci-fi fans would look forward to the day when something fresh comes along.

  105. DVD sales. by I+am+Jack's+username · · Score: 1

    See the daily Amazon.com ranking since 2003-07-22 at fff. The market for new straight to DVD episodes would be huge.

  106. Oooh, Amazon tracker--shiny! by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

    Thank you very much for the link to that sales tracker page. That was the information I really wanted, and I didn't know that had been stored somewhere. That is awesome, and I'm keeping that link.

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds