Slashdot Mirror


Virgin Atlantic Bans Dell, Apple Laptops

TechFreep writes, "Amid a slew of incidents involving exploding Sony batteries, Virgin Atlantic announced that it won't allow passengers to use batteries in any Apple or Dell laptops on flights. The announcement, posted on Virgin's website, said that passengers may carry on the laptop itself, but batteries must be properly wrapped and stowed away in carry-on for the duration of the flight. However, the airline provided no details as to what proper wrapping entails. For those who wish to use a laptop while on the plane, Virgin plans to provide power adapters on flights where outlets are available." Will Virgin allow on board exploding Sony batteries in IBM ThinkPads?

205 comments

  1. Seat power outlets by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Virgin plans to provide power adapters on flights where outlets are available."

    Well, this is the problem with most flights, particularly those that last longer than 3 or 4 hours. Specifically, there are simply not enough power outlets in the seats. So, if the airlines want to ban laptop batteries, and they want to maintain business, how about installing more power outlets? Its sad, but a classic case of airline security taking care of the problem after the problem has been identified and dealt with rather than being proactive in their plans. What this sort of behavior is doing, along with all of the other lame security procedures like taking off belts, shoes and sandals is simply making airline travel more onerous.

    I can't tell you how frustrating it is to have to try and work on a flight after security delays of sometimes hours have meant getting on board with a laptop battery that is drained only to find out there is no power port on board the flight. Even worse, on several Delta flights where they were *supposed* to have power outlets in the seats, they have been non-functional.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Seat power outlets by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "getting on board with a laptop battery that is drained"

      Easily solved. I carry a spare,charged battery. While waiting in terminals, I plug in my wall wart and run from that while keeping my Thinkpad charged, minimizing battery use.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Seat power outlets by krunk4ever · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um... If there are power outlets, just bring along a surge protector and guess what, now you can share! I don't know how much power each outlet can output, but I'm more than certain it can do more than 1 laptop per outlet.

    3. Re:Seat power outlets by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Sure, I carry a couple of batteries, but that only buys you 3-4 hours. What if the flight is an international flight?

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    4. Re:Seat power outlets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure, I carry a couple of batteries, but that only buys you 3-4 hours. What if the flight is an international flight?
      Get a more efficent laptop for traveling, sleep, or just watch the inflight movies. I never carry a Computer during my International Summer Travels (I stay more than 30days) and I survive.
    5. Re:Seat power outlets by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 2, Informative
      I don't know how much power each outlet can output, but I'm more than certain it can do more than 1 laptop per outlet.

      Don't count on that. The last one I used (on a new Air Canada Embraer 190) had only enough power available to charge the battery *or* run the laptop (a Dell D610).

      Until the battery was fully charged, I had to leave the laptop turned off or else the breaker would trip every 2 minutes.

    6. Re:Seat power outlets by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      You would be mistaken about that certainty. First off, it's not a 120V three prong plug like you're used to using at home, but rather, a car lighter type socket.

      Technically you could go to AC, split it, and have two or more people connect into a power strip, but there are some serious amperage limits, which will be made worse by the loss of going from DC to AC and back to DC again -- If you have a bit of a power hungry notebook to begin with, you'll often need to remove the battery as the socket may not be able to both run your computer and charge the battery at the same time.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    7. Re:Seat power outlets by GNU(slash)Nickname · · Score: 1

      Not all planes use 12V sockets. The Embraer supplies 120VAC in a "universal" socket configuration. You can plug US style 2 or 3 prong plugs in, as well as European 2 prong ones, and probably others.

    8. Re:Seat power outlets by timeOday · · Score: 0, Troll

      Now you're just begging for somebody to brag about their laptop... I flew all the way from New Mexico to Taiwan on battery power with my T40 Thinkpad. Three 9 cell batteries, and each battery lasts for 5 hours. I gotta have my fix :)

    9. Re:Seat power outlets by nxtw · · Score: 1

      Get a better laptop. With the additional 12-cell battery plus the internal 6-cell, my laptop has an estimated battery life of 16 hours (6 on the internal, 10 on the additional). That'd probably work out to 10 hours or so while playing a movie.

    10. Re:Seat power outlets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lufthansa has 110V plugs. On a 747 (old-style LH business class), my Dell D600 with 65W AC adapter started tripping the breaker halfway through the flight.

      Given that I was on a Honolulu->LAX->Frankfurt flight, I did just give up and go to sleep. I was haunted by dreams that I had not adequately exploited the $23 of WiFi access I paid for.

      Guess I won't have that problem any more.

    11. Re:Seat power outlets by dindi · · Score: 1

      hmm, while mi toshiba dies in 1 hour, my new HP lasts for 4+ hours, using wireless, browsing the net, and dong stuff ..... i guess reading a document, or similar would make it for 4.5 hours (official battery time) while wathcing a movie would drain it in 3 hours ....

      still 2 batteries will fly you to europe, and somehow I always find an airport plug to leach some free juice into my devices (no one ever came up to me telling not to use an outlet) :)

      my point is : i have a good and a shitty laptop, get one that is decent and 2 spare batteries and they will get you 10-12+ hours comfortably ....

      get a small laptop (12'' ibook) and it will last forever ...

      now on the safety issue: i understand any of the companies forbidding faulty laptops. Yhouse burst-in flame videos are scary enough in an apartment, I do not want to see them on a flight :(

    12. Re:Seat power outlets by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      The majority of power outlets I've seen on international flights are 120VAC outlets.

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    13. Re:Seat power outlets by rynthetyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heck, I flew all the way to India, didn't get let off the plane for 18 hours (security in London was extra tight because it was right after the subway bombings so they wouldn't let us off during the refueling stop), and I had nothing but a book and an old portable CD player to keep me entertained. Wasn't the most pleasant plane trip, but I survived, and not only that, came home smarter because I ran out of books in the middle of the trip and found A Brief History of Time in a bookstore (it made surprisingly good travel reading). People who feel the need to drag their computers along on vacation miss out on the benefits that come from reading a good book while traveling.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    14. Re:Seat power outlets by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bring a book! You can fit four to six good paperback books in the space taken up by a laptop.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    15. Re:Seat power outlets by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2
      if the airlines want to ban laptop batteries, and they want to maintain business

      Like it or not, people are not going to not travel if they can't use a laptop on the flight.

    16. Re:Seat power outlets by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Funny
      hmm, while mi toshiba dies in 1 hour, my new HP lasts for 4+ hours, using wireless, browsing the net, and dong stuff
      I don't know what airlines you fly but most won't let you use your dong in the cabin.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    17. Re:Seat power outlets by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      True, but they do weigh a lot more. For travelling, I now primarily use my Nokia 770 as an eBook reader. It is small enough to fit in a jacket pocket, has a gorgeous screen, and the battery lasts across the Atlantic. Combined with a quick visit to Project Gutenberg, it's a good way of providing my literary fix.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    18. Re:Seat power outlets by sjf · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it is more likely that companies will change their purchasing policies to exclude Apple and Dell if this remains anything more than a temporary measure.

    19. Re:Seat power outlets by Eunuchswear · · Score: 0

      Dump the thinkpad, get a VAIO TX3 (5-6 hours on 1 standard battery).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    20. Re:Seat power outlets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People might be more tempted to travel by rail (for non-transoceanic journeys). This does of course depend on the length of the run; London to Glasgow (typically 5 hours by rail) would be a prime candidate for rail substitution, at least if the service is improved (say to a 60 minute frequency all-day), while London to Athens (typically 49 hours) or New York to Los Angeles (typically 68 hours) are probably still best done aeronautically. I suspect that the threshold between air being preferable and rail being preferable would increase from about three hours to about five hours (maybe even as long as six hours).

      Admittedly, Virgin Atlantic do not operate flights short enough for business passengers to seriously consider surface alternatives (few passengers would choose to travel by freighter or QMII liner just so they can use a laptop). However, airlines running flights between points less than about 1000 km apart (this reduces to about 700 km in the UK and USA as their rail networks are slower, less frequent and less efficient, and reduces further for journeys involving crossing stretches of water without the benefit of a bridge or tunnel) may have more serious concerns.

    21. Re:Seat power outlets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >most won't let you use your dong in the cabin.

      Isn't that what the Mile High upgrade is for???

    22. Re:Seat power outlets by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Well, this is the problem with most flights, particularly those that last longer than 3 or 4 hours. Specifically, there are simply not enough power outlets in the seats.

      For some airlines, this is completely intentional. If they put outlets only in business class, then people who are making money from laptop use will share that money with the airlines. This screws the people who can't justify paying $50-200 per hour for an outlet and a big chair, of course. But given the precarious financial conditions of the airlines since 9/11, I imagine that doesn't keep them up nights.

    23. Re:Seat power outlets by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 1

      From what limited experience I have with airplane power outlets, it appears that Boeing prefers the car style power adapters (15VDC) while Airbus prefers standards real power outlets with AC. Don't know why that is.

    24. Re:Seat power outlets by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      It is probably based on the electrical systems already on the plane -- And I tend to fly Boeing, which is why I've not seen the 120V systems anywhere myself.

      What's the amperage like on the 120V systems?

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    25. Re:Seat power outlets by Kijori · · Score: 1

      What laptop do you have? I thought mine was good, and it only gets 4.5 - 5 depending on usage. (That's on the rather measly internal)

    26. Re:Seat power outlets by dindi · · Score: 1

      i meant at the airport, use plugs at the airport,

      than use your spare batteries during the flight ...
      i flu last time in 2002 with my laptop though, but i know that my hp packs 4 hours on a battery, so 2 makes a 8hour flight bearable ,,,

      but hey ! isn't it nice to not stare at a monitor once in a while ?

    27. Re:Seat power outlets by rthille · · Score: 1

      My wife and I got to use my dong on a flight to Hawaii before we were married. Of course that was before all the heightened security. Now I think you have to use the restroom one at a time...

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    28. Re:Seat power outlets by Osiris+Ani · · Score: 1
      People who feel the need to drag their computers along on vacation...

      ...often really has little to do with this issue.

      98% of my time spent on planes is for business travel. I work from home and the occasional remote customer site or disaster recovery facility. WHen I travel, the rest of my job doesn't just magically disappear, so spending hours in transit should not mean that my productivity must drop, especially when most of that time is spent sitting down.

  2. Outrageous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dell I can understand. However there have been no reported cases of Apple laptops causing any risk to an airplane. I hereby announce a boycott of Virgin Atlantic air lines until this idiotic policy is reversed and Virgin gets back on the cluetrain.

    If action is not taken within 24 hours I may have to start an Internet petition to augment my activist efforts here so described.

    1. Re:Outrageous. by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are no cases of Dell laptops causing risks to airplanes either, are there? Both varieties of laptops have certain models which use exploding Sony batteries, which is the heart of the issue. Why are the Apple laptops different in this circumstance? Or are you just on the Dell-bashing and/or Apple-loving bandwagon(s)?

    2. Re:Outrageous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT

    3. Re:Outrageous. by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 0, Troll

      TFSTO

    4. Re:Outrageous. by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      On top of that, what's the risk? How many have exploded? Something like one in a million? And how bad are the explosions?

      Something tells me it's a lot riskier to let pilots fly without a blood test.

    5. Re:Outrageous. by devilspgd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How often do you fly on Virgin? Do you have any status there (awarded due to mileage?) If not, do you think they'll care?

      As far as the internet petition, those tend to be worth the paper they're printed on, so I'm sure the airline will care there too.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    6. Re:Outrageous. by m85476585 · · Score: 1

      That's because on airplanes people use laptops on their laps (I haven't seen a tray table that doesn't force you to tilt the screen at an unconfortable angle (except in busines class)), so they notice the heat (hopefully) before their battery catches on fire, and shut it down.

    7. Re:Outrageous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, there's no reason to ban every single one. My laptop right now is a Dell Latitude CP, made around 1998, and I have yet for the batteries to explode (or anything else unusual to happen, which is especially interesting seeing as it's missing a panel on the bottom, I've dropped it several times, and not to mention who knows what kind of abuse it went through before my aunt gave it to me!) Seems almost like racism really, or maybe we should say "brandism" or something equally cheesy?

    8. Re:Outrageous. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      [sarcasm] No, instead we should train airport security / checkin officials to recognise different battery batches, or have them bookmark each and every manufacturer's various battery pages to see if a particular battery is 'at risk'... [/sarcasm]

    9. Re:Outrageous. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I will be flying Virgin Atlantic in just under two weeks, and I own an Apple PowerBook. I tend not to use it on flights though, so it's not a huge problem for me. From the wording, I should be able to keep the machine with me, turned off, without any problems, which is all I really want to do.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:Outrageous. by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1

      Or are you just on the Dell-bashing and/or Apple-loving bandwagon(s)?

      I believe he is employing what is commonly referred to as sarcasm. This unique form of humor seems to be lost on many netizens, especially those on certain tech forums.

    11. Re:Outrageous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell just has sold significantly more Laptops, including such with affected batteries than Apple. Apple on the other hand has a much worse quota of defective batteries to latops sold than Dell, so you are actually less safe sitting besides an Apple than sitting besides a Dell.

    12. Re:Outrageous. by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      And what do people do if they have Dell/Apple laptops without batteries from the bad lots?

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
    13. Re:Outrageous. by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      I apparently posted that at 6:54 AM. Clearly I shouldn't be posting until I'm well awake. I got a nice modding for it though ;)

  3. Meh. by eosp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Closing the barn door after the horse is long gone.

  4. Wow great by Alb_Be · · Score: 1

    Is this a real security issue or does Virgin just want to ruin the other companys' images?

  5. Will they work without the battery? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

    I know my ancient sony will not work without the battery inserted. And I cant even figure out how to get the battery out of my brothers new HP.

    1. Re:Will they work without the battery? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Ah never mind the comment abou tthe HP, just found the release button. An it does work without the battery. Is my sony one of the few that cannot run without the battery?

    2. Re:Will they work without the battery? by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      I would think so. Even my ancient 1996ish P266 Compaq laptop works without a battery when connected to the power.

    3. Re:Will they work without the battery? by nickheart · · Score: 1

      Yeah, i had an HP OmniBook 800 p133 and never once owned a battery for it. Always worked on AC.

    4. Re:Will they work without the battery? by TheRealStyro · · Score: 1

      I have an old NEC Versa 4080H laptop that is so old that Windows 98 barely runs with any speed. The thing has a completely dead battery but will only run on AC adapter. The thing is that the battery must be installed for the laptop to run. Strange design, but I don't really use it very much.

      I hope that laptop manufacturers have designed current models to be able to run using either battery or adapter power. I would hate to have to get an airline to give me and AC outlet capable of doing 120 watts so my current HP laptop would run (default battery life is about 90 minutes w/o CD/DVD activity, min HD activity and a very dimmed display).

      --
    5. Re:Will they work without the battery? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Fortunatly most laptop manufacturers gave up that "feature" around the time Mhz ratings started hitting triple digits.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    6. Re:Will they work without the battery? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The PowerBook has a small internal battery which allows it to run for a few minutes without mains power or the main battery present. The aim of this is to allow users to swap batteries out in the field.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Will they work without the battery? by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      It was my understanding that it only had a capacitor, to let you switch batteries without losing your time/date settings. I know my 12" alu powerbook won't let me switch out the power supply and battery at the same time, at least...

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
  6. translation by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

    However, the airline provided no details as to what proper wrapping entails

    Place the battery into a lead lined steel surrounded lockable box and ensure all regulation markings are placed upon the exterior (radiation warning labels).

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  7. I have heard of other airlines doing this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have heard of other airlines doing this and would love to take the chance to educate the flight attendent on how my battery is not going to explode anytime soon, so I'll have my laptop on, thankyouverymuch.

    Regardless of a number of equally stupid rules on air travel these days, I don't think this is likely to last very long, lawsuits incoming.

    1. Re:I have heard of other airlines doing this.. by canuck57 · · Score: 1

      Regardless of a number of equally stupid rules on air travel these days, I don't think this is likely to last very long, lawsuits incoming.

      Better than lawsuits, people will not fly.

      Me, I have had it being stranded in airports because some ditz didn't schedule a plane on time with a connecting flight. I will not forget the time I entered a plane in Chicago for Milwaukee and 5 minutes after the last bus went to Milwaukee they let us off the plane when they didn't have a pilot.

      I would rather drive down the highway with the CD cranked right up, the PC in the back and take a rest on my schedule not theirs.

      Makes me wonder if Pam Anderson has to check in her breasts as potentially dangerous chemicals. Seriously, terrorists will send in kids to blow up, why not a well endowed Muslim lady?

      I look at it this way, sooner or later the people are going to get tired of being treated worse than their broken baggage. I only use planes when I have to for business.

    2. Re:I have heard of other airlines doing this.. by raydobbs · · Score: 1

      I have taken this stance, and I *nearly* got the privledge to drive to my assignment to work... paid milage and all, but my boss wanted me there NOW, not in a day. Seriously though, my personal cash is NEVER going into the hands of the airlines ever again.

      Company is expensing everything, and if anything vital is broken on the trip - company is paying for it.

    3. Re:I have heard of other airlines doing this.. by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      You should of just rented a car and taken I-294 to Milwaukee

    4. Re:I have heard of other airlines doing this.. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      lawsuits incoming

      Hahahaha. Oh god, that's hilarious. Lawsuit? On the grounds that you cannot use your laptop on a flight? Oh, man, fucking priceless!

  8. Uninformed management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is worse. The batteries do not have to be in the computer to have this issue. It is better to have them in the plane where people are, so the possible fire could be put out. If a battery explodes in the cargo area where nobody is there to put it out, the outcome could be far more tragic! They should have done their research prior to mandating this change...

    (Unless their "proper packaging" includes automatic sprinkler systems)

    1. Re:Uninformed management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They said "stowed away in carry-on" and not check-in baggage which goes in cargo.

    2. Re:Uninformed management by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that jets are equipped with some sort of fire surpression system in the hold.

      Maybe another s/.er can confirm.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    3. Re:Uninformed management by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Unless you're on some of the short-haul jets (I don't think Virgin Airlines has any) -- its not uncommon for your carry-on baggage to be taken away at the gate and stuffed in the cargo hold and returned to you at the gate when you land.

    4. Re:Uninformed management by Goldfinger7400 · · Score: 1

      Can't wait for batteries stowed in the overhead bin that has the oxygen tanks to catch fire... >:)

    5. Re:Uninformed management by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      I'll admit that I don't fly regularly, but that's never happened to me, and furthermore it seems to defeat the purpose and definition of "carry-on" luggage.

    6. Re:Uninformed management by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      There are no oxygen tanks in the overhead bins, except for a handful of emergency air tanks used by flight attendants and perhaps oxygen in an emergency medical kit.

      The oxygen masks intended for emergency use by passengers are supplied by oxygen generators, which use a chemical reaction to generate oxygen. They get quite hot and will ignite anything combustible that comes in contact with the generator. Combine that with the additional oxygen, and you have a potential problem. For that reason, they are considered hazardous and are prohibited from being shipped in the cargo holds of airplanes.

      Oxygen generators contributed to an in-flight fire in the hold of a ValuJet plane a number of years ago. All passengers and crew perished in the subsequent crash.

    7. Re:Uninformed management by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      I would imagine that jets are equipped with some sort of fire surpression system in the hold.

      US airlines moved quickly to install fire suppression systems in their cargo hold after the ValuJet plane crash in 1996. Some airlines didn't even wait for the FAA to require it.

    8. Re:Uninformed management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note this is generally done on those small jets or turboprop planes carrying about >60 people

      Generally they steal the "carry-on" luggage for those idiots who carry full blown luggage on board and think it will fit on overhead compartment. I just want to scream at people, check that crap esp when they know they will be flying in small jets.

    9. Re:Uninformed management by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      I have seen bins on a plane that say oxygen equipment no storage or something like that.

    10. Re:Uninformed management by ubergamer1337 · · Score: 1

      And you should have done more reading before posting your response It says that the batteries must be put in the carry on, which goes on with you in the cabin, so the danger is at worst the same.

    11. Re:Uninformed management by polemon · · Score: 1

      Maybe put them into a compartement (or tray or something) where the flight attendants are, so it's monitored even at night flights.

      --
      EOF
    12. Re:Uninformed management by takev · · Score: 1

      Ehm, yes, but how would you actually put out a battery fire. I understand that even a fire fighter just tries to move the battery to a location where it can cause the least harm such as the center of a room and let it run out of fuel.
      I guess you would be able to put one in the center of a plane, try and remove all the seats around it. and hope it doesn't burn right through the floor.

    13. Re:Uninformed management by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Delta is really bad about it - they use the same size limits for carryons but their canadair regional jets don't have the same amount of space in their overhead compartments as their other aircraft do.

      Poor planning, really.

    14. Re:Uninformed management by jizmonkey · · Score: 1
      I'll admit that I don't fly regularly, but that's never happened to me, and furthermore it seems to defeat the purpose and definition of "carry-on" luggage.

      It means the TSA monkeys never get to paw through your luggage without you being there to watch them, and it means that your luggage won't miss the flight or be sent to Timbuktu.

      --
      With great power comes great fan noise.
    15. Re:Uninformed management by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      The latter part is why I only fly with carry-on if at all possible. My friend just came back from a trip with his family and had nothing to bring with him on a trip taken with me and a couple friends because all of his luggage was somewhere between the UK, the US, and God only knows.

      I'll glady wear a pair of pants twice if it means the pants will be in my possession the whole time.

  9. Shouldn't be a problem for apples by macadamia_harold · · Score: 5, Funny

    Amid a slew of incidents involving exploding Sony batteries, Virgin Atlantic announced that it won't allow passengers to use batteries in any Apple or Dell laptops on flights.

    That shouldn't be a problem for people with Apple machines. I hear those are capable of running solely on one's own sense of self-superiority.

    1. Re:Shouldn't be a problem for apples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh that's a good one. I have a mac user in one of my classes and your theory helps explain the remarkable battery life.

      Some linux fans really like tux. Here's a penguin joke:

      A vacationing penguin is driving through Arizona, when he notices that the oil-pressure light is on. He gets out to look, and sees oil dripping out of the motor. He drives to the nearest town and stops at the first gas station.

      After dropping the car off, the penguin goes for a walk around town. He sees an ice cream shop, and being a penguin in Arizona, decides that something cold would really hit the spot. He gets a big bowl of vanilla ice cream and sits down to eat. Having no hands, he makes a real mess trying to eat with his little flippers.

      After finishing his ice cream, he goes back to the gas station and asks the mechanic if he's found the problem.

      The mechanic looks up and says, "It looks like you blew a seal."

      "No, no," the penguin replies, "it's just vanilla ice cream."

  10. WTF, someone can't cause other laptops batteries.. by Locutus · · Score: 0

    to explode or burn in cascade? Ya, some Sony batteries might catch fire but NOBODY would EVER think of causing any other laptop battery to cascade. These 'experts' have no clue IMO and just wait til they find some attempt or information on an attempt. THEN they go and collect every instance of the offending material from passengers while they take a few months to figure out things like fingernail clippers are NOT a threat.

    Virgin should ban all laptop size batteries or any LiIon battery which is large enough to be uncontrollable in failure in the cabin or in cargo. IMO.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  11. OH GOD NO by bunions · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not an Internet Petition!! I mean, sure, they're terribly evil people, but let's not get crazy and do things we'll regret down the line. I'm sure there's less extreme ways to get your point across.

    --
    there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    1. Re:OH GOD NO by Megane · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there's less pathetic ways to get your point across.

      Fixed.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  12. Powerbook terrorist by viking2000 · · Score: 1

    I am sure a fire in the luggage section of the plane is so much easier to control than a fire in the cabin.

    Or is this rule to prevent someone from using the battery as a weapon? Powerbook terrorist: "Turn this plane around, or this battery will certainly explode"

    1. Re:Powerbook terrorist by SpectralDesign · · Score: 0

      Well, I didn't RTFA (of course) but this little gem from the summary says, "but batteries must be properly wrapped and stowed away in carry-on for the duration of the flight."

      Carry-on *would* be the cabin. But actually, wouldn't they be safer in the sub-zero-low-oxygen-cargo-hold, than in the cabin? (where perhaps a malicious individual could purposely cause just about *any* type of batter to go up in flames?)

      em/ holds breath waiting for the new FAA regulation re: batteries, knowing it will probably be measureable in nano-seconds

      --
      Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss
    2. Re:Powerbook terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is, there is no such things as a "sub-zero-low-oxygen-cargo-hold" in a passenger plane. In fact, most cargo planes these days are passenger planes and the crew is not isolated from the rest of the cargo behind. Think about the pressure issue...

  13. Re:Dear Apple fanatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never had a problem with my MacBook Pro. I've read of literally thousands of men with Dell laptops having problems. Frankly, I'd be happier if Dell laptops were just banned everywhere I go. My coffee shop, for example, does not permit Dells to be used unless their batteries are removed and placed behind the counter.

  14. Why not ban *all* batteries? by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why discriminate by brand and/or type of hardware being used? Any battery can be rigged to explode into flame simply by creating a short circuit. I learned this the hard way several years ago after sticking a coin into a AA battery port on one of those electronic kits. The coin super heated and starting making small flames near the batteries as the current flowed directly from the batteries and back without a load.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Why not ban *all* batteries? by sholden · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt your coin superheated. The chances that a pool of 5300F melted coin just made small flames seem vanishingly small...

    2. Re:Why not ban *all* batteries? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Obviously it's not about terrorism as you assumed. Somebody saw that flaming battery picture on the Internet, and thought that would be bad to have on a plane. But effective terrorist weapon? Hardly.

    3. Re:Why not ban *all* batteries? by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, pretty much any lithium-ion battery is extremely dangerious and flammable under the right conditions. The only thing preventing most batteries from bursting into flames is a tiny IC that controls the charge/discharge current of the battery. I've seen a video where your standard lithium-ion battery is punctured and the battery instantly starts bursting into flames. A reaction with atmosphere is all that is needed.

      Lead acid batteries on the other hand are even more dangerous, luckily, these are already banned, but I wouldn't be surprised if screeners missed them since they are too busy looking for bottles of water in your baggage.

    4. Re:Why not ban *all* batteries? by mkiwi · · Score: 3, Interesting
      In 2002 I went to a conference in San José California. It was a technology conference for young engeering students and had CEO's of many large companies (such as Intel) making speeches. We also toured Silicon Valley, got a chance to visit Apple, Cisco, etc. inside the buildings and we toured all the nearby Universities in the Bay Area, including Berkeley, UCSC, etc.


      I had a special item wish me- an ultra powerful rechargable battery-powered flashlight. I had not perfected the design (I had not even tried to design a case) and I ended up using high capacity handset batteries from Radio Shack to power the thing. All in all, there were about 51,000mWH of power strapped to what was little more than a assembly to hold the lights and a separate double-sided copper pcb that all the anode and cathode terminals were connected to.

      The thing worked great, it was incredibly bright (it used three high luminosity light bulbs), it just looked like a bomb. I mean, the little battery cells looked like mini sticks of dynamite ready to explode at any time.

      Only problem was I did not consider airport baggage handlers in my design. They ended up cutting the sheathing of one of the positive wires with the copper clad PCB. Of course, it had to be in the negative terminal, which burned a huge hole in my polyester bag, burned through two pairs of shorts, and melted a toothpaste tube, all tucked away inside the cargo cabin of the plane.

      I was not pleased to find out that my great invention had been so easily destroyed (for heaven's sake it was the ultimate rechargeable flashlight!). My uncle found out about the incident and gave me a fire extinguisher rated for electric fires for Christmas. T.t (crying face)

      Looking back, how the hell did they even allow that device on the plane? That could have seriously damaged someone's luggage (besides mine) and filled the cabin with toxic smoke, or worse yet exploded inside the cargo cabin, all 51Wh of it all. Banning ALL Apple and ALL Dell batteries, not just those made by Sony, is shortsighted and likely a decision made by a very uninformed person. My battery was more a risk to the plane then any of the Sony batteries and they inspected it and let me on. What gives?

    5. Re:Why not ban *all* batteries? by daverabbitz · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lead acid battery is *not* more dangerous than a Lithium battery. It does provide a higher short-circuit current in general because of the design of said battery, however...

      * An SLA doesn't explode if punctured, it just leaks corrosive paste everywhere (still nasty).

      * An SLA doesn't explode if overcharged, it generally just busts open and leaks the corrosive paste.

      * An SLA doesn't explode if undercharged, it just sulfates the plates causing the battery to not work well.

      * An SLA doesn't explode if shorted out, the pressure release valve pops and hot corrosive paste is ejected.

      In theory if the pressure release system had been tampered with and the battery was shorted out, the paste/aqueous solution could boil and build up critical pressure cuasing it to explode, however I have never seen this happen, and it still wouldn't burst into flames, just throw highly corrosive steam everywhere...

      --
      What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
    6. Re:Why not ban *all* batteries? by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt your coin superheated. The chances that a pool of 5300F melted coin just made small flames seem vanishingly small...

      Yeah, this was mostly a figure of speech, rather than literal. After I submitted the parent post, I realized then that someone was probably going to bring this up.

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
    7. Re:Why not ban *all* batteries? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      The recent British made "terror scare" where the terrorists apparently had to setup a chemistry lab in a dark corner of the plane for a few hours (hoping it wouldn't blow up in their face) didn't seem to be that much of a great terrorist weapon idea either. Yet look at the mess it created in airports worldwide.

      Whoever is hired to come up with those regulations doesn't seem to have a very firm grasp of real life. In the end the only way to travel safely would be ship anesthesiated people stark naked (after they've been xrayed) with their luggage and stuff in another plane.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    8. Re:Why not ban *all* batteries? by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      Looking back, how the hell did they even allow that device on the plane? That could have seriously damaged someone's luggage (besides mine) and filled the cabin with toxic smoke, or worse yet exploded inside the cargo cabin, all 51Wh of it all. Banning ALL Apple and ALL Dell batteries, not just those made by Sony, is shortsighted and likely a decision made by a very uninformed person. My battery was more a risk to the plane then any of the Sony batteries and they inspected it and let me on. What gives?

      Do the math, Fermi style.

      First, calculate the number of mad scientists who have not yet had their "maybe I should be more careful" moment. Now multiply by the number of crazed projects they are likely to make a year, the number of flights they'll make, the odds of getting through airport security, and the risk of catastrophic in-flight failure.

      Now do the same calculation but for Dell and Apple laptops.

      Although mad scientist projects are more dangerous than laptop batteries, there are a lot more laptop batteries on planes. Business travelers are more numerous than cockroaches. Dell and Apple are prominent brands. Mad scientists never have large budgets to work with, so they can't afford many flights. Plus, non-catastrophic damage to their gear is much more likely, which means more time in the lab doing repairs and less time flying. Overall, I think laptop batteries are a much bigger risk, especially in the cabin.

      Plus there are two other factors. One is an organizational one. Getting security people to evaluate weird technical prototypes for safety requires sending half of TSA off for the first couple years of an EE program. Getting them to filter out Dell and Apple laptop batteries just requires sending a memo with some pictures and a checklist.

      The other is a question of public opinion. Everybody has heard about the laptop batteries bursting into flame, so if it happens on a flight, the public will say, "Duh, they should have expected that." Whereas with your ultra-mega-flashlight, the investigators would all say, "Nobody could have expected that someone would be dumb enough to carelessly pack enough power to pop a bag of microwave popcorn." You do 1-3 in Club Fed, so the airline's off the hook.

  15. Re:Dear Apple fanatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, now you're just loosing steam. Don't make me send you to Troll Boot Camp.

  16. Re:Dear Apple fanatic by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

    Of course dells always work for women.

    --
    You mad
  17. hmmm... by mAIsE · · Score: 0

    how about banning all sony batteries instead of entire brands that use some sony batteries ?

    I have a mac book pro that does not have a sony battery.

    1. Re:hmmm... by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Because that's likely beyond the intellectual abilities of the people who need to enforce the rules.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    2. Re:hmmm... by absoluteflatness · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. Even ignoring any negative stereotypes you may have about the intelligence of security and airport personnel in general, what kind of "intellectual abilities" could identifying battery model numbers require? Valid gripes would include the extra time it would take to check every Apple and Dell battery, or the hassle to passengers, but not claiming that security officers don't have the capability to match numbers on a battery to numbers on a list.

  18. Wow by joel8x · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, even if you are using a 3rd party battery or have one of the replaced ones, you know they won't let you use it anyway. That's one less airline I will be using. Stupid. Just stupid.

    Why not ban all muslims from airplanes, since a few muslims hijacked some airplanes? IT'S THE SAME THOUGHT PROCESS. You think the muslims are pissed about the pope right now? Wait 'till you piss off some Apple fanatics - then you will be in a living hell.

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
    1. Re:Wow by value_added · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why not ban all muslims from airplanes, since a few muslims hijacked some airplanes? IT'S THE SAME THOUGHT PROCESS. You think the muslims are pissed about the pope right now? Wait 'till you piss off some Apple fanatics - then you will be in a living hell.

      Even worse - Muslim Mac users!

      The DHS should add that category to their profile Top Ten List, right above Weird Looking Guys with Beards.

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even worse - Muslim Mac users!

      JIHAD!

    3. Re:Wow by Brandybuck · · Score: 2

      Apple fanatics don't firebomb Anglican churches just because a Roman Catholic suggested they refrain from violence.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    4. Re:Wow by PW2 · · Score: 1

      > You think the muslims are pissed about the pope right now?

      They'll show him eventually -- just keep burning and killing to show how violent they aren't.

    5. Re:Wow by Megane · · Score: 1

      Apple fanatics don't firebomb Anglican churches just because a Roman Catholic suggested they refrain from violence.

      That's right. It's the Linux fanatics that firebomb Anglican churches just because a Roman Catholic suggested they use Windows.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    6. Re:Wow by anothy · · Score: 1

      i think you might be missing one tiny difference here. let me see if i can try to clarify this subtle point:

      muslims are people. batteries are inatimate objects.

      people, which we've established muslims are a subset of, have rights, including the right of religious freedom and freedom from discrimination based on said religion. there are other, differences, too. one can check to see if a battery is the affected model by simple inspection of its serial number. humans don't come with easy ways to check if they're terrorists. and, of course, before that one can even check to see that the thing in question is, in fact, a battery quite easily; there isn't a currently extant test to determine if someone's a muslim.
      this ban's probably stupid, but not for any of the reasons you say.

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  19. Ugly hack by MoogMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    /me tapes over the DELL sticker

    1. Re:Ugly hack by joshier · · Score: 0

      A crafty litle wise man.. Hmm!

    2. Re:Ugly hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dunno if it counts as an "ugly" hack if it ends up being an improvement. . .

    3. Re:Ugly hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea mate! Let me fetch a bit of tape... I now present to you my new "DFLL" laptop!!! THAT'LL FOOL 'EM!

    4. Re:Ugly hack by akeyes · · Score: 1

      Just tape over that awful 'E'. Then you just have a DLL laptop.

      Wait...

    5. Re:Ugly hack by wannabgeek · · Score: 1

      You are trying to sneak a potential explosive device into the airplane!

      You've just been tracked.

      Tomorrow's news: How the guv'ment secured the lives of many airline passengers by breaking a potential plot of terrorists by deciphering their evil plans that were being hatched on a site known as a terrorist and communist (which is worse?) hangout! The officials are considering whether to change the alert from 0xFFFF00 to 0xFFAA00 or to 0xFF5500

      --
      I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    6. Re:Ugly hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LoL!! That was the funniest thing I've heard all day!

    7. Re:Ugly hack by servodave · · Score: 1

      Student at (unmentioned) college I work for took silver sharpie and re branded several monitors in one lab. I caught him in the act and he sort of freaked out and said he would clean it off, but I told him "No, it's pretty much an improvement anyway."

      This was a few years ago and they remain as a small point of joy in my daily routine.

      Props to anyone who comes up with official looking rebranded logo for a Dell laptop that says "HELL" and underneath "FIRE"

  20. Dumb by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

    This is really really pointless. They already did the recall a while ago, and I'm sure most professionals heard about it and checked it. And face it, most laptop users I've seen on flights have been professionals, not little kids playing Half-Life.

    I could see if they did this just as everything was announced (and even then only for a short time).

    1. Re:Dumb by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Hey, my kid resembles that remark.

      (The only reason I take my laptop with me is so he can play half-life instead of bothering me).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    2. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checking your battery once on Dell's websaite may not be sufficient. 3 days after the reall was anounced, I've received an email from our sales contact at dell with the serial numbers of all the notebooks in our company that were affected. Out of the 5 notebooks listed, only 2 were flagged by the website as requiring replacent. Since I didn't find all the uses immediately (one was on holidays), the initial checks were performed up to one week after the email arrived. It took one month for all batteries that Dell themselves had reported to us as defective to properly be accepted by the website. If you have one of the affected notebooks, and you did check immediately after the announcement, you should re-check again if you are elegible for a free fresh battery.

  21. My IBM Z50 w/NetBSD runs off of AAs! Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - that's right... old technology, new operating system, and FIVE hours runtime off AA batteries on my Z50 running NetBSD! (10 hours w/the dual-LiIon batteries)...

    - solution? don't fly Virgin

    (and don't be a virgin!) :-)

  22. So, a ThinkPad catches on fire... by AetherBurner · · Score: 1

    Ok, so a Thinkpad's battery catches on fire. No where does it say in the article that there were Sony batteries actually in the unit. Nowhere does it say that the battery pack was genuine IBM or not. Nowhere does it say that the battery pack was virgin and not damaged from dropping, being worked on, etc. So,the emperor does not have any clothes on. Li-Ion batteries are capable of delivering large amounts of short circuit current. They can fail. A Gates Energy Products 2 volt lead-acid starved electrolyte battery the size of a D-cell could deliver 150 amps short circuit current. Unfortunately, the spec sheet for the Sanyo batteries that are in my Thinkpad do not mention what the short circuit current rating is for the battery. So until there is more info, just move along.

  23. Welly welly well! by aarku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As an iBook user, I hereby ban my use of Virgin Atlantic!

  24. Publicity stunt? by RumGunner · · Score: 1

    Seems like it to me... The whole thing is just too silly to be taken seriously.

  25. 85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by mhocker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, and how are us MacBook Pro users going to use the "inflight power" with our monster 85 watt power supplies that don't work on ANY airline?

    No toothpaste, no pocket knives, now no laptop. I'm really getting sick of the air travel nazis. It's making the "won't you think of the children" bunch look sane.

    1. Re:85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by chaoticgeek · · Score: 1

      I can see why no pocket knives are allowed. And a lil bit for the toothpaste, just because of the whole bombing plot. But why do you need a pocket knife on a plane?

      --
      hello
    2. Re:85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To shave off my excessively long beard that grew while I was waiting to board the plane.

    3. Re:85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      On a plane, you might not actively need it. I know I find having one on my keychain to be very useful though, it comes in handy far more often then you might otherwise expect.

      What's the possible harm? As long as the cockpit is properly secured, and you manage to ban power tools, axes, and things of that class, nobody is going to take over the plane anyway.

      Things were very different pre-9/11, back then a hijacking just meant everyone would get an unexpected stopover and a bunch of time and hassle for everyone involved, there was little threat of death, so a small weapon (which could realistically kill one or two people before the hijackers were subdued) was a big deal vs everybody wasting a few hours of their lives.

      Post-9/11, the rules are different -- The expectation is that if you hand control of the airplane over, everyone might die. As a result, someone threatening the life of one passenger or crew member is not a sufficient threat to hand over everyone's lives.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    4. Re:85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Use iChat and stay home...

      There is zero excuse for busness travel anymore.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    5. Re:85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can see why no pocket knives are allowed.


      Then you can see allowing the government to ban whatever they see fit to ban. Let's go by you're logic then.

      Let's ban all betteries as they have the potential to be a dangerous tool for the terrorists.
      Let's ban pencils as they can be used as weapons for the terrorists.
      Hell, teeth can be used as a terrorists weapon as well, let's ban someone with teeth. Same goes with fingernails. Shit, let's ban everything as anything has the potential to become a dangerous tool for terrorists. That is going by the fucked-up logic by you as well as the republicrats and democans.

      _____________________________________
      A vote against a Libertarian Candidate is
      a vote to abolish the Constitution itself.
    6. Re:85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      Or we could, you know, use reason and common sense. Not everything must be in absolutes. If you have a knife, you can take control of a lot of people. With a pencil, you'll be laughed at.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    7. Re:85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by gustaffo · · Score: 1

      On ANY airline? I used my Macbook Pro plugged in on my last trip to europe. FYI this was aboard a Northwest Airlines A330 (A332 I believe). Worked both up front (only the first [n] rows have power, with [n] I think being 20) and in business class fine. Watched every episode of season 1 of the boondocks which I had just gotten on DVD. Can't speak for other jets, but the 330's I was on had no problem supplying my laptop with power.

    8. Re:85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should petition Apple re that, not the airline. There's only a finite amount of power available on the aircraft - it's not their fault Apple's laptops guzzle juice like there's no tomorrow. More powerful laptops come with smaller AC adapters, after all.

    9. Re:85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by Sander_ · · Score: 1

      I fly a good bit and I have a large-ish thinkpad (T43p). This is an easy problem to solve:

      1. If your battery is fully charged it should work fine in all airlines.

      2. If you need to charge as well as run the machine and work, then use whateve tool your OS uses to make sure that the CPU speed handling is set to a minimum (typically "Conserve battery" on ThinkPads), lower the brightness of the screen and work along.

      Tested and tried on SK, SQ, BA, UA and others.

      -A

    10. Re:85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by Megane · · Score: 1

      You do know that a good deal of that 85 watts is for charging the batteries, right? You don't need that big of a power supply if you aren't charging batteries.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    11. Re:85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      but there is always the problem of sometimes you need to actually be in the same room as a person

      (any good BOFH knows that soemtimes you need to wave a cluebyfour around to get folks to see reason

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    12. Re:85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by Pfhor · · Score: 1

      Easy, buy the 65 watt power supplies for the Macbooks. Work on the MacBook Pros, and are smaller. I keep one 85watt at home, the other at the office, and a 65watt in my backpack. It just charges slower.

    13. Re:85 Watt MacBook Pro Power Supplies by chaoticgeek · · Score: 1

      If you train with a knife and you go up against people without training in cramped quaters where they can come at you one by one you could possibly take on the entire plane. However Make it so knives are put in the luggage compartment where you can't get to them and make sure that people can't get to it. I get that people carry around pocket knives for reasons other than to hijack a plane, but does not mean they should not be able to prohibit them in the cabin. Then I guess if you don't like it you can always take a boat, bus, train, car, bike, or walk yourself.

      --
      hello
  26. Dude...! by JaededByName · · Score: 1

    My company (a very big one) uses Dell laptops exclusivly... They've just lost a *major* customer... Dude...! You're goin' out of business...!

    1. Re:Dude...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My company, also quite large (In the top 50 of fortune 500) also exclusively uses Dell laptops, and will also be losing a lot of customers as the company likes it if you do work while you're on the plane since you're considered to be on the clock.

    2. Re:Dude...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly doubt that. If your company has need to fly and uses them as a carrier they are doing so for value or convenience. You are more likely to find that if Dell laptops are banned you will be using something else if travel is necessary to your business and you need to fly on their airline. At any rate your company; no matter how large it is, would not be a big enough cross section of a major airlines customer base to do much. Unless you are prepared to buy your own planes you are going to have to deal with inconveniences in air travel, get over it.

  27. No explosions, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Will Virgin allow on board exploding Sony batteries in IBM ThinkPads?

    Any battery that is currently exploding is probably not allowed, regardless of make.
    1. Re:No explosions, please. by niceone · · Score: 1

      Well, apart from the fragments that are travelling in the direction of the plane door and have a velocity high enough to make it through a member of cabin staff.

  28. Indiscriminate ban by Greg+Lindahl · · Score: 1


    My Dell laptop is so old that it isn't subject to the recall, but Virgin's ban is for all Dell laptops.

    Ah well.

  29. old news by nihaopaul · · Score: 1

    sorry but virgin has been banning this for a while, i know last time i flew from heathrow to shanghai just after the the `foiled plot` they had notices up at the counter, this was 4 weeks ago

  30. This would make sense... by Dan+East · · Score: 0

    This would make sense if they were checking battery serial numbers to see if they were part of the defective batches. However to ban them wholesale is ridiculous. This sounds more like one CEO wants to smear mud in the face of another CEO (or worse, they have an interest in a competitive product or manufacturer).

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:This would make sense... by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      I think you're overestimating the amount of time, effort and intellect airlines have available to screen passengers.

      You can teach chimps to recognize a Dell or Apple logo, you likely cannot teach them to verify against a serial number database (which would need to be maintained too, since the recall might well be expanded)

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
  31. Thinkpads don't use Sony by ddurdle · · Score: 1

    IBM/Lenovo Thinkpads don't use Sony batteries. Why the misinformation?

  32. In other news... by Rodness · · Score: 1

    Today Virgin Atlantic strongly expressed its lack of desire to continue to do business with frequent business travelers by making their lives more difficult.

    Not that any of the road warriors in my company regularly fly on Virgin Atlantic, but it's already landed on our corporate "we'd prefer you didn't use this airline/car rental/hotel/etc for business travel" list.

    This seems to be a simple concept, if you make it hard for business travelers to get work done, they'll travel with someone else who won't get in their way. I don't understand why an airline doesn't get this.

    1. Re:In other news... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's been my experience that once your company reaches a notable size, those decisions cease to be those of the employees - your travel is either handled externally - often Carlson Wagonlit and AmEx seem to be the biggest in specialising in 'corporate travel' - or at some companies I've been at, they actually /have/ an internal travel department with employees trained on Galileo, etc and a travel agent's license.

      It's rarely "hey, book your own flights, just try not to use airline x, y, and z".

      Besides, most corporate travel policies aren't based on "hey, these guys won't let you use your laptop", it's generally "cheapest possible. you can keep the flier miles, and fly your preferred airline to get those points, as long as the airline choice doesn't result in increased expenditure".

  33. Proper wrapping by SeaFox · · Score: 1
    The announcement, posted on Virgin's website, said that passengers may carry on the laptop itself, but batteries must be properly wrapped and stowed away in carry-on for the duration of the flight.

    Be sure to use lots of layers of tinfoil wrapped tightly around the battery! :-D
  34. It IS a real fire hazard by Secrity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is not really a security issue but it is a real fire hazard problem. Dell batteries have a documented history (some with pictures or videos) of bursting into flames, and I would not want to be on an airplane at 40,000 feet when somebody's Dell bursts into flame. I know that the recall is only for certain models but it would be too onerous for the flightcrew to sort out which Dells or Apples could become airborn flambeaus.

    http://wcco.com/consumer/local_story_148150249.htm l
    http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/laptops/dell-laptop -explodes-in-flames-182257.php
    http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2006/08/dell _fire.html

    1. Re:It IS a real fire hazard by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Of course airplanes mostly burn because of the fuel they carry. Inside of the cabin, almost nothing is flammable (apart from the Dell batteries), so starting a fire that way is a practical impossibility.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:It IS a real fire hazard by Secrity · · Score: 1

      Would you want to be sitting in seat 12B (middle) when the laptop in seat 12C (aisle) bursts into flames in the manner shown in the videos? There is also likely to be quite a bit of toxic smoke generated. Airplane cabins can and do burn, one example is the 1983 Air Canada in-flight fire aboard a DC-9.

    3. Re:It IS a real fire hazard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thumbs-up to that twenty-three year-old precedent, because they certainly haven't made any changes to improve safety of the cabins (both new and existing) in that duration.

  35. Pants on Fire by cyberformer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to keep spare AA batteries in my pockets, alongside coins and keys. I learned a very painful lesson not to do that anymore.

  36. Re:WTF, someone can't cause other laptops batterie by db32 · · Score: 1

    I agree with the most part, but I had a similar rant about fingernail clippers once and kinda changed my mind. I was talking to a buddy of mine's dad...who is a rather large guy with combat experience... I said something about how stupid the fingernail clipper ban was and he looked at me and just said "Would you want me to have a pair of finger nail clippers when I attack you?" I sat and thought about it and all the soft parts of my face suddenly became very sensitive... So while I think the ban is still pretty stupid, he really did put the every item is a potentially lethal weapon argument into nice perspective. The only real solution is to fly naked with no carry ons which is just the epitome of stupid overreaction, but still....every day items can be very lethal.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  37. Good for a chuckle by Mr.Scamp · · Score: 1

    It's probably wrong of me, but I just know I'm going to have to chuckle at all those Dell and Apple owners when I walk onto the plane with my SONY laptop.

  38. What about the security checkpoint? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you still have to boot up your laptop and show the security guard that it works? If so, isn't this effectively an outright ban on Apple and Dell laptops on Virgin Atlantic flights?

  39. Re:WTF, someone can't cause other laptops batterie by tapin · · Score: 1

    Give me a break. They're not making you fly naked; nail clippers are less dangerous than, say, ballpoint pens.

    Next time your buddy's dad asks you such a dumb question, ask him if he'd be willing to attack 150 people simultaneously with a pair of nail clippers.

  40. somethingawful.com = something fishy? by spnz · · Score: 1

    Following the link to "Will Virgin allow on board exploding Sony batteries in IBM ThinkPads?" I found something weird about the story. While I don't contest the Thinkpad burned up, I think the story surrounding the incident is a little difficult to believe. Check out the story and explain to me this:

              "I spoke to the laptop owner (while getting close for some pictures!) and he said he his laptop was an IBM"...

    There is absolutely no one in the photos or anywhere around, making me think these are stock or airport photos taken after the incident, not from an opportunist.

          "Notice the circular hotspot on the floor where the thing actually burned."...

    Come on, it's from the base of the divider stand. Also note that the chair has been pulled back.

    Looks more like someone had a problem while sitting in the waiting area not running off a plane!

    Based on that I think we need to question the entire story.

    1. Re:somethingawful.com = something fishy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quoting Something Awful as a legitimate news source is laughable and denies the story any credibility.

  41. title is wrong by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    How does banning batteries for two laptop brands equal banning the laptops themselves?

    1. Re:title is wrong by TalkingWire · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really. Only about 15% to 35% of the global market (from my interpretation of provided links) seems to be affected. See:

      Hey. I know it's a really, really broad number. But it seemes to be accurate given these sources.

      Is is it just me, or is this alot of people?

  42. Will they stop flights? by TalkingWire · · Score: 1

    I'm curious. If the proportion of people injured or killed in flight is equal to or greater than the proportion of users killed or injured owing to exploding laptop batteries, will Virgin discontinue its flights?

  43. Virgin Galactic by Plocmstart · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm well guess I better fly Virgin Galactic instead. Seriously though I've already returned my iBook battery and received my new non-explodey one.
    Actually when I travel I typically have at least 6 lithium ion batteries in my carry-on: laptop, spare, camera, cellphone, PSP, and Archos MP3 player. The only other items I usually have are my bathroom items that aren't already banned. When they ban all lithium-ion batteries I'll have no need for a carry-on anymore.

  44. So now I can't play Snake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...on a plane?

    *ducks*

  45. Re:WTF, someone can't cause other laptops batterie by db32 · · Score: 1

    I didn't say I agree with the bans, and the flying naked thing was sort of sarcastic but you apparently missed that. So...next time you have such a dumb response ask yourself if the last set of attackers attacked 150 people simultaneously with a knife/box cutter. You have however demonstrated the big picture thinking that can only be achieved by those not in the situation...humans are expendable, if you have 150 vs 1 you can obviously win even if you end with 148 and 3 dead. I wonder if it would be so clear cut if you had to be the first 1 or 2 to try to stop the guy and were likely to become seriously injured or dead.

    The point I was making is that "nail clippers are not a threat" is simply not true, that almost any every day item can be a deadly weapon, and the only viable solution would be to fly naked, which would be stupid overreaction, and that life inherrently involves some risk.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  46. Put this in the window by linzeal · · Score: 3, Funny

    At that height I bet the efficiency on a solar charger would be enough to charge a spare battery, you can also ask the airline if you can mount it on the outside of the plane like the RVers do. I'm sure pilots from the south will understand.

  47. Apple recalls. by niktemadur · · Score: 1

    In case you fly Virgin and are lucky enough to get a seat with a power source for your iBook or PowerBook, keep this in mind:
    http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/08/13/ 1710258
    For the life of me, I cannot grasp that the hell is in the minds of these corporate lackeys. Will they ever realize that assembling things on the cheap not only endangers lives, but ends up costing tons more in the long run, by way of recalls, damage control and alienated customers?

    That said, now that Apple is doing a massive recall, the very least they should do is give out some sort of certificate that the battery has been replaced with a newer, safer model. These guys (Apple and Virgin) should be in talks about it.

    If all else fails, at least you can kick back in your incredibly cramped Airbus seat, sipping from a can of nasty Virgin Cola, playing quarter-of-a-century-old Nintendo games, all the while trying to scrape the breakfast muffin dough that has turned to glue in the roof of your mouth. On a more sinister note, maybe Richard Branson has his eye on the battery market? Virgin Batteries, "The Life Of Your Laptop".

    --
    Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  48. A Word to the travel wise ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Virgin has gone bloody bonkers!

    Sell Virgin stock on Monday, and avoid them for tickets!

    Give Virgin and Sir "high school drop-out" the financial finger and they will listen.

    Toodles

  49. I'm not worried about the ones in the cabin by wsanders · · Score: 1

    I'd be scared shitless of the ones in the cargo bay in checked-in luggage, especially now that no one can carry the usual huge pile of crap into the cabin, or the pallet-load of battery packs in cargo. Even the ones stuffed in the overhead bins are more dangerous than the ones on your tray table, which if it catches on fire, will quickly be tossed hot-potato style to a waiting army of flight attendants with extinguishers, trained to deal with the situation.

    Sounds like defensive lawyering.

    And there are substatial risks with wiring each seat with outlets, whether low voltage DC or mains AC.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  50. Re:Dear Apple fanatic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, that's a statistically significant survey -- One person with a working MacBook Pro who has heard of Dells having problems.

  51. Apple had best... by FFFish · · Score: 1

    ...send out nice authentic laminated Apple business card-sized list of the serial number of the fubared batteries to all the airports it can muster. It's absurd to have all of something banned because some of them may have a problem.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:Apple had best... by FFFish · · Score: 1

      er, absurd, at least, when the problematic ones are so easily identified.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  52. Re:WTF, someone can't cause other laptops batterie by Locutus · · Score: 1

    really now, since the 9/11 attacks, people no long play victim and let hijackers do what THEY decide. Also realize that the 9/11 attackers were not stupid by any means. ANYBODY who tried to attack someone on a plane with fingernail clippers is going down and the initial attackee is not likely to have life threatening injuries. I agree that a pen is more dangerous but is also not going to be capable of more than one or two injured.

    For goodness sake, they were taking fingernail clippers from people visiting the Statue of Liberty! When I heard that security personnel knew of liquid explosive attempts since the late 1990s, I could not believe we were not told to keep all POTENTIAL liquid substances in checked bagage and out of carry-on.

    We don't have to fly naked but we could streamline the system so that carry-on was a special form of checked baggage and thereby greatly reduce potential assembled weapon type of issues. I don't think that laptops and cellphones should be allowed in the cabin because of the potential energy of the battery packs. Light one of those foam seats on fire and all hell is going to break loose. And I don't think an LiOn battery fire is going to get put out very easily.

    But the TSA will probably wait til some faulty battery goes up or someone actually does it on purpose before they 'decide' it's in our best interest to not fly with these. I'd rather see them pro-active in a 'smart' way than freak out and look like dumb shits everytime something happens. IMO.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  53. a much faster solution by Desolator144 · · Score: 0

    It's not that hard to just scan for the type of lithium that makes em blow. FedEx has been using the required technology for other mollecules for years. If they did that, all the electronic devices could get on and just use the AC adapter (dunno if they have outlets on a plane though, never flown lol)

    --
    now stop reading and go play Dance Dance Revolution!
    1. Re:a much faster solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, you are seriously retarded!

  54. a trend i hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can i congratulate Virgin airlines on this sensible precaution. I only hope that other airlines follow suite - i suspect they will.

    Never mind mac users; as opposed to travelling around the planet you can spend even more of your time hidden away, furiously ransacking your dignity in front of that overpriced piece of plastic.

    You swallowed the apple marketing bilge...gulp...gulp...gulp...now live with it.

    Oh and would you like some eye candy with your toy computer...gulp...gulp...gulp?

  55. oh man I hope this news doesn't get out.... by microcars · · Score: 1
    --
    I like microcars
  56. Hey at least IBM solved their problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The initial problem reported was batteries not holding a charge.

    So they put somebody to work on it, somebody with a solution. So what if the guy had an ex-military background, specializing in demolition and incendiary charges?

  57. Laptops are spontaneously flammable by Myria · · Score: 0

    I think eventually laptops will be banned from planes - even in checked baggage. Batteries these days are basically spontaneously flammable, and you can't allow that on a plane. It wouldn't be very hard for terrorists to rig laptops with batteries that short themselves at a certain altitude. Get a bunch of terrorists to fly together and have a bunch of rigged laptops in the luggage, and you have a nice probability of starting a big fire in the cargo hold.

    Not to mention that the fire risk is bad enough by accident.

    Melissa

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
    1. Re:Laptops are spontaneously flammable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you do not have them in checked baggage!!!!

      Why are people so stupid to think that when they can't see something it is ok?

      You want the laptop and the bateries with people on the plane. If it blows, carry it to the nearest toilet and let it burn out. How, hopefully the toilet is not plastic (ie. the actual toilet not the seat :) Out it in checked baggage and you are fucking screwed. Batteries must NEVER be allowed in the hold or someone is freaking stupid.

      http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0UBT/is_29_ 18/ai_n6280925

    2. Re:Laptops are spontaneously flammable by drummerboybac · · Score: 1

      If you banned all laptops from planes, that would wreak havoc to business across the country. Personally I cant do my job if I cant travel with a laptop. and there are thousands of people in the same boat, which based on their frequency of travel, make up a significant portion of airline business.

  58. But this is the *replacement* battery! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiots.

    Apple has already shipped out replacement batteries.. I have mine.. Soooo.. They're saying that they won't allow the NEW non-defective batteries on the planes?

    Just more BS that won't protect anyone from anything.. just more fuel on the "air-rage" fire...

    Whoever came up w/ this needs to be caned.

    sigh.

  59. The irony of course by Sir+Unimaginative · · Score: 1

    that after all the 'precautions' at the airport these days ON TOP OF: -getting to the airport -waiting for the plane (in multiple chunks of time depending on delays and security &cet.) -waiting for checked baggage -getting to wherever (hotel/meeting/&cet.) that the time difference between the two probably isn't all that much for distances below (educated pull out the arse) 500 miles.

    --
    The problem with your idea is that it makes sense.
  60. No Batteries! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Internet petitions just keep on going 'round for years, kind of like the Energizer Bunny. Yeah, Batteries.

  61. Don't fly virgin by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    The answer is simple. Don't fly virgin. I haven't flown virgin since that sophmore trip to Europe.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  62. Wrapping details... by ocie · · Score: 1

    the airline provided no details as to what proper wrapping entails

    "Here is some duct tape. Please affix your laptop to the underside of the plane. If your laptop falls off in the course of the flight, we will refund you the cost of the tape."

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  63. Right movement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is good example of right movement, without harming bussiness that conducts this movement. Apples products are overpriced and build from cheap parts. The users want to belive their computers, etc. are good because they paid so much for them.

  64. One Jet's already burned. by DingerX · · Score: 3, Informative
    Hold fire suppression systems are not that I know mandatory, and if they were, it is questionable whether they'd be effective on a Li-Ion fire. There's a discussion about just this stuff going on at the NTSB right now, since laptop batteries are strongly suspected in a recent hull-loss. From the July 12-13 hearing about the UPS DC-8 that burned right after landing back in February. They found plenty of laptop batteries in the hold, most of them crisped. Cause has not been assigned yet, but
    2. Design, Testing, and Failure Modes of Lithium Batteries.

    * Testimony about lithium batteries will include discussions of their benefits and their hazards, as well as their safety features and failure histories.

    3. Operations and Regulations concerning Lithium Batteries.

    * Discussion under this topic will focus on the requirements involving air transportation of lithium batteries--including differences in these requirements between passenger and cargo aircraft--and ways in which the hazards associated with lithium batteries can be minimized and finally,

    4. Aircraft Fire Detection and Suppression Systems and Regulations

    * The Safety Board has issued recommendations in the past for incorporation of detection and suppression systems on commercial aircraft. Discussion under this topic will include a review of technology and regulations of these systems, difficulties and challenges that these systems may bring, and differences in these areas as they pertain to both passenger and cargo aircraft.
    At that meeting, they noted a case in December, in Chicago:
    Several lithium battery incidents have occurred in recent years, including a lithium-ion battery fire that occurred less than two months ago on an airplane in Chicago. Flight attendants used extinguishers on an overhead bag that was smoking. The bag was removed from the airplane and placed on the ramp, where it then caught fire. The fire apparently started from a spare laptop battery being carried in the bag.


    In these cases, the batteries were not on, nor even in computers. The things are dangerous.
  65. I've got about 300K frequent flier miles on Virgin by The+Mutant · · Score: 1

    Good thing I don't have to use them on Virgin.

    My PowerBook goes everywhere with me; not close by, not partially disassembled, but sleeping nearby and ready to be used.

    I like Virgin but they can go to hell. And I'm not booking any more long haul BizTrip in Virgin Upper Class either.

    I'll give the Biz to a more rational airline.

  66. Re:WTF, someone can't cause other laptops batterie by db32 · · Score: 1

    We think that noone will play along. We really haven't had any real events to prove that, and I'm not entirely convinced that people won't continue to play along. I am in no way justifying these bans, and I think people are having a really really hard time with that. I think they are retarded and that life involves some risk and people need to quit their bitching, if they are so afraid then they can pony up the gas money and drive. The only way to eliminate all these "oh my god the boogeyman!" risks is to treat the plane like a prison bus.

    We weren't told then because it wasn't nearly as profitable to keep the populace in a constant state of fear. The administration at the time didn't have the same goals or methods. We weren't told because the threat was terribly small, terribly difficult, terribly unlikely, and not profitable to keep us all trembling in our homes. We have known about this 'liquid explosive' threat since the 90s or so...and it has yet to happen even once...so why is it that suddenly liquids are the new fear buzz with TSA...

    Rather than any more stupid bans or fear based policy we could do the math on the whole thing and realize how statistically stupid we are being. I am FAR more likely to die by getting hit by a drunk driver rather than any form of terrorist attack. Should we take all drunk drivers to guantanimo? Why do they take my ligher and give me matches when its easier to make an incidiary device with a book of matches? Why are they taking everyones fluids when so many chemists have all but totally debunked that paranoid fantasy. Why do we have to show ID to get on the plane when 20 years back or so Americans were outraged those evil communists made the poor oppressed people of Russia do the same. Its about time Americans wake up and pull their heads out of the sand...deal with the various threats and risks of day to day life proportionately. # of Americans killed on US soil in the last 7 years due to terrorists a little over 3400, # of Americans killed on US soil in the last 7 years due to alcohol related instances somewhere in the ballpark of 2 million. We are just being kept paranoid and stupid for a group of profiteer whores running the show. And no damnit...if they take away my beer to deal with that threat then by god we are going to have a fight! :)

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  67. Uninformed slashdotter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's in the cargo hold, it will be in a cargo crate. Those cargo crates will survive the fire, being built to withstand a bomb attack (and doing a reasonable job at it).

  68. Re:WTF, someone can't cause other laptops batterie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Banning finger nail clippers is rather stupid when the stewardesses are still pushing their carts filled with glass bottles through the aisle. And the guy with the "combat experience" can probably bash your skull in with a blunt instrument, which - as far as i know - are not yet banned.

  69. Stupid to ban the manufacturers who recalled batt. by parabyte · · Score: 1

    It is really stupid beyond belief to ban only those manufacturers who recalled batteries, makeing their models in fact much safer than other manufacturers, especially those no-names that actually pose a higher risk because people don't even know that their batteries are dangerous.

    They should have either banned *all* Li-Ion batteries, or find other ways how to deal with it, e.g. put fire-proof cases or asbestos bags/blankets on the plane where they can drop a burning laptop into. On Lufthansa planes you were not allowed to use CD-Players, but you could use *every* other electronic device because some idiot in the management must have been convinced that CD-Players emit specific electromagnetic interference.

    These freaks who try to provide security by uninformed actionism really suck, because at the same time they tend to ignore *real* risks as soon as they start to affect their bottom line.

    p.

    --
    Without order, nothing can exist. Without chaos, nothing can be created.
  70. Not all batteries affected by necro81 · · Score: 1

    The Dell recall affects some 4.1 million batteries, which is only about 18% of those sold over the last few years. The Apple recall affects 1.1 million batteries, a similar fraction of their products.

    Of the six batteries in my household (some dell, some apple), just one of those has been recalled. There are far more Dell and Apple batteries out there that aren't affected by the recall than are. If someone were able to furbish documentation that their battery is in the clear, will Virgin be able to continue banning it? Will any business traveler continue to use them?

  71. Reputation by IT074859 · · Score: 1

    Well...what can I said about the laptop batteries made by Sony explodes..it's kinda of sad to hear this incident. It shouldn't happen in the first place. Such a big and well-known electronic manufacturer should have known this problem. Dell and Apple, i guess this inceident must be a big 'hit' on them...I remembered my friends was initially wanted to buy Dell laptop because it is affordable and reliable and Apple, expensive yet design and quality is attractive and undeniable. Due to this incident, my friends told me that thanks gosh they didn't buy it...well, by right the 3 big company Sony, Dell and Apple should be more precaution about their products before releasing them because reputation creates confidence and security in the public's heart.

  72. Battery Recall - Dell's Laptop by IT074859 · · Score: 1

    Those who had bought the Dell Laptop,check out below info:

    There are 4 models of affected Dell laptops: Dell Latitude(TM), Inspiron(TM), XPS(TM) and Dell Precision Mobile Workstation(TM) notebook computers.

    These are potentially affected batteries were sold with the following models of Dell notebook computers or separately as secondary batteries:

    Latitude: D410, D500, D505, D510, D520, D600, D610, D620, D800, D810

    Inspiron: 500M, 510M, 600M, 700M, 710M, 6000, 6400, 8500, 8600, 9100, 9200, 9300, 9400, E1505, E1705

    Precision: M20, M60, M70, M90

    XPS: XPS, XPS Gen2, XPS M170, XPS M1710

  73. Clueless by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    This is unfortunately VERY typical of mucky-mucks who don't know squat about technology. It's also a case of using FUD to exercise control over people. "Oh, cellphone cause the avionics to go haywire!" Yeah right, that's bullshit. How many people have left their cellphones on in their carry-ons? Can you document ONE case where a cellphone screws up the avionics? Aside from the fact that above a certain altitude you get no signal and end up draining your battery. "Oh, cellphones cause gasoline pumps to explode." Oh, really? Are there ANY spark-inducing components in a cellphone? That went out with rotary dial phones. More likely some schmuck was smoking right next to the filler.

  74. Product Placement Issue by servodave · · Score: 1

    Link article has ad at top for 'Great deals on refurbished Dell laptops'... Of course I reloaded and clicked it a few times to show my approval of this brilliant advertising strategy. Could this be the start of something great? Man, OH MAN, do I hope so. House fire caused by deranged child -> link to Zippo lighters and Diamond brand matches. Concrete tunnel collapses -> link to 'get your engineering degree online in two weeks' Massive computer project over budget and fails -> link to 'Microsoft enterprise systems' etc...

  75. Just Flew Virgin; seems true about Dell and Apple by IronSilk · · Score: 1

    I just flew Virgin from San Francisco to London on Wednesday, and they indeed made an announcement telling people who wanted to use Dell and Apple laptops to identify themselves to a flight attendant. Personally I don't want to be on the plane when a battery explodes, but I'm hoping it's a conversation with the passenger about whether their computer is included in the recalll, whether they participated in the recall, and where an outlet is if they have a vulnerable computer, rather than a blanket ban.

  76. The other solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just fill the whole plane with argon, and have you use the oxygen mask system full-time? Since nobody can be in line for the bathroom anymore, it'd really speed up bathroom trips (at least until somebody asphyxiated in there).

  77. Re:WTF, someone can't cause other laptops batterie by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    Hell, you could probably use the trays on the seats as a weapon.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  78. Re:WTF, someone can't cause other laptops batterie by db32 · · Score: 1

    I have been waiting for the ban on laptop AC adapters. I know if I am ever on a plane and some asshat threatens me with a box cutter I will go mideval on his ass. Laptop becomes Exploding Dell Shield and AC adapter becomes Transformer Cube Flail. Weighted brick on metal cord would give me a tad more range than a boxcutter.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  79. I'm worried about SG-1 by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    We know that Samantha Carter uses a Dell, she won't be able to solve problems with it if she's on a plane anymore! THE EART IS IN JEOPARDY FROM THE GOAULD AND ORI NOW! BITCHES!

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.