Slashdot Mirror


How a Wiring Rack Should Look

Julie Jacobson writes, "It's so much fun to deride some of the worst home wiring jobs in existence. But once in awhile, we should salute some of the cleanest, most perfectly labeled cabling jobs in U.S. homes. At the recent CEDIA Expo, the association for home-technology integrators handed out awards for the Best Dressed Systems, each featuring miles of cable, hundreds of connectors, tons of steel, and a clean aesthetic that could make the most finicky designer swoon. Show them to your own installer for inspiration."

357 comments

  1. Ahh... messy racks... by crazyjeremy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Found an old picture of one of the messiest racks I have ever seen. Personally I think a messy NOC should be a punishable offense. I can't tell you how many times some stupid blip in the system is caused by a dangling wire with so much other wiring hanging on it that it gets pulled from the panel. Nothing like a 4am pager going off, coming into work and finding the root cause of the problem is the idiots that wired the rack. Kudos to those who do it right.

    1. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      What type of install is that? I see something big and bulky on the left of the photo that looks like a transformer or something heavy.

      Also why is there a shop light hung in the middle?

    2. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by jeeves_moss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      FINALY!!! Someone actuly relizes that guys like me who do the "grunt" work in the basement actuly know what they're doing. I've gone into COUNTLESS messy racks, rooms, and basements to fix the problems. My fav. tool is a large pair of limbing nippers. I usaly start where the wire dropps out of the celing, then just rip everything out. I HATE a mess, and 9 times out of 10 it's just easier to rebuild it than it is to patch it.

    3. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by crazyjeremy · · Score: 4, Informative

      The site is down already. http://www.talkaboutcedia.com.nyud.net:8090/articl e/10397/ should get you there until it's back up.

    4. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should see a SuperNet Pop site. The things are wired to telco specs. Simply awesome, as good or better than the articles pics. I'd post a pic, but if they ever found out I'd lose my access.

    5. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could say that was the worst wiring rack I'd ever seen... DOesn't come close...

      I used to work at a company called USA Floral Products. In one of the first floor offices there was an old Data General (but I repeat myself). Serial cables from terminals throughout the building ran into this one room. A new server was installed upstairs. All the old serial cables were pulled out and dumped in this room. Alas, they couldn't turn off the DG. They ran more cables. Then added some terminal servers. Then added CAT5. Unfortunately, gray CAT5 cable is about the same thickness as the gray serial cables running to the DG. When all was finished, there was a room of middling size completely filled with a spaghetti of cables. You couldn't walk into the room because the cables blocked your way. When a cable went bad, they didn't even bother trying to trace it; they just leaned over and unplugged it and ran a new one.

    6. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

      here's the drawing to go with that...
      http://www.mbay.net/~ketan/herf.jpg

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
    7. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, that is NOTHING compared to a couple of racks we had at a branch office where I worked for a major US multinational company some ten years ago. The office was in the vicinity of London Gatwick airport (but thankfully, not aviation industry related - I shudder to think what would happen were aircraft to be wired in this manner!).

      There were literally so many cables tangled in each other that they couldn't physically remove cables when setting up a new patch - they'd just unplug and cut the ends of the old cable, leaving the middle mired in the mess, and then lay a new cable over the top.

      I sometimes wondered how the sheer weight of cabling hadn't managed to topple the rack over on its side. /oh, and this wasn't connected to my job. Had it been, I'd have advocated pulling the entire lot and starting from scratch - it was just that bad.

    8. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Interesting
      CAT5 is the debbil. Krone Hi-Band 25's is what we're using to the wall (grocery retail chain). Great stuff. Nothing worse than two or three hundred CAT5 cables coming out of a rack.

      Old story -- Long time ago a Vax 785 / RS232x9600 installation in Tasmania had a problem with perfect crosstalk -- one VT220 terminal was displaying & accepting keypresses identical to the one on a desk near it, with the latter terminal being unplugged from the computer. Turned out the cables were bound together neatly along their entire length, and the bits just jumped across inductively.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    9. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

      Yikes reminds me of the time we were doing contract work for Premises One (may they rot in hell) at a site near the Phoenix airport. Seems this company didn't believe in pulling old runs or discontinued cabling. The main feed into the one big closet was a trunk 4 feet across of twinax, arcnet, old phone lines, thinnet cat-IV, cat-V, cctv cables you name it. It was actually starting to eat some of the punch-downs on the walls.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
    10. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by protohiro1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      wait a minute...these are HOME installation? Who needs 48U of rackspace and that much cable in their HOME?

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    11. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by fishbowl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >Who needs 48U of rackspace and that much cable in their HOME?

      I have half that much rack gear and probably a quarter mile of audio cable, just in my modest
      home recording studio. Except for my piano, I'm sure that patchbay cabling has been my largest single expense.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    12. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Sounds like my current office... we're the 4th occupants. The wiring for the previous "networks" are still in the walls and ceiling. In the phone room, they simply chainsaw'd the bundle just above the drop ceiling. The people who have the back half of office now... ran their own damned wire instead of using the pre-existing, perfectly functional ports going to every desk. All they had to do was move a patch panel to the other side of the wall. Obviously, all of that wire is still in the walls -- had the idiots told me the truth, I'd've removed all that wiring (and the $$$ wall boxes.)

      (When we move out of that office, I'm taking EVERYTHING. I'll take the carpet too if I can get it unglued from the floor.)

    13. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by soft_guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who needs 48U of rackspace and that much cable in their HOME?

      Maniacs.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    14. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by WebCrapper · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see you've done network contracting too... Its amazing what some people will draw up as their network map.

    15. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by binaryspiral · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No doubt, jeeves. I've been there, done that.

      In a collocation facility that used to allow customer to rack their own gear... yeah, how ever bad the rack looks in your imagination at this point - double that. Now we strongly suggest they allow us to do it the first time, or we shut them down and do it over - and it typically takes about 150% more time.

      I can appreciate the neat and clean wiring/racking job - for a full 48u rack with 1U servers and network gear- expect about 15-25 hours of labor to get all the systems installed and wired. This is assuming redundant power, redundant network, KVM, and management connections.

      Or you could just let the customer throw it in, and they'll have it plugged in before lunch time. But it'll look like crap, have hotspots, crimped wires and fiber, overloaded PDUs, and nothing labeled.

      Then they expect it to stay up and running for 3-5 years like that.

    16. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Laserwulf · · Score: 2, Funny

      You must be new here.

      --
      "Make cyberlove, not cyberwar!" -Khaed(544779)
    17. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      What type of install is that?

      I'm no expert, but I believe that would be a cluster fuck.

    18. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by smcn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you ever noticed, anybody who has less wires running through their home than you is a newbie, and anyone who has more wires is a maniac?

    19. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      The critical issue here is: with the latter terminal being unplugged from the computer.
      You should never, NEVER unplug RS232 equipment from the computer and leave the port enabled. The interface spec wasn't designed for it. Even with proper cable, what will happen is that the computer will receive the output it is sending, and thus receive its own login prompt.

    20. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Greventls · · Score: 1

      Speaking of messy wiring, anyone have any recommendations on how to sort ibm type 1 connections? Right now where I work has a giant tumble of cables that go into a shitty rack thing. When you try to fix the end of a cable, you bump another and it comes off, knocking someone offline.

    21. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      Evil geniuses and rap artists.

      Same thing, on a certain level, I suppose.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    22. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by prescor · · Score: 1

      Carlin On Campus. Nice.

      --
      signat-url: http://www2.potsdam.edu/dctm/prescor/signat-url.ht m
    23. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Funny

      heh...

      <georgecarlin>Have you ever noticed, anybody who drives slower than you is a moron, and anyone who drives faster is a maniac?</georgecarlin>

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    24. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Have you ever noticed, anybody who has less wires running through their home than you is a newbie, and anyone who has more wires is a maniac?

      Oh good. That means I'm a perfectly experienced sane person.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    25. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by rickb928 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stay anonymous. You'll do better that way.

      rick

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    26. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

      Beowulf?

      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
    27. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by archen · · Score: 1

      Heh, I'd like to see the budget allocation for that.

      "Sir we need $200,000 to upgrade the clusterfuck or we don't know what's going to happen. Actually we don't know what's going to happen when we upgrade it either."

      CxO: "Uhhh... okay"

    28. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by radtea · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Back in the day I worked in a lab where the network cabling ran through the electronics shop, and part of the network was RG-58U co-ax, which is was used heavily in those days for nuclear instruments. There was a coil of cable with a BNC straight-through hanging on the rack beside all the other spare cable. Some grad student (it might even have been me) scrounged the connector for his apparatus, not knowing that it was part of the network. It took over a day to figure out why a couple of machines were suddenly incommunicado.

      On the other hand, the "neat" installation examples in the article are a little too cable-tied for my taste. The first time something goes bad or needs to be changed there's going to be a lot of cutting and re-tieing going on. A few ties as required is good. More is not better.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    29. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Daenks · · Score: 1

      Here in houston, 90% of the structured wiring vendors are doing installations that look like crap. My company makes ALOT of money cleaning up these nasty datacenters: http://www.vdicommunications.com/datacenter_tour.p hp. That link goes directly to some before and after photos of installs and cleanups we've done. Check them out, its quite funny.

      --
      Meridian 59. EPIC WIN. http://openmeridian.org
    30. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Who doesn't?

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    31. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

      We did that one time to a subrenter at our old office. Guy came in one day to several big boxes of terminals and thousands of feet of Cat-3.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
    32. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      Well, I've drawn up maps like that, just rush jobs to drop in a linksys box and a switch for less than a dozen machines, being paid in beer. But that's about the largest job I'd do something like that for.

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    33. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by idonthack · · Score: 1

      It's a fine line, and I walk it very carefully.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    34. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by greed · · Score: 1

      There are "releasable" cable-ties out there; you squeeze a little tab and it releases the ratchet so you can pull the tie apart. I use them in exactly the kind of situation where something is likely to fail or need to be changed.

      I couldn't tell from the photos if they had used that kind or not.

    35. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Nowdays people are moving to velcro cable ties -- the nylon ones are strong and cheap, but they hurt when you run them past your hands, and people are always losing the cable tie guns. Velcro is reusable, strong enough, and doesn't leave little nylon bits on the ground.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    36. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Ahh, memories. At one point in the past, I was tasked with removing 50+ runs of PVC-coated CAT-3 from the buildings plenum. Turns out, it was cable-tied into bundles every 18 inches AND tied to support beams, false ceiling hangers, electrical conduit and anything else in there that seemed to be attached to the building.

      We ended up moving before I got to it.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    37. Re:Ahh... messy racks... by mmclean · · Score: 1
      Who needs 48U of rackspace and that much cable in their HOME?
      Maniacs.
      Can you image a beowulf cluster of those?
  2. Work to be found by Cold_Lestat · · Score: 1
    There is a multitude of work for technicians to come into a corp environment and just rip and repatch and wire. I've done some really back breaking cabnet jobs (with before and after photos.).

    I really does make a big difference to the poor help desk guys when they gone down to a cabnet to repatch something for someone. I wish i had setups like in that link.. *very pretty*

    1. Re:Work to be found by Orangedog_on_crack · · Score: 1

      Bah! Those breast-fed IT guys never had it so easy. Try mining out 50 pair cable over a live local switch in an old Ameritech central office outside of the maint. window so you can take Friday night off. Now that's a rush!

    2. Re:Work to be found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I know this is not going to be a popular opinion but..
      Tightly bound cable bundles at the rack are NOT helping anyone but the anal person looking at the pretty pictures. Try troubleshooting or replacing a wire in that bundle at the rack. A rack is a dynamic environment, that is why there are jacks there! If it was not meant to be dynamic, why even use jacks at the rack? Just hard wire everything. If your rack is attached to the floor, movement and cable chafing is not a problem either. If you have to spend more then 5 minutes to get the bundle the way it looked before you replaced a wire at the rack level, you are wasting every ones time including your own to get it to look absolutely perfect. There is NOTHING wrong from a technical standpoint by using the plain old cable management hooks on the front of a typical rack that the cables route through, each wire does not need to be zip tied or Velcro every few inches and each wire spreading off of the bundle with a cable tie for each one, in fact, you can cross over the width of a typical 19 inch rack without the need for any additional bundling other then standard wire management trays and hooks. Side rack mounting depends on type of management you have for that, I've seen some better then others.

      Like I said, my opinion is not going to be a popular one but can someone give me a technical reason why every rj45 plug in something like a 24 port blade needs to tied individually or even in groups of two? Is that "unsafe"? Is it a hazard in your environment? If so, what the hell is going on in your equipment room and why do you not have a door on your rack? Is it harder to track down then a huge bundle 20 deep and zip tied to 10ft lbs every 3 inches?

      Oddly enough, I've seen many installations where the rack looked pristine but the out of sight areas or covered parts for the actual runs like under floor or overhead in partially covered trays or inside the rack vertical sections looked like spaghetti. If your goal is neatness and you justify the clean rack area for some technical reason, what is your excuse for the other areas that are out of normal sight looking like crap, do those technical reasons for a pristine rack not apply to areas others can not easily see? In order to get the rack to look nice, the extra cabling is balled up and hidden elsewhere. It does not make sense.

      For reference, I do neat work now and I've had to replace and re bundle cables and wires inside nuclear reactor instrumentation control panels and rack mounted electronic instrumentation shelves using nylon string and shellac so I am very familiar with the concept and the goals of proper wire management.

    3. Re:Work to be found by Monty_Lovering · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think balance is best; those ultra-tidy racks would also win prizes in a contest for Obsessive Compulsives. Of course, maybe they are in the avionics bay of the space shuttle and need to be zipped down... or maybe they have bad infestation of those naughty server-room elves...

      Somewhere in the fricking middle is best; don't zip-tie stuff that makes re-working twice the tsak it need be. Unlss your GOAL is to make re-wroking twice the task it should be...

    4. Re:Work to be found by dmdb · · Score: 1

      A decent wireman will actually be able to get a cable coming out of a loom at the same spot as it went in which does actually make tracing cables a lot easier than going through a maze of cables. Also if cables are tied back properly then the chance of them failing is substantially reduced. In my experience properly installed cables just don't fail, its the ones which aren't put in properly which fail. When the looms are installed a couple of spares are also put in to allow for the one or two which won't work from the start (broken pairs during wiring etc) and after that point it just doesn't happen. All cables have unique numbers across the facility meaning finding the two ends of a cable is a doddle. If someone knocked a cable out while installing something else is going to cost the company several thousand a minute then yes it is worthwhile. In terms of hard wiring, having patch panels allows you to deal with the unknown scenarios, when you put the equipment in of course you know what has to connect to what but if circumstances change down the line as well as for equipment fault finding life for all is made much easier.

    5. Re:Work to be found by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I mostly agree. Such neat bundling is handy for backtracking a specific failure to a specific location, but when reconfigurations are necessary they're painful to handle. And when one class of rackmount unit has 8 ports, and another has 24 usable ports, and another has 2 fiber-optic ports going somewhere else, it can get pretty odd pretty fast.

      Rather than tightly bundling and anallyy overspecifying each connection, a huge benefit comes from using a conventional label-maker, a bit of color-coding, some thought about keeping the network cables away from power cables, and investing in lots of medium size Velcro strips rather than hundreds of precisely cut plastic Ty-wraps. The ease of reconfiguration and the the time saved more than justify the costs. Even more important is a policy of providing spare connections, so that *when* one fails, or when someone needs a spare connection in their office, you don't have to spend lots of money on extra power strips and expanders. A bit of investment is priceless in allowing people to easily handle an extra plug for a laptop or a debugging port.

      It's also priceless when the original installer is unavailable, and some after-hours support person is asked to look for the dead port to check the failed machine, or to slip in a debugging connection to monitor the traffic.

    6. Re:Work to be found by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      That's about what I thought as well. I'm all for neat wiring, but when I saw that there was absolutely no slack left at the ends of the wires I felt nothing but pity for the guy who has to work on that system.

    7. Re:Work to be found by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Oh one more thing that nobody ever thinks about in the anal-wires-must-look-good crowd. it will look like messy hell the second you need to make a change. that perfeectly cut wire on the left needsto be pulled and put on the right... oops, undo the whole damn thing to move one wire.

      Make it neat but the cable length to reach where it would need to go in the event of change orders or changes down the road. means you cant have it look like any of those photos. I already have that problem in a 36 zone home audio installation. all the nice perfectly cut wires needed a zone moved foom amp-1 to amp 6... lengthening it by 12 inches. Now I have splices in there that are a new point of failure down the road. yay.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Work to be found by cafucu · · Score: 1
      There is NOTHING wrong from a technical standpoint by using the plain old cable management hooks on the front of a typical rack that the cables route through, each wire does not need to be zip tied or Velcro every few inches and each wire spreading off of the bundle with a cable tie for each one, in fact, you can cross over the width of a typical 19 inch rack without the need for any additional bundling other then standard wire management trays and hooks. Side rack mounting depends on type of management you have for that, I've seen some better then others.
      That's fine for the front of the rack. You will be doing a lot of MAC (Move, Add, Change) work there. But most of these systems appear to have the nice dressing in the right place--on the back of the rack. Horizontal cabling rarely needs to be replaced after it's been tested and dressed in. You may need to add a cable here and there, but those can be done in a separate bundle.


      Like I said, my opinion is not going to be a popular one but can someone give me a technical reason why every rj45 plug in something like a 24 port blade needs to tied individually or even in groups of two? Is that "unsafe"? Is it a hazard in your environment? If so, what the hell is going on in your equipment room and why do you not have a door on your rack? Is it harder to track down then a huge bundle 20 deep and zip tied to 10ft lbs every 3 inches?
      A well dressed rack provides clean access to view connection status LEDs and makes it easy to plug in console and power cables. There is a difference between unsafe and unprofessional, and there's a healthy balance to be found between professional and anal. The conservative use of velcro on the front of the rack provides order and access to the equipment. Overuse is a bad mistake. On the horizontal cabling (back of the rack), pencil-dressing and documented test records make for a professional job.
      --
      :%s:work:/.:g
    9. Re:Work to be found by Ben+Newman · · Score: 1

      Remember that this is home automation equipment. The ultra neat wiring was likely done to make the homeowner happy that he went with such a professional company. Professionaly installed home automation of this magnitude is only going to be in place in the most upscale of homes, we're taking in the multi millions. You don't want those kind of customers to think you did a sloppy job. Plus it's a home automation system. If the thing were easy to take apart, the home owner might try to fix it themselves instead of making a service call.

  3. Not me. by O'Laochdha · · Score: 0

    I currently have my wiring straight up from my computer, forward enough that I have trouble putting the moniter up and down, around a tight corner by putting a hook right next to it, onto the wall above the door by a serious corner-cut, back likewise, around another corner, a more reasonable outward corner, then guided down until the coil resting on my dresser, in a loop around back to the jack, all on hooks that slip off at least twice a day.

    It's better than tripping over it.

    1. Re:Not me. by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Spend two bucks on zip ties and stop your whining. Yeesh.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:Not me. by O'Laochdha · · Score: 1

      ...not sure how zip ties would help.

    3. Re:Not me. by fastmike · · Score: 1


      As a cable team lead....

      Shhhhhhh. It will only get better if you ignore it. If not.. Cancer is an option too!

    4. Re:Not me. by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suppose you could use them to tie yourself to your chair and therefore not trip over stuff.

      (no I don't know either how they could help)

      OTOH there are some U shaped nails that are wide enough for CAT5 cabling. I've used those before.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  4. Site's down and only 3 comments? by Taimat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Boy, that was quick

    --
    The above comments are not guaranteed to make sense to anyone other than the author...
    1. Re:Site's down and only 3 comments? by crazyjeremy · · Score: 1

      Also, the editor put an incorrect link in. The worst home wiring jobs links to the same place as the Best... But I guess it doesn't matter if you can't even reach the page.

    2. Re:Site's down and only 3 comments? by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Also, the editor put an incorrect link in."

      Guess he got his wires crossed ...

    3. Re:Site's down and only 3 comments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's precisely why it got slashdotted. The site was linked TWICE. It didn't only get slashdotted - it got double-slashdotted!

    4. Re:Site's down and only 3 comments? by Mooga · · Score: 1

      Or did it get Slashed and then dotted? O_o

      --
      ~ Mooga
  5. nyud mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  6. forgive me if this is a dumb question by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but can a linksys wireless router actually work inside of a steel cabinet?

    1. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by Taimat · · Score: 1

      Yes, and no. I like the fact that those ant. are angled sideways.. I'm sure even if it gets outside the box, your not going to get much of a signal with it sideways

      --
      The above comments are not guaranteed to make sense to anyone other than the author...
    2. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by spyinnzus · · Score: 2, Informative

      the principles of faraday cages tell us that you can't send signals out of or into a mathematically closed surface of conductors. The box isn't fully closed and isn't made of a perfect conductor, but it should kill 90+% of the signal I'd guess.

    3. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      but can a linksys wireless router actually work inside of a steel cabinet?
      But this begs the question* of Linksys wireless routers actually working at all.

      *
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    4. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are omni directional antennas, so angle should make no difference. In fact, most of them don't trnasmit well straight down so angling is a good idea.

    5. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by RuBLed · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you guys are talking about but all i see is an open cabinet. I'm sure it would work. :)

    6. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by cheese-cube · · Score: 1

      Probably not. Thats why they keep the door open.

    7. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      If you know that "begs the question" doesn't mean "raises the question", then why didn't you just say "raises the question"? Wouldn't that have been a lot simpler then posting a footnote?

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    8. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by NaDrew · · Score: 3, Funny
      [offtopic]
      If you know that "begs the question" doesn't mean "raises the question", then why didn't you just say "raises the question"? Wouldn't that have been a lot simpler then posting a footnote?
      Because I actually used "begs the question" in its proper meaning, i.e. a circular argument. The post I responded to asked whether Linksys wireless routers would work inside a metal box; this begs the question (assumes without evidence) that the Linksys wireless router works at all.
      [/offtopic]
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    9. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polarisation of the radio waves makes it harder for clients to connect to the AP that is sitting at a wierd angle.

    10. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Third party firmware, and it'll be fine.

    11. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by Cramer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only if it's GROUNDED. You can transmit OUT all you want. No signal will be able to get back IN, however. Anyway, it's not even remotely a properly sealed faraday cage... there's holes in it for the cables. And the door doesn't have metal mesh RF shields. Even a very small crack will leak RF -- we had to put them inside the systems we used to sell to pass UL/FCC requirements.

    12. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by morcego · · Score: 1

      I second that.
      I have been using WRT routers for many different things, including VoIP relays, bandwidth management, ADSL router/firewall etc.

      Those are some versatile little boxes, once you get right of the factory provided firmware.

      --
      morcego
    13. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Informative
      Polarisation of the radio waves makes it harder for clients to connect to the AP that is sitting at a wierd angle.
      The problem with polarization is that you can't say for sure which way the mobile antenna will be pointing, so you can't make any blanket pronouncements about what constitutes "ideal orientation" for all occasions. PCMCIA wireless adapters have the antenna horizontal. Many integrated laptop wireless cards mount the antenna vertical in the LCD housing. The worst polarization for vertical receiver is a horizontal transmitter, and vice-versa. Placing the base station antennas at 45 degree angles from horizontal, and 90 degrees relative to each other gives you the greatest possible coverage of potential polarities of mobile antennas. You're unlikely to exactly match the polarity of the mobile (best), but you're also unlikely to end up with them at 90 degrees to one another (worst).
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    14. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Funny
      I have been using WRT routers for many different things, including VoIP relays, bandwidth management, ADSL router/firewall etc.

      Those are some versatile little boxes, once you get right of the factory provided firmware.
      Or you can keep it and they make geeky little paperweights!
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    15. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Might they not have some sort of antenna leading out of the case?

      Also, offtopic question: does your sig actually work?

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    16. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by EotB · · Score: 1

      Its probably just being used as a router. We have quite a few of these things floating around in various places doing routing duty. For the most part you leave the antennas connected so that if for whatever reason the radios aren't switched of properly they don't cook themselves but running unloaded.

    17. Re:forgive me if this is a dumb question by Sillygates · · Score: 1

      Well, I have a very similar router wrt54g, and I dont use it wirelessly. I have found that its worth the extra few bucks to get a router if dd-wrt can be loaded on it, so I can have the control of a $500 router (telnet, vpn, QoS, being able to adjust stuff like connection timeout, etc). With dd-wrt one can easily make one of these routers sustain 800+ simultanious connections, not to mention croning wake on Lan, or booting a comptuer remotely.

      --
      I fear the Y2038 bug
  7. Severe toilet training mayhap? by scuba_steve_1 · · Score: 0

    I suspect that someone was potty trained with a cattle prod.

  8. Dupe Link? by DumbSwede · · Score: 1

    Huh? The best and worst links are to the same article.

    1. Re:Dupe Link? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      It just means that the range of wiring jobs out there is very narrow.

      Or maybe the editor/submitter was having a bit of a Dickens moment...

    2. Re:Dupe Link? by mdecarle · · Score: 1

      It avoids discussions ... What one calls good wiring, another (see a higher comment by an AC) calls bad wiring.

      So, one picture should be enough.

  9. Neatness is good, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... there is such a thing as carrying it too far. I'm reminded of the tale of the junior sysadmin who proudly showed the senior sysadmin the cabinet he'd just wired up. Very neat, very pretty.

    The senior sysadmin looked at it thoughtfully, then flipped a single switch. Every server in the cabinet went down. Yup: every server had its entire power source coming from a single rail, instead of having the two redundant inputs coming from different rails.

    Where I work, every cable to every server in the machine room is labelled at both ends. The patch panels are also labelled with the address of the other end of the cable. Makes troubleshooting network problems a lot simpler (and that's important when you're talking over 200 servers on the floor ...)

    1. Re:Neatness is good, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... there is such a thing as carrying it too far.

      I had the same thought but a slightly different reason.

      Let's assume they're smart enough to put in all the right cables in all the right places. Now imagine a cable's found to be bad. To get it out from the bundles and replace it, they'll have to cut each of their million carefully-tightened cable ties, then put them all back. Likewise if they need to add a new cable to an existing bundle, reroute one, etc.

      If they used a few velcro straps instead of a million cable ties, it might not look as pretty, but it'd be just as organized and a whole lot easier to maintain.

      Where I work, every cable to every server in the machine room is labelled at both ends. The patch panels are also labelled with the address of the other end of the cable.

      The former is a great idea. The latter's a good idea...if people are rigorous enough to update the label when they reroute the cable. If not, it's just confusing. I try to know my limitations...in software, I follow the DRY principle for this reason.

    2. Re:Neatness is good, but ... by SpacePunk · · Score: 0

      You got lucky, or someone had some time on their hands. Around here (SE NM, Lubbock, and the Midland/Odessa, tx area) every single freakin patch panel and cable I've seen has been unlabeled. One place had cat-5 run, and I asked "they didn't label anyting?", the admin there just shrugged and said "They said it didn't need to be labeled." Most places it's just comedy gold. Cables run to patch panels like they should be, then short cables run to switches. Shit, guys, just cut out the patch panel if your going to do that, but it does look fancy.

    3. Re:Neatness is good, but ... by AsbestosRush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uhh... "cutting out the patch panel" causes a massive amount of headaches when dealing with building wiring. Moving connections around is *much* easier with a patch panel than hoping that the wire coming out of the wall is long enough to get to the bottom of the rack. This is just one example of why it's nice to have patch panels.

      --
      EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
      AC's need not reply
    4. Re:Neatness is good, but ... by fastmike · · Score: 1


      I don't think he meant cutting it out in a literal 'chop out the wires' sense..

      He was saying that if you don't label the cables and just punch 'em down willy nilly you might as well cut costs and put RJ45 cable ends on both sides and make a loooooooong patch cable.

      Hell, that might make it easier.

    5. Re:Neatness is good, but ... by Technician · · Score: 1

      The senior sysadmin looked at it thoughtfully, then flipped a single switch. Every server in the cabinet went down.

      For those who don't wish to dump running servers to test redundant power, I use a 100 Watt light bulb on a christmas flasher and a clamp ammeter. I can see the current wiggle .8 amps at the breaker box to identify the circuit without interrupting power. If both legs in the cabinet are on the same breaker, it's time to investigate further.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    6. Re:Neatness is good, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think one cable is not enough? Try zero cables. ;)

    7. Re:Neatness is good, but ... by notaspunkymonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      I spent some time working at a UK Gov site - their patching was so bad that when we were due to tidy it all up - they sent one of their Health and Safety bods down to look at the working environment and he dictated that no 1 person was to be in the room on their own at any 1 time.. at all points there had to be 2 of us in there... not sure if it was because of the danger of electricution (which was high) or the fact that you could get tangled up in the cat5 and never escape.

    8. Re:Neatness is good, but ... by enos · · Score: 1

      gotta admit that the wiring I saw at Monash Clayton was neat, although I only saw the stuff visible to the public. I was there on exchange last semester.

      But I have to say that the rest of the system was total rotten spaghetti.. Barely any integration, stupid configurations like 20 MB user disk space (my home uni had 500 in 1998, btw) with the Firefox disk cache set to 50MB (!). see a problem?

      Are the 6 round-robbin proxy servers each with a unique IP part of the 200? God damn I hated those things. Broke a lot of secure sites that made the reasonable assumption that the same session would come from the same IP, not to mention the trouble with forcing everything to HTTP. Don't even speak of the kludge that is Permeo (SOCKS proxy). The help desk even had the audacity to tell me that i didn't need SSH to the outside. It was a real pain in the ass to update the websites I was responsible for when there is NO FREAKING WAY TO UPLOAD TO THE OUTSIDE. I had to settle for 1 kb/s using the HTTP-Tunnel program and setting up an upload page that i could POST to. When I got there I was honestly wondering how a major university in a 1st world country can have such a terrible IT system. No wonder that even the CSE people I met couldn't do the most basic things. ITS just in the way of everything.

      And god damn, $17/GB??? how in the world can you (or MRS) justify that price in this day and age?

      Sorry I had to vent a little. I don't mean to blame anything on you personally, but ITS needs a MAJOR overhaul.

      --
      boldly going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse
    9. Re:Neatness is good, but ... by swimmar132 · · Score: 1

      If anything, the fact that it was neatly done might've allowed the senior engineer to figure out the problem quicker.

      The story didn't support your assertation that "neatness can be taken too far".

    10. Re:Neatness is good, but ... by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there is that. There's also small networks, that honestly don't need patch panels. If you have 8 drops, a switch, and one router, there's no need for a patch. If you have 100 drops, yeah, a patch is good. One place in particular had 36 drops, the idiots that put it in put in a 24 port switch, an 8 port switch, and a 4 port switch, and a router. No labeling of any kind, anywhere. So, they had essentially three different networks all wired up willy-nilly, which was suppose to be one network. It cost them more for me to go out, get a 16 port switch, sub-contract a guy to help me out (that I could trust), and a good part of the day hot plugging jacks while he looked for the blinking light, and both of us marking cable at both ends. To make matters worse it was one of those 'neat installs' where we had to cut zip ties, and follow cables in the closet. That kind of wiring job is a love/hate thing. On one hand it just pisses me off to no end, on the other hand it makes me money. I'm just one of those "if you going to do it, do it right the first time" kind of guys.

      Don't even get me started on the idiots that put in cat5 with 8 conductor telephone wire.

    11. Re:Neatness is good, but ... by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      According to our Health And Safety nutter (he comes and visits the office every 6 months and then I get a lecture from the office manager), I'm not allowed to be in the office alone. On the other hand, best time to do maintenance on the network, patch panel or servers is during the weekends (when everyone who has a life does something nice) and no one else wants to come and mess with the patch panel - hence my panel is almost as bad as the ones linked here (but probably not that bad - the network still works fine).

  10. Nice wiring is great and all by pcgamez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A super-neat wiring rack is great, if you don't need to get to the wires often. If you need to rearrange wiring often (for whatever reason), there is no point in making it look great (though a certain level of neatness is required for optimum efficiency).

    1. Re:Nice wiring is great and all by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      That's definitely a problem. Bundling all the wires together so tightly, with no slack, allows for no rearrangement and might not allow equipment substitution. It shouldn't be a rat's nest, but I don't think making it look like it was moulded in place makes it easier. Ideally, it should be neat, but making it accessible and easily changeable is more important.

    2. Re:Nice wiring is great and all by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "if you don't need to get to the wires often"

      But golly, this is electronics. Why would you need to change anything?

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    3. Re:Nice wiring is great and all by Technician · · Score: 1

      If you need to rearrange wiring often (for whatever reason), there is no point in making it look great (though a certain level of neatness is required for optimum efficiency).


      Want to bet? The wireing to the structure does not get moved much. It goes to a wall jack someplace right? Bring it into the cabinet into a patch bay. If someone changes office location and needs to keep their location on the managed system switch, simply repatch from the patch panel to the switch to keep the same port. There is no reason to ever have a rats nest in the back of a cabinet.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Nice wiring is great and all by CharlieG · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's why they invented PATCH PANELS - the wiring coming into/out of the rack is bundled, and goes to the patch panel - NEVER to an item in the rack - in fact, even wiring intra rack goes via a panel

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    5. Re:Nice wiring is great and all by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      even wiring intra rack goes via a panel

      That would be tough in many situations, and isn't desirable in most. To get a patch from rack 5 to rack 15, and also from 5 to 22, you would need a fully meshed network of patch panels. If I did that, I wouldn't have enough room for all the patch panels not to mention equipment. That's why we use ladders / suspended raceway. I also don't care to run much wire under the floor - only structured (patch rack to wall jacks) that don't change go that way.

      Also keep in mind that every single connection point - wire to plug, plug to jack, jack to wire, adds potential points for failure and noise. It's better to minimize those connection points and not use patch panels just for the sake of using patch panels.

    6. Re:Nice wiring is great and all by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      I didn't say you were not going to spend MONEY and TIME and space - but once it's RIGHT....

      I wish I could show the photos of some of the wiring downstairs - hint - the raised floor is a FLOOR - aka there is a full sub-basement under the wiring racks - and the master patch bay is something like 20 RACKS wide - NOTHING but patches in each rack

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    7. Re:Nice wiring is great and all by adolf · · Score: 1

      I agree completely.

      I'd like to add that the reasons for moving a cable from one patch panel to another are always wrong, and always stupid. So just don't do it.

      If, knowing this, the cable still needs to be moved, then run another one. Or use additional patch panels to work around it.

      This is expensive. But, then again, so are messy racks.

      I have always been under the impression that one of the basic concepts of this whole "structured cabling" thing was that the infrastructure cabling goes from point A (a walljack, say) to point B (typically a patch panel), and then IS NOT TO BE FUCKED WITH. EVER.

      Using this simple mentality will automatically save you from a large percentage of wiring problems, and prevent most temptation to fuck with all those nicely-tied wires, as they needn't be fucked with because they're not fucked up because NOBODY HAS EVER FUCKED WITH THEM.

      LEAVE THEM THE FUCK ALONE.

      (thank you)

    8. Re:Nice wiring is great and all by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      There IS a time when infrastructure wiring changes - when the infrastructure does! You add bundles as new racks are added or even new server rooms

      But that's the idea - it doesn't change all that often - and when it DOES, it's not a "1 wire" thing - it's BUNDLES of wires

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    9. Re:Nice wiring is great and all by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      BTW I forgot to point out - you are making a MAJOR mistake if you think you need a full mesh - and that you run wires from 5 to 15 and also 5 to 22!!

      Lets say your main patch bay is rack #1 (note - not patch PANEL - patch BAY - a full rack of patches)

      When you want a cable that goes from 5 to 22 - the wire goes like so:
      Equipment in rack5 > Patch Panel in Rack 5
      Patch Panel in Rack 5 > Patch Bay in RACK 1
      Patch Bay in Rack 1 to Patch Panel in Rack 22
      Patch Panel in Rack 22 to Equipment in Rack 22

      Replace the #22 with #15 for rack 15

      Now - you now need to go to a backup gear in rack 16, to replace something in rack 22

      You go to the pach BAY - pull patch that connects #5>#22, and move it to connect to #16 - your DONE (assuming you have the patch panel in rack 16 configured)

      BTW in Audio-video, patch panels are often "normaling" - if the normal, original design has rack 5, cable 1 attached to Rack 22, cable 6, they will be one above the other in the patch bay - and best yet - if there is NO cable in the patch holes, they are automatically connected to each other by the panel itself. Under NORMAL operations, you walk by the patch bay and patch panels and se NO patches

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    10. Re:Nice wiring is great and all by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Oh - and BTW - there IS another way - and we can trace through the idea - lets see where it leads (give me time - you'll see how this is NOT OT by the end):

      As you may know if you've ever delt with analog racks and patch bays, back when, someone came up with the idea of an electronic patch bay. Instead of moving a physical patch from jack 1 to jack 7, you tell the patch bay to connect jack 1 to jack 7 with a command..

      The NEXT step in the process is we take the signal, and we come up with a way to do 2 things - tell the patch bay we WANT a connection and when we are done with it - and we have a way to tell the patch bay where we want to connect. Let's say we do the first part by having a 48 DC volt idle voltage drop to about 6 volts when we want a connection, and when we are done, we raise the voltage back to 48 volts. We then signal who we want to connect to with a series of 10 sets of pulses of the control voltage - each pulse set moving a relay stack

      We've just invented the rotary dial telephone

      Now, electronics comes along, and we replace the pulses with tones - we have touch tone. But we still have this problem. Your local rack has a LOT of wires going to other racks - wires, particularly wires between cities, cost BIG money. So using this new fangled electronics, we first devise an analog way to put more than one signal on a wire, and break them up on the other side, by shifting frequencies - we'll call this "Multiplexing". We eventually come up with the idea of digitizing this data, and we do that -

      But now we realize - there is a LOT of dead space in each data stream - so we can break the steam up into little chunks -lets call them packets, and tag a sender, and a destination on to each packet, and stuff them on the wire. We decide which wire to send them to on a packet by packet basis, based on the header information - and we let the machine on the other side decide where to send them... (starting to sound familiar?)

      OK - to make a LONG story short - we've invented these rally nice, highly flexible electronic patch bays - they are called routers/switches

      You stuff one in EVERY rack - all gear goes to the router - the router decides if the packet is local - and you send it by the one FAT pipe out of the rack to the central patch bay (a bay full of routers) for it to be moved betwen racks...

      Of course this assumes you can deal with packet latency, and have a fat enough pipe to handle the inter rack traffic (otherwise, run more than one pipe)

      In theory (yeah I know the difference between theory and practice) - in todays day and age, there should be ONE wire coming out of each rack - that's it! The wire coming out of the router - that goes to the router bay - and you think of a lan room like a big rack...

      Want to patch device 1, in rack 6, lan room 12, company 220 to device 3, rack 22, lanrom 14, company 156? Maybe you just tell the router that 220.12.6.1 goes to 156.14.22.3?

      Look at the history of those big dumb telcos - they are not so dumb, and can still support legacy gear from WAY back when

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  11. Cheap does it. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Back in the days when RS-232C ruled, I was in charge of wiring, and our department always made fun of another department's propensity at overspending and buying expensive gadgets.

    When they wired their mainframe, they spent about $2000 for a bunch of bix panels.

    When it was my turn to do the same job, I took $5.00 and went to the hardware store, I picked up a 1ft by 4fr plywood scrap and bought a box of finishing nails and brought that in the office (the canadian head-office of a fortune 500 company, btw) and started hammering away neat rows of nails to which I soldered wires from a 100 pair cable we ran between two floors.

    On hearing the hammering, the boss of the other department (who happenned to pass by by chance) came to have a peek, and he sees me hammering and soldering and asks me "what are you doing???"

    - I'm doing a patchboard for the serial lines.

    - Why don't you use a BIX board like we did in the plant?

    - Because yours cost $2000 and mine only $5.00.

    He left without saying a word.

    1. Re:Cheap does it. by ltbarcly · · Score: 0, Troll

      And then it caused impedance issues which you didn't even know existed!

      But it worked as far as you know, right?

      I mean, all those equations and stuff don't matter, it's just wires. If they connect then everything is fine. Did you ever wonder though, why does an EE degree take 4 years to get when you can just hammer some nails?

    2. Re:Cheap does it. by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      why does an EE degree take 4 years to get

      Well see, college educations used to matter, but then the hairpieces decided that they could make billions coming up with a "brand" over croutons and ranch. Innovation doesn't matter when you can sell logos.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    3. Re:Cheap does it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty hard to screw up RS-232, impedance-wise. The signals are so slow that the corresponding wavelengths are hundreds or even thousands of meters long.

    4. Re:Cheap does it. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Informative
      And then it caused impedance issues which you didn't even know existed!
      But it worked as far as you know, right?
      I mean, all those equations and stuff don't matter, it's just wires. If they connect then everything is fine. Did you ever wonder though, why does an EE degree take 4 years to get when you can just hammer some nails?
      If you have had a EE degree, you would know that RS-232c is +/-12 volts, and at that time (20 years ago), the maximum speed the mainframe could work at was 9600 baud, so that's 104 microseconds per cycle, worst case.

      So no, it did not have any impedance issues.

      And yes, it worked fine, and did so for the next 15 years.

    5. Re:Cheap does it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was all my fault and I will never live it down. The system in question ran traffic lights and used ribbon cables to link the computer system with the modem racks. I shut the system down to do something with the modems and pulled all the cables out at the modem end so I could work on it. Then I put the lot back together and powered up and -lo and behold- sent 100 intersections to fallback.

      The ribbon cables were piled up on the bottom of the rack holding the modems and I had totally missed the bottom row of 16 modems which meant that every cable was 16 modems out of synch and all the checksums were wrong.

      Never have I had a more lonely five minutes than I did tracing back through the last hour or so of work to find the problem. A quick repatch and everything was ok.

    6. Re:Cheap does it. by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      Twenty years I worked in telecom in Toronto (ROLM, Mitel, Nortel, others), and if I had ever seen a punch down block where the tech had soldered the connections, I would have been astounded to the point where I would have walked out. There's a reason for BIX blocks; they work well, they keep the MDF reasonably uncluttered, and more important, you save thousands in the long run through easier maintenance and upgrades.

      Your solution is the perfect example of "penny wise, pound foolish".

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    7. Re:Cheap does it. by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      I guess we'd better not tell the OP about how I used to connect .... (drumroll)

      a whole bunch of three-prong extension cords and XON/XOFF handshaking.

      That worked fine, too, although 9600bps wasn't always achievable. But I was always worried somebody would actually plug one in to an electrical outlet while the end was still attached to my terminal in another building....

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    8. Re:Cheap does it. by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's +/-25VDC, but most systems were never that picky. Some modern day systems use 0 and +5VDC and it's "good enough". (read: no charge pump to get +/-5.)

    9. Re:Cheap does it. by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Oh, so you must have inspired the guy who did the telephone wiring in my apartment building. I've seen it... and it seems that every time someone changes service, my DSL goes out..

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    10. Re:Cheap does it. by dotgain · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of capacitance. Impedance bothers every signal, low or high frequency.

    11. Re:Cheap does it. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      You should have used CURRENT loop, then... :) :) :)

    12. Re:Cheap does it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      `If you have had a EE degree, you would know that RS-232c is +/-12 volts,'

      I've only got a physics degree, and I can't find a copy of the official standard on-line for free (no surprise - it's a commercial product from the IEEE), but:

      `Signal State Voltage Assignments - Voltages of -3v to -25v with respect to signal ground (pin 7) are considered logic '1' (the marking condition), whereas voltages of +3v to +25v are considered logic '0' (the spacing condition). The range of voltages between -3v and +3v is considered a transition region for which a signal state is not assigned.'

      The -3V/+3V minimum is why you may not run RS232C off 5V (the above is the transmitter specs, if my memory serves). But I do recall that the *receiver* voltage level spec is for +2.5V/-2.5V up to +30V/-30V, so `you might get away with it over short quiet runs'.

      ` and at that time (20 years ago), the maximum speed the mainframe could work at was 9600 baud, so that's 104 microseconds per cycle, worst case.'

      Are you sure that mainframes could only communicate at 9600 baud in 1986? Old slow ones, maybe.

      For example, the Apple high speed serial card for the Apple ][ could manage 19200 baud RS232C well before then, as could the 1981 BBC Micro (although in that case, not fully to spec - better make sure your connectors are good and your cable run is short). The original 1984 Macintosh computers had two 230,400 bit/s RS422 ports (semi-compatible with RS232C) designed to be externally clocked at up to 920,000 bit/s. I find it hard to believe that mainframes of the time were slower than PCs. Even real IBM PCs could do 9600 baud RS232C in 1986.

      `that's 104 microseconds per cycle, worst case. So no, it did not have any impedance issues.'

      Hmm... RS232C is spec'd up to 25m. Assuming free space speed of light down the cable (invalid, but good enough for order of magnitude), a wave of that wavelength has a frequency of:

      c/wavelength = f

      3 x 10^8 ms^-1 / 25 m = 12MHz

      In practice, quarter-wavelength stuff is relevant for impedance matching, so you you need to think about 3MHz waves.

      Assuming that you want a good clean square wave, by rule-of-thumb that means you're okay up to of the order of 300,000 baud before you think about impedance matching issues over 25m runs. I'm probably being pessimistic - but note that 230,400 bit/s is what the original Mac serial ports could run at without external extras.

    13. Re:Cheap does it. by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Has current loop ever been used *anywhere* commercially besides MIDI?

      I remember reading the original MIDI spec about a hundred years ago, and saying "Say, that's quite clever!".

      It's particularly appropriate for musical instrument use, as ground loops in studios are definately something to avoid. Also, stupidity errors are usually limited to blowing an opto coupler.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    14. Re:Cheap does it. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Has current loop ever been used *anywhere* commercially besides MIDI?
      Yup. Teletypes (Baudot and ASCII) used current loop.
  12. One of my favorite messy racks by MikeDataLink · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here is a picture of a site in Dallas, TX. This picture belongs to a HUGE telecom company. A baby bell if you will. ;) How they maintain this I will never know. http://www.waystupid.com/item-378.htm What is more amazing is that after several attempts by staffers, the management refuses to let people clean this up. And they show this to prospective customers on a daily basis!!!

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    1. Re:One of my favorite messy racks by ksm2552 · · Score: 1

      that picture scares me...

    2. Re:One of my favorite messy racks by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

      Ohhhhh myyyyyy god.... I don't even know where to begin with comments... wow.

      --

      I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

    3. Re:One of my favorite messy racks by mwhite42 · · Score: 1

      I had a stupid boss once that after I had wired everything with color coded patch cables came through the server room and went nuts because he did not want different colored or lengths of cables. I had to redo it all with 6 foot blue cables. I left soon after.

    4. Re:One of my favorite messy racks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they have a single supplier at least. Plus they say that yellow is soothing.

    5. Re:One of my favorite messy racks by jnaujok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, if this is a telecom, then I can tell you exactly who is to blame for this mess, your favorite Uncle, Sam.

      Having worked for a telecom (one that might just have had the biggest bankruptcy in history), I went to one of their main voice switching centers and was shown an entire room that looked like this. When I asked why in the world we had an entire room that was just cable loops that went from a DEMUX board to a MUX board, he told me that federal law requires them to break out every signal that travels through the data center down to the DS1 level (that's about 25 phone lines) so that the FBI can still use their 1950's based equipment to tap the phone lines.

      So, instead of just packet sniffing on the 20 OC-192 lines coming in and out of the main switch, they had to break that down into nearly one million DS1 ports in a room that wasn't used for any other purpose than to break down phone lines to DS1.

      With one million lines of cabling being demuxed down from OC-192 to OC-12 and then down to DS-3 and then DS-1, that room was just awash in yellow cable (they also used yellow for some reason, don't ask me why). I remember one bundle coming out of the room that was about two feet around of solid cable.

      Mind you, when the phone techs actually tested the line they just went to a PC and snagged the packets off the OC-192 stream, and played them through the sound card. In order to "test line quality" of course.

      --
      Life, the Universe, and Everything... in my image.
    6. Re:One of my favorite messy racks by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Having worked for a telecom (one that might just have had the biggest bankruptcy in history), I went to one of their main voice switching centers and was shown an entire room that looked like this. When I asked why in the world we had an entire room that was just cable loops that went from a DEMUX board to a MUX board, he told me that federal law requires them to break out every signal that travels through the data center down to the DS1 level (that's about 25 phone lines) so that the FBI can still use their 1950's based equipment to tap the phone lines."

      I remember learning in high school about how East Germany and the USSR used to do things like this. It was being used as an example of how evil those countries were, if I remember correctly (that they spent more on wiretapping than they did on the phone system itself)

  13. As long as it works! by insideyourhalo · · Score: 0

    I don't really care how pretty the wiring job is. Typically we denote drop speed by the color of cable.. and that is about all that really matters. What should be more important is the wiring job at various points that involve a smaller 5-10 port switch for an individual office. For the love of god make sure that things are marked and neat so some one doesnt end up plugging a switch into itself on accident.. not that *i* have done such a thing and watched the entire network come to a screeching halt.

  14. Neat != Usable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'd actually argue that although some of the wire racks pictured look nice they're unusable - you'd have to snip all of those zip-ties to trace a cable. If letting the cable lie in the wire management isn't good enough Velcro would be better, and less likely to be over tightened to the point of pulling the cat5 twists out of spec.

    In our computer room I just provide plenty of wire management, a wide assortment of cable lengths, and a picture of the wedgie I gave the last admin who kludged something 'for testing' and left it that way for months.

    1. Re:Neat != Usable by curtlewis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly, you need to be able to get to any cable. Zip ties are single use. Velcro rip ties, while more expensive, are reusuable.

      And talk about overkill on that one 24 port switch or whatever it was. They used at least 24 zip ties, one for each cable and some doubles. Don't you think one every 2-4 would have done just as good a job? Instead, they completely locked down the cable making any troubleshooting a nightmare. Three well placed ripties would do a fine job, keep it orderly AND maintainable. Especially if the ties were long enough to have additional room for growth.

    2. Re:Neat != Usable by akahige · · Score: 4, Informative

      What you fail to grasp -- along with everyone else who's posted in the thread so far, if the comments are any judge -- is that these are AV gear racks, NOT computer/network/phone racks.

      CEDIA == Custom Electronic Design and Installation Association. These people install home theatres, integrated audio systems, etc.

    3. Re:Neat != Usable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Zip ties are single use.

      Until I started working with Dell rackmount servers, I would agree with you. Dell throws in reusable zip ties to organize the cables on the back. There is a little button you can push to release the zip tie.

      I thought it was pretty neat for 1 cent of plastic.

    4. Re:Neat != Usable by AsbestosRush · · Score: 1

      Audio/Video connections still fail from time to time, just like notwork connections. When I worked for a big A/V firm out of OKCity, our service techs would tear installers a new hole for not leaving some sort of service loop (usually at least 6", preferably 12") on every connection inside of a rack. We eventually started using deep well Panduit inside of the equipment racks: It leaves the rack looking nice, yet gives you a place to shove a service loop that's out of sight.

      --
      EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
      AC's need not reply
    5. Re:Neat != Usable by sjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is hard sometimes to make service loops look neat, but they're absolutely worth any clutter they cause.

      Of course, with a little creativity it's often possible to bundle everything up so that one or two snips releases plenty of extra length.

      My "favorite" though is people who pull fibre cables "nice and tight" then zip them within an inch of their lives while the equipment is warm. As soon as it's powered off for a few hours, fibres start breaking. It sure looks pretty until you have to cut a zillion ties to do anything.

    6. Re:Neat != Usable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What you fail to grasp -- along with everyone else who's posted in the thread so far, if the comments are any judge -- is that these are AV gear racks, NOT computer/network/phone racks.

      What does that have to do with anything? They have exactly the same problems - equipment can change, cables can be defective, etc.

    7. Re:Neat != Usable by rock-o-matic · · Score: 1

      releasable cable ties: http://tinyurl.com/fsgaz we use 'em all the time in our racks - keeps everything nice and tidy and you don't waste 40 ties every time you pull a new line in.

    8. Re:Neat != Usable by Technician · · Score: 1

      you'd have to snip all of those zip-ties to trace a cable.

      Dude, Invest in a fox and hound. Check your local electrical supply dealer. I am not talking about pets here. It should be part of any low voltage tech's toolkit.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    9. Re:Neat != Usable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they're not as dangerous as the normal ones.

      'Dangerous zipties' I hear you cry in astonishment.
      Yes indeed, those things are sharp as hell when they're not cut off properly and it's easily enough to slice through skin. I believe they're banned in some states of USA as someone stuck his hand through a duct and ended up slicing his wrist open with particularly nasty result.

      That first cab looks real neat, until you have to trace a cable through it and discover not only are they tight as guitar strings but they're all locked in place. Looks nice but crap to work on.

    10. Re:Neat != Usable by whmac33 · · Score: 1

      Those things suck. The couple of times I've needed to undo them after install they've either been in the most awkward position I couldn't press the tab properly, or they're so brittle they just snap. I through the damn things away now.

    11. Re:Neat != Usable by GTMoogle · · Score: 1

      I once tried to cut a zip tie with a fairly heavy duty pair of scissors, where I couldn't slip the tie closer than about 2 inches to the hinge. Snapped one of the scissor's blades off. It was an old pair of scissors, but still, wtf? That must have been some shoddy steel.

      Zip ties are evil.

    12. Re:Neat != Usable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so that one or two snips releases plenty of extra length

      I believe that is also the priciple behind penis lengthening surgery.

    13. Re:Neat != Usable by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      I'm going to be redundant here - as I've said it in 2-3 other messages. You use patch panels for flexibility. Yeah, they cost money. The FLEX comes in designing you panel correctly - NO wire goes direct from unit "A" to Unit "B" - it goes - Unit A to Patch Panel in rack where A is - to fixed wiring - to Patch Panel in rack where unit B is, to Unit B - even if they are in the same rack

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    14. Re:Neat != Usable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Zip ties are single use

      Surely you jest ? A deft poke with a well placed cocktail stick/pin/"something small and pointy" always works for me.

      Then again I'm really skint so that £ 2 bag of cable ties I bought three years ago has got to last me for life !

    15. Re:Neat != Usable by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      1.) That's the back of the patch panels. That's the building infrastructure, which should be done once, labeled well (each jack on the front of the patch panel corresponding to a plug in the wall of whatever office), tested and verified.

      2.) Tone generator and probe wand.

      --
      sig?
    16. Re:Neat != Usable by ryanhos · · Score: 1

      Those photos of terminated 25-pair sure look like comm systems to me!

      --
      "I threw up my hands in disgust and wondered if it had been such a good idea to have eaten my hands in the first place."
    17. Re:Neat != Usable by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      these are AV gear racks, NOT computer/network/phone racks.

      I don't see how that makes any difference. Are A/V cables any less prone to failure than data cables?

    18. Re:Neat != Usable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As soon as it's powered off for a few hours

      Uhmmm... you know, we don't really power off our fibrechannel connected systems.

      .
    19. Re:Neat != Usable by legirons · · Score: 1

      "I'd actually argue that although some of the wire racks pictured look nice they're unusable - you'd have to snip all of those zip-ties to trace a cable."

      Why not just look-up the cable's ID number if you want to know where it goes?

    20. Re:Neat != Usable by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      You are supposed to use a clipper, not a scissor or a pen knife, you can easily cut yourself and I'm definitely a bane of health and safety nutters - and I would always take the time and go and find the clipper.

    21. Re:Neat != Usable by putaro · · Score: 1

      Are A/V cables any less prone to failure than data cables?

      Of course! Provided that you bought the high-end audiophile grade cabling in addition to increasing presence, cancelling out any phase jitter and working in conjunction with your tube amplifier to provide the most analog warmth for your music they also magically heal themselves.

  15. Looks great for now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure that wiring looks great right now. Lets give it a while when they have to start pulling new cables and lets see what happens. I'm pretty sure they are not going to cut every zip tip, pull the wire through, then redo the zip ties. The wires will be going every which way outside of the rails. Wiring hell is every data center's destiny.

    1. Re:Looks great for now by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      So.. what you're saying is they should've wrapped in a few extra wires of the longest length to allow for replacements?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:Looks great for now by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i don't think you have your cunning plan fully thought out where do those extra cables run to? you won't know where to run them untill you need them.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:Looks great for now by DaEMoN128 · · Score: 1

      You run spares to to furthest termination point on that row or rack. If it is wire wrap, you run it to the furthest pins, and then roll it up in the fan. If it is a patch panel, you run it to the furthest port on the panel and terminate it (same with punchdowns). Either that, or you completely populate the patch panels and wire wraps on the perminant side, and leave enough slack on the spares to reach the furthest termination point and then dress the cable back into the spares. Telcos have been doing that for years. Any other questions.

      --
      Stop signs are only Suggestions
  16. Dynamic environment... by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Neat-looking network and server racks are for taking photos for glossy magazine and sales brochure covers. In a *real* IT shop, like the ones I run, things can change on a daily basis... sometimes several times each workday. We keep our racks just neat enough to be serviceable and flexible for the rapid config changes and equipment installs and removals we perform very frequently.

  17. Low-voltage wiring by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1

    If I were building a house, I would almost certainly do the low-voltage wiring myself. Is there any reason not to?

    1. Re:Low-voltage wiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Building Codes

    2. Re:Low-voltage wiring by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1

      Right, thats what I was getting at. Is it not allowed to do low voltage wiring yourself? If so, who enforces it? How to you get the qualification, it can't be that hard to pass the test, even the electrician wiring rules exam isn't that hard.

    3. Re:Low-voltage wiring by Cramer · · Score: 1

      One word: Building Codes. :-)

      (and if your insurer knows an unlicensed installer did *any* of the wiring, they'll never insure the structure.)

    4. Re:Low-voltage wiring by Martix · · Score: 1

      You can do it all your self.....Then get it inspected.

      Ive done it a few times and no hassles

    5. Re:Low-voltage wiring by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you are (what your local codes say) and what you're doing. For simple stuff like running an outlet or a light switch, then "nobody has to know". :-) But for any large project, like wiring an entire (new) house, then odds are you're not going to get away with it. Around here (NC), since you don't actually own the house being built until it's finished -- housing communities, the builder(s) own it -- and you aren't being supervised by a licensed electrician, you cannot wire it yourself.

      Keep reading that first sentence until it sinks in. :-)

    6. Re:Low-voltage wiring by Skater · · Score: 1

      I just wired my (preexisting) house with Cat 5e ethernet cable, telephone, and TV cable. It wasn't that hard to do, though it did take some time, and having someone be able to get the fish tape and attach the wires to it helps a LOT (I had no help for most of it, and the project took two or three times as long as it should've - also, sometimes my cat would attack the cables as I was pulling them up to the attic, making it even harder).

      (The phone wiring in the house was bad and only had two jacks, in inconvenient locations - there were more but they were all removed when the house was remodeled. The cable TV wiring was all cut when the house was remodeled - I found the remains in the attic. Since I was redoing the telephone anyway, I decided to put in ethernet and cable as well and have it look modern.)

      Some pics of the results: http://rjmarq.org/house/wiring/

      For your specific question, as others have said it might be a problem to go into an unfinished house to do that. There may be laws, and there may be things in your contract that deal with it. My brother did it for his guitar room in the house he had built, but I don't know how he got permission (or even if he did) to do it.

    7. Re:Low-voltage wiring by SGGent · · Score: 1

      Building codes are very localized typically on a county by county basis. Though typically things like wiring fall back on National Electrical Code.

      Licensing for electricians is done state by state. For example, in Georgia there are a few different types of licenses. You can get general (any), general(200 amps), and low voltage (telcom, data, alarms, sound). Neighboring states will usually honor each other's licenses but that's about it. You can obtain a license by either working under a licensed electrician for 4 years or enrolling in a vo-tech class to shave a year or two. In either case you will have to pass a test.

      Some areas are very picky on who installs the wiring. You may have done a perfect job, but if you aren't licensed, the inspector may make you tear it all out. Some will allow you to do some small home wiring, have it inspected, and pass code. It also depends on the inspector.

      Some of the brief gotchas I've found with data cabling.
      -plenum rated cable (a measure of toxicity released in buring)
      -conduit type and grounding (cable trays in ceilings)
      -filling in holes running through a firewall (the orignal defn :)
      -avoiding zip ties and such everywhere except the network closet

      I'm sure there are more. The other side of not being up to code hinders buying, selling, repairing, or insuring your home and may bring along fines.

  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Bad wiring made me less pretty by svunt · · Score: 1
    Wow, I'm impressed. I run a fairly cable intensive home network, and I get grief from friends & partner for my neat cabling obsession. But once you've tripped over the wires running from your video card to your TV going for a piss at 4am, and chip a tooth when your mouth hits the arm of a chair on the way down, you get neat.


    Having seen these pics, I think I'll go and re-do all my cabling...I feel inspired by these mush bigger, yet even neater seups.

  20. mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  21. Someone had to say it by hellfire · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd like to be a judge on that panel. I'd love to give out awards for the best rack.

    What? Wiring? What are you talking about? Oh...

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  22. 120 volt wiring is the easiest by victorvodka · · Score: 1

    you could do the high voltage wiring yourself too. i've done lots of stuff with digital and analog circuits, and they nearly always have to be debugged. but once you know that black is hot and white is neutral and bare copper is ground, it's very rare to wire something at 120 volts and not have it do exactly as expected. dual-switched lights are the only exception to this rule, but only in cases where you're faced with someone else's existing work.

    --

    The flag just makes more sense than the constitution. - Judas Gutenberg

    1. Re:120 volt wiring is the easiest by d3matt · · Score: 1

      Bahh... Dual switched lights are easy. It just take a couple seconds to remember how you want it to work.

      --
      I am d3matt
    2. Re:120 volt wiring is the easiest by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1

      Right, but if it doesn't do exactly what you expected, its a bit more serious if its 120V! Besides, it is illegal, unless you are a qualified electrician and have passed the wiring rules. Or at least this is true where I live, surely it is true in USA as well?!?

    3. Re:120 volt wiring is the easiest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It depends on the local building codes.

      In cities you usually have to either have your wiring done by a licensed electrician or have the building inspector look it over.

    4. Re:120 volt wiring is the easiest by magetoo · · Score: 1
      The rules in Sweden are interesting. The way they were explained to me was something like:


      "...so basically, the rules say that you may do the installations yourself, provided you have the necessary knowledge."
      "Okay, that sounds reasonable. But what exactly is meant by 'necessary knowledge'?"
      "Well, if you wire your house yourself, and there's an electrical fault and it burns down ... you did not have the necessary knowledge."

      I don't know if this is completely true, but at least it's a good story. :-)

      Considering that they let us build switched extension cords, and use them, in shop class (what's the term I'm looking for?) when I was 14, it seems it can't be that far off.

    5. Re:120 volt wiring is the easiest by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 1

      In most of the USA you are only required to be a licensed electrician if the work you are doing is for a business or common dwelling. The authorities only get involved when your screw-ups could potentially kill someone other than you and your immediate family.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    6. Re:120 volt wiring is the easiest by mikael_j · · Score: 1
      For most "real" wiring you need to be an electrician and "the blue book" is what you follow. The blue book can best be described as a shitload of rules for exactly how to perform an installation, and if you want to keep your job you'd better follow the rules. I've seen some crazy older installations though, green and yellow phase is one example (green and yellow is ground, only ground and let me repeat this to you again only ground and nothing but ground), that was one seriously scary installation..

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  23. I'm in trouble now. by Sometimes_Rational · · Score: 5, Funny

    While viewing the article, my wife overheard me saying, "Ooh, nice rack on that one.

    --
    Warning: The intelligence of this post may be larger than it appears.
    1. Re:I'm in trouble now. by mdhoover · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh, best story I have comes from Comdex/Interop.

      Wandering around away from my display (armed with booty to trade, mugs for penguins etc) I came across 2 middle aged IT geeks checking out some glorious powdercoated, properly cooled, neatly wired and well laid out rack equipment on display.

      As they were tinkering with the offerings one was heard to pronounce "what a great rack, wouldn't you love one in your home".

      At this point the poor unsuspecting geek was set upon by one of the very well endowed skimpily clad models hired to parade around and lure in the punters, who promptly slapped him across the face and berated the poor confused fellow (who had that mix of deer in the headlights and WHA!! look on his face) for being a "misogynist pig" etc etc.

      Took 2 hours for my sides to stop hurting...

    2. Re:I'm in trouble now. by feepness · · Score: 1

      At this point the poor unsuspecting geek was set upon by one of the very well endowed skimpily clad models hired to parade around and lure in the punters, who promptly slapped him across the face and berated the poor confused fellow (who had that mix of deer in the headlights and WHA!! look on his face) for being a "misogynist pig" etc etc.

      I would have calmly explained to her that the device she was standing in front of was indeed called a rack, it was a very nice one, and many of the people seeing it would enjoy having one just like it at home. And then, just as calmly, I would have said as I turned to walk away "And by the way, just so you know, you've got a GREAT set of tits."

    3. Re:I'm in trouble now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I would have calmly explained to her that the device she was standing in front of was indeed called a rack, it was a very nice one, and many of the people seeing it would enjoy having one just like it at home. And then, just as calmly, I would have said as I turned to walk away "And by the way, just so you know, you've got a GREAT set of tits."

      You wouldn't have *calmly* done anything. FYI, Sean Connery is that cool--you are not. I just love it when some spastic slashdork pretends to himself that he's a smooth operator. Here's what actually would happen: you would ejaculate in your pants because it's the first time a decent-looking woman ever touched you. After the show was over, you would go back to your mom's basement where you live, lovingly place your pocket protector on the nightstand next to your filthy bed and have a wank.

    4. Re:I'm in trouble now. by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      Read my sig. That was actually fairly funny, so you shouldn't have hidden behind AC! =)

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
    5. Re:I'm in trouble now. by feepness · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't have *calmly* done anything. FYI, Sean Connery is that cool--you are not. I just love it when some spastic slashdork pretends to himself that he's a smooth operator. Here's what actually would happen: you would ejaculate in your pants because it's the first time a decent-looking woman ever touched you. After the show was over, you would go back to your mom's basement where you live, lovingly place your pocket protector on the nightstand next to your filthy bed and have a wank.

      Godamn man, lighten up. It was a joke. Here, replace "I would have" with "You should have". There, feel better? No? Have a valium, that's what the nice Doctor prescribed them for.

      Now, I have to go, Mom says my Mac and Cheese is ready and I'm late for a raid on WOW.

  24. Don't Do It *TOO* Perfect by zulux · · Score: 1


    Leave some slack!

    And don't wire wrap every half an inch!

    Nothing worse that a bunch of Cat5 cable cut too close that you can't even change the switch out with a different model because the jacks are in different places and the cable is too short. Or the patch panel is flaky and needs to be swaped out, but there's not an inch of slack!

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  25. And then by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

    Someone in Congress yells "the internet is a series of tubes!" *click* the web goes dark and the perfectly wired server rack is talking to your toaster.

    Oh how we hope the cranial rectal interface is disconnected before we shitcan a century of invention.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  26. Is crosstalk not a problem? by joeflies · · Score: 1
    Yes, I'm sure that there's plenty of shielding on these wiring systems. But I still hear my engineering teacher telling me that short & direct wiring that's easily services always beats the neat layouts that can't be modified easily. And cross talk becomes a problem when too many wires are lined up in neat straight lines.

    Of course, we were talking about bus lines, not network cable, just didn't know if the same rules applied.

    1. Re:Is crosstalk not a problem? by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. Yes crosstalk can become a problem. For most people this means migrating from one type of cable to another as the speed of your network increases. As an example, copper gig-e pretty much requires a properly wired Cat-5E cable, However if you are going to be setting up several runs in close paralel, (50' of station cable from the patch pannel to a quad of cubicals for exammple) it makes sense to move up to Cat-6, or better yet set up remote patch panels at the cube quad and run the appropriate cable for that configuration.

      In most cable plants, copper is used for 'local' connections, and most high capacity trunking is done via fibre. That can almost eliminate any concern regarding crosstalk. Granted if you like to roll your own fiber bundles, and don't properly insulate and run your fiber, you are going to encounter problems, but mos people don't do that with fiber ayway.

      I agree strongly with the note a couple up from here. If you wrap your bundles in such a way that every last cable has to be disconnected from any hardware that is going to be replaced, without building in enough slack to move that equipment when it fails, you are the one who is at fault for any resulting long term outage as the techs performing the swap attempt to get everything back where it belongs. If you have to replace a 6913, that is fully populated with 96 port blades. It's nice to have the ability to stick a label on each blade, identifying what slot it goes into, have enough slack available to remove it from the chassi, extract the chassi from the rack, rack up the new chassi, and re-insert the blades. Likewise replacing a single blade when you can simply hang the old blade in front of the new blade, and simply transfer the cables individually or in pairs will make the replacement go significantly faster. Also make sure you leave enough slack so that if a tech suspects that either a port, or set of ports on a card is bad, the cable can be connected to a different port for diagnostic purposes. If the port is determined to be bad, the cable should go back into the original spot on the replacement component, but do you want to get the blame for the device being down for an extended period because the user couldn't be moved to another port a blade or two away? Or would you rather come back and re-wrap all those bundles later on?

      Just my thoughts. I'm sure that lots of people can come up with other thoughts and opinions. Their probably right too.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
  27. I should have known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is the kind of 'nice rack' that Slashdot readers are interested in. _

  28. pfft, that is normal in VZ central office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i guess many of you do not get into the central office of the ILECs.
    When you walk in, you learn what cable management really means.
    Ladder racks several feet off the ground with several levels.
    Zip ties no where to be seen, we use wax string. You should see
    some of the racks and the cabling... they used string to hold the
    cables together so they look like a pack of ciggarettes.. that tight
    and cool looking.

    all fiber is ran in orange tubers and plastic trays just for it.
    dc power has cardboard wrapped around it whenever it gets close to
    metal for rub reasons.

    everything is grounded, ussually twice. two power supplies.
    t1s are brought to you very elegantly, as well as ds3s looking
    much spiffier then those pictures. wax string holding it all down.
    people do not want cut wrists when you reach for cables u know :P

    sooo bring on the telecom racks from old timers and see some
    union work in action.

    1. Re:pfft, that is normal in VZ central office by Dravik · · Score: 1

      That is a union kind of setup. That kind of work looks takes a lot of labor hours to both set up and maintain. Ohh its pretty too.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
  29. Damn by Beefslaya · · Score: 1

    /.'ed.

    Oh well, I wanted to submit my network closet at work in which they converted to a toilet paper/cleaning closet. (complete with nice Cisco Catalyst 2900, and PIX Pinesol shelving units).

    1. Re:Damn by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      Yeah we had something like that where I worked.

      When I got there, the rack was messy. I said "I think we should clean up that rack"... Management says "Ok do it over the weekend" (Job was on Salary - No overtime)

      Other people in the office started complaining about the messy rack - clients coming in and seeing the "core of our network", plus it was just unsightly (and in plain view).

      Management solution: add a "door" over the weekend to cover it up (And not even a nice door). I come in Monday morning to be faced by... "Oh dear."

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  30. You know what is missing? by ryanhos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You want to know what I didn't see in a single one of those "neat & tidy" wiring photos? I didn't see a single service loop. Sure, anybody can wire-tie the heck out of something and make it look nice and neat on project completion day. Hell, I used to produce racks of similar tidiness when I was 19, working for a regional communications installer doing hospital and school networks. But it takes a real artisan to make something look that neat AND design it to stand up to five years of corporate changes and rearrangements. Just wait until one of your wires has to move from the top of the rack (near the entry point) to the bottom of the rack.

    I think it was a previous comment that wrote: "Neat != Usable" That's so true. (Or Neat !== Usable for you PHP-tards)

    --
    "I threw up my hands in disgust and wondered if it had been such a good idea to have eaten my hands in the first place."
    1. Re:You know what is missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for us "php-tards" != also works. Damn server monkeys.

  31. The Obsessive and Aging by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You know, those with obsessive compulsive disorder can get really really bad about it... or get over it.

    I didn't Read either of TFA, because they seem to be slashdotted at the moment.

    However, after years and years of living, I can tell you that "if a job is worth doing, it is worth doing well" is just not true. Sometimes doing a job "good enough" is more than enough. It might get torn down next week. If you wash the windows "OK", that is probably good enough, they'll be dirty again soon enough.

    It all depends on what you are doing. Building a house? Do it well. Wiring a computer cabinet? Pfft - make it good enought for a few years. It will change. RS-232, thin-wire, thick-wire, 10BaseT, Cat 3, Cat 5, Cat 5e... Fibre... whatever.

    If you can do a 90% job for half the cost you will have enough left over to do another 90% job of something twice as good 4 years from now.

    Maybe. YMMV.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  32. Wow, now I'm embarrased... by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 1

    That home network "can" looks almost identical to mine. Packed into the same sized unit is a cable TV splitter, a multi-tap cable TV amplifier with power brick, a power strip, a 5 port GigE switch, a Linksys cablemodem, a phone punch panel, and loose bits of cellulose insulation. The wireless router sits in another room since I actually want a usable signal (though it does require 2 drops to the room, one from the modem, and one back to the switch). There's an abundance of unused cabling for extra cable drops for CATV, ethernet and phone.

    Because it's closed up in the can, I don't have to look at it. However because things are sat "just so", if I move one thing around, most of it "falls out" if I'm ever working in there. Downside is unless I sink some metal screws in there, there's little way of mounting it.

    The problem w/ these built-in units is that they're designed mostly for the manufacturer's equipment (switches, etc.) which mounts in a somewhat proprietary fashion. Using comodity equipment, it doesn't look very neat unless you found a way to secure things.

    Fortunately my racks at work don't look that messy - and rip-ties ARE my friend. Just too cheap to use them at home.

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  33. he mentioned RS232 by vlad_petric · · Score: 4, Informative

    I honestly don't think that it was much of a problem for RS232 communication (i.e. high-voltage, relatively low frequency).

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:he mentioned RS232 by Technician · · Score: 1

      I honestly don't think that it was much of a problem for RS232 communication (i.e. high-voltage, relatively low frequency).

      It was a real problem for RS232. RS232 is not a balanced signal with a + line and complimentary - line to reject common mode noise. Long RS232 lines were known for errors due to being a good antenna and radiating signal as well as receiving interferance. Ground loops and ground noise from all the power filtering that dumped current, noise and voltage into ground wires caused problems. This noise corrupted data regulary. That is why balanced lines instead of RS232 is used for long runs.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  34. I was worried for a second by spoco2 · · Score: 1

    Now, the site seems down, but being that you labelled that "One of my favorite messy racks", and it's from a site called waystupid.com, I was expecting a set of breasts with mud on them or something.

    But then I remembered I wasn't on Fark.

    1. Re:I was worried for a second by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      I've been to this company, it's in the INFOMART in Dallas IIRC.

  35. misread by elmarkitse · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read this as:

    How a Winning Rack Should Look

    and think that it was going to be full of posts with links to pictures of supermodels? Not that learning more abour WIRING RACKS is a bad thing, but this late at night I wouldn't mind some nice WINNING RACK photos.

  36. Extra security by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

    Mine's part of my security system. If the thieves stupid enough to try to take the cabling too I'll catch them for sure. It's like the old Ray Bradbury story "Fruit at the Bottom of the Bowl". Even if I'm on vacation they'll still be trying to untangle the cables when I get hope. The Gordian knot has nothing on my cabling!

  37. Never mind the wires, look at the final projects! by CaseyB · · Score: 1

    Yes, all the bundles of coloured wires look nice. But holy mother of home theatre, check out the links to the project pages!

    Might be an ok place to watch a flick.

    This is what a hardcore geek does when he sells his dotcom to Microsoft.

  38. Whiz Kids... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    When I kid in the early 1980's, I always wanted something like the main Whiz Kids room with multiple tables, electronic gear and wires strung all over the place. As an adult, I prefer my room to be neater for more practical reasons like vacuuming the floor. Some of those killer dust bunnies can put up a fight.

  39. Too Neat? by omeomi · · Score: 1

    The cabling might be incredibly neat and tidy, but when replacing one cable means cutting 50+ cable ties, isn't that going a bit overboard?

    1. Re:Too Neat? by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

      When's the last time you replaced a cable? I've only done it when building out a system and found a defective one.

    2. Re:Too Neat? by omeomi · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just because I work with pro audio, and have to rearrange equipment or move things from place to place every so often...I guess you're probably right, with a network, it's not like it's getting changed around too frequently.

    3. Re:Too Neat? by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      Finally, someone who understands that not everything is digital!!!

      I worked in pro audio for many years, and sometimes ground loops will appear out of nowhere after 3 years of perfect working conditions. If your racks aren't ready to be poked and prodded at any time, then you're not going to have the hum removed by tomorrow's sound-check, and you can kiss your job goodbye because big-name touring groups just don't have time for you to be behind a rack.

      The only equipment that needs to be perfectly wired and harnessed are the relatively short cable runs inside mobile racks. 500 miles in the back of a semi-truck can cause all kinds of insecure connections to become faulty, so you better make sure that vibrations and stretching aren't going to be putting any stress on solder joints. These IT people with their punch blocks don't know how easy they have it. At least the telecom guys know what wiring is about...

    4. Re:Too Neat? by mdouglas · · Score: 1

      Velcro ties.

    5. Re:Too Neat? by omeomi · · Score: 1

      Velcro ties.

      Yes, they do come in handy.

  40. Looks good ONCE, and only once. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To a limited extent, I agree.

    Neatness is one thing, but those examples just look like an advertising photo for nylon wire ties. I mean, they look nice now, but what happens when you need to move one of those connections around, say from one port to another?

    You'd have to cut 50 different ties, and all the wires are cut to such precise lengths, you'd probably end up having to splice some sort of nasty extender in there (adding a significant insertion loss due to the connectors or splice). It would be a total mess. Having everything wired in drum-tight may look nice, but it's a bitch later on. Something that has more "drip loops" before all the wires get bundled up into single harnesses may not look quite as polished initially, but it's far easier to work on down the road.

    I've worked on audio systems like this, and it always strikes me as something that you'd do if you were a contractor working on a one-shot job, something where you want to impress the client and justify your fee, with no real thought to maintenance later.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Looks good ONCE, and only once. by iamlucky13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's exactly what I was thinking while looking at those pictures.

      Half of the purpose of having neat wiring is maintainability (in addition to aesthetics, air flow, and just plain keeping crap out of the way of other things). That setup is almost as unmaintainable as a wall draped in spaghetti. I at least hope they either have good documentation kept up to date to match the small fortune and abundant time they spent on zip-ties or else have both ends of their cables labeled so they know which cable to yank once they do cut all those zip ties, because you aren't going to trace those out by hand.

      I guess if your system is perfect and you have no need to ever replace equipment or expand, this is fine, but for the rest of us, give us some service loops and removable wire clips.

    2. Re:Looks good ONCE, and only once. by chazwurth · · Score: 4, Informative

      You'd have to cut 50 different ties...

      Indeed. Where I work, we use velcro ties to solve this problem. They can still be a pain in the ass, but it's a lot easier than cutting and re-tying every time you need to move a cable.

      --
      The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. --Dan Kaminsky
    3. Re:Looks good ONCE, and only once. by putaro · · Score: 2, Funny

      We had that situation. One of our managers had set up a rack and he had gone through and cable tied everything down just so. The rack didn't need to be changed very often but finally there was a day when something needed to be replaced. One of the sys admins who worked for him (who was a close friend with him) walked over to his desk after she had fixed things and dropped a double handful of cut-off cable ties onto it.

    4. Re:Looks good ONCE, and only once. by NoMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Neatness is one thing, but those examples just look like an advertising photo for nylon wire ties. I mean, they look nice now, but what happens when you need to move one of those connections around, say from one port to another?
      You don't - that's the back of the rack you're looking at, not the front of the patch-panel...

      (And if you do need to change a subrack for something different, you pretty much have to replace all the cabling anyway.)

      Having said that, those pics look like nothing more than (what used to be) standard telco cabling practices. We used to do that, day in, day out, with 100/200 pr cotton-braided cable - and we didn't have zip-ties, we did block-lacing. Hell, if I'd done work as sloppy as some of that 20+ years ago when I was an apprentice, I would have been failed!

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    5. Re:Looks good ONCE, and only once. by rapiddescent · · Score: 1
      if I have a rack mounted hub in a rack full of servers, I put the hub in backwards so the ports are facing the rear of the rack. This way, it is much easier to diagnose cable faults because you can trace them from the hub to the cable arm and into the server.

      it saves having to walk along to the end of the racks and round to the front every few minutes. In big machine rooms - this is a good thing. believe me.

      Don't you just love it when:

      • folks put a 1U hub in the front of a rack and then stream all the wires underneath using up a 1U space. grrr.
      • someone wires a rack with 5 metre cables but doesn't realise you can shorten them.
      • none of the cables have cable labelling.
      • when straight through cat5 cables aren't labled
      • there's any use of 50 micron fibre optic inside a cabinet. slap. snap. oh crap.
    6. Re:Looks good ONCE, and only once. by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      The TRICK in that kind of wiring is patch bays, and EXTRA runs/spares to every OTHER bay. You repatch on the bay etc. More work up front, less down the road

      Go look at a TV station, or a Radio Station. They've only been doing it decades longer than we have

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    7. Re:Looks good ONCE, and only once. by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Yep, Telcos, Radio Stations, TV Stations etc have been lacing cables for a LONG LONG time (12 cord anyone )

      The back of the rack should be designed that it doesn't change - spare cables etc - patch bays in the front that are well thought out

      BTW folks - FILL your patch bay!! If they give you 32 patches, don't run 20 cables to it - put in the 12 spares - you'll use them sooner or later. That's why when you see a telco cable, you'll see multiples of 25 pairs - 25 pairs = 1 block

      Now - Chicago sytle lacing, or not ;)

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    8. Re:Looks good ONCE, and only once. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think people forget that this is exactly the neatness and tolerance you need to get many certifications as a CO-LO...

      While it doesn't make sense for "Joe Six-pack" admin to do this for their data center on the front of the patch panels... This is essentially what the back of the rack punch down / connections should look like... No matter what, baring a tech cable type change none of those connections will ever change... Though I agree all cabling should have at least a couple of slack service loops in the runs anywhere near where you may have to extend or move a connection without splicing or coupling.

      Our CO-LO is funny... People pay exorbitant $$ to rent a rack, it is done to perfection in the back, but their wiring from the patch panels to their servers in that rack revert back to spaghetti almost instantaneously...

    9. Re:Looks good ONCE, and only once. by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      That's what I thought when I saw that.

      It's all well and good to leave service loops on the fronts, but that is part of the building infrastructure. That's something that you wire once, you test every connection, you double and triple check it, and then you never touch it again.

      ~Wx

      --
      sig?
    10. Re:Looks good ONCE, and only once. by salunatics · · Score: 1

      The problem I have with this is that the Grand Prize winner was only cabling the back. Having worked at a data center for a large Puget Sound software company ;) and a telecommunications company I can show you rows and rows of patch panels terminated beautifully on the back. Those 48 port blocks in the top picture aren't going to change. They are just infrastructure. The real test, as evidenced by some of the links provided in other comments, is how organized the FRONT side is.

  41. This is a BIG reason for virtual machines by dilute · · Score: 1

    Pretty, I suppose, but looks like an operational nightmare. Just IMAGINE having to check for a cabling problem somewhere in one of these tightly packed systems, or worse yet, reconfiguring your server setup. This is one big reason for going with a simpler physical server setup and running VMs.

    1. Re:This is a BIG reason for virtual machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not totally true - I worked somewhere where they used virtualisation a lot and each VMware server had 9 physical network connections. Say that each physical box can run 10 VMs then that's not too far away from 10 physical servers each with a single network connection.

      The problem is that those 9 network connections are now 10 times more important as unplugging one of them can cause every VM to lose connectivity, stop vmotion or stop access to the service console.

    2. Re:This is a BIG reason for virtual machines by Quila · · Score: 1

      I could never get the cables on my virtual machines to look this good either.

  42. Can't rewire? Here's the solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen the future, and it is filled with ducts.

  43. They look poo by s-twig · · Score: 0

    I reckon they look better when the wires a swinging around and making sparks and all that.

  44. Only on Slashdot... by lullabud · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Can one create a duplicate within the same submission.

  45. EE can't let ignorance go unpunished! by donscarletti · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ha Ha, impedance in a low bandwidth, 40 year old communications protocol going a few metres?

    Sounds like the electrical engineering equivalent to a computer scientist berating Aunt Tillie for using a spreadsheet to calculate her finances because of "costly floating point operations".

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    1. Re:EE can't let ignorance go unpunished! by dthree · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe he works for monster cable writing all their scientific marketing BS.

      --
      "I forgot my mantra."
    2. Re:EE can't let ignorance go unpunished! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't you know that uses a DOUBLE??"

  46. As much as I appreciate a good education... by patio11 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... sometimes it has a tendency to get to your head. You didn't get your EE degree for hammering some nails to string RS-232C, any more than a doctor gets their degree to treat a common cold in a healthy 8-year old. In the same fashion, I didn't get my CS degree to write Swing UIs. Did our educations tangentially cover these things? Yep, they did, but they're a) not our core competencies and b) can be done by someone who is literate and capable of following a simple single sheet of instructions.

    Why are our degrees important? Well, one thing they let us do is properly identify edge cases. A self taught programmer implementing a Swing UI with a sorted combobox might decide to use a bubblesort on it, which would work fine through testing right until it got to a customer who put a couple hundred items in it, when the application would just start to unexpectedly hang. The doctor hopefully catches that 1 kid out of 10,000 who doesn't actually have the cold and needs treatment within the next 48 hours to save his life. And you, as an electrical engineer, identify when impedence would be an issue.

    Ah, but here's the rub: edge cases are edge cases for a reason, and purported experts who cry wolf regarding the edge cases get ignored by a public which sees solutions which work perfectly for 2.5% of the price. And, as several folks have pointed out, you're crying wolf here. The reason the solution appears to work isn't because the grandparent was ignorant of impedence, its because its just physically impossible for that to be a problem for that device.

    Or, as I learned in Engineering school (in tech writing, of all places): "You're going to graduate with a degree from one of the best schools in the country, and you'll be working your first job with tech-school grads who have 15 years of experience, and in your first two weeks one of them is going to say something you learned in school is wrong. You might disagree, perhaps vehemently. But before you voice your disagreement, figure out exactly why he thinks his way will work, because odds are it will. Remember: he's worked there for 15 years and hasn't blown it yet, or he wouldn't still be there."

    1. Re:As much as I appreciate a good education... by asuffield · · Score: 1
      You didn't get your EE degree for hammering some nails to string RS-232C, any more than a doctor gets their degree to treat a common cold in a healthy 8-year old. In the same fashion, I didn't get my CS degree to write Swing UIs. Did our educations tangentially cover these things? Yep, they did, but they're a) not our core competencies and b) can be done by someone who is literate and capable of following a simple single sheet of instructions.


      Surprisingly few people are capable of reading a simple sheet of instructions. Fewer still are capable of following them correctly.

      Well, at least it's surprising until you've done tech support for a couple of years.
    2. Re:As much as I appreciate a good education... by feepness · · Score: 1

      and purported experts who cry wolf regarding the edge cases get ignored by a public which sees solutions which work perfectly for 2.5% of the price.

      They also ignore experts who imply that 5 is 2.5% of 2000.

      Sorry, had to be said. Oh wait, no it didn't. Crap.

    3. Re:As much as I appreciate a good education... by tygerstripes · · Score: 1
      And, let's not forget, it was his degree-education (as compared to the other guys' years of "doing what works") that allowed him to save the best part of 2K. Anyone can over-specify, but it takes someone with knowledge and training to know how to specify appropriately. God knows I always over-specify when I'm doing anything DIY-related simply because I'm prepared to spend and extra 50% to make something that I'm sure will work first time (ie stay up). That doesn't make it a better solution, just a more reliable one for someone without training - were I a trained carpenter/builder/whatever, no doubt I could do it cheaper and better.

      Then again, it may be the trained Civil Engineer in me that wants everything to withstand 1.4-2.0 times its expected maximum load (depending on the safety requirement). Etc.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    4. Re:As much as I appreciate a good education... by gknoy · · Score: 1

      t may be the trained Civil Engineer in me that wants everything to withstand 1.4-2.0 times its expected maximum load (depending on the safety requirement). Etc

      Hmm. Could be. Though, I find myself wanting the same. Why buy a 380 watt power supply when I'm not sure it's enough? 450! (doh). I think it's a common engineer thing. ;)

    5. Re:As much as I appreciate a good education... by ltbarcly · · Score: 1, Insightful
      But before you voice your disagreement, figure out exactly why he thinks his way will work, because odds are it will.


      "Will work" isn't a binary value. Lots of things work, but also cause constant problems. A Yugo will work for transportation, excepting when it breaks down and doesn't. A 500,000 line perl script written by someone who doesn't know that there are such things as arrays or strings, who doesn't understand file locking, will work if you work enough kinks out. A radio which has a poorly designed antenna (perhaps made of nails in boards), where you can barely make out the announcer over the buzzing and hissing 'works'. But in these examples, 'work' == get job done, and usually you can do better than that. The 500,000 line perl script produces the desired output, but what if you have to make a change? No, you can't do that without repeating the entire work the kinks out process because of the numerous unaccounted for side effects. So it doesn't 'work' if you require anything above absolute basic 'get the job done' functionality (such as the ability to make changes, or to enjoy music in the case of the radio), and if you can point out anything that just requires that basic functionality I will be glad to point out where you are short sighted and stupid.
    6. Re:As much as I appreciate a good education... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      The 500,000 line perl script produces the desired output, but what if you have to make a change?

      Heve you been studying Slashcode?

  47. Crosstalk by ebob9 · · Score: 1

    Here's something I've always wondered:

    If you've got a super-neat bundle of UTP Ethernet cables like this, won't that increase cross-talk? Especially for long-distances?

    If nothing else, this theory works great as an excuse for my messy wiring!

    ebob9

    1. Re:Crosstalk by Cramer · · Score: 1

      No.

      (Not if the cable is up to spec. Which also implies you didn't pull a 5000ft run.)

  48. This article sponsored by. . . by jafac · · Score: 2, Funny


    This article sponsored by; ZipCo International.
    Manufacturers of the worlds most reliable and most costly zip-ties!
    Organize your wiring cabinet today! You can never use enough zip-ties!

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:This article sponsored by. . . by deadweight · · Score: 1

      High-end audio idiots would cetainly buy "special low loss molecular nylon pre-stressed" zip ties for $600 a piece all day long! I once read a serious thread about the merits of well-over-$100 POWER CORDS! They were spouting utter bullshit like "the soundstage with brand X cord is clearly elevated" and other random word crap.

  49. Broadcast TV by fishbowl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your average network TV station has wiring that puts any telecomm to shame. I've seen patchbays just in control rooms that have far more going on than anything in the photos on the CEDIA website. That stuff *has* to be organized. Just the labelling systems are amazing, let alone the craftsmanship involved in wiring them.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:Broadcast TV by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I have done time in TV studios. You seem to have seen more of it then I. They are even worse then sound studios, because there is fibre, cat5, and related for IP stuff. I remember seeing bundles of BNC carrying composite, SDI, those triplicate YCbCr packs, and some other weird stuff. Then those snakes that combined 50 cables carrying everything from audio to teleprompter feed.

      The sound studios aren't as bad, it is more a question of volume. Once everything is at +4 dBV, all is well. The small studio I used to work in had a 144 point bantam bay in 'studio a', and it got fairly complicated sometimes.

      The thing that shocks me though are the large multi-operator post audio consoles, with a half dozen 56 bundle MADI inputs, video sync, and feeds to ADR rooms. Intimidating.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    2. Re:Broadcast TV by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      "The thing that shocks me though are the large multi-operator post audio consoles, with a half dozen 56 bundle MADI inputs, video sync, and feeds to ADR rooms. Intimidating."

      YES!

      I know guys who can deal with that stuff, but none ever seemed to have any passion (about anything). To my mind, they tend to be the kind of person who forgets about their work *completely* when they are not on the clock. I'm way different from that. If I don't have work that motivates me 24/7, I'm not happy, because there is no possible way I could consider such a trade to be "art."

      I'm ranting, sorry... A/V production brings back a long, long list of bad memories :-)

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:Broadcast TV by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      I'm chuckling

      One of my friends here at work designs Network TV studio wiring. I would LOVE to post a photo to "Master Control" over here, but even taking a photo is off limits

      Folks should get a gander inside one of the "Remote Trucks" at a Football game or a NASCAR race - here is gear that has to be packed up, MOVED, setup DIFFERENTLY, in a different location, and repeat, all season. The design of the wiring there, and how it's done could teach most IS shops a lesson. Then again, they are paying folks GOOD money to design this stuff, and TV stations realize that the signal is their product, and will SPEND - of course, we also have some horrid IT wiring, because it's NOT the product, and they cut corners

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
  50. I remember the days... by Sir+Unimaginative · · Score: 1

    ... when one kept the million lines of spaghetti code INside the computer.

    --
    The problem with your idea is that it makes sense.
  51. That's nice. Mine's like that.. by Khyber · · Score: 1

    These guys should see what the back of my Effects rack looks like. That includes power amps, beat machines, synths, guitars, pedals, rack-mounted DSPs, and THEN you've got my computers, stereo systems, powered monitors, cameras, lights. I've got four breakers to myself in my room (thank goodness the panel's right in my closet!) Hell, I can't even take a picture of it. I couldn't get it all in four shots If I stood in the other corner of the room!

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  52. Re:The Obsessive and Aging by lullabud · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You're totally right. That's something I've learned at my new job. I was always trying to do things perfectly, and I realized that it took too long to do them as well as I wanted, and even then they wouldn't be *perfect*. I thought back to my metals class when my teacher talked about the level of accuracy which is necessary for particular jobs, and how you wouldn't build a house while measuring lengths in micrometers just as you wouldn't build an engine while measuring in inches. (I forget the name of the principle, I was in Jr. High.)

    What really drove that point home was when somebody plugged an ethernet switch into itself a few weeks after I'd done a moderately good wiring job in our closet and I had to tear it all out because I couldn't even get to our management console on the switch to see which port was causing the traffic storm. (Netgear FSM750S if you want to know.) So, just as many people had pointed out, my zip-tied bundle of cables did me no good and they are now hanging off the side of the switch in a mess, no longer matched up to the numbers on the patch panel.

    I guess it really does matter what kind of job you're doing... If you're not going to be changing anything, zip tying it all up might make sense. They staple AC wires inside the walls of houses, so I'm sure we can find an instance where zipping up cables would be appropriate. For me though, I'll take velcro and a slight mess.

  53. Re:Never mind the wires, look at the final project by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    No. A hardcore geek does it himself :-)

    But seriously. That second system has got to be *loud*. Those Crown amps are meant for huge auditorium-sized PA systems.

    And there's at least 7 of them in that system.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  54. Re:120 volts is low by swordfishBob · · Score: 1

    Don't know if people realised, but 120V actually is low voltage, at least according to Australian standards and the International ones they're derived from.
    LV = up to 1000V AC or 1500V DC
    Extra Low Voltage = up to 46.4V AC or 60V DC
    Telecommunications Network Voltage can be higher than ELV but must be current-limited to minimise danger.

    AS/ACIF S008 and S009 are legislated standards in Australia, regulating who can do what with cable installations.

    --
    -- All your bass are below two Hz
  55. Service loops... by zarozarozaro · · Score: 1

    The racks are very pretty. Nice neat wiring...but not one service loop.
    Anyone who has done av for a while can tell you that when a piece of rack mounted gear fails it is nice to be able to replace it by removing the rack screws, pulling the piece of gear out from the rack, and disconnecting the wires.
    This is easy to do if the installer left a loop of wire at the back of each device, just enough to pull the gear far enough out to get to the connections.

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. With all due modesty... by fm6 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... I feel I am the worst wiring technician on the planet. All I have to do is look at a cable to get it tangled!

    1. Re:With all due modesty... by sir_montag · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, with the whole 'twisted pair' (well, any twisted format which is most electrical cables), cables do tend to tangled. Did you think that it was voodoo?

  58. Telecom cabs by Oldav · · Score: 0

    I remember seeing old step by step telephone exchanges, beatifully wired,such as a 1000+ cable pairs starting at the top of a rack, in a circular bundle nearly 12" in diameter, tapering to form a perfect inverted cone down to the last pair! All held together by lacing with waxed twine! BTW reusable/releaseable zip ties are available and are great for comms cabs that need occasional wiring changes.

  59. They all fail by dprimary · · Score: 1

    All the wiring is too tight, most of them I can't see any wire labels, there is no service loop on any of them, the old phone guys knew how to wire. How do they expect to service any of it? What happens when you need to change or move equipment do they rewire the whole house? Thanks for posting the story I have few guys that tend to build systems this way and it really needs to stop, now I have some pictures of what is not acceptable. It can be both clean and serviceable.

  60. you expect the site to stay up... by LordEd · · Score: 2, Funny

    when the article is asking us to go look at some nice racks?

  61. Lets not be silly... by LordEd · · Score: 2, Funny
    Nothing like a 4am pager going off...
    4 am doesn't exist. Its just a story made up to scare little children.
  62. Re:Ahh... messy racks... Update... by crazyjeremy · · Score: 1

    Mebbie they don't like messy racks, but their site is messy. It's back up now, but you'll notice that page is 800k in size. No wonder it went down. Also, for those who want to know what the first link was supposed to point to, try this http://www.cepro.com/search/keyword/Bad%20Installs .html

  63. The worst wiring job ever... by Krokus · · Score: 1

    It wasn't on a rack, but I think I'm squeaking by with being on topic.

    I used to gut and rewire video game cabinets and took great pride in doing so. Nary a wire would run at an angle other than zero or ninety degrees when I was done with it. Tearing out the old, crap wiring job was a lot of fun. There are a *lot* of bad wiring jobs in video game cabinets.

    A friend of mine had picked up a video game cabinet at an auction once (some Tecmo game, as I recall). I was to rewire it for him. The back panel on the cabinet was held on with nails. Once I'd pried it off, I had a peek inside. Oh, my god, the horror.

    The first thing I noticed was that *every* single wire in the cabinet was orange. The previous person who worked on it must have only had a big spool of orange wire, or something. Ok, fair enough, you make do with what you've got. Didn't matter anyway because I was ripping it all out. However, the other thing I noticed was that this person must have been running low on orange wire because every single wire in the cabinet ran in a straight line from connection to connection. It was like a great big orange spider web. Most of the wires were so taut you could pluck them and hear a note.

    I've never seen anything worse, before or since.

  64. Choice. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In this post, let us discuss the word "Choice." It is a word that we in the FOSS community like to throw around quite a bit, especially when justifying the existance of 30 different ways to "ls" in color. So the choice I'd like to discuss is this one: What are YOU doing this winter? Getting tangled up in wiring racks? How about something a bit more fun? Taglit-birthright israel with Sachlav Educational Experience. This is a free trip to Israel, not a trick to make you buy something, or a contest you have to win. And there's no essay to write. It is a free trip to Israel for Jewish young adults ages 18 to 26. If you're eligible, you could be there this winter with a group of peers, connecting with IDF soldiers your age who will join your group, hiking Masada, taking an unsinkable swim at the Dead Sea, seeing the holy sites, and a whole lot more. Bring a camera and lots of memory cards to take pictures of your new friends from the United States and Israel. This trip is an action-packed 10 days, and the entire experience is amazing and uplifting. Trips take place around late December through early January. Travel on Taglit-birthright israel. EXPERIENCE Israel FREE with Sachlav. Sure beats tripping over gobs of wiring back here at home while your friends are having the time of their life in beautiful Israel. So what's your choice?

    1. Re:Choice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey you stupid, brainless, rabid zionist fuckhead: SHUT UP!

      You're a discredit to the human race, and deserve all of the hatred that will be aimed at you for the rest of your days.

  65. Zip Ties? by Cramer · · Score: 1

    It's A/V wiring, so I won't bitch too loudly about the zip ties. However, no IT wiring should ever use (single use) zip ties... they look like crap and are pain in the ass to remove. Besides, NEBS dictates "yak" -- waxed nylon string; if you've ever seen any, you know exactly what I'm talking about. (I love that stuff. If done Right(tm), you can retie it... a bit shorter, but still reusable. The installers used that stuff like it was air.)

    (BTW, I've been yelled at for using zip ties to hang a power strip on a shelf. They didn't care about the power strip; "that nylon tie won't pass inspection.")

    1. Re:Zip Ties? by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Dunno about yak--sounds like something that I need to get for our data centre.

      However, we tend to use velcro ties wherever there's any chance of impermanency (which is pretty much everwhere). Prettier than zip ties, reusable, and far easier to move around.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  66. I didn't fail to get it! by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Check a post I made earlier in this discussion!

    I'm probably the only one, for that matter, that mentioned all of my hookups and setup in this discussion!

    Yes, it's offtopic. Mod if you feel the need, but seriously, so far as I can see, nobody besides myself and the parent to this post actually got it right.

    And that post above, with the Dallas Texas wire-job, I'll bet you that was the SWBell Mainframe room. I've seen almost an exact replica, albeit smaller, mess in their branch offices.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  67. Re:The Obsessive and Aging by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    I appreciate your philosophy. I looked at this (very attractive but highly impractical) rack wiring, and thought: "whoever did this is far more concerned about looks than functionality". This means, to me, that they don't use this equipment to earn money. Appearances matter, functionality is a distant second.

    It's very important to put the money on the stuff that matters! Having pretty wires leading to your servers is irrelevant if your customers never see said servers. Having RELIABLE wires that can be quickly and easily replaced if they go bad is VERY important to your customers when they actually use said servers! A few velcro straps zip-tied to the frames could make this days-long wiring job happen in a few hours, while keeping it quite neat and usable.

    Then you have days more time to focus on stuff that matters - like what the servers actually DO...

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  68. Wiring pictures in question by sir_montag · · Score: 1

    This might help (grabbed from article before it got slashdotted):

    Picture 1

    Picture 2

    Picture 3

    And the really scary one mentioned earlier.

  69. Tie wraps by 1310nm · · Score: 1

    Most of those look like a severe overuse of tie wraps. I can't imagine replacing broken cables that are tiered into 24562345 tie wrapped globs, especially during an outage.

    1. Re:Tie wraps by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "I can't imagine replacing broken cables that are tiered into 24562345 tie wrapped globs, especially during an outage."

      One of the benefits of a well-organized wiring system is that broken cables are vanishingly rare.
      Think in terms of wiring between patchbays. Stuff that's carefully planned, and never rearranged after the initial setup (because dynamic stuff is the whole point of patchbays.)

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Tie wraps by 1310nm · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, but it still happens.

    3. Re:Tie wraps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      velcro is your friend...
      I've used 1 inch velcro cut to size from a spool on many racks - easiest thing I've found to re-attach after tracing connection problems

    4. Re:Tie wraps by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Well, sure, but it still happens.

      I agree, but I also happen to work in an environment with much larger installations
      that look as together as the stuff featured in the article. Things that are well-organized
      can be dealt with by any tech who knows the system, not just the guy who touched it last.

      To be fair, we also have skunk works facilities where changes are too frequent to even consider
      that level of organization. But the economic risks of a failure on some of our production systems
      are orders of magnitude higher than the costs of keeping things organized, and beyond that, the costs
      of stuff like fault-tolerant hardware, cooling and power technology, security, fire suppression, and
      seismic resistance are also easily justified against our risks.

      We've done lazy and cheap approaches in the past, learned lessons, and as we've matured (still counting the decades), we've established best practices and follow them. If a production system must be rewired or moved or what have you, we do it in a standard way. Nobody actually tries to make things perfect for a photo op like in the article, but it's certainly on the same level of organization; maybe more so -- the detail in the pictures isn't sufficient to see what kind of labeling system is used.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    5. Re:Tie wraps by 1310nm · · Score: 1

      I work for a big telco; the same concerns you've outlined are mitigated (sometimes). Labeling seems to be the biggest problem, not so much a lack of pretty tie wrapping. The frequency of problems that require frontal patches and physical loops would cause long MTTR, which is more important than being pretty.

      I think we're on the same page here though, there is a happy medium.

  70. You really should have read TFA by anagram · · Score: 1
    That's a good point, but this site is really nothing more than advertisements for the featured companies.


    Engineered environments of Alameda CA won the gold award for best dressed system. They also happen to sell premiere residential electronic systems. Their "distinguished clientele" won't pay top dollar for wiring up their estate in a way that's just "good enough." They build systems to be shown off. I'm guessing the same kinds of people who order these systems for their houses also have excessive sports cars and trophy wives. A stray ethernet cable is probably cause for a furious call to the installer.


    But I totally agree with you. I do IT work at a university. Good enough will do just fine, thank you very much.

  71. Good Engineers..... by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Any good engineer wouldn't leave the racks inaccessible from all angles save one to begin with. My computers face the wall, with their vents blowing towards me. Not only do I have easier access to my computer cables, (I don't need my CD-ROM unless it's for installing an OS, BTW,) but due to the airflow of my fans in my system, I get far less component failure since I do smoke around my machine, because the smoke's blown to the other side of the room, where most of the particulate matter has a chance to settle upon things other than my boards and IC pins, causing a short. (Nicotine does conduct electricity.)

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  72. What about home and office wireing? by houghi · · Score: 1

    A rack is a relative easy thing to wire, and especially if it is a new rack that will have a dedicated wiring for the next many years.

    It becomes different when you start looking at the wiring at your office or even worse, at home. At home I have the following wires running from my PC. All a different length an thickness.
    1 power cable
    2 VGA cables
    2 sound in/out
    1 TV cable in
    1 TV cable out
    1 network cable
    3 USB cables
    1 cable to the UPS

    Then I have obviously several other cables to power my speakers, my Scanner/Printer, my router/modem and my UPS. Oh and the two screens that need power as well.

    I have my PC under my desk and have tried as much as possible to hide the cables. Alas maging them all the smae length is not realy an optionn, exept for the network cables and perhaps the TV cable.

    And then there are the offices where you are not sitting against a wall, like I do now, so you don't have the space or the place to realy hide these cables, no matter how hard you try.

    Someties you see solutions for one vable, yet I have not seen a serious solution for ALL the cables going in 5 or mor drections. http://houghi.org/Fun/PC_cables.odg is an OOo Draw of my cables and I have not even put them all in.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  73. Nuclear Power Plant Wiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the chance to have an internship in a company responsible for cabling
    and automation of the first fully computerized nuclear power plant. I toured
    a few different jobs, each during one week. I spent one of those weeks with a
    professional cabler.

      I'll tell you that those "best dressed" cabinets would get you fired real quick
    in such an environment, mostly due to lack of labeling. I spent many hours
    labeling what felt like a few cables. I was living close to this power plant
    and it felt very good to see the high standards used during its construction.

  74. That's nothing compared to this one. by antdude · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out this crazy yellow one. And it's yellow! :)

    From AQFL.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yikes. The admin for that place must be screaming each time he sees a plate of pasta!

      I just imagine the face on the guy who just gets hired to maintain a place like this :)

      PHB : And this is our server racks

      New guy : Aeeeeiiiiii! (jumps out the window)

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by tygerstripes · · Score: 2, Informative
      My eyes! The goggles do nothing!


      Sadly, this looks a lot like the wiring I've seen at some big LAN-parties.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    3. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by kylehase · · Score: 5, Funny

      To diffuse the bomb, cut the yellow wire.

      --
      You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
    4. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this when Mothra changes into the big moth and attacks Tokyo?

    5. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by nocaster · · Score: 1

      This must explain the high price of copper.

    6. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by TRS80NT · · Score: 1

      Holy Moly, antdude. Is that the rack room or the hay harvest?


      --
      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
    7. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      OK sit down and take a breath, the first computer I ever saw was in the Army and it was made by (Are you still breathing) RCA. The CPU was in a big verticle drawer(are you sitting) and made out of nand gates and ferrite core memory, (still breathing) and every thing was wire-wrapped bt hand and the results were still more organised than what that picture lookes like!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    8. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by lys1123 · · Score: 2, Funny

      By all that is holy, you have found him!

      The Flying Spaghetti Monster!

    9. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by archen · · Score: 1

      Wait.. I'm color blind. They ALL look yellow!

    10. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be "straw', not "hay" ...

    11. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      defuse

    12. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      What a mess - they should have used wireless...

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    13. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by fbjon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I prefer my bombs to be in focus when working on them, thank you.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    14. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by SacredNaCl · · Score: 1

      To be perfectly honest, the big solid yellow mass of cables scares the hell out me of to think about how much stuff must be bundled up in that mess and what possibly could be so critical as to need all that ...and actually depend on all of that. Something like that, you get a problem, you might as well just run another cable and throw it in the pile, you will NEVER find the one that is faulty in that mess to pull it out.

      I have, however, seen something about 2/3 of the way to that bad at one of the hospitals near here that is always under construction. They no longer bother to put the ceiling tiles back in place. Their phones look like that, their network looks like that, their intercoms look like that, much of the wiring for the important monitoring stuff for patient care looks like that, the patient call system looks like that, and worse - the equipment that runs to their own paging tower looks pretty close to that. The only thing is even remotely close to straight forward is the electrical wiring, and I'm told half of that is dead from moving it around so much with the changes to the hospital. They at least bundled that and supported it so it isn't hanging down in the service & employees areas like a spider doing its ninja impersonation ready to pounce like so much of the twisted pair phone system. Some places where they do have it covered over in tiles and/or drywall like ceiling -- the weight of all of the unsupported, non-secured cables and literally buckling the ceiling. Not just popping out tiles, but bending the framework that holds it to together, most of this isn't even tied together with band straps, of if it is, its so far between sections that its all come apart.

      Nothing is labeled either - with the exception of a few smaller sections of private office (for doctors that treat mostly outpatient in another wing) data centers - there are no labels. They at least bundle some of it at the racks to get it out of the way in a few spots, but its not exactly bundled to organize it by what it does or even where it goes in there, it was an attempt to overcome where the duct tape failed to keep people from tripping over it... And I mean a LOT of duct tape. I have no idea how they would diagnose say a phone problem if they thought it was the line itself, the only thing they could do would be to go run another line and add to the pile, and that looks like what has been SOP for a long time. This stuff can get way out of control so quickly when its done wrong the first time.

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
    15. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      Who's ever heard of a needle in a strawstack, though?

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    16. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      Ok time for my fav story, luckily enough this predates my position here.

      Once upon a time there was a wiring closet, very very messy, token ring. Among the wiring was a single plastic spoon. This spoon was taped to a cable coming out of the rack. New network supervisor inqueried about it, the tech at the time claimed that it was necessary to keep the network up. Network admin dismissed the idea and began to remove the spoon, soon enough the admin sees lights flash like crazy and the network drops.....

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    17. Re:That's nothing compared to this one. by gwyrdd+benyw · · Score: 1
      --

      I adblock all animated gifs.
      Blessed be the prime numbered slashdotters
  75. Pah - try changing it.. by cheros · · Score: 1

    I suggest such entries are tested for sustainability. Identify 100 random ports that need to be repatched and see how wonderful that looks afterwards, especially if done by non-qualified staff (like you'll often find at managed offices).

    Making it look good NEW is a matter of sorting our your patch paths (no, I don't like tie wraps as they get in the way later), making it look good forever requires IMHO dedication and a cleanup every so often (let's stay realistc :-). It is, however, much better when tidy as you don't spend ages tracing a cable.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  76. Very simple solution I have been using for years by cheros · · Score: 2, Informative

    What you're after is called control panel trunking. For an example what it looks like, go to http://rswww.com/ and enter "PVC open slot trunking" in the search box (I tend to use mainly black 50x50mm). This is, incidentally, also the trick I have seen on some rack systems to keep it looking tidy. That doesn't mean it IS tidy (matter of definition), but it looks that way :-).

    Cut it to size and drop on the floor behind equipment or under your desk, or screw down where required. Best use separate ones for mains power and signal cable, but I've managed with all-in-one as well (not with audio, though).

    The idea is to route the cable straight in, route out at exit point and roll up the excess inside the tray. However, if you're thinking of doing that with power cable you better make very sure that you don't go near the rated capacity of the cable (sensible in any case), so a cable powering an electric heater is probably not a good candidate.

    After you're done, pop on the lid and it all looks wonderfully tidy. Yet, if you want to change something, all you do is rip the lid off and change. I've once had a workroom where I'd simply run a trunk all the way round the room, just above the skirting board, and my desk has one just under the edge, plus one running down a leg. That was a real hi tech solution, it was fitted using double sided sticky tape :-)

    In an office you just use sensible colours, so I guess blue is probably not the best solution . It's basically just following some visual tricks, the eye ignores straight lines and regular patterns.

    Caveat: I repeat, this makes it LOOK tidy. It can still become a complete nightmare inside, and I've found that at occasions it's simply better to rip the lot out and start again.

    So there. It's not as hard as it looks - you just have to know which tools to use..

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  77. How is this news? by Logiksan · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but after many years working in phone company central offices, those pictures look like "Monday" to me. Maybe I'm better at my job than I thought.

  78. great but... by john_uy · · Score: 1

    i will bow to the people who done that. it's so neat it makes me cry. they have a bunch of extremely oc people doing it.

    anyway, me and my friend have been trying to find a way of neatly doing wiring jobs (inside a datacenter.) however, the problem that we have is that our patching moves from time to time as well as new additions happening. the neat pictures have everything terminated which we don't have that luxury. it's really difficult to make it totally neat.

    --
    Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  79. Julie........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....please show us your rack!

  80. Wiring as an art form by BoxRec · · Score: 1

    I'm a great admirer of the old point to point wiring, this is an example of an amp from the early 60's - http://www.valvefacts.com/index.php/Image:Leak_Ste reo20_below_image.jpg

  81. No fun whatsoever by Plutonite · · Score: 2, Funny

    What would be the fun in trying to locate a cable in one of those perfectly tied, will-you-marry-me-now bundles? Where is the CHALLENGE, the spirit of the techie?

    I'm a comp.science person, so we don't do such mundane tasks, but for you lowly H/W freaks I suggest that cabling be done a little worse to make your miserable lives a little more interesting.

  82. Beautiful by darkdante · · Score: 1

    Wow, Nice, I never saw one so neat before!

    What happens if I have to change 1 wire? I need to rewire the whole rack?

    No wonder IT people are losing their jobs.

  83. Have they never heard of induction? by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    That many wires running together like that are bound to have a few EM fields somewhere.

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:Have they never heard of induction? by Theaetetus · · Score: 2, Funny
      That many wires running together like that are bound to have a few EM fields somewhere.


      Yeah. If only there were some magical technology that could notice that the induced EMF is in the same phase on the two legs, and with some sort of amplifier, find a differential signal that would remove it.

      If I ever invent one, I'll call it a magic-signal-sorter.

  84. Think opportunity cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5$ for the materials, 1 hour for the work (another 30$). Net saving 1965$.

    If the patch panel lasts 1 year before needing to be scrapped, the 1965$ if invested would have returned a profit of about 180$. Enough to but a new solution of the same order and still leave cash over.

    Penny wise and pound foolish only apply if the penny spend didn't work.

    1. Re:Think opportunity cost by danbeck · · Score: 1

      Look... for a struggling company with barely any IT or telco budget, this sort of creative frugal thinking can be a lifesaver. Believe me, I've been there before.

      But, for an established company with money budgeted for expenses like this, the only thing you are doing is making yourself feel superior than others by not "wasting" the money. The OP is correct, your penny-wise pound foolish solution just makes it a pain in the ass for others to deal with.

  85. Wiring Racks !! by Zebadias · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yes?

  86. this IS nerd related. by aristolochene · · Score: 1

    for a change on ./ this is actually nerd related and not another excuse to launch into a flamewar/ rant against/for Bush/Blair/Iraq/Iran/Apple/Microsoft/DRM.

    --
    echo $SIGNATURE
  87. That's just like ... really exciting ... by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 1

    Perfection is boring. Even if it involves blue LEDs. (Which I see none of these winners have.)

    Also, if they really were proud of their layouts, there'd be some 10 megapixel snaps that the rest of us could pore over for minute detail.

  88. I don't trust in self documenting wiring by ldardini · · Score: 1

    I see a lots of wiring with labels on each cable. From my personal experience this is not the correct way to go. Labels tend to get off too easy and for a very dense cabling, it is near impossibile to read or track them to the right port. For my personal needs I create a GPL project on sourceforge, "OpenCabling", www.opencabling.org, an easy and wysiwyg system to document the cabling. It needs a lot more work, but the bigger part is already done.

    Leandro
    PS
    If a crazy technician pull off all your cables, how can you recover from this? Save your soul with OpenCabling ;-)

  89. wireless was disabled. by wiredog · · Score: 1

    I have my home system set up that way. When friends with laptops come over I can enable the wireless. Otherwise it's just a bridge between the cable modem and the Linux box.

  90. Maintainability by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The discussions of maintainability reminded me of a funny story.

    At the first company I started, we had an excellent ops fellow who did all our wiring. The racks were immaculate, on par with the the winners in the competition. We never found maintainability a major factor, as things were wired right, and patch panels routed things as changes dictated.

    However, on one occasion, I do remember his obsessive compulsive approach annoying. We were doing some moving around, so he was coming in and out of my office every few minutes for various changes, as was I. I typically don't screw in my monitor (or other cables), because, well, I don't need to, and I often change things around. Anyhow, the work I was doing that day involved plugging the monitor into a few different units to check things out. At one point, I couldn't remove it from the PC. It had been screwed in. I undid it, and moved it to the next PC I was checking, went to the bathroom. When I came back, I couldn't remove it, it had been screwed in again. Every time my employee walked by, he was screwing the monitor cable in tight, the way it "should be." This went on for about four or five times. The fact he even spotted it was amazing, much less the inability to walk by it without "fixing" it.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Maintainability by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

      I do the same thing for the computer I'm building. It's being built at the same location as my main one, so I only have one keyboard, monitor, etc., so I just let all the cables hang on. The only reason for the screws holding the things in is so that when you're moving stuff around, things don't fall out.

    2. Re:Maintainability by courtarro · · Score: 1

      That's when you take a pair of pliers and rip out the screws from the connector. :)

    3. Re:Maintainability by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Don't you hate it when it's just not screwed in, but screwed in so tight you need to get tools to do it? I mean what are these people doing with their monitors that the cable needs to screw it in that tight?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  91. HOWTO or tips for cable management? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there are HOWTOs or 'tips' sites for doing things properly? I've tried to be clean with my servers, but I'm never quite satisfied with the results of my cable management. How do you learn how do to things 'properly': trial and error, from other admins, courses/classes?

    1. Re:HOWTO or tips for cable management? by DaEMoN128 · · Score: 1

      your howto is called BICSI. its a cert. and very expensive.

      --
      Stop signs are only Suggestions
  92. Re:We want Titty Racks !! by dmdb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    again Yes! Like others have said, if you work in an enviroment where you have to deal with machine faults etc (I'm actually a broadcaster but its increasingly server based now and the same principles apply) it makes it so much quicker and easier if the rack is wired neatly and in such a manner that you can trace cables (numbering helps too!). Unfortunatly what I've found when Broadcast and IT kit start to combine is people can't be bothered to make CAT5 cables and so the premade patch cables get used, for a temporary bodge this is fine however on permenant installations having cables the correct length and with appropriate numbering makes life so much easier!

  93. Re:We want Titty Racks !! by kshade · · Score: 1
  94. Wireless Z by kylehase · · Score: 1

    Forget the wires, just get the bleeding edge Linksys pre-Z 108Tbps wireless router. It's even Vista ready.

    --
    You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
  95. A/V is not networking by nhesson · · Score: 1

    I completely agree with this. I work for a custom integration company and many of our racks have not been touched in years. The equipment does go bad occasionally but it gets replaces with the exact same model if it can be found. There is no reason to move cable around. Yeah it is a pain to troubleshoot if you start pulling plugs, but if you know what you are looking for and the proper starting and ending points, it is not a big deal.

  96. I was hopeful for a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, the site seems down, but being that you labelled that "One of my favorite messy racks", and it's from a site called waystupid.com, I was hoping for a set of breasts with mud on them or something.

  97. No labels, no good by MECC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The racks shown in the article look nice and all, but I didn't see any labels. They get an 'F'. Its one thing not to have labels at IDFs, but not on server racks - ever. At least one of those looked like server racks.

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  98. You're kidding, right? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    Wrap a ziptie around each bundle of wires. Ziptie each ziptie to your hooks. Do it tight enough so that they won't fall off.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:You're kidding, right? by O'Laochdha · · Score: 1

      It's not the wires that fall off; it's the hooks. Bundling them would just make it worse.

  99. Legal use of GPL licensed software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After reading this article, I was sifting through the site and came across an article about Crestron Eletronics SIMPL language used for home automation programming. I thought cool, let me check this out. Well from Crestron's site I downloaded a pdf that was a language reference fo rtheir SIMPL language. In it I noticed that they have repackaged and use the GNU Coldfire C compiler. I thought that was cool and of course my next thought was "where's the source code" for their SIMPL language? So they have some ftp links that supposedly point to the source code, but you can't get to them because a username and password are required. My question, is Crestron Electronics violating the GPL by selling products based on this code base when the source code is not "freely" available?

  100. there's definitely a talent to this by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

    I have never been able to wire anything cleanly, no matter how hard I try. It always ends up looking worse than that yellow rack.

  101. Pretty, but by DaEMoN128 · · Score: 1

    1. You can never do an uninstall and have it look like that again.
    2. You are going to have hell tracing a poorly marked cable.
    3. Those cables that were bundled in giant bundle and going vertical is tied wrongly according to BICSI standards.
    4. I hope they are shielded or fibre, because there is going to be a hell of a lot of crosstalk.
    5. Excellent job on the wirewraps. That is what the standards were when I went to BIC for fanning out a cable. I would love to work there:)
    6. What does the ladder rack, cable trough, or cable tray look like. At the racks are beautiful, what does it look like getting there?
    7. That was all installed at the same time. It doesn't look like there have been any addition or subtraction of circuits in those setups. If there has been changes, damn good job.

    Just so you know Im not talking out my ass...
    3 years installation experience (my actuall job) + BIC certified + 3M Fibre Certifed

    --
    Stop signs are only Suggestions
  102. Nobody has linked the relevent BOFH episode? by crosseyedatnite · · Score: 1
    --
    e to the i pi equals negative one
  103. Nah. by Hillgiant · · Score: 1
    I don't think anyone would confuse a genius of any sort with a rap artist.

    Talented? Maybe. Genius? Not really.

    --
    -
  104. "most perfectly labeled cabling jobs in U.S. homes by thorkyl · · Score: 1

    The winner is a commercial install not a home

    --
    -- I am the NRA, enough said...
  105. Education is a sign of quality. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    http://octavia.zoology.washington.edu/handicap/spe nce.html

    The actual content of the education itself seems to be rather irrelevant, it's mainly an exercise in branding.

    --
    Deleted
  106. Re:We want Titty Racks !! by macdaddy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Hand-made patch cables are EVIL. I can't begin to tell you how many times I've found the problem to be a custom, hand-made patch cable that has failed (yes, cables do fail). Of the hundreds of server rooms I've been in I always replace the patch cords if I have the slightest inkling that they're bad. Too many times to accurately count the cables were the problem. 99.9999% of the numbuts out there couldn't properly terminate a cable to save their life! I know many network engineers, carrying certs from the lowly CCNA to CCIE, that I wouldn't trust to make a single straight through cable, let alone put it into production.


    Stop making your own cables for production use! Stop being part of the problem that we have to come fix! Buy factory-made and certified cables that come with a warranty. You people are keeping people like me employed because of your save a buck attitudes. Then again I suppose that's a good thing, for me.

  107. Telephone offices have a longer history... by GnuTzu · · Score: 1

    I've traced cables that were tightly bundled. Yes, tightly bundled cables can be traced, but it is harder, and strong hands are a help.

    My RS-232 work started in a facility with several Honeywell Multics main frames, a couple of IBM main frames, and a dozen or so mini's. I've paid my dues in blood--literally--from poorly clipped tie wraps. I hate--repeat HATE--tie wraps.

    Then, I'd spent some time working in telephone offices. You can tell that the telephone industry has a longer history of dealing with wiring. (Shocking, isn't it.) On many occasion, I've traced their neatly dressed bundles, and I've never scraped my hands on a tie wrap; they DON'T use them. They use waxed lacing cord instead. Sadly, this is a dying craft. 1) you have to know how to tie the right kind of knots. 2) Tie wrap manufactureres have more marketing behind them.

    Experience is the only way to know what kinds of cabling layouts work well. Every style has its trade offs. Sloppy inexperience always causes the most trouble.

    Professional installations use bundling for a reason; its the only way to manage massive permanent installations. In smaller environments, where tools for tracing are scarce, other styles can be used. But, don't assume that you can get away with being sloppy, because it'll cost ya.

    --
    { return clarity; }
  108. liar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stop repeating stories that are clearly untrue. it makes you look stupid and gullible

    1. Re:liar by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Untrue? Bloody oath, I was there. It happened to *me*. Hydro-Electric Commission, Tasmania. Mid-80's.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  109. Dynamic my ass. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You are missing the point.

    What is dynamic is the movement of machines, not the cabling. End of life of a machine? No problem, remove it, put back one in place, the cable will be there, because all is tidy and no bozo is messing up with them.

    In a well managed data centre you don;t need to move cables all around the place. If you need to move cables that means you need to go back to the drawing board and figure out what this is so.

    Maybe your racks are no longer adequate for the kind of equipment you are using now, maybe the technology is changin and you need different type of cables. Maybe you need more shelfs per cabinet. Or more.

    But once you identiy your needs, you shuld be able to provide for a solution that lsts several years (3,4,5) before you need to touch those cables again.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Dynamic my ass. by macdaddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ha! What a crock of shit. Cables have always and will always move frequently if for no other reason than people can not afford (or will not buy) enough switchports for every drop. We had a new building wired not too long ago. In total there were over 1500 drops in the building. We had about 450 switchports total to support 400 users. Businesses however are extremely dynamic. One day they're using a conference room for a temporary training lab and need 12 working drops (wireless is not an option). The remodel X offices per week (I think it's a requirement from their charter), requiring additional drops on different walls. They move one department from one area to another. Of course one of the departments is the dev team which has numerous drops per cube. The point is wiring closets are never, EVER stagnant. Wiring closets are more comparable to a living breathing being. Hell it can develop an attitude. Wire neatly. Punch everything down and use cross connects. Don't try to be a wiring zealot. It won't work.

    2. Re:Dynamic my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminded me of something almost similar (actually not really, but it's a fun story anyways).

      My school got a new science building just before I started (I worked for the telecom while I attended). State of the art. 3 floors. Probably about 300 drops per floor. Even the closets had drops. Heck, the data closets each had 12-16 ports in 3-4 seperate boxes. Anybody sparing even the smallest expense would just think, "Hey, it's a data closet. If anything in there needs a connection, they can just run a cable across the floor to the distribution frame." I'll bet you can save well over $1000 in labor for 36-48 drops.

      Which made it a major shock a few years after the building opened when we were asked to add telephones to two of the labs (which according to the safety policy, absolutely should have had them all along). We go in thinking we'll check the port number against the panel in the data closet, make a few cross-connects and be done. Nope!

      There wasn't a single drop in either of those two classrooms! Instead we spent over a semester waiting for the project to get approved ("you absolutely have to do this, but we can't proceed until the VP signs off on it..."), a month waiting on the physical plant to create a wirepath and install boxes, and two or three days threading just 6 drops through the HVAC and electrical in the ceiling, then across an actual drywall ceiling (I have no idea why it wasn't ceiling panels) in the classrooms to feed it down the wall right next to 110 VAC cables to countertop level. All because somehow these two rooms got missed when they wired the building originally.

  110. If you need re-working the cables.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... it is because your data centre design is not good enough.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  111. But you have to admit it's tempting .. by cheros · · Score: 1

    .. to start such a discussion, just for the hell of it. Is that what you wanted? :-)

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  112. Mediocrity is a nice place to be. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    One lives giving onself half assed excuses about whay good enough is about right.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  113. Re:We want Titty Racks !! by gmack · · Score: 1

    Agreed. Even a good tech will get a cable wrong sometimes and often a cable tester will show up a marginal cable as ok. I've often fixed intermittant problems by ripping out all custom cables and putting in factory premade. Extra cable can be tied nicely and put out of the way. If you honestly need a long custom cable than do it properly with wall mount jacks. This is both more reliable and easier to label.

  114. Don't try this at home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or at least not in my home.

    Requirements change and this super anal stuff just doesn't cut it over time. I'm gonna add my 2c to support everyone who has questioned this here.

    About 12 years ago when I bought my current place I had to renovate it - the core of it is about 150 years old, the rest has been added on - and decided I'd "wire" it. So when I had the floorboards up and the plaster in a couple of rooms off, I laid in the conduit and cabling for future use. With 10Base2. Which is now obsolete.

    In the interim years we lived overseas and rented the house. We returned about 6 months ago and I had to set up my office, my wife's office and the bedrooms for the kids (also some digital TV runs).

    I looked at what I had:- obsolete coax, inside unsuitable conduit (for UTP cables), behind 150 year old lath and plaster and under floorboards I'd spent a fortune on preserving or replacing, with an unsuitable topology (bus rather than structured).

    I decided not to replaster the house (lath-and-plaster, in case you don't know, doesn't have open cavities so you can't run wire by dropping it down), rip up the floor boards or whatever. Similarly, I couldn't just put a whole lot of faceplates for power, data and TV into those walls, because I'd need a skilled plasterer to repair them. The structured wiring philosphy just wasn't going to fly.

    Here's what I did:

    * daisy chained CAT-5 from the internet access point to other rooms via the _outside_ of the house (it's timber). Visible and slightly messy, but see below.
    * ditto the coax for the TV
    * single entry point for all cable types to a single faceplate in each room that needed it

    and then:

    * wired up "patch panels" in each room by bolting up the requisate hubs, splitters and powerboards underneath the desks at which people work in each room. In other words, all the wiring is attached to disposable furniture rather than requiring a rebuild of the house.

    I think I did a pretty neat job, but it's a little messy and ad-hoc. However, it has some advantages:

    * it's fast (takes only a half hour or so to run cables round the house and secure them)
    * so what if I've CAT-5 exposed to the weather? It'll last a couple of years at least, can be quickly replaced and will probably be obsolete when it it wears out anyway (cf. the 10Base2 experience which was expensive and useless)
    * by screwing all the 21st century cables into 21st century furniture (IKEA in most cases) rather than semi-rebuilding my house, I preserve the houses' value (for those who've seen the 60's film "The President's Analyst", this is the antithesis of "total sound").

    For me, ultra-neat wiring like this has about as much point as building a ziggurat.

  115. Neat-Patch by pnagel · · Score: 1

    http://www.neatpatch.com/ is a company that makes a product that will help make service loops easier to manage in many situations.

  116. Clean install requires hand terminated cables by spun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, because the cables in that winning system were all store bought - NOT! How hard is it to test a cable after you've terminated it to the exact length you need for the neatest, tidiest install possible? I used to do a lot of that, and I would have to re-terminate maybe one out of every fifty cables, it's not that hard.

    If you want a really nice looking install, you need to terminate yourself.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Clean install requires hand terminated cables by Rifter13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One of the problems where I work, is not cables that are not properly built, but cables that degrade over time. For the first 6 months, all the cables were fine. After 6 months to a year, they started having problems. Lo and behold, the cables would just quit working. When studying for the A+ (Needed to finally get it for a job that just cared about that cert), I was surprised when I read a piece saying that if you mix the metals of the connectors (gold to nickle, I believe) they start corroding, and you start seeing problems about 6months down the road.

    2. Re:Clean install requires hand terminated cables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But please, if you decide to go that route and terminate yourself, do it OUTSIDE the data center. I can't stress enough how splattered grey matter will really degrade the look of a nice, tidy install!

  117. MOD PARENT UP by spun · · Score: 1

    Thank you. All these people with their "Oooh, look at the anal wiring job, what if you have to fix or move something?" were really starting to piss me off. Lazy and uninformed, what a winning combo. Goobers can't even tell the front of a rack from the back, and have no idea of the right way to wire either. They're the ones who's wiring ends up looking like a plate of spaghetti in a few years.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  118. Doesn't look so bad - by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Either:

    - This is a telco dungeon in a facility the size of the Pentagon, or a big city CO.

    - It's all one 10,000-meter patch cable and a really bad job of slack management.

    Geez, it probably takes less than an hour to trace out a connection, and you probably only yank out 2 or 3 subscribers in the process. Imagine if it was punched down.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  119. Thank you thank you thank you! by quux4 · · Score: 1
    Yes!

    Finally someone who gets it. An equipment rack is not a work of art, and more cableties/velcro/string are NOT automatically better on the plug side of the rack. Hey, go hogwild with your cableties on the punchdown side, guys. But some of us have actual WORK to do on the plug side!

    On the plug side:

    Use the right cable length; use vertical and horizontal rackmount wiremanagers. Tywrap is a timewaster. Bundles should be neat but a little loose. Strip out unused cables right away.

  120. Re:The Obsessive and Aging by Burning1 · · Score: 1
    If you're not going to be changing anything, zip tying it all up might make sense.
    Exactly. And I'll bet you that most of the pristine wiring jobs we see in this post are in use by clustering centers, where nothing really changes at all.
  121. Excellence is a great place to be too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Glad you like mediocrity. Based on your spelling you are not quite living even that. Based on your sig, maybe a wee bit much of the drink, and so early in the day...

    Living an over-all successful and satisfying life sometimes doesn't leave time to nit-pick over some of the details.

    No half-assed excuse here - simply stating the obvious; There isn't enought time to do EVERYTHING, so you need to prioritize.

    How does that old saying go? When on their death bed and asked if they had any regrets; No one ever says "I wished I had done a neater job in that wiring closet."

  122. Factory or Field? Depends on the situation... by sirwired · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For truly permanent installs, like wiring from the comms room to offices, then skilled (and tested) field terminations are pretty much the only option. There is way too much slack if you factory terminate end-user wiring.

    For data centers, all the really good installs I have seen use factory-made trunks going to patch panels interconnected with factory-made patches. This gives you MUCH more flexibility than point-to-point cabling, and makes box installs go much faster when you can just break out a crate of more-or-less appropriate-length patch cables.

    Ideal in my mind for a data center: Server -> factory patch of a good length (use several different sizes and select whichever is appropriate) -> mini patch-panel -> factory trunk -> central patch panel -> factory patch -> whatever... (usually your switch). This involves more cables than a field-terminated point-to-point setup, but it makes changes SO much easier.

    I can say that for fiber, you should only use field-terminated cables if absolutely necessary. It is simply too easy to screw up optic fiber terminations. 90% of the cabling issues I deal with in my line of business (enterprise storage support) are because of poor field-terminated 50u (or *shudder* 62.5u) cabling.

    SirWired

  123. lol @ you by idonthack · · Score: 1

    Damn my lack of mod points.

    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  124. Re:The Obsessive and Aging by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    I think the problem stems from the fact that modern networking needs a single run of cable for each port. This is in stark contrast to electrical and telephone wiring, where many plugs and jacks can be daisy-chained. For home electrical and telephone wiring, "good enough" is neat and easy.

    We really need a home networking standard that doesn't require 30 runs of ethernet to each room. What average homeowner needs such a network? In the home of the future, we might see one or two computers* in each room, plus a few data-enabled devices.

    * The computer would also be used as a phone, television, and stereo.

  125. You haven't been to digg by idonthack · · Score: 1

    You haven't been to digg. People reply all the time with "THIS ARTICLE IS BETTER:" and then give a link to the one in the submission.

    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  126. One Wilshire Meet Me Room by Exstatica · · Score: 1

    if you ever heard of one wilshire... http://photos.mednor.net/Laura_and_Andy/Geek/one_w ilshrie/ its still a total mess.

  127. Re:We want Titty Racks !! by dmdb · · Score: 1

    Network engineers and wiremen are two very seperate types of people, please don't confuse the two, I am actually neither (Broadcast Engineer) but work with wiremen on a regular basis on installs. This has nothing to do with saving money and everything to do with reliability which we have to have as downtime on television chanels rungs into thousands every minute. If you had done your research you would know that wiremen are expensive to say the least but do the job properly. I would quite agree that 99.9% of the IT industry can't make patch cables, my industry is converging with yours but please do not confuse the two professions and their abilities on this front. Equally what you term as the solution persons in my profession would term the problem, unnumbered and overlength cables cost more time when fault finding kit.