Slashdot Mirror


iPod Car Integration Reality Check at Apple Expo

An anonymous reader writes "At the last Apple special event, Steve Jobs was almost bragging about the fact that 70% of new cars sold in the U.S. this year had (optional!) iPod 'integration' available ... Obviously, he didn't talk about the rest of the world. But most of all, what Steve didn't tell us is how crappy the existing "integration" solutions actually are! Here is a review of actual iPod car integration solutions showcased Apple Expo 2006 Paris. Some of the nicest cars (like the Audi TT for example) don't necessarily have the best iPod interfaces."

176 comments

  1. Not terrible. by riceboy50 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I rather like the integration in my Scion tC. The iPod is hidden in the center console, while I control it from the head unit.

    --
    ~ I am logged on, therefore I am.
    1. Re:Not terrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Only 06+. 05's didn't have it.

    2. Re:Not terrible. by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 3, Informative

      My sister just got a tC, and they did a fine job with the iPod integration. The interface was basically the same as an iPod. It was so intuitive for an iPod user, that only after I finished and had my music playing did I sit back and realize, "Damn, that's a nice setup." It's nice to see that at least one company realized that copying the excellent iPod design is the way to go.

    3. Re:Not terrible. by mayesje · · Score: 1

      That's because this is a pioneer HU and most of the after-market HUs are actually a heck-of-a-lot better than the OEM crap.

    4. Re:Not terrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My car's "head unit" is your sister.

    5. Re:Not terrible. by schnitz_mi · · Score: 1

      Another "3 Cheers" vote for the integration of the upgraded head end unit for 2006 and later Scions!

      I've got an '07 Scion tC with the upgraded head-end unit and LOVE the iPod connectivity. It was one of the main reasons I chose the car (in addition to price/value, gas mileage, styling, and overall purchase experience).

      Plusses:
      - iPod is concealed in the center console to prevent the old "smash & grab"
      - Still have an extra AUX port available
      - has no problem with my fully-loaded 30gb iPod Video (and AAC files, protected AAC files in addition to the plain old mp3s)
      - Ability to skip tracks even via the integrated steering wheel stereo control buttons

      Minor gripes:
      - Experienced issues where it would lockup my iPod after about 5 minutes when I first got the car.
      [Problem seems to have gone away by always ensuring that the Dock Connector is FIRMLY inserted into the iPod and jiggled a little to make sure that both locking clips are locked, and making sure that the integration cable isn't bent at too severe an arc]
      - Head-Unit's timeout when navigating menus is a little shorter than i'd like it to be.
      - Would love to have the option of having ID3 tag data (artist, song, album) scrolling continuously on the Head Unit display as opposed to having to hit the "Text" button on the HU -OR- the ability to scroll through the ID3 tag data using an integrated steering wheel button.

  2. Honda Music Link by nuxx · · Score: 4, Informative

    In case anyone is interested in Honda's solution, here is my review of the Honda Music Link iPod Adapter.

    After being burned by the purchase of the Honda Music Link earlier in the year I wrote up that review to try and keep others from throwing away their money on it.

    1. Re:Honda Music Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why spend so much extra money on integration when you can just stick a tape in that connects right to your ipod? Its only $20 and I'm telling you the sound quality isn't noticeably worse. Plus theres no extra interface involved.

    2. Re:Honda Music Link by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Those sound terrible. They're inherently muddy because you can't get the head gap down to the point that you get any HF response no matter how you design it. The best you could to is design an EQ circuit to compensate, but nobody does that....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:Honda Music Link by EvilMagnus · · Score: 1

      And I thank you for that - your review was instrumental in me not getting Music Link for my Accord.

      Honda would have been better off just providing an AUX input in the glove compartment. How hard would that have been? They even managed to put an AUX on the front panel of the new Civics, for frak's sake.

      --
      -EvilMagnus
    4. Re:Honda Music Link by mustafap · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I just fitted one yesterday. Bloody crap. Hissing, poor frequency response. Why we can't just have a low level 3.5mm jack socket... oh, cause then the garages wouldn't be able to charge £250 for fitting it. Silly me.

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    5. Re:Honda Music Link by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      you can just stick a tape in that connects right to your ipod

      New cars still come with tape players?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    6. Re:Honda Music Link by brunascle · · Score: 1

      bingo. i've got a AUX in hooked up to my zen and it works great. now if i could just get it mounted somewhere close to the deck, it would be perfect (i have it sitting in my cup holder now).

    7. Re:Honda Music Link by L7_ · · Score: 1

      my problem isn't the sound quality, its that I *try* to use the 'Skip Forward' and 'Skip Back' commands that I use for CD track control to skip to the next track in the ipod playlist. What it does instead is Fast Forward or Rewind the tape interface in the deck! I have to eject the tape interface and reload it when I forget that I need to pick up the ipod and hit '>>|' on it to get to the next track in the playlist.

      I would love it if I could make it so that my car controls could command the ipod.

    8. Re:Honda Music Link by lewp · · Score: 1

      My 2k4 Infiniti G35 did. I didn't spring for the brand new one, but they had tape decks as well. It's Bose, so it sucks, but at least I can plug in my iPod without having to use an iTrip. Sirius is pretty nice too :)

      It'll do until I decide to really rip the thing apart and put in a new receiver.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    9. Re:Honda Music Link by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      ...or if you're fussy about sound quality a CD player that recognises MP3 data CDs - around 60 quid in the UK, so maybe $100 US? It's got to be a better option than trying to shoehorn any sort of MP3 player into a car and then finding that all it tells you is "TR04" or similar. This assumes that you haven't bought into some scheme that stops you copying music off your player, though.

    10. Re:Honda Music Link by nuxx · · Score: 1

      Thanks very much, and you're welcome. I'm always glad to hear that the review helped keep someone else from throwing $200 (or more) down the hole.

    11. Re:Honda Music Link by toddestan · · Score: 1

      New cars still come with tape players?

      Sadly, they still do.

    12. Re:Honda Music Link by roseblood · · Score: 1

      New cars still come with tape players?]

      I have a damiler/chrystler product with Casette CD and 6 DVD/CD changer in dash (no MP3 support, no MPEG support, no DVD-R or DVD+R support.) Yeah, new machines still come with casettes.

      Unfortunately I also have a Ford/Lincoln/Mercury/Jag/LandRover product with a CD changer. This thing has no MP3 or CDR/RW support. No imput jack. No Casette deck. I have to use a FM Modulator to get MP3s to play with this car. Royal pain in the arse.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    13. Re:Honda Music Link by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      Mine had one that was optional, had I been willing to pay the extra $200 for it (it was cheaper to buy a line out adapter and have it professionally installed, and that works better since all I wanted the tape deck for was to use it with my XM radio). I didn't see many cars that had one standard.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    14. Re:Honda Music Link by rikkards · · Score: 1
      I have to use a FM Modulator to get MP3s to play with this car. Royal pain in the arse.


      Happy to say you don't. I have a Jeep Liberty and you can get the IPOD2CAR.
      I have it and love it. I got fed up with using FM Modulators as mine didn't come with a cassette adapter. Took longer to figure out where to run the cable than to install the unit.
    15. Re:Honda Music Link by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      I have a 1995 Jag which has a 6 CD changer, it plays CDR's perfectly, and i never intend to be in the car long enough to listen to 6 CDs worth of music...
      With the price of blank CDs nowadays, it`s not too much hassle to burn a big stack of them and swap them around every now and again, i have a spindle of about 70 CD's full of music sitting near the changer in the trunk.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    16. Re:Honda Music Link by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      You actually care what kind of stereo your car comes with?

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    17. Re:Honda Music Link by ebh · · Score: 1
      Someone needs to make a CD adapter. You know, a thing shaped like a CD with a wire you plug into the headphone jack, then insert then adapter into the slot on the head unit, and...

      *never mind*

    18. Re:Honda Music Link by Cloud+9 · · Score: 1

      Griffin makes the SmartDeck, which does exactly that.

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    19. Re:Honda Music Link by kchrist · · Score: 1

      I'm convinced that this is the way to go. I rolled my own iPod integration for my old Acura and will be doing the same again in my current car.

      The iPod adaptor marking is way overpriced and not remotely mature enough yet. Maybe I'll check back in a couple years.

    20. Re:Honda Music Link by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I care that cars still come with such old technology as a cassette player. I'd have thought CDs and CD-Rs had taken over the pre-record and home-record cassette markets by now.

      I'm not that big a fan of commercial music. I'm no audiophile. My CD collection is very small. I have no interest in filling a drive with MP3s or AACs or whatever. I'd use an iPod to record conversations or as a portable alternative boot drive.

      My Honda Fit Sport came with a CD player that can also play MP3-CDs, and has an aux-in jack (which I'll probably only use with a portable TV when parked, maybe the cell phone). There is an optional iPod accessory, but I don't have an iPod so I wouldn't know if it is in fact the same Honda Music Link referred to earlier. Lately I just burn MP3-CDs of This Week in Tech.

      I have no need to install a system that vibrates the whole car's body and annoys people in a three-block radius.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    21. Re:Honda Music Link by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about a system that will set off car alarms from block away?

      But I've seen what the mfrs put in. They's the stereo equivelant of an E-machine. Personally the factory system wasn't even close. I don't need something that will make me deaf, but I want something that I can actually hear with the top down, at 70 MPH.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    22. Re:Honda Music Link by EnderWigginsXenocide · · Score: 1

      I listen to alot of audio books. Some of the unabriged ones run well over the 6 hours I can feed into a CD changer. Currently I either use a FLASH based MP3 player or small DVD player with MP3 support to playback audiobooks (DVD player stays in the car, MP3 player when I am going to spend any significant time out of the car.)

      Also the inconvience of burning multiple CDR/RW is much greater than that of burning a single DVD or syncing up a mp3 player. This is why CDRS are not a good solution for me when it comes to listening to MP3s.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups. -- 0 1 My two bits
    23. Re:Honda Music Link by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      > Griffin makes the SmartDeck, which does exactly that.

      Theoretically. The SmartDeck wasn't so smart for my 2003 350Z. The controls didn't work to actually translate head unit commands to my iPod. So I returned it and bought a regular Sony tape adapter.

      Someone at Nissan should explain why a freakin' Nissan Minima (AKA Sentra) came with an Aux jack on the front of the head unit, but my 350Z didn't.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
  3. Steve Jobs Distorts Reality by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is shocking - simply shocking, I must say!

    1. Re:Steve Jobs Distorts Reality by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      Eh, looks like I got moderated down by the Apple fanboys. Don't worry guys, I posted this from a mac, so I'm one too! I just think this is a total non-story to anyone who has even heard of Steve Jobs.

  4. VW +iPod = Lackluster Integration by natural1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My new 06 Rabbit has iPod integration...and it sucks. Only 6 playlists and you can't see any of the song info on the stereo, plus you can't access songs any way except to click through them one at a time. So much for the click-wheel. It would've been nice to have steering wheel mounted controls too... I know it's an entry level car, but c'mon - it's supposed to be German engineering! I guess the Germans don't like music?

    1. Re:VW +iPod = Lackluster Integration by famikon · · Score: 1
      c'mon - it's supposed to be German engineering! I guess the Germans don't like music?
      its not that... they just listen to shitty, cheap music.

      aaah it makes perfect sense now.

    2. Re:VW +iPod = Lackluster Integration by ruiner13 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I know it's an entry level car, but c'mon - it's supposed to be German engineering! I guess the Germans don't like music?

      You're talking about a country that worships Hasselhoff's music, so they are clearly tone deaf. I hope it was a rhetorical question...

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    3. Re:VW +iPod = Lackluster Integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like they mapped controls for a 6CD changer to working with an iPod, rather than designing something that actually works with an iPod. I wouldn't call it "integration", rather a back-end hack to claim iPod support even though they haven't changed the physical interface in the car from the old optional CD changer controls.

    4. Re:VW +iPod = Lackluster Integration by larryj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have the same setup in my '06 Touareg. It has it's limitations (as the parent pointed out), but it's not too bad. I like that the iPod is hidden in the glove box, but don't like not being able to navigate to anything I want to listen to. I've learned to use my iTunes playlists more. I just rename my playlists to change what's available in the car. I prefix the 6 I want with the numbers 1 through 6. That forces them to the top of the playlist menu and makes those 6 available in the car.

      I've also found that if you start playing something, pause it and then connect the iPod in the car, you can continue to listen to what was paused. It's not much, but it helps when you have a specific artist or album in mind while on the go.

      I thought that the "on the go" playlist was going to save me. My plan was to just add stuff to the OTG list in an effort to gain more flexibility. Unfortunately the OTG playlist always becomes the last playlist on my 4th gen iPod. I even tried prefixing everything else with a 'z' but OTG is always at the bottom.

      --
      What if the Hokey-Pokey really is what it's all about?
    5. Re:VW +iPod = Lackluster Integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They should have just connected the steering wheel directly to the clickwheel, with the indicators, windscreen wipers and horn for play/pause/forward/rewind and menu. They might have had to overcome some technical difficulties but I don't see any major problems with the idea.

    6. Re:VW +iPod = Lackluster Integration by dwightk · · Score: 1

      I know germans don't like cup holders... and iPod control on the steering wheel is the equivalent of being buried alive in cupholders

      --
      Like anyone can even know that
    7. Re:VW +iPod = Lackluster Integration by tbone1 · · Score: 3, Funny
      I guess the Germans don't like music?

      Dear natural1,

      In spite of your Folk Implosion-inspired name, bite us royally.

      Sincerely,
      Johann Sebastian Bach
      Richard Wagner
      Johannes Brahms
      Ludwig van Beethoven
      Joseph Haydn
      The entire Strauss family
      Klaus Meine and the rest of the guys from Scorpions

      (Okay, some of those are Austrian, but still, ...)

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    8. Re:VW +iPod = Lackluster Integration by moracity · · Score: 1

      There are 3 different VW solutions. One is a generic input in the glovebox that can be with any portable device. The second it the VW iPod adapter that also runs into the glove box. There is a third one that replaces the CD changer in the center armrest. This one actually has a dock that you sit your iPod into.

      The two iPod specific solutions allow you to marginally control from the headunit, but no tag info is displayed.

    9. Re:VW +iPod = Lackluster Integration by Nithron · · Score: 1

      Dude, wasn't there a law against unification of Germany and Austria after that whole trying-to-take-over-the-world thing a few years ago?

  5. Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I want the 5 minutes of my life back that I spent reading through that badly-written drivel. The only thing worse would have been the same stuff in an audio or video format. Ugh.

    To save others from the same pain, here's a quick summary: the vast majority of iPod integrations work either by pretending the iPod is a CD changer, or by sending RDS (radio data stream, I think - it's the stuff that piggybacks song info onto the AM/FM signal) to the radio. Which means they all still suck. It's cumbersome to navigate stuff and you don't get the info you expect (songname, etc). We get promises that next year, everything will be better, but we heard all that stuff last year already.

    In short, if you want to use your iPod in your car now, use your headset. And if you live in California, just hope the cops don't catch you.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    1. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by truthsearch · · Score: 2

      If by headset you mean headphones, don't do it. Do not ever drive with headphones covering both ears. Even at an average volume you're far less likely to hear horns honking and emergency vehicles. I've seen the disasters that happen when people don't hear sirens. Do everyone on the road a favor and plug that iPod into your head unit or leave it at home.

    2. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Why would anybody want to spend money on a feature for their car so that they could listen to music from a single brand of MP3 player? Wouldn't it make more sense to get a stereo with an audio input jack that could attach to any audio player? I mean, sure the controls aren't integrated, but you have controls on you MP3 player. Use those if you want to switch songs. Besides, you should be focused on driving, not trying to find the next song you want to listen to.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by admactanium · · Score: 1
      Why would anybody want to spend money on a feature for their car so that they could listen to music from a single brand of MP3 player? Wouldn't it make more sense to get a stereo with an audio input jack that could attach to any audio player? I mean, sure the controls aren't integrated, but you have controls on you MP3 player. Use those if you want to switch songs. Besides, you should be focused on driving, not trying to find the next song you want to listen to.
      because they have that brand of mp3 player? why wouldn't you get a car integration solution that did offer you controls from the headunit or steering wheel if you already own that music player? strange that you say people should be focused on driving yet encourage people to take a hand off the steering wheel to change the music on their tethered audio player.
    4. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by jbellis · · Score: 1

      "I mean, sure the controls aren't integrated"

      Do you actually drive a car? Integration is the *whole point*.

    5. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by SoCalChris · · Score: 1
      Why would anybody want to spend money on a feature for their car so that they could listen to music from a single brand of MP3 player?
      Because the ipod does its job of being a music player very well. With the smart playlist feature, it does a good job of managing a playlist of songs that I want to hear. Also, there are many ways to integrate an ipod into my car's stereo, I haven't seen any other MP3 players that have as many options available as the ipod does.
      I mean, sure the controls aren't integrated, but you have controls on you MP3 player. Use those if you want to switch songs. Besides, you should be focused on driving, not trying to find the next song you want to listen to.
      Currently, I have over 1,000 songs on the main playlist that I listen to. Every now and then, a song will come up that I don't really care to listen to then. It's much more convenient and safe to reach up, and hit the "Next Track" button on the stereo, than it is to reach for the ipod that's bounced away from where I put it (I drive mostly on unpaved, rough roads), and try to change the track that way.

      Also, I hate having wires strung around my car, so having the ipod integrated into the radio allows me to stash it away out of sight.
    6. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      You can actually get some nice setups from Pioneer and other aftermarket places that work much better than the stock stereos. Most of the Pioneer, Sony, Alpine, Panasonics and what have you can have add-ons for them that let you control your iPod from the card remotes. They also have three line displays so it's almost like looking at your iPod interface.

      I'm planning on getting one of these sets for CDs and iPoding in the car.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    7. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by 7Prime · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People take their hand off the steering wheel all that time, ever heard of something called "shifting geers"? Seriously, people make a big deal about taking your hands off the wheel, but that isn't what's dangerous, what's dangerous is focusing your attention elsewhere for any length of time. Those fancy iPod controls might be right on the steering wheel, yes, but if the system is combersomb and frusterating to operate, then it's going to be far more distracting and dangerous than "taking your hand off the wheel" to operate an interface you've used for years. None of the systems I've seen offer a "simpler" (meaning less pushing of buttons) interface than the iPod itself. And most car stereo buttons are no bigger than the buttons on a click wheel, not that button size really matters anyway.

      It's myths like this that lead people to buy hands-free cellphone systems, even though they've been proven to be no safer than using a normal cellphone in the car. The only point to total car integration is that it feels snazy and looks pretty, although I'd say my homemade integration system (which uses the iPod for control) feels pretty snazy, maybe partly because I built it up myself.

      Now, what's important is that the iPod is positioned in a static, secure place that doesn't require fumbling around for it (like trying to feel where you last put it on the passanger's seat). I've created a little mount for my iPod belt clip (a Vaja case) right on the top of the stereo head unit, that way it's always in the same place when I reach over for it, and it's no farther away than the stereo or temperature controls. I can quickly hit the forward and back buttons like I would on any car stereo, or if I'm at a stop light, I can quickly lift it off its mount (attatched with a modified rivet clip on the back of the case), and pull it right in front of me for more in depth control. In this case, I can choose my own level of involvement with the UI according to the particular driving situation.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    8. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Americans are insane. Very few cars here are sold with manual gearboxes. Most are fully automatic, and the drivers have no idea when the car shifts gears, or why it might be useful to drop to a lower gear to pass on an expressway. They don't want to deal with the extra work. Of course, they're far more likely to have a cell phone in one hand and a bloody newspaper in the other (yes, I see this almost daily on freeways.) Or, a cigarette in one hand while putting makeup on in the visor mirror, or holding the bottle for a baby in the back seat with one hand, leaning far back to do it...

      I guess that I'm agreeing with you -- it's just that USians don't bother with shifting gears -- they need their hands free for other things (not driving, but other things.)

    9. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite sure where you are refering to, "here"... do you live in the US or somewhere else? American drivers are pretty bad, and I hate the driving attitude in the US, although I've heard some statistics that most European countries have far worse accident rates, and that cell phone driving is even worse over there. No, Americans just eat in the car all the time (and everywhere else, for that matter).

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    10. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by Shadarr · · Score: 3, Informative

      JVC has a couple of decks out with a USB port on the front. I have a friend with one, and he loves it. If you don't already own an iPod, why drop that kind of money just to listen to music in the car, when you can pick up a 1GB thumbdrive for $20?

    11. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know a law in california was just passed requiring us to wear headphones when using a cellphone?

    12. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      that is a headset.. not headphones.. one speaker not two. one ear covered not two.. it really makes a diffrence

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    13. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      i have diven in the US and Europe.. US drivers are mainly distracted.. over seas people seem far more aware of their suroundings and on average seem better drivers. i have two cars one with an auto and the other with a manual.. it is sport shift so out of habbit i shift alot in the auto.. over seas most cars are manual in the US they are auto.. i feel that that has allowed us drivers to become way too easily distracted.... if they had to stop what they where doing every 1-2min to shift when driving to work (city) then i don't think they would do all the crap they do now in cars...

      although i do wish i lived in a no fault state.. then i would buy a shity truck and hit all the ricers that are watching movies on the dash and talking on phones while laying down int he car instead of driving..

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    14. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I have the alpine model with the 3 line display. The ipod integration is great. Being able to pull up songs from the HU by either playlist, artist, album, song is really nice. My only minor gripe is that skipping songs could be a bit faster. I want CD skip speed, but I'm not sure that's possible with a HD based ipod.

    15. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I love stick shifts, but the average commute in the US is not very conducive to having a clutch. It is mostly stop-and-go freeway driving on big, straight roads. You would burn out a clutch pretty quickly. Also, many Americans drive trucks, which sort of takes the fun element away from the stick shift. I know that they also save gas, but if the truck driver cared about that then they wouldn't buy a truck. Let's face it, even at $3/gallon, gas is cheap here compared to Europe.

      It's also hard to eat when you have a stick shift (though I manage)... you might have noticed all of the drive-throughs here :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    16. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure there's no such thing as a typical US driving style. It's a huge country, and every area has its quirks. Driving in Manhattan is surely different than driving in Chicago. I've never lived anywhere that the average driver was as good and attentive as I am :) Nashville, my current hometown, is the first place I've regularly seen people signal the opposite of the way they intend to turn.

    17. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      You would burn out a clutch pretty quickly.
      Not if you know how to drive.

      Also, many Americans drive trucks, which sort of takes the fun element away from the stick shift.
      How is a 275+ horsepower pickup that eats most "sports cars" (yes, I mean Mustangs and the like) from a stop or rolling start not fun? Unless you're talking about those little 1/4 ton "trucks" with the 4 and 6 speeds in them.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    18. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by roseblood · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about headphones.
      Worry about highly soundproofed automobiles.

      To quote my favorite underage sci-fi character:

      by EnderWigginsXenocide (852478) on Wed Apr 26, '06 08:59 AM (#15205234)
      (http://ladeda.com/)
      QUOTE

      Look at how many idiot drivers fail to see emergency vehicles with lights and sirens blaring, and tell me that they'll notice loud pipes. /QUOTE

      REPLY

      In the past few years a popular German auto maker ran a series of commercials where their car was operated on a noise city street. Traffic. Construction. Emergency vehicles. "Cars that go boom"(loud music, if you can call that music.)

      The windows go up and complete silence. A hand turns of the gain on the onboard sound system and Bach or Brahms comes pouring out of the TV set. Lovely. Cars marketed by playing up the fact that you are isolated from the driving environment as much as possible. Coming soon will be blinders to go with the ear-plugs. Wait...they are here..see many cars with narrow windows, big pillars, heavy window tinting and "wings" added on that all cause problems for driver visibility.

      Add to that many car magazines that cater the "luxury and performance segment" will rate a car LOWER if you are not sufficiently soundproofed, as outside annoyances like Police, Fire, and EMS sires, will seriously fuck up your driving experience when they impinge upon your enjoyment of a 5000000 watt 30 speaker Dolby DTS digital 70.1 surround sound system. [Numerical exadurations intentional]

      Anyhow, to the point, auto makers and car enthusiasts are turning their cars into boxes where they can be blind and deaf while motoring about.

      When you want quite and blind get yourself a coffin and get out of the fucking car before you put other motorists or pedestrians into their own coffins.


      If the car is a sound proof tomb a pair of headsets won't make a bit of diffrence.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    19. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank you for pointing this out. I'm incredulous at the number of people seemingly incapable of tying their shoes while carrying on a conversation ... I drink coffee and drive, why not change stereo stations and drive? Why not talk to my wife or 4yr old while driving?

      Besides, that crap on the steering wheel encourages poor hand positioning. I like to drive at 10&2 as per my driving lessons way back (or the one-handed 12 o'clock position). Never do I have my fingers or thumbs anywhere near the area of the steering wheel that has controls on it (there's a reason Ferrari's paddle shifters are where they are).

      Why not make good UIs for car consoles with nice big finger-recognizable control surfaces? PS, when its cold out, I want to be able to turn the knobs with gloves on.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    20. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by batemanm · · Score: 1
      I like to drive at 10&2 as per my driving lessons way back
      The recommended driving position these days is 9 and 3 since that reduces the chance of injury if the airbag deploys.
    21. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by rikkards · · Score: 1
      JVC has a couple of decks out with a USB port [crutchfield.com] on the front. I have a friend with one, and he loves it. If you don't already own an iPod, why drop that kind of money just to listen to music in the car, when you can pick up a 1GB thumbdrive for $20?


      Because I have 19 Gigs of music and normally just hit play and let it go. The only time I hook up my iPod is to charge it or if I deplete my bank account of $0.99. My main playlist is a Smart Playlist with only music over 3 stars rating. Which right now is aroun 1400 songs.
    22. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by MightyYar · · Score: 1
      Not if you know how to drive.

      I'm pretty sure that you are just trying to bait me, but how exactly does one avoid burning out the clutch if the average speed on the road is less than idle in first gear? Or if it is stop-and-go? You've developed some way to get rolling without the clutch?

      As for the trucks, I was referring to the 99.99% of trucks on the road that Americans are driving, not the sport truck that you describe. And while your sport truck might have nice straight-road times, I'd hate to see it on a twisty road :) Half the fun of a stick shift (for me) is anticipating the gear you'll need to pull through a curve... but fun is subjective.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    23. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how exactly does one avoid burning out the clutch if the average speed on the road is less than idle in first gear? Or if it is stop-and-go?

      By taking the bus, or the train for longer distances.

      Oh, wait, Americans don't use public transport, do they? Because God knows it's more "free" and "empowering" to idle on the freeway for three hours than to spend one hour travelling in comfort, able to get up and walk around and relieve yourself, not having to steer or anything...

    24. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by POPE+Mad+Mitch · · Score: 1

      I use an adaptor that makes my ipod appear as a unilink (sony) cd changer, hooked to a pretty generic sony head unit. The interface is pretty decent, you can select between playlist, artist and genre mode, then next/prev disc buttons scroll through the selection, and prev/next track goes through the tracks in that selection.

      the sony protocol means that the track name, artist and album names are all fed to the head unit properly, so the head unit can show you them as you like.

      the only thing that particularly sucks is scrolling through a list of several hundred artist names if you have a big collection, but with the kind of buttons available in a car theres not much scope for improvement.

    25. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Jackass. I'm the only one who's going to read your stupid comment, and I live in New York City and don't even own a car. When I did commute, it was to a place where taking public transport would take 1.5 hours vs. 30 minutes by car and I drove a 99HP stick-shift 40MPG Saturn. Before that I lived next to work and, while I OWNED a car, I filled it perhaps once a month since I walked to work.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    26. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      In an auto, the difference between your current velocity and the idle speed is absorbed by the torque converter and brakes... You can sit stationary in an auto with the brakes applied without doing it any harm.
      Ofcourse idling along slowly with the brakes applied to keep your speed down very quickly grinds your pads away.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    27. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      A USB thumbdrive device won't be able to play music when you leave the car...
      An iPod can also be used as a USB storage too, so you could plug it in to the same usb port and play the mp3 files stored on it.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    28. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      We were talking about a clutch in a manual transmission. There is no torque converter in a manual transmission. There is no way to start and stop with a manual transmission without wearing the clutch.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    29. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How is a 275+ horsepower pickup that eats most "sports cars" (yes, I mean Mustangs and the like) from a stop or rolling start not fun?
      A stock Ford F-250 with a 275 HP engine is slower at 0 to 60 than my stock Honda with a 160 HP engine. I also get 3 times the gas mileage. Don't get me started on cornering and other handling issues. I'm sick of people with huge fancy SUVs and truck trying to prove something. That big engine is there to handle the weight of all that fancy trim. I grew up with trucks, but these shiny waxed truck beds are stupid. I can't even count how many I've loaded with firewood, etc. If you're scared of scratching your bed, you should get a car. Trucks are for hauling stuff, not commuting (or driving fast). (sorry if F-250 isn't want you mean, it was the closest I could find to what you described)
    30. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      That's because they've taken off the left blinker on their trucks.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    31. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      USB hard drives are roughly the same size as an iPod, and come in sizes much larger for much less money.

      That said, I just soldered in a couple RCA jacks into my truck which didn't come with a stereo so I can listen to my Creative Nomad M. Yeah, I'm a hypocrite for saying anything.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    32. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by BillX · · Score: 1

      Thanks for summarizing TFA; I kind of figured before bothering to click that it was going to be some random blogger saying basically that they all sucked.

      I don't own an ipod, but is it really true that after 4 generations of them, there still is no non-kludged way of passing control messages to/from a HU? Modulating song title data over FM, what are they smoking? The thing has not only USB and firewire pinouts on the dock port, but a bidirectional serial interface too.

      Hell, I just "integrated" my own homebrew CompactFlash mp3 player (linky) into my dash, using the magic of line-in. The old Pioneer HU in my car has an IP-BUS dataport on the back that can send and receive commands (button presses, title display data)...if I were ambitious (I'm not), I could tie them together with a $2 CANbus level translator.

      I think one of the child posts hit it on the head; it seems the ideal ipod integration hardware is Velcro and a line-in.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    33. Re:Can we at least get links to quality blogs? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      So after shaking my head in silence for a minute I need to get this out:

      I'm supposed to change my hand positions so I'll be better off in the off-chance of an airbag deployment (very very rare compared to say, cornering on the road) instead of in the better-for-driving-accuracy positions.

      Yeah, that makes sense.

      How about this: airbags suck, and this is yet another proof.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  6. OOH by PDubNYC · · Score: 0

    What a terrifically interesting topic for conversation. I am completely amazed that many of the offerings suck. And incredulous that Steve Jobs would crow about the percentage of cars available with iPod integration w/o mentioning that many of them suck.

    whoohooo

    1. Re:OOH by Dargoth_Rejuv · · Score: 1

      Hey, they could always just not exist at all, then we'd have nothing to complain about, would we? The interfaces HAVE improved over time thus far, one could assume they will continue to get better.

    2. Re:OOH by spagetti_code · · Score: 1

      You've got to remember this is Marketing.
      Its a box he can tick - whether its a big tick or a little
      one (or a wobbly upside down one) is irrelevant.

      This is not, as some have claimed, the Jobs distortion
      field. Any marketer I know would be crowing the same
      way.

    3. Re:OOH by PDubNYC · · Score: 1

      Maybe somehow I didn't pour on the sarcasm thick enough, but outside of a sarcasm beatdown stick, I don't know what more I could have done.

  7. It could be worse... by The+Dalex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm busy looking for any good solution for my iPod and my 2000 Acura 3.2TL. The tape or FM adapters have poor, inconsistent quality, and my CD player stopped playing burned CDs (it seems to only like 640MB discs and I can't seem to find them anymore). Crutchfield says if I replace the CD player, my factory sub stops working. They have an iPod adapter that plugs into the CD Changer input on the factory stereo, but to install it, I need to remove my console and gearshift! So, in conclusion, any sort of direct-input auxiliary connection for an iPod is better than nothing, bad reviews aside. It could be worse!

    1. Re:It could be worse... by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      google "Blitzsafe". It's a very simple, generic cable that ties your iPod into the "CD Changer" port and charges your iPod as well. They have a number of different options according to the particular make and model of your stereo head unit (it works dozens of them, I hooked it into my '99 Camry). Then build yourself a custom mount, and you have the best iPod interface integrated right into your car: the iPod.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    2. Re:It could be worse... by phorm · · Score: 1

      I bought one of these to use my mp3 player (not an iPod) in my work vehicle, because it just has a tape-deck+radio which tends to get no reception on long drives out-of-town.

      I was expecting static and/or a crappy signal (including shipping I think I paid $10CAD), but was pretty impressed with what I got for my money. My mp3 player doesn't play+charge by USB simultaneously, but if yours does you can also use the USB adaptor (or firewire on some models) to keep the thing powered up while you're on the road.

      Not the best solution, but a pretty good value for the price.

    3. Re:It could be worse... by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

      Cant you just replace the car stereo with one that plays MP3s off of a harddrive?

      You dont have to carry a radio from your house and plug it into your car, so why have do you have to physically carry your ripped tracks between house and car?

      "iPod integration" is actually "audio disintegration", your iTunes tracks are not integratable with any other media devices.

      This thing is getting there.
      http://www.advancedmp3players.co.uk/shop/product_i nfo.php?cPath=4&products_id=1260

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
  8. Click/steering wheel? by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least none of the control schemes have tried to introduce the dangerous fusion of the click and steering wheels...

    "Honey, why are we driving in circles?"
    "I wanted to listen to some Frank Zappa, but we're still in the L's"

    Or, worse yet...

    "Dammit, I can't change songs because there's a semi along side me!"

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
  9. Use a real media system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't they simply use the touchscreen solution so many of my friends have done? They have a touch screen modded into their console, then have it hooked up to a nix laptop and can run a complete media center with it. Considering a lot of cars have LCD displays for whatever, would it really be that hard to put a little 'iPod' button on it to display the car's media center?

    1. Re:Use a real media system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why don't they simply use the touchscreen solution so many of my friends have done? They have a touch screen modded into their console, ...

      Because we don't live in the ghetto?

  10. Two Words: Scion xB by PaulMorel · · Score: 1

    The Scion xB is the best. It just has a line in to your stereo. Simple and effective, and I can attach any device I like (my iPod or my piece of $#%& iPaq).

    --
    burrocrisy
    and that would be what? Ruling by jackasses? Never has a slashdot misspelling been more apropos
  11. What defines iPod integration? by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

    The article is loading very slowly so I haven't read it yet, but what constitutes iPod integration? I just ordered an '07 Mustang. It comes with a basic stereo input jack. I would prefer a really well done total iPod integration, but this still works well. The other benefit is that in 10 years if I'm not using an iPod (or the hookups change), it will still work perfectly with my car.

  12. Sick of forced imcompatibility for better brands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not use a standard USB connector, Steve? Instead of forcing on us all of your proprietary crap.

  13. MINI +iPod = Lackluster Integration by Greventls · · Score: 1

    The MINI Cooper is the same way. I'm pretty sure all BMW products have the same 'integration' as well as your Rabbit.

  14. aftermarket receivers and iPod integration by nxtw · · Score: 1

    My Pioneer DEH-6800MP's iPod integration works very well. The receiver has a wheel that works similar to the iPod's wheel. The reciever's remote would work fine except that it has no repeating or hold-down scroll, so it's useless unless you're near what you're looking for.

    The default list gives me Genre, Artist, Song, and Album. Selecting Genre lets me choose the genre and then artists within the genre, so that's my preferred method of finding a given song.

    The display shows two lines of song info; I leave it on song title/artist.

  15. Revenge of the car-poor by Creosote · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those of us driving old clunkers with cassette decks are snickering, as we can purchase low-cost cassette adapters for iPod or generic MP3 players that take about five seconds to install or remove and don't suffer from interference like the FM transmitters.

    1. Re:Revenge of the car-poor by Cahrin · · Score: 1

      I've been using an FM transmitter every day of my commute since last Christmas, and have never experienced any interference. And, since I play my music at a reasonable level, I don't ever experience any noticable quality loss either. I don't know why FM transmitters get such a bad rap - They are easy and work well for their price. The only downside is having to use the click-wheel instead of integrated controls on the stearing wheel.

    2. Re:Revenge of the car-poor by electronerdz · · Score: 1

      I'm actually going to install my own RCA jacks under the stereo in my new Colorado so it will work with ANY MP3 player.

      --
      Kernel Krunch - Part of a Complete OS
    3. Re:Revenge of the car-poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't a free radio station on the dial that doesn't already have something on it causing interference (i live in chicago).
      I've tried 4 different transmitters for the ipod, friends cassette deck adaptor doesn't have any problems.

    4. Re:Revenge of the car-poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, true. Too bad it sounds like your listening to a 32 kbit/s bitrate MP3 though.

    5. Re:Revenge of the car-poor by holden+caufield · · Score: 1

      You must not live in a major city, or at least ones with stations in the lowest part of the available FM frequencies.

      --
      I'll create an amusing sig when I have something meaningful to post.
    6. Re:Revenge of the car-poor by subsoniq · · Score: 1

      My 2005 Acura TL (with full sound system and navigation package) has both a 6 disc CD changer and a tape player, so I'm all set.

    7. Re:Revenge of the car-poor by TClevenger · · Score: 1

      I solved that by disconnecting the jumper wire from the back of the stereo to the power antenna. That way, the antenna stays retracted and I get great reception from the FM transmitter sitting in the tray under the radio. (I have the parts to install a switch inline that does the same thing.) On rentals with standard antennas, I bring a small crescent wrench to remove the antenna and stash it under the seat.

    8. Re:Revenge of the car-poor by dknj · · Score: 1

      you have a radio with a poorly shielded antenna connection. my stock radio used to get decent reception (i live in a major metropolitan area) until i switched to an aftermarket stereo. now i get crappy reception whereever i am (tested in different areas). so my fm transmitter which i thought was the best thing since sliced bread is now garbage.

      my next move? wire in a new connection directly to my amp to play my mp3 player. as long as the amp doesn't send 200+ watts to my mp3 player, we should be okay

    9. Re:Revenge of the car-poor by NoStrings · · Score: 1

      That's similar to my solution for this. I have an '05 Dodge Caravan with a factory DVD player. The DVD player has RCA jacks on the front (I guess so you can hook up a game console). I opened the dash, pulled out the DVD player and soldered in another set of RCA jacks on the back. Then I found an empty spot on the dash and cut a hole for an iPod dock. I also wired power to the dock so the iPod would charge all the time. Once I had it all wired up, the car stereo just thinks it's a regular aux input. Since the iPod is mounted on the dash, I can easily use it's controls. It's a great set up, but it definitely wouldn't have been as easy without the aux jacks already there. I'm not looking forward to the lease ending on this vehicle.

    10. Re:Revenge of the car-poor by Trogre · · Score: 1

      That's why I don't think I'll ever be selling my humble Fujitsu Ten (aka Toyota) head unit, with its front-mounted 3.5mm AUX jack.

      My little Samsung plugs right in and plays oggs with no quality loss.

      That is, until the signal gets to my tinny door-speakers.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    11. Re:Revenge of the car-poor by ben+there... · · Score: 1

      You're also degrading the sound quality by running it through FM. You end up with about 50Hz to 15KHz frequency range, where your car's system is probably capable of 20-30Hz to 20KHz, at least. You lose a considerable range of bass and the really high end treble.

  16. Two more words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Butt ugly.

    I used to think the Aztek was an abomination, but wow.

    1. Re:Two more words by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, the one advantage to the box-on-wheels design is that it is atleast roomy - something you can't really say about many other inexpensive cars.

  17. subaru by mjsottile77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've complained plenty to Subaru about the lack of options for my Outback. Up until the '07 models, the only solution was the less-than-optimal FM transmitter or an aftermarket replacement for the factory stereo. Unfortunately, in the '07 model they gave it zero effort in "integration" - all we get is an AUX input plug. Sure, this has the benefit of not being iPod specific, but it requires that I have an additional piece of hardware between the iPod and the car to take unamplified (ie, not from the headphone jack) output from the iPod and to feed into the car. Otherwise I'll have the fun that I used to have with the cassette deck adapters where you have to find that nice balance of cd player/iPod volume and system volume. Subaru is near the bottom of the heap with respect to iPod or Satellite radio integration, relying on external units with FM or (now) a single AUX plug as connection. There are many other manufacturers who have done it much better than Subaru has in terms of getting the audio signal into the stereo, and integrating control of the radio/iPod into the car controls to reduce safety risks. For a daily long distance commuter, this is definitely impacting my next car purchase. It's really a shame that such a nice car on the driving end of things fails so miserable in features like this.

    1. Re:subaru by maxume · · Score: 1

      My parents had a Subaru wagon in the eighties. We upgraded it from AM to AM/FM. Good luck. Nice car though.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:subaru by garinh · · Score: 1

      For applicable Subaru models, the following adaptor is useful:

      http://www.jazzyengineering.com/product_info.php?p roducts_id=28

      I installed one in my 06' Outback, and it's wonderful. The "blank" CD for my Subaru doesn't even have an audible gap when going from the end to the beginning of the blank track -- it's an utterly seamless setup.

      I use a simpler CD-changer adaptor for my Honda Civic, and although it wasn't trivial to install either, these kind of adaptors are well worth it -- they both give me flawless MP3 player integration.

      Garin

    3. Re:subaru by zoomzit · · Score: 1
      For a daily long distance commuter, this is definitely impacting my next car purchase.

      I am amazed that you are letting the cost of a $180.00 part affect your decisions regarding a $25,000 car.

      Just get an aftermarket stereo. Here's my recommendation: http://www.crutchfield.com/S-MEZTmbfCxvl/cgi-bin/P rodView.asp?g=266150&I=500CDE9852&search=alpine+cd e/
      It's only $180. I can attest from personal experience that the 2006 model works quite well. The 2005 models, however, were plain horrific.

    4. Re:subaru by topham · · Score: 1

      Let me know when you figure out how to install an aftermarket stereo into my Mazda 6 without making everything look like shit, or not work, etc. (2006 Model year by the way).

    5. Re:subaru by zoomzit · · Score: 1
      I've installed my own stereos and I can say that installing aftermarket stereos correctly is stupidly simple to do. But I have heard of people running into electrical issues with aftermarket stereo installation.

      I personally believe that this is more of a function of the quality of labor (i.e. 18 year old Best Buy employees earning $10/hr) than issues with the stereo or it's complexity.

      As far as the look of aftermarket stereos, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Granted, I personally think they are all stupendously ugly, but that's my trade-off for quality iPod integration.

      It is amazing how attractive iPods, HD Tv's and iMacs can appear, while auto electronics are still unforgivably ugly.

    6. Re:subaru by topham · · Score: 1


      Take a look at the design of the Mazda 6 before you say it's easy to do.

      First, unless you like Bose, you have to rip out everything.

      Second, you need to keep the car working, which isn't easy since half the climate controls go through the stereo link.

      Third: the console design leaves little room for a hack-job.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it is do-able. But in some cars, and it seems to be more and more common, it is being made more and more difficult.

    7. Re:subaru by zoomzit · · Score: 1
      Ahh... I understand. I think the prius is this way too. It's a bit shitty of the manufacturer to not only not support mp3 integration, but also make it frustratingly difficult to change to a stereo that allows for integration.

      You may want something like this http://www.autotoys.com/x/catalog/MAZDA_6_2003_RAD IO_DASH_KIT_p_5251.html/. I'm in no way supporting this product, as I just googled "mazda 6 aftermarket stereo" and that's what came up. Anyway, I'd think with something like this, and a decent looking aftermarket stereo, you might have a decent install. With the Alpine units, the ipod cable comes out of the back of the stereo, so I run my cable behind the dash, through the center console and into a center console storage bin. With this setup, the iPod is completely out of sight..which helps me avoid the "hack job" look.

    8. Re:subaru by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      It's very simple unless your car has components with non-standard shapes. I've done it twice; the first one, an old-ish minivan, was very easy and looked fine because the console was just a bunch of flat rectangles stacked on eachother anyway. The second, a more recent Ford Focus, wasn't exactly rocket science, but because of the shape of the console we had to take a hacksaw to the mounting kit and get a bit creative with some of the parts. And it sticks out like a sore thumb because the color is off, the face doesn't curve along with the rest of the dash, and the corners are completely squared off where the hole in the dash has rounded corners. We didn't care. We just wanted a cheap CD player.

      I don't know what the situation is in these Mazdas, but I can see image-conscious folk balking at an hack job like my Focus. And the Mazda might even be worse, impairing the ability to get anything in there at all. Carmakers are really jazzing up those center consoles these days...

    9. Re:subaru by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Your Mazda 6 is made by Subaru?

    10. Re:subaru by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an 06 Suzuki Swift. Sadly, no iPod integration until 2007. Saying that, I have an iRiver anyway.

      There are two options for the stock head unit:

      - Get an ipod adapter
      - Get a generic RCA adaptor

      I went for the rca adapter. I managed to connect it without any tools at all, I just jammed my hand up the back of the dash, and manipulated the plug into the socket on the back of the HU. I ran the adaptor into the glove box, and ran an RCA-3.5 lead out. The player sits quite nicely in the cup holder, visible cabling is minimal. Quality is excellent.

      I took this choice over the other, which was my old a/m head unit. It's a kickass alpine with mp3/wma CD playback, built in iPod integration (as in the HU duplicates the controls of the iPod). It also has a 3.5mm aux in. Truly a great piece of hardware. Sadly, it would have required me to replace the centre fascia of my dash. I didn't want to for a number of reasons, among them the fact that I would have had to pay £100 to get the replacement fascia shipped in from Japan.

      So see if you can get one of these adapters for yours. Mine was £39.99~ish. Much cheaper than a dash rebuild.

  18. Theme Music by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 2, Funny

    We need some intelligent control mechanisms for song selection with the iPod/car integration. For example, if the control scheme detects rapid acceleration and braking, along with heavy steering, it starts playing something from Crazy Taxi. If we just get left hand turns, then start playing music from, I dunno, Days of Thunder maybe? If the traction control system detects lots of skidding, then music from The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift. Also, we'll need some microphones in the car to listen for gunfire, in which case we have a much wider selection of music to chose from.

    Remember, the point of this technology is to let you keep your hands on the wheel at all times - safer driving, you know.

    --
    There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    1. Re:Theme Music by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      Just so long as it's only one-way.

      "I was doing fine, until it started playing some Crash Worship."

  19. Go Bluetooth by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I see the high-end TomTom navigator intends to have a bluetooth connection to car stereo by 4Q 2006. It'll be interesting to see how that works out...

    http://www.tomtom.com/products/features.php?ID=212 &Category=0&Lid=4

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  20. Alpine iPod by TadMSTR · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have an Alpine deck, forget which model off hand. Anyway it has an input for an ipod and you are able to control the ipod through the deck. Only down side is when you go to scroll through your music it always starts from the beginning. Its not like the ipod where it starts where you last were. Other than that it works great. It even displays the song info on the deck and you have a few different scroll/display options.

    --
    There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:Alpine iPod by ben+there... · · Score: 1

      Ha, that's true. I still have my 5 year old Alpine deck and never bought an iPod, so I haven't thought about this much, but that's pretty obvious.

      The best way to integrate an iPod with your car is to buy a deck. Works with all makes and models. I don't know why you'd spend that much on an iPod and then keep your stock deck anyway.

  21. Aux-Pod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone tried and can they comment on the functionality of the Aux-Pod? I believe it's from PAC audio?

  22. A bit disappointing, but... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    I just ordered a new car stereo, after a couple idiots smashed my window and took off with my cruddy old one. One of the features is USB, another is iPod integration. I don't know if I'll get an iPod some day (when the prices drop considerably I might), but I picked out the model just in case I might.

    This is about as welcome as buying a car and then getting home to see it feature prominently on the evening news for an urgent recall.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  23. Re:Sick of forced imcompatibility for better brand by timster · · Score: 1

    There is no standard for media player integration, unless you consider the Dock Connector a de facto standard. If all you want is the sound, the iPod has a standard minijack connector and pins for line-out, but it's not "integration" if all you're getting is sound. There isn't a standard, USB or otherwise, for selecting playlists and all the other things that people want to do in their cars.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  24. I'm quite happy with my homemade interface... by 7Prime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is one option that he forgot to mention, when going over a final rundown of solutions to use: the generic, CD changer interface that doesn't try to read a specific playlist, and you simply control it with your iPod. Seriously, there is NO better interface to control an iPod than the iPod itself, and I'm sorry, but the difference between an interface display with a 10 point font and a 12 point font is really insignificant (especially when one you can hold right in front of you when operating it), so just use the fucking iPod itself.

    What I've done, on my '99 Camry, was I bought a "Blitzsafe" iPod adaptor, which plugs into the generic CD Changer port behind the console. I then built a little custom mount, using a modified Vaja case "rivet clip", to be able to quickly pull the iPod in and out of the mount, and attatched it to the top of my dashboard. This way, the rivet clip itself, on my case, acts as the mounting bracket. I left enough cable so that I can pull the iPod up to my face (while at a traffic light, or during light traffic), and operate it normally. If I'm just switching tracks, I'll just use the clickwheel. I've never seen a simpler, more reliable, safer, and more user-friendly iPod integration system than this.

    Basically, all I'm trying to say is that with a little research and some ingenuity, anyone can create something far better, and far cheaper than the ones shown here. Everyone has their own way of using their iPod: some people use playlists, others don't, some people put their iPod in a leather case, some put it in a clear rubber one, some (stupid people) don't put the iPod in any case and let it scratch to hell. From what I've noticed, is that most these iPod integration systems virtually require that you 1) use playlists (I don't) and 2) not have your iPod in a case. My suggestion, build your own out of generics if you have the time, then you can customize it to your own style of usage.

    --
    Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    1. Re:I'm quite happy with my homemade interface... by twitchingbug · · Score: 1

      You're right, that AUX in is totally the way to go.

      However, I do get by without a case and use this product. It's actually really really nice. The front doesn't scratch at all, and while the rear doesn't have full coverage, I don't mind so much about the back scratching. And it lets me pocket the iPod without having to deal with a large bulky case, and lets me use my FlexDock in my car to pop my iPod on. So not everyone's stupid who doesn't have a case...

    2. Re:I'm quite happy with my homemade interface... by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      yeah, that was probably a bit harsh. It's just annoying when I hear people complain about their iPod getting scratched up. Well, duh. I don't have any problem with people not using a case, just don't complain about it. You've taken measures to protect yours, which is all I was saying.

      My thoughts were that most iPod cases come with a belt clip and many people are searching for a way to mount their iPod in the car... so why not just combine the two, and mount a loop or clip system on the dash of the car? It's been extremely convenient for me.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
  25. Audio Input is all I need by BrianPan · · Score: 1

    Sure spiffy integration would be great. But if 70% of cars just give me an audio line in, I'll be happy. Last car I bought and my last trip to the car radio section at Best Buy a couple of months ago this definitely wasn't the case.

  26. iPod by puddpunk · · Score: 1

    Get into my car!

  27. only a few have high-quality iPod integration by drmancini · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have spent quite some time evaluating the current situation of iPod integration capabilities of various car hifi products. And the result? Most manufacturers that brag about iPod compatible head units offer terrible capabilities, most of which were mentioned in other posts (lack of control, only a few (6-10) visible directories ...). This manufacturer shitlist includes names like Sony, Blaupunkt, Kenwood, Pioneer and VDO. According to a very good car hifi dealership in my neighborhood Alpine and Becker are two of the few that offer great quality of iPod integration (all data visible, freat control and integration ...)

    --

    Never underestimate the power of idiots in large groups
    1. Re:only a few have high-quality iPod integration by FGizzard · · Score: 1

      I recently installed an Alpine CDA-9857 into my '94 Camry, along with the Alpine iPod cable. Having tried (and returned) a Belkin FM transmitter, I found that the Alpine + iPod integration works great, with only a few minor complaints.

      The only complaints I have about it are that it takes about 1-2 seconds to fetch the information of a song after you press previous or next, and that none of the various display options includes the time left counter, only the time elapsed.

      Alpine actually has a very nice video of the unit in iPod operation here http://www.alpine-usa.com/en/products/product.php? model=CDA-9857

      Overall, I love the setup. Now if it only had a text-to-speech system while you navigated the menus...

    2. Re:only a few have high-quality iPod integration by zoomzit · · Score: 1
      Agreed. I too have the Alpine unit, and it works very well, although there are a few glitches here and there.

      I do have to say though, it's the 2006 Alpine models that have good iPod integration. The 2005 models were really hideous as far as integration goes.

    3. Re:only a few have high-quality iPod integration by philipgar · · Score: 1

      I have a kenwood system, and overall it isn't too bad. The player was nothing special, just a couple year old head unit that supported the cd changer interface (and track names etc) as well as they're ipod interface that plugs into it.

      The setup has a couple different modes where you can browse through artists, playlists, and albums (i think). The downside is that the system is slow. scrolling through artists took a couple seconds to do, so obviously looking through a long list is not practical. I have set up a couple playlists of stuff I wanted (set on random) for long trips before, although I've found the option of unplugging the ipod, browsing to the album I want to listen to, hitting play and plugging it back in works great. Doing this I can easily select an album once before driving, or every 45 mins or so, and still have full control of previous, next, play/pause, random on/off, and repeat. It's not as useful as an ipod interface, but it's very much nicer than having to do that on the ipod manually while driving (especially turning random on/off). Also displaying the current track name during playback is great. I just wish it would easily show the artist and album name as well. Even if it just scrolled Artist-Song Name across the screen.

      The interfaces need a couple more years before they can be as easy to use as the ipod, but what is to be expected from early adopters? For the money I spent (less than $100 to upgrade my head unit, and $75 for the ipod interface) I can't really complain. Especially the coolness factor. The method is 10x better than trying to use an FM adapter, and cassette adapters require a cassette player which most cars don't have any more. The rca jacks work, but then you need a high end stereo anyhow. The $75 upgrade is worth it just to have the track names displayed and ipod charging. I think it's partially just the coolness factor of it all.

      Phil

  28. doesn't matter... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    Deaf people drive all the time. They just learn to look out for flashing lights and to be careful.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:doesn't matter... by Rockenreno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That doesn't make it safe... Distractions should always be minimized when possible. Listening to the car stereo (so long as it is not at absurd volumes) still allows entry of more outside noise than if you were earing headphones (heaven forbid you have some working, noise-cancelling headphones). Personally, I like to hear what's going on with my car as well as the environment around it to a certain degree so that I can act when necessary.

      --

      Forecast for tomorrow: A few sprinklings of genius with a chance of DOOM!
    2. Re:doesn't matter... by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 1

      Deaf people also have spent much [or all] of their life compensating for their lack of hearing. Some jackass wearing headphones in his car while driving has not, and is a danger to others.

      --
      If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
  29. I dont use an iPod, but... by AP2k · · Score: 0

    My bypass jack into the amp board on my radio has yet to fail me while listening to my Zen Touch. Plus it costs less than a dollar.

  30. What is a Colorado? by PDubNYC · · Score: 1

    Never heard of it. Durango?

    1. Re:What is a Colorado? by Greventls · · Score: 1

      Canyonero.

    2. Re:What is a Colorado? by thegoogler · · Score: 1

      replacement for the chevy S10, it's just a little truck

  31. Bad reporting by tkrotchko · · Score: 3, Informative

    The guy talks about the Dension unit as FM only and uses RDS. That may be true for the version he looked at, but Dension offers several models, most with full integration with the car bus for many cars. I have the iBus version and it sends information to the head unit about tracks, and offers a relatively decent interface using steering wheel controls already built into the car.

    The sound is fine, since it goes directly from the connector on the iPod into the car stereo. It looks somewhat like a CD changer to the car, but that's only of consequence if you use playlists (I listen to full albums). You have full control over the iPod by scrolling through the album/artist lists and choosing an album or artist that suits you. Installation is relatively painless and allows you to manipulate the ipod fairly safely. I think it's the best interface out there. Another great use of this interface is that it charges your iPod as you play.

    There are many other units; some are better than others. But this writer is blissfully unaware of the actual good interfaces that are out there.

    And I agree with another poster here about the Honda interface. I paid almost $200 for it, and the interface is so awful on it that my wife refuses to use it. It's beyond bad. It stretches into that territory that is so comically bad that you have to wonder what product line manager looked at it and said "Oh, that's not so bad, we can ship".

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  32. Well.... by tkrotchko · · Score: 0

    "when you can just stick a tape in that connects right to your ipod?"

    A tape in what? Tape players stopped being put in cars right around 2000. You can find them as options, but it's hardly worth it.

    Plus, it's a pain to worry about turning off the iPod when you shut off the car, you can't charge the iPod, you have wires hanging over your dash. I'm not clear why somebody buys a $400 iPod (because of aesthetic and sound quality considerations), and then decides to hang wires all over the dash in pursuit of a lo-fi solution to save $150.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Well.... by sg3000 · · Score: 1

      > A tape in what? Tape players stopped being put in cars right around 2000.

      My 2001 Mercedes SLK320 came with a tape player (in addition to the disc changer). It was unreliable as hell, so I sold it and bought a 2003 Nissan 350Z, which also had a tape player (in addition to the disc changer). Both had Bose systems (blah).

      Hard to believe but at least up until 2003, cars did come with tape players. Not to listen to tapes, but to listen to audio books on tape (where you could get away with 8 tapes instead of 20 discs, or whatever).

      Now that iPods are so popular, it's probably cheaper just to put an aux jack and leave off the tape deck.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
  33. Nissan Integration works well. by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My 05 Murano does not have a specific kit from Nissan for it but I use the XTerra's kit.

    It plugs into an extra coupling on the Satellite connection. From there it goes to a "magic box" which has a standard docking cable attachment.

    My iPod charges and plays while hooked up. While the stereo controls are not intuitive, forum help was great, I can select ANY playlist I want. I can skip forward and back with the steering wheel controls and control the volume as well. To change playlist I have to use the far selection button on the Bose 6CD In-dash player. I can select playlist, artist, etc - just as if I were using the iPod directly. Selecting "Enter" is one of the buttons on the left. Scrolling between artists/playlists takes a second to response but can be done with the tuning nob.

    Not the best but from it sounds like its far better than most setups. I get the full quality of playback as its sourced from the dock connector.

    This works with or without the fancy Navigation screen. Non-navigation equipped Murano's have an Orange LED screen that displays text just fine.

    One day they might even have a real unit for my specific model and year. I have not used the 6CD player since I hooked up the iPod. It cost around 190 and I got it from http://yournissanparts.com/

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  34. Use the satellite radio interface not the CD one by thule · · Score: 4, Informative

    Cars that have satellite radio interfaces in them can adapt better to iPods. Many iPod interfaces use the CD changer interface which does not have a way of sending back a track title. With the satellite interface the title *can* be sent back to the radio. This doesn't necessarily help the overall control of the iPod, but it will display something other than TR04.

    For us people that want our SatRad *and* iPod there are interfaces that will allow easy switching between the iPod and the SatRad.

  35. Just like everything else... by catwh0re · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this is less a case of Apple doing a poor job, and rather the specific car manufacturer doing a bad implementation. In any case car companies are pretty happy updating their consoles with each revision... so even though it's an Audi which is supposed to be a nice car, and the console is currently unusable, it will be better in the next revision. (Cars often get system updates at services.)

  36. Harmen/Kardon iDrive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone else used an iDrive? It has to be the best iPod car solution I've seen. It runs a separate screen and click wheel wannabe while the iPod is tucked away in the centre console. It pauses the iPod when the car stops (so I can come back to the same point in a song when the car starts again - just like a real CD!) and plugs in through line in, so sounds terrific. I have been using mine for 6 months and am really happy with it.

  37. iPod Hookup by localman · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've hooked my iPod up with four different devices over the past couple years with aftermarket devices; the quality varies greatly. I skipped the FM and tape units as the sound quality isn't satisfactory. So these were all direct-in solutions, using the dock connector and the CD-changer hookup that most cars have today. The one that I most recently installed is called the DICE, and I'm really happy with it. Previous tries had problems with the iPod not always shutting down or starting up automatically when the car was turned on and off, and some of them would introduce odd noises now and again. But the DICE hasn't exhibited any of these problems, and also has some really cool extras like text display of the artist/song if your stereo does CD text, and steering wheel control while still allowing direct control with the iPod.

    Anyways, that worked well for me!

    Cheers.

  38. Re:What defines iPod integration? - Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other benefit is that in 10 years if I'm not using an iPod (or the hookups change), it will still work perfectly with my car.

    Seems to me this is a hugely improtant point that might make iPOD integration totally irrelevant. I'm not sure, but none of the different iPODs I've checked out from different generations (okay they're all two generations apart, but still) have the same hookups (all kinds of weird mini firewire, thin and wide usb, connections). This means that any solution is completely non-future proof, ie. any bleeding edge, must have the newest, latest and greatest install will be locked at the present generation, and iPOD generation time is a lot faster than car lifetime. I guarantee you there will be another interface change in the next few years, the size of these things is getting to the point that to download all your TV and movies onto the suckers, there will have to be an update in the connection interface, and a change in connection format to prevent usse with legacy hardware (ahem, I means, to prevent confusion).

    In dash iPOD interface, the 8-track player of the future.

    Also, my new Prius has a simple stereo line in too. A simple, straightforward and relatively futureproof solution. I guarantee that either the same cables will be in use, or simple adaptors will be availible for at least twenty years (heck you can still get the big fat headphone jack adaptors)

  39. And how! by nsayer · · Score: 1

    I have a 2006 VW Passat. I love the car, but if I had known the the iPod integration was going to be as bad as it is, I wouldn't have bothered.

    The iPod is, effectively, treated as a 6 disk analog CD changer, with the first five playlists (alphabetically) and the whole library comprising the virtual "disks." No track info is displayed, just numbers. And if a playlist (or the library) has more than 100 tracks, then you only get the track%100, which makes skipping around (which you do a track at a time with the FF/REW buttons) worthless.

    It's enough to make me want to just burn CDs and use the CD changer. Thank God for XM!

  40. I like the Nissan iPod integration by meme_police · · Score: 1
    I got it with my Xterra. My needs are minimal so it suits me fine.

    Here are my wishes:

    #1 - I wish I had more control from the steering wheel. I can't scan through playlists or artists or whatever with the steering wheel, I have to lean over and use one of the knobs or arrow buttons.

    #2 - I wish I could navigate into Artist then Album. You only have one level of navigation. However, in my case I long ago had set up a playlist for every album I have on my iPod. I did it because there were way too many albums and artists to scan through because of all the one or two tracks I downloaded from some artists. So this isn't a big issue for me.

    #3 - I wish that it didn't default to random off when turning off the car. This is a drag because I'm constantly starting playlists over randomly and it's a different order each time so I end up having to skip tracks I just listened to.

    #4 - I wish there were more characters than 9 displayed when scanning through playlists. The display does show way more characters when playing so I don't know why they limit it to 9 while looking through playlists or artists or albums.

    Cool things:

    #1 - I can skip tracks from the steering wheel (I wish I could fast forward them from the steering wheel, I can fast forward from the head unit but no rewind).

    #2 - By default I have the track name displayed but with a push of the DISP button I can see the artist name.

    It's much more integrated than the Honda one we looked at for my girlfriend. I think because it connects to the satellite radio port rather than a 6 CD changer port.

    --

    The meme police, They live inside of my head

  41. The physical interfaces suck by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    While the new trend towards mobile-phone-esque "docking cradles" is a distinct improvement from the "poke a cable out in the glovebox and plug the ipod in there" of early efforts, it still sucks.

    I want a head unit that I stick the ipod unit into like a cassette tape.

    *That* would be "iPod integration".

  42. When did we get rechargable CD's? by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

    CD Charger? Last time I checked around, it was called a CD Changer, as in "changes CDs for you"...

    I dunno, but this guy writing this article seems like a pissy whiner. "Pioneer didn't contact me... I'll never buy from them ever." It seems that Pioneer is making a pretty good iPod interface. I'm impressed they've maintained the same bus throughout the years... I could still plug my 12 disc CHANGER into a new head unit... along with this iPod adapter.

    ---from Pioneer Electronics ---

            * Text Information Display
                Song/album titles, artist names, and track length -- memorized by connected iPod -- are conveniently displayed on the monitor or headunit display. This capability also permits multiple "search" functions, making it a snap to find a song to play back.

            * Multiple "Search" Functions
                Just like looking for files stored on a PC, iPod-recorded songs may be sorted according to registered playlists, genres, artists, or albums to ensure easy access to each music file.

            * Repeat Playback
                The Repeat Playback function offers two options -- repeat playing of a particular song or playback of all tunes from a specified playlist.

            * "Shuffle Songs" Function for Random Playback
                Everybody's favorite option for mixing things up, Shuffle Songs randomly plays the songs in the iPod music library. Every song is a pleasant surprise, and the more files that are stored in the iPod, the greater the surprise.

  43. Rock on AUX Miniplug! by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Car stereos that offer miniplugs are the best. This is THE WAY to do music player integration without the expense.

    --
    http://brandonbloom.name
  44. This should not be hard. by twitter · · Score: 1

    There isn't a standard, USB or otherwise, for selecting playlists and all the other things that people want to do in their cars.

    That's really too bad, but there are standards if you use the right software. Tags are standardized and mounting USB or Firewire file systems is not tricky. Would it be too much to ask for a customized Amarok that could query a mass storage device for music and playlists? A ten inch touch screen LCD and a volume knob would work that interface. Yes, people have made Amarok work with iPods, despite it's firecly non free and standard busting storage formats.

    Oh but oh, no, the "pirates" might use such a device to share their music on those rare occasions people share a ride. Better just build your own.

    If you own a Honda, like I do, you won't be able to replace the head unit because it's the alarm, but you can cover it up.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:This should not be hard. by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Amarok would be overkill. You make a fair point though, there should be support for music players other than iPods, however iPods shouldn't be left out either.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  45. it may be crappy... by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

    but what are your alternatives? in fact, if you own anything else besides an iPod, what are your choices?

  46. 2006 Audi come w CD and Tape decks! by spineboy · · Score: 1

    My wifes Audi A4 comes with a Bose sound system that has both a CD player, and a tape deck. Very easy integration.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  47. Don't get me started on my Skoda then.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it's a mess of wires because there is no iPod integration. Bah!

  48. Easy by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

    Just strap one of these babies to the dash and you're good...

    --
    Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  49. Head units suck. by dschuetz · · Score: 1

    I've been futzing around with iPod integration for the last couple years, trying a couple different solutions and, every 6 months or so, trolling all the various electronics shops looking for new head units, and I've come to one unavoidable conclusion: head units suck. They're screwed up in many ways, not least of which is a useless focus on form over function, but that's a rant for another day. When it comes to iPod integration (or XM, which I've also been playing with), they're totally useless. Many of them only display 8 or 16 characters of the song title!

    Both the iPod and the XM SkyFi have good sized windows that display artist, track, and album (the XM doesn't show album, but the screen space is there). Both those windows would fit in a standard-sized head unit, but NOBODY makes a unit with that kind of screen. It's damned annoying.

    Anyway, to get to specific integration experience, I used (for a while) one of those "fake CD-changer" Aux inputs on my Ford Explorer, for XM and iPod, and it worked pretty well, until the CD button on my factory radio stopped working. (I could still play a CD, by inserting one and it'd automatically start playing, but if I switched to radio I couldn't get back to CD without ejecting the disc and re-inserting. Because the CD button also switched to the "changer" (the aux input box), I couldn't use that for XM/iPod any more. Now I use a cassette adaptor.)

    For our other car, a Toyota Prius, I found a pretty nice system that mostly integrates with the big display: A VAIS Tech system (actually, the predecessor model to the one I've linked here). It also has to fake-out the head unit -- in this case, it pretends to be an MD changer, so I've got 12 "discs" to choose from instead of 6. Each "disc" is a playlist, and it shows the playlist name on the screen. It'll also show the song names as they get played, along with either the playlist, artist, or album (selectable). Most of those limitations are in the way the Toyota screen works. I would like to have thought there'd be a better way to add a new device to the system than this changer-simulation, but I guess that either there isn't or Toyota simply isn't sharing. The other nice thing about this is it's got a second Aux port that I've got connected to the XM radio, so I can pop back and forth between the built-in CD changer, the iPod, and the XM easily. Again, because of the limits of the built-in head unit, it's much easier to use it in "simple mode" whereby it's basically another Aux input and I just use the iPod to control and select music (though the steering-wheel buttons for forward and reverse track still work). (BTW, the "official" Toyota XM interface works almost exactly the same way, so even when Toyota can do better for such an interface, they don't.)

    One thing I've definitely noticed, though, is that even if the integation into the multifunction display screen on the Prius were "perfect" (showing everything you'd possibly want to see from the iPod), I'd probably never use it. Most of the time, the display is showing my mileage/efficiency information, or the navigation screen. And when it's doing that, you can't see what's being played (I'm not even sure that it'll show a popup of each song as they start up, though it might). I've really decided that a dedicated screen for music information is required, so you can glance down and see the track, jump ahead, etc.

    What I'd *really* like to see is either a head unit or small external unit (like the SkyFi) that can do both XM and iPod, using a full-size SkyFi/iPod like screen, preferably flourescent instead of backlit LCD, with a wheel that works (the SkyFi wheels are notoriously bad). Put that screen into a standard-height head unit, hide the CD slot and some kind of iPod slot behind a pop-down panel, and put a *good* user interface with more than 6 station presets in a bank on the unit (there's that other rant starting up again), and you'd have a real winner.

    I think there'd be

  50. The best solution by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1

    The best solution would be for Steve and Johnny Ive to design an Apple branded in-dash head unit that major car manufacturers could offer as an optional accessory for new cars. It should have 802.11n and be able to sync wirelessly to your home computer while it sits in the driveway or garage. No iPod to plug in, It IS an iPod that happens to be semi-permanantly mounted in the dash.

    Once Apple takes over the car-space and has a micro computer and Wi-Fi in every new car...imagine the possibilities!

  51. Why aren't these standard? by argent · · Score: 1

    I don't suppose anyone has a rational explanation for something that's been bugging me for the past quarter of a century. Well, one other than "car companies and car stereo manufacturers are run by right daft bastards".

    It's still a matter of amazement to me that a stereo mini plug hasn't been a standard part of all car audio systems since, oh, about 1980 at the latest.

    I mean, we're talking about a feature that would cost them pennies per unit in a device.

    The only vaguely rational explanation is that they're terrified by the possibility that if people could plug their own kit in easily they'd do that instead of upgrading to a better unit. As if someone spending a minimum of ten or twenty thousand dollars on a car is going to hold back a buck a week on their payments so they can have a more easily stolen CD player and more cables strewn about the inside of the car.

  52. and this is apples fault, how? by joshsnow · · Score: 1

    At the last Apple special event, Steve Jobs was almost bragging about the fact that 70% of new cars sold in the U.S. this year had (optional!) iPod 'integration' available ... Obviously, he didn't talk about the rest of the world. But most of all, what Steve didn't tell us is how crappy the existing "integration" solutions actually are!

    How is this Apples fault? Not to sound like a fan boy (which I'm not) the point here is that 70% of motor manufacturers selling cars in the US are offering some level of iPod integration. That in itself speaks volumes about the market saturation and mindshare of Apples product, so of course Jobs is going to make a song and dance(pardon the pun) about it. OTOH the fact that the type and quality (for want of a better word) of the integration offering varies from very good to very crap is besides the point.

  53. tried iPod, went Phatnoise by RabidMonkey · · Score: 1

    When I got my new car last year, I wanted to be able to do mp3s. I went out and got an iPod and an iTrip. That was thrown away as soon as I got in the car. I live in Toronto, and there is approximately 1 free spot on the FM dial that you can get FM on for the iTrip, and even it gets overrun sometimes. I found the quality horrible, so blah. Next was a tape adapter .. that worked great, but was messy (cables for audio and charging). VW didn't offer an iPod integration kit at that time, and 3rd party kits were like $500. So I started looking at VW options and found this:

    http://www.phatnoise.com/

    I got a Phatbox. It plugs right in to the the desk, through the CD Changer control cable already in the trunk. It's fully accessable through the deck (And steering wheel contols). The cartridge comes out of the player (it's just a laptop HD in a fancy case) and you plug it in to a cradle to load music on it. When you change songs/cds/artists, depending on what mode you're in, it reads you the title, so you don't have to look at anything. It's completely simple to use, and I never have to take my hands off the wheel, or eyes off the road.

    The point of this is - while the iPod is a good device for mobile use, if you want something in your car, it's probably not the best solution. There are many solutions out there that are sound better, work better, and are cheaper (The phatbox was a whole $300 installed).

    plus, for the Phatbox, the hacking community is alive and well, because the Phatnoise player actually runs Linux. And now that they've figured out how to upgrade the drive sizes, you can buy the 20gig DMS and drop whatever size laptop HDD in there you want.

    http://www.phathack.com/

    Just my $0.02 CDN

    --
    We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
    1. Re:tried iPod, went Phatnoise by dsalmon9 · · Score: 1

      I have a Kenwood head unit with the iPod interface and it works very well. I've seen what others have said regarding new cars with iPod interfaces built in and they don't sound very good. You'd think one of these companies would have partnered with Phat Noise to help them build their solution (like Kenwood did). You can search by genre, artist,album, and playlist and your iPod is nicely tucked away in the glove compartment.

  54. Re:Not a Princess, really by schnitz_mi · · Score: 1

    ... and I forgot to add:

    If those minor gripes are all I have to b*tch about, either I'm a total princess or Scion/Pioneer did one hell of a job here!

  55. Re: Apple Remote by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

    I'd try and stick an "Apple Remote" wired equivalent in the steering wheel, this way it's function/usage is known, simple and consistent accross (car) manufacturers and I don't need to think too much about it. Any more than that and you'd have to have a HUD as a FrontRow display.

  56. can I moderate this troll? by Hillie · · Score: 1

    Is there a way I can moderate this story down?

    Steve Jobs said that "70% of new cars sold today offer iPod integration." He was basically showing off the fact that they offer specific integration exclusively for their product.. WHO CARES if most of them are not ideal integrations. The fact that they're there is a milestone for Apple, and that is all he was saying, nothing more, nothing less. He didn't go into detail about it, or brag about any specific brand of integration.

    This seems to me a pointless jab at Jobs' keynote, and feels like it's more qualified for a personal blog rather than a reputable news website.

    Just the opinion of a long time Slashdot reader..

    --
    - Alex
  57. Re:Nerds and their shit. by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    Jeez, you guys! Yes, there ARE still some people who have cassettes. I'm not really all that old, and I still have a box of cassettes; I never play 'em much, but they have music on them I recorded in the 80s that simply doesn't exist anywhere else. And for people who still record their CDs onto tapes this is a reasonable solution.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  58. There's your answer... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    I mean, we're talking about a feature that would cost them pennies per unit in a device.


    Right there - re-read it again, then go google up on the story behind the "exploding Pinto"...


    The gist of that story was that Ford made the Pinto with a "saddle fuel tank" - that is, the fuel tank straddled the rear drive shaft of the vehicle. When the Pinto was in a rear-end accident, there was a high probability that the axle would be pushed up and into the fuel tank. There was also a small bolt involved, but the main thing is that the axle would tend to rupture the fuel tank, spilling fuel and ultimately causing fire and/or explosion.


    The punchline? It was found that a simple 10 cent piece of metal or such placed at a certain critical area would stop such an accident from becoming a miserable fatality. When the CEO (at the time) of Ford was asked why they didn't add such a part to the Pinto, the response was that it cost too much money, and it was cheaper to simple settle the lawsuits as they happenned.


    Yep, the beancounters at Ford and many other companies do have a price for human life, and they know compared to their profits, it doesn't amount to much. Is it any wonder that Ford also created the Crown Victoria Interceptor, another saddle tank design, which was responsible for many fires, including one that severely maimed a Phoenix police officer?


    Of course, they settled on that one as well - offering retrofit kits (essentially puncture proof racing cell bladders) and such on all Interceptors being used by police departments across the country. Of course, a standard civvie Crown Victoria has the same design flaw, but there was never a recall there. Plus, many Interceptors were sold at city auction prior to the retrofit kits being available. Add this all up, and you may think twice before stepping into that cab (many cab companies and independant cabbies drive Crown Vics).

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:There's your answer... by argent · · Score: 1

      So they're basically stupid sons of bitches.

      And all the people making aftermarket radios are stupid sons of bitches as well?

    2. Re:There's your answer... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      No - they are not stupid. They know the "price" of a human life, and are simply optimizing their profit for their shareholders based on this. If they can pay out settlements and fines, and those settlements and fines are less than the cost it would take to retrofit/add on extra components to prevent paying out that money, then it makes fiscal sense *not* to do so. Otherwise their ass would be in a sling for not doing right by thier shareholders (believe me, there are laws against that as well - damned if you do, damned if you don't).


      What is stupid is the number of people who continue to believe that companies hold their customers interests and well being in the highest regard. They don't, and until more people stop believing they do, nothing will change (on a side note, it is in their interest that people continue to believe, whence the kind of marketing you see all over the place, such as GE's recent enviro-friendly marketing campaign). Their only interest is in their profit and to their shareholders - nothing more, nothing less.

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    3. Re:There's your answer... by argent · · Score: 1

      No - they are not stupid. They know the "price" of a human life [...]

      "He's posting without reading the OP."

      "crOsh, you've turned off your posting computer. Stay on topic."

      I'm referring to them being "stupid" for not realising the value of marketing value of spending a penny on a mini stereo jack ten years ago (let alone 25). And "sons of bitches" for the reasons you cited. Which is why I asked whether the folks making aftermarket stereo gear are equally stupid.

  59. Read Here Now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FREE DEAL OF THE WEEK
    FREE 30GB iPod VIDEO [Black/White]
    Offering Site
    : Flashipods4free.com
    Offering Company: TRAINN - Transcedent Innovations

    30GB Video iPod

    • 2.5 inch color LCD screen
    • Less than half an inch thick, 4.8 ounces
    • Holds up to 7,500 songs, 75 hours of video
    • 14 hours of music playback, 6.5 hours of video playback
    • Supports music, podcasts, audiobooks, photos, TV shows, movies, videos, and games
    • Earbud headphones, dock adapter, USB 2.0 cable, and protective sleeve included

    How to Complete the Offer

    1) Sign Up at FlashiPods4Free.com; look on the bottom right for the signup box.

    READ THIS! IMPORTANT!
    At signup, you are presented with a choice of a referral account or point account. The difference is, once you complete an offer, you will either refer friends to sign up or complete offers for more points. Once you finish points or finish your referring, you will receive your iPod regardless. Its a matter of personal choice. Referral or points!

    2) CompleteONE offer; the easiest current offer is Stamps.com, which is free if you cancel within 28 days. It is also listed as INSTANT Credit. Over 50 different offers are also available!

    3) Start referringonly 5ofyour friends to do this! Or if you signed up for the points option, complete more offers until you satisfied the amount of points needed.

    4) Once the offer has been approved and your friends have signed up for an offer, a Free iPodWILL BE recieved!