Slashdot Mirror


A Lot of Money for Playing Games

knowhow writes "Tom Taylor took the risk of dropping out from high school just to play video games. The guy who is just 18 years old, was prompted to take this step; because of the reason that emerged from his love for gaming. After playing for six months on a full time basis the guy signed a contract for a staggering $250,000." From the Article:"Now Tom taylor is known as Tsquared on the gaming circuit. He's earning six figures and has product endorsements and a video game tutoring business. He's one of about 100 professional gamers associated with Major League Gaming, a video gaming league founded in 2002. When they're playing well, pros might bring home a few grand a month."

239 comments

  1. When the money dries up... by JoeCommodore · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wonder in what situation he will be, he better be working on a backup skill.

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:When the money dries up... by Mavric1337 · · Score: 1

      If that happens let's hope he learns to invest.

    2. Re:When the money dries up... by Frogbert · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes I'm sure someone handling their own expensive sponsership deals, complex contracts and his own business would have no marketable skills outside of playing quake.

    3. Re:When the money dries up... by MaXiMiUS · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I was actually listening on the radio, about this guy that had retired at 34, because he had invested in Crest®, or maybe it was Colgate®.. Anyways, he was making 3 grand a month just from dividends apparently, which is quite a bit for (correct me if I'm wrong) tax-free money. Anybody that chooses not to invest is probably going to regret it, nomatter what their line of work is.

      --
      It's never just a game when you're winning. - George Carlin
    4. Re:When the money dries up... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Assuming he didn't tell his high school teachers to kiss his shiny rich ass on the way out, he should go knocking on Harvard's door for an education. He can afford it and money talks at that school. Although I'm not sure if the blue bloods will want a prize-winning video game player in their midst. MIT or Stanford might take him. And then write a book.

    5. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would take me seven years to make that much money. Maybe I should worry about what to do since my money dries up before each month ends. You make it sound like he won't have a job after the $250,000. With the current trend of video games I might say his job is more secure than a lot of people I know.

    6. Re:When the money dries up... by HappySqurriel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seven years? Man you need a better job ...

      Anyways, the problem with a competition of this nature is that you can make a lot of money as long as you're at the top of your game. For every person in this league there is (probably) 100 people who are nearly as good and (if they so choose) could easily start challenging you for your spot in the league. In other words you always are at risk of not being good enough to keep your 'job'.

      Growing up, I knew a few guys who ended up becomming professional snowboarders; they lasted about 18 months before their sponsership and were 'forced' out. I imagine that, if gaming continues as a 'sport', professional-gamers will have to 'train' for 8 hours a day to stay competitive.

      IT may be an insecure field, but I doubt all the jobs will dry up all of a sudden. Much like the gamer in the article, if you feel that your job isn't that secure you should train some skills that are useful both inside and outside of IT (say public speaking) and save up your money in case you suddenly find yourself without a job; this is easily said, and can be accomplished, but rarely will an 18 year old recognize how good he has it until it is gone.

    7. Re:When the money dries up... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you have a significant chunk of change in any set of stocks that pay qualified dividends (tax free), anyone can make $3,000 a month (or more likely, $9,000 every quarter) to live on. That's what a lot of rich people do. That's what senior citizens do after saving for 30 or 40 years. That's what I'm in my Roth IRA (although I'm years away from pulling three grand a month in dividends). Nothing magical about it. Unfortunately, a lot of kids just don't get it that there's more to life beyond today.

    8. Re:When the money dries up... by protich · · Score: 0

      What is your backup skill if I cut off your fingers? Or you go blind?? ( assuming you are a dev)

    9. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better job would be nice. But actually where I live, $40K a year is not bad, especially for reading slashdot most of my time on the clock.

    10. Re:When the money dries up... by supabeast! · · Score: 1
      I wonder in what situation he will be, he better be working on a backup skill.


      Given the money he's making, he'll have no trouble putting himself through college to pick up a backup skill after the funding for pro gaming has dried up.
    11. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For every winner there is a loser. Technically, 1.0001+ losers after broker fees.

    12. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I believe he has a publicist / agent. Those are really only useful when you are famous, so if his skillset consists of only 1) playing video games, and 2) interacting with his publicist / agent, he's screwed.

    13. Re:When the money dries up... by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      He could get a CS degree...that would guarantee him a good life.. oh, wait...

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    14. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U mean a Degree is Counterstrike; Where do I enroll?

    15. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or you could work for the government. My dad works for the state (NJ) and after 30 years he can retire with a pension of about $3k a month after taxes and of course with full health care. However such pension plans will be a thing of the past in 10 years. Today everyone gets 401ks and/or IRAs which is pretty much betting your retirement on the stock market and your investor. Then of course there is social security... pfft.

    16. Re:When the money dries up... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      What exactly is the marketable skill in signing a contract that says 'give me loads of money'?

    17. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh PERS is quite nice. I know a cal trans guy who retired at 101% of salary (he was actually *losing* money by working). Bastards ended up rounding it down to 100 in the end, though.

    18. Re:When the money dries up... by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      If you invest for increase in value, yes. If you invest for dividends, no. The company just needs to make money then.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    19. Re:When the money dries up... by nessus42 · · Score: 1
      MIT or Stanford might take him.
      Yeah, after he gets 1500 on his SAT scores.

      |>oug
    20. Re:When the money dries up... by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Braile screen readers. I had a blind guy in my CS classes.

      For the fingers- type 1 handed. Or use voice recognition software.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    21. Re:When the money dries up... by Danse · · Score: 1
      Yeah, after he gets 1500 on his SAT scores.

      yeah... or writes a large check... if he's got the cash, he can get in just about anywhere...
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    22. Re:When the money dries up... by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Heh, well I don't know about government, but for private company pension funds, the money came from company investments anyway, so you were betting your retirement on the stock market and the financial health of the company. Also, when you died, your family was left with nothing. At least if you invest in a 401k and IRAs your family can get whatever is left in the account.

    23. Re:When the money dries up... by nessus42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've never met anyone who got into MIT on the basis of money. And even if they somehow did, they'd flunk out the first semester if they weren't really damned smart and already had an excellent high-school level education.

      |>oug

    24. Re:When the money dries up... by benplaut · · Score: 1

      Counter Strike 'classes'? Incredible! Sign me up, folks!
      (It's a JOKE, people!!)

    25. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make that in 12 years =\.

    26. Re:When the money dries up... by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sure he can probably play SAT long enough to get his score up to 1500.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    27. Re:When the money dries up... by Nyph2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Unfortunately, a lot of kids just don't get it that there's more to life beyond today"

      Unfortunately you don't get there's a lot more to life than money. Money is a means to various services. Everyone needs to contribute to society in order to draw on the services of society. For those who no longer work, it's simply saying you've payed your dues(in the form of time) to society equivalent to those which you're drawing back from society.

      To get those IRAs or dividends to the degree which you did, if you did it without advancing some field in a unique way, you had to work over 40 hours a week, had to work for the bulk of your life, or skimped and saved as much as theoretically possible. If you advanced an underdeveloped field, you benefitted society enough to deseve what you're getting*. If you worked significantly over 40 hours a week (unless you were one of the lucky few who truely enjoy their job) or if you skimped & saved every penny you could, imo you wasted a portion of your life... for possible returns. Albiet if you've reached the point of retirement those have payed off to a degree, but you're putting a down payment in either case, of significantly decreased short term enjoyment(which is guaranteed) for the chance or it paying off later. (what I mean by chance is both the method of investment, which carries risk, as well as the odds of survival for the # of years till it really pays off)

      *undeveloped fields are systems which have not been fully developed, but are of benifit to society. Those who understand these systems both work them to their advantage as well as benifit the field to the gain of society as a whole.

      -

      There is no free lunch. There is no easy answer. IRA's, skimping and saving, or even comprehending a field which no one else does, these have costs(personal) or benifits(societally) which end up resulting in retirement at some earlier than otherwise possible point/a more comfortable retirement. But they're not free, dont delude yourself into thinking that. You payed for that money/month.

    28. Re:When the money dries up... by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      Possibly the fact that he has piles of cash and people recognize him. Look at John Elways. Who thinks "What kind of car-selling skills do you get from playing football?" but the point is that he had so much money that it doesn't matter.

    29. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you have a significant chunk of change in any set of stocks that pay qualified dividends (tax free), anyone can make $3,000 a month (or more likely, $9,000 every quarter) to live on.
      So, you've uncovered the secret that anybody with a sufficiently large chunk of change can live off of it. Thank god you were here to explain that to us mere mortals, because we would have never figured it out on our own. You should become a financial planner and share your genious with the world.
    30. Re:When the money dries up... by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      Why are you certain that the money will dry up? Do you mean for the profession, or for him personally as he gets older and his reflexes aren't as good? Maybe he'll go on to games where reflexes aren't that important. I don't think the assumption that the money will dry up is necessarily a good one. It's good to hedge against, but that's good advice no matter what you do.

    31. Re:When the money dries up... by iocat · · Score: 1

      scrimp now, live comfortably later, or spend now and eat dog food later... the difference is, LATER I can't work if I change my mind.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    32. Re:When the money dries up... by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But the problem is that this type of person generally is more interested in having the toys than the security. Some people can get away with it because they are content in a smaller house with a reasonable car that joe public can afford. Throw the big bucks at many others and they start thinking pimped Escalades and stuff from Cribs.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    33. Re:When the money dries up... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Considering that I'm planning to live to be 120, and will be into my fourth or fifth career by the time I retire at 100, I don't have a problem with this. Why retire at 30 and waste your life for the next 90 years?

    34. Re:When the money dries up... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      The best part is that you got my advice for free. Next time, pay the piper. :P

    35. Re:When the money dries up... by andersvirtualsolutio · · Score: 1

      If i only had a dollar for each time i started up Quake3 i would be rich - that game ate some of my most productive school years ;)

    36. Re:When the money dries up... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hell, maybe he'll be a game coach. There are people who actually make money that way.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    37. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PERS can transfer to your spouse. So uh...yea. And it doesn't fluctuate based on anything after you retire (salary, years employed using pers and age of retirement are the only real factors). The caltrans example retired in his early 50s and has a wife (so she'll get it after he dies). Government offers some killer benefits, if you're willing to toss all imagination and higher thinking processes out the door for the rest of your career. It favors the lazy, but all are welcome.

    38. Re:When the money dries up... by suntac · · Score: 1

      True true, when the money dries up he will be having a problem,... however as he is getting so much experience right now from playing the game he can always start helping to develop them. Think about that he could become a consultant in a game company giving developers advice on the best way to develop the interaction between player and computer.

      I think he will be in the gaming industry for a long time, maybe not as a star player but he will have a role in the development. At least that is what I am thinking about it.

      Regards,
      Johan Louwers.

      --
      Regards, Johan Louwers.
    39. Re:When the money dries up... by Ichigo+Kurosaki · · Score: 1

      You do know that the top score today is 2400?

    40. Re:When the money dries up... by srussia · · Score: 1

      Ya, my thoughts exactly a while ago when I heard about a guy making lots of money for playing games. Like Tsquared this guy had a nickname too, A-Rod or something...

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    41. Re:When the money dries up... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Does the USA have the concept of a "mature age student"? I'm not bagging the US ( this time :), I only ask because that is how I got my BSc in Australia. Most of the posts I have seen so far seem to assume that if you return to formal education you will have to directly compete against school leavers for a place.

      In Australia, universities select school leavers by a score, similar to SAT's in the US, but it has little bearing on educational opportunities once you reach the ripe old age of 23. When I applied to enter a BSc course I was interviewed by the department head, he asked me to complete some remedial maths via correspondence and reapply next year, I did that and they were happy to let me in. Of course if you have the cash you can keep paying them for a place until you pass the exams, there are plenty of international students willing to do that but very few locals go down that path. (Note: over here the Govt pays ~85% of the bill for students selected on merit, the student pays the rest as a tax levy when/if ever they start earning $XYZpa, the tax debt is accumulated by the hour ).

      There is a compelling reason why universities are "soft" on entry criteria for mature age students: Mature age students really do want to "get the bit of paper", their motives vary from money to self satisfaction. Many school leavers don't understand "the bit of paper", they are motivated by social factors and hormones. My anecdotal "proof": I started along side 160 others, three years later only 30 odd of those graduated, ALL of the original dozen or so mature age students were amongst those who "got the bit of paper".

      Disclaimer: The above facts and figures are based on shakey recolections dating back to 1989-1991, the system may have changed in detail since then but it still operates along the same lines.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    42. Re:When the money dries up... by somersault · · Score: 1

      for only £250 an hour, I'll teach you how to play Counter-Strike

      --
      which is totally what she said
    43. Re:When the money dries up... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Why retire at 30 and waste your life for the next 90 years?

      Work is the only thing that gives your life meaning? Wow. Sucks to be you.

    44. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Another demonstration of why a little knowledge is dangerous.

      The long term return on stocks, _including_ dividends, is roughly 7%. If he's going to follow your model, genius, that means he'd need about $600k in a Roth account. Here's a math problem for you: given the annual cap on Roth account contributions and a growth rate of 7%, how many years would he have to contribute in order to reach your goal? In the meantime, the income from the moneys outside that account is subject to tax.

      But you want him to live off _dividends_, and not touch the capital appreciation. The dividend yield of the S&P 500 is around 1.4%. So now he needs $2.6m to hit your goal.

      The BLS tells us that the average boomer has $50k +/- $175k saved for retirement. What does that tell you about what "senior citizens do after saving for 30 or 40 years"?

      Here's the better news. I've neglected the role of inflation in my calcuations. And I'm not even going to deign to respond to your point that qualified dividends are tax free, besides pointing out that they're not.

      Here's my free advice to you: I'm going to keep my mouth shut about "what rich people do" until I'm a rich person, and I'd advise you to do the same. In the meantime, I hope this kid goes out, gets famous, and gets laid like crazy, incidentally creating a big money professional gaming league that I can aspire to join someday.

      See you in thirty years.

    45. Re:When the money dries up... by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which is really ironic as I've yet to hire a MIT grad. Every one that I've interviewed (and yes a pool of 5 is statistically significant, even if it is a very small representation of a population) has an ego the size of a planet and actually seems to have got a very poor education with respect to usable, practical science. However, they seem to assume that I'll hire them based on the image the MIT research gets in the media. My guess this media image is generated by a very few select departments. - Mod this for flamenait and bring on the MIT flaming (actually it'll be interesting to see how 'clever' the flaming is).

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    46. Re:When the money dries up... by smchris · · Score: 1

      Oh, well. When University of Phoenix opens a Second Life branch, he can always go back to college. Good chance for a sports scholarship.

    47. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might consider reading Prophecy by Robert Kiyosaki

    48. Re:When the money dries up... by cttforsale · · Score: 1

      Have at you! Your post is your rebuttable.

    49. Re:When the money dries up... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      Growing up, I knew a few guys who ended up becomming professional snowboarders; they lasted about 18 months before their sponsership and were 'forced' out. I imagine that, if gaming continues as a 'sport', professional-gamers will have to 'train' for 8 hours a day to stay competitive.

      I say 'so what'? You do it for as long as you can, and then go to school (or do whatever other career you want to try out). It's not like trying to be a professional whatever is going to ruin the rest of anyones life.

    50. Re:When the money dries up... by killerdark · · Score: 1

      On average we had a big world war AND a big depression about every 50 years. We are behind on schedule. The moment either of those two hit, your money will either vaporize or it will be used to build war machines with. I will just spend my money, that way I will die a happy man on the battlefields of WWIII.

      --
      A tadpole is a pollywog
    51. Re:When the money dries up... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      The long term return on stocks, _including_ dividends, is roughly 7%. If he's going to follow your model, genius, that means he'd need about $600k in a Roth account. ...

      Here's the better news. I've neglected the role of inflation in my calcuations.


      Wow, many errors. First of all, that 7% might be right if you're subtracting out inflation. Nominal return on stocks has been 11% since 1927. Second of all, when you're talking about retirement income, you wouldn't draw it from stock dividends. You would sell the stocks and buy bonds (preferably a bond fund). Bonds, of course, might on average pay 7% (not *now*, of course, unless you use a high-yield fund). But your money would appreciate faster than 7% when you save through stocks. Save over THIRTY YEARS and you can easily make the $600k.

    52. Re:When the money dries up... by dmd · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Why waste your life working?

    53. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The $250K contract is over a 3-year period (near $83K a year). That contract basically makes him an employee of Major League Gaming. He's required to go to speaking arrangements, shoot commercials, and so on for them. Of course, his main job is "being cool" which is one reason why MLG spent the money on him and other players. MLG works as his agent and he has to get permission from them to play in other tournaments. The money comes from MLG investors. 4 other players got the $250K deal. Most new high school grads can be bought for $83K a year. However, there is a small handful of top HALO players that are leaving the game go to college. The money just isn't there yet.

      I wouldn't say that his job is secure. He isn't a top video game player. He's not a top FPS player. He's a top HALO player. His sucess depends on how the video game HALO is made. HALO 2 is radically different than HALO 1. HALO 3, which will likely be out at the end of 2007, will be radically different than HALO 2. The gameplay of those games are changing with each new release. He has to adapt to the gameplay or move on to something else. Many of the top HALO 1 players couldn't hang with HALO 2. The gameplay changed too much. A few players were able to overcome those changes and hang around. Most of those players that did that are top MLG players. However, many of the top HALO 2 players were not top HALO 1 players.

    54. Re:When the money dries up... by crgrace · · Score: 1

      Tapecutter,

      No, the USA doesn't have that concept (mature age student) in any formal way. You are treated no differently from a new high school graduate. However, most "Mature Students" would go the Junior College route, which makes it significantly easier to get into a given state-supported school. I agree that older students are probably more likely to be motivated, my own personal observations supports that. And as for dropping out at 16, then getting back to school, and being successful all the while... may I only say "GOOD ON YA!"

      Carl

    55. Re:When the money dries up... by nessus42 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Every one that I've interviewed (and yes a pool of 5 is statistically significant, even if it is a very small representation of a population) has an ego the size of a planet and actually seems to have got a very poor education with respect to usable, practical science.
      That's probably because MIT has a very significant humanities requirement.... (That was a joke, btw, even though it is true.)

      The joke around Boston is that you hire Northeastern grads to get the work done, MIT grads to be your CTOs, and Harvard grads to run the companies.

      The joke is not quite true, since so many companies in Massachusetts have been started by MIT grads, but there's a kernel of truth. Northeastern trains people in skills that are immediately useful. MIT tries to give its students the fundamentals that back science and engineering in general, rather than training in specific technologies. In this manner it is hoped (and I think rightfully so, I might add) that even though the graduates are not as immediately productive as Northeastern graduates, they can always continue to easily learn whatever new methods, techologies, and ideas come down the road, and hence over their lifetimes, will always be current and productive.

      So, a Northeastern CS grad is sure to graduate knowing Java and relational databases and to have implemented an airline reservation system as a class project, an MIT CS grad might end up graduating only knowing Lisp and Modern Alegebra and have implemented a Modula II compiler as their class project. (Actually, for quite some time MIT grads would have learned Java for training in concurrent programming, but I'm making a point, so facts be damned.)

      Regarding ego, anyone who graduates from MIT is smart, and they're going to know they're smart. MIT is also a very humbling experience, though, since it puts you through quite a wringer. Almost anyone who goes to MIT is going to have met people even smarter than themselves and is going to have seen that there's so much to learn, they couldn't possibly know it all.

      Regarding your hiring practices, it is well known in the Boston area that there certainly are companies who would prefer to hire Northeastern grads. On the other hand, most MIT grads have no problem finding jobs. I certainly have never had such a problem.

      |>oug
    56. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow, many errors. First of all, that 7% might be right if you're subtracting out inflation. Nominal return on stocks has been 11% since 1927.
      Too bad price-to-earnings ratios are at record highs. Perhaps you've heard somebody mention that 'past performance does not guarantee future results' or something along those lines, a time or two. Good luck getting a 7% real rate of return in that environment. What's the average annual real rate of return for the past 5 years, champ? Free clue for you: it's negative.
    57. Re:When the money dries up... by Nevyn · · Score: 1

      $9,000 a quarter = $36,000 a year. Bond's are giving me about 0.25% a month, my really nice dividend stocks/mutual-funds are giving me about 1% a quarter (but the stocks esp. have growth as well, although some of that is compounding too -- which you'd lose out on). Let's just double those numbers. You'd need $450,000 invested into stocks, or $1,800,000 into bounds.

      Note that bonds are high atm., the above doesn't account for inflation and assumes the dividend income is risk free (more true for bonds). If you save your entire working life, you could get there ... but it is very non-trivial.

      --
      ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B
    58. Re:When the money dries up... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      I pay significant taxes, therefore I contribute to society....

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    59. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your gonna live to 120!! dam, I'll be lucky if I make it to 60. So at 35, my life is more then half over. So hell hey I would like to retire, but I can't right now.

      **very few members of my family make it much past 60. Too much cancer and other things that end a life quickly. I am still trying to firgure which relative spent time on a necular test facility back in the '40s that ave everyone cancer.

    60. Re:When the money dries up... by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Unfortunately you don't get there's a lot more to life than money.


      It's true there's a lot more to life than money... but I hardly see how you can read that he doesn't understand that from his post.

      There's a lot more to life than money, so when I have enough to retire comfortably, I can pay someone to clean and do yard work. That way I can spend more time with my family - because spending more time with my family is more important the money I'm spending to do it.

      So this whole "money can't buy hapiness" is true only to the point that material possessions don't bring true happiness, but financial freedom gives you the ability to DO the things you might not otherwise be able to - travel, go back to school, pay others to do the menial tasks you've had to do in the past to free up more of your time, and if you've got enough you can be a philanthropist. If you're a computer geek, you can write or finance (or both) that useful application you've been thinking people would enjoy.

      But regardless, you are always being a benefit to society - that guy you pay to cut your grass doesn't have to collect welfare, for example. You still buy food and the necessities of life and pay bills and so forth, all helping the next generation of people survive without being a drain on societies resources.
      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    61. Re:When the money dries up... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you've heard somebody mention that 'past performance does not guarantee future results' or something along those lines, a time or two.

      Of course I have. But for a record that long (which extends back to pretty much every equity index since the 17th century), which does not depend on any one manager, it gives you a better idea where the bell curve lies.

      Good luck getting a 7% real rate of return in that environment. What's the average annual real rate of return for the past 5 years, champ? Free clue for you: it's negative

      False. The Fidelity Spartan US Equity Index Fund (Symbol: FUSEX), which tracks and gives you the return of the broad performance of the US stock market, shows 5-year returns of 6.86%/year. That's well ahead of inflation.

      Of course, you should be more concerned about the long-term rate of return ... but that's a lot higher, so ... yeah, you'll beat 7%.

    62. Re:When the money dries up... by Theoden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Unfortunately, a lot of kids just don't get it that there's more to life beyond today."

      Even more of a pity that the majority of kids and adults can't appreciate how important 'life today' really is.

    63. Re:When the money dries up... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      My physics instructor was an MIT grad and his nick name was Wild Bill, and I thought his ego was comensurate for someone teaching non-calc physics at a community college; He was pretty cool too.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    64. Re:When the money dries up... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      What??? Bonds are paying you 0.25%/month? That's ~3%/ year. Dude, money markets pay more than that. Vanguard's is 5.1%/year right now (probably 5.3% for the amounts you're talking about), which comes to 0.41%/month (~40% higher payments than you described) with no principle loss. And bond yields are actually lower than they have been historically. The total bond market returns 8.5% over the long term, and it's now ~5.5%.

      You're way overestimating the amount you need to have.

    65. Re:When the money dries up... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If you don't enjoy your work, maybe you need a different job. to accept his lot and be happy in his work -- this is a gift of God." (Eccelesiastes 5:19)

    66. Re:When the money dries up... by PaxTech · · Score: 1

      Actually, when World War III starts, this type of guy will be in high demand to be hired as a remote operator for the battle robots that will be doing all the fighting. The difference between fighting wars and playing vidoe games gets smaller every day.

      ObSimpsons Quote:
      Commandant: The wars of the future will not be fought on the battlefield or at sea. They will be fought in space, or possibly on top of a very tall mountain. In either case, most of the actual fighting will be done by small robots. And as you go forth today remember always your duty is clear: To build and maintain those robots. Thank you.

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    67. Re:When the money dries up... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      So hows that different than any other individual sport, there is a hundred things that can knock you out. I used to bowl, you'd be amazed at how many PBA and former PBA bowlers are out there. Many saved up a bunch of money and went out on the tour to see if they had the chops to play with the big-boys when they burned through their money at a rate of about $2K a week they came home. Quite a few still throw at regonals, I imagine Golf is pretty simmilar. This guy has a sponsor he's getting a financial advisor, a media consultant and trainer and a $250K salary, that's actually a sweet deal compared to most.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    68. Re:When the money dries up... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Working from home and Slashdotting at the same time doesn't work too well. Here's the corrected comment.

      "Moreover, when God gives any man wealth and possessions, and enables him to enjoy them, to accept his lot and be happy in his work -- this is a gift of God." (Eccelesiastes 5:19)

    69. Re:When the money dries up... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      I never went to high school. Tried getting into the adult high school diploma and was told it would take five years to get a high school diploma. They sent me off to the community college where I got my associate degree in four years. Was at the university for a year before I got kicked out of school for poor grades (i.e., hanging out with the wrong crowd, a failed relationship, and being depressed). Worked three years in a resturant, accidentally got into software testing on a six month contract, and landed a software testing job that lasted for six years. Five years ago, I went back to the community college to learn programming on a part-time basis and started earning my certifications. I'm now working at a help desk as a support specialist that I make enough money to have my own apartment. If I ever went back to the university, it will probably be much later in life when I'm making a significantly different career change.

    70. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, I would of modded you flamebait if I had points simply because you asked for it.

    71. Re:When the money dries up... by carrier+lost · · Score: 1
      Considering that I'm planning to live to be 120


      Why only 120?? Are you depressed? Is there anything we can do to help?

      :)

      MjM

    72. Re:When the money dries up... by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      For every winner there is a loser. Technically, 1.0001+ losers after broker fees.

      That's not true. The stock market is not a zero-sum game.

    73. Re:When the money dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you got this tax free BS buddy, but unfortunately there are no free meals in this world. I'm not sure what a RothIRA is VS a RRSP, but if it's anything like an RRSP you'll be forced to withdraw all of your savings before a certain age and that's when the taxes start kicking in. If you just take the dividend and put it in a savings account, it will be considered a capital gain for the said year. But once again, no such thing as a tax free dividend. Whatever you do with it (RRSP, IraROTH or whatever) you'll be taxed eventually... just slightly less. I don't know how much your dividends that you own pay, but in general dividends pay-outs are about 10% of what it cost to buy 1 unit.

      ie: I was overseeing an account with $350 000 in it, all used up to purchase energy stocks @ 20$ each that's 17500 stocks and they payed out $0.24/stock per month (or $2.40 per annum(which is pretty good I'm told)) which is $4200/m or $50.4k per annum. Now 75% (just guesstimating taxes) that you get to keep comes up to $37.8k which is $3150/m . Last but not least, as used in my example , $350k is a nice fat load of money and I don't suspect the average person to have that much available to them, therefore this situation is not in everyone's reach. If someone would be really serious about this and wanted to start small, most of the trust fund companies offer a DRIP (dividend re-investment program) in which they let you take your dividend payout and buy more stocks with it at 6% off from previous day's closing price.

      Now, if you're a retiree, I would say that monthly income is acceptable. As a young adult, I wouldn't be satisfied with that if I had a mortgage, car payment and a kid to take care of. In addition, things can always change, extra money needed for an emergency. You have to realize the more free time you have, the more you'll want to go out and do something (spend money) and all the time you're spending, is time you could of been working saving up.

    74. Re:When the money dries up... by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      It would take me 70 years to earn that kind of money (go Third World salaries - I don't expect to earn this for long though).

      So quit whining :P - and I should start practising those FPS skills :)

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    75. Re:When the money dries up... by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Actually, all you have to do to save money is not get laid. Which isn't too hard for most of the people here.

    76. Re:When the money dries up... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Maybe he should try that then..

      Six months after he started gaming full time, he signed his $250,000 contract. He also got a publicist, a financial adviser and media training.

      Sounds like other people are doing it for him to me.

    77. Re:When the money dries up... by theJamAbides · · Score: 0

      Yeah and I think ING Direct's is at 5% now too...

      --
      James Taylor
      (No, I'm not related. However, I am on the no-fly list)
    78. Re:When the money dries up... by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      Baghdad

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    79. Re:When the money dries up... by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      So the Army would pay for him to go to college, so he could get a degree in CS.. or.. wait...

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  2. Women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I suppose that, unlike actual sports leagues, Major League Gaming doesn't have to worry about sex party scandals.

    1. Re:Women by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Major League Gaming doesn't have to worry about sex party scandals"

      Are you kidding? All they have to do is install the Hot Coffee Mod, and lawyers like Jack T. will be on them like the FBI on a criminal driven tank.

    2. Re:Women by mike2R · · Score: 1
      All they have to do is install the Hot Coffee Mod, and lawyers like Jack T. will be on them like the FBI on a criminal driven tank.

      They'll repeatedly crash into the back of them, but burst into flames and explode before doing any damage? This I've got to see!

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
  3. Rating by Kangburra · · Score: 4, Informative

    Major League Gaming shows he's not even the best! :-(

    --
    Common sense is not so common
    1. Re:Rating by Barny · · Score: 1

      Hrmm, he is 8th in halo2. what else does he play pro? well, according to his score sheet, nothing.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    2. Re:Rating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Plays HALO 2 and isn't the best at it. That game is last gen and played on old XBOX hardware. What happens when MLG catches on to a new FPS and a next-gen console?

  4. When slashdot dries up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't the same be said for all of us? What happens if IT "dries up"?

    1. Re:When slashdot dries up... by XNine · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then the few of us who actually have real girlfriends are left to die alone?

      --
      Never monkey with another monkey's monkey.
  5. Fatal1ty by Drakin020 · · Score: 0

    I wonder if Fatal1ty makes more?
    Sorry HTML skills suck
    http://www.fatal1ty.com/

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
  6. Reminds me of poker by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Obviously the youngun's have the advantage when it comes to twitch style video gaming, but this seems very reminscent of poker, where you can make aliving playing if you're good enough, but not many people are that good.

    As for the people who say "what's his backup skill going to be?" Assuming he can talk & isn't butt ugly, I imagine he'll be a commentator or spokesperson someday.

    Hell, if there's enough drama in the industry, he can write a book too.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  7. Nice "editing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'm not usually one to complain about the editors, but come on.

    The guy who is just 18 years old, was prompted to take this step; because of the reason that emerged from his love for gaming.

    Set that poor semicolon free! It doesn't deserve to be cooped up in that horrible excuse for a sentence! The semicolon is a beautiful creature that can only be appreciated in its natural habitat: a sentence containing two full independent clauses. Or certain lists.

    1. Re:Nice "editing" by prichardson · · Score: 3, Funny

      "a sentence containing two full independent clauses. Or certain lists."

      That should read: 'a sentence containing two full independent clauses or certain lists.'

      There was no reason to separate those thoughts. It made the flow of your prose awkward. I must refer you to the old saying about glass houses and accusations. :-)

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    2. Re:Nice "editing" by noidentity · · Score: 1

      That semicolon is only one of the many problems with that sentence. I re-read it and my mind is left in a jumble: 18 year old guy, something prompted him to take some step, reason emerged from love of gaming... what?!?

    3. Re:Nice "editing" by Zugok · · Score: 1

      The semi-colon is my friend; grandparent post was a poor example of its usage.

      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    4. Re:Nice "editing" by teknomage1 · · Score: 1

      That's nothing, think of all the poor semicolons stuck delimiting Perl code!

      --
      Stop intellectual property from infringing on me
    5. Re:Nice "editing" by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Or asking a Congress page about her penis size ;-)

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    6. Re:Nice "editing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      printf ("And at the end of each statement"); ;)

    7. Re:Nice "editing" by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      ;_;

      --
      -
    8. Re:Nice "editing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a sentence containing two full, inpdenendent clauses, or certain lists

    9. Re:Nice "editing" by Kuvter · · Score: 1

      The editor must have droped out of highschool too.

      --
      "To be is to do." --Socrates
      "To do is to be." -- Aristotle
      "Do-Be-Do-Be-Do..." --Sinatra
    10. Re:Nice "editing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing; think of all [of] the poor semicolons [which/that are] stuck (left?) delimiting Perl code!

    11. Re:Nice "editing" by teknomage1 · · Score: 1

      Your grasp of humor and modern colliquialisms seems truly lacking, AC.

      --
      Stop intellectual property from infringing on me
  8. Ah, Superstar Economics. by Rachel+Lucid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We may as well talk about the guys who drop out of school to play basketball...

  9. One thing is for certain: there is no stopping the by Neoncow · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I, for one, welcome our new video gaming celebrities.

  10. Too much of a good thing? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everyone always talks about wanting to get a job where they get paid to do what they enjoy, but I tend to wonder if maybe you'd get burned out of doing something that you enjoy as a pastime, if you had to start doing it for 8, 10 or 12 hours a day. (Okay, admittedly there are WoW players who seem to have no problems there.)

    There are lots of things that I enjoy in moderation that I don't think I'd like anymore, if I started doing them as my day job. Maybe it's just me...but I just think that playing games for a living might take the fun out of it.

    I guess maybe this is because I enjoy playing games as a way to relax, and I guess I wouldn't want to play them more than a few hours a day, regardless of the other constraints on my time.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Too much of a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, tell me about it. I used to love programming. Until I started doing it for a living.

    2. Re:Too much of a good thing? by Enigma1625 · · Score: 1

      The thing is that a lot of the best pro gamers out there (at least for the FPS games which I am most familiar with; eg. Q4) only play a couple of hours a day and simply have enough talent and experience to be able to win tournaments on a regular basis. Pro gaming can be a part time job as well. If I remember correctly, a couple of years ago when Paul Nelson (aka "czm") was most active in Quake 3, he was also a math student at Princeton.

    3. Re:Too much of a good thing? by JensenDied · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its always fun doing what you like... when your doing it for yourself.

      --

      09:F9:11:02 - 9D:74:E3:5B - D8:41:56:C5 - 63:56:88:C0

    4. Re:Too much of a good thing? by udderly · · Score: 1

      There are lots of things that I enjoy in moderation that I don't think I'd like anymore, if I started doing them as my day job. Maybe it's just me...but I just think that playing games for a living might take the fun out of it.

      I took a Psychology of Motivation class in college and I believe that they taught us that there is an ample amount of research out there that suggests that anytime you get paid to do something, your motivation to do it will be less.

    5. Re:Too much of a good thing? by Jaeph · · Score: 1

      The difference between you (and me) and this guy is that he *does* derive satisfaction from playing obscene hours, regardless of the circumstances (deadlines, pressure to win, etc). It's what makes a pro a pro.

      It's similar to everything I've read about the geniuses in history - a major factor that set them apart was an ability to focus on one problem far longer than anybody else. Consider Einstein spending years of his life learning the advanced math he needed to tackle general relativity.

      So would you or I get burned out? Sure. That's why we're not ever going to turn pro.

      -Jeff

      --
      Please learn the difference between a dissenting opinion and a troll before you moderate.
    6. Re:Too much of a good thing? by l0cust · · Score: 1

      I agree. Its one thing to do something because you feel like it. Its totally another when you are supposed to be doing it. The simplest example would be students really finding the subject matter from different streams very interesting. I remember I loved going through my friends' mechanical engg notes, AI related stuff and even my brother's History notes, and found all of them much more interesting than most of what I was studying. It was almost always the opposite case with my friends. I think it has something to do with the freedom you feel when working on something because you decided to work on it. It gives you a challenge and a feeling of accomplishment unmatched by anything you can get at routine work.

      I am currently learning the most basic things about game development at my current job. Now I have designed simple puzzles sort of things in college days just for fun but I don't find working on anything like that very interesting now if the boss asks me to, whereas I enjoy working on the same damn thing once I am not required to work on it, and end up spending hours making them as perfect as possible. Gaah! Can't wait to get my skills up to a decent level and try working on my own or freelancing.

      --
      Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
    7. Re:Too much of a good thing? by AncientPC · · Score: 1

      I play(-ed as of two weeks ago) poker as sole income for the past 3 years. I've seen a lot of people burn out within 6-12 months. The only reason I can keep playing is that I truly enjoy the game outside of monetary value and I pace myself / have other things in my life.

      I was also a video game reviewer in the past. Not as much fun as you would think when you're forced into playing games you don't really care about.

    8. Re:Too much of a good thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After 11 years in IT, I'm quite sick of computers. I can't wait to retire and become a farmer.

      Shit, I forgot to water my houseplant.

  11. Re:One thing is for certain: there is no stopping by edward2020 · · Score: 1

    I wonder who he's dating.... Maybe E! can cover this in one of the their hard hitting investigative reports. I bet he's a scientologist too!

    --
    Don't worry about the mule, just load the wagon.
  12. How about ... by vlad_petric · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Game tester. It's not really that fun (playing same games repeatedly until they're balanced/stable enough), but he's got the skills.

    --

    The Raven

  13. What? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

    >> The guy who is just 18 years old, was prompted to take this step; because of the reason that emerged from his love for gaming.

    Say that again, but not in Klingon.

    1. Re:What? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now how can we argue with that. I think we are all indebted to Gabby Johnson here for clearly stating what had to be said. And I'm glad the children were here today to hear that speech. Not only was it authentic frontier gibberish...but it expressed a courage that is little seen in this day and age.

    2. Re:What? by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Good one!

      (I don't have mod points)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    3. Re:What? by dozer · · Score: 1

      Rrrrabr!

    4. Re:What? by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      I think they're trying to say that gaming clouds reason.

    5. Re:What? by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Give that man a hurumph!

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  14. Grammar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy who is just 18 years old, was prompted to take this step; because of the reason that emerged from his love for gaming.

    ... *weeping*

  15. Don't quit your dream job by MemeSpitter · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The guy who is just 18 years old, was prompted to take this step; because of the reason that emerged from his love for gaming."
    "... do not use semicolons. They are transvestite hermaphrodites, standing for absolutely nothing. All they do is show you've been to college." -- Kurt Vonnegut
    Or, if you must, at least avoid using if you haven't the foggiest idea of where to put them (such as, say, between two independent clauses). All that does is show you've dropped out of high school to play video games.

    1. Re:Don't quit your dream job by lullabud · · Score: 2, Funny
      if you must, at least avoid using if you haven't the foggiest idea of where to put them

      print "Such as at the end of the line rather than in the middle.\n" ;
  16. I'm waiting.... by Tinman_au · · Score: 1

    ....for the Reality TV show that will be based on the Barbie Diary Mysteries pro circut.

    I'll finally have the perfect reason to abandon an outdated entertainment medium and move on the the net full time...

  17. Gambling with his future... by jorghis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I cant even count the number of people I knew when I was in college who threw away the chance to become succesfull engineers (I went to an engineering school) to play WoW/Everquest/Counterstrike 15 hours a day. For every guy like this who makes a career out of gaming there are hundreds of thousands who give up their careers because they spend too much time playing video games.

    Spending the enourmous amount of time required to be good at video games is a worse investment than a lottery ticket. Lottery tickets have had more winners, require less time investment, and the payoff is a lot bigger than 250 grand.

    Yes, I realize that a lot of people play video games for fun and moderate their time spent well. But dont we all know people who play endlessly because they want to be the best on their server or be in a clan that wins a lot of tournaments?

    1. Re:Gambling with his future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you but the games you listed are poor examples of money-making games. I suppose Counterstrike would be one but a majority of the time game tournaments consist of FPS games.

      College aged students that invest 15 hours/day in WoW, Everquest and Couterstrike don't deserve engineering degrees. They'll realized their mistakes once they're 35 years old, fat with bed sores, virgins and living in their mother's basement whilst waiting for the newest patch to be released.

      I think a majority of the time the initial reason people play video games is for the fun factor but then it starts a domino effect. First fun, then competition, then "social" acceptance. It's probably not always in that order, in fact, I'm sure many kids these days start playing games for the "social" acceptance factor but who knows.

      I just got done playing the BF2142 demo for about 3 hours but then again, I'm not in college and it was only 3 hours.

    2. Re:Gambling with his future... by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Or what about the people that waste their days reading slashdot comments! And this is even less profitable then a lottery ticket, as no one ever got rich with that anyways! Hmm, come to think of it ...

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    3. Re:Gambling with his future... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I know just as many people who play the pokies endlessly because they want that thrill of the win. Many more people have given up their careers (not to mention their houses, their savings, the clothes of their back) for the sake of another toss of the dice/deal of the cards/roll of the slots. Balance is important; it's easy for your recreation activity to take over and dominate your life. Computer gaming is just another example of an existing phenomenon, not a new phenomenon itself.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:Gambling with his future... by isopossu · · Score: 1

      I'd say video games saved my life. I got my first one at my thirties, and the game taught me persistence, concentration, and to take my time and really figure out how to proceed.

      I needed all this in my professional life, but the environment never really encouraged me to develop these skills.

      I remember being in (well, minor) trouble and almost giving up, and suddenly I thought I'd try at least ten times more if this were in the game. I took it as a challenge and I have to admit my life's been a lot better ever since.

      The point: people who have played all their lifes and take the video games for granted tend to underestimate their good sides. They've just never tried to do without the gaming experience.

    5. Re:Gambling with his future... by javilon · · Score: 1

      Yes, I realize that a lot of people play video games for fun and moderate their time spent well. But dont we all know people who play endlessly because they want to be the best on their server or be in a clan that wins a lot of tournaments?

      Yes, that is called a hobby and there are lots of them. I don't think it is bad if you can combine it with the rest of your life.

      --


      When his defense asked, "Which computer has Jon Johansen trespassed upon?" the answer was: "His own."
    6. Re:Gambling with his future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, at least you can learn about the use of the semi-colon.

    7. Re:Gambling with his future... by jdcook · · Score: 1
      "I cant even count the number of people I knew when I was in college who threw away the chance to become succesfull engineers (I went to an engineering school) to play WoW/Everquest/Counterstrike 15 hours a day. For every guy like this who makes a career out of gaming there are hundreds of thousands who give up their careers because they spend too much time playing video games.

      Really? You can't count the number of people you personally knew who were smart and ambitious enough to get into engineering school and then (presumably) dropped out to play video games? Even 4 strikes me as an astonishingly high number (and my school had 30,000 undergrad students though that was well before the apparent plague that is WoW was invented). And you think that "hundreds of thousands" give up their careers to play video games? For argument's sake let's say 200,000 dropouts and 200,000,000 people between the ages of 18 and 65. So you think at least .1% of working age Americans have dropped out to play games. Really?

      --
      Q:How many libertarians does it take to stop a Panzer division? A:None. Obviously market forces will take care of it.
    8. Re:Gambling with his future... by pr0nbot · · Score: 1

      "The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time."
      Bertrand Russell

      Of course the question is whether, while spending 14 hours a day to get the next PVP rank so you get shoulders with spikes on them, you are really enjoying yourself.

    9. Re:Gambling with his future... by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. There's a few sad truths about video games, and one is that people think they can "brek into" them by playing them a lot (and being good) or that they can "break into" the industry by working at a Gamestop. That's kind of like saying you want to be a NASCAR driver so you take a job with a long commute or you want to start designing Ferraris for Pininfarina so you work at a car wash.

      If you want to write about video games, write about them. There's hundreds of sites around and I'm sure one will take some of your work if you can write. If you want to work in video games, work in video games. Get on a team working on a mod, or make some maps for the newest FPS. But only playing Halo and Strcraft is probably not going to get you there.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    10. Re:Gambling with his future... by icebones · · Score: 1

      yeah, but videogames are more fun than the lottery :)

      --
      Life is pain. Anyone who says differently is selling something.
    11. Re:Gambling with his future... by jorghis · · Score: 1

      Hmm, ok I could estimate it, the number of people I personally know who I believe have been harmed significantly by spending too much time playing video games is probably around 50. Maybe my sample is skewed though, I went to a "nerd" college and lived in the dorms for four years. You usually dont meet these kinds of people unless you live in the dorms because they never leave since they play games so much. If it wasnt WoW it was some other game, did you go to school before internet gaming was popular with clans and guilds and so forth?

      Since you called me out on it I will admit that I pulled the "hundreds of thousands" out of my butt. But it seems probable, its got to be *at least* a hundred thousand, maybe even in the millions. I would be interested in seeing a survey of what percentage of people game for 40+ hours a week.

      Take the number of people who play world of warcraft, thats well into the millions. If even 5% of those are messing up their lives by playing it we've got way over 100,000 from that game alone. And lets face it, the way that game eats up peoples time the number is probably higher than 5%.

      I dont believe I specified a nationality, you arrived at that .1% figure by excluding members of other nations. (even though I believe .1% is probable) In Korea this issue is causing a huge outcry in mainstream media, much moreso than the United States. It seems reasonable to assume they are contributing hundreds of thousands of people who spend too much time gaming.

      Believe me there are -vast- numbers of people who are spending so much time playing video games that they will never go anywhere in life. So to answer you: Yes, Really, or at least I am convinced its true.

  18. Players making 6 figures, so writers... by Calyth · · Score: 1

    If players are somehow making 6 figures, why should the writers be making less? There's far more skill involved in writing a game than playing it, but often the developers are highschool students or university co-op making something at least an order of magnitude less than this player...

    1. Re:Players making 6 figures, so writers... by jorghis · · Score: 1

      The developers are highschool students and university co-ops? I very much doubt that. I can imagine that there might have been a few co-ops involved with some game's development at some point as part of their recruitment program but just about every game is written by teams of professional software engineers with lots of experience. And experienced software engineers aint cheap.

    2. Re:Players making 6 figures, so writers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when writers can get sponsorships and prize winnings, then Ill agree.

    3. Re:Players making 6 figures, so writers... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      People want to watch and sponsor people playing games. They don't want to watch or sponsor people writing games. This is a very simple concept.

    4. Re:Players making 6 figures, so writers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More skill in writing them than playing them? You are orders of magnitude below this guy in skill at games, your character would likely not finish landing on the floor of the map (there's always a slight gap to prevent feet from getting stuck in the floor) before the round would end versus pro gamers. I'm many orders of magnitude below these guys, I would not land either, and last time I went to a major LAN to compete, 300 people showed up, and in both the CSS, CS 1.6, and even the quake III tourny, I had a cumulative death count of 2. Anyone can point and click, anyone with time can point and click with per pixel accuracy - predicting, often 5-6 steps ahead of the now, versus an intelligent, human opponent, is no different in first person shooters than it is in any board game. Designing games is no small feat either, but if you look at how many adept people go into video game design knowing full well what the pay is - and you look at how many people have any hope of approaching these guys in their field even if they devoted their lives to it (and for every one who makes it, there are perhaps hundreds of kids who play video games as a priority over school). They get paid therefore, not just for being intelligent predators (because that's exactly what athletes are) but for being RARE intelligent predators. Anyone can pull a high score on pong at a low speed, I bet if you taught a monkey the controls the loss for their intelligence would not decrease significantly compared to other humans. The real opponent however, in all games, is not the complexity of the rules of the game, but the ability of your opponent.

    5. Re:Players making 6 figures, so writers... by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Is there really that big a market for pro game sponsorring?

      Personally, I'm not much of a sport afficionado, though occasionally I do like to watch a bit of sports. Games, I like a lot more, but I can't imagine ever willingly watching game competitions on TV.

      And who actually buys these products endorsed by random-gamer-geek #29? It's like a basketball player endorsing a TV set, because they play better on a HD set.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    6. Re:Players making 6 figures, so writers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You propably have to compare the average wannabe (middle class) progamer to the average (middle class) developer and the star progamer to the star developers/studio owners. Who earns more now?

      It is propably the same with pro sport and programmers. Bill Gates earned 1000x more than most sport professionals and he is not the only one. And you average programmer earns still way more than you average sports guy who trains the football team of his school, because he was not good enough for more.

    7. Re:Players making 6 figures, so writers... by Rubinhood · · Score: 1

      "You propably have to compare the average wannabe (middle class) progamer to the average (middle class) developer and the star progamer to the star developers/studio owners. Who earns more now? It is propably the same with pro sport and programmers. Bill Gates earned 1000x more than most sport professionals..." Excuse me? Bill Gates -- a top programmer? Which planet are you from? If he is so good, why does 50% of whose business is computers (virus makers, virus buster makers, spyware and -buster makers, botnet kiddies, firewall programmers etc.) live off EXPLOITING or FIXING his idiot pet product called windows? Imagine all these people doing something USEFUL instead... Oh, I get it! It was a JOKE! Hilarious :-) Mod the guy +10 Funny.

    8. Re:Players making 6 figures, so writers... by Spinalcold · · Score: 1

      While I certainly agree with you that writers should make more than the gamer I have to dissagree with you on the skill level. The reason he is getting paid this much is that he is one of a couple hundred people who can play at this level. While there are some coders who are better than others, I believe most of those who are one of your 'elite' are already getting paid a lot of money working at IBM or Micro$oft or some other big company.

  19. There are still issues in gaming by Wiarumas · · Score: 1

    There are still issues in gaming. The most extreme in my opinion would be the illegal use of steriods. We need to check all the professional gamers to see if they are using steroids. It would be a bad influence on those who are still playing as Night Elves in World of Warcraft (aka the younger crowd).

    --
    I will bend like a reed in the wind.
    1. Re:There are still issues in gaming by archgoon · · Score: 1

      You are mocking a very serious issue and you should be ashamed of yourself. Remember kids: Caffiene kills. :)

  20. QA testers by lordvalrole · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There are a lot of QA testers that play just as much as him if not not more and probably can woop the crap out of him in any game. It really doesn't take that much talent to play video games, you just got to spend time figuring out what the developers where thinking.

    1. Re:QA testers by bunions · · Score: 3, Funny

      That doesn't really explain why John Carmack lost his Ferarri. I mean, unless JC was confused about what he was thinking at the time. Lord knows it happens to the best of us.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    2. Re:QA testers by rkd2110 · · Score: 1

      First, I agree that a QA tester that plays a specific a game as a full time job is probably an excellent player in that specific game. Probably. However, I resent the assertion that "It really doesn't take that much talent to play video games, you just got to spend time figuring out what the developers where thinking.".

      You have no idea how many games are played in ways that the developers never thought off. Two examples from the top of my head are the translocator/air-gun combo in Unreal Tournament and rocket jumps in Quake. There are probably also hundreds of similar creative work-a-rounds in RPG's and strategy games that the developers of the game never thought of.

      Most modern games are very, very complex environments. Functioning in them and being successful at it is much more than understanding some technical aspects of it, the same way understanding thermodynamics or quantum mechanics won't help you be a better human being.

    3. Re:QA testers by DaAdder · · Score: 1

      Err...

      So what you're telling us, is that if we sit down around a table and figure out all the angles and velocities, any tom, dick & harry, regardless of talent or god-given motor skills, could beat the vast majority of regular participants in any competitive sport?

      It's a blanket statement and a silly one at that.

      Especially twitch gaming has very much to do with spatial perception, reaction times and of course tons and tons of experience.

      But even so, no matter how much you "figure" out an RTS for instance, I challenge you to travel to korea and try to make name for yourself as a starcraft player. Those guys had talent, and then put in a helluva lot of hard work to get where they are. Just like with any skill.

      Contrary to what you believe, most people that write the games suck at them, and so do the QA crowd. They don't spend enough time actually competing and will never ever *have* 18hrs a day, 7 days a week to spend on the game. And will thus suck mightily compared to any half decent "gamer" with no interesting in anything but playing and competing at a high level. Oh and let's not forget, seemingly endless amounts of spare time.

    4. Re:QA testers by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who is a natural at RTS games (and pretty good at FPS although I can hold my own with him there). We usually have to team up 3v1 to beat him in a RTS. So I would have to disagree that playing games takes no talent.

      I'm not sure if it's related, but he's also one of the most athletically talented people I know. He makes everything look easy.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    5. Re:QA testers by lordvalrole · · Score: 1

      First of all, when I make the comment
      "It really doesn't take that much talent to play video games, you just got to spend time figuring out what the developers where thinking." it refers to how developers work. I should know because I work for one and I work as a designer. I can bet you anything that developers for the most part know exactly what they are creating...like the rocket jump and translocator kill. I don't think the public understands that a lot of games (especially from big developers) go through a lot of QA testing, which means that they report bugs or exploits they can find. Developers have to develop around the average player (so they can make more money) more often than not the games you play are dumbed down so that average gamer can be enjoy the game.

      "Functioning in them and being successful at it is much more than understanding some technical aspects of it, the same way understanding thermodynamics or quantum mechanics won't help you be a better human being."

      You are kidding me right? Infact, yes it does make you a better human being. I won't go into it but that wasn't the most brilliant statement I have heard.

    6. Re:QA testers by lordvalrole · · Score: 1

      "So what you're telling us, is that if we sit down around a table and figure out all the angles and velocities, any tom, dick & harry, regardless of talent or god-given motor skills, could beat the vast majority of regular participants in any competitive sport?"

      Actually, yes I am saying exactly that. I would say the right hardware setup for each person is a major factor on how well someone does. This is debated widely in console versus pc fps games. Some people have the thumbs to deal with the console fps games and some don't but I can bet anything that you give them enough time on it, they will become pretty damn good at it.

      "Contrary to what you believe, most people that write the games suck at them, and so do the QA crowd. They don't spend enough time actually competing and will never ever *have* 18hrs a day, 7 days a week to spend on the game. And will thus suck mightily compared to any half decent "gamer" with no interesting in anything but playing and competing at a high level. Oh and let's not forget, seemingly endless amounts of spare time."

      This has to be the best thing I have read all day or atleast the dumbest thing I have read all day. First of all, I am a person that "writes" (you should say develop makes you sound a tad bit smarter) games. I think I understand this a little more than you. Most people who develop games understand game philosophies and game mechanics. I am talking about programmers and designers (not talking about artists, but they understand other principles of the game as well) these people understand exactly how their game works and typically play 10x more games than the average gamer and easily rival "competitive gamers". Uh, I really don't know exactly what you mean by they dont spend enough time actually competing, they don't have to. Competitions are not more than just game matches in tournament style rank system. There isn't something special about competing that makes someone better. If you are "practicing" 18 hours a day 7 days a week and you aren't the top gamer in that game...then you should go jump off a bridge or something because that is just retarded or maybe get a life and go get laid.

      You have to remember something, someone is always better than you.

    7. Re:QA testers by lordvalrole · · Score: 1

      That is great for him. I also know people who are naturals at FPS and RTS games. They just know how to exploit the game in their advantage. They know what units to pump out first, they know what resource to go after. The thing about an RTS game is the fact that yes you do have freedom but you are also confined to "laws" of the game at any given point during the game. It becomes a factor of narrowing down how you play and what the right way to play against someone else is. It is just a matter of knowing what the developers wanted in balance of a game. It is all about balancing in any multiplayer game. Some games are less balanced than others but still it doesn't take skill to play most games at a competitive level. The only skill involved is how long it takes for a person to understand the principles of the game.

    8. Re:QA testers by bunions · · Score: 1

      Everything you've said is mostly true if you only play single-player games, maybe has a kernel of truth for multiplayer RTS games, but is almost totally false for FPS games. I notice you didn't answer the question of why John Carmack lost his Ferarri to Thresh.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
  21. a few grand a month, eh? by Khyber · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "When they're playing well, pros might bring home a few grand a month."

    Hell yea, where's the Enemy Territory tourneys with the money? C'mon guys, don't neglect good and free for everyone games! Let's see who rocks the free-world for the most cash!

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:a few grand a month, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My friend's ET clan got a buttload of sponsorship agreements recently, so the corps are starting to get interested. It'll probably ramp up in the next few years, but until then, Counter Strike will still remain dominant.

  22. What what what what what?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    How dare you slander good name Scientology! Not even capitalize Scientology! You free fair game now buddy junior. We suck you brains out with super power, sue you all you money, and bump rudely into you whilst in street! Maybe even in that order! Bet you sorry now!

  23. How sad by nlawalker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems a shame to take a recreational activity that you love and make it your sole source of income.

    Yes, I do believe you can love your work. But this guy took a thing that he truly loved that *wasn't* work and *made it* his work. Playing games for a living sounds great, but anything loses its luster once you are chained to it if you want to eat and have a place to live.

    For all you gamers, think of how excited you are when a new blockbuster game comes out and you can't wait to get your hands on it. Now take that feeling and completely invert it, and I think that that about approximates what this guy must feel when that happens. "Oh man, a new game... guess I better start getting good at this one too. Back to ten hours of practice a day."

    1. Re:How sad by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's disgraceful that his job is actually something he enjoys. It'd be better if he cleaned toilets or something so gaming would keep its 'luster'.

    2. Re:How sad by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Well, if that something you love to do is to fuck, I can't really think of a better thing to get paid for (provided it's somewhere in California and there's a camera present, of course). And then you could really say, "I love my work."

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:How sad by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Ah, so Michael Phelps must hate swimming, Schumacher must have hated driving F1 cars, etc. etc. Ok, exaggerating here, but really, I don't see your point! As if you don't like programming in Perl anymore, just because you get paid for it! (hmm, wrong example)

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    4. Re:How sad by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Who said he was chained to it? You're assuming he has no money in his bank account and is counting on this 'job' to feed him. It is entirely possible he can quit at any time and be perfectly fine.

      It's also a mistake to assume he has no other skills. The simple fact is, this is his -best- skill, not necessarily his only skill.

      As for the 'new game' mentality... Someone in a previous thread noted that he only plays 1 game professionally: Halo. There's been quite a few games in that genre since then, and he didn't bother to 'practice' them so he could play them professionally. So he's not stuck with this problem, either.

      No, it's quite possible that the opposite of all this is true. He may actually enjoy games MORE now because he has money riding on them. There's an adrenaline rush there that you can't get from just gaming. And he only plays 1 game professionally, but he's free to play all the others just for fun.

      I suspect all your arguments were used for the first person to get paid big money to play sports, too. And several hundred (thousand?) people do it yearly now.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    5. Re:How sad by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Playing games for a living sounds great, but anything loses its luster once you are chained to it if you want to eat and have a place to live."

      How about learning to enjoy a variety of things? Food and shelter are nice!
      Getting them in exchange for gaming instead of pumping porta-johns is a screaming deal!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:How sad by fuzz6y · · Score: 1

      Is playing games for a job less awesome than playing games when it isn't your job? Yes.

      Is it still awesome? Yes.

      I'm sure it'd be more fun to be independantly wealthy and play games for fun all the time, But I bet on the whole, he's having more fun than if he were a typewriter salesman by day and a gamer by night.

      --
      If you're going to be elitist, it would help to be elite.
  24. wtf? by binford2k · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The guy who is just 18 years old, was prompted to take this step; because of the reason that emerged from his love for gaming.

    What the fuck is this supposed to mean?

  25. I just can't see this taking off by istartedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What would TV coverage of this look like? You can't just have a shot of the screen, but if you cut back and forth you miss screen action. They probably have to edit together a lot of highlights. I can't imagine this would be very entertaining to watch on live TV... ok, some stuff like one-on-one fighting games might play well... it would be like boxing without the chance of actual injury. Yes, I guess this could be watchable if done right. The missing element is that you aren't watching your friends get beat, or beating your friends, or well... gaming. Robot wars was OK TV because most of us don't have the time, money or skill to make a decent fighting bot. Everyone can game. When I was a kid and was totally game crazy, the time I spent having to just *watch* was pure agony. Gimme the joystick!!! How many kids these days get their only daily exercise fighting their siblings for the controller? You're going to take gaming and make it totally passive? Those kids are going to explode, leaving nasty bits of fat all over the walls. Hey... that'd be a cool effect in a game.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:I just can't see this taking off by Tyrion+Moath · · Score: 1

      Ask some native Koreans, I hear they have their own game channel to that effect. I think they mostly watch StarCraft on it though. Not sure.

    2. Re:I just can't see this taking off by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

      More and more games are coming with built-in spectator modes, so that people can connect and watch the game live without actually taking part. Counter-Strike has had this for several years now. You can have overhead views of the map, view a particular player from 1st or 3rd person perspective, overlay tactical maps, use cinematic camera angles, or just fly around with a free range camera.

      I take your point about wanting to play, and I agree, but if you're a fan of a particular game, there's definitely something to be gained from watching people play with a very high skill level. Not much different to other professional sports really, almost anyone can play, but watching people who are very skilled can be just as entertaining.

    3. Re:I just can't see this taking off by Dekortage · · Score: 1

      "What would TV coverage of this look like? ... I can't imagine this would be very entertaining to watch on live TV...."

      I suppose you didn't read this recent ./ article?

      --
      $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
    4. Re:I just can't see this taking off by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      I can't imagine this would be very entertaining to watch on live TV...
      The BBC tried it, and you're right.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    5. Re:I just can't see this taking off by DrXym · · Score: 1
      What would TV coverage of this look like?

      Probably excrutiatingly boring. I've never, ever seen any show featuring competitive gaming segements which was even slightly interesting to look at.

    6. Re:I just can't see this taking off by arglesnaf · · Score: 1

      Gameplay HD is a fulltime game channel. It comes on Dish Network's MPEG-4 HD package and is one of the old Voom channels. It tends to follow one person's screen a few minutes at a time. And it is excruciatingly boring. You tend to get shows with CS, Quake 4 and Starcraft commentary, including Tournaments. I thought the idea was cool till I saw it. G4 is better, but that's certinally faint praise.

  26. Dilbert Rules for investing by peter+Payne · · Score: 1, Interesting
    --
    You've got a friend in Japan: http://www.jlist.com
  27. Keeping your eye on the prize... by msimm · · Score: 1

    I think this is a common situation and a common misunderstanding. Just because you like something doesn't mean you like it under any circumstance. Why would it? Maybe you like doing something at *your* pace, but don't like it so much when you have to hassle or keep deadlines. Thinking about what you really would like to do is a pretty complicated prospect and I suspect most of us don't actually achieve it. Such is life.

    But its short-sightedness that probably brings a lot of us to it. Probably a bit of lack of imagination and bills too. :)

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Keeping your eye on the prize... by HoboMaster · · Score: 1

      I think another thing is that people expect to like their jobs ALL the time. Any job will have parts you don't like. The question is whether the bits you like outweigh the bits you dislike. My mom's a great example. She's a financial advisor, and there are definitely parts of her job that drive her crazy (dealing with tax-related stuff being the foremost), but on the whole, she loves her job. People need to realize, that you are WORKING. Yes, you should enjoy your job. No, you shouldn't expect it to be great all the time.

      Me? I hate my job, but that's one of several reasons I'm only going to be here another couple months.

      --
      Remember kids, tin foil doesn't work, so use LeadHat.
  28. a video game tutoring business?? by bunions · · Score: 1

    I mean, I guess it's not actually any different than going for tennis lessons, but something about that just leaves me with an overwhelming feeling of wtfness.

    --
    there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
  29. Weigh the options. by PDExperiment626 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    All right, so this kid got a contract for 250k; how long will he be able to get such contracts. Given the new nature of gaming, the amount of young competition, and the lack of training required, I would be surprised if he gets a follow up contract. Let's face it, to become an elite gamer requires good reflexes and an obsession with gaming; a lot more people fit this criteria as opposed to having the athletic prowess to be a professional soccer player. It also takes a lot less self-dicipline than getting into professional sports (where you also have to train outside of playing the actual game, watch your diet, etc.). In the end, professional gamers will always be more available than professional athletes; so they are going to have a very short money-generating life span. This isn't mentioning the fact that to be a professional gamer will require you staring at a screen for something like 15 hours a day. It's true many spend that much time gaming a day without getting paid; but for a professional, that's 15 hours of work. I don't know, 15 hours a day everyday for 250k a year doesn't seem like such a great deal to me. I'll take a lower salary and less time working, thanks. Maybe he will go back to school after his gaming career is over; frankly, he'll have few options if he doesn't. That being said, I have to wonder if he won't spend years gaming in futility trying to get another contract after his time has passed. Another point to consider is the affect media will have on such a profession. Let's say you've been gaming for years and have put on a few pounds or aren't the most attractive person to begin with, then someone comes along just as good as you but prettier, who's more likely to get the contract if a sponsor had to choose?

    1. Re:Weigh the options. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to highlight the lack of substance in the original article, there are more sentences in the parent of this post than in TFA.

      In journalism, lack of substance generally equals lack of research, lack of verification of facts, lack of effort, and lack of credibility. Nothing to see here, keep moving.

    2. Re:Weigh the options. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'll take a lower salary and less time working, thanks."

      Less working time so you can sit at home and play video games??

  30. Michael Jordan by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 4, Funny

    "like Michael Jordan was born to play basketball. I feel like I was born to play video games." ... and to use that as an excuse to compare myself to Michael Jordan.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  31. This is not a career by Jack9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More people won MORE money playing the lottery. This type of sensationalist stuff doesn't interest most people but it keeps making headlines on /. ?

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
    1. Re:This is not a career by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Um, maybe that's because more people play the lottery than attempt to have a career playing video games? How about:

      More people made MORE money...
      As CEO of a company
      Playing sports
      Making movies
      Singing
      As head of a country
      As drug kingpins
      In the stock market

      No, this is news because it's so rare. That's the way news works... The stuff that doesn't happen every day is what gets talked about.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  32. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't say whether that's 250k over 1 year or 10 years....Sure if it's 1 year it's amazing, but a 10 year contract...

  33. Worst job in the World? by Durzel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can't think of many worse (in terms of sustainable income) jobs in the World than this to be honest.

    For a start you're competing against millions of people who don't require any technical qualification to compete with you. Besides gaining knowledge on a subject most people go to College & University to set themselves aside from the pack, to make themselves look more attractive to employers. With pro-gaming you haven't got any of this, the only barrier to entry is sufficiently fast reflexes, a little intelligence and a competent PC.

    This person is going to be a target for the rest of his playing career. The guy below him is gonna be aiming to usurp him to get his sponsorship, not to mention thousands upon thousands of upstarts actively seeking to relegate him to obscurity.

    It's also the sort of industry where unless you are in the Top 10 or so players for an extended period of time you're anonymous. It's not like being a professional footballer where even if you're in the lower divisions you're still making enough money to live on. This guy has to realise that there are thousands of people below him who are making no real money to speak of just waiting for him to slip up.

    No one really knows the terms of this $250,000 contract - whether he's actually been given this amount of money or whether that's essentially his "valuation" in pro-gaming terms, but if I were him I would invest all of it and work on the principal that his career could just fizzle out in a couple of years or so.

    1. Re:Worst job in the World? by mlush · · Score: 1
      This person is going to be a target for the rest of his playing career. The guy below him is gonna be aiming to usurp him to get his sponsorship, not to mention thousands upon thousands of upstarts actively seeking to relegate him to obscurity.

      Is this any different to someone in Pro Tennis, Snooker, Darts, Golf or Tiddlywinks?

    2. Re:Worst job in the World? by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Besides gaining knowledge on a subject most people go to College & University to set themselves aside from the pack, to make themselves look more attractive to employers."

      But almost everyone has a degree these days, so if you want to 'set yourself aside from the pack', you shouldn't be wasting your time at university.

    3. Re:Worst job in the World? by Hahnsoo · · Score: 1

      This person is going to be a target for the rest of his playing career. The guy below him is gonna be aiming to usurp him to get his sponsorship, not to mention thousands upon thousands of upstarts actively seeking to relegate him to obscurity.
       
      It's also the sort of industry where unless you are in the Top 10 or so players for an extended period of time you're anonymous. It's not like being a professional footballer where even if you're in the lower divisions you're still making enough money to live on. This guy has to realise that there are thousands of people below him who are making no real money to speak of just waiting for him to slip up.
       
      No one really knows the terms of this $250,000 contract - whether he's actually been given this amount of money or whether that's essentially his "valuation" in pro-gaming terms, but if I were him I would invest all of it and work on the principal that his career could just fizzle out in a couple of years or so.

      Why does this make me think of contract killers/hitmen? Not real-life ones, mind you, but the ones in the movies, like "Grosse Point Blank". *grin*

    4. Re:Worst job in the World? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      But almost everyone has a degree these days, so if you want to 'set yourself aside from the pack', you shouldn't be wasting your time at university.

      You don't want to set yourself aside from the pack. You want to set yourself AHEAD of the pack. And if the pack has college degrees and you don't, you're going to face an uphill battle trying to convince people that you're better than them at most things.

    5. Re:Worst job in the World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But almost everyone has a degree these days, so if you want to 'set yourself aside from the pack', you shouldn't be wasting your time at university.
      Yeah, if everybody is doing it, you shouldn't! Like going to college or speaking English or showering...

      When employers look at your resume, you don't want them to be thinking "Oh, here's another guy who's educated and qualified for this job. I am so sick of looking at all these people with qualifications. Where's the pile of resumes from drop-outs? I'm sure those guys learned algorithms and data structures out on the mean streets, where they got lots of real-life experience collaborating with other programming hobos."

    6. Re:Worst job in the World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who's actually done a college degree knows that they don't relate well to work conditions at all... it's almost totally orthogonal. Degrees really are (were) to differentiate yourself from the pack ("sideways"), not put yourself ahead. Think - someone with 2 months relevant experience is much more desirable as a hiree than someone with 4 years of college.

    7. Re:Worst job in the World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't know where you live but not "everyone has a degree these days". Maybe more than in the past, but far, far from "everyone". Not even close in fact.

  34. Quiting school is not a life sentence by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Informative

    "What exactly is the marketable skill in signing a contract that says 'give me loads of money'?"

    None at that stage, but getting someone to offer you a genorous contract in the first place is a "marketable skill". If this kid has any financial smarts he will suck that contract dry and get a renewal, if not he will get bored, throw a "party", and watch it slip through his fingers.

    I dropped out of high school at 16 (Australia), it did not stop me from renting a house, buying a car, raising a family... Sure I completed a BSc when I was 30 because by that time I had figured out what I wanted to do, now I am 47 my pay pack is well above average. To be honest, I would have to say that making a living is less "financialy challenging" when you have the right bits of paper, but that still doesn't mean your life is ruined without them.

    However the notion that dropping out of school will ruin the rest of your life is false and usually promoted by those who stayed at school and have yet to find out what earning a pay packet is all about. And no, a couple of years burger flipping while leeching off your friends and relatives does not qualify.

    BTW: Please excuse my spelling, as I said, I'm a high school dropout.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Quiting school is not a life sentence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a bitter little post.

    2. Re:Quiting school is not a life sentence by cptnapalm · · Score: 0

      Of everyone I know, it is the college dropouts which are doing the best financially. The graduates tend to be spread all over the earnings map. One recently started a business, but for the last several years waited tables. Another was a stripper for a decade. I only recently have begun making more than $20k a year.

      The dropouts I know are FAR better off financially. They also tend to be the more personable people of those I know.

    3. Re:Quiting school is not a life sentence by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Strippers do well finacially if they manage to stay away from drugs and booze and remember that after a decade, they're pretty much tapped out.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    4. Re:Quiting school is not a life sentence by saltydogdesign · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Conversely, people who haven't been to school often fail to understand its benefits, which, as often as not, are not necessarily financial. Moreover, one person's success does not make a given path the smooth one. Fact is, and I'm sure you're aware of this, most dropouts do miserably.

      --
      // This is not a sig.
    5. Re:Quiting school is not a life sentence by Servo · · Score: 1

      A good stripper can earn a hell of a lot of money. If they save it and put it in a high yield savings account or other decent investment, they can live off the rest for a long time without having to worry too much about it.

      I used to be friends with an ex stripper. she used to make anywhere from $100k to $300k a year. That's a million to 3 million earned in a decade. You can save and invest that and do pretty well for yourself.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    6. Re:Quiting school is not a life sentence by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Agreed, dropping out is at best a bumpy shortcut to financial success, and I am also not advocating that one should remain permenantly ignorant just because they can afford too do so financially. What I do say is that an opportunity like this kid has been handed should not be dismissed just for the sake of completing his education. He is young and will have many years (and plenty of cash) to catch up later in life.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    7. Re:Quiting school is not a life sentence by budgenator · · Score: 1

      My wife lived next door to a semi-retired stripper; not sure what the biz is like now, seems there's a lot of competition from eastern european women anymore.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    8. Re:Quiting school is not a life sentence by Servo · · Score: 1

      I don't frequent strip clubs so I couldn't say, but the last time I did (6-7 years ago) all the girls were definitely all southern belles.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  35. That's great by omeg · · Score: 1

    ... anyone who knows what game he actually plays? This is the typical sensationalist news that I loathe, especially when it's about competitive video gaming. They presume that the people reading the article are interested solely in the bizarre fact that people can make money playing video games, and that they probably wouldn't need to know which game we're actually talking about here.

    1. Re:That's great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After searching through flash hell, it seems he has played Halo on the Xbox. He may have played other games as well I guess.

  36. I hate this progaming... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is just marketing/PR to make the kids believe you can actually earn money with playing games. How many kids "ruin their live" while trying to become a progamer?
    And all this shit just to sell a few more games and getting PR. They could hire 5 developers instead. That would be at least be productive.

    As someone else stated: The guy is a lottery winner. He had incredible luck to get his "job". 99.9999% of the kids who try the same will fail miserably.

    I like games, but it is a hobby. If you want to earn money/dedicate yourself do something usefull, please. If all the time wasted in Wow, Warcraft, Counterstrike would be spend productive (research, art, maybe open software) that would be great.

    I hate those cynical bastards betraying, decifing and seducing the kids and destroying opportunities.

  37. $250,000, but over how long? by sirwired · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't say how long the contract runs.

    If it is $250k for one year, then that is pretty damn good. $250k over five years is pretty darn average once you take out income tax, Social Security, and Medicare. Not bad for a High School dropout, but not exactly the staggering sum it is made out to be.

    SirWired

    1. Re:$250,000, but over how long? by s31523 · · Score: 1

      Good point! I wonder if the contract has free Jolt cola as part of the deal!

      It also doesn't mention what grade he was in. As an 18 year dropping out of high school should have been right in his senior year. If he was in the middle of his senior year, that would be pretty dumb, but if he was still like a sophomore well then that tells you something.

      Seriously though, as a parent I say good for him, but I would have pushed the graduating high school a bit more. For my kids, once they get out of high school I will support them in whatever they want to do as long as they can support themselves and are happy.

  38. in the orignal klingon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    v ghaH wa'maH chorgh DISmey qan; ghaHta' Daq tlhap vam- vo' meq vetlh vo' Daj muSHa' vaD [gaming]

    You're welcome.

  39. No excuse by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    Education is for everybody. There should be no excuse for him to leave school only for the money, because the minute this wonderful company comes down he's going to be in deep shite. There shouldn't be a problem with playing hard and maintaining at least a passing grade in school and college.

  40. Celebrity headline submissions now? by inviolet · · Score: 1
    The guy who is just 18 years old, was prompted to take this step; because of the reason that emerged from his love for gaming.

    William Shatner submitting slashdot articles now?

    --
    FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
  41. It could go somewhere - depending on his next step by Panaqqa · · Score: 1

    Back when I was 14 years old, I was a video game fanatic. Now admittedly, that was quite a long time ago. I was addicted to "Asteroids" and "Defender" and "Robotron". But while I played them, I also got quite a good idea of the underlying programming and how the game itself worked.

    Two years later, I was writing games. It was the days before IDEs and sophisticated graphics engines, so everything had to be done from the metal up. It was hard work. But some of my software was picked up by a software company affiliated with a major computer magazine (Instant Software, Kilobaud Magazine) and royalty cheques started to come in. Big time.

    Ultimately my business interests in writing games and having others distribute them lasted only 3 years, but it was the springboard for me to grow into other areas of computing. To this day I still own a computer related business. Video games were my start.

    One could argue that today, with 7 figure budgets for game production and armies of programmers, there is no way for a young single guy or 2-3 friends to write successful game software. I would say, though, that this is incorrect: look around the Internet and you will find many many examples of shareware game authors earning quite a good living. In some cases very good. The Internet is an unparalleled software distribution resource, and if you can get 2% of 500,000 people who downloaded your software to pay you $5 for it, that's $50,000 for your efforts. You don't need many of those in a year.

    Hopefully this young man can milk this game playing contract for all it's worth, then use his earnings as seed capital for the next stage in his career. It's what I did, and I've never looked back.

  42. A few grand a month? by JPriest · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A few grand a month does not sound like something worth dropping out of school over. Also, in the case of Tom Taylor, if he was 18 and still in school it didn't sound like he had much time left before graduating. I never understood the point of spending 13 years of your life in school to walk out the door 2 or 6 months before graduation. The least he could have done is homeschooled the remainder of his diploma to avoid having to place G.E.D. on his future resume's.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  43. Re:One thing is for certain: there is no stopping by fritzk3 · · Score: 1
    Actually, MTV already covered this guy. He was on a show called "Real Life: I'm a Pro Gamer" (or something like that). They showed him and a couple of others... Jonathan "Fatal1ty" Wendel might have been one of them; the other was a Gamecube player from NYC. This kid (TSquared) is an Xbox (Halo) player. He had a GF at the time of the show but basically was shown ignoring her whenever he would rather play video games.

    Though he did make a rather strange habit of wearing a pair of his GF's panties around his neck during all of the tournaments that he played. He looked like a tool.

    --
    All your sig are belong to us.
  44. You are thinking about this wrong by everphilski · · Score: 1

    In high school I loved space. I loved looking at the stars. Thinking about satellites, the coming commercialization of space, etc. So I went to school to become an Aerospace Engineer.

    By your logic I shouldn't have, because I "took a thing I truly loved that *wasn't* work and *made it* work" ... but you know what? I love work! I can't think of anything I'd rather be doing. And if I were doing something else I'd probably be watching the clock to race home and work on my real passion for space. Think about what you are saying. You should do what you love.

  45. Demand pushes salaries by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 1

    It's the same principle as Briteny Spears making more money than the people who write her songs.

    Honestly, though, I'm sure the top 0.1% of game developers are making 6 figures (Take Will Wright, John Romero, and John Carmack), just like the top 0.0001% of gamers. You can't really compare the 'leetest' gamers with your average game software developer (who will still earns well over 50,000/yr). That would be like comparing Will Wright to the average gamer (who pays $1500/year to play games).

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
  46. Shouldn't he be 2T? by Asmor · · Score: 1

    I mean, maybe it's just me, but I'd interpret his intitials as T+T, not T*T.

    1. Re:Shouldn't he be 2T? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tom Taylor
      TT
      T*T
      T^2

      stfu

    2. Re:Shouldn't he be 2T? by Asmor · · Score: 1

      Actually, Tom Taylor would be T.T.

      I don't believe that the period is a unary mathematical operator, is it?

    3. Re:Shouldn't he be 2T? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who's to say it has to be T.T.? not every acronym uses periods to seperate each word. is it RTFA or R.T.F.A? is it STFU or S.T.F.U.?

      so now, we are forced to decide between T.T. or TT. since, as you say, the period is not a unary mathematical operator, then we can just focus on TT.

      QED

      or is it Q.E.D.?

  47. Hope for Others by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    So does this mean that the thousands of kids who have fucked up their education by too much gaming can look forward to big endorsement checks? I guess being addicted to WoW actually is a good thing.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  48. Stanford grad student getting $100 million by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I am more impressed with one of the co-founders of YouTube still going to school and becomeing fabulously rich. HP, Yahoo, CISCO, NetScape, Google, YouTube ... those Stanford startups just keep on pumping money.

  49. Not enough info. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have only one hobby, and make that into your paycheck, then it's almost expected to witness 'burn out'.

    I don't know if TSquared has other hobbies like art or athletics, but having such alternate forms of fulfillment helps significantly.

    Balance.

    In the mean time, I would encourage him to continue with this and not touch (read: conservative investments) half of the post-tax money for a few years. By that time, he'll experience more of the industry and figure out what else interests him. Maybe he'll just get sick of the whole thing and quit for nothing in particular - the reason for saving some of the money now.

  50. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those that follow the Professional Halo 2 scene this is old news. T2 is on the team widely regarded as the 3rd best on the circuit; Str8 Rippin. At the same time that T2 got his contract the number one Halo 2 Team "Final Boss" (OGRE1, OGRE2, Walshy, Saiyan) also signed the same 3 year MLG contract worth $1,000,000 (or £250,000 each). Final Boss only lost once during the 2005 season and have only lost once so far in 2006, completely dominating the entire 2005-2006 season, and are regarded as the best Halo 2 team in the world.

  51. No, the math will not work out for the gamer by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is a company known for paying a generous dividend. Their annual dividends on a share of stock ($28 as I write this) are $.40 cents at the moment, for a yield of 1.5%. If you want to make a $36k yearly income from dividends, you need a cool $2.4 million invested in a company with dividends of the same yield as Microsoft. Even if you get an unheard of yield of 4.5% you need $800k. Dividends are *not* tax free! You'll get a 1099 form from MSFT (or whoever) listing how much you made, and then you get to go through a fun process to decide whether they are ordinary dividends (taxable as income, same as if I paid you the same amount of money to play games for me) or qualified dividends (still taxable, but as capital gains -- you get either a 5% or 15% rate as opposed to whatever your normal income tax bracket puts you in, depending on what bracket you're in). The IRS says the overwhelming majority of dividends are ordinary, not qualified, and I'm inclined to agree with them since they'll break my kneecaps if I don't. (http://www.irs.gov/publications/p550/ch01.html#d0 e4586)

    I'm skipping the impact of a traditional or Roth IRA, since neither of these applies to an 18 year old gamer -- you'd get penalized up the wazoo for touching a penny.

    The reason most old folks can afford retirement isn't dividends (or bond income), its that their portfolio has appreciated to the point where they can live out the rest of their life expectancy through a combination of dividend income, bond income, and drawing down the value of the portfolio. Thats less of an option for a hypothetical 23 year old ex-pro gamer, since his hypothetical stash will not likely generate sufficient income to cover his expenses without liquidating a bit of it every year, and he will probably live long enough to see it vanish in its entirety. (Supposing a cool million in stock and $30k in annual living expenses, you'll need to either pray for an increasing market EVERY year of your life or liquidiate a few percent of your portfolio in year one, then a few more in year two, then year three, etc etc, and the amount you have to sell increases in every year because you're selling your future income stream down the river every time you sell a share).

    Obligatory: THIS IS NOT TAX OR INVESTMENT ADVICE. I just have had these issues on my mind a lot recently as I've been working on starting my own retirement plan.

    1. Re:No, the math will not work out for the gamer by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Um ... nobody (with any real financial knowledge) would use stocks (let alone, a *single* stock) as a monthly income fund. That's what bonds (preferably, a bond fund) are for. Those will pay ~7% on average, with moderate capital fluctuation. The purpose of stock investments is to grow your capital quickly *without* drawing significant income.

      Go to vanguard.com.

  52. When gaming becomes work... by Chilli_DA · · Score: 1

    ...it's not really "playing" anymore. I find gaming great for unwinding and venting a little anger (e.g. by virtually blowing someone's head) of now and then, but I can't think of a more boring job. You don't create anything, after a while you don't need to think much anymore, and the Carpal Tunnel must be a killer.

    But still... for 250k I guess there's a good enoughh reason for some people.

  53. Marketing? by PatTheGreat · · Score: 1

    Maybe MLG is not going to keep this kind of thing as the norm. They're relatively new, and they want to be taken seriousely? So how do you do that? Get some people who make some serious cash. So how do you do that? Give 'em the money yourself. Might just be the conspiracy nut in me kicking in, but this might be the exception, even as exceptions go.

    --
    Google: "All your data are belong to us."
  54. I'd like to add that I've avoided any serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    career moves simply because I didn't want to spend the best ten years of my life preparing for the worse ten years of my life. I didn't want to wait until I was 60 to see the beautiful mountains through the window of a tour bus/ cruise ship/ etc. I wanted to climb it. One of the turning points in my life was when I was sitting in an old folks home and an old lady told me she had spent her entire life preparing, saving, and avoid things that might have, should've, but never did, happen. Her main regret was that she was so focused on her career that she never got to do the things she wanted to do. And when she finally did have the time and money she wasn't physically able. I also learned from my dad he's 65 and has no plans to retire. Sure he no longer works super stressful hours but he always says "Why would I want to wait around to die." Working was his life to him. He says he'd rather die working, than die being useless.

  55. Are you kidding? by Aceheaton · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else think this guy is a totally idiot? I "took a chance and it paid off"??? What a load of horse manure. He doesn't even graduate from High School? Where is this kids parents? Where is the discipline? It is articles like this that make me angry. It celebrates our societies mistakes, and makes them look like something of value. Too bad he couldn't see the value of school. Everything has its place, but quitting high school to play video games full time is a sure path to loserville. Poor chap...

  56. Olympians don't even get paid by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    And how long do THEY train for the possibility of winning a shiny metal disc that no one else is going to remember 20 years later?

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  57. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    There's a Far Side akin to this.