Slashdot Mirror


Details on the PS3 Online Service

Eurogamer has details of Sony's online strategy for the PlayStation 3. Finally. The long article goes into the process by which you log into the service, some of the things you can expect to find online, the different aspects of user accounts, and finally some details about the PlayStation Store. From the article: "As to the content that will be available, Sony is still playing its cards close to its chest to some extent - but one thing the giant firm is clear on is that the PlayStation Store will grow to encompass more than just new game content and demos. Alongside the free and paid-for game content, the store will also play host to a wide range of new titles developed specifically for download (the first of which, fl0w, was shown off at TGS - dozens more PlayStation Store exclusive titles are being worked on around the world thanks to an initiative which Sony launched at GDC last year) - and as Ken Kutaragi revealed at TGS last month, it'll also be possible to buy PSone and PS2 classics you missed out on, as well as a selection of PSP games, from the PlayStation Store, and download them directly to your PS3." After all this time, it's nice just to know there is an online strategy.

156 comments

  1. Will this force XBox Live to become free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope so... Not all the content has to be free.. but I'd like to play online without a monthly subscription. Finally some competition.

    1. Re:Will this force XBox Live to become free? by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      I hope so... Not all the content has to be free.. but I'd like to play online without a monthly subscription. Finally some competition.

      I personally don't think XBox Live is the type of service Microsoft is trying to compete on price with; they seem to be more focused on quality of service and increased functionality. By having a charge, Microsoft will be able to provide services that would not be cost effective on a free service; much of this functionality may be of questionable value (gamer-scores and what not) but it is what the service is based on. I would expect that XBox Live would (probably) increase the ammount of services it provides rather than reduce the price.

    2. Re:Will this force XBox Live to become free? by grapeape · · Score: 4, Informative

      While the web browsing and friends lists looks nice, people seem to be missing one key point...the sony online services doesnt tie into games. You can chat all you want or buy things at the sony store but they service still isnt going to link you up to play some madden head to head. Gaming on the PS3 may be free (or may not in a few cases depending on the publisher) but its also piecemeal. Peer to peer or publisher control online play is still the only way to do it with Sony, there is no centralized matching service or more importantly infrastucture maintenance for gaming.

      Thats the big advantage of XBox lives subscription services...if all you want is profiles and shopping, MS already has that for free its called Xbox Live Silver.

    3. Re:Will this force XBox Live to become free? by Babbster · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is an excellent point. PS3 developers/publishers are either rolling their own or using services like XFire or Gamespy to get their games online. That could (based on the history of the PS2) mean multiple logins to access multiple games. I just can't imagine developers being happy with that compared to the ease of use cited with Xbox Live from just about its beginning on the first Xbox.

      Past the initial setup, Xbox Live access has been completely transparent with my 360. I start the console, I'm immediately logged in, any game I insert checks for updates and has multiplayer ready to go when I select the appropriate mentu options. The most I ever have to think about is how many XBL points I have when I'm looking at perhaps downloading something.

      Maybe Sony will have similar functionality that allows the third-party online services to utilize Sony's login, but we haven't seen any evidence of that, yet. The bottom line is that if Sony's online complexity varies on a game-by-game basis, then it will continue to suffer in comparison to Xbox Live.

      PS- I should note that XBL multiplayer is by no means perfect across all games. Lag is reported as an issue in some games while being a virtual non-factor (except on a connection-by-connection basis) in others, so obviously there is still code that depends on the developer. MS and developers still have some work to do in this area, but as far as convenience and ease of use they seem to have things down pat.

    4. Re:Will this force XBox Live to become free? by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      The entire flipping XBOX wasn't cost effective as a franchise. So far, neither is the 360. It's a BS argument anyway, since somehow Steam isn't a charge service and yet Valve is still making money hand over fist.

  2. shortsighted. by CDPatten · · Score: 2, Insightful

    anyone else read that and feel like the author just has an axe to grind against online gaming.

    I think he is kind of shortsighted by saying (strongly implying at least) that full games will never be web based.

    I certainly can see (as broadband speeds increase) purchasing a game like halo, and you download the 30 mg level in a 30 seconds. Video clips are streamed in real-time instead of being played off the DVD.

    Am I just off here, or was that author lacking vision.

    1. Re:shortsighted. by justice7 · · Score: 1

      If you look towards the PC Take a game like Guild Wars for example. You don't even have to install this game to play it. The initial client is 96KB, and the client streams game content to you as you play. It initially downloads all it needs to get you going, and as you progress and during play you are downloading content. It is a great feature, and people who play guildwars never really notice patches as they are constantly streamed to them during play.

  3. Re:Zonked by nmaster64 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh STFU. There were murmurs a while back about Sony possibly lacking an online service and leaving it up to 3rd parties. However, his comment was more of a nudge of humor than "editorializing". Move on with your life asshat.

    If you don't like the writers, don't read the website.

  4. Valve has been doing this for over 2 years now. by Unworthy+Advocate · · Score: 0, Interesting

    This has already been done, its called STEAM. It changed the way I play and pay for games. No, it is not perfect but overall it rocks.
    Auto game updating makes me VERY happy and the range of available games is expanding all the time.

    Though this is not to say that Sony couldn't possibly do it better and more efficiently.

    1. Re:Valve has been doing this for over 2 years now. by Merovign · · Score: 1

      Heh. Not everyone feels the same way about Steam.

      I've had to reinstall it about 5 times. I've fought with it to get it to recognize games I have installed. For someone without limitless free time, auto updating (especially without knowing how long it's going to take) just cuts into what little gaming time I have. I hate having to shut down my net connection just to run Steam if I want to enjoy my 30 minute gaming window instead of spending 10 minutes updating.

      It's stopped working, lost games, and yes, it has switched me to Steam-related messages while I'm playing.

      I just happen to think it's a bad model. At the very least I should be able to tell it "pretend this is standalone" when installing, but I can't. I understand why they did it, but it doesn't make me any happier with the product.

      I'm glad it works well for you, though!

  5. The Details For The Lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "the system does show you friend sign-ins and new messages received in overlays on top of the game you're currently playing"

    "Oh - and it's all free, too. The only place you'll be asked to fork over a penny is when you purchase something in the PlayStation Store - all of the online services, from sign-up right through to voice and video chat, are free, as is normal multiplayer gaming"

    "the only things you'll pay money for are paid-for downloadable content, or subscriptions to premium services like massively multiplayer games."

    "Unlike Nintendo and Microsoft's offerings, Sony doesn't hide the price of items behind an arbitrary "points" scheme"

    "it'll also be possible to buy PSone and PS2 classics you missed out on, as well as a selection of PSP games, from the PlayStation Store, and download them directly to your PS3."

    "what we've seen is very promising. Account creation and management, buddy lists and various types of chat appear to be working just fine, the interface is simple and elegant, and the PlayStation Store"

    Zonk: "After all this time, it's nice just to know there is an online strategy. "

    Pathetic. Just pathetic.

    The Wii and PS3 are only a month away and the Slashdot community is missing out on many major console gaming news due to the 'fucked in the head over Sony/PS3' Zonk. It's time for a change. It's not funny. It's not inflammatory. It's just fucking sad.

    Zonk, go away. Deal with whatever the fuck issues you have with Sony on your own time. Slashdot is long overdue for a sane games editor.

    1. Re:The Details For The Lazy by HappySqurriel · · Score: 0, Troll

      Most of your points are stupid, or not that impressive but I want to comment on this one in particular:

      Unlike Nintendo and Microsoft's offerings, Sony doesn't hide the price of items behind an arbitrary "points" scheme

      "Points" is a much better way to offer these services to customers in this buisness model. If you consider that not everyone has a credit card, or likes using that information online, a "points" model allows people to buy "points cards" at their local retailer and use them online; this means that everyone from little Jimmy (8 years old) to Nana Smith (72 years old) can access your online content. This also limits the quantity of trafic that your ecommerce site faces because rather than every purchase requiring a credit card check you only require one when people buy new points.

      As for the confusing the price, how is having 1 point per yen (in Japan) or 1 point per dime (in the US) a really confusing system; this is Nintendo's Wii points system.

    2. Re:The Details For The Lazy by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      I really hope Nintendo isn't using that system since $0.10 is equal to 12 yen. If that's the case I hope I'll be able to use imported point card and save a lot of money.

    3. Re:The Details For The Lazy by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong but I think the American and Japaneese points are not interchangeable ...

    4. Re:The Details For The Lazy by Tim+Browse · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Zonk: "After all this time, it's nice just to know there is an online strategy. "

      Pathetic. Just pathetic.

      Actually, it's a pretty reasonable comment - and a sentiment that many PS3 developers share, which you'll have seen evidence of, if you've been following the PS3 news in the past couple of months.

      Sony have shown time and time again that the one thing they are hopeless at is software, and an online service is all about the software, not forgetting of course the hardware/server farms, which I think Microsoft just might have more experience with.

      Knowing Sony's MO, the fact that this service is free basically telegraphs to me that Sony don't think this service will be as good as Xbox Live. In other words, they can't compete on quality or value with the online system, so they've decided to compete on price.

    5. Re:The Details For The Lazy by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      Those sentences in quote marks are direct quotes from the article. Flaming Mr. A.C. about them being stupid is even more pointless than replying to an A.C. post normally is...

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    6. Re:The Details For The Lazy by havenskate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think you can jump to that kind of conclusion. And regardless of the quality of their service, it's been clear to me that Sony just doesn't believe in charging for online services. I, for one, would NEVER pay for the online service if they did charge - I think that's a ridiculous concept and I would rather see an AD for a new game or PS3 hardware product than have to fork out a monthly fee just to browse a store where i'm going to buy something or get updates for games.

      I think Sony is just doing the right thing and being FAIR to their customers by not charging.

    7. Re:The Details For The Lazy by zeroduck · · Score: 1
      I think that's a ridiculous concept and I would rather see an AD for a new game or PS3 hardware product than have to fork out a monthly fee just to browse a store where i'm going to buy something or get updates for games.

      You don't need to pay for those functions on the 360 either. Marketplace is free to browse, and updates are for everyone that plugs it into the internet. Paying for the gold membership just gets you into online multiplayer.

    8. Re:The Details For The Lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the cost of maintaining the network is negligible and can be factored into the cost of downloads.
      maybe sony realized how sheisty microsoft was being and decided to take the high road themselves.

    9. Re:The Details For The Lazy by tepples · · Score: 1
      Marketplace is free to browse, and updates are for everyone that plugs it into the internet.

      But doesn't Xbox 360 lose its big selling point when broadband is unavailable, leading to low console sales and low Live subscription rates in geographic areas where dial-up is still the norm?

    10. Re:The Details For The Lazy by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Come off it. Sony hasn't exactly screamed about its online service but there have been enough nuggets along the way to know there is one. It's been known for a long time that it has a browser, demos have show the Singstar online store, demos of the UI have show the friends and chat functionality. They mightn't have sun their plans from the rooftops but it was quite obvious they were going to do something. And it's obviously going to develop over time too.

      Besides, it's not as if Nintendo have fully disclosed what they are doing either. We know there are "channels" with various network snippets and an optional browser but they haven't said much at all about how the network gameplay system works. Why no snide articles about that?

      Zonk is just trolling as usual. The only PS3 articles you see on Slashdot are negative or spun with some bullshit synopsis. The only Wii articles you see are positive or hyped. Kotaku.com is a far better place for rounded games news, or 1up.com's excellent video and radio casts.

    11. Re:The Details For The Lazy by zeroduck · · Score: 1

      I don't believe either the PS3 or Wii support dialup either. You could still use dialup, I suppose, on any system if you set up some sort of network (ICS on Windows).

      I don't believe you'd have a pleasurable gaming experience on any console with dialup.

    12. Re:The Details For The Lazy by tepples · · Score: 1
      You could still use dialup, I suppose, on any system if you set up some sort of network (ICS on Windows).

      Not if the system does some sort of connection speed test and will not allow registering an account on dial-up or IDSL, which is often the fastest connection available to residential customers in places where housing is affordable.

      I don't believe you'd have a pleasurable gaming experience on any console with dialup.

      I understand for online Smash Bros., but how does chess or Tetris need high bandwidth or low latency? How does downloading an NES game need high bandwidth or low latency?

    13. Re:The Details For The Lazy by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      "it'll also be possible to buy PSone and PS2 classics you missed out on, as well as a selection of PSP games, from the PlayStation Store, and download them directly to your PS3."

      Even more reason for me to try an sell my PSP. Man, I had such hopes for that system. Sadly, I can only get about $60 for it from GameStop. =( Such a beautiful piece of hardware, only to sit, stale on my desk for lack of games and the inability to actually use the bloody Wi-Fi to game with others... unless it's Ad-Hoc. I'm no longer interested in 'modifying' things like I was 10 years ago. I just want to pay for something that will give me what I want 'out-of-the-box'.

      Other than that, the online services seem to be in the right direction for Sony. Particularly downloading those hard to find or expensive to now buy PSOne and PS2 games.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    14. Re:The Details For The Lazy by NotWorkSafe · · Score: 1

      Actually, 1 Wii point = $0.01 US

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wii_Points

      --
      There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of animals Chuck Norris allows to live.
    15. Re:The Details For The Lazy by brkello · · Score: 1

      What prevents Sony from making a Sony Online Store card that are worth different dollar amounts (i.e. $10, $20, $50, etc)? Nothing. You really don't have a point. A points system is just used to make you spend more money. People tend to be more willing to part with points than they are with dollars. It is dumb, since it is easy to figure out, but human psychology just works that way. Sony is doing something less evil than XBOX and Nintendo...yet you would still defend Nintendo's practice as better. Kind of the definition of fan boy. Ultimately, it isn't a big deal either way. But you Wiitards (you lemmings that would gladly follow Nintendo over a cliff) need to relax. Nintendo is just as evil as any other console maker. They want all your money too.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  6. they have a strategy ? by tehpwn · · Score: 0, Funny

    I guess it's better than having a turd in your locker

  7. Wikipedia: comedy gold! by goldaryn · · Score: 1

    From wikipedia page on the PS2.. comedy gold!:

    Sony rolled a PS2 online adapter in late 2002 to compete with Microsoft, with several online first party titles released alongside it, such as SOCOM US Navy SEALS to show its active support for Internet play. Sony also advertised heavily, and its online model had the advantage of being supported by Electronic Arts.

    Uhm...

    1. Re:Wikipedia: comedy gold! by trimbo · · Score: 1

      I think what the Wikipedia author meant there is that EA did not support Xbox Live for at least a couple years after it came out. I think either Madden 2004 or 2005 was the first version that had XBL, whereas Madden 2003 was the first on PS2.

    2. Re:Wikipedia: comedy gold! by kubevubin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've never used Xbox Live, so I have a question concerning it: Are less popular or older games ever removed from the service, rendering them unplayable online thereafter? EA likes to remove online support for the PlayStation versions of older (as in two years old) sports titles in order to force players to purchase a newer version. Does this occur with the titles that are playable on Xbox Live, by chance? If not, then it makes perfect sense that EA would be a bit hesitant to support Xbox Live in the beginning.

    3. Re:Wikipedia: comedy gold! by nissu · · Score: 1
      I've never used Xbox Live, so I have a question concerning it: Are less popular or older games ever removed from the service, rendering them unplayable online thereafter? EA likes to remove online support for the PlayStation versions of older (as in two years old) sports titles in order to force players to purchase a newer version. Does this occur with the titles that are playable on Xbox Live, by chance?
      Yes, apparently EA has pulled the plug on some of their older Live titles. However, if I have understood correctly, all the non-EA Live titles ever released are still playable online.

      No more online play for EA's back catalogue

    4. Re:Wikipedia: comedy gold! by damiangerous · · Score: 2, Informative

      EA doesn't actually use XBL. They are the only exception I know of that is allowed to use their own service. I'm sure one of their main reasons was so that they can pull support. As far as I know no game's support has ever been removed from XBL.

  8. Re:Zonked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I support your view on this matter.

  9. How much will it cost? by linzeal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Xbox live 360 from Microsoft costs 40 bucks a year. Has there been any indication this is going to be free or something?

    1. Re:How much will it cost? by Nick05 · · Score: 1

      No i do not think MS would make it free, they have invested quite a lot of money and made a huge loss selling the consoles. One way to recuperate that cost would be through selling subscription(Xbox Gold membership). I am happy Sony is making this free. Total cost of ownership will be more or less same when you compare both(Xbox 360 Vs PS3).

    2. Re:How much will it cost? by libkarl2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Has there been any indication this is going to be free or something?

      From the article:

      Oh - and it's all free, too. The only place you'll be asked to fork over a penny is when you purchase something in the PlayStation Store - all of the online services, from sign-up right through to voice and video chat, are free, as is normal multiplayer gaming. There's no equivalent of the Xbox Live Gold account, where you're expected to pay extra for a further tier of services - the only things you'll pay money for are paid-for downloadable content, or subscriptions to premium services like massively multiplayer games.

      --
      You are where you are at the time you are there.
    3. Re:How much will it cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell us the truth, this comment was just an excuse for you to post your Amazon affiliate code, wasn't it?

    4. Re:How much will it cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But Sony really isn't making it free. They are just using a different model. Instead of paying Sony for online play you will pay the game publishers with Sony coordinating the transactions. Either way, you will still pay for online play.

      As far as the cost, we will have to see what game publishers charge for a monthly subscription before we can determine how comparable the two systems are in TCO. Right now I can pay $40/year for Xbox Gold and play any online game I own until my thumbs fall off. That's a good deal for even one game and it's a great deal if you play many different games. OTOH, if the game publishers follow the same subscription model on PS3 that they do on the PC, it will be $10/month for each game. $120/year > $40/year. And that is just one game. Even at the half the cost it is still $60/year. But we won't really know until the PS3 is out.

  10. If Only.... by SCDavis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If only microsoft, Sony and Nintendo could get together and have a "global" network with all three systems and even PC maybe (gamespy? or one of those guys?) and let people that have say Ghost Recon for the 360 play against people with the PS3... or even a global store where you could buy the things once... When i get the Wii and IF i get the PS3, i really dont want to pay for all 3... with Live costing 40/year or whatever it would be good to get a deal on all 3...

    360+wii = 60
    360+wii+ps3 = 90

    where all seperate could cost people 120+ a year!

    but we'll see... Nintendo seems to have things going the right way with rumors of being able to download old nintendo games (whether it be for free or not we'll see).

    Also Microsoft seems to already be rolling with their network set up while the PS3 will have to work out all of their bugs that Microsoft worked out with the first XBOX... Nintendo also might have the same problems that Sony will have, but who knows...

    1. Re:If Only.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      RTFA. The Sony service is free.

      360 = 40

      360 + PS3 = 40

    2. Re:If Only.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sony are working with gamespy for their online stuff.

      (nintendo wifi on ds was also a collaboration with gamespy)

    3. Re:If Only.... by GweeDo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      We might want to also mention this: 360 + Wii + PS3 = Xbox Live Fee The WiiConnect24 is free.

    4. Re:If Only.... by Jimbot256 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=2031 0
      It seems like PS3 users will be able to chat with the PC community through Xfire. May not seem much compared to your idea, but it's a start.

    5. Re:If Only.... by Kagenin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wii Virtual Console downloads will cost about 5-10$/game. They're not rumors, they're confirmed facts. NES, SNES, and select Genesis and TG16 games will be available. AFAIK, the Wii online services will be free - no annual registration, just a points system for purchasing Virtual Console titles and other offerings (something like 1 yen or 10 cents per point).

      Its also worth noting that the Wii will not be sold for a loss - unlike M$ and $ony, the big N will be making profit from every console sold from day one. M$ and $ony can't make a profit until they can get their manufacturing costs way down (which is probably further off for $ony then I think even they realize). This will be the Achilles heel for $ony - their pricing scheme will put off a LOT more people than they're anticipating (just look at the current /. poll!). They plan on making their money back from games and peripherals, but if no one's buying systems, games and pads will sit on shelves, profiting no one. The other whammy here is they're not gonna have enough systems in stores before Christmas - every source out there is reporting that the numbers just aren't there yet.

      Nintendo has everything going for them going into this generation. The didn't sell as many units as their competitors last generation, but they made more money than either of their competitors on hardware sales, because they've never sold their hardware for a loss. They're PWNING $ony in the handheld market - Are there any good games for the PSP yet? Cuz I already have a dozen DS games, and I love them all.

      --
      "All warfare is based on deception."
      Sun Tzu, "The Art of War"
    6. Re:If Only.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WiiConnect24 does not have online gaming as of launch, and not for several months if not a year after release. I know that EA (my employer) does not have an online team for Wii, because there are no online functionalitys to implement. Wii also intends to charge money for a web browser of all things starting next summer. Ridiculous.

      The leads in the handheld gaming market are ludicrously exagerrated, by the way :) In north america, PSP was selling more systems than DS by a few thousand every month, before the DSLite hit and gave DS a boost.

      Lastly, to address PS3 numbers: There are only 100,000 less american PS3s on launch day than there were for PS2, and actually about 70,000 /more/ than there were launch 360s. Sony is doing just fine.

    7. Re:If Only.... by Dorceon · · Score: 1
      Nintendo seems to have things going the right way with rumors of being able to download old nintendo games (whether it be for free or not we'll see).
      It won't be free, and they've never said it would be free. NES games start at 500 Wii points, SNES at 800, and N64 at 1000. 1 Wii point is 1y or $0.01US; I don't think they've announced what the pricing will be in Europe. (Hopefully E0.01)
      --
      What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
    8. Re:If Only.... by be-fan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Its also worth noting that the Wii will not be sold for a loss - unlike M$ and $ony, the big N will be making profit from every console sold from day one.

      I love how you're putting the dollar signs on MS and Sony, when its Nintendo selling the warmed-over Gamecube for $250.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    9. Re:If Only.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you look like a complete retard when you put dollar signs in company names.

    10. Re:If Only.... by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      I was going to make the same point, but granted, $i$te$do doesn't make much sense.

    11. Re:If Only.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well for the EU market you could use Nintndo

    12. Re:If Only.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    13. Re:If Only.... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Hopefully 0.0075€. 0.01€ would be a ripoff, that's like 1.5 JPY.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    14. Re:If Only.... by tepples · · Score: 1
      0.01 would be a ripoff, that's like 1.5 JPY.

      Sales tax is applied after the advertised price in Japan and North America but before in Europe and Latin America.

    15. Re:If Only.... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Sales tax is 16%, exchange rate puts our prices at 50% over the japanese price. The rest is greed.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    16. Re:If Only.... by MoriaOrc · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's different for online goods and services (though I don't see why it would be), or just local to the Kansai region, but sales tax was always included in the advertised price wherever I went while I was in Japan this summer.

      It was quite nice to not have to mentally track the percent tax and add it to every price. And quite annoying when I got back home.

    17. Re:If Only.... by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      While I agree with your sentiment, you know as well as I do that Syphon Filter blows. Please, don't try to sugar coat your argument, it will stand without the washed up console game - 1.

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    18. Re:If Only.... by brkello · · Score: 1

      What is ironic about your comment is that you spell Sony and MS with $ signs. But then you go on to say that Nintendo is making more profit off of their consoles. It is unfortunate that Nintendo has no s's in it...but it sounds like Nintendo is being more greedy than the other two companies. I don't really understand why Nintendo fanboys brag about how Nintendo made more profit than Sony and MS. The other consoles are sold at a loss that will slowly change to break even and then a slight profit by the end of their life cycle. It sounds like Nintendo is ripping you off (despite being cheaper).

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    19. Re:If Only.... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Syphon Filter for the PSP was awesome, for a handheld game, anyway. Most fun I've had playing an FPS since the original GoldenEye. What didn't you like about it?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    20. Re:If Only.... by Kagenin · · Score: 1

      Ars just posted a great article that talked about the profits retailers will make off each unit - The Wii will get retailers about 5% profit per unit, while the non-core 360 setup is only around 3 or 4%.

      Another think you gotta understand is that Nintendo only does gaming, unlike their competitors. We all know the scams M$ uses to make their cash and inflate their stock, they've been well discussed, and $ony (who will forever be tainted in my mind over the rootkit fiasco) is practically the GE of Japan (in that I mean they do anything and everything, not just appliances or electronics). Selling hardware for a loss is a strategy with a lot more risk for them, because they have fewer revinue streams to fall back upon. The result? A much more conservative approach to this hardware generation than their competitors.

      It also means that they can cut their prices sooner, and more signifcantly.

      Still think its a rip-off? Compare to the "HOW MUCH?!?" price of the PS3?

      Right. Whatever.

      --
      "All warfare is based on deception."
      Sun Tzu, "The Art of War"
    21. Re:If Only.... by SCDavis · · Score: 1

      well im just out of the loop... thanks for the info... again Wii = good...

  11. The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For 500 dollars you get from Sony:

    This amazing and free online network
    1080p games - already at least seven 1080p games - and 1080p looks like it will be the standard rez for most PS3 games
    Full backwards compatibility with the entire Playstation and PS2 library of games
    1080p BluRay movies
    HDMI
    20 gig harddrive that can be upgraded to any size from any computer store
    The ability to buy old PS1 and PS2 games from the online network
    The tilt controller
    A full Linux distro right on the harddrive of every PS3 system
    A full set of dev tools right on the harddrive of every PS3 system
    DLNA compliance
    And I believe you can just plug any standard USB WiFi device into the system

    The Xbox 360 for 400:

    Needs to have 50 dollars every year to play online - add 200-250 dollars to the system over four to five years
    Needs to have 200 dollars and a clunky addon to play HD-DVD movies - but no HDMI connection and no 1080p or high quality audio output
    Plus Microsoft charges you to be allowed to do homebrew - 50? 100?
    Can't upgrade the harddrive
    The now admitted massive hardware defects - 50 dollars just for an extended warranty
    And let's not even go into the ridiculously marked-up 360 peripherals...

    1. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by shodanjr_gr · · Score: 0

      You just have to love retarted fanboys...

      "The ability to buy old PS1 and PS2 games from the online network"
      Still waiting on them to get the PSP emulator and online shop up and running...hadnt they promised that a PSP-oriented download website would be online by last summer?

      "A full Linux distro right on the harddrive of every PS3 system"
      Yeah, you wish...This WILL NOT happen. It was just usual sony BS from 2 years ago while they were marketing the PS3.

      "A full set of dev tools right on the harddrive of every PS3 system"

      Yeah, you wish again...Give us a kutaragi quote that is not 1-2 years old about this.

      "And I believe you can just plug any standard USB WiFi device into the system"

      And will the Cell processor be so advanced as to come up with the device drivers by itself?

      "Needs to have 50 dollars every year to play online - add 200-250 dollars to the system over four to five years"
      At least its a unified network, that works and is tried and tested...And it will probably turn free once nintendo and sony launch.

      "Needs to have 200 dollars and a clunky addon to play HD-DVD movies - but no HDMI connection and no 1080p or high quality audio output"
      a) At least MS isnt forcing a high definition format down everyones throat
      b) There isnt any HDMI, but THERE WILL BE 1080p via component and VGA.

      "Plus Microsoft charges you to be allowed to do homebrew - 50? 100?"
      90 for a year, but contrarty to Sony, it will happen.

      "The now admitted massive hardware defects - 50 dollars just for an extended warranty"
      Not really. European 360s got a de-facto 2 years guarantee, and American ones had theirs extended to 1 year. Also MS is giving money back to everyone who had to pay to get their 360 repaired. Contrary to Sony who waited for a class-action suit against them before compensating the consumers who had DVD problems with their PS2s...

      "And let's not even go into the ridiculously marked-up 360 peripherals"
      The hard drive and wifi unit are overpriced...But i dont think the controllers or cables are... Standar prices afaik.

    2. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>"A full Linux distro right on the harddrive of every PS3 system"
      >>Yeah, you wish...This WILL NOT happen. It was just usual sony BS from 2 years ago while they were marketing the PS3.

      No, really. There will be. We got told all about this by a SCEE guy today.. He didn't explain fully, but he made it clear that it was their own linux distro, but that you should be able to run your own software on it. I'd imagine most people won't tho. He was a bit vague, but it also seemed that software written to run on-top of the linux wouldn't be able to use the full power of the cell processor (ie fully programmable use of the SPEs).

      We were pretty baffled.. It seems like a strange idea, but apparently it's true.

    3. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when you get a job, you won't consider numbers like $500 and "$50 per year" to be enormous financial burdens.

    4. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fanboys fighting fanboys... yay!
      "Yeah, you wish...This WILL NOT happen. It was just usual sony BS from 2 years ago while they were marketing the PS3."
      "90 for a year, but contrarty to Sony, it will happen."

      Key to winning an argument is not to put in your own personal views and feelings, but instead stuff you can base on fact. Your arguments are just as full of holes as the ps3 fanboy above you.

    5. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly is 'baffling'?

      Everything you just posted has been known for over a year.

      * Linux distro on ever PS3 harddrive
      * Full set of libraries and dev tools to build PS3/Linux apps
      * You won't be able to have the same access to the hardware as licensed PS3 game developers do

      I assume there is either a button combo and/or a system setting to choose PS3Linux or XBM when the PS3 boots. And that there will be a BluRay disc that has the full system software/Linux install for people who buy new harddrives for the system.

    6. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And when you get a job, you won't consider numbers like $500 and "$50 per year" to be enormous financial burdens."

      And when you move out of your parents house and start paying for your own bills, gas, insurance you'll realize what financial burdens are. Even getting paid 25/hr having $500 extra cash is hard pressed. I suppose if I didn't care about saving or my future I could go on a spending spree.

    7. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      I'd say you have to take a hard look at your spending if you have trouble saving 500 dollars at 25 per. Call taxes 50% and that's still only saving 40 hours of pay. If you can't pull that off in a reasonable time frame, you're living beyond your means.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    8. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Scipher · · Score: 1

      PS3Linux is the kernel. Absolute.

    9. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by dlim · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I suspect this is just some anonymous flamebait, but still, you're not really making a proper comparison.

      You compare:
      This amazing and free online network
      to
      Needs to have 50 dollars every year to play online - add 200-250 dollars to the system over four to five years
      As others have stated, the Xbox Live does have a free service as well, and I saw nothing in the article describing free online multiplayer gaming (which is mostly what you pay for on Live).

      You compare:
      1080p games
      to
      no 1080p or high quality audio output
      The Xbox 360 is supporting 1080p following the fall 2006 update, which I believe is scheduled to be distributed prior to the PS3 launch. If that's a result of the competition from the PS3, great. But it really isn't a selling point right now. Also, the Xbox 360 does support digital surround sound audio. You don't make it clear what is better about the PS3's audio.

      HDMI
      - You are correct that the Xbox 360 doesn't have an HDMI connector, but I believe it's $600 for a PS3 with one.

      You compare:
      20 gig harddrive that can be upgraded to any size from any computer store
      to
      Can't upgrade the harddrive
      The article doesn't say the hard drive is upgradeable. Are you making it up? I remember not putting my PS2 online because I had to pay $50 for a special 10/100 network adapter that fit the PS3, when a generic one cost $10. I'm not convinced there will be an easy way to upgrade the hard drive without buying proprietary hardware. This is Sony after all. (BetaMax, MiniDisc, MemoryStick, BluRay) etc. And are you sure opening the box won't void your warranty?

      And let's not even go into the ridiculously marked-up 360 peripherals...
      Are you claiming that the PS3's peripherals will be dirt cheap? (See comment above about $50 PS2 network adapter.)

      How is anyone modding this "Insightful"?
    10. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Thexare+Blademoon · · Score: 1

      Needs to have 200 dollars and a clunky addon to play HD-DVD movies

      I'm starting to think I'm the only person that buys a game console to play games, not to watch movies or cook breakfast with...

    11. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by be-fan · · Score: 1

      See, that's why you gotta work 70 hour weeks. So you can buy lots of toys :)

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    12. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I remember not putting my PS2 online because I had to pay $50 for a special 10/100 network adapter that fit the PS3, when a generic one cost $10.

      Those generic ones are $10 because they're produced in enormous quantities for completely generic machines. After all, everything has a PCI slot, so the buyer market is huge. $50 for a custom adapter for a specific machine is really not in the realm of "overpriced".

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    13. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (1) XB360 just upscales games at 1280x720 to 1080p but doesn't actually render games in full 1920x1080 like the PS3 does. This is just like the current PS2 that actually can set to output 720p or 1080i by using that HDTV boot disc.

      (2) Both PS2 models have HDMI v1.3 (yeah, it's among the first devices to output HDMI v1.3, supporting billions of colors insted of DVI/HDMIv1.2 that are limited to 24-bit) : http://www.gfdata.de/archiv10-2006-gamefront/2347. html

      (3) The harddrive is a regular 2.5" and can be user replaced. There is even pictures of this on the PS3 websites, or just go to the great www.gamefront.de site : http://www.gfdata.de/archiv10-2006-gamefront/ps3fe stplatte.jpg

      (4) The special "$50" ethernet adapter also had a 56-kbit analog modem and the IDE buffer/connector. You needed this to add a harddrive to your PS2 (som games supported the harddisc, but I guess most uses of this was the HDLoader, where you could run all your games, cracks and homebrew straight from a fast HDD instead of juggeling discs and soldering up your PS2 with a mod-chip)

      (5) There were a cheaper ethernet adaptor without the modem later, and besides - regular ethernet adaptors where NOT $10 back when this adaptor was released, I guess they most probably are more even today ...

    14. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh look someone who is a paid marketer for Sony. This is a very biased and untruthful comparison.


      Who cares about PS1 or PS2 games they are obsolete. HDMI is just an interface with DRM and doesn't add anything to the games. People aren't buying consoles to watch movies they are buying consoles to play games. Progressive scan is over rated and isn't an improvement in resolution. Why would you want to pay 300 dollars extra for Blu Ray? With the DVD developers have adequate space and are encouraged to use it efficiently unlike the Sony which will use Blue Ray wastefully an costs a lot more. The developer tools on the PS3 probably suck compare to XNA and Visual Studio and theres a reason why that development system for the PS3 cost 20,000 dollars.


      An xbox 360 has the following advantages.

      It's out now and has been for 1 year.

      Xbox 360 is triple core vs. the 1 core and the 7 single precision FPUs in the PS3

      Xbox 360 has a VGA port

      Xbox 360 has a vibrating controller

      Xbox live

      Marvell Online and Halo 3

      Direct X and XNA

      Exclusive GTA content
       


      The PS3 has the following disadvantages
      Its made by Sony

      Its not out now and it's vaporware.

      The controller doesn't have a vibrator.

      The PS3 CPU is single core and 7 whatevers. Those 7 other SPEs don't count.

      The online system is a la carte with each vendor providing different services. As one man said you have to setup your credit card with 5 different companies just to play games.

      Sony Online Sucks Campared to Xbox Live

      Sony is trying to monopolize the console market

      No Direct X and DRM

      Paid content for Gran Turismo at 30 bucks a pop

      No VGA port to support monitors that are better than TVs
       


    15. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      I use a game console to play games too. However, if one of the consoles supports a next-gen video format such as Blu-Ray out of the box, and the others don't, then the odds that I'll buy one will be firmly stacked in its favour.

      If you cast your mind back a few years, back to when DVD players were actually a costly purchase, a lot of people bought the PS2 specifically because it had DVD support. Granted, the jump between DVD and Blu-Ray isn't perhaps as significant as the jump between VHS and DVD, but it's still a definite bonus in my eyes.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    16. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by snafu109 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well, Microsoft has break-dancers and Sony makes me want to sleep.

    17. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, let's just make up stuff and label them as facts so we can make the 360 look bad.

      1. Yes Live costs money, but guess what, with paying customers comes responsibility. Since Sony doesn't charge you for online, it could go down for a period of time, or let's say it goes down for an hour or two every day (you can't complain about a free service). I think I'll pay $3-4 a month for reliability and for a service thats up and working 24/7/365. Sony has already said it will let the developers deal with online, whereas MS provides built in online functionality to their SDKs - more reliable and more constant from game to game.

      2. The HD-DVD drive will support 1080p and HDMI so I'm not sure where you heard otherwise. Also games at 1080p instead of 1080i? whoopie. Check back a few weeks on slashdot story linking to a nice story mentioning that 1080p doesn't look any better than 1080i unless you're TV is over 60 inches...

      3. BlueRay included vs. paying for HD-DVD? Congratulations buying a PS3, you have to pay extra for some fluff, nice of Sony to include that $200 fluff into their system even when a majority of consumers won't use it. I'll wait to the players to come down in price myself. Sony could have knocked off a few hundred bucks off of the hardware and released it months ago - instead they want to charge their users a few hundred dollars for something most will not use - I'm sure the PS3 users can't wait to spend $25-$35 dollars for a movie for their old 27" color tv.

      4. Who says you can't upgrade the HD on the 360? It's a plug-in attachment on the outside of the box. Pus you can already buy a USB plug that connects the HD to your home network/pc to transfer and back up your HD to your PC, never need another HD after that.

      5. You complain that MS charges for homebrew? It's never legally been done for any console and of course they'll charge for it. You pay for support and software, not to mention you can develop your game on the PC for free, then if you decide to "port" it to the 360 for that $50. Let's not even mention if a homebrew game is good enough to go on their Live network, there is the possibility of making a few hundred thousand dollars...

      5b. Linux and dev tools? I'm sure it'll fly just like Linux for the PS2 did - remember all the great things that came from that? neither does anyone else, and I'm going to assume the dev tools is prob a C compiler, also going to guess its to develop for the 'linux' on the box and not actual games for the PS3 (could be wrong - first I heard of this at all).

      6. Ya MS has some hardware defects, a lot of 1st gen hardware does. Part of their bad press of launch were people tipping their 360s while the disc was spinning or they crammed their 360s into a tiny space when it needed to vent. I'm sure the PS3 will have some hardware issues as well - and you don't need to spend $50 for the 'replacement policy' if you have faulty hardware, MS will, and has, replace your damaged unit for free if still under warrenty which they did for any bad hardware from launch.

      7. Marked up 360 peripherals? I don't see any pricing quotes from Sony that don't show their controllers will not be about the same price (the Wii is pretty pricey as well) - and from what I've seen/heard, the PS3 controllers feel like cheap plastic compared to the 360s (IGN has a write up on that now)

      8. Gee I can rebuy games from the PS1 and PS2 that I either a) alreayd paid for or b) don't want, that's awesome...

      Does the PS3 look good on paper, sure it does, but not for the money and knowing Sony half of the stuff it can do, it won't be taken advantage of. There is going to almost no PS3s around for the holidays and the developers aren't going to rush any games out knowing there will be no sales of the hardware (they got screwed last xmas because of that with the 360 shortage).

      The PS3 will prob be pretty good next Xmas when its a bit cheaper and actually has some games out for it. It's a big beast of a machine, that's overpriced, and is Sony's way to

    18. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not providing proper comparison either. It is widely known that the PS3 will have FREE MULTIPLAYER, unlike the Xbox Silver subscription. Phil Harrison has said it numerous times that gaming will be FREE. The only exception is MMORPG-type games.

      Secondly, 1080p without HDMI is useless because there are only a few 1080p HDTVs capable of supporting 1080p signals via Component connections. And even so, they are which are restricted to 1080i.

      How is anyone modding your post insightful?

    19. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by utway · · Score: 1

      The Xbox 360 is supporting 1080p following the fall 2006 update, which I believe is scheduled to be distributed prior to the PS3 launch. If that's a result of the competition from the PS3, great. But it really isn't a selling point right now.

      What was the original MS attitude towards 1080p support in games? Well, their initial take on the 1080p support is "basically impossible", see Xbox exec on PS3: "1080p... will be basically impossible". As late as Aug 17, 2006, they were still saying No 1080p games for PS3 this year, 'Don't get sucked into the hype'. Then why suddenly just prior to TGS 2006, they announced 1080p support? As we now know, it's because Sony will be able to ship 1080p games at launch, see Harrison confirms 6 1090p games for PS3. Should I be worried about how committed are they to 1080p in 360?

    20. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by tepples · · Score: 1
      I'd say you have to take a hard look at your spending if you have trouble saving 500 dollars at 25 per.

      Even with a four-year degree, how do I get a job that pays $25 per hour and compete with the offshore outsourcing providers who pay their workers $5 per hour? Monster and CareerBuilder have not been helpful. It's hard to find even minimum wage work in some parts of the United States.

    21. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Hubbell · · Score: 0

      I love this argument on getting jobs.
      I learned a good one when I was working construction for 7 months to pay for college, on the subject of jobless people:
      "Anyone who can hold a jackhammer or push a broom can be a laborer and make *insert your areas union pay*"
      In Connecticut where I live, that's $23 an hour. I'll be making $27.50 soon working with my dad as a fulltime carpenter before I join the army in December. Making money is not a problem, being WILLING to do the work required is.

    22. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by tepples · · Score: 1
      "Anyone who can hold a jackhammer or push a broom can be a laborer and make *insert your areas union pay*"

      On average, how many applications does it take to get such a job, or even an interview? Is it considered typical to put in fifty applications and not get one interview?

    23. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by Hubbell · · Score: 0

      Being a laborer is as simple as doing what you're told. You join the union and you get a job with any number of construction companies.

    24. Re:The Xbox 360 Just Became Massively Overpriced by tbannist · · Score: 1

      You just might need to invest in a better resume. Check with your local government/university for resume workshops, or do some online searching. You need a decent resume to get a job, most employers will receive enough resumes that a single mistake or a poor layout on your resume can disqualify you from the running. It's seen as careless with something that should be of utmost importance to you, and thus makes you appear to be lazy and incompetent before the interview. Most employers won't waste their time on that.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  12. Mass suicides in the Xbox community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is scary to see the reaction to these details of the free Sony online service in the Xbox community. They seem to be taking it...badly.

    I guess the online stuff was the one thing they thought they would always be able to hold on to. I don't think many Xbox owners realized that most of this online stuff is really nothing more than mundane database transactions and a set of standard protocols for game developers and not some magic that needs 50 dollars a year from players to fund the upkeep of.

    1. Re:Mass suicides in the Xbox community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I can buy things on their service without a subscription. Can I play games with my friends with it? I don't see anything about that. XBox Live Silver is free and lets you buy from the marketplace. So Sony's amazing new offering is XBox Live Silver.

    2. Re:Mass suicides in the Xbox community by kabdib · · Score: 1

      Troll.

      <sarcasm> Heck, games are just pushing pixels onto a screen and handling user input, what's so hard about that? For online games you just sprinkle some packet handling in there. Should take you like half an hour to do all that.

      I mean, operating systems just use standard hardware (e.g., paging and protection) and some standard protocols (e.g., SATA, USB), and what's so hard about them? Compilers? I wrote three last week, and didn't even stoop to use a parser generator. This afternoon I think I'll do a browser, and maybe an MPEG-4 decoder after supper. It's just mundane, standard stuff, innit? </sarcasm>

      It's really easy to dismiss this stuff as easy. Sir (or Madam), you have no idea what you're talking about.

      ... obSnideAside: Or if think you do, maybe you work for Sony :-)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is insufficiently documented.
  13. Pretty obvious really by DrXym · · Score: 3, Insightful
    People keep thinking that the PS3 has to recoup its money through games, and how can they possibly do that blah, blah, but look at the revenues open to Sony from this device:
    • Games (obviously)
    • Peripherals (like bluetooth TV remotes, headsets, controllers, keyboards / mice (?) etc.
    • Monthly subs from "premium" online services, whatever they happen to be
    • Online games, movies & music promote to buy, rent & (sell?)
    • Lots of licence fees if Blu-Ray wins the HD TV format war
    • Blu-Ray movies.
    • Increased sales of HD televisions.
    • Increase sales of LocationFree wireless room-to-room / internet streaming devices.

    How well it does these things remain to be seen, but Sony has far more ways of making money than either MS or Nintendo do with their systems. The other consoles have their online systems, but all their other revenues must come from games. Perhaps that is why the PS3 sometimes appears to be a "kitchen-sink" system to catch all those revenues.

    1. Re:Pretty obvious really by The_DoubleU · · Score: 1

      Every console sold by Nintendo is profit, they don't sell at a loss.
      So all the games they sell (online) are extra.
      Sony needs to sell a lot of movies/games before they are even on level because they are selling at a loss.

      --
      What power has law where only money rules.
    2. Re:Pretty obvious really by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Bingo. We got a glimpse of their future plans with Gran Turismo HD. They want to sell you every single element of the game, and the only way they can do that is if you are forced to suck off the tit of their online gaming service.

      Is online gaming the future? Of course. And online services are essential for future consoles. But if its any company that I do NOT trust when they say the service is "free", its Sony. They WILL recoup that cost in some way, most likely through scraping content and forcing you to pay extra microfees to download it. Beware, the future is paved with a road where each chunk of asphalt costs $1, and in the end you never own any of it.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:Pretty obvious really by HaMMeReD3 · · Score: 1

      I think your talking about microsoft, who are currently profitting from

      • Games
      • Peripherals
      • Xbox live gold
      • Online games (xbox live-arcade), music and other content
      • Hd-dvd movies, if they happen to win the format war
      • Increased sales of windows xp media center and vista media edition
      • Customer loyalty

      Regardless of hardware & companies, it's 99% about the games, and if the games are not good, the system will not be either. Sony recently let me down with the PSP, which on paper looks much more attractive then a DS. That sure doesnt explain why I never see psp's around anymore but I see several people chilling on their ds's.

      Microsoft has proved that they can push out a competent console at a fraction of the cost, and as my friend once said, you can't appreciate the 360 until you own one.

      Now if the Ps3 can actually run linux openly out of the box, I'll most likely buy one, just for the knowledge of the communities that will follow it.

    4. Re:Pretty obvious really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget PSP sales for Sony and DS sales for Nintendo - both their new consoles are supposed to tie into the handhelds (somehow). MS may do something similar with the Zune too.
      You also forgot straight-on advertising. Xbox Live has sponsored weekends sometimes with what are basically banner ads.

      And I also must note the Nintendo sells its systems for a profit, so it has no loss to recoup in the first place - hopefully this will make them a bit less mercenary in their attitude than "buy-our-format" Sony or "p(l)ay online" MS.

    5. Re:Pretty obvious really by DrXym · · Score: 1
      The PS3 to PSP ties look pretty lamentable with one exception. The thing that interests me greatly is that the PSP is a LocationFree player. If the PS3 can stream movies as has been suggested, then you could stream content from your PS3 to your PSP anywhere in the house. And anywhere in the world assuming there is Wi-Fi nearby. That would be a pretty cool feature.

      Otherwise I don't know how much cross over exists for Sony or Nintendo respectively. You might perhaps be able to copy file saves, or have some kind of photo / music sync function but nothing that would be that interesting.

      On the subject of whether consoles make money, I think it's safe to say that all consoles make money. It may be they sell at a loss at launch, but after that it's pure gravy. Even the PS3 probably doesn't cost to make as much as anyone thinks. The "premium" version costing $100 more contains maybe $30 of additional components.

  14. Zonk's philosophy by Pluvius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When Nintendo is secretive about its product: "It makes perfect sense for Nintendo not to give everything about the Wii away all at once. Secrecy keeps the rumor mill churning, thus making sure that the Wii doesn't lose its presence in the news media. And every time Nintendo releases new information, it causes a feeding frenzy among the fans. Secrecy also keeps Nintendo's competitors guessing and sometimes catches them off-guard."

    When Sony is secretive about its product: "Christ, what the hell is taking them so long to give us information about the PS3? Obviously the only reason they aren't talking is because they have no clue what they're doing."

    I'd like to remind Zonk and the other anti-Sony fanboys that most of the important details for the Wii's Virtual Console were only revealed a month ago.

    Rob

    1. Re:Zonk's philosophy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'd like to remind Zonk and the other anti-Sony fanboys that most of the important details for the Wii's Virtual Console were only revealed a month ago."

      Zonk is just earning his share of the massive amount of money Microsoft is throwing around the Net trying to salvage the Xbox 360 mess...

      Almost every major site that deals with console gaming has:

      1) Publicly admitted Microsoft employees posting FUD while trying to give off a "we're all just a bunch of swell gaming guys like everyone else"

      2) Anonymous Microsoft posters dishing out a continual stream of FUD

      3) Site owners or editors receiving huge amounts of marketing money from Microsoft

      None of it appears to be one bit effective looking at 360 sales - which are worse than the first Xbox.

    2. Re:Zonk's philosophy by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to defend Zonk's posting, but I do think there is a difference between how Nintendo's treated the Virtual Console and Sony's treated their Online System.

      Back at E3 in 2005 Nintendo announced that the Virtual Console would give you the opportunity to download and play games from the NES, SNES and N64 (later adding the Sega Master System, Sega Genesis, and Turbographix 16); in one sentence the core idea of the virtual console was described. Certainly, there are dozens of questions people wanted answers to (how much it would cost, which developers would provide games, what games would be available, etc.) but, to a certain extent, those could wait and you still had a basic understanding of what you're getting into.

      My memory could be wrong, but IIRC Sony basically said that their online service would be free, require developers to implement their own system, and it would rival XBox Live; which left many people with the question "Huh?". Without further details you can't even make reasonable assumptions on what is going on in Sony's world.

      I may be wrong, but that is how I see it

    3. Re:Zonk's philosophy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're forgetting 1 important factor - content of said news items. While Nintendo had been perhaps the most secretive of the 3 major players at first, when they started announcing details they delivered truly compelling ideas. Sony, on the other hand, is scecretive, and then they tell everyone the PS3 is going to be $600.

      I'm sorry, but is it really that big of a surprise that Nintendo gets praise for announcing an innovative controller, and Sony gets flamed for announcing a $600 console?

    4. Re:Zonk's philosophy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and then they tell everyone the PS3 is going to be $600.

      Really? I thought they told everyone it would be $499. Hm, curious...

    5. Re:Zonk's philosophy by Pluvius · · Score: 1

      Even ignoring the fact that the Wii's controller and the PS3's price are completely irrelevant to the issue at hand: Just because it's unsurprising that fanboys like to exaggerate Sony's flaws and minimize its advantages while doing the opposite for its competitors doesn't mean that it's right.

      Rob

    6. Re:Zonk's philosophy by aztektum · · Score: 1

      More specific details were revealed a month ago, but we've known for a long time you'll be able to download games going back to the NES era and they have at least talked about it. Sony hadn't said boo about their service. Unless they have been telling developers behind closed doors, how would you feel about supporting a console that "is suppose to have an online service." but you don't know what you can do to utilize it in your game?

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
  15. Also, what about entitlements? by jchenx · · Score: 1

    One thing the article doesn't go into is what Sony is planning to do in response to Xbox Live's gamerscore and achievements system. They mentioned a while ago something similar called "Entitlements", but it would have been nice to hear more. As neat as the Friends notification and system are on Xbox Live, it's really the gamerscore that I find really cool. My friends and co-workers are often competing/comparing scores and achievements, and it's gotten to be a bit competitive. I know it's not something everyone cares about, but enough people do.

    --
    -- jchenx
  16. RTFA by Scipher · · Score: 2, Informative
    Could everyone please read the article? The number of replies being posted is stupendous..so many.



    "Oh - and it's all free, too. The only place you'll be asked to fork over a penny is when you purchase something in the PlayStation Store."



    "So, once you add friends, what can you do with them? Obviously enough, you can check their status and see if they're online; you can see if you have any new messages from them, and send them messages. Sending emails through the system uses the same peculiar text messaging style keypad that users of the PSP will be familiar with, which seems a bit painful at first but rapidly becomes a much faster way of entering text than the on-screen keyboards used by other system"

    Please take of the fucking blinkers! slashdot?! you ate my balls with the xbox360 fellatio!

  17. PS3sstrategy sounds like a lot of "hopefully" by kinglink · · Score: 1

    These guys have seen the final system? Sure they have.

    Remember that this is the same company who releases patches for the PSP over and over, yet does it actually improve the PSP? not exactly. They are just tempting people away from home brew and hacks and keep getting broken.

    I'm all for a robust online experience, but from the sounds of it this is going to be the SAME online that Xbox has. Though with one difference. Xbox Live is a pay service which pays for the servers. the PS3, will not be paying for the servers which means the cost falls on the manufacturing price for the games, not the Xbox Live cost. I have a feeling that you'll see weaker online games where as the 360 has a huge push for "every game has online"... which has the best stategy? Don't know. don't care.

  18. "fully upgradeable operating system" by dlim · · Score: 1

    Does this mean we can't call it a "rootkit" anymore?

  19. Re:Zonked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    He has to editorialize everything.

    I agree, editors should not editorialize.

  20. it's free by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 2, Informative

    As others have stated, the Xbox Live does have a free service as well, and I saw nothing in the article describing free online multiplayer gaming (which is mostly what you pay for on Live).

    Playing online is free on Sony's PS3 network, just like it is on PS2. PS3 online gameing: free. Playing on Live costs money.

    You are correct that the Xbox 360 doesn't have an HDMI connector, but I believe it's $600 for a PS3 with one.

    $500 in US. $430 in Japan. All PS3s have HDMI connectors, not just the expensive one (was announced a month ago).

    The article doesn't say the hard drive is upgradeable. Are you making it up? I remember not putting my PS2 online because I had to pay $50 for a special 10/100 network adapter that fit the PS3, when a generic one cost $10. I'm not convinced there will be an easy way to upgrade the hard drive without buying proprietary hardware. This is Sony after all. (BetaMax, MiniDisc, MemoryStick, BluRay) etc. And are you sure opening the box won't void your warranty?

    Over half the games on PS2 that played online would support a cheap 10/100 network adapater, in addition to Sony's which was $50 (but fell to $35 very quickly and is included in the Slim PS2).

    The hard drive is upgradeable on the PS3 (do a search). You don't have to open the box either, it goes in the end. Sony never said it was upgradable with just any hard drive though, it's quite possible you have to buy Sony's HD (like on PS2) to upgrade it.

    The higher-end PS3 has CF and SD memory slots next to the memory stick one. My Sony digital camera has a CF slot! And don't use BluRay as an example of Sony going it alone, HD-DVD has only one company backing it (Toshiba), BluRay has the entire rest of the industry. On the other hand, UMD (as used in PSP) is a great example of Sony going it alone, to their detriment. Dumbos.

    Are you claiming that the PS3's peripherals will be dirt cheap? (See comment above about $50 PS2 network adapter.)
    PS3 uses a standard HDMI cable. It uses a standard power cable. It uses standard USB cables. The only proprietary cable it uses is the analog video out, and that's the same connector they have used since PS1, so many cheap 3rd party versions are available.

    Additional wireless, rechargeable SIXAXIS PS3 controller: $43 (only priced in Japan so far). Charges with a standard USB A->mini B cable.
    Additional wireless, rechargeable 360 controller: $62 ($50 controller + $12 rechargeable battery pack, and you still don't get a charging cable).

    So, at least so far, the cost of peripherals for the PS3 looks pretty reasonable.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:it's free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The hard drive is upgradeable on the PS3 (do a search). You don't have to open the box either, it goes in the end.


      Since no one will actually do the search, I did one. And it won't be a Sony-branded upgrade you need to buy, it can be any ATA drive that fits the physical spec. There's this article which quotes Phil Harrison:

      "You can upgrade to whatever size of drive you like. You can put in any drive that you like - it is a computer, after all." (referenced interview here.

      The article above also claims: "The only non-upgradeable feature of the 20GB configuration will be the HDMI output." However, the article was dated 5/16/2006 and last month at TGS it was announced that the $500 PS3 will include HDMI.

      Regarding GP's "Are you claiming that the PS3's peripherals will be dirt cheap?" Which parent addressed succinctly, I should amend that the article addresses this also:

      "you can always plug in any standard USB keyboard, which will work with any text entry field anywhere on the system, as well as with the web browser."

    2. Re:it's free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Playing online is free on Sony's PS3 network, just like it is on PS2. PS3 online gameing: free. Playing on Live costs money.


      "the only things you'll pay money for are paid-for downloadable content, or subscriptions to premium services like massively multiplayer games."

      So at least some games aren't going to be free on PS3.

      $500 in US. $430 in Japan. All PS3s have HDMI connectors, not just the expensive one (was announced a month ago).


      Looks like 360 is getting HDMI, you can Pre-Order it now.
    3. Re:it's free by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      So, at least so far, the cost of peripherals for the PS3 looks pretty reasonable.

      Thank you. Your post was reasonable and informative, I daresay one of the only ones in this whole thread.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  21. PSP emulation? by Kuukai · · Score: 1
    it'll also be possible to buy PSone and PS2 classics you missed out on, as well as a selection of PSP games, from the PlayStation Store, and download them directly to your PS3.
    Does that imply that the PS3 will have PSP emulation? That's would be very interesting, since there are a couple of PSP games I want to play, but I don't want to buy one, and none of them are really "handheld" material, they would all be better on a console in my opinion. Or is this a PS3-based PSP game store? (I didn't know you could legally download games onto the thing)
    --
    Sendou Wave Kick!!
    1. Re:PSP emulation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Japan, you can already download game demos onto the PSP via WiFi hotspots in retail stores. Sony is probably going to release a firmware update so that you can download full games from the PS3 via USB or WiFi. That's more likely than a PSP emulator, which is probably technically feasible but not terribly useful--unless Sony starts selling an external UMD reader to attach to a PS3, similar to the GameBoy attachment for GameCube. I'm not saying it'll never happen, but it's unlikely that Sony had R&D personnel to spare on a niche project like that in the past year.

  22. Mod parent :) by stunt_penguin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is an excellent point.

    It's not only an excellent point, it's the point. I can't see Sony getting their online service right for another year- they need a unifying framework that all of their game developers can use to provide one login, one matchmaking service and one game update platform.

    Microsoft had it 80% sussed with the Xbox (there was no tangible dashboard, but the basic core was there) and are doing extremely well with the 360's service; sony have, it seems, only reached the 30% mark :|

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  23. Actually, not by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's a pretty reasonable comment - and a sentiment that many PS3 developers share, which you'll have seen evidence of, if you've been following the PS3 news in the past couple of months.

    What are you talking about? I follow game news pretty rigorously (for all systems, including the PS3) and there's not that much of a hint developers are all that in the dark regading online play. Some have said they are a little unclear about the sales of extra material online, but the core seems pretty fixed in place with games like Fall of Man already knowing they will support fourty simultaneous players online.

    The actual part of online play we'd most care about - playing online with other people - seems to have been in place for some time.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  24. Ps3-Downloadable playstation and ps2 games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just as sony got sued by the immersion corporation for coppying their idea of a rumble controller , there is also a decent chance that Nintendo will bring up a suit against Sony for copyright infringement. What i'm thinking is that Nintendo will accuse Sony of copying their idea for the Wii's virtual console.

  25. Same thing by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Two links - covering the same story, which if you actually read carefully only mentions "Online Components". Somehow other developers seem to have been able to do online play just fine, includign Warhawks and Fall of Man.

    Just because one developer does not have all the online libraries does not mean others do not as well or Sony has not planned out what they are going to have. You are basically zonking yourself here with a misconception based on piss-poor reporting - like reading game news from Ars Technica!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Warhawk hasn't really been talked about since the demonstrator at E3 made a fool of himself using the Sixaxis's motion sensor and Fall of Man is the subtitle to Resistance(:Fall of Man)

    2. Re:Same thing by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      Others, too - this one was fairly widely reported, I thought.

    3. Re:Same thing by animejoe · · Score: 1

      Actually, they're not the same thing. The reason I posted the second link was because it also mentioned difficulties with Virtua Tennis 3. I was in a hurry to provide some links to refute your notion that everything is going smoothly in Sony's online endeavor, but I came up short. Unfortunately, I don't have a lot of time on my hands to dig up articles I read a couple of weeks ago.

      You're right though, just because one or two developers aren't in the loop doesn't necessarily mean Sony doesn't have their s*** together. The thing is it doesn't really build confidence in the platform if the console is a month from launch and there are still developers out there who have yet to receive support from Sony regarding implementation of online functionality. It remains to be seen just how consistent this service of theirs is going to be with some developers relying on xFire, some using Gamespy, and others using alternate methods to provide online features. If they want to compete with Microsoft they need to provide a user-friendly, reliable, unified online service. It remains to be seen if they're capable of such a thing. They haven't exactly been forthcoming with information.

    4. Re:Same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just Tony Hawk, the Oblivion guys have said the same thing- Sony hasn't shared most of their online strategy (assuming they actually have one) with third parties. Since Resistance is essentially a second-party title funded completely by Sony, it is no surprise they may be getting Online stuff early. Knowing the Insoniac guys, they probably just wrote their own networking code since that's basically what you had to do on the PS2. While their claims of 40 players online is somewhat impressive we have yet to hear how well it works with voice chatting and 40 players. The only talk about online multiplayer about Resistance noted that the maps were very tiny for such a large number of players. One has to wonder whether the number 40 was forced on the developers by Sony for marketing reasons so they could brag it allowed more players than Perfect Dark. And tell me, if Sony actually had something remotely equivalent to Live, would XFire or Gamespy be needed for any PS3 games? I do talk to console developers (I work on a PC game that is going to be ported) and Sony is really scrambling to copy Live, but they still don't seem the get what are the good parts of Live.
      BTW, anybody else think giving Sony your credit card sucks? I much prefer the points system for Live since I can go to Best Buy and buy a card with points (or give and receive them as gifts), and fill up my Live account. Microsoft never has to have any personal info. Do you really trust Sony with your vital info? These guys can't even make batteries that don't explode (nor admit it- where's the Vaio recall?), and you think they won't sell your info? Heck, do you think Sony's software will keep out some hacker in the Ukraine from getting your credit card number?

  26. Shortsighted vs realistic by MMaestro · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I don't think that the article was shortsighted, but it was realistic. Just go down the usual list:

    1. Is cheap, reliable, FAST broadband available to the (gaming) masses? No. Its not unheard of to still meet people who surf the net or play online with dial-up.

    2. Has anyone ever successfully streamed a DVD quality, full length video over the internet yet without hiccups? Not near the commerical level so that rules out Sony's dream of selling movies directly to customers.

    3. Remember when Microsoft initially announced that Xbox Live was going to be broadband only? That didn't sit very well with many people did it?

  27. Lots of assumptions there by MMaestro · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Games (obviously)
    With few exceptions, Sony's lineup has nothing on Nintendo's all-star launch and Microsoft "our system is already out so show up or shut up."

    Peripherals (like bluetooth TV remotes, headsets, controllers, keyboards / mice (?) etc.
    Which are directly tied into the system's success. Peripherals don't sell systems, systems sell peripherals.

    Monthly subs from "premium" online services, whatever they happen to be
    They just promised not to have monthly subs. And "premium" services are likely to be one-time purchases, not exactly a cash cow system.

    Online games, movies & music promote to buy, rent & (sell?)
    Unless Sony has some kind of PS3 Online Arcade system in the works, I'm not seeing this happen anytime soon.

    Lots of licence fees if Blu-Ray wins the HD TV format war
    General concensus is: Don't hold your breath.

    Blu-Ray movies.
    Thats assuming Blu-Ray takes off in the first place.

    Increased sales of HD televisions.
    Sony is not a major seller of HD-TVs these days. They don't own the patents either. Sharp is destroying Sony (and the rest of the market) in marketshare as well.

    Increase sales of LocationFree wireless room-to-room / internet streaming devices.
    The only people who would probably benefit from this would be companies like Netgear. People don't exactly think Sony when they buy a wireless router.

    1. Re:Lots of assumptions there by DrXym · · Score: 1
      With few exceptions, Sony's lineup has nothing on Nintendo's all-star launch and Microsoft "our system is already out so show up or shut up."

      What sort of lame comment is that? Sony will be gathering revenues through the entire life of the console, not just at the beginning. Wikipedia already lists 100 or so titles in the works, and there are 20 or so at launch.

      Which are directly tied into the system's success. Peripherals don't sell systems, systems sell peripherals.

      And? They're still revenue. Sony will make a tidy sum from people buying bluetooth remote controls, headsets and the like. MS and Nintendo also see peripherals as a source of easy money. Just look at the inflated price that Wii remotes sell for.

      They just promised not to have monthly subs. And "premium" services are likely to be one-time purchases, not exactly a cash cow system.

      No, they promised not to have monthly subs for various basic services. Doesn't mean they won't charge a sub for other things they deem to be premium. Such features might include some kinds of downloadable content, MMOs, music / radio / video streaming, XBox Live style games, VOIP, tournaments etc. Basically anything you could conceivably charge people to do on their computer on a monthly, top-up or once off basis.

      Unless Sony has some kind of PS3 Online Arcade system in the works, I'm not seeing this happen anytime soon.

      Sony have plans to rent and sell movies, music and games through their service. It's a perfectly natural and obvious way to make money from a system with a hard drive and the ability to download and play content. I have no idea what form that might take, but its absolutely certain it will appear sooner or later. Sony intend to reveal more info in the next week but its already known that Flow will be a downloadable game so clearly some infrastructure will exist at startup.

      General concensus is: Don't hold your breath.

      Blu-Ray stands a far better chance than HD-DVD and will continue to do so while Microsoft dither about supporting the format or not. Some ugly, external HD-DVD strap-on is not going to sell the format. Microsoft have to put the HD-DVD in the 360 and support HDMI if they want to compete against Blu-Ray. I expect they'll do so sometime next year. In the meantime, Sony will be selling millions of PS3s and have the jump on the format. Even if MS do support the format, their games will still be stuck on DVD and suffer by comparison.

      Thats assuming Blu-Ray takes off in the first place.

      Which they will if there are millions of PS3 owners. The number of HD-DVD & Blu-Ray owners is currently neglible. The launch of PS3 will flood the market with Blu-Ray players. Unless MS seriously takes up the fight, HD-DVD is screwed. If MS sits on the fence too long, the battle will already be over.

      Sony is not a major seller of HD-TVs these days. They don't own the patents either. Sharp is destroying Sony (and the rest of the market) in marketshare as well.

      Hogwash. A visit to any Sony Center reveals numerous HDTV models. Whether Sony are a major seller or not (I have no idea) is irrelevant. The clear fact is that they will sell more HDTVs because of the PS3. It may well be that other manufactures share in this too, but it is still revenue to Sony. Ironically they'd even coin it in from the XBox 360 too.

      The only people who would probably benefit from this would be companies like Netgear. People don't exactly think Sony when they buy a wireless router.

      LocationFree isn't a wireless router. Is is a room-to-room and over-internet television transmission system. The PS3 will be able to beam content such as movies to LocationFree enabled receivers, computers, TVs and the PSP in the house or over the web. It is similar to Apple's iTV but already exists.

    2. Re:Lots of assumptions there by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      Wikipedia already lists 100 or so titles in the works, and there are 20 or so at launch.

      "In the works". I'm not buying a system just to wait a year or two to play a game that might end up being cancelled.

      And? They're still revenue. Sony will make a tidy sum from people buying bluetooth remote controls, headsets and the like.

      Peripherals are pocket change when you consider the costs involved, the competition from 3rd manufacturers and the fact that THEY DON'T SELL if the system itself doesn't sell.

      Doesn't mean they won't charge a sub for other things they deem to be premium. Such features might include some kinds of downloadable content, MMOs, music / radio / video streaming, XBox Live style games, VOIP, tournaments etc.

      MMOs, downloadable content, tournaments and "Xbox Live style games" are developer decisions. Sony doesn't make anything on that. Music, radio and video are unproven due to current broadband limitations. VOIP will be free since they're using Xfire.

      I have no idea what form that might take, but its absolutely certain it will appear sooner or later.

      Hey, you know what that reminds me of? The PS2's network adaptor. It only took them 2 years to attach a network card, 56k modem and a hard drive together, but they did it!

      Blu-Ray stands a far better chance than HD-DVD and will continue to do so while Microsoft dither about supporting the format or not. [...] their games will still be stuck on DVD and suffer by comparison.

      Hey, MS bashing AND "more space != better games" in the same paragraph! Good job there troll, now go show me a game that takes up more than 9.4 GB (a dual layered DVD) compressed.

      The launch of PS3 will flood the market with Blu-Ray players.

      Half a million units is not flooding the market.

      A visit to any Sony Center reveals numerous HDTV models.

      Yes, because we all know Sony Centers are an excellent source of the market's future adoption rate of HDTVs.

      LocationFree isn't a wireless router. Is is a room-to-room and over-internet television transmission system.

      Ok, so its a box set to recieve, forward and transmit information. How is that different from a router?

    3. Re:Lots of assumptions there by Scipher · · Score: 1
      "In the works". I'm not buying a system just to wait a year or two to play a game that might end up being cancelled.

      Just like all those people who bought an Xbob 360 last year right?


      MMOs, downloadable content, tournaments and "Xbox Live style games" are developer decisions. Sony doesn't make anything on that. Music, radio and video are unproven due to current broadband limitations. VOIP will be free since they're using Xfire.

      You are way off base. Did you even read the articles around? Xfire is the developer's choice, but community support will be standard (friends lists, chat, in game messaging). Yes your id appears in Xfire as well as in the regular PNP suite.

      Hey, MS bashing AND "more space != better games" in the same paragraph! Good job there troll, now go show me a game that takes up more than 9.4 GB (a dual layered DVD) compressed.

      What about the future? By your logic games will never need to be more than 9.4GB..sounds familiar, where have I heard that before? Quit defending MS's lack of will - they failed gamers by omitting next-gen storage.

      Half a million units is not flooding the market.

      Maybe so, but 10 million certainly is. US != Worldwide market.

      Yes, because we all know Sony Centers are an excellent source of the market's future adoption rate of HDTVs.

      No they certainly are not, but fucking come off it! Your staunch stand against all the prior posts is now becoming silly - are people going to stop buying HDTVs?

      Ok, so its a box set to recieve, forward and transmit information. How is that different from a router?

      By that logic your mobile phone is a router. But it's not is it? Fucking ridiculous.

    4. Re:Lots of assumptions there by DrXym · · Score: 1
      "In the works". I'm not buying a system just to wait a year or two to play a game that might end up being cancelled.

      Then you're not buying any console of any kind. Whether its 20, 100 or more likely 1000s of games over its lifetime, the Sony will make revenues from all of them. Which was the original point that you twisted out of all recognition..

      Peripherals are pocket change when you consider the costs involved, the competition from 3rd manufacturers and the fact that THEY DON'T SELL if the system itself doesn't sell.

      The costs involved? A wii-mote plus nunchuk costs $60. You'd have to ask Nintendo what it costs to make but I bet $15 isn't too far from the mark. I'm pretty certain that Sony will be flogging HDMI cables for $30 that cost them $5 to make, SD/MMC/CF reader kits for $60 when they cost $10 etc. Every console maker does it. EB Games is even selling the Wii in 3 different bundles at launch with various accessories, knowing full well that buyers will bite. Even the 2 models of XBox 360 & PS3 are basically bundles with the $100 difference being an easy way for MS & Sony to make extra cash from a few trinkets that cost them far less than the price differential.

      Even 3rd party accessories can make them money through patent licences, copyrights on controller layouts, proprietary formats & protocols and so on.

      MMOs, downloadable content, tournaments and "Xbox Live style games" are developer decisions. Sony doesn't make anything on that. Music, radio and video are unproven due to current broadband limitations. VOIP will be free since they're using Xfire.

      Sony is responsible for the portal so it is intimately their decision what form it takes, what things you pay for, what things you get in any bundled subscription model. Even if an MMO is created by somebody else, if the billing is via your PS3 account then Sony absolutely takes a cut from it. In other words they make money. Your music / radio / video comments are absurd - AOL has been pushing radio for years, iTunes & Amazon.com demonstrates that music and video downloads are feasible and practical, Napster demonstrates you could even offer some kind of monthly sub for music. There is nothing infeasible about any of them. As for VOIP, I was referring to Skype style services. A PS3 is a computer and capable of offering virtually any service that you get through your PC. The difference is that Sony provides the pipe that most of it must happen through and therefore they make money. Which was the point being made, and subsequently twisted again by you.

      Hey, you know what that reminds me of? The PS2's network adaptor. It only took them 2 years to attach a network card, 56k modem and a hard drive together, but they did it!

      So an internet enabled PS3 with integrated web browser, chat, friends, LAN (+ optional wifi), games & demo downloads and ultimately video & music downloads reminds you of a PS2 network adaptor? A second ago you're snorting about the basic services being free and now you're trying to dismiss the whole thing out of hand.

      Hey, MS bashing AND "more space != better games" in the same paragraph! Good job there troll, now go show me a game that takes up more than 9.4 GB (a dual layered DVD) compressed.

      Grow up moron. Some PS2 / XBox titles such as Final Fantasy, GTA, Metal Gear Solid etc. were already busting at the seams. Even doubling the capacity will not help that much when graphics, polys and textures need at least 4x the capacity, FMV at 10x capacity, 5:1 & stereo sound channels, multi-region versions of the same content. Sony claim 85% of their launch titles already need Blu-Ray capacity. The developers of Resistance: Fall of Man claim they use over 20Gb for the content. I have no idea what you mean by "compressed" or not - perhaps the content could be "compressed" by reducing the textures, or reducing the poly count, or cutting the sound channels, or cutting the locales, or degrading performance with on-th

  28. MS, update the HD for gods sake by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Why oh why will MS not have an optional Extreme pack for a 80gig HD is a mystery, or at least
    allow 3rd parties the permission to do it if some dick at MS thinks theres not a big enough market for it.

    Is it really that much to ask for MS to allow any HD to be plugged in, just replace and 'reinstall' from
    a dvd.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  29. Its either full or none, which is it by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    The SPEs are like real processors, ie the full instructions that you usually get with motorola, 40 branches, 40 moves, complex adds/subs/mults, what more do you want?
    printf in assembly?

    Either you can 'send code' to the SPE and run it, or the linux OS wont allow you to do it, but will allow you to use built in
    libraries that use the SPE to do common functions/opperations, kind of like having 200 macros/apis with enough flexibility
    that you wont be needing to make your own SPE code.

    So go read the SPE assembly docs, its quite powerfull and flexible that it could easily run any code, recompile c/c++ code easily
    at a nice speed. Its not a $3 dsp at 3ghz.

    So sony could tell us but they wont, marketing dept rules and tells the engineers to shush up.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  30. Just to clarify your SPE put down. by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    http://cell.scei.co.jp/e_download.html

    The instruction set doc is at http://cell.scei.co.jp/pdf/SPU_ISA_v11.pdf

    If you know what instructions from 68k to intel to ppc are, then reading should show you its more than a simple FPU, its
    has full power of a normal processor (sans fancy pipelines etc..) but its still powerfull dude. If your not
    a programmer, then its beyond your comprehension.

    Oh and a linux emu on that site too btw, inc gcc.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:Just to clarify your SPE put down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SPE is not a general purpose processor. It's a SIMD vector processor.
      Look at this link:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_(microprocessor) #Synergistic_Processing_Elements_.28SPE.29
      The altivec is better designed than an SPE.
      In Scientific Computing having high floating point precision is important. The Cell SPE doesn't provide this in the PS3.
      If Cell is so good then why did Apple and Steve Jobs bypass it?
      As Katagurai said Sony isn't as strong in hardware as evidenced by those flaming batteries. Sony is having trouble manufacturing the processor and doesn't compete with Samsung or Intel in Chip manufacturing.

      The Cell architecture and those SPE's are a piece of junk. The Sparc T2 has 8 true multi threaded integer processors and 8 FPU units compared with the Cell's 1 main core and 7 SPE's with broken double precision execution. Those SPE's drop by an order of a magnitude in double precision floating point calculation as in the PS3. A PS3 SPE is only good for single precision. An SPE is just a fancy vector unit and this is not designed for non math operations where a normal CPU would excel. An SPE would be really bad at text processing or non numeric computations such as language processing. Sony has emphasized a single core multiple vector CPU whereas other newer CPU's such as the Core Quadro have 4 true CPUs and 4 vector units with ultimately 8 or 16 processor cores and a floating unit each. The Cell is a very imbalanced architecture from a scalability standpoint. Cell was a dinosaur when it was designed and Sony is trying to pawn this turd as a gem.

  31. RTFA, it's single sign-on. by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

    This is an excellent point. PS3 developers/publishers are either rolling their own or using services like XFire or Gamespy to get their games online. That could (based on the history of the PS2) mean multiple logins to access multiple games.

    RTFA, it's single sign-on. It's in the page one.

    1. Re:RTFA, it's single sign-on. by CheeseyDJ · · Score: 1

      RTFA, it's single sign-on. It's in the page one.

      You're missing the point. The ID for Sony's service does not allow you to play online games.

      To enable online play, a different service, in addition to Sony's service, is needed (e.g. Gamespy, XFire etc.). Access to such a service will naturally involve another ID. Not your Sony ID.

      And unless all games companies agree on using a single solution to this problem (I'd estimate the chances of that happening as zero), you're going to end up with several different IDs - one for each service.

      This is a complete mess compared to Xbox Live.

    2. Re:RTFA, it's single sign-on. by CheeseyDJ · · Score: 1

      Looks like I might be talking shit. From the article, page 2 paragraph 2:

      ...all of the online services, from sign-up right through to voice and video chat, are free, as is normal multiplayer gaming

  32. the point of points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here and there I see a passive aggressive, snarky comment on Live's Points system. I actually like the idea very much from a product management point of view. Without a points system, you have to figure out how to much with a zillion different currencies for a zillion different products. How much does that game demo cost in Yen, Yuan, Euros, and dollars? Not only does the backend have to know your language and locale, and your preferred currency. Yuck. I'd hate to be managing that mess.

    Points is much simpler. You only have to sell one product in N different currencies. Everything else is the same.

  33. Some big assumptions yourself by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    Thou dost protest too much.

    Games (obviously)

    With few exceptions, Sony's lineup has nothing on Nintendo's all-star launch and Microsoft "our system is already out so show up or shut up."

    Are you joking? Besides the absolutely enormous back library of PS1 and PS2 titles, I don't see any shortage of big games for this launch. Hell, it looks a lot better than the PS2's initial launch lineup.

    Peripherals (like bluetooth TV remotes, headsets, controllers, keyboards / mice (?) etc.

    Which are directly tied into the system's success. Peripherals don't sell systems, systems sell peripherals.

    Yes, however we know for a fact that the system will do well at launch. That is practically a given. So chicken-and-egg is not really an issue with Sony. Wouldn't stop them at any rate. Or 3rd parties for that matter.

    Monthly subs from "premium" online services, whatever they happen to be They just promised not to have monthly subs. And "premium" services are likely to be one-time purchases, not exactly a cash cow system.

    Huh? Sounds alright to me! What, you are suddenly concerned with SCEA's bottom line?

    Online games, movies & music promote to buy, rent & (sell?) Unless Sony has some kind of PS3 Online Arcade system in the works, I'm not seeing this happen anytime soon.

    Well I'm not convinced that even the well-executed Xbox Arcade is raking in tons of cash. A fine point, but do you think things like Geometry Wars are really going to make or break a platform?

    Blu-Ray movies.
    Thats assuming Blu-Ray takes off in the first place.

    I do assume this. It is practically a foregone conclusion as far as I am concerned. Its not an ideal situation mind you, not one I'd prefer, but I can see the momentum behund Bluray and it is impressive. Apple, Sony, Disney, + 4 of 5 movie studios are on board with that thing. That's all you need to know.

    Increased sales of HD televisions.
    Sony is not a major seller of HD-TVs these days. They don't own the patents either. Sharp is destroying Sony (and the rest of the market) in marketshare as well.

    Dude, put down the kool aid and go look at the Bravias. They are a huge product, Sony sells tons of them. You are deluding yourself if you do not think this console (and the Xbox360) spur HDTV sales.

    Increase sales of LocationFree wireless room-to-room / internet streaming devices.
    The only people who would probably benefit from this would be companies like Netgear. People don't exactly think Sony when they buy a wireless router.

    I also recommend you look up exactly what LocationFree does; Netgear is not involved. It is not a 'wireless router' it is a 'wireless realtime streaming server'. I'm not convinced of this product's viability.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:Some big assumptions yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you joking? Besides the absolutely enormous back library of PS1 and PS2 titles, I don't see any shortage of big games for this launch. Hell, it looks a lot better than the PS2's initial launch lineup.

      Having a better launch line-up than the PS2 is nothing to brag about; the PS2 had one of the worst launch line-ups in history (SSX was the only game worth playing). Personally, I don't see a Single Big Game that is launching with the system; most of the Big Games I have seen announced with the PS3 are scheduled to be released in 2007 and many will probably be delayed.

      Yes, however we know for a fact that the system will do well at launch. That is practically a given. So chicken-and-egg is not really an issue with Sony. Wouldn't stop them at any rate. Or 3rd parties for that matter.

      How do you figure the PS3 will sell well at launch?

      Sony is only releasing 500,000 units for launch and, with how many problems they have had so far, will be lucky to get 1 Million out before the end of December; add to that the fact that the PS3 is beyond the price range of most gamers and it becomes very hard to predict how it will sell when the supply based shortages disapear. Between the supply shortages and the price I don't think that any (rational) person believes that Sony will be leading in any market at the end of 2007 and only a delusional person would believe that Sony will be the market leader at the end of 2007.

      Third parties have already started to divert resources from PS3 games to multiplatform games and exclusive games for another platform; the Wii has benefited the most from this, probably because third party support was weak initially. If the PS3 starts to sell poorly (as in it is the trailing console in every region around the world) expect many developers to port any exclusive game they can to another platform, and to focus their development efforts to another platform.

      I do assume this. It is practically a foregone conclusion as far as I am concerned. Its not an ideal situation mind you, not one I'd prefer, but I can see the momentum behund Bluray and it is impressive. Apple, Sony, Disney, + 4 of 5 movie studios are on board with that thing. That's all you need to know.

      The only people who actually matter are consumers, something both Blu-Ray and HD-DVD have had great difficulties attracting. What I am expecting from this is that Blu-Ray will get one victory by having far more players in people's homes by including a Blu-Ray player in the PS3 (being that all Blu-Ray/HD-DVD players are Slow and Crappy now I think its fair to say that the PS3's Blu-Ray player will be Slow and Crappy), and HD-DVD will sell more stand-alone players because of how inexpensive it is (I'm personally expecting $400 HD-DVD players in store at Christmas); the result will be that (practically) the same number of movies will be sold for either format because people who bought a PS3 will (likely) be more interested in playing games than watching movies.

      Dude, put down the kool aid and go look at the Bravias. They are a huge product, Sony sells tons of them. You are deluding yourself if you do not think this console (and the Xbox360) spur HDTV sales.

      I'm not so sure anything will spur the sales of HDTVs because (after a decade of pushing) HDTVs are still not in everyone's home; much of the growth in HDTV sales recently has been of people buying a second HDTV after their first one broke, or because their inputs are not compatible with the new movie formats. Personally, I'm not too convinced that gaming systems are going to be the killer app for HDTV either being that the one person I know who owns both an XBox 360 and a HDTV said (when I asked him how it looked on his HDTV) that his wife "wouldn't let him" use the XBox 360 in the living room. Any married man with children will tell you that videogame systems live in the den or the children's play room.

  34. Video, or MPAA video? by tepples · · Score: 1
    Has anyone ever successfully streamed a DVD quality, full length video over the internet yet without hiccups?

    Does your question also require that the movie have been published by a movie studio that is a member of the Music And Film Industry Associations? If not, then yes. Remember that entry-level cable modem service is up to 6 Mbps, and DVD is 10 Mbps, and some DVDs don't use the full bitrate because a dual layer disc costs more to replicate, and some video codecs are twice as efficient as DVD's MPEG-2.

    1. Re:Video, or MPAA video? by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      Remember that entry-level cable modem service is up to 6 Mbps, and DVD is 10 Mbps, and some DVDs don't use the full bitrate

      True, but thats assuming you recieve the MAXIMUM amount of potential speed which is realisticly impossible since there's always going to be network congestion/bottlenecks/hardware can't keep up/server gets overloaded/ISP will put a cap on speeds.

  35. Dial-up? by tepples · · Score: 1
    AFAIK, the Wii online services will be free - no annual registration

    But do they work with dial-up? In the United States, broadband can cost $25 per month more than dial-up, and I can imagine that a lot of families, especially those who choose a Wii over a PS3 on price, don't want to have to spend $300 (billed as $25 per month over a minimum commitment of 12 months) on an upgrade from dial-up to DSL just to buy one game. File sizes aren't an issue in this case, given that the largest NES game in North America was 768 KiB and the largest Super NES game was 6 MiB.

    1. Re:Dial-up? by AlexanderDitto · · Score: 1

      Strange how you only seem to target the Wii... but do XboxLive or the PS3's system work on Dial Up? I don't believe so. You can't pin this one on Nintendo alone.

      --
      No, Mr. Green. Communism is just a red herring.
    2. Re:Dial-up? by tepples · · Score: 1
      but do XboxLive or the PS3's system work on Dial Up? I don't believe so. You can't pin this one on Nintendo alone.

      Dial-up is correlated with lower disposable incomes, and so is Wii. The thinking is that families who have dial-up are more likely to buy a Wii at $250 than to buy a PS3 at $500 or an Xbox at $400; therefore, there is more demand for dial-up compatibility on Wii than on the more expensive systems.

    3. Re:Dial-up? by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt the average Joe family that buys the Wii over the PS3 on price, wouldn't even consider hooking it up to the internet anyway. To said average Joe family, the internet is that phone cable thingy (or fat phone cable thingy if they have broadband) that plugs into the PC and magically gives them the awesome power of AOL. I live in a fairly small (population wise) area of Canada where everyone and their dog has broadband, I can imagine if we're in that state here, it must be around the same adoption rate as similarily sized cities in USA. I'd also be so bold as to say that the adoption of broadband rate would be higher in the US cities simply because of the better infrastructure in the american towns. Without researching the national broadband to dial-up ratios, I'd put money on there being more than 50% broadband connections.

      With that said, why should any of the console manufactures shoot for the minority when the amount of broadband connections are increasing, the number of dial-up connections are decreasing, and in a few years time broadband making up more like 75% of the internet connections in North America? Furthermore, Don't you think that the majority of people lining up to preorder these new consoles are more likely to keep current in technology? (read: more likely to have a broadband internet connection)

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    4. Re:Dial-up? by NotWorkSafe · · Score: 1
      --
      There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of animals Chuck Norris allows to live.
    5. Re:Dial-up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, who the heck still has dial-up? Dsl in most areas is the same price if not cheaper than some dial-up services such as AOL. Besides, If someone DID only have the choice of using dial-up, they could always crossover from their computer; in the modem, out the ethernet card. I do the same thing with broadband for my ps2. I have wireless internet and the ps2 doesn't support it.

  36. Using ¥ and € signs to spell Nintendo by tepples · · Score: 1
    $i$te$do doesn't make much sense.
    A lot of people say Nint¥ or Nin¥endo or Nint£ndo or Nint€ndo. But the $ in M$ could just be a throwback to Microsoft's history as a provider of BASIC interpreters dating to its first product, as all string variable names in line-numbered BASIC end in the $ sigil.
  37. But can I use USB joysticks? by tepples · · Score: 1
    you can always plug in any standard USB keyboard

    But will first-person shooters for PS3 recognize a standard USB keyboard and a standard USB mouse as game controllers, or does Sony require that the keyboard and mouse controllers be ignored during game play? And can players connect and use any old USB HID joysticks as a wired game controller, or does it have to be a Sony brand joystick?

    1. Re:But can I use USB joysticks? by tbannist · · Score: 1

      It probably depends on whether the game designer allowed key bindings or not. I know Champions of Norrath 2 on the PS2 allowed you to hook up any usb keyboard and use the text chat while playing online, but I don't know if you could actually control your character from the keyboard.

      As for joysticks, I doubt any joystick would work, the signals have to be comprehensible to the PS3, but there are always 3rd party controllers available. I'm guessing that the old PS2 and PS1 controllers will work, but any tilt functionality obviously won't.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
  38. Import tariffs? by tepples · · Score: 1
    Sales tax is 16%, exchange rate puts our prices at 50% over the japanese price.

    I would imagine that in Europe, tax on goods produced by a foreign country and imported into the European Union tends to be higher than tax on goods produced in Europe and sold to a European end user.

    1. Re:Import tariffs? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Doesn't explain why this doesn't happen for PC games and hardware and why there's no fluctuation with the currency values (the Euro was worth about 0.8$ when that price was set IIRC, they never adjusted it). Also the import duties on videogame consoles have been abolished quite some time ago and were never higher than single digit percents AFAIK.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.