Slashdot Mirror


A Truly Open Linux Phone

skelator2821 writes to tell us about the debut of the OpenMoko, a Linux phone with GPS that is open from top to bottom. The device is set to debut to developers this month for $350, according to the article, but there is no detail on how to get your hands on one, and no link to the manufacturer (FIC). From the article: "This is the first phone in a long time to get us really interested in what it is, what it isn't, and the philosophy behind it. The philosophy is the thing that makes Linux great... it is really open. It runs the latest kernel, 2.6.18 as of a few weeks ago, and you can get software from a repository with apt-get."

164 comments

  1. Now only if it supported.. by joshier · · Score: 0

    Wifi.

    Oh, when will companies realize we want wifi!

    1. Re:Now only if it supported.. by dreamchaser · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you read the article it does say that wifi is planned for a future release of the hardware.

    2. Re:Now only if it supported.. by isometrick · · Score: 1

      RTFA. They're considering it for the next version, so they probably have realized it.

  2. No Camera... by Andy_R · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...no headphone socket, no memory card socket, not enough memory to be a great mp3 or video player.

    Great software can't fix harware problems, so no sale here.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:No Camera... by deanlandolt · · Score: 1

      "Do one thing and do it well" -- now where have I heard that before?

      I'm willing to bet there are more than a few ways to extend this to include all the little goodies you can imagine.

    2. Re:No Camera... by crindt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No Camera...no headphone socket, no memory card socket, not enough memory to be a great mp3 or video player.


      OK, no camera, but that's what my DSLR is for.

      Headphones: use bluetooth, perhaps?
      Memory slot: What's that MicroSD thingy?

      Sounds good to me...except maybe the touch screen---tactile controls are really hard to beat.
    3. Re:No Camera... by bunions · · Score: 1

      > no memory card socket

      what?

      Let's step back and look at what the phone itself is before we get into the software that runs on it. The hardware itself is a Samsung 2410 266MHz ARM9 with a 2.8-inch VGA touch screen. There are only two buttons on the phone, the rest is handled by the touch screen, a microSD slot, Bluetooth 2.0, and USB for connectivity and charging. It also has two 1W stereo speakers so you can repurpose it to an MP3 player or anything else you would like.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    4. Re:No Camera... by goaty_the_flying_sho · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds perfect :)

    5. Re:No Camera... by mitchskin · · Score: 1
      no headphone socket
      Well, it'll have bluetooth 2.0, and I believe bluez has A2DP support.
      no memory card socket
      According to the article, it'll have a microSD slot.
      not enough memory to be a great mp3 or video player
      With 128 MB of RAM, it's got plenty to play mp3s. Video probably depends on whether or not there's a DSP.
    6. Re:No Camera... by EveLibertine · · Score: 1

      Funny, maybe I'm old, but the only thing I was really worried about was whether or not it was a good phone.

      Headphone socket aside, I've already got all that other stuff. Why would I want to pay more for one piece of hardware that will probably do all of them poorly?

    7. Re:No Camera... by miscz · · Score: 1

      It was about software, not hardware.

    8. Re:No Camera... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      Doing one thing and doing it well is great you're talking about software, and you can have a million things on your computer. It's a bit less good when you need a pocket for each one.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:No Camera... by jbrader · · Score: 1

      I second your sig.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    10. Re:No Camera... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pretty much any 'phone made in the last five years is a good 'phone. There are some exceptions, but not many. Once you've got the 'good 'phone' part solved, the question is 'what can we do with all the spare CPU power we have on this machine?'

      An address book is obvious; you need to store 'phone numbers anyway, so it's not much of a stretch to store the rest of the contact information. Add in IrDA or Bluetooth so you can trivially send vCards to other people and it's a useful feature. If someone asks for a friend or colleague's contact details you can hand them a virtual business card.

      Since you need to sync the address book with a computer, you may as well sync calendar information as well. I have my 'phone with me more often than my computer and so being able to have calendar alarms on the 'phone instead of the computer is great.

      A camera? I wasn't convinced by this one until I got a camera-phone. I hadn't owned a camera for quite a while and didn't see the point in getting one. But then I found out that having a camera that took reasonable (2 megapixel - not fantastic, but not bad) quality pictures in my pocket all the time meant I actually used it.

      A media player would be useful for the times I don't want to carry my iPod, except that the included headphone have sharp corners which hurt my ears and Nokia insist on a proprietary headphone socket.

      I can't remember what other features my 'phone has, but if they don't take up any UI space (and they don't, since I have a set of shortcuts to the features I actually use) then they don't bother me. Mass production brings the price down.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:No Camera... by draxbear · · Score: 1

      According to the article it has a microSD slot.

      Its also got bluetooth which should slightly offset the lack of a headphone socket (except for playing MP3's which you seem to be interested in).

      While I'm not big on WiFi, it certainly would have made sense for this thing. A nice app to search for and alert if any open wireless is available, so you can kick off voip would definately underscore the power of an open platform.

      --
      --- I've completed diagnosis of your problem and can classify it as a YOYO...You're On Your Own
    12. Re:No Camera... by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      Would you pay 350$ to get a phone that can only call and receive calls, just because it runs linux?

      I would rather just get a cheap candy bar nokia.

    13. Re:No Camera... by FrostedChaos · · Score: 1

      The screen is far too small on a cell phone to play movies. Watching a full-length movie would be really painful. I might occassionally watch "guy gets hit by a pie on youtube" on my cell phone, but hardly more than that. And you don't need massive disk space to do that.

      Proper quality headphones are bigger than the entire size of the cell phone. Having a headphone jack is therefore somewhat irrelevant. If I wanted an iPod, I'd buy that, and throw it in the duffel bag with my regular size headphones. What's that, you say? You use crappy lo-fi "ear buds" that let everyone else hear what you're listening to? Well, the built-in speaker should be fine for you.

      As far as the camera feature goes... I already have a camera which is much, much better than any camera on a phone. I can see using the cell phone camera in emergency situations where you absolutely have to take a picture of something. But aside from that, it is pretty much useless.

      Also, there is a memory card socket FYI.

      --
      "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
    14. Re:No Camera... by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      I am curious just how bright the screen might be... I used a small lens to project my GP2X screen (3.5") onto the back of a bus seat with an approx 11" diagonal viewing area and it still had better contrast than I (an admitted non-videophile) need. I would love to try the same with this little gadget.

    15. Re:No Camera... by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      "only call and recieve calls"? wtf? what else do you want a phone to do, phone-wise? for everything else, you have the linux. play games, run office applications, watch movies, surf the web (assuming some sort of networking is available).

      the only other hardware you might see in a phone these days is a camera, and i can damn well do without that.

    16. Re:No Camera... by TheJorge · · Score: 1

      Me, too.

      -TheJorge

    17. Re:No Camera... by DRACO- · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth. Just sync up a ear danglers for headphone+mic. Sync up stereo headphones for mp3 playing, sync up any bluetooth camera.

      Id likely get one or two.

      Draco

      --
      Consider yourself blessed if you are sneezed on by a dragon and only get wet, it could have been a fireball.
    18. Re:No Camera... by bunions · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is hilarious. The original post contains three facts, one of which is simply wrong (there is a memory card socket) one of which is irrelevant (no headphone jack, but it supports bluetooth headsets, which are better) along with one assertion (not enough memory to be an mp3 or video player) which is either a conclusion based on the wrong fact or a ridiculous assertion that 128MB is too small to fit a player into.

      So basically, the post contains 75% misinformation, and the information it does contain is painfully obvious.

      And it's still +5 insightful.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    19. Re:No Camera... by rtyall · · Score: 1

      According to this the phone will accept MicroSD cards, also lets not forget it has bluetooth, so you could use a bluetooth stereo headset if you're so inclined. I'm tempted by the GPS myself.

    20. Re:No Camera... by bhima · · Score: 1

      So Andy... what is the SD slot for?

      How about this: no headphone socket and no camera.

      I have a iPod and DSLR this doesn't sound like a problem to me.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    21. Re:No Camera... by bcmm · · Score: 1

      How many good silent movies have been released lately?

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    22. Re:No Camera... by bcmm · · Score: 1

      What I meant was, you probably wouldn't want to have to either hold the phone to your head or force everyone else to listen to your movie.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    23. Re:No Camera... by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Pretty much any 'phone made in the last five years is a good 'phone.

      I'm not sure I agree with that. Ok, so the actual _phone_ bit may be ok, but the software needed to use it tends to be crap. For example, the bluetooth stack on my P900 is unstable as hell and not infrequently brings down the entire OS (or worse: it sometimes only becomes apparant that the stack has broken after you've picked up the call with your bluetooth headset). When the OS crashes you have to pull the battery out and powercycle the damn thing, then wait while it reboots and logs back into the GSM network. Infact, the whole OS tends to be pretty unstable and it's not uncommon for me to have to powercycle it even when not using bluetooth.

      Infact, I haven't seen a truely stable phone since my Nokia 5130. The phone I got after the 5130 was a 7110 and that was also unstable. My UTStarcom F1000G (802.11g SIP phone, about 6 months old) is also bugridden and frequently decides it can't see the network and needs a powercycle. Generally there seems to be no recognised way of reporting bugs and when you _do_ report a bug it's usually ignored by the manufacturer (for example, I reported several bugs to UTStarcom - some of them more than once. When their last firmware release was made it stated that there were "no known bugs" but they had completely failed to fix any of the bugs I had reported...).

      The problem seems to be that the life of the device is too short - it's rushed to market with unstable software to begin with, then they only sell it for a year or two and they won't release any software updates after they stop selling them so the software never stablises. The software running on the current generation of PDAs/Smartphones seems to be of lower quality then Windows 3.0 software.

      I'm hoping that a open phone will do 4 things:
      1. Make a platform standard so that older software can be used on newer phones. This means that software can undergo a long development cycle over several generations of phone instead of only working on one specific model which is only available for a short time.
      2. Produce higher quality software through open development. FOSS software is frequently higher quality than closed software, and if I find a bug then at least I can fix it instead of just having to live with the problem.
      3. Get us out of the Windows-style shareware scene. Coming from a Linux background where useful software is freely available, it's quite painful for me when I find that the phone is missing some little feature that _should_ be integral, and then finding that someone wants to charge me £35 to register their crappy little utility that works around the problem.
      4. Make the development environment more standard. The current generation of devices seem to need propriatory SDKs in order to develop any software. Frequently they are Windows only - no good to me at all. I just want to be able to install the libs and cross-compiler on my Linux workstation and be able to compile a project by typing "make". And being able to look at the code of the things I'm linking to is invaluable when the documentation (inevitably) proves to be useless.

      A camera? I wasn't convinced by this one until I got a camera-phone. I hadn't owned a camera for quite a while and didn't see the point in getting one.

      I've got a camera phone - the lens is crap at the best of times and it gets covered in fluff while it's in my pocket. The result is that it never gets used coz the photos are terrible. Yeah, ok, so I guess it might be useful if I have a car accident or something since I'd be able to take some (crappy) photos of the scene for the insurance company, but that's about it.

      A media player would be useful for the times I don't want to carry my iPod

      I find that when I use my phone as a media player the end result is simply that I have no battery left when I actually want to make a call. Suckage. That and the fact that there's nowhere near enough memory to store my whole music collection and I'm buggered if I'm going to sit there working out what I want to listen to before I leave home.

    24. Re:No Camera... by plover · · Score: 1
      Its also got bluetooth which should slightly offset the lack of a headphone socket (except for playing MP3's which you seem to be interested in).

      What do you mean, lack of headphones? a2dp over Bluetooth 2.0, baby. I bought a set of Motorola HT-820 headphones for $50. They can connect to an audio source AND work with a cell phone simultaneously (they send a 'pause' command to the music player, and/or mute the audio if it's not pausable,) play the ring tone, and you pick up by pressing the button on the side. When you hang up the call, the music resumes.

      The only complaint I have with them is they inject a slight digital delay into the audio path, which makes them poorly suited for watching television. (Oh, that and the stupid glowing blue lights. WTF is up with that?) Otherwise, they work really well. Battery life is pretty good, and Motorola now equips all their rechargeable consumer goods with a nice standard mini-USB jack-based charger.

      --
      John
    25. Re:No Camera... by sunny256 · · Score: 1
      With 128 MB of RAM, it's got plenty to play mp3s.

      And one of the great things about this phone is that it could even be tweaked to play Ogg Vorbis. Yessss, hopefully my search is finally over.

      This is what openness is about. Nevermind all the phones/gadgets/whatever which is called Linux devices just because they use the kernel. If I can't modify it to do the things I want, I could just as well buy yet another Nokia.

      Another phone that looks interesting is the ROAD PC phone, but at the moment it's only vaporware.

    26. Re:No Camera... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you need to sync the address book with a computer, you may as well sync calendar information as well. I have my 'phone with me more often than my computer and so being able to have calendar alarms on the 'phone instead of the computer is great.

      Any particular reason why you stick an apostrophe in front of "phone" but not one after "sync"?
      Not to nitpick, but hasn't "phone" become an accepted word on its own and is no longer really considered short for "telephone," while "sync" is still working its way through its adolescent phase as the child of "synchronize"? (eg, phoning = seems fine; syncing = looks odd)

      How do you feel about "fax"?

    27. Re:No Camera... by egghat · · Score: 1

      Even worse. According to their blog, it contains a headphone socket too.

      All those naysayers really p*** me off. After years of longing finally an nearly 100% opensource phone, with a proven build-system (openembedded) and backed by a development team which has some of the brightest hackers in the mobile linux world including Mr. GPL (Harald Welte, from gpl violations). And what do we get? A bunch of postings from naysayers, who didn't read the article, didn't do two seconds of their own research (like checking who is in this team) and distribute plain wrong facts.

      As soon as this thing is available, my Motorola A780 (which is Linux, but badly badly crippled) will be for sale on ebay.

      Bye egghat.

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    28. Re:No Camera... by Andy_R · · Score: 1

      Actually, I did read the article, and nowhere does it say there is a headphone socket, and nowhere in the pictures does it show one. I have never heard of "microSD", so I had no idea that was a memory slot... it's certainly not a slot I can put any of my existing memory sticks in.

      Blame the journalist for writing a bad article, not me for reading it. Yes my post was flawed, and it didn't deserve the +5 it was modded up to because I missed the memory slot, but my fundamental point, that this phone looks horribly under-specced to me, stands.

      I'm choosing my next free upgrade soon... I can get a 3.2 mexapixel cameraphone or an 4Gb mp3/video player phone, so I'm not going to hold out for a 128Mb no-camera phone.

      If I was a naysayer, I'd have probably pointed out that this phone was vapourware and that GPS is useless for in-car navigation without an up-to date open-source roadmap, which doesn't exist, and wouldn't fit in the memory even if it did.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  3. Zaurus vs. This by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    I own a Sharp Zaurus, and aged as it might be, it pretty much keeps pace - absent the GSM bit.

    Of course, I will buy.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Zaurus vs. This by lindseyp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean apart from the one piece of functionality which defines it as not being a phone?

      --
      j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
  4. No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I doubt very much that carriers will be friendly towards open,hack-by-anybody, phones. Most/all carriers require all kinds of certification & testing before they allow vendors to hook up a phone to their network. They also don't like time wasters trying to hook up low volume/low profit phones to their networks. The testing can cost a big bunch of dollars -- ballpark $250k. Now if Joe hacker wnats to spend that, and he can convince the carrier he's going to sell many thousands, he's welcome. Otherwise, at least some part of the phone firmware will be locked down and tamper proof to keep ceritication valid.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. It might be open software, but the wireless hardware has to remain closed due to FCC rules, just like the Intel Pro Wireless firmware on my laptop. I like the idea of open software at least.

    2. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by idiot900 · · Score: 1

      It's an unlocked GSM phone, so it should work with many carriers in many countries. What carriers exclude handsets by model number?

    3. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Most of them in the US...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    4. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by VP · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not the GSM vendors (Cingular and T-Mobil) - any unlocked phone with the appropriate SIM card will work on their networks.

    5. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by livewire98801 · · Score: 1

      I haven't found that to be the case. I've worked with Cingular and T-Mo (the two major GSM carriers) and they have given me no trouble with alien hardware. The problem is going to be marketing if the carriers aren't selling it for you. Most ppl won't buy one unless they can get it from their carrier.

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    6. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Ah... see I have no experience with either since they don't offer service in my area... My choices are locals or Verizon (with a very very small Sprint footprint not worth mentioning).

      It's nice to know other vendors aren't quite so barbaric...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    7. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Do you really think so? My carrier is Virgin Mobile, but that's purely a cost consideration on my part (I don't need more than ~100 minutes a month, which through all my possible carrier chocies where I live doesn't exist). I buy my phones outright (though they must be approved by my carrier as none are sim replacable and they don't sell sim cards).

      Otherwise the 2 local cell phone vendors (Blue wireless & CellOne) as well as Verizon (& Sprint if you feel like tracking down their one store in my area) all use phone lock-ins... With hefty costing plans per month (well compared to mine which costs me $20/quarter of a year) requiring multi-year contracts and limiting your options in changing phones... So people couldn't buy one if they wanted to...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    8. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by DanielNS84 · · Score: 1

      Cingular Prepaid (Go Phones) are most likely the way to go if they cover your area. They use sim cards and the phones and cards are swappable with eachother if you decide on a plan later on...if you buy one of those 20 dollar phones and take the sim out (or you might be able to get one at a cingular store) you could slide it into one of these phones.

    9. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by livewire98801 · · Score: 1

      Virgin Mobile resells Sprint service, which is a CDMA carrier. They have the option of refusing a phone based on ESN, as does Verizon (CDMA). Cellular One is a congomerate (sp?) that uses several different technologies so YMMV. I've never heard of Blue Wireless, so I would guess that they are either local providers in your area (like Unicel here) or a reseller like Virgin is. I switched from Verizon to Cingular mostly because they can't control what hardware I use (and Verizon's customer service tanked) as Cingular is a GSM carrier.

      --
      "He may be mad, but there's method in his madness. [...] It's what drives men mad, being methodical." G.K.Chesterton
    10. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by webgeek2point0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're absolutely right. I work for T-Mobile. As long as you have a handset that takes a SIM card, you can use any phone you like. We actually have a tech support department devoted to just helping people with unsupported devices. I help people all the time set up their GSM phones to use on our network (i.e. - internet and picture messaging). I believe Cingular is the same way...as is most of the rest of the world.

      --
      "End of Line." - MCP
    11. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      There are no local GSM carriers for me (which was my point). I'd love to have more chocies, but apparently 500,000 people is to small for them...

      Verizon, Cellular One, Blue Wireless, and Sprint have the only networks locally and all require more expensive plans I just don't need... Even prepaid phones are limited to a few providers due to what networks exist here and Virgin Mobile offered the best price vs Service area. Not that they even have service in all Sprint areas either...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    12. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Not offered since their is no cingular network locally (though I'm going to guess they do have towers on the interstates concneting to Cleveland/Buffalo and Pittsburgh, wouldn't want to interrupt service as they drive through after all). But 2 roads is hardly going to help with an area that's 80x30 miles (rough guess). And I'd have to get one outside my local area, making certain landlands (like the one my parents use) treat it as a long distance number (even with number portability I really doubt I could ahve it considered local). Not really worth the effort...

      Of resellers (ie companies that resell service through other companies networks) we have Virgin Mobile (some of the Sprint Network), AT&T Wireless (Probably Sprint), and Tracfone (Probably Sprint). Combined with only 4 networks covering the local area (2 local, 2 national) it's just a dismal area for cell service...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    13. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think they do have towers between cleveland and buffalo. I use t-mobile and I just drove that route a week ago and my battery was drained by the time I got to chicago (where there was signal). When there is signal my battery lasts a week, so draining a full charge in way under 10 hours with no talk time suggests that there was no coverage on most of the route - causing my phone to run in hi-power mode desperately searching for a signal that was not there.

    14. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by dwater · · Score: 1

      ...perhaps they're interested in other markets then??? "Other markets than the US???" shock. horror.

      --
      Max.
    15. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      epic fail

    16. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you have the chance to buy a contract without a phone in the USA? In Germany you can save 5-10/month if you don't buy their subsidized phones.

      Anyway, with carrier-provided phones becoming more and more crippled, you don't have a choice but simply buy the things from the producer. As more and more people will do so, they will become cheaper too, and the carriers might actually start *competing* with the phone vendors.

    17. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      Actually, there isn't really any problems with that, some wireless cards don't have open firmware because they're capable of producing interfering/illegal frequencies, the case is not the same for cell phones. Cellphones generally use separate modules which are controlled by AT modem style commands -- there's no risk of people tampering with them and broadcasting illegally.

    18. Re:No vendor lock-in? I don't think so by iabervon · · Score: 1

      That's why they're using a closed GSM module. It's like using a cell modem with your laptop, except that it's internal. The carrier doesn't care what you say to your cell modem, because the device is certified to behave appropriately regardless. And the GSM modules are high volume, because a wide variety of applications use them, and the modules don't get new versions all the time to add new UI bells and whistles.

      So you're right that part of the device is locked down and tamper-proof, but it's running on an entirely separate chipset (probably only connected by a serial port, actually).

  5. um, ok by Starteck81 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why the hell is every thing tagged as itsatrap today!?!?! Slashdotters need to take some paranoia meds.

    --
    "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
    1. Re:um, ok by The+Real+Toad+King · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, I want to smack all the people using the tag "itsnotatrap" when they know, if they read the tagging FAQ, that it should be "!itsatrap".

    2. Re:um, ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because MS astroturfers are tagging everything isatrap so that the next Microsoft story wont look so bad.

    3. Re:um, ok by snarkth · · Score: 1

      itscrap

        Oh great, another tag meme. ;-)

      snarkd

  6. Feeling like the codger I am by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

    Why not make a 100$ one that simply, lets me make phone calls, and not much else? I don't care if the are Wifi. Or Wii. Im 34, and I'm over that.

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    1. Re:Feeling like the codger I am by snarkth · · Score: 2, Informative

      I assume you are living in the US.

        Buy a tracfone. $29.xx at Walmart, 250 minutes for fifty bucks (or better if you want to spend more). Unless you need something that'll let you talk to your girlfriend for fourteen hours at a time, they are a pretty good deal. I recently carried mine on a trip across NW South Dakota and had a tower for just about the whole trip. No credit check, they pretty much just work, although adding minutes can be a pain sometimes, their tech support has been pretty good in my experience. Nice, too, if you want relative anonymity (ie, no name tied to the phone).

        Other cell co's/phone packages have pay-as-you-go plans; last time I was at Walleyed-world there were three or four phones like that on the displays for under $100 with various plans.

        Check to see what sort of service in your area is available first. Unless you are *way* the hell out there, at the very least a tracfone ought to work for you.

        Oh, and warning: These phones have other functions on them, too. Games, and shit. You don't have to use them, however ;-)

        Danged kids ;-) (I'm only forty and you are making me feel old ;-)

      snark!d

    2. Re:Feeling like the codger I am by burns210 · · Score: 1

      How about the Motofone? No linux, but exactly what you want. Cheap, reliable and has an e-ink display to boot.

    3. Re:Feeling like the codger I am by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

      I'm sold. Does the e-ink run when it gets wet?? I wouldn't want it to ruin my pants.

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
  7. Re:Is it just me or what? by realmolo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yup. Just like ethernet is becoming the new AT&T.

    Your analogy sucks. You are an idiot.

  8. care to visit the company website? by hjf · · Score: 0

    Did anyone read that at the top right of http://www.fic.com.tw/ it reads "FIC RECOMMENDS WINDOWS XP". Open source friendly?

    1. Re:care to visit the company website? by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      FIC got lots of free advertising from Microsoft for that blurb.

      Besides, you can recommend Windows XP and still be OSS friendly, despite what some idiots think. Some people actually need to use the best tool for the job.

  9. Open Phone by Shadyman · · Score: 1

    So if it's an open phone... Does it come "Locked"?

  10. New Linux Phones - Great! by avapex · · Score: 2, Informative

    OpenMoko does not yet return results on Google.

    Yahoo shows 2 results for OpenMoko.

    The $350 price tag is looking a lot better than the $600 tag attached to a similar Linux phone from D-Link.

    1. Re:New Linux Phones - Great! by stinkytoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      No results from the search box on FIC's website either. So much for karma whoring with a nice informative link, i guess.

    2. Re:New Linux Phones - Great! by snarkth · · Score: 1

      linuxdevices.com seems to have had a link at one time, but it's apparently gone now

        google cache: http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:6NxUy-LDPgcJ:w ww.linuxdevices.com/sponsors/SP8515396280.html+ope nmoko&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1&client=firefox-a

        8:20MT

        Odd there isn't more

      snark'd

    3. Re:New Linux Phones - Great! by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Great link. Make for interesting reading. Since the link is no longer available it makes me wonder if it is even real.

    4. Re:New Linux Phones - Great! by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://openmoko.com/

      Who would of thunk it??

      And, http://openmoko.com/files/OpenMoko_Amsterdam.pdf for the initial presentation of this device.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
  11. Re:It's a Trap! by stinkytoe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    huh?

  12. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    Please clarify, is this some agreed community GPL violation fee that Novell are paying?

  13. two points by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 4, Insightful
    1. From TFA: Everything barring a few small drivers is GPL'ed.
      This is a joke, right? The drivers are probably the most important part of any piece of hardware, so calling this thing "open" but keeping drivers proprietary is ridiculous.
    2. From the site: FIC recommends Windows(r) XP
      Yeah, and I am to buy a Linux product from you? Dream on...
    1. Re:two points by IvanCruz · · Score: 1
      From the site: FIC recommends Windows(r) XP
      Yeah, and I am to buy a Linux product from you? Dream on...

      HP recommends Win XP, DELL recommends Win XP and even IBM recommends Win XP, so, what is your point?
    2. Re:two points by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      HP recommends Win XP, DELL recommends Win XP and even IBM recommends Win XP, so, what is your point?
      What makes you think I own any hardware produced by any of them?

    3. Re:two points by cos(0) · · Score: 1

      I think the grandparent's point is that no matter whose hardware you own, the manufacturer will recommend Windows XP, regardless of how well they support Linux.

    4. Re:two points by scott_karana · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's the radio and the GPS which are closed, but that's for Federal reasons; you can't have people broadcasting willy-nilly these days, and I know that there are some GPS restrictions. The interfaces to the drivers are perfectly usable. RTFA, and do some research.

    5. Re:two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful



      > 1. From TFA: Everything barring a few small drivers is GPL'ed.
      > This is a joke, right? The drivers are probably the most important part of any piece of hardware,
      > so calling this thing "open" but keeping drivers proprietary is ridiculous.

      Yeah.. Screw that! I'm only using a phone that is 100% open source. Let's see, where is that list of all the completely open options? Hmm, I can't find one, that's strange.

      Perhaps the original poster can enlighten us with what would be the better course of action. What phone would be a better choice?

      > 2. From the site: FIC recommends Windows(r) XP
      > Yeah, and I am to buy a Linux product from you? Dream on...

      How dare they?!? Endorsing something that accounts for 90%+ of their sales? Scandalous! The infidels put their profit ahead of the one true license. They don't deserve your business.

      Good luck with your Stallmanian jihad. Keep cutting down those open source efforts that are not 100% pure in your eyes. Only morons believe that there is value in getting a foothold against the completely closed/proprietary solutions. You wise few have seen that it is better to reject that 99.8% open solution, and instead use the 100% closed one.

    6. Re:two points by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. Screw that! I'm only using a phone that is 100% open source. Let's see, where is that list of all the completely open options? Hmm, I can't find one, that's strange.
      Perhaps the original poster can enlighten us with what would be the better course of action. What phone would be a better choice?

      No, I can't, but that's besides the point, which was "It's quite certainly not open".

      How dare they?!? Endorsing something that accounts for 90%+ of their sales? Scandalous! The infidels put their profit ahead of the one true license. They don't deserve your business.
      Indeed, they don't. Want some cheese with your whine?

      Good luck with your Stallmanian jihad. Keep cutting down those open source efforts that are not 100% pure in your eyes. Only morons believe that there is value in getting a foothold against the completely closed/proprietary solutions. You wise few have seen that it is better to reject that 99.8% open solution, and instead use the 100% closed one.
      If this were a jihad, I'd probably call everybody to kill you, but it isn't. I just think you're a jerk. That said, I don't give a fuck about your choices, my choice is not to buy this product, because it doesn't provide what is of interest to me as advertised, namely, being "completely open".

    7. Re:two points by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      It's the radio and the GPS which are closed, but that's for Federal reasons; you can't have people broadcasting willy-nilly these days, and I know that there are some GPS restrictions. The interfaces to the drivers are perfectly usable. RTFA, and do some research.
      I RTFA and I did "some research" before posting, thank you. That doesn't change the fact that the "completely open" system isn't "completely open". If it's not possible to provide free software solutions for your hardware then don't include said hardware (or don't produce in the US).

    8. Re:two points by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      I think the grandparent's point is that no matter whose hardware you own, the manufacturer will recommend Windows XP, regardless of how well they support Linux.
      Well, AMD isn't (neither on their frontpage, nor does their search turn up anything. Maybe they still do, but not as blatantly as a company trying to sell a Linux phone, don't you agree?), same goes for ASUS, etc.

    9. Re:two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's not a joke, they might be in for some trouble.

      The Linux kernel is GPLed, so if you link drivers to the kernel, they HAVE to be GPL (yes, those binary video card drivers aren't really legal, if anybody would bother to sue).

    10. Re:two points by Pastis · · Score: 1

      If you look at it from a black or white points of you, yes it's a joke.

      But life ain't like that. This thing looks almost white, and if Harald Welte (who is/was part of the project) thinks it's good enough, then I might be inclined to believe him.

      http://gnumonks.org/~laforge/weblog/2006/11/08#200 61108-my_no_longer_secret_project

    11. Re:two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you blame FIC for all this? This is an article over somewhere, trying to get people excited. FIC doesn't even have a web page for it yet.

      And even so, this is as good as it'll get until the FCC let's you do more.

      So yeah, this phone, right now, is the holy grail.

    12. Re:two points by GooberToo · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to your crazy logic, no one is able to run OpenGL apps on Linux with NVIDIA hardware because the drivers are closed source. If that's not what you mean, then your comment is completely without value. If that is what you mean, then you completely misunderstand. So long as the interface is available and documented (html, text, or simply header files), interfacing to a proprietary driver is not a problem at all. Just like writing OpenGL applications which run on NVIDIA's proprietary graphics drivers are not a problem at all.

    13. Re:two points by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      Thanks for calling me crazy. I do in fact think binary drivers are a bad idea (though I never said they couldn't be used!).

    14. Re:two points by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      From that blog "Yes, it's not the perfect phone. It runs a proprietary GSM stack on a separate processor. There are some minor, self-contained proprietary bits on the back end side in userspace."
      I might have a different threshold than he does before calling something "open"...

    15. Re:two points by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      How can you blame FIC for all this? This is an article over somewhere, trying to get people excited. FIC doesn't even have a web page for it yet.
      How can't I? They want to produce this, so they're responsible. Period.

      And even so, this is as good as it'll get until the FCC let's you do more.
      I'm not subject to US laws and regulations, so the FCC is of no concern to me. Maybe if FIC tried to change the FCCs stance I would change my opinion of them...

      So yeah, this phone, right now, is the holy grail.
      So yeah, this phone, right now, is a step in approximately the right direction, but unless there is no piece of proprietary software on it I don't specifically care.

    16. Re:two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Yeah.. Screw that! I'm only using a phone that is 100% open source. Let's see, where is that list of all the completely open options?
      >> Hmm, I can't find one, that's strange.
      >> Perhaps the original poster can enlighten us with what would be the better course of action. What phone would be a better choice?
      >
      >No, I can't, but that's besides the point, which was "It's quite certainly not open".

      > That said, I don't give a fuck about your choices, my choice is not to buy this product, because it doesn't provide what is of
      > interest to me as advertised, namely, being "completely open".

      You don't see a bit of a logical inconsistency here? You are all pissy about a 99% open solution and refuse to use it. Instead, using a completely closed solution.

      You, sir, are a dumb ass.

    17. Re:two points by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      You infer that I am using a cellphone now.

    18. Re:two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given you replied here in this very thread one could assume you are interesting in having a cellphone, or need one. Now, perhaps you are not interested nor have a cellphone. Then I suggest you get off your high horse and put a bucket of water over your head. Once you're back in reality, I suggest you start to realize MANY PEOPLE (statistics in my country equal the # of people living here) use cellphones and SOME PEOPLE (not "all of many") would like to run a (more) open alternative to their 100% (or less than "99%" as here the case) closed source cellphones. To these people, this is an improvement (as are perhaps other options). For you not, since you don't care about having a cellphone anyway. What is the big deal? Perhaps you need to go 15+ years back in time and see Stallman working on GNU. Then notice what closed source software he used as a _bridge_ to a new world. Perhaps if you buy this, in a few years we'll see this is more popular and new development takes place, or we'll see more open source devices. Whereas if you boycot this product, it may not receive futher development and people may then conclude there's no market for an open source cellphone. Money talks!

    19. Re:two points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The previous post is right. You're a dumbass.

    20. Re:two points by chreekat · · Score: 1

      These guys are doing the best with what they have. I would rather see a company work at delivering a completely free (libre) device, even if they can't go 100%, than see them give up and disappear.

      In portable electronics, the best and neatest components are often proprietary, and in some cases the proprietary components have no worthwhile competition! This is not ideal, but it is reality. Does this mean we should entirely give up on companies and products that are as open as possible, yet still use these components? I don't think so. I think that making a few concessions, being successful, and showing the rest of the industry that customers embrace and love openness would be a spectacular plan. Some of the component vendors (*cough* TI) would do well to see the writing on the wall, but they won't see shit if non-realistic ideals prevent any project like the OpenMoko from getting off the ground.

      Quasi-disclaimer: I'm a volunteer hacker/beta tester involved with Neuros, a company doing for media centers and other devices what FIC has done with phones. They're in the same predicament.

      On the other hand, if you want to argue semantics, I would agree that it is incorrect for FIC to claim that the OpenMoko is 'completely open'. But to say that their *company* is completely open is fine. I.e. as long as they don't keep any secrets from their customers, I think they're doing pretty good.

    21. Re:two points by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      That's another assumption: "If I didn't own I cellphone, I couldn't be interested in one". I suggest you stop assuming things when discussing ethical decisions and dilemmas, it usually backfires...

    22. Re:two points by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 1

      Finally someone who's not calling me a dumb-ass first thing in the morning over this issue :-) I agree, it's a step in the right direction, though not a very big one (the drivers are what's most important to a cellphone, so that's why I find it a joke in this case). And when the words "completely open" are involved I naturally argue semantics, because that's all it is :-)

    23. Re:two points by African+Dyoung · · Score: 1

      People often claim "the law forbids" without any evidence whatsoever. Can you cite a particular Federal law or regulation mandating that the sources to the radio & GPS receiver driver are closed? With your interpretation of the relevant clauses, please? I don't believe that any such law or regulation exists in the United States.

      --
      The African dyoung stays cool in its burrow during the daytime, coming out only at night to forage for food.
  14. Could you do GPS silliness? by fortinbras47 · · Score: 4, Funny

    if(!at_home && distance(get_current_location(), get_house_location()) lessthan FIFTYYARDS) ) {
    FILE* mail = openMailStream(girlfriend@house.com, "Hi honey!");
    fprintf(mail, "I'm home!\n");
    closeMailStream(mail);
    at_home = true;
    }

  15. More details by IvanCruz · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:More details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the above, the infamous Harald Welte (of netfilter/iptables/gpl-violations.org fame) is directly involved with the project.
      He was mentioning his frequent trips to China but he never revealed his employers or the project he was working on.

      Suddenly the whole project seems more serious to me.

    2. Re:More details by desmoquattro · · Score: 1

      u can take a look at openmoko.com

  16. The GSM code is locked down by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    So it can't, in all honesty, be called fully open.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  17. SUSE? by rexbinary · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hope they are using Novell SUSE Linux, if not they are open to litigation from Microsoft for patent infringement.

  18. your wrong about the lack of memory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't care about the camera. I never seen much of a point to a camera phone. Makes about as much sense as a mp3 playing bathtub, which I am sure somebody somewere made.
    Sure it's convient, but so what?

    And your absolutely wrong about not having enough memory. It takes miniSD cards and has 128 megs of RAM. Right now I have 2 1gig miniSD cards and a 128 meg SD card. Also you can buy up to 4gig MiniSD cards.

    So frankly with miniSD slot your disk space is practically UNLIMITED.

    For instance many possibilities:

    * Go the 'Slax' route. Slax is a customizable Live Linux cdrom. It has various modules that you can use that you can add-on applications and other things to a already existing live cdrom. You can do this because the modules are compressed read-only file systems and you use UnionFS to mount them over the existing file system transparently. You can mix and match applications in that manner.

    You can do the same thing with this. No problem.

    So other possibilities.
    * Remote X11 applications. Need I say more? (and yes NX compression will make them perfectly usable)
    * Simple games.
    * VoIP.
    * remote access of systems through a veriaty of means such as voice command, terminal, tones.
    * 266mhz CPU is fast enough for video.
    * GPS kicks-ass. Interact with other GPS systems and keep track of things via GPSD and such.
    * secure encrypted file systems for passwords and other sensitive information.
    * stream audio

    What this thing is is a Linux PC that fits in your pocket. Pretty much anything you can do with a PC linux box you can do with this thing.

    This thing literally kicks the shit out of any sort of propriatory hardware phone you can think of. Even with out the camera. The possiblities are endless.

    1. Re:your wrong about the lack of memory. by DanielNS84 · · Score: 4, Informative

      MiniSD != MicroSD For Comparison...
      MiniSD:
      |-----------|
      MicroSD:
      |----|

    2. Re:your wrong about the lack of memory. by SoapDish · · Score: 1
      Makes about as much sense as a mp3 playing bathtub, which I am sure somebody somewere made.


      Where can I get one? Seriously, it beats a shower radio anyday.
    3. Re:your wrong about the lack of memory. by cold+wolf · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can do VoIP because it doesn't have WiFi (you could use the USB to hook it up to your computer, but just use your computer at that point). And I wonder how you can get into service providers' systems without a SIM card?

      Wake me when it has WiMax.

    4. Re:your wrong about the lack of memory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does have a SIM card.

    5. Re:your wrong about the lack of memory. by roseblood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And I wonder how you can get into service providers' systems without a SIM card?

      Software emulation of hardware.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    6. Re:your wrong about the lack of memory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cameras turn out to be quite useful. You can take notes with them by taking pictures of

      - opening times of a shop
      - telephone numbers on public boards
      - a recipe
      - a part of an article in a magazine you're reading in a waiting room
      - license plates of cars

      It comes handy when you have to report a car crash.

    7. Re:your wrong about the lack of memory. by iamdrscience · · Score: 1
      I don't think you can do VoIP because it doesn't have WiFi
      If it has support for GPRS/EDGE, you could connect to the internet with it. Sure, it's not going to save you any money since you're going to have to have a dataplan, but there's still some fun VoIP stuff you can do that might make sense.
    8. Re:your wrong about the lack of memory. by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Please just don't use the word "literally". It is almost certainly impossible to teach you what it means.

      Other than that, fascinating. I would have given you an Insightful.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    9. Re:your wrong about the lack of memory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bathtub is better since it only plays OGG.

  19. WTF by sabit666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When is this ITSATRAP shit going to end?

    1. Re:WTF by daverabbitz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Around the same time as slashdot gets rid of trolls, thaat is to say, never.

      --
      What could be better than a jet powered motorcycle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8l6GTHLSWE
    2. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when it stops being funny DUH

    3. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case it is appropriate. As another poster has pointed out, there are drivers that are not GPL'ed. Hence, the article is just astroturf because drivers are on of the most significant aspect of "openness" on any hardware. It is a trap. Save your cash until the drivers are available.

    4. Re:WTF by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      the same time as "fud notfud yes no maybe" stops being tagged to EVERY SINGLE FUCKING ARTICLE

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    5. Re:WTF by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      the same time as "fud notfud yes no maybe" stops being tagged to EVERY SINGLE FUCKING ARTICLE

      So I can tell the fucking articles from the non-fucking ones by checking if they have this combination of tags?
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:WTF by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      of course - it all makes sense now! :p

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  20. Not basic enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just want a basic phone that can make and receive calls. And get off my goddamn lawn.

  21. Well, I gave it a shot... by goaty_the_flying_sho · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and it didn't seem to work:

    From: Postmaster
    To:
    Reply-To:
    Sender: Postmaster

    Your message to home.com was rejected.
    I said:
    RCPT To:
    And home.com responded with
    550 5.1.1 ... User unknown

  22. Sean's "Mystery Guest Speaker" presentation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the Open Source in Mobile conference in Amsterdam is available here:

    Open, but not as usual

    Click the blue square at the bottom of the page

  23. Gentlemen, start your compilers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm taking odds on how long it is before someone mods the hell out of one of these things.

    Next, just think of a worm that will spread from phone to phone making a several thousand node Internet/telephone connected Beowulf cluster. :D

  24. Yeah, I know it's off-topic by RandomPrecision · · Score: 1

    But, for the record, this was indeed tagged 'itsnotatrap' before 'itsatrap'.

    Your efforts at countering today's 'itsatrap' initiative, while numerically significant, aren't really helping.

  25. itsnotatrap, itsatrap by snarkth · · Score: 0, Troll

    Begun, these tag wars have.

      youreit!

    snarkd

  26. Open from top to bottom! by glebd · · Score: 0

    Keeps losing small bits and pieces, sometimes the battery also falls out.

  27. Some hardware details... by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 1

    glommed from the net...

    Neo1973 Handset Hardware

    The Neo1973 is based on a Samsung S3C2410 SoC (system-on-chip) application processor, powered by an ARM9 core. It will have 128MB of RAM, and 64MB of flash, along with an upgradable 64MB MicroSD card.

    Typical of Chinese phone designs, the Neo1973 sports a touchscreen, rather than a keypad -- in this case, an ultra-high resolution 2.8-inch VGA (640 x 480) touchscreen. "Maps look stunning on this screen," Moss-Pultz said.

    The phone features an A-GPS (assisted GPS) receiver module connected to the application processor via a pair of UARTs. The commercial module has a closed design, but the API is apparently open.

    Similarly, the phone's quad-band GSM/GPRS module, built by FIC, runs the proprietary Nucleus OS on a Texas Instruments baseband powered by an ARM7 core. It communicates with Linux over a serial port, using standard "AT" modem commands.

    The Neo1973 will charge when connected to a PC via USB. It will also support USB network emulation, and will be capable of routing a connected PC to the Internet, via its GPRS data connection.

    Moss-Pultz notes that the FIC-GTA001, or Neo1973, is merely the first model in a planned family of open Linux phones from FIC. He expects a follow-up model to offer both WiFi and Bluetooth. "By the time one ships, the next one is half done," he says.

    1. Re:Some hardware details... by ningeo · · Score: 1

      Definitely not surprised that the GPS reciever is proprietary, but having the API open is a start. I wonder if you can get at anything but NMEA data? Just finishing up a Geomatics Engineering degree, so this could be interesting for me.

      --
      Teenage Mutant Ningeo Turtles. Trust me, its funny.

  28. missing lines by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    You forgot at the end:

    set_Destination(couch);
    start_navigation();
    }

  29. Throwback... it had to be done by stretch86 · · Score: 2, Funny

    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

  30. No 3G/EDGE? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Sure it might be open, but you think there'd be some way to get more than just GPRS on these kind of phones? It's not as if GPRS is the only game in town for data, there's certainly no credible reason why it's omitted on these phones

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:No 3G/EDGE? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      I second that. GPRS data is cruel and unusual punishment. EDGE isn't broadband by any measure, but it IS fast enough to be tolerable. It makes me sick to think that the TrollTech GreenPhone gave up EDGE to use the slightly-cheaper GPRS-only chipset and shave a whopping $5 or so off the manufacturing cost of a phone meant to sell for $500+.

      And no gamepad? Jesus Christ, would it *really* kill phone manufacturers to just bite the bullet and give us a decent analog (hell, even digital) gamepad for once? It might not be the ultimate gaming platform, but can it AT LEAST try to not be completely dysfunctional for games?

      Somewhere, in a parallel universe, Nintendo is about to unleash the PhoneBoy and experience the hottest-selling Christmas item in history -- a "must have" item for kids AND their parents (ok, at least their dads). A phone, with real keypad. A transflective color touchscreen with Graffiti handwriting recognition. AccessLinux for Palm. A Zodiac-like analog gamepad on one side, a digital gamepad on the other, with two thumb-able buttons flanking each. SD or MicroSD. WiFi. Bluetooth. MP3 playback, via headphones or A2DC. And a cool feature that lets you plug 4 GBA cartridges into the charging base and upload them to flash (playable for 48 hours or however long the cartridge has been continuously plugged into the base, whichever is less... a reasonable compromise between convenience and copy protection).

      Sigh.

  31. Dimensions? by cockroach2 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have a clue about the dimensions of the thing? I currently own an old Sony-Ericsson T100 and most modern phones are way bigger and heavier. If it isn't, it might actually be an interesting gadget, since I've been annoyed by a couple of design choices made for my phone - a non-issue for an open-source phone...

  32. You know what's lame? by snarkth · · Score: 1

    A company proposes an open linux cellphone, and there aren't enough nerds left on slashdot to even fill a page with intelligent comments.

      That's lame, my friend. Slashdot is bleeding it's best readers.

      snarkd

  33. What a name!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moko (well... moco) means snot in Spanish.

  34. Absolutely so! Here's the state of the art by btarval · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Well, you're just not familiar with what's going on in the Open Source Phone world.

    First of all, the Carriers have little choice here. Fully functional Reference kits are available in the under $1000 range. For GSM, you can get them for about $200-300. These are the kits that companies who build cell-phones use to jumpstart their designs. So what's a Carrier going to do? Outlaw these? And kill development for cell-phones? I don't think so.

    The most they might do is to tighten down on the registration. But that involves overhead and hassle. Unless these kits prove to be an issue, it's not going to happen; at least not with the GSM market. And not worldwide.

    You are also wrong about the "time wasters" who supply low volume and low profit phones. What the Carriers want (at least some of them) is to sell the airtime. Some of these Carriers really don't care where it goes, as long as they get paid for it.

    There's a whole resale market here which underscores the point. You want to to become your own cell-phone company? You can, if you have the money. And if you don't think *those* resellers are hungry, you're kidding yourself.

    I admit that as far as the standard view about "time wasters" goes (for the big companies) you are correct. And it's explicitly been this attitude which has severely hindered innovation in the cell-phone market. There are a plethora of uses for small markets. Some of the hungrier carriers fully realize this, and are supportive of anything which will make them money.

    Finally, the lockdown on GSM transceivers is a bit silly. The interface is extremely simple; it's a variation of the old Hayes Modem interface. I kid you not. "ATDT....". There's even an Open Source Project for this. Here's the link:

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/libgsmc

    Finally, there's even a group dedicated to a fully Open Source phone. Namely, the Silicon Valley Homebrew Mobile Phone Club. They are having a meeting tomorrow night in San Francisco. Here's a link to their mailing list archives:

    http://telefono.revejo.org/pipermail/svhmpc_telefo no.revejo.org/

    Check out the list, and the information on various associated websites. There's really a groundswell building in this area. And those Carriers which close things off are going to miss an opportunity that their competitors are actively interested in.

    --
    The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Peter Drucker.
    1. Re:Absolutely so! Here's the state of the art by gregorio · · Score: 1
      Finally, the lockdown on GSM transceivers is a bit silly. The interface is extremely simple; it's a variation of the old Hayes Modem interface. I kid you not. "ATDT....".
      That's just an emulated modem created by the GSM chipset. The GSM network doesn't work like that.
    2. Re:Absolutely so! Here's the state of the art by btarval · · Score: 1
      It's a bit more than just a modem, as it allows for voice transmissions, not just data. Classical modems didn't.

      If, by "the GSM network" you're referring to the radio-wave transmissions, yes, you are correct. I thought it was clear from the context that I am referring to the user-level interface to the transceiver module.

      Or, to make it more clear, I'm referring to the proprietary drivers that are on this phone. My point is that it doesn't have to be this way, and this company missed an opportunity to provide a more Open Source phone than what is currently out there. As it stands right now, there are several other phones in this category.

      --
      The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Peter Drucker.
  35. um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so if it's a free phone.... does it cost money?

  36. Little did you know that.. by nephridium · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your overly suspicious girlfriend installed tracking software on your phone and remotely polled your locations while you were gone with her phone. Hence her automated reply to your message read: "Re: Hi honey!" "Don't bother. Since you were visiting that bitch Laura again I switched the locks. We're though."

    --


    And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
    1. Re:Little did you know that.. by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Hey! My wife's name is Laura! That bitch!

  37. It's just you. by Fordiman · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that trolls are becoming the new Slashdotters.

    --
    110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
  38. Prediction: by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    This will never be available in the United States.

    Purchase of it and use of it on U.S. GM networks will be punishable by death.

    (I'm only half kidding)

    --

    +++ATH0
  39. What the hell are you talking about? by StarKruzr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It can do ANYTHING, because it runs Linux. It's GSM so it can send and receive text messages like anything else. It can do web browsing, IRC, VOIP, whatever else you want, because it runs Linux.

    What else are you looking for? What can your "cheap candy bar Nokia" do that this can't?

    The reason this will be outlawed by cell phone carriers is precisely because it can do anything... because it runs Linux. Anything that loosens their ironclad control over handsets is verboten.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:What the hell are you talking about? by bodan · · Score: 2, Informative
      It can do ANYTHING, because it runs Linux. It's GSM so it can send and receive text messages like anything else. It can do web browsing, IRC, VOIP, whatever else you want, because it runs Linux.


      You forgot the origin of the thread. It is about hardware: it's got little memory, no camera, no wi-fi, no headphone (that's what the thread is about, whether it'll be true or not). Which means that even though the software can do anything, it can't take pictures, it can't do VoIP (well, it can do it over the carrier's lines, but that's not as nice as wifi), it can't be an mp3 player, etc.

      <blockquote>What else are you looking for? What can your "cheap candy bar Nokia" do that this can't?</blockquote>

      So his point was that without these hardware options, a "cheap candy bar Nokia" can do exactly on thing that this can't: be cheap. Implied in his comment was that he didn't care much about the software freedom without the hardware options.

      On a completely unrelated note, why don't all devices have a solid-state six-degrees-of-freedom motion sensor? Especially hand-held devices with a screen or a GPS receiver...

      --
      "I think I am a fallen star. I should wish on myself."
    2. Re:What the hell are you talking about? by refitman · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is about hardware: it's got little memory, no camera, no wi-fi,

      FTFA:

      The initial version will come with 128MB of flash and 128MB of DRAM. There is the potential for a version with 1G of flash, but with a slot, do you really need it? OpenMoko comes with a 12mw battery for somewhere around three hours of talk time, but there will undoubtedly be more options if it takes off. It also has a Globallocator GPS unit and the phone bits are TI quad band GSM. The only thing lacking is Wi-Fi and that is planned for the next gen hardware.

      Easily expandable memory with the flash slot, Wi-Fi for the next gen. A little patience please from Mr Moon-on-a-stick.

      --
      First God made idiots. That was for practice. Then He made Jack Thompson.
    3. Re:What the hell are you talking about? by bodan · · Score: 1
      You forgot the origin of the thread. It is about hardware: it's got little memory, no camera, no wi-fi, no headphone (that's what the thread is about, whether it'll be true or not).
      --
      "I think I am a fallen star. I should wish on myself."
  40. Great phone by __aamavj3307 · · Score: 1

    Looks great, has touchscreen, memorycard-slot, GPS, and even runs linux. If it only had a camera and a headphone-socket (is it really missing such a socket? I find that quite hard to believe), this would be the perfect phone I was always waiting for!

  41. WiFi is important by KjetilK · · Score: 1

    Does it have Wifi? I think Wifi is really important, because while at a hotspot, like in your home, you could route your voice calls over VoIP. That would make it so much cheaper, and could be a killer app for Joe Average. I really think we ought to do this.

    That said, I'll stand in line to get one of these, if the hardware is a bit rough. I'm sick and tired of my Sony Ericsson K700i, I've had it less than a year, and it is just totally borked allready. It is important that a phone can take a bit of beating.

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  42. [OT] Clarification: What's GPSD by ashirusnw · · Score: 1

    Can someone pls explain what above poster meant by:
    > GPS kicks-ass. Interact with other GPS systems and keep track of things via GPSD and such.

    what's the point of GPSD? I know its a deamon that allows multiple GPS receivers to send GPS data but what is the point of that, why do you care where the device is.

    wikipedia article doesn't explain why you'd want to use it

    thx,
    Ash.

  43. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Imagine encrypted SMS ?
    Or encrypted voice conversations?

    Imagine mapping/pinpointing locations and using the GPS to show your place, and have a map with bookmarked locations, to find a certain store on a certain street so you don't have to walk around lost not knowing where is what.

    1. Re:Awesome! by CockMonster · · Score: 0

      Exactly the reasons why this will never be allowed to connect to networks (in 'The West' anyhow)

  44. Yeah, but.. by Flopy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does it run Linux?

  45. flashing? by braindead_in · · Score: 1

    Can it be reflashed? TFA does not mention it. Will the firmware for the baseband and the AGPS be provided along with code?

  46. GPL violation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IANAL, but if this telephone utilizes non-free drivers and a Linux kernel then isn't it breaching the GPL? If that is indeed the case then it would be illegal for this to be bundled with an OS in the US as well as other countries that respect copyright law.

  47. Mobile OS market by traveller604 · · Score: 1

    Belongs to Symbian! But yeah I'm all in for competition, however I don't think Linux or Windows can beat Symbian in this area.

  48. Already been done Motorola A780 by jonniesmokes · · Score: 1

    The Motorola A780 (about 2 years old) has integrated GPS and runs the Linux Kernel and a heavy Linux filesystem. Its got the camera/mp3 player/GPRS-EDGE/320x240 color screen/Blue Tooth/microSD slot/USB blah blah blah... Its really cool. I finally got one, but only the European version has the integrated GPS. So I had to order it through ebay.co.uk and find someone willing to ship to the US. It even came with CoPilot preinstalled so you can really use the GPS functionality.

    Why it isn't for sale in the US is beyond me, but I'm sure there is some Motorola/Microsoft politics going on. There's a community of Linux activists hacking the phone and Motorola offers the source downloadable from their website. In short this product exists and works well.

    This recent announcement looks like vapor hardware. All the 'pictures' are CAD renderings. If you want it now, you can get it now. Though, unless you're in Europe, expect to work hard to get it.

  49. OK for no vendor lock-in: they want your business! by KWTm · · Score: 1

    Yes, vendors will try to lock you in, but when they can't, they'd rather have your business than not.

    For example, I have a Treo 650. I could have gotten the newer Treo 700, but that only comes in Sprint and Verizon models, requiring that I choose which vendor into which I lock myself. The 650, on the other hand, has a "generic" version where I can choose my own vendor, so I chose T-mobile.

    Now, T-mobile generally doesn't sell Treos. If you go to a T-mobile store and ask for one, they'll ask you to get a Windows-powered device, or at best Blackberry. But here I am with a Palm Treo, so, do they want my business? I asked them, and of course they said yes.

    I am happily using my Treo, with the fairly inexpensive (+US$30) Unlimited Internet connection feature. Not only is it convenient to use the built-in browser to Google for nearby stores when I am travelling (Google: "barnes & noble [enter local zip code]"), but I can use Bluetooth dialup to connect my laptop to the Internet while I'm riding in the car, and never have to worry about finding a Wifi hotspot again.

    If the makers of OpenMoko market the phone independently, I expect it to have appeal with Linux hackers at first. As the community develops and applications appear, it would have expanding appeal to borderline geeks, and then eventually to the population at large, although taking only a miniscule segment of the market. It would be similar to the Linksys WRT-54GL router, the improvements of which allow savvy IT staff to use it for their SOHO needs over a more expensive router.

    What would be lacking would be the backing and marketing clout from a mainstream provider. Sure, they could sell a locked version to Verizon, who might promote the phones at their stores or sell at a subsidy, but then someone would crack it, and then we'd have cheap OpenMoki subsidized by Verizon being used on Cingular networks, or something like that.

    Instead, perhaps the makers could partner with --oh, I don't know, some electronics retailers such as Best Buy, or computer makers such as Dell, to include the OpenMoko in some package. I haven't thought this through yet. But if they can get it out, then I'm sure the carriers would be happy to do business with them.

    (Off-topic: one of the reasons I chose T-mobile over Verizon is that Verizon doesn't do GSM phones or SIM cards. How does Verizon expect their phones to work overseas if they don't use GSM? Or is it just that Verizon users never go anywhere?)

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]