Slashdot Mirror


Fallout From the November Console Wars

All three 'next generation' consoles are out, and we can finally stop using that term. The NPD numbers for last month have been released, and there's plenty of information there to discuss. Analysts have already made some observations, with brandintel specifically pointing out the Xbox 360's 'surprising' role in last month's fight. For some more well-reasoned thought, Dean Takahashi's take is the place to turn: "At this rate, Microsoft isn't going to hit its goal of 10 million units by year end ... Sony's number is consistent with its warnings, but 197,000 is worse than what many expected ... the fair fight is really going to be what happens in the year 2007, when all three console makers should be able to ship as many consoles as consumers want. To me, this looks like consumers are hit with a case of sticker shock. The mass market is paying for cheap PS2s, DS Lites, and GBAs." Despite the Wii's success last month, it should be noted that Nintendo is no longer bragging of 1 Million units in the U.S. by the end of the year. So, essentially, it looks like all three companies will fail to hit their console goals for the year.

182 comments

  1. shucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I saw Fallout, but no 3. Frankly, I don't care what happens with those consoles, just give me my Fallout 3!

    1. Re:shucks... by scombs · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm not sure you want that, with Bethesda behind the wheel. Elder Scrolls: Fallout, even more buggy than Fallout 2, but with light bloom! I'll take Van Buren, thanks.

    2. Re:shucks... by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      Only if they turn it over to the original developers first. The last thing I want is Morrowind with guns.

    3. Re:shucks... by HeavyAl · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother!

      Screw the consoles, give us some quality game play with a real story line. And I'm not talking about the shoddy excuse for a story they threw out in FOT:BOS.

      Hell, I'd settle for a retooled version of Dungeon Siege/Diablo and its ilk styled using some kind of isometric real time engine .. I've had just about enough of these attempts at making everything 3d and ultra-realistic.

      Great games start in the mind, and those kinds of games start with a good story. This flashy console stuff is a bunch of fluff with no soul.

    4. Re:shucks... by louisadkins · · Score: 1

      Actually, Fallout 3 has been licensed by Bethesda Softworks. They are working on it.
      2004 Press Release
      Bethesda originally claimed a Nov 2005 release, but it was (as understood) to not be accurate. Actual release date is still up in the air, but I would rather they take the time to work on it and do it right.

    5. Re:shucks... by louisadkins · · Score: 1

      A bit more poking around gives this which sounds very familiar.

  2. Interesting by Kingrames · · Score: 0

    I rather expected a large turnout for the Wii.

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thus far I've only seen a few interesting games. Nintendo has the best "Gift" potential due to the all ages tendency. Final Fantasy games (GBA, DS, PS2) have been highest on my wishlist this year.

    2. Re:Interesting by Kingrames · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "...Nintendo has the best "Gift" potential... "

      Precisely.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    3. Re:Interesting by FroBugg · · Score: 3, Informative

      They're still selling every single Wii they ship, often within minutes of it leaving the box, but the problem is that Nintendo isn't shipping quite as many as they had originally said they'd like to. They haven't offered any reasons for this.

    4. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If I could find a place selling them where I did not have to wait in line for a couple hours outside the building for the opportunity to maybe buy one, I would go there and buy one right now. This holds for all of my friends who have the remotest interest in gaming that I have talked to. Wii is where it is at for price and actual innovation. Btw, improving graphics is no longer an innovation when I can get better graphics by building a computer myself and still spend less money. I am looking at you Sony. But even the 360 is not that great of a deal.

    5. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Originally I believed it would be a Sony cakewalk. A grown man.. drooling in anticipation of a gaming system. However I changed by mind awhile back. The reason for this change in outlook isn't the delays, mixed reviews, nor sticker shock.

          It was the rootkit incident.

            Ridiculing Sony products used to be almost sacrilege but after that we (techie types) pounded them mercilessly for that incident. I know that it pissed me off royally. And today as a result that negative press seems to have taken a life of its own. I get a sense many are almost wishing for it to fail in spite. I suspect the incident literally cost Sony billions in sales across their product line.

              They may have overcome the other issues if we were all still in blind love with Sony. However I think that incident turned Sony away from the Santa company that sold us amazing toys we loved to buy... into being just another cliche faceless corporation. We all know companies are about making money but gamers are about having fun... and that incident really did suck the fun out of it for many of us.

          Of course they'll still sell plenty of units but it won't reach PS2 highs. PS4 may have more luck in ten years when the new kids come in and the incident will become another footnote in history. I don't hate Sony. I mostly feel the apathy of a lover that was once cheated on but has now moved on.

          I am looking forward to the purchase my new Xbox360.

    6. Re:Interesting by DECS · · Score: 1

      I agree that Sony acted irresponsibly in installing DRM software scandalously as it did. But the Sony Windows Rootkit was enabled by Microsoft, who shipped a product that happily installed the covert software for users without them even knowing.

      So if the rootkit incident taints Sony forever, buying new products from Microsoft isn't exactly assuming some high moral ground. Microsoft's answer to Sony's "problem" (the rational behind the rootkit) was provided by PlaysForSure, a similarly twisted and evil system that is similarly built into the system and denies users' rights. Combined with the general security design flaws of Windows, Micosoft is no better than Sony on the DRM front or the "gives a crap about users" front.

      You're better off buying the system you like to play, because whatever system you buy is going to be playing you, whether you realize it or not.

      PlayStation 3 vs. Xbox 360 vs. Nintendo Wii

    7. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent overrated..

    8. Re:Interesting by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative
      I rather expected a large turnout for the Wii.
      Nintendo is selling out every shipment. What Nintendo has stopped "bragging" about (i.e., projecting) is a million sales in the U.S.; they're easily going to surpass a million worldwide sales. As many other sites have pointed out, it's likely that Nintendo is pleased with U.S. sales numbers right now and would like to direct more supplies toward Europe and Japan for the rest of the year and spread things out. I suspect, though, they'll still manage to hit a million U.S. sales by December 31...just a feeling. I'm not surprised by the 360 sales given YAXS (Yet Another XBox Shooter) released, which appears to be all its good for. With Microsoft's near-zero presence in Japan and Sony's low supply numbers, Nintendo probably wants to take Japan completely with the Wii and DS.

      Actually, if you include their portable systems, Nintendo is already the #1 video game company worldwide with the most market share and highest sales. The press never covers Nintendo that way, though.
      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    9. Re:Interesting by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Probably a conspiracy between Microsoft and Sony to put dirt into their clean rooms.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:Interesting by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1
      To be fair to Microsoft they
      (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_Sony_BMG_CD_copy _protection_scandal )

      According to BBC News on 2005-11-14, Microsoft has decided to classify Sony BMG's software as "spyware" and provide tools for its removal. "Speaking about the suspension [Mark] Russinovich said: 'This is a step they should have taken immediately.'"

      IIRC, Windows Defender removes the rootkit.

      They also hired Mark Russinovich. But yeah, enabling autoplay by default on CDs on machines that run Admin if you use the default installation was incredibly naive.
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    11. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Microsoft's near-zero presence in Japan and Europe and Sony's low supply numbers and late release in Europe, Nintendo probably wants to take Japan and Europe completely with the Wii and DS. There you go.
    12. Re:Interesting by brkello · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you would expect the press to cover it any other way. You put consoles vs consoles and handhelds vs handhelds. When you compare the iPod to the Zune, you don't talk about XP sales vs OSX. I'm really not sure what you are expecting.

      The Xbox 360 is starting to get some exclusive JRPGs. It will be interesting to see if this makes a difference as shooters are not something that sells in Japan.

      I really enjoy how anything negative Nintendo gets a positive spin on here. This is the same company that alienated all their third party partners by being overly restrictive, refusing to move off of cartridges, and saying that people don't want to play online. At least they can figure out when they are wrong. You really have to wonder what their production issues are since they aren't cutting edge like the PS3.

      I have been impressed with the Wii showing, though. It seems like it stands a good chance to be the top console this round. It will be interesting to see what happens in a few years though when supplies are plentiful and the differences in hardware will be a lot more pronounced. But maybe graphics don't matter to a majority of people. It seems people are enjoying Wii Sports (I got to play it this weekend) and let's face it, Wii Sports is not something you would play for graphics.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    13. Re:Interesting by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      The bigger question that Nintendo should be asking is, even though you want the Wii now, what will you being doing with your Wii 5 years from now? Will you still be buying games 5 years from now? I doubt it. The Wii will start a trend with non-gamers and with all trends they die out. Then Wii will be left in the same position it was with the GameCube and only supported by its hardcore gamers and parents who think its rated G for their kids.

      The Wii is trying to bring a non-gamer into the gaming market by using a controller, which is working, but non-gamers don't like games. It isn't that there aren't games out there for them, because there are, but the non-gamers just don't feel like continuely laying down $50 a month for a game and they just don't like video games. I give it a year and you will see this hype about people-who-normally-don't-play-games starting to fade and Nintendo will have to start marketing to their base again, which is gamers.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
  3. Remedial geography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All three 'next generation' consoles are out and we can finally stop using that term.

    *Cough* Europe.

    Despite the Wii's success last month, it should be noted that Nintendo is no longer bragging of 1 Million units in the U.S. by the end of the year. So, essentially, it looks like all three companies will fail to hit their console goals for the year.

    That was for 'The Americas'.

    1. Re:Remedial geography by keeboo · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was for 'The Americas'.

      You mean North America.
      I see no sign of any of those consoles here in Brazil.

    2. Re:Remedial geography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brazil != entire Latin America.

    3. Re:Remedial geography by caudron · · Score: 1
      That was for 'The Americas'.

      Yeah. That's what he said. L.A. New York. Chicago. Detroit. etc.... You know, the Americas. What else is there?

      (Es una chiste, mis amigos suramericanos.)

      Tom Caudron
      http://tom.digitalelite.com/
      --
      -Tom
    4. Re:Remedial geography by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 3, Funny

      We'd be more than happy to give away Detroit

    5. Re:Remedial geography by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 1

      Actually, I take that back. There's this new robotic police officer we've been working on...

    6. Re:Remedial geography by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

      then move to santo andré, next to são paulo. there's plenty of them in a shopping mall near here. price tag is R$ 2.300,00 (YIKES!!!)

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    7. Re:Remedial geography by ccp · · Score: 1

      (Es una chiste, mis amigos suramericanos.)

      Es un chiste...

      Cheers,
      CC
    8. Re:Remedial geography by KillaBeave · · Score: 1

      Whats not to like about Detroit? It's got the climate of Canada, the economy of early 90's Russia and the feeling of saftey and security found only in downtown Baghdad! This is the only city I've ever lived in where I found myself watching my back in the GOOD part of town!

  4. It's the Sticker Shock by scombs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When it comes down to it, I believe I can have the same amount of fun (if not more) with the $130 Nintendo DS than I could with the $300+ current-gen consoles. My fun wouldn't increase five-fold if I bought a PS3, I don't think.

    1. Re:It's the Sticker Shock by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      After playing Rayman and Sports, however, I do think your fun would increase two-fold if you bought a Wii... which coincidentally is less than twice a DS.

    2. Re:It's the Sticker Shock by KokorHekkus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you're right when it comes to the long run ("extreme" gamers don't make up the majority of the customers. And from what I've read it would seem like Nintendo has an advantage when it comes to appealing to the non-gamers/occasional gamers with the new controllers... because. as you say, it allows them to have more fun. So I'm guessing the Wii will do allright (not saying it will come up on top but though) Me? No console and don't play much games.

    3. Re:It's the Sticker Shock by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "extreme" gamers can some times set the trends that more casual players will follow, however. it's still too soon to tell where this will all go.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    4. Re:It's the Sticker Shock by sootman · · Score: 1

      But I've got a family, and we can't all play a DS at once. I'd buy a Wii in a second if there were any around--$250 isn't bad at all. I will get one eventually but I'd love to get one for the family for XMas--too bad there aren't enough. With the great reviews and the great price I think it'd be the winner if there were more.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    5. Re:It's the Sticker Shock by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Fun doesn't need to increase linearly.

      You can have quite a bit of fun playing various forms of solitaire with a $2 pack of playing cards. Are you really going to say that a Nintendo DS is 65 times more fun than a pack of cards? Actually, does trying to define a "fun comparison factor" even work?

      Any notable increase in fun that you can afford is generally worth it. The Nintendo DS isn't 65 times better than the pack of cards, but it's still worth getting a Nintendo DS because it's fun. If you want to play games that are available on the PS3 and you can afford around $700 for the console and the game, that's worth it. If you can afford a 50" 1080p HDTV to go with your PS3, that'll be worth it too because you'll get an awesome picture.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    6. Re:It's the Sticker Shock by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Is rayman really funny? Looks a little simple? Wii sports must become boring after a while, I think I rather play smash football or whatever the name of the gamecube tennis title is and so on because you can make more stuff in them, those with the new controller will be even better thought of course.

      On the DS I'm not intrested in the real gimmick games either such as Wario ware DS or whatever it's called and some other titles like that, Yoshi Touch&Go is ok and Kirby rocks thought.

      On the Wii I would much rather play Zelda, COD3 and Metroid Prime 3, and Mario Galaxy of course.

      But I bought my Gamecube like 13 months ago and still haven't played more than say 50 hours on it and my DS lite 3-4 months ago or so so I have plenty of games I can play anyway, the Wii is expensive and you can't chip it yet so I'll wait.

      Anyway I just post because I wanted to say that there are way better and more intresting games than Wii sports and Rayman coming or released for the Wii.

    7. Re:It's the Sticker Shock by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I don't like card games much at all, so yes, the DS is more than 65 times as fun ;D

  5. One more system by Sciros · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But what if I want to talk about the Infinium Labs Phantom? can I still use the term "next generation?" A friend of mine was really confused about the console sale figures, as was I. And then we both realized we're playing the PS2 I bought just a month ago :-) (for FFXII). With so many folks being excited for the Wii/PS3 releases, I'd say not only sticker shock but also a determination to have at least something to play is what sold the other consoles. That and black friday making Game Boys cheap-as-free. I wonder just how many sold on that day...

    --
    I like basketball!!1!
    1. Re:One more system by dotbenjamin · · Score: 1

      "Black Friday"? Can anyone clarify what that is a reference to? Maybe it's an American thing.

      --
      Nothing like blowing your own trumpet.
    2. Re:One more system by Golin_KNar · · Score: 1

      Black Friday is the day after the American Thanksgiving and the begining of Christmas shopping. Most stores have huge discounts, vendors have cool displays, and new products are released. All of that causes lots of people to go to the stores en mass, making it difficult to get to anywhere or do anything other than stay home or shop.

    3. Re:One more system by idugcoal · · Score: 1

      Traditionally, "Black Friday" is the day after Thanksgiving, when (as the previous poster mentioned) many stores have huge sales. That day is, according to lore, the day that many businesses begin to make a profit for the year. I'm not sure how accurate this is, as I'm not in retail, but this doesn't sound reasonable to my ears. Check out snopes' perspective here: http://www.snopes.com/holidays/thanksgiving/shoppi ng.asp

    4. Re:One more system by rfunches · · Score: 1

      The Snopes article only focuses on the myth that Black Friday is the busiest shopping day of the year (false: it is the Saturday before Christmas, has been for many years) but does correctly define Black Friday as the day which supposedly brings most businesses into a profit for the year -- the financial phrase "in the black" means you are making money, whereas being "in the red" means you are losing money. Snopes doesn't comment on whether the definition is true, but it certainly makes sense for seasonal retailers.

    5. Re:One more system by cornjones · · Score: 1

      Having worked for some retailers, I can vouch that the term black friday is described as the day when a company generally goes into the black (profit) for the year. Many retailers make over 80% of their sales during this last 2 months of the year.

  6. Analysts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay. Let's assume for a moment that I announce to the press that I'm going to sell 1 million units or Product A by year end. There's much hype and fanfare, then I'm only able to actually produce 500,000 units. The Sales numbers at this point no longer mean anything. You can only have a valid comparison if there is a steady supply of all three models. Come on folks THINK.

    -ac

    -Parent should have never made slashdot...there nothing to read here move on..

    1. Re:Analysts by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      That's a good point, but if a company really thinks they're going to be able to sell a million units of their product it seems like they'd go out of their way to make sure that a million units are available. Even if it cuts into the amount of money you make per unit, it'd be worth it for double the sales.

    2. Re:Analysts by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's much hype and fanfare, then I'm only able to actually produce 500,000 units. The Sales numbers at this point no longer mean anything. You can only have a valid comparison if there is a steady supply of all three models. Come on folks THINK.

      Actually, they do mean something, just not that much about market acceptance. Since these consoles sold out, we can use the sales numbers as production numbers. And from that standpoint, there are really two interesting pieces of information: Not really a surprise given all the warnings, but Sony was able to make only half of their grossly down-sized forecasts. This means producing the PS3 is even more difficult than was thought, or the blue lasers are in even shorter supply than thought, and may even indicate that the longer term supply will be limited. In some ways more surprising is that Nintendo was unable to reach their manufacturing target for launch. I would naively assume that they should have minimal problems, but that apparently isn't the case. Maybe the remote is a trickier beast than thought? Supplies of extra remotes have been short for those who were able to buy a console.

      I realize that these sales figures may not be complete. I doubt that means Sony really sold twice as many consoles.

      An interesting catch: All these companies depend on IBM. Apple dropped IBM largely because they didn't seem ready or willing to develop and produce mainstream chips on a schedule that suited Apple. Are they partly responsible for the shortage of PS3 and Wii? I have no data to back that up at all; it's just idle speculation.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Analysts by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      While I agree that some of the analysis is a little overblown in significance, I think you might be overreacting. Slashdot is what brings us news every day, and to say that its parent should never have made it makes it feel very sad and unwanted.

      --
      SRSLY.
    4. Re:Analysts by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 3, Interesting
      An interesting catch: All these companies depend on IBM. Apple dropped IBM largely because they didn't seem ready or willing to develop and produce mainstream chips on a schedule that suited Apple.


      ah, but apple wanted faster iterations of PPCs every 6 months. What they got was a 700 MHz upgrade in 1.8 years, and then the top speed got cut back by 200 MHz to make room for dual core CPUs. Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft all have PPC specs set in stone for the next 5 or 6 years. much more compatible with IBM's slow pace of consumer chip upgrades.
      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    5. Re:Analysts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ahh, and there are other powers at play: IBM's lack of improvement in GHz was due to Altivec (as I understand it). But both Xbox and PS3 have better versions-- Xbox by having 128 vector registers and PS3 by having the dreamy SPE instruction set and 128 vector registers. But stuff like that only impacts performance-tuned code, and therein is a universe of difference between a game console and a Mac.


      Anyway, if there is a culprit it's definitely not IBM. Even though it makes for an mod-uppable "interesting catch."

  7. Sticker shock for sure by analog_line · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've no plans to buy an Xbox or a PS3 for only reasons of price. $500 as the minimum cost of entry for a system and one game is just nuts. I can't afford it, and I won't bother with it. There's nothing inherent that I will get out of either of those systems over the Xbox and PS2 that I own now, other than the derision of my friends, that I spent a pile of money I could've spent on food or rent on those. I'm sure the games are great, and I wouldn't mind owning one, but they're not worth that, no matter how many fools are willing to overpay for it.

    I'd like to get a Wii, and I have a reasonable chance of both affording and getting my hands on one at some point soon. However, right now, I'm actually considering getting a new GBA SP, because I have a lot of games I like for GBA, and an SP is a lot easier to carry around than even the new DS Lite (and a lot easier than my original recipe DS). And a second PS2 to backup my current box, so I can play all the good PS2 games that are now showing up in bargain bins before they become collectors items. Once the price comes down to something resembling reasonable, I'll get a PS3, and maybe even an Xbox 360, but it's got a LONG way to fall before it gets there.

    1. Re:Sticker shock for sure by karmachild · · Score: 1



      Roger That!

      "A fool and his money are soon parted" -W.C. Fields

    2. Re:Sticker shock for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry but i totally disagree! i buy a console today for $500, you buy it two years later for $200. that means i spend $150 a year for the console! thats a little over $10 a month, and for the enjoyment i recieve out of it i would gladly pay that amount of money!

    3. Re:Sticker shock for sure by Shemmie · · Score: 1

      Spot on. Not a console gamer myself, only ever owned a PS1 and my PSP, but the Wii is the console for me, and I look forward to getting one. The PS3 leaves me cold. If the Xbox 360 comes down a fair bit, I might get one for the Media Center functionality.

  8. XBox a surprise winner? by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, not when you think about it. Consider the typical big-box electronics store customer:

    "Excuse me, do you have any PS3's?"
    "No."
    "Nintendo Wii's?"
    "No."
    "Well, what do you have in stock?"
    "The xBox 360."
    "We'll take it."

    Having product on the shelves covers a multitude of sins.

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    1. Re:XBox a surprise winner? by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      And they'll take it back to the store after Johnny registers his dissapointment in not getting the "hot new game system of 2006". Sorry - I think the eBay frenzy is pretty much solidified which consoles are "hot" in most consumer's minds.

      BTW It took me 3 weeks to score a "classic controller" for the Wii. This blue-ray laser shortage is really packing a punch!

    2. Re:XBox a surprise winner? by robbiedo · · Score: 1

      Thousands of PS3 are selling closer to cost on eBay.

    3. Re:XBox a surprise winner? by donaldm · · Score: 1

      Well I live in Australia and have a PS2 so it would go something like this.

      Browses massive selection of PS2.
      Find some very good games for half to a quarter of retail price.
      Go home with a collection of good to very good PS2 games.
      Saves myself a huge amount of money.

      Or the person who is looking for a game machine for a present.
      Hmm! PS2 is cheap and I can get a huge selection of games for a smaller outlay of money
      Guess I'll get the PS2 plus some games.

      Or the grandparents/parents buying for the kids.
      Hmm! The kids already ave a PS2 so I could get some games for them. This will save me.
      Hmm! Handheld appear to be popular so I will get the DS plus some (not many) game for the kids.

      Even some of the cheap second hand PS2 games look attractive so why would I want to spend AU$600 to AU$750 for an Xbox360 or AU$400 for a Wii and a pack-in games.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    4. Re:XBox a surprise winner? by Hawkxor · · Score: 1

      [i]Even some of the cheap second hand PS2 games look attractive so why would I want to spend AU$600 to AU$750 for an Xbox360 or AU$400 for a Wii and a pack-in games.[/i]

      Why would somebody want to do this? Because they can afford it. ...

  9. Couldnt be worse for Sony by LibertineR · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Has another corporation ever had such a single bad year?

    Who'd thought that the Wii would suck the life out of the PS3 launch?

    The Wii gets all kinds of free press and publicity, if not for Sports, then for idiots destroying their plasma screens and blaming the Wii-mote strap for being too weak.

    In the mean time, Microsoft has the best game out in Gears of War for the 360, while the only thing I hear about the PS3 is that it is so hard to program that most games will suck on it for another year.

    Oh, and thanks for the root kit, Sony. Karma is a bitch, eh?

    1. Re:Couldnt be worse for Sony by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am not going to knock Gears of War, since I just bought it the other day and have yet to have a chance to really sit down with it. But I don't think Gears of War is going to appeal to too many people other than shooter fans and Xbox 360 fans.

      Sure, the game looks beautiful, amazing even. But to jaded gamers or casual gamers there isn't enough there to draw in anyone who wouldn't have already been drawn in already. I personally picked it up, played it for about 10 minutes, said "neat", and put it down. I'll get back to it when I have more time.

      When I picked up Wii Sports, on the other hand, I said "neat", and I couldn't put it down.

      There is a huge difference here.

      Gears of War isn't going to expand the 360 much further beyond the existing gaming crowd. Wii Sports will.

      On the other hand, there is a lot to be said about stores actualy having 360's and Gears of War in stock. Because, you know, you can actually get those if you want 'em. Of course, you can also get a PS2 and FF12 or Guitar Hero II as well... for less money.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    2. Re:Couldnt be worse for Sony by LibertineR · · Score: 1

      I should have been more clear, as I only meant best game out during the launch season, when Sony should have captured all the attention. Gears of War is good, but not earthshaking. I expect Halo 3 to accomplish that, though. The big winner is the Wii, and Microsoft did okay for not having any big news of their own. Sony lost this one big-time.

    3. Re:Couldnt be worse for Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the surprising thing is that the 360 is not doing better than it is. The PS3 numbers are limited by supply. We know there aren't any more to be had. The same for the Wii. There's no such restriction on the 360, and with the so-called 'Sony backlash' I thought the 360 would get a huge boost. Look at the numbers. It didn't happen. The 360 isn't doing much better than the 'can't be found in stores' Wii. I think this doesn't look good for Microsoft. Surprisingly, it seems that when the supply restrictions for the Sony disappear, more people will be buying that than the Xbox.

    4. Re:Couldnt be worse for Sony by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      Yeah, automatically calling "Gears of War" the "best game" is a little one sided, as it will only appeal to certain audiences. This year is going to be insanly tough to give "game of the year" awards to, because we've had so many absolutely amazingly HUGE and wonderful games: Oblivion, Okami, FF12, Gears of War, Twilight Princess. My personal vote goes to Twilight Princess by a land slide, with Okami and FF12 coming in 2nd and 3rd... then again, I'm a pretty hard core RPG fan, so epic-style games are likely to come out on top. It's obvious that Okami is going to get forgotten, a bit, which is a shame since I feel it is an extremely inspired game, but I have a feeling that it's going to be a dead heat between FF12, Zelda, Oblivion, and Gears of War, with different types of gamers taking sides and looking to kill everyone else.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
  10. Cheap PS2s... by LearnToSpell · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:Cheap PS2s... by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      I appropriately misread "Bid with confidence" as "Bid with confusion."

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    2. Re:Cheap PS2s... by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      haha

      "You're bidding on Sony Playstations, 3 of them."

      mod auction +5 clever (or is that +5 slimy?)

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    3. Re:Cheap PS2s... by xantho · · Score: 1

      Wow, and the buyer's ebay handle is a 10 digit number. You think that's a phone number? I normally wouldn't think so necessarily, but this person did pay $900 for three of the original Sony Playstation. Now that's dumb.

  11. Not worth the entry price by RichPowers · · Score: 1

    Consumers aren't entirely stupid. If you don't already own one, you can snag a PS2 dirt cheap. And there's a huge library of games - many going for $10-30, even cheaper used. PS2 even has some awesome games coming out in 2007, like Rogue Galaxy. If you're itching for party games (sans Wii Remote of course), you can't go wrong with Gamecube's library. The last gen (funny saying that) still has plenty of life.

    The point is the current lineup for Wii and PS3 isn't that great, especially considering the high asking price.

    That, and the technical jump to Wii/PS3 from GC/PS2 is less than the jump from N64/PSX to GC/PS2.

  12. surprising by Superfarstucker · · Score: 1

    I think things actually look pretty damn good for Microsoft's console considering it has been out for over a year. How many consoles do you think Nintendo and Sony will be selling next holiday season? For reference, Microsoft moved about 900,000 units in 2005 when they launched and due to supply issues it was almost impossible to find one until mid february according to wikipedia.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_launch#North _America [wikipedia.org]

    From those numbers it really seems like nintendo has screwed the pooch with this launch or that they are artificially restricting supply to give the illusion that greater demand exists. They should have had many more units available for sale given they are using essentially the same hardware that was found in the gamecube. To be fair I do believe Microsoft's advertising budget absolutely dwarfed what Nintendo has spent on launch advertising. But from where we are standing right now it seems Microsoft has positioned itself well and stands a good chance of taking the lion's share of the 'next generation.'

    1. Re:surprising by doormat · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, Nintendo is having supply chain issues - that is they physically are having problems getting consoles to the big box stores. And when you look at the issues present, it seems about the only explanation - the hardware isnt too advanced to be having yield issues, manufacturing capacity is there, its just they cant get the boats fast enough here from China or whereever its made.

      They're not restricting supply intentionally - they could probably sell 2M+ this season if they had the stock to sell. But there is no stock.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    2. Re:surprising by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that Nintendo will also need units for Japan? Which, let's be honest, the 360 didn't?

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
    3. Re:surprising by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1
      How many consoles do you think Nintendo and Sony will be selling next holiday season?

      Probably a lot more than the 360 is selling right now. Nintendo and Sony are constrained by supply issues just like the 360 was 12 months ago. Nintendo has previously said they expect to ship up to 4 million worldwide by the end of the year, which is nearly half of what Microsoft has sold in the last 12 months. If people take to the Wii like they took to the DS, then Microsoft needs to worry because the hardcore gamers will be spending their money on the PS3 and maybe Wii on the side, and the mainstream casual gamers will be getting Wiis. Despite everyone's love of hating Sony lately, they still dominate the home console market, and the PS2 is selling more than the 360, while Nintendo owns casual gaming and portables. YAXS (Yet Another XBox Shooter) isn't going to change Microsoft's market position.
      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    4. Re:surprising by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      They should have had many more units available for sale given they are using essentially the same hardware that was found in the gamecube.

      That's true, except for the way that practically every single part of the system from the optical drive to the input devices to the casing to the mainboard to the CPU to the output port is an entirely different part on the Wii than it was on the Gamecube.

      Um, I assume that the Gamecube controller and memory card ports on the Wii are the same. So you've got that at least.

  13. Nope. Still Next Gen by moehoward · · Score: 4, Funny


    They are still to be referred to as "next generation" until you can actually get one. Just because Nintendo shipped its only Wii to Zonk does not mean that we are suddenly in a new generation.

    The PS3 and Wii are vaporware at MSRP. I await proof to the contrary.

    P.S. Oh, and when you get proof, pick one up and ship it to me. I'll reimburse via Paypal. Thanks in advance!

    How in the hell did I turn into one of those Tickle-Me-Elmo parents???

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:Nope. Still Next Gen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you try pre-ordering, or did you just decide in advance to come to slashdot and be a complete jackass?

    2. Re:Nope. Still Next Gen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paypal? No thanks. I'd like to actually OWN my money.

    3. Re:Nope. Still Next Gen by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Would you like to see a receipt? I paid $249.99 plus tax for my Wii, along with 43 others a few weeks ago.

      The trick to getting one is knowing an employee who will tell you expected shipping dates (thanks, Lexxx!), and getting to the store two hours early. Time wasted argument aside, you know that you wouldn't have billable hours at 8am on a Sunday, and you'll more than piss away that "lost" two hours actually playing the thing.

      Of course, if you want the PS3, you're SOL. But I haven't met one person who seems very happy/impressed with one yet (whereas with the Wii, I've met a single person of several dozen who didn't like it, and it had nothing to do with graphics).

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    4. Re:Nope. Still Next Gen by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      The PS3 and Wii are vaporware at MSRP. I await proof to the contrary.

      Well, going by the furious screams of agony I'm receiving from muscles and tendons that have spent the last decade in complete disuse, I'd say that Wii is pretty damn real...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    5. Re:Nope. Still Next Gen by jZnat · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain; this is fucking ridiculous. Scalpers are almost as bad (if not worse) when it comes to the Wii compared to the PS3. I am not going to wait several hours in subzero weather outside a Target/Best Buy/Walmart/non-gaming store (wtf is up with the low supplies given to the stores that actually specialise in games?) just to get one.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    6. Re:Nope. Still Next Gen by !eopard · · Score: 1

      I wandered into the local Electronics Boutique yesterday and picked one up. Someone that pre-ordered didn't pick theirs up in the timeframe listed, so their order became 'general availability'. Good for me, too bad for them. It was an impulse buy, I didn't realise the Wii was out until I heard people talking about it. Good upselling on peripherals though by the girl behind the counter. However, after looking through a few other places, I reckon there's none left down under until the next shipment.

      --
      Boolean logic: True, False, and File not found.
    7. Re:Nope. Still Next Gen by necro2607 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Best Buy near my girlfriend's place got a shipment on Friday. You know what? There were about 30 people lined up, THE NIGHT BEFORE, with TENTS. This is fucking three weeks after the console's launch. Who knows how long the line was by the morning (needless to say we went home as soon as we saw the line the night before). But guess what? Best Buy received ELEVEN SYSTEMS. Fucking eleven. Can you imagine how pissed off the rest of those people were after they camped out all night, three weeks after the console was made available?

      We've been calling stores for nearly two weeks, about 20-25 stores every single day, and that was the only place in the surrey/langley area at all that received any. And they received 11 fucking systems. Frankly, I'm getting pretty pissed off.

      Unless I want to pay 3x the price by buying one through craigslist or ebay or whatever (or start camping out at stores days before they receive shipments), I doubt I'll have one before my birthday in March, let alone before Christmas time (which I was really looking forward to having all my family over for, and have a new Wii system for the party).

      Oh here's another story. A friend of mine who works at EB Games here told me about four mothers who came into the store one morning wanting to buy Wii systems. They were told how the store didn't know if they were receiving any but they're getting some kind of shipment in that day. The women all stayed there and just sat on the floor the rest of the day until a shipment came in in the afternoon (no Wii systems).

      Oh and people are now just cutting us off when we call about the Wii. We say "do you have any-" and they say "no, no Wii systems, sorry" (not because they recognize us as having called before). Trust me, at least around here, these things are NOWHERE TO BE FOUND in retail... :(

    8. Re:Nope. Still Next Gen by Omestes · · Score: 1

      The manager of the local Target tipped off my dad last week that they were getting 30 that Sunday. He sized him up before giving the random insider tip, it seems. At 8am there were 6 people inside, in line, and about 16 consoles. It was all very orderly. But no camping, or such, I even missed the 8 opening thanks to a heinous traffic accident.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    9. Re:Nope. Still Next Gen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can just walk in and take one off the shelf here in Australia.

  14. impossible business model by edwardpickman · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The technology is so expensive that they almost have no choice but to give away the consoles. By give away I'm referring to dropping the prices below $200. They need to sell games and a lot of them to pay off the machines. If you're already loosing a few hundred on a machine you have no choice but to depend on game sales. Prices have to drop like a rock next year or they'll never sell enough games to break even let alone show a profit. They are taking advantage of early adopters now but there will be price drops once the manufacturing volume chatches up. If you have a million machines out there and you are loosing a couple of hundred on a system and after buying the expensive box people can only aford three games you are loosing a fortune. Better to sell 5+ games to ten million customers. Xbox can better aford to loose the money on sales than Sony can with P3. They have far more units on the streets. Sony needs to drop to at least $250 ASAP to promote game sales. Sony dropped the ball on this release and may never catch up again. Microsoft is now positioned to release their next generation consoles a full year before Sony and they already have a commanding lead in sales. Sony may be forced to accept the Apple position of a perminate second place. They may be more innovative in the future but it's doubtful they'll ever catch up. The company is not positioned well to take risks where as Microsoft is cash rich and can take risks. Wii is kind of the small nimble hare in this race. They'll eventually have to drop their prices but for now they are the cheap fun alternative to the bloated big boy systems. They can't compete with Microsoft but they can blow Sony out of the water. Both Microsoft and Sony are likely to come out with competing controllers for their next generation systems but the Wii will have several years jump on either and will have a huge backlog of games based on the controller. The strategic win has to go to Nintendo even if they can't win overall sales.

    1. Re:impossible business model by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      The technology is so expensive that they almost have no choice but to give away the consoles.

      Wrong. Sony could very well have gone with a "real cost" figure for the PS3, and cut their liense feel and MSRP for games as well. They made a concious corporate descion to keep the same idea that got the PS and the PS2 out the door and into the mindset of everyone around. I doubt it'll work, as the PS3 isn't nearly as big a leap forward as either of its predecessors were.

      The strategic win has to go to Nintendo even if they can't win overall sales.

      Nintendo won the last generation on straight profit; they were simply a better investment in a business sense, unless you count the entire DVD universe as part of the PS2 picture.

      In six months, I expect everyone who couldn't get one the day after launch but wanted one to have a Wii. In eighteen months, I expect virtually everyone who has an Xbox 360 to have a Wii, and a fair share of those with PS3s as well. By thirty months, I'll expect the Wii to be successful enough that a "Wii DS" or similar reconfiguration will all but repeat the Wii's sell-out performance.

      In the same time frame, I'll expect the six-month out mark to include stories of how well the XBox360 works with Vista for media sharing, followed by a hack by Sony (and possibly NS) to do the same, albeit with a proprietary format or "special software" that will hinder both advances. Eighteen months will solve the production problems, and show price cuts due to R&D costs being largely paid off. By thirty months, we'll see a right-turn with the X-Box, possibly something as simple as a "computer attachment" to enable it to act as a terminal, and Sony will start hyping the PS4.

      And in thirty months, someone on /. will be trolling because their favorite console didn't do as well as they thought it was going to.

    2. Re:impossible business model by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      What again does Nintendo have to do for your consider them able to compete with Microsoft?

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    3. Re:impossible business model by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1
      They can't compete with Microsoft but they can blow Sony out of the water.

      Why can't they compete with Microsoft? Microsoft is in a potentially bad position. In 2007, a hardcore gamer with money to spend on a high-end console will eventually go with the Playstation 3 when supplies aren't limited (Sony still has 80% user base of the home console market, last I read). Everyone else will be getting Wiis, along with hardcore gamers wanting a secondary Nintendo system. This puts the 360 in a middleground position where it has to compete for both hardcore and casual markets that the other guys are specializing on. They also have to compete with free online gaming--Sony and Nintendo won't be requiring subscription fees.
      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    4. Re:impossible business model by tlh1005 · · Score: 1

      I don't believe this is the case. I would think when the figures say they're losing X amount of dollars per console sold it takes into acount R&D cost spread out over # of consoles produced at the release, hardware cost per unit, etc. All of these things are high because manufacturing isn't ramped up and they're also not getting any bulk discounts on compoments. As more factories get on-line and more consoles are leaving the shelves the cost of production will go down. Eventually they'll be out of the red, even if it takes three years it's ok because I don't think that is even considering the game licensing and sales figures.

    5. Re:impossible business model by old-lady-whispering- · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. I see PS3 struggling into 2007 until they can drop price or provide a compelling differentiator. I certainly don't rule out Sony pulling a hat trick. PS3=Mac is a very interesting point. I am not sure that will happen. The PS3 will either get significant market share or they will be a loser. If they can't get their shipped numbers up to at least 100,000 a week starting Jan then they have no chance of catching the 360. Sony has alot of great titles comming for the PS3 but unless 360 sales stop completely the PS3 is unlikely to catch up in any market except Japan.

      Nintendo is taking a mind blowing risk. I certainly could not have concieved of them agreeing to this type of risk when conteplating their next move after the Gamecube. The problem is the Wii is more novel than inovative. Both Sony and Microsoft can easily produce a competing controller which could devalue the Wii's uniqueness. Compounding this is the fact that PS3 and 360 games will on average look spectacularly better because of the graphics power houses built into both of them. The sales for the Wii should be supported by demand in Japan which will keep it going but I don't see them dominating anywhere else. Let's face it everyone likes the cutting edge graphics when selecting games and the screen shots of Twilight princess provided the proof for me to wait for the gamecube version. The Wii will soon be looking like last gen once the novel controller wears off. When you adopt HD TV would you rather have a Wii or a PS3/Xbox360? By the way HD sets are on schedule to hit the consumer sweet spot within the next two years.

      The Xbox360 got off to a rough start but it seems to be fairing much better than their competitor's launches. The 360 has struggled with the slow growth of sales which coincides with the slow release of major hits. Though Xbox Live is at the top of the hill it requires a subscription where it's competitors do not. Despite all these weaknesses it's competitors will be confounded by about an 8 million unit lead; hardware performance that should equal the PS3; difficulty in differentiating themselves from the well funded Xbox Live; and the looming possibility of a price drop in 2007.

      Also Keep in mind that most of the sales of consoles happen in the last 2/3rds of it's lifespan where the Wii will certainly be viewed as long in the tooth. For me the Wii is the worst choice this gen and only the PS3 and 360 should be considered.

      I don't own any next gen yet but am planning to buy an 360 at the first price drop in 2007. I can't imagine the PS3 will see a price drop anytime soon but like you said we may be surprised this spring.

      --
      The truth suffers more from convictions than from lies.
    6. Re:impossible business model by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      The problem is the Wii is more novel than inovative.

      Says you.

      Both Sony and Microsoft can easily produce a competing controller which could devalue the Wii's uniqueness.

      Not if a sheaf of Nintendo patents on the Wii control systems have anything to do with it.

      Let's face it everyone likes the cutting edge graphics

      Says you. What were the most popular games at the party I went to over the weekend? Nintendo Ice Hockey and Super Mario Bros 3, played on an NES bought nearly 20 years ago.

      Everyone likes fun. Only some people care about cutting edge graphics.

    7. Re:impossible business model by old-lady-whispering- · · Score: 1

      The problem is the Wii is more novel than inovative.

      Says you.

      Both Sony and Microsoft can easily produce a competing controller which could devalue the Wii's uniqueness.,

      Not if a sheaf of Nintendo patents on the Wii control systems have anything to do with it.
      Patents do provide protection but if your patent is too vague and general then you are in for some expensive fights. You can't patent wireless, vector, and acceleration for a game controller that will prevent your competitors from incorporating the same capabilities in theirs. Nintendo has a very specific patent. So MS and Sony can't clone a Wii controller but they can offer the same functionality in a different controller. Who knows it might end up being a better mouse trap or it might never happen.

      Let's face it everyone likes the cutting edge graphics.

      Says you.

      What were the most popular games at the party I went to over the weekend? Nintendo Ice Hockey and Super Mario Bros 3, played on an NES bought nearly 20 years ago.

      Everyone likes fun. Only some people care about cutting edge graphics. .
      As an old curmudgeon it vexes me to have an argument thwarted by a party where you and your friends play NES. Why didn't I think of that? I do recall a party I went to long ago where a friend had bought an Atari 2600 off Ebay and we all took turns playing combat. It really was lots of fun. Though none of us ever bought a 2600 except the one friend. We ended up with PS1's and N64's etc.... By the way you could use your argument against the Wii also. There are many other choices that are cheaper than the Wii and many would argue more fun (erg. PS2, Xbox, NGC). So like a bucket with holes your argument does not hold water for long. When shelling out hundreds of dollars performance is important because it equals longevity and I think the Wii will have one of the shortest lifespan for a Nintendo console. Maybe Nintendo will do some type of technology refresh for it in a few years but the early adopters will still be left with a bag full of last gen performance.
      --
      The truth suffers more from convictions than from lies.
  15. Stop the "Artificial restricting supply" nonsense! by jchenx · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From those numbers it really seems like nintendo has screwed the pooch with this launch or that they are artificially restricting supply to give the illusion that greater demand exists. They should have had many more units available for sale given they are using essentially the same hardware that was found in the gamecube.
    When will people realize that this whole "artificially restricting supply" theory is just wrong. First there were claims that MS was doing this with the 360, then next with Sony, and finally with Nintendo. The theory is just absurd.

    Do you think those companies want to miss their sales forecasts, and get punished in the stock market for doing so? Of course not. All three companies have run into supply problems because, well, releasing a console worldwide is pretty damn difficult. (Consider that in the past, hardware releases were generally not global either) Should MS, Sony, and Nintendo be chastised for their errors? Certainly.

    But this whole "oh, they're just artificially restricting supply to make the illusion of demand" is just nonesense. It's usually spouted off by fanbois who can't imagine that there are actually consumers that want the "other" system.
    --
    -- jchenx
  16. Sigh. Buy a 360. by maynard · · Score: 1

    OK. After bitching over how my first 360 died within an hour, instead of returning it I exchanged it for a new unit and a 2 year warranty. I'm pretty sure the second unit will croak, but I'm am totally sucked in by Gears of War and Dead Rising. Shit. I want to hate this thing, but the games are freak'n great.

    Oh! The blood!!!

    1. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think any 360's made within the past year shouldn't give you any problems (other than a lemon, and all electronic products have their share of lemons).

      Don't worry too much about it.

    2. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by maynard · · Score: 1

      Oh, I disagree. I think the current 90nm based 360 hardware is junk. But the games are incredible, and the PS3 will be no better in the near term. I've decided to stick with the 360 for my own online gaming fun, and buy a Wii for party games with friends. This - I think - is the sweet spot right now.

    3. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by walnutmon · · Score: 1

      Sucked in by Gears of War? Hope you enjoy all 8 hours of gameplay. That sucks.

      --
      You take it, I don't want it...
    4. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by walnutmon · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Ok, Can someone please tell me about these incredible games? I really would love that explanation, because I hear it all the time, but I see no proof of it, and I would love my 500 dollar purchase vindicated.

      I bought and xBox360 at launch, and it is technically a very good machine. I have had no problems or complaints with it's operation. It is loud, but not as loud as the volume I play at. It is sleek and looks cool where I have it. I like the controller more than any other controller to date (haven't played a Wii, played a PS3). The graphics are great and looks cool as hell on my high def TV. I can't wait to actually enjoy a game for more than 5 hours.

      Fight Night was cool for awhile, about 5 hours. But single player mode is very repetative. I'll throw smackdown and the racing games under that category too. The racers are not as good as Gran Turismo for PS2 5 years ago, disapointing. I don't play online that much because everyone online is better than me, I am into consoles for the single player experiences for the most part. Not that I don't dabble in online play, I just think that consoles should offer games substantial enough to stand on their own.

      So we have Gears, which is short and not in the same league as most FPS on the PC, not suprisingly. If I want to play online shooters, I will boot my computer and play one of the many awsome online games.

      So what else is there? Why did I spend 500 dollars on a system that has given me probably less than 50 hours of enjoyment in a full year. WoW did many times that for about $180, game and subscription, which I no longer play.

      And please don't try to sell me on rainbow six or any other FPSs, consoles are still behind PCs in those games, and since I have both, I excersise my better option %100 of the time. Oh yeah... and what the hell happend to Madden? How does EA skip over their big franchise title on the big new console two years running. They still haven't caught up to their PS2 offerings.

      So when I think incredible games I think, Mario World, Half-Life, WoW, Warcraft, Oblivion (oh yeah, I forgot, that game is sweet! So sweet that I stopped playing it on xBox after about 10 hours and bought it for the PC, awsome decision), FF1-7 (haven't played 12 much yet, but I hear it is pretty good). I am a gamer, I love games, and I love being sucked into a great experience. So please, "incredible games", can you enlighten me?

      --
      You take it, I don't want it...
    5. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by maynard · · Score: 1

      I was sold by Gears of War and Dead Rising. I'll also probably buy Call of Duty 3, but that's been ported to everything. So, if you've played those games and didn't dig 'em, dump that 360 right now. Sell it on craigslist or whatever.

      But I'm totally hooked. --M

    6. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

      Well, according to gamerankings and metacritic, GoW is better than any recent PC FPS release, so if you want a recent FPS there is no reason to not pick up GoW for the multiplayer, as the controls work well for a console. Viva Pinata is a great game, even though it looks childish it is alot of fun. Dead Rising is pretty good as well.

      So, 3 excellent games, a few great ones (there are other FPS games+racing games), and a ton of o.k. games.

      So we compare consoles at this point, the wii and ps3 have 1 excellent game, and mostly shovelware.

      All 3 consoles are going to have a ton of great games next year.

    7. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I just hate games that are really great, and have all these multiplayer options, because then the eight hours are over so fast and then it is time to bin the game...

    8. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by colmore · · Score: 1

      I can't tell you why you spent $500 on a machine that didn't have any games you were interested in. Compulsive consumerism?

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    9. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      The Wii has only 1 excellent game? Have you forgotten Rayman, Wii Sports, Excite Truck, and Trauma Center? Not to mention the Virtual Console? I'd say the Wii has had the best launch lineup compared to the PS3 and 360--a far cry from the launch lineup the Gamecube had.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    10. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Wow, it's "really great" and has "multiplayer options." That really justifies ripping people off in single player.

      I spent a weekend at a friend's house and beat Gears of War by Sunday. Five hours on Saturday and four on Sunday. Is the Xbox 360 nothing but shooter games or what? Sheesh. When Metroid Prime 3 comes out and proves that the Wii's controller is the ultimate way to control first person shooters on a console, 360 gamers will look pretty silly trying to aim with their little joysticks.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    11. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      Only things I see on the 360 that I want are Dead Rising, Gears of War, and Saint's Row. *If* I had paid more attention and known it was an upscaling DVD player as well, I probably would've picked one up. But I *just* got an upscaling DVD player 6 months or so back and it seems a shame to chuck the thing in favor of a 360. Granted, it wasn't that expensive, but I only have one HD-capable set in the house, and I did pay a premium over a normal DVD player for it.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    12. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Oh, I disagree. I think the current 90nm based 360 hardware is junk.
      > But the games are incredible

      Kevin Flynn would beat the MCP and have linux or FreeBSD booting on that piece of junk in no time. Suck it up!

    13. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by maynard · · Score: 1

      Compulsive consumerism? Beats me. I wanted a diversion, and the games are plenty of fun. However, I'll point out that I bought this at Microcenter in Cambridge, MA, which has a $100 rebate on the Core and Premium. So I paid $299 plus the warranty and tax for the premium unit. Still expensive though.

    14. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

      1. The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess 95.5%
      2. Trauma Center: Second Opinion 84.5%
      3. Madden NFL 07 83.7%
      4. Marvel: Ultimate Alliance 80.4%
      5. Rayman Raving Rabbids 78.8%
      6. Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 2 78.5%
      7. Wii Sports WII Nintendo 77.4%
      8. Tony Hawk's Downhill Jam WII 75.8%
      9. Excite Truck WII Nintendo 74.7%
      10. Call of Duty 3 WII Activision 74.3%
      11. Super Monkey Ball: Banana Blitz WII 73.5%
      12. Red Steel WII Ubisoft 23 65.9%

      from gamerankings.com (a meta-review site)

      If by excellent you mean average at best, then sure. (I perhaps discounted trauma center unfairly, as I'm still pissed it doesn't support 480p, and madden and marvel are cross platform games).

    15. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Well, people are raving about Wii Sports, Rayman, Trauma Center, and Twilight Princess (real people, not a meta-review site). Time Magazine called Sports the greatest game ever made, and everyone who tries it loves it. Even if you just count Sports and Zelda, that's two great titles for the price of one. Again, the Wii has the best launch lineup of the three consoles.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    16. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm a huge fan of the Wii, and I'm an even bigger fan of Metroid Prime, but I have my doubts that MP3 will be the be-all-and-end-all of FPSs. For one thing, Metroid Prime isn't an FPS, by genre, it's a sci-fi adventure game that HAPPENS to be in first person. It has never appealled, much, to the traditional FPS crowd, and unless they put in a damn impressive multiplayer (of which both Retro and Nintendo totally screwed up in their previous two MP outings: MP2 and Hunters), they're gonna take a lot of flack from the FPS community, who have embraced a total of 3 console shooters: Halo, Halo 2, and Gears of War. You have a huge schism between the FPS playing community, and the rest of the gaming community, and hardly ANY game has been able to greatly bridge that gap. As much as I love the Metroid series, I think the fact that it was started by the same company that made "Kirby's Dream Land", back in the day, will be enough to deter the FPS meat-head crowd.

      Secondly, there are problems with the Wiimote as a perfect FPS controller. Aiming is beautiful, and I'm able to pick off enemies in Twilight Princess faster than I ever could in Counter Strike, on a PC, but combining that with movement, on the other hand, is another issue entirely. A game on rails, without the need to turn, run, and dodge, like you have with Zelda's bow&arrow scheme, is perfect, but using the margins of the screen to turn, is CLUNKY. I've been racking my brain on this one for quite some time, but I've still been unable to come up with a control scheme idea that isn't somehow greatly flawed. One notion is to completely abandon the Wiimote for all kind of head turning, and religate that to the analog stick, but then you're back to the FPS "problems" of Metroid Prime 1/2, in which you had to stop to look up or turn, which completely pissed of FPS freaks who accidently picked up MP thinking it was one. I have heard that some people have been able to fine tune the bounding box so that it's better than others, but MP3 got a lot of flack at E3 for its notoriously slow turning speed, and clunky "bounding box" control setup... I don't think we're there yet.

      That said, Metroid Prime was far and away my favorite action/adventure game, until Twilight Princess came along and blew it out of the water, and I'd LOVE to see the next Metroid be a mega-hit crossover title. But most FPS fans I know have a vendetta against adventure games / RPGs, a category which Metroid falls smack in the middle of... so its gonna take an act of god for MP3 to become "The Next Halo". And with the recent debacles of Metroid Prime 2 and Metroid Prime Hunters (of which, I know, was not Retro... shame on you NINTENDO!) I'm guarding my expectations, just hoping that it lives up to MY enjoyment.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    17. Re:Sigh. Buy a 360. by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      I'll agree that the Wii launch lineup, as a whole, isn't all that impressive. That said, TP is ranked 11th of All Time... and in my opinion, this is actually unfairly low. It is also huge: I'm at 60 Hours right now, and just wrapping things up. I'd go as far as to say it beats the shit out of any other launch game... and that includes Mario World and Mario 64. So, for me, Twilight Princess IS the launch lineup, and a killer one at that, practically worth the price of the Wii in itself. It's been quite some time since a console had a Top 20 game at launch, and the fact that the Wii has pulled that off is a good sign. Now, that said, yes, I'm a little unhappy with the rest of the lineup, but I know that there are quite a few huge games just around the corner: MP3, two Mario games, Smash Bros Brawl, an FF spinoff, and a DQ spinoff, just to name a few. Currently, I've yet to finish FF12, and before that, Okami... so they will keep me busy for quite some time after I finish TP. By then, there should be some more great games for the Wii.

      Oh, I also picked up Excite Truck on the side. Not a game I'll put hundreds of hours into, but it's a blast, none-the-less. Too bad it's not 4 player, because it's a great party game, simply in 2 player mode.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
  17. Re:Stop the "Artificial restricting supply" nonsen by dunstan · · Score: 1

    Nintendo's game plan is surely influenced by the fact that Sony hasn't launched PS3 other than North America. They have the European and Asian market buzz to themselves - the news channels here in GB are full of stories about Wii, while there has been nothing about PS3 because it doesn't launch until March.

    If I were Nintendo I'd want to be getting units into the European markets pronto before people start holding back their purchases for the PS3 launch. For the unlucky ones there is a waiting list for Wiis to be delivered in the new year - there is no waiting list for PS3.

    Whatever, I've got a Wii safely tucked away for my children's Christmas present (just had to make sure it worked properly - took a while coz i needed to check all the games in Wii sports). No way I'd have bought them a PS3 at launch prices.

    --
    The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
  18. I think it is too expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a 360 and a couple of games, about two months ago. Mostly because I wanted to check it out. Today my live account is downgraded to silver after the free trial ended, and I haven't upgraded it again since I don't play much online.
    But the games are to damn expensive, I paid around 90$(local currency converted to $) for GoW at the local ebgames and even though I didn't rush through it. I finished it in a couple of days. Even if I liked playing online, I believe the multi player part would get boring soon.
    It seems to me that most of the games that sells the capabilities of the 360 are still in development. It is all fine to see Halo 3 trailers but the game is still a year away.
    Why are the games so expensive when they are full of bugs. With these new consoles, you get patches for the games via the internet. New console games are more complicated than the old generations so of course there are bigger chances of bugs. But when the games costs as much as they do, I'd say that they should have found by the time it went in the press. As far as I can see from my 2 months of ownership, 360 game developers rely heavily on the possibility of online updates, something you could expect with lower priced games that are copied a lot, not from expensive console games.

    I want my Bomberman.
    A of course, the 360 lacks a good party game(as in play with you friends while drinking) like bomberman, yes they have "Bomberman: act zero" or something like that, but it seems like a step back making it 3D. Having the screen split into four does not look like a step forward. I haven't tried it, because I don't want to pay 90$ for it. Release something closer to the original on live arcade, please.

    Noise.
    Then there is the irony of the noise you have to put up with when playing the games. Forget about fan noise. Imagine the cheapest DVD drive you can find, running at full speed all the time when playing a game. The irony part is that after you have downloaded a 1GB demo via Live, you get to play the demo in relative silence(only fan noise). But when you get the game, you are treated with the full experience of the glorious 30$ DVD drive warp speed sound.

    20gb enough for everybody?
    Please give me the option of buying a 100gb drive. I love all the demo's and video's you can download from live. But I filled up the 14gb available in 3 days. So I started deleting and re-downloading stuff when I wanted to show it to friends. 65GB of traffic on my internet connection the first month I owned it. I used about 10-15gb before that. I have "unlimited" usage so I won't complain about that, still it can't make the ISPs happy with a lot of console customers. :) I looked into buying a 100gb drive and replacing the original one, but it seems like it can't be done.

  19. you might want to get a gba micro not an sp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got one on black friday for cheap. it's tiny! I love it! only thing is the screen is pretty small.

  20. Re:Stop the "Artificial restricting supply" nonsen by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Do you think those companies want to miss their sales forecasts, and get punished in the stock market for doing so? Of course not.

    Spot on with the stock market comment. Plus we all saw pictures of the lines for the PS3 release. If Sony could have sold a PS3 at $600 to every one of those people instead of the first half dozen, do you think they wouldn't have? PS3 is a strategic tool for Sony for pushing Blu Ray, and the strength of that push is dependent entirely on the number of PS3 sold. So they would limit the number they sold, keeping it unclear whether their strategy would pay off or backfire? It makes no sense. Some nonsensical "perceived demand" is irrelevent compared to actual consoles in the market as far as directing the future of the market. Which does a better job of encouraging sales via word of mouth: "I wanted a PS3 but there wasn't one to buy", or "I got a PS3, check out how cool it is, you can get one too".

    Same goes for Nintendo. If you're trying to expand beyond the traditional gamer demographic, then you damn well better be able to sell to people who aren't willing to wait in line for it!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  21. Year end for the 360 isn't dec 31st by cybrthng · · Score: 1

    Its financial year end, somewhere around March if i'm not mistaken. I don't see them missing there goal.

    1. Re:Year end for the 360 isn't dec 31st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their goal

  22. However... by Omeger · · Score: 1

    NPD doesn't count online sales. Those numbers are a LOT higher.

  23. And the loser is... by danwesnor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was in Best Buy today and noticed the console displays. One guy in his mid-40's playing the PS-3, nobody watching. There was nobody near the Wii. I didn't look at the 360 (forgot about it, actually), but there were about 10 people standing around watching a kid play Guitar hero on a PS-2.

    Looks like the last gen is winning the next gen war.

    1. Re:And the loser is... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's it, folks. Dan Wesnor's lone experience in a Best Buy officially determines who is winning the next-gen war. Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft--may as well pack up your bags and go home. There's no way around the fact Dan saw some people playing Guitar Hero on a demo kiosk. It's all over.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    2. Re:And the loser is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My personal experience at a Best Buy in West Hollywood was playing Flatout 2 on an Xbox(1) with a Nintendo Wii display directly behind me playing a looping video of how "great" the system is with no controllers or any way to actualy try the system. (I wouldn't be suprised if the "system" in the display case was just a hollow box). They used to have a Guitar Hero setup just behind the display I was standing up, and it did attract a lot of people, but it was removed a few weeks ago. I headed over to the PS3 display, and all they had was NBA 06 or something playing on it, and nobody was standing around the thing at all. I love store displays, because
      I can usualy try the games with them, but if it's just a lame video playing, or the thing is broken, then that is more customers who probaly went with something else because they didn't get to see for themselves how good/bad the games were.

    3. Re:And the loser is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, the Xbox 360 only barely beat the Wii in November sales, and that's solely because the Wii is supply-constrained. Nintendo is going to eat Microsoft for breakfast in 2007. What do demo kiosks have to do with that?

  24. Not sure yet about Wii Sports by jchenx · · Score: 1

    I'm not so sure on Wii Sports. I got a chance to try out two games recently, Tennis and Boxing. Both were interesting, but really seemed gimmicky. It disturbed me that in Tennis, you didn't control player movement and all you could do was swing. As for boxing, my character didn't really do what I always wanted it to do. You know how people "button mash" to win certain games? For Wii games, it's all about the "violent shaking". That said, I've heard that Tennis and Boxing may be the worst of the Wii titles, so I am hoping that the other sports are better.

    That said, I agree completely with your statement that Wii Sports will expand beyond the existing gaming crowd. As a free pack-in game, it does a great job introducing the console to non-gamers. I just don't know how long its going to last. Anyone who thinks that the Wii is going to suddenly take the middle-age non-gamer public by storm, is going to be mightly depressed. It's not going to make a gamer out of your parents, but it might be something they pull out every so often, when they have friends over.

    Then again, that might be good enough for Nintendo, since they make money off console sales and don't need a high attach rate like Sony and MS do.

    --
    -- jchenx
    1. Re:Not sure yet about Wii Sports by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      You really have to play Wii Sports with another person for the full effect. You can play it solo, but it's just not the same experience (except for perhaps bowling and golfing which fare better as solo games). The Wii is the kind of system grandmas will keep around to pull out for when their grandkids come over. It's something everyone can enjoy, much like the original NES before "hardcore" gamers took over the market and turned everything into sports games, racing games with "Street" or "Underground" in the titles, and first-person shooters.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    2. Re:Not sure yet about Wii Sports by jchenx · · Score: 1

      Ehh, I should have mentioned ... but that's what I did. It was in a holiday party situation.

      Actually, that probably didn't help the situation. Everyone was interested in the food and mingling, more than playing any type of game.

      Wii Sports would have a pretty cool party game to have when I was in college. Potentially dangerous too. :)

      --
      -- jchenx
  25. I think you mean something else ... by jchenx · · Score: 1
    Sorry - I think the eBay frenzy is pretty much solidified which consoles are "hot" in most scalper's minds
    There, I fixed it for you.
    --
    -- jchenx
    1. Re:I think you mean something else ... by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 0, Troll

      And Nintendo's inability to put out accessories? You know - those really hard to make things called JOYSTICKS? Didja fix that too? Good fucking job!

      Could you fix their marketing message too? They keep going on about "casual gaming" with Zelda's 70 hours of hardcore gameplay. The bullshit from Nintendo is starting to pile up - perhaps you could help out.

    2. Re:I think you mean something else ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, jchenx only "fixes" things when they're advantageous for Microsoft (the company he works for, imagine that! nothing better than self admitted astroturfing.)

    3. Re:I think you mean something else ... by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      BTW: I own a Wii, but that doesn't mean that Nitendo has been all saintly along the way. I'm still imagining the Borat level comedy unfolding as the "casual gamer" get's whacked upside the head by Zelda. It's a great game - but not a great "casual game". In fact - has anyone noted that the control scheme is now the most complex version ever done?

    4. Re:I think you mean something else ... by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      It's also easily the best control scheme ever made (the fighting in WW was too damn Context Sensitive), except for the item screen, which sorta blows. But the actual fighting controls are top notch. I agree, though, that at, now 60 hours in, with not anywhere close to every heart piece, and I THINK nearing the end of the story, it's definitely not a game for the faint of heart, not to mention its dark and slightly more sophisticated storyline/characters, are likely to bore the younger crowd. For the Final Fantasy gamer, this is the PERFECT Zelda, and is currently fighting a very convincing battle for all-around best game, in my book, but it's certainly not for everyone.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    5. Re:I think you mean something else ... by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      re:"finitely not a game for the faint of heart, not to mention its dark and slightly more sophisticated storyline/characters, are likely to bore the younger crowd"

      Of course having a semi-adult player that caters to and is encouraged to play with children - yes - that's very dark. Neverland dark. And isn't he horse just the worst ever rendered? I mean it's creepy. Next play-through I'm naming it "ZombieHorsie".

    6. Re:I think you mean something else ... by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      Maybe I missed something, but... hmmm... WHAT?!

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    7. Re:I think you mean something else ... by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Which one - the part where half the game centers around him having an unusual relationship with minors, or the deformed horse with no eyes? "ZombieHorsie - GET THE BRAINS!"

    8. Re:I think you mean something else ... by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      Are we talking about the same game, Zelda - Twilight Princess? Because I never saw anything strange about Epona's model, and this is the first I've heard of it. The point is, you assume it's common knowledge that everyone's talking about, because you made no attempt to explain what you were talking about.

      And who is having unusual relationship with minors? GameStop? EB Games? WTF?

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
  26. Console displays suck by jchenx · · Score: 1

    Bah, console displays suck. Store employees often don't set them up right (composite cables on a HDTV!?) or take care of them. Many of the displays I see are "demoing" error or blank screens.

    Additionally, I believe you can only demo ESRB-rated "E" (everyone) games, which means no Resistance for the PS3 or Gears of War for the 360. Nintendo is actually fortunate here, since they don't rely on M-rated titles to be some of the best games for their systems.

    That said, I am excited for Guitar Hero II, although I'll be waiting for it on the 360.

    --
    -- jchenx
  27. We are aware of Europeans. by dfenstrate · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We are aware of you Europeans. But we're not talking about you. Not everything is about you guys, don't you know? Not everything is about the US either, but this article is

    Anyway, It always helps to read the FAQ.

    Especially the Slashdot version.

    I quote:

    Slashdot seems to be very U.S.-centric. Do you have any plans to be more international in your scope?

    Slashdot is U.S.-centric. We readily admit this, and really don't see it as a problem. Slashdot is run by Americans, after all, and the vast majority of our readership is in the U.S. We're certainly not opposed to doing more international stories, but we don't have any formal plans for making that happen. All we can really tell you is that if you're outside the U.S. and you have news, submit it, and if it looks interesting, we'll post it.

    It is worth noting that there is a Japanese Slashdot run by VA Japan. While we helped them a little in their early days, they essentially run their own content without any real involvement from us... none of us can read Kanji! There are currently no plans to do other language or nation specific Slashdot sites.


    Do europeans want a pity mention every time a discussion of the North American market comes up?

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:We are aware of Europeans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Do europeans want a pity mention every time a discussion of the North American market comes up?


      That`s not necesary, WE ALL KNOW YOU`RE BUSY BOMBING OTHER CONTRIES!
    2. Re:We are aware of Europeans. by Josef+Meixner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know what is even funny about the parent you answered to? He could have brought up a very good point.

      SONY couldn't even manage to produce enough hardware to deliver to Europe. Being a European myself I even can understand it, consoles never were as popular here as in Japan or the US. But after the first delay (remember when the PS3 originally was to ship?) SONY promised to bring the PS3 out in all three markets at the same time, so for us it was actually moved forward, because the original date of shipment was in March 2007. Now they moved it back breaking another promise. They even presold it for December in Summer and now some kids won't get their console for Christmas.

      There really must be bad problems to produce this beast. What they now managed is to anger their European customers even more, drove some to buy another box (or can you imagine parents giving their kids a coupon instead of a toy?) and showed just how hard it is for them to produce the hardware.

      Does anybody really anticipate it will change fast? I don't and that means they will loose a lot of revenue, because until they can sell in volume (or even start selling here) the price of XBox 360 will have dropped even more making the PS3 look even more expensive or giving SONY even bigger negative cash for each sell.

      I don't see those problems for Nintendo, their problem is to get enough good games which only work with the Wiimote. If they don't manage that, they will probably make some money, but will probably stay in third place. I at their position would try to get a license for some Star Wars game, imagine all the people who would love to swing their wiimote as substitute for a laser sword. They could even opt to make a special edition of the controller shaped like a laser sword. Honest, how many people would run out to get it (and the box and the game)?

    3. Re:We are aware of Europeans. by Don_dumb · · Score: 2, Funny
      I at their position would try to get a license for some Star Wars game, imagine all the people who would love to swing their wiimote as substitute for a laser sword. They could even opt to make a special edition of the controller shaped like a laser sword.
      LASER SWORD? Oh dear, not knowing what a lightsaber is called. Consider your geek license revoked.

      That said, yes I agree that a lightsaber game (perhaps KOTOR or Jedi Academy kinda thing), would be the best thing Nintendo can do with the Wii. Currently I dont think I can afford to buy a Wii and am happy to wait, but those adverts of Wii-sports & Zelda are really turning the screw right now and 'Star Wiis' would be just the thing to hurt my credit card.

      Dont forget that even Nintendo have struggled to meet pre-orders here (at least in the UK).
      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    4. Re:We are aware of Europeans. by Josef+Meixner · · Score: 1

      Oh noes. Sorry, but I wasn't sure on the translation any more. The official German translation is actually Lichtschwert meaning light sword. And if you give me some more time, I will find an even better excuse.

    5. Re:We are aware of Europeans. by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      If you were commenting in your second (or third or fourth) language, then I apologize, you're a clearly more qualified geek than me.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
  28. X360 base price is $299 not $500 by xswl0931 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The base X360 is $299. With game, that's $350. Use the Overstock 12% off coupon and it's ~$308 for the base console plus one game. That's a big difference from your $500 claim (even without the coupon). Don't confuse the 360 price with the PS3 price.

    1. Re:X360 base price is $299 not $500 by DECS · · Score: 1

      Of course, with the $200 Microsoft HD-DVD, the 360 is the exact same price as the PS3. Microsoft just allows you to not buy HD optical player as an option, so its not really less expensive at all, its just offered in a cheaper configuration.

      PlayStation 3 vs. Xbox 360 vs. Nintendo Wii

    2. Re:X360 base price is $299 not $500 by bottlerocket · · Score: 1

      With the Core system, you'll need a memory card. So, add $40. And the games cost $59, not $49.

      I'm just throwing that out there; I'm a happy 360 owner. But I do think that not including some sort of integrated storage system in the Core system (does anyone buy those?) was a mistake. Data caching, patches and update storage, easier game saves, a more consistent base for developers: the lack of integrated storage in one of the SKUs does give the PS3 a significant advantage.

      --
      where the comment ends and sig begins
    3. Re:X360 base price is $299 not $500 by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's pretty disingenuous of you to not mention that you're referring to the Core configuration, which has no wireless capability or hard drive.

      If you buy a Core system for $300 and actually want to save your game or have XBox 1 compatibility, that's an additional $100 for the hard drive add-on, putting you up to $400 (Microsoft really wants you to get a hard drive). Along with a game, that's $450, and at that high of a price, you may as well just shell out for the Premium configuration at a whopping $400, which is $450 if you include a game.

      And after all that, you still have to pay Microsoft money every month just to be able to play online. Microsoft currently has no plans to make Xbox Live free, while Sony and Nintendo will offer it totally free.

      Of the three consoles, I actually consider the Xbox 360 the most overpriced. Nintendo can justify their price with the built-in WiFi, 512MB flash storage, and remote control, while Sony can cite Blu-Ray and the Cell in contributing to the cost of the PS3. I really think the 360 will be in trouble in the next two years when Sony sorts out its supply issues and everyone else picks up the Wii as a cheap primary or secondary console.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    4. Re:X360 base price is $299 not $500 by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Yes but presumably he wants to save his games, too. That's at least 40$ extra, probably 100$ if he wants the harddrive which anyone with half a brain probably recognizes as the better investment.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    5. Re:X360 base price is $299 not $500 by dontbgay · · Score: 2, Insightful

      close but no cigar. I know you want to drive your anti-Xbox point home, but at least get your facts straight. It's around $50 US for the annual gold membership. I pay that price because it keeps (most of) the cheaters out and my experience that much better.

      --
      Sig not found.
    6. Re:X360 base price is $299 not $500 by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1
      close but no cigar. I know you want to drive your anti-Xbox point home, but at least get your facts straight.

      It's pretty funny that you link to a page showing the free Silver membership without mentioning that you can't play games online with it. You have to pay for the Gold membership to actually do that. Enjoy sending Microsoft $50 a year; the rest of us will play online for free.

      Looking at that page also reveals that you have to have a storage device to use Live, which means either buying the expensive Premium 360 or buying a Core and shelling out for the hard drive separately. Again, I believe the Xbox 360 is the poorest deal and the most overpriced of all three consoles.
      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    7. Re:X360 base price is $299 not $500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet Xbox live is famous for being full of complete jackasses! Because of the ranking system people quit rather than lose. People will turn their routers off to lag kill opponents! You don't get that playing a game with a dedicated server, and stat tracking disabled on that server.

      Look at your own username... you're either a homophobe or you're using 'gay' as a derogatory term. Either way you're not someone I'd want to play a game with. Are you the best ambassador for Live?

    8. Re:X360 base price is $299 not $500 by iainl · · Score: 1

      Or buying a Core and a memory card. No-one, but no-one buys the Core and puts a hard drive on it unless:

      1) they did so around a year ago, when that soon after launch some people would buy any 360 they could find, because it beat being taken to the cleaners by someone on eBay

      2) they're loaded and really, really like the look of the plain grey drive tray, rather than the nasty looking chrome effect on the Premium

      3) thought they could get by with a memory card, then changed their mind months down the line.

      I went for the Premium, because the Core is astonishingly bad value for money by comparison. But on the other hand, I'm perfectly happy with my Silver account, because it gives me everything I want of online (downloading demos, comparing Robotron scores with my friends elsewhere in the world) without the stuff I tired of quickly on the original XBox (being sworn at by American teenagers).

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    9. Re:X360 base price is $299 not $500 by aftk2 · · Score: 1

      It's pretty disingenuous of you to not mention that you're referring to the Core configuration, which has no wireless capability or hard drive.

      Heh. No wireless? Let's space than a premium?! There is but one word that can be used to myopically define this configuration...

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    10. Re:X360 base price is $299 not $500 by elvismofo · · Score: 1

      Actually, first party games are 49. And I think "platinum hits" are 29?

  29. Many with worse years, and Sony's not bad. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you've heard of Tyco or Enron or Worldcom?

    See, there are plenty of corperations who have had way worse years. Even with teh Rootkit stuff Sony isn't even on the same level as those guys.

    What Sony has had is manufacturing problems, and some bad press. But they have actually had not a bad year when it comes to the gaming segment - sure the PS3 supply is lower than they had hoped but it is still selling out of stores instantly - some people seemed to feel Sony wouldn't sell ten units. Nolan Bushnel doubted they could sell a million in a year, but Sony still says they can sell taht many by the end of this year! And while many think the PSP is a dismal flop, what people don't realize is that it's actually selling OK - it just looks like a flop next to the supernova that is the DS Lite. But one companies success does not autmatically mean anothers doom, and so the PSP continues on in the market. The only real gaming failure I've seen from Sony this year is UMD, now that was the most awful idea ever.

    And of course, what you seem to have forgotten is that eclipsing all the sales of NextGen consoles was the PS2, just as it has done almost every month this year. So was this even the year of NextGen consoles at all? And don't you think Sony might have made just a tiny bit of money on all the PS2's that sell month after month in greater numbers even than the Wii?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  30. Supporting evidence - NPD PSP numbers by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    And while many think the PSP is a dismal flop, what people don't realize is that it's actually selling OK - it just looks like a flop next to the supernova that is the DS Lite.

    I just thought I should provide supporting evidence for that assertion - From the NPD report:

    Units:
    DS, 918k.
    PSP, 412k

    See? A little under half of what the DS sold. Not nearly as many as the DS but also not an unmitigated disaster either - I'll bet you wish you made something that 412,000 people wanted enough to pay $200 for. That's enough units being sold that Sony does not have to think of cancling the PSP, just as Gamecube's third place standing in the last round of consoles did not mean Nintendo had to fold either.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Supporting evidence - NPD PSP numbers by catprog · · Score: 1
      Don't forget the other handheld

      DS, 918k
      Game Boy Advance: 661k
      PSP, 412k

      --
      My Transformation Website
      Kindle Books http://www.catprog.org/rev
      Interactive CYOA http://www.catprog.org/st
    2. Re:Supporting evidence - NPD PSP numbers by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      The Gamecube remained profitable because of Nintendo's first-party titles. Sony doesn't make first-party PSP games.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    3. Re:Supporting evidence - NPD PSP numbers by iainl · · Score: 1

      Yes Sony do make 1st-party PSP titles. This year's F1 game (from Sony Liverpool, the guys who also did wipEout purE for launch) is in my bag as I type.

      Sony actually sold more 1st-party games (admittedly mainly for PS2) than Microsoft or Nintendo last year, apparently.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  31. HD-DVD not required by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

    You're assuming everyone wants or needs HD-DVD, which simply is not the case. Not everyone who buys the PS3 will play Bluray movies just like not everyone who buys a PSP plays UMD movies. The HD-DVD add-on is simply an optional accessory that has no impact on gaming.

    1. Re:HD-DVD not required by DECS · · Score: 1

      No that's the point of options: Microsoft provides an option of getting it or not. Sony doesn't.

      Sony wants to force adoption of Bluray, and if it can make everyone who buys a PS3 a Bluray customer, that will help.

      Microsoft's unbundling of the HD-DVD gives gamers uninterested in HD a discount, but that also means that HD-DVD won't be as widely available, making it less attractive for studios to release their movies for. It's the same problem Microsoft has with the hard drive option: the low end base model of the 360 lacks a hard drive, meaning that users will have to buy one in order to use the Live online movie service. Since many users will opt for cheaper, Microsoft is cutting down its potential audience for online movie sales, making it less likely that Microsoft will keep it going. It may end up ditching it like it abandonded PlaysForSure, screwing both partners and customers who bought into it, including many stupid libarians who made sure all their crap was locked up in PlaysForSure DRM.

      The Two Faced Monster Inside Zune

    2. Re:HD-DVD not required by GodInHell · · Score: 1

      I think it was very wise to cut the expense of the HD-dvd from the base model. Even assuming sony wasn't out there trying to tear buisiness away from HD-dvd, it wouldn't have been true to the xbox model. The original Xbox didn't play movies without the decoder/remote option. As then, there is no reason to try to make the 360 a true all-things to all people solution - give me what I want, let me leave what I don't care for on the floor.

      The lack of Hard Drive in the 360 seemed at first to be a rip-off.. but I went without one for the first few months (relying on a trusty memory card) and I never noticed the lack of storage space, even while downloading some minimal content. the Hard Drive is thus similar to the HD-dvd add on, if you want the space to support movies and make the best out of the machine, you buy the hard drive at a decent price. Not a fair price for sure, but well within reasonable for the demos, movies, and games you can get off Live.

      This modular design has allowed me to build my xbox the way I need it, yes to the hard drive, yes to wireless, no to HD-DVD, and 4 wireless controllers. Defraying the cost by spreading it out also helped diminish sticker shock, for what that's worth.

      -GIH

  32. Microsoft's FY isn't ending in March, either. by Corvaith · · Score: 1

    Nitpick: Microsoft's *fiscal* year-end (fiscal, not financial) is June 30. But that doesn't preclude them from having goals for any period, up to and including December 31... in fact, it's a fairly good bet that they do have projections in place for Christmas sales.

    As the articles don't seem to actually mention specific Xbox360 goals, I don't think we really have any way of knowing if they'll meet them or not, but they probably do exist.

    1. Re:Microsoft's FY isn't ending in March, either. by justchris · · Score: 1

      This article doesn't mention it, but Microsoft's stated goal is, and has always been, 10 million units shipped worldwide by the end of the calendar year.

      --
      just some guy
  33. They will offer 60/100gig next year by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    .... at DOUBLE the retail price of a 100gig SATA drive, because you know
    that plastic casing and special format costs SOOOO much and not to mention the retail margins at the shop.

    When Mr Microsoft could get a damn CLUE, and sell a $19 DISK to reformat ANY replaced HD. This would make them
    an instant $18.99 profit. Or let people go to 120/150 when the get released.

    Curse the evil Business Analyst , not the programmers, because im sure the coders at microsoft have 100gig + versions in the lab and AT HOME.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  34. Irrelevant to my point by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I already said that Nintendo's success was like a supernova. Adding in GBA figures does nothing to address the point I was making.

    Just because Nintendo is doing amazingly well, does not mean the PSP is not also doing OK. From the press and general comments in forums I had though the PSP was selling more like 20k units a month - and was startled that so many were being sold. At 412k units a month, nothing can be considered a "failure" even if the success is not as great as Nintendo has seen. And looking back, PSP figures have been more in the hundreds of thousands each month - not the tens of thousands trash talk had led me to believe.

    I don't even own any handheld units; I just don't have places in my life where they would be of use often enough to justify one. But many people out there seem to be buying both the DS, and PSP.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  35. Re:Stop the "Artificial restricting supply" nonsen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >When will people realize that this whole "artificially restricting supply" theory is just wrong. First there were claims that MS was doing this with the 360, then next with Sony, and finally with Nintendo. The theory is just absurd.

    Absurd but true. Even after the launch date, Nintendo still dictated when stores could sell their Wiis they have in stock. One store here (Futureshop) sold some wiis on the wednesday before black friday (no black friday in canada but during that week) and they got bitched at by nintendo hq.

    Also Nintendo has always been known to artificially push back release dates (even if they are finished) for games, to spread them out during the year. One such example is earthbound on nes. The game was completely finished/translated and they didn t relaase it so as not to interfear with the sales of other games.

  36. Just get a DS. by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Micros are a little too small, unless your a little kid. The DS lite is awsome. I have a wii, but i beat zelda already and red steel sucks, so untill i get more games (christmas) i've been back to playing New Super Mario Brothers and FFIII on my DS lite. Plus theres Meteos which is like upsidedown tetris on meth, which is awsome. Get a DS lite and New Super Mario, you will not regret it.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  37. Re:Stop the "Artificial restricting supply" nonsen by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    Absurd but true. Even after the launch date, Nintendo still dictated when stores could sell their Wiis they have in stock. One store here (Futureshop) sold some wiis on the wednesday before black friday (no black friday in canada but during that week) and they got bitched at by nintendo hq.

    Coordinated release != lack of supply problems.

  38. Re:Stop the "Artificial restricting supply" nonsen by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 0, Troll

    re:"Nintendo's game plan is surely influenced by the fact that Sony hasn't launched PS3 other than North America"

    Japan is in North America? Holy FUCK - continental drift is really moving FAST these days. No wait - you're just a fucking retard. Never mind.

  39. Lots of hype but little substance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the store displays here in Los Angeles, they have displays with a Wii in an acrylic case,
    and some video playing extolling the benifits of the Wii. No playable units here yet (sigh). I tried one of the PS3s, which had Motorstorm running on it. The visuals were gorgeous, but the game seemed to be not much more than your average racer, even if it did have destructable landscapes and what not. Plus, there were many artificial restrictions, and the car came apart way to easily (I know they were trying to aim for realism, but damn!) I had much more fun with UnWheel. Lately, they seemed to switch the display game to NBA, and I don't even like sports games. (and the f&^&ing game menu is locked so you can't exit. grrrrrr.). This year, it seems to bve a shitload of hype, but little delivery. Hopefuly next year things will be much better.

  40. 5+ more for Nintendo by shaka999 · · Score: 1

    If they ever get off their asses and actually get some units I that I don't have to camp out for. I know they have already lost a couple of my friends to Xbox just because they got so pissed off at how the store are handling things.

    Why in the world are they doing an international launch when they can't supply one country with enough units? Its making people, myself included, bitter. I'd rather they staggered things by a few months so they could get enough of the product to market.

    --
    One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
  41. Stop calling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I got a Wii in downtown Vancouver. Just walked into EB Pacific Centre right after opening, asked, and bought one. Same deal later on when I wanted an extra controller.

    They had seven Wiis when I bought mine, but when people called while I was checking out, the clerk said they didn't have them. The staff knew by the time anybody on the phone got down there the systems would already be gone. Then EB would have to deal with several dozen pissed-off Wii fans who'd been "promised" a Wii.

    They also know that if they tell people the day before that the systems are coming in, they'll have to deal with that line-up mess. Best Buy doesn't mind that because they got a huge store full of other consumer crap. Disappointed customers are, for them, people who might buy a DS and a whole bunch of games "just in case" they can't get a Wii for Johnny. Places like EB and Zeller's don't want to put up with the shit, so they just bring 'em in and sell them to walk-ins.

  42. Blu-Ray Killing PS3 by stwf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While waiting for the PS3 I was sure I'd buy one. It's a no-brainer, like a free Blu-Ray player. And with PS3 pushing Blu-Ray it had to be the winner.
    But that has totally changed now. It seems we'll be stuck with 2 formats forever and like most normal people I'm limited by video inputs on my tv.
    So I'm not buying a next gen dvd player until they are dual format, my upscaling dvd player works very well, and they are releasing ridiculous movies in Blu-Ray. Ballad of Ricky Bobby? How about something beautiful, that you'd want in a higher quality format like Life Aquatic?
    It's clear to me now that a single format next-gen dvd player is a liability to my entertainment center. I'll wait for the dual format players and play a nice small cheap stable PS2 in the meantime.

  43. Re:Stop the "Artificial restricting supply" nonsen by jchenx · · Score: 1
    Now, listen, everyone. Stop using this stupid word! It's Fan Boys. Fanboys. Just people who are fans of something.
    For fucks sake, it's not some kind of French-derived cultivated word.
    I know this is offtopic, but I did want to point out something. In my own strange world, I do use two spellings of the term. "Fan boys" are fans of a certain product, but they do so tastefully and intelligently. They probably don't exist. "Fanbois" are those l33t spe4king kids with messages like "M$ IS TEH SUXXXX!!!!!!!111!!" and "i luv sepirrr0th, Ninendo can suk my wiiiiiiiiiii", who do call themselves "fanbois" with that purposeful spelling.

    Hence, "fanbois". It's my way of making reference to them in a derogatory fashion.
    --
    -- jchenx
  44. From a SONY Fan Boy, get a XBOX 360 by toy4two · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have been waiting 2 years for the PS3. I loved the PS2 but was ready to use the potential of my HDTV because I'm a hard core Gran Turismo player. Well the new PS3 has been a total disappointment for me. My TV only does 1080i HD, no 720p. The PS3 doesn't upconvert its 720p games to 1080i, but instead down converts them to 480p! So much for next generation. Solution? $1500 external scaler, $2000 new HDTV, or go to the XBOX 360. Next up, I love rumble in racing games, guess what, SONY dropped the ball on that one too. XBOX 360 wins again. Now, there won't be any Gran Turismo on the XBOX, but wait, Forza 2 is coming out, and judging by the track list and car list, GT isn't the only game in town. http://forums.forzamotorsport.net/forums/permalink /23209/21658/ShowThread.aspx#21658 Then there is all the claims the PS3 is more powerful, so the graphics should be better. We all know game publishers are multi-platform these days, so they are going to develop for the lowest common denominator, so that may be the XBOX 360, Madden looks identical on both, Need for Speed Carbon is virtually the same. At least I won't have to deal with 480p in my games on the PS3. Then the best part, its $200 cheaper AND it comes with HDTV component cables, unlike the PS3. The only downsides I can see are you have to play for multiplayer XBOX LIVE, but from what I hear its a better experience.

  45. I bought a DS Lite (new) and a GameCube (used) by sjonke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At home the game system is for my kids, 4 and 5. I have little to no time to play a console system, other than playing with them a little bit. I got them a used GameCube (w/box) with one official wired controller and official memory card for $54. I've gotten them a used (complete) copy of Super Mario Sunshine for $12, a used (complete) copy of MX Superfly for $8 and a new copy of Donkey Konga w/bongos for $20. I purchased one extra official wired controller for $20 and then another from amazon for $18, both new. I also got a pair of extension cables for $6. I just ordered a copy of Donkey Kong Jungle Beat w/bongos and a free 2nd set of bongos from gamestop for $21 shipped. Those are all new. I actually intend to sell Jungle Beat w/bongos on ebay and believe I'll net about $21 for it, effectively getting me the extra set of bongos for free. Total price for the GC w/3 nintendo-brand controllers (one used, two new), memory card, Super Mario Sunshine (used, complete), MX Superfly (used, complete) and Donkey Konga w/ 2 sets of bongos (all new) was around $140. More than $100 less than a Wii system alone (albeit with Wii sports). Or, if multiplayer Donkey Konga is all it's cracked up to be, I could keep Donkey Kong Jungle beat w/bongos and have a 3rd bongo controller (as well as DKJB) for an extra $21. The used games were purchased on ebay. I tested them and they work fine. Every price noted includes shipping.

    For myself I'm getting a (new) DS Lite which I'll be able to play on the train every day. Unlike the Wii, no accessories are necessary, so the $117 I paid for it (shipped) from buy.com is all I have to pay for it other than games. Lots of great games are available for it for little money, including a thriving used market. Indeed, even new games are only $30 to $35, compared to $50 for Wii/360/PS3. Before long new titles drop to $20. I picked up used/complete copies of Meteos and Madden '05 for about $19 total (including shipping). I'm also getting Gunpei DS (new) for $20. So all told it sets us back about $156 for the DS Lite (new) and 3 good games (2 used/complete, one new.)

    Total for both the complete GameCube setup and the complete DS setup was about $296. That's less than the price of core-version Xbox 360 alone and less than a Wii with one extra set of controllers (pretty much a necessity.) The Wii is no doubt a ton of fun and better than the GameCube, and unlike the 360 and PS3 seems to offer new/fun gameplay, but I'd rather have a nice system for my kids and a nice portable system for myself that I can actually use, not to mention lots of games to play on both of them. Some day I will get a Wii, in part because it will be able to play the GameCube games we'll have, but there's no hurry. At the earliest it will be next Christmas, when the price will have dropped, there will be a used games market, and new games will better utilize the system.

    --
    --- What?
  46. Bullshit! by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I want to rip your heart out of your chest, your head on a plate and throw the rest to the jaguars.

    Chiste, ni que chiste.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  47. Then I tell Johhny is that or nothing at all. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Honestly, since when children dictate the rules of the house?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  48. Practice what you preach buddy... by Vr6dub · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's pretty disingenuous of you to not mention all that players get for their $50 (only $6/month mind you, cheap bastard). A unified friends list, common UI's for online games, and anti-cheating (one of the biggest advantages) measures. You are correct that Sony will be offering their "online service" for free but can you really call it a service when it doesn't do anything for you? If you and I know each other and we are playing different games, Microsoft's service will allow me to send you an invite or better yet we can start our own chat session across games. What does Sony have? Nothing. No video chat, no voice chat...only text messages but only if you know the person's tag for that particular game because of course every single online game you play with the PS3 is out there by itself. These features may not seem like much but they add a lot to the experience. Is not really fair to make a comparison between a feature rich service like what Live offers and some half-assed implementation that was shipped out the door just so they can say "ME TOO".

  49. Re: Wii Games... by trdrstv · · Score: 1
    I wanted to say that there are way better and more intresting games than Wii sports and Rayman coming or released for the Wii.

    Perhaps, but Rayman, and Wii Sports are both Crazy fun. Wii Sports is more multiplayer centric, but still gets played the most out of all my Wii games (including Zelda). Rayman's sence of humor is great, and you will lol many times during the game. It really should be played, and it shines on the Wii.

  50. Re:Stop the "Artificial restricting supply" nonsen by justchris · · Score: 1

    So far, after 4 weeks of availability, the PS3 has sold ~187,000 units in Japan. That's less than the total number of units they sold at launch in the US. More importantly, each week since launch, they have sold increasingly fewer units. Assuming that they are still selling every unit they produce, I think the gp can be forgiven for not realizing the PS3 has launched in Japan.

    --
    just some guy