Slashdot Mirror


Many New Species Found Under Antarctica

gt_mattex writes to tell us The Globe and Mail is reporting that quite a few new species have been found in the ocean beneath the Antarctic ice. From the article: "It is too early to say exactly how many new species were discovered in the Antarctic, many in the Weddell Sea, where ice crushed the ship of Antarctic explorer Ernest Shackleton in 1915. The scientists saw more strange creatures than familiar ones, says Ron O'Dor, an expert in octopuses and squid from Halifax's Dalhousie University and the chief scientist in charge of producing the first marine life census of the planet by 2010."

173 comments

  1. In case you didn't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ernest Shackelton is Chuck Norris's father.

  2. Let me get in my boat before you start research... by the_tsi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this the initial stage of the Second Impact?

  3. Amazing by Sneakernets · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's been millenia and we still don't know all the life on our planet. I always look forward to articles like this, they really tell us how little we do know.

    --
    "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Amazing by LiquidMind · · Score: 5, Interesting

      i've been thinking about that too, especially about the life that resides at the bottom of our oceans....
      how interesting (and suicidal, but bear with me) would it be to somehow drain all the oceans of water just to see what's left over...

      --
      This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
    2. Re:Amazing by HardSide · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well if the global warming craze didnt tell you anything, I give it 20 years, and you can see whats really at the bottom of the ocean...

    3. Re:Amazing by dhj · · Score: 1

      That is an interesting thought. Although I think the result would be an ocean floor stacked deep with bloated carcasses. A fishing boat goes out and cuts a net size cylinder out of the ocean, returning with a huge pile of fish. It doesn't take long (hundreds of yards) for a shrimp boat to haul up a net full of shrimp and crabs from the bottom in the Gulf of Mexico (highly recommend shrimping if you get the chance). If you took a square meter at the surface and condensed all the volume of the rectangular cube going down to the ocean floor into one square meter at the floor the interesting stuff would probably be underneath the stuff we know about. I would rather see the top 2/3rds taken out completely and just drain the last 1/3rd. Although still there has to be huge amounts of unknown species swimming around in those top 2/3rds. Depending on the average density of life in the ocean that last 1/3rd could be problematic too. I wonder what is the average density of ocean life, and how much it's changed in the last 100 years. Also, I call not it on building the tank necessary to hold all that water. :)

      --David

      Oh! Maybe we could build a machine that zaps all the known species and sends them to the top then scoop them off. Drain out the rest.

    4. Re:Amazing by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Funny

      Drain the oceans?!? That's ridiculous -- where would they go??? I guess you could find something that sucks really hard, like Digg, put a straw in it, and plop it on the beach.

      But it would make much more sense to rapidly evaporate all of them, perhaps with a large scale hairdryer task force and/or a few strategically placed nukes.

    5. Re:Amazing by Cadallin · · Score: 1

      Well, not draining per se but one could hypothetically ignite a sufficiently large thermonuclear device to burn off the atmosphere and oceans. However, that wouldn't leave the desired residue for subsequent study. More effective would probably be a number of space elevators launching the oceans bucket by bucket into space. however, nukes are much faster.

    6. Re:Amazing by geobeck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's been millenia and we still don't know all the life on our planet. I always look forward to articles like this, they really tell us how little we do know.

      I just finished a Microbiology intro course where the instructor kept stressing that. You think it's amazing how many macroscopic species we are still discovering; that's nothing compared to the unknown species of bacteria that are right under our noses--and that could be quite literal.

      It seems that life on Earth, as far as the number of species is concerned, consists of bacteria, beetles, and assorted debris.

      (After Asimov: "The Solar System consists of the Sun, Jupiter, and assorted debris."

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    7. Re:Amazing by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "But it would make much more sense to rapidly evaporate all of them, perhaps with a large scale hairdryer task force and/or a few strategically placed nukes."

      If you cause it to rain here in L.A., I'm going to drive to wherever you live and kick your ass. That is.. assuming I can find a road that leads out of this city.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:Amazing by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      Drain the oceans?!? That's ridiculous -- where would they go???

      Into the basement of the Fat Man's Club of Trenton, New Jersey.

    9. Re:Amazing by polar+red · · Score: 1

      That's not surprising i think, we are talking about millions of species (that's even if we are only talking about creatures > 0.1mm) And for many of those it's sometimes not easy to see whether 2 instances are from the same species or not. See the http://www.tolweb.org/tree/tree of life for an overview.

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    10. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't have enough nukes to get anywhere near that level of destruction. This is in the "cracks the crust of the planet" level of energy if not more.

    11. Re:Amazing by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      You could use a space elevator and a bucket. A really big bucket.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    12. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's impractical evaporate all of them unless you're going to turn Earth into something like Venus (and there would be so much water initially in the atmosphere it would start raining back out again), but evaporating whole seas has been done for the Mediterranean before. Build a dam from Spain to NW Africa, and it could happen again.

    13. Re:Amazing by jcgf · · Score: 1

      Isn't the risk of global warming that the polar ice would melt thus deepening the oceans as opposed to drying them up?

    14. Re:Amazing by silentounce · · Score: 1

      Maybe he forgot a couple zeroes.
      2000 years of constant warming may be able to put the surface temp above 212F, but I doubt it. We'd be long gone before it ever got that high and we wouldn't be able to pump greenhouse gases into the air to accelrate the process.

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
    15. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmmm.... boiled seafood.

    16. Re:Amazing by superlaughtive · · Score: 1

      Definitely. I've said for some time that the search for aliens should begin there; what lives in those depths is likely far more extraterrestrial than we may find in outer space. The BBC documentary "Blue Planet" episode "The Deep" begins to shed light - literally, and some of these creatures have never seen sunlight so I wonder about the effects of exposing them to lamp light.

  4. Anyone else worried after reading this? by chabotc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "A school of fish the size of Manhattan off the New Jersey coast. About 20 million herring were travelling together."

    That soon we'll find ways to make ocean life go extinct in those parts which so far relativly are protected from our interferance.. With our normal area's of fishing drying up quickly, how long will it take before we go and do our thing there too ... *sigh*

    1. Re:Anyone else worried after reading this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm...no. No I'm not. Please, think for yourself rather than letting ManBearPig think for you.

    2. Re:Anyone else worried after reading this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear, hear!

    3. Re:Anyone else worried after reading this? by nog_lorp · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't you worry! We will have those scary new species gone in no time!

    4. Re:Anyone else worried after reading this? by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Herring is typically used as pulp for cat food and fish farms but server right (fried or raw in curry) they are super SUPER tasty.

  5. Great... by Durrok · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here comes the Second Impact. Glad I'm a couple hundred miles inland and not living in Japan...

    --
    I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
  6. ANCIENTS by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    IT's the ANCIENT outpost

    1. Re:ANCIENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would've been very disappointed if there were an article in ./ with Antarctica in title and not a single joke/reference to Stargate.

    2. Re:ANCIENTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was a Lovecraft reference...

    3. Re:ANCIENTS by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1
      I think it was a Lovecraft reference...


      Yes, it's specifically from "At the Mountains of Madness" where they find the ancient city of the Old Ones in Antartica, and much hilarity ensues.

  7. Life census of the ocean? by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

    So they have about 3 years to catalog all the life in the ocean? ahh hahahhaha

    1. Re:Life census of the ocean? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      So they have about 3 years to catalog all the life in the ocean? ahh hahahhaha

      FTA: This is the sixth year of the marine census

      You mean you didn't bother to read the article? ahh hahahhaha

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Life census of the ocean? by phantomcircuit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually I already knew how long the study had been taking place. They are attempting to catalog all the life in the oceans when we haven't even cataloged all life in the rain forests, which is a far smaller task. Now when you consider that the surface area (not volume) of the ocean is 75% of the earth, the chances of encountering every creature in the ocean seems ridiculously small, much less the chance that every creature is encountered and properly documented in all of 9 years. The jokes on you.

    3. Re:Life census of the ocean? by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What point are you trying to make, should they give up because their ultimate goal will never be reached?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:Life census of the ocean? by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      I bet they could pull it off:

      *dumps shiploads of biotoxins into ocean*

      "No lifeforms present." "Alright, let's hit the green!"

    5. Re:Life census of the ocean? by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      No they should get rid of the arbitrary final date.

      What is he going to do when times up? Is he going to just stop cataloging ocean life?

      I doubt it.

    6. Re:Life census of the ocean? by polar+red · · Score: 1

      they'll probably just run out of funding ...

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    7. Re:Life census of the ocean? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      yea, I refer to this as the "cut and run" date. At which point we all know the ocean life wins. I think we need to "stay the course." Not set a date that the ocean life can hide until.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  8. shouldn't it be... by wealthychef · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "octopi and squids"? :-)

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
    1. Re:shouldn't it be... by siride · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. Either "octopuses" or "octopodes".

    2. Re:shouldn't it be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's Octopussies!

    3. Re:shouldn't it be... by lawpoop · · Score: 5, Informative

      The word 'pus' is Greek for foot, and the plural in Greek is 'podes', so it would be octopodes -- except the name of the animal is not 'eight-feet', it's 'eight-foot', so it's one 'eight-foot' or 'octopus' and many 'eight-foots' or 'octopuses'.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    4. Re:shouldn't it be... by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

      I personally like octopodes.

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    5. Re:shouldn't it be... by djupedal · · Score: 1

      "octopi and squids"? :-) Sorry, still incorrect.
      ...deers? No... 'deer'

      "octopi and squid"

    6. Re:shouldn't it be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "octopi and squids"? :-)

      I like to think of them as kalamari!
    7. Re:shouldn't it be... by tommten · · Score: 2, Funny

      mmm.. octopie *drools*

      --
      - I choked on the red pill and now I'm stuck in limbo
    8. Re:shouldn't it be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember reading somewhere that according to Greek etymology that the plural for octopus was octopata but that octopuses and octopi are both generally accepted anyway...

    9. Re:shouldn't it be... by supertsaar · · Score: 1

      OctoPussy!! OctoPussy!!

      --
      The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
    10. Re:shouldn't it be... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      what a complete misnomer then. They are more like legs or arms than feet anyway.

      I vote for a name change. How about Squishy?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  9. I get suspicious... by clifgriffin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I get suspicious whenever a creature purported to have gone extinct X million years ago is discovered alive and well.

    It seems to happen with some regularity.

    It seems to me, if you find a fossil of an animal you believe to be extinct, you will probably test it with the assumption it is of relatively old age.

    I think you probably find what you're looking for.

    Anyway, not trying to start a flame war. But that's probably going to happen anyway. ("YOU IGNORANT BASTARD DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW DATING WORKS!!!")

    1. Re:I get suspicious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need for suspicion. Separated habitats. In those known, dead 30 million years ago maybe. With new technology for exploration and charting, maybe locate a new habitat were it survived over that time. This only invalidates extinction of what is found alive in the new habitat, not the dating techniques used to find 30 million years old in example for 30 million year old fossils in previously known habitats.

    2. Re:I get suspicious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ("You IGNORANT BASTARD do you even know HOW DATING WORKS!!!") [edited for lameness filter]

      This is Slashdot. Do you really have to ask that question?

    3. Re:I get suspicious... by hywel_ap_ieuan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I get suspicious whenever a creature purported to have gone extinct X million years ago is discovered alive and well.It seems to happen with some regularity.It seems to me, if you find a fossil of an animal you believe to be extinct, you will probably test it with the assumption it is of relatively old age.I think you probably find what you're looking for.Anyway, not trying to start a flame war. But that's probably going to happen anyway. ("YOU IGNORANT BASTARD DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW DATING WORKS!!!")
      You've hit on the first objection to your suspicion already - dating isn't based on anything so trivial as believing an organism is extinct. It's based, typically, on knowing the approximate age of the sediment the fossil is found in. That in turn is based on things like radiodating of overlaying igneous rock, index fossils in the same or nearby layers, and similar techniques. Due to stuff like that, the general age of most sediments is pretty well known. Geologists who are familiar with a given area can tell you what era a particular formation dates from. If your fossil came from a well-known formation, you probably know the date of a given fossil plus or minus a few percent as soon as you locate it.
      As to how you know the critter is extinct: You don't, not with 100% certainty. But if it's over a few million years old, it's a pretty good bet. Most species don't last all that long, geologically speaking. And you're probably also rather misled by the popular reporting. The "Jurassic Shrimp" is actually a new species within a genus (Neoglyphea) with only one previously-known member, which genus is part of a family (Glypheidae)that was previously thought to be extinct. As one of the discoverers said, "the group is less completely extinct than was thought."
    4. Re:I get suspicious... by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      Your post is quite amusing actually. You did exactly what you are complaining about--in the same breath and with no sense of irony.

      See, it's perfectly possible for a creature to have lived X million years ago and still be alive. Our assumption that it was extinct is the only one challenged, not the age of the fossil--finding a creature alive has no effect on the dating of the fossil.

      If we were to find a dinosaur alive, it wouldn't invalidate all the dating ever done, it would simply mean that somewhere a group of dinosaurs has gone unobserved for a long time.

      To not realize that and to instead jump to the conclusion that it has to do with bad dating is simply an indication of your desire to find fault in dating techniques because of some personal issue you have with them.

    5. Re:I get suspicious... by vaughanf · · Score: 2, Funny
      ("YOU IGNORANT BASTARD DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW DATING WORKS!!!")
      What kind of question is that in a place like slashdot? Really...
  10. Re:Could they be harmful? by Kiba+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Naaah. Since they never probably evolve near humans, they couldn't possibility be harmful. But that is just my uninformed opinion though.

    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-RMS
  11. Do Octopus dream in octal?? by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

    Or should that be base 256?

    1. Re:Do Octopus dream in octal?? by jd · · Score: 1

      No, they dream in salt water. Now, the salt water might dream in octal, but that's another matter.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  12. The Thing by Diagoras · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Somebody in this camp ain't what he appears to be. Right now that may be one or two of us. By spring, it could be all of us."

    --
    I value politeness. If you extend it to me, I'll extend it to you.
  13. Needs pictures by Inverted+Intellect · · Score: 4, Funny

    The article describes some pretty odd creatures.

    I mean, without a picture of that centimeter-in-diameter protozoan, how the hell am I supposed to imagine how it looks like, much less the more important facets of such a discovery... such as how does it taste?

    1. Re:Needs pictures by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      I'm more interested in this one.

      A new species of rock lobster in Madagascar that may be the largest in the world. Its body spans half a metre.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Needs pictures by Coulson · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm, protozoan.

      From imdb:
      Tank: Here you go, buddy. Breakfast of Champions.
      Mouse: If you close your eyes, it almost feels like you're eating runny eggs.
      Apoc: Yeah, or a bowl of snot.
      Mouse: Do you know what it really reminds me of? Tasty Wheat. Did you ever eat Tasty Wheat?
      Switch: No, but technically, neither did you.

    3. Re:Needs pictures by Joebert · · Score: 1
      such as how does it taste?

      I'm guessing like a cross between shrimp & monkey brains.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  14. I've given it 20 minutes... by clifgriffin · · Score: 0

    And no one has said it so here goes...

    I for one welcome our new, aquatic overlords.

    *ducks to avoid tomatoes and beer cans*

  15. I wonder... by Cheapy · · Score: 1

    how tasty they are.

    --
    Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
  16. Re:Could they be harmful? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Other then that

    Seek also the difference between "then" and "than" ;)

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  17. WEEEE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See them now before global warming and oceanic acidification make them all extinct.

  18. Re:Could they be harmful? by css-hack · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sure they could be harmful. In fact, where two species evolve seperately, it is less likely that they'll be able to coexist peacefully. Just look at the species that have been introduced to Australia.

    I think the greater danger here, though, is that humans will disturb or destroy the new-found species or their habitats.

  19. Re:Could they be harmful? by Ironsides · · Score: 1

    You've never been to Australia, have you.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  20. Worried? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our exotic new sushi overlords.

    1. Re:Worried? No. by BandwidthHog · · Score: 2, Informative

      You, for one, must have meant sashimi.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  21. Sushi, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm Feeling Hungry(tm)!

  22. My god -- it's full of geeks by anagama · · Score: 5, Funny
    In the dark ocean beneath the Antarctic ice, researchers have found scores of species they've never seen before, including strange jellyfish and other gelatinous organisms that thrive without light

    My god -- it's full of geeks.
    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    1. Re:My god -- it's full of geeks by aldo.gs · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new gelatinous basement-dwelling overlords!

    2. Re:My god -- it's full of geeks by Lane.exe · · Score: 1

      Keep your shoggoths away from me.

      --
      IAALS.
    3. Re:My god -- it's full of geeks by dasunt · · Score: 1

      Pffft. They sound like shoggoths to me.

      It was a terrible, indescribable thing vaster than any subway train a shapeless congerie of protoplasmic bubbles, faintly self-luminous, and with myriads of temporary eyes forming and un-forming as pustules of greenish light all over the tunnel-filling front that bore down upon us, crushing the frantic penguins and slithering over the glistening floor that it and its kind had swept so evilly free of all litter.

      My god, what have they awakened?

    4. Re:My god -- it's full of geeks by antic · · Score: 1

      Compulsory watching *before* digging around in the Antarctic...

      The Thing
      Alien vs Predator

      What are these people thinking?!

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  23. Re:Let me get in my boat before you start research by wellingj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure enough people get the NGE allusion

  24. Elder Things? by bendy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes but have they found any evidence of Elder Things yet? Or at the very least some Shoggoths?

  25. that's a bizarre reaction by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that little nugget of news was reason to find cheer, i think

    a colossal school of herring? off new jersey? isn't that good news?

    why the despondent reaction to that news item? there are certainly tons of news items to find depressing reactions to about ocean life and man's hungry stomach... but that particular nugget of news is reason to cheer, don't you think?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:that's a bizarre reaction by node+3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's like finding a pocket of air in a sinking ship. The good news is far overshadowed by the bad news.

    2. Re:that's a bizarre reaction by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It isn't such great news if the herring are filling an ecological niche left vacant by the destruction of another species, or are present in large numbers because their natural predators have been wiped out.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:that's a bizarre reaction by shadwstalkr · · Score: 1

      a colossal school of herring? off new jersey? isn't that good news?

      Depends on how much you like pickled herring. Covered in raw sewage. They probably owe money to the mob, too.

  26. New...? by djupedal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As in just fell out of the tree of evolution?

    ...bah....

    Those critter are most likely checking out the mini-subs and shaking their heads and thinking "Oh, look! A new species!"

    1. Re:New...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Newly discovered,' or 'new to us.'

    2. Re:New...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is highly unlikely that these newly discovered species are capable of that level of reasoning.

    3. Re:New...? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      that's like thinking "Camels are probably telling each other their toes look like human vaginas"

      Humorous but not likely.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  27. what, the yeti lobster didn't do it for you? by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Informative

    but, anyways, here you go, lotsa pictures

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  28. i'm with you by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    take the common wood louse, that you can find under any rock in any forest

    now, blow it up a thousand fold in size

    there you go, running around the ocean floor

    amazing indeed

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i'm with you by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      As someone who raises hermit crabs*, I can relate. Those things can be insanely creepy when viewed close up. And I’ve always said that the difference between cockroaches and lobsters is merely a question of scale.

      *It’s primarily my girlfriend’s project, but still.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    2. Re:i'm with you by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      That thing is about a thousand times creepier than I would've imagined from your description. Very interesting creature.

    3. Re:i'm with you by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I knew I'd see some of these. For any slashdotters who want to see a FASCINATING and beautifully produced BBC documentary on this, I recommend episode 2 "The Deep" from their award-winning "The Blue Planet" series. Here's a direct .torrent link.

      BBC The Blue Planet: The Deep .torrent

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:i'm with you by tsa · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's very cool. But what about this giant one-celled organism they talk about in the article. Does anyone know more about that?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    5. Re:i'm with you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gack!!! somebody call in Princess Nausicaä!!!

    6. Re:i'm with you by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Very True. The Deep is absolutely the best episode in the series. "Frozen Seas" being second-best, IMHO.

      The rest, I'm sorry to say, are mediocre, and most of their content you can just as redily find in any other nature shows, covering ocean life.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:i'm with you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As someone who raises hermit crabs* (...)

      *It's primarily my girlfriend's project, but still.


      I just know there's an std joke hiding in there...
    8. Re:i'm with you by mgblst · · Score: 1

      If you loved this, then you will love Planet Earth, which has just finished showing here in the UK. No plans at yet to show it in the US unfortunately.

    9. Re:i'm with you by MrOuija_AK · · Score: 2, Interesting
    10. Re:i'm with you by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      My current favorite:

      http://www.amonline.net.au/fishes/about/fieldwork/ norfanz/psychrol2.htm

      The name they gave it is fine, but 'Sploork' seems like a better fit to me.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:i'm with you by somersault · · Score: 1

      I saw it while I was in Canada for a while, so at least some North Americans can get it :p I live in the UK.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    12. Re:i'm with you by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 1

      It's not truly creepy until you see the 4chan photoshops of it :).
      (Especially this one

    13. Re:i'm with you by operagost · · Score: 1

      And I've always said that the difference between cockroaches and lobsters is merely a question of scale.
      Definitely. Imagine how meaty a lobster would be if it were as huge as a New York cockroach!
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    14. Re:i'm with you by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      One of the things that made The Deep the best was that as they keep going deeper and deeper, they eventually unveil life that has never before been filmed because nobody had gone that deep before. While today this stuff is kind of old news...its absolutely fascinating.

      Although one thing I always wonder about this series....are they adding their own foley (sound effects)? Or did they actually put mics out there and this is what those suckers actually sound like? I'm particularly curious with those shrimp that shoot glowing bolts of goo. That sounded pretty intense.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    15. Re:i'm with you by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      It looks like pasta!

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
  29. Cuboids? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Any large black rectangular structures waiting the for the completion date? ;)

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  30. Ha! That's nothing! The Kraken Awake! by jd · · Score: 1

    (John Wyndham's novel still gives me the creeps. That and Day of the Triffids. But as best as I can tell, the survey hasn't turned up any underwater Triffids. Yet.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  31. Re:Could they be harmful? by jd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everything in Australia is deadly. The spiders are deadly, the snakes are deadly, the crocodiles are deadly, the plants are deadly, the driving in Sydney is definitely deadly, the TV commercials are lethal... I never did find out what happened to those rabbits that escaped from a research facility on a Government-owned island and made it to shore, back in '95. As I recall, they were being used for some research into some lethal pathogen or other. Since there are Australians still alive, I take it that the crisis was brought under control, but that was cutting it a little fine. I guess we can add the Australian Government to things that are lethal, though.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  32. some people really need to learn by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    to count their blessings

    if everything is doom and gloom to you, you soon sap any ability to keep working for improvement in the world

    it means you've already given up

    in a way, you've betrayed whatever it is you care about

    find heart to carry on, or stop talking about the subject matter entirely

    but to continue talking about something with pessimism, to continue talking about anything with pessimism, helps no one and nothing, including yourself

    so stop talking about it and move on, or change your attitude about life in the ocean

    seriously

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:some people really need to learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "so stop talking about it and move on, or change your attitude about life in the ocean"

      I can attest to that.

      I used to believe it would be the worst thing in the world. If it was forced upon me, I thought, I would surely die rather than submit to such a harsh and painful existence. How could I eat? How could I breathe? Both would come at significant hardship, all as my skin shrivelled and those few comforts I'd brought from my land-dwelling past rusted away.

      Yes, I was someone who, like many, clung to the land desperately.

      How silly that attitude seems to me now. The atmosphere is clogged with pollutants, the crops doused with carcinogens, the cities governed by rich men who guide the masses' efforts into their own purses.

      This is what changed my attitude about life in the ocean, and that is what, I hope, will help you change yours.

    2. Re:some people really need to learn by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Dude, WTF are you talking about? I'm highly optimistic about ocean life. What I'm not optimistic about is how people will treat it. Being all sunshine and lollipops about it isn't going to change the actions of others. On the other hand, if I point out the idiocy of others, perhaps they will either change or be forced to change by others.

    3. Re:some people really need to learn by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      This is what changed my attitude about life in the ocean, and that is what, I hope, will help you change yours.

      So, uh, how do you protect your computer from corrosion ?
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    4. Re:some people really need to learn by polar+red · · Score: 1

      "if I point out the idiocy of others, perhaps they will either change or be forced to change by others."
      Most people don't want to be criticized, and most of the time they attack YOU instead of reading/commenting on your opinion. (hence the sig)

      --
      Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    5. Re:some people really need to learn by somersault · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, if you're ignoring everything that you consider negative, then you're not going to feel the need to improve things, and other people won't realise anything is wrong either. Just because there are a lot of fish in one place (and I did think it was pretty good news), doesn't mean we shouldn't make sure we're not overfishing..?

      --
      which is totally what she said
  33. Oh, that's easy. by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You label everything as one or more of "sushi", "chowder" or "probably made into soup somewhere". Saves on physiological and genetic analysis, and it's all that Joe Average is likely to care about. (If the average person gave a rat's about conservation or science, we'd be a thousand years more advanced and ten thousand years wiser.)


    Besides, in 15 years or less there won't be enough of a food chain in the oceans to sustain most of the organisms that do still exist and without a gene bank capable of storing that kind of volume of information there's no possibility of either having any usable data OR being able to revive the ecology once conditions have returned to saner levels. Collecting photos is all fine and good, but in not that long a time that is ALL we'll have, unless serious efforts are made to either conserve or genetically catalog.


    (And, frankly, I can't see the US Government even getting past the planning stages in a mere 15 years - assuming it even got that far. As they're the only group with the clout and the money to build a center capable of analyzing and storing a few hundred million DNA/mtDNA databases in that kind of timeframe, most of the information currently in the oceans is beyond any possibility of recovery.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Oh, that's easy. by Tiro · · Score: 1

      Japan could lead the effort. With Norway. They both like fish and like eating whales, and Japan has the cash.

    2. Re:Oh, that's easy. by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      Besides, in 15 years or less there won't be enough of a food chain in the oceans to sustain most of the organisms that do still exist and without a gene bank capable of storing that kind of volume of information there's no possibility of either having any usable data OR being able to revive the ecology once conditions have returned to saner levels. Collecting photos is all fine and good, but in not that long a time that is ALL we'll have, unless serious efforts are made to either conserve or genetically catalog.
      1970 called, they want their dire ecological predictions back.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  34. At The Mountains of Madness by harp2812 · · Score: 1

    Next thing ya know, they'll be finding weird 6' starfruit with tentacles...

    --
    I've found that nurturing one's Zen nature is vital to dealing with technology. Violence is pretty damn useful too.
    1. Re:At The Mountains of Madness by bsa3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, the parties to the Dresden Agreement of 1931 have sent repeated followup expeditions, but the crawling chaos got them all. And the Russians are deploying shoggoths in attack mode in the Khyber pass... sucks to be in that universe, I gather. (The robot to be slurped is "A Colder War" by Charles Stross. Highly recommended.)

  35. Hey Great! by gp310ad · · Score: 2, Funny

    A new isle at the fish market!

    --
    Do not look into LASER with remaining eye!
    1. Re:Hey Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one big ass fish market.

  36. Re:Could they be harmful? by nomadic · · Score: 1

    You're forgetting the vegemite.

  37. Re:Could they be harmful? by StikyPad · · Score: 0

    [Insert Croc Hunter joke here]

  38. Pointing out negs is responsible but not enough by iendedi · · Score: 1

    Some people really need to learn to count their blessings
    if everything is doom and gloom to you, you soon sap any ability to keep working for improvement in the world
    it means you've already given up
    in a way, you've betrayed whatever it is you care about
    I agree, for the most part, with what you say here. If you give up, you have betrayed whatever or whoever you care about. One should not give up.

    Find heart to carry on, or stop talking about the subject matter entirely
    but to continue talking about something with pessimism, to continue talking about anything with pessimism, helps no one and nothing, including yourself
    so stop talking about it and move on, or change your attitude about life in the ocean I think you are being overly harsh here. Should everyone disgusted with environmental abuses hide their voice? Will that accomplish anything? Clearly the answer is "NO". But that is perhaps not enough, I think you are saying. I think you are saying, help with solutions and action, not just your criticisms... Ideally, sure, that is better... but...

    The entire human race (or the subset that has some sensibility) needs to scream STOP THE ABUSE - this action in itself is valuable. This man is doing just that and should be commended for it. You are telling him to shut-up or put-up and should re-think that position a bit.

    seriously
    Seriously
    --

    It is your personal duty to fight for what is right on a daily basis. Ignoring injustice is identical to approving
  39. you're conflating two separate subjects by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i am attacking pessimism, and you act like i am attacking concern

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you're conflating two separate subjects by iendedi · · Score: 1

      i am attacking pessimism, and you act like i am attacking concern
      You attacked pessimism and speaking up. I agreed with you about pessismism.
      --

      It is your personal duty to fight for what is right on a daily basis. Ignoring injustice is identical to approving
  40. Lake Vostok by Timbotronic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It'll be interesting to see what they find in Lake Vostok, which is a freshwater lake as big as Lake Ontario and has been sealed under Antarctic ice for up to a million years.

    Could be the perfect test for a Cryobot mission to Europa

    --

    One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

    1. Re:Lake Vostok by Knara · · Score: 1

      Before I read closer I thought that's what this was, and was pretty excited.

      Any idea when that's scheduled to actually take place?

    2. Re:Lake Vostok by Timbotronic · · Score: 1

      Pretty soon. Possibly even next year. Hopefully the Russians won't proceed until all the contamination risks have been averted.

      --

      One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

  41. Re:Could they be harmful? by Alicat1194 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Naah, Vegemite is like 1080, only toxic to non-natives :)

    --
    You can learn a lot about a person if you just take the time to inject them with sodium pentathol
  42. Most surprising discovery... by tulsaoc3guy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Latest report: scientists glimpsed body of Jimmy Hoffa... confirmation by Geraldo is pending.

  43. Like chicken. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh.

  44. i didn't attack speaking up by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    read it again

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  45. If it rhymes, it must be true by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Funny
    In the ocean, wriggling by,

    are octopuses, not octopi.

    Attr. to Patricia T. O'Conner, as is the quote, "Octopi is for suckers".

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:If it rhymes, it must be true by ModMeFlamebait · · Score: 4, Funny

      octopi is 25.1327412

      --
      Pavlov. Does this name ring a bell?
  46. Re:Could they be harmful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Instead of listing all of the deadly things about Australia, it's much easier to list the non-deadly things:

    - some of the sheep

    Thanks Terry Pratchett.

  47. Final Frontier by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    NASA is planning on testing Europa probes on a pocket of liquid ice buried for centuries (millennia?) within Antarctica's ice. If there is an ecosystem inside, we will contaminate it. This research indicates the possibility of such an isolated ecosystem is higher than purely theoretical.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Final Frontier by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      What's the point in going to all that trouble of launching a probe into space, crashing it back in through re-entry into the arctic and then digging down into the ice when they could just as easily take a drilling rig across and simply drill down into it ?

      These boffins should concentrate on solving world hunger rather than pointless pie in the sky shenanigans like this.

    2. Re:Final Frontier by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I don't think the Antarctic ice bubble would feed us all more than hors d'oeuvres. But maybe a consumme...

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Final Frontier by trongey · · Score: 1
      ...These boffins should concentrate on solving world hunger rather than pointless pie in the sky shenanigans like this.

      We've had the solution to that problem for decades - Global Thermonuclear War. Just eliminate everything that eats and you have no more hunger.
      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    4. Re:Final Frontier by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Actually if they did concentrate on pie in the sky that would solve world hunger too but maybe not so tidily as global thermonuclear war.

    5. Re:Final Frontier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misunderstand. They would only be testing the as-landed part of a Europa probe in Antartica. Traveling through the incredibly thick, constantly shifting ice on Europa, then being able to actually transmit data back through it all is not a simple challenge, and it's never been tried before. It would really suck to spend a $billion or so on a delivery system that could land an under-ice probe on Europa, then have it fail to return any useful information because of a problem that could've been discovered and fixed on earth for a $million.

      Besides, it should be obvious that throwing money at world hunger is not going to solve the problem. There are much larger, very political issues behind it.

    6. Re:Final Frontier by trongey · · Score: 1
      Actually if they did concentrate on pie in the sky that would solve world hunger too but maybe not so tidily as global thermonuclear war.

      I guess it would depend on the size of the pies and their initial altitude.
      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    7. Re:Final Frontier by Noxes+Kaj · · Score: 1

      and initial velocity, if those pies are going much faster than 5 kilometers a second (relative velocity of course) then the results will be basicly the same as the previousley mentioned nuclear war...

      --
      I started out with nothing and still have most of it left.
  48. Re:Let me get in my boat before you start research by PrinceOfStorms · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And for those who don't even get the "NGE" reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neon_Genesis_Evangeli on_glossary#Second_Impact.

    (And yes, I had to look it up myself.)

  49. Re:Could they be harmful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I never did find out what happened to those rabbits that escaped from a research facility on a Government-owned island and made it to shore, back in '95. As I recall, they were being used for some research into some lethal pathogen or other.

    Fortunately, the pathogen ('calicivirus') was only lethal to rabbits. It was intended to help control the wild rabbit population, and was being tested to ensure that it was harmless to the native wildlife (and to humans), when it was accidentally released and achieved its objective a bit sooner than planned. This isn't the first time that a virus has been used to kill rabbits in Australia - myxomatosis was released back in 1950, and suppressed the rabbit population quite thoroughly for a couple of decades before they started to evolve immunity.

    I've actually been camping on an island neighbouring the one where this testing was done, shortly after the virus was released.

  50. aussie childhood, oh the memories... by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Funny

    I remember growing up in adelaide.

    'don't' walk on the grass without shoes'
    'don't lean on the hedges'
    'don't go near the lizards'
    'don't dig in the garden'

    and in Broadbeach

    'don't play with the jellyfish'
    'don't go in the sea without shoes'

    Not that these rules worked especially well on me, I broke almost all of them on a reguler basis, and so did my friends. It's amazing Aussie kids survive to adulthood.

    I came to england at 7, and was shocked to find kids running from pissy little spiders and bee's....

    1. Re:aussie childhood, oh the memories... by hawkfish · · Score: 1
      It's amazing Aussie kids survive to adulthood.
      I'm not aware of any that have...

      (/me ducks!)
      --
      You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
  51. Re:Let me get in my boat before you start research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great comment, I'd mod it up if I could :P

    Neon Genesis Evangelion r0ckz!! :D

  52. Re:Could they be harmful? by jimicus · · Score: 2, Funny

    myxomatosis was released back in 1950, and suppressed the rabbit population quite thoroughly for a couple of decades before they started to evolve immunity.

    Steady on. You'll start a flamewar with the creationists.

    What if a bunch of rabbits intelligently designed immunity?

  53. The Thing by revlic · · Score: 1

    Quickly give the researchers guns and ammo!

  54. Sharks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The deep ocean is free of sharks, which live at 1,500 metres or above."

    Thank God.

    TH

  55. Re:Could they be harmful? by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Funny
    Naaah. Since they never probably evolve near humans, they couldn't possibility be harmful.
    They could have nasty pointy teeth.
    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  56. I found these species already.. by ZX3+Junglist · · Score: 1

    they were right there, on the front pages of http://squidse.cx/ and http://octopuse.cx/..

  57. Very interesting indeed by l0cust · · Score: 1

    Just goes to show how less we know about our own world. One of these days someone will come out of an old abandoned mine and declare that he has found a whole civilization living there! More on topic, take this for a sci-fi imagination: Alien :)

    --
    Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
  58. Re:Let me get in my boat before you start research by Whatistehmatrix · · Score: 1

    somthing's scary about that being modded informative.. i guess it really is the initial stage! someone develop some big robots! quick!

    --
    visitor from www.slashdot.jp
  59. Educated sea creatures by tim_abell · · Score: 1

    Which begs the question, how many octopuses and squid are there at Halifax's Dalhousie University?

    --
    Respect copyright - the GPL relies on it.
  60. Thrown another "Bulkier" Shrimp on the Barbie! by Dareth · · Score: 1

    "A shrimp believed extinct for 50 million years ago was found on an underwater peak in the Coral Sea near Australia. It is has been nicknamed Jurassic Shrimp. It is the same colour as modern shrimp, but looks bulkier."

    But how does it taste? What if it is better than all other shrimp!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  61. Is there anything we can just leave alone? by Bright+Apollo · · Score: 1

    Honestly, the human race is like a sugared-up two year old in an electronics store sometimes, without the parent saying "Don't touch that" eleventeen times.

    -BA

  62. Ni by QuantumPion · · Score: 1

    Is 20 million herring sufficient to chop down the mightiest tree in the forest?

  63. OLD Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These articles have been posted as far back as March 2006, and possibly before:

    http://www.screaming-penguin.com/main.php?storyid= 5763
    http://axlotl.net/wp/2006/03/09/kiwa-hirsuta/

    (eww, rotten eggs)

  64. Re:Let me get in my boat before you start research by somersault · · Score: 1

    and someone please develop some big batteries ffs

    --
    which is totally what she said
  65. Re:Could they be harmful? by trigonalmayhem · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the deadly stingrays!

    Erm, too soon?

  66. Re:Could they be harmful? by somersault · · Score: 1

    I think the greater danger here, though, is that humans will disturb or destroy the new-found species or their habitats.

    I know I'm going to be!! I'm having trouble finding a watch that's rated to 5km, but there's got to be one for sale somewhere!
    --
    which is totally what she said
  67. You're a moron! by silentounce · · Score: 1

    We can use the interweb tubes. Duh.

    --
    There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
  68. Look ma, bacteria! by novus+ordo · · Score: 1
    Another team found 10 to 100 times more species of bacteria than they expected to, including rare microbes that may be relics from the early days of the planet.
    Cool! Bacteria that our immune system has never seen!
    --
    "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
  69. You could cut down a rainforest... by razorh · · Score: 1

    with 20 million herring!

  70. Re:Could they be harmful? by njchick · · Score: 2, Funny

    And don't forget koalas. They a lurking everywhere waiting for human flesh. Even a small koala can rip you apart in a matter of seconds.

  71. Song: Antarctica by fitten · · Score: 1
  72. Re:Let me get in my boat before you start research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Five minutes at partial power isn't enough for you?

    Hey, anyone want to place an order for lunch? I'm going to that new S2 Engine place over on main street...

  73. Are you kidding? by jd · · Score: 1

    Those sheep are baaaaad news. They could lamb-chop you in half before you could say "mint sauce".

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  74. Re:Could they be harmful? by Joel+from+Sydney · · Score: 1

    You neglected to mention the most lethal animal of all, the drop bear!