Slashdot Mirror


Which Rechargeable Batteries Do You Use?

kramer2718 asks: "I go through a lot of batteries in my digital camera, remote controls, etc. I'd like to go to the rechargeable route for the environment and for my pocketbook, but I don't know which rechargeable batteries are the best. Can anyone out there give me some advice about which brand and types of batteries work well?"

176 comments

  1. Fire Marshall Bill by CmdrPorno · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lithium-ion ones made by Sony.

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
    1. Re:Fire Marshall Bill by jonnyredbeard · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I would not buy a sony li-ion battery as .5 billion dollars in recalls last year. I say radio shack has the best batteries with energizer coming in a close second (they are made at the same manufacturing plants). http://www.imaging-resource.com/ACCS/BATTS/BATTS.H TM [imaging-resource.com] The Radioshack batteries listed here are 1600MAH model wich they do not sell anymore its a 2000mah now. So performance is greater.

    2. Re:Fire Marshall Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *whoosh*

    3. Re:Fire Marshall Bill by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Humor isn't your strong point, eh?

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    4. Re:Fire Marshall Bill by slurry47 · · Score: 1

      I like your joke. Still, I'd like to point out that you can't get standard size (AA, 9 volt, etc.) rechargeable batteries. They need special circuitry to avoid exactly what you joke implies.

      Sort of off topic -- apparently one can use a welder or other high powered device to revive worn out rechargeable batteries. http://www.instructables.com/id/EPV474YLF3EV2Z8V9V / Hopefully I won't remember this the next time I'm drunk.

      --


      Dirt doesn't need luck.
    5. Re:Fire Marshall Bill by slurry47 · · Score: 1

      make that: "...standard size LITHIUM-ION rechargeable..."

      D'oh!

      --


      Dirt doesn't need luck.
    6. Re:Fire Marshall Bill by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno ... I C4 of them in my charger right now.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    7. Re:Fire Marshall Bill by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Single-chip regulator solutions are available: I removed the top from a D-size lithium cell. The top quarter inch or so was just a cap, with a small circuit board beneath it. On it was an IC and a few other parts, which I assume was a charge controller.

      A capacitor bank can be used to revive dead nickel-cadmium cells, so long as the reason they're dead is because of a shorted cell. A brief high-current pulse can burn the short away. I've never tried it on other types of batteries, but I've successfully recovered dead Ni-Cads that way.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    8. Re:Fire Marshall Bill by jonnyredbeard · · Score: 0

      Guess not

    9. Re:Fire Marshall Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    10. Re:Fire Marshall Bill by enosys · · Score: 1

      Yes, a capacitor bank can burn out internal shorts in a NiCd cell but often such cells short again quite quickly.

  2. MAHA NiMH. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    MAHA NiMH from http://www.thomasdistributing.com/ . I've had several that have been working perfectly for more than half a decade now.

    1. Re:MAHA NiMH. by nek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't agree more. Couple those high-capacity NiMH MAHA cells with a good MAHA charger and it's a match made in heaven. I have been using some 2500 maH MAHA cells in some wireless Clear-Com and radios and wireless mics for a year now and have saved $500 in battery costs. At home, I use them in my digital camera, iPod speakers and portable radios. MAHA kick ass. I recommend their new 8-bay AA/AAA charger: http://www.thomas-distributing.com/maha-mh-c801d-b attery-charger.htm

    2. Re:MAHA NiMH. by rvw · · Score: 4, Informative

      You should indeed buy NiMH batteries (not NiCd). I've used Sony and several B-brands, all of them working okay. But beware that not only the batteries are important, but the charger can make a big difference as well. All these batteries suffer from memory-effects (even if they claim NiMH does not). After a while they seem to wear out. At one moment, you charge them, want to use them, and they stop working after a second or so. Then you need to discharge (refresh) them completely. In fact, you should have done this long before. Special rechargers offer the function to discharge them completely before charging. This discharge draws them empty completely.

      I use a Sony charger, like the Sony BCG-34HRMF4 Super Quick Charger.

    3. Re:MAHA NiMH. by roseblood · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It you have not heard the news [http://www.google.com/search?UkU&q=sony+battery+f ire] Sony has some history when it comes to battery technology.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    4. Re:MAHA NiMH. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't heard of any fires with Sony NiMH. What are you talking about?

    5. Re:MAHA NiMH. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm afraid you're mistaken about the "memory effect". There never was a memory effect in consumer-grade batteries, NiCd or NiMH. What people experienced, and what was called "memory effect" was in fact overcharging due to crappy timer-based chargers.

      When you put a partially-charged cell into a timer-based charger, the charging circuit won't shut off until well after the cell is cooked, thus the directions to fully discharge the battery before recharging.

      However, with modern electronically controlled chargers (Such as the Energizer 30 or 15-minute NiMH charger) this is no longer an issue, and the wear on the battery caused by deep cycling far exceeds any risk of overcharging the cell.

      My suggestion is to use NiMH cells in anything that tends to wear down the batteries fairly quickly (cameras, portable electronics, etc) and get a GOOD charger; a charger rated for 30 minutes or below will be electronically controlled and will maximize cell life. Be prepared to spend $50 on a charger.

      For any low drain applications such as remote controls, smoke alarms, flashlights etc, your best bet is to use the non-rechargable lithium batteries that have recently become available in AA and AAA sizes. Unlike NiMH, NiCd and Alkaline to a lesser extent, Lithium batteries do not self-discharge over time, so they're perfect for applications where you want a long shelf life between uses. Lithiums also perform well in high-drain devices, but other cell types are much less expensive for such uses ('titanium' alkaline or NiMH).

      (captcha on this post is 'loosing', no wonder nobody around here can spell 'losing')

    6. Re:MAHA NiMH. by NekoXP · · Score: 1

      We should loose a pack of wolves on them. That would be loosing, wouldn't it? :)

    7. Re:MAHA NiMH. by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      We should loose a pack of wolves on them. That would be loosing, wouldn't it? :)
      Sounds like a winner to me.
      Or is that a weiner?
    8. Re:MAHA NiMH. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. The memory effect is BS. (For the vast majority of consumer based applications) I never saw it during all the years I used NiCds and I have yet to see it in NiMH cells.

      Also yes, a good charger is a MUST!! I use a Maha C401FS here and I love it! It even charges each cell individually. I find this tends to prolong the health of my cells. I see it with my own eyes all the time. The cells do have different charging times, sometimes only a minute or two sometimes even more.

      Most chargers on the market charge two cells in one bank together. So definitely look for one that'll charge them individually. It's also nice for when you end up with a device that uses 3 AAs. :)

    9. Re:MAHA NiMH. by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      You are right on the money with thomasdistributing. I've used them for my rechargeable battery needs since 2000 and just bought my second set of batteries!

      But you have the brand names mixed a little. Poster wants the Maha C204f charger with PowerEX batteries. There is no other way to power your battery devices.

      My digital camera runs for two hours on energizers when I'm snapping away and using the screen to compose all my shots. The latest powerex batteries (2800 ma) allow it to run at least eight. I am *extremely* happy with their products and service.

  3. What by McGiraf · · Score: 0, Troll

    There is batteries out there that you can recharge?

    Wow. we learn something every day ....

    1. Re:What by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is batteries out there that you can recharge? Wow. we learn something every day ....

      Yup. And tomorrow it's conjugation.

    2. Re:What by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      Oups :)

  4. NIMH here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    18 pack of ray o vac NIMH's. Energizer charger.

    Further, I made an effort to simplify devices around them:

    1. My flashlights use them
    2. My mp3 player uses them
    3. The flash on my canon XT uses them
    4. I bought a bluetooth headset that uses them ( 1 x aaa ) Motorola H300
    5. My wireless mice use them ( both use 2 x aa )

    YMMV, but NIMHs are a good way to go. LiPo and LiIon I dont think are really as common or as inexpensive.

    1. Re:NIMH here by Gryffin · · Score: 1
      YMMV, but NIMHs are a good way to go. LiPo and LiIon I dont think are really as common or as inexpensive.

      Lithium batteries aren't a direct replacement, because they run at waaaay too high a voltage.

      The voltage of a battery is determined by it's chemistry. Different formulations give different voltages:

      • Alkaline (non rechargeable): 1.5-1.6V fresh, decreasing steadily with use; most devices quit when the voltage drops to ~1.0V.
      • Energizer Lithium (non-rechargeable): ~1.7V, dropping very little in use to perhaps 1.5V, before they just die. Although the voltage runs a tad higher than alkaline, it's still within the range most devices expect to see.
      • Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMH): ~1.3V-1.4V when fresh, dropping quickly to 1.2V in use, with little further drop until they just die. Like the Energizers, the voltage range differs from alkalines, but in most devices it still within the expected range.
      • Lithium primary (non-rechargeable): 3.1V-3.0V fresh, with little drop before depletion. Note these don't normally come in the standard AAA, AA, C or D sizes; using 3V batteries in a device designed for 1.5V can easily damage circuitry.
      • Lithium Ion (Li-Ion): 4.0V-4.2V when fresh, dropping quickly to ~3.6V in use, with little further drop until depletion. Obviously, using 4.2V batteries in a device that's designed for 1.5V batteries can easily damage circuitry. Also, some devices designed for 3V Lithium primary cells can be damaged by 4.2V Li-Ion cells.
      • Lithium Polymer (LiPo): I don't have as much experience with these, but I believe they're rated for 3.1V-3.0V, so they're better rechargeable replacements for Lithium primaries than Li-Ion.
      --
      Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself.
    2. Re:NIMH here by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      Good job!

      I'm annoyed at the wide range of consumer products coming out with built-in propritary batteries. Ever run out of juice in your bike light and cannibalized batteries from your camera to make yourself visible on the way home? I have done things like that several times. Others buy a seperate propritary battery for everything, and then wonder why they have too many AC adapters in their lives, and often replace entire devices because its cheaper than replacing their wierd-o batteries.

      AA: 1970s technology kicking the bass of 2006 corporate schlock.

    3. Re:NIMH here by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      There are many devices out there that use 2 1.5V cells. I found that a single Li-Ion cell in series with a diode works great as a replacement (the diode drops the voltage by 0.7, giving just about 3V).

      The other advantages of the Li-Ion cells for me are:
      - cheap; I scavenge them from Li-Ion laptop battery packs.
      - long-lasting; they hold a lot of charge
      - quick to charge
      - no self-discharge; this is one of the more annoying properties of NiMH. I cannot afford a bank of trickle chargers to keep a dozen NiMH batteries ready.

      One disadvantage is the DIY "look" of the device with a rigged battery pack. I wonder what the airport security people would say to a duct-taped handheld GPS with a red and black wire running along it. ;)

      Another trick some people do is to use old/broken cell phones as complete battery+charger solutions. Rip out everything but the battery and the minimum required contact pins, rig a way to power some desired device like GPS or camera, and the charger is free.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    4. Re:NIMH here by Gropo · · Score: 1
      4. I bought a bluetooth headset that uses them ( 1 x aaa ) Motorola H300
      I was glad that this thread came along as I recently bought an H300 myself, thinking that swapping out a rechargeable > waiting for an onboard to recharge. Problem being, I already find the thing pretty cumbersome with a standard alkaline powering it (plan on using it for extended periods of time as a gaming VoIP communicator). Don't you find NiMH's way too heavy to be clasping to your ear? I was just looking around for alternatives and was thinking about low-mAh NiCd (240 range) as a solution to that problem.
      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
  5. Energizer by shlepp · · Score: 1

    Energizer's nickel-hydride, the recharge fast and last a pair last a couple weeks in my 360 controllers, i have 8 of them in total and doubt i will be buying batteries for a long time to come.

  6. Rayovac's OK, but I'd say Energizer by Yooden_Vranx · · Score: 4, Informative

    I use Rayovac's nickel metal hydrides. I started out with Rayovac's alkalines, which were one of the first on the market, and just stuck with them since I don't want to buy new chargers. If I were just buying today, I'd go with Energizer over Rayovac because not everyone stocks the Rayovacs, but the Rayovacs do work pretty well. I don't have any actual experience with Energizer. I don't have a speed charger, so it does take a few hours to recharge them if they're pretty deeply drawn down. I haven't seen any alkaline rechargeable in a long time, but even if you do, definitely go NiMH. The alkalines don't have a very high peak power, and if you ever drain them completely, they can't be recharged.

    1. Re:Rayovac's OK, but I'd say Energizer by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      actually the newer energizers are also NiMH rechargables also

    2. Re:Rayovac's OK, but I'd say Energizer by welshsocialist · · Score: 1

      I had Rayovac's alkaline (or NiMH, can't remember) batteries and I have a pretty bad experience. I used them in my Creative Labs NOMAD II MP3 player for about six months. I noticed that after the battery would go down and down until they went. After a while of this song and dance of recharging and the battery dying in the player, I began to wonder. I asked my parents and they told me it was the battery. After this, I chunked the whole unit and went back to throw away batteries. After this, I got a new player from some fruit company whose name escapes me. Since then, I've been happy.

      --
      Support the Chagossians
  7. Ni-Metal by stonefoz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I still don't trust lithium-ion for regular uses, the device really needs an onboard controller just to keep them safe. Can't overcharge, voltage spike, drain too far, temp ect. However any device will be happy with Ni-Metal. Ni-Metal has the closest performance next to lithium-ion with the only drawback is weight, nickel is heavy.

    --
    I think I just cashed out all my cool points.
    1. Re:Ni-Metal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are referring to Lithium-Polymer with the unsafe bit.

    2. Re:Ni-Metal by dangitman · · Score: 1

      No, Lithium Polymer was introduced as a much safer alternative to the old-school Lithium Ion. In fact, Lithium polymer Batteries are actually Lithium Ion Polymer, but most people omit the "Ion" part of their full name.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    3. Re:Ni-Metal by Desert_Scarecrow · · Score: 1

      While weight is one significant drawback of Ni-MH, another that you fail to mention is shelf life. While the performance is somewhat close when you use either one fresh off the charger, charge bleeds from Ni-MH much faster than Li-ion. I'm speaking from experience in an environment where I maintain a stock of 120+ Ni-MH and 50ish Li-ions that are used in the same systems, man-portable radios which transmit at 5W on max power. Ni-MH fresh off the charger are typically good for 8-12 hours, while Li-ion last 12-18 hours. The other effect we've noticed is that in cold (below 32F) or hot (above 125F) environments, Ni-MH lose their charge faster than Li-ion, though that is anecdotal evidence, while the bleed time is supplied with each shipment of batteries on a few pages of graphs from some lab. Our operators sleep with their spare batteries in their sleeping bags when it's cold to help them last longer.

    4. Re:Ni-Metal by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      "the device really needs an onboard controller just to keep them safe"

      In fact, in the United States, a manufacturer is legally required to include protection circuitry (against short circuit, overcharge, and over-discharge) in any Lithium Ion battery pack sold in the United States.

      If I recall correctly, manufacturers of Li-Ion cells are not allowed to sell bare cells to anyone who is not licensed to work with Li-Ions. Any company you see selling "bare" cells to the general public most likely has a disclaimer somewhere that it is included in a pack with protection circuitry with undocumented/unknown functionality. They know you're using it as a "bare" cell for projects, but they've satisfied the law by selling it in a pack with a protection circuit.

      Li-Ion batteries simply cannot be used as a generic replacement in most devices for a variety of reasons, the first of which is that their nominal voltage (3.6 volts) is not anywhere close to the nominal voltage of normal alkaline or NiCd/NiMh cells. They also have quite a bit of output voltage variability. (They are charged at 4.1 or 4.2 volts depending on the exact cell chemistry, and slowly drop to slightly below 3.6 as they discharge.)

      BTW, NiCd/NiMH cells have a far lower nominal voltage (1.2 volts) than alkalines (1.5 volts), which makes them perform worse in some devices. They have a far lower internal resistance, which makes them superior to alkalines in any device that has high drain and can deal with the lower voltage, for example a device that contains an internal switching regulator to convert 2.4-3.0 volts to 3.3 volts, or from 4.8-6.0 volts to 3.3 like many digital cameras.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  8. The ones that came with my laptop comp by FractalZone · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I went through a phase where I bought a bunch of rechargeable AAA, AA, C, D and 9V batteries, along with some chargers.

    I have since realized that I can do without most battery operated devices that take standard external rechargeable batteries. I'm thinking hard about the batteries I do recharge often, and they are in my: laptop computer, electric razor, power bit driver, automobile, and cellular phone. Hmmm.

    --
    "You're young, you're drunk, you're in bed, you have knives; shit happens." -- Angelina Jolie
    1. Re:The ones that came with my laptop comp by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As far as I've ever been able to find, C and D rechargeables are complete rip-offs.

      Every time I see a rechargeable C or D, they appear to have exactly the same capacity as a mid-range AA. Apparently, they just stick a AA core inside a C or D sized "shell". Anybody ever found a "real" NiMH D-Cell?

    2. Re:The ones that came with my laptop comp by Russellkhan · · Score: 1

      Haven't tried these, but I do use the MAHA AAs and have found them to be excellent.
      http://www.thomas-distributing.com/dbatteries.php

      --
      Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
    3. Re:The ones that came with my laptop comp by thsths · · Score: 1

      > Anybody ever found a "real" NiMH D-Cell?

      I have not used them, but I know that Sanyo makes them. They have around 10000 mAh and cost nearly 20 dollars per piece. This probably explains why you don't see them in retail, because after the 3 times markup they are just way to expensive. They have some use in industrial applications, although they are rare even there. C-Cells where popular at a time, but now everything seems to standardize on sub-C.

    4. Re:The ones that came with my laptop comp by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      AA core in C/D "shell" is common practice for consumer-targeted batteries.

      True C/D cells exist, you usually have to go to a specialist store or order online. (Quite a few have linked to Thomas Distributing, one such online specialty store. There's another online distributor that offers bulk discounts for industrial NiMHs, I forget their name at the moment.)

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    5. Re:The ones that came with my laptop comp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I use AA to C converters you can get them on ebay, sure they dont last as long but it simplifies things if you also have alot of stuff that needs AA, cheaper too - also saves some weight in my cycle light.

  9. USB-Powered by micksam7 · · Score: 1

    I use those usb-charged batterys over at ThinkGeek. Work great in my digital camera. Too bad they can't be AAA-sized for some of my TV remotes and my TI-calc.

    1. Re:USB-Powered by Technician · · Score: 1

      Too bad they can't be AAA-sized for some of my TV remotes

      Very low average power use is not an application for rechargable batteries. Considering that rechargable batteries often die after less than 5 years use and self discharge in under 6 months, it is very hard to justify using rechargable batteries in things like a tv remote or smoke detector. A 5 year supply of batteries for a TV remote is less than 5 sets of batteries for most people. Unless you channel surf constantly, there isn't much draw on a TV remote's batteries.

      The other place I don't use rechargable batteries is in the LED flashlights I keep next to the generator and electrical panel. I don't need to find self discharged batteries in a critical moment.

      A good rule of thumb is use rechargable batteries in applications that would typicaly kill a battery in under a month of typical use. Good uses are MP3 players, digital cameras, CD players, laptop computers, cordless keyboard & mouse, cell phone, workbench flashlights, electric razors, and other higher current items. Don't use them in items where you change the battery once a year or so such as smoke detectors, emergency kit radios and flashlights, alarm sensors, watches, backup batteries for the clockradio, TV remote, etc.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:USB-Powered by roseblood · · Score: 1

      I bet to differ with the parent. The remote I use for my HTPC setup is the one that comes with Radeon AIW video cards. With a little irblaster and few scripts on the HTPC I can (and do) use the one remote to operate everything connected to the TV. That thing eats up far more than 5 sets of batteries a year. Imagine the folks with the really fancy remotes with LCD touch screens and the like. Remotes have come along way sense the 80's my friend.

      I do agree with you on smoke alrams, flashlights, or any emergency "must work now" gear that does not see frequent use.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    3. Re:USB-Powered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) The phrase is: BEG to differ.
      2) That's a fringe case.

      Of COURSE in your high-drain remote rechargeables are a good option. That's NOT what that post was referring to. He was talking of your everyday run-of-the-mill remote where the batteries will die out perhaps once every year or three.

    4. Re:USB-Powered by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      I bet to differ with the parent. The remote I use for my HTPC setup is the one that comes with Radeon AIW video cards. With a little irblaster and few scripts on the HTPC I can (and do) use the one remote to operate everything connected to the TV. That thing eats up far more than 5 sets of batteries a year.

      I concur. My MCE Remote works its way through a pair of rechargable 2500mah AA cells every ~6 weeks or so.

    5. Re:USB-Powered by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      "I concur. My MCE Remote works its way through a pair of rechargable 2500mah AA cells every ~6 weeks or so."

      While the original poster said 6 months for self-discharge, IMO NiMH self-discharge is worse than that. I believe NiMHs are worse than NiCDs for self-discharge.

      Those batteries probably would have discharged themselves significantly in those 6 weeks anyway, inside a device or not.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  10. www.thomas-distributing.com has it all by holden+caufield · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have no connection to this company, other than being a satisfied customer, but what you want to do is to purchase Powerex NiMH batteries, and a MAHA - MH-C204W Smart World Travel Conditioning Battery Charger.

    Then you will be a satisified customer too.

    --
    I'll create an amusing sig when I have something meaningful to post.
    1. Re:www.thomas-distributing.com has it all by Danse · · Score: 1
      I have no connection to this company, other than being a satisfied customer, but what you want to do is to purchase Powerex NiMH batteries, and a MAHA - MH-C204W Smart World Travel Conditioning Battery Charger.

      Seconded. I bought these for my camera, and they've been great. The charger is the best I've used.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    2. Re:www.thomas-distributing.com has it all by leiz · · Score: 1

      I bought nimh batteries from thomas-distributing as well and I'm happy with them. I also have a bunch of ray-o-vac rechargable alkalines. You should buy the right type of battery depending on your situation:

      The nimh batteries work great for items like mp3 players and cameras that draw a lot of power. Rechargable alkalines tend to die after half an hour in my mp3 player. Rechargable alkalines work better in items like graphing calculators and palmpilots, which does not drain the battery as fast. In these devices, nimh batteries do not work well because they slowly lose their charge over a few weeks and then one day you try to turn on your calculator and it doesn't work.

      In any case, you have to make an effort to remember to charge the batteries, but it really helps the environment because you're reducing the amount of battery waste by 10X-100X.

    3. Re:www.thomas-distributing.com has it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remote controls last so long that using rechargables is BAD for the earth with its chems etc.

      If yor digital camera doesn't come with its own rechargable, man you need to get a new one. It must be 10yrs old. Or ur a school - they like digital cameras that use AA batteries.

      U know the environmental cost of disposing of rechargables?

  11. Check out this site by namityadav · · Score: 1

    You didn't specify what kind of batteries the camera takes. But I'll assume it is AA.

    I think the obvious choice will be some high capacity NiMH batteries. Now-a-days we have a wide choice of cells ranging from 1500 to 2700mAh. Obviously, higher capacity means longer run time.

    You can find more info here: http://www.steves-digicams.com/nimh_batteries.html

    1. Re:Check out this site by berzerke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...cells ranging from 1500 to 2700mAh...

      Be warned that the manufacturer's cheat with the higher mAh batteries. They say they are a certain size, but actually the batteries are slightly bigger than their stated size. More chemicials mean more mAh, but more chemicals also need more space.

      The upshot of this is if the battery compartment is tight, the larger mAh batteries won't fit as they are not the standard size. There is an upper limit. For AA, it seems to be about 2000-2200 mAh from my experience. The 2400 AA's I bought actually fit in only a few of my devices.

    2. Re:Check out this site by Threni · · Score: 1

      Think that's just a dodgy batch you've got. I've never been particular about which brand of battery I've bought - I just get the highest mAh rated AA rechargeables I can (afford), and I've not noticed them coming in different shapes and sizes.

    3. Re:Check out this site by berzerke · · Score: 1

      ...I've not noticed them coming in different shapes and sizes.

      Again, if the battery compartment is loose fitting, you probably won't notice a difference. The 2400's do fit a few of my devices. But there are other devices they won't fit in.

    4. Re:Check out this site by Threni · · Score: 1

      Sounds like your battery compartment doesn't conform to whatever standard batteries use (if any).

    5. Re:Check out this site by Russellkhan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've also had no problems. I use 2700 & 2900mAH AAs in my Canon digital camera, which has what looks to me to be a fairly tight compartment (individual slots for each battery - and yes, it looks tight with standard non-rechargables, not just with my high mAH batteries).

      I'd mention the problem to whichever place you bought your batteries from. You may get a refund or exchange, and I'm sure they'd be interested in knowing that the product doesn't conform to its spec.

      --
      Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
    6. Re:Check out this site by peterpi · · Score: 1

      So that's what it is! I've had batteries in the past that didn't seem to fit into anything, whereas cheaper ones did. I had no idea that's why it happened.

  12. nonrechargable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is always the non-rechargable route. Just go to Costco and pick up 48 AA for $9. That will last you a lot of pictures on your digital camera!

    1. Re:nonrechargable by Turken · · Score: 1

      After taking a few international trips, I've decided that Energizer's non-rechargable lithium batteries are essential for my digital camera. They may cost 4-5 times as much as traditional alkalines, but they also last 4-5 times longer and weigh significantly less. I can easily take a few thousand pictures on only a dozen batteries purchased from Sams Club for ~$18, and I don't have to worry at all about self-discharge or plug/voltage issues with chargers.

    2. Re:nonrechargable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What experience have people had with the rechargers that supposedly
      recharge disposable batteries?

      http://www.viatekproducts.com/ProductDetail.jsp?LI STID=DD0000-1111623369

    3. Re:nonrechargable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what a good way for someone to earn themselves a Darwin award.

    4. Re:nonrechargable by xsonofagunx · · Score: 1

      I've recharged normal non-rechargeable alkaline AA's [Duracell and Energizer] in my Radioshack 3-hr NiCd charger before. It's important to only do it a couple times, because they will start leaking if you do it more than that, or at the very least the charge just won't take anymore. It was kind of an experiment, and because of the obvious hazards, I was quite careful with it (I even taped a nice little plastic "shield" [aka a small tupperware dish] to the wall around the outlet, just in case). It did work, but they did start to leak after a few recharges. In any case, I don't really recommend it, they never lasted as long on the re-charges as they would have new off the shelf anyway. It was interesting to know that it was possible though.

    5. Re:nonrechargable by robbak · · Score: 1

      No experience, but I do know a little of the chemistry.

      When you pass a current backwards through a cell, the chemical reactions reverse, replating the metal back to the walls of the cell, and reforming some of the chemical. In ordinary cells, this plating takes place unevenly, causing dendrites (spikes) that soon short the cell out internally. If this happens when the cell contains a lot of charge, the heat produced could cause an exposion, or certainly leakage.

      Most chargers get around this by charging it in a two-steps-forward,one-step-back manner. - putting a little charge in, and then drawing some out. This burns off the dendrites, and makes for an even coating.

      As for how good they are (or are not), I'll leave for someone who has used them. They have not become really popular, however, so I expect they do not live up to expectations.

      When added to the fact that NiMH cells outperform Alkaline cells, and the extra cost amortized over the life of the cell is negligable, there is really no reason to be bothered with it.

      --
      Prediction for end of Universe #42: Fencepost error in Quantum_bogosort.cpp
  13. Comparison site by ximenes · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.imaging-resource.com/ACCS/BATTS/BATTS.H TM has comparisons of various brands from a year or two ago. It seems like basically PowerEx is the way to go, particularly when you take into account that they are now available in 2700 mAh versions. The highest mAh AA NiMH battery that I could find is from Accupower at 2900 mAh. However, they don't seem to perform as well as Sanyo 2700 mAh batteries, and so I would guess that they are also inferior to the PowerEx 2700 mAh ones.

    The important thing to remember is that anything towards the top of a comparison list is probably going to work fine; you don't necessary need the very finest NiMH battery available on the market today. For instance, I have some Sanyo 2300 mAh batteries that work just fine.

    It seems like www.thomasdistributing.com is the place to buy batteries if you're looking for a reputable online store.

    1. Re:Comparison site by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1

      Those Sanyo 2700 mAH batteries, I take it you're refering to the "Superlattice Alloy" types? They been performing well for you? I bought 8 of them, but they lose their charge over a timespan of 2 to 3 weeks, while lying on the shelf. However, I assume it's because of the crappy Memorex charger I charged them in the first couple of weeks (didn't have a decent charger back then, and it said on the charger that it was suitable for NiCd and NiMH, so I went with that). Now, no matter what I do to them in my Ansmann charger that does a great job on the included 2300 mAH batteries, I can't seem to get those Sanyos to perform. They're still OK for high drain applications, but not for long term storage while not in use.

      Long story short, at first I thought that it must've been some annoying trait of NiMH batteries, but when the new batteries that came with the Ansmann charger proved me wrong, I started suspecting I might've overcharged them with the old crappy charger... If you can confirm those batteries actually work great for you, then I can safely assume this to be the case. In which case: does anyone here know a way to revive NiMH batteries that have been overcharged and/or undercharged a couple of times too many?

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
    2. Re:Comparison site by crossmr · · Score: 1

      The site is a bit out of date though. Any tests of the latest batteries?

    3. Re:Comparison site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got some AA "Vanson" 1800mAh Ni-MH and they also tend to lose all power - whether it takes 2 to 3 weeks as you mentioned I don't know

  14. NiMh for me by thomasdz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm a big fan of "middle of the road" NiMh
    I know I'm not getting the biggest bang for the buck, but lately, any of the Lithium batteries scare me and NiCad's have that memory effect (and Cadmium is a environmental baddie).
    They ALL have their good points and bad points... heck good old lead-acid is great for long-term, always topped up storage like emergency lighting and car batteries.

    And by the way, Offtopic I know...I really detest things that have four AAA cells instead of two AA cells... you don't get a huge saving in thickness and AA cells seem to last way longer anyway

    I was going to do another "funny" post (anonymously), but I'm late for an appointment already, so here it is:
    Rechargable? Heck, I stick a copper penny and zinc-coated nail into a lemon if I want a battery. None of these newfangled

    So mod me funny OR insightful OR offtopic! This post has it all.
    TDz.

    --
    Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
    1. Re:NiMh for me by xsonofagunx · · Score: 1

      Two AAs can only put out ~3v, while four AAAs put out ~6v. The two AAs may have higher capacities [mAh] than even the four AAAs, but if the device needs 6v giving it 3v isn't going to cut it.

  15. The charger matters more by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 4, Informative
    A cheap-ass charger overheats your batteries and drastically shortens their lifetime. A negative delta-V charger (like a MH-C777PLUS or that ilk) detects the teeny teeny tiny little voltage drops that NiCd and NiMH batteries do when they reach peak charge and stop right there.

    I've always just bought whatever high capacity stuff I can find that's on sale and use a nice charger. I've had cells last nearly ten years by babying them this way.

    As for the batteries, NiMH have higher capacity but a pretty horrible self-discharge rate. NiCds are a bit better, but to get decent usage out of either you really need to make a habit of topping them up before going off on your little expeditions. And always, always bring some alkalines with you. Their shelf life is phenomenal.

    Oh, and don't forget that the NiCd memory effect is a myth. Let it die, already.

  16. Batteries with large mAh by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Though I have no idea what's wrong with Joules.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Batteries with large mAh by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Tension of batteries vary, so energy is not exactly equals charge * nominal tension. Consequently, using joules is confusing and leads to marketeers using weard measuring schemes, like they do with power of sound systems.

  17. Just pick up a NiMH quick charger and battery pack by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    I picked up a Lenmar quick charger with 4 2700mAh batteries three years ago for $20. I can typically get 1000 shots (20% of them flash) or 45 minutes of video out of my old Canon Powershot A80. Plus it came with a 12v car adapter. I think they're relabeled sanyo batteries, which are pretty much the best on the market as far as I can tell. Charges in about 30 min (As advertised). I picked up a second set of 2500mAh batteries for about $12.
     
    oonly down side is that they lose 2-3% of their charge per day, so it's always a good idea to have a set of alkalines on hand as backup.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  18. 15 minute charger by geniusj · · Score: 1

    Various NiMH cells + an Energizer 15 minute charger is what I use.

  19. Cheep Ni-Cad ones by lhaeh · · Score: 1
    Rather then waste money and time on the pricey ones, I just but the really cheep ones from the local dollar store @ $0.50. That way I can put them into low drain and occasional use devices like remotes, alarm clock backup, flashlights, portable test equipment, etc.

    The ones I get now are made in china and are labeled as 600/300mAh for AA/AAA. I also go with older, but never used chargers from a local surplus store that go for under $5 each. I used to buy really expensive chargers and batteries, but found that it was much easier to just buy a lot of cheep ones then a few expensive ones.

    The only issues with them are that I go through them faster and therefore more end up having to be disposed of properly and I have to carry more of them around for high drain devices. These issues don't really bother me as I'm sure the mAh on the cheep ones will go up over time and they are lighter then the expensive ones so carrying around more isn't too bad.

    1. Re:Cheep Ni-Cad ones by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >low drain and occasional use devices like remotes, alarm clock backup, flashlights, portable test equipment, etc.

      Rechargeables are the wrong choice for those. They self-discharge while the unit is on the shelf. Rechargeables are less annoying, and better able to pay for themselves, in regular heavy usage.

      Cheap chargers, by the way, are destructive.

    2. Re:Cheep Ni-Cad ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The only issues with them are that I go through them faster and therefore more end up having to be disposed of properly and I have to carry more of them around for high drain devices.
      So then don't. Not only is the Cadmium part of NiCad significantly more toxic than anything that's used in NiMHs, you end up with just a quarter of the capacity of NiMHs (>2400mAh and 1200mAh for AA and AAA respectively) and even less of it usable, since NiMHs work significantly better with high drain devices. NiMHs can be charged faster, they don't degrade as quickly as NiCads. Their only drawbacks are higher price and a higher self discharge rate, i.e. they lose charge by just resting on the shelf.
    3. Re:Cheep Ni-Cad ones by Technician · · Score: 1

      I just but the really cheep ones from the local dollar store @ $0.50. & portable test equipment

      Use them in only cheap flashlights. I've seen too many cheap Ni-Cad batteries turn the spring contacts and wires into green powder. I would not want that in my digital camera or test equipment.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Cheep Ni-Cad ones by lhaeh · · Score: 1
      Although they do discharge on their own, it is not as fast as Ni-MH. They are good for at least 6 months IIRC. Even regular batteries lose their charge over time, the only ones that I'm aware of that don't are Li-C batteries. Just using them in hi-drain devices made a lot of sense in the past, but now that they cost next to nothing I find it makes sense for me to use them in almost any application.

      The most expensive charger I bought ($90 at the time) thought it was a good idea to discharge my Ni-MH batteries before charging them, killing their lifetime. The cheep ones do need you to remember them to keep from killing via overcharge, but this is easily solved with an external timer. Since they are not rapid chargers I don't have to worry about starting with a slow charge.

    5. Re:Cheep Ni-Cad ones by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Oh woopy I need to recharge my remote batteries very six months, instead of changing them maybe once in the lifespan of the device. It is not economic for low current drain devices that will last years with alkaline batteries to use an expensive rechargable.

  20. I use NiMH by grishnav · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To learn about the different chemistries:

    http://batteryuniversity.com/

    I've found NiMH to be the best balance for all my applications.

    I've had good luck buying NiMH in bulk from this company:

    http://www.shorelinemarket.com/

    I've purchased AA and AAAs in bulk from them (Tenergy AAs and Powerizer AAAs). While they aren't the highest capacity batteries available, they are pretty close, and I haven't been able to beat the price per cell on comparable batteries or the price per MaH.

    The AAs seem to do a bit better in high-drain, as they seem to bleed a full charge in about four-six months, which means something that might run practically forever on a set (like a transistor radio you don't use often, or a small scanner), usually won't eat the batteries before they eat themselves. But they've done really well for me.

    I'm not real happy with the Powerizers. They seem more like 400-500mah than 850, but alas, I can't really test them. I'm tempted to buy some of the Tenergy AAs to try, but unfortunately I've already got a bunch of the Powerizers.
    I also purchased their 10-position AA/AAA charger/discharger. It works fine, but makes this annoying buzz every second or so as it charges and discharges, I'm assuming because of cheap components. Invest the extra bucks for a nice Maha.

    Anyway, read up at battery university before you go making any purchases. There is a lot of good info there. Just keep in mind they are operated buy the guy who runs Cadex.

  21. Energizer NiMH or Lithium Ion by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    I use the Energizer NiMH witha 15 Minute charger.....all sizes. They charge up quickly and last a long time if you get the higher amp hour ones.

    --

    Gorkman

  22. I've given up on 'em. by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Informative

    A few years back I made a big push to try to save money by using rechargeable batteries. I gave up on them. Here are my personal experiences. Your mileage may vary.

    --How well devices on 1.2V rechargeable batteries varies a lot from one device to another. Some work just fine. Quite a few work poorly enough to be a nuisance. Conventional incandescent-bulb flashlights, for example, sort of work but are distinctly dim and yellowish. Many motorized devices are noticeably weak and lethargic. You can't really tell how well a device will work until you try it. And then you need to keep mental track of which devices you can use the rechargeables in. I had a cassette recorder that would play OK on 1.2V batteries, but when recording it didn't have quite enough power to hold the recording speed steady and the recordings would have some "wow" and unevenness to them.

    --Rechargeables store distinctly less energy, i.e. don't last anywhere near as long on a single charge as a disposable. This creates a large nuisance factor. Even if the device is only going to be used at home, it means that if you have devices that take N disposable batteries, you will need considerably more than N rechargeables, and probably more charges than you thought, in order to have freshly charged batteries always ready to swap in.

    --The nuisance factor of storing less energy is considerable. If my wife takes her camera on a vacation, she can put in an (expensive) disposable lithium at the start and that's it, she's set, no charger to drag along.

    --Rechargeables lose energy if not kept in the charger. This means you can't just keep a drawerful of freshly-charged batteries available.

    --Rechargeables die fairly quickly, typically in about two years. And suffer reduced capacity as they age. Yes, they do this no matter how anal you are about following whatever your favorite superstitious battery-care ritual ([always|never] discharge them completely before recharging, [do|don't] just leave them continuously charging in the charger, etc.) Individual batteries have enormous individual variation in their useful life. You can have two "C" batteries bought in the same package at the same time and one may suddenly crap out in a year, the other may be going strong after four... which makes the management problem more complicated.

    ACTUAL USEFUL TIP: In my experience, smaller rechargeables were very consistently worse in terms of premature failure. AA's were terrible. D's were pretty good.

    --It is like pulling teeth to get a manufacturer to replace a rechargeable battery that has failed "early." They know darn well the products aren't long-lived and will not just happily replace them on your say-so.

    --Because of the various factors mentioned, you cannot just replace all the alkaline disposables in your house with rechargeables, so you still need to have a drawerful of alkaline D's, C's, AA's, and AAA's as well as finding space for a charger or two and another outlet strip and so forth.

    --Because rechargeables require a certain amount of attention... what does it mean when the charger is showing a flashing red light? a steady green light? etc... and because so many of us develop our own personal rituals ("the charger on the left is with the charged batteries that are ready for use and just being kept topped up...") you can't really share rechargeables with other family members—even adult members, certainly not kids—except on the basis of "every time you need a battery come see me."

    --Because the rechargeable batteries themselves are expensive, and because the chargers are expensive (and because it's never completely clear whether it's safe to use any charger other than the one designed specifically for the specific batteries) and because the batteries tend to fail in a few years, it is not at all clear that you actually save money using them in a general way.

    Obviously, if you have a battery-hungry device that you use all the time that runs fine off 1.2V rechargeables... say one that you use so often that you replace the batteries every week... you may save money.

    1. Re:I've given up on 'em. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      *and* in the case of Ni-Cds you can't just throw them in the household trash, not if you're at all responsible. You get the joys of finding where to recycle hazmat.

    2. Re:I've given up on 'em. by Deagol · · Score: 1

      I didn't think you were really supposed to toss disposable alkalines in the trash, at least if you want a green conscience.

    3. Re:I've given up on 'em. by saviorsloth · · Score: 1

      i don't want to be rude, but really you shouldn't be throwing any batteries in the trash at all. while they're not all hazmats like Ni-Cd, they're all pretty nasty. i know it's a pain in the ass but most cities will have a couple of free battery disposal periods during the year or something (i think).
      as a matter of full disclosure i should probably state that i've never gotten up the gumption to actually take advantage of these things, but i also have various "dead battery depots" containing every battery i've used since childhood (i'm 22 now). it doesn't seem to be so bad so far, the bottom of the buckets haven't been corroded by battery acid, and i'm fairly sure that someday i will take advantage of a battery disposal period for the whole lot of them.
      at any rate, if anyone can even find those ridiculously shitty Ni-Cd batteries these days, they deserve some sort of medal, 'cause NiMh batteries are so much better in every way that i'm aware of. i think they also alleviate a fair number of the grandparent post's concerns. besides, for anything more battery hungry than a remote control, rechargables probably will save you money in the medium to long term. maybe just keep a set of good disposables for when you need backups for your camera or something.

    4. Re:I've given up on 'em. by Kalak · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
    5. Re:I've given up on 'em. by evilviper · · Score: 5, Insightful
      A few years back I made a big push to try to save money by using rechargeable batteries. I gave up on them.

      Your experience is seriously out-of-date, and just about the exact opposite of reality now.

      How well devices on 1.2V rechargeable batteries varies a lot from one device to another. Some work just fine. Quite a few work poorly enough to be a nuisance.

      1) The more batteries a device has, the more chance that there will be a problem. Anything that only uses 2 batteries will be fine. 4 should be okay as well. 6-8 and you've got a real issue. In that case, some higher-end devices have extra compartments for extra rechargable batteries. On my Sega Nomad, I added a couple myself.

      2) Panasonic's NiCD batteries are rated at 1.25 volts, which helps.

      3) Alkaline batteries offer lower voltages over time, as they become drained, so just about everything has to be able to operate on 1.2V anyhow, otherwise it will have horendous battery life. NiCD batteries, unlike Alkalines, will hold their 1.2V until they're almost completely drained. That works great in most modern devices, but is considered a drawback in flashlights because you get no warning.

      4) But more than that. Modern Ni-MH batteries, though rated at 1.2V, really offer 1.5V (in my own tests) when freshly charged, and slowly go down, like Alkalines.

      Rechargeables store distinctly less energy, i.e. don't last anywhere near as long on a single charge as a disposable.

      This hasn't been true for over a decade.

      1) "High capacity" AA NiCDs from Radioshack (850mAH?) have just slightly less power than Alkalines, and have been sold for at least a decade now.

      2) High Capacity AA Panasonic NiCDs (1100mAH) last as long or longer than Alkalines, DESPITE the lower voltage of NiCD.

      3) NiMH AA batteries, as sold by Energizer and Duracell (2000+ mAH), last nearly TWICE as long as disposible Alkaline batteries.

      Rechargeables lose energy if not kept in the charger.

      1) True for NiCD, but absolutely not true for NiMH. NiMH batteries will hold their charge for months.

      2) I haven't seen an always-on charger in well over a decade. So your experience is obviously very out-of-date, and not remotely applicable or helpful.

      3) Recent batteries and chargers have gotten charge time down to 30 minutes, so unless you are in a situation desperately need a battery R

      4) Leaving NiCD batteries constantly charging will significantly reduces their lifespan. That may have been causing some of the other issues you listed.

      Rechargeables die fairly quickly, typically in about two years. And suffer reduced capacity as they age.

      1) Really crappy NiCDs, under an extremely heavy duty cycle, may have the life you describe. The better ones will last far longer. And in more realistic usage, even the crappy ones will last far more than a year.

      2) NiMH have no such problems. They'll last for many more years, and exhibit very little capacity loss.

      you cannot just replace all the alkaline disposables in your house with rechargeables,

      Not true. With NiMH batteries, EVERYTHING I have is operating on rechargables.

      ("the charger on the left is with the charged batteries that are ready for use and just being kept topped up...") you can't really share rechargeables with other family members

      Yeah, 20 years ago that was a real problem. Ever since, it's been trivially easy.

      it is not at all clear that you actually save money using them in a general way.

      It's been overwhelmingly proven, time and time again, in study after study, that you save significant money, even with the cheapest, oldest rechargables.

      Today, the situtation is worlds better, and extremely clear-cut.

      Tell me, does your laptop computer operate on disposible Alkaline AA batteries, or does it use rechargeables? How about your iPod?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:I've given up on 'em. by pacmanfan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whoa whoa whoa. Lots of misinformation here. -You really should look at flashlight output curves with alkaline cells, and then NiMH cells. While they tend to start out brighter with alkaline cells, that tends to quickly change, and NiMH cells will stay brighter for longer. The brighter the flashlight, the more this difference is amplified. -I wouldn't say rechargeables store DISTINCTLY less energy. Technology has improved, and they are now storing nearly as much energy as alkalines. I look for them to surpass alkalines sometime this year. The catch is useable energy. As currents increase, alkalines really start performing poorly. I know that with a piddly 1A current draw, NiMH cells will very noticeably outperform alkalines. I've got a flashlight pulling 3.3A, and alkalines barely last 10 minutes in it. My NiMH cells last over 40 minutes. -I'm not sure what the shelf life is of NiMH batteries, but the majority of my 4 year old cells are working fine. The reason some aren't is because I ran them too low in large battery packs (8 cell series configuration), and every now and then a weak one will reverse charge in that scenario. Now that I don't try to milk every last joule out of them before I put them on the charger, I haven't had any more problems. In my experience, capacity doesn't start noticeable dropping until at least 100 charge/drain cycles. -Complaining about a two-color status LED requiring attention? Come on man, this is Slashdot, FFS! Solid red light means it's charging, flashlight red light means it couldn't charge because of a problem, and green indicates the batteries were successfully charged. How hard is that? Even my father figured it out, and I had to show him the power button on his new TV remote the other day. And while we're on the topic, it's perfectly safe to charge any NiMH battery in any NiMH charger, regardless of brand. I'd just stay away from off-brand chargers, and even off-brand cells. Just like I don't use no-name alkalines. Cost-wise, it's something everyone has to figure out for themselves. For me, it was simple. Duracell/Energizer alkaline: ~$.60. Energizer 2500mAH NiMH cells: $2.00. Even including the electricity to charge them, the rechargeables pay for themselves in just 4 charges. There's the charger cost to consider too ($20), but recharging 4 AAs just six times covers that, by my math. I still use alkalines in my alarm clock, but that's about it. And to the other child poster: NiMHs actually do lose energy just by sitting, and in fact at a greater rate than NiCD. I believe NiMHs lose about 30% of their energy per month, while NiCD is more like 18%. This is NiMH's chief drawback IMO, but it's not significant to most people. I just use alkalines in my clocks and remotes, and NiMHs in everything else.

    7. Re:I've given up on 'em. by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Sorry but some classes of device are not economic to run on rechargables, because they last for so long on alkalines. A prime example would be remote controls, which seem to go at least five years between replacement in my experience. Other devices should not be run on rechargables for safety reasons. For example it would be very foolish to use a rechargable in something like an avalanche transceiver.

    8. Re:I've given up on 'em. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      And then you need to keep mental track of which devices you can use the rechargeables in.

      Why would you need to keep mental track of it? You could just put a label in the battery bay.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    9. Re:I've given up on 'em. by Gryffin · · Score: 1

      Generally good post, very informative. But I have one correction:

      1) True for NiCD, but absolutely not true for NiMH. NiMH batteries will hold their charge for months.

      Actually, the newer NiMH formulations that allow those crazy high capacities (2400mAH+ in AA, for instance) do have this problem. Bad. I deal with this myself; the 2500mAH Energizer NiMH's for my digital camera won't work if they've been sitting more than a couple weeks after charging. I have to leave them in my smart charger if I expect them to be full when I need them.

      In fact, while most manufacturers keep pushing capacities higher, some are selling NiMH batteries designed for minimal self-discharge, like these Titanium brand cells. They arent' available in as high capacity, however.

      (I just noticed that those Titaniums recently improved from 1800mAH to 2100mAH; hopefully this means that we won't always have to sacrifice capacity for low discharge.)

      --
      Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself.
    10. Re:I've given up on 'em. by Agripa · · Score: 1

      2) Panasonic's NiCD batteries are rated at 1.25 volts, which helps.

      3) Alkaline batteries offer lower voltages over time, as they become drained, so just about everything has to be able to operate on 1.2V anyhow, otherwise it will have horendous battery life. NiCD batteries, unlike Alkalines, will hold their 1.2V until they're almost completely drained. That works great in most modern devices, but is considered a drawback in flashlights because you get no warning.

      4) But more than that. Modern Ni-MH batteries, though rated at 1.2V, really offer 1.5V (in my own tests) when freshly charged, and slowly go down, like Alkalines.

      Terminal voltage depends on chemistry and while Panasonic may print 1.25 volts on their cells they use the same chemistry and produce the same voltage as other similar cells. One advantage to the spiral wound construction of NiCd and NiMH cells is the large surface area yields a very low internal resistance and high power density. Primary alkaline batteries lack this and suffer at high discharge rates although they themselves are much better then the dry cells they replaced. The discharge curve for NiCd and NiMH is actually so flat around 1.2 volts that it is not trivial to measure it accurately during charge and discharge.

      Incidentally, I have successfully used a 10 D cell NiCd battery belt I originally constructed for high power drain applications to start cars in place of the standard lead acid battery which it easily exceeded in performance although not in capacity. I would love to use something like it on a permanent basis but reverse engineering car charging systems for modification is getting more difficult to do.

      1) "High capacity" AA NiCDs from Radioshack (850mAH?) have just slightly less power than Alkalines, and have been sold for at least a decade now.

      2) High Capacity AA Panasonic NiCDs (1100mAH) last as long or longer than Alkalines, DESPITE the lower voltage of NiCD.

      3) NiMH AA batteries, as sold by Energizer and Duracell (2000+ mAH), last nearly TWICE as long as disposible Alkaline batteries.

      The early standard AA sizes for NiCd, NiMH, and Alkaline cells were about 500 mAH, 1000 mAH, and 2000 mAH. For D cells this was 4 AH, 7 AH, and 14 AH. Since then rechargeable batteries have improved by about a factor of 2 so ignoring power density issues, NiMH has caught up to Alkaline and NiCd is about where NiMH used to be.

      Rechargeables lose energy if not kept in the charger.

      1) True for NiCD, but absolutely not true for NiMH. NiMH batteries will hold their charge for months.

      NiCd really should have a lower self discharge then NiMH but the construction used to create higher energy density in these types of cells naturally leads to a higher self discharge and shorter life. In theory the lower capacity cells of a given chemistry should have a longer life span and a lower self discharge rate but within a given construction design I have not been able to measure a difference and consumer batteries are optimized for capacity at the expense of everything else including reliability.

      I have some sintered NiCd cells approaching 50 years old that work as well as when they were new. Their failure mode at this point is case fracture when dropped. Of course, their energy and power density are relatively low by modern standards and they are not maintenance free.

      2) I haven't seen an always-on charger in well over a decade. So your experience is obviously very out-of-date, and not remotely applicable or helpful.

      3) Recent batteries and chargers have gotten charge time down to 30 minutes, so unless you are in a situation desperately need a battery R

      4) Leaving NiCD batteries constantly charging will significantly reduces their lifespan. That may have been causing some of the other issues you listed.

      Even now a lot of chargers really do not do an adequate job and

    11. Re:I've given up on 'em. by smchris · · Score: 1

      A prime example would be remote controls

      Guess it depends on how long you expect to live. With rechargeables priced at about 1-1/2 to 2 times a name-brand alkaline, it isn't exactly like you are selling the kids into slavery to afford the initial investment. Or need to do a lot of recharges over _your_ lifetime to recoup the cost.

      But, yes, instead of changing the time zone this fall for daylight saving time, I decided to actually properly adjust the time on a world map 2-1/4"x3" screen LCD desk clock I have and discovered that it was running on a Rayovac Renewal alkaline. I couldn't tell you how many years that rechargeable has been in there or where the heck I put its charger.

      The root parent post seems to basically be an essay complaining that you have to get used to doing things differently. I bought slightly over twice the NiMH rehargeables we need. My wife knows when she needs some to dump the "empties" in one box and take fresh ones from the recharged box. When there are at least eight empties, I run a charge. By not buying _too_ many batteries, I can be assured that the fresh pile will get used reasonably promptly. It isn't rocket science. We're never without batteries and batteries don't make our shopping list.

      However, the six month discharge is interesting in our one exception because we don't take a lot of pictures and it can bite us in the camera bag. _What_ I find interesting is that I can seem to get between one and two years on a motorized wall clock and, like I say, who knows how long on something like this LCD desk clock. Granted, they aren't examples that drain a lot of current but nonetheless it still seems like the batteries will function a lot longer when they are actually being used than when they are sitting in our camera bag.

  23. Energizer NiMH by Eil · · Score: 4, Informative

    If, like me, you typically only use AA or AAA batteries, just go to your local department store and get the bundled 4-pack of Energizer NiMH batteries and charger for $15-20. Spring for the better, more expensive charger (or buy one online) only if you're constantly going through batteries or need sizes other than AA and AAA.

    When buying the batteries themselves, go for the highest capacity they have in stock, 2500mAH or higher. Compared to alkalines, they pay for themselves after just a few recharges and each charge lasts about as long or longer than your typical alkaline battery. Most NiMH batteries are rated to last up to about 1000 charges. In my case, that means I have a better chance of losing them before they go permanently dead.

    You can't replace alkalines with NiMH in all situations, though. NiMH batteries lose their charge at a rate of about 1% per day, so this takes them out of the running for low-drain applications like remote controls, digital clocks, and smoke alarms. Things that you'd never change the batteries in more than once a year. They also don't replace NiCad batteries in especially high current draw devices like RC cars.

    Another possible con is that devices which contain built-in battery meters (MP3 players and PDAs) are calibrated for alkalines. Thus, when you put in an NiMH battery, they usually show the battery as being only 80% right out of the charger. However, they will stay at that level for quite a long time and then start to drop off quickly when the power is almost gone. When your device says you have about 20% left on your batteries, you probably only have a couple of minutes before they die completely. It's not a smooth discharge curve like alkalines.

    But on the whole, the savings are worth it. I used to pay more in batteries for my GameBoy Advance than I did for the unit itself and the games. Now, after a $30 investment in a charger and batteries, I just rotate through the same set of batteries.

    1. Re:Energizer NiMH by Flodis · · Score: 1
      Good post, but I have one minor gripe with it:
      They also don't replace NiCad batteries in especially high current draw devices like RC cars.
      Actually, even if NiMh has a slightly lower current draw than NiCd, the higher capacity still makes them desirable. I *do* race with R/C cars, and I honestly don't know of anyone who still uses NiCd. As far as I know, NiCd hasn't been used for racing for the last 5 years, and while NiMh may be the most popular for the time being, it is being surpassed by LiPo and Li-Ion. Especially in anything flying (due to the higher capacity per unit of weight).

      On another note, I saw some people comparing the capacities of Alkalines and NiMh in some earlier posts. I've had the opportunity to try both in the same applications under similar conditions. In both transmitters and some small R/C cars (Mini-Zs take AAA batteries, I have one).

      As others have already pointed out, it is preferrable to use alkalines in low-current draw applications such as the transmitter, but Alkalines really don't stand any chance whatsoever in moderate to high-draw applications such as powering a Mini-Z.

      Jörg Mrkwitschka, world record holder for fastest electric boat ever (140.9 MPh google 'mrkwitschka' for movies of some of his runs) uses NiMh cells (32 of them IIRC).

      I also know that a swedish team gunning for the fastest R/C car also use NiMh batteries.

      Both of those are [b]all[/b] about extreme current draw, so I'll stick my neck out and say that NiCd batteries are pretty much eclipsed in the R/C hobby.

      Finally, NiMh batteries do lose their charge quite quickly, so it's necessary to 'exercise' them if you have them sitting on a shelf. Even after a single week, the lack of 'punch' is quite noticeable when racing.
    2. Re:Energizer NiMH by 22_9_3_11_25 · · Score: 1

      That was a great reply. It is also what I use :)

  24. No, I didn't read the article blurb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use lead-acid batteries.

  25. NiMH + Low Discharge = Hybrid by ll1234 · · Score: 1

    I'm pleased with the performance of Sanyo's Eneloop batteries. They're rechargeable and have the capacity (middle of the road at ~2000 mAh) of NiMH with much better self-discharge properties. Sanyo claims they'll hold 85% of their charge after a year. I haven't had them long enough to test that claim but the low self-discharge rate is the reason I purchased them for my Wii controllers. It's not often three other people show up but when they do I don't want to be swapping batteries and/or charging, the remotes should just work even if they've been sitting idle for a few weeks.

    A few other companies are releasing hybrid batteries, they'll be showing up in retail outlets with greater and greater frequency over the rest of the year.

    1. Re:NiMH + Low Discharge = Hybrid by Fishy · · Score: 1

      yep, I would be buying these if I didn't already have a load of generic NiMH around the place. When they eventually wear out these long discharge types must be the way to go.

    2. Re:NiMH + Low Discharge = Hybrid by Guppy · · Score: 1

      Yup, I have a couple of the Hybrio batteries (http://www.hybriousa.com/). Supposedly they are not quite as good as Eneloop (~70% after a year in storage is what I've heard), but still pretty decent as far as capacity and self-discharge goes. Very good in my digital camera -- I don't take pictures often so it tends to sit in storage for a couple of months between uses.

    3. Re:NiMH + Low Discharge = Hybrid by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      These may be a good option for me. I've been looking at the Ray-o-vac hybrids, but frankly couldn't find anyone, anywhere that knew anything about them (aside from teh Ray-o-vac website, which claims they're great - big shock).

      Thanks for posting.

  26. duh by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Funny

    Potato. To recharge it you just drop it on the ground and wait.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming you mean a potato with two pieces of dissimilar metal nails in it.. this won't work. As part of the discharge process, the metal in at least one electrodes is used up too, so it needs to be replaced.

    2. Re:duh by funfail · · Score: 1

      Metal can be mined from the ground too

    3. Re:duh by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      But you get more bang for your buck from SPACE METAL

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
  27. Echo'd: Get Cheap NiMH + Good Charger/Conditioner by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

    For batteries...
    http://www.all-battery.com/index.asp?PageAction=VI EWPROD&ProdID=564 - Free Shipping and cases
    http://www.shorelinemarket.com/aaponiba.html - Shipping and cases extra

    I don't have a specific charger recomendation, but I would agree that a good charger is key.

  28. Nintendo by Paralizer · · Score: 1

    A bit off topic, but Nintendo advises for the Wii remote not to use rechargeable batteries. Since those things seem to suck an alkaline down in about a week or two of play (among everyone who has been using it recently), I thought rechargeable would be the way to go.

    Is there any reason a device like this should not be using rechargeable batteries? Has anyone had positive or negative experience using rechargeables with the wiimote? If so, what type of batteries and what charger are you using?

    To contribute, I use Energizer NiMH rechargables in my wireless mouse. I use a low end Merkury recharger I was given for free (I don't have the official Energizer one) and they seem to last on average about 3 weeks. The batteries physically are a little heavy, but it doesn't bother me that my mouse has a little weight to it.

    1. Re:Nintendo by friedmud · · Score: 1

      I'm using Energizer NiMH batteries in my Wiimotes... haven't had any problems.

      I must have missed the part where they tell you not to use rechargeables.... but at any rate, everything is working fine. There was simply no way I was buying regular Alkalines all the damn time. Only time will tell if it damages the Wiimote.... but my bet is they are just protecting their asses in case something _did_ happen.

      Friedmud

    2. Re:Nintendo by Zerth · · Score: 1

      I'm using Rayovac 15 minute nimh(just cause I can get them wholesale) in my wiimotes since november, no problems yet. They last 1-2 weeks, and really do take about 15 minutes to charge.

    3. Re:Nintendo by Zarxrax · · Score: 1

      Actually, Nintendo has added a statement on their support site saying that it is alright to use NiMh rechargeables in the wii remote: http://www.nintendo.com/consumer/systems/wii/en_na /setupWiiRemote.jsp I bought a cheap duracell charger that included some AA's. It seems to work fine, but even when fully charged, the wii software will only show 3 bars of capacity rather than the 4 bars you get on alkalines. They seem to only last about 50%-75% as long as alkalines too, but I don't really find it to be a big deal. Your mileage may vary depending on what kind of batteries you go with though.

    4. Re:Nintendo by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen them say that anywhere, and even so it would be stupid to buy new batteries for every 35 hours (that's how long they say it lasts)
      A rechargeable cell doesn't do anything different than a primary alkaline battery. It provides a voltage that the device can use for electrical power. In fact, the voltage of an alkaline cell drops very quickly to the 1.2V of a NiMH cell, and continues to drop below that. So most of the time you will probably get less voltage from an alkaline battery.
      The different discharge voltages will give a false charge reading if the system is designed to only give the charge of alkaline batteries. That's why the indicator on my Wii remote stayed at two or three out of four, before it eventually died.

      I don't know how they compare with battery life, because it always depends on the application. A typical alkaline battery apparently has an equivalent capacity of 3000 mAh, but that is only true for certain test circumstances.
      An alkaline cell deteriorates significantly when it discharges, compared to the constant performance of a NiMH battery. So for example digital cameras, which need high currents, it might not be able to use alkaline batteries which still have a significant amount of charge. From what I've heard, cameras will typically last up to twice as long with high capacity rechargables compared to alkaline cells.
      I should think the Wii remote is pretty similar, as I have only recharged the batteries once so far. I hope Nintendo can do some kind of update for the remote to give more accurate readings for rechargabes, it should be at least possible.

    5. Re:Nintendo by Paralizer · · Score: 1
      I haven't seen them say that anywhere
      The Wii manual (system setup one) says on page 18:

      - Use only alkaline batteries. Do not use lithium ion, nickel cadmium (nicad), nickel metal hydride (nimh), carbon zinc or any other non-alkaline batteries.

      - Do not recharge the batteries.
  29. Lead-Acid... by Hymer · · Score: 1

    ...excellent electrical performance (low storage loss and more than 85% power out to power in ratio, aka. efficiency), the obvious disadvantage beeing their weight. With proper maintenance (checking acid concentration and refilling) they may last forever, especially if used in temp. above 0 deg. C and below 25 deg. C.
    The proper question would have been: "What is your favourite battery for purpose X ?" where X is clearly defined.

  30. You don't want... by Hymer · · Score: 1

    ...to use rechargeable batteries for remote control (the IR type used for TV-sets). Been there, tried that, does'nt work: discharge rate is too big for that. You use rechargeable for high power consumption equipment and normal for low power consumption equipment. Unless your motivation is purely eco-motivated but even then it may be better to use normal "green" batteries for your remote.

  31. Cheap NiMH ones by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

    By the time they need replacing, technology will have moved on, and the answer may be "something else". But this answer seems OK to me for now.

  32. Consumer Reports Disapointing by Kalak · · Score: 1

    After seeing this, I went to Consumer Reports, and to my disappointment and surprise, they don't have much on rechargeable batteries, even with my subscription there. Basically pick a nickel-metal hydride, but they don't compare manufacturers.

    Any ideas on where to find a non-biased moderately scientific comparison?

    --
    I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
  33. Cheapo advices by Vo0k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    - avoid "famous brands", like Duracell, Philips etc. You pay premium for the name while the quality doesn't change.

    - Capacity - same as with HDDs except you get amper-hours per dollar, instead of gigabytes/$. If you want to bother, calculate mAh/$ ratio for all available and pick the best. If you don't, the rule of thumb is to pick a notch or two below the highest available on market. With smaller you pay extra for costs common to manufacturing any capacity, with bigger you pay extra for cutting edge.

    - make sure you get a matching charger. Some don't work with lower capacities, some with high. Good bargains for rechargables+chargers can be found. Chargers without auto-off suck.

    - all rechargables discharge by themselves over time. If you use them in remotes etc, prepare for recharging bi-weekly or so. Sucks. Use in devices you use a lot. It still pays with wireless mouse/keyboard too.

    - It's good to get two sets for each device, one charging, one in use. If you want the cheaper way, get one set of normal cheap batteries for time when the rechargables recharge. Remember to replace as soon as the rechargables are charged.

    - Despite what they say on the packages, you can recharge standard single-use Alkalines - about 2-5 times (as opposed to hundreds with rechargables) with a slow charger. Just in case, place the charger with batteries down, on a surface that's easy to clean and not expensive, don't leave unattended and if it's not auto-off, unplug before they reach designated full capacity (that's when they start to heat up and are most prone to explode.)

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Cheapo advices by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1
      Despite what they say on the packages, you can recharge standard single-use Alkalines - about 2-5 times[...]

      You can actually do this MORE than that under certain conditions. The trick to treating alkalines as rechargeables is that unlike NiMH and NiCad batteries, alkalines do best if you recharge them frequently, after every small use (whereas usually you hear people recommending that you mostly drain NiMH and NiCad batteries before recharging, for fear of "the memory effect"). You can never get quite back up to completely full charge, but if you charge them after every small use, you can stay pretty close to new for a long time.

      Once they're drained below a certain point, you can no longer get them to recharge. I'm not sure why, but "Energizer" brand seems to drop into the "no longer rechargeable" range every easily, while on the other hand I've been using the same set of "Duracell" AA's in my digital camera for about a year and a half (recharging after every session of use.).

  34. I-C3 batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I picked up a bunch of AA and AAA batteries a few years ago from Radio Shack and Fry's, they charge in 15 min and work well in high-draw things like cameras, and low-draw things like remote controls (in the remote I recharge them every year or so).

  35. Mouse by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    I use Radio Shack batteries in my Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer. Although they need charged like once a week, it's better than replacing it with new batteries every 4 weeks.

    1. Re:Mouse by dannycim · · Score: 1

      I suggest you try the Logitech wireless mice, as they draw a lot less current. My Radio Shack NiMH batteries last about 2 months at work, and I'm using the mouse a lot.

    2. Re:Mouse by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt I will find one that fits my hand so perfectly though.

  36. Ouch. Look at those prices! by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    The prices at Thomas Distributing are VERY high, in my opinion. The charger recommended is $70. The batteries are more than twice what they cost during a sale at Fry's.

    Overnight Battery Charger With 4 AA Ni-MH Batteries, $11.99, regular price.

    1. Re:Ouch. Look at those prices! by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      An overnight battery charger != a one hour charger with a conditioning cycle. The OP was looking for recommendations, not for the cheapest thing he can get. (That said, I have no idea if the recommendations are well founded or not)

    2. Re:Ouch. Look at those prices! by fistfullast33l · · Score: 1

      I bought this charger about two years ago and I love it. The batteries last forever and the charger is perfect - very small, portable (charge in your car's lighter) and fast - I use the slow charge mode and it takes about 4 hours. Even better, it has trickle charge so the batteries aren't overcharged but will remain at full power. It's worth the $50 investment (with 4 batteries!), trust me. I was redeemed even further when I saw that HP has moved to using MAHA Batteries as well for their rechargeable AA battery solution.

    3. Re:Ouch. Look at those prices! by acvh · · Score: 1

      Gotta put in my 2 cents on Thomas Distributing. I've been using 3 sets of four AAs from Thomas for over four years now, and they work as well as the day I got them. Add up what I would have spent on Duracells and this was a bargain.

    4. Re:Ouch. Look at those prices! by Zen · · Score: 1

      Ditto - I've got 8 maha powerex AA - 2500's from thomas distributing with this same charger and couldn't be happier about them. The larger AA size was available from thomas months before the stores started carrying them (energizer mostly around me). My wife picked up a pack of Energizer NiMH with 8 or 12 AA's and 4 AAA's with a 1 hour charger from Sam's club to use at school a few months later. The energizer set was much cheaper, but it also doesn't seem to perform as well. I'm about to buy the Maha 8 bay charger so I can charge the C's and D's I've picked up as well. Right now they're pretty useless because I don't own a charger :(
      The cost does seem a bit high, but considering the outstanding ratings that are available all over the web for Maha/powerex, you definitely get what you pay for. It all depends on how often you want to purchase new NiMH batteries.

  37. endlessly rechargeable by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Re:endlessly rechargeable by vga_init · · Score: 1

      I think you can save a lot of money by just buying standard NiMH batteries. They don't last forever, you know...

    2. Re:endlessly rechargeable by Paralizer · · Score: 1

      They don't seem practical to me. If you always have open USB ports open then maybe. You can already buy crazy things that have USB adapters that you would likely never want to use while at your computer; lights, fans, vacuum cleaners (seriously...), now we have a battery. A battery that plugs into a USB port. A battery. Sure there's a geekish side to it that makes it a pretty cool thing, but at $10 each (on thinkgeek, which is always a little high.. maybe you can get them for $6) it's just ridiculous -- you're basically paying for the geek factor alone.

    3. Re:endlessly rechargeable by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      I just got two pairs of these. I'd love to effusively rave about them, but I've only just charged them up and used them for about one hour of Wiiplay. So far they're great. I certainly didn't have problems finding four USB ports that are powered without a PC needing to be on.

  38. So many rechargable haters! by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow. Just reading some of these comments, you'd think that rechargeables are horrible. I use them everywhere. Remotes, flashlights, wireless mouse, wireless keyboard, toys, lcd clocks, caller ID boxes, volt meters, you name it.

    The answer is to buy cheap NiMH batteries, like so: 24 @2600mAh for $30, free shipping, free cases

    Also find yourself a good charger, and this discussion seems to be filled with them. There are different onces for different needs. Be it you need 8 charging at once, C/D size and 9 volt, or you want one with a good conditioner.

    At $1.25 per battery [final price, shipped], even if all the haters are correct about 'wasting NiMH batteries in low draw devices', you're still ahead of the game. And people are very satisfied with Tenergy brand batteries, and they're 2600mAh.

    The real key to being happy with rechargeables is, first to buy them for all your items, and then (most important), buy those few extra batteries to fill up your battery charger. Then, when your toy/remote/whatever runs out of batteries, all you do is swap the new ones in the charger for the depleted ones in your device. Having a constant supply of charged up battiers is the key to being happy with rechargables. Very little education required for others in your household. ("If you take some batteries out of here, put your old ones back in here.")

    I think the only way I'd switch away from rechargables is if I had an exceptionally high-draw item that I needed to last longer between battery changes. Like an 80s boombox if I wasn't inclined to carry a second set of batteries with me. Not that alkalines would solve the issue either, though. Just push out the depletion a little further.

  39. Rayovac Hybrids are new, with less discharge? by Karl+J.+Smith · · Score: 1

    I haven't tried these myself, just read an article in the paper, and looked at the web page and put them on my 'to try' list.

    Normally NiMH batteries discharge so rapidly when not in use that you pretty much need to remember to charge them the night before you want to use them, which is a pain when taking spare batteries on, say, a backpacking trip.

    Rayovac has new 'hybrid' NiMH battery that ships fully charged and is supposed to hold a charge much longer in storage.

    http://www.rayovac.com/recharge/hybrid_technology. shtml

  40. What make a bad battery by gradbert · · Score: 2, Informative

    I use 4 AA NiMH batteries in my camera (a Canon S1). I have some 2500 mAh energizer batteries that I will not use in it and I have some 1800 mAh sanyo ones that I use regularly. Why? because of variances in the batteries and their self discharge rate.

    When my wife wants to take a picture of the kids doing something cute we need the either the batteries in the camera to not be discharged, or for there to be a charged set of batteries ready to go.

    So I bought a bunch of 2500mAh batteries thinking these would be a good thing. but they didn't seem to last as long when shooting and they were often discharged after sitting for a while. I found out a couple of things, the first is that after using these batteries for a while I would end up with one cell that was discharged more than the others. This was enough for the camera to say that I had low batteries. The other thing was that if I charged up a set of these batteries, a week later the wouldn't have enough charge to run the camera. These batteries had a very high self discharge rate.

    So at the end of it, its no good to have high advertised capacity if its not going to be there you

    I have had good luck with sanyo batteries. The new sanyo eneloops have a low enough self discharge rate that out of the package they have a usable charge

  41. Juice CRV3 Rechargeable Lithium by cymen · · Score: 1

    I brought 4 CRV3 rechargeable batteries and a recharger all branded by Juice for a decent price on eBay. I think rechargeable lithium is the way to go for cameras if your camera is compatible (apparently, some have a slightly higher voltage than regular CRV3 lithium but they are working fine in my Pentax DSLR).

    1. Re:Juice CRV3 Rechargeable Lithium by rsborg · · Score: 1
      I brought 4 CRV3 rechargeable batteries and a recharger all branded by Juice for a decent price on eBay.
      Good on ya, that your camera takes CR-V3 (them's the coolest). Yeah, only wish more folks would design their damn battery cases to allow for CR-V3... only difference between an AA and a CR-V3 is the /\ groove that needs to be removed. I often wanted to sand this down in my devices so I could stop using AA's... especially my external DSLR flash.
      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  42. Fixing "dead" batteries by nixman99 · · Score: 1

    In my experience, when a battery suddently dies, it's because it has gone into reversal (polarity has reversed). Once batteries reach this state, chargers won't recharge them. Cheap batteries (Hama) have this problem much more frequently than Duracell or Energizer (I can't speak to other brands). I've fixed "dead" batteries by installing them backwards in a flashlight with good batteries and turning the flashlight on for ~30 minutes. The "dead" batteries can then be recharged. Disclamer: I've done this for about a dozen batteries and it has worked fine. YMMV ps - Ever notice that the crapiest batteries (Hama) have a name similar to the best recharger brand (Maha)? Going for consumer confusion?

  43. Your mileage may vary by moons · · Score: 1

    I use Energizer 2500mAh AA/AAA batteries in all my remotes and for me they last well over six months. I use the Energizer Compact Charger for recharging and while it takes forever (12 hours) to recharge four batteries, they seems to work okay without noticeable capacity loss over the last few years.

    1. Re:Your mileage may vary by Hymer · · Score: 1

      I usually got between 3 and 6 months... wich I consider poor since the same remote could run for 12 to 18 months on a std. AA sized battery.

  44. Everready NiMH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pretty much use Eveready NiMH batteries in everything I use, including my digital camera. I may hsave blought about 6 alkaline in the last year when I forgot to recharge in one device or another

  45. "Real" NiMH C & D Cells by nixman99 · · Score: 1

    http://www.thomas-distributing.com/new-products.ht m 6000 mAH C cells and 11,000 mAH D Cells. I've used earlier versions of the Powerx C & D cells and they work great.

  46. Depends on the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4th of July, Sony. Rest of the year, Energizer.

  47. Fast chargers==BAD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure it's a 15 minute charger? That would mean charging each cell at a multiple C, which would destroy them pretty soon. The best way to charge NiMH cells without shortening their life is by slow-charging them. Never use chargers that supply more than 1/4 of the cell capacity. The best method is always buying 2x or 3x the batteries you need and put them in a slow charger, in the long run you will spend *much less* than buying less batteries and shortening their life through fast chargers.
    Avoid at any cost all chargers advertising full charges in less than 4 or 5 hours; the ones requiring a full night or more at 1/10 the cell current (ie 250 mA for 15 hours for 2500 mA cells) are the best.

    Also, avoid those fast chargers that come in the same blister with the cells. The reason they're so fast is pure marketing: ruining your batteries will force you buying replacements soon. Get a good slow charger from a company that doesn't make batteries and you'll be happy.

  48. Stick with the industry experts by jblakezachary · · Score: 1

    Energizer charger model CHM24: http://data.energizer.com/PDFs/chm24.pdf

    Energizer NiMH batteries (silver in color): http://data.energizer.com/PDFs/nh15.pdf

    I've used these exclusively for several years (the same batteries) and they work great in all applications.

    You can find these everywhere: online, drug stores, supermarkets, department stores, etc.

    Charge time on this charger model is 15 hours - but this extends the battery's functional lifespan. These batteries are cheap enough that I keep several more than I need in all my devices at any given time, so I never have to wait for a charge.

    Have had a pair of these AAA in a TV remote since 2004- still going without a charge. Haven't bought batteries in 3 years.

    1. Re:Stick with the industry experts by D3m0n0fTh3Fall · · Score: 1

      Industry experts? Please. You mean the ones with the most advertising.

    2. Re:Stick with the industry experts by jblakezachary · · Score: 1

      Touché... Industry "market share leader", rather. Based on my personal experience, these are the best available, like it or not.

  49. Eneloop batteries - NiMH with low self discharge by Ezzelin · · Score: 1

    I'd second many people's comments. NiMH batteries are very very nice these days, and have far more capacity then they used to. http://thomasdistributing.com/ is good, and if you want cheap batteries, http://batteryspace.com/ is good, but their ratings are 400 mAh or so above their actual capacity. Sanyo or PowerEx is certainly good if you have the money, and 2500 mAh Energizers are a good locally available option. The real key is to get a good charger. I just got one of the new Maha MH-C9000 chargers (http://www.thomas-distributing.com/maha-mh-c9000- battery-charger.php) and it has the ability to do break-in charges, discharge, refreshing, etc. You can also just put batteries in it and it will charge them with a safe rate.

    For applications like remotes, or other devices you want sitting around for a long time and ready to use, there are new NiMH batteries that have much lower self discharge rates. Eneloop batteries by Sanyo (http://www.eneloop.info/) have performed the best, and they can be picked up locally at Ritz camera locations as well as ordered online for a little less. They only lose a little of their charge over a years time. For more information about rechargable batteries, try the batteries forum over at candlepowerforums. (http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/forumdisplay. php?s=04cb1ed93243098d9b7795bae32555cb&f=9)

  50. Rayovac I-C3 system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are NiMH batteries that can be charged in 15 minutes, AA and AAA. We got them because my wife's digital camera uses two AA batteries. Since it takes longer than 15 minutes for the camera to use up a charge, she never runs out of camera juice as long as she is near a car or electrical outlet.

  51. Charger makes more difference than battery. by Myself · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The charger is much more important than the batteries you're putting in it. Most brands perform just fine, for a while. Knowing when a set (or an individual cell) is past its peak is the key. I picked up a LaCrosse BC-900 charger just over a year ago, and it's awesome. Most chargers leave you "blind" as to the actual capacity, they just tell you "this one's full!". Being able to really test the batteries is great. I found a neglected set in a box that I hadn't touched in about 4 years. Some of them had failed short. After a moment with a benchtop power supply I'd awoken them, but none would hold much charge. (showing ~500mAh capacity) So I tossed 'em in the LaCrosse for a refresh cycle, and after a few days they were all performing within a few percent of their original rating. No other charger would've given me the information I needed, or the automatic refresh cycle, to bring those back from the dead.

    My BC-900 melted last week. It was the rev-32 firmware, which apparently wasn't careful enough about stopping activities when a cell overheated. It took out a Powerex 2300mAh cell, which was sputtering and smoking and stank up the whole end of the house. I've got an email in to LaCrosse right now, but even if they won't replace my (three months out of warranty) unit for free, I plan to pick up a new one (running rev 33 firmware) as soon as possible. A near-fire hasn't diminished my love of this charger, that's how revolutionary it is.

    1. Re:Charger makes more difference than battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in total agreement - it's a superb charger. and the refresh mode is brilliant - it constantly discharges and recharges the battery whilst measuring the output mah on the discharge and only stopped when the discharge capacity stops increasing (can take several days depending on the charge/discharge current chosen).

      the charger is available over here in europe as the technoline icharger. it's exactly the same charger.

      for a good battery comparison page, check this:
      http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php ?t=79302&page=1&pp=30
      includes graphs, voltages and total power output for most commonly available rechargable AA battery types. the post appears to be dated 2005 but it's actually updated quote often with new battery stats added.

  52. Or you could risk a bursting battery... by likewowandstuff · · Score: 1

    It may not be the best solution from an environmental standpoint, but I recently purchased a charger that claims to safely recharge most alkalines (not 9V) along with NiCD and NiMH. The "Battery Xtender" seems to differentiate between these automatically and safely charge alkalines by doing so slowly...veeerrrrryyyyy slowly. ~8 hours on AA batteries, with no obvious difference in charging times for name-brand batteries and the off-brands. I've tried boldly ignoring directions on other chargers in the past, and alkalines normally get very hot before they pop and leak. A few survived and worked (which only encouraged further experiments), but not many. With the new charger, alkalines don't get warm to the touch. I have not used it enough to notice long-term changes in battery life, so my opinion on the product may change by this time next month.

    batteryxtender.com

    1. Re:Or you could risk a bursting battery... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it say in the documentation at which rate it (mA) charges different battery types?

  53. Cheapest way... by Forbman · · Score: 1

    Potato-nickel-penny piles. Canadian pennies and nickels work better than US ones.

  54. obligatory house quote? by stuuf · · Score: 1

    They recharge? I just keep buying new phones.

    --

    Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

    1. Re:obligatory house quote? by duhjim · · Score: 1

      The sun is a battery of sorts. Like the rest of its ilk it will surely fall 20% short of its advertised shelf life. Then, if we havent yet drowned in a sea of battery poison, it will toss us out.

  55. size of energizers? by danpritts · · Score: 1

    I've had the same problem - duracell nimh's (just purchased a couple weeks ago) were too tight in my camera flash.

    I had the brilliant idea to remove the plastic outer wrapper to make them a bit slimmer. Don't try this, it's a fine way to short out the batteries against one another. Luckily i didn't damage the flash.

    Does anyone happen to have a set of recent energizer nimh's and a fairly precise measurement tool, to check the diameter for me? Sam's Club has them at an attractive price and the battery test web site mentioned above reviewed them strongly.

    i'll try to check back here but i'm danpritts on yahoo if anyone happens to be able to do this. thanks!

  56. Solar Charger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use NiMH's and haven't bought new batteries in years. No new landfill, no new costs, etc. I'm committed to rechargeables and I'm ready for the next level. Anyone have a good solar battery charger/battery combo to recommend?

    (and I can do a Google search, I'm wondering if anyone has any personal experience ;)

  57. I would recommend by joto · · Score: 1
    The difference between different brands are minimal, as obviously, many brands use the same manufacturer(s). You get what you pay for (although it could just as well be that you're paying for the brand-name instead of the performance). But if you insist in worrying about this, make sure to buy from someone who sells lots of batteries. Old batteries that have lived on the shelf for a year, without being recharged, are probably in bad condition.

    Conclusion: Buy cheap, but not suspiciously cheap, no-brand or weirdo-brand batteries from a high-volume retailer (e.g. the "private" brand of a large webshop specializing in batteries).

  58. Fast chargers!=bad by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

    Both Energizer and Ray-o-vac have 15 minute chargers, but it requries you have the special batteries to go with it. In the Ray-o-vac model, there's built in electronics on each 15-minute battery that govern how it behaves during recharge. I'm not sure if the Energizer works the same way. I'm interested in other Slashdotter's experience with them.

    I've been eying this technology myself, but basically decided to avoid it, since I'm OC enough to always keep a set charged and ready anyway. As a photographer, you don't get pictures - no big deal, as a bicyclist I get run-over and DIE. Hence the OC behavior.

  59. Rechargables & household denizens by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1
    The real key to being happy with rechargeables is, first to buy them for all your items, and then (most important), buy those few extra batteries to fill up your battery charger. Then, when your toy/remote/whatever runs out of batteries, all you do is swap the new ones in the charger for the depleted ones in your device. Having a constant supply of charged up battiers is the key to being happy with rechargables. Very little education required for others in your household. ("If you take some batteries out of here, put your old ones back in here.")


    There's a problem with this. First, you're not supposed to mix-n-match batteries once they've been used in seperate devices. We have a 3-AA remote controlled car, several 2-AA mice, and several 4-AA bike lights. We have to partition those and keep them seperate. You have to train house members NOT to mix-n-match.

    I've taken to writing names on each group of batteries (Amanda, Betty, Cathy...), and also ids (1/4, 2/4, 3/4, 4/4). Use the Amanda-4s all together and all in the same device. I also buy lots of different brands, because they appear different. Amandas are Energizer, Betties are Ray-o-vac, etc.

    I have a cardboard box with 3 pockets. In the left is the "goods", where house members pick up new batteries. On the right are the "bads", where I store empty batteries. In the middle is the "hmmms", where we stick batteries we don't know about. In my copious free time I test and rebin those.

    Okay, I lied, I have that box split in to two sub-boxes (2x3), so that the top row is for Alkalaine and the bottom row is for rechargables.
    1. Re:Rechargables & household denizens by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

      I have consistently mixed and matched for years without problems. But I actually would be interested in reading more about this requirement, to understand any potential downside (likelyhood of an event, and severity).

      In my mind, at least, people seem to concentrate a lot on theoretical problems, or they focus on actual problems that in life have very little real impact. So I just kind of wonder where this one stands.

    2. Re:Rechargables & household denizens by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1
      I have consistently mixed and matched for years without problems. But I actually would be interested in reading more about this requirement, to understand any potential downside (likelyhood of an event, and severity).
      Read the instructions on your charger. For the ones you can buy at Wallgreens, they say not to charge batteries from different batches. Also, I've heard from about a million different sources that the weakest link in a battery pack ends up having to do all the heavy lifting, and so wears out first. I think the best way to keep all cells balanced is as I described. Or shell the $70 for a very fancy charger...
    3. Re:Rechargables & household denizens by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

      I've got a Rayovac 1 hour charger. Takes all brands (and does NiMH/NiCad). Individually charges each battery. Yeah, I've seen those chargers which stop when the first battery is full. Unfortunate. Here is a highly regarded (and quite geeky) charger for $37, shipped: http://www.amazon.com/LaCrosse-Technology-BC-900-A lphaPower-Battery/dp/B00077AA5Q/

      It would be great for conditioning the cells and monitoring their capacity.

      Yes, you're right about the weakest battery being the bad link. Although matched batteries doesn't protect you from a weak cell (happens all the time in laptop battery packs... once of the cells in the pack goes bad, and it brings the whole thing down). But you're right, you're probably more likely to run into that issue when you mix and match. To date, it hasn't been a problem for me. Although it would be nice to have a charger (like the one above) so that you can detect and weed out the bad cells from your collection.

      Point taken on the weakest link.

  60. 1.2 volts will kill me by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

    I bike. A lot. I depend on LED Bike lights to keep me alive every night. Alkaline AAs are 1.5 volts. I would like to use NiMH AAs and AAAs, but at 1.2 volts they're just not bright enough. :(

    There's no law of physics that says NiMH has to be 1.2v. As we all know from high-school physics, putting two batteries in || effectively gives you one battery with double the voltage. NiMHs have made such huge strides in power storage, but have made no effort to come into voltage conformance with the AA and AAA standards? Why the heck is that?!

    1. Re:1.2 volts will kill me by caffeinated_bunsen · · Score: 1

      There's no law of physics that says NiMH has to be 1.2v.

      Well, it's chemistry, not physics. Look up "standard electrode potentials" sometime. Alkalines, along with carbon-zincs, produce a characteristic voltage around 1.5V per cell. NiCd and NiMH produce about 1.2V per cell. If you put two NiMH cells in series, you get 2.4V, which is more than your radio/flashlight/whatever is designed to expect from each battery. Since there's no such thing as a fraction of a cell, you're stuck with multiples of 1.2V. The solution is to buy better lights -- there's still plenty of energy left in an alkaline battery when its terminal voltage has dropped to 1.2V, and a device that craps out before then is badly designed and wastes most of the energy in your alkalines, in addition to not working with NiMHs.

      --

      Bugrit! Millenium hand and shrimp!
    2. Re:1.2 volts will kill me by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1
      Well, it's chemistry, not physics. Look up "standard electrode potentials" sometime.
      Huh! I always assumed that if you chopped a 1.5 v battery in half (and cleaned up the acid properly), you'd find two 0.75 volt batteries end-to-end. Guess not. Thanks!
    3. Re:1.2 volts will kill me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just an FYI, its series, not ||. look it up

    4. Re:1.2 volts will kill me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, I always thought that if I chopped a ArmorFiend in half (and cleaned up the electrolyte properly), you'd find two half-ArmorFiends end-to-end. Guess not. Thanks!

  61. self-discharge of NiMH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't personally tested these but they claim their NiMH batteries have a much lower self-discharge rate. http://www.rayovac.com/recharge/hybrid_technology. shtml http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php ?t=138632

  62. Re: Make 'em by MavenW · · Score: 1
    I noticed the same thing. But AA NiMH are getting cheap enough that you hit the break-even point at 3-5 recharges. ($.35 - $.50 each for alkaline AA, $6.27 for 4 NiMH AA) So when my kids got a gaming console for Christmas and I was too cheap to buy any C batteries, I just created my own C shell out of a bit of cardboard and tape. Three AA's last 18 hours on a charge.

    I was going to try to make D batteries out of 3 AA batteries but I haven't gotten around to it yet.