Slashdot Mirror


Giant Rabbits To Feed North Korea

iamdrscience writes with news of an East German pensioner who breeds rabbits the size of dogs. Karl Szmolinsky won a prize for breeding Germany's largest rabbit, at 23 lbs., in 2006. News photos reached the North Koreans, who asked through their embassy whether Szmolinsky would be willing to sell them some as foodstocks — each rabbit yields about 15 lb. of meat. A deal was struck and Szmolinsky will be traveling to North Korea in April to help them set up a breeding program. (The photos in the article use the most extreme, contrived camera angles to make the rabbits look even more huge.)

86 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. i for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    welcome our Giant Rabbit Overlords

    1. Re:i for one by Foole · · Score: 3, Funny
      *wipes dust from title*

      "Giant Rabbits To Feed On North Korea"

      --
      This is not a turnip.
    2. Re:i for one by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Funny

      You insensitive clod!

      Regards,

      Jimmy Carter.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  2. Harvey? by ShaunC · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that you, Harvey? I can't see... :)

    On the plus side, I don't see anything wrong with eating rabbit meat. Rabbits are well known for their reproductive capabilities, so if it's edible, why not? It beats kimchee...

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  3. Roos by HermanAB · · Score: 4, Funny

    In Australia the rabbits are even bigger - I think they call them 'roos'...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Roos by stox · · Score: 4, Funny

      In the US, they're even bigger, we call them "politicians."

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    2. Re:Roos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, Kangaroos are often larger than your average politician; quite a bit more intelligent as well.

    3. Re:Roos by Cee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In Australia the rabbits are even bigger - I think they call them 'roos'...

      This reminds me of what happened in Australia when the brought rabbits there in the first place. Granted, I guess there already are native rabbits in North Korea, but it's a very risky business to bring in foreign species into an ecosystem.
      The first episode of the documentary Strange Days on Planet Earth illustrates that quite clearly.

    4. Re:Roos by jack_csk · · Score: 2, Funny

      > In the US, they're even bigger, we call them "politicians." Interesting, I thought they are known as "Rats".
  4. Seems like a make-work project... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    who breeds rabbits the size of dogs.

    Why don't the North Koreans just continue to eat dogs?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by tilandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because dogs eat protein so that would defeat the purpose.

    2. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Why don't the North Koreans just continue to eat dogs?

      Because the fashion industry doesn't like to admit to selling products made out of dog fur.
      really, they don't
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Seems like a make-work project... by comradeeroid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why don't the North Koreans just continue to eat dogs?

      A dog must eat meat to grow, which means you have to first feed an animal that you feed to the dog. As you can understand this is wastefull since you'll loose energy in the conversion from vegetables to dogfood.
      The problem is that any conversion from vegetables to meat is a lossy one, so in the end even the rabbits are a stupid (yet so brilliantly communistic) idea. It would be better to grow crops and feed the north Koreans vegetarian food. (though they might want to rebell if forced to eat just carrots)

      --
      If you see a rock violating the law of gravity, then the law is wrong, not the rock!
  5. Rabbit Starvation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Rabbit Starvation by ArtuRocks · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Les Stroud talked about this on an episode of Survivorman; what you're supposed to do to avoid rabbit starvation is eat the entire rabbit, from top to bottom, bones, eyes, brains, etc (but not the fur).

  6. Here is why this is a bad idea by monkeySauce · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can anyone else see next month's headline? ... Giant Rabid Rabbits Wreck Havoc on North Korean Village.

    The giant rabbit thing sounds straight out of a cheesy horror film. I think I would go with micro rabbits instead. You could breed them by the millions and just eat them whole like little snacks. They might be a little furry and a little crunchy, but at least there is less danger they will turn out evil and eat your children.

    1. Re:Here is why this is a bad idea by jimicus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's already happened:

      http://imdb.com/title/tt0312004/

  7. Giant rabbits you say? by dj245 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are they made of wood?

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  8. SQUISH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And a beef will rise again, broken machine in his hand. Ten words: snapping bunnies twitching gurgling forget the bombs in your eyes. Roaring with whispers to the tiny bunnies SMASH/SPLAT those fucking bunnies. Send them information in a sensationalist manner, THEY CORRUPT. Heads snapping and misspelling eyes twitching in response to the sound of the words. Red world-like words zooming boiling. Moons in the shallow sky. Roaring with whispers to the tiny bunnies SPLAT/SQUISH those fucking bunnies. Twitching bleeding screaming bring the hammer down. Screaming bunnies bleeding bloody bunnies smeared across the ground. Drool spilling down his chin unto his beard as he screams red words at A blank and pointless sky of mothers. Red words popping and crackling black. Ten words: Snapping bunnies twitching gurgling forget the bombs IN YOUR EYES. Forget the bombs in your eyes. Speak the words to crack open the sky

  9. Help the poor North Koreans? by argoff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If he thinks that he is going to help the poor starving North Koreans, he will probably be in for the shock of his life. It will probably be for the rich ruling class, or even worse the elite may suffer from poor aim when they go out hunting rabits for sport.

    If Korea is really concerned about starvation, they should look at their neighbor China. China went from a disaster of 10's of millions of starving people to total solution almost immediately. How did they do it? They let the farmers have private property rights.

  10. Useful Scientific Facts About Bunnies by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Funny

    DAAAAAAAAAAAA!!

    They may not taste good but they can dance.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  11. Terrorism by seifried · · Score: 4, Funny

    What happens when (not if) N. Korea weaponizes these giant rabbits? Possibly by irradiating them and turning them into an even larger and more fearsome animal (sort of like African killer bees, but with big floppy death ray shooting ears). Seriously folks. Won't someone think of the children?

  12. Efficiency? by UOZaphod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not a vegetarian myself, but even this raises questions regarding the efficiency of such an operation.

    Is it more efficient to feed these rabbits vegetable matter to be converted to protein (which, according to the article, is what the diet of many N. Koreans is deficient in), or would it be better instead to grow protein-rich plants that can be consumed directly by the people?

    If the rabbits can consume grasses and other things that humans are unable to digest efficiently, and convert that into protein, then I suppose it would make sense.

    --
    "The unicode stuff in the latest version is working fabulously well. My russian mafia friends are ecstatic."
    1. Re:Efficiency? by shmurfect · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In terms of efficiency, it would be most efficient environmentally to have N. Koreans consume protein-rich vegetables directly, as each step through the food chain is about 10% efficient. This is why, if you look down the food chain, the biomass of plants and vegetables is exponentially greater than herbivores, as herbivores are exponentially greater than carnivores. At each step down the line, there is a tremendous waste of energy.

    2. Re:Efficiency? by UOZaphod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I'm wondering, however, is if the situation is such that there are tracts of land that aren't suitable for growing such protein-rich vegetables. The same land, however, may yield grasses and other plants that would make fine rabbit food. The rabbits become a supplement to the protein-deficient diet of the people, because they can convert plant matter that was once non-beneficial to something that is.

      --
      "The unicode stuff in the latest version is working fabulously well. My russian mafia friends are ecstatic."
    3. Re:Efficiency? by mblase · · Score: 2, Funny

      At each step down the line, there is a tremendous waste of energy.

      But a tenfold increase in taste.

      Plus you don't get gas from eating an entire plate of chicken protein.

  13. Giant bunnies vs. Just get rid of Kim! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Informative

    North Korea is not like China, not even close. It is very much like Soviet Union under Stalin. It is pretty much a time capsule of the 50s. Google for some blogs or photos from westerners who went there, it is a totally surreal experience.

    Large empty streets, every foreigner is followed by an assigned guide. If a tourist as much as takes a digital photo of one of their leader's statues that is off center or has the head cut-off they are forced to retake the picture. There are stories of children being used to help harvest poppies for heroin production after they get off school. Everything is a show, they use all of their funds to build their military while hundreds of thousands are starving. Their leader is crazy and he has nukes. Iraq was a kindergarten compared to NK. Until the crazy dictators are ruling the country no amount of giant fluffy (and yummy) bunnies will save the people from starvation...

  14. Long term effects? by sinserve · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't know the technical name for it, but eating the ultra lean rabbit meat is known to cause malnutrition and eventual poisoning and death. I have seen several "adventure" videos where the survival experts remind viewers not to go very long on rabbit meat alone, for its lack of fat, and augment it with other sources of fat.

    1. Re:Long term effects? by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know the technical name for it, but eating the ultra lean rabbit meat is known to cause malnutrition and eventual poisoning and death.

      But see, the thing is... the average Kim Joe in NK is already starving/malnurished. The place is a culinary hell-hole, that way. The Stalinst way they run their agriculture is having (shocking!) the same results that it did under Stalin: mass starvation and death, unless you're in the military. Eeesh, what a place. And the people there seem to really believe that they're about to be attacked by the rest of the world (or, the US, anyway), and that their current suffering is just part of their war-posture sacrifice. Incredible what the in-house propoganda machine can get away with in the complete absense of a free press, anything like modern media, and anyone who might tell it like it is fearing for their lives.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Long term effects? by replicant108 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Incredible what the in-house propaganda machine can get away with

      Those were exactly my thoughts reading the comments attached to this article.

  15. May I be the first to say... by PapayaSF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In Soviet North Korea, rabbits eat you!

    Seriously though, how absurd is it that anyone thinks this is going to make any difference: it's a Communist dictatorship. The government runs food production and distribution, so of course they don't have enough food. All the rabbits in the world won't change that. It's sad and absurd that the average North Korean is still paying the price for a government that ignores that basic fact, proven so thoroughly and with so many graves in the 20th century.

    --
    Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    1. Re:May I be the first to say... by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Having grown in Soviet Union, I'll attest to the fact. No matter how many resources the government will have, no matter how much the technology progresses, it will all get mis-managed, wasted and funneled into militarization. The price of the human life is very low.

      But I gotta give them credit, at least they got the right idea about how to properly run a communist country -- fear! Stalin style (yeah, I like the alliteration, just came up with it!) People will obey when they see their neighbors in the evening and by morning the secret police have taken them away because someone made up a lie about them being "enemies of the people." I am not making this up, this happened to families I knew personally, this is how things are in NK.

    2. Re:May I be the first to say... by pyite · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let me welcome to the Soviet States of America.

      Such comments are really nothing but an insult to people who actually did live in Communist Russia. I know some of them, myself, and likening the United States to Soviet Russia is such a laughable comparison that you should be ashamed. Many of these people used basically all the money they had to move to countries like the US.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    3. Re:May I be the first to say... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 5, Funny
      My ancestors were German farmers in Russia.
      These days there's a premium for lean meat, so farming Germans isn't profitable any more.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    4. Re:May I be the first to say... by deevnil · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Such comments are really nothing but an insult to people who actually did live in ...
      Whenever anybody compares the decline of civil liberty and freedom release patches there's always a whiner saying that comparing Bush to Hitler, or the PATRIOT Act to a country that has patriot act mentality and abuses it( or "losing freedom is like losing a leg" and someone with two legs always says, "that's an insult to people who have lost a leg." )...insults somebody.

      So what would you have people do, wait until it's too late. Wait until they really are being dragged out of their houses, do you honor oppression by waiting until the last minute when it is more appropriate to propose an analogy? I think they would want that.

    5. Re:May I be the first to say... by darjen · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Such comments are really nothing but an insult to people who actually did live in Communist Russia. I know some of them, myself, and likening the United States to Soviet Russia is such a laughable comparison that you should be ashamed. Many of these people used basically all the money they had to move to countries like the US.
      I think the point is that, sadly enough, people in America really aren't as free as they are led to believe. I tend to agree. This is not an insult to anyone who sacrificed to come here. They wanted to be in a more relatively free country. But unfortunately, the US is becoming more and more like the situation they tried to leave. Having the right to oppose the government, though it might be an improvement, still doesn't mean too much if you are forced to fund them.
    6. Re:May I be the first to say... by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny

      With the increase in vegetarians, maybe a good crop of swedes could make money?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    7. Re:May I be the first to say... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Funny

      These puns are getting out of hand, best turnip it in the bud right now.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    8. Re:May I be the first to say... by spyfrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And here rest of EU thought you where free because of yourself and the courage of the polish people.

      I think you overestimate the United States role and underestimate your own.
      It was the polish people who overthrown the communistic dictatorship, not an american invasion.

    9. Re:May I be the first to say... by deKernel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your statement is one large contradiction. First you hint that societal infrastructure should be nationalized, and then in the next sentence you think that the inefficiencies could be fixed by decentralizing the power (whatever that would mean).

      You really need to pick a side and stay with it or just come to grips with reality.

      By and large, if you nationalize anything, you are automatically accepting a level of inefficiencies. If you don't agree, you really need to spend some time in economics. If you don't want to spend time going to school then I would suggest that you just look at history.

      There is no perfect solution here. The problem is that (a) they won't accept that people die (b) any form of communism (and to a lesser degree socialism) makes some people lazy and others corrupt (c) you were not born with a single right or privilege in this world. If you want something, you need to work hard and sacrifice for it. Once you realize that, you will then be happy because you can achieve anything you wish. Nationalizing, socializing and such don't help or fix anything little alone enhance the human spirit. If anything, it kills it. Don't believe me, just ask anyone who escaped from those types of regimes. Here is a quick list: Soviet Union, China, North Korea, Cuba, Iraq, Iran and the list goes on. People die trying to either get themselves away from these types of governments or trying to get their family away.

    10. Re:May I be the first to say... by Kohath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So what would you have people do...

      How about being accurate? How about if you talk about what's actually happening now instead of saying basically:

      "Everyone knows about this bad thing that happened in the past (Nazis, Killing Fields, slavery, plague, whatever). Without being specific at all we're saying that what's going on now is just as bad."

      - How is it just as bad? We're not telling you that.
      - What's the bad thing that's happening? Nothing specific, but it's really bad, we assure you.
      - What should you do about it? You should do what we tell you to do!
      - Who are the victims? Everyone!
      - Can you give me a few examples? No, just believe us. Are you stupid or something?

      Etc, etc, etc.

      In other words, instead of talking about what happened 60 years ago in WWII, talk about exactly what you don't like that's happening now and actually try to make the case that it's bad in some way. Be specific and reasonable and talk about reality.

      Why should anyone listen to hysterical ravings? Do scaremongers have a good track record for correct predictions of the future?

    11. Re:May I be the first to say... by budgenator · · Score: 3, Informative
      FTA
      "I'm not increasing production and I'm not taking any more orders after this. They cost a lot to feed,"

      OK if North Korea could afford to feed the rabbits, it seems likely they could afford to feed the people
      if the North Koreans find enough food to feed them properly. "I feed them everything -- grain, carrots, a lot of vegetables. At the moment they're getting kale," said Szmolinsky.

      Boy that sounds like people food to me, if I were breeding food rabbits they'd be bred for max production eating things like hay, alfalfa, clover and maybe throw in some field corn and soybeans on occassion; but that's not what's going to happen here, they are going to starve people to free up food for rabbits to feed the starving people, pathetic.
      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    12. Re:May I be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      May I sum up your comment as, "Whenever I engage in hyperbole, someone always calls me on it"? Oh my. What an outrage.

    13. Re:May I be the first to say... by toddhisattva · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The people are in Guantanamo because America is great.

      If we were not such a bunch of great people, they would be dead.

      We don't need to take prisoners. Shoot 'em in the field! No muss, no fuss, no fourth estate or fifth column parading them around as innocents.

      But we took prisoners, and for this we are hated.

    14. Re:May I be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Holy fuck, I've never seen the broken window fallacy applied to prisoners of war before.

      Tell ya what, Captain Sunshine, How about if I come over and tie you up, rob your family, and maybe rape your dog while I'm at it.. It'll prove I'm a great guy, since hey, I could have just murdered you all!

    15. Re:May I be the first to say... by dbcad7 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Ok, when you capture someone or they surrender.. you most certainly do need to take prisoners.. What kind of video game world are you living in ?

      I don't think we are hated for taking prisoners. It might be the treatment of those prisoners. I imagine your assumption is that everyone who was taken prisoner is a "terrorist" and doesn't deserve humane treatment. However many were civilians caught up in the wrong place at the wrong time, some are legitimate solders, and others just fighting on the "wrong side" for whatever beliefs they had. Certainly there are some real terrorists in custody but I think the number is a extremly low one. To lump everyone together is a pretty big mistake.. kind of like lumping Iraq and 911 together.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  16. Military applications... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aren't these giant rabbits subject to military export control laws? An army of killer rabbits is no joking matter. It would be safer let the North Koreans have nukes than an army of killer rabbits.

  17. Oregon Trail by feld · · Score: 5, Funny

    I disagree. I've made it plenty of times to California being only able to shoot and kill rabbits.

    PS we used a raft to get past the last river.

    PPS my wife died of cholera

  18. You don't understand by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Funny

    The dogs will have to evolve and get bigger to be able to kill the rabbits. That way they get bigger dogs too!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  19. Move along... by TechnoGuyRob · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nothing to see h--Oh. Wow. Nevermind.

  20. N. Korean nuclear test by halex-ab · · Score: 2, Funny

    For those who thought that the North Korean nuclear test was a hoax, take that!

  21. If I Were A Thinking Man.. by JohnnyOpcode · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd say that the N.Koreans will be breeding these wabbits to release into the DMZ (detonate the mines) as a response to everyone laughing at their low-yield nuclear capability demonstration. Kim Jong whatever his name is got the idea from Snakes On A Plane. Think of the global (not to mention local) impact of thousands of bunnies being blown-up in the DMZ (and seen on CNN). Only a evil genius would bring the world to the brink this way. F@#king brilliant, I with I had thought of it first!

  22. One step closer by Darth · · Score: 3, Funny

    One step closer to Night of the Lepus. My plans to cause the least likely horror movie to become a reality are almost complete.

    --
    Darth --
    Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
  23. Re: Giant bunnies vs. Just get rid of Kim! by iSeal · · Score: 4, Informative

    North Korea spends %50 of it's expenditures on Military. It is a massive force, as all citizens are required to spend 10 years in it. A massive force which is a consumer of food, and is reputed to steal it at their behest. Kim Il-Sung is credited for pushing forth "revolutionary" agricultural techniques, that in reality were disastrous failures. North Korea's recent public escapades, among other previous activities, have jeopardized vital capital from South Korea (NK = cheap labour.) It has little credibility in the international marketplace, as the regime is notorious for failing to repay debts. At the same time, the regime doesn't want to initiate trade relations, because it goes against it's Juche philosophy. In truth, these are all acts of twisted paranoia for the sake of the regime's self-preservation. The starvation isn't a product of North Korea's poverty or lack of natural resources. It's a product of North Korea's regime.

    A regime that would rather see the misery of all it's citizens than reunifying under the leadership of the south.

  24. North Korea now safe... by kiddailey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, at least we know that North Korea is now safe from Jimmy Carter. ;)

  25. It's the end of the world by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the love of God hasn't anyone seen "Night of the Lepus!" Deforest Kelly is dead. Who's gonna save us from the giant rabbits this time? I hope they have a rail system they can electricute the super bunnies on. If people would just watch more cheesy SciFi films we wouldn't have these problems. SciFi Channel is there to inform people! Next thing you know we'll be dealing with giant snakehead fish in our lakes. Watch these films and learn! Giant rabbits turn carnivous. They knew this in the 70s. How soon we forget!

  26. "They cost a lot to feed" by iSeal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did anyone else find this quote amusing, from the original article?
    "I'm not increasing production and I'm not taking any more orders after this. They cost a lot to feed," he [German Farmer] said.

    They're too expensive to feed for the German farmer to continue. By German rabbit-breeding standards. Now if the North Korean regime already (and allegedly) finds it too expensive to feed it's own people on even the lowest standards, how is diverting those much needed foodstuffs to rabbits going to solve anything?

    Usually there's a logic to this. Unfortunately, the same people powering this decision are the same people that had the foresight of building a massive hotel that couldn't be finished (you know what I'm talking about if you're familiar with Pyongyang.)

  27. Why did you convert the units? by HvitRavn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    TFA uses metric units, but the slashdot machinery has for some reason converted it to imperial units. Why?

  28. Bad camera angles?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The photos in the article use the most extreme, contrived camera angles to make the rabbits look even more huge.

    I dunno about that, but this shot could get him in a lot of trouble with the law in some places.

  29. Absolutely crazy, disaster waiting to happen by AlzaF · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How many kilograms of food will be needed to feed each rabbit need to produce the 7 kilograms of rabbit meat? There is also a possibility of an ecological disaster waiting to happen in the form of an explosion of the rabbit population due to its large reproductive nature. If they got into the wild, they would strip the land of any agriculture left and the people would be far worse off than there are now. The same thing happened when rabbits were introduced to Australia. The best solution is for North Korea to stop feeding it's military machine and feed it's people.

  30. I can see it now... by confield · · Score: 3, Funny

    Father Turtle: So you nervous for the race tomorrow, son?
    Turtle Jr: No way, Dad! Us turtles NEVER lose to the rabbit!
    Father Turtle: Riight... but I think you better have a look at the competition.

    * In thunders the giant German Rabbit dwarfing Father Turtle and his son *

    Giant Rabbit: Guten Tag!

  31. No need to do much research by TheLink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Communism is just a precursor of Dictatorship.

    This is because Marx had this stupid idea of condoning or even encouraging violence as the way to achieve Communism.

    So when you have a "Communist" Revolution ala Marx, guess who ends up becoming leader of the country?

    The one who was willing AND able to exert the most violence.

    Yeah, that's right, most of the time you get Mr "Silence all Opposition".

    Marx's Communism is severely flawed because of this.

    You basically have to wait till you get taken over by a Benevolent Dictator, or the Evil Dictator hands power to nondictators, or Mr Dictator has a change of heart.

    --
    1. Re:No need to do much research by vandan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Communism is just a precursor of Dictatorship.

      Interesting assertion. You don't back it up with anything though. I say you're way off, and just repeating bullshit that you've heard elsewhere. It's not your fault. You probably don't even realise you're doing it.

      This is because Marx had this stupid idea of condoning or even encouraging violence as the way to achieve Communism.

      Well firstly, Marx didn't condone violence. He provided an analysis of capitalism, and argued that the working class must fight to liberate themselves from the ruling class. The nature of the struggle depends on the nature of the ruling class, and unfortunately the ruling class won't just stand aside and take default gracefully. It is widely recognised that violence is justified if it leads to self-emancipation.

      So when you have a "Communist" Revolution ala Marx, guess who ends up becoming leader of the country?

      Someone else for once?

      The one who was willing AND able to exert the most violence.

      Not necessarily. This is what happens if there is no party able to inspire and lead the masses forward - a power vacuum exists and is filled by violent people. Yes. But it's not the only way things can play out, and you'd like us to believe.

      The rest of your comments don't really deserve comment. You should do some reading on Marxism instead of parroting Fox News and the neo-cons.
    2. Re:No need to do much research by hanssprudel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well firstly, Marx didn't condone violence. He provided an analysis of capitalism, and argued that the working class must fight to liberate themselves from the ruling class.

      An analysis that happened to be dead wrong in every concievable way. From the very start it was un-scientific historcist nonsense, and since its inception it has been completely contradicted by historical facts. In fact capitalist societies provide more opportunity for social movement than any other societies in history (including all the ones that followed Marx pathetic model).

      This is what happens if there is no party able to inspire and lead the masses forward - a power vacuum exists and is filled by violent people. Yes. But it's not the only way things can play out, and you'd like us to believe.

      Oh, really... Care to give us one - one single - example of a large scale Marxist revolution that did not play out in this manner? Come on, let us hear it.

      In fact, the grandparent was only wrong when he claimed that communism is a "precursor" to dictatorship. In fact, communism IS dictatorship. A dictatorship of many or of few (and in practice always of few), but because its very principle is to put the collectivism over individuals, it can be nothing but that. A free society recognizes every individuals to live and work for themselves, and thus keep - and own - the that which they have created with through their own labor. A society that does not do this can only be the horrid distopia that all too many people have suffered under already thanks to the idiot Marx and his followers.

      BTW, I hear North Korea will take immigrants. Your Marxist utopia is becons...

    3. Re:No need to do much research by Jeian · · Score: 3

      You can theorize about how plausible and great communism *could* be with the right people running it, and how horrible capitalism is... ... then you should take a look at the real world, which has yet to see *one* workable communist state (with the dubious exception of China), and any number of successful capitalist states.

    4. Re:No need to do much research by toddhisattva · · Score: 2
      with the dubious exception of China
      Yup, "dubious" indeed! China is best described as,

      "Communist on the outside, Legalist on the inside."

      In other words, Chinese communism is (now) just a garment they wear to endear themselves to the West's Useful Idiots.

      Underneath it's the same despotic legalism as practiced by Shihuang.
  32. Correction... by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > move to countries like the US.

    Should be: "move to countries like what the US used to be".

    1. Re:Correction... by c_forq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you cite this please? I would be interested in reading about it.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    2. Re:Correction... by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Only on /. can uninformed political bickering be considered more interesting that GIANT FUCKING RABBITS! For God's sake people are you all insane? There's 23 pound rabbits on the loose and you're arguing over whether refugee would prefer to go to Europe or America? I want to hear about the rabbits and all I get in the comments are references to communism, a lecture on the life and times of Marx, nookular missiles and such trivial things. Seriously guys think of the rabbits!

      --
      I hate printers.
  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. You got it the wrong way by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dictatorship is a precursor to communism.

    Move specifically, the "dictatorship of the proletariat". It is in the official Marxist road to Communism, a temporary state of dictatorship that should lead to the promised land.

    Just about all self-declared Marxist regimes claimed to be the "dictatorship of the proletariat" state, being bright enough not to claim to the people that the current state of affairs was he best they could hope for. The one exception I know of was Albania, which at some point claimed to have reached "true Communism".

    It has been rough to get there, but those intellectuals that still dream of Communism have mostly reached the conclusion that any kind of dictatorship of temporarily suspension civil rights are *not* acceptable steps on the way. It just took a few (well, rather more than a few) million lives to get to that insight.

    Hopefully it will take less than that for the neo-Conservative to see that torture and other suspension of civil rights are not acceptable means to reach their goals, neither abroad or at home. Unless, of course, that is their goals.

    1. Re:You got it the wrong way by jonasj · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dictatorship of the proletariat simply refers to the idea that the workers, rather than the capitalists, should be in control. It is not intended to be any more of a dictatorship than current capitalist countries, nor to include any temporarily suspension civil rights.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictatorship_of_the_p roletariat

      Do not blame an ideology for the people who believes in it.

      --
      You know, Microsoft's street address also says a lot about their mentality.
    2. Re:You got it the wrong way by qbzzt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Do not blame an ideology for the people who believes in it.

      You mean, "don't judge it by what it has achieved in practice, almost every single time it was tried" (Kibbutzim worked better, but they are only inhabited by people who want to be there).

      --
      -- Support a free market in the field of government
  35. Re:Were's the beef? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course, the question is: The size of which dog? After all, there's a huge size difference between dogs and dogs!

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  36. Rabbits can be a worthwhile food source by Marcion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >Seriously though, how absurd is it that anyone thinks this is going to make any difference

    In Roman Britain Rabbits were an important food supplement. A large number could be easily be fed and cared for by the Children while the parents did more arduous agricultural tasks such as attempting to grow crops or maintain larger animals.

    Pretty bad that in 2006 we have come to this though, especially when the US and EU ploughing food back into the soil and African countries would dearly love to be able to have foreign food markets.

    1. Re:Rabbits can be a worthwhile food source by plopez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Something for both you and tapecutter.

      http://www.lileks.com/institute/gallery/othrwhtmea t/2.html

      BTW, if you haven't seen the 'Gallery of Regrettable Food', it's great.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  37. Brilliant ! by Joebert · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Giant Rabbits To Feed North Korea

    In the future, they'll be able to reuse 97% of that headline.

    Giant Rabbits Feed On North Korea
    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  38. "The Aquariums of Pyongyang" by nadanumber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    North Korea uses prisoners in their various prison camps to breed rabbits, which are killed for meat. (not for the prisoners, who must eat bugs, worms, raw rats, etc. in order to survive) Kang Chol-Hwan who was imprisoned with his entire family in the 'redeeemables' area of the Yodok prison camp wrote a book that describes his experiences, "The Aquariums of Pyongyang". For anyone interested in North Korean human rights, its a must read. Kang Chol-Hwan is now a reporter for the South Korean newspaper the Chosun Ilbo on North Korean affairs. He's one of the most successful North Korean refugees living in South Korea.

    Most North Korean refugees who manage to escape into China lead hunted lives in a terrible limbo of exploitation, terrified that they may be returned to North Korea, where people are often executed for the crime of trying to leave the country and bringing shame upon the Dear Leader.

    If you read Aquariums realize that Kang Chol-Hwan's nine years in the Yodok prison camp as a boy were in the least brutal area of the least brutal camp, the only area where people are ever released. Many are sentenced to work on secret underground projects, similar to Hitler's rocket works at Peeneemunde, that only offer death through overwork as an escape, once you go in, you never come out.

    Sun Ok-Lee is a North Korean refugee living in the US who worked as a bookeeper in another slave labor camp and her account to the US House is probably the most realistic account of these camps. She is one of less than five people known to have ever left one and lived.. Thousands die each year in these camps. They work people to death. (Each person, and their fat, represents useful energy to be extracted before killing them, as you will see)

    Her account is at http://ncafe.com/northkorea/SunOkLeeTestimony_w_ll us.pdf

  39. For lazy people by bioglaze · · Score: 2, Interesting

    23 lbs = 10.4 kilograms
    15 lbs = 6.8 kilograms

    --
    Who is John Galt?
  40. It might help by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All the rabbits in the world won't change that.

    Maybe not but it certainly might help. Rabbits can survive on grass and crude silage, can be grown in relatively small areas and reproduce reliably. Faster than goats, the most widely eaten animal on the planet.

    Similar husbandry programs with cavia porcellus, guinea pigs to you, have helped many families lift themselves out of poverty in Peru and other areas in South America.

    Rabbits would be better suited to the colder climate of North Korea. The fur would provide a secondary revenue source. It may not sound like much but when you're dirt poor having meat to eat and furs to trade is big deal.

    How is this not a good thing? Why would you want to see the North Korean people starve just because their government is the asshat of the world? That's almost as silly as people hating all Americans because Bush is a douche bag. It's not like they elected that idiot in North Korea and there's growing evidence we didn't elect our idiot, either.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:It might help by wonkavader · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think this analysis really depends on whether these hyper-growing rabbits still have the eating requirements of their smaller cousins. If they can still survive (at their growth rate and ultimate size) on what's indigestible to humans, then clearly this is a big win. If they require big nutricious vegtables (the breeder says he currently feeds them kale) that would otherwise be edible by humans, then they aren't going to help -- they'll be less efficient than the humans eating the vegtables.

      If only this could become an export for them. However for both practical and political reasons, I doubt that will happen.

  41. U.S. bureaucracy = North Korea? Yeah, right. by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dude, here's a nickel, buy a clue. Sure, large bureaucracies cause inefficiencies but that is so far from the primary reason for North Korea's current situation it's absurd, in fact offensive, to make the comparison. You are seriously lacking in a sense of perspective.

    Go for it, son, define "large" for me. Give me some numbers. We have plenty of bureaucracies that are as large or far larger than the entire North Korean government, General Motors, for example, and while they may be inefficient, they do not leave millions of their own starving to death or subject to a high likelihood of torture or death. Equating the two is beyond wrong, it's flat out irresponsible.

    Those of us living in reality point, rather, to lack of accountability, lack of transparency, inefficient cross-communications, y'know, the stuff that us actual experts in industrial organization are always willing to explain to those clued enough to pay attention.

    You go out there and talk to some genuine experts in the reasons for North Korea's current state. Read up on, say, rule of law. See what energetically capitalist outlets like the Wall Street Journal have to say about the causes of North Korea's problems.Then come back and we'll have this chat again.

    Oh, and if you're so hyped on decentralization, tell me, what in the real world have you done to bring that about? Personally, I've been working at that for over twenty years, just testified this past week on government procedures to New York's city council. This wasn't so bad since I've been dealing with the senior relevant councilman since, oh, about two months since he was elected, back in '01.

    So, how about you. What have you accomplished?

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
    1. Re:U.S. bureaucracy = North Korea? Yeah, right. by Aptgetupdate · · Score: 3, Insightful

      General Motors, for example, and while they may be inefficient, they do not leave millions of their own starving to death or subject to a high likelihood of torture or death. Equating the two is beyond wrong, it's flat out irresponsible.

      Right. Because of decentralization...if GM tortured people, or merely left them to starve, people would go work somewhere else. (Like, for example, because of massive lay-offs for which massive bureaucracies are infamous.) Because they're only one of many corporations, rather than the sole, centralized authority.

      Or are you arguing that if GM were the government, they wouldn't leave people out in the cold? Or that North Koreans should just use their other government? What the hell is your point? Did you read the post you're responding to, or just use it as a launchpad to offer your opinions? Stating that the results are different doesn't mean the initial conditions aren't similar. It only reinforces the original point, in this case.

      Finally, please don't use attending an "open to the public" city council meeting as a credit to your "expertise". Or at least, if that's the extent of your credentials, don't be such a pompous, arrogant, condescending jerk to other /. posters. Humility is a sign of confidence. Having the tone of a self-important and intolerant ass is a sign of uncertainty.

  42. What kind of idiot still digs Marx?! by toddhisattva · · Score: 2
    The grandparent said,
    Communism is just a precursor of Dictatorship.


    To which the parent said,
    Interesting assertion. You don't back it up with anything though.


    An assertion that is completely obvious needs little or no backing up. But here is some just for fun:

    Russia: Stalin, Lenin
    China: Mao
    Cambodia: Pol Pot

    Perhaps the author of the parent should pull his head out of his ass.

    Perhaps the author of the parent needs to find one case where Marxism did not lead inexorably to dictatorship.

    Then, if he hasn't killed himself over wasting his life believing in fairy tales, he should try to figure out why Marxism leads inevitably to dictatorship.
  43. Re:Correction..."/." is dying from cynicism. by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 2, Insightful

    slopes go both ways, we went up a slope, now were going back down one. Returning to the good old days is the problem.

  44. Re:Correction..."/." is dying from cynicism. by c_forq · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I remember correctly it was an executive order that create Japanese internment camps. Not legislation, not a federal court, but an order sent out on the sole authority of the President. At least Guantanamo Bay has congressional support.

    --
    Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns