Slashdot Mirror


China Treats Internet Addiction Very Seriously

eldavojohn writes "China has taken new extremes in preventing internet addiction in youths and is even offering boot camps to parents who want their child weaned from the electric teat. The article notes that 'no country has gone quite as far as China in embracing the theory that heavy Internet use should be defined as a mental disorder and mounting a public crusade against Internet addiction.' The article mentions the story of Sun Jiting who 'spends his days locked behind metal bars in this military-run installation, put there by his parents. The 17-year-old high school student is not allowed to communicate with friends back home, and his only companions are psychologists, nurses and other patients. Each morning at 6:30, he is jolted awake by a soldier in fatigues shouting, "This is for your own good!"' Sun found himself spending 15 hours or straight on the internet. Thanks to his parents' intervention and the treatment, he now has life mapped out until he's 84. "

249 comments

  1. This just in... by RingDev · · Score: 4, Funny

    Youth engaging in self destructive addictive behavior. News at 11:00.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:This just in... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Youth engaging in self destructive addictive behavior.

      Am not!

      Just because I know this story has been duped twice before does not mean I'm an addict!

      [...]

      What? Why are you looking at me like that?
    2. Re:This just in... by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between a dupe and expanded coverage. The original articles were about the facilities, while this article shows the life of someone who is actually there.

      --
      I got nothin'
    3. Re:This just in... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      It was a joke. Relax. :)

    4. Re:This just in... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Parents everywhere overreact, that story after the feature.

    5. Re:This just in... by raddan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I suspect that this has more to do with the free flow of information than 'addiction'. Since when has China been so worried about the welfare of its citizens? That prison cell sounds really conducive to mental health.

    6. Re:This just in... by bunions · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Since when has China been so worried about the welfare of its citizens?

      Since when has -any- country been so worried about the welfare of its citizen? Replace 'internet' with 'pot' and you're describing America.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    7. Re:This just in... by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      However, it makes people watching you too closely blind.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    8. Re:This just in... by pembo13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      See how you got modded flaimbait? That will tell you to talk truthfully about the US of A in public. Shame on you!

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    9. Re:This just in... by nixkuroi · · Score: 1

      In China, the internet surfs YOU! *badumbum*

    10. Re:This just in... by npgmr · · Score: 1

      It's very easy to make up some stories about someone living in China.. as easy as them reading stories cook up by their local authorities... everything is censored and controlled, right?

    11. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      15 hours straight? That's it?? Pussy.

    12. Re:This just in... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      At least they let him sleep in every morning.

  2. Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Old communism and new communism still have one thing in common: reeducation of deviants and defining any 'social' problem as a mental disorder that they can treat/imprison you for.

    1. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the U.S. is a Communist country because it would prefer people who spend all their money on drugs to the neglect of the people around them should spend some time in rehab?

    2. Re:Sounds about right by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
      From TFA: > Each morning at 6:30, he is jolted awake by a soldier in fatigues shouting, "This is for your own good!"'

      'Smith!' screamed the shrewish voice from the telescreen. '6079 Smith W.! Yes, you! Bend lower, please! You can do better than that. You're not trying. Lower, please! That's better, comrade. Now stand at ease, the whole squad, and watch me.'

      > Thanks to his parents' intervention and the treatment, he now has life mapped out until he's 84.

      But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.

      And as long as I'm on an Orwell kick today, "the Slashdotters looked from TFA to the dystopian science fiction novel, and from the dystopian science fiction novel to TFA, and from TFA to the dystopian science fiction article again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."

    3. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Old communism and new communism still have two things in common: reeducation of deviants, defining any 'social' problem as a mental disorder that they can treat/imprison you for, and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope. Oh damn!

    4. Re:Sounds about right by happy*nix · · Score: 1

      Truly scary.

      I wonder when it will be implemented here in the good ole US of A ?
      I mean we certainly can't let the world think that China takes better care of it's citizens than we do.

      -sigh-

      --
      Gone to my happy place.
    5. Re:Sounds about right by bunions · · Score: 3, Insightful

      yes, thank god something like this could never happen in America, right?

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    6. Re:Sounds about right by melikamp · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Old communism and new communism still have one thing in common
      Namely, they are both called "communism" despite the fact that the countries that are spoken of are collectivist and authoritarian regimes, usually dictatorships, but falling short of that, oligarchies. Wake me up when there is a major country with (1) but a single class and (2) the means of production being equally shared among everyone.
    7. Re:Sounds about right by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We are more advanced. Instead of putting them in jail we diagnose our kids as ADD and give them drugs.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    8. Re:Sounds about right by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't kid yourself.

      My co-worker in the US did this to his daughter for 18 months when she started running away. There's a large facility with a capacity for 500 "students" in this city. They "reeducate" the kids. Sound familiar?

      He paid a lot of money and she was basically brainwashed back to a safe mental state (honestly- she was headed down a self destructive bad road).

      Parents have large amounts of freedom to brainwash their children until those children move out.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    9. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll?? Oh come on! this is classic!

    10. Re:Sounds about right by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Old communism and new communism still have one thing in common: reeducation of deviants and defining any 'social' problem as a mental disorder that they can treat/imprison you for.

      How is this any different from "new democracy", where the US has more of its population in jail than any other country, by number and by percent. And where most of those prisoners are in jail for non-violent drug offences, i.e. deviancy.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:Sounds about right by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that'll happen as soon as someone creates a capitalistic utopia where the invisible hand works and everyone is equally informed.

      Those in power want to remain in power, and that's the reason why neither society can be transitioned to properly.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    12. Re:Sounds about right by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Congrats, my friend, you just redefined the term "overstretched analogy" for me.

      So, in your very imaginative mind "society-individual" relationship is perfectly analogous to "parent-child" relationship?

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    13. Re:Sounds about right by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      16 hours straight on the internet IS a psychological (mental) disorder. His parents provided help which took a harsh (to some, ok - to the other) turn.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    14. Re:Sounds about right by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Let me preface this comment by saying that I agree with your sentiment - the US imprisons way too many non-violent offenders.

      That said, we're talking about China here. They execute drug offenders, so it's probably not worth comparing their incarceration rate to ours. I mean, they are KILLING their non-violent offenders.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    15. Re:Sounds about right by Malakusen · · Score: 1

      Wish I wasn't out of mod points, that was pretty funny.

      --
      Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to conviction
    16. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >most of those prisoners are in jail for non-violent drug offences

      Don't kid yourself. Most of those prisoners are violent offender that have pled down to a lesser charge in order to to get them into the system quicker.

    17. Re:Sounds about right by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "16 hours straight on the internet IS a psychological (mental) disorder."

      Whew....thank God they didn't say someone watching that much TV in a day was a mental disorder.

      I'd have been locked up a few times after a couple of boring weekend days with nothing much else to do.....although, I did have the computer on they whole time??

      Damn...mixing media could be worse???

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:Sounds about right by StaticEngine · · Score: 2, Funny

      What was this girl's name? I want to be sure to look her up at the strip clubs in Vegas when she finaly escapes her household.

    19. Re:Sounds about right by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Actually, she came out very stepford like. It's a very effective program and uses a lot of cult-like techniques including complete isolation from even the parents until the kids acheive certain states.

      And like 1984, it's not enough for the kids to say he is holding up four fingers when he is holding up one- the people running it are wise to that and the kids have to believe it before being allowed privileges.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    20. Re:Sounds about right by StaticEngine · · Score: 1

      Wonderful. Another potential nobel laureate relegated to being a sheet folder and dish washer.

    21. Re:Sounds about right by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Yea - kind of frightening.

      And it's the best and the brightest that get lobotomized like this becuase they are unhappiest with the powers that be.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    22. Re:Sounds about right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, well, you see, the difference here is that in China, the state does it, so it's wrong. In the US, it's private enterprise that does the brainwashing, so it's perfectly OK.

    23. Re:Sounds about right by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Throw in WORK too! :-)

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    24. Re:Sounds about right by atomicdoggy · · Score: 1

      Dammit! The nerve of parents trying to raise kids!!!! That is what the TV and internet are for!

    25. Re:Sounds about right by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea I know. There is a fundamental rule that parents can raise their kids to be suicidal murderous monsters if they want to (not joking- serious here). It's a fundamental problem with Iraq- the only way to really fix it would be to reeducate the kids to different values and get them out of the hands of their murderous parents.

      Only if you cross certain arbitrary lines (feeding a kid too much food, keeping them in cages instead of beds, touching them in a way that is taken to be inappropriate) does society jump down your ass and take them away from you.

      You can brainwash them and teach them any wierd world view (an entire generation of kids in the US is being brought up with very extreme values because of private schools) and that's okay.

      Public schools were a great system for sanding off those extremes and giving you the agility to simultaneously believe your wacko beliefs but also let others have there own. The current generation is much more intolerant and since their way is the only way they have ever been exposed to they can't compromise on gay rights or abortion or other issues. They feel they MUST control other people's behavior because it is just a crime against the universe.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    26. Re:Sounds about right by myth24601 · · Score: 3, Funny

      As an american teen, I think this whole ADD thing is a bunch of... ...I like cheese.

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    27. Re:Sounds about right by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      Which world would you prefer to live in, Huxley's "Brave New World" or the Orwell's "1894"?
      (If you haven't read Brave New World, basically, everyone's on drugs and has a lot of sex.)

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    28. Re:Sounds about right by khallow · · Score: 1

      The current generation is much more intolerant and since their way is the only way they have ever been exposed to they can't compromise on gay rights or abortion or other issues.

      Name a generation that collectively was more tolerant to its children. I personally don't think you can.
    29. Re:Sounds about right by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 1

      There is no difference between the parents turning in their kid for "Internet Addiction", and the children turning in their parents in 1984 for thoughcrime. It's still 'reform' at the hands of the state, and in the most brutal possible way.

      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
    30. Re:Sounds about right by zuiraM · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm doubting that a lot of kids get labelled with ADD, ODD or what-have-you without fitting the criterion for this, but your argument makes no sense.

      Giving ADD-medication to a regular kid that's all over the place will make that kid *more* impossible to manage. We're talking about fairly strong CNS stimulants here. They increase psychomotor activity in "healthy" kids. A lot.

      Perhaps what you meant to say was that we have an unfortunate tendency to give ADD meds to the kids when they don't actually need it? I can go with that. The problem here is informed consent: they can't give any without having tried it in advance, and that requires having the parents make the informed consent for them, and docs don't always remember to pull the kids back in to ask them if they prefer life *with* the meds or without.

      Oh, and, personally, I'd worry more about how Risperdal has been approved to treat irritability, agression and other signs of not being happy, content or "socially well-adjusted" among kids with autism spectrum disorders. That's an antipsychotic, and it might take years off their healthy adult life: statistically 25 years if you take it throughout your entire life. If that effect is one that accumulates linearly, that means the kids lose 1 year of life per 2 years on the drug. I'm not at all convinced this is a tradeoff they'll be happy about later in life.

    31. Re:Sounds about right by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Right, children turning in their parents because they are so well informed about party line, not because they are mad at parents, or just want to have fun.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    32. Re:Sounds about right by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps what you meant to say was that we have an unfortunate tendency to give ADD meds to the kids when they don't actually need it?"

      Bingo

      Some parents even push to have their kids diagnosed with learning disabilities so they can get breaks during standardized testing sessions (extra time, etc). This has come up in MA.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    33. Re:Sounds about right by zurmikopa · · Score: 1

      Given the frequency that these kinds of comments come up while discussing ADD, I think we can now safely say that Cheese causes ADD.

  3. This obviously works quite well by thousandinone · · Score: 5, Funny

    From TFA: "Sun looks forward to returning to school and getting on with his life. The first task on his agenda when he gets home: Get online. He needs to tell his worried Internet friends where he was these past few weeks." Obviously he is totally cured of his "internet addiction..."

    1. Re:This obviously works quite well by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that kind of treatment seems like it'll cause more problems than it'll help.

      I like the comments from Tao in there. He seems to have a better idea on how to handle the situation, I hope he gets a chance to try his way.

      In plain english: to get them off the internet, we gotta get them laid.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    2. Re:This obviously works quite well by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I agree about Tao. Whatever is wrong with the rest of the program, this guy obviously groks that "internet addiction" is a symptom of deeper issues, not an isolated syndrome in itself.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:This obviously works quite well by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, but the article seems to place him more as an independant (or competative) critic, rather than a part of the program.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    4. Re:This obviously works quite well by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I got the impression that he works within the program, but with considerable independence to do things his own way. Regardless, he sounds like he has his act together, and hopefully he'll be a good influence.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  4. Just a thought by andy314159pi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Spending 15 hours on the internet at a time might be a normal reaction to living in an extremely oppressive society.

    1. Re:Just a thought by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, you could always take Lunesta, the drug to calm the restless mind... But by the same token, with all the shit going on in the world today, it's the people who aren't restless who have problems.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Just a thought by andreasg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Living in an oppressive society doesn't prevent meaningful social relationships with other humans. While you might be able to discuss your hopes and thoughts on the society freely on the internet, I doubt that was what he used his 15 hours a day for. China is known to have a lot of problems with online gaming, for example the Chinese version of World of Warcraft limits the playing time each day.

    3. Re:Just a thought by CRCulver · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Spending 15 hours on the internet at a time might be a normal reaction to living in an extremely oppressive society.

      Have you ever been to China? Authoritarian countries are usually never perceived by all or even most of their citizens to be truly "oppressive", only a minority of people notice problems with the system and express their frustrations in counter-cultural ways. Notice how even in the darkest days of the Soviet Union the average person didn't think things were that bad, asserting even that people who saw problems were subversives or nutjobs, and today many people look back on such times fondly. The problem with Internet addiction in China cuts across the youth population in such a way that you cannot blame in on simple frustration with the system.

    4. Re:Just a thought by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      My living in a democracy must be why I've only done 8 hr sessions.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    5. Re:Just a thought by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      Living in an oppressive society certainly does affect your social relationships. You cannot talk about any activities that deviate from the norm (like obsessive gaming) for fear of being reported. You cannot ask for help or show illness for fear of being ground under the wheel of the system. You cannot find others with whom you might relate, because they're all hiding as well.

      Think of how a satanist or pedophile might feel, living in America today. That's how a gamer (or democrat!) lives in China. Where's the line -- what kinds of obsessions should society accept, and what kinds should be shunned?

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    6. Re:Just a thought by thousandinone · · Score: 1

      Case in point, North Korea. The average citizen is a KJI fanboy. Of course, they're brought up with propaganda from infancy, but still...

    7. Re:Just a thought by Explodicle · · Score: 1

      In America we have laws protecting the rights of Satanists and public Satanist organizations, so I don't think that's a very good analogy.

    8. Re:Just a thought by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And notice even in the darkest days of the 1950's in the US, folks didn't think it was that bad. The only people who saw problems were subversives and commies.

      Thank god for the baby boom- at least it blew things loose for a little while but now I fear the aging baby boom is going to get really repressive.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    9. Re:Just a thought by Southpaw018 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and we also have several states that require belief in a Christianish version of God in order to hold public office, and one state that requires it as a prerequisite for equal protection under the law.

      Just because the principle of this country is freedom doesn't mean that freedom always exists. People have spent every waking breath fighting for them since the Constitution was signed.

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    10. Re:Just a thought by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      In America we have laws protecting the rights of homosexuals. Yet there are still places where you can be hanged as one.

      You have a good point that much of the oppression in China is institutionalized in their system of government, while in America oppression mostly arises from cultural influences. But that only supports my point about socialization being difficult for deviants, and that China is a very, very bad place to deviate from the norm.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    11. Re:Just a thought by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1

      Can you explain / elaborate?

    12. Re:Just a thought by Nimey · · Score: 1

      O RLY? The US constitution forbids a religious test to hold office, and the 14th Amendment extends the US constitution's protections to citizens of all the states. Can you give a cite for your statement?

      That said, my employment oath with the State of Kansas had "so help me God" at the end. I crossed that bit out and signed. Nobody raised a fuss.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    13. Re:Just a thought by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      Chinese life isn't quite the same as the US's propoganda evidently has made you believe. Even if the government sucks, it's not like it gets in the way of daily activities. People generally have happy, productive lives, with concerns that are essentially identical to what they would be in the US. 15 hours a day on the Internet is unhealthy & indicates a mental problem, just as it does in the US.

      Or would you care to explain yourself further?

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    14. Re:Just a thought by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      Can you please cite your sources for this information? I'm not trying to flame, I am just curious as I have never heard of such state laws. It seems to me that this is false becuase it is unconstitutional. The constitution trumps state's rights.

      --
      I got nothin'
    15. Re:Just a thought by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I'm in class right now (can't lookup a cite ATM but I will later) but my state (South Carolina) is definatley one of those states (possibly the only?). Though I don't know how much it's enforced, by law you have to believe in God to hold any public office in the state.

      You have to understand the attitudes around here though. 70-80% of the people in this state seem to think that "freedom of religion" only applies to different demoninations of Christianity. I kid you not - they think that the founding fathers meant to not officially support Baptists, or Methodists, or Holiness churches in particular, but that Christianity in general is just obvious and they couldn't have been talking about not supporting it. They'd organized letters to public officials trying to get them to close down some local Mosques . . .

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    16. Re:Just a thought by maxume · · Score: 1

      When I want to calm my restless mind, I reach for a drink. If we are going to talk about drugs that are mass marketed, we might as well go for the big one.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    17. Re:Just a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's no different from old land covenants that specify "this land shall only be owned by persons of the white race" or other similar things. The law is unconstitutional, but nobody wants to bother with the political circus required to change it. Any why bother? It might be written as "law" but as it has no legal effect, who cares?

    18. Re:Just a thought by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      I call BS. In this "extremely oppresive" society youth might have more economic possibilities (given the healthy rate of economical growth in China compared to developed world) than analogous group in US or Europe.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    19. Re:Just a thought by rodentia · · Score: 1


      Notice how even in the darkest days of the [United States] the average person didn't think things were that bad, asserting even that people who saw problems were subversives or nutjobs, and today many people look back on such times fondly.

      Indeed.

      --
      illegitimii non ingravare
    20. Re:Just a thought by idontgno · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting. I was sceptical but you appear to be fundamentally right.

      Per the South Carolina Constitution, Article VI, Section 2:

      No person who denies the existence of the Supreme Being shall hold any office under this Constitution.

      Weird. I'm amazed this hasn't been successfully challenged in the US Supreme Court yet. (I can't claim to be amazed that it hasn't been amended from within the state yet; in many states of the U.S., you'd have a hard time getting together enough of the population to support an atheism- or polytheism-friendly or religiously neurtral platform.)

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    21. Re:Just a thought by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Spending 15 hours on the internet at a time might be a normal reaction to living in an extremely oppressive society.

      I spend 15h online daily.. I never knew Canada was oppressive. But it must be true.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    22. Re:Just a thought by oddfox · · Score: 2, Informative

      The U.S. Constitution forbids quite a lot of things, including religious tests to hold office. However, these are routinely violated in state or local laws.

      Article 19, section 1 of the Arkansas Constitution: Atheists disqualified from holding office or testifying as witness.

      No person who denies the being of a God shall hold any office in the civil departments of this State, nor be competent to testify as a witness in any court.

      There's many many more, and you can find them all here. And people say that liberals have all these unconstitutional restrictions in place in order to keep God-fearing Christians from public office. Last time I checked, most elected representatives I read up on, especially Presidential candidates, identify themselves as Christians...

      Disclaimer: Not that there's anything wrong with that...

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    23. Re:Just a thought by rodentia · · Score: 1


      Thank god for the baby boom- at least it blew things loose for a little while but now I fear the aging baby boom is going to get really repressive.

      No, don't thank those narcissistic prigs. They are the ones who felt this lack of a *good war* for their generation and got us into the current situation: a war that makes Vietnam look like patticakes.

      The boomers are the least generation. The most empowered and enfranchised in history and look what they have bequeathed us. It was Roethke said: I was never too liberal in my youth for fear of becoming too conservative in my old age. That fits the boomers to a *T*. They've been elitist prigs right down the line and the death of progressive politics.

      I'm down with Valerie but I lump the granola girls in with the high-heeled boys.

      --
      illegitimii non ingravare
    24. Re:Just a thought by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      I think the wording is peculiar. It doesn't say God, it says Supreme Being. Couldn't Allah also be considered a Supreme Being under this constitution? It doesn't even say Christian Supreme Being.

      It seems to only discriminate against atheists.

      --
      I got nothin'
    25. Re:Just a thought by DarkGreenNight · · Score: 1

      I'm on vacation and in so a lazy mood that and I can't get my ass from the chair in front of the computer. Not on comunist China but Catalonia (western Europe, inside Spain).

      If at least this served me to level up...

      BTW, anything "might" be a normal reaction to anything else. After all, what does "might" mean?

    26. Re:Just a thought by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Atheists, yes.

      But the use of a definite singular article ("the Supreme Being" [emph. mine]) also rules out polytheistic religions, like Hinduism and Shinto.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    27. Re:Just a thought by Knara · · Score: 1

      I spend about 15 hours a day "on the internet" (whatever that vague statement means), yet I excel at my job and get A's in my classes that I take after work.

      So I guess the question is, how do you define "on the internet". Is web-surfing from a phone the same as 5 hours on WoW? They both meet the description. Does surfing the web on my laptop while watching a movie count as 2 hours of being "on the internet"? The phrase is basically meaningless the way you've decided to use it.

    28. Re:Just a thought by Lockejaw · · Score: 1

      My great-grandfather immigrated to the U.S. in the 1920s, and as he worked and earned money, he sent some home to family in the Soviet Union. A long time later, when he was able to visit them, he found that they still had every dollar they'd gotten from him -- they were afraid to spend American money. Clearly, they knew something wasn't quite right.

      --
      (IANAL)
    29. Re:Just a thought by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Minor nitpick, but Allah, and the Christian God (Jehovah/Yahweh) are the same entity (even agreed upon by members of these religions). Outside of Islam, Christianity, and Judaism though, it still seems like it would include any monotheistic religion.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    30. Re:Just a thought by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      How could someone who swear he believes in something he has never actually saw could be competent to testify as a witness?

    31. Re:Just a thought by byornski · · Score: 1

      From a brief google search here is the case of Torcaso v. Watkins (1961) in which the supreme court said that those requirements are unconstitutional and so cannot be required to hold public office.

    32. Re:Just a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No person who denies the existence of the Supreme Being shall hold any office under this Constitution.

      I'm an atheist, but also hugely egotistical and full of myself, so there is no lack of a Supreme Being in my reality.

    33. Re:Just a thought by oddfox · · Score: 0, Troll

      Because nobody ever lies when they swear on something like a holy book, or say "I swear to God..." and proceed to lie. How about we do away with the damn thing entirely because it's bullocks to begin with.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
  5. Tagged: excessive by WillDraven · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, I understand how internet addiction can take over your life, but being put in a penal institution is not the answer. And mapping out your life until you're 84? You've just had something else take over your life instead. Not much of an improvement in my opinion.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Tagged: excessive by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


      And mapping out your life until you're 84? You've just had something else take over your life instead. Not much of an improvement in my opinion.

      His life plan:

      Age 17-23: School
      Age 23-84: Work in factory making crap for WalMart.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Tagged: excessive by GiovanniZero · · Score: 2
      Oh that's silly. We've managed to replace a dangerous, degenerative addiction with a close association to the party and it's principles. Surely these will serve him well for the rest of his life. Thank goodness we have the techniques to help these individuals see the benefits of full party support!



      Reminds me of 1984, they always love the party in the end.

      --
      Mod me up, mod me down, do your worst you modding clown.
    3. Re:Tagged: excessive by slim-t · · Score: 1

      That's an awful lot of education just to make crap for Walmart.

    4. Re:Tagged: excessive by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      You've just had something else take over your life instead.

      Yes, but now the State is in control. See? Much better.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  6. I live in the Twin Cities... by mikecardii · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And saw this article in the paper the other day. It caught my attention, and frankly, it disturbs me to my core. I won't deny that it's possible to become addicted to the internet, but the extremes to which some of this clinics go is very disturbing. I don't think that these kids should be treated like they're addicted to drugs.

    1. Re:I live in the Twin Cities... by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      I don't think that these kids should be treated like they're addicted to drugs. I agree, they should be treated as if they are addicted to books, newspapers, radio and television.
      I would consider 15 hours a day of the above, normal. Far more normal than living in a prison and being prevented from seeing or talking to your friends.
      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    2. Re:I live in the Twin Cities... by zuiraM · · Score: 1

      What makes you think drug addiction should qualify for this kind of thing?

      For one, the dopamine-response associated with CounterStrike is more than an order of magnitude greater than what you get from e.g. heroin.

      Second, opening the door to dehumanizing and mistreating *one* group of people means accepting the mental mechanism (moral core) that allows stuff like the holocaust to happen. Now, this isn't meant as a reductio ad hitlerum argument; I'm just pointing out that it's the same mental mechanism that allows the slope to get slippery, and that it's been shown (repeatedly) to be trivial to alter the perceptions that define this border (inside/outside moral core).

  7. China is right to take this seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Many of these internet addictions lead to suffering a bullet-related death.

    1. Re:China is right to take this seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I don't think this should be modded as funny. It seems about right. Suicide becomes an option when the person feels they are out of control and have no way out. Addiction feels like that. At some point, the addiction (alcohol, drugs, pr0n, gambling, food, etc) makes the person do things they no longer want to do. And they can't NOT do it. AA and other 12-steps programs work because they give a person options and tools so they do not HAVE to do this behavior. It's not about will power, it's about treating an illness.

    2. Re:China is right to take this seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you idiot. GP was talking about executions by the government.

  8. Before we get all high and mighty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This reminds me of the drug treatment programs where teens were incarcerated in the US. They were much more popular in the late 80s and early 90s. The one we had locally, "Straight, Inc." used to advertise on TV all the time. There were cases of kids getting caught with a joint once and being sent there, mixed in with hardcore addicts and becoming more addicted off stuff smuggled in. Either that, or they were just isolated and abused. These companies were scandalized and faded into the background, AFAIK they may still be there.

    1. Re:Before we get all high and mighty by WolfWalker545 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh, they're still there. They've expanded beyond drug treatment claims to include 'behavior issues', but aren't staffed or licensed to deal with either. They usually get around that by claiming to be boarding schools, but then they frequently don't meet the licensing requirements to be schools, either. They now call themselves Therapeutic Boarding Schools for 'troubled teens'. If you look at the tactics they use for dealing with the kids, most of them fit in with what I was taught about brainwashing in North Korean and Vietnamese POW camps. It's no real surprise that a lot of the survivors of these programs wind up displaying PTSD later. A friend was sent to one of these places basically because she had problems getting along with her stepfather, one of her classmates there committed suicide not long ago (and it's certainly messed her up some, but she's coming to deal with it. Of course, one of the issues between her and her stepfather is that she's attracted to other women...)

    2. Re:Before we get all high and mighty by scopius · · Score: 1

      These companies do still exist here in the United States. They are known as TCs, which can mean Therapeutic Community or Treatment Center. They used to be much more hardcore than they are now, meaning like 10-15 years ago. Back then, typical punishments for succumbing to your disease were wearing a sign around your neck (public shame), and scrubbing a bathroom clean with a toothbrush. Today, they put people to work, and give them power over other "addicts" by giving them roles in the community. The rate of people not using drugs or the internet is pretty good, WHILE THEY ARE THERE. Over 90% of them go right back to their old ways as soon as they leave the TC. It is simply a case of substituting one addiction for another, in this case "power" or "the need to please" takes the place of the other addictive substance for a time. The problem is that they are attempting to treat a symptom of the disease without treating the underlying cause. If I have skin cancer, and I only get one mole treated, that will not cure the cancer. It will probably pop up in another mole soon. It has been suggested by some that what is really going on is spiritual, and needs to be treated as such. I guess we can learn much from the results that different treatments produce.

    3. Re:Before we get all high and mighty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These boot camps are still going "strong", and killing people in the process.

      http://nospank.net/boot.htm

    4. Re:Before we get all high and mighty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In fact, some of these "schools" get around things like licensing and inspections by locating themselves out of the county. One interesting example is Tranquility Bay (http://www.tranquilitybay.org/) located in Jamaica. They also offer a handy kidnapping service that will shanghai your child in the middle of the night. It sounds absolutely horrendous (http://observer.guardian.co.uk/magazine/story/0,1 1913,987172,00.html). Bizarre forms of stress position torture, brain washing, different types of deprivation. Glad I'm not a minor anymore.

    5. Re:Before we get all high and mighty by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      Something tells me that this would violate Articles 5, 9, and 3 of the Universal Deceleration of Human Rights, several laws against cruelty to children, and you might want to call the social worker about it.

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
  9. It's not weened by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's weaned. Don't use words you don't understand. Or that the slashdot "editors" don't understand.

    It's also "parents'" and not "parent's". The former is plural possessive. The latter is singular possessive.

    Since the slashdot editors will not edit, I guess someone else is going to have to do it. Pity we can't edit the actual story submission, and have to content ourselves with providing corrections here.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:It's not weened by LanMan04 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's weaned. Don't use words you don't understand. Or that the slashdot "editors" don't understand. To be fair, I think they understood the meaning of the word. It was simply misspelled.
      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    2. Re:It's not weened by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'd mod you up if I could.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:It's not weened by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Blame the popularity of the band "Ween"

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:It's not weened by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I see the problem to but it's two late to loose your temper over some thing tervial like that.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    5. Re:It's not weened by SnotBob · · Score: 0

      Go easy on them. They're Slashdot editors. It's not like they've seen boobs lately.

    6. Re:It's not weened by black+inc. · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If you are going to complain about someone's grammar, make sure to check your own. "have to content ourselves with providing corrections here" is not a complete sentence; therefore, you should not have placed a comma before "and".

    7. Re:It's not weened by swingerman · · Score: 1, Funny

      I used to be like you. I would try to help out by correcting usage, grammar, spelling, and punctuation.


      But now I'm cured. After 6 months in a penal facility run by the military and being awakened to a sergeant shouting that "it's for [my] own good," I now accept the fact that people are going to butcher usage, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. I am now at peace with that fact. Now, have the courage I did. Go to your local chapter of "Curing Grammar Obsessiveness" and get cured yourself. Hopefully no one will smuggle in a copy of Strunk & White or the Chicago Manual of Style to prolong your addiction and agony.


      /s/ Your Brother in Proper Usage

    8. Re:It's not weened by Aaron32 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Your an idiot! (yes, it was on purpose)

    9. Re:It's not weened by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Jeez- some people don't get jokes.

      It was a joke mr. stupid moderator.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    10. Re:It's not weened by maxume · · Score: 1

      Isn't that just somatics? Err, I mean, semantics?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:It's not weened by black+inc. · · Score: 0

      You seem to have trouble understanding the differences between a dependent and independent clause. For example, "have to content ourselves with providing corrections here" is not an independent clause. Here is a link to help with that: Independent and Dependent Clauses.

      You also seem to have some issues with anger management. Here is a link to deal with that as well: How to Deal with Anger.

    12. Re:It's not weened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, you are actually wrong here. I think you do not quite understand what an independent clause is and how it is different from a compound predicate (which does not take a comma). The Purdue website, which is a good resource, is correct that compound sentences do take a comma before a coordinating conjunction between two independent clauses. No comma, however, is placed between two predicates.

      To make it simple, an independent clause needs a subject phrase and a predicate phrase. The phrase "have to content ourselves with providing corrections here" is not an independent clause because it lacks a subject phrase. Instead, it is the second part of a compound predicate. If I could draw a tree diagram, I could illustrate this point much better.

      But just in case you don't believe me, please note rule number #13 on the very website you linked to:
      13. Don't put a comma between the two verbs or verb phrases in a compound predicate.

              We laid out our music and snacks, and began to study. (incorrect)
              I turned the corner, and ran smack into a patrol car. (incorrect)

      (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_ comma.html)

    13. Re:It's not weened by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 1

      ooh, looks like we touched a nerve

      --

      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
  10. Oblig. Futurama quote by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Bender, what are you doing in the bathroom? Are you jacking on in there?"

    --
    stuff |
  11. Holy Fsck! by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Okay - I understand that sometimes a kid can get more than just a little involved with computers (Hell, I remember a period of time as an ADULT when I spent nearly every waking non-work hour online playing Quake or Counter-Strike), but like anyone, they get past it, they move on.

    If it starts to be an actual detriment (not eating, not sleeping, etc), okay - I can see the need for intervention. Still, this one makes me queasy a bit.

    Why? Well, what about the requirements to be declared "addicted"? Isn't there a danger that safeguards could be tossed, and it would eventually boil down to just someone else's subjective opinion? Hell of a way to be got rid of in a hurry by a disgruntled low-level gov't worker, a pissed-off friend, etc. Anywhere else on the planet okay - I could understand that there would be a due process. But in a country which still prosecutes (and I quote) "hooliganism" (which can mean whatever they want it to mean), and lock dissidents up for years on end? Sounds like just an updated and modernized excuse to shut up anyone who makes the gov't feel uncomfortable.

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Holy Fsck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I spend upwards of 17 hours a day on the computer, Im not always on the internet, im mostly playing games, but even in my games I can chat with my friends, not that I always do.

      I think, most of my time on the "internet" is just me in love with my computer, I don't really care what I do with the computer,as long as I am on it.

  12. This is intense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I went to treatment when I was younger (for drugs), we had five year plans and such. We had a rating system where you're level 1-3 (for outpatient, level 4 is mandatory inpatient). Then if you had a serious drug addiction to say heroin you could by rights take an option to farm pigs in Alaska as a treatment option. We considered this rather extreme and was usually scheduled for 6-12 months. My addiction at 19 was a six year addiction to pot, meth, alcohol, lsd, mushrooms, cocaine, and opium (ordered by preference). Because, I didn't have any felonies I was considered a level 3 maximum outpatient required. This kid is worse off than the pig farmers for playing video games? I don't really get it and planning out to the age of 84 seems to be a setup for failure, I seem to think he's just trying to stay off of the 3rd floor.

  13. For Your Own Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of a bad acid trip where everyone was connected directly to the internet. And we were all big fat slobs scarfing down McDonalds while browsing through more pr0n, goatse and ugly media in 10 minutes than a human psyche is meant to handle in a lifetime. Hoses are all connected taking care of bodily functions, no need to move. One for piss, one for shit and one to collect and dump your DNA right into a swirling pool of filth where it belongs.

    For fuck's sake. Save yourself. Go outside!

  14. Compulsive behavior is not bad--just the Internet? by liam193 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thanks to his parent's intervention and the treatment, he now has life mapped out until he's 84.


    Okay, let me get this straight. "Thanks to his parent's intervention and the treatment, he now has [replaced one compulsive behavior for another]." The need to organize your life 50+ years into the future is not far from the compulsion to spend 15 hours a day on the Internet. In fact, I would maintain that it is potentially a more destructive behavior.
  15. Pathologizing dissent by Brunellus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would seem to fit into the PRC's pattern of taking 'deviant' thought and pathologizing it. Now, instead of re-education camps, internet 'addicted' youths are treated with all the care and compassion the Party can muster.

    I'll bet my last yuan renminbi that this will be used to lock up bloggers and other people with similar internet 'addictions.' Surely you must be addicted if your jones for information has you circumventing the Great Firewall of China, right?

    1. Re:Pathologizing dissent by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1
      While the Chinese dictatorship takes the "addiction" of ethnic Chinese boys to the internet, and all the potentially anti-Party material lurking there, very seriously, that same machinery has zero tolerance for the neighbouring Tibetans under their brutal occupation who pine for their freedom and independence...


      Quote from a recent Rolling Stone article "The End of Tibet"


      The small concrete room smells of urine. In the corner, a young woman lies on a metal cot, moaning softly and vomiting up blood. A former Buddhist nun, she is recovering from an operation on her stomach to fix internal injuries caused by beatings from Chinese guards. Her roommate, Lhundrub Zangmo, speaks in a whispery monotone. Zangmo's head is no longer shaven, and her straight black hair falls over her tight sweater emblazoned with the words The Coolest Boy. But even though she has left the clergy, Zangmo remains deeply religious. She has plastered the walls of the tiny room with photos of Buddhist deities and the Dalai Lama, leader of Tibetan Buddhists.


      It has been only a few months since Zangmo and her friend fled Tibet on foot over the Himalayas to this squat, block-shaped center for Tibetan refugees in India. The two women had been imprisoned along with a group of other nuns, some for as long as sixteen years. They were first arrested in 1990 for staging a protest in Lhasa, the capital of Tibet, to demonstrate their outrage over China's continuing presence in their native land. As the women chanted "Free Tibet," Chinese police moved quickly, knocking them to the ground and dragging them to jail before their protest could attract attention. Inside the prison, Chinese authorities subjected the nuns to a brutal routine. "Police stuck electric prods into my vagina and then hung me from the ceiling," Zangmo says softly. Her voice doesn't waver, but she looks away. Some of her friends lost consciousness as soon as guards pushed the cattle prods inside them, but Zangmo remained alert throughout the torture. "I was totally, totally frightened," she says.

      Police eventually transferred the women to Drapchi, the most feared prison in Lhasa. According to human rights organizations like the International Campaign for Tibet, there are hundreds of political prisoners in Tibet, the majority of them Buddhist clergy. Scores have died from torture at the hands of Chinese authorities: electric shock, hanging, forced blood extraction. "They tried to pull my arms out of my sockets, and beat my legs and arms with metal bars and shocked me," recalls Phuntsog Nyidron, another nun who was imprisoned at Drapchi. "I was worried they could easily kill me." After repeated beatings, a monk named Lobsang Choephel hanged himself at Drapchi, his body dangling from the iron bars of his cell.

      The punishment was most severe for those who refused to give up their faith. "In Drapchi, there were numerous demonstrations," Zangmo says. One day, four nuns refused to renounce their Buddhist beliefs in front of the Chinese guards. "They were beaten until they died." Zangmo stares at the floor and starts to cry, her voice breaking. "They died together."


      --

      Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

  16. Internet addiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Saying "Internet Addiction" is like saying "Ethernet addiction". It means nothing.

    What is this guy doing for 15 hours? Is he chatting with friends? Young kids spend hours on the telephone before and this wasn't telephone addiction. Sure communication is better now, but simple chat rooms existed for modem users 20+ years ago. Nothing new there either.

    Is this guy playing games? Is he gambling? Is he looking at porn? Is he sending emails? What is he doing for 15 hours?

    The point being, the action that this person is doing online is what they are addicted to, not the network access. If you are addicted to looking at porn or playing games, for example, then that is the issue not "the Internet".

    What about kids who play their playstation for hours and hours on end? Is this and addiction?

    The bottom line is "the internet made me do it" is just another excuse.

    1. Re:Internet addiction? by alan.briolat · · Score: 1

      I wish I could get more people to see that "on the computer" or "on the internet" is not a single activity. Through most of my early teenage years I was always being referred to as "playing on the computer too much" when actually I was doing a combination of keeping in touch with people and writing software. Hardly "playing".

      Of course, now I'm a computer science/software engineering student, and 14 hours/day on a computer isn't exactly uncommon. But I'm not addicted - I can just as easily spend several days with barely any computer usage, and my favorite idea of a holiday generally involves not even having electricity (I like walking).

      I'm not sure whether or not this classification of "the Internet" as an addiction is the work of officials who are just plain clueless/out of touch, or of those with less innocent intentions.

      --
      I swear we should be allowed to give mod points to sigs... "-1, Offtopic"
  17. In America, we program Boot Camp. by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In Socialist China, boot camp programs you!

    --

    Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

    1. Re:In America, we program Boot Camp. by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Funny
      Umm, Can you just have GRUB program me instead? I'd rather not be proprietized.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:In America, we program Boot Camp. by lewp · · Score: 1

      First one of these I've gotten a laugh out of in a while. Well done.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    3. Re:In America, we program Boot Camp. by jZnat · · Score: 1

      But GRUB2 is the only bootloader known to work on your particular configuration. Have fun beta testing! :)

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    4. Re:In America, we program Boot Camp. by Peter+Trepan · · Score: 1

      (Score:0, Offtopic)

      I hate doing this to a joke, but here goes:

      Boot Camp is a program that simplifies the process of getting Windows/Linux/Whatever to boot on an Intel Mac alongside OS X. It was programmed by Apple, in California.

      But see, in this instance, the Chinese child went to an actual boot camp, where he was programmed (which is to say brainwashed) against the use of the internet.

      There. Now laugh.

      --

      Step into a huge movement. Don't Tread In Me.

  18. Heck by Fist!+Of!+Death! · · Score: 1

    If the UK had controls that booted you from online games after 5 hours half the IT support workforce would actually have to work come 14h00...

    --
    Nothing witty
  19. Only 15? by swillden · · Score: 1

    Sun found himself spending 15 hours or straight on the internet.

    Pah! Lightweight! Sure, he's got to sleep four or five hours per night, but what's he doing with the rest of the time?

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  20. Re:Way off topic don't bother wasting yr mod point by Zonk+(troll) · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's what Amanda Tapping blow up dolls are for...

    --
    "The Federal Reserve is a fraudulent system."--Lew Rockwell
    End The FED. -
  21. A Clockwork Internet by Helmholtz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Alex: You needn't take it any further, sir. You've proved to me that all this gold farming and internets is wrong, wrong, and terribly wrong. I've learned me lesson, sir. I've seen now what I've never seen before. I'm cured! Praise god! Dr. Brodsky: You're not cured yet, boy.

    --
    RFC2119
    1. Re:A Clockwork Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dr.:
      You're not cured yet, boy..... For you do not yet truly love big brother...

      We will help you, here take this... It will make the pain more bearable....

      Alex:

      What pain?....... ARRRRGH! YOU MONSTER!

      Dr.: Ahh yes, The treatment is going nicely. (PFZZZZZZZZT!)

      Dr.: We are doing this for your own good, orderly attach these to his testicles....

    2. Re:A Clockwork Internet by metlin · · Score: 1

      Spot on.

      That's exactly the thing that came to my mind. Dystopia, here I come. Oh, sorry. Dystopia, here I am.

    3. Re:A Clockwork Internet by Cernst77 · · Score: 1

      Yes, please get them off my MMORPG (SONY EQ2 Station Exchange servers) farming gold so that I can sell my gold at a higher price!!!! =D

  22. "The Internet" is exactly what? by noidentity · · Score: 1

    What exactly are these "addicted" people spending their time doing? "The Internet" is a lot of things. Are they chatting all day? Writing e-mail? Reading discussion forums and posting messages? Playing online games? Reading random web pages and articles? Downloading music and software? etc. At least they were more specific than "sitting at the computer" (as in, "the computer is EVIL!!!").

  23. Alternatives by moore.dustin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Internet addiction really boils down to needing to fill a need. People are often drawn to a certain area of the internet for whatever reason(most likely a personal interest in something), and then become connected to the community that they found there(anonymity makes it easy). If it were not for the social networks and communities online, what would people really have to do to consume that much time a day? Sure, exceptions are around where people do just that, but as for your everyday John Doe, he would not be able to fill that time without the online communities.

    The social aspect found online is the root of most internet addiction. Once people are able to fill the need to social interaction online, they are much more prone to addiction. Think of all the WOW addicts out there - They are almost all addicted to the social community, not the game itself.

    To curb this addiction, you need to present alternative to the addicted person which would fill the void being created by unplugging. These people will have to get that social interaction offline, but that is easier said than done for many. They may be shy, sheltered, socially inept, or any combinations of things which yield a socially awkward person. If an alternative cannot be presented to fulfill the need for social contact which is inviting and easily available, these people trying to cure an internet addiction are doomed to relapse over and over again.

  24. Im spending more than 14 hours on the net too by unity100 · · Score: 1

    - and making a career out of it through programming. Ah, also im meeting various capable professionals, colleagues, crazy gamers, noticeably high i.q. women.

    And what those parents were wanting their children to do in future for a living - pottery ?

    1. Re:Im spending more than 14 hours on the net too by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Hey, those Chinese kids have to get off their butts, stop messing with "the internet" and start getting low paying jobs in factories to make stuff for Walmart so that the US people can keep buying it with money they don't have, that was borrowed from banks. Money that's printed by the Feds, backed by bonds bought by the Central Bank of China (and the Bank of Japan).

      I hope you understand it's a pretty delicate situation, if too many Chinese kids and other people don't do the "right thing", the whole scheme could fall apart a bit earlier than _expected_.

      --
    2. Re:Im spending more than 14 hours on the net too by Ontology42 · · Score: 1

      Don't knock pottery, or carpentry for that matter they both lead to pot addictions. And trades will make a huge comeback when the net goes dark after that whole net neutrality is lost.... Then it will be the pot smoking carpenters that rule the world with the geeks a close second....

  25. Ulterior Motive by KermodeBear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I believe that China takes internet 'addiction', or usage of it at all, very seriously because of the access to information it provides. Information that China would rather censor. This is a perfect excuse to indoctrinate.

    --
    Love sees no species.
    1. Re:Ulterior Motive by melikamp · · Score: 1

      That does not make sense to me. I would not expect a boy who spends 15 hours a day on the Internet to be the next MLK as the result of his addiction. Nah, they just treat it as a disease because of their strong collectivist inclinations. On their view, people who are useless to the state should be re-educated; it may be unpleasant to the individual, but the individual is nothing aprat from the state.

    2. Re:Ulterior Motive by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      Don't you know what those young kids in China do online or you are simply afraid to see what you see? P0rn and WoW.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
  26. Human Rights Watch: Abuse of Psychiatry in China by reporter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    According to a report issued by Human Rights Watch in 2006 March 17, "The systematic abuse of psychiatry for political purposes in China became internationally known in late 1999, when large numbers of Falungong practitioners were reportedly interned in psychiatric hospitals. However, experts have long asserted that political abuse of psychiatry in China includes among its victims several other main target groups. In August 2002, GIP and HRW jointly published a 298-page report, 'Dangerous Minds: Political Psychiatry in China Today and its Origins in the Mao Era', which detailed China's extensive use of psychiatric detention as a means of silencing political dissidents, spiritual nonconformists, trade union activists, whistleblowers, and others. The report estimated that since the early 1980s more than 3,000 people had been incarcerated on such grounds."

    One political dissident in China was imprisoned for 13 years in a psychiatric hospital.

    That the Chinese government imprisons an Internet addict at the request of his own parents should surprise no one. The Chinese, not merely the government, regularly abuse psychiatry to achieve social or political goals.

    The Chinese entity that is psychologically ill is not the Internet addict, the political dissident, or the other victims improperly imprisoned for supposed psychological problems.

    Rather, the Chinese entity that is psychologically ill is Chinese society itself.

  27. And then? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    I wonder what his 85th birthday party will be like.

  28. Follow up... by RingDev · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    AKAImBatman's parents, in a fit of desperation, have turned to the state government for assistance in raising their kin. Hilarity expected soon. Stay tuned for details.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  29. Par for the course buddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep in mind the country this is in.

    This is a country where people get "disappeared" all the time for saying the wrong thing or acting the wrong way.

    1. Re:Par for the course buddy by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      And that is different than the US in how? Even has the "rest of your life mapped out" reeducation camp too.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  30. Wow. Incredible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never would have thought China ... CHINA, for God's sake ... would treat it's people like THAT. It's just so hard to believe ... I mean, the egg rolls are just SOOOOO good. And the fried wontons ... awesome. You have to try the Mu Shu Chicken, too ... BEST thing I've ever eaten from a cardboard box with a little metal handle on it, EVER.

    Well, all I can say is Wang Chow won't be getting any tip from me next time he delivers. Take that, you Red Menace, you.

  31. OMFG! Communism is just like the society by wiredog · · Score: 1

    laid out in Orwell's 1984! What a coincidence!

    1. Re:OMFG! Communism is just like the society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've always thought that 1984 was written initially about the perils of Catholicism and not communism, but orwell saw an opportunity to have a go at the soviet union and...well the rest is history.

      if you don't believe me check out the bits where winston first meets o'brien and they drink communion together. there are other examples but thats the best.

      good satire none the less and probably the only good book that he wrote.

    2. Re:OMFG! Communism is just like the society by maxume · · Score: 1

      *Banging head against wall*

      If you meant that they used it as a guide to fun things to do in an authoritarian society, let me know so I can stop.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:OMFG! Communism is just like the society by oddfox · · Score: 0, Troll

      China, communist? Hah, as if. China has been a totalitarian, oppressive and increasingly capitalistic nation for quite a long time now. It's called fascism, with Mussolini as the chief architect in the past and many world leaders the perfectors through time. Communism is an economic policy, nothing more. To pretend Communism has anything to do with throwing kids into rehab for "internet addiction" is quite silly. Thanks for playing though.

      Good book, by the way.

      --
      "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
  32. It's not just kids by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a raging debate in modern penal and support systems about whether the punishment/treatment does more harm than good. I'm sure you've heard someone say before that sending a first-time offender to prison only connects them with hardened, experienced criminals to learn from, and that's often the case. When inmates get out of prison they're not penitent for their crimes: they're smarter about how not to get caught next time.

    On the other hand how can we address problems like this? Some people need monitored care, but outside of someone taking direct and personal responsibility for the individual we just can't do better than insitutionalizing someone right now.

    Unless, you know, direct and personal responsibility for youth = parenting. But that's a can of worms I'm sure nobody wants to address.

    --
    --- Need web hosting?
    1. Re:It's not just kids by maxume · · Score: 1

      Forehead tattoos.

      In a less Stephensonian bent, we would do well to get over the idea that crimes don't all need to be treated with such a narrow range of punishments. Marijuana may well be a problem, but it isn't particularly productive to be detaining people that are caught with it; it probably makes a lot more sense to just take it away, and maybe fine people that are caught with *lots* of it. If there are even 100,000 people imprisoned on marijuana related charges, that translates directly to tens of thousands of police that you can go ahead and put on the street(if better enforcement makes sense).

      The 'damage to society' someone causes when they smoke a joint is distinctly out of proportion to the damage caused to society by putting someone in a cell for about 4 hours, so I find it a compelling example, but there are lots and lots of others. The problem is that person A wants to put person B in a cell for being 'bad', while person B is often not aware of having done anything other than be.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  33. Chinese scientists can also control you in flight by woohoo76 · · Score: 1

    Anybody else see the article about them controling pidgeons in flight? Pull up Pidgeoto!!!

  34. Why simply spell checking won't cut it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poster wanted "wean" here, not "ween"

    wean 1 |w?n| verb [ trans. ] accustom (an infant or other young mammal) to food other than its mother's milk. accustom (someone) to managing without something on which they have become dependent or of which they have become excessively fond : the doctor tried to wean her off the sleeping pills.

    ween |w?n| verb [ intrans. ] archaic be of the opinion; think or suppose : he, I ween, is no sacred personage.

  35. Soviet Russia Soviet China? by Diordna · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it's time for a new joke.

  36. Newsflash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    noticeably high i.q. women.

    Not everybody on the 'net that claims to be female has the prerequisite equipment to make such a claim...

    1. Re:Newsflash! by unity100 · · Score: 1

      thats very old news, if you will

  37. How not to treat internet addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This might be a little off-topic but it reminded me of a news article I read one morning when I was in China last summer.

    A couple locked their teenage son in their own home to prevent him from sneaking out at night to internet cafes while the parents were out. There was a fire. The boy died. When they found him after the fire, the metal anti-burglary bars on their window were bent in the kid's attempt to escape. His body was found still clinging to those bars.

    1. Re:How not to treat internet addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the metal anti-burglary bars on their window were bent in the kid's attempt to escape.

      Anti burglary bars? Riiiiight. I smell so much BS here, I feel like I need to wipe your post off my screen with a roll of charmin. You obviously have NOT been to China. If you had, you would know it is quite communal (in every SENSE and APPLICATION of the word) And even where rich ex-pats live, there are no anti-burglary bars (just a guard or two for the compound). Travel outside along the rural parts of China and you will see most people have holes in floors for a toilet. And you wish everyone else here to believe they can afford metal bars for a house?! You, sir, need to quit reading internet folk tales and applying them as you see fit to the circumstance.

  38. Ghost In the Shell by Garrett+Fox · · Score: 1

    I'm reminded of Ghost In the Shell: Stand-Alone Complex (the anime series), in which a secretive group treats kids with a form of Internet addiction. The treatment actually consists of using them to create and crack security codes.

    --
    Revive the Constitution.
  39. Re:Human Rights Watch: Abuse of Psychiatry in Chin by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

    It isn't political psychiatry in the sense that it is used to further political power, but the basic idea of using psychiatry as an end run around law to get rid of undesirables is not just a symptom of Chinese society.

    --
    ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
  40. Internet? Or Online games? by TheGreatGraySkwid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All the stories I've seen on this have just used the vague tag "Internet Addiction," but it seems like most of the individual stories I've seen described involve addiction to an online strategy or RPG game of one sort or another. This imprecision bugs me intensely, since addiction to online gaming seems like quite a different beast from, say, /. addiction.

    Has anyone seen accounts of "addiction" that weren't gaming related?

    --
    The Humblest Mollusk on the Net
  41. Re: Swapping Internet for Drugs by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    Led by Tao Ran, a military researcher who built his career by treating heroin addicts, the clinic uses a tough-love approach that includes counseling, military discipline, drugs, hypnosis and mild electric shocks.
    Yea... cause we all know the cure sounds far better than the cancer
    --
    Disclaimer: I am not god.
    We may not be created equal
    But we can be treated equal.
  42. WoW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe this will reduce the number of "chinese farmers"

  43. Communists fear internet. What else is new? by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    So the ruling Chinese Communists fear the internet. What else is new?

    Basically the more time that people spend on the internet, the more likely they are to come across a source of unfiltered news and history about the actions of the Chinese Communist party. Since all communists and fascists rely on total control of news and information sources as part of their political control, it stands to reason that any access to an uncontrolled source of news and information would be a grounds for a diagnosis of mental disorder.

        The Soviets did the same thing. The Cubans are still doing the same thing.

        If someone is fanatically using the internet in China to find a way to worm through the security systems of the US Defense Department, then they can spend 24 hours a day, 365 days a year on the net without having the slightest trace of any internet-induced mental disorder.

        The Chinese government is 100% full of shit. Just read the history of the 20th century for China, its Communist government, and the millions of lives that they have destroyed and tell me that this is not so.

  44. Thought Crimes and thought control 101. by kabocox · · Score: 1

    Um, there isn't a difference between socialist state, a police state, a religious state, or an athiest communist state. All the states want their citizens to be uniform and instinctively follow the behavior the governmental model demands. Thought control is fundmental to action action. If most of your population doesn't just think, but know that crimes are impossible to commit without either the state or god watching them, then most of your population will follow your dictates. You can actually ignore the .01% of people that actually try to think. It's usually better to funnel those people into R&D universities so those ideas are all contained in an isolated environment. All scientists and those on the science career track ought to be keep away from the general citizenry for both groups own good. The scientists should never be allowed to directly communicate to the general citizens as that might give the scientists power or disrupt the general harmony of the general population. All sciencists should be treated like scared holy virgins and never allowed to be spoken to except by a special priest or governmental official. Most governmental officals actually running things and knowning the state of the things shouldn't be allowed near the general population either. They need to be isolated just as the scientists need to be isloated.

    The general population needs to stay busy, stay feed, stay happy, and most importantly stay in their mental boxes. As long as you have enough entertainers or a nice safe religion to follow, most of your population will be perfectly happy. I've left out the role of teachers and education, but that's just to setup the mental boxes on the general population and ID those that need to be funneled into science or government posts.

    1. Re:Thought Crimes and thought control 101. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      It's fortunate that most Democracies are nothing like that. Every citizen is an independent thinking individual. None of this evil communist conformist crap.

      After all, the Left-wing Party and Right-wing Party are poles apart. They are as different as the Good guys and the Bad guys in Pro Wrestling.

      How more obvious can it be. Left is on one side, Right is on the other side. Like the difference between the Communist Red corner and the Freedom Blue corner. Or the Axis of Evil and the Coalition of the Good!

      And the wonderful thing about modern democracy is you have the freedom to choose any of those choices! :p

      --
  45. Re:Way off topic don't bother wasting yr mod point by metlin · · Score: 1

    Just because her reproductive organs are on the inside and not on the outside doesn't mean you make a blow up doll out of her! How dare you!

  46. Re:Human Rights Watch: Abuse of Psychiatry in Chin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    "The systematic abuse of psychiatry for political purposes in China became internationally known in late 1999, when large numbers of Falungong practitioners were reportedly interned in psychiatric hospitals

    Abuse? Do you have any idea what Falun Gong members believe? You would HAVE to be mentally ill to believe all that crap about gaining salvation through a magic wheel turning in your stomach, implanted psychically by your human cult leader who calls himself a god and who demands your abject allegiance. Calling Falun Gong a "meditation technique" is like calling Scientology a "personality development system." It's a whole lot more insidious than that, and the Chinese government should be commended for protecting its citizens from such mind-bending evil.

  47. Troll? Wtf? by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 1

    Who modded this troll???


    Someone who's never seen the sketch, I guess. Or someone with no sense of humour. And ruthless efficiency.

  48. Dear Sun Jiting by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    Dear Sun Jiting,

    I read your story with interest. You sound like you are a fine young man. Once you are released, please see me concerning employment at my Network Operations Centre in Shanghai...

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  49. Here's an idea... by kidcharles · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Before sending him off to boot camp, maybe the parents could try taking away his computer. Or, here's another crazy thought, letting him go online for only 2 hours a day. If he goes to an internet cafe instead, regulate how often he can go outside the house. How did the solution to this problem become locking him up in a cage hundreds of miles from home?

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  50. well, as we all know by mustardayonnaise · · Score: 1

    INTERNETS: SERIOUS BUSINESS

  51. Re:Compulsive behavior is not bad--just the Intern by dave562 · · Score: 1
    The need to organize your life 50+ years into the future is not far from the compulsion to spend 15 hours a day on the Internet. In fact, I would maintain that it is potentially a more destructive behavior.

    This seems like a good enough place to comment.

    I too latched onto that notion of having his life planned out far into the future. I think that it might be a cultural thing for the Chinese. I study a Chinese (Daoist) martial art. My sifu has been training the art since he was 6. A few times a year he teaches a philosophy class at the temple. One of the things that he emphasized in the last class was prioritizing and planning ahead. When he was a kid, he came up with a list of ten things that he wanted to do before he was fourty. Now he has a list of ten things that he wants to do before he dies.

    I guess the point that I'm trying to make is that long term planning might be inherent in the culture of Chinese civilization. Conversely, that penchant for long term planning might be misunderstood here in a America, a country that hasn't even been around for three hundred years yet.

    I think that the perception of the need to be organized for 50+ years into the future is a bit overblown. More than likely what happened is that it was suggested (probably pretty strongly given the sounds of things) that the "addict" in question take a long, hard look at where he wants to go in life. Then once he decided where he wanted to go, he came up with a plan on how to get there. We could debate whether or not the "choice" he made about what to do with his life was "right" or not, however I think you'd have to be a fool to debate the fact that cultivating long term thinking in children is a good thing.

  52. anyone know by dweebzilla · · Score: 1

    Anyone know what his slashdot ID is?

    --
    Get your tagline off my lawn.
  53. Very Encouraging News, If Your an Economic Rival by skeptictank · · Score: 1

    This implies that China's culture still has the strong strain of technophobia and fear of the new that has plagued it for the last 500 years. Chinese culture, with the full support of the government, is actively discouraging the development of a tinkerer culture. Anyone with the level of interest and inclination to innovate is likely to spend much of their life in a re-education camp.

  54. In one way or another this guy needed help by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Sun found himself spending 15 hours or straight on the internet

    In one way or another this guy needed help.
    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  55. Insensitive clod! by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    Lucky little bastards. In my day, we had to buy our own drugs, at great risk and expense! Nowadays it's all Mommy and Daddy and the health insurance. Bah.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  56. only 15 hours? by eneville · · Score: 1

    15 hours is really nothing. it's easy to go 15 hours on the internet, but i work at an ISP so i kind of have to. the only breaks i get are driving to/from my place of work. aside from that, i'm quite happy to do this if it's for the better good of keeping things running smoothly. what's really so bad about spending a lot of time working? there are a lot of worse things that a internet user can be doing.

    i quite agree that children/teenagers should learn to do things away from the internet, if and only if they are doing things that are not beneficial to themselves or others. i consider idle messaging/forums to be a bad use of time (/. excluded).

  57. Reeducation camp by Lazarian · · Score: 1

    In the case of China, I don't believe that trying to cure people of a dubious internet "addiction" is their intent. It's probably more along the lines of having people believe that individuals who actively communicate over the net, having access to knowledge and ideas that are not controlled by the state is a sign of some sort of disease. China does everything possible to isolate its population from ideas of democracy and freedom. A google.ch search on Tianamen Square yields vastly different results than a Google search from anywhere else. Having people who have access to information that is not sanctioned by the state is a danger to a government that seeks to completely control its populace, so they brand them as being "sick", and cart them off for "treatment".

  58. 1.9 servings per person per day! by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    If we are going to talk about drugs that are mass marketed, we might as well go for the big one.

    Caffeine?

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:1.9 servings per person per day! by maxume · · Score: 1

      Assuming a mug of coffee is more than 1 serving, I'm more than doing my part.

      I am curious, but feeling too lazy to compare the advertising budgets of the various coffee and alcohol concerns.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  59. Forming a band by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay; I am so forming a band called "The Electric Teat."

    Anyone want in with me?

    In the immortal words of Travis from ATHF, "Thank you bitch. Suck it dry!"

  60. Re:Very Encouraging News, If Your an Economic Riva by koreth · · Score: 1

    If you define "tinker" and "innovate" as "sit there playing World of Warcraft all day," anyway. Which is pretty much what you see if you walk into any Internet cafe in a major Chinese city, if my experience there is typical. Occasionally I'd see someone reading email, but mostly it's WoW from one end of the cafe to the other.

  61. Wait a second... by theworldisflat · · Score: 1

    If this keeps up, there will be no one to farm gold in WoW. The horror!!!!

  62. This is a completely deferent story by lxt518052 · · Score: 1
    I'm not defending the Internet Censorship. But this story has nothing to do with it. These teenagers are not on the net searching for government sanctioned information. They are addicted to online games, chatrooms, and porn.

    The treatment their parents use do look a bit radical. But I can perfectly understand how these parents think. The kid is their only hope in many families and he/she is reduced to a piece of internet junk. What will you do if you're in that position?

    --
    People who dislike China tend to mention Tiananmen Square a lot, but they always forget the Tank Man is also a Chinese.
    1. Re:This is a completely deferent story by Lazarian · · Score: 1

      Point taken. I probably jumped the gun by implying censorship being the main motivation behind the program. Addiction to being online seems to be a growing problem, and I certainly wouldn't like seeing my family or friends with a problem like that. But I can't help but think that the Chinese government wouldn't mind the idea of having the internet being painted as an evil vice and that people who access it should be rigorously monitored by their family, lest one becomes a victim of addiction. And the statement "Thanks to his parents' intervention and the treatment, he now has life mapped out until he's 84." makes it seem that he was "treated" for more than just being an internet addict.

    2. Re:This is a completely deferent story by lxt518052 · · Score: 1
      And the statement "Thanks to his parents' intervention and the treatment, he now has life mapped out until he's 84." makes it seem that he was "treated" for more than just being an internet addict.

      I have to say this does sound a bit creepy to people who haven't seen a typical Chinese family before. For those who have, this is actually a tongue-in-cheek statement. Chinese parents' love for their kid (no plural because of the one-child policy) is quite unique. They are willing to do anything to make the kid a better future. Anything indeed. The expectation is so high that many kids find it unbearable. The parents actually plan ahead for their kid when he/she is still very young and still tend to take care of everything for him/her in his/her late 20s. All these do in effect kills the child's personal freedom and independence in many cases. But in the name of the child's own good, many are still to realize its harm.

      The last thing I'd like to stress again here. Although China is still under the communist party's rule, Chinese parents are just as loving as parents in any other country. I find it really distasteful to demonize everything Chinese just because of the ruling party's unfortunate name. As many have pointed out here, the Chinese government now favours as much capitalism as any country on the planet. It's just that values well established in the west, such as civil liberty, independent jurisdiction, and democracy, have not gain enough ground in the past 30 years of economical achievement.

      If one look back in history, similar situations is not hard to find in the western countries, even in not so distant past.

      --
      People who dislike China tend to mention Tiananmen Square a lot, but they always forget the Tank Man is also a Chinese.
  63. Propaganda. Propaganda. Propaganda. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Funny
    Is this story true? Maybe. How would we know?

    And what difference does it make? Reporting this stuff is just another way to say, "The hobbits at the other end of the shire are sort of queer. i.e., Let's support our government in spending billions to create a cold war when we could otherwise get on with our lives. All this peace business is bad for the bottom line."

    Oooh. And the story comes direct from the Startribune news service. How shiek. They never report biased pre-fab crap because their bosses don't want to have the IRS come knocking or have their dog vanish or their job vaporize. Thank-you, the CIA. We love you ever so cuddly very much we do!


    -FL

  64. That's enough to make you go crazy by Machtyn · · Score: 1

    Sorry if this is a repeat...

    The 17-year-old high school student is not allowed to communicate with friends back home, and his only companions are psychologists, nurses and other patients

    That's enough to make you go crazy!

  65. The internet is not by Zephyr14z · · Score: 1

    The internet is not clockwork. It's a series of tubes.

  66. Brainwashed Nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Information from the internet may lead to critical thinking, this is what they are trying to stop.

  67. Censorship by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

    So, basically, if I view too many democratically-oriented websites in China, the government can claim that I have a mental disorder and take me away. Brilliant.

    Even if they don't do this, limiting people's Internet access should help avoid having lots of Chinese people being edu^H^H^Hindoctrinated by "foreigners".

  68. Re:Soviet Russia Soviet China? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

    Slashdot treats running jokes very seriously.

  69. Re:Human Rights Watch: Abuse of Psychiatry in Chin by Pollardito · · Score: 1

    According to a report issued by Human Rights Watch in 2006 March 17, "The systematic abuse of psychiatry for political purposes in China became internationally known in late 1999..." if only they had Tom Cruise over there to educate them about the evils of psychiatry, they're just as misinformed as Matt Lauer!
  70. Boot camps for kids don't work by ndogg · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember some places here in the US trying similar such boot camps for troubled teens, and to my knowledge they didn't work.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  71. Re:Internet? Or Online games? by quincunx55555 · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine from China told me about how video games are viewed negatively there. He told me this about 10 years ago, actually. He recalled a public service announcement where children and parents are warned about people that inject highly addictive drugs into people while they're at the arcade to get them "hooked". Apparently the arcade games over there are so intense, you wouldn't notice someone sticking a needle in you. And to think, they haven't made Go illegal.

  72. Coffee by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    I couldn't find that, but you might find the statistics here interesting, they have a breakdown of coffee consumption in kg per year per capita, in various countries. The USA isn't anywhere near the top of the list. Those Northern Europeans are way ahead of us.

    http://www.coffeeresearch.org/market/consumption.h tm

    I suspect that their advertising budgets aren't as high, because in general coffee and other caffeine-based beverages don't have the image or PR problems that alcohol does. I doubt that alcohol producers spent much money on advertising, when anyone could buy their products, regardless of age, and there was no social stigma associated with drinking them at any time. A lot of alcohol advertising isn't necessarily the promotion of one product specifically (or isn't just the promotion of one brand or product) but is the promotion of the product in general. E.g. the Sam Adams commercial where a young guy and a few flunkies are at a business lunch with the big boss, and the young guy orders a beer, the flunkies order non-alcoholic drinks, and then the big boss decides to get a beer, too. In addition to just promoting the brand (Sam Adams), they're also promoting the whole concept of drinking beer in the middle of the day, in a business situation, which might or might not be thought of as appropriate. You don't run into that a lot with coffee. Nobody's going to get judgemental on you for drinking caffeine at any time of the day or night (well, although they might wonder about your sanity if it's 2AM). Coffee advertising is mostly about the promotion of one brand over another; it's internecine.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  73. Re:Way off topic don't bother wasting yr mod point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She needs to open the iris on her worm hole. My team needs to go through.

  74. Re:Human Rights Watch: Abuse of Psychiatry by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    There was a rash of these articles in American context recently as well.

    And wasn't it just a few stories back that we were all "more productive now that we were fully online (at work). ... So tell me where young IT staff is supposed to train & practice... I know! Offline!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  75. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Government large enough to employ censorship, indoctrination, and behavioral conditioning against its subject class does exactly that. Story at 11:30.

    (D'oh, the US government is also large enough to do that! Guess what?)

  76. Re:Propaganda. Propaganda. Propaganda. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah I mean China has such a great track record with human rights. So why should we believe something this crazy?!

  77. Not surprising... by SeePage87 · · Score: 1

    ...China treats everything Seriously.

  78. High Order is Unstable by Unlikely_Hero · · Score: 1

    Trying to put an inherently chaotic thing (humanity) (and chaotic does not mean disorderly) in a nice square box and expecting it to work is an example of pure stupidity.
    Nothing in existence that is highly orderly lasts very long. Highly ordered things decay and break down quickly.
    Perhaps China is on the same place in its timeline Soviet Russia was when it diagnosed many with "Sluggishly Progressing Schizophrenia" (a 'disease' they could diagnose anyone with) and put them in "psych wards" (read: hell).

    There will always be sad little kings of sad little hills claiming to know the truth and trying to force others into believing them.
    In the end they are wrong
    In the end I am wrong too
    In the end everyone is wrong about everything. We can only hope to find a decent approximation. To claim that we know the absolute truth and moreso to force others to follow is disgusting.

    This is why communism does not work
    This is why socialism does not work
    This is why no form of government works, ever. This is why a 'utopian' society is impossible.

    Please excuse my rant.

    --
    Happiness does not come from having much, but from being attached to little.
  79. Women by king-manic · · Score: 1

    A contributing factor to Chinese online addiction may be the situation with women. They now have a stastistically significant difference between number of women and number of men. Also the cultural shifts in the last 40 years or so have resulted in everything a chinese man is taught about women is wrong. Those that don't adapt or have some advantage will not get a girl friend.

    In some villages your hopes of getting married withuot haveing a sister is 0. The families set up marriges of their children to each other or some arcane arrangement similiar to that.

    This leaves a non trivial minority in a position where the only compainionship they can get has to be paid for. Its enough to drive anyone to addictions.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  80. Re:Propaganda. Propaganda. Propaganda. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yeah I mean China has such a great track record with human rights. So why should we believe something this crazy?!

    That's not the point. The point is that China has been fascist for a very long time. The question we can benefit from asking is, "Why is China in the news now?" Five years ago, nobody cared what China did. It was a big blank spot on public perception. That's no longer the case. The spotlight of media attention doesn't swing around unless it is being pushed.


    -FL

  81. Re:Internet? Or Online games? by dukieduke · · Score: 1

    Porn?

  82. On a more serious note by Lockejaw · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine once disappeared into a mental health hospital for two weeks, and nobody had any idea where he'd gone. Everyone was relieved to finally hear from him once he got out.

    --
    (IANAL)
  83. Re:Human Rights Watch: Abuse of Psychiatry in Chin by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    If you want to read something scary, read through this site.

    The same thing is happening right here at home. The subject matter is different, but process is the same.

    It gives me nightmares knowing that this could happen to my son or daughter.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  84. Re:Human Rights Watch: Abuse of Psychiatry in Chin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    See? The US is completely different than China. We call "political dissidents, spiritual nonconformists, trade union activists, whistleblowers, and others" liberals, and we just call them evil - perhaps sent by Satan himself, and in league with Al Queda - and most definitely, not patriotic.

  85. Oppressive society? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever been to China? In major cities (like, the kind where they have broadband internet connections) life isn't all that much different than anywhere else.

    Ignorant schmuck.

  86. Yeah right... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    Don't fool yourself. If their parents just let them do whatever they want, they'd be trying drugs and having sex when they're 13 and dropping out of school and running away. Then they wouldn't be able to get jobs as strippers because they'd be under 18, so they'd become prostitutes instead. And they'd be doing drugs because you can't buy alcohol when you're under 21. So by forcibly keeping them out of that stuff until they're 18, the parents are protecting them until they have more options.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:Yeah right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that you can't buy drugs when you're under 21 as well, so I don't see how being under 21 means she'll turn to drugs. Plenty of kids underage drink, get a decent fake I.D. and no one cares enough to stop you from buying.

  87. Hardcore in China by milatchi · · Score: 0

    They're hardcore in China!

    --
    Slashdot = -1 Redundant, Asperger, kdawson FUD, Libertarian, and Linux
  88. Re:Internet? Or Online games? by TheGreatGraySkwid · · Score: 1

    Where did you see a story saying that these Chinese folks were addicted to online porn?

    --
    The Humblest Mollusk on the Net
  89. Double Standard by BlueCollarCamel · · Score: 1

    This whole 'internet addiction' is just one large double-standard pile of crap. If someone were to play a sport for 15 hours a day, they would be considered a star athelete. Someone chooses to use the computer, and it's considered a detrimental addiction. Granted, the sports may be better for you physically, but at the same time use of the computer could be providing the mental challenge you couldn't get anywhere else.

    --
    1&1 - Cheap domain and web hosting.
  90. WoW addicts not socially inept by DoubleReed · · Score: 1

    Hey, just wanted to chime in. I've met some of the "leaders" of my WoW guild in person. Let me just say that well they all had some aspects in common, social ineptness was not among them.

    They were all:
    • unemployed
    • young (early 20s)
    • financed by parents
    • well dressed and sociable

    Not to sound racist, but they were also all Asian (although I don't think this was a factor), and all grew up in USA.

    I don't know what you want to call "addicted", but they were all doing 4 hour+ instances several times a week. It wasn't like they were junkies or anything, but the gaming schedule would be impractical with a job.

    1. Re:WoW addicts not socially inept by moore.dustin · · Score: 1

      I led a very large and successful guild for a year or so too. We raided for progression nearly every day with extensive schedules and requirements. I was employed for about half of that time, though my hours were flexible. I was in my young 20's, was not financed by my parents, and I am very social. I, however; was not Asian :) - Exceptions exist, especially at the top of large guilds, since that is a leadership position which would not appeal to someone anti-social. Im looking at the rest of the group when I make my observations. The "average" hardcore player.

  91. Re: KF Before we get all high and mighty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These types of places definately still exist. They are called treatement programs for "at risk teens" These places have a huge and slightly underground industry in our economy. From what I recall there are three main types of these programs, lockdown, wilderness, and boarding school. The lockdown variety basically strips the teen of everything they have and puts them in a literal "lock down" situation. I dont know alot about them other than there is alot of therapy involved. The wilderness variety takes the teen out into the wilderness with some type of crew and they are taught how to fend for themselves in the woods while learning about how their "addiction" is bad and how to overcome it. The boarding school mixes a boarding high school with treatment. With most of these programs the teen has no contact with the outside world besides their parents and the length of the programs vary. The wilderness programs can last around 10 weeks. The boarding school and lockdowns can last for years, the one I went to (more later) had a minimum stay of 18 months but i knew people that had been there for 3+ years! Each place has its own way of treating the teens such as religion, psychological therapy and even Alcoholics Anonymous's 12-Steps. These schools are so prominant that there are "educational consultants" that parents hire to find the exact match of school for their child. There is even companys called "escourts" who will sent two men in a police style vechical who are trained to forcifully take the teen to the treatment center. The escourts are often excops who didn't make enough money. An escourting can cost $4000 and the wilderness programs can cost $30,000 for 10 weeks. The boarding schools can cost $100,000 a year.
    Now back to my expierience. I went to a one of the boarding school variety for 18 months. I personally needed it. At the age of 17 i was a garbage head when it came to drugs and was going end up dead soon. I was escourted to the boarding school when i was almost 18 years old. I went unwillingly and put up a fight at first but after some time that i was a drug addict and needed some kinda help. So when i turned 18 and the option came for me to leave I stayed. Now i needed it but many of the kids i saw there did not at all. Their parents sent them there because they couldn't deal with the fact that little bobbie decided to try smoking alittle weed one day and was stupid enough to get caught. poor bobbie (theoretical person) was then subjected so so many strange practices you wouldn't beleive me if i told you. people who i describe the place i went to think its a cult. BUT IT DID SAVE MY LIFE. like i said before i had tasted death so many times before i got "sent away" that it was a miracle that i was still alive. I lived through multiple ODs and being at the bad end of a gun 5 times and shots fired once. That place helped me get my life back on track and i'm now in college on my way to a new career. The school also helped me make over 100 felonies never appear on my record. BUT NOT EVERYONE NEEDS THIS TYPE OF EXTREME i did but little bobbie didn't. You were completely cut off from the outside world. No tv no phone no internet nothing. you couldn't call any of your old friends to let them know you 'd be away for awhile (loooong time for a teen) you only got a five minute phone call with your parents every week and you couldn't even make ur first call until 30 days after you got there.
    Anyways point is some need them but many that are there dont. i'll end my rant bye everyone

  92. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please. Good comment.

  93. Re:Human Rights Watch: Abuse of Psychiatry in Chin by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

    And are other religions any better? Or are you atheist/agnostic?

    --
    OSx86 FTW
  94. Re:Human Rights Watch: Abuse of Psychiatry in Chin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That must be some kind of special water, btw, is much better than killing... killing enemies against Islam will gain yourself a place in the heaven.. Jihad!

  95. Re:Human Rights Watch: Abuse of Psychiatry in Chin by Wes+Janson · · Score: 1

    Cults are just nature's way of genetically trimming out gullibility in humans.

  96. Take a moment to look at what you're defending by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

    I mean specifically. Quoting the great-grandparent for you:

    "Actually, she came out very stepford like. It's a very effective program and uses a lot of cult-like techniques including complete isolation from even the parents until the kids acheive certain states. And like 1984, it's not enough for the kids to say he is holding up four fingers when he is holding up one- the people running it are wise to that and the kids have to believe it before being allowed privileges."

    Alternatively:

    There are four lights!

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  97. Beware those who would cut you off from informatio by Kodack · · Score: 1

    Knowledge is power and I would be wary of any government who would treat the pursuit of it as a "mental disorder".

    The internet is a utility just like your gas or electric. Homes should have water, power, communication, and information.

    Labeling something an addiction or mental disorder, because it has become part of our lives, is a thinly veiled effort to prevent the free flow of information and keep people cut off and ignorant. China is one of the most restrictive industrial nations with regards to freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of information.

    Is it a mental disorder to read too many books instead of too many webpages?
    Is it a mental disorder to work 11 hours a day instead of learning or communicating?
    Is it a mental disorder to carry a cellphone 24 hours a day instead of having IM up 24 hours a day?
    If someone spends 4 hours a day commuting to work does that mean they are addicted to commuting?

    An addiction is something that is un-healthy and destructive to a persons life. The internet is no more an addictive thing than your water or gas utilities. It's just an information and communication utility, two things the Chinese government doesn't want people doing is talking and sharing information.

  98. Re:Internet? Or Online games? by dukieduke · · Score: 1

    At http://news3.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-10/08/cont ent_5176989.htm
    This cite doesn't single out the recent folks that prompted this thread. The roots of it begin there. The Chinese gov't feels porn is amongst the four usual suspects responsible for 90% of juvenile delinquency.
    "The statement announced that technical methods would be explored and applied to prevent teenagers from being harmed by unhealthy on-line information and help teenagers out of Internet addiction."
    "The authorities would also help set up more rehabilitation and treatment agencies for addicted youth. Response centers would be established to deal with complaints and reports of unhealthy on-line behavior."

    The roots of this proclamation have been set so that "unhealthy information" actually takes precedent.
    Looking at naked pictures of women, when you have been raised for the past 15 years in a society that has now gotten itself in a quandry with more males than females in many towns can be just the crime tossed against you when someone has decided you have accessed other "unhealthy information".

  99. Insane! by DynamicLynk · · Score: 1

    I am on the computer 9 - 11 hrs a day, that because it is my job. By no means am I an addict, sometime I wish I could throw it out the window. You say well that's because you are not having fun, actually we are allowed to use the net at work, any online gaming I do at home. Basically it comes down to the parent waiting till the kids or teens are in-to-deep, then they decide to do something about the compulsive disorder. Maybe if they took time to spend with their kids, go to church and accept Jesus as their savior and pray daily, they could live normal lives. I am by no means a saint, but I know when I have been on the PC/net to much, well that and my wife lets me know too :) Also I know I will likely get flammed to death for this, oh well it's just text. ;)

  100. also featured in "Farm Sluts" ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    This quote is also more-or-less featured in Farm Sluts, a short movie by Fox searchlight. view here at their site.
    Their Quicktime movies used to be a lot better in quality, too bad that flash applet is getting featured everywhere without download option...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..