Slashdot Mirror


Purdue Unveils a Tricorder

aeoneal writes "According to Science Daily, mass spectrometry is no longer limited to what can be taken to the lab. Purdue researchers have created a device they liken to a tricorder, a handy 20-lb. device that combines mass spectrometry with DESI (desorption electrospray ionization), allowing chemical composition to be determined outside of a vacuum chamber. Purdue suggests this could be useful for everything from detecting explosive substances or cancer to predicting disease. Researcher R. Graham Cooks says, 'We like to compare it to the tricorder because it is truly a hand-held instrument that yields information about the precise chemical composition of samples in a matter of minutes without harming the samples.'"

177 comments

  1. Obligatory... by garcia · · Score: 5, Funny

    a handy 20-lb. device

    "He's dead Jim."

    "Well, I dropped the tricorder on his head."

    1. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now if they could make it for $20, I would buy it.

    2. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, $200 in a USB version with Windows, Linux, and OSX drivers and a nice CD database of element/molecule signatures, I'd buy it. $500 in a Bluetooth version with PalmOS, Windows Mobile, and Symbian Java drivers and a 2GB MiniSD image for the database and I'd buy it.

    3. Re:Obligatory... by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

      On the plus side, if you get involved in any shirtless hand-to-hand combat with strangely humanoid aliens, you won't have to go looking for any styrofoam rocks.

    4. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Looks like a Soviet miniaturized tricorder.

    5. Re:Obligatory... by orielbean · · Score: 1

      I thought it was some new sort of delicious 3-headed chicken...

    6. Re:Obligatory... by ozbird · · Score: 1

      On the plus side, if you get involved in any shirtless hand-to-hand combat with strangely humanoid aliens, you won't have to go looking for any styrofoam rocks.

      ... but only if you fight in slow motion. "It's inertia, Jim."

    7. Re:Obligatory... by The_Rook · · Score: 1

      cut them some slack jack. they've still got a couple hundred years to miniaturize the thing.

      --
      when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
  2. smells like ... the future by chriss · · Score: 5, Funny

    In 1992 Harry Harrison (of SF fame) and Marvin Minsky (of AI fame) collaborated on The turing option, trying to merge Minsky's ideas about how an artificial mind could work with a SF story. Wasn't exactly a masterpiece, but there was an astonishing twist: In the book a brilliant scientist creates the first true AI and embeds it into a sort of fractal robot, whose arms are split into more arms like branches on a tree, ending with thousands of autonomous arms with their own vision each. And the first place this system is used (after being stolen): in agriculture, picking up bugs.

    So I will predict the first mass use of Purdue's Tricorder: Japanese toilets!!!. It can already recognize "biomarkers" in urine, so someone will build a cheap version of it into a toilet and every time you take a dump it will tell you what you should not have been eating, how sick you will be tomorrow and that if you continue that way your insurance won't cover your therapy. It will save the health systems billions.

    .

    Oh, and I'm serious about the toilet part.

    1. Re:smells like ... the future by greenbird · · Score: 1

      And the first place this system is used (after being stolen): in agriculture, picking up bugs.

      Now we know where all the bees are going.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    2. Re:smells like ... the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already predicted by Greg Bear in his novel Slant. Medi-toilets which tell you when you're sick by monitoring your wastes.

    3. Re:smells like ... the future by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

      how sick you will be tomorrow and that if you continue that way your insurance won't cover your therapy. It will save the health systems billions.

      You've seen 2057 on Discovery, I take it? :D

      --
      Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  3. pussies by Penguinshit · · Score: 5, Funny

    The research team has used the device to ... identify cocaine on $50 bills in less than 1 second.

    REAL playas use Benjamins to snort blow!

    1. Re:pussies by Prysorra · · Score: 3, Funny

      Where'd they get the cocaine? And it's actually an important point - everything that requires knowing what an material is made of is bound to be used EVERYWHERE.

      .......BEEP BEEP. ....MOM! Why is there broccoli in this??

    2. Re:pussies by rednip · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where'd they get the cocaine? Well, since studies have shown that up to 4 out of 5 circulated bills have traces of cocaine, I'd say that it was fairly easy. However, before you try to smoke your $50s, the amount per bill is very small (16 micrograms).
      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    3. Re:pussies by AndersOSU · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had a colleague who was testing out a new mass-spec machine (probably similar to the one in TFA) to verify cleanliness between campains at a plant site. The machine had been developed for use in airports, and the software already contained the profiles for a number of drugs and explosives. Apparently, as the sibling points out, coke is on a lot of our money. Most of the time it is in the ppb level, which could be transfer from money that was with money that was with money that was with coke. Occasionally however a bill would show 100 - 1000x the typical amount, we concluded that those were bills that made it into peoples noses.

      A related note, a lot of money on the also has measurable levels of meth.

      I don't think the point to this how much money is involved in drug trade, but rather how inter-connected out money is, and how good our analytical chemistry techniques are.

      Although... a terrorist would probably be using money that hasn't been in wide circulation - perhaps we could spot them by seeing if too much money any individual is carrying is devoid of drugs.

    4. Re:pussies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      REAL playas use Benjamins to snort blow!

      Purdue ain't cheap. Neither is coke.

    5. Re:pussies by mastershake_phd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Although... a terrorist would probably be using money that hasn't been in wide circulation - perhaps we could spot them by seeing if too much money any individual is carrying is devoid of drugs.
       
      What a great logical conclusion. I can just see a politician/cop/prosecutor thinking this. Clean money = terrorist. Dirty money = drug user. Lockem up!

    6. Re:pussies by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      You can actually buy cocaine from pharmaceutical companies.

      Well, not *you* specifically. But research chemists can get it, it's just another compound. It requires an inordinate amount of paperwork for some reason though. And a few checks (no, not the cash kind, background checks, proposed use,etc). And you're going to have to keep it under lock and key.

      But apart from that, yeah, you can get it.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    7. Re:pussies by kypper · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a market for purification if you ask me.

    8. Re:pussies by compro01 · · Score: 1

      You can actually buy cocaine from pharmaceutical companies.

      on a side note, i believe it's still used for some types of facial reconstruction surgury.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    9. Re:pussies by palad1 · · Score: 1

      Coke-heads will soon rush to their ATMs, withdraw $1000 then cash it in one hour later :)

    10. Re:pussies by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 1

      Well, you have to admit that's a effective way to protect innocent bystanders from terrorist acts - if you have something on everybody, there aren't any.

      --
      Squirrel!
    11. Re:pussies by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      A related note, a lot of money on the also has measurable levels of meth.

      I've heard anecdotal stories of bank tellers that have failed drug tests by testing positive for half a dozen different types of drugs. Supposedly by handling so much money during the course of their jobs, they absorb enough trace amounts to test positive.

      I've also been told that it's a common enough occurrence that the some testing labs usually flag specimens that have unusual results (low concentration + wide variety) just so that a follow up can be done and the situation can be investigated.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    12. Re:pussies by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      I haven't heard these stories, but I'd bet they are a load of crap. Either the teller is doing lots of drugs and needs an excuse, or the lab screwed up.

      The amount of drugs on bills is in the nanogram level, in order for enough to absorbed through the skin to be measurable once diluted in your blood stream you'd probably have to soak billions of dollars in acetone then rub it all over your body.

      Labs probably flag unusual results because it is a good indicator that they screwed something up.

  4. Still waiting for the TNG version by El+Cubano · · Score: 4, Funny

    a handy 20-lb. device

    Must be the ST:TOS version. At 20 lb, I would imagine that a shoulder strap is mandatory wear. Thanks, but I'll wait until the ST:TNG version hits.

    1. Re:Still waiting for the TNG version by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      but the black finish and chrome highlights...It's a classic design.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    2. Re:Still waiting for the TNG version by virgil_disgr4ce · · Score: 1

      This is the interesting/fascinating thing: when I saw the image the first thing that I thought of was news stories / press releases from say, the 80s, about brand new "portable" computers--and I then imagined the future press releases for a device like this that actually *is* the size of a TNG tricorder. Exciting.

    3. Re:Still waiting for the TNG version by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

      It looks more like a tri-toaster to me...

      STB

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    4. Re:Still waiting for the TNG version by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      a handy 20-lb. device

      Actually, TFA says "handheld", instead of TFAS's "handy".

      You know..."handheld"--like a suitcase?

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    5. Re:Still waiting for the TNG version by Khabok · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I don't need the weirding module.

  5. Take a good look.. by ElScorcho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remember what calculators and computers looked like 20 years ago? In a couple of decades we'll be looking at these pictures and laughing ourselves silly at the description 'portable'.

    --
    Evil will always win, because Good is DUMB
    1. Re:Take a good look.. by gardyloo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Insightful. But it can go the other way: Many laptops these days are more like boat anchors. Well, the ones running Vista, anyway.

    2. Re:Take a good look.. by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Funny

      *clarification: Vista does not run well on boat anchors. They really prefer an Aqua interface.*

    3. Re:Take a good look.. by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      Ever read a Hardy Boys book?

    4. Re:Take a good look.. by xeoron · · Score: 1

      Would be interesting to have such a device in a lighter form that could scan something and inform a person if it is safely eatable or not; it would be a must have for survival package.

    5. Re:Take a good look.. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Vista does not run well on boat anchors.

            Until you lower them in the water. Then you get to see how they fixed the sleep/shut down problems...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:Take a good look.. by Media+Withdrawal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Remember what calculators and computers looked like 20 years ago? In a couple of decades we'll be...laughing ourselves silly at the description 'portable'.

      Har, point taken, but you've gotta be kidding about calculators getting smaller. 25 years ago, I bought a Casio scientific calculator for $39. It was nearly credit-card sized and got me through somewhere between 100 and 160 semester credits of science and math, no sweat. I carried it in my pocket for years and only had to change the batteries once or twice. When the keys finally fell out, I could not find a replacement nearly as portable.

      PS: An earlier poster mentioned Harry Harrison, who indeed liked small devices. His Stainless Steel Rat series was full of pinlights and other improbably miniscule, un-ergonomic gadgets.

    7. Re:Take a good look.. by fermion · · Score: 1

      Not a good comparison. 20 years ago, this was the calculator, which is pretty similar to what we use today. Even 25 years ago, the calculator was a significantly powerful computing machine capable of mass storage, and still fit in a pocket. To get to really massive machines, one has to go back to the pre transistor days, when the mechanical machines were 40 pounds.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:Take a good look.. by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      Until you lower them in the water. Then you get to see how they fixed the sleep/shut down problems...
      Hmm.

      [ ] Log off
      [ ] Shut down
      [x] Sleep with the fishes, see?

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    9. Re:Take a good look.. by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

      20 years ago, my computer wasn't much larger than my keyboard is today.

    10. Re:Take a good look.. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Don't eat the green berries, don't eat the white berries and don't eat the mushrooms will get you surprisingly far.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:Take a good look.. by tsalaroth · · Score: 1

      And don't eat the brown, funny-smelling berries you find on the ground...

    12. Re:Take a good look.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be buying budget hardware then - score one for the FUD crew. Spend a buck, it's not hard to find a very light weight, compact, powerful laptop that *isn't* a boat anchor.

      A great example is the LG S1 series - fairly light and well designed. Which I might add, runs Linux, XP and Vista.

    13. Re:Take a good look.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was an awful pun. Just awful.

    14. Re:Take a good look.. by meozi · · Score: 1

      You're correct. The Mini 11 is reportedly already down to around 9 pounds with its battery installed at I'm not sure it has even been 2 years since the 10 was finished.

  6. God damn, reminds me of my "portable" Kaypro by WarlockD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not to say it wasn't convent to have a computer with a handle.

    That being said, I wonder how hard it would be to miniaturize this kind of scanning technology. There is a real need for smaller computers, but is there a real need for mass-produced mass spectrometers?

    1. Re:God damn, reminds me of my "portable" Kaypro by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Now no. That is a product that must become available before common household applications come to light. As long as it costs $50+ they won't be used much so this has a long way to go. If they are mass produced in a lightweight handheld version with an idiotified interface then I can see this being used all over the place.

    2. Re:God damn, reminds me of my "portable" Kaypro by rednip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but is there a real need for mass-produced mass spectrometers? Never get ripped off buying blow again! Yeah!

      Also, the next cop who busts me might find it useful for testing my 'stash' without destroying it. Farmers could do soil tests out in the field. Ambulance crews could use it for quick diagnosis. A school could have one to transfer between the science classes. And of course Homeland security will buy these by the dozen (* as long as there is a couple good Republican donors on the company's board)

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    3. Re:God damn, reminds me of my "portable" Kaypro by Original+Replica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      " real need for mass-produced mass spectrometers?"

      Police, airport security, and military applications spring to mind easily. The article did point out that they could detect cocaine residues. Other drugs, and explosives are just as easy I'm sure. I wonder what the range is?

      --
      We are all just people.
    4. Re:God damn, reminds me of my "portable" Kaypro by stmfreak · · Score: 1

      There is a real need for smaller computers, but is there a real need for mass-produced mass spectrometers?

      I'd buy one.

      I'd use it when eating out to test for bacteria, virii and other contaminants.

      I'd use it at home to analyze the paint on my walls and products for lead, mercury or other poisons I don't want in my house.

      I'd use it on my used engine oil to determine levels of wear.

      I'd use it on my kids pee and clothing to see what they've been up to.

      I'm sure I'd find other uses for it until I couldn't imagine living without one. Kinda like a phone or a computer with more than 640KB of RAM. :-)

      --
      These opinions guaranteed or your money back.
    5. Re:God damn, reminds me of my "portable" Kaypro by reverseengineer · · Score: 2, Informative
      I doubt there could be quite as much of a need for smaller mass spec than there is for smaller computers, but I think applications will definitely be found for man-portable mass spec as these devices become smaller and more robust. One of these would allow for rapid trace chemical analysis in the field instead of collecting samples and taking them back to the lab (or to what before counted as "portable," an MS that could fit in a van). I think something like this would be great for lab analysis as well. In the lab I work in, there are only a few mass spectrometers in comparison to a large number of smaller, lower cost detectors like spectrophotometers and refractive index detectors.

      This is because mass spec instruments are large (fairly new benchtop ones aren't nearly 300 pounds like the article states, though- maybe 100 or so) and expensive (hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars) while UV spectrophotometers are comparatively small and cheap (tens of thousands of dollars, and about the size of a toaster oven). Mass spec is also rather complex in its benchtop form- the instrument I work with also requires a gas cylinder and a vacuum pump for operation- and it requires very frequent maintenance to keep working right, particularly maintenance of the electrospray ionization source.

      However, the sensitivity of a mass spec instrument is unparalleled (down to femtograms and attograms of material) and by providing molecular weights and fragment ions, is a huge aid to characterizing unknowns. As an example from personal experience, I've worked with three different methods for the detection of one particular molecule: liquid-chromatography with UV detection, LC with fluorescent detection, and LC-MS. The LC-MS method is at least 100 times more sensitive than the other two. While an instrument like this probably cannot do all the things a high-end instrument can do, it does seem like it could be an attractive option. I can definitely see more and more labs going to mass spec as it becomes smaller, more affordable, and easier to use.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    6. Re:God damn, reminds me of my "portable" Kaypro by encoderer · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I wonder what the range is?"

      It can go up to 11.

    7. Re:God damn, reminds me of my "portable" Kaypro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This IS the miniaturized version of this scanning technology.

    8. Re:God damn, reminds me of my "portable" Kaypro by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      I'd use it on my kids pee and clothing to see what they've been up to. What a wonderful way to build trust with your kids.
      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    9. Re:God damn, reminds me of my "portable" Kaypro by Fishead · · Score: 1

      $50+? I am short of disposable income right now, but I could sure come up with fifty-bucks real fast if I found a mass spectrometer for that much! Heck, would prolly be able to come up with a couple hundred bucks just for the coolness factor of having a hand-held mass spectrometer. Not sure what I would use it for, but I could probably find a use for it... like convincing the wife that my shirt is still good for a couple more days.

      Ebay has several in the thousands, and one for $51 right now... gonna have to keep an eye on that one. At 400lbs though I am gonna have to use 2 hands to carry it ;-)

    10. Re:God damn, reminds me of my "portable" Kaypro by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      ...an MS that could fit in a van... Vista?
      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    11. Re:God damn, reminds me of my "portable" Kaypro by rifter · · Score: 1

      There is a real need for smaller computers, but is there a real need for mass-produced mass spectrometers?

      That statement reminds me of the execs from HP who exclaimed "what would an ordinary person want with a computer?" And the DEC exec who said that there was only a market for about 6 computers in the whole world.

      There are a variety of uses for such a device in the home which spring to mind immediately, and, like the computer, more will be found as people gain access to the devices. It wasn't long ago that people would never have thought CO detectors and other similar devices would be useful in homes, now many homes come with them out of the box. Tech tools solve problems we don't know we have and improve life in ways we would not imagine without them. Refrigeration might have been considered a luxury back in the middle ages, now we know that refirgeration and air conditioning save lives and increase the number of humans we can sustain on the planet. This will be no different.

    12. Re:God damn, reminds me of my "portable" Kaypro by Arcane_Rhino · · Score: 1

      ... and once a day, my papa holds this metal cylinder (vis a vis Star Trek) near me while I pee and then he goes to checks out my dirty underwear. But he says it is for my own good... so it's ok.

      Yeah, that'll be lots of fun to explain to Social Services.

      LOL

  7. Is this the big brother... by stoneycoder · · Score: 0

    of the robot mentioned a while back that thinks humans taste like bacon. Lets see what this thing thinks your hand is.

    1. Re:Is this the big brother... by JensenDied · · Score: 1

      raw bacon, until after it scans.

      --

      09:F9:11:02 - 9D:74:E3:5B - D8:41:56:C5 - 63:56:88:C0

    2. Re:Is this the big brother... by dosius · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but it seems to take tooth fillings for Golden Tickets...

      *RUNS*

      -uso.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
  8. detects explosive compounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    the boston police should be happy about this

    1. Re:detects explosive compounds by shigelojoe · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know, I don't think it would be a good idea to send a 20-pound package to the Boston police marked "Warning: Sensitive Electronics".

    2. Re:detects explosive compounds by tchdab1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      >>the boston police should be happy about this

      Why, does it also detect portable lighting displays?

    3. Re:detects explosive compounds by Lord+Ender · · Score: 4, Funny

      the boston police should be happy about this


      Sergeant: Sir, according to this device, the cartoon character is made of plastic. If I remember my extensive training at community college correctly, bombs can be made of plastic explosives. I recommend we shut down the city and destroy all the cartoon characters at great expense to the taxpayers.

      Mayor: Sergeant, why waste all the taxpayer's time and money on a few lamps?

      Sergeant: Cause fuck em, that's why.

      Mayor: Excellent.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    4. Re:detects explosive compounds by RogueSeven · · Score: 1

      You're telling me. I can't wait to become immersed in games like Bomb Squad: Streets of Boston on the Wiidux in 5 or so years.

    5. Re:detects explosive compounds by RyoShin · · Score: 1
      I'm imagining a Futurama or Family Guy segment where someone has created a simple bomb detector for the mass populace, which has five easy to understand levels:
      • Firecracker
      • Cherry Bomb
      • Building Buster
      • Holy Shit, it's a nuke
      • Portable Lighting Display*
      * Works within Boston city limits only
  9. Desorption Electrospray Ionization (DESI) by Evilest+Doer · · Score: 1

    Here is a short blurb about how DESI works. It is something worth checking out and then searching Google for since it is the key to how this device works.

    --
    I feel like death on a soda cracker.
    1. Re:Desorption Electrospray Ionization (DESI) by Lord+Agni · · Score: 1

      [blinking lights signaling contraband of some kind] LUCYYYY! You got some splaining to doooooo!

  10. Already got something like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog#Smell

    Dogs can do most of the things this spectrometer is touted for. Dogs can smell explosives and they can detect cancer. They can even tell when people are going to have a seizure in time to provide warning. I just hate the thought of the beagle at the airport becoming unemployed because of this new device.

    1. Re:Already got something like it by budword · · Score: 1

      The beagle is portable too...

    2. Re:Already got something like it by damian+cosmas · · Score: 1

      And can dogs give you an accurate mass-to-charge ratio and fragmentation patterns?

      I'd be willing to wager that the femtomolar detection threshold for the portable DESI-MS (on the order of 0.1 picograms for a typical organic molecule) is probably lower than for a dog's nose. That, and the mass spec. doesn't need to be fed, trained, and cleaned up after.

    3. Re:Already got something like it by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Dogs can also intuit what their handler is looking for and 'tell' whether there's anything there or not. What is the error rate of drug dogs? I'm not sure anyone knows, or cares to know. And that's assuming the handler is honest. If the handler is dishonest a drug dog turns into carte blanche to search anyone at any time. At least with a device like this you'll have a printed record of what was detected.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:Already got something like it by blake3737 · · Score: 1

      But a spectrometer can't hump your leg...

  11. IGEN Tricorder released in 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    IGEN (now called Bioveris) is a biotech in MD that licenced the Tricorder (R) name from Paramount for their product. PDF list o products

    and it detects

    • E. coli
    • Salmonella
    • Listeria
    • Cryptosporidium
    • Botulinum Neurotoxin A & B , E & F
    • Staph A
    • Staph B
    • Ricin
    • Anthrax
    1. Re:IGEN Tricorder released in 2000 by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      licenced the Tricorder (R) name from Paramount

            All they have to do is call it a Tri-quarter and viola, problem solved ;)

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:IGEN Tricorder released in 2000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does a viola have to do with anything?

    3. Re:IGEN Tricorder released in 2000 by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

      What does a viola have to do with anything?

            It's how drunk Frenchmen say "voila"...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:IGEN Tricorder released in 2000 by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      What does a viola have to do with anything?
      Must be strung out...
      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  12. Re: The Island by prakslash · · Score: 2, Informative

    Interestingly, the "toilet tricorder" was shown in the 2005 movie "The Island" starring Ewan McGregor. The toilet detected too much salt/nitrates in the urine and restricted him from eating bacon.

  13. Doesn't seem very trek-like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Data: Geordi, the Galorndon core is unstable. We need to beam you up to the Enterprise immediately.

    Geordi: Hold on Data. I seem to be picking be picking residual biophotonic signatures on my tricorder... wait, it's still scanning. Let me get back to you in a few minutes.

  14. The weight by hack++slash · · Score: 5, Funny

    After carrying one of those around all day with a shoulder strap you'd welcome a Vulcan nerve pinch to ease the pain.

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
    1. Re:The weight by StarfishOne · · Score: 1

      (Or) a massage (== nerve pinch? brought to you by T'Pol... *purs* ^_^

  15. Very clever by bendodge · · Score: 2

    This does indeed have enormous potential. But - how many million does it cost?

    --
    The government can't save you.
    1. Re:Very clever by Nappa48 · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know that too.
      I remember the Beagle 2 Mass Spectrometer cost the guys quite alot to miniaturize it as far as they did. Heres hoping they can do it relatively cheaply.

  16. Looks like a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Spock: It looks like a toaster Jim.
    Jim: Spock...what's a toaster?
    Spock: It was a early 21st century tool for draining primitive power sources.
    Jim: Why would they need such a tool?
    Spock: The existence of such a tool defies logic Jim.
    Dr. McCoy: YOU VILE EARTH BASHING VULCAN. Everything that was made by pre-space fairing human defies logic.
    Dr. McCoy: I was used to prepare food, YOU POINTY-EARED AUTOMATON.

    Jim: Oh look...toast

    1. Re:Looks like a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And it makes really cool noises, Cap'n!"

      "Give me that, you fat, bloated, EE-DIOT!!"

  17. Anyone know anything about these? by arlo5724 · · Score: 1

    I'm not in this field (mathematician, no fancy equipment required) but I am curious, why do these things have to be so large in the first place. Anyone in the know point me to a good explanation of how these work? My curiosity is piqued. A quick google search didn't return much for me.

    1. Re:Anyone know anything about these? by sokoban · · Score: 3, Informative

      A mass spectrometer needs to be a certain size since it ionizes a molecule to break it into smaller pieces and then passes them through a magnetic field. The charge (of the ion fragments) interacts with the magnetic field to cause the path of the fragment to bend. The radius of the curvature of the deflection is correlated to the mass/charge ratio, thus the mass spectrometer will tell how massive the fragments are. By knowing the mass of the fragments, the formula and structure of the compound can be elucidated by using a few tricks based on the isotopic abundance of elements in the earth.

      Wikipedia has a pretty good article and diagram.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_spectrometry

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    2. Re:Anyone know anything about these? by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why do these things have to be so large in the first place. Anyone in the know point me to a good explanation of how these work?

            Here for some vague info on how a spectrometer works. Basically you have to turn the stuff to gas (so you need a heating unit), then you have to ionize it, then you shove the whole lot into a magnetic field of known strength.

            Since the degree of deflection of a particle when it passes through the magnetic field is proportional to a) charge and b) mass of the particle, what you end up measuring is a series of peaks at certain points on a graph. This info (when compared to charts of known compounds) lets you know the composition of the substance you tested. That's the way it was at the beginning.

            Then someone said why don't we just stream the particles from a homogenized sample, and vary the strength of the magnetic field. That way we simplify our detection part of the equipmet.

            This is a very general idea of the principles, obviously you could spend years learning all the techniques, and I haven't been in a lab for a while. At the beginning all we could work out was the types of elements involved in a compound, and empirical formulae. The separation and ionization techniques have been refined somewhat, and now we can compare different molecules instead of atoms, which helps a great deal in figuring out what we're looking at.

            Getting back to your question, the unit invariably has to be a bit bulky since you need a) a powerful magnet and b) an adequate distance to "catch" all the particles you are interested in.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Anyone know anything about these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to add a bit about chemical elucidation...

      Mass spec is a very useful aid in determining what a chemical is, but by itself is not a definative tool for identifying a compound. Nor is any single testing method.

      When one analyzes a compound via MS, you ionize it. Lets really extrapolate on what that is. When you "ionize" a chemical, basically what you are doing is breaking it into (sometimes several) fragments that are charged, each with a distinct mass. If you send all of these fragments into a magnetic field with the same starting energy, they will travel thru it with varying velocities, depending on both the mass of the fragment and the charge of the ion. What I am describing is basic time of flight mass spectrometry that lets you seperate the fragments from hitting a detector over time. (For those in the know, yes, this is sort of an analogy, but hey, this is slashdot). The pattern of how the fragements hits the detector produces a graph, and by comparing that graph to known compounds, one can find matches (this is how the analytical chemist looks at it, as opposed to say, an organic research chemist who looks for patterns in the spectrum to identify what the fragments look like they are). What keeps this from being a definitive identification? Well, lots of different but similar chemicals will ionize into similar fragments. You can have 2 molecules where one is twice as large as the other, but they break down to the same ionized fragments in the same proportion, to give an example. So Mass Spec is very useful in limiting the possiblities of what a sample may be to a smaller group of compounds, but it doesn't tell you which one it is.

      This is why in chemistry, when a new compound is defined, we use several different methods of spec to determine a what a molecule is. For an organic compound, you really want to have run an AA to determine preportions of the various different types of atoms composed of, also you might want say, an infrared analysis to see what types of functional groups might be there, maybe (but of less use) an xray diffraction of the crystalline structure. There are other methods as well, (UV comes to mind), but if you want the best information you can get, even better than mass spec, you really need an NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) which I won't even start to describe here (see the big blue book). The combination of all of these various methods of analysis combined produces a very, very good idea of what you are looking at. A true "tricorder" would be able to run all of these tests.

    4. Re:Anyone know anything about these? by kegghead · · Score: 1

      Contrary to what most posts have indicated, the size isn't dictated by the fact that you're dealing with a mass spectrometer. Modern mass analyzers are quite capable of miniaturization.

      Based off previous work by Cooks I'd hazard a guess that the spectrometer is likely a Quadrupole Mass Analyzer or a Quadrupole Ion Trap (the linked article doesn't specify). These types of instruments aren't inherently large since they do not have a magnet in them. Instead separation of the ions is made by a combination of DC and radio frequency AC electric fields.

      The size of the instrument would be due to the fact that *several* high voltage power supplies are needed, a high vaccuum, and in all likelihood (high voltage) radio frequency generators. It's quite a feat that it could be done in such a small space to be honest. Though the mass analyzer is likely very small, it's the supporting electronics that would keep the instrument rather bulky for some time.

    5. Re:Anyone know anything about these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are HV power supplies, though the RF generators are lower voltage. The pumping system, in getting from atmospheric pressure to ~10^-5 Torr is the real trick, as is keeping the battery and power consumption down. Yes, it's working off of a battery and is still under 20 lbs.

    6. Re:Anyone know anything about these? by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that you need to separate the components of the mixture via gas chromatography. I am not sure how the proposed new detector will be any better other than being smaller and not needing a vacuum pump.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    7. Re:Anyone know anything about these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The charge (of the ion fragments) interacts with the magnetic field to cause the path of the fragment to bend. That isn't quite how the Mini 10 works. The Mini 10 uses a rectilinear ion trap (RIT) which I believe is about 1-3 cm a side. Work is on going to make RITs and cylindrical ion traps (CITs) in micrometer sizes so that they can be used in arrays. If the researchers suceed then they'll eventually be able to operate near atmospheric pressures. (The reduction in the size of the trap reduces the required mean free path which allows for higher pressures. Or at least something along those lines.) I don't feel like looking up a link that describes that technology so you'll have to find it on your own if you're interested. It is similar to the description of quadrupole ion traps in the wikipedia article you cited with a different geometry.
  18. The StarTrek Days will come when... by StickyWidget · · Score: 1


    The StarTrek Days will come when I can finally transfer auxiliary power to the shields in my Jetta....

    1. Re:The StarTrek Days will come when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U drive a Jetta??? No wonder you need shields. Tell me, if you press the brakes, does it stop before 100 ft?
      -:)) Sorry couldn't stop digging you on a Jetta...

  19. fractal robot by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...they must have stolen it from Rocheworld.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  20. Liars! by sokoban · · Score: 0

    So, this is just a DESI and mass spec. in a 20 lb package.

    That's no sort of tricorder. That's a monocorder. A tricorder measures THREE things, hence TRI.

    Damn lying hoosiers.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    1. Re:Liars! by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 1

      So, throw in a geiger-counter(sp) and a thermometer/barometer and you are set.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    2. Re:Liars! by MarkKB · · Score: 1

      I would presume that a tricorder triangulates co-ordinates, but that's just me.

    3. Re:Liars! by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      Glue on a GPS reciever and a spectrum analyzer. May be a few more pounds though...

    4. Re:Liars! by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      I am sure somebody could stick a microphone and a cell-phone camera on it, too, without too much hassle.
      -> isntant "tri"-corder.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    5. Re:Liars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, he's a boilermaker, not a hoosier

  21. It's a prototype. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a prototype. I'm guessing the first production model will be 10 pounds and then it'll get smaller at the same rate as everything else. Much smaller in 5 years, a lot fucking smaller within 10.

    Anyone remember the brick cell phones?

  22. Re:I've been wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
  23. Actually, this is not the first... by Flailmonkey · · Score: 1

    While it is a new design, and has different features, this is in fact not the first tricorder that has been made. http://www.stim.com/Stim-x/0996September/Sparky/tr icorder.html talks about the very first "tricorder," but it doesn't look like it was very successful. Maybe Purdue's device will stick around longer. By the way, something that is very interesting to note is that Gene Roddenberry allows anyone who creates devices like the ones in Star Trek (and presumably its variations) can use the names used in the show. Get to work all you Trekkie engineers!

  24. Two measurements ? by icebike · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that be a Bi-corder rather than a Tri-corder?

    I'm holding out for the next generation.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  25. RTFA by TheRon6 · · Score: 1

    In a couple of decades we'll be looking at these pictures and laughing ourselves silly at the description 'portable'.

    Did you see that thing??? I'm ALREADY laughing myself silly when they say that thing is portable. I must be very ahead of the times...

    --
    Does this rag smell like chloroform to you?
  26. Actually, this is not the first... by Flailmonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    While it is a new design, and has different features, this is in fact not the first tricorder that has been made.

    http://www.stim.com/Stim-x/0996September/Sparky/tr icorder.html talks about the very first "tricorder," but it doesn't look like it was very successful. Maybe Purdue's device will stick around longer.

    By the way, something that is very interesting to note is that Gene Roddenberry allows anyone who creates devices like the ones in Star Trek (and presumably its variations) can use the names used in the show. Get to work all you Trekkie engineers!

  27. Just wait... by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    In the 29th century, it'll be worn on your wrist.

    In the 33rd century, it'll be an implant...

    1. Re:Just wait... by WeblionX · · Score: 1

      "I just sniffed what?!"

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
  28. Beagle II rushed - Transformers not responsible. by mr-mafoo · · Score: 1

    Bear with me, this could seem a little longwinded - and verging on the conspiricy theory side

    As we know the beagle 2 mars mission tragically dissappeared on entry into the martian atmosphere. This shouldnt really come as any surprise to anyone in the UK who watch the televised lead up to the launch and landing as they will remember the breaking airbags never worked. Yes, when tested inside a low atmosphere chamber (wiithout even making contact with a surface - less at speed) they popped - boom - poof.

    The only reason why I think they launched the probe, neihg - given it any funding, was the one funky peice of equiptment it had on it. A pocket sized Mass Spectrometer. The sooner they write off the beagle project the sooner they could commertialise their research.

    I wonder if the above device has anything to do with a ceartain small hound. Meh, random speculation

  29. OK, but .. by BigLug · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...allowing chemical composition to be determined outside of a vacuum chamber. Purdue suggests this could be useful for everything from detecting explosive substances or cancer to predicting disease.
    OK, but if we use this, can we get the chemical composition of Coke or KFC? From there, we should be able to determine the recipe or the 11 Secret Herbs and Spices .. right?
    1. Re:OK, but .. by JoshJ · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, but you won't get it in a cooking recipe form.
      Consider an apple- you'd get things like "fructose", "sodium", etc. You wouldn't point it at an apple and get "apple". It'd take a lot more effort to do what you suggest than you think.

    2. Re:OK, but .. by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1

      Not really. Create a database of natural items like "apple" and "pear" and "banana" and have it contain the average readings. Then when these readings come up, list the possible objects it could be.

      --
      Rawr
    3. Re:OK, but .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's set covering, which is NP-complete. Good luck!

  30. First use will be military, second law enforcement by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So I will predict the first mass use of Purdue's Tricorder: Japanese toilets!!!. It can already recognize "biomarkers" in urine, so someone will build a cheap version of it into a toilet and every time you take a dump it will tell you what you should not have been eating, how sick you will be tomorrow and that if you continue that way your insurance won't cover your therapy. It will save the health systems billions.

    The first use will be counterterrorism/counterinsurgency, the second law enforcement. In the law enforcement context they will analyze the air around you when they stop you to chat, pull you over, etc. The molecules leaving your body/clothing/car will enter the public domain atmosphere and be fair game for analysis. It think there is precedent from having dogs sniff the exterior of a car at a border crossing, the pot smell entered the public domain, the trained dog signaled, instant probably cause for a search. Similar justifications will be safety related. "I need to interview you, but first for your safety and mine, I need to scan you."

  31. Re:I've been wondering... by MightyYar · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Tubby? No wonder girls are putting their finger down their throats. Looks healthy to me.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  32. My one question.. by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Can it detect suspicious tachyon emissions coming out of my PC ?

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:My one question.. by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      If it does, you've been playing Max Payne in Bullet Time too much.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  33. Re:I've been wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    She's not naked for fuck sakes

  34. No Surprise by kahrytan · · Score: 1

    It's no surprise to me that such a scanning device is developed. And like any new technology, it is always just the beginning.

    After all, We have the quantum computer, beginning to master quantum entanglement for teleportation, tractor beam, and last but not least, Geordi's visor to allow blind people to see.

    What we need next is a energy based weapon and energy shield.

    --
    \
    1. Re:No Surprise by subl33t · · Score: 1

      What we need NOW is the replicator. Screw everything else.

    2. Re:No Surprise by kahrytan · · Score: 1

      A Replicator NOW would seriously screw up the economy today. Though, I wouldn't mind it. What I would want is a waterless shower like Sonic Shower.

      --
      \
    3. Re:No Surprise by Nappa48 · · Score: 1
      Wasn't there already an energy-based weapon in prototype last month there? If anyone remembers, you can help me here (hope i didn't dream up another thing again)
      And does anyone know how that Israeli "forcefield" worked to protect tanks and helicopters from RPGs? I'm not sure if it is an energy shield or if its just something else.

      And "Geordi's visor" (well, at least something similar) is something being researched now by a group, can't remember the site it was on just now and being in college, i can't get it just now.
      I'll try to find it when i get home later, but i'm pretty busy at the moment, so no guarentee.
      If i remember correct, they found out some way of manipulating the brain without any surgery, but i think they had some problems (well obviously!).
      Theres already been research done on how the brain interprets what the eye sees, think it was posted on here actually. Something like "decoding how the brain sees" (actually, it may have been physorg.. yeh i'm sure it was)
      So heres hoping they can do something interesting and maybe "cure" blindness, at least until cell replacement for things like that begin (probably not for a good decade or 2 because of idiots complaining about stem cells being alive..."ITS MURDERRRR, YOU ARE EVIL!")

    4. Re:No Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geordi's visor to allow blind people to see

      We've actually gone past Star Trek in some respects! In Star Trek IV (I think it was IV, it was one of the movies) McCoy gives Kirk a pair of reading glasses, since Kirk's allergic to whatever drug they have that cures age related hyperopia (farsightedness).

      Reading glasses? How quaint! I was very nearsighted (myopia) all my life until I reached my forties, and was both nearsighted and farsighted, needing both contact lenses and those quaint reading glasses McCoy gave Kirk. Yeah, most geezers just get bifocals... Then I got a cataract in my left eye from steroid eye drops an eye doctor prescribed. They did surgery, sticking a needle in my eye, turning my lens (cataract) to mush, sucked it out, and replaced it with a CryataLens IOL.

      I no longer need glasses or contact lenses. At all. I can get up, get and the car and drive. I can read. My vision is BETTER THAN 20/20 at all distances! ...and if McCoy would have seen the operating room they did the surgery in, he'd have been jealous.

    5. Re:No Surprise by kahrytan · · Score: 1


      Geordi Visor reference was to the recently invention. They uses a simple pair of glasses with small camera. Video was processed by wireless computer and wireless sent back to device attached to the retina. The optical nerve would then send the data back to the brain.

      More research has turned up some promising research on the use of cold plasma for a shield. Military are invested in the project for satellites.

      FYI -- It's not stem cells being alive. It is the Embryo. It is the beginning of Life. And because of not using embryo for stem cells, the medical community have adapted so they don't need it anyways. It's called progress. There's half a dozen ways to get stem cells without destroying a precious life.

      --
      \
    6. Re:No Surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Replicator NOW would seriously screw up the economy today.

      Cue the Material Components Association of America! Replicator DRM?

  35. Re:I've been wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably not, since they're both gimmicky frauds.

  36. Sources by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    Where'd they get the cocaine?

    Easy - they applied to the DEA for a research permit and were certified to buy small amounts from qualified vendors.
     
    Yes, I'm serious. If you are a properly certified research/development facility, and you get an approved permit, you can buy or be loaned all manner of things not available on the 'open' market. This includes cocaine, meth, plutonium - and moon rocks. (And yes, part of being certified is having a tracking and accounting system in place for the material, and there limits as to how much you can obtain.)
    1. Re:Sources by smagruder · · Score: 1

      Cocaine and meth aren't available on the open market?

      Meth labs are exploding like Jiffy Pops in some parts of the country. That's *some* closed market! :)

      --
      Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  37. Bi-corder, eh? by ThePsion5 · · Score: 0

    Then there's some information I need to retrieve from my wife...

  38. Futurama Reference by likewowandstuff · · Score: 1

    It's not a precise quote, but the best I can do right now. I wonder what the results of field research on the Mini 10 will be?

    Shifty Alien: This is Z Ray.
    Fry: Is it like an X Ray?
    Shifty Alien: Yes, but is better, is Z.

    [Bender aims Z Ray at Fry's pants]
    Fry: Ow, my sperm!
    [Bender pushes button again]
    Fry: Well, it didn't hurt that time.

    1. Re:Futurama Reference by delinear · · Score: 1

      So the real question is, can we use this to find the prizes in promotional products?

  39. DESI?? by Prysorra · · Score: 1

    Am I seriously the first to wonder how many people from India worked on this project?

    1. Re:DESI?? by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. I can imagine it noooow. Curry powder is used to calibrate. Unit flashes '91CCNXXXXXX / Bollywood RULEZ / Welcome2 Edison, New Jersey / I [heart] Ravi Kumar' during calibration all the while playing George Harrison's 'Within You Without You'.

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  40. Need this on Mars Science Lab!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the instrument that is so needed. Wow! Excellent. Seriously, if it can tell organic molecules apart, volatiles, and the alkali metals, not just the iron oxides that MER A and B can detect, this would be exactly what the next generation rover needs!

  41. Science catching up w/ Star Trek is fine and all.. by openaddy · · Score: 1

    ..but when will fashion catch up w/ Star Trek? It's not enough that Trekkers wear Star Trek uniforms in public. We cannot rest until they sport those giant Guinan hats that Whoopie so boldly wore in the TNG episodes.

  42. Yeah, but who's gonna wear the red uniform? by unassimilatible · · Score: 1

    We know he gets killed first, especially if he is black.

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
  43. It's the dilithium stupid! by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    *sigh*
    Trying to replicate trek tech is a complete waste of human resources until we find/manufacture dilithium crystals. Why the heck is NASA wasting my tax money on shuttle replacement parts?!? It's all about dilithium!

    1. Re:It's the dilithium stupid! by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      *sigh*
      Trying to replicate trek tech is a complete waste of human resources until we find/manufacture dilithium crystals. Why the heck is NASA wasting my tax money on shuttle replacement parts?!? It's all about dilithium!


      Really? Ever hear of a cell phone? How about automatic doors that open when you approach?

      I can think of a very good documentary you should watch if you think that trying to replicate Star Trek technology is a waste of time.

      Interestingly, like the first cell phones, it also weighs in at a hefty 20lbs. This must be an ST:TOS tricorder, not an ST:TNG one.
      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    2. Re:It's the dilithium stupid! by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      No, you misunderstood. I'm all for replicating trek tech but we need to do it in the right order. Without interstellar space travel everything else is just gadgetry. And as everyone knows, without dilithium crystals it aint gonna happen. Find that first, then work on tricorders, special space fabric, mod boots that look so cool and whatever else you want.
      I only hold out two exceptions.
      1) Holodeck. I would like one of these as soon as possible.
      2) Replicator technology. This may in fact be the real key. I know Spock said you can't replicate dilithium in ep#32 but that may have just been a plot line excuse. I bet it can be done.

  44. One toycorder, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  45. Re:First use will be military, second law enforcem by fattybob · · Score: 1

    No, I think the first poster was right, Japanese toilet technology (or similar "trivial" commercial product) will eventually be spun off being seen as reliable enough to see it used further afield. Yes, no doubt the FBI etc may have one in their labs, but they will take years to appraise it's use and wont trust it versus the lab with its scientific controls.
    The most likely sceanario will see use in food techhnology, checking for food contaminants making foods last longer and are safer that come off an aseemby line - checking for the deadly ingredient in Fugu perhaps!!!

  46. Re:First use will be military, second law enforcem by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    The problem with the "trivial" commercial products will be the price tag. For law enforcement the years of appraisal are not really necessary. The application would not be scientific data that meets courtroom evidenciary standards, it would merely be a sufficiently reliable indication to meet probably cause and allow searches and the collection of the "real" evidence. Think of getting your shoes swabbed at an airport. A positive indicator could not convict you in court, but it will get you a visit to private room where you and your baggage are subject to further inspection. Similarly, the military does not need absolute certainty for all operations. There's a bomb factory in a neighborhood, scanning could help develop a list of who and where to visit first, as opposed to cordoning off the neighborhood and going door to door. Yeah, medical application will be right up there with military and law enforcement.

  47. Tricorder emulator for Palm by speculatrix · · Score: 1

    there's been a fun emulator for Palm for years:
    Jeff Jetton's Tricorder Palm site

    the colour one runs fine on my Palm T3 despite the program being written for pre Arm processors

    1. Re:Tricorder emulator for Palm by maxume · · Score: 1

      If you want to look at meaningless blinking lights for no good reason, why not do it the easy way and just stare at the sun for a couple seconds?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Tricorder emulator for Palm by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      look at meaningless blinking lights for no good reason, why not do it the easy way and just stare at the sun
      because I don't want permanent scarring of my retinas?

      a fake tricorder and a cheap palm pilot is a damn site cheaper than buying Vista if you want eye candy!

  48. Pocket electron microscopes... by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 1
    You used to be able to get desktop scanning electron microscopes. These were not popular at the time (1970's) - you wanted a big vacuum pump or you waited ages before you could look at anything, and the electronics usually meant that the thing was pretty huge. The resolution was nothing like the big SEMS, but it was still better than anything optical, and the depth of field was might greater.

    If you replace the diffusion vacuum pump and rotary backing pump with a modern turbomolecular pump, then you don't have the warm-up time or the noise. If you have a small aperture, and pump the thing hard enough, then a 25KeV beam will travel a few mm in air. Use a magnetic field to turn the beam just before the aperture and the air going through the aperture won't roar straight up the electron optics. People have viewed living cells under electron microscopes so having a high vacuum electron optics with a small open end is possible. A bit of air can also avoid the charging problems, which is whjy SEM specimens are usually coated in gold first.

    If you can sweep an electron beam over the surface you can get the SEM view of it, but you can also use the electron beam to evaporate and ionize material, which can then go into a mass spectrometer. You can look for X-rays, electron diffraction, and so forth. There's lots of stuff you can stick onto a SEM that could probably be minaturized down to the cassette player size of the Tricorder.

    It's not 'life form readings at 500 meters' but it's a start.

  49. A muffin for example.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This cannot be a tricorder, from what I understand, if it were then it would be able to use triangulation to identify molecules at many points (depends on resolution) in front (or around) the device.

    For example a muffin, it would be able to scan the entire muffin and tell you the average percentage of sugar and whether there were parts of the muffin with more or less sugar.

    This could be done without moving the muffin around nor having to break it up into a million pieces.

    The triangulation could be done by either having more than one sensor in the device or by moving the device around.

    So, tricorder my ass. No really, if it were a real tricorder they'd be able to see what I ate.

    But really this type of device could make a company extremely rich if they would sell one that would identify sugar content, nuts, fatty acids, cholesterol, chemicals that are known to be used in food products for those who want to "stay green" and all those other "new trend" ingredients that are marketed to us each day.

    So yes, someone else said monocorder and this seems like the more appropriate name.

    AC because I'm a lazy ass who lost his pw.

  50. You're not going back far enough by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    30 years ago, a simple +-*/ calculator was easily twice the size of today's standard calculators. While today's calculators could be made smaller, in general it's cheaper and UI design issues that stabilize the size. After all, using 50+ keys on a calculator requires a certain size in design, and ruggedness requires a certain thickness unless you start going with more exotic (expensive) materials. After all - would you (be able to) use a scientific calculator the size of a postage stamp?

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    1. Re:You're not going back far enough by Media+Withdrawal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      30 years ago, a simple +-*/ calculator was easily twice the size of today's standard calculators.

      Yes, yes, and the ENIAC was bigger still. We all know that technology generally advances if you look at long enough stretches of time. What's not obvious to the young, though, is that this change is not smooth, uniform and linear like their coursework, but choppy, multiplex and shaped by random social and market forces. "Two steps forward, one step back" has left a hell of a lot of good design buried in the dustbin of history---the tiny Casio included. Its short tenure was not a simple overshoot of a size optimization problem. Who's to say it wouldn't succeed now that science and engineering include many more people with small fingers, pockets and handbags (i.e. girls, women, people from developing countries)? The longer you work in technology (especially design), the greater the chances that you'll profit by unearthing some of the treasures buried in the archeology of your own field. The past isn't just for dissing.

  51. Similar sevices have been available by WaldorfSalad · · Score: 1

    for a few years now. Thermo Scientific http://www.niton.com/ has a line of handheld, portable X-Ray Fluorescence analyzers for a few years now. XRF performs elemental analysis, so it's not much good on pharmaceuticals or organics, but works great for metals, alloys, and trace element detection. They're widely used to find lead-based paint in homes, for example. Plus, they kind-of look like a Phaser.

    --
    You can't have a battle of wits against an unarmed opponent.
  52. Handy? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    If this thing is handy...

    How big are your hands?

    1. Re:Handy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny pun, but "handy" does not mean "hand-held." It means easy to use, or easy to reach. Like, Look! a varelse life-form! I'm reaching for my handy phaser to blow it away!

  53. /. == suckers for Star Trek (from the lab itself) by CupBeEmpty · · Score: 1

    I have found the rapid proliferation of this story across the web really funny. This same lab and this same device have been featured several times on PhysOrg but the moment the word "tricorder" is thrown out there it gets instant net popularity!

    My buddy who works in the lab responds and is available to answer questions on his website. The one that has been killing me is the "why does it have to be so big" question. For the love of G-D they condensed a gigantic mass spec into the size of a PC case. These things can weigh hundreds of pounds and now they are even working no an 11 lb version.

  54. Re:First use will be military, second law enforcem by CupBeEmpty · · Score: 1

    Exactly right... in the lab a lot of the funding already comes from DHS and DARPA

  55. Re:First use will be military, second law enforcem by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Yes, no doubt the FBI etc may have one in their labs, but they will take years to appraise it's use and wont trust it versus the lab with its scientific controls.

    Because we all know how well the reliability of say, polygraphs or fingerprint analysis has been tested. People in general put far too much faith in these technological methods. A thin veneer of science and we forget all about false positives.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  56. Interesting by paranatural2002 · · Score: 1

    This has thousands of very interesting implications. Most people right now are focused on the portability, but it doesn't actually need to be portable to be very useful. Imagine walking into a small chamber in a hospital. The air is pumped out, some sterile air is pumped in, and your body exudes whatever chemicals are in your system. You step out and the tech gets a handout of everything in you, from perscriprion drugs, illegal drugs, and whatever bacteria and viruses are infesting you. Due to the advent of these dogs that can actually sniff out some forms of cancer, it stands to reason these gas spectrometer-like devices should be able to as well. Suddenly you can have damn near a complete check up, including a lot of blood work, in maybe a few seconds time. That, coupled with maybe an RFID tag that displays a list of allergies or even an ID to a hospital database that would list your medical history, all within moments of walking in the door. Of course, this goes way beyond that. You know that entranceway at bank's doors? Who's to say they couldn't have these guys constantly sniffing for gunpowder? Even with manufactured and cleaned bullets in a clean gun I'd bet the proverbial dollars to doughnuts a uzi packed with 30 rounds would put off enough residue to set off a few alarms in a remote area which can then tap into the security system and take a look around. The list goes on and on. Police stations everywhere could have a few, one for evidence, one for people. Say you got a guy who is acting crazy as hell and you suspect he's on PCP? Throw him in the chamber and maybe find out he's clean except for a bad reaction with some prescription medication. You get the idea. Of course, I am sure the uses for it could be much more sinister as well, but I'd guess that within 10-20 years we'll see similar things everywhere.

    1. Re:Interesting by nasor · · Score: 1

      This sort of device has been around for at least 50+ years - the only big deal about this one is that it's small, and the sample needs little prep.

  57. Won't detect donuts yet. by Asklepius+M.D. · · Score: 1

    That, and the mass spec. doesn't need to be fed, trained, and cleaned up after.

    Yes, but the cops/feds/etc who use it will. For those few of you who've never had the pleasure *cough* of attending an organic chemistry class, permit me to point out that the output of a mass spec is not the easiest thing to read. A limited understanding of organic functional groups is required. This means that you either train your operators to read the output themselves (unlikely), the operator wirelessly transmits the data back to some (presumably) competent and overworked analyst, or a piece of software does the interpretation based on a pre-stored set of known compounds. Each of these methods has strengths and weaknesses, but it is unlikely that this portable device will be so "idiot proof" that any beat cop can use it in the near future. So keep your tinfoil hats on, but you can probably forgo the activated charcoal liners ---- for now.

    --
    He who would be a man, must be a nonconformist. -- Emerson
    1. Re:Won't detect donuts yet. by damian+cosmas · · Score: 1

      We're into the realm of wild guesses here, but it's probably programmed to filter out typical fragmentation patterns found in nitro-compounds (HMX, TNT, PETN, etc) and alkaloids of interest, as well as doing some background subtraction. The analytical software on my lab's GC/MS dates to the early '90s, and is pretty decent at doing just that. It's pretty trivial to program. Then there's the difficult task of putting little lights on the device that say things like "TNT" when it detects it to within 95% or so. Remember, the TSA folks already use non-portable Mass Spec's to screen baggage. And they ain't scientists.

    2. Re:Won't detect donuts yet. by Asklepius+M.D. · · Score: 1

      All that you have said is, of course, correct. My point, however, was merely that they would only be able to detect a limited set of preprogrammed substances (i.e. they have to know in advance what they want to find), many of which can easily be lost in the "noise" from the sheer volume of chemical substances that an individual is exposed to on a daily basis. I merely wished to counter the paranoia of some of the tinfoil hat folks who think that Joe Policeman is going to detect the presence of a random compound and jump to the wrong conclusions, or who will sniff indiscriminately and somehow be aware of all of that person's actions over the last 8 hours.

      --
      He who would be a man, must be a nonconformist. -- Emerson
  58. No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    a handy 20-lb. device

    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

  59. sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just make sure you arent wearing a red shirt while using the device.

  60. Re:First use will be military, second law enforcem by JhohannaVH · · Score: 1

    However, that is completely contradictory to the 4th Amendment Right protecting us against Search & Seizure. Or, is it that when we are pulled over for a traffic violation, we are immediately suspects and that right is waived?

    --
    Sorry man... the Internet pooped on me.
  61. Re:I've been wondering... by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

    Tell you what, you bring me all your "tubby" chicks, hell, much thinner than that and I put them in the "anorexic or sickly" cateogry.

  62. A tricorder detects disease? How awkward for Kirk! by RexDevious · · Score: 1

    Kirk: Looks like a class M planet, what've we got Mr. Spock?
    Spock: I'm picking up oxygen, nitrogen, basic plant life... and your prostate is the size of a grapefruit!
    Kirk: Put that thing away!
    Spock: My apologies captain. I'll try to keep my observations more focused.
    Kirk: Thank you. Now, any life forms?
    Spock: Mr. Sulu has crabs.

  63. To misquote The Departed... by andrewd18 · · Score: 1

    Mayor: Qui bono?

    Sergeant: Qui gives a shit?

  64. Re:First use will be military, second law enforcem by rpbird · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nope, not unless the Supreme Court is overthrown. They ruled several years ago in a case involving the police use of FLIR to spy on the houses of suspected pot growers, that the use of remote sensing equipment without a warrant is a violation of the "Unwarranted Search" clause of the Bill of Rights. The cops tried to use the "plain sight" exception, but since we don't see in infrared, the court wasn't having any of it. I think the tricorder would fall under this ruling. Using a tricorder without the express permission of the suspect would be a similar violation.

    Though this does bring up an inconsistency. As you pointed out, US law does allow for the use of dogs to detect drugs. Or does the officer have to get permission to use the dog? Not having smuggled drugs, this is an area I'm woefully ignorant in.

    I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on TV.

  65. Correction: by David+Gould · · Score: 1

    In the 29th century, it'll be worn on your wrist.
    In the 33rd century, it'll be an implant... WTF!? Eight centuries to reduce a 20-lb table-top unit to wristwatch-size? Another four centuries after that for implants?
    Dude: The 19th Century wants its rate of technological progress back.

    Try this:
    In the 2010's, it'll be carried on a shoulder strap.
    In the '20s, it'll be worn on your wrist.
    In the '30s, it'll be an implant.

    --
    David Gould
    main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
  66. Re:First use will be military, second law enforcem by bhiestand · · Score: 1

    However, that is completely contradictory to the 4th Amendment Right protecting us against Search & Seizure. Or, is it that when we are pulled over for a traffic violation, we are immediately suspects and that right is waived? Most people already waive the right regularly when asked "You don't have any drugs on you, right? So you wouldn't mind if I searched your vehicle." A previous poster was correct, though. This is more akin to the dog being allowed to sniff around the car.
    --
    SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling