Slashdot Mirror


$100k For Kenobi's Cloak

dws90 writes "The cloak worn by Sir Alec Guinness when he played Obi-Wan Kenobi in the Star Wars original trilogy has been sold at a TV and Cinema auction. The cloak sold for £54,000, which is about $103,923 according to Google calculator. According to the article, the cloak was missing for nearly 30 years, during which it was rented out to a number of other films, including the Mummy. It was found two years ago, and has been part of a film memorabilia exhibition in London since then. The cloak sold for more than any of the other movie costumes the article listed, beating out Sean Connery's dinner jacket from Thunderball and a helmet worn by Terry Jones in Monty Python and the Holy Grail."

140 comments

  1. The Mummy? by CaptainBruce · · Score: 1

    I didn't know there were Jedi in the Mummy!!

    1. Re:The Mummy? by NinjaTariq · · Score: 3, Funny

      Didn't you know Rick was a Jedi Knight and Jonathan was his Padewan... And Imhotep was really Jonathan and Evelyn's father. However the sabre battle was cut out during post production due to copyright issues with Lucas.

  2. Only $100k? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd imagine that Leia's slave outfit from ROTJ would go for much, much more than $100k.

    1. Re:Only $100k? by Sobrique · · Score: 5, Funny

      Depends who was wearing it last.

    2. Re:Only $100k? by D-Cypell · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's funny you should say that, because as soon as I read this story, my first reaction was...

      "There is a millionaire out there that is gonna be doing some 'roleplay' tonight!".

    3. Re:Only $100k? by ravenfan · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder how much the Cloak of Invisibility with fetch.

    4. Re:Only $100k? by Billosaur · · Score: 5, Funny

      Really? I picture some rich Geek-onaire putting it on, walking into bars, strolling up to beautiful women and intoning "I'm the Jedi you're looking for." But that's just one point of view.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    5. Re:Only $100k? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 0

      "Cum on my face, and I will become more powerful than you could possibly imagine."

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    6. Re:Only $100k? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter, I think either would reinforce the notion that Star Wars fans have too much money and not enough good sense.

    7. Re:Only $100k? by techpawn · · Score: 1, Funny

      What? I like Obi Wan Kenobi/gyn?

      --
      Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
    8. Re:Only $100k? by Megane · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe BloodNinja bought it...

      "Aight, I put on my robe and wizard hat. AND KENOBI'S ROBE!"

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    9. Re:Only $100k? by leamanc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only if it came with 1983-vintage, coked-out Carrie Fisher pre-installed in it.

      --
      :q!
    10. Re:Only $100k? by AnotherHiggins · · Score: 1

      Ya missed it. OB/GYN Kenobi would have been funnier.

    11. Re:Only $100k? by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are in front of a mirror, trying it on right now, aren't you?

    12. Re:Only $100k? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2, Funny

      A guy would be saying this?

        I think I just threw up a little bit. In my mouth.

    13. Re:Only $100k? by sentientbeing · · Score: 1

      It surely must be all creased and unwearable anyway. I saw Darth Vader standing all over it.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    14. Re:Only $100k? by Minwee · · Score: 1

      I think that George is hanging onto that one for his own personal use.

  3. Of course, it wasn't very pretty... by jpellino · · Score: 4, Funny

    With the earlier owners standing at the back of the auction screaming "THIS IS NOT THE CLOAK YOU'RE LOOKING FOR!!!"

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  4. They knew it was Guinness' cloak by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

    They found a slip of paper in the pocket which said "bald with glasses."

    1. Re:They knew it was Guinness' cloak by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1

      Although he may be bald with glasses, he still has genuine class.

    2. Re:They knew it was Guinness' cloak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's dead. Use the past tense.

    3. Re:They knew it was Guinness' cloak by brentodd · · Score: 1

      +1 for Simpsons reference?

      --
      ?
    4. Re:They knew it was Guinness' cloak by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      Well played Sir.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
  5. That explains it by Fist!+Of!+Death! · · Score: 1

    No wonder Darth V cut him down like a dog - just another Death star mugging stat...

    --
    Nothing witty
    1. Re:That explains it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but Darths I-IV couldn't manage it!

  6. Cloak by Ikyaat · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is so worth it, I know for a fact that this cloak gives you +12 Agility and +20 Charisma. I personally would wear it to work and get all the babes.

    --
    "Luck is a tag given by the mediocre to account for the accomplishments of genius." -Heinlein
    1. Re:Cloak by CaptainBruce · · Score: 1

      also +10 Ool Man Smell!

    2. Re:Cloak by djtachyon · · Score: 2, Funny

      .. and off to JWST (Jedi Workplace Sensitivity Training) with the lot of ya!

      --
      "What's the use of a good quotation if you can't change it?" - Doctor Who
    3. Re:Cloak by jbeaupre · · Score: 5, Funny

      Holy cow! You managed to combine role playing and Star Wars along with a desperate desire for companionship in one line on Slashdot. Geekdom so tightly compressed you risked creating a singularity, destroying humanity.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    4. Re:Cloak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it's cursed. After 2d4 days, you begin to atract cohorts and followers, but they have a horrible odor that requires DC 25 fort save to avoid loss of consious. Also, the followers impose a -10 circumstance penalty to any diplomocy checks. use of the cloak on the /. plane may spawn 3d6 trolls of CR 21. Even if slain, the trolls will return after 1D2 posts

    5. Re:Cloak by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      posession of the garmment may well imbue you with an ability to acquire females with whom previously you stood no chance, but I would like as not expect, they would not be ones I, nor you, would happily hold forth as example of 'babes'

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    6. Re:Cloak by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      posession of the garmment may well imbue you with an ability to acquire females with whom previously you stood no chance, but I would like as not expect, they would not be ones I, nor you, would happily hold forth as example of 'babes' I suspect, however, that possession of the sort of financial holdings that allow one to blow that sort of cash on a movie prop would imbue the holder with the ability to acquire females definitely falling into the 'babe' category.

      Remember, it's the size of your wallet, not what you do with it!
      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    7. Re:Cloak by VWJedi · · Score: 1

      Remember, it's the size of your wallet, not what you do with it!

      Well, if you spend all your money on movie props rather than gifts for the 'babes', I don't think they'll be too impressed.

    8. Re:Cloak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by babes you are referring to Rosie Palmer and her five sisters, then you sir are correct!

    9. Re:Cloak by nomadic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Holy cow! You managed to combine role playing and Star Wars along with a desperate desire for companionship in one line on Slashdot. Geekdom so tightly compressed you risked creating a singularity, destroying humanity.

      I think he was one Dr. Who reference away from killing us all.

    10. Re:Cloak by rpbird · · Score: 1

      But only if you're the Exile. Remember, Outcasts don't wear robes, only Exiles.

  7. After the novelty wears off by drooling-dog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So I wonder how it feels to have blown that much money on something like this, after the novelty's worn off and you've already worn it around the house and invited your friends over to see and touch it. A little buyer's remourse, maybe?

    1. Re:After the novelty wears off by ari_j · · Score: 2, Funny

      Buyer's remorse is more the immediate, emotional response to a purchase brought on by emotional doubt that the decision you made was the right one. I think that the rational realization after two weeks of pretending to be an old Jedi that you made the wrong decision is more in line with crappy investing or even garden-variety stupidity than with emotion.

    2. Re:After the novelty wears off by mastershake_phd · · Score: 2, Funny

      You kidding? The price can only go up! Well until all the Star Wars fans die off. Or maybe Star Wars fans will never die off. Maybe it will be a religion in 2000 years. And Han Solo Said "Make it so #2" and he did, and it was good.

    3. Re:After the novelty wears off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hold on, are we talking about the Obi-Wan cloak, or the Wiimote?

      I kid, I kid!

    4. Re:After the novelty wears off by eMbry00s · · Score: 1

      A quick bath in the money pool would make that go away fast enough.

    5. Re:After the novelty wears off by db32 · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is just the precursor to buying the corpse and building a display out of it. The cloak...pft...having a Jedi under glass...now that is impressive.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    6. Re:After the novelty wears off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always start attending cons and use it to pick up chics in storm trooper gear...

    7. Re:After the novelty wears off by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      Something like this is a hardcore rich collector's museum piece, not something that would even be sullied by human hands or by wearing it.

      Sort of like how a comic collector nut will buy a comic, only to put it in special bags to preserve it, never actually reading it, lest it become less than mint in any way.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    8. Re:After the novelty wears off by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

      $100,000 is "only" £50,000. There are plenty of geeky city boys getting bonuses way over that amount. To me & you (I assume), that's a lot of money. But when you're 30 somthing and pulling down over £500,000 a year working for a hedge fund in London, £50,000 isn't that much.

      Hell, one guy's bonus this year was £50,000,000. And then there's the Russian millionaires & billionaires floating around London.

    9. Re:After the novelty wears off by Kandenshi · · Score: 1

      Glass?

      I wonder(but not enough to look it up myself), how much that Han-Solo-frozen-in-carbonite went for at auction?
      Would be a neat thing for Halloween, though I can't see me displaying it in the front entrance any other times of the year.

    10. Re:After the novelty wears off by db32 · · Score: 1

      Carbonite would make it a tad difficult to see said $100,000 cloak
      Ol Ben was never in the carbonite
      Since I am a tad lazy, and not quite nerdy enough, just consider yourself mocked for a Solo vs Jedi comparison

      Other than that, I think the frozen in carbonite thing would be pretty cool, but not so much for the halloween thing (although it would be), but can you imagine the joys of sending misbehaving children to go open the closet you store it in?

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    11. Re:After the novelty wears off by BendingSpoons · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is not the investment you're looking for.

      --
      For all we know the moon may be as conscious as a poet or a realtor, and extremely weary of its monotonous round. - HLM
    12. Re:After the novelty wears off by jo42 · · Score: 1

      You turn it around and sell it to some sucker^h^h^h^h^h^hinvestor for more than you paid for it. Just like Real Estate and Fine Art...

  8. Jedi Cloak Trick by Butisol · · Score: 5, Funny

    **"You want to pay $100,000 for this cloak" --"I don't know, it seems awfully expensive" **"You want to pay $100,000 for this cloak" --"I want to pay $100,000 for the cloak"

    1. Re:Jedi Cloak Trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jedi "Cloak" Trick?

      That still looks like a Jedi Mind Trick to me...

      A Jedi Cloak Trick might be where the jedi... hmmm.... convinces a cloak that those aren't the droids you're looking for?

    2. Re:Jedi Cloak Trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had an uncle that once did a Jedi cloak trick for us... he's in jail now.

    3. Re:Jedi Cloak Trick by nigham · · Score: 2, Funny

      "If you sell me off I shall become more expensive than you can possibly imagine."

      --
      I don't want to read /. I want to go home and re-think my life.
    4. Re:Jedi Cloak Trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did it involve touching his lightsaber?

    5. Re:Jedi Cloak Trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he said it was once my father's.

  9. £54,000, which is about $103,923.... by sqldr · · Score: 1

    That reminds me.. I should must get a few quid out and book a flight to New York, so I can come over and buy all of your stuff :-)

    --
    I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
  10. Value? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You know, I never used to question the value of these sorts of things, and still don't for truly unique film artifacts like the original lightsabers or storm trooper helmets, but I have to ask the question...."SERIOUSLY?!"

    Something tells me the person buying this would be the same person spending $100 on a piece of cardboa...err, Magic card. The only reason I ask this is because I used to be that kind of person, but now I find myself questioning the wisdom of someone who would toss out that big of a chunk of money for a piece of cloth.

    I know that the value assigned to something is determined by what the market will bear...just playing Devil's Advocate is all. Not saying I wouldn't want to own it myself, just not at that price.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Value? by Butisol · · Score: 0

      That $100 piece of cardboard can make a deck kick ass. Then all the neckbeard gang will think you are cool. $200 for a $3 pair of sneakers with $0.50 worth of labour seems a worse deal than that.

    2. Re:Value? by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We're talking a one-of-a-kind here. And one that some people deem valuable for some reason. The more people deem it valuable, the higher its value. That's why paintings are valuable and range in the millions, 'cause pretty much everyone considers a painting of Picasso valuable. By itself, it's pretty much worthless, it's some linnen and some oil paint.

      The same is true for that cloak or the cards you mention. Other good examples are stamps. There is no "real" value attached to them. Their value comes from being rare and the fact that there are some people who'd love to have them.

      As you've said, the price of an item is what the market will bear. And since there is a market, the price goes up. Another reason for the price of those rare items going up is simply that they can't be multiplied. There's one. If you have it, you have the only one in existance. And as long as the economy does not collapse, its value will at the worst stay the same, and given some luck it goes up. In other words, if nothing else, it's a good investment.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Value? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Dear Collectors of the World,

      I give you my personal guarantee that the pleasure you would derive from DONATING $100k to relieve poverty and injustice in the world would FAR surpass the pleasure you get from looking at a piece of cloth in a glass case.*

      * I realize this collector expects his purchase to maintain value, so it isn't exactly the same; but if he is looking to invest rationally, he would be putting his money into something other than stage props.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    4. Re:Value? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      As you've said, the price of an item is what the market will bear. And since there is a market, the price goes up. Another reason for the price of those rare items going up is simply that they can't be multiplied. There's one. If you have it, you have the only one in existance. And as long as the economy does not collapse, its value will at the worst stay the same, and given some luck it goes up. In other words, if nothing else, it's a good investment.

      I agree with you that certain items, especially unique ones, have more value than you would consider just from the object itself. Sometimes extreme value. However, I don't think it's safe to say that this is a good investment.

      The price here was determined by auction. That means that there was one person who thought it was worth $100k, and nobody thought it was worth any more than that. That's what it means to win an auction -- you were willing to pay more than anyone else. I of course don't know the bidding history, but imagine something like the price rises quickly to $20k with multiple bidders, but after that there's only two bidders engaged in a bidding war driving up the price. This would mean that there's only one other person who thought the item was valued even close to $100k, and that may have only been in the excitement of the auction. You can't count on them being around or still wanting the cloak in ten years, either.

      My point is that you can't say that auction price == market price. The distinction is irrelevent if you're the seller since getting one guy to pay $100k is good enough, but if you're trying to determine what the ROI of buying the cloak would be then it is important. You can only get an idea of the 'market price' of an item from auctions if there are lots of auctions. Look at a few hundred Ebay auctions for PS3 and you will get an idea for what the market will bear. Look at a single Ebay auction, and you only get an idea of what one person will bear, and they might be an idiot who will be dead from drinking lead paint by the time you try to sell your "investment" for profit.

      Personally I see the popularity of Star Wars as waning. Not dead (netcraft hasn't confirmed it) or anything like that, just that the peak was sometime in the past and in the future you're going to be more and more hard pressed to find people who think a Jedi's cloak is worth $100k, much less more than $100k. It will probably retain some value, but if it was purchased with the intent of it being an investment then I think it was an ill-conceived idea.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Value? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here we go again! Fatten up the poor, fatten up the poor! How stupid we must be to continue to support deadbeats that have already proven that they have no desire to pull themselves up by their bootstraps.
       
      And BTW: Collectables and artwork is some of the best investments you can make. Unlike the $100 magic card mentioned earlier movies props have avery good track record. You won't find this kind of record or return on stocks.

  11. who by mastershake_phd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It was found two years ago

    Who found it? And how did they know what it was? Did Sir Alec Guinness write his name on the collar?

    1. Re:who by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      The strong minded knew it was the right cloak when weak-minded individuals kept referring to the cloak as "this isn't the cloak you are looking for."

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re:who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They spot it in the corner of the Star War Kid video...

    3. Re:who by gkhan1 · · Score: 1

      Somebody probably started to go through the archives of the movie studio, tracking it film by film till they finally found it in some warehouse in Hoboken.

    4. Re:who by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon...it was missing for years and then they conveniently found it and said, "oh, I've been looking for these." Kind of like the Rose Law firm billing records.

    5. Re:who by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who found it?

      Someone found it crumpled up on the floor of the Death Star.

    6. Re:who by Clever7Devil · · Score: 1

      And how did they know what it was?

      There was a faint image of Obi Wan Kenobi's on the cloak. Some Jedi scholars believe this is an after-image resulting from his ascendancy to a force-based entity.

      --
      "By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to suspect 'Hungry.'" -Gary Larson
    7. Re:who by VWJedi · · Score: 1

      Someone found it crumpled up on the floor of the Death Star.

      A small section of floor and the cloak being the only parts of the Death Star to withstand the massive explosion...

      Sorry, did you miss that part of the movie?

    8. Re:who by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I didn't say WHEN they found it. There was a substantial time period between the time Obi-Wan Kenobi was killed, and the Death Star was destroyed by rebel forces based out of Yavin IV. Considering the pristine condition of the hallways of the Death Star, it seems highly unlikely that the robe would just be left there for the weeks or months that took place between the two events.

      Don't try to outgeek me; I get geekier things than you in my breakfast cereal.

  12. Missing, presumed rented by mccalli · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the summary: "According to the article, the cloak was missing for nearly 30 years, during which it was rented out to a number of other films, including the Mummy."

    For rent: one cloak. Location: unknown. Cost: If sir needs to ask, sir cannot afford it. Renter collects.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  13. Dr Who scarf by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know I'm a sad fanboy for pointing this out, but the "Doctor Who" scarf pictured in the article and purported to be part of Tom Baker's costume, looks nothing like any of the scarves he wore on the show.

    1. Re:Dr Who scarf by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're only a sad Dr. Who fanboy if you wrote that while wearing one of Tom Baker's original scarves.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    2. Re:Dr Who scarf by Zebadias · · Score: 1

      That website burns my eyes!

    3. Re:Dr Who scarf by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness mine is just a homemade copy!

    4. Re:Dr Who scarf by bhima · · Score: 1

      That makes two of us.

      My Gran got no end of amusement out making it too.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    5. Re:Dr Who scarf by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      I suspect that's because it has faded. All color clothing (and color pictures too) will fade over time, especially if regularly exposed to UV radiation (sunlight). Drastic variations in temperature (i.e. keeping stuff in the attic) will also make them brittle. And water will fade and discolor as well.

      I guess nothing lasts forever.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Dr Who scarf by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      It's not just the color, the stripes are all wrong. On the original scarves the stripes were of all different widths. This scarf seems to have stripes of identical widths.

    7. Re:Dr Who scarf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the article for the lot it says he never wore this outfit on TV, only for personal appearances.

    8. Re:Dr Who scarf by MichaelJ · · Score: 1

      According to Outpost Gallifrey, "The Fourth Doctor costume was discussed, where it was clarified that the costume wasn't used in the series itself, but was used by Tom Baker for public appearances like conventions."

      --

      Michael J.
      Root, God, what is difference?
    9. Re:Dr Who scarf by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Ok, so its BBC news that got it wrong. Thanks for the info!

  14. Jedi Mind Tricks!! by canipeal · · Score: 1

    \waves hand *You will over pay for this Cloak*

  15. McCoy's costume sold for more by Brian+Cohen · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article implies that this broke some sort of record, but the article fails to mention the space suit worn by Dr. McCoy wore in "The Tholian Web" that sold for $144,000 at the Christie's Star Trek auction.

    1. Re:McCoy's costume sold for more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it just says that it sold for more than any of the other costumes in that auction. No mention or implication of record breaking that I can see. On that note, I believe that there are other costumes/props that beat the McKoy spacesuit - I think the Superman suit worn by Steve Reeves went for 150,000 and one of the original lightsabers for 200,000.

    2. Re:McCoy's costume sold for more by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      The cowardly lion's costume from the Wizard of Oz sold for $700,000, making neither one of these items close to the record amount paid for movie props/costumes.

      --
      I got nothin'
  16. Dr Who items also sold by acroyear · · Score: 4, Informative

    Outpost Gallifrey is reporting that several original Dr. Who costumes were sold in the same auction, and Tom Baker's coat and scarf took in over 24000 GBP. Other Doctors' costumes took between 1000 and 8000 GBP each.

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
  17. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FTA:

    While Sir Alec's cloak was missing, it was loaned to other films - including The Mummy in 1999 - and was even hired out as fancy dress.

    How was it loaned if it was missing? And ever more... how was it "hired out"?!

    1. Re:Moo by Reziac · · Score: 1

      That sort of thing is typically owned by a prop or costuming house, not by the studio. Studios tell 'em "we need to rent NN-many cloaks of this description" and the costuming house brings them forth for the production, then hauls them away afterward, to be cleaned and stuffed back into storage until the next studio wants "NN-many cloaks of this description".

      This is why these items ultimately wind up sold at auction, or in a used clothing shop (there are several in Hollywood that specialize in such stuff) some years later, rather than in a museum or as part of a studio attraction (like Universal's Tour).

      Almost everything in the average Hollywood production that CAN be rented, IS most often rented, rather than owned. Costumes and props are no different.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

      Interesting, thanx. :)

  18. $100k For Kenobi's Cloak by Kortegaard · · Score: 5, Informative


    Ahhhh, but the oldies are the goodies.

    Judy's red slippers in Wizard of Oz stepped away for $666,000

    1. Re:$100k For Kenobi's Cloak by comradeeroid · · Score: 5, Funny

      $666 thousand? Who bought them? The devil?

      --
      If you see a rock violating the law of gravity, then the law is wrong, not the rock!
    2. Re:$100k For Kenobi's Cloak by ezzewezza · · Score: 1

      Were they Prada? Because I hear that's what the devil wears.

    3. Re:$100k For Kenobi's Cloak by SlashRSlashN · · Score: 1

      Wow, the person that bought it must have really wanted to get home!

    4. Re:$100k For Kenobi's Cloak by Scoldog · · Score: 1

      $666 thousand? Who bought them? The devil?
      "There's no place like hell!"
      --
      This space for rent
  19. Slashdotters by aldo.gs · · Score: 1

    So the owner is not a slashdotter? Shame on you! :P

  20. Surely it's in pieces from Vader's cruel stroke? by QuatermassX · · Score: 1

    If I remember rightly, Darth Vader cruelly sliced Obi-Wan in half and the Jedi Master vanished to be one with The Force? Surely Vader's lightsaber cut through the cloth of the cloak?

    Ahem.

  21. They would have found it sooner... by Dannon · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ...but the guy in charge of inventory kept insisting, "This is not the cloak you're looking for."

    --
    Good judgment comes from experience.
    Experience comes from bad judgment.
    1. Re:They would have found it sooner... by brouski · · Score: 1

      Question. This article had been posted for over an hour before your post.

      How could you not know that this joke would have been done 5 times already?

      --
      Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
  22. Is it really real? by smwoflson · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know how this cloak was authenticated? The only reason I ask is because if it was lost for 30 years and then rented out to other studios, it seems that said cloak could have easily been misplaced, replaced, taken by someone to give to his/her kid, etc. I'm not saying that it ISN'T the real thing... and I'm certain that there was authentication, but I'm just curious if anyone out there knows how it was done. I ask because its my understanding that in like the art world, there is a lot of forgery going around a lot of the time, and they have very strict authentication standards. I'm curious if the same is true for amazingly famous movie props.

    1. Re:Is it really real? by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter, the Force overrides provenance.

    2. Re:Is it really real? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Good point. Many movie props have many duplicates, in case one gets damaged, or if one is planned to be damaged during filming. After the fact, it'd be very difficult to tell which was the one that was really filmed, and which was a standby prop.

      I have some friends that have an actual Yoda. It most definitly isn't the one that made it to film, it's more like a pre-production prototype. (looks just like him tho)

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    3. Re:Is it really real? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, I suppose one thing that would help is that it's a one of a kind, hand made article. It is possible several identical robes were made, as sometimes happens, but they may not have made a dozen cloaks for Sir Alec, given that his role wasn't all that physically demanding. SW was pretty low rent -- even the Vader mask was reportedly a bit irregular and assymetric.

      Altogether, this probably means that the cloak could be compared in great detail to the original footage, both for irregularities in tailoring and overall dimensions. Being a cloak, it's unlikely to have been altered. You could probably get a pretty penny for the suit Marlon Brando wore in the Godfather, except chances are it's been altered or possibly torn apart and put together several times.

      Finally, as computer geeks we know having a back pointers doesn't mean we have a forward pointer. The cloak may have changed hands several times. Each organization might have a record of where they got the cloak, but no record of what they did with it. I imagine costumes get ruined and thrown out all the time, so they may not keep precise records of how costumes are disposed of.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:Is it really real? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      It's probably based on the rental records of the costuming company that last had it in inventory. These things have inventory numbers, often sewn into the garment. And the fact is, it's probably one of *several* that were either used or on standby during the filming of Star Wars, with no way to tell which one it was.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Is it really real? by Shinglor · · Score: 1

      If it can't be tested then does it really matter either way? If you're only buying it for psychological value then a placebo would do just as well.

  23. Not the Cloak You're Looking For by Deewun · · Score: 1

    Some people are saying this is not, in fact, Ben Kenobi's cloak. It's just an expensive dressing gown. This site is one of the better sites for real-life Star Wars history, and one of the commentators in the linked thread is a prop collector. He's unimpressed, and so am I. (Although perhaps for different reasons.)

    1. Re:Not the Cloak You're Looking For by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's unimpressed, and so am I. (Although perhaps for different reasons.)

      And I'm unimpressed too, for even more different reasons...

  24. Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows you duped that cloak

  25. This reminds me of Half Baked by jerryodom · · Score: 1

    When Brian purchased Jerry Garcia in a pouch.

    --
    For some reason I refuse to use either spell check or the spacebar properly.
  26. big deal by jswigart · · Score: 1

    People pay tons of money for even more garbage than this. Virgin Mary in a pancake or grilled cheese will make you a pretty good chunk of change. Matter of fact, think I saw her on my toilet paper this morning, I feel a payday coming up.

  27. Re:Well, after your government has taken their sha by sqldr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, I didn't realise this was a nationalist forum for paranoid fox news watchers.

    --
    I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
  28. It's what the mafiaa has been preaching for years by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    It's not the MEDIUM that's valuable, it's the CONTENT...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  29. Re:Surely it's in pieces from Vader's cruel stroke by Alaria+Phrozen · · Score: 1

    What I don't get is: when he reappears to Luke why isn't he naked?

  30. Full Auction Catalog by GogglesPisano · · Score: 1

    The full catalog for the auction can be found at the Bonhoms auction site here. There's some cool stuff there for movie buffs, including costumes from Dr. Who, Alien, Superman, Indiana Jones and Highlander.

    A detailed picture of the Kenobi cloak can be found here. Apparently there are some hardcore Star Wars fans that doubt its authenticity, based on the locations of some hems and seams.

    1. Re:Full Auction Catalog by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What a lot of these hardcore fans don't recognise is that there probably wasn't just ONE "Kenobi cloak" -- there probably were half a dozen, to allow for damage, cleaning, etc. (they can't stop the cameras for a week just because you spilled coffee on your costume -- they bring out another one, you change, and off you go again).

      An item that's not yet in the costuming house's inventory is usually stitched together quick and dirty, so I'd be surprised if the probable-several-cloaks were more than a cursory match -- good enough for the camera at the time, if not for the nitpickers 3 decades later. And over the course of being rented out for later productions, these cloaks probably underwent minor alterations/repairs, too.

      As I recall, there were at least 8 partial or full Darth Vader costumes from the first 3 films. So if anyone claims to have the One True Costume, they're delusional. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  31. i bet it was... by pohl · · Score: 1

    ...ESR.

    --

    The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

  32. Slightly OT... by sqldr · · Score: 1

    A relative died the same week as Alec Guinness, and they happened to be in the same morgue. I saw Alec Guinness's corpse. Does that count as a star spot?

    --
    I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
  33. What I want to know... by fonetik · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Is what sold for the LEAST. Did they have a scarf that Dustin Hoffman wore in "Ishtar"? Kevin Bacon's Bike from "Quicksilver"? Someone had to get some bargains there.

    1. Re:What I want to know... by coredog64 · · Score: 1

      If you bought Kevin Bacon's bike and then sent a video of yourself riding it into your swimming pool to AFV, what would your "Kevin Bacon" number be?

  34. Too much money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a cloak that's sliced in half and with lightsabre burns.

  35. "This is not the tax writeoff you're looking for" by anandamide · · Score: 1

    ...it had to be said.

  36. Didn't mean to pay so much, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a voice in my head said, "If you bid me down, I shall become more powerful than even you can imagine."

  37. A dinner jacket? by Krater76 · · Score: 1

    The cloak sold for more than any of the other movie costumes the article listed, beating out Sean Connery's dinner jacket from Thunderball and a helmet worn by Terry Jones in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

    Shocking. How about comparing it to some good memorabilia? If it was say up against the golden gun that would be a good comparison. A dinner jacket? Meh.

    This reminds me of when my wife and I were on vacation. We were in Honolulu and ate at the Planet Hollywood there. They have memorabilia but most of it is crap. We tried to find the most obscure thing we could and sure enough: the 'costume' (a t-shirt and shorts) worn by Andrew McCarthy in "Weekend at Bernies 2". We were truly in the presence of greatness...

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  38. teh cloak by harry666t · · Score: 1

    Wait, I thought it was lost when Luke destroyed the 1st death star?

    Perhaps Vader took it to his TIE fighter.

  39. Great... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    Somewhere there's a naked Jedi running around.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  40. Dr Who Items not from show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently, the Dr Who stuff was promotional material (for publicity, etc.) and was never used on-screen in the actual show.

    The fanboys with good eyes already noticed that it didn't look like anything from an actual episode.

  41. wow by Dretep · · Score: 0

    Slap me silly and mod me flamebait but the replies to this article can be used as samples as to how nerdy half the subscribers on Slashdot really are.

  42. The joke's on him! by pavon · · Score: 1

    Wait till he finds out that Jedis don't have corpses.

    1. Re:The joke's on him! by db32 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he should get the lightsaber too and just toss them in a pile to be accurate.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  43. what a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a Waste of Money

    1. Re:what a waste by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
      You can't "waste" money - it always goes somewhere.

      Unless of course, you physically destroy the banknotes.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  44. Re:Surely it's in pieces from Vader's cruel stroke by Prien715 · · Score: 1

    Mythologically speaking, after you die, you re-appear as an "image" rather than "in person". No one asks a ghost "Where'd you get your clothes?"

    In short, if you've conquered death, making a holographic cloak shouldn't be too hard;)

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  45. Best auction item ever by Destoo · · Score: 1

    I wonder for how much did the coconuts go for?

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  46. Some quotes you might hear out of the bedroom by nephridium · · Score: 4, Funny

    Impressive!
    Most impressive!
    Use the force, Luke!
    I can't - it's too big!
    All right, don't lose your temper. I'll come right back and give you a hand.
    Let go, Luke!
    Luke, you switched off your targeting computer, what's wrong?


    And if he's more of the "kinky" kind we'll also hear:

    Now I am the master!
    Steady, girl. What's the matter? You smell something?
    Now, release your anger!

    And of course:

    The target area is only two meters wide. It's a small thermal exhaust port, right below the main port. The shaft leads directly to the reactor system.. Only a precise hit will set up a chain reaction.

    --


    And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
    1. Re:Some quotes you might hear out of the bedroom by Minwee · · Score: 1

      You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought.

      What a really wonderful idea. What an incredible new smell you've discovered.

      My parts are showing? Oh, my goodness, oh!

      She may not look like much, but she's got it where it counts, kid. I've made a lot of special modifications myself.

      Curse my metal body. I wasn't fast enough. It's all my fault.

      Get in there, you big furry oaf! I don't care what you smell!

      Your powers are weak, old man.

  47. Rented? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    So... it's been missing until 2 years ago but was used in The Mummy (1999)? How did they get a hold of it if it was 'missing' then?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Rented? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because missing != didn't exist

  48. Only one? by polyex · · Score: 1

    Usually in film, if the costume is relatively simple like a robe, a couple of examples of the same outfit are made or purchased as opposed to other more expensive props which sometimes have only one copy made. Its much easier for different locations, safety of a backup, stunts etc. I would be curious what the provenance showed for this particular robe as being the one and only one that showed up on film, especially considering the ridiculous price paid.