Slashdot Mirror


Blackberry Network is Down

Brian writes "According to CNET and others, "A system failure at Research In Motion has affected BlackBerry users in the Western Hemisphere, a news channel reported on its Web site late on Tuesday. The infrastructure failed on Tuesday night, and e-mails were not being delivered to the handheld devices.""

243 comments

  1. Better headline needed by neoform · · Score: 4, Funny

    Common, this was an easy one!

    "Blackberry Blackout"

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
    1. Re:Better headline needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      COME ON! Two words. Two very short, very simple words. Even the vast majority of non-English speakers get this one correct. What possible excuse can you have? I'll accept dyslexia as the only valid answer.

    2. Re:Better headline needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's so 'common' about it? Does this happen frequently?

    3. Re:Better headline needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Blackberry is down! I repeat, Blackberry is down!

    4. Re:Better headline needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I guess noone told him it was two words

    5. Re:Better headline needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Blackberry down! Blackberry down!"

    6. Re:Better headline needed by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too bad for them because my iPhone is still up and running. Oh, wait ...

    7. Re:Better headline needed by operagost · · Score: 1

      "Crackberry Crackup"

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:Better headline needed by keepingmyheaddown · · Score: 1

      NOC Knockout Blacks Out Blackberry

    9. Re:Better headline needed by AugustZephyr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does anyone have a mobile link for the website. I can't seem to connect to it on my blackberry.

    10. Re:Better headline needed by Goffee71 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Blackberry Jam.... leaves room head bowed in shame

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    11. Re:Better headline needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:Better headline needed by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 5, Funny

      Blackberry Jam.

    13. Re:Better headline needed by Petra_von_Kant · · Score: 1
      FTA, ".... left the network for its BlackBerry devices in the Western Hemisphere...." then " ..... that affected BlackBerry in North America .....".


      I realise that the latter is a subset of the former, but despite all best attempts by the latter, the former is not a subset of the latter.


      I only bring his up because (at least for one major user in Australia) there was no hiccough.



      "You've got a chart filling a whole wall with interlocking pathways
      and reactions to shock and the researcher says "If I can just control
      this one molecule/enzyme/compound I'll stop the whole negative
      physiologic cascade of post haemorrhagic shock." Yeah, right."

    14. Re:Better headline needed by neoform · · Score: 1

      you win, that's better ;)

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
  2. OH NO! by Jhon · · Score: 4, Funny

    My thumbs are twitching!

    1. Re:OH NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      First Post!

      ------
      Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld

    2. Re:OH NO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the funniest thing I've seen in a while on Slashdot!

  3. Crap! by Gen.+Malaise · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I have to go in to work and explain that I dont control the Blackberry network........Cmon RIM!!

    1. Re:Crap! by somersault · · Score: 1

      I know.. my lusers have been having Blackberry issues for a couple of months, and I keep trying to tell them that our email servers are fine, it's their crappy network that is causing their delays!!!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Crap! by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      That's okay, my BOSSES have been having issues with their Crackberries. And yes, I get to keep explaining that our email servers are perfectly fine.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    3. Re:Crap! by MentalMooMan · · Score: 0

      It's times like this that I'm glad that I do control my own "blackberry network", and don't rely on little black boxes to do all of my work for me.
      Today is a good day to be a geek with a PDA that doesn't hide the innards from its owner.

      --
      43rd Law of Computing:
      Anything that can go wr
      fortune: Segmentation violation -- Core Dumped
    4. Re:Crap! by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well actually it is my Bosses that are using them (apart from a few people who like me are using WM5 phones), and I've been trying to restrain myself from telling them not to hassle me about it again :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:Crap! by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 1

      Perhaps your relationship with your boss requires a little more... umm... "spark"...

      Cut open a power cable and get them to hold it while you plug it in... if it doesn't work at least you had the fun of it!

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    6. Re:Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So true, man so true.

      We have multiple BB servers, use Boxtone, a cron job thats sends the entire IT department an email every 30 minutes with a subject of "Yes, the BB system is still working" so those of us with BBs can verify it is actually working from end to end twice an hour and I restring fresh garlic around the server weekly. All in an attempt to keep the users off of our back. Nothing more frustrating then getting an earful because a user is in Winchestertonville Iowa and they do not have coverage and they want it fixed right now. The clients they are with have BBs and they work, why does mine not work? WTF? Well, maybe they are not using TMobile? They come back to the office in a rage, we swap everything over to a different carriers device for them and then we get the same call a week later because they are in Europe and they have no signal. Of course we told them that before switching them that international would not work with that carrier but they seem to have forget that small tidbit. Rinse, lather, repeat.

    7. Re:Crap! by somersault · · Score: 1

      That could work, if it wasn't for the fact that my boss is good friends with my uncle - which is the reason he even works here in the first place! Thankfully he isn't actually *my* boss per se, he's just one of the managers, and technically I'm a manager too, albeit just of any IT issues :p There are plenty of other people who would be willing to try out the power cable thing though, I'll try suggesting it to them subliminally in domain wide emails.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:Crap! by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

      ha! We just deployed blackberries to everyone here about three months ago. As the IT person, I fought strongly for WM5 phones, but I was shot down. I love being able to say "I told you so".

    9. Re:Crap! by PinkPanther · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it's their crappy network that is causing their delays!

      Being a heavily-addicted user (and admin) myself, I have to say that the VAST majority of the time the RIM network is quite responsive. Often I'll send something to my work account from my gmail account and the browser screen just barely finishes refreshing from clicking "send" and my hip is vibrating from the new love.

      --
      It's a simple matter of complex programming.
    10. Re:Crap! by somersault · · Score: 1

      Indeed. They're more complex to setup (as in I doubt the average user here wouldn't be able to do it themselves what with needing the certificate put on and then the server configured in ActiveSync), but they give great results. Another Microsoft product that I actually have a little respect for.. the list is growing, albeit very slowly, heh..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:Crap! by somersault · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Regardless, I'm kind of thinking that they're a victim of their own success, and every time my users have been having delays I'm thinking that RIM are doing a poor job of keeping up with demand. It could just be problems with the local telcos of course, but here we see that the whole network has gone down, and I really am not surprised after the Blackberry issues we've had for the last couple of months.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    12. Re:Crap! by arivanov · · Score: 1

      All I can say - thanks god I changed jobs and I am no longer anywhere near the cretinous gooseberry service. I remember with extreme "fondness" how our sales and marketing director at the time rang half of the company at 1am after we deployed greylisting on the mailservers and his crotch stopped receiving the necessary stimulation. If something like this would have happened at the time the mayhem would have been complete. And anyway, this is for the better. At least some people will finally realise that it is not just a device, it is a service as well. And a service which is being provided by a company which you have no legal recourse to deal with and which is generally outside your jurisdiction.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    13. Re:Crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Does it plug in? ...then it's your fault.

    14. Re:Crap! by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Generally, IME, it is the local telcos. We have two major providers and often we'll see a drop in responsiveness for some users but not all, and it's almost always the case that the users are with the same telco.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  4. I feel a disturbance in the net... by cnelzie · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...as though a million voices just cried out and were suddenly silenced.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:I feel a disturbance in the net... by Compact+Dick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Voices? Silenced?

      Much you have to learn, young PDAwan.

    2. Re:I feel a disturbance in the net... by God'sDuck · · Score: 5, Funny

      Much you have to learn, young PDAwan.
      Dear Sir, please send payment for:
      • 1: New Coffee
      • 1: New Monitor
      to: 123 Fake street, Fakeville, NY, 12345. Thank you.
    3. Re:I feel a disturbance in the net... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Voices? Silenced?

      ok, ok, it's like two million tiny thumbs flailed away their chicklets, but instead of sending messages, well, they simply looked retarded.

    4. Re:I feel a disturbance in the net... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      to: 123 Fake street, Fakeville, NY, 12345. Thank you.

      If he's sending them there, presumably you'll want a decaf with non-dairy creamer, and one of those cardboard pictures of a monitor like they have at Office Depot.

  5. Man, this isn't good for RIM... by Markus_UW · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the service interruption, but imagine the backlog once everyone realizes their crackberries are working again... Frankly, I'm scared.

    1. Re:Man, this isn't good for RIM... by daeg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They have about a half hour to fix it before the stock market opens. From what I've seen, they've already taken a massive hit. I wonder how much of their gain since Oct 2006 they'll lose (They jumped from around $79 to over $130 in the 4th quarter last year).

      They're already down close to $3.60 in pre-market alone. Ouch.

      A hundred thousand angry users plus thousands of angry investors? Someone's got a case of the, uh.. Wednesdays.

    2. Re:Man, this isn't good for RIM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to buy some crack, um, I mean rim stock I guess if you want it

    3. Re:Man, this isn't good for RIM... by jsewell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Incredible! They were down at the open, but are now UP 5 bucks from yesterday's close! An outage taking out all of North America and the stock is up. Why don't I own some RIMM?

    4. Re:Man, this isn't good for RIM... by daeg · · Score: 1

      Contrary to my prior post, it makes sense. This has happened before, for instance, with power companies or utilities that suffer a major outage, only to rebound strongly after fixing the issue without losses and with minimal interruption. I don't know if it's worth a $3 increase in RIMM's case, since they are likely the ones that caused the incident to begin with, accidental or otherwise. Utilities generally are hit by natural causes, or a retard digging where he shouldn't dig. Still, I was kind of hoping for a massive crash. I hate those little devices. :P

    5. Re:Man, this isn't good for RIM... by stokessd · · Score: 1

      Yup, it's proof that they can aggressively respond to major problems (how the problem happened seems to elude many investors). The company looks good...It's time to get a RIMM Job.

  6. There's some other coverage on this.... by 8127972 · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:There's some other coverage on this.... by Markus_UW · · Score: 1

      Haha I like the gizmodo article, it made me chuckle...

    2. Re:There's some other coverage on this.... by kbahey · · Score: 1

      And from the CBC.

  7. Back by 11:00 EDT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is expected to be back up by 11:00 EST.

    1. Re:Back by 11:00 EDT by trcooper · · Score: 1

      It's back in Omaha, NE now. Thank god... I really missed that thing annoying the hell out of me on my drive into work.

    2. Re:Back by 11:00 EDT by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Off-topic:
      Woo, Omaha!

      --
      No existe.
  8. must resist Great Disturbance In The Force joke... by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because millions of voices really ARE crying out in pain. Man, the cooler we make things, and the more that entire business cultures get built around this stuff, the more fragile it is. Just think of the war stories we're going to hear about people who've come to utterly depends on their Crackberries having lost a deal, not heard that a critical server was down, not realized that a surgery had been rescheduled, and so on. I wouldn't make a living if people didn't depend on fancy networked technologies, but it sure does feel like a house of cards, some days.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  9. BES users potentially not affected? by WolfTattoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For what its worth, my employer (in Washington D.C.) has their own Blackberry Enterprise Server (an on-site server that interfaces directly with corporate mail systems), and it appears to be unaffected by this outage.

    1. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      Good opportunity to wander in, smack the server repeatedly with a hammer and take the rest of the day off cos you cant get hold of anyone on their blackberries if you ask me.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by davidmcw · · Score: 1

      As do we, but we are horribly, horribly, but a little refreshingly, down.

      --
      Just because your paranoid doesn't really mean they aren't out to get you
    3. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by nherc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Doesn't BES still have to interface with the RIM network to get the cellular data to the 'net?

      --
      'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
    4. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by protactin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes.

    5. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by MartijnL · · Score: 1

      Is that still the one that needs full administrative access to the Exchange server ? I haven't been around Blackberry since I read that one (coupled with the fact that the Blackberry Server couldn't be placed in a DMZ but had to be in direct contact with the Exchange backend.

    6. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by Philosinfinity · · Score: 4, Informative

      RIM lost their primary NOC last night. Your BES transmits data to their NOC including mailflow routing and SRP information. This issue affects the Americas entirely and is currently fixed for Sprint and Nextel. GPRS/EEDGE providers are still unable to contact back to RIM at the present time. So, if you are a Sprint or Nextel shop, this would explain why you are not experiencing the issue at this time. However, everyone was experiencing it from 6:30PM CDT to about 3:00AM CDT.

    7. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by davidmcw · · Score: 1

      We're Sprint and we are still down.... :-S

      --
      Just because your paranoid doesn't really mean they aren't out to get you
    8. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by Philosinfinity · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm. I wonder if RIM is rejecting your SRP due to lack of connectivity (even though it was caused by their fault). Log into the BES and see if your users are showing pending messages. If they are then you may not be communicating with RIM yet. You may want to call the T-Support number and check in with them. If there are no pendings, then RIM is just severely backlogged with mail to deliver and your messages are sitting in RIM's queue. They gave us an "official" all clear for CDMA devices, so I don't see why you would be experiencing any problems.

    9. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by davidmcw · · Score: 1

      We just came back up. The emails are flooding in, oh goody.

      --
      Just because your paranoid doesn't really mean they aren't out to get you
    10. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by squallbsr · · Score: 1

      Remember the outage affects the western part of the US, last I checked Washington DC is on the EAST coast, which probably means you weren't affected...

      --
      Sleep: A completely inadequate substitution for Caffeine.
    11. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HUH? You made the wrong assumption there. You are not actually resposnsible for your BlackBerry system or your Email system right?
      Having your own BES has nothing to do with this. Your BES reads mail from your mail system and sends it to RIM, RIM sends it to the devices. RIM is down therefore your BBs are down. Of course at 8:43 this morning, it may have been working.

      As of 9:47AM:
      A small sampling of our T-Mobile devices starting getting mail about an hour ago. Our Verizon devices started getting them about 30 minutes later. The first mail we started seeing delivered was NEW mail currently being processed by our BES, mail sent out while the system was down started coming in a little later. This may be a throttling attempt by RIM to prevent overloading the system and causing further problems or RIM started processing mail before firing up the queue or delayed mail. Typically when RIM or the carrier go down, delivery is a little scattered until everything stabilizes. At least this time, we did not have to restart any services on our BES servers.

    12. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 1

      I'm on T-Mobile and it just came back up!

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    13. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

      RIM lost their primary NOC last night. Your BES transmits data to their NOC including mailflow routing and SRP information. This issue affects the Americas entirely and is currently fixed for Sprint and Nextel. GPRS/EEDGE providers are still unable to contact back to RIM at the present time.

      I'll LOL if RIM is FOOBAR and can't GBTW but my PHB won't ROFL that the BOFH at RIM is AFK. LBC, 213.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    14. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by Philosinfinity · · Score: 4, Informative

      NOC = Network Operations Center
      RIM = Research In Motion
      BES = Blackberry Enterprise Server
      SRP = Server Routing Protocol
      GPRS = General Packet Radio Service
      EDGE = Enhanced Data GSM Environment
      IHBT, HAND

    15. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Blackberry Server (BES) has to have access to the Exchange mailboxes, how else is it supposed to work?
      Which would you rather have
      1) The BES internal and allow it specific two way access to RIM over a specific port.
      2) The BES on the DMZ and allow access to your Exchange server from your DMZ.

      Scenario 1 is a far better solution. Remember, IT is here to provide technology for the company and IT departments provide a service to the money making parts of the company. You provide what the users desire and need in the business evironment in the most secure and logical manner you can. 100% securuity and no functionality is not an option or your business would not be able to do any business. Opening up an internal server port on a BES for data flow to RIM is a security risk or a disadvantage but users having a BB and the capability to send and receive corporate email, contacts, and calandar updated in real time is a huge business advantage.

    16. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EAST: PASS

    17. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everyone knows that!

    18. Re:BES users potentially not affected? by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      Sorry about the dalay.

      --
      This message was posted from my BlackBerry!

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  10. Not very reassuring. by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A single point of failure can bring down the entire network? Not very reassuring, especially considering Blackberry is predominately a business tool.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Not very reassuring. by 8127972 · · Score: 1

      A single point of failure can bring down the entire network? Not very reassuring, especially considering Blackberry is predominately a CRITICAL business tool.

      There. Fixed that for you.

      --
      This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    2. Re:Not very reassuring. by lbmouse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they're on a shared server with Turbo Tax.

    3. Re:Not very reassuring. by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      especially considering Blackberry is predominately a CRITICAL business tool.

      Contrary to popular belief. E-mail is NOT a critical business tool. You don't believe me? Then compare e-mail with the following:


      Supply Chain Systems? Critical.

      Customer Order/Customer Relationship Systems? Critical.

      Manufacturing systems? Critical.

      Payroll? Absolutely the single MOST critical application at most enterprises (especially during pay runs).

      But, e-mail is not critical. When I've been involved in storage meetings, e-mail is always a Tier Three application. In other words, while it is a useful tool, there are other ways of contacting people in an emergency. You know, like by telephone.

    4. Re:Not very reassuring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to popular belief. E-mail is NOT a critical business tool. You don't believe me? Then compare e-mail with the following:

      Supply Chain Systems? Critical.
      Customer Order/Customer Relationship Systems? Critical.
      Manufacturing systems? Critical.
      Payroll? Absolutely the single MOST critical application at most enterprises (especially during pay runs).


      I've worked at companies where most of those functions ARE handled by email.

    5. Re:Not very reassuring. by fabs64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a ridiculous statement, quite often those things you stated rely on email, as it is a means of COMMUNICATION, and in quite a few businesses, the primary one. Supply chain is worthless if crm can't communicate with them, ditto for manufacturing, payroll is worthless if they can't communicate with accounting or HR. Also note, for those things the phone is not an option, it must be in writing. Try to keep in mind that many, many businesses do not reside in one office, or one building, or one postcode, or one country, before you make a silly comment like "e-mail is not critical".

      And even putting aside all that, it depends on the business, for an IT consultancy, network admin, software dev house, e-mail is pretty fucking critical.

    6. Re:Not very reassuring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      yes, but my scripts don't *telephone* me when one of our servers go down.

    7. Re:Not very reassuring. by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      Most businesses have adapted to the point that no useful work can be done during a long email outage. Even when everybody does have a phone, the directory is stored online, not as paper phonebooks. Most of the communication that email is used for cannot be done effectively over the phone. Email is also the fastest method of business communication that is still precise enough for critical tasks.

      Consider the effect when email goes down, as compared with other things you list. When an ordering system goes down, you postpone or lose a few sales, but the rest of the company keeps going. When manufacturing goes down, your supply chain starts to run dry and some people might get their product late. When payroll goes down for a few days, you hurry to make up for lost time and send out the paychecks asap. When email goes down, the entire organization goes on auto-pilot, which for most companies means that workers default to doing the dumbest things. This may lead to any number of further problems arising or going unresolved for too long.

    8. Re:Not very reassuring. by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow, you must be one of the users that is freaking out over Blackberry today.

      Supply chain is worthless if crm can't communicate with them, ditto for manufacturing, payroll is worthless if they can't communicate with accounting or HR.

      Most of the systems I describe have a DR and/or failover capability because they are considered critical to the operations of the business. Personally, I have NEVER seen an e-mail system that has had DR or Failover. Beyond DR, ask an even more important question: In the event of disaster, how quickly does e-mail come back up on-line? Is it the first system recovered? Or are there 35 other systems that are recovered before e-mail? That should tell you how important e-mail is in comparison to your company's other systems.

      Now, let's talk about using e-mail as an interface: Does the communication you describe have to occur via e-mail? I have been working in IT for 15 years and I have never seen a place that depends upon an e-mail to interface between any of the systems I described. For example, if I am running a Supply Chain system, I can keep the supply chain moving for hours without worrying about ANY e-mail communication with external systems. Well-designed Supply Chain systems use EDI (not e-mail) for communication. And, EDI is usually built with redundancy and DR capability If they don't use EDI, they depend upon someone manually entering the information into a screen, or even a flat file. If I absolutely MUST contact someone, I just call their phone. As for Payroll, payroll runs at even small companies are not dependent upon e-mail. The timekeeping systems interact with the Payroll systems via EDI or some sort of file transfer that is NOT dependent upon Exchange/Domino.

      Hell, even if I am in hardware support and my e-mail server crashes, I should be smart enough to log directly into my messaging console to keep an eye on the status of my other servers. Most monitoring tools use e-mail to send messages to Operations. My operations department had better be able to log into their consoles to check the systems real-time and not be waiting for the e-mail system to recover.

      Also note, for those things the phone is not an option, it must be in writing.

      There are a few options here: If you are running a normal PO approval process, then there is always an expected time-lag in approvals. My manager cannot be expected to drop everything to approve my new business-card order system. And, if there is an emergency, well-designed systems have an override that allows for exceptions.

      Try to keep in mind that many, many businesses do not reside in one office, or one building, or one postcode, or one country, before you make a silly comment like "e-mail is not critical".

      Firstly, I work for a Fortune 500 company. We are spread all over the world.

      Secondly, There is nothing silly about my statement. E-mail is NOT critical. People THINK it's critical because it is the system they have the most 'face-time' with. But, face-time is not equal to criticality. If your organization has built interfaces or business processes that depend upon someone approving something via e-mail, then you have a very poorly designed system. You can easily have interfaces move directly between systems without ANY human interaction. You can build custom web-pages to allow approvers the ability to make their approval directly in the purchasing system.

    9. Re:Not very reassuring. by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      yes, but my scripts don't *telephone* me when one of our servers go down.

      So, you don't know how to log into your monitoring management console to check the status of your servers? Most organizations have an e-mail or a page sent when a server crashes. But, the fail-over method is for the Operations department to actually, you know, log into the monitoring application and keep an eye on things for a few hours.

    10. Re:Not very reassuring. by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      When an ordering system goes down, you postpone or lose a few sales, but the rest of the company keeps going. When manufacturing goes down, your supply chain starts to run dry and some people might get their product late. When payroll goes down for a few days, you hurry to make up for lost time and send out the paychecks asap.

      I knew a person that was involved in the implementation of a new Payroll System for the Port Authority of New York/New Jersey (think toll collectors for Bridges and Tunnels). He told me that if the first payroll run on the new payroll system had an error rate that was too high (and error rates for Payroll must be less than 2% at most organizations) then all of the union employees would go out on strike. As a result, every bridge and tunnel into and out of Manhattan would open up their gates and the Port Authority would lose MILLIONS of dollars in revenue for every hour that the error remained uncorrected.

      A few moths ago outside of Pittsburgh, a developer on a future Wal-Mart site had a hillside failure. Tons of dirt slid down a hill, across four lanes of traffic and onto a major railroad line. It took almost 7 days for the rail-line to be cleared. The developer not only had to pay fines to the government, the railroad billed the develop millions of dollars for the delay in the Supply Chain. While that is an extreme example, you should remember that Supply Chain systems for even small companies are built using "just-in-time" Theory. One minor screw up will mess up not only that one part of the Supply Chain, it will have ripple effects up and down the system. Even a minor hiccup in supply chain will cost thousands (if not millions) of dollars in revenue for every hour.

      I give you the two above examples in order to explain how important real enterprise-class systems are to an organization. One error can cost thousands, if not millions, of dollars.

      E-mail crashes do not cost that kind of money.

      How important is e-mail to your organization? To repeat what I posted earlier: Ask your IT department what their DR plan is. In the event of a Disaster at your Data Center, what is the order in which systems are brought back up. Is your e-mail server the first system that IT worries about? Or are other systems ahead of e-mail in the Recovery plan? That will tell you how important e-mail is.

    11. Re:Not very reassuring. by bitslinger_42 · · Score: 1

      Paper checks for 10,000 employees: $1000
      Pens to write on said checks: $ 50
      Envelopes in which to stuff checks:$ 100

      Not having to worry about that 3rd party company being a single point of failure for your payroll system: Priceless

      People like to think that you can't run a company any more without these whiz-bang technologies. I wonder how stuff got made and people got paid before the Interweb was created?

    12. Re:Not very reassuring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    13. Re:Not very reassuring. by AudioInfecktion · · Score: 1

      One Major error will cost more than warehousing stuff where it needs to be in some cases.. If I ever get to the point where my business relies on something being someplace, some amount of it is going to be kept there. No I's, A's or B's.

    14. Re:Not very reassuring. by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      One Major error will cost more than warehousing stuff where it needs to be in some cases

      I don't fully understand inventory, but from what I do understand, you are contradicting the theory behind "Just-in-time". It costs money to hold material that may or may not be used in some future process. It is much cheaper for a company to have the component arrive at the door of the factory the precise day in which the component is scheduled for installation.

      It sounds to me like you may be costing your organization some money. Then again, I am not a supply chain process expert. I've just coded on a few supply chain ERP systems.

    15. Re:Not very reassuring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have NEVER seen an e-mail system that has had DR or Failover. Beyond DR

      Well then the businesses your dealing are not relying on email then, or worse, they are relying on email and do not have a backup plan. I work at a medium sized company. We have clustered mail servers, mail servers in multple offices that can act as the mail servers for other offices (with the exception of your mailbox but you can still send and recieve new mail while in limbo), and if all of our systems are down at our company, within 60 seconds, our users are direced to MessageOne (a third party company) that will receive our email and all users are given a web interface to access it which they will also be able to send email from and have access to a recently syncronized copy of their contacts and calender from our system that is always less then 24 hours old. I'd say our company considers email VERY important.

    16. Re:Not very reassuring. by Greventls · · Score: 1

      Manufacturing is the only critical one I see on that list. Shutting down a process unexpectantly/improperly can kill people. The rest can't.

    17. Re:Not very reassuring. by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      Manufacturing is the only critical one I see on that list. Shutting down a process unexpectantly/improperly can kill people. The rest can't.

      I used Payroll more or less as a joke, although I wouldn't want to be the Payroll Admin on the day the Pay Run failed.

      Supply Chain is usually critical because of the way 'Just-In-Time' Inventory works. You could easily screw up a well-oiled machine if your Supply Chain system has an extensive outage. Would it kill people? Probably not. But, it could cost millions of dollars. And, that would kill someone's job.

    18. Re:Not very reassuring. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you don't know how to log into your monitoring management console to check the status of your servers?

      Not when I'm driving on the highway or sleeping. Email notification is vital for me. (YMMV).

  11. Cold-turkey for Crackberry-heads by redelm · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Well, it was bound to happen with a centralized/heirarchical service model. Perhaps RIM will learn and go decentralized. Perhaps not.

    More interesting will be the addicts reaction. Some people really hang on the devices and get addicted to their Crackberries. I wonder how they will adjust (most people will do just fine) and what lawsuits will result. Or if the plantiffs are too worred about simply having their service cancelled!

    1. Re:Cold-turkey for Crackberry-heads by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lawsuits? Surely any network-based buisness with a legal department worth a lick of salt would include provision in their terms and agreements of services that cover such instances of blackouts, loss of service, or even financial collapse of the company leaving addicts with their network device without a network.

      --
      Demented But Determined.
    2. Re:Cold-turkey for Crackberry-heads by redelm · · Score: 1
      So? Lawyers are creative, and don't need an iron-clad case to sue. One obvious suit is from a non-Crackberry user who sent email that wound up on a Crackberry. Say an order to a broker. Sure, the broker is _mostly_ liable for not executing the order. But RIM can certainly be made party to the suit, and it's liability adjudged.

  12. 123together seems to be up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although I did notice I couldn't browse some web sites last night and this morning. My email and phone calls are working fine!

  13. Re:must resist Great Disturbance In The Force joke by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    I already beat you to it.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  14. Can't be true.. by JohnHegarty · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can't be true... I would have got an email telling me if it was......

    1. Re:Can't be true.. by mtmra70 · · Score: 0

      Can't be true... I would have got an email telling me if it was...... You laugh, but I received an email from my work's NOC stating that there was a BlackBerry/RIM outage.
  15. Where is the redundancy??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to wonder where is the redundancy in a system if a failure such as this can occur. I shudder to think of the amount of money that will be lost by companies who have become dependent on the device. I wonder if there will be a lawsuit in the States from companies claiming lost revenue?

    1. Re:Where is the redundancy??? by Doctor-Optimal · · Score: 1

      The redundancy is right there, in your post, which was duplicated by earlier ones.

      --
      New punctuation update "~" (no quotes) at the end of a line to indicate sarcasm. ~
  16. more like all day tuesday by Hachey · · Score: 1

    This wasn't really Tuesday night methinks. My boss who is Deaf and uses a blackberry like the dickens for contacting outside the office said she couldn't send from it all Tuesday day, starting in the morning.

    --
    Please allow me to hate the creator of the 120-character limit: *HATES*. Thank you.
    1. Re:more like all day tuesday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nextel customers were hit yesterday; Verizon today.

    2. Re:more like all day tuesday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but how did she tell you this?

    3. Re:more like all day tuesday by dgbrownnt · · Score: 1

      It worked just fine for me in the morning. I even recieved an email around 10pm PST. After that, though, it went all fubar. (I'm on T-Mobile and have a Pearl)

      It's working just fine now.

      -D.G.

  17. Just count it like a Snow Day... by Moby+Cock · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... and tell everyone to stay home.

  18. Two Reactions by necro81 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can predict at least two possible reactions from end-users.

    First: jumping out of a building due to the terror and pain of sudden withdrawal. It happens to heroin addicts, it can happen here too, folks.

    Second: people wandering the streets of major cities bright-eyed and staring in open wonder, as though they were waking up from a long dream. Joining hand in hand, they frolic in the parks or whatever greenspace they can find chanting "Free at Last, Free at Last..." The clouds part, and an auspicious rainbow graces the sky. Oh, and I suppose there are other reactions: incoherent rage at no one in particular (ever chat with a cold-turkey smoking quitter?), unjustified rage at corporate IT for letting this happen, curling up in a fetal position in the corner, uncontrollable thumb twitching (almost like phantom limb pain).

    Then there's another reaction: simply shrugging and going back to computer-based email and cellphones.

    1. Re:Two Reactions by xdroop · · Score: 1
      Actually Corporate IT is probably safe -- it is only the RIM BES servers which are down. Here in Canada, if you have your own BES, it's business as usual.

      So Corporate IT is only in trouble if they cheaped out and didn't buy their own BES.

      --
      you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
    2. Re:Two Reactions by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      ...unjustified rage at corporate IT for letting this happen

      This seems the most plausible

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    3. Re:Two Reactions by Philosinfinity · · Score: 1

      Not true. RIM lost their primary North American NOC last night. Even if you have a BES, you are constantly transmitting data and messages to RIM (SRP for instance). Because SRP ping and because even when it was back up, RIM's DB wasn't online, even if you have your own BES (we have 3), you'd still have experienced the issue.

  19. Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by Peregr1n · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's fine here in the UK, and the rest of Europe. As far as I can tell it's the US server, which 'only' serves the USA and Canada. As mentioned by others though, one point of failure destroying such a large portion of the network is bad planning at the very least!

    1. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by Scutter · · Score: 1

      Western Hemisphere

      While it's true that some parts of Europe are west of the Prime Meridian, the Western Hemisphere is generally take to mean the Americas, especially in the context of this story.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    2. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Europe isn't the Western Hemisphere. The Western Hemisphere is North & South America. You guys are just the western part of Eurasia. :-P

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by taskforce · · Score: 2, Informative

      Considering the Prime Meridian runs through the middle of Greenwich, UK, half of the UK is in fact in the Western Hemisphere

      --
      My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
    4. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by userlame · · Score: 1

      I believe the affected systems were all of North America (at least from the DNS). I can confirm from work last night that the affected address was srp.us.blackberry.net which is a CNAME for srp.na.blackberry.net.

      It was down for quite some time. The (very touchy) customer that reported the problem said it began at about 9pm our NOC time (CDT). There was a brief period where one of the two IPs tied to srp.na.blackberry.net was up for about a half hour, but for the most part they were entirely down until about 5:15am CDT.

    5. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 0.24 degrees West of Greenwich and it's working fine here too...

      Seriously, though, it's the srp.na.blackberry.com infrastructure that's down (ish). srp.eu.blackberry.net covers Europe and Africa, and srp.ap.blackberry.net covers Asia/Pacific. Country URLs (e.g. srp.za.blackberry.net, srp.mx.blackberry.net) resolve to one of these 3 (actually, .na is showing as two IPs to me right now).

      Presumably we can expect some minor changes to RIM's high availability webcasts and presentations in the next few weeks (!) - and it would be interesting to see how open they are about what went wrong.

    6. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Funny

      Considering the Prime Meridian runs through the middle of Greenwich, UK...

      Maybe we should move that puppy over to Iceland?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    7. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    8. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I can tell it's the US server, which 'only' serves the USA and Canada.
      RIM's primary data center which serves all of NA is located in Canada, not the US.
    9. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by dyslexicbunny · · Score: 1

      Silly Europeans... the Americas are in the Western Hemisphere while Asia and Australia are in the Eastern Hemisphere. You guys like thin the Central Hemisphere. Geez, go to American schools and learn something...

      This is meant as a joke. Like haha funny.

    10. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by xoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Would it be churlish to suggest that "The Americas" would therefore be a better term to use as unambiguous and less likely to irritate those of US who happen to be sat less than a dozen miles west of the prime meridian but who don't count for some reason?

      The Wikipedia article you cite is accompanied with an extensive discussion of exactly this sort of ambiguity: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Western_Hemisphe re

    11. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You guys are just the western part of Eurasia."

      or Eurabia?

    12. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by deepestblue · · Score: 1

      Erm, except that's what the Western Hemisphere means. Go read it up.

    13. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by soliptic · · Score: 1

      Considering that Greenwich is FAR nearer the UK's easternmost extremity than its westernmost, I'd imagine it's actually a lot more than half.

      Yes, this pedanticism is purely tongue-in-cheek.

      (As it happens, I grew up about half a mile east of the prime meridian. There was a cute little sundial by the roadside to mark it. These days, though, I've traitorously switched hemispheres, and live at 0.0731 deg W.)

    14. Re:Not quite 'Western Hemisphere' by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Considering the Prime Meridian runs through the middle of Greenwich, UK, almost all of the UK is in fact in the Western Hemisphere.

      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  20. Uh, system reset... by OnlineAlias · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Officials with RIM said they are trying to reset the system and told NewsChannel4 that they are concerned that the backlog of data, which will rush through when it comes back on line, could cause a bigger problem"

    When in doubt, reboot!

  21. Oh, nbw it makes sense! by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 2, Funny

    I got in trouble with my wife last night for not reading her emails to me, and I could not figure out why synchronization wasn't working. Thank you, Slashdot! You saved my marriage!!!

    --
    I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
    1. Re:Oh, nbw it makes sense! by schwartzg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, this is certainly unusual. Slashdot saving a marriage......

    2. Re:Oh, nbw it makes sense! by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Slashdot! You saved my marriage!!!

      You must be new here. Everyone knows that /.-ers aren't married.

      (And, yes, I noticed you're #1469. That's part of the funny.)

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    3. Re:Oh, nbw it makes sense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Thank you, Slashdot! You saved my marriage!!!

      That's not something I ever expected to read on here!

    4. Re:Oh, nbw it makes sense! by Cervantes · · Score: 1

      It's much more unusual for a Slashdotter to have actually gotten a woman...

      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  22. Western Hemisphere by minorproblem · · Score: 1

    Did anyone read Western hemisphere and think WTF?

    1. Re:Western Hemisphere by HangingChad · · Score: 1

      Did anyone read Western hemisphere and think WTF?

      No, but I did wonder how many people in Alabama could point to it on a map.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    2. Re:Western Hemisphere by rueger · · Score: 1

      No, but I did wonder how many people in Alabama could point to it on a map. Much less in the White House...

    3. Re:Western Hemisphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or Detroit, LA, Compton, D.C., etc....

  23. You don't see anything on the server by techpawn · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I don't want to carry one, first I heard is when a user asked me about it. Sure enough, my boss is asking me why their blackberries aren't working and I'm in a meeting trying to show them how the system works... CURSE YOU RIM!

    They could at least tell a time they plan on having it working again...

    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
  24. Re:must resist Great Disturbance In The Force joke by AlHunt · · Score: 1

    Man, the cooler we make things, and the more that entire business cultures get built around this stuff, the more fragile it is.


    To (mis)quote someone(s) I don't remember:
    Society is a millipede - the millipede has a thousand Achilles heels.

    --
    1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
  25. Quote much? by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

    There were so many double-quotes in that write up that I thought it was a """paean to VMS""". It's nice to see that Python continues the practice.

    --
    I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
  26. It IS a house of cards by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Reason? It's cheaper than bricks.

    Seriously, that's what's gonna break our neck sooner or later. We strip systems of their redundancies to make them cost less, we use cheaper components and the lowest bidder, we downgrade specs to the bare minimum because price makes right.

    Technology already starts learning from nature, copying structures and models from millenia proven concepts. I think business could learn a thing from them too. Because nature has down what business wants to achive: Maximum output for minimum input. There is no such thing as waste and surplus in nature's makeup, if there was, it would be used for more output instead. So why do we have 2 kidneys, why is our brain able to adapt to damage, if it wasn't for the simple fact that this proved to be the more successful way in the long run.

    But as long as companies are run by managers who care more about their next quarter report than the company itself, this won't fly.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:It IS a house of cards by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Technology already starts learning from nature, copying structures and models from millenia proven concepts. I think business could learn a thing from them too. Because nature has down what business wants to achive: Maximum output for minimum input. There is no such thing as waste and surplus in nature's makeup, if there was, it would be used for more output instead. So why do we have 2 kidneys, why is our brain able to adapt to damage, if it wasn't for the simple fact that this proved to be the more successful way in the long run.

      You must be new here. (To life that is...)

      You will realize the fallacy of your statement soon after your 50th birthday. Nature isn't all that it's cracked up to be. Those bouncy little disks in your back will start taking on the appearance and flexibility of cardboard. Your prostate (assuming you are male) will enlarge and back your bladder up into your nostrils. Your uterus (assuming your female) will simultaneously enlarge, flop over and quit working. Your eyes will go bad. Various other bits will quit working while parts of your body that you didn't know existed will start creating problems.

      While modern medicine can approach some of the problems, any repairs will be more like soldering a few new capacitors on to a Pentium II motherboard (and charging for an eight way Opteron system) than anything really useful. Oh, and you want a warranty?

      Death and taxes to you sir!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:It IS a house of cards by TrippTDF · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Disclaimer: I am 27.

      You do have a good point about things going out when you get older, but that's not nature's fault. Because if it were not for all our complicated medicines, we'd still have about a 45 year lifespan, and we'd be dead before a lot of those things started to happen. So Nature does have it worked out to the extent that it thinks we should be living... all the other things that happen stem from our ability to extend life through knowledge.

    3. Re:It IS a house of cards by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      You might read "To Engineer Is Human" by Henry Petrowski, at some point. He talks about this at length. Basically, his argument is that, aside from the business/accounting demands for lower prices, it is an emergent characteristic of engineering that iterative development is done to optimize a system until it breaks. It always ends up breaking. Then, the engineers have a better idea of the breaking point, so they use that data for the next series of iterations, until something else breaks. It's not just the price that drives this: it's the very process of engineering itself.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    4. Re:It IS a house of cards by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      All that really illustrates is that those under 50 are so productive that they can take the time to keep those over 50 alive just for sentimental reasons.

    5. Re:It IS a house of cards by Illserve · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So why do we have 2 kidneys, why is our brain able to adapt to damage, if it wasn't for the simple fact that this proved to be the more successful way in the long run.

      Actually, evolution puts our design under the exact same pressures: do more with less. That is, in fact, the definition of natural selection.

      Reliability and redundancy are just one aspect of our optimality, and it's not something that's always at the top of the priority list. One might counter your point about 2 kidneys by asking why we don't have two hearts. We sure as hell should have two hearts more than two kidneys. You can go a day or two without a kidney without even noticing, but 30 seconds without a heartbeat is a bad way to start your day.

      I think our internet is about as redundant as we should like and that it doesn't seem likely that these various gloom and doom scenarios are going to play out. Yes there are periodic problems, but they are rarely systemic. Even under various forms of DOS attack and the horrendous inefficiency of spam, when I wake up in the morning, I can visit slashdot so long as my local connection is up.

      And that's pretty impressive given the largely unstructured way in which the net has been thrown together. Let's not take what we've got for granted.

    6. Re:It IS a house of cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really without both kidneys you can keep few minutes..

    7. Re:It IS a house of cards by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      You forgot knees, they start to go around the same time as the funny looking hairs start popping out of odd places, I think they could be related.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    8. Re:It IS a house of cards by Minwee · · Score: 1

      That's a design feature. After you have reproduced and supported the herd evolution no longer needs you. In fact, the longer you insist on living the more you get in the way of next year's model, so your body includes a self-destruct switch. It doesn't flash red and urge you to report to Carousel, it just starts shutting down parts of you until you are finally eaten by wolves.

      Don't go calling it a flawed design just because you think that the business requirements have changed.

    9. Re:It IS a house of cards by speaktruth · · Score: 1

      Anyone ever hear of a little thing called the Irish potato famine. Basically, the Irish discovered a great cheap source of food and soon became wholly dependent on it. Then, one little glitch (read potato blight) came along and wiped out millions. Sounds familiar?

    10. Re:It IS a house of cards by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The human body wasn't meant to last for 80 years. That's way past warranty, and the menopause certainly stresses that. After you're no longer able to procreate, you are no longer "valuable" in the eyes of mommy nature.

      Yeah, she's a real bitch. Never said she's nice.

      We're actually more built for about 40-50 years, tops. The rest is human work. Also, we weren't meant to eat trans fat and spend our life in front of a TV inhaling the thermal waste of some plant. We were actually meant to spend it hunting and gathering.

      Don't call it nature's bad design when you use said design off spec. If you use your screwdriver as a chisel, do you complain to the manufacturer when it breaks? It wasn't meant to be used as such.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:It IS a house of cards by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean... just ... maybe ... a few million managers could die? May I get my hopes up?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:It IS a house of cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, let me get this straight... you are attributing humanity's current average longevity solely to post-industrialized scientific and technological advancements? Because nobody ever lived to 100 before?

      Something about eating right, getting some sleep and exercise seems more plausible to me. Frankly, the current tears in the fabric of our social existence (e.g. Blackberry, IT overtime, /. topic-du-jour, etc.) appear to me to be bringing us down to a 45-year life span if it weren't for medical/scientific advancements. We're doing it to ourselves, which sounds more like the humanity I've come to know.

      Give it a few years. Your 30s put you closer to 50, and the cynicism kicks in full force about then, even if the body is still working roughly like your 20s (although, trust me that doesn't last either). :-)

    13. Re:It IS a house of cards by Angstroem · · Score: 1

      The human body wasn't meant to last for 80 years. That's way past warranty [...] We're actually more built for about 40-50 years.
      That's not true. The human body has a designed-in lifetime of about 120 years. This is, what you can reach with most optimal medical treatment, going beyond 120 would requiring some more magic. The 40-50 years you're talking about is the life span you get if you really ill-treat your body, mostly "food abuse". Not so much putting too much of everything in (although this is bad also), but putting to little of certain stuff in. Or living in cloaca.

      You shouldn't take modern misbehavior and declare it as the norm. People living in slums, people having no money for decent food -- here you will find the 40-50 year life span, yes. But with just appropriate food and proper living conditions, people were able to live way past that age -- yes, already at the dark ages of middle age and also during Roman or Greek times.

      Yes, people died younger back then as well. Just like they do today. Despite all advances in medicine, people still die at age 40, 50 of heart attacks etc.

    14. Re:It IS a house of cards by KinkyClown · · Score: 1

      ...extend life through knowledge.
      Humm that's exactly what we have been doing with our technology as well... ever seen the technology landscape of a very large financial institute? One that has had a few mergers? As an IT specialist we extend life through knowledge...

      for instance: COBAL programs still life on...

      (I shiver when thinking of doing THAT maintenance)
    15. Re:It IS a house of cards by ggy · · Score: 1

      And that's where technology managed to get it right.
      Upgrade to a new shiny body every third year, and these problems would never appear.

      (Though it would be nice if they managed to work the bugs out before releasing the body to the market.)

    16. Re:It IS a house of cards by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as waste and surplus in nature's makeup,
      You mean, like, when Killer Whales rip just the tongue out of baby Grey Whales and leave them to die?

      Like when the idea "big claw = better" gets embedded in the female fiddler crab psyche, and sexual selection causes them to end up with claws so huge they are barely functional?

      Ever think of those vestigial organs animals have? How is that anything BUT surplus and waste?

      I'm sorry, but you lost the Slashdot Nature Analogy game.
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    17. Re:It IS a house of cards by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "But with just appropriate food and proper living conditions, people were able to live way past that age -- yes, already at the dark ages of middle age and also during Roman or Greek times."

      You only now do *live* past forty/fifty at much; all you managed to do prior XIX century was *survive*. And you didn't survive because your body was "designed" to live sixty or seventy years but because *society* as a "panorganism" allowed you to survive. It has not too much to do with proper food or living conditions but about society protecting you; if ever society dismantles, how old do you think you have to get before the wolves run more than you?

      But then you could say I'm talking about prehistory, too far away. Then I tell you need to remember that while our "current design" is more or less 100.000 year old roman days were about 2000 years ago, roughly a 5% percent of that time. If you want to go older than this, OK, I'll take 10.000 years for the whole "civilization thingie"; still just 10% of the time. The other 90% time, that of "natural environment" (in fact, the part when you can expect natural selection to show her force), and you went off at 40 at most, quite curiously the age when even a healthy sportive guy clearly knows that the "good days" are really a thing of the past.

    18. Re:It IS a house of cards by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would talk prehistory when talking about natural design. Everything that came after we decided that it would be a neat idea to build houses for shelter and harness fire to make food easier to digest has nothing to do with natural selection and the way nature "designs" (i.e. weeding out the models that don't work by throwing them to the wolves or whatever other predator would be around).

      Sure, we are social animals. And you can see in other animals with similar pack orientation some cooperation. But there is no room for sympathy and pity. Sure, every animal of a pack will protect the young who can't defend themselves, but if you're old and a burden to the pack, you're pretty soon dead.

      Funny enough, with some pack animals the old ones seem to "accept" that fate and leave on their own before they get thrown out.

      As you said, we "allowed" the old ones (read: Humans past age 40) to "survive" because, hell, we're human after all! We do care about our parents, far beyond the time we need them. Maybe that's what makes us human after all. We don't just like it when they're around, we do care for them, to the point of defending them with our very own lives (well, assuming you do have a good relationship with your parents and don't just want to inherit quickly).

      We also care beyond the mutual beneficial relationships of packs for our friends. Would you dump a close friend because he has an accident and loses a limb (assuming it can't be fixed with modern medicine)? Would you stop seeing him 'cause he can't "hunt" with you anymore (and assuming you don't see him as a neat tool to cut the line at Disney World)?

      I guess that's what really separates us from animals. Not the use of tools, that's just our way to dominate. What makes us human is not our brains, it's our consciousness.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:It IS a house of cards by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And those baby whale corpses go to the dump, or do they end up in the stomach of another animal? I know that a lot of animals go on a frenzy when there is a lot of food to go around. Bears, hunting salmons going up streams to spawn, first eat them whole, 'til they are fed. That doesn't mean they stop, but instead they just keep on hunting and eat just brains and eggs, the most nutritient parts of the animal. It's not waste, though. It's simply what happens when there is a sudden surplus of food. The rest doesn't go to "waste", there are actually animals that depend on that "waste".

      The claw, and even more the decorative feathers of birds (peacocks, anyone) do actually serve a purpose. An animal that can "waste" so much energy onto something so useless and sometimes actually obstructive and dangerous, and STILL survive, has to be somehow superior than its peers. You can see this in many fashions. Feathers, antlers, enlarged or especially flashy body parts (which can be really dangerous because not only your females but also your predators can see you a lot better). It all means that someone who can be so flamboyant and wasteful and still survive has to be really good at surviving. And that's what the female wants for her offspring.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re:It IS a house of cards by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Because if it were not for all our complicated medicines, we'd still have about a 45 year lifespan, and we'd be dead before a lot of those things started to happen.

      Don't believe any of that pharmaceutical propaganda. They are full of it. We only live longer because we no longer wallow in our own poop, we outsource it, to places where the life span is 45 years, at best. It's basic sanitary practices that has given us our long life span. There's no more horse crap in the streets constantly being kicked up into your nostrils. You have clean water coming out of the tap, and the toilet, if you have one, doesn't just empty into the street. Chances are your not working in factory breathing coal dust, or live near the stock yards. You probably wash your hands before you eat. Your diet is healthier, believe it or not. You're not eating moldy bread and a bowl of lard, I would think. Damn companies trying to claim credit for something that had nothing to do with them. The drugs that really work were invented or discovered a long time ago. The new stuff is poison.

      --
      What?
  27. Black Berry Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blackberry down, we got a blackberry down.

    Leave No Email Behind

  28. Its funny by i_am_socket · · Score: 1

    'cuz mine still works like a champ. Damn near everyone else in the office is calling and whining that they can't send or receive any emails. I tried rebooting the server a few times, rebooting other servers, rebooting the blackberries, and then I find this.

    I gotta start checking teh internets before I start working...

  29. More Info On Outage and Status by Philosinfinity · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was on RIM's rolling conference call last night and received some additional information. It seems that somehow they lost connectivity in their NOC. When they failed over to a co-lo they couldn't get the SRP communication up and running, causing all BES to fail in their connection to RIM. Fast forward a few hours and SRP is back up, but they cannot get critical components for email delivery to connect to their DB. Fast forward a few more hours and they get this up and running also. Currently, Sprint and Nextel are up and running, but the GPRS/EDGE service providers are still not receiving consistent mail flow.

    1. Re:More Info On Outage and Status by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
      So in other words RIM supports themselves and their servers as poorly as they support customers with Blackberry Enterprise Servers?


      I just see this as a major backlash of karma that has built up over the past 10 years.

    2. Re:More Info On Outage and Status by Philosinfinity · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you're willing to shell out the money for T5 support, their service isn't too bad. When we were on T2, the hold times and quality of support was absolutely horrible. Recently we jumped to T5, have a dedicated technician, experience no more than 5 minute wait times, and get some extremely qualified support personnel. However, I think we're paying well over 100K/year for it.

    3. Re:More Info On Outage and Status by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
      $100K? Holy freaking cow. I hope you have a few thousand BB's in service to justify that.


      I'm pretty sure we were on T2. Hold times were tolerable; inexperience, incompetence and general lack of knowing what to do or who to find was not. I think a few times when we had major problems, we eventually talked to one of those T5 guys who fixed it in 15 minutes.

    4. Re:More Info On Outage and Status by eratosthene · · Score: 1

      I think you might be speaking some sort of English, but I'm not entirely sure.

      --
      -- There, everybody likes a gorilla.
  30. one word response to this tragedy by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yippee!

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  31. The DoD emailed our Blackberries to tell us..... by teshuvah · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good ole' government. Last night at 11:37 PM the DoD distributed an email to all Blackberries informing them that the Blackberry service was down.

  32. just like imus by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

    I heard the blackberry mainframe was about to spill the beans on 9/11, thus blowing the lid off of civilization.. but it was taken down at the last minute, mysteriously.

  33. An hour of uptime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had about an hour of it working 100% this morning - email, web, IM clients - from about 6:48 to 7:45 eastern. Using Cingular.

  34. Eedundancies and dependencies by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A single point of failure is always a bad thing. Especially if a lot depends on it. But it can be some cascading effect too, for example power plants running on top output that couldn't swallow the sudden additional load when some parts of the network blew up.

    It's a lack of redundancies. Redundancies cost money, and we want everything as cheaply as possible. So no redundancy. But hey, it "works". Usually. The question is, though, can we afford the blackout?

    Imagine communication breaking down. No cell, no net, no data transfer, nothing. You could hear commerce grind to a halt. Nothing could be scheduled, nothing could be delivered on time, we'd simply break down. And that scenario isn't as impossible as it seems, because telcos don't have a lot of redundancies in their networks anymore either.

    But we're depending on them. Often enough with our very lives. Yet we're not willing to pay the price.

    But even if we did, would it be invested? I mean, afaik it's not like RIM made some kind of promise that the service would work. And as long as you can't hold them responsible for the loss, of money and maybe even life, they certainly won't add anything that costs more than it has to.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Eedundancies and dependencies by LinuxDon · · Score: 1

      Quote: "It's a lack of redundancies. Redundancies cost money, and we want everything as cheaply as possible. "

      This is why I always stay calm when a server goes down. If it would be such a big problem, management would come to me, double my budget and tell me to never let it happen again.

      It's all a cost/reliability tradeoff, the art of the business is to try to ignore the scream of terror of the people who are not in the position to make that decision.

  35. Damnit man, I need details! by Darth_brooks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It'll be interesting to see just how much detail we get concerning what exactly failed and why the current level of redundancy didn't kick in.

    I mean, it's not like the power supply failed on an NT 4 server (you know, the one with the post-it taped in place that says "East Coast B-berry server, DO NOT POWER OFF!!!"), it's not like somebody accidentally drove a nail trough some coax in the wall at RIM's HQ, it's not like somebody accidentally typed "rm -r *" at the wrong prompt. There has to be some serious "Thank God I'm not the one stuck cleaning up that mess" stuff going on here.

    Funny unrelated story. We had an exec looking at one of the blackberry's. He put in back in the hard case and was fumbling around with it and saw the "RIM" on the back. Then he asked, in the innocence that only an exec can have, "So, how does one go about getting one of these 'RIM' jobs anyway?" When I am canonized as a saint, one of my miracles will be "not laughing at the VP who asked how to get a rim job."

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:Damnit man, I need details! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can assure you, from personal experience, that the absolute worst nomenclature is brought about by having a RIM job as a penetration tester. Try explaining that on your resume with a straight face.

    2. Re:Damnit man, I need details! by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      I went to Middle Tenn State Univ. My major is Recording Industry Management (I am an audio engineer). When everyone graduates from the RIM major they all want RIM jobs. http://www.mtsu.edu/~record/

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
  36. BES: Verizon users affected T-Mobile partially by isn't+my+name · · Score: 1

    We too have our own BES server.

    None of our Verizon users are receiving or sending mail (or able to use other network functions). The phone still works as a cell phone.

    Of the three T-Mobile users we have heard from, two are fully functional and one is down.

    On my own system, the last e-mail I received was at 11:40PM last night. That e-mail was sent from our internal e-mail system and was received by me on that system at 7:14PM. So, it appears that there was intermittent connectivity last night.

    Perhaps they are bringing systems back on line in stages so as not to overwhelm everything?

  37. Re: blackberry blackout by matt+me · · Score: 1

    The yuppies follow with Outage Outrage

  38. For a communications company by philo_enyce · · Score: 4, Insightful
    RIM is pretty bad at communicating with their end users. They do not have a network status page. When you call in to TSupport, there is no message indicating a general interruption in service. This is totally unacceptable. I spent two hours on hold last night after checking over a client's BES and not finding any issues locally. That hold time could have easily been reduced to a couple of minutes if RIM had a system in place to notify users of problems. Even Time Warner, which has terrible customer service, has service outage notices as part of the call tree when you call in for support. I would guess that this is a conscious choice on RIM's part, to try and appear as if they never have problems. Bad idea. Customer frustration sets in big time when you don't talk to them during outages.

    RIM: Get better at communicating with your client base or they will go elsewhere.

    philo

    1. Re:For a communications company by userlame · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually there was an option (I called in to the number listed on their website last night) "if you are calling about an outage press 5." Bam, pre-recorded message telling you there was an outage and they had no ETA but expected things to be back up soon. Although I feel your pain, I spent a good few hours triaging with one of our on-call engineers looking into a customer's BES servers only to find it had nothing to do with us.

    2. Re:For a communications company by philo_enyce · · Score: 1
      Well I'll be damned, that's good to know. I wish it had been more prominent in the call tree, information like that should just be presented to you from the start. At least in the future, I'll know to check that option first.

      Thanks for the heads-up.

      philo

  39. Single points of failure by cortana · · Score: 1

    I don't understand how the ENTIRE network can be down. Hasn't anyone learned from the design of email?

    But then again I can't see what Blackberry gives you that you can't get with an IMAP server anyway.

    1. Re:Single points of failure by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > But then again I can't see what Blackberry gives you that you can't get with an IMAP server anyway.

      Partial message retrieval and message push (IMAP is pull-only, which is a real problem for slow networks.. and GPRS ain't exactly DSL).

      Not to mention "wireless client".

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:Single points of failure by cortana · · Score: 1
      Perhaps I just don't recognise the terms you are using. AFAIK, IMAP supports all of this.

      IMAP lets a client retrieve all or some of a message's headers, flags, body text (including each MIME part), etc.

      As for 'message push', once the MTA delivers the message, the IMAP server will immediatly notify the client that a new message has arrived. Here's an example transcript of an IMAP session that took place after I authenticated. Lines in bold are sent by the client, everything else is from the server:

      * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 SASL-IR SORT THREAD=REFERENCES MULTIAPPEND UNSELECT LITERAL+ IDLE CHILDREN NAMESPACE LOGIN-REFERRALS] Logged in as sam
      ab SELECT INBOX
      * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $Label1 Junk $Label5 $Label4 $Label2 $Label3)
      * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $Label1 Junk $Label5 $Label4 $Label2 $Label3 \*)] Flags permitted.
      * 27 EXISTS
      * 0 RECENT
      * OK [UNSEEN 24] First unseen.
      * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1129721302] UIDs valid
      * OK [UIDNEXT 13164] Predicted next UID
      ab OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed.
      aa IDLE
      + idling
      Now I'll send myself an email. Immediatly the server sends:

      * 28 EXISTS
      * 1 RECENT Finally, I'm not aware of any reason why IMAP clients can't run on wireless devices? :)
    3. Re:Single points of failure by LinuxDon · · Score: 1

      Quote: "Finally, I'm not aware of any reason why IMAP clients can't run on wireless devices? :)"
      They can, but if they were using standard technology how could they justify the high price?

      But I believe Blackberry also does contacts and appointments. Although you might as well just use windows mobile or palm with Intellisync (which supports all of the features including message pushing). Novell actually includes all of that as part of the Novell Open Workgroup Suite, which works great btw.

    4. Re:Single points of failure by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that IMAP supported partial retrieval; I was fairly sure it didn't, but I admittedly haven't read the spec since sometime aronud the turn of the century.

      IMAP's version of push is insufficient, however. It requires an already-established TCP/IP. This means that you could not use the device to make phone calls or send/receive SMS messages if you wanted to be notified of new incoming mail.

      > Finally, I'm not aware of any reason why IMAP clients can't run on wireless devices? :)

      They CAN, but I don't see Mike Crispin selling hundred dollar IMAP phones.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    5. Re:Single points of failure by iamskelter · · Score: 1

      IMAP's version of push is insufficient, however. It requires an already-established TCP/IP. This means that you could not use the device to make phone calls or send/receive SMS messages if you wanted to be notified of new incoming mail.
      I really wish I could post a comment refuting your claim but my TCP/IP connection is already in use by the internet radio station I'm listening to. But seriously, how does having an established TCP/IP connection prevent the phone from doing other things?
    6. Re:Single points of failure by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > But seriously, how does having an established TCP/IP
      > connection prevent the phone from doing other things?

      The phone's network stack, and the network it's on, it's not as sophisticated as your laptop.

      Remember, we're talking about a cellular phone, which needs to, first and foremost, talk on a cellular phone network. These are designed to maintain a single connection per remote device, whether that connection be data or voice. SMS can be used as OOB signalling (it was invented as OOB debug), which is probably ROUGHLY how RIM does their magic, just like WAP push. Send a specially coded SMS, which triggers the device to go fetch the info. Or, RIM could be doing something special require extra hardware at the BSS I'm not sure.

      Long story short, you seem to be attacking the problem from a "well, gee, internet-connected computers can do this" position, but the problem is, email on your phone .. is not on an internet-connected computer and cellular networks are expensive to design/build.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  40. Oh, no by Skidge · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now what's a busy executive supposed to do when you're giving them a presentation? Actually pay attention to you?

  41. What about users with Blackberry Servers by Drakin020 · · Score: 1

    Does this affect us? We haven't had any issues but I am wondering if it is because we have the enterprise server.

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
  42. Time for mobile push... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And people think I am on crack when I tell them that Windows Mobile and Push technology is the way to go...

    Totally independant from any type of telecommunications, only requires a data connection be present....

  43. Remember POP over TCP/IP ? by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

    In the meantime, my Treo is working fine. Why? Because it relies on the POP protocol used over a TCP/IP network. Traditional, boring, standards-based and reliable.

    Yes, my TCP/IP is provided over GPRS, but I hope that my next Treo (linux-based?) will offer a Wi-Fi connection as well.

    Pascal

    1. Re:Remember POP over TCP/IP ? by Churla · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is something which mystifies me...

      How does RIM plan on maintaining this behemoth it has created when more smart phones that know how to use TCP/IP are in play and people realize "wait, we can just set up an exchange or IMAP server..."

      Is there something THAT magical in their kool-aid?

      --
      I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
    2. Re:Remember POP over TCP/IP ? by userlame · · Score: 1

      But it uses push technologies! omgz! We all saw how successful that was in the browser world. ...right?

    3. Re:Remember POP over TCP/IP ? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Push would sure make web 2.0 a hell of a lot cheaper for certain classes of applications!

      And when you're paying by-the-byte for data (like on a GPRS network), push makes a LOT of sense.

      Push is the network equivalent of IRQ-based devices. There is a reason why IBM put IRQ lines on the PC-XT bus. It's a fuck of a lot cheaper to use an IRQ than to continuously poll. Polled IO sucks!

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    4. Re:Remember POP over TCP/IP ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, push email is a cron job that checks an inbox every few minutes or so for new mail, then initiates an outbound notice to a device. I guess what they think where everything is fancy is that instead of sending an outbound notice (triggering the device to connect and pull the email down locally), it just sends the whole message instead of the notice. BFD.

      You're right, it makes far more sense to only send when there is something to send, rather than have the device continually check, but everyone still seems to think RIM has some sort of magic fairy juice running their system.

    5. Re:Remember POP over TCP/IP ? by userlame · · Score: 1

      I suppose that's true in some areas. Mobile devices/costly bandwidth would make a case for it, but I believe that will be less of a problem as time goes on. Moving data always seems to be getting cheaper.

      And it's just opinion, but I feel more like "if I want it, I'll ask for it." If something is critical enough that it can't wait until I get around to checking it (probably only a matter of minutes, but that's at my discretion), then there's already a great push system in place I've been using for years: the phone.

    6. Re:Remember POP over TCP/IP ? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      POP is pull, Blackberry is push. In ideal circumstances push is faster because the mail is delivered to the client as soon as it comes in. Pop has to be polled at regular intervals. So push is more of a real-time technology. I've worked at places before where my mail would get to my blackberry faster than to Outlook (via Exchange) due to RIM having a lower latency and/or load on their network than the company I was working for at the time. Also pull can be more of a strain on the battery if they device is tugging on the mail server every few minutes.

    7. Re:Remember POP over TCP/IP ? by acoustix · · Score: 1

      This is correct.

      I also receive emails faster on my BB handheld than I do through Outlook, but that's because I run Outlook in cached mode.

      Nick

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  44. Re:The DoD emailed our Blackberries to tell us.... by squallbsr · · Score: 1

    God love the Government, it is actually common practice for people in the Govt (my experience was with the US Air Force) to send an email out that literally said: "Email is currently down, we will let you know when it has come back up" - and they do of course send out another email later when Email comes back up. You get 2 emails right after another, one saying Email is down ("No freaking way!") and one saying Email is up...

    Hence the oxymoron: Military Intelligence

    --
    Sleep: A completely inadequate substitution for Caffeine.
  45. It's back up... by zubinjdalal · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... 9:52am EST (Rochester, NY)

  46. Story broke here first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.fiscaltimes.com
    They're also posting updates as they come in.

  47. mine has been working for the past 24 hours.... by teknopurge · · Score: 1

    then again it's a treo and not dependent on a provider with a single point-of-failure.

    Mobile outlook 1, crackburry 0.

  48. Re:The DoD emailed our Blackberries to tell us.... by rprycem · · Score: 0

    Shameless Plug for you DoD folks. Full disclosure, this is my employer and I directly work on setting up new installs of this compliant mobile email alternative.

    You should look into Apriva and our Sensa windows mobile mailer and PIM software. We are just starting to get traction with our product as it took some time to get all of the needed approvals. Our infrastructure is not very different from the other guys, with a "Sensa server" sitting next to your Exchange server, forwarding to a NOC (US Based) then out to your device.

    I cannot tell you that our network will never ever have problems, but I am more just informing that there are alternatives.

    rmatthews at apriva dot com if you would like to contact me.

    To quote our site.

    Sensa® is an advanced, secure mobile email system. The system is designed to support S/MIME v3, secure email with robust interoperability with Microsoft Outlook® desktops, the ubiquitous RIM Blackberry® devices and emerging best-of-breed tri/quad-band Windows Mobile PDA's.

    Sensa® supports multi-vendor handheld wireless devices and multi-vendor wireless networks with common server components to provide unique budgetary flexibility.

    The Sensa® secure mobile email system was designed from its initial conception to comply with DoD Directives and NSA Type 4 (SBU and FOUO) Protection Profiles. Additionally, full DoD PKI enablement was a key design objective.

    http://iss.apriva.com/solutions/securemessaging.cf m/

  49. Re:must resist Great Disturbance In The Force joke by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

    You raise a really, really good point. This is why it's important for their to be a wide variety of hardware and software makers out there, all using like protocols to communicate. Email as a whole is never going to go down because there are too many different ways handle it... even if every exchange server in the world were to blow up, there are alternatives, and the system as a whole keeps going.

    In other words- beware things that are popular, as you'll be subject to the same problems as everyone else when the system goes down.

  50. Old joke around here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I work in Waterloo (at a different IT shop). The 'RIM job' line is very old hat up here...

  51. Re:ATTN: SWITCHEURS! by RFaulder · · Score: 1

    Hey! That last one is MSTRKRFT! thanks for the pic meng

  52. But still... by userlame · · Score: 1

    Nothin like having a Severity 1 issue, finding the cause, and being able to say "Hah! Not my problem!" :D

    1. Re:But still... by tedjjohnson · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. Now, if only my cellphone and pager would have stopped going off all night as my users panicked...

      --
      I'm just, you know, this guy...
  53. You have Sprint or Nextel Phones.... by Lanboy · · Score: 1

    Verizon, T-Mo and Cingular are still limping along. BES and BIS affected to the same degree. I am surprised that my Blackberry internet uses the same data channel from the T-Mo network, I knew that BES did, but I suppose the fact that google always defaulted to google canada was a giveaway.

    Nothing for me to d but play Brick Breaker or actually work. I will choose the former no doubt.

    1. Re:You have Sprint or Nextel Phones.... by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 1

      I am surprised that my Blackberry internet uses the same data channel from the T-Mo network, I knew that BES did, but I suppose the fact that google always defaulted to google canada was a giveaway.

      Yes, it's ridiculous. If you want to switch TCP/IP traffic to go directly over your carrier's network instead of through RIM (and assuming your BES policy allows it), all you need to do is go into the Service Books preferences and delete Desktop[IPPP], which is the service book that routes TCP traffic through the BES.

      I had to do this to get Opera Mini working on my (also T-Mo) Pearl, as my BES provider doesn't allow TCP traffic through it. Nothing broke when I did this (all other BES functionality remains).

  54. UPDATE 9:15 AM CDT by Philosinfinity · · Score: 1

    The EDGE/GPRS issue (where the signal type is showing up lower case), may have been resolved. RIM is claiming that there was a backlog of registrations and messages hitting their database. This was causing the wireless provider's inability to get a better signal from the relays. RIM states that they may have resolved this issue by removing burden from their DB. If users are still seeing a lowercase edge or gprs, the device may need to have the radio recycled or the power recycled. This is assuming that the BES are trafficing information to RIM. If not, power cycle the BES first.

    1. Re:UPDATE 9:15 AM CDT by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      My 7130e stayed at 1xev all this morning until I did a resend on a "Red X" message and it did a lot of network activity for 10 seconds then I saw 1XEV and a blue check mark.

  55. New service outage updates at ZDNet by russjourn · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is Russell Shaw. I do the BlackBerry beat blog for ZDNet. I've just called all the carriers, and RIM, and have just posted the latest at: http://blogs.zdnet.com/blackberry/?p=135

  56. RIM says service back for "most" customers by netbuzz · · Score: 1

    From the statement: "Root cause is currently under review, but service for most customers was restored overnight and RIM is closely monitoring systems in order to maintain normal service levels."

    http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/1416 9

  57. Good. May it be permanent. by finlandia1869 · · Score: 1

    Maybe people will actually pay attention during meetings today. It always stuns me when my team has meetings to discuss, say, a plan to realign billions of dollars of procurement funds, and some senior jerkoff is too busy shooting off emails to pay attention to the rather more important matter at hand. I always joke that we need to slip in a random bit of classified info so that everyone will be required to check all their devices at the door.

  58. This just in! by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Funny

    Karl Rove in ER being treated for shock following Crackberry failure. Nation's government falls. Peace breaks out, we run a surplus, Crawford is consumed by tornados that miraculously miss the protestors.

    Wait, am I awake now? Damn.

    1. Re:This just in! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a mail list setup at http://www.c2security.org/mailman/listinfo/bb-outa ge to notify people of this. BB-Outage is a mail list for people to notify others if RIM's service is down in a particular area. if RIM is down in China, US, A particular state, city, etc, for people then post the area to the list so others are notified. It's probably best to subscribe from an address that's not associated with your Blackberry since if RIM's service is down, you won't get the e-mail anyhow

  59. I'm already tired of hearing about this by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

    People are ridiculous. "Oh no, I can't receive emails while I'm in my car!" Can't these people find anything useful to do with themselves in the interim? Barring very, very specific and anamolous exceptions, if I have an employee who basically shuts down because of a Blackberry outage, I think I need to find another employee. It's like, wow guys, it's amazing anyone got anything done back in the Dark Ages of 2002 when we didn't have Blackberries!

    Grow up, Blackberry users, and find something to do.

    --
    mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
  60. Exchange Activesync is better by abdulzis · · Score: 1

    I would prefer Microsoft's Exchange Activesync better than Blackberry. Both configuration wise (EAS is out of the box in Exchange 2003/2007) and in usability.

    --
    Cheers!! Abdul Aziz
    1. Re:Exchange Activesync is better by scatteredsun · · Score: 0

      EAS is better except for the fact you can't sync public folders with it.

  61. Push alternatives ? by Billsabub · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone tried the free (as in beer) alternatives to Blackberry for Push email?
    For instance this one
    You need a data plan, so not completely free, but it works pretty well for me. Check the list of supported phones before going through the registration though.

  62. Parent is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Email is not mission critical. I work for a fairly large corporation, we are dealing with sar/ox auditors at the moment. Plain and simple, the exchange servers are not on their list of mission critical servers. Why? Exchange servers don't deal with the financials in any way (and shouldnt). The company itself may decide that email is critical, but the auditors and investors dont care. Without email we can still take orders, phone calls, fax, MANUFACTURE GOODS. You gotta draw the line somewhere. The business will go on without email, you better have a way to take orders without email. What, you rely on the availability of 3rd party internet routers for your mission critical applications?

    1. Re:Parent is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Speak for yourself. Email is mission critical for my company, and yes, we rely on the availability of 3rd party internet routers.

      On the other hand, we don't rely on Exchange servers (yuck!) since email is important (critical!) to our business.

  63. Re:The DoD emailed our Blackberries to tell us.... by teshuvah · · Score: 1
    We get those too, and I laugh every time. Another wonderful thing they do is they send us a net send message whenever there is a tornado drill. The problem is that the message is telling us that the tornado drill is OVER, and that we can come back to our desk now. We of course, are out in the hallway with no computer access, sitting around waiting for it to end.

    I wish I was joking.

  64. BlackBerry vs BCSS by robstol · · Score: 1

    In addition to a BES are running a Sprint/Seven product known as Business Connect Server Solution which offers the same sort of middleware solution as a BES does but for a client (BizConn) that can run on PPC/PalmOS/and some Java-based handhelds. We have a saying in the office - "If RIM is down, it makes headlines. If BizConn is down, it must be Friday". My own experience is that RIM's managed network is more reliable and better supported. Sprint's continued mismanagement of the BCSS back-end has caused us no shortage of grief. They refuse to provide an SLA for the service, which has forced our team to dial support back to 8x5, M-F for the app. They push client updates with little notice and no advance download available for testing. Their support line offers perpetual catch-22. They refuse to issue ticket numbers for incidents and then request ticket numbers on subsequent callbacks. I can see the rational for the arguments that RIM should decentralize, but I would much rather deal with them in times such as these than the telecom proper. Then again we also run Exchange and offer ActiveSync. Don't ask why we offer 3 flavors. Please don't ask.

    1. Re:BlackBerry vs BCSS by cbelle13013 · · Score: 1

      You must work in a law firm...

    2. Re:BlackBerry vs BCSS by robstol · · Score: 1

      University setting. Freedom of choice is a beautiful thing when it comes to having to support every platform under the sun.

  65. does it means RIM sees all emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From every single person using a BlackBerry's email functionnality?

    I know that emails are a plain-text technology... But how comes this transit trough a RIM-only network!?

    Btw is there a web browser in BlackBerrys allowing to connect to a company's "webmail"?

  66. 2002?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the hell were you in 1999?

  67. Re:must resist Great Disturbance In The Force joke by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Of course, if the crackberries just communicated via standards, then you wouldn't have to have this problem. The only special thing needed is new mail notification. They elected to build a special server to handle everything, and now they have to deal with it when it blows up.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  68. RIM Outage Mail List. by sk0al01 · · Score: 1

    There's a mail list setup at http://www.c2security.org/mailman/listinfo/bb-outa ge/ to notify people of this. BB-Outage is a mail list for people to notify others if RIM's service is down in a particular area. if RIM is down in China, US, A particular state, city, etc, for people then post the area to the list so others are notified. It's probably best to subscribe from an address that's not associated with your Blackberry since if RIM's service is down, you won't get the e-mail anyhow

  69. Does this effect SMS ability? by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    I was planning on purchasing a Blackberry shortly. I know the e-mails sent have to go through the RIM servers, but I guess this would not effect SMS or phone calls on the newer Blackberries right?

    1. Re:Does this effect SMS ability? by Pengo · · Score: 1

      I was in the area effected, and I was using SMS without any issues.

    2. Re:Does this effect SMS ability? by freeweed · · Score: 1

      According to our Telco, no. However, we noticed an issue with SMS off and on all last night, so I'm taking this with a grain of salt. Could be entirely unrelated, but considering SMS pretty much *always* works for us...

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  70. Email DR by sbjornda · · Score: 1

    Personally, I have NEVER seen an e-mail system that has had DR or Failover.
    I certainly have. I've even managed one that's gone through a catastrophic failure. It was a Lotus Notes/Domino-based system, and while god knows that platform is far from perfect, one thing it does pretty well is replicating users' mailboxes over a WAN with very little extra effort required on the sysadmin's part.

    Beyond DR, ask an even more important question: In the event of disaster, how quickly does e-mail come back up on-line? Is it the first system recovered?
    In my current organization it's the 3rd application to come back on-line in event of a disaster. Administration wants it available for communication during disaster recovery since it provides a good audit trail (phone calls don't).

    Payroll, on the other hand, is not on the criticality list at all. Our DR strategy is to write paycheques by hand based on people's last pay stub (that info can be recovered quickly from backup tape) and square up discrepancies a month or two later.

    --
    .nosig

    1. Re:Email DR by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 1
      I certainly have. I've even managed one that's gone through a catastrophic failure. It was a Lotus Notes/Domino-based

      I was wrong in that statement on DR/Failover. Most of my client's have been Exchange (which, as I understand) does have some capability to move users from a failed server to another server in the Cluster. And, I forgot about my company. When my Notes server fails, I just login to the backup server.

      In my current organization it's the 3rd application to come back on-line in event of a disaster

      Now, this is surprising. I do believe that where a system resides in the Disaster Recovery 'Order' is a good way to judge how important that system is to an organization. So, your company thinks e-mail is the third most important system. First time I have seen it in the top 10. Just curious, how many apps are in the DR plan?

      Administration wants it available for communication during disaster recovery since it provides a good audit trail (phone calls don't)

      And this makes NO sense. Unless you can guarantee all of your users are actually "reading" their e-mail in a timely fashion, what is the point of keeping an 'audit trail'.

      True IT Disasters really are difficult to manage. I've seen mass conference calls (which, as an observer can be rather comical). I have never seen e-mail as being used in the manner you described. Anyway, it's your organization. If it has worked during your disasters, then maybe you know something I don't.

  71. Now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now might be a good time to apply for a RIMjob

  72. Re:ATTN: SWITCHEURS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...have made me consider returning it"

    What are you waiting for, you fucking switcheur? GTFO.

  73. Good, Another excuse! by garwain · · Score: 1

    I've avoided crackberries and similar products like the plague since they came out.My pda has a cable that connects it to my cell phone if I really need to get on the net for something... I picked up a treo a while ago and immediatly put it back down on the shelf. If I want to make a phone call, I'll use something small that resembles a phone. if I want to surf the net or send email, I'll use a computer, and if I want to set up a meeting on my planner, I'll use a palm pilot that is designed to be an agenda. Combine too much together and you have a device that's too large for it's main purpose, to small for it's secondary purposes, and generaly not equiped to handle any of it's jobs properly. Now with blackberries proving they don't have a solid network, it's just one more excuse for me to keep avoiding them. My desk phone forwards to my cell, my voicemail sends a SMS message to my cell, urgent emails send a sms message to my cell... servers page me by sending a SMS message to my cell... I don't really need any more instant information... if it's a critical issue call me... Any important server issues that are detected by the servers can easily be summarized into a SMS message, which has been around for a while and has been relatively stable. Actually 90% of the server messages I receive fall into ("Application log full", "Power fault, UPS active", "Power restored", "Server X is rebooting" or "Server X is MIA")