Slashdot Mirror


Transform a Regular LCD Into a Touchscreen

eZtaR writes "NAVisis is introducing a new USB gadget (for Windows only including Vista) called LaptopTablet. You mount it onto the side of your regular LCD monitor to transform it into a fully functional touchscreen, controlled with an included pen. The gadget is priced at around $100 and seems a good alternative for Photoshoppers."

146 comments

  1. Oy ... by packetmon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let me know when some high end printing company bundles this so I can go to work on Photoshopping my paycheck. (For educational purposes of course)

    1. Re:Oy ... by charlieman · · Score: 1

      You mean this?

    2. Re:Oy ... by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      I'll sell you some high-end printing paper you can touch with included pen for $100!

    3. Re:Oy ... by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      Ugh. There are so many things wrong with that video. First off the device is to well packaged to be a prototype, and it seems pretty obvious from the response of the mouse (and the car and the helicopter) that the girl is either a: being told what to do with her hands, or b: has been practising a prescribed set of movements. This means that it doesn't even qualify as a proof of concept video; it barely qualifies as geeky fantasy. Secondly, whoever made this video thinks that their (non-existant and unproven) technology must be the best idea ever to have chosen "take my breath away" as their soundtrack. It's not like no one thought of this concept before, hell even Johnny Mnemonic had this sort of techenology and that was 12 years ago! In short never post a link to that video again. I currently have mod points, but there doesn't seem to be a selection for "-1 link supplied makes youo feel like someone wiped a bogie on your neck."

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    4. Re:Oy ... by charlieman · · Score: 1

      I leave it to the benefit of the doubt, I won't truly believe it until I see it myself, although there was a conference in Colombia where the creator shows it's usage.

  2. TabletMouse by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Funny

    RThe TabletMouse looks interesting as well. The company should probably hire a better translator though. "Welcome to NAVIsis, The Best Company of Tablet Device"? Apparently, all your mice are belong to them.

    1. Re:TabletMouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what you say!?!?!

    2. Re:TabletMouse by accelleron · · Score: 1

      Something sitting on the side of my monitor and watching my por^h^h^honline activities? No thanks.

      --
      Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus handicapped.
  3. I can't put my finger on it by syntap · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but there has to be a pr0n application here somewhere.

    1. Re:I can't put my finger on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please don't tell us what you're going to use as a stylus. Please.

    2. Re:I can't put my finger on it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isn't the porn application you can put your finger on/in it

    3. Re:I can't put my finger on it by pato101 · · Score: 0

      Warning: do not trust Russian applications, they might put a finger on you...

    4. Re:I can't put my finger on it by PC-PHIX · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Warning: do not trust Russian applications, they might put a finger on you...
      Don't you mean:

      In Soviet Russia, application puts finger on you.

      Damn. Can't believe I just typed my first ever "In Soviet Russia..." joke and I wasn't even actually making the joke.

      Sheesh.

      --
      Optimist: The thumb drive is half empty! Pessimist: The thumb drive is half full...
    5. Re:I can't put my finger on it by Snarkhunter · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's called Doki Doki Majo Shinpan. You touch Japanese schoolgirls to see if they practice the dark arts. Nintendo said " it isn't pr0n," but after they said that they mouthed "it's totally pr0n." Enjoy.

  4. Just a gadget by Frostclaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunatly, I don't think this will be much more than a neat gadget, and it certainly won't live up to the needs of a serious artist. There's no mention of accuracy or pressure sensitivity, and I didn't see art/photoshop listed on the website. I'd be keen on seeing some reviews of it, and the prospect of attaching it to a laptop screen sounds pretty interesting but for the price I'd rather just pick up a small Wacom tablet. The fact it's made mainly for a laptop monitor only and claims to work only for Windows makes it a pass for me.

    1. Re:Just a gadget by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1, Informative

      There's no mention of accuracy or pressure sensitivity, and I didn't see art/photoshop listed on the website.

      Says 400 DPI on the page linked to and go check the "Example" tab for art. It's good enough for anime.


      Really, Read The Fucking Article/Product Page/Whatever next time. Borderline trolling, what you posted.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    2. Re:Just a gadget by Kankraka · · Score: 1

      Personally I'd rather -not- be putting pressure on my laptops LCD panel, it's not designed for things like that. The graphire III i have now does a more than suitable job at my on-the-go tablet needs.

    3. Re:Just a gadget by Phat_Tony · · Score: 4, Informative

      His "borderline troll" is undoubtedly accurate.

      Pressure sensitivity is key for most any artist, it's where the real value of the Wacom tablets lie, allowing you to control the quality of your brush strokes with pressure as you work. That's a bigger part of the tablet's advantage over the mouse than the actual "pen" method of input for many artists. This makes no mention of any kind of pressure sensitivity. Clearly, it can't make the screen pressure sensitive. Perhaps they could build a sensor into the pen that measures pressure and use the edge device for position, but that doesn't look like it's what they did, their pen looks like a "dumb" device, not a wireless pressure sensor. Even if it did have a pressure sensor in the tip, it's going to have to be so sensitive that it requires a really light touch, or else you're going to mar your screen, and that would greatly diminish its value.

      As far as resolution is concerned: they say "sampling" is at "about" 400 DPI (whatever that means), but then it says "recognized resolution 0.2mm" which is about 125 dpi. The Wacom tablets artists work with recognize a resolution of about 5,000 lines per inch.

      I'm sure you can draw a cartoony sketch with it just fine, but there's no way this device as it stands now is going to replace tablets for professional artists. That doesn't mean it's worthless. A lot of thing you want to do with touch sensitive displays isn't professional art. These could be a much cheaper alternative for touch-sensitive user interfaces and games and such. Maybe in future generations they will add some sort of pressure sensitivity through the pen and increase the resolution by an order of magnitude. Until then, the "borderline troll" is correct.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    4. Re:Just a gadget by Frostclaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I did in fact see the 400DPI. I'm more referring to "if I put my pen at point x on the monitor, does my cursor accuratly reflect that point onscreen".

      I'm curious to see how well it works, and I appologize if my comment came off as trollish.

    5. Re:Just a gadget by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the Intuos3 series is capable of sensing pen rotation and x/y tilt. You need plugins and whatnot for some of these effects, and some features aren't present with the bundled stylus, but the feature-level on these tablets and accessories is absolutely astounding. Not to mention that each stylus, even among multiple of the same type, has its own unique ID, and can be associated with different tools. You can have an array of styluses, each with a different color, brush size/type, and opacity. I don't use mine as much as I'd like, but even for designing web graphics, it's invaluable.

      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
    6. Re:Just a gadget by NJ+Hewitt · · Score: 1

      sounds like you think conventional graphics pads/tablet PCs have squidgy pressure sensitive screens? that isn't the case, the pressure sensitivity (up to 1024 increments) is always built into the spring-loaded stylus tip, and communicated wirelessly to the PC.

    7. Re:Just a gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you meant retard, retart is not a word. It's what a guy with a lisp says when he is losing in Donkey Kong.

    8. Re:Just a gadget by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Informative

      "sounds like you think conventional graphics pads/tablet PCs have squidgy pressure sensitive screens?"

      No, I did not think that. As other people have posted before in this discussion (at +5), "conventional graphics pads/tablet PCs" have screens that are tough and scratch resistant and are designed to be pushed on all day with the tip of a stylus. This would destroy conventional LCD's. So, as I said in my post:
      1. It doesn't appear that this device has any pressure sensitivity, and
      2. If they wanted to add it, it would have to use really light strokes to not damage the LCD, which still isn't very valuable.

      Maybe they can sell it with a thin polycarbonate screen protector or something, but I doubt that would fit in most notebooks and allow them to close. Perhaps it would be good for converting desktop LCD's to touch-screen though. Of course, they'd have to offer a huge variety of sizes and shapes of screen protectors. Or perhaps expect people to cut-to-size with a paper cutter or something. Anyway, I don't understand what there was in my post that made you think that I thought that the screens need to be sensitive to varying degrees of pressure; all I pointed out is that the stylus can't respond to firm pressure on conventional LCD's without damaging them.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    9. Re:Just a gadget by NJ+Hewitt · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, I misread.

    10. Re:Just a gadget by ian_mackereth · · Score: 1
      The main utility of this to me and, even more so, to my wife is that we're PDA users and occasionally find ourselves trying to tap on a dialog box with a finger on the PC monitor. This would make that activity useful!

      (Now I need some utility to make my PC mouse pointer able to appear on my PDA screen when it's in the cradle on my desk, the same way it does with the laptop LCD and the 19" monitor next to it!)

    11. Re:Just a gadget by Aliriza · · Score: 1

      A small step , users recomendations will improve it.And for the price it is a catch.

    12. Re:Just a gadget by Kagura · · Score: 1

      All touch-screen implementations that I have come across have calibration tools to ensure coordination between the stylus and the feedback from the display cursor.

    13. Re:Just a gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but does it works with the gimp or inkscape?

    14. Re:Just a gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as resolution is concerned: they say "sampling" is at "about" 400 DPI (whatever that means), but then it says "recognized resolution 0.2mm" which is about 125 dpi. The Wacom tablets artists work with recognize a resolution of about 5,000 lines per inch.

      Most LCD screens have a pixel density lower than 125DPI, so what would be the point in having a touchscreen overlay that was any higher than that? I suppose you might be able to mess with subpixels, and/or use intensity variation to simulate a higher degree of positional accuracy.....

    15. Re:Just a gadget by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      [T]he prospect of attaching it to a laptop screen sounds pretty interesting but for the price I'd rather just pick up a small Wacom tablet.

      If you're going to do that, why not buy a Tablet PC? The price premium over a regular laptop is the same as the cost of a Wacom tablet, and you'll have the (IMHO, much better) experience of actually having your drawings appear under your pen instead of drawing in one place and having it show up somewhere else.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    16. Re:Just a gadget by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it would be good for converting desktop LCD's to touch-screen though. Of course, they'd have to offer a huge variety of sizes and shapes of screen protectors. Or perhaps expect people to cut-to-size with a paper cutter or something.

      Considering that a Wacom Cintiq is well over two grand (for a 21" LCD), for that particular market such effort would be worth it -- $300 + $100 + a little work is a Hell of a lot better than $2500!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    17. Re:Just a gadget by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      >> It's good enough for anime. Like the OP said. No mention of art. ;)

    18. Re:Just a gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The fact it's made mainly for a laptop monitor only and claims to work only for Windows makes it a pass for me.

      What!? There's no Mac version?? WAHHHHH!!! WAHHHH!!!!

      Oh well, it would probably only have a one-button stylus anyway. :)

    19. Re:Just a gadget by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Except, you can't use your finger: only the supplied stylus.
      That makes it all but useless to me.

  5. Ugggh ... by LaughingCoder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who wants to hold their arm out, hovering over the keyboard, attempting to "draw" on a surface that isn't firm (laptop hinges are not designed to resist pushing on the screen)? This is a terrible idea in my opinion. The big advantage of *real* tablets is that they fold "roughly" flat so you can write/draw on them more naturally. Even at that, they are usually too thick, making writing uncomfortable.

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    1. Re:Ugggh ... by theNote · · Score: 1

      You don't HAVE to use it on your laptop screen, the article said it could be used on any flat surface.

    2. Re:Ugggh ... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yes, an age old problem that's been recognised since touchscreens were touted as the panacea to all usability woes.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Ugggh ... by slysithesuperspy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know it's not ideal but you could just fold the screen backwards so it's parallel to the desk. Or perhaps have the screen upside down and put the keyboard furthest away from you.

    4. Re:Ugggh ... by Kwiik · · Score: 1

      For all laptops that I've ever seen (except tablets) 1) folding the screen backwards so that it's parallel to the desk (if it can go parallel to the desk.. I've only ever seen that in Dell's) will cause it to push on the hinges as the parent to you complained, and 2) if you put the screen upside down with the keyboard furthest away, you'll end up not being balanced and it'll fall back on to the keyboard. Maybe there's some ancient laptops that break this rule, but I highly doubt it.

      --
      Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
    5. Re:Ugggh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If nobody wanted to draw on an LCD, why would Wacom sell Cintiqs? Here's a guy who went through the trouble of building his own "Cintiq" from an LCD and tablet.

    6. Re:Ugggh ... by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      Who wants to hold their arm out, hovering over the keyboard,...

      A telling observation, since it was gorilla arm that pretty much killed the touchscreen as a primary input device (except for applications where the user only spends a short time using the device, such as ATM screens).

    7. Re:Ugggh ... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I've done similar to this guy with one of my laptops.
      it works a treat as long as you position the tablet guts somewhere away from the main power/data cables behind the LCD.
      (If the cables are across the active surface, the tracking is screwed, mine has a nice area on the screen just able to fit a 6 inch touch panel).
      The downside to this is the entire screen is not touch sensitive and there isn't a 1:1 relationship.

      I ended up writing my own graphic software to work with it, and have since *downgraded* to running it on a pda (loss of pressure sensitivity).

      I will end up getting a full tablet one day but it was good playing around with what I had.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    8. Re:Ugggh ... by slysithesuperspy · · Score: 1

      Ah, your right I've just tried it on my old IBM one. It goes further down than parallel, however, it definitely is putting strain on the hinges.

    9. Re:Ugggh ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with touchscreens, it's all in the way they are used. If it was located where your keyboard is normally located - as it often is in a kiosk situation - then it wouldn't be causing that problem, would it? But it certainly doesn't apply to all situations. On the other hand, if I could get a Wacom tablet combined with a gigantic LCD, and I could just take it off a stand and set it on my desktop to draw, I would be interested. (I hear they exist but cost more than a car...)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Ugggh ... by shotgunefx · · Score: 1

      Well if it works half decent (need more info on the pen and any features), you could take a cheap 15 lcd a piece of plexiglass and make a decent sketchpad. Yes, it won't compare to something made for the purpose, but then again, probably an 1/10th of the price.

      --

      -William Shatner can be neither created nor destroyed.
    11. Re:Ugggh ... by Danse · · Score: 1

      A telling observation, since it was gorilla arm that pretty much killed the touchscreen as a primary input device (except for applications where the user only spends a short time using the device, such as ATM screens).

      On a related note, I just spent a week walking around various facilities for 8 hours a day holding a tablet PC and entering data using the touchscreen and onscreen keypad as needed. While the screen-tapping wasn't too bad as long as I could rest my wrist against the tablet (which helped with accuracy), I found that my left arm, the one I carried the tablet with, was cramping up pretty badly. I started calling it "tablet elbow", as it was my elbow that was feeling the most strain from cradling the tablet in a position where I could enter the data. Some sort of tablet sling or something might have been nice to help with that, as long as it could hold it in the right position.
      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  6. Why LCD only? by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Seems the only thing making this thing LCD-only is the design of the plastic clip for the sensor that determins the position of the stylus. Any geek worth his bandwidth could use this with a CRT.

    Very interesting product either way. Seems better and cheaper than a Wacom.

    --
    All rites reversed 2010
    1. Re:Why LCD only? by aarggh · · Score: 1

      As this is basically electronic whiteboard technology applied to a laptop, it probably will only work with a flat screen CRT if at all. Although for an LCD as mentioned it seems a ludicrous product. Definately the fastest way to destroy the LCD and void a warranty! Some cheap end solutions end up quite expensive!

    2. Re:Why LCD only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Seems better and cheaper than a Wacom.
      Cheaper, perhaps. I'm not quite sure how you translate "lower resolution and no pressure or tilt sensitivity" into "better", but hey, whatever floats your boat...
    3. Re:Why LCD only? by tsalaroth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Same price, actually, as the smallest Wacom Graphire.

    4. Re:Why LCD only? by nametaken · · Score: 1


      Except Wacoms have pressure sensitivity, don't they?

  7. Smashing by Bazman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Quite literally. Laptop screens aren't designed to be touched, let alone scraped and prodded all over with a stylus. Or does this thing come with a plexiglass overlay?

  8. Aren't normal LCDs a bit fragile for this? by WillAdams · · Score: 5, Informative

    The touch screens and active stylus input displays have a thick glass or plexiglass or other durable substance to protect the screen, but every LCD (laptop or desktop) I've ever set up has a warning about not touching the screen in w/ the setup / operating instructions.

    My boss and several co-workers regularly touch the LCDs here in the office, making the surface bend and distorting the image and it makes me wince everytime.

    William
    (who is looking forward to _all_ LCDs coming w/ some sort of digitizer built-in after manufacturers decide the added durability and lessened expense of one manufacturing line instead of two makes economic sense)

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    1. Re:Aren't normal LCDs a bit fragile for this? by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 1

      Well, I touch my LCD too, and it still seems to be fine. If the people at your office touch them regularly and they still havent gotten any permanent damage, then whats the problem?

    2. Re:Aren't normal LCDs a bit fragile for this? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      The people in my office who touched my screens certainly got some damage, typically through the whacking of the offending digit or high pitched screaming along the lines of "get your greasy fingers off my screen you pervert!". The damage probably wasn't permanent but the message usually was permanently imprinted.
      The screens were all right though.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    3. Re:Aren't normal LCDs a bit fragile for this? by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      We've got a couple of Panasonic 17" LCD screens with a glass front. Makes them heavy, but trivial to clean.

    4. Re:Aren't normal LCDs a bit fragile for this? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Duuuuude... it's never been about economic sense. It's about how much more are you going to pay for that little extra gimmick that only 1% of all customers really want ? I think it would make economic sense for my $500 gaming-class video card to have 8 outputs, but in reality I would have to pay $800 for an special-purpose video card with a GPU from the dark ages in order to accomplish that. Sale price has very little to do with manufacturing cost.

      Personally, I'm pissed off that there are still so few tablet PCs out there. I remember four years ago wanting one, but I couldn't justify the ridiculous price versus a plain old notebook. I mean, Dell doesn't even offer one yet. WTF is up with that ? Pardon me for not feeling comfortable throwing gobs of money at some tablet company I've never heard of, that will probably go up in smoke before the warranty ends.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    5. Re:Aren't normal LCDs a bit fragile for this? by feagle814 · · Score: 1

      I've taken apart my Tablet screen and it's just a normal LCD screen with a thin piece of glass in front (anti-glare treated) and a Wacom digitizer behind it. They don't manufacture the LCD special for it; they just sandwich it between tablet parts.

    6. Re:Aren't normal LCDs a bit fragile for this? by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      Right, but wouldn't it be better / cheaper / more integrated if they built the digitizer integrated into the display components?

      Also, the thin piece of glass in the Tablet screen is in addition to the normal piece LCD pane --- adding this contributes to the parallax problem one gets w/ the offset caused by the display being beneath a panel to begin with.

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  9. ICK. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Needs a pen, that sucks. I prefer real touchscreens where you simply touch them like the ELO.
    as for photoshoppers, doodling on a monitor sucks. Using a pen tablet on the desk is far easier and way more intuitive as well as not having your hand and pen device in the way blocking your view.

    This is a neat device, but for the price you can get kits from ebay to add a real touchscreen layer to your lcd or laptop instead of something that requires a special pen.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:ICK. by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Needs a pen, that sucks. I prefer real touchscreens where you simply touch them like the ELO.
      as for photoshoppers, doodling on a monitor sucks. Using a pen tablet on the desk is far easier and way more intuitive as well as not having your hand and pen device in the way blocking your view.
      Not to mention a bad case of gorilla arm after 10 minutes of work.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:ICK. by Cesa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What you could do is using a dual screen setup, with the touchscreen monitor lying down on the desktop like a piece of paper. Extend the windows desktop over both screens and move the child window with the picture to the touchscreen monitor. That way your hand won't be in the way any more than when you draw/write on a piece of paper, and you don't have to wave your arm in the air.

    3. Re:ICK. by Kwiik · · Score: 1

      Or just clone the monitors. I wouldn't mind placing a 17" touch screen where my keyboard normally rolls out of my desk, and putting the actual keyboard up on the desk. It'd be even more beautiful considering my desk is made of glass ^_^

      --
      Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
    4. Re:ICK. by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      I dunno... I have one of the Lenovo multi-touch screens... and I find myself using the pen about 90% of the time for the accuracy. I thought I'd use my finger all the time, and for apps that are designed for a touch screen (read big buttons, no menus) I do... but the pen really isn't so bad. But the multi-touch (pen + finger) is definitely a path I'm glad to have, would be annoyed at this point if you took either or away from me.

    5. Re:ICK. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      The thing is, the designs for the pen only systems suck. you have to buy a special $100+ pen if you lose yours. Finger sensitive work great, a $3.00 stylus works on them in the way you want it.

      Most of the sucky tablets have the wacom style magnetic pen system. worse ones have a battery in the pen.
      Only the best are resistive types that give an X+Y signal back and are typically found on high end commercial touchscreens.

      so you get both because you have a finger sensitive type. if you got the other type you could never you your finger.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:ICK. by gtada · · Score: 1

      Informative?

      Have you ever tried a Wacom Cintiq? Doodling on a monitor is like drawing on paper or painting on a canvas. Pretty intuitive to me. You'll get more control than doodling on a pen tablet. And for Photoshop, some sort of implement would seem more natural than no stylus, unless you're used to finger painting. ;)

      I do agree with the majority of posters that this device looks like a toy. If price were no issue, Cintiq all the way. Otherwise, an Intuos or Grapphire tablet would work just fine.

  10. Photoshoppers ? by fruey · · Score: 3, Informative

    A serious graphic artist probably wants a CRT for accurate colour, gamma, etc. And at least an A4 Wacom if they prefer drawing, but on a horizontal rather than vertical surface.

    Most pros I know use a Wacom in Photoshop or Illustrator, but mostly they're mouse people.

    I can't imagine that a serious Photoshopper would want to use an LCD screen and draw on it with a stylus, it's just not accurate enough.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:Photoshoppers ? by ameline · · Score: 3, Informative

      Look at a wacom cintiq -- they're really nice.

      The reason they're mouse people more than tablet people is that most software sucks on a tablet -- many on the common UI elements that work well with a mouse fail completely on a tablet. You really have to design with pen based interaction in mind.

      Look at Alias SketchBook for an example of a UI that works well on tablets

      --
      Ian Ameline
    2. Re:Photoshoppers ? by TheDrop · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "I can't imagine that a serious Photoshopper would want to use an LCD screen and draw on it with a stylus, it's just not accurate enough."


      I'm about as serious as they come in regards to Photoshop and completely disagree with you. I use a Cintiq (Wacom) daily which is a LCD screen controlled by a stylus. And sketching on screen with a stylus is unequivocally superior to sketching with a mouse (and on a separate tablet IMHO). It is simply natural to look at what your drawing.

      In regards to TFA, pressure sensitivity is the key aspect in art/design applications. I saw resolution mentioned, but nothing on pressure sensitivity. If this device has no, or little pressure sensitivity it will certainly remain a non-artisan tool for the majority of users. Personally, I would not be interested in this product because most laptop screens are 'soft' and susceptible to damage, and the keyboard is in the way.

    3. Re:Photoshoppers ? by fruey · · Score: 1

      A Cintiq looks great, but it's not like a crummy laptop screen.

      And it looks like it can be tilted correctly, so that you can "write" / draw on it properly.

      You're right about pressure sensitivity too, hadn't thought of that (not being a Wacom user or designer, although I use Photoshop for serious photo touch-up, I'm not someone who'll draw / illustrate in software)

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    4. Re:Photoshoppers ? by nbritton · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine that a serious Photoshopper would want to use an LCD screen
      We don't... until you add in the price and space requirements for a good 21 inch moitor.
    5. Re:Photoshoppers ? by TavisJohn · · Score: 1

      Wich is why Wacom has BOTH mice and pens for most of their Digitizers now!
      http://www.wacom.com/graphire/index.cfm
      I have one of those... And it is GREAT! I can use a mouse for most apps, and when I want to work in a graphic app, I grab the pen and now it acts as a Digitizer! Best of all the mouse and pen DO NOT NEED Batteries! The digitizer powers the mouse and pen Wirelessly!

      The other issue I have with this fancy LCD Touch product (Aside for everything else that was mentioned by others)... Is that it will NOT work with my 17" screen! It is just too large.

    6. Re:Photoshoppers ? by 3choTh1s · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with you for now about how a serious graphic artist would want a crt + Wacom tablet. But these limitations are degrading quick

      LCD's will close the gap when it comes to accurate color and gamma when LED backlights become the norm and widely available. Also the page states that the apparatus has a resolution of 400 dpi. Not fantastic but not that bad. I'm sure with a couple iterations it could be very precise.

      But I want to postulate a new idea. What if instead of having one monitor on which you drew, have 2. 1 CRT in front of you for accurate color representation and a second one mounted horizontally like you would a wacom. When you pick up the stylus you would know exactly where to put it down at because you could see where it would go. And you'd have a crt screen in front of you to make sure everything looks exactly how you want it to.

    7. Re:Photoshoppers ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also the page states that the apparatus has a resolution of 400 dpi. Not fantastic but not that bad.

      400DPI is higher than any mainstream LCD screen resolution, so what difference would a better DPI make?

  11. This thing sucks by bhima · · Score: 1

    I don't mind that it uses a stylus, I use one on my Waacom tablet.

    But Jesus, why does it have to be this huge cancerous growth hanging off the side of the laptop?

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    1. Re:This thing sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or fancy these PlayAnywhere into PlayTogether from M$ Research?

  12. Sounds a lot like electronic whiteboard tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IR and ultrasound, like eBeam or mimio? Some background discussion.

  13. Only $100? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This could turn out to be a very cost effective solution for Point of Sale registers. Touch screen flat panels are expensive (and flat panels are popular with PoS devices since they take up much less counter space) so this could lower costs per register by $100 -$200.

    1. Re:Only $100? by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 1

      for the short amount of time until you wear/poke right through the not-supposed-to-touch-me LCD screen, and it becomes an LCLOSINLAD*. And then you'll have to buy another one. So, the up-front savings will be short-lived. You'll be much better off buying the right device for the job.

      (*Liquid Crystals Leaked Out So It's No Longer A Display)

    2. Re:Only $100? by Poppageorgio · · Score: 1

      A Point of Sale terminal has to work with finger input. Having to use a stylus would create too many problems. How would you like to wait in line at McDonalds while the cashier crawls under the cabinet looking for the dropped stylus!

      --
      Me fail English? That's unpossible!
    3. Re:Only $100? by Master+Ben · · Score: 1

      So then you chain it to the screen.

    4. Re:Only $100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, McDonald's cashiers are people, too!

  14. just dont touch too fast by bl8n8r · · Score: 2, Funny

    or you'll exhaust all your server resour.... forget it.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  15. Curves of CRT? by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems the only thing making this thing LCD-only is the design of the plastic clip for the sensor that determins the position of the stylus. That and the tendency of cheap CRT screens to be curved in one or both of their dimensions, and possibly the static electricity that builds up on a CRT.
    1. Re:Curves of CRT? by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 2

      Oh, right. I was just thinking of my own retired flat CRT. I've cursed the name of the sometimes ball-formed CRTs ever since I got the flat one, years ago. So much easier on the eyes, so much better accuracy. Funny thing is the old 17" Viewsonic (G73fm) of mine still compares rather well with today's CRTs.

      The product page however still says that you can use the gadget with any flat surface, but I don't have the heart to tell more of my fellow Slashdotters to RTFA. There's no need to ruin your LCD.

      One thing for artists to consider is however that you can probably opt for a any textured surface to give you any amount of "pen drag" you wish. All the tablets I've tried so far are very slippery, which is by no means always a good thing. I could pick a rough paper, or even a textile according to what I feel is comfortable.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    2. Re:Curves of CRT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Wacom Volito 2's got a textured surface that feels just like drawing on a paper with a graphite pencil.

    3. Re:Curves of CRT? by Ross+D+Anderson · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the nice thing about WACOMs is that you can stick a piece of paper over the top of the tablet and regain all that lovely texture all for about $0.005.

  16. touchscreens, ugh... by dmnic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    other than in a POS or evoting application, I honestly do not see why why people want a touchscreen.

    I'm talking about a laptop/tablet configuration.
    yes, the idea sounds great and people will say that their productivity will increase, yada, yada, yada, but MOST people who say this have never used one or experienced the frustration when their touchscreen goes out of calibration, which will happen ALOT!!!

    I support a salesforce of about 200 who use various touchscreen PCs from HP Ipaq to Fujitsu tablets and laptops. at first they were ecstatic about the touchscreens then they slowly figured out that it was actually quicker for them to use the mouse/keyboard instead of having to touch the screen x/y on this side of this form and -x/y on this side of another button, etc in order to put in their orders.
    the screen doesnt go out of calibration uniformly across the whole screen, but generally in 5 different ways in the 4 corners and in the middle. this is a nightmare to use and to support!

    1. Re:touchscreens, ugh... by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

      So what you are saying is that they don't work right so people don't like them, even though they find the idea very attractive? Most technology doesn't really catch on until it actually works right, so I'm not sure why you are surprised.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:touchscreens, ugh... by dmnic · · Score: 1

      not quite.
      the idea is great. they work great at first but once the calibration starts going (and it will) thats when you start having the problems. yes, you can reset the calibration and continue to use the device but you will find that you are resetting the calibration more and more often.
      the units we work with have little watch style batteries that keep the calibration settings.
      maybe that is the cause of the problems, maybe not.

      regardless, this is not new technology! how many voting stories have we seen that mention the touch screen loosing its calibration?

    3. Re:touchscreens, ugh... by maxume · · Score: 1

      I would say that you just paraphrased "It doesn't work right yet". Sure, it can be made to work, but from what you say, it simply isn't reliable over a reasonable period of time, which is something I include in my definition of working correctly.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  17. slashdotted by eneville · · Score: 2, Informative

    looks like the host is slashdotted, here is a mirrordot link to the first page of the article, does anyone have a better mirror of this site?

    http://www.mirrordot.org/stories/a3c962572c00cfd47 6bc23e2cfff8f72/index.html

  18. Neat! by mattr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Last time I read /. at 0 that's for sure. A bunch of people worried about pressing on an LCD not designed for it, and then a bunch of trolls. Guess all stories are like this.

    The company's in Korea. Any slashdotters there trying it with linux / trying it out in the store?
    This could really hurt Anoto, which makes an extremely advanced system of bluetooth/optical recognition pens and special paper using a pattern that is unique for every page.

    Anoto, like the Flypen toy based on its tech, has all kinds of applications. For example a checkbox called "Fax" at the bottom of a sheet of paper that when you check it, it gets faxed. Navisis has a portable version for pdas and maybe phones, called the phone pen which looks quite cool, and the mouse version that works on your table top is quite neat too. They do sell protective covering for your lcd as well, anyway I'd like to hear from someone who really uses it, and then hear about if it just looks like a mouse to the system or if it needs a driver.

    1. Re:Neat! by mattr · · Score: 1

      I also give points to them for their "The Little Prince" illustration. (the hat shaped object is a snake that swallowed an elephant...) I like these guys!

  19. Cool, but by pipingguy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    what about gorilla arm?

  20. Down with the mouse? by Nephrite · · Score: 1

    This is very good news. At last we got a separate device which I can hook up to any screen and which provides touchscreen functionality. Well, yes it's windoze only and laptop only but hey, the technology is here and I think they will be making devices like this for other monitors and OS's a well. I always hated windowing environments with OK/Cancel/etc buttons because they made me use the mouse. Touchscreen and pen is better because you may look where you point your cursor AND see your hand and pen at the same time. I thought it's no big deal until I tried to use applications with lots of small buttons packed together like MS Word or OpenOffice. Mis-clicking is so annoying. Maybe it's just me and my shakey hands but come on! Resume: I'd like to have such a device for my CRT monitor. THIS one is not for me though yet.

    1. Re:Down with the mouse? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I don't like touchscreens, because you always end up with dirty screens really quickly.

      I wonder how you would play FPSes with touchscreens...

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  21. OT: CRT Vs LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I considered myself a holdout but I just replaced the last of our CRTs. If you're designing for screen, output is increasingly going to be viewed on a flat panel. If you're designing for print, RGB output is always inaccurate.

    LCD displays have improved since the late 90s and the advantages of CRT monitors are becoming fallacy.

    1. Re:OT: CRT Vs LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Even relatively cheap LCD's (like mine) are quite adequate when it comes to colour representation, brightness, etc. Also the available resolutions are starting to match those of CRT's (my LCD's resolution is a tad lower than my CRT's was, but not a lot) and you can completely forget about conformity issues. Plus, the image is always sharp - my CRT was slightly fuzzy at it's maximum resolution.
      Recently I saw an interview with the director / chief animator of a major animated movie. It was set in the studio, and on the desk where a tablet and two LCD's, one of them truly gigantic. I couldn't help feeling a pang of envy ;-) ~~~~

    2. Re:OT: CRT Vs LCD by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      It's usually not the CRT itself that's fuzzy, but signal degredation caused by the cable...
      VGA cables really aren't well designed, with all the pins so close together like that. A good CRT using a 13W3 or seperate shielded RGB cables will look a lot better, especially at high resolutions. LCD screens look like crap through VGA connections too...

      My basis for this, are the old 21" and 24" SUN/SGI CRT screens... They have dual VGA/13W3 inputs, and the difference is quite noticeable, even on the same system if you plug a 13w3->vga adapter straight into the videocard and then connect to the monitor using a vga cable.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  22. There are already touchscreen kits by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Which basically tape over an existing screen, LCD or CRT. I briefly investigated them for an epos system I was putting together but eventually decided on a ELO screen, why add hassle you don't need.

    e.g.
    http://www.magictouch.com/builtin.html

    Given a few years, they'll be built into almost all screens.

    --
    Deleted
  23. Slashvertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been done before, and done a lot better. How did this get through the moderators?

  24. There are more amateurs than professionals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in most creative fields, there are several times more amateurs than there are professionals. This is especially true when it comes to computer graphic design. Sure, the professionals are usually willing to pay a steep price for a high-quality product. But then again, amateurs are willing to pay a reasonable amount for a product that is nowhere near as good as what the professional demands. And companies can still make a lot of money this way.

    Dell's a good example. They made their start selling low-end, semi-trash PCs to those who wanted the PC desktop experience, but didn't want to or need to pay the amount of money that IBM was demanding. They really weren't making the big deals that IBM was with financial institutions and other power users. But for every large deal at a financial houes, there were hundreds of thousands of deals to be made selling to average folk and small businesses. And as we've seen, Dell still became very successful, even if they didn't sell to "professional" users (ie. banks, insurance companies, etc.).

    I think some of the major open source projects struggle with this concept. Take the Mozilla project's Gecko engine. It's damn near impossible to find any usable documentation that explains how to embed Gecko within an existing application. Sure, there are some embedding demos, but they're poorly maintained, virtually without comments, and a very poor introduction to the task at hand. There are no doubt many amateurs who wish to integrate Gecko with existing applications, but are unable to use the existing solutions. Some simple documentation would really go a long way towards making Gecko usable by amateurs, and then also by professionals alike.

    1. Re:There are more amateurs than professionals. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Well, there is the third-party Gecko ActiveX control, if your application is Windows-only... fits perfectly in place of Trident...

  25. sounds familiar by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a device we use occasionally in our office. I wish I knew what it was called so I could link it.. but I'll just have to deal with describing it. You attach the device to the corner of a whiteboard, use a special marker, and it records your writing. You can then plug the device into a laptop via USB to download the board notes. We've had this thing for at least 2 years.

    Sounds like simliar technology.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  26. Re:Aren't normal LCDs a bit dirty for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Nah, they probably spare no expense. If a screen's dirty, just replace it.

  27. Power Pen by RealityProphet · · Score: 1

    They should call it the Power Pen. It's so bad.

  28. About Damn Time We Change GIMP's Name by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    This being Slashdot...

    an alternative for Photoshoppers...

    and GIMP/GIMP pimps/GIMPoids/GIMPles/GIMPhomaniacs

    take your pick
     

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:About Damn Time We Change GIMP's Name by frenchbedroom · · Score: 1

      Or how about just plain "GIMP users". Oh, unless you want to troll about GIMP's name, right. Forget what I said.

    2. Re:About Damn Time We Change GIMP's Name by doti · · Score: 1

      Let's just accept that "photoshop" now means raster image editing. I use Linux exclusively for many, but when I manipulate an image with GIMP I still say I "photoshop" it.

      --
      factor 966971: 966971
  29. LCD second monitor flat on desk? by Brit_in_the_USA · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one thinking...

    cool, I'll just spend an extra $100 on a 17" or 19" LCD monitor and lie it flat on the desk. I'll drive it with the second monitor output of my graphics card. For screen protection I'll buy some kind of 3M film from staples for $10 a roll or a 200 pack of laser printable transparency sheets.

    or even - I could roll my own context sensitive touch tablet, instead of a $1500 OLED keyboard

    ...with new gadgets comes new opportunities.

  30. "Photoshoppers"?? by snowwrestler · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think you meant to say "graphics professionals who use the software application Adobe Photoshop®."

    sincerely,
    - Adobe

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  31. huh by z_gringo · · Score: 1

    Well, im reading that and thinking wow, that is interesting.

    Until I get to: The gadget is priced at around $100 and seems a good alternative for Photoshoppers.

    Im not much of a phtotoshopper, but what unmet need does this meet for photoshoppers?

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    1. Re:huh by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      A tablet is superior to a mouse for just about any photoediting purpose, and most drawing purposes. So yeah, it's an alternative. However, most of the value of having a tablet is its pressure sensitivity, which this device does not have. So I wouldn't say it's a 'good' alternative to a real tablet.

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
  32. TabletPC availability by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    Well, Fujitsu has been (profitably!) making pen computers for well over a decade, so I can't imagine them stopping, and they're large enough that I can't see them going away any time soon, and their warranty support is quite good by all accounts.

    William
    (who bought a Stylistic 'cause he got tired of waiting for Apple to make a replacement for his Newton)

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    1. Re:TabletPC availability by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Fujitsu will go wherever the money is, and abandon everything else as dictated by business forecasts. They used to sell decent (cheap) desktop hard drives, but one day they just up-and-left that market. They "honored" warranties by replacing failed hard drives with a $40 cheque. Then everyone was afraid they'd do the same with their notebook drives, many people flocked to Seagate and Hitachi as a result. I certainly won't be surprised when they drop tablets and ultralights from their line-up once the other manufacturers show the slightest hint of competition, because competition equals price wars, and price wars aren't easy.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  33. A very bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you start touching the surface of an ordinary LCD panel, it certainly won't last long.
    I know that every time I see a public touch screen, I feel somewhat compelled to test its durability with a good few pokes of the finger.

  34. It's called a whiteboard recorder by cheros · · Score: 1

    Comes in various guises, but usually has a detection bar and a couple of special pen holders so the board can track the position of the pens (and the eraser).

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    1. Re:It's called a whiteboard recorder by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      At work we just take pictures. Higher resolution and we can use any color.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  35. Not a touchscreen by mongogeek · · Score: 1

    Looking at the technology of this device, it does not monitor touch, but instead the position of the pen. A "real" touchscreen does not require a special pen to register a touch, your finger is typically used. There are many types of touchscreens, some actually respond to the force of your touch (resistive technology), some sense the capacitance of your finger, others the acoustic damping caused by your touch, and a new technoloty even "listens" to the sound of your touch and calculates where you touched.

  36. Lack of Mac Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the website for the product it only supports XP. Most of the people I know that would think of using this are artist types and they don't use XP.

  37. Ultrasound? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    1. is it 'ultra' enough to be completely inaudible? I've had some experience with ultrasonic devices for cleaning etc. and they are unbearable to be around due to the high-pitched shriek they emit. To be fair, this is at much higher power levels than this pen will use.

    2. Ultrasonics can be quite destructive, both on the laptop screen and on the bones in your hand (again, more of a problem at high power levels).

  38. not for mac by jordan314 · · Score: 0

    I've seen a couple of these pop up, but I'm still waiting for one that's mac compatible and big enough to cover a 20" or 24" screen. Then I can use it on my iMac. Sure the thing's heavy but if I took the stand off I'd gladly use the giant glowing flat slab of mac in my lap.

  39. Oxymoron of the century... by donnythebowler · · Score: 1

    "Enjoyable ink chatting on MSN Messenger."

  40. Re:yeah but... by dramenbejs · · Score: 0

    The most stupid things in universe is a slashdot modder.
    How else can you explain modding the parent question flamebait?

    Oh wait... once I saw a flie repeatedly flying into a flame, until it burnt! So the /. modder could be the second most stupid probabbly, not the first.

  41. Blast from the past by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

    It's not a touch screen, it's a Light Pen, straight outta 1957. Everything old is new again...

    1. Re:Blast from the past by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      No, it is not. This and a lightpen use completely different technologies and position detection systems.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  42. Not for Photoshop by gig · · Score: 1

    > The gadget is priced at around $100 and seems a good alternative for Photoshoppers."

    In the same way that a cut finger is an alternative to a pencil.

    Actual art tablets that are specifically designed to use with Photoshop (and vice versa) start at $99.

  43. A la Minority Report by vivtho · · Score: 1

    Imagine using something like that used in Minority Report all day...

    If you thought your RSI from using a mouse was bad, think about what'd happen after you'd been waving your arms at your computer screen all the time.

    1. Re:A la Minority Report by nasch · · Score: 1

      Um... nothing? RSI comes from making very fine repetitive motions. Waving your arms around wouldn't have that same effect. I've never heard of people getting RSI from sweeping floors all day, or pulling weeds, or working an assembly line, or other large-scale repetitive motions. Somebody could come along and prove me wrong, though.

  44. Or another option that works on Macs by lk · · Score: 1

    http://www.magictouch.com/addon.html

    It's priced around US$200, but works with your fingers and have a mac version.

  45. Quite nicely, in fact. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    nt

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  46. note taking by tengwar · · Score: 1

    There seem to be a lot of comments saying that this device is useless to artists because of lack of resolution and pressure sensitivity. True, but it misses the point. I used to use a Psion 7, a lovely little A5 size clamshell machine running a proprietary OS. It was ideal for taking notes in meetings as I could go straight from touch-typing to sketching a diagram straight into the word processor. These days I use MS OneNote, which is slightly more clumsy in that respect (much better in other ways). If I have a tablet I can sketch into my notes, but usually it's too much hassle to take the tablet and find room on a table in a crowded meeting room. A device that clipped on to the screen would help to a certain extent. The Psion would still be better in having the hw built in, internal stowage for the stylus, and a fancy hinge that brought the bottom of the screen forward to avoid the machine tipping backwards when the touch screen was used.

  47. NAVisis is not really new with this technology by Codacas · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a business and have implemented the use of a S/W program that is heavily based on touchscreen technology for production. The funny thing is that I have gone through 2 of these expensive suckers (CRT & LCD) before getting smart. I now buy cheap lcd's and cheap overlays!! The cost is almost a third of the price of the complete unit and work great. But here's the real funny thing, I always, always always, always check a technology company's bottom line of their web site for their copyright date to see how good they are keeping the public web stuff current. NAVisis's web site has a copyright of 2002. :-o This technology is not new stuff anyway they are just catching up.

  48. 3 * 180 degree by otot · · Score: 1

    Noticed how the keyboard and the display on a laptop are not in a nice position for drawing? The only thing you need is 3 times 180 degree rotation. 1 For opening your laptop. 2 For rotating your laptop. So your display is pointing towards you. 3 For Vista to position the UI upside down.

  49. You still... by bandmassa · · Score: 1

    ...get paid by cheque?!

    I'd have to Photoshop the electrons flowing between my employer and my bank :-(

    --
    "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1