Slashdot Mirror


Dell Linux Details

jon_anderson_ca writes "Dell, through their direct2dell website, has released some details of their soon-to-be-available Linux machines. Among the highlights: Only hardware that works with Linux is offered; open-source drivers are used where possible; binary drivers for Intel wireless cards, etc.; and no support for proprietary media codecs. Seems reasonable, but it's too bad that Click2Run isn't in Ubuntu 7.04 for the sake of those wanting to (legally) play DVDs, use AVI files, etc." The direct2dell site divulges no details on what models will be offered with Linux. For those we turn to linuxquestions.org, where proprietor Jeremy published a scoop last week: "We will be launching a Linux based OS (Ubuntu) on the E520, 1505 and XPS 410 starting next Thursday, 5/24."

288 comments

  1. But will they be cheaper? by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The base Dell 1505 laptop is $699, with some low-end version of Windows Vista preinstalled. If the Linux version costs more than that, Dell isn't serious about this.

    1. Re:But will they be cheaper? by spoop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But with Windows on a $700 laptop, I'm sure they install all kinds of crapware that brings the cost down, which they obviously can't do with Linux. I wouldn't be surprised if the actual cost to Dell for Windows and Linux is the same.

      --
      I blame geof's speakers.
    2. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why do you think you can't pre-install crapware on linux ?

    3. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Jimmy+King · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would think we could look at their current Linux supported offerings, the PowerEdge line, to get an idea.

      Base price is no OS.
      + $261 for RHEL5 w/ 1 year support
      + $785 for RHEL5 w/ 3 year support
      + $105 for Suse 10 EL w/ 1 year support
      + $262 for Suse 10 EL w/ 3 year support
      + $599 for Windows Server 2003 Standard
      + $974 for Windows 2003 SBS

      This seems pretty in-line with what the pricing was when the company I work for bought a Linux compatible Optiplex last year.

      With that in mind, I would imagine that the Ubuntu desktops will also be less expensive than the same desktop with Windows on it.

    4. Re:But will they be cheaper? by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The difference is that the PowerEdge line is servers. You can't install crapware on a server. Any admin (I would hope) would promptly wipe the drive anyway and start over from scratch if you included anything close to crapware (or even if you didn't, just because they wanted to do everything from scratch). You can't compare the pricing on their servers to the pricing on their desktop machines, because they serve entirely different purposes, and entirely different markets.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:But will they be cheaper? by scumdamn · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you can't because customers wouldn't stand for it. You COULD install it on Linux, but not if you're targeting your offering to Linux nerds as opposed to Linux n00bs. (And I say this as a Linux nerd.)

    6. Re:But will they be cheaper? by fishthegeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm suffering from Multiple Personality Disorder on the idea that the Linux laptop should be cheaper. On one hand it is financially cheaper for Dell to offer the machines without Windows. On the other hand Dell is probably offering more of a value to most people by vetting the hardware against the software before delivery.

      Some of us have had the joy of getting wireless or sound working over the course of a week. Heaven help anyone trying to get power management on a laptop working well. I'm typing this on a 30 day old Acer and what power management I have working is a gross and inelegant hack. I jumped on ideastorm like a couple of other people did and said my peace. Having done that I intend to sell this laptop on craigslist, and buy a Dell preloaded with Feisty and I will pay the difference if I need to. I have the sneaking suspicion that most of the posts on ideastorm are "me too" posts or kids wanting to feel 1337. I hope I'm wrong. I hope that most of the posters are willing to put their money where their mouth is. I believe that having Dell add the value of making a good laptop with a great (and hardware vetted) OS will be worth what they ask. I feel a little naive for suggesting that Linux folks should trust Dell but Dell just might actually price their laptop fairly and I for one will pay for easy Feisty goodness. Look at System76, they sell Ubuntu preloaded and I can promise that they will never be the lower cost option.

      --
      load "$",8,1
    7. Re:But will they be cheaper? by VernonNemitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't care how much junk software they add, so long as Micheal Dell has read "World Domination 201" and decides to offer for sale a disk full of licensed codecs. Dell has the clout to put such a disk together, faster than Linspire.

    8. Re:But will they be cheaper? by lawpoop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, how much can each craplet defray the cost of a new computer?

      I don't know what the numbers are, but I would bet there is at least 1,000 installs for every eventual purchase of an app. If you paid $5 to have your app pre-installed, that would be $5,000 dollars before you got your first $79.99 sale.

      The actual amount that each app brings down the cost of a laptop has got to be in the cents range.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    9. Re:But will they be cheaper? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      According to the Linux Questions article, yes.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    10. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait, huh?

      Pardon me a moment...Ha! Ha!

    11. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Darundal · · Score: 1

      Difference is that there is a cost for a license for those Operating Systems, whereas Ubuntu has no cost for a license for the OS.

    12. Re:But will they be cheaper? by westlake · · Score: 0, Troll
      On one hand it is financially cheaper for Dell to offer the machines without Windows.

      This assumes that OEM Linux can succeed for Dell where it failed for Walmart - in delivering mass-market sales. Marketing is expensive. Maintaining a dual inventory and support structure is expensive. The product with the 1% market share gets the axe.

    13. Re:But will they be cheaper? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Difference is that there is a cost for a license for those Operating Systems There is no cost for a CentOS license, and CentOS contains nearly the same software as Red Hat Enterprise Linux. With RHEL or SUSE, you get x years of support for $280*x (RHEL) or $100*x (SUSE).

      whereas Ubuntu has no cost for a license for the OS. But how much does its support cost?
    14. Re:But will they be cheaper? by MLS100 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't give up hope, maybe McAfee runs under Wine!

    15. Re:But will they be cheaper? by dysfunct · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if the actual cost to Dell for Windows and Linux is the same.

      I've heard this argument so many times on slashdot and never seen any kind of proof. Is there anyone who can prove or disprove this?

      Honestly, I doubt that even the most "evil" and anti-competitive licensing deal with Microsoft can force the price per install any lower than $20 for Vista. I also doubt that the crapware revenue per unit sold is any higher than $5, which leads to the (speculative) conclusion that Linux should be $15 cheaper per unit sold or at least equal if you consider the cost for retraining the customer service monkeys.

      --
      :/- spoon(_).
    16. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I jumped on ideastorm like a couple of other people did and said my peace. Dear Sir,

      Next time please say your war. That is more important.

      Yours Sincerely,
      Anonymous Coward
    17. Re:But will they be cheaper? by glittalogik · · Score: 2, Informative

      As far as the average home user goes, just about anything you need can be found within 10 minutes on the forums or various tutorials and how-tos via google.

      Paid support from Canonical (source):

      9-5: $250/yr (USD)
      24x7: $900/yr (USD)

    18. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Daengbo · · Score: 5, Interesting
      From the Dell website,

      Michael's Computers

      What kind of computer does Michael Dell have? See for yourself. These are the systems and peripherals Michael is using right now. If you want to learn more about these products, or purchase one of your own, visit the links.

      At home: Dell Precision M90

      Hardware:

      * Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 Processor
      * 4GB DDR2 667Mhz DRAM
      * 17" WXGA+ Widescreen LCD
      * 160GB 7200rpm SATA hard drive
      * 8X DVD +/- RW optical drive
      * NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 512MB

      Software:

      * Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Fawn
      * VMWare Workstation 6 Beta
      * OpenOffice.org 2.2
      * Automatix2
      * Firefox 2.0.0.3
      * Evolution Groupware 2.10
      It's the first computer listed. I suspect that support for Dell Linux laptops will be moving right along with MD's primary computer running Ubuntu 7.04.
    19. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Stocktonian · · Score: 1

      Why would you expect Linux to be cheaper? Just because the licence is cheaper? There are many many other factors involved and realistically you should be concerned with good value for money. In terms of getting the most out of your hardware over the long term and not putting up with daily crashes, Linux can't be beaten. Stop worrying about if it's more expensive than Windows. You get what you pay for and if you want quality you have to pay more.

      --
      XePhi Computers sell really cheap Linux CDs! http://www.xephi.co.uk
    20. Re:But will they be cheaper? by drsquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And you're basing this conclusion on numbers you've completely made up?

    21. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately you are completely neglecting the cost to develop and maintain system images for dell and support those images. an Image with a million users is gonna cost the same to maintain and support as one with 100 users. Hence there is actually a significant cost in producing linux for a system, Dell are a for profit business and you can bet your arse that this cost is being passed on to the purchasers.

    22. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Stocktonian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does anyone else think that offering only 3 models is a little underwhelming?

      Only one laptop model? I can tell you it's because Dell's hardware just isn't compatible enough. Sure it's good enough to get by with Linux on it but they're not likely to stump up the costs for development of a laptop that is 100% compatible.

      And for everyone who thinks they can just swap out components that don't behave well, I'm afraid I can tell you from person experience it's not that simple. You need to get the factory on board to make it happen and most of the time Linux compatible components aren't cheap. I'll take it all back if Dell start producing a line of laptops and desktops that work 100% with Linux.

      My company has taken the time to create 4 specifically Linux OEM laptops, so we know how hard it is. When people say they expect it to be cheaper too it's just getting ridiculous. The hardware choices you need to make for really good compatibility just do cost more. WiFi is the best example, once you've changed from a generic card to an Intel card you've lost the saving you make by not paying a Windows Licence. And that's before you even have to start worrying about the right Intel chip! I can't wait to see these laptops, turn on the WiFi, 3D desktop and put it into suspend mode. Then when it wakes up we'll see how compatible these things really are.

      I commend Dell for trying, but I think before everyone gets too excited we need to wait and see how much effort they actually put in.

      --
      XePhi Computers sell really cheap Linux CDs! http://www.xephi.co.uk
    23. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not dual boot?

      I prefer a dual boot machine. If dell doesn't offer the option, to stay legal I have to purchase a Vista preinstalled laptop and install gnu/linux myself. Nevertheless, it's easier to install gnu/linux on 100% gnu/linux compatible hardware (i hope).
      I'm pointing this out because quite a few people will purchase Vista laptops but still use gnu/linux and hopefully benefit from hardware compatibility. This is not a reason to halt preinstalled gnu/linux as dell should get more overall sales. Unfortunatelly I believe gnu/linux only laptop sales will be low.

      (Why do I need Windows? CAD software -read games-)

    24. Re:But will they be cheaper? by AVryhof · · Score: 1

      Maybe an aliened version of this.....

      http://shop.mcafee.com/Products/LinuxShield.aspx?C ID=6005&WT.mc_id=semd|ggl|us_SMB_Linux_en|s4A7|s

    25. Re:But will they be cheaper? by SEMW · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know what the numbers are, but I would bet there is at least 1,000 installs for every eventual purchase of an app I think you're overestimating the average user and underestimating the psycology used.

      Grandma buys a Dell computer. Grandma uses it happily for three months. After three months, Norton pops up a window with an Alarming Yellow Exclamation Mark telling her that her antivirus protection "Will Expire in 5 Day(s)" and that unless she pays $20, her computer Will Be Vulnerable To Newly Discovered Viruses And Other Security Threats! Now, Grandma's read about computer viruses in the papers. She's never heard of AVG, Avast, or ClamAV.

      So Grandma presses the button and pays $20. From her perspective, what else could she do?

      No, I don't have any figures either, but I suspect that percentage subscription renewals from preloaded apps are a hell of a lot larger than you think.
      --
      What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    26. Re:But will they be cheaper? by JohnBailey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does anyone else think that offering only 3 models is a little underwhelming? I think it would be incredibly stupid to offer Linux on every PC they sell at this stage. Firstly, they are doing a trial project by installing Linux on the computers in question. Secondly, it takes time and money to verify to the point where they can guarantee that the hardware will actually work reliably with Linux. Thirdly, they would have to go through every Dell computer to find the incompatible components and change suppliers and specifications on each one. Not a great idea for a trial line. A much more sensible option is to do it in stages. Offer a small sub set of their stock, then slowly increase it according to demand, and increase the number of countries that they sell in.

      I have no way of checking, but I would assume when optical mice, LCD monitors and various other options came to be offered by Dell first, they rolled them out on a small number of computers first, then extended them based on customer feedback and support calls etc. This Linux experiment is only the first step. We will have to wait for step two before we can make any informed judgment about their long term commitment.
      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    27. Re:But will they be cheaper? by bberens · · Score: 1

      Linux nerds will reinstall the OS no matter what.

      --
      Check out my lame java blog at www.javachopshop.com
    28. Re:But will they be cheaper? by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that they can't install crapware and ads on Linux?

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    29. Re:But will they be cheaper? by jmac1492 · · Score: 1

      Actually, in this case Dell only proceeds to Step 2 (???) after Step 1 leads them to Step 3 (Profit!)

      --
      Jenny's got a new number! 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    30. Re:But will they be cheaper? by LocoMan · · Score: 1

      There's also economies of scale... if they sell 100 windows computers for every one linux computer (numbers pulled out of my behind), then you have to take into account that each of the windows computer end up being cheaper to produce (without counting OS price) than each of the linux ones.

    31. Re:But will they be cheaper? by maxume · · Score: 1

      The amount they are paying per install is still going to be a lot closer to $5 than it is to $50.

      This computer didn't come with all that much crapware. My gut feeling is that the pre-installs probably had (much) less than a $75 impact on the price.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    32. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to check out your laptops, but the ads are covering up the page content (on IE6 at work)

    33. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The difference is that the PowerEdge line is servers. You can't install crapware on a server.

      Sure you can. Dell offers Windows pre-installed!

    34. Re:But will they be cheaper? by fishthegeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry that you were modded troll. I don't think that you're trolling at all. Dell doesn't expect more than one percent yet they are still doing it. There once was a time when MS or Novell had "1%", there was a time when Commodore owned the home computer market. If Dell uses wisdom, and savvy here they stand a chance of being at the forefront of an emerging market instead of being the dude kicking the dead horse. Dell won't have to support Ubuntu if the community does it, and having used Ubuntu's forum and launchpad, I can tell you first hand that the quality of support there is often higher than I've seen on Technet and it certainly is easier to read.

      Dell I suspect is looking for exactly "1%" not looking for a market crusher. Wal-Mart failed because most anyone that buys a computer from Wal-Mart is the type of person that answers "Windows" when you ask them what kind of computer they have. Wal-Mart was a marketing mistake because they do not actually market products they market prices.

      --
      load "$",8,1
    35. Re:But will they be cheaper? by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Dell flashes their operating systems onto the hard drives after they've been manufactured. The cost of putting Windows or Linux on them is the same.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    36. Re:But will they be cheaper? by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      As you know there's a big difference between numbers and percentages. For example, there was a time when MS only had a tiny amount of DOS customers. There was never a time when MS had only 1% of the OS market for IBM PCs.

      I also wouldn't make too much of the "emerging market" theory. If Linux PC sales took off, Dell's competitors could roll out their own offerings very quickly. It's not as if there's any secret Dell technology that competitors would have to duplicate, everything is readily available.

    37. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Sir,

      If you think I'm going to sit here and let someone say their war, you have another thing coming.

      Yours Sincerely,

      Anonymous Coward II

    38. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Lord+Faust · · Score: 1

      You are so wrong it's not funny. It's at least several 10s of dollars per installation. When a company Dell (or anyone else) software, they end up supporting it (to varying extents) or at least fielding support calls regarding it, and there is the customer impression that the company recommends that software. They're not just slapping "use AOL" ads inside the system, they're installing the app and leaving chosing a screenname and entering a credit card number as the sole tasks required by the user. Thanks for trying, though.

    39. Re:But will they be cheaper? by fishthegeek · · Score: 1

      Who is making much ado about anything? I want an alternative. I'm getting that alternative. IBM PC's had less than one percent of the overall computing market at one time (http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/total-sha re.ars/4). Who cares what companies offer similar products to what Dell will offer. I said I'd buy one and I will. I was arguing against the troll mod because I thought it was unfair. I hope I see that mod when I get the next metamod link.

      --
      load "$",8,1
    40. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to http://dyumnin.com/views/opensource_tax.shtml
      Opensource dell laptops are costlier by $128 compared to WinXP laptops. and the preinstalled crapware discount your laptop by around $54.
      So if dell cannot load crapware on its linux laptop your machine will be more expensive than a windows laptop.

    41. Re:But will they be cheaper? by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      So, would you agree that for anti-trust purposes MS's market share should have been calculated based on the "overall computing market"?

    42. Re:But will they be cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will include crapware... gnome! And vi!
    43. Re:But will they be cheaper? by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So Grandma presses the button and pays $20. From her perspective, what else could she do? OK, but does she do this for every pay-ware app installed?

      Let's assume that the developers make $20 off of a purchased app. We can't assume 100% sales. Let's just say that it's 50%. I think that's a more than generous number. So, the developers cannot afford to pay more than $10 per computer to put their app on it, without losing money ( and this is a year later, after the subscription has run out).

      So you knock $10 off of the cost of the computer.

      Now, do all of the pre-installed apps get purchased? No. they might buy one or two, but they won't buy all five. So you might assume 50% sales on anti-virus, but you can't assume %50 percent sales on Yet Another media player, and even less for the third app, etc. Also, the more the software costs, the less sales there are, therefore the less you can afford to pay Dell to pre-install it.

      I mean, so realistically, how much could be knocked off of the price of a computer? $50 max?

      I am starting to think that these apps are value-added -- it's something that Dell pays (however little, multiplied by the number of units) for, to create a better experience for the user, over and above new purchased from other vendors. I really doubt now that developers pay Dell to have their stuff pre-installed.
      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    44. Re:But will they be cheaper? by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      Because lack of crapware is one of Linux's biggest weaknesses.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    45. Re:But will they be cheaper? by mpe · · Score: 1

      The difference is that the PowerEdge line is servers. You can't install crapware on a server. Any admin (I would hope) would promptly wipe the drive anyway and start over from scratch if you included anything close to crapware (or even if you didn't, just because they wanted to do everything from scratch). You can't compare the pricing on their servers to the pricing on their desktop machines, because they serve entirely different purposes, and entirely different markets.

      In quite a few corporate environments if may not matter if the machine in question is a "server" or a "desktop". The first thing that happens to it when it arrives is that it is connected to a network and the appropriate set of software installed, without every running whatever the OEM has bothered to install. Effectivly OEM installs can be "crapware" by definition.

    46. Re:But will they be cheaper? by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      I think you're underestimating Dell's power in the market. When you assume that Dell only has to pick from existing hardware and existing drivers, of course their selection is limited. It would be the same way with Windows if Windows had less than 5% marketshare.

      The difference is, Dell can go to their hardware suppliers and say, "we want to buy your product, but we really need you to create a Linux driver for it. If you can't do that, we will buy from someone else." Dell is a big enough account for some of these suppliers that *someone* will be willing to develop a driver for Linux in order to score the Dell account. The more hardware that has Linux drivers, the more computers Dell can offer with Linux, and the more divers that get written for Linux.

      Hardware is just silicon. All it needs is a driver to work on any operating system. The reason Linux lags right now is that the hardware companies only develop drivers for Windows, based solely on marketshare. Once Linux sales pick up at Dell, that will start to change.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    47. Re:But will they be cheaper? by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      Very true. The advantage for the Linux community as a whole is that a company like Dell will not only be able to give an incentive to the hardware manufacturers to produce Linux drivers, but that they will also encourage other big companies to offer Linux as an option on at least some selected lines. Provided they are successful that is.

      That is in the future though. Right now, Dell have work within the subset of hardware that is Linux friendly, and get past the legion of nit pickers who are predicting the failure of the project before it even starts, to get to the customers who actually want to buy a Linux PC pre installed.

      they may be successful and sell lots of Linux machines, or they may not, but at least they are having a go.

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
  2. Support NIGHTMARE by Gothmolly · · Score: 1, Funny

    Customer: Hi, I want to watch erm, a video, which I downloaded.
    Dell (best read with Apu's accent): I see that you are having a Dell Linux computer.
    Customer: Yes.
    Dell: What I can do for you sir is to tell you that you cannot watch a WMV file.
    Customer: Um, but my kid sent it to me from HIS computer.
    Dell: Please hold.
    Customer: *fume*
    (5 mins later)
    Dell: Sir, I want you to take the system recovery disk and reinstall your operating system software.
    Customer: Why?
    Dell: Please hold.
    Customer calls friend/child/etc on the other phone: Hey do you have a Windows Vista CD I can borrow?
    (1 min later)
    Customer: Great thanks.
    *click*
    Dell: Sir? Sir?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Support NIGHTMARE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Customer calls friend/child/etc on the other phone: Hey do you have a Windows Vista CD I can borrow?
      only if they're an idiot. incidentally are you aware of Vista's DRM fettish? btw if your gonna say something stupid post as anonymous coward- it saves karma.
  3. Fast articles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not...
    "starting next Thursday, 5/24." So this week....
    This article was on Digg last week it is just too bad that retarded article comparing trolls to building contractors was chosen over it, this needs to be known out in the public as much as he fiasco with the Indy race car incident.

    Anyways this is good news it just makes me wonder about the future and codecs not being installed for legal reasons.
    What other legal options might limit certain programs being installed or from being used right out of the box on Dell Linux machines?

    "That's one small step for man, one giant step.. err*dohh* leap for mankind"

  4. Is it going to be completely Ubuntu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is Dell going to have their own repository? If people can get software from every repository it is possible that they will get something that doesn't work with the hardware. If Dell had its own repository then they would gain the same advantage that Apple has; the software would be guaranteed to work with the hardware. That would save them a bunch in support. That could make Linux much more attractive to Dell.

    1. Re:Is it going to be completely Ubuntu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf?

    2. Re:Is it going to be completely Ubuntu? by LevonB · · Score: 5, Informative

      They currently have a yum repository: http://linux.dell.com/repo/software/ I can only imagine they would have a debian based repository as well.

      --
      Levon Barker
    3. Re:Is it going to be completely Ubuntu? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      It's actually very simple to deal with multiple repositories and hardware compatibility: "If it didn't come from the Dell repository, we don't support it."

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:Is it going to be completely Ubuntu? by SavvyPlayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ubuntu is updated every 6 months, and Dell has chosen the more cutting-edge 7.04 version over 6.06 for which Canonical had promised support for 3 years on the desktop and 5 years on the server. With Windows, Dell has been accustomed to supporting a relatively stagnant Windows kernel. To commit to supporting a Linux kernel that evolves every dozen weeks or so, and a software distro that evolves every 6 months will require active participation on Dell's part -- regular contributions to testing (n+1) and participation on the Ubuntu launchpad.net site. If Dell is going to contribute at that level it might as well simply become another full ubuntu mirror. Exciting prospects indeed.

    5. Re:Is it going to be completely Ubuntu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right on the money, for me. I use Kubuntu because I just can't stand GNOME. Maybe KDE is a little ugly, it ain't GNOME, and I'm happy with it that way.

    6. Re:Is it going to be completely Ubuntu? by wellingj · · Score: 1

      System76 already does this with their driver update tool. I'm guessing Dell will do something like that.

    7. Re:Is it going to be completely Ubuntu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KDE isn't ugly, but Kubuntu's default theme is. The default KDE theme is better than what the Kubuntu devs chose, I can't see why they changed it other than to differentiate it from a default KDE install.

      I think KDE provides a better desktop than GNOME and that Ubuntu would be better off with a (possibly simplified) KDE instead of GNOME, but in the end it doesn't matter to me what everyone else uses as long as my preferred desktop (which is currently KDE) continues to be developed. So, Dell pushing Ubuntu is still a good thing since if it is successful it will encourage the development of more Linux-compatible hardware which is a good thing for all Linux users.

    8. Re:Is it going to be completely Ubuntu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it doesn't matter to you that certain pieces of software have no viable competition on Linux and are gnome-ified because they use gtk? Too much software is already being held hostage by lazy, incompetent gtk developers (gimp's problems with tablet support are first to my mind) and the stupid, backasswards gnome interface constantly gets in the way.

      Yes, it SHOULD matter to you what other people use. At as long as it limits your ability to use entire categories of software to apps with absurd interface conventions that are a combination of the stupidest ideas from macs with the stupidest ideas windows. And don't forget the show-stopping bugs because the developers are too fucking stupid or lazy to fix them, and will pass the buck at every opportunity, like with gimp tablet support. These guys are fucking tools and morons and they're making it worse to use desktop Linux than a mac or windows, which is just fucking pathetic.

  5. Proprietary Codecs? by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Which proprietary codecs aren't specifically supported? There's a version of LinDVD you can get for Mandriva that AFIAK is completely legal. What about talking with apple and getting some Quicktime codecs. What about other Codecs like MP3 that aren't included in some distros, yet are included in others? Either way, I don't really think it will be a bad thing. Anybody ordering a Linux machine will know how to get their own codecs, or will know someone who does (this will be the person telling them to get the computer). I don't see any noticeable percentage of people buying a linux machine who won't be at the direction of somebody who linux-knowledgable. However, I think that if they don't include things like MP3 playing capability then it's a garauteed failure for all such users, no matter the percentage.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      I have been running a 64 AMD computer with the 64 bit Ubuntu operating system. I use firefox and there is still no 64 bit flash with little hope that there will be one in the near future. There are a lot of sites that use flash such as youtube so there is a lot of video that one can not view with that set up.

    2. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

      >Which proprietary codecs aren't specifically supported?

      They don't want to pay royalties to the companies that own the proprietary codecs. Although it's free for a home user to use some of these codecs, you need to pay $$$ to distribute others in software form. So, for instance, for if you want to play MPEG under linux, technically you should be downloading / paying for MPEG TV (http://www.mpegtv.com/download.html). That's also why it's standard for SuSe, Mandrake, Red Hat, etc., not to include proprietary codecs in the default install of the free versions (unless you download from a server (e.g. Penguin Liberation Front) from a country that doesn't have copyright nazis). And in the case of playing DVDs, FAIK the MPAA won't allow it...

      I believe even Slackware doesn't include many codecs in it's default install for this reason.

      So it's not about just adding a package to the default image they install. It's about them wanting to put Linux out there in the cheapest way possible...

    3. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's a couple options for you.

      1) Install a 32 bit browser, along with a bunch of 32 bit libraries. Downside is this takes up extra disk space for the 32 bit libraries, and your browser is only 32 bit. Upside is the rest of your computer is 64 bit, and I don't really think there's a real need to have your browser running in 64 bit.

      2) Wine at Adobe until they release 64 bit flash for linux. I think this will be a while, considering they completely skipped version 8 for Linux, and I'm pretty sure version 9 is still in beta.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      It's about them wanting to put Linux out there in the cheapest way possible...
      Heaven forbid they spend a couple extra bucks to put out something that's a little more usable for the non-so-savvy user so that they might actually have a good experience. I think it may even save them a few bucks from not having users call all the time asking why they can't play MP3s on their new linux boxes.
      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by mattmacf · · Score: 1
      From TFA:

      At this time, we are not including any support for proprietary audio or video codecs that are not already distributed with Ubuntu 7.04. These include MPEG 1/2/3/4, WMA, WMV, DVD, Quicktime, etc. We are evaluating options for providing this support in the future.
      I personally don't like this idea at all. If there's serious corporate backing behind Linux, I feel like Dell would do best to pay the license fee for at least some particular codecs (e.g. mp3). However, I don't feel like it would be a failure by any stretch of the imagination that these codecs are not provided standard. For anyone intelligent enough to purposely buy an Ubuntu box will be able to find their answer in google rather trivially. Anyone who can't manage that is likely not going to be able to download mp3s onto the box in the first place.

      Another (slightly tangential) thing I'd be curious to see would be whether or not samba is running by default on an Ubuntu box. While having Windows networking available by default would be nifty, I don't know if the patent/security issues would permit it. Anyone with insight on this?
      --
      I only mod funny =D
    6. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by simcop2387 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      actually version 9 is out of beta now IIRC and the reason (that they state anyway) that there is no amd64 version of the flash player is because the JIT type code they have for flash isn't 64bit safe still, don't know if thats true though, if it is, its at least a semi-reasonable excuse, but its still something they should work on.

    7. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been running a 64 AMD computer with the 64 bit Ubuntu operating system. I use firefox and there is still no 64 bit flash with little hope that there will be one in the near future. There are a lot of sites that use flash such as youtube so there is a lot of video that one can not view with that set up.

      I'm not a big fan of the Microsoft/Novell/Dell garbage and I personally would never buy a Dell because of it but there may be a couple of good things that come out of this. Since there will be more Linux based machines out there it might be more incentive to develop a 64-bit flash player/plugin for Linux. Or Youtube might have more incentive to put out video in a non-proprietary format (doubt it). Or some new whiz kid who gets interested in Linux because it came on his new Dell writes an open source flash player that supports all Linux architectures (I think this actually violates the flash player license even thought I don't see how that is legal). Or ...

    8. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is because the JIT type code they have for flash isn't 64bit safe still

      The interesting thing is that Java has had native 64 bit implementation for years and years, yet still hasn't gotten around to making 64-bit plugins, not even for solaris on sparcs. I wonder if there's something else going on that for some reason nobody wants to mention, like maybe the specs for the plugin process simply isn't portable to 64 bit apps?

    9. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Now that JAVA is GPL, there is nothing stopping someone else producing a 64 bit browser plugin (unless the relavent bits of JAVA aren't open source yet)

    10. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      ffmpeg already supports flv for both playback and encoding I believe.
      As for an open source flash player, there is nothing to stop someone doing that as long as they don't use the Flash spec document from Adobe to do it. (see GNASH for the example that is the most usable at this point)

    11. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ffmpeg already supports flv for both playback and encoding I believe.

      Yes, but Youtube wraps it in their SWF player and as far as I know there is no way to easily pick out just the *flv files. I could be wrong on that.

    12. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      Another poster mentioned the option of installing a 32-bit firefox and libraries.

      But there's a better option:
      Install Flash9 in 64-bit firefox using ndiswrapper. See the Ubuntu forums:
      http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=341727

      It might look a little daunting, but I found it pretty straight-forward, and my browser has been rock-solid.
      In summary, I'm running flash inside a 64-bit browser in 64-bit Ubuntu Feisty Fawn (orig under Edgy Eft)

      YMMV, but I think it rocks! Good luck :-)

    13. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by njchick · · Score: 1

      Dell is not going to install Wine. I guess you meant Whine.

    14. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      it can be done, there's even a 64to32 plugin that will let you use 32bit plugins in a 64bit gecko browser, i never had much luck with it though.

    15. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by MadTinfoilHatter · · Score: 3, Informative

      2) Wine at Adobe until they release 64 bit flash for linux. I think this will be a while, considering they completely skipped version 8 for Linux, and I'm pretty sure version 9 is still in beta.

      First a slight correction: Adobe flash v9 came out of beta in January this year.
      Then an addition of a third available option:

      3) You can install the Netscape plugin wrapper http://www.gibix.net/projects/nspluginwrapper/ which allows you to use 32-bit plugins on a 64-bit browser. It works with Netscape and Mozilla browsers.
    16. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      aka nspluginwrapper . or check out gnash from svn

    17. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by zsau · · Score: 1

      At least you have a way around it. Those of us running GNU/Linux on PowerPCs are stuck in the cold and we've got even less hope than you do. When a site uses Flash, I have two options: Don't visit it, or use another computer. I usually pick the former.

      (Disclaimers: For Youtube and similar sites, its often possible to use an online tool that extracts the .flv Flash video file, but this only works when flash is used as a media player. When people are using Flash the way it ought to be used, that doesn't help. Gnash exists, but unless it's got remarkably better in the last few months, it's still very much in alpha and not worth installing for an end-user.)

      --
      Look out!
    18. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by drayzel · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do not work for Dell, but I happen to have a friend that works for one of their outsource providers. He read some of the internal docs related to the Ubuntu launch and asked me about the Codecs and such as he was unfamiliar with the way things work in Linux land From what I could gather there will be no DVD decoding or MP3 software installed, techs are instructed not to help customers install or locate any such software. Part of the script is "Although the hardware is capable of reading DVDs we do not support that function on this platform." A few other highlights. Hardware support will be handled by Dell Techs (or outsourced techs) using the Dell Hardware Diagnostics that ship with the Utility CD (Software based) or PSA tests (Part of the BIOS). Any OS configuration or usage support will be handled by a support que at Canonical if the customer purchased a support contract with the system. Otherwise they are referred to community support resources. Perhaps I can have him email me the document... but the again from what he says even their Toilet paper has DELL CONFIDENTIAL stamped all over it...

    19. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by drayzel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Forgot to clarify that there will be a special que for Linux support at Dell. which is a good thing as the majority of the techs I know at that location would choke the second a customer mentioned linux.

    20. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by ceeam · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Wine at Adobe...

      And then - when you're seriously drunk - shout at them: Youuu baasterdss (hick)... When arrre you goin' to make siss... siss... sissty-fooourr bit Flassshhh pluginnnn... (throw up)

    21. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by Suriken · · Score: 1

      there's still the iffiness of VP6 (ie flash video 9 - or is it 8?) implementation. And like that other dude said, it doesn't help when all the flvs are wrapped in swfs.

      --
      My Mommy says smoking kills. Oh, is your Mommy a doctor? No. A scientific researcher of some kind? No. Well then sh
    22. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      YouTube movies are in flv, which is basically a bastardised MPEG format. You don't need Flash player. There's a GreaseMonkey script which will allow you to watch them using mplayer. FLV isn't even a proprietary codec (ffmpeg knows about it. In fact, the whole toolchain for converting your camera's AVI files into something you can host on a website is entirely Open Source. Only the player is proprietary, and the GNASH developers are working on that. I'm currently working on a site with embedded video clips, and I will make them accessible to GNU/Linux users without Flash player.)

      I'll grant you, it's not obvious -- and that's not entirely unrelated to many people having vested interests in keeping alternatives to what they sell non-obvious. When was the last time you saw a site with PDFs mention that you could use anything other than Adobe Reader to view them? (Ones designed by me with on-the-fly PDF-munging technology [again, the toolchain to do this is 100% i-tal] and smart links to kpdf, xpdf, evince or foxit reader depending on your browser and OS don't count.)

      The problem begins and ends with closed-source, proprietary software. Always has, always will. Short of passing a law against caged software (which I don't believe is impossible for some small country sometime in the near future) the best thing you can do is support the Free Software movement. Use Free Software, suggest improvements (don't just say "this sucks", say "this would be better if ....."), donate money, time or hardware to an existing project, start a new project. If you want to put the "and other" into "non-violent and other direct action", there are quite a few things you can do which won't do any harm to life or tangible property, just bogus "intellectual property".

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    23. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      There's nothing to stop you exporting the SWF documentation to some country where the condition that it not be used to develop a competing player is unenforcible (Spain, maybe?) and doing the work there.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    24. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by wellingj · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just installed Debian Etch on my new Thinkpad. Debian is one of the most free distros around.
      mp3 mpg avi divix all worked out of the box. I had to install 1 package and DVD is now working.

    25. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Wow! Dell lets their techs talk to their customers now?!?!

    26. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by delire · · Score: 1

      In Ubuntu 7.04 you just have to click on an MP3, AVI etc and a popup will ask you if you to let the system automatically download and install the appropriate codecs. Once installed, a media player associated with that mime will appear and play the given file.

      With this being so streamlined I don't see why they should ship with $POPULAR_CODEC_OF_THE_DAY. While AFAIK Windows machines can play MP3's OOTB, DIVX codecs (for instance) don't ship with Windows on Dell. Why should it with their Linux offering?

    27. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Here's the problem though. The reason they aren't including the codecs is because they are proprietary, and would require royalty payments. If they just have some script that automatically downloads and installs a script at the click of 1 button just by trying to open the file, then I don't see how this really gets around any royalty issues. What's the difference between including it in the base installation, and installing it automatically when the user clicks on a file?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    28. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by delire · · Score: 1

      What's the difference between including it in the base installation, and installing it automatically when the user clicks on a file?
      The difference is that 1 click. User intervention is the point at which the responsibility can be shifted from the distributer to user. At the point of clicking she/he is making a choice - supposedly educated - to use software considered illegal and/or patent encumbered in some countries (largely America).

      If it was fully automated - eg the moment you install Ubuntu it sucked down the codecs and installs them without you knowing it - that would put Ubuntu it in very different legal standing and they might as well be breaking the law and just shipping those codecs with the CD ISO. It may seem semantic but there is quite a gulf between both methods, at least where the law is concerned.
    29. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried the Unplug Firefox plugin (assuming that runs on a 64bit browser, I've only ever run 32bit). I often use it to find the direct .flv file locations from Youtube so I can download them for offline viewing.


      Wow, Thanks! Works like a champ!
    30. Re:Proprietary Codecs? by Mountaineer1024 · · Score: 1

      In Ubuntu 6.06 and now 7.04, you have options within Nautilus (file manager) to share a folder of files.
      It asks you if you want to use NFS, SMB or both.
      It goes off and grabs samba, installs it and configures it for you.

      From that point I actually went in and manually hacked the config file, but only because I'm an anal bastard. :)

  6. Latitudes... by jhnphm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too bad the Latitudes don't seem to be offered- the inspirons are craptacular- I would never get one of those, but I would get a Latitude.

    1. Re:Latitudes... by theGreater · · Score: 1

      Along a similar vein, I had cause to delve inside an XPS 400 series last weekend (water damage cleanup from the Greensburg, KS, USA, tornado).

      The guts in an XPS 410 appear to be almost identical to the Precision 380 (now 390) which is a pretty decent piece of kit and can handle at least a stock 8800GTX with the addition of a $5 USD PCIe power adapter. We use a lot of 380/390 gear at work, so I can provide one half of the puzzle; anybody have good access to an XPS 410 and want to share the results of lspci -vv?

      I think supported linux on an entry-level workstation that scales up to quad core could be quite interesting. You can run anything from Pentium D and 512 MB of RAM on your secretary's desk, right up to a quad-core 4GB behemoth with GPGPU in your engineering department....

      -theGreater.

  7. But can it run.... by adez · · Score: 5, Funny

    Erm, nevermind.

    1. Re:But can it run.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just might be the only one that thinks that's hilarious...

    2. Re:But can it run.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you're the only one.

    3. Re:But can it run.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're not the only one.

    4. Re:But can it run.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it can run windows.

  8. restricted extras by Ash-Fox · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seems reasonable, but it's too bad that Click2Run isn't in Ubuntu 7.04 for the sake of those wanting to (legally) play DVDs, use AVI files, etc."
    Because start menu -> Add/remove programs -> Ticking 'ubuntu restricted extras' to get proprietary codecs, flash, java etc. is so much harder than 'Click2Run'.
    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    1. Re:restricted extras by schotty · · Score: 1

      Its Click N Run, not Click2Run.

      And yes, as a former user of Linpsire (will return possibly when 6 is released), CNR is currently the easiest and simplest way to acquire software. Although Ubuntu's software manager is damn nice, it's still not where CNR is today.

      --
      Sigs are nice guns ...
    2. Re:restricted extras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Linspire, not Linpsire.

    3. Re:restricted extras by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Its Click N Run, not Click2Run.
      I used quotation marks around Click2Run, guess why.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    4. Re:restricted extras by Pausanias · · Score: 1

      For DVD playback? No, you will not get libdvdcss2 (the library required to play DVDs in Ubuntu) by any standard means in Ubuntu, because it is illegal in the US according to the idiotic DMCA. So, no, you will have to jump through the standard hoops (Automatic/3rd party repositories/etc) to get DVD playback.

      DVD playback is a huge problem for Linux. Until they figure out a way to fix it, it will be the #1 obstacle to linux adoption on the desktop.

    5. Re:restricted extras by janrinok · · Score: 1
      DVD playback is a huge problem for Linux....

      but only in the US. The rest of us have no problems with DVD playback, listening to MP3 or whatever.

      --
      Have a look at soylentnews.org for a different view
    6. Re:restricted extras by tepples · · Score: 1

      DVD playback is a huge problem for Linux. Do most people have their PCs hooked up to a television set?
    7. Re:restricted extras by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      notebooks!!!! many people travel and take all their entertainment with them. Or in the case of students don't bother with a separate TV at all anymore.

    8. Re:restricted extras by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize that DVD's were restricted to televisions... oh man, running that relatively small video in a corner of my 1680x1050 screen while I'm chatting and working is just the wrong way to do things! Thank you for bringing that to my attention... I'll cease my aberrant behavior forthwith.

    9. Re:restricted extras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least there are no license problems. If your computer comes with a DVD drive, you have paid the license, so you have every moral right (if not legal right under the DMCA) to watch your paid-for DVDs.

    10. Re:restricted extras by kripkenstein · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The point isn't that CNR is easier, it is that CNR is legal. You can buy the proprietary codecs, etc., from there. Downloading them through "add/remove programs" is (sadly, stupidly) not legal in the US.

    11. Re:restricted extras by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      The point isn't that CNR is easier, it is that CNR is legal.
      CNR is technically a package manager. If I install the same packages through CNR, that doesn't change anything at all. So no, there is no point.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    12. Re:restricted extras by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      You can also BUY services through CNR. CNR is not only a package manager, it is also a store. If you pay for MP3 codecs through CNR, then that is legal.

    13. Re:restricted extras by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      You can also BUY services through CNR.
      I know that, doesn't mean that just because CNR might be coming to Ubuntu that the same store, or even the same packages be available - there is no guarantee it will.

      If you pay for MP3 codecs through CNR, then that is legal.
      It's legal to play-back mp3s for personal usage without paying any licensing fees according to mp3licensing.com.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    14. Re:restricted extras by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      It's legal to play-back mp3s for personal usage without paying any licensing fees according to mp3licensing.com.
      Interesting, I didn't know that. That might solve most of the mp3 problem, then. Still, mp3 is just one of the formats - there is also WMA, DVDs, etc.
    15. Re:restricted extras by schotty · · Score: 1

      Doh, I should type slower.

      --
      Sigs are nice guns ...
    16. Re:restricted extras by tepples · · Score: 1

      notebooks!!!! many people travel and take all their entertainment with them. People who can afford frequent long bus, train, or plane rides can afford to buy the DVD player software through CNR.
    17. Re:restricted extras by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 1

      Everyone makes a huge deal about DVD Playback, but the truth is I have probably only watched one or two dvd movies on a computer in the last ten years. Most users probably don't even know they can watch a dvd on a computer. Lack of MP3 and windows media codecs is probably more of a problem for most users.

    18. Re:restricted extras by Churla · · Score: 1

      "Because start menu -> Add/remove programs -> Ticking 'ubuntu restricted extras' to get proprietary codecs, flash, java etc. is so much harder than 'Click2Run'."

      Actually yeah, it is. Maybe not for us. But I see needing to explain what a repository is, what a codec is, why some codecs are restricted, why others aren't, and how to use the repository to put codecs onto the system to my 12 year old niece, or 55 year old mother.

      Both of which would then as "But why is it when I have Windows it just works without all this?"

      Once again the hurdle for Linux acceptance is not technology, it's ease-of-use.

      --
      I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
    19. Re:restricted extras by jon_anderson_ca · · Score: 1

      That doesn't enable libdvdcss, tthough.

    20. Re:restricted extras by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Actually yeah, it is. Maybe not for us. But I see needing to explain what a repository is, what a codec is, why some codecs are restricted, why others aren't, and how to use the repository to put codecs onto the system to my 12 year old niece, or 55 year old mother.
      Having had experience with teenagers, they really don't care for explanations, they just want to know what to click/install to get it working.

      Both of which would then as "But why is it when I have Windows it just works without all this?"
      I never got codec support for anything but windows media and mp3 and some very basic things that Linux supports too. No, I didn't get the ability to play DVDs either out of the box.

      On Linux I get the basics at least, things like Divx, Xvid, flac, ogm, mkv etc. supported out of the box too. With one more tick I can get everything else supported. Thankfully I don't live in a country that has software patents, much like the majority of other nations.

      I decided to check your claims that DVDs do not play, even after installing ubuntu-restricted-extras. So I inserted a DVD that I have problems playing under Windows on another computer (I bought it from the States, it's a region 1 encoded DVD, I am in region 2) -- worked perfectly (Cannot take snapshots of overlays, hence the black screen in the picture - just like on windows) for me. libdvdcss or libdvdcss2 isn't even installed as you can see.

      Why are you trying to spread false information?
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    21. Re:restricted extras by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      That doesn't enable libdvdcss, tthough.
      What is the problem if I don't have libdvdcss?
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    22. Re:restricted extras by jon_anderson_ca · · Score: 1

      Why are you trying to spread false information?

      Whoah there... let's not go calling anyone a liar.

      On my laptop (running Ubuntu 7.04), I inserted a DVD and it played fine. Then I ejected, uninstalled libdvdcss2 and re-inserted. The error message that I get from xine is:

      The source can't be read.

      Maybe you don't have enough rights for this, or source doesn't contain data (e.g: no disc in drive). (Error reading from DVD.)

      Maybe you installed libdvdcss a long time ago, from source or RPM, but to the best of my knowledge, playing encrypted DVDs does not work without libdvdcss, and said library isn't included in the Ubuntu repositories for obvious reasons.

      Now I have to go find libdvdcss again, since I uninstalled it to rebut your accusation and, as I said, it's not in the standard repositories...

    23. Re:restricted extras by jon_anderson_ca · · Score: 1
    24. Re:restricted extras by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Maybe you installed libdvdcss a long time ago, from source or RPM, but to the best of my knowledge, playing encrypted DVDs does not work without libdvdcss, and said library isn't included in the Ubuntu repositories for obvious reasons.
      I did not install libdvdcss. I have no use for DVDs - I only own a few DVDs because I hate this region encoding crap. The only alternative repositories I use is WineHQ's. I never used automatix or any of those other scripts that some how make 'ubuntu easier'.

      I ran a 'locate libdvdcss', cannot find any files.

      But, I remembered something about setting regions on the DVD drive. So I quickly looked it up and apparently if regions are set on the DVD drive, you can play DVDs without requiring libdvdcss...

      regionset version 0.1 -- reads/sets region code on DVD drives
      Current Region Code settings:
      RPC Phase: II
      type: SET
      vendor resets available: 4
      user controlled changes resets available: 4
      drive plays discs from region(s): 2, mask=0xFD
      Apparently, not region 1.

      However, with the region setting, this does mean people can legally play content from one region anyway, no matter what the OS (is it illegal to play content from other regions in the States?).

      Now I have to go find libdvdcss again, since I uninstalled it to rebut your accusation and, as I said, it's not in the standard repositories...
      I am using Kubuntu feisty 7.10 and I have ubuntu-restricted-extras installed and it's working for me. I would suggest you try installing ubuntu-restricted-extras and seeing if it works then.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    25. Re:restricted extras by jon_anderson_ca · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm... here's my output:

      regionset version 0.1 -- reads/sets region code on DVD drives
      Current Region Code settings:
      RPC Phase: II
      type: NONE
      vendor resets available: 4
      user controlled changes resets available: 5
      drive plays discs from region(s):, mask=0xFF

      Is this a region-free drive? Perhaps I could play DVDs without libdvdcss if I set my drive to Region 1, but reading this, it seems as though I might ruin my ability to play other regions' DVDs. Guess I'll stick with libdvdcss (I've got ubuntu-restricted-extras, etc., but I need libdvdcss to do the decryption for libdvdread).

      Anyway, it seems as though we're both right: some people don't need libdvdcss to play DVDs, but others do (unless they want to play around with region codes and possibly limit themselves).

  9. Hmmm, not good by GFree · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Dell isn't going to be supplying support for proprietary media codecs (regardless of how easy it is to add them yourself), then this suggests to me Dell wasn't prepared to pay licensing costs to make this happen. I hope they provide instructions, or perhaps a script that runs the first time you boot into your Linux box that can auto-install these codecs, otherwise this will piss off a lot of people.

    1. Re:Hmmm, not good by scumdamn · · Score: 1

      If you search the Dell knowledge base for "Ubuntu DVD" after it ships you'll have the answer to this question.

    2. Re:Hmmm, not good by Compholio · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hope they provide instructions, or perhaps a script that runs the first time you boot into your Linux box that can auto-install these codecs, otherwise this will piss off a lot of people.
      Supposedly they'll be shipping 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) which has a codec wizard
    3. Re:Hmmm, not good by QuantumG · · Score: 1
      I love that screenshot.

      GStreamer extra plugins
      Codecs to play mp3, sid, mpeg1, mpeg2, AC-3, DVD (without encryption)

      GStreamer ffmpeg video plugin
      Codecs to play mpeg, divx, mpeg4, ac3, wmv and asf files

      GStreamer plugins for aac, xvid, mpeg2, faad
      Codecs to play Average user:

      "What the fuck is a GStreamer?!? Hmm.. Guess I'll just install the first one.. oh wait, no, the second one says divx and wmv files, maybe that's what I want."

      Then they probably notice the box down the bottom which gives them a description of what the package contains.. and it says what?

      GStreamer plugins from the "ugly" set.
      GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of filters which operate on media data "Huuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhh? What the hell does that mean? This is way too complicated.. I don't think this GStreamer thing is what I want to install."

      A Wizard that assumes you are a wizard, brilliant!
      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Hmmm, not good by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 1

      What I would like to see happen is for Dell to pay licensing, Novell paid Real to allow them to include Realplayer for MP3 support, thus SLED has MP3 support out of the box. There are even Banshee and Amarok packages that utilize the Helix (realplayer) backend for just this purpose.

      I can guarantee that if Dell just installs a stock Ubuntu installation with Gnome, people will have a lot of problems. Particularly in the system management area, gnome is very lacking, and Novell includes their YAST system on top of Gnome for this reason. If Dell doesn't include a similar system it will reflect badly on both Dell and Ubuntu but also Linux in general.

    5. Re:Hmmm, not good by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      You only get that particular wizard if you know what codecs you are going to need before you need them. Otherwise Ubuntu will install the correct packages for you the first time you attempt to open a file that needs them, you don't even need to know the package name.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    6. Re:Hmmm, not good by trawg · · Score: 1

      Of course, the converse might be true - if they do include a way to auto-install codecs it might piss off the people that own the patents for these various media types.

      mp3 and mpeg4 video are the first that come to mind. Given Microsoft's recent declaration that they're going after patent violators it seems only a matter of time before MPEG-LA and other media licensing organisations think they should start going after people that are using legally questionable media software like ffmpeg, mplayer, xvid, lame, etc.

    7. Re:Hmmm, not good by Dacelo+Gigas · · Score: 1

      If Dell isn't going to be supplying support for proprietary media codecs (regardless of how easy it is to add them yourself), then this suggests to me Dell wasn't prepared to pay licensing costs to make this happen. I hope they provide instructions, or perhaps a script that runs the first time you boot into your Linux box that can auto-install these codecs, otherwise this will piss off a lot of people.

      Yes, but mostly just the support reps.

      However, it may make quite a few people happy. Imaging an overworked IT person at a small business. They can order a Dell PC without a bunch of crapware installed. Sure, no media codecs, but for some businesses, that may be a bonus. If it isn't on there, they don't have to support it. If people want to play MP3's at work, they can bring their iPod.

      Dacelo Gigas

    8. Re:Hmmm, not good by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 1

      Yea, but most of that software is developed outside of the country where the patents apply, some of it in countries that don't even recognize software patents. Thats not even considering that some of these companies don't have a right to patent certain things. Going after people who develop WMV codecs for instance, can only hurt Microsoft, and in my opinion this is an interoperability issue, Microsoft doesn't have a right to bitch about people coding for a platform they refuse to support.

      The same holds true for other codecs, however there IS a valid MP3 codec for linux in the form of the helix engine, and packages are available from Realplayer that dont actually force you to use their player.

      DVDs are another issue, and i would go so far as to claim that CSS would not have been cracked so quickly if they had just released a player of some kind for Linux, it could have been open source for the most part with the CSS closed source, or just simply closed source entirely.

      MPEG4 on the other hand i consider to be a standard at this point, and licensing should not be necessary. MPEG-LA is well supported already and it does them no good to go after open source codecs, it does however hurt the format.

    9. Re:Hmmm, not good by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can just tick the box that corresponds to whichever one mentions the type of file they're trying to play? Hmm, nah, I guess Joe Sixpack is too fucking stupid to try something like that...

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    10. Re:Hmmm, not good by trawg · · Score: 1

      Going after people who develop WMV codecs for instance, can only hurt Microsoft, and in my opinion this is an interoperability issue, Microsoft doesn't have a right to bitch about people coding for a platform they refuse to support. Well, they do - that's presumably the entire reason they patent stuff in the first place - to force users into their platform to use their services and products.

      MPEG4 on the other hand i consider to be a standard at this point, and licensing should not be necessary. MPEG-LA is well supported already and it does them no good to go after open source codecs, it does however hurt the format. My point was really that it could potentially be lucrative for MPEG-LA to let companies get comfortable with using open source software (eg, Google with FFMPEG), wait until its entrenched into their processes, and then hit them with licensing fees.
  10. Why can't we install the dvd player? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how hard is it to install VLC? Really?

  11. Lose, Lose by tyleroar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sick of reading all these comments about how horrible it is that Dell isn't going to include the proprietary codecs to play DVDs or mp3. It's not completely legal to do so now without paying a license fee. And if Dell did pay a licensing fee to include, people would be complaining about why it costs just as much as Windows does. And besides, it is VERY easy to look up instructions on how to add the capability to play those codecs online, and most people that care enough to specifically order a Linux Dell, are already going to know how to do this.

    --
    Portland, North Dakota Puppies
    1. Re:Lose, Lose by schotty · · Score: 1

      I agree. But where I would be complaining is when CNR for Ubuntu is relased and it isn't offered by default from Dell. CNR is aimed at the general computer user, and really does make linux shine. Those of us that can give numerous anecdoted on compiling 2.0.x kernels obviously don't feel a need to buy it since we can run a CLI based apt/yum/pkgadd command and get our software the original way.

      But yes, I see it moronic to force codecs down our thoats since the first wave of owners of these new Dell Linux machines are going to be the nerds that can add them within the first 5 minutes anyway. But I can understand the counterpoint, I just think its not the best thing at this time. For all we know, that is something in the works (ala CNR) or a Fluendo license of some sort.

      --
      Sigs are nice guns ...
    2. Re:Lose, Lose by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 1

      Fluendo MP3 decoder is technically free, and its source is MIT licensed, they simply request a distribution agreement.

      Helix engine is also available, Novell does this by using Realplayer and the Helix-banshee package.

    3. Re:Lose, Lose by kripkenstein · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if Dell intend people to break the (ridiculous, but existent) law to play MP3s, then that seems odd: doesn't that open Dell up to a lot of liability? (contributory infringement, that sort of thing)

    4. Re:Lose, Lose by ceeam · · Score: 1

      Uhm, what are you talking about people? My Feisty downloaded all drivers automatically (with a prompt) on first attempt to play MP3, DivX, etc from the _standard repository_. Maybe I enabled universe or multiverse though. Are they not "on" by default? - I don't remember.

    5. Re:Lose, Lose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      you know, I gotta say I lean toward the "damn the proprietary codecs" camp on this one. After all, it was only after mozilla/firefox started becoming popular that websites started becoming commonly non-IE-centric.

      We should stick to our guns. If Dell Linux machines become popular, we won't see all this fucking flash shit all over the place any more.

    6. Re:Lose, Lose by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      I wish you had logged in. I don't mod-up anonymous cowards, no matter how insightful their post.

      While we're at it, how about Dell setting up their own digital music store, offering downloads in Ogg Vorbis format?

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    7. Re:Lose, Lose by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "If Dell Linux machines become popular, we won't see all this fucking flash shit all over the place any more."

      I think you've got it backwards. If Dell Linux machines can't display common Internet content, they won't become popular.

  12. Defective by design? by d_jedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That tag seems to apply here..
    No DVD support, no proprietary codecs? Good grief. I would have hoped Dell would have at least paid the $2 or so for the licensing fees for this stuff!

    If this is any indication, it doesn't look like pre-installing Linux will be the panecea some think it will be to beat Windows on the desktop..

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
    1. Re:Defective by design? by fishthegeek · · Score: 1

      Codec schmodec. Anyone buying Feisty preloaded already knows what to do right now. This will not be true forever but it is true now. I wouldn't blame Dell for not buying the licenses. First they have no idea whether or not those laptops will sell and second they are trusting the community to show them the way. When they sell laptops they will invest but not so much in the initial offering. I just want working hardware out of the box. I'll take care of the codecs, and besides when CNR is integrated codecs will not be an issue and they will be legal.

      Come on guys & gals, let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

      --
      load "$",8,1
    2. Re:Defective by design? by LevonB · · Score: 1

      People. This is not going to be Linux's big win on the desktop. Dell Linux sales are not going to rival the sales of Windows or Apple any time soon. I personally wonder if Dell will make any money on this initiative directly. However, as Linux has the interest of many IT people, supporting it captures the attention and respect of many people who can influence IT budgets now and in the future.

      --
      Levon Barker
    3. Re:Defective by design? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      All the gold in Ft Knox would not be enough to get a license from the DVDCCA that would make DVD players based on libdvdcss (which is how pretty much all of the "illegal" media players that play DVDs on linux currently do it afaik) legal to distribute.

      The only option for DELL would be to write (or license from somewhere else) a closed source binary linux DVD player.

    4. Re:Defective by design? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I can't help but feel that you think the lack of DVD support and/or the lack of some of the codecs is going to be an absolute deal breaker for most of the people who might buy this. As many others have pointed out, the support's easy to find and install. However, what you're not even considering is that not everybody who buys these will want or need that support. Some of them will go to business people who want a laptop that just works and is guaranteed to stay free of viruses, trojans, addware and other junk. As long as they have something like OpenOffice that can read/write MS Office files they won't care, because it will do what they need. Not everybody thinks that multi-media is a crucial capability in a cheap laptop.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:Defective by design? by westlake · · Score: 1
      Codec schmodec. Anyone buying Feisty preloaded already knows what to do right now.

      Yes they do. The problem is, that is mighty small number when you are tipping your toe into the mass consumer market.

    6. Re:Defective by design? by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      Most people use computers today to surf the web and check email. How is the average Joe going to use iTunes? I've had documents created in OpenOffice on Linux and saved as a Word document not look right in Word on Windows, formatting gets changed etc... What if mom goes to a website that looks for a plugin not available on Linux? I first installed Linux in 1996, Slackware was the distribution. I think I had fewer issues with websites back then as most sites were programmed for Nutscrape 1.x/2.x. People need to face that Linux is only replacing UNIX and if you want a good UNIX laptop get a Mac. The amount of work I put in to installing Linux on my last few laptops was only worth it for me because I wanted to run Linux. I'm slowly moving towards buying me a Mac laptop, though I covet the old 12" powerbooks, they need to bring that form factor back. I don't like the MacBooks and they need to come out with a 12" MacBook Pro.

    7. Re:Defective by design? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is that you can't always get exactly the same experience from Linux that you do from Windows or Mac, and that therefore, you shouldn't use Linux. Even if, as my post pointed out, you don't need any of the things that you might have difficulty with, don't use it because you don't have them right out of the box. (In some cases, granted, not at all.) You're asking what happens when Mom needs a plugin that's not available for Linux? Well, if having those plugins is such a deal-breaker for her, Linux isn't right for her. For somebody who uses their laptop for business only and doesn't need all that glitz, or the malware that goes with them, Linux might be just what they want on their laptop. Instead of looking at the worst (or best) case possible, try asking yourself what the most likely result is and I think you'll see that for those who'd want Linux on their laptop, it's a good choice.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    8. Re:Defective by design? by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      My mom is the average user. I appoint you to support everyone that you think can easily replace Windows with Linux. Your vision is myopic. The number of people that want Linux on their laptop is small, the market supports my view.

    9. Re:Defective by design? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      The number of people that want Linux on their laptop is small, the market supports my view.


      The market is small because such a thing has never been offered before. We'll not know for sure how many people want Linux on their laptop until several months after Dell starts selling them. My vision may be myopic, but your mind is closed like a steel trap that's rusted shut. What you know, you may know well. (I can't tell.) What you don't already know, you don't even suspect exists. Has it ever occurred to you that it might be you that's wrong?

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    10. Re:Defective by design? by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      The market determines what is available. Remember Loki Games? Remember VA Linux? There are providers offering laptops right now with Linux installed and they have been doing it in the pas as well. Let me guess, past failures are because they don't know how to market to you or the millions you believe that are ready to pounce right?

      Back when Acrobat came out for OS/2 there was a lot of downloads in the first few days, Adobe actually took note, and then they fell to nothing quickly. The OS/2 users were ecstatic in the first few days, look at all of us, then the momentum couldn't be kept up. There is what we want to believe and what is real.

      I don't like Windows as a primary OS but I use it for what I need to use it for. I have used and installed many different operating systems on many different hardware platforms. My mind is very open, I'm just not in to wishful thinking. So are you going to start working towards making Linux more useful for the mainstream market?

  13. Models listed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a Dell employee I can say the models listed in the summary were pulled directly from a Dell internal email. I would imagine that email was sent around to many people outside the company and that is where the list comes from. As far as I know those are the accurate models that will be offered first.

  14. Sounds like they're doing it right by bl8n8r · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've never liked Dell, but they seem to be doing it right.

    * The default software from the Ubuntu media will be installed
    * hardware options thoroughly tested by the Linux team
    * restricted drivers where there is no equivalent open-source driver.
    * wiki page that gives technical details
    * recommend Linux users buy Dell printers that have PostScript engines in them.
    * We are evaluating options for providing (mp3/wma/etc codecs) this support in the future.

    They're not rolling their own distro (hello Oracle), they're checking out the hardware focusing on GPL drivers wherever possible, documenting via wiki, recommending Postscript supported printers, and they aren't ruling out the *legal* mp3 support down the road. They seem to just be saying "We are trying to figure something out with this mp3 royalty mess". Not to mention, they *must* be pissing off Microsoft big-time. I bet Balmer has chairs tatooed with the Dell execs names on them, just waiting for the right time. That's not like Dell either, historically. They are usually just another little m$ bitch when Bill cracks the whip. Maybe this is a new era for Dell.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    1. Re:Sounds like they're doing it right by Redacted · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Maybe they saw how Apple is making a metric assload of money selling a UNIX derivative, closely tied to decent hardware, and want a piece of it?

      It's pretty far out there, but what if Dell are positioning themselves as an Apple for Linux - good hardware, guaranteed compatibility, support for installed packages, etc. I know a lot more people would consider Linux on the desktop/laptop if a name-brand, respected company like Dell were offering it.

    2. Re:Sounds like they're doing it right by Redacted · · Score: 1

      Maybe they saw how Apple is making a metric assload of money selling a UNIX derivative, closely tied to decent hardware, and want a piece of it?

      What if Dell are positioning themselves as an Apple for Linux - good hardware, guaranteed compatibility, support for installed packages, the whole deal? I know a lot more people would consider Linux on the desktop/laptop if major, well-known company like Dell were offering it.

    3. Re:Sounds like they're doing it right by Poppler · · Score: 5, Informative
      Even better, they're going to push hardware vendors to write Linux drivers:

      For hardware options not offered with this release, we are working with the vendors of those devices to improve the maturity and stability of their associated Linux drivers. While this may not happen overnight, we do expect to have a broader range of hardware support with Linux over time.

      --
      What's the ugliest part of your body? Some say your nose, some say your toes, but I think it's your mind. -Zappa
    4. Re:Sounds like they're doing it right by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Hopefully Dell will start funding some Open Source developers to work on these drivers.. nothing gives you better driver support than having it integrated with the kernel.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:Sounds like they're doing it right by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      That's not like Dell either, historically. They are usually just another little m$ bitch when Bill cracks the whip. Maybe this is a new era for Dell. That's one interpretation.

      The other one is that they never were at Microsoft's bidding and weren't offering Linux simply because not enough people wanted Linux to warrant the expense. Now that Linux is getting more popular they are offering it.

      Another interpretation is that Microsoft is no longer Dell's bitch; perhaps Microsoft stopped giving Dell discounts.. But I think the last interpretation is more realistic.
      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    6. Re:Sounds like they're doing it right by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      They are usually just another little m$ bitch when Bill cracks the whip. Maybe this is a new era for Dell.

      We can probably thank Vista for that, since it offers so little in terms of functional improvement that MS is hard pressed to sell it without help from hardware retailers. Retailers, especially large ones like Dell and HP, now have a lot more leverage in their relationship with MS.

    7. Re:Sounds like they're doing it right by C_Kode · · Score: 1

      It comes down to the mighty dollar. (or whatever currency your ship runs on)

      Not only are they bucking Microsoft, they've already started bucking Intel with the addition of AMD processors. I'm more than sure that AMD's press release about ATI providing better Linux support has a boat-load to do with all the Linux noise Dell is making.

      This is what I think it happening...

          * Dell is seeing the market change.
          * They aren't doing as well as they were.
          * HP sold 60k Linux corporate desktops.
          * IdeaStorm's most vocal users are screaming Linux!
          * AMD made Dell an offer to get them to sell AMD products.
          * AMD offered better ATI driver support for Dell's new Linux desktops and laptops.
          * Dell sees a chance to use it's vendors (AMD/ATI) to make the move to Linux cheaper.
          * Dell wants to become the leader in Linux desktops and laptops rather than allowing HP to do it.
          * If Dell starts selling Linux, Microsoft will have to compete and drop the price of Windows.

      This is a win all around for Dell and Dell's customers. In this case, Dell's win is a big win for all open source users.

    8. Re:Sounds like they're doing it right by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      I know a lot more people would consider Linux on the desktop/laptop if a name-brand, respected company like Dell were offering it.
      Dammit, this is Slashdot. I thought we were supposed to hate Dell along with all of the other Wintel computer manufacturers and brag about how our beige-box PCs built with parts cobbled together in our Mother's basement had been running Debian and had uptimes over 1000+ days? I'm so confused, what should I do?
      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  15. Hardware compatibility first... by rajkiran_g · · Score: 1
    As long as every bit of the hardware is supported, there should not be any problems.

    From TFA,

    We use partial open-source or closed source ("restricted" in Ubuntu terms) drivers where there is no equivalent open-source driver. This includes Intel wireless cards and Conexant modems.

    I hope that the "restricted" drivers work along the lines of the nvidia driver where the source of the kernel module would be available which would provide an interface to the binary driver. That way, users would be free install a different distro/kernel of their choice. A purely binary driver that would only work with the specific kernel version shipped by Dell might not be very helpful.

    BTW, in India, Dell is offering laptops with the option of having no OS pre-installed. My colleague got one a few months back and saved about Rs. 3,000 (about 75 US$)

    1. Re:Hardware compatibility first... by the_womble · · Score: 1

      BTW, in India, Dell is offering laptops with the option of having no OS pre-installed. My colleague got one a few months back and saved about Rs. 3,000 (about 75 US$)
      And he is running Windows on it, right?
  16. This Thing Will Fail by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

    I was quite enthusiastic about this, especially since I am an Ubuntu user. But without MP3 and DVD support out of the box people aren't going to bite. Dell and Canonical had better get their shit together soon if they want this to work.

    --
    There is more to science than physics!

    www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
    1. Re:This Thing Will Fail by koreth · · Score: 1

      Business users don't need MP3 and DVD playback. As long as the box will open up a web browser and connect to all the web-based intranet apps their employees need, they're good to go.

    2. Re:This Thing Will Fail by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

      Good point, however is that how they are being marketed? I suppose it is a foot in the door that might get people hooked on linux at work, but you must admit that today a computer sans DVD and MP3 support is useless to a lot of people.

      --
      There is more to science than physics!

      www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
    3. Re:This Thing Will Fail by grolschie · · Score: 1

      I was quite enthusiastic about this, especially since I am an Ubuntu user. But without MP3 and DVD support out of the box people aren't going to bite. Dell and Canonical had better get their shit together soon if they want this to work.

      If you really were an Ubuntu user, then you'd know how stupidly easy it is to get codecs installed. It's similar to how DVD player manufacturers sell region locked DVD players, but sometimes included typed up instructions on how to region-free the player included in the box. Others release the info to the community.
    4. Re:This Thing Will Fail by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

      Of course I know about the joys of automatix. However I think that us computer geeks really don't understand that what is painfully obvious to us is sometimes another language (literally) to others.

      Don't flame people for actually acknowledging what needs to be done for Linux to actually work as a mainstream desktop OS.

      --
      There is more to science than physics!

      www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
    5. Re:This Thing Will Fail by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Automatix and EasyUbuntu are dead or dying (Netcraft confirms it ...) and with good reason. Codecs in the latest release of Ubuntu (7.04) are installed as needed when playing unsupported media. Installing plugins has always been easy on x86 32 bit because Firefox will simply download them for you and install them to your home folder. Now, however, you can just use Add/Remove Programs to install Ubuntu Restricted Extras and get MS fonts, the Flash plugin, the Java 6 plugin, and the "ugly" plugins (like mp3 and DVD) system-wide. I desperately tried to find EU and Automatix for Feisty this time, until I realized that I didn't need them.

  17. Binary drivers for Intel Wireless cards? Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of the Intel wireless cards have Free and Open Source drivers. ipw2100, ipw2200, ipw2945, and iwlwifi. They use binary-only firmware, but not binary-only drivers.

  18. No complaints by harris+s+newman · · Score: 1

    I'm writing this on Ubuntu running on a Dell 1705...absolutely out of the box performance.

    If your worried about drivers, things costing too much etc, what you, as an open source user should do is contribute! Contribute to the cause and the price will improve, the drivers will improve, and then you'll be able to complain about other things.

  19. Damn, no WUXGA laptop by dara · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well if this is the lineup ("We will be launching a Linux based OS (Ubuntu) on the E520, 1505 and XPS 410 starting next Thursday, 5/24." from Jeremy's Blog), I guess I have to wait longer. I'm only interested in WUXGA - the 15.4" Latitude D830 would have been nice, but I'd have considered the E1705 too. If I have to buy an unsupported model and install Linux myself, there is less incentive to pick Dell in the first place.

    I seconded ideas on ideastorm that suggested Dell get rid of this stupid division between Latitude and Inspiron, but who knows if that will ever happen. Just a single line of well built laptops in a few different screen sizes is all we need (it works for Apple and if Dell wants to entire the retail market seriously, it would help to have a reduced model line).

    Dara

    1. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by Mountaineer1024 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got a Dell Inspiron 9400 which I believe is the E1705 (depending on market) and tried the Ubuntu 7.04 live cd.
      Everything worked perfectly with no extra effort.
      It prompted me when it reached the desktop that it needed to use a binary driver to make the wireless work, and work it did.
      It prompted me that it needed to use a closed source driver to make the nVidia 7900 GS work, and work it did.
      I stuck a SD Card into the side card reader and it promptly mounted and allowed me to move files on and off.
      The sound works flawlessly.
      The DVD burner works.
      The touchpad works.
      An external hdd and mouse worked.
      I'm not sure what else anyone can want.

    2. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, right?

      How the hell are you going to see anything on a 15" screen with a 1920×1080 resolution? That's just idiotic.

    3. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by jmv · · Score: 1

      I live in Australia and just bought a D820 n-series, which means the only OS it came with was a FreeDOS CD. And it has a WUXGA display as well. I'm quite happy with it -- now that the kernel handles Core2 without crashing.

    4. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by Falladir · · Score: 1

      Other things that are frequently bothersome:

      Suspend/hibernate
      extra media buttons (volume mute)

      Do you have those working? Was it easy?

    5. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by r3m0t · · Score: 1

      Increase the DPI?

    6. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by Noonian+Soong · · Score: 1

      I don't have that notebook, so I can't actually confirm anything for it. Nevertheless, my experience with (K)Ubuntu 7.04 shows that extra media buttons most of the time work out of the box. Even on my desktop where an OS wouldn't usually assume extra keys on the keyboard, they worked right away.

      --
      The strength of a civilization is not measured by its ability to fight wars, but rather by its ability to prevent them.
    7. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      I seconded ideas on ideastorm that suggested Dell get rid of this stupid division between Latitude and Inspiron, but who knows if that will ever happen.

      It won't and they shouldn't. Corporations need a stable platform with business-focused features (battery life for road warriors, biometrics, next-day on-site support), while consumers demand the latest, greatest and especially cheapest.

      The corporate market is Dell's bread and butter and they make a shit-ton of money there. Why the hell would they change to Apple's model which only has a drop in the ocean in that space?

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    8. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by xtracto · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what else anyone can want.

      Does it play DVD videos? (both unencrypted and encrypted?) what did you do to make it play? was it easy?
      Does it Hibernate? does it return alive from hibernation?
      Does it sleep? (does it return alive from sleeping?)
      How long does the battery lasts? 1 hour? 2 hours? 4 hours?

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    9. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I've got a Dell Inspiron 9400 which I believe is the E1705 (depending on market) and tried the Ubuntu 7.04 live cd.
      Everything worked perfectly with no extra effort...

      I'm not sure what else anyone can want. More stories like these.
      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    10. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by Mountaineer1024 · · Score: 1

      The media buttons on the front worked fine.
      When I tried to open an xvid file totem appeared before prompting me that it would need to get some codecs.
      When it tried to do that it prompted me that it would need to add some repositories.
      I agreed to both dialogs, several megs of files were downloaded and then totem played the file fine.
      I didn't try a dvd, but I wouldn't be surprised if it worked flawlessly: it certainly works on my desktop pc (which has feisty installed, 6.10 - 7.04 upgrade).
      I didn't try hibernate, sleep or a battery drain test sorry.
      I was playing for my own amusement, not as a detailed tech review. :)

    11. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by dara · · Score: 1

      It's true that Apple's share of the business market is less than Dell's, but I think that is for different reasons than Apple making only 2 well designed model lines (though not my speed - I don't like OS X). There is no reason that any of the features you list can't be options on the same laptop offered for home use (in fact biometric stuff is optional on Latitude last time I checked). I think many home consumers want a reliable laptop with decent battery life that is well built - it's annoying to have so many choices placed in a different category that is (according to some) more difficult to buy from if you are a home user. If it were me, I'd change the Latitude not all that much and dump most of the Inspirons.

      Dara

    12. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by kni52 · · Score: 1

      Looking at how quickly Dell responded to the suggestion of offering linux (if you assume that this is a response to their call for suggestions and wasn't already in the works) you you might not have to wait too long for additional models to be added. I would think that offering linux, and drivers for all of their hardware and supporting it would take much longer than it has taken to get these three models ready.

      If you haven't already, make sure that you let them know you that you want that model with linux, and if you're serious about buying one now, contact their sales department and ask if you could buy one with Ubuntu, knowing that some of the drivers might not work as well as the current linux models mentioned above. That would count as a sale for linux rather than communicating a lack of insterest or a sale for windows.

      Don't forget what your other options are: buying with windows and installing linux yourself, or paying more for someone else to do that. If this doesn't succeed, or appear to be a promising or profitable path for Dell, those might remain the only options for much longer, and you won't ever see the specific laptop you want preinstalled with linux.

      I'm thinking about buying one of these in a couple of days when they are released. I also would be interested in one with higher resolution, but if these are priced as low as, or close to the windows versions, it's not too much money to just buy one with a nicer screen in a few months or next year. Hopefully we'll still have linux as an option.

      --
      My subtext is just a figment of your imagination.
    13. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Apple don't even have WUXGA screens yet, so clearly it's not working for Apple as you'd hope... :)

    14. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      I seconded ideas on ideastorm that suggested Dell get rid of this stupid division between Latitude and Inspiron, but who knows if that will ever happen. Just a single line of well built laptops in a few different screen sizes is all we need (it works for Apple and if Dell wants to entire the retail market seriously, it would help to have a reduced model line).
      Actually I don't really expect Dell to ever do this. The reason why is this: Dell realized that the consumer and business markets are very different.

      When consumers buy a PC they want the latest and greatest features, expecting that they probably won't be upgrading for a few years so they want whatever is hot right now. That means they might just buy a computer with Vista because it's flashy and has "cool" graphics. They might buy a computer that's silver colored and "looks more like a Mac."

      Businesses want exactly the opposite. They want a computer that will continue to be supported and sold for years at a time. They like to standardize on a computer line that won't change much, because corporate desktop installs are usually cloned with a tool like Ghost and if hardware changes frequently that messes up the master image. They also standardize on older versions of software like Windows XP for the same reason. Keeping things simple and the same across all corporate desktops makes it very easy to troubleshoot issues. When your $10 an hour help desk staff can't figure out how to fix Windows, just reimage the desktop and give it back to the user.

      That is the reason why Dell offers 2 distinct product lines. So they can offer newer technology to consumers, and offer stable technology with a longer support lifecycle to businesses. I don't see them changing any time soon.
      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    15. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, what's the point of having such a high resolution if you're just going to bump up the size of the UI?

      Silly people... only concerned with spec numbers.

    16. Re:Damn, no WUXGA laptop by r3m0t · · Score: 1

      Because the text will look sharper, and more detail will appear on the pictures too.

      Silly you.

  20. Re:Support DREAM by mhall119 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Heh, you must not use Ubuntu 7.04.

    Here's how it would actually work...

    Customer gets WMV file from his kid.
    Customer double-clicks WMV file, or right-clicks and selects "Open with Movie Player"
    Ubuntu: This file requires additional codecs to play, would you like me to install them?
    Customer: Yes please
    (wait 1 minute)
    Ubuntu: All done, enjoy your movie!
    Customer happily watches their WMV.

    The next day, Customer sends his Windows kid some awesome Theora file...

    --
    http://www.mhall119.com
  21. Correction by Tama00 · · Score: 1

    "for the sake of those wanting to (legally) play DVDs, use AVI files, etc.""

    I think that line can be misunderstanding. It is not illegal for you under Linux to play DVD's or use AVI, its only illegal to distribute their codecs without a license to do so and we all know licenses cost money. If Ubuntu had to pay for the license then it would probably have to charge for a binary copy of Ubuntu. This is where Linspire comes in with click and run, they paid for the license and so they can give you the CD with the codecs on them.

    Although its legal for you to download the codec yourself for your own use. You just cant go making a product and putting their codec on it without a license even if the product is free.

    1. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Although its legal for you to download the codec yourself for your own use"

      No, it's not legal just because you download it for yourself (though it may be legal where you live). Most of those codecs are covered by patents, you can't use those without a license if the patents are valid where you are. Other solutions may require wrapping copies of the Windows drivers. Using those most likely involves copyright infringement, unless you could use those Windiws drivers in place without copying them.

    2. Re:Correction by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      I think it's an open question as to whether it's legal even to download something like libdvdcss into the United States. The anti-circumvention clause of the DMCA reads:

      "(2) No person shall manufacture, import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that--
      (A) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;"

      Under a strict reading of this provision, I would argue that downloading a codec from a server outside the US constitutes "importing" that software. There's no exemption for personal use that I can see. However, I don't know of any case law yet which subjects this clause to further interpretation. You could also read this provision as forbidding only the "traffic" in these prohibited items, which would be consistent with your interpretation. Regardless, I'd guess that if Dell provided information to its US customers on how to install such items, it would quickly face a lawsuit as a contributory infringer. Such instructions might even constitute an "offering to the public" in violation of this provision as well.

  22. They called it Click'N'Run last time I checked it by gummyb34r · · Score: 1

    but it's too bad that Click2Run isn't in Ubuntu 7.04
    for the sake of those wanting to (legally) play DVDs, use AVI
    files, etc.


    They called it Click'N'Run last time I checked it. It was renamed?
    Doubt it...

    FYI there is already a nice frontend for adding software - it is
    easy and straightforward to add proprietary codecs/drivers and
    opensource software. It has a popularity based star-rating as well
    as a short package description. One can search for a name match etc.
    So I havn't noticed the lack of C'N'R feature. Ubuntu 7.04 is a good
    choice for a desktop OS imo.
  23. nspluginwrapper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you meant "nspluginwrapper".

  24. How many here will buy? by dioscaido · · Score: 1

    Anyone here planning on picking up one of the linux pre-installed machines when they go on sale? I'm legitimately curious.

    1. Re:How many here will buy? by bouchecl · · Score: 1

      Anyone here planning on picking up one of the linux pre-installed machines when they go on sale? I'm legitimately curious.
      Yes. My sister-in-law will need a laptop in the next few weeks and I'm seriously considering a E1505 with Ubuntu if Dell makes these available in Canada in the right time frame.
    2. Re:How many here will buy? by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 1

      If they start selling them in sweden before the end of the summer, I'll get one. When it comes to laptops, dell is as good as any other company, and if I can get one that's guaranteed to work with linux, then thats just perfect. I think they will be slightly cheaper than windows versions, but I'll get one even if they are not.

    3. Re:How many here will buy? by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      I already have a couple E1505s. It was a PITA to get the video working properly (ATI) and the Dell wireless card in one never really worked even with ndiswrappers. I spoke with sales support today and the E1505 with an Nvidia chipset is not offered anymore. Big shame because that would have been a perfect system for me. But if the price is decent and xorg fully supports the Intel 950 chipset, I'll probably end up getting another one despite it all.

      The Dell home customer support is probably the worst I've ever encountered, but their systems tend to be cheaper than other vendors.

    4. Re:How many here will buy? by deadlocked · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not nescessearly when they go on sale, but my next laptop will be a Dell for sure. Not because it is distributed with Ubuntu, but because I now can install the distro of my choice and know the hardware is supported

    5. Re:How many here will buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm planning to buy a laptop this summer. I am waiting to see what Dell offers before I make my final decision, but I am more likely to go with System76.

    6. Re:How many here will buy? by spikeb · · Score: 1

      Yup. Planning on picking up a laptop.

    7. Re:How many here will buy? by TheMeuge · · Score: 1

      I have an Inspiron 1505 and I had no problem with the wireless on Ubuntu 6.10 or now on 7.04.

      The wireless/bluetooth combo I got worked out of the box with no tinkering and no ndiswrapper required. Not only that, but the wireless killswitch keyboard shortcut works perfectly as well.

      The only thing I had to tinker with were video drivers to get direct rendering to work. I had to install the closed-source fglrx driver, set up an XGL session, and start beryl with the -noforcewindowmanager option. Everything except the last one I did directly off a wiki, and the -noforcewindowmanager option was required when I got a white screen upon launching beryl-manager. The solution was the first link in my google search, so altogether I spent far less time setting up this laptop on Linux than if I had installed Windows.

    8. Re:How many here will buy? by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      I am. My old Linux box fried, and I need a new one. I plan to buy on the first day they are offered (I think it is supposed to be Thursday). I'll probably keep the pre-installed Ubuntu, but even if I don't, I know my hardware will work with Linux.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  25. Re:Binary drivers for Intel Wireless cards? Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't draw a distinction between binary firmware and binary software. If I don't have the freedom to modify it, I don't want it.

  26. And yes, you can play Theora in WMP by tepples · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ubuntu: This file requires additional codecs to play, would you like me to install them? Replace "Ubuntu" with "Linspire, a distribution of Ubuntu", and that's about right. Linspire's CNR press release states its plan to make proprietary codecs available through CNR.

    The next day, Customer sends his Windows kid some awesome Theora file... Kid goes to Google or Yahoo! or MSN, looks up windows theora player, and finds the Theora plug-in for Windows Media Player.
    1. Re:And yes, you can play Theora in WMP by MrLizardo · · Score: 1

      Uhm, no. What he's saying is it already works like that in Ubuntu 7.04. I can actually vouch for the fact that by default the built-in media player is a hell of a lot more compatible than Windows Media Player. Sometimes I've found the need to *gasp*shock* relaunch the media player (totem) before the newly installed codecs work. flash was either installed by default or trivially easy (ie, no command line needed). I actually find it funny that so many ubuntu howtos include instructions to use the command line for this and that when most of these things are easily accomplished through the GUI.

      --
      ^I'm with stupid.^
    2. Re:And yes, you can play Theora in WMP by zsau · · Score: 1

      Old habits die hard. It is the curse of GNU/Linux that you can do everything from the command line, so some people will (either through ignorance or what passes for preference). This makes others think that you have to do everything from the command line, when of course you don't.

      --
      Look out!
    3. Re:And yes, you can play Theora in WMP by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      There may be another reason as well: It's much harder to explain how to do something with a GUI. With the command line, basically you write what the user has to type; with GUIs you have to describe which options to click, where to find that certain menu option, etc., and then maybe the user has a different locale installed and will not know that e.g. to go to "Edit|Preferences", on his localized system he'll have to go to "Bearbeiten|Einstellungen".

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:And yes, you can play Theora in WMP by ajs318 · · Score: 1
      Beh. What's wrong with a command line anyway? Don't fear it, embrace it.

      I think for people whose experience was never soured by MS-DOS, Bash won't actually be such a big deal. It makes a lot of sense if you communicate with people in words, rather than pointing at things and grunting. You get a record on the screen of what you've been doing, like a till roll; and the concept behind abbreviations such as ls, mv, rm and so forth will be familiar to anyone who has used a mobile phone. Ubuntu's default editor is nano, which is a bit like pico (if you remember pine).

      Also, just try doing the equivalent of

      echo -e "<html>\n<head>\n<title>My Holiday Snaps</title>\n<body>" > index.html && for i in *jpg; do thumb="`basename $i .jpg`_mini.jpg"; convert -resize 160x120 $i $thumb && echo "Shrunk $i to $thumb" && echo "<a href='$i'><img border='0' src='$thumb' /></a>" >> index.html; done; echo -e "</body>\n</html>" >> index.html
      in a GUI, and tell me it's quicker and easier and less effort. (Time taken to learn how to put that one-liner together from first principles doesn't count. I already learnt it from first principles. Nobody else will ever have to do that again.)
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    5. Re:And yes, you can play Theora in WMP by Terrasque · · Score: 3, Funny

      Open F-spot. Import images. Select the ones you want. File -> Export -> Webgallery.

      While I personally love the command line, that was perhaps not the best example I've seen :)

      --
      It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
    6. Re:And yes, you can play Theora in WMP by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Alright, smartarse. One-all. I'll be back :)

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    7. Re:And yes, you can play Theora in WMP by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      Kid goes to Google or Yahoo! or MSN, looks up windows theora player, and finds the Theora plug-in for Windows Media Player.
      My Grandma wouldn't know how to do all that. Why can't media in Windows Just Work(TM)? It's certainly not ready for the desktop.
      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    8. Re:And yes, you can play Theora in WMP by zsau · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with a command line anyway?

      Plenty is wrong a command line (learnability/command discoverability for instance, or any inherently graphical task). Plenty about them is useful (ability to quickly write a one-off program). Some people will be scared away by a command line—even just asking them to type one specific command into a terminal window is enough to turn some people off GNU/Linux completely.

      Many common, everyday tasks are just as easily performed by the commandline or through a GUI, but the GUI method is less error-prone and less scary. Even though it's harder to write, most HOWTOs that cover topics most people would want to do should be written with only the GUI in mind.

      (Personally, I usually have at least a couple of terminal windows open for various tasks. But they're a poweruser's tool, not a shortcut to a more inclusive interface.)

      --
      Look out!
    9. Re:And yes, you can play Theora in WMP by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      I think for people whose experience was never soured by MS-DOS, Bash won't actually be such a big deal.
      I cut my teeth on DOS batch files before I ever saw a bash shell, and before Windows was a gleam in Bill Gates eye. For that very reason I felt right at home using bash. Hell, DOS might have sucked compared to bash, but it actually had some pretty good stuff like pipes, variables, and gotos. Did you know there is a "more" command in DOS? And you can pipe files to it? I used to do a "type filename.txt|more" all the time, and DOS even had a rudimentary editor called "copy con filename.txt", which would literally copy the stdin from the console (keyboard) directly into the file... better not make a typo :-)

      Ah the good old days... Now you kids get off my lawn!
      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    10. Re:And yes, you can play Theora in WMP by evalhalla · · Score: 1

      The great thing with the command line when helping people remotely is that it is easier to communicate what should be done and the results, expecially over some text only channel like chat or im.

      The awful thing with the command line when helping people remotely is that it is so convenient that people don't even bother trying helping new users with the gui, and just let them blindy paste lines and lines of code they won't even try to read, which is not exactly a good way to help people learn.

    11. Re:And yes, you can play Theora in WMP by zsau · · Score: 1

      Yes! Thankyou evalhalla, that's exactly what I was wanting to say.

      --
      Look out!
  27. Windows from Scratch by The+Monster · · Score: 1

    You can't install crapware on a server. Any admin (I would hope) would promptly wipe the drive anyway and start over from scratch if you included anything close to crapware (or even if you didn't, just because they wanted to do everything from scratch).
    I think any admin worth a damn would want to install from scratch just to be sure it could be done again if need be. There has to be a contingency plan for it, and the only way to know for sure you can do it, is to do it.

    Since the alternative of going into Add/Remove Programs and wacking the crapware is never really 100% in Windows (where supposedly uninstalled programs tend to leave droppings in the Registry), the only way to be sure is to nuke it from orbit.

    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

  28. 97 billion USD can buy a big chunk of the MPAA by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

    All the gold in Ft Knox would not be enough to get a license from the DVDCCA The bullion depository at Fort Knox holds 147 million troy ounces of gold. At 660 USD per ounce, that makes 97 billion USD. This is more than enough to buy a controlling interest in The Walt Disney Company, News Corporation, and Viacom Inc., and spin out their film divisions.
    1. Re:97 billion USD can buy a big chunk of the MPAA by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      The bullion depository at Fort Knox holds 147 million troy ounces of gold. At 660 USD per ounce, that makes 97 billion USD. This is more than enough to buy a controlling interest in The Walt Disney Company, News Corporation, and Viacom Inc., and spin out their film divisions.

      Or enough to pay off the U.S. national debt...er wait, N/M.

    2. Re:97 billion USD can buy a big chunk of the MPAA by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

      Or fund the Iraq war for 2 years. Oops, I guess it would be all spent already.

  29. Re:Binary drivers for Intel Wireless cards? Why? by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, tell me exactly what about the firmware for the intel wlan cards you were planning to modify? The driver is where you would implement frame grabbing or packet injection so tell me exactly what you would accomplish with the firmware source....

    I agree that its a good goal to have things open source but in areas that it doesn't matter, you are wasting your time and a lot of peoples effort.

  30. Really... by BlurredOne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know that this does not apply to all of the threads in here, but I need to get something out.

    Is there anything that any hardware or software vendor can do that will make the /. community happy? This isn't meant as flamebait or a troll, it is a genuine questions. Dell is taking a step in the right direction by offering Linux on select systems, and some of you seem to be taking this as a personal afront because Dell doesn't cater to all of your whims. This is the start of them offering Linux publically on their systems. It will take some time for Dell to get everything worked out. Please, if you want Dell to continue to offer Linux on their systems, don't criticize them for the initial offering, support them. Go onto the Direct2Dell site and let them know what you would like in future releases. Contribute to the process, don't complain when something that you never asked for isn't included.

    Noone gets it right the first time, and if they did, we would still be using the alpha of Ubuntu.

    1. Re:Really... by xtracto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, there is no way to do it. The /. community (Or if you want to put it this way, the Open Source community) is very heterogeneous. When you talk about a "slashdoter" you find from the mom-basement geek to the PhD in Chemical Engineering (or even professor), some of us are more interested in the actual funcitonality and see things as this as good, while others are more concerned with the philosophy and as such they do not like closed source drivers, etc. And yet others are interested in the capitalistic view of it and hence they see Open source just as somethng else (the Windows or Mac followers).

      And then there are others who see computers just as big über-powered calculators which serve a specific purpose as tools and we do not care about following any kind of obscure beard-smelly guy cult. We just use the computer todo our job.

      So no, there is no way you can make happy everyone, I would hope that your parents had taught you it is not possible to make everyone happy :) that is what compromises are all about, and that is what I believe Dell is doing here, it is a good start, which could have been done before but, for me, it is just another feature offered by a company, just that. It is like if Ford suddenly decided do add vibrating seats to their cars, cool, just another feature, nothing more, nothing less...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Is there anything that any hardware or software vendor can do that will make the /. community happy?

      Welcome to the real world. The answer is no.

      "The /. community" is not a person. There is not one thing that you can do to "make it happy". No matter what is done, some part of the community will be dissatisfied. And they'll complain. It's what people do. Learn to live with it.

  31. Click2Run? What is this? by master5o1 · · Score: 0

    I thought it was called CNR? Click 'n Run?

    --
    signature is pants
  32. Why not make an "Uncrippled for non-US" edition? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are there any "European Linux" distros that don't kowtow to the U.S. DMCA rule, and include libdvdcss by default?

    It seems like all the major distros basically play by the U.S. rules, but with the seeming increasing popularity of Linux in Europe, I'd think that the time would be right for somebody to just stop following idiotic U.S. regulations and make a distro that's not hampered by anti-circumvention ... I mean, why not have "Crippled for U.S." and "Un-Crippled" mirrors, and just ship the same distro with a different /etc/apt/sources.list file depending on whether it's the "US ISO" or the "International ISO"? (And, duh, everyone except for corporate users in the U.S. would probably just download the European version, but the point would be that in order to get the 'good stuff,' you'd have to shamefully pretend to live in a country that doesn't suck so bad at IP laws.)

    It would be sorta like the 40-bit encryption restrictions in the early 90s, only in reverse. We need to make it screamingly obvious to politicians in the U.S., that America is losing on something that the rest of the world is doing without us, because of our stupid rules.

    I don't normally encourage obnoxious European holier-than-thou-ism, but this is one case where it could be put to useful effect.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  33. Re:Why not make an "Uncrippled for non-US" edition by janrinok · · Score: 1

    It wasn't intended as 'obnoxious European holier-than-thou-ism'.

    It was simply pointing out that there are only a few countries (perhaps even only one) where DVD playback is a problem. Installing libdvdcss2 and w32codecs takes less than 30 seconds and is not illegal where I live. They perhaps aren't installed by default in the same way that apache2, tor or blender are not installed - not everyone will want it.

    Will Dell Europe be able to sell computers with linux installed and DVD playback already enabled? If not, why not?

    --
    Have a look at soylentnews.org for a different view
  34. Ubuntu? :-( by hotfireball · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You may mod me as down, but I am really frustrated this news. While there is a Novell with great solutions, support they can provide and completed advanced desktop which lacks nothing what is needed for average Windows user (mp3, codecs and so on), they choose Ubuntu, where apt-get is the only good thing... Does not sounds serious to me. :-( Of course we say: "Go install $foo yourself", but this is ain't a point, because average users never treat PC as a potential LEGO constructor, but simply a device, which they can turn on and start to work or have fun with NO worry to post-install things. Hope Dell's Ubuntu will be different Ubuntu, but I am not sure... Also I am not sure how do they handle unstable repos, where is the only place to get actually nice software. Do they think that average user will vim apt sources and follow numbers of HOWTO's?.. Yes, *I* can do that easily, maybe everybody on /. are familiar, but yet not average Windows user. :-(

    1. Re:Ubuntu? :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be frustrated all you like.. it's probably from dealing with RPM

  35. While I agree: by crhylove · · Score: 1

    That DVD playing functionality should be included "out of box", I don't think it's much more difficult than opening synaptic, typing your password, and installing VLC. I agree it should be included in the distribution by default, but it's one of the only things an end user will need that ISN'T pre-included.

    1. Open Office, a full office suite.
    2. The Gimp, a photoshop clone.
    3. Gaim (now Pidgin), instant messaging for every client, msn, aim, icq, yahoo, soon also MySpace)
    4. Firefox, arguably the best browser in the market.
    5. Evolution, not as good as Thunderbird, but certainly safer virus wise than Outlook.
    6. Tomboy Notes, Rhythmbox, literally a laundry list of other great software that end users might want....

    I mean, true, having a really good game installed would be nice, but you CAN get Urban Terror for free, and I like it quite a bit more than any version of Counterstrike.

    I think compared to the huge list of software I need to buy and then install for windows, the Ubuntu process is much easier and cheaper already!

    rhY

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
    1. Re:While I agree: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get 1-5 of your list for Windows. For a compelling argument you need to list unique features of Linux/Ubuntu.

      I don't really care about promoting Linux but a few things that come to mind are:

      1. Free new version every 6 months with easy upgrade including applications.
      2. Virtual desktops. Yes you can get these as an add-on for Windows, but they don't work very well in Windows.
      3. Nicer to use than Windows, yes this is just my opinion, but it's one of the reasons I use Linux.
      4. Easier to customise.

      I'll admit this isn't really a great list, but I'm just using as an example of a better argument than a list of programs that are available on both platforms.

  36. Apple has 2 lines of laptops by so1omon · · Score: 1

    Apple also has two very distinct lines of laptops. The MacBooks, and the MacBook Pros. Each line has it's own focus market... much like Dell and their Lattitudes and Inspirons.

    --
    i'm the jedidiahmarkfoster your parents warned you about
  37. WUXGA on the D820 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is about to be superseded by the D830 you mentioned.
    Everything works, except the useless WinModem. The pixels
    *are* quite small on a 15.4" lcd...

  38. Or maybe by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    they see that MS is insanely jealous lately of anybody that is also making money.

    Playstation->Xbox
    iPod->Zune
    Google->???? ("I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google.)

    I'm surprised they haven't gotten jealous of intel yet and started making their own chips:) Anyway, MS is already in the hardare business with Xbox/360 - a long shot to anything competitive to dell I know, but still, don't stick all your eggs in one basket - don't trust your business to a 3rd party.

    It's in Dell's and any computer manufacturer's longterm interest to have a 2nd viable consumer OS when it comes times for negotiations and the like. (Otherwise MS can threaten to hold any of them hostage to their terms, cutting off cheap licenses, without a fear of losing marketshare because Maker X can't realistically offer any other OS).

    1. Re:Or maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google->Ms. Dewey
      http://www.msdewey.com/

      she is like so much hawter than google and will eventually win all of our hearts with her wit.

  39. It's not the version number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and if they did, we would still be using the alpha of Ubuntu."

    I don't care about version numbers, or whether it'd be called alpha. If they'd gotten it "right" the first time nobody would complain and be damn happy.

    Version numbers were invented only because people don't get it right the first time, not because people would be unhappy if there was only one version (disregarding updates due to progress of technology).

  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. VM isn't 32 bit safe, nspluginwrapper by Sits · · Score: 1

    You're right. The Penguin.SWF blog says the flash JIT VM needs to be converted and that's why there's no 64 bit version.

    The GP also forgot to mention the 3rd option (for the flash plugin):
    3) nspluginwrapper. It's far from easy to get going on Ubuntu Feisty and needs a 32 development environment (in addition to a 64 bit environment) to be compiled but it _can_ be made work. A brief glance suggests it does it stuff by running the plugin in a 32 bit environment and communicating back to the 64 bit browser over sockets.

  42. Re:They called it Click'N'Run last time I checked by Sumadartson · · Score: 1

    It's even better. If you try to play a file for which you don't have the codec, it prompts you on whether you want to download that codec.

  43. Re:Why not make an "Uncrippled for non-US" edition by kwark · · Score: 1

    "Will Dell Europe be able to sell computers with linux installed and DVD playback already enabled? If not, why not?"

    No. EUCD.

  44. Re:Support DREAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot the entering your password bit, but other than that, spot on. I am really loving 7.04. I almost gave it to my parents last week but me pa is still confused by me showing him a firefox icon instead of internet explorer. Maybe the next incarnation will be there yet.

  45. Yeah, but will it run... by EtherC · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, but will it run Windows?
    ...
    ...wait wait, ok ok, just... please don't hurt me!

  46. That all seems reasonable... by simong · · Score: 1

    Dell aren't really selling these for the Linux hobbyist market, but are selling them as a proof of concept for the soho/business user who is looking for alternatives to Windows. Hopefully the USP will be that said user will be able to call a support line if something goes wrong and someone will be able to give answers that will resolve a problem. 7.04 does seem to be a mistake when 6.06 is the distribution with long term support but without screwing Synaptic down it would be hard for a casual desktop user not to upgrade - LTS is probably more useful for servers in a production environment. Otherwise the idea seems solid and support for specific machines and components will make the support desk's life easier, until the wireless components are changed from Intel to Broadcom to save a bit of money. Hmm. I would also be prepared to bet that the majority of service calls will be about trying to get printing to work with some 20 year old Applewriter, or worse still, a cheap GDI colour laser (note to Dell's Linux support team: foomatic is your friend).

  47. Re:Why not make an "Uncrippled for non-US" edition by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Are there any "European Linux" distros that don't kowtow to the U.S. DMCA rule, and include libdvdcss by default?

    In Europe there's the EUCD, which basically is the European version of the DMCA.
    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  48. Re:Why not make an "Uncrippled for non-US" edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps. There is nothing to stop them shipping a closed and properly licensed DVD player with their machines.

  49. more than $15 per image? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be a training cost of over $15 million for a million images of linux.

    You can pay for an awful lot of training for that kind of money...

  50. Doh by danespen · · Score: 1

    He said he did

  51. Re:Why not make an "Uncrippled for non-US" edition by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes. At least in Britain and Europe, if the DVD is your property, then you are legally entitled to watch the film recorded upon it. Otherwise, the store that sold it to you was breaking the law -- goods sold to a consumer must be fit for their rightful purpose. The fact that you are circumventing encryption is irrelevant in this case, since you are (by sole virtue of ownership of the disc) the intended recipient of the encrypted communication and therefore have authorisation from the sender of the encrypted message (the film company) to view it.

    Enforcement of the EUCD in such a way as to protect the interests of established manufacturers would violate pre-existing European laws against anti-competitive behaviour.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  52. Re:Why not make an "Uncrippled for non-US" edition by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps. There is nothing to stop them shipping a closed and properly licensed DVD player with their machines.

    Even though I wouldn't run one myself, this does seem like a reasonable option. I'd bet that the people who use the Dell-installed distribution are probably the types who just want stuff to work, even if they have to sell their soul to get it. These are the types who give Linux bad publicity by ranting about it being "crap" since it won't play their DVDs, MP3s, etc.

    The people who really care about freedom are the people who would probably reinstall the distro from scratch anyway.

    Once you've got people involved in running Free software, even though they also use non-Free bits, there is much more scope for them realising the advantages of the Free ethos instead of just dismissing it because it doesn't support their propriatory stuff. And once these people realise why Free implementations, formats, etc are better then there will be more people pressuring for this stuff to be Free.

  53. Batch Zell by tepples · · Score: 1

    Also, just try doing the equivalent of

    echo -e "<html>\n<head>\n<title>My Holiday Snaps</title>\n<body>" > index.html && for i in *jpg; do thumb="`basename $i .jpg`_mini.jpg"; convert -resize 160x120 $i $thumb && echo "Shrunk $i to $thumb" && echo "<a href='$i'><img border='0' src='$thumb' /></a>" >> index.html; done; echo -e "</body>\n</html>" >> index.html
    in a GUI, and tell me it's quicker and easier and less effort. Type it once, and then make a script (which some users might call a "batch file") that will do this whenever the user double-clicks it. Such a user would download the script:
    1. Use the graphical web browser to copy the script from your post.
    2. Use the graphical text editor to paste it into a file.
    3. Use the graphical file manager to make it executable (e.g. checkboxes in a file's properties dialog that do the equivalent of chmod).
    And then for each folder, the user would run the script:
    1. Use the graphical file manager to copy it to the folder containing pics.
    2. Use the graphical file manager to run it.
  54. Buy a second computer to get to the forums? by tepples · · Score: 1

    As far as the average home user goes, just about anything you need can be found within 10 minutes on the forums or various tutorials and how-tos via google. Which would appear to require the purchase and maintenance of a second computer to troubleshoot problems with your computer that prevent it from booting or accessing the Internet.
    1. Re:Buy a second computer to get to the forums? by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Do you really not have any friends or neighbors who have computers that connect to the internet? Sometimes it pays off to make nice with people.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
  55. Photoshop clone ? by Builder · · Score: 1

    I love it when people call Gimp a photoshop clone. That's like calling my Ford Ka a Bugatti Veyron clone.

    1. Re:Photoshop clone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand... you're saying that Gimp (Ka) is affordable by the masses, does most of what people want, is reasonably economical and easy to control, but Photoshop (Veyron) is unbelievably overpowered, costs immense amounts of money just to keep going, is oversized but doesn't look it, and is obtainable only by a very narrow wealthy elite?

      They both get you from A to B. One costs way more, and can go a lot faster, but there's a speed limit anyway for most uses.

      I really don't understand your problem with it being called a clone.

    2. Re:Photoshop clone ? by Builder · · Score: 1

      Gimp doesn't get you from A to B. Gimp costs you 10s of man hours in lost time and re-training and then you find out it can't do a load of VERY important stuff for any semi-professional outfit.

  56. Re:Why not make an "Uncrippled for non-US" edition by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    There are Brazilian distros that bundle mp3 and DVD playing by default. But it would be stupid to do so on a distro that aims at a broader (global) audience, since the US is big, and there are other countries with DMCA like laws.

  57. Re:Support DREAM by SilentChris · · Score: 1

    Forgive my ignorance, but WTF is a "Theora"?

  58. Linux on Dell laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    I am currently running Slackware 11 on a Dell Inspiron 640M. I do think its cool that Dell has listened to the people that want the choice ti have Linux pre-installed on their systems ( if they wish )...

    As far as FTA on the drivers .. I am not 100% on the conexant hardware ( Sorry i dont use the modem ;) ) .. but pretty much all drivers are Open these days especially the Intel IPWxxxx range. If you mean firmware then yes your talking about something completely different.

    This 640M has the IPW3945ABG and works quite well with the 2.6 kernel. Remember Dells own Wifi cards use the BCM43xx chipsets which have proven to be problematic as Broadcom has not released any docs on it.

    Dells use of Intel ICH chipsets means that pretty much all the internals work out of the box, everything from Audio and accelerated desktops / 3d.

    I am not saying its easy to mold the OS around the hardware but when it works, its very impressive.

    Issues i have noted are due to ACPI problems my Mic port is non operational. I think this issue is just tied to the ICH 7 High Def codec in this one.

    If you do run linux on Dell laptops & or systems its a good rule of thumb to keep the bios Axx to the latest, Dell is notorios for broken firmware/bios's ..

    Regards

  59. The "Linux on Dell Laptops" Has Already Sold Two by Nit+Picker · · Score: 1

    I don't know if Dell marketing will realize this, but even before they offered Linux on laptops, the hype surrounding it has caused me to buy two.

    My oldest daughter was looking for a light but not too expensive laptop, but I had not found one in my limited shopping. When I first read about Dell's Linux plans, I started looking at the Latitudes (where I first assumed that Linux would be offered). There I discovered that there was a machine that met my daughter's specs, and I bought it for her with XP.

    Although my daughter only runs XP on the Latitude, I tested a live Ubuntu disk on it and found it seemed to work OK. Then TN offered a tax holiday for computers, and I decided that the tax savings were greater than anything I might save by waiting for pre-installed Linux. I bought an Inspiron (1705 with WUXGA) with Vista Home Pro and hardware that appeared to be supported by Ubuntu. I have set it up to dual boot to Ubuntu, so I now can look at Vista (My younger daughter prefers it but likes Linux Sudoku.) and run Ubuntu. There are a few things I have not yet got going in Linux (BBC video, for example), so the Windows is still useful.

    Right or wrong, I wanted WUXGA on a large screen, so I probably would have been disappointed with the Dell Linux offerings, but the talk about the planned offerings led directly to the purchase of the two laptops. Others with similar wants may look at the Linux specs and then buy a non-Linux machine with hardware based upon the Linux machines.

  60. Re:Support DREAM by mhall119 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Theora is a patent-free, royalty-free open-source video codec. It's the video counterpart to the Vorbis audio codec and competitor to MPEG4 and WMV.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theora
    http://xiph.org/

    --
    http://www.mhall119.com
  61. Mod Parent Troll by cparker15 · · Score: 1

    There are legal and ethical issues with supplying proprietary technologies in a free (as in freedom) operating system. Proprietary (non-free) software cannot be supplied in a free operating system, otherwise the operating system as a whole is no longer free. It shouldn't matter if supplying the proprietary software would help people maintain their status quo. The goal behind free software is freedom, and proprietary technologies inhibit freedom.

    A homeless person freezing and starving in the winter could easily solve their problem of not having shelter or food by doing something to be imprisoned for some time. Why, then, don't we see more homeless people committing crimes and going to jail? Although jail would be an easy and convenient solution to the problem, it would come at the cost of freedom.

    While the severity of proprietary technology distribution pales in comparison to that of a life-or-death scenario, the same fundamental principles remain. If anything, the act of tainting a free operating system with software that dilutes that freedom is what's defective.

    --
    Have you driven a fnord... lately?

    You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

    1. Re:Mod Parent Troll by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Well, if one values philosophy over functionality, than one has nothing to complain about if the functionality is unavailable.

    2. Re:Mod Parent Troll by cparker15 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think we have every right to complain about a broken patent system that is being used to take away our “digital” rights and freedoms.

      Are you suggesting that freedom isn't a worthy goal, or that it's somehow impractical?

      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

  62. Success Criteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Posting anonymously because I'm a Dell employee who wants to see this succeed but am not 'authorized' to speak for Dell.

    Dell needs to sell 20,000 of these systems to consider this pilot a success. If we sell less than this, don't expect much in the way of continued effort. This is a royal pain to get rolling as fast as we are - especially since a huge majority of our tech support know windows only.

    Oh, and you only have a couple of months before the systems we're shipping these on go end of life. They are mature systems, with good technical information. But in order to be responsive to the Ideastorm ask as quickly as possible - we decided to go with systems that were about to be EOL rather than waiting for the next hardware refresh.

    The people that said they would wait to buy a box until Dell offered Linux are about to get your chance - I *really* hope you follow through on that promise.

  63. Incorrect by tknd · · Score: 1

    It will fail because people like you and half of the posts here will never be satisfied. Dell is installing a Linux distribution and is guaranteeing that all hardware works with drivers. That's the product, buy it or don't buy it. But chances are, if not enough people purchase these systems, Dell will scrap the entire project.

    1. Re:Incorrect by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

      I don't think asking for basic features that are among the most popular reasons to use a computer today are at all unreasonable to expect of Dell. Having said this, it turns out that 7.04 has the option in add/remove programs to add said codecs, so hopefully users will stumble across this. I was concerned that they would have to go get automatix or something like that.

      --
      There is more to science than physics!

      www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
  64. Because the article didn't have 'em... by Qubit · · Score: 1

    Here are some URLs for the Dell models listed:

    Dimension E520 Desktop - $370+

    Inspiron E1505 Laptop - $700+

    XPS 410 Desktop - $900+

    I'm in the market for a new laptop, but unfortunately the E1505 is too large and heavy for my needs -- the base weight is 6.18lbs! Dell should really consider adding something smaller and lighter to the ubuntu-supported mix. How about the Latitude D420 ?

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
  65. Paul Bremer wants to know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many truckloads is that?

  66. Non-US ? by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

    Will they be available outside the US ? Quite simply, I'm not going to buy a laptop with an American keyboard layout. However, assuming the price is fair and they sell in my country I will probably get one.

  67. Re:Binary drivers for Intel Wireless cards? Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about support (i.e. in ten years) and bug-fixing?

  68. Who cares? by psymastr · · Score: 1

    Nobody will buy them anyway. It's just a move to get support from the geeks.

    --
    Improve at backgammon rapidly through addictive quickfire position quizzes: www.bgtrain.com
  69. Oh yeah sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like it runs Linux. So what? When will Dell realize that Free Software is only ideologically correct on a Free Computer, and send me a free computer, completely pre-loaded and configured to my exacting 1337 requirements including weird funky p2p apps and codec cracks, 3d desktop that performs flawlessly and a free 24/7 support guy to hold my hand, fix everything i screw up, make me peanut butter and jelly sammiches (for free, natch) and and live in my basement?

    Only then shall my ideological foment be sated! But then i shall complain for them daring to put their crass commercial logo on MY box!

  70. I am. by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

    My old Linux system fried a few weeks ago, and I suddenly am in the market for a new PC. I have owned Dells for years and have never had any problems with them (other than having to reload Windows). I could have bought another bare bones system or rolled my own, but I am waiting for Dell. I talked to a sales rep who was very helpful, and also let me know about the training required for the support staff. It is obvious that Dell is very serious about this. It will be really nice to actually have supported hardware.

    I think that 20k number may be hit in the first few days. I hope I don't have to wait too long for my PC if Dell gets overwhelmed.

    "Dell recommends Feisty Fawn"

    --
    "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  71. Since you asked... by Toby_Tyke · · Score: 1

    There was a story on Ars Technica a while back (I don't have the link, sorry) where Michael Dell was doing a question and answer session, and someone asked him how much extra they would have to pay to get a PC without "Craplets". The figure he gave was $50 - $60.

    Now, I don't know how much Dell pay for a vista license, and I don't suppose we will be finding out any time soon, but if it's less than $50 dollars (which would not be a shock) then the Linux machines may be more expensive. If I had to guess though, I think they will probably sell for the same price as the Windows machines.

    --
    "I realise this is not a very popular opinion but it's the truth, and there for needs to be said" -Bill Hicks
  72. My list was describing "Out of box"... by crhylove · · Score: 1

    and/or ease of use for the n00b crowd who might not even know how to install applications, but Linux has them ready to go automatically for them. I'm not a unrepentant fanboi, but it seems to me for most people (mom, etc.) Ubuntu is set up better than Windows by default.

    Unless of course, you consider the horrific shit brown.

    rhY

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  73. Re:Why not make an "Uncrippled for non-US" edition by kwark · · Score: 1

    Has anybody ever seen Cyberlinks PowerCinema Linux?
    (http://www.cyberlink.com/eng/press_room/view_970. html)