Slashdot Mirror


AC = Domestic Terrorists?

Miang writes "A video from a recent FOX 11 (Los Angeles) newscast has surfaced on YouTube. In the segment, reporter Phil Shuman investigates so-called "Hacker Gangs" comprised entirely of anonymous users. The segment, which focuses mainly on users at 4chan, 7chan, and 420chan, seems to confuse /b/ raids and motivational poster templates with a genuine threat to the American public. For added FUD, the FOX team inserted an unrelated video of a van blowing up — twice! Presumably, one is intended to equate anonymous posting with domestic terror. The story and video can be found on the local FOX website, so it does not appear to be simply a clever parody." Cringe as you watch this video explain terms like 'LULZ' and show inspirational poster parodies as evidence of the evils of this terrifying "Group".

81 of 519 comments (clear)

  1. "so-called 'hacker gangs'" by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "so-called 'hacker gangs'"

    They're only called that because you just called them that! Jeeez. There are roving gangs of hackers, lurking the backstreets of the 'net looking for sites to spray their graffiti on.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:"so-called 'hacker gangs'" by KoldKompress · · Score: 3, Funny

      But that's the only way we can get "Truly Epic Lulz"!

  2. Fear the wrath of Anonymous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How dare you, Slashdot, call us - Anonymous, a COWARD?!

  3. Yellow journalism at its finest by Chmcginn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fact that it's a Fox affiliate isn't relevant, really. I've seen plenty of stories on local ABC, CBS, or NBC stations that were just as cringe-worthy. Even as computers have become more popular, people who really like (and understand) computers haven't.

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    1. Re:Yellow journalism at its finest by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even as computers have become more popular, people who really like (and understand) computers haven't.
      Sounds like somebody couldn't get a date for the prom!
    2. Re:Yellow journalism at its finest by goodmanj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that it's a Fox affiliate isn't relevant, really Sure it is. Whether the submitter had a "Fox News Sucks" agenda or not, you need to call institutions out by name when they're acting like morons. ABC, NBC, or Fox, they deserve to have their name in blink tags over this one.
    3. Re:Yellow journalism at its finest by brass1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      An affiliate, like an individual franchise, isn't owned by the overall corporation. Actually this affiliate, in the #2 TV and radio market, is owned by Fox Television Stations, Inc. Fox owns (pdf, sorry) 30 affiliates including affiliates in 9 of the top 10 markets. You'll find that NBC, ABC and CBS have very similar station ownership stats.
    4. Re:Yellow journalism at its finest by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds like somebody couldn't get a date for the prom! Impossible.
      Anonymous always delivers.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    5. Re:Yellow journalism at its finest by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your line of argument doesn't seem to stop everyone else here holding Bill Gates personally responsible for every single Windows flaw.

      --
      I hate printers.
    6. Re:Yellow journalism at its finest by Meccanica · · Score: 2, Informative

      people associated with Anonymous did threaten several football stadiums

      Are you serious? It's not like people who post anonymously all know each other or something. You seem to have fallen into the trap, by buying into the idea that 'Anonymous' is a specific group of people. I'm sorry, it doesn't work that way.

      Oh, man. I'm watching the video as I type this (still loading on my dial-up connection, or I'd have watched it first). Oh hell. It just gets worse and worse. Do people not remember that 'anonymous' is a WORD? (wikipedia powers GO! "derived from the Greek word , meaning 'without a name' or 'name-less'"). The video is now making reference to "sites linked with Anonymous!" Oh no! These nefarious ne'er do wells are using the proper word to describe an individual whose identity is not known! Google and I have found a great many sites linked with Anonymous: there's www.alcoholics-anonymous.org, www.anonymousclothing.com, and an extensive collection of their quotes on www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Anonymous.

      Jeez, now I'm really getting worked up about this.

      they use the internet and their moniker sounds a little like AC

      Again, same point. /.'s Anonymous Coward may be an original implementation, but GUESS WHAT. It's not a coincidence that it sounds like Anonymous. It's not a word that was spontaneously invented for the internet. /. didn't just pull it out of thin air.

      IT. IS. A. WORD.

      I apologize, now, for venting my frustration at you. Don't take it personally.

      But discussion of Anonymous as if 'he' were an individual is a joke, just another meme. Just look at the last shot in the video, which I think sums it up. It's another mock-up of an inspirational poster, reading:

      "ANONYMOUS - because none of us are as cruel as all of us"

      As an "amateur psychologist and observer of human nature", I hope you an understand its meaning- the mob mentality of high-traffic message boards (which are nevertheless out of the mainstream), combined with the relative unimportance of an individual's identity in that environment, results in a higher tendency for unreasonable aggression. Some 'sophisticated thinker' took the time to make it into a joke.

      --
      You live and learn. At least, you live.
    7. Re:Yellow journalism at its finest by florescent_beige · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I try, I really do, not to fall into the obvious traps but if I did it wouldn't be the first time. My implied premise is that there's a difference between Anonymous and anonymous. Ok that's splitting hairs I know but it's Saturday so I reserve the right to ride off on wild tangents. Anonymous is a proper noun and anonymous is an adjective. *sigh* I even annoy myself sometimes.

      On top of the fact that I'm perched on a darkly obscure distinction is the unfortunate fact that I'm using Fox as a source. That's just asking for it. I know this.

      Can I say that .*chan culture understands the label Anonymous to be part of the the tribe's defining characteristics? Along with quasi-code looking language inventions and obscure acronyms and 133+ speak. It looks to me very much like a classic case of group definition by exclusion. Note the enthusiasm someone demonstrated when they proudly declared that anyone showing up in their territory because of Fox has already been excluded as a "foxfag".

      Also, while I'd be the very very VERY last person to side with Fox on anything there's an old cautionary phrase that fits: A third-rate professional is always better than a first-rate amateur. So while Fox has ulterior motives and their coverage of everything is tinted red, one shouldn't write off the bare facts they used with a wave of the hand. They are professional information gatherers.

      And also .*chan claimed ownership of goatse. That's just plain stupid. Probably evil too.

      --
      Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  4. I ... by LordKaT · · Score: 5, Funny

    I ... wha ... ha ... za ... fuh?

    Either the words don't exist to describe just how stupid these people are, or I'm too stupid to describe how stupid they are.

    And the FOX reporters are worse!

    1. Re:I ... by phoenixwade · · Score: 4, Funny

      I ... wha ... ha ... za ... fuh?
      Either the words don't exist to describe just how stupid these people are, or I'm too stupid to describe how stupid they are.
      And the FOX reporters are worse! Why make a choice?

      Other than it being one of the worst "spin" attempts I've seen, I have to admit, it was worth it for the amusement value. visions of a mob of geeks, derringers hidden in their pocket protectors.... Drive by shootings from late model Scooters.....

      thanks, everyone, really cheered me up this morning.
      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  5. I'm crazy! I'll do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm serious, you all step back, or i'll blow this place SKY HIGH!

    1. Re:I'm crazy! I'll do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Alex: Hi is this Fox News? I have a story for you. It's about this website full of evil people harrassing me!

      Fox reporter: How did you get this number? Get lost kid we have a war on terror to report on.

      Alex: But... butbutbut... They ARE terrorists! They... they.. they once threatened to destroy stadiums with carbombs!

      Fox reporter: Hmm I guess we can stretch this enough to make it Fox-worthy. Jackson, get my coat - we may have to blow up a minivan for dramatic footage just to be sure.

  6. The reason why they blew up the vans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They did it for the LULZ!

    1. Re:The reason why they blew up the vans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      FOX: Do not want!

  7. But if you carry out threats anonymously.... by Durrok · · Score: 5, Funny

    .... you don't get any karma. :(

    --
    I keep telling myself I'm not the desperate type.
    1. Re:But if you carry out threats anonymously.... by iknownuttin · · Score: 5, Funny
      .... you don't get any karma. :(

      Yeah, but when you die, you go to heaven and get 42 brand new computers - never used!

      --
      I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    2. Re:But if you carry out threats anonymously.... by click2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

      no... i'm not listening to you.. TFA says you're a terrorist so the GP must be telling the truth

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    3. Re:But if you carry out threats anonymously.... by morari · · Score: 2, Funny

      *Somehow makes it into Heaven, despite it not existing, only to find out that the forty-two awaiting computers are actually eMachines and Compaqs!* :(

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    4. Re:But if you carry out threats anonymously.... by KwKSilver · · Score: 2, Funny

      More likely Packard-Bell Pentium-Pros with 512MB memory running Vista-Ultimatum. "Patience, Grasshopper"

      --
      If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
    5. Re:But if you carry out threats anonymously.... by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 2, Funny

      No you get Vista, Multimedia edition, all of the Blue ray disks that will ever be made, a 70 inch HDMI monitor with full resolution - and only 128 mb of RAM.

  8. Hackers On Steroids by LackThereof · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apparently, the ability to phish myspace passwords from clueless users earns you the title of "Hackers on Steroids" now. OMGWTFHAX!

    --
    Legalize recreational marijuana. Seriously.
  9. There is only one solution for this problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is the same solution that will always work: Make a law forbidding anonymous posts. Make anonymous posting on the internets a felony and not an offense, so that only criminals will be posting anonymously.

    Death to all those fanatics!!!! And yes, i will post anonymously.

  10. I actually have sympathy.... by Umuri · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually have some sympathy for the reporters involved in this, because they have no clue what they're getting themselves in to.

    Anonymous is what happens when you give people the ability to act without reprecussions, a good portion of the world turns into total a**holes. And they will surely retaliate, for two reasons. The first being the justification that "oh, we're called domestic terrorists, we better at least do something worth that name now".
    The second being the justification "Umm, no. You totally misunderstand what we do here. We're just normal internet stupidity. want a sample? How about everyone in your company? We can do a mass raid if you want"

    The second already is happening in droves, if you'll notice their forums.

    Now, that said, the people i DON'T feel pity for are the "victims".
    The male victim, who fails at trying to be anonymous, now has his name, and his story, all over all of the *chans. All he's doing is trying to get revenge because anonymous wouldn't raid his stupid girlfriend and that they told him he was being a moron. He spends most of his time actively trying to spread dirt on the *chans, including warning potential raid targets, making up lies about what raids actually are.

    As for the female victim, her story is similarly stupid, but as I do not know the entire thing with all facts for certain, i will refrain from final judgement and spreading rumors.

    But for most raid "victims" in general, their main flaw was that they posted too much personal information online, and made a point of either harassing others, who happened to be anonymous, or whining to anonymous for favors.

    I am not anonymous, but it pays to know about them.

    --
    You never realize how much manually made unmanaged "linked" lists suck, till you have src.link.link.link.link...
    1. Re:I actually have sympathy.... by skrolle2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If there's anything else the victims have in common is that they take themselves way too seriously.

      The internet is a wonderful place, everyone can get their 15 minutes of fame, and more. However, it might not be the fame they want, and trying to control it is absolutely futile. Maybe posting some sob story on your livejournal that everyone on the internet can read isn't such a good idea, maybe posting too much skin on your myspace is a bad idea too. It's as if people forget why it's a good idea to protect your privacy when they go on the internet, and some of these people get burnt by it. I hope they learn something at least.

    2. Re:I actually have sympathy.... by Chmcginn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      actually have some sympathy for the reporters involved in this, because they have no clue what they're getting themselves in to.
      If reporters don't take the time to properly educate themselves on something before reporting on it, they're not doing their job, plain and simple. I don't have any sympathy for them - mainly because plenty of grandma & grandpa types who've never even heard of 4chan before that report now think their house will get firebombed if they post to the wrong message board.
      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    3. Re:I actually have sympathy.... by oohshiny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anonymous is what happens when you give people the ability to act without reprecussions,

      And "reporter" is what happens when you have sunk so low that it doesn't matter anymore what you say as long as it's controversial.

      No matter how anonymity may be abused, it's an essential part of a functioning democracy and free society, because if you don't have it, the only people participating in discussions are those with nothing to lose.

    4. Re:I actually have sympathy.... by notnAP · · Score: 5, Funny
      what happens when you give people the ability to act without reprecussions, a good portion of the world turns into total a**holes.


      Are you referring to the hackers, the reporters, or FOX?

    5. Re:I actually have sympathy.... by kv9 · · Score: 4, Funny

      mainly because plenty of grandma & grandpa types who've never even heard of 4chan before that report now think their house will get firebombed if they post to the wrong message board. or at least get your minivan blown up.
    6. Re:I actually have sympathy.... by jamstar7 · · Score: 2, Funny

      mainly because plenty of grandma & grandpa types who've never even heard of 4chan before that report now think their house will get firebombed if they post to the wrong message board.

      or at least get your minivan blown up.

      Fooled you!!! I don't HAVE a minivan!!!!!!!!!

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    7. Re:I actually have sympathy.... by jamstar7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      what happens when you give people the ability to act without reprecussions, a good portion of the world turns into total a**holes.

      Are you referring to the hackers, the reporters, or FOX?

      Yes.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  11. PH33R J00R 1337 SKILLLLLLZZZZZZZZ!!!!1!!!1 by Chmcginn · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've got nothing, really.

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  12. Anonymous, not Anonymous Coward. by Virak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Two completely different people. Anonymous Coward is a normal Slashdot user who merely has perpetually bad karma. Anonymous is, as the video states, an "Internet hate machine". He is the very personification of the deepest, darkest desires of the Internet. Which, of course, means he spends half of his time masturbating to strange pornography, the other half attacking easily-angered idiots for his personal amusement, and the other other half debating Bush, pedophilia, and quantum mechanics.

    1. Re:Anonymous, not Anonymous Coward. by Chmcginn · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the last half doing poor math? :P

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  13. They did bring us HP7... by rdwald · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, 4chan did let us all read Harry Potter 7 five days early...and the video does equate spoiling popular fantasy books with domestic terrorism...so I guess they are terrorists!

    1. Re:They did bring us HP7... by MostAwesomeDude · · Score: 2, Informative

      it was actually LueLinks that leaked them out. Sheesh, why must LLers always be anonymous outside of LL? Anyway, yes. The leak was originally from a user on www.luelinks.net, who obtained an advance copy from a friend working at a bookstore. He then proceeded to take photos of every single page and leaked them to LL. The LL community then introduced them to 4chan on /b/, and 4chan went ahead and attempted to frame Gaia Online and eBaum's World for the leak and subsequent spoilers.
      --
      ~ C.
  14. Re:Hahaha... and I thought Slashdot was funny... by skrolle2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They bought a dog. How are you gonna get past their dog? Huh? Huh? Didn't think of that, did you?

  15. Re:I am not a number by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am neither a number or a named individual. Fear my anonymity. f0x 4r3 10s3rs ;)

    Damn, too fast to post. Damn this is what you call an unmasked AC - oh well.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  16. You got a bunch of people by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    right here on Slashdot who feel the same way. "I ignore ACs" "I don't respond to ACs" "I mod ACs to -6". I think it's sick. Those people are closed minded so-n-sos. Well, all you ACs out there, I DO respond if the comment is worth responding to. I don't care where it comes from. I derive value from the comment itself, not necessarily the author. Don't let anybody shut you down. Use whatever abilities you have to be heard.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:You got a bunch of people by joto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We are all more or less anonymous here on slashdot. Very few people know who hides behind a username. The problem with ACs isn't their anonymity, it's their lack of identity. It's the same thing people are discussing about certain muslim women covering their face. Not only are they anonymous (most everyone in a big city is, even if they tell you their name (which could be fake)), but they also lack an identity. If you met her later, you wouldn't be able to tell if it was the same woman, or somebody else. This makes people feel uneasy about talking to such a person, even if she is a nice religious woman, and not a bank-robber (although bank-robbers have been known to use burkas as well).

      It is no doubt that anonymity, and certainly, lack of identity, leads to antisocial behaviour. If people are to be held responsible for their actions, they need to be recognized by the people around them. That's why every discussion group on the Internet is full of people behaving antisocially, from flamers to trolls to crackpots, most of those people would have shut their mouth if it wasn't for the fact that they are anonymous. People who also choose to lack an identity (such as AC) are usually even worse, and seldom worth listening to.

      There is nothing wrong about being scared of anonymity. What is funny about the Fox 11 coverage isn't that they claim anonymous Internet users can behave badly. What is funny is that they compare this to actual real-world terrorism, which, to take it mildly, is quite a different matter.

    2. Re:You got a bunch of people by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, this is FOX we're talking about here. It's all about ratings. And FUD, like lesbians = ratings. Personally, I'd rather see more lesbians.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:You got a bunch of people by AusIV · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I generally ignore ACs, because often the ACs are complete trolls. If they happen to get modded up into the range of posts that are viewable to me, I read them and sometimes respond.


      But ACs aren't the extent of anonymity on Slashdot. You go by the nickname iminplaya. I assume that's not your real name. All I know about you is that you have 6,309 posts on slashdot, I can easily find the last 24 if I'd like, and somehow after 6,309 posts you've managed to avoid getting a karma bonus.

      The same is pretty much true with me. Even though I seem to be the only 'AusIV' on the web, I still have a great deal of anonymity. Someone who knows me might be able to track what I say (and I keep that in mind), but I still have the wiggle room to say what I want on the web without being concerned it's going to piss them off and they're going to hunt me down in real life.

  17. Re:What's the Background? by Chmcginn · · Score: 2, Informative

    I understand that Fox News isn't really news,

    It's not FOX's national news that did this report, it was a local affiliate. Check out your local ABC or NBC station for more examples of idiocy.

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  18. simply wow by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow. That's all I can say about that piece. Just wow...

    First off, wasn't the Harry Potter spoiler clip in the middle of there taken from the Daily Show? (I could swear that's John Oliver's voice).

    Second, the tool with the MySpace account--it's clear to anyone that has any idea about anything that he simply ended up with a virus/keylogger installed. "Anonymous" got his passwords from that and the virus got spread to his friends. Woooooh, that kinda shits been happening on the internet for forever now. He simply appears even more foolish for not having even that much of a clue (hell, my grandparents are aware that there are viruses and nasties out there).

    What I find most disturbing about this is that if anyone sends Fox 11 an email/letter/phone call/whatever explaining to them how far off base their piece is, they'll just treat it all as threats that further back up their claim. Truly truly sad....

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  19. Re:I am not a number by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Midnight Thunder (17205) wrote: "I am neither a number or a named individual."

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  20. HA! by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As long as they get this kind of press, they'll never get bored. The FOX story is a great recruitment piece.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:HA! by florescent_beige · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...The FOX story is a great recruitment piece.
      Quite. And if it occupies the kids who have nothing to do because their divorced moms and dads are too busy working to pay for their BIG STUPID PICKUP TRUCKS then I'm all for it. Keeps them off my lawn.
      --
      Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
  21. Re:What's the Background? by skrolle2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a place on the internet called 4chan. It is an imageboard, where you can post pictures of.. stuff. There is a lot of porn on it. There is a lot of very weird porn on it. There is a lot of funny pictures, and people modifying them to become even funnier. It's home to a lot of anonymous posters that enjoy poking fun at idiots on the internet.

    You might learn more here:

    http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/B
    http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Image:B_summa ry.jpg
    http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/4chan
    http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Image:4chan-v enn-diagram.png

    If you think tubgirl, lemonparty and goatse is funny, this is where they came from. If you think lolcats and ORLY is funny, this is where it came from.

    Also, the biggest crime you can commit is to ask for information, just like you did. You clearly need to lurk moar.

  22. Re:Hahaha... and I thought Slashdot was funny... by Joebert · · Score: 2, Funny

    They have a plan.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  23. /b/ is mainstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seriously, /b/ is so mainstream now, it beggars belief. Here is a Slashdot article that mentions it in passing without so much as stopping to explain the term. This was always going to happen. A group of people focused around memes, with a subset of them bent on spreading these memes to other sites? There is no more perfect recipe for notoriety than that. Rules 1 and 2 have completely failed, just as miserably as they would fail in a real-life fight club (where did those new members come from anyway?).

    It's a shame really. For a short while, /b/ was a great little internet phenomenon. Anonymity, with all its baggage, and somehow no lawsuits. Now, though, the old guard is quickly moving on. Anybody who's frequented the site can attest to this.

    As for the FOX clip... pure garbage. Most /b/tards call images "pictures", and directories "folders", and get confused between wallpaper images and desktop screenshots. The /i/nvasion people are a little closer to "hacker gangs", but even then, the "hacking" only ever amounts to SYN flooding and MySpace phishing.

    Despite my pessimistic tone, I predict that "Anonymous" will continue to grow. As more and more attention is given to these "secret websites", more and more people are clamoring to become "hackers on steroids". This new Anonymous will be larger, with more brute force at his call, but at the same time stupider, and less apt to create entertaining content. And paradoxically, he'll be less anonymous than before. I see threads where a bunch of high-schoolers recognize each other based on posted photos and local memes. They greet each other by name and socialize. On /b/.

    They say that raiding /b/ is liking pissing in an ocean of piss. But what if the people doing the raiding aren't pissing? What if they think this is a kickass beach where they can hang out and go for a swim with their friends and not worry about taking a piss while they do? It's not cancer, it's a full-on mutation.

    1. Re:/b/ is mainstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      /b/ is well-known among people who are familiar with the Internet as a culture, and not just that thing you use to download porn and music, but it's not quite mainstream yet. It doesn't really matter at this point anyway, /b/ as it once was is long dead, never to return.

      While some people point to the invasions as the beginning of the end, I think there were far more contributing factors, of which the invasions are a relatively minor contribution. The most obvious problem is that there are only so many quality posters: eventually, as it continued to grow, the average new user got progressively worse, dropping the quality of the board as a whole significantly. Another important, yet often overlooked, cause is the mods, or more specifically the lack of mods. In the /b/ of old, the moderators were highly visible and thus had a significant effect on the board, whether it was through publicly banning idiots, wordfiltering anything they felt like, abusing their power to force a meme, or whatever else. And of course, there's the eternal problem of moot being a gigantic faggot who fucks everything up.

      But though one could debate the many possible causes behind it, at this point it can't really change the massive failure /b/ has been for the past (at least) 20 million or so posts, and will be until 4chan is dead.

    2. Re:/b/ is mainstream by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Informative

      /b/ is a cesspit. A conglomeration of all that is disturbing, perverted, juvenile, inane, humorous, annoying, offensive, shocking and vile. The site is much worse than the sum of its parts.

      And yet..... I'm glad it's there. I'm glad that there still exists a place where people can be offensive, racist and rude in all manner of ways. Frankly, the place warms my heart because of its simple honesty. It doesn't pretend to be anything other than the asshole of the internet. It even revels in it. I can respect that kind of honesty.

      Ultimately, the /b/tards are more human than the legions of Politically Correct hypocrites that plague our modern society. Humanity isn't always in the images of angels or gods. Sometimes we're altogether more earthly beings, and places like /b/ should serve to remind us of that. If /b/ did not exist, it would be necessary for someone to create it, because /b/ is a part of what humanity is.

      To finish off, anytime I have browsed /b/, despite the form of the post and their extreme vulgarity, I never get the vibe that the place is filled with genuinely evil individuals spewing hate and bile. It seems to me that the /b/tards are rather more akin to jesters, or cynics than to Nazi's or the KKK. /b/tards are more likely to laugh and deride such people than side with them. The site seems to be more playful than malicious.

      I can see the hypocritical legions of politicians, reporters and busybodies rallying to condemn /b/ as hell on earth, and I can see the /b/tards laughing and mocking them as they do so. But the possibility of the /b/tards being cowed and broken by such a crusade frightens me, because I think it's entirely possible that they will be sought out and persecuted by our modern witch hunters. To me, /b/, ugly as it is, represents our freedoms, and if it falls, I can't see how anything else truly worthwhile in our society can resist being torn down as well.

      Sites like /b/ are proof that our society still free. Perversely, its continuing existence akin to an eternal flame of liberty (A flame which no doubt /b/ would collectively attempt to fart on). If it gets snuffed out, I for one won't sleep soundly at night.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    3. Re:/b/ is mainstream by Zekasu · · Score: 2, Informative

      /b/'s actually quite well known, to anyone who's been on the internet for awhile.

      I'll start by calling it the cesspool of the internet; it's where all the waste from the tubes go to die.

      That being said, /b/ is the one who brought things such as Caturday (Not "lolcats") into existence, and also sveral motivational posters. There's actually a lot of internet culture that spawns form that cesspool, which is to say the least, ironic.

      If you want to find out what /b/, or /i/ is, I recommend going there yourself. (... Not on your work computer, either.)

      [The author is in no way responsible for the aforementioned post whatsoever. What one does with the aforementioned information, etc. is solely the responsibility of the doer.]

  24. Re:/b/ raids? by skrolle2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think u need to lurk moar.

  25. And you're surprised? by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny

    You expected fair and balanced reporting from Fox News? Ever watch Fox News before? They're the first news service in history to qualify in the dramatic series category for the Emmy Awards.

  26. /huh?/ by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

    Undefined terms in Slashdot summaries are indicative of poor editorial quality, not necessarily widespread familiarity. I have no idea what "/b/" is, let alone the rest of /terms/ used throughout your post. You seem to know what you're talking about; care to provide some background for us?

  27. Fox 11 Trolled by nitehawk214 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I dont know who that "Former Anonymous" they had on there was. But he is now the greatest Troll in internet history.

    Congratulations, sir. You have my undying admiration for having the balls to do a RL troll the likes of which I have never seen before.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  28. What's wrong with people. by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is it that after all these years, there are still people who don't realize that nothing that happens on the internet is real? That hot chick you've been chatting with? There's a 95% chance she is a dude and a 5% chance that she is fat, ugly and crazy. That dude who told you he would slit your whole family's throats and shit down their esophaguses because you like original Star Trek better than the Next Generation? He's 12 years old. Porn sites that say their girls are having sex for the first time? They're lying. That e-mail you got from a guy in Nigeria who wants to give you money? You're not going to get it.

    ad infinitum.

    1. Re:What's wrong with people. by Neeth · · Score: 4, Funny

      So... what you are saying is not true?

      --
      Yes, I am the one with the legendary sig.
    2. Re:What's wrong with people. by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That hot chick you've been chatting with? There's a 95% chance she is a dude and a 5% chance that she is fat, ugly and crazy
      That may have been true ten years ago. Today, myspace, facebook, and other "social" sites are more popular with women than men. Yes, you really can meet real women online. Just make sure they aren't Chris Hansen before you meet them :-)
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  29. Re:Welcome by KoldKompress · · Score: 3, Funny

    If only we knew who they were...

  30. Conservative Fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As we've had to see for the past seven+ years, there is absolutely NOTHING which conservatives don't live in terror of.

    It's little wonder groups like Al Qaeda are outmaneuvering Bush and the other conservatives: the Bushites are so fearful, they only know what they can see from their "undisclosed location". Conservative = coward.

    Cowardservatives!

    1. Re:Conservative Fear by Chmcginn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree... as long as you preface all "conseratives" in the previous post with "neo-".

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    2. Re:Conservative Fear by Charles+W+Griswold · · Score: 5, Funny

      As we've had to see for the past seven+ years, there is absolutely NOTHING which conservatives don't live in terror of.

      It's little wonder groups like Al Qaeda are outmaneuvering Bush and the other conservatives: the Bushites are so fearful, they only know what they can see from their "undisclosed location". Conservative = coward.

      Cowardservatives!

      "there is absolutely NOTHING which conservatives don't live in terror of" you say? Hmmm, I consider myself to be somewhat conservative, and yet there are quite a few things that I don't live in terror of. For instance, I'm not at all scared of bunny rabbits. Well, perhaps if I met the bunny rabbit that was featured in the absolutely terrifying documentary "Monty Python and the Holy Grail", I might be scared, but I certainly hold no fear of your average garden-variety bunny rabbit.

      Oh, yeah, plush Cthulhu toys. They don't scare me. Well, as long as they're not the plush Cthulhu slippers of course, but that goes without saying.

      Kiwi fruit. Sure, they scare me, but I think that "terror" is pushing it a bit far. I might cross the street to avoid one, but I've never yet run screaming from a Kiwi fruit.

      In conclusion, I would like to state that your characterization of conservatives as being terrified of absolutely everything is not only inaccurate, but comes close to li . . . libe . . . written slander. Sorry, I've always been terrified of that word.

      --
      "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber" -- Plato
    3. Re:Conservative Fear by dgbrownnt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's really a shame.

      First off, you have a news station who adds a bit too much drama to their report, making it bigger than it should be. In turn, when this hits the web, it becomes a lambasting of the people who were victimized here.

      Yes, these aren't 'hackers on steroids' or anything. The report is just talking about groups of malicious internet users -- I'm sure many of them have no skills and are at best script kiddies. The point is that there are people running around harassing people. Your typical slashdotter may feel the need to make fun of the mom that found a need to get a security system and a dog, but that's EXACTLY the kind of reaction most of our parents would have if confronted with calls of death threats, posting of family members pictures and addresses online, and notices for people to do bad stuff to them.

      What you have are groups of people who do have fun being assholes to the rest of the internet. Terrorists, no. But it is a problem, none-the-less. So go ahead and laugh at the people that these assholes victimize. I, for one, don't think it's funny.

    4. Re:Conservative Fear by Genda · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I sympathize with your compassion for anyone who is the victim of malicious mischief. I was quietly sitting in my dining room, next to a window, when a BB shot by some young punk broke the window and left a nasty welt on my arm. That said, I wouldn't call the FBI, and I don't think a couple years in Gitmo, are required (though the mental image does have certain appeal) as appropriate punishment for said miscreant(s).

      The point here isn't the victims. It's not even the perpetrators... there have been pimply faced, antisocial, teenagers all the way back when young Ogg climbed up a tree and dropped a prehistoric rotten egg on Mrs. Umars head then promptly fell out of that tree laughing his furry protohuman butt off.

      There's this E-V-O-L-U-T-I-O-N thing going on, and we're supposed to be rising to higher levels of intelligence and social functionality... the FOX NEWS folks (and there fearmongering minions) would have us devolving back into stupid brutes who club one another insensible at the slightest provocation. Kids are stupid... they do stupid things... don't any of your remember the stupid things you did in the throws of puberty? It's truly the human condition. Guide them if you can, talk to them because you must, spank them if you absolutely have to, but let's not cure adolescent inanity with the threat of thermonuclear deterent. The punishment cetainly doesn't fit the crime, and god knows once the hormones subside, and the frontal lobes develop a little more, most of these young jerks will mature into perfectly descent human beings. We just need to focus a little more on what's of real importance in the world and stop knee jerking at the sound of ever "BOO" emanation from the desk of FOX NEWS, because if you knee jerk long enough, all you're doing is Goose Stepping...

  31. Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory by griffjon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not to mention that this is wll known theory worked out by Gabe and Tycho; Normal Person + Anonymity + Audience == Total fuckwad.

    Nothing new here people, move on.

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  32. Anonymous cowards unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're all the same person anyway. I'm with me!

  33. Re:What's the Background? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    tubgirl and goatse have been around *far* longer than 4chan has even existed. But yes, they do represent the mentality of the place.

  34. Re:What's the Background? by dctoastman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ah yes, an elitist bastard. How do you do?

    4chan is not the place where all this gets started. 4chan is the place where all this collects. Due to 4chan having a rather large population, it is more than likely that most soon to be popular things on the internet will pass through the place.

    These things then become popular on 4chan and outside of 4chan simultaneously and independently. 4chan then takes the credit for making it popular. For proof that 4chan cannot propagate a meme, look at Cracky. No one outside of 4chan cares.

    Don't mistake your fishbowl for the ocean.

  35. Corporate terrorism at its finest by twitter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As an amateur psychologist and observer of human nature I'd guess anyone who thinks "lulz" is cool isn't a very sophisticated thinker; this bunch are probably just alienated kids.

    Alienated? Is that the nice word for asshole? The world is full of them. Most grow out of it.

    You don't have to go very far to find paid assholes. M$, telcos, the RIAA are all engaged in some very rough and ugly astroturfing and cracking.

    They people raising the alarm over ACs are those who want an exclusive power to harass. Broadcasters, telcoms and software companies are used to having these powers and backing them up with the entire legal system. They want to exert and extend that centralized control over the internet and anonymity is incompatible with that. Eliminating our privacy and freedom to hamper assholes won't limit those who control the switches. They will continue to harass those who annoy them. When the rest of us have lost our freedom and privacy, the assholes will act with impunity.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  36. Privacy = Terrorism by PMBjornerud · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As we've had to see for the past seven+ years, there is absolutely NOTHING which conservatives don't live in terror of. I'm more worried about the connecting "anonymity" with "terrorism". Anonymity causes people to be jerks, but it's also great for free speech.

    Cue suggestions to track people by name and number online, to prevent this kind of terrorism. The police state and crackdown on piracy fits lovingly well together.

    Yes, that's a bit on the paranoid side. I'm bored.
    --
    I lost my sig.
  37. Re:overrated-MOD TO OBLIVION by toQDuj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, no. You have it wrong there.

    Anonymity is a prime ingredient for a functioning democracy. Take camera surveillance. People are going to be scared to do anything out of the ordinary, for fear of being flagged as a peculiar guy (and thus much more likely to be caught doing anything illegal, even the mundane stuff like throwing something on the ground instead of in the trashcan). This fear prevents anyone from questioning the status quo, and thus a "democracy" results in everyone agreeing with the current government.

    B.

    --
    Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
  38. Re:/b/ raids? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Informative

    WTF? Rules 1 and 2, assholes.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  39. SAGE by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE If your don't get it, you weren't meant to. SAGE.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  40. I'm a victom too! by svunt · · Score: 2, Informative

    You people laugh all you want...I've been in hiding now for six months, after receiving credible threats from the terrorist group "LOLCATS"

  41. Extreme Disappointment by Uberwabawaba · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have to say I am incredibly disappointed in this post and some of the responses. This group is sending death threats and threatening to blow up stadiums, if that is not the definition of 'terrorism' then I cannot imagine what is. I am suspicious of the motives of those who would defend a group like this.

  42. Re:they are harmless! by Uberwabawaba · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Every single thing you said in this post are assumptions. You stated absolutely nothing that is factual unless of course you are actually a part of this group. While I admit they are probably are a bunch of social rejects the problem is you only have to be wrong once, and as soon as some innocent person actually dies people like you miraculously just fade into the shadows. As the old adage says, "Its only funny until someone gets hurt"