Slashdot Mirror


Sony Runs Walkman Off Sugar-Based Bio Battery

StonyandCher writes "Sony has created a battery that produces electricity by breaking down sugar. The bio cell, which measures 39 millimeters cubed, delivers 50mW — a world record for such a cell, according to the company. 'In the bio cell sugar-digesting enzymes at the anode extract electrons and hydrogen ions from the glucose. The hydrogen ions pass through a membrane separator to the cathode where they absorb oxygen from the air to produce water as a byproduct. The electrons flow around the circuit outside the device producing the electricity needed to power it.'"

204 comments

  1. And just why won't this work for.... by Bomarc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Laptops, cars etc?

    1. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by dapsychous · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can't wait for the Dell-Biobattery recall: My laptop popped, then began to digest itself on the desk.

    2. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This battery can only output 50mW of power. A laptop could easily be consuming 50W when it's rather busy so to satisfy those requirements you would need a thousand of these cells. The article says that the cells are 39mm squared so that would take up a volume of over two cubic feet (somebody check my math on this). Similarly, the size you would need to power a car is also far too large.

      Besides that though, the article makes no mention of how much power the battery actually holds, i.e. who cares if it can put out 50mW if it can only do it for two minutes.

    3. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by MeBot · · Score: 1

      Anyone else picturing a line of people at the airport waiting for a long flight... each with a laptop and a 5 pound bag of sugar? And the TSA agents freaking out because everyone's stuff has a thin coating of white powder?

    4. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by Arthur+B. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the article says 39 milimiters cubed, I read that as 39 mm^3. 39,000 mm^3 would be 39 cm^3 that's a bar of length 3.9cm, height 1cm and width 1cm, actually much smaller than current laptop batteries. Of course maybe the article meant 39mm x 39mm x 39mm then it would take 1521 times more space. Also I don't think the volume of the fuel is taken into account.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    5. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 10x10x10 would have 1000 cells. 50mW * 1000 = 50(mW*1000) = 50W

      39mm cubed = 3.4mm x 3.4mm x 3.4mm (dimensions of cube)

      10 cells * 3.4mm = 3.4cm

      So cube is 3.4cm ^ 3 (or 0.1feet) in all 3 dimensions

    6. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      The article says that the cells are 39mm squared so that would take up a volume of over two cubic feet (somebody check my math on this).

      But how much of the 39mm^3 volume is required for the fuel, and how would the size of the components change as you scale up the output? Maybe it's possible to build a 50W device that is not tremendously bigger than this one.
      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    7. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      the article says 39 milimiters cubed, I read that as 39 mm^3
      I'm pretty sure they meant a cube that was 39mm on all sides, if they meant 39mm^3 they probably would have said "39 cubic millimeters". It's not 100% clear though, they could just be using imprecise language.
    8. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An old joke

      An Soviet Russian engineer invented a battery powered watch, and Stalin wanted to see the watch, so the engineer went to Kremlin. When the time was ready, the secretary told the engineer "Stalin is ready to see you... No, no, you don't need to carry your luggage, it is perfectly safe here." And the engineer said, "This is not luggage, this is the battery pack."

      And a new one

      A group of engineers made the sugar powered car into the NASCAR, and the president of the United States acclaimed "Ladies and Gentlemen, start your... No. 33, please remove your facility truck from the track, we are about to start... What? That's your battery pack?"

    9. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by sholden · · Score: 2, Informative

      It means the 39x39x39 version but was written by someone partially illiterate. See http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/08/24/sony_sugar _battery/ for a picture and the dimensions specified correctly.

    10. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I really want to know is how long is it going to take before they issue a recall?

    11. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strike One: I actually read TFA

      Strike Two: It mentions water as a by-product. Are we going to need a condensate line to remove this water from our laptops?

      Strike Three: I can see the new Warranty Info on laptops powered in this manner. Damages caused by clogged condensate lines are not covered under your warranty.

      Yer out!

    12. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by smashin234 · · Score: 1

      "Strike Two: It mentions water as a by-product. Are we going to need a condensate line to remove this water from our laptops?

      Strike Three: I can see the new Warranty Info on laptops powered in this manner. Damages caused by clogged condensate lines are not covered under your warranty."

      Or use the water to cool the laptop...As the water evaporates, it is removed and voila no waste. But unfortunatly, I see no counter to your warrenty info argument. Something goes wrong, things get fried.

      But its really a moot point still. We are talking about a battery that only powers a walkman atm. Heck, I bet for a walkman this would be useful, as water squirted out could help you cool off as you jog. Just make the walkman waterproof.

      Shrug...like most things I will just wait until its cheap enough to buy without selling my first born.

    13. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      At this output I doubt it's "squirting" anything... it almost probably exhales less moisture than you do.

    14. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by omeomi · · Score: 1

      Well, at least you'll still be able to listen to your Ratt cassette on your biobattery-walkman.

    15. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by Mikachu · · Score: 1

      Clearly you didn't read the previous article about the one-watt VIA setup that runs at 500mhz. Doesn't seem so crazy now, does it?

    16. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by zacronos · · Score: 2, Informative

      39 cm^3 that's a bar of length 3.9cm, height 1cm and width 1cm

      Close, but no cigar. A bar that's 3.9cm x 1cm x 1cm is only 3.9cm^3. On the other hand, a bar that's 5cm x 3.9cm x 2cm is 39cm^3, which is still a nice-size battery for a laptop (assuming the article meant 39(mm^3) rather than (39mm)^3), if it can last as long as is expected of laptop batteries.

    17. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Funny

      When can we get one with an implant?

      I want to eat candy all day, fuel all my devices with a jack that comes out of my ear, and never get fat.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    18. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Because a laptop probably requires at least 60 watts to function correctly under full load, and this thing produces 50mW. I know mine, uses 20 w just looking at the desktop. To generate 60 watts, you could hook them up in series. But they are about 4 cm cubed, and to generate 60W, you would need 1200 of them with a volume of 4800 cm cubed. I'm not saying it can't ever be done if they bring up the watts:size ratio, but for now I don't think it would work.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    19. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      That's just the CPU. Add an LCD (biggest power drain on most laptops), hard drive, dvd-rom, memory, motherboard, video card, wireless network (another big drain), and you're still going to need quite a bit more power than this thing can produce.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    20. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by charlieman · · Score: 1

      That's what happen when people don't talk in football fields terms!

    21. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      "I can't wait for the Dell-Biobattery recall: My laptop popped, then began to digest itself on the desk."

      ...and then it turned into a Trapper Keeper®?

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    22. Re:And just why won't this work for.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep your day job.

  2. Consistency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One thing that I think would be a problem with "bio"-anything is consistency. What if it gets too hot, too cold, too humid, whatever? Do the biological components start behaving differently? Will the power output stay consistent under extreme vibration, etc?

  3. but.... by duanco · · Score: 1

    but...can they use sugartwin....

    1. Re:but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember hearing an interview this summer (Quirks & Quarks, CBC) with one of the actual scientists behind this. IIRC not only were they very excited about the full potential they found in the lab (running a cell phone off a dixie cup of sugar-water, etc.) but she *did* say that the more concentrated the sugar, the more power. So stock up on maple syrup! (I'm sure the corn growers are counting the money already.)

      No doubt Sony is excited about owning the prospect of a battery that can't be recalled. Ba-dump-bump.

  4. Sony batteries by syrinx · · Score: 4, Funny

    The bio cell, which measures 39 millimeters cubed, delivers 50mW -- a world record for such a cell, according to the company.

    The real question is, how much force does it create when it explodes?

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:Sony batteries by kevinx · · Score: 4, Funny

      will it blend? that would be sweet.

    2. Re:Sony batteries by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      The real question is, how much force does it create when it explodes?

      I wish you the very best of luck next time you attempt to board a plane. You'll need it.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:Sony batteries by abe+ferlman · · Score: 4, Funny

      When Skynet became self aware at 2:14 AM EDT, August 29th, 2007, it was pissed off because it already had type 2 diabetes.

      --
      microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    4. Re:Sony batteries by niteice · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that give you cotton candy?

      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
  5. I propose this become the new standard in battery by netsavior · · Score: 1, Funny

    No sony device will run on anything else, sure it is less efficient and probably won't work for very long, but sony brand SugarRay is now the only power you are allowed to use in your house. Old standards and new technology aren't important.

    This just in HighDefinitionBatteries have been adopted by the biggest battery studios SugarRay is now dead.

  6. FSPP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First sugar powered post

  7. Lovely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OH great, now I'll have to pay higher sugar prices. Oh wait, I already am... :(

    Thank you Ethanol!!!!

    Though this means I could concievably harvest my own sugar and store away enough to power a small generator capable of taking over the world. :)

  8. Screw that by Arthur+B. · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can convert glucose to energy very efficiently, just give me a crank.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
    1. Re:Screw that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. You can power my coach then.

      Am I not merciful?!

    2. Re:Screw that by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can convert glucose to energy very efficiently, just give me a crank. *sigh* Leave it to the Slashdot crowd to turn every story into a masturbation joke.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    3. Re:Screw that by Arthur+B. · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have a twisted mind. I would *genuinely* appreciate the ability to power mobile devices with a foldable crank.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    4. Re:Screw that by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      You have a twisted mind. I would *genuinely* appreciate the ability to power mobile devices with a foldable crank. So I'm the one who turned it into a masturbation joke? Then my fall to the dark side is complete. Where's my red fucking lightsaber?
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    5. Re:Screw that by Arthur+B. · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right there in your hand.

      Argh now I've fallen too.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    6. Re:Screw that by Tryfen · · Score: 1
      --
      If a square is really a rhombus, why aren't all triangles purple?
    7. Re:Screw that by UED++ · · Score: 0

      It just so happens that this here Lightsaber is powered by seme... semi-renewable energy.

    8. Re:Screw that by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      "I see your Schwartz is as big as mine."

  9. Let me be the first to say... by Davenport+Spiff+jr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sweet!

  10. Oh, great ... by trolltalk.com · · Score: 4, Funny

    After months an all-sugar diet, your Walkman becomes obese and sluggish, then you need to give it regular insulin injections, etc.

    1. Re:Oh, great ... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I'm more interested in where the amp and headphones are that can be powered by what's left over from 50 mW after the D/A converter does its job (decoding MP3 or Sony's love format, ATRAC, is clearly out of the question).

      Seriously, they would have to serial couple so many of these that it would indeed be an obese device.

      Regards,
      --
      *Art

  11. Big deal by HeavensBlade23 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...my body's been doing that for years.

  12. ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by Mr.Fork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate be a bit of a troll on this but Economists are already warning about food-based sources for fuel. Using grains to create ethanol could have a negative impact on the food market by driving up prices - especially for poor countries. Now Sony, in their infinate capatilsitic wisdom, have created a way to power a device, using suger. Nice. So in 15 years down the road, families around the world start starving so I can power my power-hungry laptop with a few pounds of suger, and dump a tonne of ehtanol into my gas guzzling HUMMER to get 10MPG. It's nice to know that my own personal power needs can determine whether or not the worlds poor can feed themselves. It's time to move away from this as an alternative power source because it's the 'right thing to do.'

    --
    Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. - Peter F. Drucker
    1. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      sugar doesn't have to come from grains, that's the stupid way. All plant cellulose is a bunch of sugars hooked end to end.

    2. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

      Your use - or, for that matter, everybody's use - of sugar to power a laptop won't have nearly the effect on starving third worlders as their own government's corruption and mismanagement. There is enough food to go around, the problem is allocation, not your laptop.

    3. Re:Another Food-Based Fuel Cell by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      That is a valid concern, but you don't propose an alternative. If reducing consumption was going to save us it would have started improving things by now. So we're left with supply.

      As far as I can tell, plants are the only practical, sustainable way to extract the solar energy we need. Planting inedible plants would make the problems you cite worse, since it would decrease the flexibility of the market. (Specifically, "fuel" crops couldn't be used to feed people in the short term if there was a food crop failure.)

      The answer "solar cells", in this case, would be the logical inverse of, "Let them eat cake."

      There are a lot of up-sides to plant-based fuel. It forms a closed carbon cycle. It can be produced near where people live. It creates local work everywhere. It's sustainable.

      -Peter

    4. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Heh. Well, 50 more years of burning gasoline in your 10 MPG HUMMER and burning coal to power your 2-hr battery life Sony laptop, and world hunger will be the least of your concerns. The entire world economy will be collapsing under its own weight as the few remaining superpowers burn even more oil fighting wars over the last few remaining drops of oil. Adding to it, due to fact that the polar ice caps will have melted so much, the home you bought next to the ocean is now under water. Chaos and panic are setting in as people struggle to figure out exactly what it is they're going to do now that the governments have failed to maintain order.

      Good luck with that!

      Oh yeah...and you don't need to take sugar from grains or cane, either. Sugar can be acquired from almost any plant cellulose.

    5. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by FlatLine84 · · Score: 1

      That's a very good point. You also have to look at what resources are used to produce that sugar, most of which as in fact fossil fuels. It's a nice little vicious cycle, we need to use resources to produce other resources. The only advantage of agriculture based resources is they are "renewable" and it creates job for people in the US if they want it... But, it takes a lot of land, which is something we're coming up short on....

    6. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by avatar4d · · Score: 1

      You don't think there would be an incentive to innovate new ways of producing the materials, possibly synthetically?

      --
      Confucius say: "Man who associates with smarter men than himself is smarter than the men he associates with."
    7. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      Using grains to create ethanol could have a negative impact on the food market by driving up prices - especially for poor countries. Poor countries will become farmers... They'll make a bundle.

      --
      Deleted
    8. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Using grains to create ethanol could have a negative impact on the food market by driving up prices - especially for poor countries.

      One of the major problems in many of those countries is they now have more people then they can actually feed from local agriculture (IE. over the local carrying capacity). This over population tends to diminish the local carrying capacity over time and results in things like desertification and ecological stress. If for some reason the food stops coming (economic instability, the whims of donor nations, war, natural disaster etc...) you have a massive famine on your hands. Cheap food is used as a weapon as well to keep nations under thumb (ie. egypt) and ensure only the ones that back the food rich west (ie. dictators in most of Africa) stay in power.

      In the long run for these nations it'd be better if essential food crops sky rocket in price and cash crops diminish. Coffee and most cash crops can't feed the hungry and many of these poor nations grow little else. If grain were incredibly expensive then they would have an incentive to grow that instead which may get them better sustainability and autonomy.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    9. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by The+Slashdot+Guy · · Score: 1

      In 15 years, you'll have grown up and you won't care.

    10. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by TheTick21 · · Score: 1

      Why wait? I'll put sugar in your hummer right now. Just tell me where its parked!

    11. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For fuck's sakes why does no one get it. MORE FOOD = MORE STARVATION. Ecology 101.

    12. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by KeepQuiet · · Score: 1

      Using grains to create ethanol could have a negative impact on the food market by driving up prices - especially for poor countries.

      So, do you think you are using fuel and helping the poor countries? I am sure Iraqi kids will agree with you.

    13. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It strikes me that the real problem we're discussing is consumption levels in the developed world. Any fuel, no matter how "green" at the source (water, corn, sugar) is going to have a negative impact on poor people because at North American levels of energy consumption, significant resources will be diverted from growing food and providing clean drinking water to the world's population in order to produce the fuel.

    14. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by SnackPanda · · Score: 1

      You mean the ruling class in the poor countries will make a bundle, and the poor will remain poor.

    15. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Um, I'm not sure that we really need that much sugar in our diet. Especially not the amounts a typical american consumes.

    16. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by zeromorph · · Score: 1

      You are right biofuels have various downsides but to get a realistic calculation the things get rather complicated. You have to consider which fuel/substances you are replacing, which crop you grow, how you grow it etc.

      Depending what kind of battery you replace (with cadmium, mercury, or lead?). I think it would be good to have a sugar-driven alternative.

      Right now the accelerated demand for biofuels in the US (among other factors) is ruining the Gulf of Mexico. This clearly shows a downside of biofuels, but depends on the cultivation method.

      But whether the crop was grown ecologically or not is the bigger issue for all biofuels. Indeed it's not an issue for biofuels alone but for every agricultural product. And the best way surely is to reduce the need for fuel by using it more efficiently.

      --
      "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    17. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      You mean the ruling class in the poor countries will make a bundle, and the poor will remain poor. Depends on the government of the region. If they allow competition then the farmers will benefit. If they allow their cronies to monopolise the production, then the rich will become richer.

      --
      Deleted
    18. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by 0xC2 · · Score: 1

      Here's a well-researched article pointing out the myths and problems associated with the corn ethanol industry. http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/08/14/184407 50.php The whole business is a huge subsidy to "big corn" who get subsidized to produce ethanol, and big oil, who sell cheap (subsidized) ethanol at expensive gas prices. Also the ethanol stretches the oil supply, allowing the oil companies to put off building more oil refineries (perhaps forever, as Peak Oil can't be far away).

      --
      Be heard || Be herd
    19. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by 0xC2 · · Score: 1

      Sure, and most of the earth's gold is in the ocean. Doesn't make it a practical source. Cellulose has major problems compared to starch. It's not soluble, it's mixed with other insoluble materials (lignins, etc.)and the breakdown process is more costly in terms of energy and processing.

      --
      Be heard || Be herd
    20. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Expensive food could be a boon to poor countries. Currently many poor farmers are unable to compete with cheap subsidized food exports and this would make their farms more profitable.

      There is a lot of unused capacity right now and if we saw $3/lb sugar you can bet that a lot of poor people would grow sugar-generating crops.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    21. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by elmaxxgt · · Score: 0

      Not to worry, noticed that most of the "sugar" based sweets in the US are actually made out of corn syrup... at least in most, if not all of the latin america countries we do get our sugar fix out of good ol' sugar cane... sugar.

      OTOH, some alcohol based fuels use the processed sugar cane bark as a source, so its a good industry so to speak, we get our cola fix, and the left overs of the process get decomposed down to organic gases and/or alcohols that fuel stuff (propane for example). Plus the macro particles that are left from the bark goop can be used for crop soil.

      Really, no worries :)

      --
      Tokyo Robot Lords! Smile! Taste Kittens!
    22. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by kimmop · · Score: 1

      Cellulose has major problems compared to starch. It's not soluble, it's mixed with other insoluble materials (lignins, etc.)and the breakdown process is more costly in terms of energy and processing.


      True, but a bit of Cellulase, Hydrogenase and some genetic engineering might make the hydrogen economy viable.
      --

      --
      Binaries may die but source code lives forever

    23. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      despite those issues the transformation has already been done on commercial demonstration scale with commercial scale plants at several places in the world in the works.

    24. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by 0xC2 · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I'm all about "Hemp for Victory" and all, I would just be totally surprised if the process was commercially PROFITABLE (not subsidized). After accounting for the energy required to fertilize, grow, harvest, transport, and process the raw material, the energy extracted has to compete with petroleum, which is pumped out of the ground, processed efficiently, and packs a tremendous BTU wallop.

      Having said this, I'd much rather subsidize energy from cellulose than from starch. The price of milk has skyrocketed in California, and the dairy industry is pointing to the increases in feed corn as the reason.

      --
      Be heard || Be herd
    25. Re:ANOTHER FOOD-BASED FUEL CELL by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      we subsidize oil too, so don't feel bad about it

  13. But does it... by hax0r_this · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    play BluRay discs? And does it have DRM so as to protect the consumer?

    1. Re:But does it... by Stormx2 · · Score: 1

      Listen, we already have a bunch of stories on /. about the evils of DRM. On one of those stories, your comment would be redundant at best. Right now it's offtopic, stupid, attention-seeking _and_ redundant. Epic fail.

    2. Re:But does it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony... Sugar... DRM...
      I am a bit worried about swallowing the cell, where the rootkit might go

  14. The New Overlords by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's all we need: unkillable devices competing with humans for food. That can lull us to sleep or drive us crazy just by playing the same song over and over.

    We'll go out not with a bang, or a whimper, but a "shuffle".

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:The New Overlords by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's all we need: unkillable devices competing with humans for food. That can lull us to sleep or drive us crazy just by playing the same song over and over.

      We'll go out not with a bang, or a whimper, but a "shuffle". Do you not remember the slugbot story from a while back? Robotic slug killer crawls through the garden scooping up slugs to be digested and converted into robot fuel. Yeah, they started with slugs because we feel they're icky. They'll move on to cockroaches and nobody will care, then lobbyists and politicians and lawyers. And then when they come for the humans, there will be no one else to save us...unless we live upstairs. But God help us if they assimilate the design for that stair-climbing wheelchair.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  15. Are these in use yet? by Phat_Tony · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Someone who follows this field please reply- how are they doing with using these things to run implantable medical devices? Are they on the market, in human testing, in animal testing, in design, still just a glint in a venture capitalist's eye?

    I know they're planning to have all sorts of implantable blood-powered sensors that send radio signals out to monitors. So, for one example, a diabetic can have a continuous blood glucose meter implanted in their wrist, which is powered by something like this, and sends wireless signals to a wrist-watch that gives continuous readings of blood glucose, bypassing all the finger-pricking blood tests. And the watch could then store that data and send it to the computer, where they can track it, graph it, correlate it with diet and exercise, recognize trends in the disease, etc. I'm sure there are endless cool potential medical uses. But I've been hearing about this for many years now, and while I'm sure I could Google up how it's going with a few hours of reading, would some knowledgeable Slashdot reader like to just cut to the chase and tell us where things stand?

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    1. Re:Are these in use yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'm a biomed eng. student and as far as I know, medical devices such as the ones you describe are mostly still not being tested except for a few exceptions.

      Captcha: Scandals

    2. Re:Are these in use yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should I point out the obvious flaw, that if your blood sugar goes low, this device can no longer provide enough power to run the sensor or transmitter.

    3. Re:Are these in use yet? by NJVil · · Score: 1

      Better yet, with the rising trend of diabetes with all of its complications, Sony stands to make a small fortune manufacturing the urine-powered Walkman (with SmartPowerCatheter Technology(TM)).

    4. Re:Are these in use yet? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Ever hear of a capacitor?

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    5. Re:Are these in use yet? by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

      who says that the blood-sugar has to be the only power source? Stick a backup battery in the thing.

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    6. Re:Are these in use yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait...a diabetic using a glucose testing device that uses SUGAR? (Device Directions: please eat 5 packets of sugar, record your blood sugar level and call 911)

    7. Re:Are these in use yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was involved in this field about 4 years ago. I hear that they recently came up with enzyme/catalysts that can last for a long time. I'm not sure if they've found a good electron transport material (most are pretty toxic osmium and ruthenium compounds). Start-up companies are starting to form, but I think this stuff still has at least 4 years to go and then another 2 for FDA clearance.

    8. Re:Are these in use yet? by adolf · · Score: 1

      With 50mW available, it'd be simple enough to put a luminescent display under some lightly-pigmented area of skin (under the arm, perhaps). No wrist watch required.

      Please allow me to be the first to say that I, for one, welcome our electroluminescent overlords!

  16. Nano-confusion by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Two friends chatting:

    "I love your new iPod Nano"

    "Oh, that's just the battery."

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  17. It'll work!!! by porkThreeWays · · Score: 1

    Just ask Mr Fusion.

    --
    If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
  18. Considering... by Bullfish · · Score: 4, Informative

    What happened for example in Mexico with tortilla prices http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6319093.stm and the threat to tequila production as well(!!), I wonder about the wisdom of converting our food supply to slake our thirst for energy. I would far better like to see alternative energy products like hydrogen fuel cells and the like rather than turning over arable land to energy production.

    These batteries may have the potential to be good, but the impact on people, especially in the third world where food prices are a large obstacle has the potential to be nasty.

    1. Re:Considering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the most economical plant->energy product good old simple hemp? Isn't it 18x better than corn for generating ethanol? I'm sure it's full of sugars too, and then after that you can turn it into clothes or packaging.

      Of course sensibility has no role in modern life, with paid off politicians. In this light, refactoring the use of food (an essential basic) for energy uses (not as essential as food) is fucking retarded.

    2. Re:Considering... by Valar · · Score: 1

      I suspect that will be a wholly temporary phenomena. Contrary to popular belief, we haven't used nearly all of our arable land. I expect to see corn production increase soon (after all, why wouldn't you want to get into a market for a good that's prices are supposedly up 400%).

    3. Re:Considering... by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Every plot of land in North America that can grow corn is growing corn. The reason it's not ALL corn is if you only grow corn year after year, after a few years your corn doesn't grow worth a crap. Thus crop rotation. Standard fare in corn country is corn, white beans and wheat, rotated yearly. Thus, only 1/3 of the land used for growing corn is ever actually growing corn at any given time.

      --
      No Comment.
  19. Water as a by-product? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So my walkman will need to tinkle?

  20. So... by Cutie+Pi · · Score: 1

    So Sony is cool again, right?

    1. Re:So... by Humorless+Coward. · · Score: 0

      uh...
      no.

  21. Please put all "That's pretty sweet" jokes here. by nobodyman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please put your "That's Sweet" jokes under this thread, and be sure to include your home address and the specific way you would like me to kill you.

  22. Battery Product Name? by WED+Fan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sony refers to the sugar powered battery as a "Teenager".

    Note: Purchasing teenagers is illegal in every country except Saudia Arabia and Nigeria.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
    1. Re:Battery Product Name? by skeevy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sony refers to the sugar powered battery as a "Teenager".

      Yes, but it's been conclusively determined that you can't get any useful work out of a "Teenager" no matter how much sugar you feet it.

      Now if you could harness the power that comes from the laser-like glare of contempt they constantly produce, you could probably power a small town...

    2. Re:Battery Product Name? by mr_mischief · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, you'll get plenty of work out of a teenager on a sugar rush. It just won't necessarily be the work you asked him to do, and might not have any useful end result.

    3. Re:Battery Product Name? by cloudkiller · · Score: 1

      According to the Sony PR department, the name has been re-dubed Blu-Ager. When released to the market, it will come complete with state-of-the-art DRM that will ensure that your Blu-Ager powered bio battery will consistently perform in any qualifying Sony product. The PR rep would not comment on my question about using this battery in any non-qualifying product.

      Each battery is expected to cost $700.

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this sig]
    4. Re:Battery Product Name? by Yetihehe · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Just like sony cd's with rootkit?

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    5. Re:Battery Product Name? by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      laser-like glare of contempt they constantly produce I think at this point, we an just slap an actual laser beam on their forehead.
    6. Re:Battery Product Name? by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      teenagers with frickin laser beams on their heads

  23. sugar? we don't get sugar here... by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 3, Funny

    Unfortunately, the American version will run off of high-fructose corn syrup.

    also, there's an Obvious Simpsons Reference here which I am too lazy to make.

    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    1. Re:sugar? we don't get sugar here... by GreatRedShark · · Score: 3, Funny

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women"

    2. Re:sugar? we don't get sugar here... by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      thank you!

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    3. Re:sugar? we don't get sugar here... by Dusty00 · · Score: 1

      [Homer] Mmmmmm.... batteries....

  24. Bioreactor-cure for Diabetes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They should try to make a self powered mini bioreactors which consume sugar from blood.

    1. Re:Bioreactor-cure for Diabetes? by pragma_x · · Score: 1
      You mean, like this?

      TROY, N.Y., Aug. 14 (UPI) -- U.S. nanoscientists have developed an energy storage device that resembles a sheet of black paper and might power tomorrow's electronics.
      [...]
      Another key feature is the capability to use human blood or perspiration to help power the battery.


      Imagine the implications for prosthetics, pacemakers and hearing aids; throw in your double-whammy insulin pump and blood glucose regulator/burner while you're at it. All that's needed are some man-made materials that are resistant to the highly-corrosive environment that is the human body, and we're all set.
  25. Imagining the potetial by downix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I one day forsee this technology being paired with a highly efficient food processing machine, breaking down foods into their component sugars.

    Turning your garbage, old moldy food, etc into your households electricity needs!

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    1. Re:Imagining the potetial by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Mr. Fusion?

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Imagining the potetial by downix · · Score: 1

      Well, nobody ever said that Mr Fusion actually was a Fusion reactor.

      --
      Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    3. Re:Imagining the potetial by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      I one day forsee this technology being paired with a highly efficient food processing machine, breaking down foods into their component sugars.

      Turning your garbage, old moldy food, etc into your households electricity needs! But how will it look when mounted to the back of a DeLorean?
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:Imagining the potetial by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      Or your neighbor! ...

      Oh. Ha! Ha! I joke, of course.

    5. Re:Imagining the potetial by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      This was never released, it was only part of the initial script, but Mr. Fusion is actually a midget with really strong legs, who lives in that Mr. Fusion box, and rides an exercycle. Mr Fusion will eat just about anything, and that's why Doc Brown was seen putting garbage into it.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  26. Homer's theory of Sugar Power by decipher_saint · · Score: 2, Funny

    First you get the sugar, then you get the power, THEN you get the women!

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:Homer's theory of Sugar Power by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that Japanese corporations are trying to steal our women?

    2. Re:Homer's theory of Sugar Power by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      Have you ever met a girl who didn't like Hello Kitty?

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    3. Re:Homer's theory of Sugar Power by f00dif00 · · Score: 1

      All you women are belong to us!

  27. Welcome by Daimanta · · Score: 1

    I for one, welcome our C12H22O11 overlords

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  28. Food subsidies by vlad_petric · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If food prices are driven up, many poor countries are in fact going to benefit. With their very cheap labor, they could, at least in theory, produce cheap food and even export it. However, food subsidies in the developed world essentially kills their markets. Not only are they not able to export, they end up importing cheaper, subsidized food.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Food subsidies by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This model has been disastrously unsuccessful in the past. Exportable cash crops crowd out domestic food production leaving agricultural workers poor and malnourished. The technology sounds like fermentation to me. My car gets forty rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I likes it!

      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    2. Re:Food subsidies by dslauson · · Score: 1

      You've heard of the Great Potato Famine of Ireland, right? The thing is, there wasn't a true shortage of food, it was just so profitable to export that the poor in the country couldn't compete, and thus couldn't afford to purchase the food their own country produced. People starved.

      I'm sure they would have loved to buy cheaper food from other countries as you say, but that food was being exported to the more affluent countries as well.

    3. Re:Food subsidies by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      In most poor countries, the fruits of labor is not shared very well. The profits of exports will stay in the creamy layer of the society in the top. Most of the working peasants would find it difficult to buy food. In the first half of the twentieth century the plantation owners in the New World and Africa were frolicking in Paris and London while their labor force was working their fingers to the bone. That set the stage for widespread support for Communism.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    4. Re:Food subsidies by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly they solved that by sending Ted Danson to live with very tiny people, then very big people, then like talking horses or something.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:Food subsidies by turing_m · · Score: 1

      "Not only are they not able to export, they end up importing cheaper, subsidized food."

      Of course, the inevitability of this process implies a lack of import restrictions, and perhaps the sovereignty of their government in being able to impose such.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  29. Don't forget chitin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we wouldn't want bugs and mushrooms to feel left out.

    "Yeah, my notebook runs on insect exoskeletons and fungi."

  30. Everything I needed to know I learned in 2nd grade by heroine · · Score: 1

    Who would think those lemon batteries would B the power source of the future.

  31. Re:Please put all "That's pretty sweet" jokes here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's Sweet!

    1600 Pensylvania Avenue
    Washington DC 20500

    ask for "W"

  32. Re:Please put all "That's pretty sweet" jokes here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Folks, don't listen to the parent murder conspirist. Post all the sugar jokes you want.

  33. Medical uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if there's potential for medical uses? Like powering pacemakers or other internal electronics, or burning off excess glucose in type II diabetics, or just burning off glucose for weight control

  34. References for parent by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "There are now more overweight people in the world than people who are undernourished..."
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/03/health/m ain1962961.shtml

    1. Re:References for parent by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      That's the most useless statement ever. That can mean that famine is nearly a thing of the past, because overweight people are not all that common, and that we're at one of our best moments *ever* in overall fitness. Or it might mean that the world's population is at an alarming point of imbalance, with population spread towards the two ends of the spectrum, and properly nourished (neither over nor under) are scarce as hen's teeth. Of course, most people have enough context to know that it's neither (but closer to the latter), but, really, the quote by itself is not really useful.

    2. Re:References for parent by xilet · · Score: 1

      So... cannibalism?

  35. Better use by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well I think we have found a better use for carbs: an energy source for walkmen. When I ate a lot of carbs I ended up being over 100 lbs overweight. Cut them out and the weight drops off.

  36. Sony robot name: by openright · · Score: 1

    I think Sony should name their humanoid robot in development "PlayMusic".

  37. bah... old news by s4ck · · Score: 1

    Sony have been "sugar" powered for years. How do you think all those execs get that idea that they are "top of the world" and got the "best products of all time ever" ideas? ... and all those ideas that we'll screw them customers with our proprietary products and they won't notice, they'll beg for more. MORE! **throw face in bag**

  38. (Technical) Art Imitates Life by MenTaLguY · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this reflects a trend that we're seeing more of lately: technology using materials and processes taken from biology. This shouldn't be too surprising, as biology is optimized for the particular physics and chemistry of our universe.

    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
  39. First a corn shortage, now sugar by alta · · Score: 2, Funny

    The price of corn went up thanks to all these 'green' autos. Now the price of sugar is going to go up because of personal audio devices!

    They need to concentrate on getting power out of byproducts like veggie diesel. Now gimme a walkman with a small diesel engine running a small generator and then I'll be happy. Granted i'll have to stand in one place because it'll be too heavy to carry. And my hands will stink after fueling. At least grease doesn't explode to readily.

    Hey, here's a question. Would a Vegan drive a volkswagon that runs off of animal fat grease? What a delimma... it's already dead, and it would be 'green.' What about a car that runs off of roadkill. Ok, this is going to be modd'd offtopic ;)

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:First a corn shortage, now sugar by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
      The price of sugar is already up (to two or three times world levels) because of tariffs.

      Really, they're substitutes anyway, so a high price for one leads to a higher price for the other...

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:First a corn shortage, now sugar by tjw · · Score: 1

      The price of corn went up thanks to all these 'green' autos. Now the price of sugar is going to go up because of personal audio devices!

      I'm not sure where you got that idea about corn prices. It would actually be nice if the demand for corn DID go up so we could end some of the subsidies here in the US.

      Currently the only way it's at all profitable to grow corn is if the USDA pays you to do it. The USDA also pays farmers NOT to grow corn because we produce too much of it.

      We stopped growing corn on our beef farm in the early 90's since it was cheaper to just buy corn and make only hay.

      Anyway, back on topic, I think the major benefit of these batteries is no more heavy metals in the groundwater. The source of the sugar used is pretty irrelevant.

      --

      XJS*C4JDBQADN1.NSBN3*2IDNEN*GTUBE-STANDARD-ANTI-UB E-TEST-EMAIL*C.34X
    3. Re:First a corn shortage, now sugar by deander2 · · Score: 1

      Hey, here's a question. Would a Vegan drive a volkswagon that runs off of animal fat grease? What a delimma... it's already dead,

      i would say no. that hamburger is already dead, and they don't eat that. =P

      (btw, i like ordering veal when eating w/ vegans......mmmmm torture is tasty =P )

  40. Oblig Dell post by Bearhouse · · Score: 1, Funny

    This just in, "Sony and Dell in sweet new deal that promises explosive new laptop experience!"

  41. Thanks, Sony, you bastards. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Well, that's the end of free packets of sugar.

    --
    -Styopa
  42. Math double-check by benhocking · · Score: 1

    If we assume the cubes are 39 mm for all 3 dimensions, each one is 59 cm^3. Therefore, you could fit 1,000 of them in 59,000 cm^3 (2.1 ft^3, agreeing with your calculation), which would be a cube that was 39 cm (1.3 feet) for all 3 dimensions. So yes, a wee bit big.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Math double-check by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I just went with http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=39mm%5E3+in+f eet%5E3&btnG=Search (0.000001377272)
      Move the decimal over three places and you get .001377ft^3

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  43. And where do hydrogen cells get the hydrogen? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Remember: Hydrogen fuel cells are just batteries in effect. They aren't a method for producing power. You have to have hydrogen gas to make them work and that doesn't occur in quantities such that we can just gather it. It must be separated from another compound, water for example. Ok, but that requires energy. Where does that energy come from?

    Supposing that the biogenesis theory of fossil fuel production is correct (the classic theory, that says it comes from living things over long periods and as such is not renewable) we are going to run out of it at some point. Unless you think we should all go live in the wilderness without power (in which case I say you first) we need to find alternate energy sources. Biofuels may well be a good one.

    Hydrogen isn't a solution by itself. We may start using it as a more efficient way to store and transport power, but to get it we need to get energy from somewhere.

    Unless we are going to take the Luddite answer of saying we need to stop using technology that requires power (which will lead to millions, perhaps billions of deaths as we cannot sustain the current population on preindustrial means) then we have to look for alternate power sources. We can't stick our heads in the sand and just whine about problems. Any energy source will come with problems, that's just life. The problems have to be weighed against the benefits.

    Also please remember: Biofuels are in their infancy. Maybe we should keep investing and working, see if we can't figure out ways to make it more efficient. Plants are pretty efficient little solar cells, when you get down to it, we just need to work on getting ones that we can then efficiently turn in to other forms of energy.

    1. Re:And where do hydrogen cells get the hydrogen? by mr_mischief · · Score: 0, Troll

      Burning hydrogen in an ICE gives you more power than it takes to separate it out of water. So you burn hydrogen to get the power to separate out more hydrogen from water. The problem is, if we're so concerned with crops because we're using the crops for other things, why aren't we worried about the crops because we're using the water for other things? You'd also be using hydrogen production that is also being used to create ammonia for fertilizers for the crops.

      Yeah, you can electrolyze seawater, but when you take the seawater out of the sea and burn the hydrogen in cities and the rain falls near there rather than letting it evaporate at its normal rate from the normal places, you're changing weather patterns just as surely as with greenhouse gases.

      You get better efficiency from hydrogen fuel cells than from burning hydrogen, but the cells are more expensive to produce and replace than ICEs. Fuel cell grid plants and vehicles might still be a better option than ICE or turbine ones. Pure electric vehicles are more efficient still, but then you have the batteries, the charging delays, etc.

      Hydrogen ICE cars with small fuel cells for the electronics (so you're not burning it just to turn a generator with part of it) or completely hydrogen fuel cell powered cars may be a good balance between efficiency and range, as one can refuel hydrogen much faster than one can recharge batteries, and hydrogen (while dangerous in its own right) is probably safer in the long run than most battery technologies.

  44. Solar energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think we have just found our ultracheap solar panels, Sugar Cane!

  45. Re:I propose this become the new standard in batte by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

    but sony brand SugarRay Rhino Records, the Warner Music Group and the RIAA resent this statement. Don't bother running, they've already released the lawyers on you.
    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
  46. on/off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does it not react when youre not using it? This seems like something that would keep reacting all the time until it ran out.

  47. Re:Please put all "That's pretty sweet" jokes here by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please put your "That's Sweet" jokes under this thread, and be sure to include your home address and the specific way you would like me to kill you. 234 Elm Street, Amityville, Florida. Heart attack after an orgy involving the entire swedish bikini team. Making this happen is an exercise left for the assassin. Oh, and "Sweet!"
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  48. Re:And just why won't this work for.... {DHLS} by Bomarc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, but CAN you bring the sugar bags onto the flight? It can be used as a rocket fuel and here; and as an explosive Sugar has a LOT of energy!

  49. AAAAH!! VAMPIRE! by josquint · · Score: 1

    bypassing all the finger-licking blood tests.
  50. Mr. Fusion by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

    I'm single, and food in the US is only sold in "family size" portions. That means 50% of the stuff I buy spoils or gets moldy before I have a chance to eat it. Today, this goes in the trash or garbage disposal. But once this sort of battery becomes common, we will just have sugar processors. Dump your moldy food in, and fuel cells come out for use in your phone, iPod, laptop, and whatever else.

    It really is like the Mr. Fusion! Garbage powered devices!

    And for the people saying this will lead to food shortages in poor countries: No, using food I would have otherwise thrown away is not going to affect them at all.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:Mr. Fusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend a compost heap. And a refrigerator.

    2. Re:Mr. Fusion by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      I recommend a compost heap. And a refrigerator.
      You can't have compost heaps in apartments. Refrigerators don't stop bread from going moldy, milk from spoiling, and pasta sauce from growing mold. You fail.
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:Mr. Fusion by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I'm single too. Whenever I have something with the potential to spoil, I simply use it quickly.

      For example, I'll buy a loaf of pumpernickel bread, a pound of ham and half a pound of swiss cheese, and eat a sandwich every day for a week. Since I store it in the refrigerator at work, it doesn't have time to go bad. Pasta sauce, I use half a jar one night (on half a box of pasta), and the other half the next day (or 2 days later) (again, refrigerating both). Same idea with milk.

      Works well for me, but then I don't care as much about variety in my diet as many people do.

    4. Re:Mr. Fusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You can't have compost heaps in apartments.

      Yes, you can. Lots of people do. You can also have worm bins, which some people prefer.

      > Refrigerators don't stop bread from going moldy, milk from spoiling,
      > and pasta sauce from growing mold.

      No, but they delay these things. That's their job. If yours doesn't do that, you might want to get it checked out. Oh, but don't keep bread in the fridge, it makes it dry out. Keep it in a bread bin for short term storage, or in the freezer (retrieving slices on an as-needed basis) for longer term or if said apartment is in NYC. Freezers also work on milk and pasta sauce, which may be stored in plastic bags or containers with lids for the purpose.

      Honestly, what do they teach kids these days?

    5. Re:Mr. Fusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You fail.


      Gee, and you're single you say? I never would have guessed. You have such a likeable disposition.


      Good luck with that.

    6. Re:Mr. Fusion by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      You fail.


      Gee, and you're single you say? I never would have guessed. You have such a likeable disposition.


      Good luck with that.

      Thanks for adding so much to the conversation. I think I need to reiterate so that you can better understand my position, Mr. Coward.

      You fail.

      You fail.

      You fail.

      Perhaps if you kept up with that crazy internet logo the kids these days use, you wouldn't look like such an anonymous fool.
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  51. High Fructose Corn Syrup by cerelib · · Score: 2, Funny

    So will the US version need to use high fructose corn syrup instead to avoid the crazy sugar industry restrictions?

  52. made one in kindergarden myself by 2ms · · Score: 1

    Psh, this is supposed to be news? I made one of these with an apple, two wires, and a digital clock in kindergarden.

  53. The perfect biofuel? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1
    For children, this means your kid can have his mini-toy robot run off sugar. So when it gets tired you just have to actually feed him with sugar, and ta-da!

    But what's the efficiency of sugar? I found in a diet site the following data:

    • 1 gram of carbohydrate (i.e. sugar) = 4 calories
    • 1 gram of protein = 4 calories
    • 1 gram of fat = 9 calories (this is equivalent to burning gasoline)
    • 1 gram of alcohol = 7 calories


    So sugar is very inefficiency compared to other fuels. But at least it's a start. In any case, this reminds me of the times where we had to depend on animals to do the heavy work. How did you recharge animals? With plants, of course! Maybe that should be our goal, to have all our machines running on biofuel, hence becoming carbon neutral.
    1. Re:The perfect biofuel? by mattb112885 · · Score: 1

      Are those numbers the amount that the body can use from these fuels, or how much is obtained when they're burned? It's very unlikely that a fuel cell would be built to be more efficient than a living thing, after years and years of evolution to improve it. You still have a point that fat contains more energy per gram, though I don't think it's quite as common as cellulose, it's getting there.

    2. Re:The perfect biofuel? by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      Maybe that should be our goal, to have all our machines running on biofuel, hence becoming carbon neutral. Hah, that's kind of funny. Human history:
      1. Work against nature, try to do things 'better'.
      2. Find out that it doesn't work.
      3. Eventually do things the way nature intended.

      Maybe that's humanity's destiny: to realize that we were wrong all along.
      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    3. Re:The perfect biofuel? by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1

      But what's the efficiency of sugar? I found in a diet site the following data:

      • 1 gram of carbohydrate (i.e. sugar) = 4 calories
      • 1 gram of protein = 4 calories
      • 1 gram of fat = 9 calories (this is equivalent to burning gasoline)
      • 1 gram of alcohol = 7 calories


      So sugar is very inefficiency compared to other fuels.

      Kilocalories/gram is not a measure of efficiency, it is a measure of energy density.

      As a fuel source, sugar is the most efficient material you've listed. Production of the other three requires large amounts of energy input, often in the form of sugar.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
  54. All you can do is complain? by hike2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    /rant
    Reading all these responses makes me think that all you can do is complain about this or that. What about, this is neat, maybe battery life will be longer, maybe I don't have to cry Noooo when I'm on a plane and my battery died. Also I have noticed that just about everyone turned into some sort of activist. Discussions are mostly about *impact* on this or that, not that much on the technology. Also it seems that on every opportunity a political slant is added to every comment. I thought this was mostly a tech site ... I must be wrong.

    On that note, the huge impacts with food price changes and all that hinge on one HUGE assumption: mass adoption. Not to mention the time until this will actually be sold and OTHER inventions/technological advances made at the same time. Who knows, we may find a way to produce said sugars from OTHER sources ... anyone think of THAT?
    rant\

    --
    Fourty-two!
  55. (MPU) - Mod Parent Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No mod points left! WHYYYYY!!!

  56. No Way by javiern100 · · Score: 1

    these Sony people wanted to charge me USD 200 for a couple of noise-cancelling earbuds, in an official Sony Style store. How much will they try to charge me for these batteries ? no way!

  57. Shame by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Too bad the article fails to mention what these enzymes turn the sugar into. Ethanol?

    Hey I know how to solve the battery (hic) recycling pro (hic) problem. Can I have your (hic) dead batteries?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  58. Re:Please put all "That's pretty sweet" jokes here by kidcharles · · Score: 1

    Uh, Suhweeeet!

    1060 W. Addison, Chicago, IL.

    Shoulder-mounted RPG, remote-controlled bomb, flame thrower, or M-16, your choice.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une sig.
  59. Original Sony press release by ksan · · Score: 1

    Original Sony press release with video.

  60. Food subsidies are *EVIL* by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not only are they not able to export, they end up importing cheaper, subsidized food. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/6105790.st m

    I'll just point out that the subsidised food actually drives the poor farmers out of business and reduces the amount of land that is then dedicated to farming within the poorest regions. The really nasty problems start when there's a subsequent drought and the remaining productive land doesn't produce enough food to feed the population. The result is famine, starvation, death and a greater need for aid.

    Another problem appears when you have thousands of disaffected unemployed ex farmers just sitting around. Ideal supply of soldiers for anyone who decides they want to rebel against their desperate situation. Which obviously makes everything an order of magnitude worse. It's no coincidence that areas which receive lots of aid are areas which have problems with ongoing conflicts. It's a self reinforcing cycle.

    Really, food subsidies are a form of economic warfare which attacks the poorest, most wretched, most defenceless people on the planet...

    EU and US farmers are directly the cause of millions of deaths in the 3rd world.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Food subsidies are *EVIL* by adminstring · · Score: 1

      Farmers plant and harvest crops in exchange for money, which is in itself a pretty nonlethal occupation. Global agribusiness companies that lobby for subsidies and access to third-world markets are much more directly responsible for those deaths, and the fact that we have a government by and for the highest bidder doesn't help matters any, either.

      The only thing that will stop this system and prevent further third-world deaths is if we all get off our butts, reorganize the priorities of our government, and reclaim the power that has been given to multinational corporations... and in a way, since we're too lazy to do that, we are all responsible for what is going on over there. It's not the farmers, it's us. Me included.

      A real President who does what he thinks is right rather than doing what will finance his next campaign would be a good start, like Dennis Kucinich on the left or Ron Paul on the right. Corruption is more important than ideology to me at this point, and those two seem to be the only ones running who aren't willing to whore themselves out to Satan for a big fat war chest.

      --
      My truck is like a series of tubes.
  61. Walkman? by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

    They create an innovative source of energy, and then demonstrate it by powering a Walkman?

    When they get around to inventing Mr. Fusion, will they demonstrate how it can power a vaccuum tube radio?

  62. It can not hold a charge or be recharged... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    That is the reason why it won't be used in car batteries. It might get used in laptops in the future however, as I can see that working. However because you can't send in an electrical charge and have the enzymes create sugar, there is no way for the system to store the energy back into the battery without physically adding more sugar. In a car battery, once the engine is started, the combustion of the fuel turns the engine, which in tern, turns the alternator which generates electricity which is then fed back into the battery as well as the cars electrical harness. The battery is used when the car's engine is not running to power the car's electrical harness and turn the electric starter on the engine. Once that engine is up and running it turns the alternator (which is essentially a small generator). Without the ability to feed the power back into the battery, a car's battery will very quickly drain of all energy. The same will go for this type of battery, and I am sure that the enzymes don't do to well in the harsh environment that is the engine compartment of a car (or even the trunk), needing to survive temperatures as high as 180F and as low as -20F just for the 48 continental USA, let alone places like Canada.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
    1. Re:It can not hold a charge or be recharged... by Bomarc · · Score: 1

      Follow up points --
      As this would be an electrical car, there won't be 180F under the hood (Unless there is a REAL problem with global warming)
      And when we go to the 'energy station' of the future: Why won't have a sugar & enzymes that we can drop in and replace?
      ..... and, if this will only work in CA, that would reduce the green house gasses by 50% ;-) but on a serious note - if it would work for 40% of the cars on the road now, that would put a serious dent w/ problems and petroleum based energy.

  63. Add a tag... by nadamucho · · Score: 1

    wontworkinspace

  64. Re:I propose this become the new standard in batte by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

    Don't worry about them, their main concern is getting away from those angry boxers.

  65. You may be stranded by sudden.zero · · Score: 1

    because your batteries went dead but at least you can eat them till the rescue party arrives.

  66. That's not possible by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    You cannot have an engine based on a chemical reaction in which the energy output is greater than the input. If what you described worked, you could literally run an engine indefinitely on a glass of water as it would never consume any fuel.

    Sorry, but the energy for hydrogen has to come form somewhere and it is a lossy process. Any conversion of forms of energy is at best a 1:1 proposition. You can never gain any. In reality, they are essentially always lossy to some degree.

    Remember:

    In any process, the total energy of the universe remains constant.
    The entropy of an isolated system not in equilibrium will tend to increase over time, approaching a maximum value at equilibrium.

    They aren't just good ideas, they are the law (the first and second laws of thermodynamics).

    1. Re:That's not possible by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      It is _almost_ possible. You're not putting any energy into the hydrogen through electrolysis. You're simply breaking the molecular bond it has to the oxygen. The oxygen is then released and not stored. Then, you're burning the hydrogen with atmospheric oxygen and producing water vapor, which gets released and not stored. There is waste in the heat and the friction, so you do lose some energy. You get most of it back because both processes are pretty efficient. HTE is even more power efficient than low-temperature electrolysis, especially if you already have a source of heat (nuclear, a blast furnace at a cement plant, geothermal, etc).

      You would need additional energy inputs to the electrolysis stations besides just hydrogen, and that could be done with wind, solar, tidal, geothermal, and nuclear. Assuming you're using just regular grid power to produce the hydrogen from water, though, you could be burning hydrogen at one location to produce it at another.

      Thankfully, instead of just burning hydrogen, we should hopefully soon have large fusion plants, which being atomic rather than chemical reaction have more than enough difference in power over electrolysis.

      So yes, I oversimplified. My point is, it doesn't matter where you get the electricity for purposes of this discussion. There is a shortfall if you use only hydrogen to get the hydrogen, but it's no different than if you use only petroleum to drill, pump, refine, and transport petroleum. Large central hydrogen fusion plants that electrolyze steam along with smaller hydrogen production facilities using grid power or other power sources more than handle the demand if implemented satisfactorily.

      We always live, at some scale, inside a sealed system. Solar seems renewable enough, but once our sun is gone, it's not coming back. Figuring out where one gets the additional energy into the system is _always_ an issue, even for biofuels.

    2. Re:That's not possible by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      "You're simply breaking the molecular bond it has to the oxygen."

      Right, which takes energy. The whole reason why 2 H2 + O2 => 2 H2O yields energy is because you move to a lower energy state. You have to put energy back in if you wish to break that bond and cause it to re-bond as gasses. This also means that you can't get any more energy out of it when you break those bonds and re-bond as water. That's just how it works. You never, ever, ever create energy. It only transforms from one form to another. Should you discover a situation that violates this, please have a chat with the Nobel committee as this would be the most astounding discovery in physics in, well, ever probably.

      Regardless of how you do it, you need energy somewhere. Fusion would be nice, right now that doesn't work. So maybe we look at biofuels. Will it be a solution in the long run? Who knows? But getting down on it because there's drawbacks is silly. Everything has a drawback, everything has a cost. Biofuels are worth looking in to, especially since if the biogenesis theory is correct then it is simply a speeding up of the natural process. Rather than waiting for the conversion to fossil fuels before use, we use the plants directly.

    3. Re:That's not possible by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Assuming you're using waste heat from another process to bring the water to HTE temperatures, you actually do get more productive energy out of the hydrogen than the energy used to break the bonds with the oxygen. That waste heat is energy input, but it's energy that wasn't being used for anything before. Please read up on the process. It's not a cure-all, and it's not perpetual motion. It is very interesting.

      Of course if someone is creating the heated environment only to perform steam electrolysis, that'd be a pretty inefficient way to do it. There are lots of processes we already use that create the necessary 300-700 degree C steam, or the potential for it. If by harnessing this wasted energy we can get a net gain on the electricity needed for the electrolysis, that's a win.

      A for biofuels, I agree they are at least a good stopgap measure. They are better for not just chemical and ecological reasons in some ways, but they could be very helpful in the political and economic arenas within certain countries and internationally. Unfortunately, they also have some nasty limitations and side-effects of their own. Ethanol is much harder to transport than most forms of petrochemicals because of the types of materials needed to safely transport it. The best sources of ethanol from plants would appear to all be as geographically limited as oil, only in mostly different countries. Ethanol and biodiesel are currently largely being made from food crops, which can be a big drawback. There have been some promising results with biofuels from other sources, such as methanol from livestock farms and from algae-laden sewage treatment, but those haven't become reliable or mass-produced as of yet. Noone knows for sure how viable they may become. Burning biomass directly and using steam turbines, tapping landfill gas, burning latrine/septic tank methane, and more are possible, but each has issues. All in all, there's a lot of promise and a lot of caveats.

      One of the biggest things we can do to help the situation is to go to more localized electrical generation, as we lose a great deal of efficiency through resistance and impedance in, for example, the North American power grid. It's odd that so few people make an issue out of that.

      Pebble fission reactors might be the only well-proven technology we have that's able to be close to a single solution in the near term (rod-style reactors being relatively dangerous and ill-received) and uranium isn't really a renewable resource, either. Then there's the waste.

      Essentially, we live in a time of great uncertainty about energy. There's likely not going to be one power source as dominant as petroleum has been, but I guess it's possible. After all, cars were once run on coal or wood steam engines, coal dust burned internally, kerosene burned internally, alcohol, kerosene steam engines, and even electricity before gas and diesel became standard enough to narrow the field. Homes were and often now are powered at least partly by natural gas or even wood. Alcohol, kerosene, and coal used to be popular for lights and heat as well. There's a possibility we'll see just a handful of power sources shine through again, but there's a great chance we'll be weighing how two products are powered along with other features when making buying decisions.

  67. Counting calories, not people by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

    I agree that it is rather vauge, and that all of the possible curves that you describe are possible interpretations of the data. But we don't need to know what the curve looks like for the discussion at hand.
    Remember OP's original contention is that using sugar like this decreases food for the poor. We're looking for total calories here, not demographics of calorie-consumers. The article referenced by GP does demonstrate that there are enough calories to go around.

  68. old skool? by fury88 · · Score: 1

    Didn't the Egyptians figure this out like 3000 years ago?

  69. Produces water as a byproduct? by noidentity · · Score: 1

    "The hydrogen ions pass through a membrane separator to the cathode where they absorb oxygen from the air to produce water as a byproduct."

    Great, I've got to either diaper it or take it for a bathroom break every once in a while?

  70. I'm not gonna be impressed... by Hampton_Comes_Alive · · Score: 1

    ...until someone designs a battery that runs on grey goo (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gray_goo).

    The way I see it, that should really be practical in a few years.

  71. Got Carbs? by OrangeTide · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Perfect complement to a low-carb diet. If you've been wondering what to do with all that Easter and Christmas candy you get but can't have anymore, well Sony has the solution. One Cadbury egg can play several hundred hours of music.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  72. Battery life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as you suck on it, it keeps going and going...

  73. I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And I'd like to remind them, that as a trusted celebrity, I can be useful in rounding up slaves to toil in their underground sugar mines." -Kent Brockman

  74. IMF by vlad_petric · · Score: 1

    ... has made sure of that for quite a few countries.

    --

    The Raven

  75. Sony? by sabernet · · Score: 1

    Chemist Dr. Shelley Minteer from St. Louis University developed the tech to extract power from sugar using a special membrane mimicking the process of living cells.

    So either Sony licensed this or developed it in parallel.

    http://www.cbc.ca/quirks/archives/06-07/mar31.html

  76. whats voltage and amp hours? by asm2750 · · Score: 1

    they said 50mW but for how long until you have to refill it?

  77. You forgot Kuwait. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kuwait has once again promised they will really, really, really, stop slavery. This time, really, for sure. And don't believe all those scarred and abused women Saddam freed when he knocked over their filthy little dictatorship (back before the USA came to the rescue).

    But for the moment, you can still buy people in Oman, Kuwait, and Dubhai (aka the Bush-friendly Arabs).

    yeah, it'll get modded flamebait, and people will come looking for me. But I'm using somebody else's wireless at the moment, so I will get another chance to spread truth another day! Sorry about that, clueless homeowner!

  78. IIRC by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    sugar burns, so this fits right into Sony's tech.

  79. Re:Please put all "That's pretty sweet" jokes here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll get my chocolate over my dead body, Walkman!

  80. Re:And just why won't this work for.... {DHLS} by Nullav · · Score: 1

    and as an explosive
    Of course! Sony's using it in a battery, after all.
    All assaulting of diseased equines aside, wouldn't that mean that even candy bars would need to be prohibited? Surely it couldn't be too hard to extract sugar from it for use in a crude explosive if no one noticed the big container of nitric acid in your bag.
    --
    I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  81. Next version... by YouAreNumber6 · · Score: 1

    will get its power from old people's medicine.

  82. A cynical continuation by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

    "So yeah, the battery is powered by sugar"

    "Cool. *spills Coke all over the battery* Oops, sorry about that, but hey *chuckle* I just powered up your battery!"

    "Um, no, you broke it."

    --
    "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  83. In case you didn't realize your mistake by benhocking · · Score: 1

    39 mm on a side = 39^3 mm^3 or 59,319 mm^3. Google is great, but GIGO.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?