Slashdot Mirror


Seven Wonders of the IT World

C.G. Lynch writes "The computer closest to the North Pole. The most intriguing data center. The biggest scientific computing grid. The little kernel that rocked the world. CIO.com has compiled a list of Seven Wonders of the IT World, some of the most impressive and unusual systems on the planet (and beyond)."

170 comments

  1. More than you might suspect... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the linked list:Secrecy level: High. Two reporters from the local newspaper are the only media who've been inside the compound and written about it (See "Inside the World of Google"): Google treats any and all details as though they belong to the National Security Agency.

    Well.... I know they were trying to be funny, but the authors could be more correct that they might have known given the history of Google (startup partially funded by CIA $$s) and how tight they are with NGIA (Google Earth projects), CIA etc..., it would not surprise me to see Google working intimately with NSA. After all, Google has been competing with NSA for PhD mathematicians for some time now (and winning) and it seems like a natural fit. Of course such a "hypothetical" collaboration would raise all sorts of ethical questions, but assuming one could appropriately compartmentalize those concerns, it could certainly be mutually beneficial.

    Personally, I'd like to think that this little project (when complete) will certainly contribute to the creation of one or more of the Seven Wonders of the IT world. After all, we all have little wetware parallel supercomputers sitting in the backs of our eyes that can process massive amounts of data, pre-encode it, filter it and more all while dealing with a certain level of data corruption, particularly in disease.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:More than you might suspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Google has in the past had jobs available that required national security clearance.

    2. Re:More than you might suspect... by rk · · Score: 3, Funny

      "After all, Google has been competing with NSA for PhD mathematicians for some time now (and winning) and it seems like a natural fit."

      If only the NSA would offer stock options and a splashy IPO, I'll bet they could get some of those candidates back.

    3. Re:More than you might suspect... by blhack · · Score: 1

      On google being top secret about some things; Aren't they required to disclose everything, and I mean EVERYTHING down to how much they spent on every light bulb in the bathroom on the 3rd floor as a part of the SEC filings?

      Isn't this exactly the reason that a lot of companies are taking themselves private again lately, disclosing everything is a HUGE hassle.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    4. Re:More than you might suspect... by BWJones · · Score: 4, Informative

      Google has in the past had jobs available that required national security clearance.

      Sure, but a security clearance can apply to lots of types of data and a diverse group of companies and government agencies. Everything from a basic collateral "secret" clearance (relatively easy to obtain) to "top secret" and compartmentalized programs are being worked on and participated in by people from not just government, but also a number of private companies. No big deal and I would certainly expect Google to have a significant number of folks possessing those clearances.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    5. Re:More than you might suspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish this were Wikipedia, because I'd edit your post with about 4 {{citationneeded}}. Google funded by the CIA? Really? What?

    6. Re:More than you might suspect... by BWJones · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I wish this were Wikipedia, because I'd edit your post with about 4 {{citationneeded}}. Google funded by the CIA? Really? What?

      The CIA helped Google from the very beginning and has continued to fund Google's spin offs and start ups like Google Earth (Interesting side story with Keyhole nee Google Earth as the revolutionary UI of Google Earth had many in the remote sensing communities picking their jaws up off the floor when they first saw it and realized the implications for everything from temporal analysis to community supported contribution to databases). I can't give you many publicly available references, but do a little research on a company known as Peleus nee In-Q-It, nee In-Q-Tel. Note: I don't see anything necessarily wrong with this arrangement and can see many good things to come out of such an arrangement. In fact, I have been a big supporter of these sorts of cross fertilizations of business and government as long as appropriate ethical guidelines are followed.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    7. Re:More than you might suspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Google (startup partially funded by CIA $$s)" is extremely different from "has continued to fund Google's spin offs and start ups like Google Earth".

      You can't claim Google was funded by the CIA in its start up days without some kind of source. Seriously. You're just mongering. If you can't back up sensational claims like "Google was funded by the CIA", then don't make them. You're cheapening Slashdot.

    8. Re:More than you might suspect... by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Just for a hoot, I looked around, and found this link out there. I have NO idea if this guy's on the level and/or sane, but he's fairly convinced...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    9. Re:More than you might suspect... by Reaperducer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, in other words you're still not able to back up anything you said.

      I don't know much about the history of Google, but Keyhole was a company independent of Google for quite years. I worked for a company that subscribed to its service. Google bought Keyhole years later.

      Your original post is completely worthless, with a bunch of home page links pretending to be citations. Lemme take a shot at your style of online journalism:

      Google is a company owned by the Dairy Queen corporation with the stated goal of infiltrating homes worldwide Radio Shack microphones and transmitters. They are carrying out this nefarious deed at the behest of the Queen of England, and the president of Mexico.

      There. I'm just as factual as you are. And my references are just as good.

      People like you are the reason smart people don't trust the internet.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    10. Re:More than you might suspect... by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Citing prison planet is like citing info wars... It's barely one step above citing the x-files.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    11. Re:More than you might suspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry dude but a prisonplanet url is your proof? Prisonplanet is Alex Jones website. The guy is a well known fruitcake.

    12. Re:More than you might suspect... by BWJones · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      So, in other words you're still not able to back up anything you said.

      I am leaving it up to the reasonably capable reader to find the references as my understanding of the background comes via first hand knowledge that has no citable sources. Take that for what you value it for, but it is factual and with enough (easy) digging, can be verified.

      I don't know much about the history of Google, but Keyhole was a company independent of Google for quite years. I worked for a company that subscribed to its service. Google bought Keyhole years later.

      Yes, Keyhole was founded as an independent company in 2001 and was so for about three years prior to Google's acquisition. Furthermore, they had a number of customers ranging from city planning and architectural firms to land management agencies... What is your point?

      Your original post is completely worthless, with a bunch of home page links pretending to be citations. Lemme take a shot at your style of online journalism:

      I never purported those links to be sources of anything other than who they were, thus the open links. I am well versed in the art of writing with proper citations (would have been hard to get a doctorate without) and I don't need any advice from a spiteful, Slashdot troll with an ID in the 800k range on how to post to Slashdot, thanks.

      People like you are the reason smart people don't trust the internet.

      Given your apparent history of calling people children who don't know what they are talking about (seems to be a favorite), I would advise you to take it easy on calling people out who likely *do* know a fair bit more about certain subject matter than you do and let them inform the community. I've found that it is folks who attempt to muzzle people publicly, without care or knowledge of who they are attempting to quiet by proving themselves more capable or knowledgeable to be the most ignorant.

      Note that none of that should be construed as malevolent. Rather, consider it advice from someone who has been around the Internet for a while, has participated in and fostered community, has educated many at the post-graduate level and only wants more respect and quality from the communities he participates in.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    13. Re:More than you might suspect... by Reaperducer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      take it easy on calling people out who likely *do* know a fair bit more about certain subject matter than you do and let them inform the community.
      I'm still waiting for you to inform the community. All you've done so far is make baseless accusations with no proof. That's not information, that's rumor. If the proof is so easy to find, why won't you show it to us? Your assertions imply that posting the proof would have taken less time and effort than posting your previous reply.

      Also, don't assume that having an ID number of 871695 makes me a Slashdot rookie. I've been here almost since the beginning, but under a different ID that I abandoned years ago. Further, the claim (again unsubstantiated) that you have a doctorate doesn't impress me or anyone else.
      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    14. Re:More than you might suspect... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oh, for the love of.... Use Google to find out. A quick search reveals information from In-Q-Tel's own site and from Google's own site of course these investments are all part of In-Q-Tel's mission and there is nothing secret about it. They are quite open about their investments and why they make those investments, so what is the big deal? Also, note that there are other companies initially invested in by In-Q-Tel that Google has acquired.

      Further, the claim (again unsubstantiated) that you have a doctorate

      Oh, come on now.... using Google is not all that hard, nor is clicking the links that I so thoughtfully already have provided for you. But, so you don't have to click twice, here it is.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    15. Re:More than you might suspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [blockquote]You're cheapening Slashdot.[/blockquote]http://www.google.com/search?q=frosty+piss
      Sorry, man. It's already over.

    16. Re:More than you might suspect... by DanielJosphXhan · · Score: 2, Funny

      The entire US government should IPO in chunks. Really, shareholding is a much more accurate form of representation that what we have now, and would allow corporations to actually and clearly own and control the state instead of doing so tacitly.

      I mean, it just makes sense.

      --
      [ think ]
    17. Re:More than you might suspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha. That shut him up.

    18. Re:More than you might suspect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those clearances are only needed for interaction with Government programs requiring those clearances. No private company simply gets them for internal uses, in fact you can't. Why would Google need cleared people? Are they subcontracting for the Government? Are they consumers of secret data? For what purpose?

      They are not developing jet engines. They are not working on weapons systems. They do not interact with classified satellites. They are not developing systems control software for aircraft carriers. They are a search engine company. Perhaps their market also targets Government installations for internal use, I do not know, however I find it odd that they would be hiring people with clearances unless it was only a very small number perhaps for exploratory purposes of new markets.

      Of course, that is the naive view. I know exactly why they need these clearances, as you stated above, they work intimately with the NSA and CIA. Text searching is of prime importance to the NSA. They have a massive infrastructure of highly specialized custom built (custom CPU architecture) supercomputers that do extreme volumes of searches. In fact its very similar hardware to that used to perform high volume DNA analysis (just text after all), only the software differs (it's not a Blast derivative.) This is where Google comes in. Anyway, thats my uninformed theory :-)

      Hold on a sec, someones at my door....

  2. Polar Photography by Kelson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Semi-off-topic, but Webcam #1 at the north pole reminded me: on Friday the Astronomy Picture of the Day posted a multiple-exposure image of last month's lunar eclipse as seen from the south pole. Not an IT-specific wonder, but still seriously impressive, when you think about it, that we've actually got people near the south pole who are in a position to take photos like this.

    And hey, for once I can use the term "polar opposite" and know that it's literally true!

    1. Re:Polar Photography by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1
      That's a fantastic picture, thanks. I'm fairly sure Antarctica is populated all year round. It is far easier to get to than the ISS, and I'm sure most scientists would feel a similar thrill staying at either one.

      So I checked, and according to the Australian Antarctic Division:

      No more than a few thousand in the height of summer, going down to hundreds over winter. The most populous antarctic centre is McMurdo Base on Ross Island, south of New Zealand, operated by the United States. Australia's four stations have winter-time populations totalling around 80 in winter, rising to perhaps 200 in summer. In addition, marine scientists spend a lot of time on research boats in the Southern Ocean during the summer months.

      So there you have it. Thanks again for the pic, and don't fret, APOD is never off-topic!

  3. I hope... by replete+phoenix · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...That Job's iPod is on there, after all, it is the seventh wonder of the actual world

    1. Re:I hope... by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1, Funny

      It was an amazing concept. Who would have thought to make a personal music player using a pocket sized playback device that you listened to through headphones? A truly revolutionary device.

  4. #8... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Steve "Monkeyboy" Ballmer and his Flying Chair Routine.

    1. Re:#8... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Funny

      Steve "Monkeyboy" Ballmer and his Flying Chair Routine.

      The article said WONDERS, not HORRORS.

  5. Slightly Dissapointed by COMON$ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I dont know about other slashdotters but I was rather unimpressed with the 7 wonders of the IT world. Not much on there in the way of impressive other than my boy blue. What about impressive symbolic marvels like The Teapot which were the icons of modern Graphics shaping science and technology. Or code that drives technology like C++ or Perl, or dare I even say it, BASIC. These current wonders are very temporary whereas the original wonders are a bit more timeless, more representative of human innovation than just something that looks cool.

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    1. Re:Slightly Dissapointed by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 3, Funny
      I dont know about other slashdotters but I was rather unimpressed with the 7 wonders of the IT world

      I agree. My name isn't on the list ANYWHERE!!! Geez, come on, people!

    2. Re:Slightly Dissapointed by khallow · · Score: 1

      Voyager One won't continue functioning for much longer, but as a piece of space junk it'll outlast the Pyramids. That puts it solidly in Wonder of the World material.

    3. Re:Slightly Dissapointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as standard test images go, I much prefer Lenna to the Utah Teacup.

      The fact that it originates from Playboy has NOTHING to do with it! Honest!

    4. Re:Slightly Dissapointed by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It might outlast Earth.

    5. Re:Slightly Dissapointed by rm999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was amazed the internet wasn't on the list. Maybe I misunderstood what the rules of the list?

    6. Re:Slightly Dissapointed by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested to know how often, if at all, the "V-Ger" computer has been rebooted,... It's hard to imagine having to push the reset button from millions of miles away, but I suppose they've probably already figured it out,... Still, if the voyager probes were running windows, they wouldn't even have gotten out of LEO without crashing! ;-)

    7. Re:Slightly Dissapointed by fractoid · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that she addressed one of the SIGGRAPH conventions, back around '01 or '02 I think it was.

      How many image processing and computer vision nerds' dreams were shattered that day? She was in her 60s! ;P

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    8. Re:Slightly Dissapointed by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

      I would've liked to see TCP/IP up there.

    9. Re:Slightly Dissapointed by Phisbut · · Score: 1

      Voyager One won't continue functioning for much longer, but as a piece of space junk it'll outlast the Pyramids. That puts it solidly in Wonder of the World material.

      A wonder it may be, but it is now so far away (and keeps getting further) that I truly doubt we can consider it part of our world anymore. At least the pyramids are still part of the planet we live on.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    10. Re:Slightly Dissapointed by khallow · · Score: 1

      I thought about that, but there's no reason the "world" of IT has to correspond to the physical boundaries of the real world.

  6. Small computer running Vista by ShatteredArm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WOW! A small really small computer runs Vista! This is groundbreaking!

    Seriously, though, the only "wonderous" things on there were the Voyager and the supercomputer. Most of the other stuff is not the most groundbreaking or superlative for its kind out there. I thought the idea of a "wonder" was something that we can only try and imagine how they managed to do it or how they came up with the idea.

    1. Re:Small computer running Vista by click2005 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, though, the only "wonderous" things on there were the Voyager and the supercomputer.

      I agree although I wouldn't even class the supercomputer as that impressive. Its not like any number of large companies/organisations couldn't build something bigger/faster/better if they really wanted to (the NSA probably has). The Voyager computer is the only one that will still be impressive in 5 years.

      I would think wonders of the world would be something that would still be considered impressive to a later generation.

      I'd be more impressed if this 50 million zombie PC Storm worm network could beat a 9/10-dan at Go. :)

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    2. Re:Small computer running Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      must have been like stuffing a hippopotamus in to a compact car...

    3. Re:Small computer running Vista by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      WOW! A small really small computer runs Vista! This is groundbreaking! Seriously, though, the only "wonderous" things on there were the Voyager and ...

      Let's celebrate by putting all the Vista disks on a new Voyager and launching it beyond Pluto.

    4. Re:Small computer running Vista by This_Is_My_Happening · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Voyager computer is the only one that will still be impressive in 5 years. Just wait. In ~250 years when it comes back home it will be even more impressive!
      --
      God made me an atheist. Who are you to question his wisdom?
    5. Re:Small computer running Vista by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Seriously, though, the only "wonderous" things on there were the Voyager and the supercomputer. Most of the other stuff is not the most groundbreaking or superlative for its kind out there. I thought the idea of a "wonder" was something that we can only try and imagine how they managed to do it or how they came up with the idea."

      - I wouldn't say that.. The classical 7 wonders are monumental feats of effort, involving mostly back-breaking labour and one person with what he thinks is a good idea, and the rest of humanity asking themselved how.. and why did they bother.

      kinda like vista really, in normal slashdot tradition I didn't read the article, but with that analogy, I'm guessing that it's on that list?

  7. New list needed by AuMatar · · Score: 1

    The 7 Wonders of 7 Wonders Lists

    Really- is there any more tired and lame excuse to grab eyeballs out there? Please, lets end these.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    1. Re:New list needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, there is a term for it now: lazy journalism. We get inundated with these especially towards the end of the year (10 events that etc.), or slow news days.

    2. Re:New list needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree...

      So I'm compiling a top ten list of reasons to stop making 7 Wonders of the world lists

      1. Wasted bandwidth
      2. They're only for pageview whores
      3. Most of the items are only 'wondrous' because people wonder why the hell its on the list.
      4. If anything really is that wondrous, humans will probably destroy it.
      5. Google will sell the #1 spot to someone else.
      6. I.T. is moving so fast that in a few months, most will be obsolete.

      thats as far as I got.

    3. Re:New list needed by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I agree...

      So I'm compiling a top ten list of reasons to stop making 7 Wonders of the world lists

      1. Wasted bandwidth
      2. They're only for pageview whores
      3. Most of the items are only 'wondrous' because people wonder why the hell its on the list.
      4. If anything really is that wondrous, humans will probably destroy it.
      5. Google will sell the #1 spot to someone else.
      6. I.T. is moving so fast that in a few months, most will be obsolete.

      thats as far as I got. Ok, I'll finish it for you:

      7. It will suffer from the Slashdot effect.
      8. Most Slashdot posters won't read it anyway.
      9. ???
      10. Profit!
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:New list needed by Kjella · · Score: 1

      7. It will suffer from the Slashdot effect.
      8. Most Slashdot posters won't read it anyway.


      Now imagine if everyone actually RTFA for once...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  8. 120F in North Pole? by Brad_sk · · Score: 1

    >1. North Pole webcam >Operating temperature: From a chilly minus 40 degrees F to a balmy 120 degrees F.
    How can it get to 120F in North Pole?

    1. Re:120F in North Pole? by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      I don't know, do magic Christmas reindeer fart alot?

      Alternate response: OMG Global Warming!!

    2. Re:120F in North Pole? by jmauro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Webcam's rated temperature, not the temperature at the North Pole. I'm also quite sad it get's "disposed" of every year by letting it sink to the bottom. That kind of sucks.

    3. Re:120F in North Pole? by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that is the operating temperature for the chips. The north pole will never reach 120 degrees, but maybe it'll get to 70 degrees and the computer might warm up to 120.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    4. Re:120F in North Pole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xmas reindeer fart like you wouldn't believe.

    5. Re:120F in North Pole? by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's when Chuck Norris tracks fugitives there.

    6. Re:120F in North Pole? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      It can't be 120F in North Pole, it is outside US. If something it would be 49C.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    7. Re:120F in North Pole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the elves steal it.

    8. Re:120F in North Pole? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, the book "Fahrenheit 451" doesn't change names when it's printed outside the united states.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    9. Re:120F in North Pole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but on the other hand, it might be fun to watch it sink...

    10. Re:120F in North Pole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell you think Santa gets the hardware to watch all the little kids, the original perv..

      Oh, man I'll never get that small vista computer for christmas now. DAMN!!

    11. Re:120F in North Pole? by KoldKompress · · Score: 1

      I presume Operating temperature means the temperature range the camera can operate in.

    12. Re:120F in North Pole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably because "Celsius 232.7777777777778" doesn't sound nearly as scary as "Fahrenheit 451"

    13. Re:120F in North Pole? by Suhas · · Score: 1

      Whooooosh!

  9. Not impressed by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 1

    For the most part, the list is unimpressive. Voyager is hardly "IT," wonder that it is. The whole story reeks of that article from Copyblogger about which headlines get the most Diggs.

  10. 120 degrees F by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

    Operating temperature: From a chilly minus 40 degrees F to a balmy 120 degrees F.

    That was the most impressive thing to me. I had no idea that it gets up to 120 degrees Fahrenheit at the north pole. And I thought our string of 100+ degree F days this summer was bad!

    1. Re:120 degrees F by blhack · · Score: 1

      that is the operating temperature for the camera, not the actual temperature at the north pole...at least i hope....maybe i need to start riding my bike to work!

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    2. Re:120 degrees F by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's the temperature achieved in the inside of the camera enclosure since it receives direct sunlight for months on end. Maybe it's 30 degrees outside, and 120 inside after baking for that long.

      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
  11. Agreed by mbeans · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The lamest one was "small computer that runs Vista".

    --
    "It was a billion times better than cobol, but still really retarded." -AC
    1. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah...that was piss poor. And more like a miracle than a wonder.

  12. Voyager 1 is not IT by michaelmalak · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Voyager 1 launched in 1977, about a dozen years prior to the coining of the term "information technology".

    There is a deeper, underlying beef here. IT is about boring business data and came to dominate an industry that previously was the domain of science (often but obviously not always for military purposes). CIO is trying to make its readers feel good about themselves by co-opting non-business domains of computer use.

    1. Re:Voyager 1 is not IT by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I don't see why Voyager 1 doesn't count as IT. It is a piece of technology and it receives commands and returns information on command.

      Oxford English Dictionary:

      information technology (abbr.: IT)
      noun
      the study or use of systems (esp. computers and telecommunications) for storing, retrieving, and sending information.

      Though I find it funny that the V1 picture was captioned as: "NASA's Voyager satellite computes at the edge of space as we know it".

      Voyager 1 is not a satellite, it's not in any specific orbit unless you count the galactic core, and it's not at the edge of space as we know it.

    2. Re:Voyager 1 is not IT by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Information Technology
      Collective term for the various technologies involved in processing and transmitting information. They include computing, telecommunications, and microelectronics. The term became popular in the UK after the Government's Information Technology Year in 1972.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Voyager 1 is not IT by michaelmalak · · Score: 1

      After doing some Google searches, I'm pretty sure that the "Information Technology Year" was really 1982, not 1972.

    4. Re:Voyager 1 is not IT by michaelmalak · · Score: 1

      Would Charles Babbage then be considered an "information technology practitioner"?

    5. Re:Voyager 1 is not IT by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      From the article I pretty much got the impression that it was meant to make CIO's think they actually understand IT by making it seem like some things they probably DO understand are the pinnacle of IT. It's basically meant to make CIO's feel good about reading the articles.

      Personally I found the north-pole thing interresting but lost interrest soon after that. The sheer lack of details and facts is appaling. They provide no good reasons for most of the "wonders" they picked. Is the Google datacenter really the biggest and most secret and secure? Is the OQO really the smallest PC? And how does the BlueGene/L compare to the #2 supercomputer? They even mention it's soon going to be overtaken by a system 3x faster; some "wonder" that was!

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  13. The list by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 1

    1. Webcam #1
    2. Voyager 1
    3. Google's Datacenter
    4. EGEE-II
    5. Blue Gene/L
    6. OQO
    7. Linux kernel

    1. Re:The list by MBCook · · Score: 1

      Some of those, especially Voyager, are quite impressive.

      I'm I the only one that thinks the OQO is really out of place?

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:The list by idontgno · · Score: 3, Funny

      No; I for one thought CueCat belonged in that slot.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:The list by Repton · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would have put "The Internet" on the list, personally.

      It gives you a research lab in all your cities too :-)

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    4. Re:The list by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      Nope, if anyone has actually used an OQO they would know how incredibly useless and impractical it is. I wrote the software for our high school's entry in the Autonomous Underwater Vehicle competition (http://auvsi.org) and we used an OQO as our onboard computer, and it is a pain to actually use. It didn't help that we wrote the software in Java, but that's what they teach in high schools now so that's what we went with. At least remote desktopping in over ethernet made it useable, but for daily use it's just pointless. That thing gets incredibly hot in an incredibly short amount of time. Not to mention that the batteries are complete crap, and we had three of them die on us right before the competition. (shameless plug: http://avbotz.net/ our site, made by me.)

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    5. Re:The list by revengebomber · · Score: 1
      The internet:
      1. Fastest library of porn
      2. Largest library of porn
      3. Most well-organized library of porn
      4. Probably useful in other applications
      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  14. Juniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Voyager 1: "Places it's dropped by: Juniper and Saturn"

    1. Re:Juniper by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      Good Eye

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    2. Re:Juniper by tholomyes · · Score: 1

      Hey, if the Voyager's the first one there, it can call it whatever it wants!

      (I noticed that too, though.)

      --
      When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
    3. Re:Juniper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voyager 1: "Places it's dropped by: Juniper and Saturn"


      At which point it pulled a slingshot maneuver using Cisco's gravitational field and then flew past the Sun.
  15. Wonder #8 by turgid · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why anyone pays money for anything from IBM, Microsoft. Oracle or MySQL AB.

  16. Link to one-page "printable" version by The+Iso · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows." - Bob Dylan
  17. Storm brewing? by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Disappointed, too.

    But only because they missed something I think should apply - the Storm Trojan network. I mean, come on! Arguably the world's most powerful centrally-controlled computing resource, and it's all comprised of horked computers? How is that not a wonder?

    You should hate its existence. But it's still quite amazing.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Storm brewing? by khallow · · Score: 1

      My feeling on the matter is that there should be some permanence to the achievement. The Storm Trojan network is merely the latest stage and it's being used (AFAIK) for spam and maybe cracking encryption. Will it be around in ten years or a century? Will it mark an acheivement that holds up well even when more capable worm network systems come around? I don't think so.

      In comparison, I think the SETI@HOME project has some potential for being a "wonder". Inspiring purpose, pervasive reach, and was an early adopter. If they continue with later versions, then it will solidify its position.
    2. Re:Storm brewing? by perturbed1 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Storm Trojan hasn't yet shown its true power and when it does, lets see how long it lasts... SETI@HOME is a grear project, but does not have the huge computing power of the EGEE but is quite similar... So the fact that they included *one* Grid project is a good start! :) -- Honestly, I had that adrenaline rush when I thought "but would they count the Grid as a wonder?!" and was quite relieved to see it on the list -- Not that the list matters, I suppose... (It also probably means, I should get back to work and submit some jobs.) I think the greatest snub is to the GNU project. Yes, the kernel is great. Yes, the kernel is wonderful. Yes, where would we be without the kernel?! But hell, who would adopt "just a kernel" for an operating system?? All those who make the switch from Microsoft to GNU/Linux do it because several GNU project have now reached the maturity level for them to be attractive to your garden-variety PC user.

  18. Biggest Paradigm Change by Red+Jesus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Biggest Paradigm Change in Enterprise Software: Linux kernel

    Don't get me wrong: I love Linus and I love Linux. But don't forget what RMS likes to remind us at every opportunity: Linux is part of the GNU system. And GNU predated Linux by a long shot.

    Stallman started the GNU project in 1983 and founded the Free Software Foundation in 1985. The Linux kernel appeared in 1991. Where did Torvalds get his compiler? Where did Torvalds get his editor? Where did Torvalds find people to work on his kernel? I understand that it can be pedantic to argue about big, abstract ideas like ``When did the paradigm shift really happen?'' Maybe the paradigm didn't ``shift'' until the Linux kernel came out. But Torvalds wasn't out to change paradigms. Stallman was. If we're going to hail the concept of free software, we should acknowledge the alphabet soup of RMS, the FSF, GNU, ETC. that gave it legs to stand on.

    1. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Maybe the paradigm didn't ``shift'' until the Linux kernel came out. But Torvalds wasn't out to change paradigms. Stallman was.

      Community development was Torvalds' innovation, not Stallman's. Prior to Linux, the FSF was a GPL cathedral cranking out utilities to run on Sun OS.

    2. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't meant to troll, but honestly, sincewhen does 0.75% of the overall market constitute a "wonder".

      Microsoft and IBM putting a PC in every household, that's a wonder, Dethroning Unix as *the* operating system, and even mS managing to all but corner the market can constitute a wonder. AT&T creating Unix in the first place, that's arguably a wonder.

      The most famous of many open kernels, with marginal to insignificant relative usage? No, not really.

      And as far as Stallman and GU are concerned, weather or not he intended a paradigm shift (and weather this shift has even occured) is irrelevent.

      I'd argue that Linus' kernel is what gave GNU legs to stand on.

    3. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the server side Linux has way more penetration than 0.75%. That is what the article is talking about (read it again).

      Therefore, you == idiot.

    4. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by Chyeld · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The straw that breaks the camel's back may just be one straw. It may not even be the heaviest or biggest straw. It may owe it's entire fame to all the straws that came before it.

      But it's still the straw that broke the camel's back. The first straw didn't, the straw just before the last straw didn't, just the one straw. The last straw.

      Thats the straw that gets remembered.

      How many people attempted to fly solo transatlantic before Charles? Can you name any, and if so, do you consider it an acheivement or a matter of 'everyone knows that'?

      That isn't to belittle RMS or his works, but for all he put into it, it would have come to naught if Linus or someone else hadn't come along and given the final push.

    5. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by Red+Jesus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That isn't to belittle RMS or his works, but for all he put into it, it would have come to naught if Linus or someone else hadn't come along and given the final push.

      I guess I didn't make my point clear enough. Why was Linus even pushing at all? The FSF did more than write software. It fostered a community. It created a public license so folks wouldn't have to write their own. It established a list of goals: software that the GNU system sorely needed. Torvalds didn't come up with the paradigm of using open source software nor did he establish the basic rules by which open source projects would operate. The fact that his kernel was the last component to be written before the GNU/Linux system could stand alone isn't at issue here. The question is whether he was responsible for founding a paradigm.

      Try this instead: Go out into the street and ask people to name a piece of free software. Odds are, they'll name Firefox. Firefox is the first piece of open source software to attract a userbase of that many non-technical people. Firefox drew the public's eye to OSS in a way that no other software has. But would you say that the Mozilla Foundation was responsible for a paradigm shift? Of course not! They just exposed a larger number of people to the concept. As fine as their software is, it's just software. And right now we're looking for paradigms. The Linux kernel is no more foundational in this respect than is Firefox.

    6. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit. open source was around when your mom was pissing in diapers. i'm sick of you joe-sixpack-come-latelies acting like this is new. it just shows you don't know the first fucking thing about computing before you thought you discovered it.

    7. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by dbIII · · Score: 1

      But don't forget what RMS likes to remind us at every opportunity: Linux is part of the GNU system

      Just because he has convinced a few newbies of this does not make it true. The hurd is part of the GNU system - linux is something else even if it does have glibc to talk to.

    8. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      Possibly simply exposing a large number of people to the concept is the most significant part though.

      Maybe in 10 or 20 years time when virtually all software is Free and package management systems like apt are the way the vast majority get their software, we'll look back and say that Firefox was the start of the trend to this way of working with computers. Or perhaps OpenOffice.org will be. Or perhaps Linux, or something else.

      In this sense, it doesn't really matter who was responsible for creating the paradigm. What's important is who or what was responsible for causing it to make a real, significant impact in people's lives. That's yet to happen, as the majority of people still download binary blobs from random websites, and consider this the normal way of obtaining software.

      Pyramid-shaped tombs were almost certainly constructed before The Pyramids, but they're not notable in any way: it wasn't until they were built on such a massive scale that they became wondrous. Likewise, creating a new paradigm for software development and community isn't notable in itself, until it becomes massively widespread. And then, it's going to be whoever made it massive that gets the attention.

    9. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by adah · · Score: 1

      bullshit. open source was around when your mom was pissing in diapers.

      Total nonsense. Open source as a movement began after Linus Torvalds was successful with the development of Linux. Linus was the first person who learned how to play by the new rules that pervasive Internet access made possible.

      Free software began much earlier. As the grandparent says, it was still cathedral style. Read ESR’s ‘The Cathedral and the Bazaar’ first, please.

    10. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure that this was an "innovation" by Linus. I think that people wanted something better than the limited minix distribution they were running. There were groups of programmers working on projects, before Linus came along.

    11. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by DoubleMike · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't really get this one right. It wasn't the kernel itself that was so revolutionary, but the method of development. What the Linux project did was introduce the open source community (and the rest of the world) to a new, decentralized development strategy that actually worked. Absolutely no one expected Linux to take off like it did, and the result of this experiment in distributed development has changed the way we all think about open source. You may not remember, but open source software development before 1992 was very different than it is today, especially for GNU. Stallman had some great ideas, but it was Torvalds that really showed us how to put them to work. Look at it this way: Torvalds was the "accidental revolutionary" that simply tried to get something done and revolutionized the industry, and Stallman was the "purposeful revolutionary" that tried to revolutionize the world and only got something done (i.e. the GNU software). Stallman is the one that wants the credit, where Torvalds wants none, but they are almost equally responsible for the change. Torvalds just gets the spotlight because actions speak louder than words.

    12. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why you choose to only go back far enough to acknowledge RMS' contributions. What about before RMS?

      The truth is, no one could do it alone. Anyway, to me it seems there was first a "paradigm shift" to proprietary software, and now free and open software is making a comeback.

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    13. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by o'reor · · Score: 1
      Well, as far as embedded software development is concerned, the rise of the Linux kernel was a huge blow to existing embedded OS kernels.

      How many people still remember pSOS, VRTX, VxWorks (which was largely based on GNU development tools but with a proprietary real-time kernel) and a few others that were popular till the late 90s ? Of course, when you need a tiny, real-time kernel, Linux doesn't cut it yet, although that is also about to change.

      But on the whole, you now have countless Linux-based embedded "solutions" on the market for various types of controllers, offering web servers or Java servlets for the user interface, at very affordable prices (forget about the $5000 per developer licence for proprietary systems), with a wealth of open-source software waiting to be ported to these new platforms. Guess who's happy ?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    14. Re:Biggest Paradigm Change by jschrod · · Score: 1
      Ah, pissing contest. OK. I was involved in porting X10 to new hardware, and X11 when it came out. I do TeX development since 1981. I made gcc backend ports to new architectures back in 1983. I ran some of the largest ftp archives in the world (if you still remember the C++ collection on Walnot Creek CDs in the early 90s, that was from me.) Since these days, I have been actively involved in development of free and open source software.

      And let me tell, the GP is right. Linux triggered a revolution in the way how open source software is created, and what is expected from distributed development in an OSS project. Before 1992, we worked differently than we do today.

      --

      Joachim

      People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

  19. No Storm? by Orthuberra · · Score: 1

    What no storm botnet on there? It's the most powerful supercomputer in the world! Seriously though this list isn't that good and their are many things I could think of that could just as easily be on there. Doug Englebart's ideas (NLS and the mother of all demos in 68) now that is a wonder we are still trying to implement successfully and yet hardly anyone has heard of it. But instead we have world's smallest computer running Vista? Pretty lame list here folks...

  20. An upcoming sucessor by ILuvRamen · · Score: 0

    The smallest computer to run Windows Vista on page 7 is soon to be overtaken by the first computer to actually run-run Windows Vista, like without crashing and stuff

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  21. the biggest wonder by hguorbray · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is that IT works at all considering that the stakeholders and implementers have little common ground or understanding or sympathy for the other.

    -I'm just sayin...

  22. More content than fluff here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  23. It's all about the satellites by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    And they're not, technically, on the world.

    Think of the pics from space - that's what the public cares about.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  24. Google at the "end of the Oregon Trail"? by tholomyes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TFA: "Pioneers knew The Dalles as the end of the Oregon trail."

    I was just in Seaside this weekend, and they had a big sign next to a statue of Lewis and Clark proclaiming that that was the end of the Oregon Trail... The oceanside makes more sense IMO.

    --
    When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
    1. Re:Google at the "end of the Oregon Trail"? by yourexhalekiss · · Score: 1

      Lewis and Clark went first... they did indeed hit the Pacific at Seaside. However, the Oregon Trail was some time afterwards, and was composed of people who were actually moving west. Lewis and Clark were explorers, the first white men in the area, while the people who followed the Oregon Trail, as it was known, were settlers.

    2. Re:Google at the "end of the Oregon Trail"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? And here I thought that the game ended at Willamette Valley, provided that your party hadn't died yet.

  25. DNS Servers missing? by Ghostalker474 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I woulda thought that the core DNS servers.... the ones that keep the internet going, would have made the list. Without them, everyone would have to resort to numbers (which a lot of us here can do, but not the general public). Ya figure they do massive amounts of work, replying to millions of requests per minute, keep the internet going [which is critical to most developed nations economies]... yet didn't receive any attention here :( I'm all for NASA with the Voyager probe... but in all reality, its a satellite that we barely keep in contact with, thats ~40 years old.

  26. I guess when you look at it that way... by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

    Who is going to make the official Nobel nomination?

  27. Seven Wonders Of The Security Software World by nickh01uk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The guys over at Three Sixty Information Security have published the results of their analysis on 7 of the most popular security tools in common use by systems administrators. The articles examines the tools on their merits and attempts to pull together common threads running through each. Finally they put forward their answer to the question "What makes this software so uncommonly good?"

    NH

  28. Wow by sharkey · · Score: 1

    I was wondering if goatse.cx had made the list, so I checked it out. Lo and behold - no article, just a big Symantec ad. Must be the work-safe way to display something large and stretched that produces feces.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  29. 8th wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    is how a spammers site masquerading as website for CIO's still gets linked from Slashdot
    ive seen less adverts and more content on a domain squatters/typo site, they must be desperate

  30. My own suggestions by khallow · · Score: 1
    • NASA's Deep Space Network - the Voyager spacecraft still function because of this.
    • The Granite Mountain Record Vault at Little Cottonwood Canyon, Utah. Maintained by the Church of Latter Day Saints.
    • Google's server farms. I believe they got that one correct.
    • SETI@HOME - my "grid computing" example
    • Linux OS/GNU tools. Got that one partially correct.
    • the US's early warning system for detecting nuclear explosions, missile launches, etc.
    1. Re:My own suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Allow me to be pedantic:

      The correct name of the church is The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints :)

    2. Re:My own suggestions by zrq · · Score: 1

      • SETI@HOME - my "grid computing" example

      I'd agree with this, but for me, the new website design has lost the 'wow' factor.

      When I first joined the seti@home project, their website produced amazing statistics like 'number of years cpu time in the last 24hrs'. I found that absolutely fantastic, and made me feel that I was contributing to something really big.

      Their new website design shows you how many 'credits' your account has scored, but not what the project overall has achieved in terms of raw cpu power. Personally I find this kind of disappointing. I didn't join the project to earn 'credits', I joined to participate in the biggest compute project the world has ever seen.

      I must admit that I've been less motivated to keep my seti processing machines updated. In fact, I don't think I have bothered to install the seti processor on any of my recent machines.

    3. Re:My own suggestions by grumling · · Score: 1

      Yea, the DEW network was an amazing thing for the day... The first application of real time computing, and networked RADAR installations as well! SABRE was the next big commercial system, if you believe IBM.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  31. Forgotten Wonder by Bastardchyld · · Score: 3, Funny

    The lamest one was "small computer that runs Vista". I agree as well, although a better wonder, and slightly more in touch with reality, would have been "any computer that runs Vista well"

    --
    $diff terrorists hippies
    $
    $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    1. Re:Forgotten Wonder by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd imagine there are computers inside Microsoft running Windows Vista Internal Edition well. Windows Vista IE is like normal Vista, with one small change.

  32. Paradigm Shift? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    Before 1991, most of the servers on the Internet ran stuff like sendmail and bind on Unix.

    Nowdays, most of the servers on the Internet run stuff like sendmail and bind on a Unix-like OS.

    Thanks, article, for going into such detail about what changed. It's like a whole different world now!

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  33. Agreed: by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Considering that both Voyagers each carry a mechanical device and a gold disk that bears lots of rich data about Earth and Humanity, I'd say that the best damned Backup/DR data storage effort we've made so far in the history of mankind.

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Agreed: by Runefox · · Score: 2, Informative

      And, taking into account some of the concepts of RFC 1149, we can reasonably assume that Voyager's data transfer to whoever/whatever/if anything receives it should be infinitely faster and higher-volume than anything we can even imagine.

      --
      Screw the rules, I have green hair!
    2. Re:Agreed: by master_p · · Score: 1

      But the data on it are horribly outdated! our world has changed so much since Voyager was launched.

      Personally, If I was to launch a new spacecraft for this reason, I would put all versions of Microsoft Windows on it. Best security for Earth ever. No aliens will dare to come over here!!!

    3. Re:Agreed: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck restoring it in case of a disaster though.

    4. Re:Agreed: by genner · · Score: 1

      Nag, nag backups are never up to date.

    5. Re:Agreed: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say that the best damned Backup/DR data storage effort we've made so far in the history of mankind. But backup is worthless if you can't actually retrieve the data at some later date....

      Oh, wait.
  34. We run bigger data centers by gelfling · · Score: 0

    MUCH bigger. Shhhhh

    -you know who.

  35. OQO? by ynososiduts · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is that doing in the mix with Google, Blue Gene, and Voyager. It's not even useful. It's too small to be used as a regular office PC, and too large to be a bring everywhere gadget. It should be replaced with like, Ethernet or something similar.

    --
    622677120
    1. Re:OQO? by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      What's OQO doing? Paying for bandwidth.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  36. Yeah, yeah, Google, CIA, OBL, M$. by gnutoo · · Score: 1

    No group has gotten more money from the CIA than Google. Except Osama Bin Laden. Except Microsoft. OMG, did I just call M$ a CIA sponsored terrorist? What a smear. This internet thing, is not fair.

  37. it would be a wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the linux community contained any heterosexuals.

    1. Re:it would be a wonder by fractoid · · Score: 1

      If it didn't, there'd be a lot less single slashdotters... >.>

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  38. Not that impressive by khallow · · Score: 1

    That's not that much load. Keep in mind that DNS is firstly distributed. So those servers receive only a minute portion of the total DNS load. And you can spread what they do get across a number of servers. The Google server farms are more impressive. They handle much higher loads, do significant data mining and processing, and cache some where around a billion or two webpages.

    1. Re:Not that impressive by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google makes money with their farm, which makes it far less impressive to me. It takes some serious money and engineering to keep the various root server clusters up 24/7, and it's done basically by a volunteer community.

      They also do have a pretty remarkable amount of load, given how rarely they "ought" to be used.

      http://h.root-servers.org/128.63.2.53_2.html

      The H server averaged 5 megabytes/sec of inbound traffic over the last month. Given how small DNS queries are, that's an awful lot of queries! Over 7,000 packets per second, every second.

  39. Stevie? by jaypolka · · Score: 1

    Stevie Wonders of the IT World? I dunno.. Whistler from Sneakers?

  40. What no robots? by adamclarke77 · · Score: 1

    Should be at least one, should there not?

  41. New 7 Wonders by dm0527 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was also disappointed by the list. Mostly because of content, but also because it contained a link to the New 7 Wonders website, which has simply got to be a joke. A list that some place put together to "represent global heritage throughout history" and the pyramids at Giza was simply a runner up?!?!? How lame do you have to be to put together a "seven wonders of the world" list where the pyramids don't warrant a place on the list, especially considering that they're the only thing still around from the bloody original list...

    --
    - dm - The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and stupidity.
  42. The Dalles Data Center by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


    They list The Dalles Data Center as one of the 7 wonders in the IT world, but they admit themselves that they have no idea what's inside of it? Those warehouses may be full of hay, for all we know. The design of it may be terrible and inefficient, even if it has servers. It's a pretty cheeky thing to claim on zero evidence.

    Which is only par for the course. That was one of the worst signal-to-noise ratios of any news site, besides, oh, the last time /. linked to a CIO World article. Seriously, can we stop linking to them? They have nothing but crap articles, with no insight, surrounded by a 100-to-1 ad ratio. Linking to them only validates their strategy, and in fact the story on /. was probably from a shill for them in the first place.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    1. Re:The Dalles Data Center by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 2, Informative


      in fact the story on /. was probably from a shill for them in the first place

      In fact, it absolutely was. Check the guy's email address on the linked submission; it goes to @cio.com; and the article was written by the same user. Please. I know it's was a fad and is now passe to complain about the editors on /., but can we have some more review of the articles that are posted than this? Not linking to the same domain as the submitter's email address would be start, especially if that's coupled with a uid that has accumulated some karma (so shows that they've been active in the community).

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    2. Re:The Dalles Data Center by cashman73 · · Score: 1
      They list The Dalles Data Center as one of the 7 wonders in the IT world, but they admit themselves that they have no idea what's inside of it?

      Well, to be fair, we're not really sure what's inside the great pyramid, either, . . . or what the Sphinx does?

  43. Yeah, but do they have a theme song? by dswensen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah, but do they have a hard-rockin' flute ballad, like the "New Seven Wonders of the World?" It's probably Chocolate Love or All Your Base or some damn thing, isn't it?

  44. CIO.COM are the seven sucks of the world ... by xmas2003 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    GAWD ... an ad page for each hop - ridiculous!

    --
    Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
  45. Kiss Computer Gurus goodbye with Desktop Search by SpectateSwamp · · Score: 1

    Desktop Search puts the non-technical citizens on equal footing with the Geekiest user.

    Learn 1 simple app and ignore most of the Computer gibberish.

    --
    Challenge: I have better access to my Video, Music, Pics and Text than anyone on Earth.
  46. Also not impressed by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Voyager is hardly "IT," wonder that it is.

    I was also not impressed and that was my initial reaction too...but then I thought. Is the impressive thing that we shot a tin can out of the solar system or that it can tell us what it is seeing out there? I think it is really the latter so it really is a information technology marvel in the most basic sense of the term.

    1. Re:Also not impressed by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 1

      Well said from a very philosophical point of view. :)

  47. What about the web? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How can you possibly put together a list of the IT wonders of the world with out including the world wide web - especially when you put the article on a website!

    1. Re:What about the web? by lhorn · · Score: 1

      Careful, you are showing your age. And giving away our advantage, when we are the last who knows how things work, they'll have to recognize our superiority (muhaahaa...)

      --
      accept no limits but time
  48. Small agency running out of ideas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I thought the idea of a "wonder" was something that we can only try and imagine how they managed to do it or how they came up with the idea."

    Substitute "patent" for "wonder" and have another go at it.

  49. Huh by khallow · · Score: 1

    I could do no right here. At least, it's more accurate than just "Mormon".

  50. This is all well and good, but... by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Where's my flying car?

    [p.s. CIO - worst-article-to-follow-across-multiple-pages award nominee]

    --
    Some days it's just not worth
    chewing through my restraints.
  51. "Google's mum" by ContractualObligatio · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Number of servers: Google's mum."

    The correct phrase is "keeping mum".

    "Google's mum" is what you would say when implying intimate knowledge of Mrs Google, or perhaps her tendency to wear sturdy footwear.

  52. csirac by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    Personally I would have put in a vote for CSIRAC, which is the oldest digital computer still in existence.

  53. The "Any Key" by bab72 · · Score: 1

    I don't see how you can have a Seven Wonders of the IT World and not include the "Any Key"

    --
    Bab72 (Not my real name)
  54. Re: The list in Readable Form! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1


    Thanks, I was looking for this "noise reducer" post.

    This article has one THE worst noise overheads I have ever seen.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  55. Wonder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always wondered how the hell Java came to be dominant programming language for business applications!! God help us all!!

    "Java is a programming language designed by two guys in a garage, and it shows."

    - university professor of information systems, and chief architect at a major multinational aerospace company

  56. that is some pretty good marketing by dctmfoo · · Score: 1

    Soon i am going to be the owner of one of the seven wonders of IT world.

    installing security updates for vista

  57. They left one out by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    They left out teh goatse! And that has *got* to be the most-viewed page of all time!

    --
    C|N>K
  58. What's another year? by brown-eyed+slug · · Score: 1

    You're both right. However, Information Technology Year was also 1995, 1996, 1999 and 2006.

  59. Missing by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    The Seti@Home project. Registered in the Guiness Book of Records as the largest computation ever made.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  60. Print link to article by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    http://www.cio.com/article/print/135700

    For those who also hate paging through an article at the speed of advertising.

    --
    -Styopa
  61. FUD of a religious sort by Loundry · · Score: 1

    It might outlast Earth.

    Repeat after me:

    Matter cannot be created nor destroyed.

    Matter cannot be created nor destroyed.

    Matter cannot be created nor destroyed.

    Your "We're destroying the earth!" is not merely run-of-the-mill religious global destruction fantasy. It's also inherently un-scientific and thus qualifies as FUD. Ditch that bullshit!

    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
    1. Re:FUD of a religious sort by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I said nothing of the sort.
      When the Sun eventually goes Red-giant and envelops Earth, Earth _will_ be destroyed. It's building blocks will become part of the Sun, but Voyager will still be space-junk beyond the solar system. That assumes God doesn't end things first, in which case Earth and Voyager might tie. ;)
      BTW, I'm undecided on whether Global Warming exists, whether it's man-made if it does, and whether having the earth warm up slightly would be a Bad Thing. Good thing I already agree with you, because your vinegar won't catch many flies.

    2. Re:FUD of a religious sort by khallow · · Score: 1

      Matter cannot be created nor destroyed.

      Actually it can. An electron and positron can collide to form gamma rays. There you go from having matter (the mass of the positron is the samee as the electron) to having no mass. Similarly, a sufficiently powerful gamma can spontaneously spin off particle anti-particle pairs, losing energy in the process.

      So more accurately, mass-energy cannot be created or destroyed.

      Then as the other replier notes, the Earth is not mass/energy, it is a lable for an aggregation of matter. And while the mass-energy that composes the Earth cannot be destroyed, the planet itself can be.

  62. What? No BushidoHacks.com? :-) by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

    Wonder #1: I say NOAA could save themselves alot of money if they bought a better webcam. Any webcam has a thermal bountry of -40 to 120F, but it gets COLD at the North Pole, like -60F cold. What happens when it gets below -40F? That's alot of data that NOAA is missing out on. They need to place a call down to NASA to see if they have any spare Mars Rover parts. Secondly, why waste money on letting the camera drown each year? Strap a floation device to it. Wonder #6: OQO is not so great. It has a very short battery life, possibly due to the Operating System it uses *cough*Vista*cough*. What OS would use the least amnout of power?

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  63. #8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #8 - Bonzai Buddy, perhaps?