Slashdot Mirror


SCO Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

Can you say "the SCO, the" in German? writes "Trading of SCO's stock has been halted on news that SCO has filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. This move just so happens to fall on the eve of SCO's trial with Novell. One would think that their prior boasts were mostly bluster, that they believe they have almost no chance of prevailing at trial, and that they're now desperate to protect their executives from SCO's creditors while seeking yet another delay. From the release: 'The SCO Group intends to maintain all normal business operations throughout the bankruptcy proceedings. Subject to court approval, SCO and its subsidiaries will use the cash flow from their consolidated operations to meet their capital needs during the reorganization process. "We want to assure our customers and partners that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations," said Darl McBride, President and CEO, The SCO Group. "Chapter 11 reorganization provides the Company with an opportunity to protect its assets during this time while focusing on building our future plans."'"

91 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. Sad, sad news by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know I'm going to be crying myself to sleep tonight.

    1. Re:Sad, sad news by snowgirl · · Score: 5, Funny

      YAY! Party at my place everyone! Champange for all! :)

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    2. Re:Sad, sad news by Romancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You will be when they have no real consequences from this whole sordid episode. When they are back at it again spweing out the FUD and dragging people through court having learned no lessons since the system is pretty much in their favor. They can drag this out another ten years and still come out with capital and the exectuives will never have to pay the people they are hurting by doing all this.

      Rant/

      Just look at all they have learned by going through the courts with no evidence and being laughed at by the people who review the case and get the facts instead of reading their press releases. They are literally filing for bankruptcy and assuring their customers that they are fine and can rely on them at the same time... AT THE SAME TIME! No reasonable company would be so immune to shame, so ignorant of the mocking thats going on right in front of them, and still be able to tell people that everythings OK. That these bottomdwellers are still making a living, still giving themselves bonuses and trying to protect their stock is a slap in the face for american justice. This is another Enron, this is another corporation exec scandle happening right now, at this very moment. They are telling us that they don't care that they are wrong and have taken the courts time and our money and threatened people, intimidated customers, extorted from innocent and ignorant law abiding citicens and companies who only wanted to avoid doing the wrong thing and pay whatever license fees to whoever owned the code they were using. They have either planned this and acted accordingly to draw it out, or they employ the most ignorant legal councel out there to advise them. No proof, no problem, No evidence, no problem, No case, no problem. Lets all make a bunch of money! Dirty rat bastards. And we will as a nation let another one get away with it. The people who made these decisions will walk away with millions. We'll complain and let them walk. Accomplices to the raping of this country. /Rant

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    3. Re:Sad, sad news by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They are literally filing for bankruptcy and assuring their customers that they are fine and can rely on them at the same time...

      Ah, but it's easy to placate your customers when you don't have any.

    4. Re:Sad, sad news by JackieBrown · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the safest thing for you to do is buy more SCO stocks

    5. Re:Sad, sad news by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Informative

      They are literally filing for bankruptcy and assuring their customers that they are fine and can rely on them at the same time... AT THE SAME TIME! Ummm... maybe you don't understand what Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings are. It's a reorganization of the company, not a dissolution.

      That isn't to say that SCO is safe, but news that they're filing for bankruptcy doesn't really mean anything.

      You want an example of companies that go bankrupt while maintaining operations?
      See: US Airline Industry
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:Sad, sad news by analog_line · · Score: 4, Funny

      You want an example of companies that go bankrupt while maintaining operations?
      See: US Airline Industry


      I see you haven't flown anywhere this summer...
    7. Re:Sad, sad news by badasscat · · Score: 4, Informative

      YAY! Party at my place everyone! Champange for all! :)

      There's nothing to cheer about here. This is SCO's way of weaseling out of their legal liabilities. They conceivably now will not have to pay Novell, or at least not for a long while. It gives them time to continue their court cases without having to settle their debts.

      It's a tactic. They're not out of business, at least not yet.

    8. Re:Sad, sad news by killjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let this be a lesson to all of you.

      Personal responsibility is for suckers and fools.

      Smart people form corporations so they can lie, cheat, and steal with impunity.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    9. Re:Sad, sad news by aneeshm · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean I Pee, right?

    10. Re:Sad, sad news by wwphx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's both direct and indirect employees. A friend of mine installs vertical app systems based on SCO. The software was developed by his employer ages ago before SCO was anywhere near buying Unix from Novell, much less the McBride invasion. He works for a legitimate company who based their business on an OS provider who basically went evil. Now Richard is in a slightly precarious position. He has lots of systems to maintain, but now all of these customers are edgy because they hear bits and pieces regarding SCO, and they know their business depends on it.

      Rich's employer sells a similar package based on Windows, but just the two platforms. Care to guess which is the more stable platform? It might have been wise of the company to port their system to a Linux distro, but they are a small company and probably didn't have the resources.

      It's not like Rich is in danger of losing his job next week, but it adds to the tension at the office and makes work life that much more unpleasant.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  2. Get out the violin by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    And tell the fat lady to start warming up.

    It's been a long time coming, but still they had to know this day would arrive. If shareholders weren't really in it for the crapshoot of beating IBM and Novell for $Billion$ they'd have a case against Darl and his lot for running the business into the ground pursuing frivolous lawsuits.

    SCO's income from normal opperations must be down to a trickle with Linux and Windows Server vying for most of the market.

    Emerge from Chapter 11? I can't see how, unless somehow there was a reversal of court decisions and they're doing nothing to grow their product market.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Get out the violin by trolltalk.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "SCO is doing this to make Novell into a creditor with respect to the money SCO owes to Novell."

      Won't work. Novell's claim isn't as a creditor. Their claim is "equitable", meaning that SCO is holding theor property ($$$), not that SCO owes them money. When you go bankrupt, anyone who can show that they own property you're holding on to can claim it from the trustee.

      This happens a lot with vending machines, for example, when a plant goes bust. The owner proves that the machine is theirs (not leased or anything - it really is theirs), and they then get to pick it up.

      Since Novell already has a judgment saying that SCO is guilty of conversion, and the question is "how much", they have a prior claim to the property (money) in question. SCO is dead.

    2. Re:Get out the violin by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the other hand, when's the last time that SCO tried a legal strategy that did work?

  3. w00t!!!! by sconeu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think PJ needs to send the red dress to the cleaners, so it will be ready when she needs it!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:w00t!!!! by Slicebo · · Score: 5, Informative

      The "red dress" reference pertains to a comment that Groklaw's PJ made a long time ago, saying she was looking forward to putting on her red dress and partying when SCO loses their case in court.

      I'm afraid a "black dress" for wearing to the upcoming SCO funeral will be more useful now.

  4. Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where's my tiny violin?

    1. Re:Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe you'll need a tunneling electron microscope to find this particular violin :)

  5. Dear Darl, by middlemen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good things come to those who wait !
    Regards, Destiny

    1. Re:Dear Darl, by IP_Troll · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't want to rain on anyone's parade, but this is not good. Bankruptcy is like a protective cocoon that keeps businesses with cash problems safe from creditors. It is a way for SCO to stall further.

      Bankruptcy prevents an entity's creditors from forcing liquidation of the entity's assets. If Novell won it's case against SCO, Novell could enforce it's judgment against SCO and force SCO to dissolve. If SCO was dissolved the case against IBM would disappear. Now that SCO has filed for bankruptcy it is protected from its creditors. Therefore Novell cannot get the licensing fees SCO owes it, and SCO can continue to exist.

      Filing for bankruptcy is not SCO tossing in the towel, it is more like SCO knows it is going to lose, and is now trying to bite off Novell's ear to get Disqualified instead of Knocked Out.

    2. Re:Dear Darl, by Desert+Raven · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem with this theory is that Novell is not a creditor.

      The court ruled that the money *belongs* to Novell. That's a far different legal issue than SCO owing money to Novell.

      It's like a burglar trying to claim bankruptcy in order to keep the stuff he stole. Since the stuff isn't actually his (and in this case has been declared so in a court of law), bankruptcy doesn't protect it.

    3. Re:Dear Darl, by shaitand · · Score: 5, Insightful

      'If SCO was dissolved the case against IBM would disappear.'

      That would be a bad thing, we don't want the IBM case to disappear, we want IBM have a very strong favorable ruling. Any other outcome means this was all a waste of time with no precedents set.

    4. Re:Dear Darl, by phoenixwade · · Score: 2, Insightful

      'If SCO was dissolved the case against IBM would disappear.'

      That would be a bad thing, we don't want the IBM case to disappear, we want IBM have a very strong favorable ruling. Any other outcome means this was all a waste of time with no precedents set. I disagree.

      The Novell ruling removed any chance of a precedence being set. once Judge Kimball said "Novel owns the copyrights, and Novell did have the right to prevent you from suing IBM" the IBM case was dead. There was no chance a precedence would be set as far as Open Source code and the Free Software community was concerned.

      This result has no effect on IBM except to limit the additional outlay of money IBM has to spend to defend themselves. There is obviously no money in SCO to pay IBM for the litigation expenses the bogus suit has given them.

      The only three things I believe are left to discover are 1; can Novell be first to the Buffet and 2; can they pierce the corporate veil, and 3; is there a prosecutable criminal case here.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  6. One word by lurker412 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can you say Schadenfreude in English?

    1. Re:One word by hpa · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to Wikipedia the English term is epicaricacy.

    2. Re:One word by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can you say Schadenfreude in English?

      Yes. It's pronounced "ha HA!", preferably in a high-pitched, somewhat nasal voice reminiscent of a certain cartoon character.

    3. Re:One word by thsths · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > According to Wikipedia the English term is epicaricacy.

      Isn't that just a Greek word instead of a German word? (And one that nobody understands, too?)

  7. Yay... by Inferger · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ding dong the witch is dead!

    1. Re:Yay... by lottameez · · Score: 2, Funny

      [gurgle] I'm not quite dead.

      --
      Yeah? Well I think you're overrated too.
    2. Re:Yay... by abb3w · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Do you think we should drive a stake through his heart just in case?" — Peter Lorre to Vincent Price at Bela Lugosi's funeral

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  8. It's Been Fun by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wait ... no it hasn't.

    For those of you who bought SCOX stock in hopes that they would win this case, you had better sell it. In the past 20 minutes, it has dropped from $0.66 to $0.37 cents (and still is dropping).

    We want to assure our customers and partners that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations. Would you care to list those products, support & services?

    According to your market data your net income was a $16.6 million loss. And when your total revenue was under $30 million, you really shouldn't even try to keep operating. Why is this Chapter 11? I guess it's going to come down to one unkillable lawyer with SCO tattooed on his chest. At that point, we'll have to call an exorcist.
    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:It's Been Fun by jonbryce · · Score: 4, Informative

      Too late. Your stock price feed most likely has a time delay built in. Trading will have been halted as soon as the news comes out. This is the insiders dumping their stock before the news gets out.

    2. Re:It's Been Fun by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Funny

      Damn. I read the post and figured I could by out the company tommorow for $15-20. Not that I want it but wouldn't it ROCK to give someone SCO as a gag gift for Christmas?

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    3. Re:It's Been Fun by Gyga · · Score: 2, Funny

      I need a box big enough to mail it to Linus.

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    4. Re:It's Been Fun by _KiTA_ · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Too late. Your stock price feed most likely has a time delay built in. Trading will have been halted as soon as the news comes out. This is the insiders dumping their stock before the news gets out.


      Isn't that horribly, horribly illegal? Will we get to see the SEC frog-march Darl and the crew for insider trading?

    5. Re:It's Been Fun by drew · · Score: 2, Informative

      Common misconception. Insider trading is not at all illegal, otherwise it would be impossible for company executives to buy or sell their stock, and and stock or option grants for high level executives would be worthless. You could forget about Steve Jobs $1 salary...

      There are just a very strict set of rules that you have to follow when you buy or sell stock as an insider, or with insider information. The main thing, AFAIK, is that you have to file paperwork with the SEC announcing your intention to buy or sell your stock, but I believe that there are other restrictions too. The paperwork that they file is public information, so if you see all of a companies executives filing to significant chunks of their stock on date X, you might want to consider selling any stock you have before that date as well.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    6. Re:It's Been Fun by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only people still running mission-critical stuff on SCO are people who have been unable to port, either because of their own technical incompetence or because the app is an utterly inscrutable horror of non-portability. About the only the SCO's impending death does to them is force them to face up to the imminent pain coming their way.

      Chris Mattern

  9. What SCO told the court by rewt66 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I seem to recall[*] that SCO told the court that there was no need for a constructive trust to protect Novell's money, since they (SCO) were in no danger of bankruptcy.

    Now SCO is facing the exact same judge on Monday morning over the issue of how much money they owe Novell. I predict an interesting day in court ;-)

    * OK, I was reminded of it by something someone (anonymous, so I can't give credit) said on Groklaw.

    1. Re:What SCO told the court by LouisJBouchard · · Score: 2, Informative

      There will be no court case on Monday. The Bankruptcy filing effectively stays the lawsuit until SCO is reorganized or the Bankruptcy judge removes the stay.

      I am thinking the later will happen. I am sure the Novell will file that SCO is really a fiduciary for their assets under the contract and as such, they get first dibs on SCO's assets. In order to find out how much Novell gets though, the case will have to be heard and ruled on. Therefore, the Bankruptcy court judge will lift the stay on the trial.

  10. And now, ladies and gentlemen... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Funny

    the tune you've all been waiting to hear.

    *drum rolls*

    Ding Dong! The Witch is dead. Which old Witch? The Wicked Witch!
    Ding Dong! The Wicked Witch is dead.
    Wake up - sleepy head, rub your eyes, get out of bed.
    Wake up, the Wicked Witch is dead.

  11. Chapter 11 by arth1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Chapter 11 is bankruptcy protection. A company can emerge from chapter 11 (SGI did), but it's usually a preamble to a chapter 7, which means liquidation and game over, pal.

    1. Re:Chapter 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, it's not. Chapter 11 is reorganization of credit, usually done by businesses or individuals with large assets. It's in no way a preamble to chapter 7. If you can't prove that you will be able to reorganize your credit / business and keep your financial obligations, you cannot file chapter 11. It's not like you pick chapter 11, give it a shot, and when you fail, liquidate. It's one or the other. The only thing you said that makes any sense is the word protection - chapter 11 is commonly referred to as protection because you are being protected from involuntary bankruptcy (i.e. your creditor initiated the proceedings after non-payment) while you determine a strategy for payment / growth.

    2. Re:Chapter 11 by peragrin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is because Novell recently claimed that it should recieve 100% of the Sun & MSFT Sco Source deals plus 7% interest. The APA SCOX loves so much says Novell recieves 100% with Novell refunding 5% back as adminstrative fees.

      Either way 95% is roughly 5 million dollars more than all of SCO's value Liquidated. I wonder if the bankruptcy trustee can declare Darl Mcbride's million dollar bonus for those two sales as invalid and ask for it back? I do hope so.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Chapter 11 by TheHappyMailAdmin · · Score: 2, Informative

      United Airlines is another prime example of acompany that came out of Chapter 11. UA declared bankruptcy to give them better control over their assets and to give them better leverage to renegotiate contracts with vendors and unions. Neither of those apply to seem to apply to SCO in this case, so I'm doubting they'll come out as well...

    4. Re:Chapter 11 by kilgortrout · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC over 90% of Ch11 bankruptcies wind up in liquidation either through the filing of a liquidating plan or conversion to a Ch7.

  12. DFWT by sayfawa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't Fuck With Tux

    --
    Free the Quark 3 from asymptotic confinement! Bring your charm! Don't get down! All colours and flavours welcome!
    1. Re:DFWT by WilliamSChips · · Score: 4, Funny

      And now he's dying!

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:DFWT by XSforMe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More like Dont Fuck With the Nazgul

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
  13. Who are these people? by mcmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    We want to assure our customers and partners that they can continue to rely on SCO products, support and services for their business critical operations

    Aside from the lawyers for whom SCO is a source of billable hours, who relies on SCO for any products, support, or services? Are these the same folks looking to George W. for stategic planning? The masses going to Michael Vick for pet care tips? OJ for public relations?

    1. Re:Who are these people? by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just two weeks ago:
      Sberbank (Savings Bank Of The Russian Federation) Chooses SCO's OpenServer 6 to Upgrade Thousands of Servers.
      They must be feeling really good about that decision now.

    2. Re:Who are these people? by vic-traill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Umm.. Sounds to me like the bank needs to review the employment of their IT director.

      Well, like North American banks and Caribbean branches that have a *tonne* of legacy code running on AS/400's, business apps are still out there running in SCO environments, apps that are critical to the business, but which scare the shit out of the organisation in terms of even thinking about unwinding them out of their businesses.

      SCO had a solid biz app developer network out there one upon a time, with a lot of re-seller support, a holdover from when they were *the* PC-based UNIX, long before daryl and his prick henchmen decided to pursue a new 'business model' [cough]pump-and-dump scheme[cough].

      But I guess they're fsck'd now, and looking at a whole different risk - they'll *have* to start working on it.

      And no, I'm not painting a tech-equivalence between a modern AS/400 installation and intel hardware running openserver 6. But the business process analogue is solid, I think.

      --
      [17] Leary, T., White, C., Wood, P. R., Bhabha, W. D., and Wirth, N. Lambda calculus considered harmful. In Proceedings
  14. Use SCO's bandwidth... by zoikes · · Score: 2, Informative

    read about the Chapter 11 filing here:
        http://ir.sco.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=264124
    ...and put a *wee* bit more pressure on their dwindling bankroll. ;)

  15. come back? nah by PureCreditor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    even if SCO emerges from Chp 11 with a nice updated product line, they've already lost their credibility, good will, and confidence of customers. Who wants to buy anything from a company who might ending up suing you for no particular reason?

    There are tons of good Unix and Linux distributors out there... no reason to choose SCO anymore.

    You want free and good? Linux and BSD. You want enterprise level? IBM and Sun. You want Windows-based? Dell and HP. You wanna convert your entire revenue stream into attorney fees billed at $400/hr? Take SCO.

  16. Re:FSCK YEAH! by QRDeNameland · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is the internet...you can say "FUCK" here. In fact, when discussing SCO, I believe it's mandatory.

    --
    Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  17. Too bad they ruined the name of SCO by ishmalius · · Score: 2, Informative

    The original SCO, the Santa Cruz Operation, made some good software. We had several servers running it many years ago, along with a few with re-branded "Dell Unix." It's a shame that the original company will be forgotten because of this current abomination.

  18. Acronym... by BUL2294 · · Score: 2, Funny

    SCO = Someone Cashed Out

    --
    Windows 3.1x calc: 3.11 - 3.10 = 0.00
  19. Pump and dump by l2718 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the point of view of SCO's execs, this has been a pump-and-dump scheme: they filed the IBM (and Novell) lawsuits, got the stock to soar on the hype and in the years since have been quietly selling their stock. But there are others with a stake here (remember all the cash infusions MS arranged?), who probably want the lawsuits to continue. I wonder what the judge thinks now about Novell's motion for a constructive trust?

  20. Good Job Darly! by SloWave · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now he's available for the Head of FEMA position.

  21. NEWSFLASH by thrillbert · · Score: 3, Funny

    Emerald City, Oz. - It was announced today that Darl McBride, President and CEO, The SCO Group has conceded his defeat regarding the Copyright Infringement case against IBM a few years ago and will file for Chapter 11 protection. Mr. McBride was quoted as saying "Chapter 11 reorganization provides the Company with an opportunity to protect its assets during this time while focusing on building our future plans."

    When asked about these future plans, Mr. McBride announced his intention to sue every single internet user, based on the fact that the Internet became as popular as it did due to traffic running on products that were based on SCO intellectual property. "I personally was the creator of these tubes and filed for a patent back in 1956". Mr. McBride became irritated when this reporter informed him that the Internet did not in fact run through tubes, rather through optical lines and copper cables. "Where have you been? You must have missed my good friend Ted Stevens describing how the internet was a series of Tubes, just stick to what you know, which is ... ah.. whatever it is you reporters do.."

    Reporting live from Emerald City, this is T. Bert signing off.

  22. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by sconeu · · Score: 2, Funny

    That happened to me all the time, but it was my big sister, who took shameless advantage of my dad's ironclad rule, "You don't hit girls. Period."

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  23. Re:Stock plummetage by jenkin+sear · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, it plummeted as the insiders and people with inside knowledge traded out- trading is halted as soon as chapter 11 is filed. It might be interesting to see who actually sold today in the minutes prior to the announcement. The SEC has been known to take a close look at that in the past.

    --
    What a strange bird is the pelican, his beak can hold more than his belly can.
  24. Re:Darn . . . by kryten_nl · · Score: 2, Funny

    May I suggest:
    "Don't just bitch about OOXML and patent trolls, put your money where your mouth is.
    Donate to Groklaw today."

    --
    For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
  25. "the SCO, the" by Scooter[AMMO] · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those that don't get the reference to "the SCO, the" in German, it comes from Episode 9F22 "Cape Feare" of the Simpsons.

    Sideshow Bob is applying for parole claiming that he wouldn't pose a danger to Bart:

    Lawyer: "Don't you have a tattoo that says 'die, Bart, die' on your chest?"
    Sideshow Bob: "No! That's German. It means 'the Bart, the'".
    Parole Officer 1: "No one who speaks German could be an evil man!"
    Parole Officer 2: "Parole granted!"

    --
    "There is no knowledge that is not power"
    1. Re:"the SCO, the" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But since Bart is male, shouldn't it be "der Bart, der"?

      Unless he's talking about several Barts, but then you'd have to conjugate the noun as well and it'd become something like "die Barten, die". Or "die Bärte, die"?

      Actually Bärte means "beards" in German, with the singular "Bart" which is masculine. So my best guess is that the tattoo was a badly written German version of "the beards, the".

      So what's Sideshow Bob's interest in beards anyway? As possibilities we have Jasper Beardly, the Sea Captain, but most interestingly, Krusty's father: Rabbi Hyman Krustofski.

      My guess is that Sideshow Bob is either a latent Nazi with a hatred for Hyman, or he is one of these wusses who cannot grow a decent beard and is taking it out on Krusty.

      An alternate theory is that I have too much time on my hands.

    2. Re:"the SCO, the" by lordtoran · · Score: 2, Funny

      When the Simpsons were first aired in Germany (I was a kid then), I actually wondered why Bart did not have a Bart (beard).

      --
      Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
    3. Re:"the SCO, the" by wronzki · · Score: 2, Funny

      But since Bart is male, shouldn't it be "der Bart, der"?
      Well, Nancy Cartwright (Bart's voice) is female, so maybe they're just being meta.
  26. STILL claiming UNIX in the press release! by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The press release http://ir.sco.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=264124 says:

    "SCO owns the core UNIX operating system, originally developed by AT&T/Bell Labs and is the exclusive licensor to UNIX-based system software providers."

    Those SCO guys are a real pantload! Hahahahah

  27. Wrong word by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "The Chapter 11 reorg will protect them from getting decimated by Novell when they win their countersuit"

    "Decimated" means destroying 1 in 10. IIRC, if a unit in the Roman Legion was cowardly|treasonous|bad, they counted off by 10's, a number was picked, and whoever had that number was beaten to death by the otehr 9 "luck ones".

    I don't think Novell or IBM want SCO "decimated". I think "obliterated" is more appropriate.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  28. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by Pojut · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I would never....EVER hit a woman, man, never...but I'll shake the shit outta a woman." -Chris Rock

  29. Re:Obvious by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not sure what they are trying to do, but it isn't what you said.

    They have already been found to be guilty of conversion - taking something that Novell owns (the royalties they were owed) and keeping it for themselves (TSCOG).

    Bankruptcy or no bankruptcy, they have to give Novell what ALREADY belongs to Novell.

    They were obligated by contract to give the royalties to Novell BEFORE any bankruptcy, they are still required to give them AFTER any bankruptcy.

    The only point to be determined by the court is HOW MUCH TSCOG kept that they should not have kept. Whatever that amount, bankruptcy has not effect on their LEGAL REQUIREMENT to GIVE IT BACK TO NOVELL.

    If - which is NOT the case - Novell had gone for punatitive damages or any other kind of damages, then the bankruptcy would have had some effect. As it is, it doesn't (at least not in reguards to Novell).

    --
    Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
  30. Re:Obvious by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not quite. In the case of the royalty money, the rulings thus far are that the royalties are Novell's, not SCO's, money. There's a question of the dollar amount to be determined, but that money isn't a debt owed to Novell so bankruptcy doesn't shield it. Read up on "conversion", which is the term the judge used. If you steal money from someone, you can't use bankruptcy protection to retain it since it's not yours in the first place.

  31. Judge Kimball has next week off by overshoot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I suspect that there's a court case on Monday unless Judge Kimball says that there isn't,
    Bankruptcy automatically stays all other civil proceedings. Which is, when you get down to it, what today's filing is all about.
    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
    1. Re:Judge Kimball has next week off by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting but will it still be a civil matter? If they made the statement in court that there was no need to put Novells money in a trust because there where not going to file for bankruptcy isn't possible contempt of court or perjury?
      If so then then this may not be a civil matter.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  32. Does anybody find it odd... by br1an.warner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That in their press release, they say "SCO owns the core UNIX operating system..." ? Maybe they missed what happened in August? Link to the article on Groklaw

  33. Re:Everything I know I learned in kindergarden... by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My coworker tells the same story, but with a different ending. His father made his sister promise NOT to pinch him (sharpened fingernails, drawing blood), and told Larry, in her presence, that he was never to hit his sister, because she was a girl. The penalty would be a whipping with a peach switch.

    15 minutes later, she struck again, and Larry punched her in the afce as hard as he could, knocking her down and bloodying her nose. His father, as he was preparing to whip him, ebmoaned Larry's lack of control. Larry responded that he hadn't lost conrol; on the contrary, he had considered it in depth and decided that the punisment was worth it. His Dad said he respected his decision, even though he believed it was the wrong one, and proceeded to whip his ass soundly.

    But his sister never went near him again.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  34. Buh-BYE! by patmandu · · Score: 5, Funny

    And in unrelated news, SCO has filed to trademark any portrayal of water swirling around in a toilet bowl, as that is their new corporate logo.

  35. Chickens came home to roost by Interested+Bystander · · Score: 3, Funny

    But since I work for IBM, I think I can be forgiven for gloating!

    --
    If I was deep this is would be profound, if smart then wise, if a poet then verse. Here it is, you judge!
  36. Maureen O'Gara / G2 Computer Intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "G2 Computer Intelligence" is listed as a debtor by SCOX in their filings, so now we know she's the paided little whore we always suspected her to be.

    That's right Maureen, you're fucking out of the fucking closet.

    1. Re:Maureen O'Gara / G2 Computer Intelligence by nuzak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you mean creditor, but yeah there they are / she is as a creditor.

      What's funny is how many restaurants are in the list of unsecured creditors. Don't these guys even pay their restaurant tabs?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  37. Mod Parent Up. by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bankruptcy judges and trustees have carte blanche to deal with creditors, and limit the effects of ongoing litigation. On Monday, everything changes in front of Judge Kimball, who will put the suit into stasis, and give at least a 60 day cooling off period to everything.

    It might turn into a Chapter 7 filing afterwards, and SCO might be forced to liquidate. This is unlikely, however. In the interim, they'll try to convince a judge or referee that they have IP assets that need protecting, along with their agreements with various companies, and will produce a lot of smoke in their quest to simply survive.

    Much attorneys fees will be spent by many companies. Much continued incivility and plain poo will continue to be the hallmark of SCO's perhaps brief existence. Like others, they don't quit until they're just dead. Don't look for much come-uppance. This ends badly, just as it began badly.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  38. Awwww Yeeee-aaaah by maz2331 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This sure looks like the beginning of the end-game scenerio for SCO. It will have zero effect on the Novell claims, since they are "equitable" and basically just amount to an embezzelment/conversion charge, not a "debt". It's a return of improperly held property, so bankruptcy doesn't provide any cover there. Actually, it may make it easier for Novell in a couple of weeks to force it into a Chapter 7 liquidation proceeding instead, since the case will already be in the Bankruptcy Courts. They are SO toast now.

  39. Re:Someone you hate by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmmm...

    SCO Vacuums - They suck!

    SCO Sexual Enhancers - Get screwed by the best!

    SCO Toilet Paper - Absorbs shit like no other!

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  40. Need to Look at the Big Picture by still-a-geek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even if SCO loses for good, there is Novell. While it's great that Novell will get the rights to Unix, in the meantime, Microsoft has a vested interest with the company. There may be a day when Microsoft will just buy out/absorb Novell, and MS will own the Unix rights. And MS being a company with really deep pockets and ever more resources, may actually pull off lawsuits ala RIAA against any Unix/Linux user. MS funded SCO indirectly to "help" with the lawsuit. It seems that MS knew SCO was going to lose. Thus, a partnership with Novell with a sweet deal it could not refuse was made. MS does not lose here. MS wins either way. I don't believe this is over by a long shot.

    --

    "Happily lived Mankind in the peaceful Valley of Ignorance." -- Hendrik Willem Van Loon
    1. Re:Need to Look at the Big Picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sigh. Just go away, you're so wrong it's not even funny.

      Learn about the GPL first. Then about "unclean hands" and "promissory estoppel" and finally about "Anti-trust".

      Mods, you're idiots.

  41. seeking bankruptcy and still in business by falconwolf · · Score: 4, Informative

    They are literally filing for bankruptcy and assuring their customers that they are fine and can rely on them at the same time... AT THE SAME TIME!

    That's what Chapter 11 bankruptcy is all about. It allows you to reorganize your business and liabilities so you can stay in business.

    Falcon
    1. Re:seeking bankruptcy and still in business by Romancer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, I'll reply to these posts since it looks like there is a common misunderstanding going on about what I am trying to get across.

      The fact that they are using the bankruptcy to escape the stock plummet that would follow the judgements that are comming is a cop out of their responsibility for the actions they have taken. I never said that they were going out of business, closing operations, or filing a different type of bankruptcy that would leed to those outcomes, and if you read that somewhere it was your assumption not mine. The problem I have with the simultanious assurance to their customers is that they are using a restructuring tactic to avoid the fallout of their horrible choices and appear to be a reliable company to anybody. It's a joke and it's on US ALL for allowing it.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
  42. Looking backwards by DVega · · Score: 5, Funny
    Let's what they said ...

    Forbes - What SCO Wants, SCO Gets
    By Daniel Lyons, 06.18.03, 12:00 PM ET

    [ ... ]

    In other words, like many religious folk, the Linux-loving crunchies in the open-source movement are a) convinced of their own righteousness, and b) sure the whole world, including judges, will agree.

    They should wake up. SCO may not be very good at making a profit by selling software. But it is very good at getting what it wants from other companies. And it has a tight circle of friends.

    [ ... ]

    --
    MOD THE CHILD UP!
  43. Nah. They're not that good... by crovira · · Score: 2, Funny

    Try:

    SCO Potato Chips, comes in douche flavor, instead of just salt and vinegar.

    SCO the newest Windows' Vista Reseller.

    SCO retailers: Going to Vietnam to compete with Wall*Mart.

    SCO Foods: Made with cyclamates, triglycerides and all the hydrogenated denatured vegetable oils you crave.

    SCO Soap: Made with extra lubricating oils and gentle soothing lotions. Suppliers to the US Penal System since we found out what we could expect.

    SCO Coffee: 'Crap'pucino, Made from what Starbuck's threw away.

    SCO Greeting Cards: Made specially for mothers' in law and other people you don't really care about.

    SCO Theme Park. Its like "Six Flags" without the rides or any of the fun. Basically, think of the lousiest fair run by the most crooked grifters on the most run down equipment, showing the worst flea-bitten, urine-smelling animals (Gerty The Wonder Rat!) and down-on-their-luck geeks (we're talking REAL geeks, Glauman geeks here,) that its ever been your displeasure to encounter outside of their tent. That's the SCO Theme Park.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  44. Bad Faith by maz2331 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Cross-post from Groklaw... I did a quick Google of "bad faith" in regards to bankruptcy filings, and there is apparently precident regarding exactly the same situation as SCO is in. Using bankruptcy just as a tool to thwart other litigation is apparently a BIG no-no. From a non-authoritative source: http://touchngo.com/lglcntr/usdc/bnkrptcy/briefs/bnk45.htm "One area ripe for a bad faith dismissal is when the debtor is using a bankruptcy filing as a litigation tactic to either forestall litigation or seek a forum perceived to be more friendly. In Marsch, the court upheld a 'bad faith' dismissal where the chapter 11 petition was filed solely to delay collection of a judgment and avoid posting an appeal bond where the debtor had the financial means to pay the judgment." Also, in addition to dismissing the bankruptcy case, the bankruptcy courts may well impose the "nuclear" sanction - barring SCO from asserting another bankruptcy claim in the future. This would leave them totally exposed to the full wieght of any other judgements, with no way out at all - not even Chapter 7 liquidation. In other words... "you're on your own, Darl..." Is anyone with any expertise in bankruptcy proceedings around to help the community figure out exactly how this works? Something tells me the bankruptcy filing is not going to fly for long, but may expose SCO's legal team to some serious malpractice liability. And... maybe after this little road bump is resolved we'll finally see Kimball bring some real sacnctions down on the SCO side too. This is just getting beyond ridiculous.

  45. The Chapter 11 hearing should be short by symbolset · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So let's see... you took $500 million in paid in equity and in nine short years managed to parley that into a princely sum less than $5 million. In the history of your company your only profitable quarter a judge has found that some if not all of your revenue was the proceeds of conversion that you have spent and can no longer pay back. Your liabilities include the counterclaims remaining from baseless lawsuits you have filed after your claims have been revealed to have no substance.

    Liquidation cannot cure your victims, but it should help prevent you from finding any more.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  46. Still no Enderle quote? by symbolset · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why, oh, why can't we have a comment from the quintessential blurbmeister here? Rob, where are you in this historic moment to weigh the subtle issues and deliver some clarity in fifteen words or less?

    Will you all please give him some hits on his blog at ITBE and let him know we need his insight at this trying time?

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.