Slashdot Mirror


PC Superstore Admits Linux Hinge Repair Mistake

Erris writes "PC Superstore says their store manager was wrong to turn away a client with a broken hinge whose machine should have been repaired. 'El Reg put a call in to the DSGi-owned retail giant to get some clarification on PC World's Linux support policy. A spokesman told us that there had simply been a misunderstanding at the store and that, in fact, the normal procedure would be for the Tech Guys to provide a fix. [PC World] will provide a full repair once the firm has made contact with Tikka.'

124 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. It appears... by msauve · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:It appears... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      For those too lazy to read the link, PCWorld is still refusing to fix the laptop. They aren't blaming it totally on Linux, now it is a mix of Linux and saying that the warranty doesn't cover the hinge because that is basic wear and tear.

      And now, my own opinion about PCWorld. They are technological idiots. I've lived in the states and now in the UK, and compared to these idiots those guys at BestBuy are hackers. I honestly don't believe you have to be more qualified to work at PCWorld than at, say, Burger King. You can manage a register, sweep floors? Good enough. They couldn't help even if they wanted to, which they don't. Extrapolating the behaviour of their workers to their management and I'm not surprised at all that it's PCWorld which pulls some crap like this.

    2. Re:It appears... by This_Is_My_Happening · · Score: 1

      Wow. That's simply amazing.

      I wish that he would post the video that he took when he went back to talk to the manager a second time. The dickishness he describes sounds outrageous.

      --
      God made me an atheist. Who are you to question his wisdom?
    3. Re:It appears... by BlueParrot · · Score: 5, Informative

      I bet you this guy didn't quite expect that his name would be linked by one of the Internet's most busy web-pages, and not in a good way... I mean seriously, slashdot will accidentally DDoS news agencies due to the large number of visitors. Companies pay small fortunes for that kind of attention... They have now managed to get worldwide bad publicity TWICE due to this laptop. The words "the most expensive $94 Orbitz will ever make" springs to mind. For those of you who don't know what I mean, here's the link: http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=orbitz_blows

    4. Re:It appears... by dreddnott · · Score: 1

      I use Opera for everything - it appears to be rendering fine in Opera 9.22.

      You may have a point, though (I don't have Firefox to confirm your complaints about rendering badly). It doesn't seem to be rendering right in Internet Explorer 6 either. To not work right in IE6 or Firefox seems almost criminal.

      --
      I may make you feel, but I can't make you think.
    5. Re:It appears... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how it should look, but it looks very nice in FF 2.0.0.6

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    6. Re:It appears... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      I am so sorry I was right (EU Law notwithstanding)... these are the hassles with hinge issues.

      And, all you EU folks who jumped on me last time - when I said this would happen, don't jump on me again with how the law will help them now.

      I'm not disputing whether the law is on his side or not... we covered that extensively last time around. But honestly, perhaps there is a better method than getting back on your high-horse about what's legal; because obviously that doesnt matter - INSTEAD (THOSE OF YOU IN THE EU) help make a big enough stink that PC World HAS to deal with it. Waiting on the law - US, UK, whatever... should be a last resort... this is a laptop - one that will be obsoleted by the time this is dealt with if that route is selected.

      You all have the address of the place... go in there and make a (polite, legal) stink till both the Linux "issue" is not an issue and till they relent and fix the machine.

    7. Re:It appears... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      From the Maddox post:

      "After I booked the ticket, I noticed something strange: there were no travel details on how I would get from San Jose to San Francisco. I called Orbitz and they told me that I would have to provide my own transportation from San Jose to San Francisco. What?"

      Orbitz didn't point out that it was anything like it ended up being. You see two airports and you assume you're flying between them. Or that there's transportation provided. The simple fact in Mr. Maddox's case is that the company sold him something that was impossible. He didn't make it. They generated it for him.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    8. Re:It appears... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      Correlaries perhaps...

      Those in the EU debating this and that back and forth could hopefully instead spend some time finding legal correlaries (that actually apply) to help this person - for instance, in the US, they invalidated clauses in vehicle warranties that required you HAD to take it back to the manufacturer for such regular maintenace as oil changes...

      Are there similar correlaries in EU law? Someone over there has to know, so this person has something else to arm them with... something that fits with installing another OS as a reason to invalidate a warranty...

    9. Re:It appears... by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 3, Informative

      Asshole. You expect the Orbitz scheduling program to give you a valid schedule. It's not the customer's place to be debugging Orbitz incompetently maintained database.

      Not only was the schedule invalid, but it depended on the customer paying for transportation between stops without informing the customer of that fact.

      It's quite the incompetent travel agent who books you flights, but neither books transportation between stops nor informs you that you need to do this. That's HIS JOB that's why you use a fucking agent.

      In this case, the agent was an incompetently written and maintained program. Not the customer's responsibility.

      So they wrapped a shit product up in a bow and sold it. The guy notices all of one minute later that he's been cheated and tries to fix the purchase. No doubt, by California law he's entitled to change his mind, but never mind that, any fucking competent business can deal.

      Orbitz failed. And they had incompetent management that not only failed the customer, but failed every kind of public relations by excusing the inexcusable and releasing the customer's private information. My God, how can anyone be that incompetent?

    10. Re:It appears... by athdemo · · Score: 1

      He should get a friend to loan him a laptop, load up the statement from PC World on it, and walk into the store with it displayed. Show that to the manager and see how resistant he is.

    11. Re:It appears... by DustyShadow · · Score: 1

      I had a similar situation last year with Dell actually. I bought an E1505 and installed Ubuntu but kept Windows on it as well. Well the video card was malfunctioning and after sending it in once they were refusing to replace it, specifically mentioning my installation of Linux as a reason. Well I posted on my blog about it and less than a week later I had a new laptop in the mail. The surprising part is that I had no readers. The Dell rep found it on his own. They wanted to avoid this type of thing. I still probably won't buy a Dell again though.

    12. Re:It appears... by deniable · · Score: 1

      Why use your own machine? Use their demo machines. Ask one of the helpful sales staff if he can sell you a machine that can play your presentation. And make sure the speakers are good and loud.

    13. Re:It appears... by l33t_f33t · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your fears are correct, I have a friend who did work experience at PC world. None of the staff had any idea what they were talking about, including those who were supposed to be fixing computers. In fact, the PC fixing unit was one of the worst. If they cannot solve the problem by putting a CD in, or opening it up and checking all the parts are there then they send it back to head office. There is also a "Service" they offer called something like a PC health check. They charge £50 for it. This service involves putting a CD in the PC to check for viruses.

      This is why, despite needing a job I am not applying to PC world.

    14. Re:It appears... by MooUK · · Score: 1

      I emailed them myself "expressing my concern", etc, and got a reply saying the situation had been resolved. Clearly it hasn't. I've contacted them again and we'll see what we get.

    15. Re:It appears... by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Any nerd in there right mind wouldn't get a job at PC world. God forbid you know more than the manager on the issue that the automatic doors opened let alone computer technology that's more than a sensor, timer and motor.

    16. Re:It appears... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      For those too lazy to read the link, PCWorld is still refusing to fix the laptop. They aren't blaming it totally on Linux, now it is a mix of Linux and saying that the warranty doesn't cover the hinge because that is basic wear and tear. Ugh, you know you cannot do this, but I would like to kick this guy in the balls, and if the police comes complaining, you'll say nothing's wrong, it's just "basic wear and tear". Hinges of laptops are notorious for breaking down. Well, tough luck for manufacturers, many of them seem to get it right nowadays. 3 years should be a minimum for a laptop. If we cannot enforce that, we'll be drifting in shitty products for the next 1000 years.
    17. Re:It appears... by fredklein · · Score: 1
      You expect the Orbitz scheduling program to give you a valid schedule.,/i>

      SHeesh, read the whole page, including the letter orbitz sent him:
      Orbitz displays flight schedules and itineraries obtained directly from the airlines. Each itinerary that we sell meets airline requirements for appropriate "minimum connection times", including the flights purchased by Maddox.


      In other words: It Was A Valid Schedule. At least according to the airlines Orbitz got the info from.

      it depended on the customer paying for transportation between stops without informing the customer of that fact.

      Every single online 'travel agency' site I've ever seen CLEARLY shows you which flight you will be be on from city to city. If it doesn't show a flight from city A to city B, then I'd assume that *I* would be responsible for that leg of the trip. Duh.

      they had incompetent management that not only failed the customer, but failed every kind of public relations by excusing the inexcusable and releasing the customer's private information,

      WHAT private information? The fact that, 3 years earlier, his flight left at 12:45 and not 12:00? That's the only 'new' info I see in their letter.
    18. Re:It appears... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      All I could think was the phrase:
      "I see someone has been drinking from the fountain of stupid again."

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    19. Re:It appears... by RockDoctor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a friend who did work experience at PC world. None of the staff had any idea what they were talking about, including those who were supposed to be fixing computers. In fact, the PC fixing unit was one of the worst. If they cannot solve the problem by putting a CD in, or opening it up and checking all the parts are there then they send it back to head office.

      Un-disputed that there are some real brain-dead numptys working behind the counter at PC World. On the other hand, I know at least one guy who works there who can't get into the "Tech Centre", despite having run a PC-building/ fixing/ selling shop for most of the previous 5 years. The problem wasn't lack of ability, it was company policies over time spent diagnosing problems, over how much swapping of parts was allowed, and warranty agreements with manufacturers. In short, if you are building your own boxes (including at a shop) you have a lot more leeway about what you can do to the machine compared to what you can do with a machine that came out of a box from Brand-X. Brend-X have policies about what they'll consider a warranty repair, and if you (the "Tech Guy") go beyond that then PC World loses the opportunity to return the machine to their supplier. Net loss to the company of several hundred quid.
      That is why they do very little at the store.
      PC World are not trying to fix your computer ; they're trying to turn a profit on the computer they sold you. One major part of that is reducing to the minimum their costs (including risked costs) on the machine. Which dictates centralisation of any technical skills and risks as much as possible.
      (BTW, my friend who was not suitable for the "Tech Guys" is now rapidly working his way up through the ranks at their small-business support centre. It seems that the store manager can see a way of making more money out of my friend than he'd earn as a "Tech Guy". Again, PC World are not in the business of fixing your computer, they're in the business of turning a profit.
       

      There is also a "Service" they offer called something like a PC health check. They charge £50 for it. This service involves putting a CD in the PC to check for viruses.

      There's a girl up the hill from here who offers a service of unclogging your vasa deferens by sucking your dick and swallowing. She charges £30 for the service. Sounds like PC World are somewhat over-priced for the market. Which is not news. You can get better prices, but you do need to hunt around. Some people value not having to hunt around quite highly.
       

      This is why, despite needing a job I am not applying to PC world.

      Sounds to me like you've not got a very clear idea of the nature of PC World's business : they're not now and never have been a PC shop - they're a machine for turning cardboard boxes with "stuff" inside into profit. And if that makes them sound like any other part of Dixon's Group ... ah, I see, you're getting the idea.

      What? You believed their advertising? Including the name?

      In that case, I've got a bridge to sell you.
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Make sure to tag this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    as twitter , just like the other ones. Avoid people who game Slashdot with multiple sockpuppets and open proxies.

  3. we're sooo sorry! by v1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    We'd like to apologize for getting an unexpectedly large backlash due to our usual behavior of being dicks to the linux users. In the future we will strive to continue our inexcusable treatment of our linux based customers without attracting such public negative PR in the process. Thank you for your support in these difficult times!

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  4. Only a misunderstanding if you get caught. by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And the question on everyone's mind is "Would this have happened had the plight not been so well discussed on the internet?"

    Also, how many other people have already been turned away for hardware warranty repairs based on what software was on their machine?

    1. Re:Only a misunderstanding if you get caught. by VirusEqualsVeryYes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the question on everyone's mind is "Would this have happened had the plight not been so well discussed on the internet?"
      Hardly. I think pretty much everyone here realizes that the reason for the change of heart was the publicity on the Internet. If you're an idealistic optimist, you might try to believe that the higher-ups heard about it through the Internet and righted the wrong simply from hearing about it, but the rest of us have enough experience with these Internet-spread stories of fuckups that it's the bad publicity that causes the higher-ups to take a correctional course of action.

      This isn't about Linux. It never was. Linux just happened to serve as an excuse for denial of service. This regularly happens to non-techie customers who don't install alternate OSs. To consumers of all sorts of electronic products. They STILL get denied service. They get convinced by customer "service" that the product is not eligible for free or low-cost repair.

      The thing is, American customer service is much like American insurance -- it's nothing but a financial black hole in the eyes of the bean counters. It's about saving a little money now. Every payment, every reimbursement, every repair denied is a few bucks saved. Who cares if the customer is unsatisfied? The corporations certainly don't ... until the customer's story makes it big on the intarwebs and thousands of people start talking about it. Oops, bad publicity causes loads of lost sales! So they better fix it so the plebians don't switch brands!

      It's all about the numbers. Denying service to customers saves a little bit each time. If the rate of lost sales because of individual angry customers is less than the money saved from denial of service, it's a win. It's only in their interest -- or rather, the interest of their bottom line -- to service the customer if the angry customer breeds anger among many more customers, say via the Internet, and causes many lost sales that far exceed the costs of the simple customer care they should have provided in the first place.

      This is capitalist shortsightedness at its worst. Bad word of mouth hurts more in the long run. Satisfaction leads to good word of mouth which leads to more sales. As a personal example, I always make a note to people about how phenomenal Nintendo customer service is. I tell them about a problem, they fix it immediately. I know for a fact that my advice has caused a few more sales of Wiis rather than (usually) PS2s. See, since Nintendo didn't penny-pinch with the cost of repairs for my system, they indirectly made more money through my satisfaction. This is foresight that I wish American companies had. I think we'd all be happier for it.
    2. Re:Only a misunderstanding if you get caught. by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      That depends. It's not the internet that fixed this, so much as having high quality leverage. If you know how, you can turn these things around in other ways. For example, I would simply go get a pad of paper and a pencil, then go back to the manager, get his full name, the precise title of his official position, the store number, and the name of his boss, in that specific order. If he refused to give any of that data, I'd simply say "sir, if I don't get your boss' name through you, I'll get it through corporate; are you sure that's how you want them to find out about your choices?" Then, I would ask for things in writing, just as did the person in the article; if Mr. Tank refused, I'd take note of the fact. In the United States, I'd point out that you cannot refuse a warranty without giving reason in writing by law, and given that the US inherited its laws from Britain, it seems likely that there's a similar law there; if he refused again, I'd simply note this fact, and while writing, "absent mindedly" mumble under my breath "Mr. Tank refuses to follow warranty law, and either honor warranty or explain why not in writing."

      Now, at that point I haven't done much differently than the article author. This is where it changes. While he's standing there as if I'm going to talk to him, I'd get my cell phone out of my pocket and call corporate. If Mr. Tank tried to walk away, I'd say "don't walk away, sir, this call is for you." (If he walked away again, that's fine; just get an employee to re-summon him, and be sure to tell the employee that their manager is avoiding calls from the manager's boss.)

      It's one thing to call corporate. It's another thing entirely to call corporate in front of the offending employee, with their name, position and store number in hand. It's relatively easy to ignore a customer; almost impossible to ignore your boss.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    3. Re:Only a misunderstanding if you get caught. by spvo · · Score: 1

      While everything you said about American companies was completely true, the criticism is out of place. The company, the event, and the story are all based in the UK.

    4. Re:Only a misunderstanding if you get caught. by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      The thing is, American customer service is much like American insurance -- it's nothing but a financial black hole in the eyes of the bean counters.
      That depends a whole lot on where you shop. The kind of service you want is expensive; you can't get it at value stores because there isn't enough margin to support the cost. There are a lot of companies out there who know how important customer service is, and who provide it in order to keep customers like you.

      It's about saving a little money now.
      It turns out that there are companies smart enough to take the $5 hit now to profit $2 off you every month. Keep the faith: when you stop looking only for value outfits, you will no longer be treated like a value customer. Do some shopping.

      This is foresight that I wish American companies had.
      Some of us do.

      If the rate of lost sales because of individual angry customers is less than the money saved from denial of service, it's a win.
      Well, that's a pretty big "if." It's true for the top-tier companies, who get customers just on their name; that's why you see this across the board in cell phone companies, but not from the little ones that people don't know about, like US Cellular and Cricket. That's why you see this at big chains like the retail outfit in question; if you were spending the extra $5 to go to the local mom and pop store, you wouldn't. This is why you never see this at a resteraunt, big chain or not - there's too much competition, even in the top throughput tiers like McDonalds' and Outback. Too many choices.

      Try your local small businesses. They won't treat you this way.
      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    5. Re:Only a misunderstanding if you get caught. by jayp00001 · · Score: 1

      This is capitalist shortsightedness at its worst. Bad word of mouth hurts more in the long run. Satisfaction leads to good word of mouth which leads to more sales. As a personal example, I always make a note to people about how phenomenal Nintendo customer service is. I tell them about a problem, they fix it immediately. I know for a fact that my advice has caused a few more sales of Wiis rather than (usually) PS2s. See, since Nintendo didn't penny-pinch with the cost of repairs for my system, they indirectly made more money through my satisfaction. This is foresight that I wish American companies had. I think we'd all be happier for it.


      Maybe in theory. In practice you overestimate the impact of word of mouth and the amount of word of mouth gets spread. Take a look at Walmart. Ask anyone if they've heard that walmart is bad for an area (or bad in general) and they'll say yes. Ask them if they no longer shop there and they'll say no. Cutting service means directly impacting cost. I could simply sell my widgets for the same price and take the extra profit, OR I could lower my price, gaining even more customers and lessening the impact of bad word of mouth and pile up even more profit by the increased sales. Of course this would be broken if the consumer ever decided that service was more important than price, but that's not likely to occur.

  5. Don't shop at PC World by GreatDrok · · Score: 3, Informative

    The moral of this story is to stay away from PC World. They over price all their components and the machines they sell are crap by and large. They exist to take money from the ignorant and their attitude when their product inevitably breaks is dreadful. The anti-linux attitude is old news as I experienced similar treatment at the PC World in Edinburgh when I had a keyboard fail on my laptop with Linux installed. Fortunately I had XP on it too and was able to prove that the fault wasn't due to Linux.

    Sadly, PC World has also put a lot of the good little computer stores out of business which is why they can behave so badly.

    --
    "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    1. Re:Don't shop at PC World by MrNemesis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the most part I'd agree with you - but IMHO the appalling treatment of customers starts the second you walk through the door.

      PC World employees are, by and large, not the sharpest tools in the box, and their managers are typically worse. They flat out LIE to cusomters about the products they're pushing, and use FUD to cajole people into buying things. Their components sales are horrifically overpriced. Last time I bought a network cable there it was £12 (~$25) for a 3m Cat5. I've heard someone tell a customer that you need "at least" a 3GHz CPU (and 256MB of RAM, no less!) to "surf interweb pages", or how iPods don't work properly with windows, or any number of made-up-on-the-spot bullshit.

      And like the parent says, they've caused alot of the smaller geek-run computer stores (which usually contained knowledgable people) to close down.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    2. Re:Don't shop at PC World by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Fortunately I had XP on it too and was able to prove that the fault wasn't due to Linux.

      Wait -- your keyboard didn't work, and you had to prove it with an operating system?

      Have these fucktards never heard of a BIOS??

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  6. Not surprised... by cyberjock1980 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So PC World pissed off a geek. He told all his geek buddies. Word got around and now PC World has either changed their mind, or announced their mistake as loud as they can for fear of reprisal from tons of geeks. Why am I not surprised? I'm sure they want to stay in business, and even if that was their policy, i'm sure it changed VERY quickly because the community they target is the same community that's now talking bad about them. Change their policy or risk going out of business? Slashdot wins! PC World - 0 Slashdot - 1

    1. Re:Not surprised... by dfgchgfxrjtdhgh.jjhv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      sorry, but pc world dont target geeks, they target people that don't know any geeks at all & have more money than sense.

      i'm amazed that a pc world customer had heard of linux, nevermind installed it.

    2. Re:Not surprised... by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      Even if they know a geek they'll still head into PC world because the cretinous staff on their shop floor and behind the support desk are far less threatening than someone who might once or twice tell them not to install random crap they see advertised on the web and explain that installing said crap is the reason they'll be taking the laptop back to PC world to have it wiped completely clean as windows will no longer boot, even into safe mode.

      Hateful people.

    3. Re:Not surprised... by cyberjock1980 · · Score: 1

      But the definition of 'geek' varies from person to person.

      To my mom a geek is: Someone that can fix my computer when it breaks.

      To me it means: Someone that has an understanding of what computer parts are needed to assemble one from scratch and has a THOROUGH understanding of computers.

      TO PC world it might mean:

      1. They want to be able to fix computers. Not today, and not tomorrow, but someday, maybe.
      2. They know how to turn it on and off and know when it doesn't boot up it's broken and needs fixed.
      3. They are a hardcore computer guru, knowing all of the commonly used programming languages that are deeply intimate with everything there is to know about Microsoft.
      4. They are smart and use Linux and don't need no stinkin' upgraded warranty.
      5. Gosh, we can scam customers out of SO much money! Let's go to town and see how far we get!

      So take your pick at what definition they want to use. And yes, THOROUGH could be broken down further, but I wanted to emphasize thorough because so many people think they know alot and really are pretty blind.

      I always rate someone's knowledge not by what they know, but what they realize they don't know.

    4. Re:Not surprised... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Well...the reason that they'll *announce* changing their policy.

      Never forget that it's easier to announce that you're changing a policy than to actually do so.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:Not surprised... by footissimo · · Score: 1

      i'm amazed that a pc world customer had heard of linux, nevermind installed it.

      Too right! It has to say something about how ready linux is for the ordinary person when someone who buys from PC World can install and run it.

      Unless it was Linspire, of course.
    6. Re:Not surprised... by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      The crazy thing about linux is that it can be as easy or as hard to install as you want it to be. Ubuntu is easier and faster the Windows XP. Gentoo is almost the most difficult to install (but you have many choices!)

      Also, don't be surprised that there are geeks out there who recognize a bargain pc/laptop at a big chain when they see one. Best Buy doesn't have a line around their stores on Black Friday for nothing.

    7. Re:Not surprised... by turing_m · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm routinely amazed at people who run linux and people who have never heard of it. I've sent away a laptop to be repaired and told that the hard drive has died when I knew it had a perfectly good linux install on it and that it was not the source of the problem. You'd think most electronics repair geeks would have some experience, but not this guy, even though he advertised his business on the web.

      And then you get random blue collar workers running it because it can revive old hardware, it helps them get more from their tiny discretionary income, and it helps them do their job when they have management that will never give them approval to buy software.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    8. Re:Not surprised... by CrossChris · · Score: 1

      You're right - this time. However, PC World (like Microsoft) will probably survive because they predominantly sell to slack-jawed morons. These are the same morons who believe Bill Gates "invented the internet" and that there's no alternative to Windows.

      No geek-led anti-PC World campaign is going to have much effect. We need a consumer-led campaign against their abysmal business practice. This should also be taken up by Trading Standards, but this is unlikely to happen.

    9. Re:Not surprised... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      i'm amazed that a pc world customer had heard of linux, nevermind installed it

      I've bought two PCs from PC World over the course of the last 5 years or so. I don't use Linux now, but for a couple of years it was my primary OS. In my time I've upgraded my kernel and gcc from source, manually upgrade from libc5 to glibc, hand-hacked modeline entries in my XF86Config file when my monitor wasn't detected properly, etc.

      So, having established some geek credibility, why'd I buy from PC World? Simple - they had a sale on and were offering "buy now, pay in a year" finance. I didn't need their help, advice or support, I just needed a PC and didn't have the money right then.

      The annoying thing is that most people who buy from them do need advice, and the sales staff (in my limited experience) simply aren't qualified to give any.

    10. Re:Not surprised... by Bassjunkie · · Score: 1

      Just been reading some of the comments on this story as I have been following this story since it broke last week. Being an ex PC World technician I have a somewhat different view of this. First off I'd love to be working in the store where this guy has been refused as I think I'd have a few words with the manager! Secondly even tho I do consider myself a geek - I use Linux as my main OS currently on a couple of PC's that I actually got from PC World! Admittedly they are PC's that I got cheap(ish) as one was from a Computers@Home scheme when I worked there and another was a customer exchange after it had taken to long to repair! Turned out it was a intermittant systemboard fault but for the price I paid I didn't care as I salvaged the rest of the components and actually fixed it with a cheap board a few months later!

      I also have to agree with Tim C re: the sales staff - from my time at the store it was clear that very few of them actually understood PC's and where more interested in pushing the customers to buy what ever PC was on special offer that week, regardless of there needs! I even remember one case where one of our "star" sales guys neglected to sell (or even mention from what I could ascertain) the extended cover plan, which covered accidental damage, to an old couple as they'd only brought a £500 laptop!! Obviously these sort of customer's aren't worthy of his super sales skills or more importantly (to him) his time! After explaining it to them they where only to happy to protect there new investment for the sake of about £6 a month!

    11. Re:Not surprised... by BiggyP · · Score: 1

      But how's this a relevant response to my post?

  7. Good by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I have wondered for a while what sort of warranty issues surround installing Linux. In the Microsoft mindset, software is considered part of the computer, and therefore replacing it would be analogous to replacing a hardware piece which would naturally void the warranty. Personally, I have always viewed installing Linux as being on the same level as installing any other software; saying it voids the warranty is, in my opinion, like saying that replacing a factory installed MS Office trial with some other office suite would void the warranty.

    Also, this is evidence that Linux systems are gaining ground -- issues like this are "growing pains."

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      it would be analogous to replacing a hardware piece which would naturally void the warranty.
      This is wrong. In the US, at least, it is illegal to deny warranty coverage for any hardware modification which is not directly linked to the malfunction. For example, if you replace your hard drive and it subsequently blows your ATA controller then they don't have to fix that, but it is illegal for them to refuse to fix your screen if it is also defective.

      Replacing the software will void the warranty on any components which fail due to the replaced software. This is not likely to be anything, unless the warranty actually covers the software. It will not void the warranty for anything else.

      I am only familiar with the US but I imagine that the law is similar in any Western country.
    2. Re:Good by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That may be the law, IANAL, so I couldn't say. It's not the practice.

      One of the reasons that I didn't buy a Gateway when they had a local store was their warranty coverage policy. Fortunately, I checked before I bought.

      Although, thinking about it, you may be technically correct. I believe that their statement was to the effect that in order to get warranty coverage I had to either restore the machine to it's original condition or allow them to do so. Including wiping *ALL* files on the hard disk and reformatting. And that if they did it, they'd charge you for the work.

      As I said, I went elsewhere.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:Good by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      1.) Someone mod this AC up!
      2.) Thanks for this clarification, I did not know that was the case. I always thought that is the way things SHOULD be, but it is somewhat rare in this country that the way things "should be" coincides with they way things "are."

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    4. Re:Good by guruevi · · Score: 1

      That's right. In the MICROSOFT mindset. For everybody else of course, replacing software or even firmware shouldn't void your warranty. Most hardware is also user-replaceable. Somebody you wouldn't expect it off... Apple ... has the designation "user replaceable hardware" for hard drives, ram, wireless cards and batteries in most if not all of their computer products, even iBook's and other notebooks which are (out of experience) quite difficult to take apart and if within (extended) warranty or recalls will provide the user with free new parts (even shipping is free both ways) and point to step-by-step manuals on how to take things apart.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    5. Re:Good by teabag_46 · · Score: 1

      I have asked PC World for laptops/desktops with either no OS, or with Linux pre-installed, and they just don't do them (that's when you find a member of staff that knows what Linux is)! When I have suggested buying one and removing Windows, they immediately tell you that this will invalidate the warranty! On top of that, they tell you that if the computer does ever need to go back to them for repair, they will simply re-install Windows! The only way to get a computer from PC World with no OS is through their business department.

    6. Re:Good by CrossChris · · Score: 1

      Don't do any business with PC World! They are seriously overpriced in all departments, and provide no useful after-sales service whatsoever. The sooner they're out of business, the better!

  8. Riiiiight by Romancer · · Score: 2, Informative

    A mistake, that's it.

    And I'm sure that there was some policy that they can quote to back up that "misunderstanding" and it was a totally isolated event.

    Pretty cut and dry denial of warranty of hardware based on software. If the manager denies service it's not a misunderstanding it's policy. Unless they can show the documents that the manager specifically didn't follow, it's a case of consumer backlash changing a companies operating practices.

    I'll believe the "misunderstanding" cop out for the responsibility when they can show policy documents that state that the OS doesn't matter in cases of obvious hardware defect. If they've got that on file, if it was a misunderstanding and every higher level employee involved in that case goes back through basic training for service repair qualification, I'll believe it.

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
  9. As usual... by Speare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A junior employee or contractor made an error that is against our policy.

    Translated:
    A local store manager is foolishly given broad discretion to run the local store and making ass-pulled risk estimates such as "this guy can't possibly escalate his complaint from porch-seat grumbling to global public-relations catastrophe."

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  10. PC World got Slashdotted!!! by darealpat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Once more it pays to be well connected in the online community. Now if only this would work with the IRS and DMV.

    --
    For every present, there is a past
    1. Re:PC World got Slashdotted!!! by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1
      Oh no, the DMV is running Mac OS and the IRS uses Google apps, so they will never feel the heat from Slashdot.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    2. Re:PC World got Slashdotted!!! by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

      I've found what works on the DMV. It's called hiring a lawyer. And it costs $1000.

      But it does work. The DMV screwed me, I went to trial the other day and they couldn't come up with any evidence (they were in the wrong). That's 3 points that didn't get on my license.

      I'm doing something similar with the IRS. To get the best deal I can out of them involves hiring accountants and lawyers and costs thousands, but it will save me three times what it costs.

  11. Yuck editors, trolls ahoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is an interesting story, but must it come from "Erris"? He's the owner of the "twitter" account, and a known troll. The editors should be on the lookout for these things.

  12. This is not about linux. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

    It was simply an excuse to turn away a customer so that one less laptop would have to be worked on .

    Laziness at work.

  13. Oh no. Re:It appears... by Erris · · Score: 1

    Someone, please, tell me that PC World is not that stupid. Tell me that web page belongs to someone other than the AC that submitted the original story and was latter identified only as "Tikka". It violates their own store policy. Their PR people told The Register they would take care of it. Tell me the video was taken days ago. I'd really rather hear anything other than some self important moron is making life difficult for a Linux user, against store policy, common decency and half the internet's outrage. No?

    Poor Mr. Tank.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  14. Wrong Name... by friend.ac · · Score: 1

    His name shouldn't be G. Tank.. it should be Tommy Tank

    (english rhyming slang for you yanks)

    1. Re:Wrong Name... by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      I think that it's accepted because the first letters are the same. But don't ask me. I live in central California (lots of cows and orange groves, but not much else.)

    2. Re:Wrong Name... by Nossie · · Score: 1

      heheh wooshed over your heads I see...

      what English word did Austin Powers bring to America?

      give you a hint, rhymes with tank but starts with a W.

  15. I'm sure this has been said already by Neuropol · · Score: 3, Funny

    but i'm certain linux caused this cracking of the hinge. if the user had continued to run windows, it would have actually gone the way of Christine, the Stephen King novel car character, and repaired itself magically.

  16. Welcome to the 21st Century. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    As Jerry A. Taylor found out, the Internet means that asmall public abuse power and or stupidity can result in you looking like fool on a planetary scale.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  17. Re:Interesting... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Funny
    It's offensive propaganda because blastocysts don't post on Slashdot.

    I used to be a blastocyst, you insensitive clod!

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  18. Re:Oh no. Re:It appears... by calebt3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    He's (Tank) lucky that his email address wasn't included in the post. Give me a few minutes...

  19. 900 diggs! It's front page! by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

    Someone needs to explain to PC world that their bad service is the 8th highest story on digg.

    How many people read digg?

    1. Re:900 diggs! It's front page! by rolfc · · Score: 1

      None at PC World, obviously.

  20. How to fix all of this by SlappyBastard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Take a crowbar and a fish. Pry the broken hinge open so as to free the penguin, then toss the fish to give the penguin an incentive to get out of the laptop. You may need to clean out the accumulated penguin filth.

    Then take the laptop to a replacement window specialist to put windows back in the laptop. Once that is done, take the laptop to have the hinge serviced. Tada! all is well.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
    1. Re:How to fix all of this by SlappyBastard · · Score: 2, Informative

      I didn't think of my remarks so much pro-MS as pro-smartassed. Usually when people suggest tossing fish and using crowbars and taking laptops to a window replacement business, they're not being peculiarly serious. BTW, in the original story part of the issue was the company refused to service the laptop because it had Linux installed and thereby was considered to have a voided warranty. Hence, the joke.

      --
      I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
    2. Re:How to fix all of this by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I thought of it as a troll or flaimbat. It gets hard to tell dell the difference when you live with a troll.

    3. Re:How to fix all of this by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I'm just a retard who tries too hard with most of his jokes.

      --
      I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  21. Re:Customer satisfaction survey by calebt3 · · Score: 1

    The issue at hand is with PC World. Not PC Superstore.

  22. Summary by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dear PC Superstore Customer,

    Our bad.

    Sincerely,
    The Management

    --
    The game.
    1. Re:Summary by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Dear PC Superstore,

      No idea why you're writing to me, the issue is with PC World.

      Sincerely,

  23. hardware not software by themushroom · · Score: 1

    Since when the fook is a hinge anything but a hardware issue, not requiring powering the machine up (other than near the end to confirm all jacks got plugged before turning all screws)?

    There was one time a Radio Shack district manager gave me the "Oh, we don't support Apples" song and dance when the item I came in to purchase was a DB9-to-DB25 serial cable off the shelf for my external modem.

    And then there was the time I actually had to say to a salesperson, "Okay, let's forget I mentioned what kind of machine this is for, shall we... Now: how much does an external 56k modem cost at your store?"

  24. I wonder... by calebt3 · · Score: 1

    if the owner of the Storm Botnet read /. and if we can convince him/her to launch a DDoS against PC World...

  25. Re:Not a big deal by compro01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I owned a store... I wouldn't worry about it at all.

    3 words : word of mouth

    Us Linux users are the ones that friends/relatives/etc. turn to when they need computer advise. If they piss us off, guess who we aren't recommended to those friends/relatives/etc.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  26. At this point... by Cycline3 · · Score: 1

    at this point.. simply repairing the laptop is not enough.

  27. not just PC World, perhaps? by dwater · · Score: 1

    If you go to their web site and follow the 'For careers at PC World click here' link, it takes you to another company called DSGi plc :

    You might then also notice on the 'Job Opportunities' menu references to Currys and Dixons. They are other high street tech stores in the UK.

    I can't help but wonder if Curry's and Dixons' customer support is equally poor.

    --
    Max.
    1. Re:not just PC World, perhaps? by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 1

      Aren't they all owned by the same company?

    2. Re:not just PC World, perhaps? by Elentari · · Score: 1

      Yes. I've been into Dixons (now renamed Currys Digital) a few times for blank media and, without exception, every time I've gone in a sales assistant has tried to sell me more expensive kinds, simply because I'm a teenage girl and they presume I don't know any better. "Yes, the coloured cases are pretty." "No, they will not enhance my DVD burning experience, and are not worth an extra £5".. etc.

    3. Re:not just PC World, perhaps? by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      >> Yes. I've been into Dixons (now renamed Currys Digital) a few times for blank media and, without exception, every time I've gone in a sales assistant has tried to sell me more expensive kinds, simply because I'm a teenage girl and they presume I don't know any better. "Yes, the coloured cases are pretty." "No, they will not enhance my DVD burning experience, and are not worth an extra £5".. etc.

      As an example of "Currys Digital" pricing, a cable connecting headphones output of an iPod to a car radio Aux input (in other words, two identical 3.5mm plugs on two ends) costs £14.99. Fortunately, they can't force you to buy there. It's the kind of stuff you get cheaper on eBay because someone bought a box of 1000 cables in china for £200.

    4. Re:not just PC World, perhaps? by CrossChris · · Score: 1

      I can't help but wonder if Curry's and Dixons' customer support is equally poor.

      It's truly appalling! These companies are so bad that they shouldn't be in business.

      There should be an organised boycott of this group of companies. This will not significantly inconvenience consumers - they can buy their computer equipment more cheaply online and get after-sales service.

    5. Re:not just PC World, perhaps? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      It is.

      A former colleague of mine had terrible trouble with a TV he purchased from Currys. It took about 3 or 4 months to sort out, with him having to take a day off every few weeks to sit at home waiting for them to deliver replacement/pick up broken TV.

      Worked out OK in the end - they sent him one worth 3 times what he originally paid. I think he must have got through to the one person in the customer service department who really did care. Even then, they were probably on their last day at work so there wouldn't be any comeback.

      The length of time he spent on the phone messing around it would have been significantly easier (and probably cheaper in terms of hassle) to get the expensive TV to begin with.

    6. Re:not just PC World, perhaps? by AndyCh · · Score: 1

      Bought a Mac Mini from PC World, and when the dvd burner went tits up I took it to an Apple service centre and was told the warranty had expired, even though I'd only had the machine for 10 months. Apparently the store had registered the machine as purchased and then kept it in storage for a couple of months simply to piss me off. I won't be buying from them again. This just makes me more confident in my own personal boycott.

    7. Re:not just PC World, perhaps? by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      They're the same company. :)

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  28. it was a theme by pizpot · · Score: 1

    Step 4. reinstall windows oem and bring it back to the store and say it was a theme you idiot.

    1. Re:it was a theme by deniable · · Score: 4, Funny

      If the hinge problem persists with Windows it wasn't an OS problem.

  29. The Microsoft mindset does not determine law by cheros · · Score: 3, Informative

    This was a UK incident, and the customer in the UK is pretty well protected against this sort of nonsense (caveat: as demonstrated, they will still have to put effort in - retailers still don't seem to care enough not to piss off their customers). The shop effectively broke the law by refusing to repair the laptop (but why did the guy not contact the manufacturer directly instead?).

    I specifically state 'UK' here because that's the only country I know this for sure of. It's pretty reasonable to assume this sort of protection is available elsewhere as well. What you suggest would amount to an override of local law which is impossible. You can't even get rid of such a law in small print in the contract as it will be found invalid in court - not that everyone + dog in business doesn't try..

    I had Dolphin Kitchens try to pull a fast one on me that way, all the way to a 'regional manager' telling me that I signed and it was thus valid. I spoke to Trading Standards and approximately 15 minutes after they had a little chat with the company I got a phone call claiming a 'trainee manager' error. The moment I hear that excuse the company's off my list. If they can't even be upfront and tell me they screwed up I can't invest any trust in them.

    The incident response of "it was a mistake" is total and utter BS. I'm pretty sure that the customer will have asked for a manager to discuss this, and said manager will have told him the same which suggest it's company policy (not store, COMPANY policy) rather than "a mistake".

    I think the only mistake they feel they will have made is not even the public relations hit because it's mainly on geek sites and sufficiently 'geeky' customers avoid that shop anyway unless it's something simple. No, the mistake they feel they have made is attracting Trading Standards and Consumer Direct's attention to the store - no store likes to be picked over by a Government department proving they're needed, especially if the validity of the complaint is well above doubt.

    So, if you want to do anything I would suggest telling you NON-geek friends. See if your local newspaper wants to carry the story..

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    1. Re:The Microsoft mindset does not determine law by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      The reason he didn't go to the manufacturer is presumably that by law, it is the retailer who is responsible, and the manufacturer doesn't have to do anything. Sometimes they do, in the interests of good customer relations, but they don't have to.

    2. Re:The Microsoft mindset does not determine law by namgge · · Score: 1

      The shop effectively broke the law by refusing to repair the laptop (but why did the guy not contact the manufacturer directly instead?).

      Probably because in the UK the relevant consumer rights only apply to the contract between you and the retailer you bought the product from. The origninal manufacturers may offer an additional warranty but as you have no contract with them you have no remedy against them if they refuse to honour it. (You'd have to sue the retailer and claim that the manufacturer's warranty was an essential part of the reason for the purchase.)

      IME (in the UK) in consumer disputes any action that is not focused on working through the chain of evidence needed to get the retailer and/or the credit provider into the small claims court is a waste of effort.

      If you did use credit as part of the purchase you are in clover. Credit card companies won't let themselves end up in court because some dodgy retailer. They settle with the consumer as soon as they know you're serious and then recover the money from the retailer. I find this provision in consumer law particularly great. The PC World manager may be trying to screw you, but you know that his destiny is to end up bent over with a bull elephant called Visa about to go to work on him. Priceless!

      namgge

    3. Re:The Microsoft mindset does not determine law by jimicus · · Score: 1

      If you did use credit as part of the purchase you are in clover. Credit card companies won't let themselves end up in court because some dodgy retailer. They settle with the consumer as soon as they know you're serious and then recover the money from the retailer. I find this provision in consumer law particularly great. The PC World manager may be trying to screw you, but you know that his destiny is to end up bent over with a bull elephant called Visa about to go to work on him. Priceless!

      You are quite correct. And the stores know this as well.

      The phrase "Fix it or I'm reporting you to the bank and let them sort it out through the Visa disputes process. Who would you rather deal with?" has quite remarkable power.

  30. Re:Interesting... by bky1701 · · Score: 1

    I used to be a 2 year old!

    ZOMG AN EX 2 YEAR OLD PROGRAMMING C++!!!!!11!11

  31. mod parent up by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

    funny Now why did /. say I had posted 16 seconds ago when it's been a couple of hours? Clock running slow?

  32. Re:You're becoming tiresome by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    Could you take this lovers spat somewhere else?

    I really could do without watching some AC flirting with the guy he likes.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  33. Re:Oh no. Re:It appears... by Angostura · · Score: 1

    If he's a manager at PC World, I find it very unlikely that he would have an e-mail address, or know how to connect to it if it existed.

  34. Re:Oh no. Re:It appears... by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

    Someone, please, tell me that PC World is not that stupid. Tell me that web page belongs to someone other than the AC that submitted the original story and was latter identified only as "Tikka". It violates their own store policy. Their PR people told The Register they would take care of it. Tell me the video was taken days ago. I'd really rather hear anything other than some self important moron is making life difficult for a Linux user, against store policy, common decency and half the internet's outrage. No? Poor Mr. Tank. Nope. PC World are that bad. After years of experience with the various Dixons group stores, including working for one of the chains for a few years, I washed my hands of them.
    --
    It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
  35. Re:Interesting... by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shouldn't it read:

    Day 2: Got a job at PC World.

    Day 3: I've been promoted to manager.

    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  36. Re:Not a big deal by CrossChris · · Score: 1

    Why the obvious troll?

  37. Re:Huh? by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's wrong is that it has absolutely nothing to do with PC World's ability or otherwise to fix broken laptops, or about tech matters in general.

    If I had mod points at the moment, I would be giving out a few -1 offtopis here.

  38. Re:Ready to burn some karma. by rolfc · · Score: 1

    There is no such thing as an "admin". In windows everyone has administrator rights.

    Anonymous user

  39. I hate PC World by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

    It's amateurish, the people there seem not to get the concept of using a computer (you switch it on) and even if you take something in because the paint's peeled off, they'll install their 'performance measuring application' (bloatware) on your machine and drop a few PC World adverts on the desktop.
    And they seem to think that 80gB is 'massive' by today's standards.

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
  40. Corporate account by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    When I heard about a store suddenly making and about-face and deciding to provide better service to a customer named "Tikka," I could only assume it was a corporate account.

  41. Re:Oh no. Re:It appears... by Wowsers · · Score: 1

    In the dim distant past I applied for a job for PC-World (I didn't get it). The store managers reason was, you know too much about computers, and might scare people away when they most need advice. They were interested in sales people and not people that could give the correct advice and make a sale.

    Just try it out, go into their stores and ask them a basic question (if you can ever find anyone) and see how far they get with it. Usually you'll get the "I'll just go check for the answer", and the sales rep runs away to the stock room until you've given up and left (to order gadget online instead).

    The store is good for getting emergency supplies like ink, paper or DVD's etc., although not particular cheap.

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
  42. Leave it to an AC... by msauve · · Score: 1
    to spout incorrect crap without citing any source.

    In the US, a warrantor can say the whole warranty is nullified if you hang fuzzy dice off the corner of your screen. The only thing they need to do is state so in plain terms. Read the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, if you want to know.

    Most of the "they can't do X" crap, like the AC's comment, stems from a misinterpretation of one specific part of the act"

    No warrantor of a consumer product may condition his written or implied warranty of such product on the consumer's using, in connection with such product, any article or service (other than article or service provided without charge under the terms of the warranty) which is identified by brand, trade, or corporate name; except that the prohibition of this subsection may be waived by the Commission if -
    (1) the warrantor satisfies the Commission that the warranted product will function properly only if the article or service so identified is used in connection with the warranted product, and
    (2) the Commission finds that such a waiver is in the public interest.
    The clause is to prevent, say, a vacuum cleaner company from requiring used of their own brand of bags (unless they provide them free). It doesn't mean you can modify your car for more horsepower, and expect the manufacturer to cover the engine under warranty when it breaks. It also doesn't mean a manufacturer can't put a clause in the warranty which says the engine warranty is voided if you hang fuzzy dice from the mirror. It means that they can't put a clause which says "Use of any brand fuzzy dice other than ACME brand fuzzy dice will void the engine warranty."
    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  43. Re:Not a big deal by bazorg · · Score: 1

    Considering the number of /. posters stating that PCWorld sucks and the number of PC World shops in existence, it appears that the bad word of mouth can be overcome by 2 cents off. (or 2p., in this case)

  44. Re:Huh? by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    Valid point.

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  45. What a crock by tecknoh · · Score: 1

    It's ridiculous that you have to get on slashdot and raise a fuss just to get a laptop serviced under warranty. I am sure the laptop hinge would still be broke if it wasnt for the swarm of bad press headed to PC World. And as far as not honoring the earranty if linux is loaded on the system, what a joke. If anyhting, they shoudln't warranty and system running windows, as in my experience, winblows is much more likely to fry your hardware than most linux distributions. All I really know is, I will never deal with PC World.

    --
    BrickerEnterprises.Com - Innovation at work
  46. Re:Ready to burn some karma. by marcello_dl · · Score: 4, Funny

    > There is no such thing as an "admin". In windows everyone has administrator rights.

    I know, my other computer is your windows box.

    --
    ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  47. Re:You're becoming tiresome by stonecypher · · Score: 1

    You know, AC, you're the actual troll here. You're hiding your identity, following someone around, making accusations against their name without evidence. You're boring. Let it go. Nobody cares if twitter and erris are the same person. You're contributing nothing but grief. Be a man and use an account, or stop wasting everyone's time.

    Erris: stop responding to people like this. All they want is to be noticed. It doesn't matter if you're right or wrong: if they think you're paying attention to them, they're getting exactly what they want, and they'll just keep it up. Positive or negative response, doesn't matter - it's a response.

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  48. Re:Having read the newest chapter by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    It's the UK. This would be a small claims track thing. You can't claim legal costs under small claims. But it's fairly informal and would just be a metter of the guy explaining that the hinge broke and the company refused to fix it, and demonstrate that he gave the company a reasonable chance to resolve the situation. PCWorld would then be gven the opportunity to explain that the hinge breaking was clearly a direct result of a different OS being installed, and/or is normal wear and tear or a result of misuse by the customer.

  49. Yeah - I like the Consumer Credit Act :-) by cheros · · Score: 1

    The protection by the Consumer Credit Act is one of the reasons I explicitly try to buy things on credit (with a non-charge period, obviously). I don't need (nor want) the credit, but the extra protection is rather helpful if things fail in the first 30 days and -admittedly unfair to the reseller- you can even just change your mind and they'll have to roll it back. No "restocking charges", no "you can buy something of the same value" - none of that. Money. Back.

    Having said that, the few times I had to use that protection were interesting. I had a Dixons "manager" tell me point blank that I had it all wrong and that they all had "training" - strangely that didn't last long when I suggested that his only other option was a phone call, with a choice between regional manager or Trading Standards. Maybe my asking for the name of his regional manager to pass on to aformentioned Trading Standards was too close to a "career" limiting move.

    Not that I didn't have to cut him short when he tried making remarks like "I'll do this as an exception" (by that time I was getting pretty irritated by his attempt to make me hang on to a defective product) by telling him I didn't need special services, only him following the law and sell me kit that works. Kinda helps if the shop's got other customers ..

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  50. Sad by Swingblade · · Score: 1

    This is just sad, I hope you manage to get it fixed. "You broke your computer when you installed linux. That's why the construction of the computer failed"

  51. One more place NOT to buy from by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Even if they 'made it right' later, being *this* incompetent up front is worrisome and ill be sure not to purchase from them, ever.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  52. Re:You're becoming tiresome by dreddnott · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that Erris and twitter are clearly trolls themselves. They absolutely adore the negative attention at least as much if not more than the positive attention and have admitted it numerous times.

    A well-fed troll is a happy troll. I have to admit I almost feel guilty advocating the open-source software philosophy because of the divisive, alienating attitude in "their" posts. I know it's just a hideous caricature of how advocacy is typically done in the real world, but still...bleah.

    --
    I may make you feel, but I can't make you think.
  53. Re:Interesting... by damncrackmonkey · · Score: 1

    Your definition of day seems to be about as consistent as the Bible's

  54. Re:You're becoming tiresome by stonecypher · · Score: 1

    I don't know them (they're the same person btw.) What I do know is that the anonymous coward to whom I replied is exactly what he's accusing of others.

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  55. A win by codingmasters · · Score: 1

    This is a win for common sense. Thank goodness.

  56. Re:Hate to say I told you so by Jaxoreth · · Score: 1

    No you don't.

    --
    In general, it is safe and legal to kill your children. -- POSIX Programmer's Guide
  57. Re:Huh? by dhalgren · · Score: 1

    Trust, me, I know about the second kind too. Maybe you missed where I mentioned that abortion is, in fact, abused. That doesn't mean I'm willing to abandon the legitimate cases, as I also said.

    And while these cases may be in the minority (which I see no reason to believe without some evidence or links), they are not so uncommon as to be ignorable.

  58. Re:It appears... Plan 9 by watermodem · · Score: 1

    Walk into the offending PC-WORLD store with PLAN-9 on a bunch of USB keys and proceed to install it on all their demo machines while pretending to look at them. Then exit the store.

    They will never figure out what they are looking at. Maybe even pray for Linux.

  59. until this whole debacle happened.... by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

    until this whole debacle happened and was posted about....I had never heard of the PC world store-

  60. Isn't it amazing... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    ...what a bit of bad press can accomplish?

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  61. Re:Ready to burn some karma. by JimFive · · Score: 1

    my other computer is your windows box.
    I think I just found a .sig quote

    Do you mind?

    --
    JimFive
    --
    Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.