Slashdot Mirror


XBox Adding HD Tuners Next Year

iloveCarla writes "Microsoft is partnering with Toshiba to turn the Xbox into a full fledged HTPC. With built-in HD DVD, a larger hard drive, revamped "MCE" interface, and possibly HDTV tuners, the Xbox would be in a better position to compete against the PS3 in the race to serve as the defacto entertainment hub for couch potatoes. According to the article "The new device is expected to be released late in 2008 or at the 2009 CES show in Las Vegas."

279 comments

  1. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if I had a screen big enough to enjoy the real benefit of HD, why the fuck would I want a locked down platform that goes out of its way to restrict my usage?

    1. Re:Who cares? by noddyxoi · · Score: 0, Troll

      I wish i had mod points to mod you up. MS spam on slashdot sucks.

    2. Re:Who cares? by absorbr · · Score: 1

      or more to the point, why would you want to waste your life as a couch potato? :)

    3. Re:Who cares? by Choad+Namath · · Score: 0

      You're obviously not anywhere near the target demographic. You sound like a guy who drives a 1987 Toyota Corolla complaining that you would never buy a BMW Z8 because it takes premium gas.

    4. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you sound like the kind of douchebag who equates the cost of his possessions with his own value.

    5. Re:Who cares? by Blahbooboo3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And you sound like someone who isn't successful enough to own a Z8 and is bitter. lol. :D

    6. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > someone who isn't successful enough to own a Z8

      And you sound like someone who has no understanding of success. FYI, I know complete failures-in-life who drive shiny BMWs courtesy of inherited wealth.

    7. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to the service you get from the cable / satellite provider? At least the X-Box has the potential to be hacked.

    8. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And you all sound like typical Slashdotters.

    9. Re:Who cares? by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      You must be new here.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:Who cares? by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      And you all sound like typical Slashdotters. Or better yet, they sound like the 12 yr old kids on Xbox live minus calling each other noobs/Newbs
      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    11. Re:Who cares? by crazzeto · · Score: 1

      What platform would you use intead? X-Box isn't any different than any other consumer level media device (other than being a game console)... Most people don't have the time or patients to deal with MythTV... So frankly, I really don't see why you're making a big fuss about this some how being "locked down", I wouldn't expect any more from TIVO/Sony/Scientific Atlantic (particularly when paired with Time Warner)/et. al.

    12. Re:Who cares? by gulikoza · · Score: 1

      XBMC is an example of an excellent media application. It plays everything you throw at it, supports network shares, hard disk and CD/DVD media. It's really too bad XBOX1 does not have the CPU power to play h264 HD media...

    13. Re:Who cares? by crazzeto · · Score: 1

      That's just it, the X-Box 360 does... That's why it's going to be a great little media device (honestly like the current config, built in HD-DVD would be nice though). I'm thinking this new x-box will be great for those who don't have/want a media center... Personally the config I've been contemplating is having a single media center PC, with x-boxs hooked up to the TVs in the house... Ya get a single centralized DVR with your content accessable anywhere in the house, with no configuration headaches and at a better price point (for HD-output) then you would get out of building your own HTPC and instally myth...

    14. Re:Who cares? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why the fuck would I want a locked down platform that goes out of its way to restrict my usage?

      Yeah! Why would I want my cable company's dodgy set-top box, when the industry has done everything in its power to weaken the CableCard mandate that would have given us more freedom?

      Oh, were you talking about the X360? Half a dozen of one...

    15. Re:Who cares? by angus_rg · · Score: 1

      I think the big reason no one will care is because it will probably be some standard qam atsc capable card that gives no access to provider specific things like encrypted pay channels, on demand, etc. That's the reason I have never bought a HD tuner.

    16. Re:Who cares? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Moreover, why would anyone in the UK or Japan or places like them buy this and be forced to pay taxes on a new "TV" or receiving device. In Japan, NHK may come after such owners for their share of the TV tax (I can't remember if NHK recently stopped coming after residents/citizens)

      http://www.google.com/search?q=nhk+tv+tax&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

      Besides, why buy a hyper-proprietary tuner, especially one from microsoft. Doesn't matter if they get it from say, Phillips, or Magnavox or Panasonic, et al, they'll heavily modify it for their own non-standard purposes...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    17. Re:Who cares? by mink · · Score: 1

      I can't get it to play unprotected WMA files without playback glitching (latest build). It play one minute or so worth of audio in one second, then it plays is fine for a few more minutes before it happens again.

      Playback of these same files on other platforms has no issues.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  2. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Nice, as usual around here, the headline isn't fully supported by the story, let alone the summary. In case Taco couldn't comprehend the first sentence he read, it says that they "might" add HD tuners. All the other stuff is a go, but the HD tuners may not make it.

  3. Not the enhancement people really want by jandrese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The real question is: Will they start making the 360s reliable enough to reduce the failure rate down to something reasonable? I don't really care about HD tuners and stuff like that, what I really care about is will it keep running long enough for me to finish a game before having to send it back to the shop?

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by DJCacophony · · Score: 4, Informative

      Microsoft has already done this. They have identified the problem that caused the general hardware failure (insufficient heat dissipation and weak solder) and retooled their assembly line to fix it. Any hardware failures you hear about are older xboxes. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_technical_problems for more info.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    2. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by grumbel · · Score: 1

      ### Microsoft has already done this.

      I am still waiting for an official announcement on what the problems exactly were, how they fixed them and when they fixed them. At the moment its all third-party guessing as to what Microsoft is up to.

    3. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by perlchild · · Score: 1

      They are also replacing units with apparently un-fixed or unsufficiently fixed(this was less than two months ago) refurbished.
      If the problem was as clear-cut as you say, I'd hope their warranty service would supply fixed units on repair...

    4. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by slyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "Halo Limited Edition Xbox 360's" or whatever their official name is are the end of all these problems. For the most part the problem has been fixed on the newer systems from what I understand (they have better heatsinks), but the halo xbox's are the first to use the Falcon chipset and have a 65 NM processor instead of a 90 NM processor.

      Assuming that what I read once at Ars Technica (that a dual core from 65 NM to 45 NM is 10 degrees C and 10 Watts less under load (at the same clock)) extrapolates perfectly from an X86 dual core to a PowerPC tri core then the difference in produced temperature should be 15 degrees C. Unfortunately, it's only on the halo limiteds AFAIK as of now, but eventually it will seep down to the Elites and Premiums the same way HDMI did.

    5. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      It's not "guessing" at all, it's the logical conclusion to draw from the fact that the chips had detached from the motherboard due to overheating and weaker solder.
      Anybody can guess. "Hell, I guess it was gremlins". Making wild guesses and drawing conclusions based on evidence and observations, however, are two different animals.
      If you're waiting on Microsoft to admit they did something wrong to believe they did something wrong, then you'll be waiting a long time.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    6. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by jandrese · · Score: 1

      They THINK it will be the end of those problems, only time will tell. Hopefully it will fix the problem, but despite all of the online speculation that the problem has been fixed for months, it is still cropping up at an alarming rate.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by grumbel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ### It's not "guessing" at all, it's the logical conclusion to draw from the fact that the chips had detached from the motherboard due to overheating and weaker solder.

      Yeah, but how then did it take Microsoft way over a year to figure that one out and (maybe) fix it? Nobody knows the failure rate of currently released XBox360s and plenty of those that Microsoft had 'repaired' after they broke, broke again a while later.

      ### If you're waiting on Microsoft to admit they did something wrong to believe they did something wrong, then you'll be waiting a long time.

      When Microsoft would want to sell a few more boxes they better start to be honest to the user. I am just a little sick of them telling us bullshit over and over again. Any word on when they will fix the DVD scratching issue that has been their for now almost two years (sorry, but blaming the user is *not* the right thing to do when a pair of rubber pads could fix it)?

    8. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by tm2b · · Score: 1

      I am still waiting for an official announcement on what the problems exactly were, how they fixed them and when they fixed them.
      Have you met Microsoft? You're going to be waiting a really long time.
      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    9. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by Negatyfus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so that's why my newer model broke down after two-and-half months for no reason.

    10. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by JakiChan · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Microsoft has already done this. They have identified the problem that caused the general hardware failure (insufficient heat dissipation and weak solder) and retooled their assembly line to fix it. Any hardware failures you hear about are older xboxes. Not true. On the official xbox forums there are plenty of reports brand new boxes still dying.
      --
      "Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
    11. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

      If they know what the problem is, then why do they keep sending customers "repaired" xbox 360s that end up failing?

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    12. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by Pojut · · Score: 1

      When Microsoft would want to sell a few more boxes they better start to be honest to the user. I am just a little sick of them telling us bullshit over and over again. Any word on when they will fix the DVD scratching issue that has been their for now almost two years (sorry, but blaming the user is *not* the right thing to do when a pair of rubber pads could fix it)?


      Right...because Sony has never fed anyone bullshit...oh, and you're right, Nintendo has never said one thing and the reality ends up being quite different.

      They are businesses. Telling us bullshit is what they do best. And you know what? People buy their stuff anyway, because they want it. If my 360 got the RRoD tomorrow, or if my PS3 or my Wii for whatever reason went belly up tomorrow, I would be replacing them as quickly as I could...Why? Because I enjoy the time that spend using them.
    13. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      They have fixed fuck all nothing. Just put a band-aid on the problem with a larger heat sync. The 360 is STILL just as hot as it was before they moved to the new hunk of metal model. The heat, and x-clamps are the major defect issue. The only light of hope for change honestly is the new 65nm chips that may or may not come out since they keep bumping back the expected date for those chips to come out. Only then will ANYTHING change. This is coming from an owner of a 360 Elite with their "new fixes" that had ROOD in under 48 hours of ownership that is heavily interested in MS's dealings with the 360. Their fixes for now will make a 360 last a little longer at best, not be reliable.

    14. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by grumbel · · Score: 1

      ### They are businesses. Telling us bullshit is what they do best.

      Telling random marketing bullshit is one thing and I agree, all of them are guilty of that. However what Microsoft did with the XBox360 wasn't just random marketing bullshit, it was knowingly sending customers boxes which where broken by design. Not just once, since this isn't just the RRoD issue, they did the same thing with the disc scratching issue. They denied it for half a year and only after some dutch game magazine did some testing, they did actually agree that there might be a problem. Of course they still haven't done anything to actually replace the broken DVD and if they actually fixed it once and for all, who knows?

      The hardware design of the XBox360 is simply a complete cluster fuck. Its one thing to fuck up, its a very different thing to still after *TWO YEARS* not being able to deliver consoles that actually work as they originally should.

      All that said, I do think the XBox360 is a great device, the games offering is great and it really looks like a device I would love to buy, but with its track record of failures I just can't justify to waste 350.

    15. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Replace "Microsoft" with "apple", replace "XBox360" with "PowerMac/iMac/MBP", and you could say the same. Face it, all companies do this.

    16. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      ZOMG! Stop the presses, there's this guy, somewhere, who had a hardware failure on a complex electronic device.

      This shit has got to stop. Someone has to be accountable! Make the bastards pay.

      Seriously, I'm trying to figure out what your so-called point is.

    17. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Which other company has ever managed to produce a 30% failure rate?

    18. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by Allison+Geode · · Score: 1

      I had my first red-light scare tonight. turns out its probably just the overheat error, as its working again, but still....... makes me really nervous to invest further money into the hardware until after, perhaps, i get the full red-ring and get a replacement unit.

    19. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by donaldm · · Score: 1

      From the following article "Toshiba Working With Microsoft On New Entertainment Xbox" http://www.smarthousenews.com.au/Games_And_Devices/Console?Article=/Games%20And%20Devices/Console/P4G5C3U2 it looks like the Xbox is going to get an inbuilt HD-DVD drive plus HDMI output, wireless, possibly a HD Tuner and a large capacity disk drive and is going to be sold as an entertainment hub. This is all well and good but what about those people (over 11 million of them) who purchased the Xbox360, does this mean that all games will now be on HD-DVD media or will games still come out on DVD (a HD-DVD player can read DVD and HD-DVD) and possibly require the hard drive?

      I think we will now find Microsoft in a real dilemma since to compete effectively with the PS3 (does not have a HD tuner yet but PVR is touted for 2008) which is now dropping significantly in price they are going to have another massive loss as they try to compete. Yes Microsoft has deep pockets but their Shareholders are going to get really pissed off.

      As I have mentioned if you have purchased an Xbox360 is your purchase now heading for the scrap heap? (the original Xbox lasted about four years) If it is you now have many very disgruntled Xbox360 owners and if the new Xbox360HD-DVD (hmm! can I patent or copyright that name) still only requires DVD's for games and HD-DVD for movies then people are going to ask why do we need this if the new machine costs significantly more than the PS3 and if they aren't getting any extra functionality except for a media center which you can actually get on the Xbox360 now.

      I can understand Toshiba working with Microsoft on this because if you are looking at the numbers of HD-DVD's to Bluray disks you really do need to take into account the PS3 because every PS3 game is on Bluray and even though the overall Bluray disks that have movies on them is maybe approx one or two million (HD-DVD is much less then that) the number of games for the PS3 increases the total number of Bluray disks to well over 10 million (I am under estimating here) and Sony is now not only pushing the PS3 as a games machine but also as a Bluray player as well. This is not lost on Toshiba who really need the new Xbox360HD model to be successful.

      We are heading for interesting times over this coming year and it should be interesting to hear the spin put out by the Microsoft PR department.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    20. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by Pojut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, Firestone's recall in 1978 (after an internal memo recognizing the problem in 1973...1973!) of over 7 million Firestone 500's (which the NHTSA documented 40 or so deaths as a result of the messed up tire)

      Let's not forget the Firestone/Ford Explorer fiasco. The problem was discovered in 1996, but 6.3 million Wilderness AT, Firestone ATX/ATXII tires were not recalled until the year 2000. And these problems caused DEATHS. Not just minor inconvenience by having to wait for your gaming box to get repaired.

      Satisfied?

    21. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by bynary · · Score: 1

      Have you actually owned a 360 or are you just complaining about it's supposed high failure rate because "It's the cool thing to do."?

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    22. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by ed1park · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I received mine from repair a month ago, and it already locked up on me once. The fan sounds louder than before too. :(

    23. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you are going to wait until people actually die from XBomb360 failure? Any consumer device not working as it is advertised over the time it's guaranteed is deemed defective. If you don't think this is a serious issue, you are delusional.

    24. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by Pojut · · Score: 1

      ? Someone said name another company that has had a 30% failure rate...I just named a company that did it TWICE.

      Smoke some pot and calm down...I know it's Monday, but holy crap...I was just responding to the question.

    25. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      The first new model batch was 8/23. So two-and-half months ago, you probably got an older model pulled from stock. Google around and there's a picture guide showing what to look for to tell if you have a new one or not. Look inside your xbox360's vent, you should see a heatpipe leading away from the GPU.

    26. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by grumbel · · Score: 1

      None of them sounds like a 30% failure rate, it just happens that the consequences of failure where far more devastating then a RRoD which required the recall. Microsoft has a 30% failure rate and *hasn't* issued a recall, so all those XBox360s are still out their waiting to fail, with a little lack, they'll do it in the warranty period.

    27. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by rtechie · · Score: 1

      I am still waiting for an official announcement Keep waiting. Microsoft doesn't want to admit that they basically screwed the early adopters so they are unlikely to tout bug fixes in new version of the 360 console, despite the fact they are significant.

      Console manufacturers have always been reluctant to discuss the specific technical details of their consoles because it can leave them at a competitive disadvantage and can aid piracy. For example, it's been recently revealed that the wii is LITERALLY an overclocked Gamecube, which not only looks bad from a marketing perspective, but aids the mod chip makers.

      The fact is, 3rd parties have been a very good source of data for consoles. Microsoft certainly isn't able to keep secrets very long. Third parties have discovered that newer Xbox 360s have more reliable DVD-ROM drives, better fans, better heatsinks, and 65nm CPUs.

    28. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by grumbel · · Score: 1

      ### For example, it's been recently revealed that the wii is LITERALLY an overclocked Gamecube,

      This isn't exactly news, it was already clear on launch day and presumed to be so even month before that, after all the Wiimote started out as a add-on to the Gamecube and the early Wii devkits where in fact Gamecubes with a wired Wiimote. Now of course Nintendo isn't going to tell you that they are selling you the same thing that they already sold you five years earlier, only with a few more Mhz, a new controller and a $50 higher price. Instead they simply didn't tell you anything about the technical details and simply focused on the games and social aspects. Unlike previous consoles there never was 'facts sheet' for the Wii where you could read how many polygons it can output in a second and all that stuff like that. Things where always keep very blurry on technical details, but thats really all, they never claimed that the Wii could render super hires hdr yada graphics.

      But as said, its one thing to not be upfront with rather unimportant implementation details and a completly different thing to sell customers broken hardware and doing little or nothing to fix the problems in a timely manner. Has any of the few resulting lawsuits actually reached anything so far?

      And while we are at it, the whole XBox360 trouble also shows quite clearly a complete failure of the gaming press. Why don't they focus more on this issue? Ask the hard question in interviews and find out what is really going on? Its not just the hardware defects, but also things like the different DVD drives in XBox360, some presumably very loud, other do ok. Why do I have to collect those info myself on random blogs? Isn't that what the gaming press should be for?

    29. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by mink · · Score: 1

      The Explorer related recall aparently had some number of causes.
      Firestone was claiming that people were not inflating tires properly so the ride would be smoother. They said Ford had not made changes to the US model Explorer that it had in other countries.

      I don't think the reasons for that recall (PR has gotta be a big one) are as straight foreward as a design flaw.
      I do know that improper tire inflation can cause damage that will lead to blowouts.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    30. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Then explain to me why other, heavier trucks (Land Rovers, Land Cruisers, Expeditions, etc.) had no problems with their tires and still don't to this day.

      Yes, inproper tire inflation can cause some major issues, but people would have to either be severely under-inflating (say around 10-20 PSI) or over-inflating (say around 45-60 PSI) for that kind of issue to occur...and yes, I'm aware that off-roaders usually run 5-15 PSI on the trail to increase tire spread and grip (aka "airing down")... but then again, they aren't traveling 70 MPH either.

    31. Re:Not the enhancement people really want by mink · · Score: 1

      Look, I didn't claim it was all there was to it, but I was pointing out that's part of why Firestone was saying it was not simply a flaw in the tire design.

      From what I remember and can read in a quick Google around, at least 3 different things were stated as part of the problem (tire failure leading to rollover in Ford Explorers), and not just they made these tires bad. Some people who were "victims" claimed they were told by dealerships to under inflate to improve the ride.

      If you want to know why a differently designed vehicle using differently designed tires does not have problems talk to people in the tire/automotive industry, I dont have those kind of answers. Firestone said that Ford made changes in overseas Explorer models design and requested a different version of that tire for those markets.

      If that's the case why didn't Ford change things here? From what I can tell some of the blowouts were directly traced to people doing highway speeds on poorly inflated tires, but I am not claiming that is the only things that happened.

      Companies do sometimes go with a recall when either the cost of not doing them is too high (lives or money) or for PR reasons. IMO in this case Firestone was doing the latter.

      The first set of tires that came with my car were recalled so to problems with abnormal inner edge wear (I saw the problem myself), so it's not like I am a fan of Firestone/Bridgstone and am giving them a free ride on the issue.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  4. Adding New Features to Consoles by usul294 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Adding new features to consoles just makes people who bought 360 early upset. If the HD-DVD had been included since the beginning, I would be buying HD-DVD movies, and I really enjoy my high-def 360 playing when I'm home from school. Well, since my Xbox is off at the repair center for red-ringing, back to my Wii.

    1. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by MooseMuffin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the HD-DVD had been included since the beginning it would have cost twice as much and most of us probably wouldn't own one.

    2. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Adding new features to consoles just makes people who bought 360 early upset
       
      Yeah, God forbid new features be added to a product. We should all be driving the Model T. Or better yet we should be living in caves and afraid of fire.
       
      You fucks are really a bore. If someone upgrades a product you bitch about being an early adopter (The fucking machine is 2 years old, do you think this is the Atari 2600?) if they never upgrade it you scream "Where's the innovation?"
       
      Get over yourselves. There is progress in the world. If you don't like it go live with the fucking Amish.

    3. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by voidstin · · Score: 1

      [quote]If someone upgrades a product you bitch about being an early adopter (The fucking machine is 2 years old, do you think this is the Atari 2600?) if they never upgrade it you scream "Where's the innovation?"
      [/quote]

      When have consoles ever been updated? the PS2 got smaller and integrated IR, that's it. Short obsolescence cycles just piss people off. If these new features are so genius, sit on them and put them in the xbox 720.

      All this is doing for mid-cycle adopters (like me), is making me wait. It's been like this all year. Wait for HDMI, wait for Falcon, wait for the price drop, now wait until 2009? If I buy now, will i have to put another ugly misshapen box like the hd dvd player next to my TV? Didn't you people learn anything from the Sega CD?

      Ultimately, it's going to be about the games. If I wanted a $600 convergence box, I'd get a mac mini.

    4. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by vertinox · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If the HD-DVD had been included since the beginning it would have cost twice as much and most of us probably wouldn't own one.

      I'd have to argue this though, the first DVD player most gamers had was the PS2. Back then VHS was still ok and no one had a need to go out and buy an expensive stand alone DVD player.

      I mean one night we were at the video store and we saw a DVD to rent instead of a VHS and we said to ourselves "Oh, if I only had a DVD player. Oh wait!"

      This really drove the format and many kids with PS2 could also watch DVD movies. Of course now the players are $20 bucks for a new one and its a moot point.

      Of course the whole issue of the HDVD and Bluray wars is kind of killing both formats at this point.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    5. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by SScorpio · · Score: 1
      I'll bit on this troll.

      Gaming consoles are standard boxes where developers create for a single technology set which is the same across all units of a system. The manufactures might make changes to the look of the system, but the base system should be the same. The 360 had the issue of not including a hard drive with the "core" model. This caused developers to not support it even though it was a huge selling point of the original Xbox where data could be cached and streamed off the HDD. Several newer games appear like they might start requiring a HDD. The same is with the Xbox only using standard DVDs. The system is pushing HD content; however, games are limited to 9GB disks. The PS3 using BluRay allows for 25GB per disk. This allows more data for cutscenes and audio. The trade off between storage can be seen last gen. Look at the Xbox version of the Prince of Persia games compared to the Gamecube. The difference in music is easily identifiable and is caused by the Xbox using 9GB disks while the Gamecube used 1.5GB disks.

      You fucks are really a bore. If someone upgrades a product you bitch about being an early adopter (The fucking machine is 2 years old, do you think this is the Atari 2600?) if they never upgrade it you scream "Where's the innovation?" They do upgrade, about every 4-5 years. Thats why you have the PS2 -> PS3, Xbox -> Xbox 360, Gamecube -> Wii. Microsoft is currently positioned to be in second place this generation even with all of the hardware problems they are having. Second place behind the Wii isn't bad since they will have the hardcore market while the Wii has the everyone market. However, if they continue to splinter their market they might just lose out to Sony. People might be complaining that the new PS3 doesn't have PS2 backwards compatibility, but that has no effect on the PS3 ability to play PS3 games. All of the systems have the same processor, same video system, and they all have hard drives of differing sizes. The difference in HDD space is minor because developers can count on it being there.
    6. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When have consoles ever been updated?
       
      Since it hasn't happened in the past it should never happen. Again, we should all be driving Model-Ts.
       
        Short obsolescence cycles just piss people off. If these new features are so genius, sit on them and put them in the xbox 720.
       
      And just who the fuck are you to say shit like this? Give me one reason they should sit on anything instead of just putting it out? Man, you really are stuck on yourself.
       
        All this is doing for mid-cycle adopters (like me), is making me wait. It's been like this all year. Wait for HDMI, wait for Falcon, wait for the price drop, now wait until 2009? If I buy now, will i have to put another ugly misshapen box like the hd dvd player next to my TV? Didn't you people learn anything from the Sega CD?
       
      Oh well. Let me just be the first to tell you that no one at MS or any other company cares if you wait. Really. Others have proven that upgrading products does boost sales regardless of people like yourself. While I do not plan on buying one either I can't think of a single real reason for them to hold back on releasing these features. You're just a whiner.
       
        Ultimately, it's going to be about the games. If I wanted a $600 convergence box, I'd get a mac mini.
       
      If you really think that set top boxes are only about the games I think you've been sleeping through recent gaming history. Heh. I'm not surprised given your attitude.

    7. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When have consoles ever been updated?"

      Don't know much about consoles, do you? The answer is: since nearly the beginning. I'm not going to get longwinded here, so I'll just cite one example. The Sega Genesis. Did you know that there were THREE versions of this system? And that's just the base unit, I'm not talking about addons like the SegaCD or 32X.

    8. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      But the PS2 didn't cost $500. Don't you see the difference. PS2 was able to include the DVD player without adding much to the cost of the console. The PS3 or XBox 360 with HD-DVD are much more expensive than the standard console. So, while it's true that it would be a cheaper HD player, it's still more than most people are willing to pay for HD video. Also, everyone seems to forget that VHS to DVD was a huge leap. DVD to HD, not so much.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    9. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, HD-DVD for movies may be nice if it succeeds but in late 2008-2009 the price of players will probably not be that much anyway and who knows if people care if it's within the console or not.

      For games they are sorta screwed anyway, to add it later will add bulk and look bad.

      At current US prices of 40GB PS3 vs premium 360 I know what I would had choosen, but I'm not intrested in any of them atm, I game to little anyway and still have plenty of DS titles to play. I wonder if PS3 sales will ever kickoff or if they will be on par with 360 the whole time (which they are atm, the sales curves are more or less identical for ps3 and 360, but 360 has been out for a longer period of time.)

    10. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fail the history lesson as well. Do some research on old consoles. They were always making updates and upgrades to consoles. This is, by far, NOT the first time it's happened.

      As long as they can all still play games entitled "XBox 360", then they haven't broken any unwritten rules. It's once you have to start looking carefully at the game box to find out that this is for "Super XBox 360" and not regular 360, that they have committed a major faux pas.

      Oh, and it seems you need the same terminology lesson most people around here do: Just because you don't agree with the parent poster's comments, doesn't make them a "troll".

    11. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Not twice, 50% more given that you are either prone to stupid hyperbole or are bad at math.

      The cost was $399 for something worth buying, the $299 model was not. The separate drive was $199, so the total for such a model would have been $599.

      Maybe not standardize on it, but the top model could have had one built in, I would have been willing to pay the extra.

    12. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by shlepp · · Score: 0, Interesting

      the PS2 did cost $500, thats what i paid for mine when i got it at launch.

    13. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I would argue that 360 will be a third at the end of these consoles life, but only time will tell.

      I would assume that Microsoft will get their next console out before Sony does thought.

    14. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      The separate drive was almost a year later. Technology comes down in price.

    15. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      According to the pricing history, you're either a liar, European, or you got ripped off.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    16. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by billiam247 · · Score: 1

      The PS2 also got an integrated network adapter and lost (for most people) the ability to add a hard drive.

    17. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 1

      If the HD-DVD had been included since the beginning it would have cost twice as much and most of us probably wouldn't own one. You are assuming that price has anything to do with the cost to manufacture. This isn't the case and should be obvious here by the fact that MS loses money on every 360 built.

      It might have been twice the price, it might have been 50% more it might have been the same price it was at launch. Whatever it would have been, it would have been determined by the Marketing department (or Sales) and ultimately us as to the price of the HD-DVD 360, not the manufacturing department.

      For all of the RIAA/MPAA rants about standing up to the industry, it really amazes me that we forget (or don't get) this.
    18. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of us don't own one.

    19. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Shabbs · · Score: 1

      And it would have been a year later. They would have nowhere near the maket penetration they do now if they had waited to get an HD DVD drive in there.

      --
      Mark
    20. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      Since the 360 came out a year before the PS3/Wii, Microsoft being the first again with its next next-gen console seems like a given. They'd only need to bump the CPU/GPU processing power to provide proper support for 1080p60 games (instead of upscaled 720p), increase RAMs, include the HD-DVD, a user-replaceable 2.5" SATA HDD and HDMI in the base configuration to have something almost directly backwards-compatible that may actually be worth calling the XBox 720 in 2-3 years.

      With that said, the way Sony and Microsoft have been introducing new variations of their platforms and discontinuing others at a rate of three or more each year is unprecedented and quite annoying. One new model per year would be ok but replacing most of the lineup over the first year makes it obvious they did not know what they were initially doing.

    21. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by loganrapp · · Score: 1
      Not to mention - this is exactly what people are pissed off about with the PS3.


      Now this is a problem with the 360, but because they don't have it? Man, we are all over the place.

    22. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by king-manic · · Score: 1

      But the PS2 didn't cost $500. Don't you see the difference. PS2 was able to include the DVD player without adding much to the cost of the console. The PS3 or XBox 360 with HD-DVD are much more expensive than the standard console. So, while it's true that it would be a cheaper HD player, it's still more than most people are willing to pay for HD video. Also, everyone seems to forget that VHS to DVD was a huge leap. DVD to HD, not so much.

      Actually up here in Canada it did.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    23. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anon because I've modded.

    24. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that and also probably not as high development costs of the 360 as the PS3 and much more money to "waste" in R&D and PR from Microsoft.

      I wouldn't agree in them not knowing what they did, Microsoft probably did know why they went without HD-DVD, no clear winner, high prices and not seen as a large extra value for the consumer worth the cost. I've seen it as a little lame especially together with their join with HD-DVD forces which to me have always been a show just to make the bluray in the PS3 seem like less of a feature and something you may worry about never kicking of.
      Sure they would probably had prefered to have more storage all the time, but at that time it wasn't economically reasonable.

      For Sony the problem is probably that people wasn't willing to pay the price, so they need to do SOMETHING. Removing the PS2 part is one of those things trying to get the price of the console down a little.

      Considering I've thought good stuff about the DS and Wii all the time it's sad I didn't had any money to invest in Nintendo a 2 or so years ago ;D
      I'm not that economical intrested and it will probably take quite some time before I get the chance again in an area where I actually know what companies are doing =P
      (I would probably have spent some money on Apple aswell, althought they haven't had as good economical development as Nintendo hade recently.)

    25. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to argue that and I'll bring in some statistics to back it up if you like after I come back from work.

      The PS2 was not a major factor in DVD sales, nor, at the time, did the DVD player greatly increase the cost of the Playstation 2. The hardware to play DVDs had already dropped significantly in price (DVD had been a format for over five years at the time of the PS2's introduction, and DVDs relied on much of the same technology that CDs did.)

      The statistics will show that DVD had already begun its upward trend in market penetration before 2000, and they will also show that the market penetration trend for VHS and DVD are nearly identical. To say that a single product (Sony's Playstation 2) had a significant impact would be erroneous and would not be backed up by any credible sources.

      It did not drive the format, in much the same way the PSP did not drive the UMD format. Sony has had a negligible impact on consumer use media formats over the past thirty years and Blu-Ray is their first hope at gaining significant market share with their own format. (Note, I said consumer use, as Betamax is or was still used in some studio environments for its superior quality.)

    26. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      GP poster specificially referenced the Sega 'upgrade' fiasco.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    27. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      You fail the history lesson as well. Do some research on old consoles. They were always making updates and upgrades to consoles. This is, by far, NOT the first time it's happened. Would you care to give some examples on these upgrades to the consoles? The only one I can think of it the PSX which was that PS2 based DVR system. The only other things are add ons like the SegaCD and 32x. These add ons never sell well though.
    28. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      The trade off between storage can be seen last gen. Look at the Xbox version of the Prince of Persia games compared to the Gamecube.

      OT I know, but I'd like to see a source for that. I played through Sands of Time on Gamecube hooked up to my 7.1 system probably a half dozen times system and it sounded incredible. Pumped through my Denon HT amp and B&W speakers, I think I'd have noticed any significant audio compression artifacts.

      There's really no reason for any game to *not* use high quality compressed audio for the soundtrack. It's not discernable, and it saves a ton of streaming/loading operations from your disc -- especially useful in a seamless game like PoP.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    29. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by DECS · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The problem with releasing new generations of a gaming platform is that it spits your existing installed base. It forces users to decide whether to upgrade (and many won't if the price is significant, as it is with high end graphics/processor upgrades) and it forces developers to decide whether they want to target their games to actually benefit from the advances of the new generation, or to aim for the lowest common denominator.

      Incidentally, that was the same problem for the Amiga, NeXT, and other advanced platforms: why would the mass market upgrade? The catch-22 for users and developers meant the market instead gravitated toward the basic PC, which slowly evolved in a lowest common denominator way and finally caught up to advances released a decade or so prior.

      Now look at the PS3: Sony's biggest competition isn't the Xbox 360, it's the PS2. Microsoft's console is big in the US, but has very limited sales outside. The 360 has sold more units so far, but that's because has been on sale twice as long as the PS3. Since the PS3's release, Sony has shipped around 7 million units, while Microsoft has only shipped an additional 2 million. In contrast, Nintendo has sold 12 million Wii units. Xbox sales look good only if you can't do math or don't understand how time relates to the graph of a sales chart.

      Nintendo Wii vs Sony PlayStation 3 vs Microsoft Xbox 360: Q2 2007

      Sony is worried about two things. First, there's already 115 million PS2s in the world; the PS3 has to be desirable enough to convince those users to upgrade. $500 for fancier versions of the same games is a difficult upgrade to force. Until it can sell 10-20 million PS3s, developers will make more money delivering new titles for the PS2, because there are more users buying games for it. Sony is still selling cheap PS2 units, so it's competing against itself on price.

      The second problem for Sony (and the reason it competes with itself) is that it's trying to push sales of Blu-Ray players and drive down the manufacturing costs of blue lasers. That means Sony is willing to lose money selling the PS3 at an initial loss, just to get Blu-Ray widely installed. Microsoft has taken sides with Toshiba in selling the rival HD-DVD format. If Sony weren't pushing Blu-Ray in the PS3, HD-DVD would be ahead in installed base.

      At last count:

      HD-DVD standalone players sold around 150k units
      Blu-Ray standalone players sold around 100k units

      However:

      HD-DVD options Xbox 360 players sold around 150k units
      Blu-Ray players bundled with the PS3 have sold 7 million units

      So Sony's PS3 game isn't just about replacing the PS2, it's also about pushing the Blu-Ray disc format. It has single-handedly turned the HD wars around and put HD-DVD in a distant second place to Blu-Ray: 7,100,000 to 300,000.

      Without Blu-Ray, it wouldn't make much sense for Sony to be trying to sell an expensive games console to replace the PS2. The games war is being won by the Wii, which costs much less and has no installed base to compete against, thanks to the poor sales of the GameCube. Nintendo can't make enough to meet demand. Nintendo also doesn't care about selling an HD platform.

      Microsoft is being left in the middle, selling a console that's losing on the game popularity end to the Wii, and losing on the HD end to Sony. It's also competing against itself with in the area of PC gaming; the Xbox 360 overlaps with PC gaming, eating up the cheap end of a finite market in the US. At least it's trying to make it easier for developers to redeploy PC games in console versions.

      Blu-ray vs HD-DVD in Next Generation Game Consoles

      PlayStation 3 vs. Xbox 360 vs. Nintendo Wii

    30. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Betamax is or was still used in some studio environments for its superior quality.)

      Are you the same people that posts stories of "glass flowing" just to piss everyone off? Or is it possible that there's STILL someone out there who doesn't know the difference between Betamax and Betacam? Very distant cousins, they don't even use the same tapes anymore.

    31. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course now the players are $20 bucks ... Twenty dollars bucks? What are those? Is that like when your car gets 20 MPG miles per gallon?
    32. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      Ah, yeah, I am referring to Betacam, regardless it is their only success in the field of media formats, and it grew out of Betamax anyway.

      Thanks for being a pedant and correcting me, but the insult wasn't necessary.

      P.S.: Glass flows! *eyeroll* Please mod parent AC flamebait.

    33. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      Adding new features to consoles just makes people who bought 360 early upset.
      Maybe Bill Gates will give you a $100 certificate to the Microsoft Store.
      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    34. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tell me how to mod you bitch.

    35. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      The problem with releasing new generations of a gaming platform is that it spits your existing installed base. It forces users to decide whether to upgrade (and many won't if the price is significant, as it is with high end graphics/processor upgrades) and it forces developers to decide whether they want to target their games to actually benefit from the advances of the new generation, or to aim for the lowest common denominator.

      In past generations, a new generation meant completely new hardware across the board. In the current generation, we have over a dozen variations of PS3 and X360 to confuse the public and developers... add a feature here, remove another there, swap parts all over the place. Some of these changes are potentially disruptive, others are trivial and we have a handful of stupid initial omissions (like no HDMI in some models for the sake of model differentiation and associated price gouging) thrown in for good measure.

      On the "using new features" side, Microsoft's X360 guidelines specifically state that the X360's HD-DVD capability shall NOT be used for gaming content since the HD-DVD drive was never part of the X360 base specs. Releasing an X720 with upgraded hardware and HD-DVD would be an interesting option for 2009 and developers would have the choice of releasing for X360 with enhancements for X720 on DVD or doing separate releases.

      HD-DVD options Xbox 360 players sold around 150k units
      Blu-Ray players bundled with the PS3 have sold 7 million units

      The HD war is somewhat off-topic as far as console revisions are concerned. In any case, most PS3 owners bought a PS3 to play games and a surprising majority of them did not initially know that the PS3 could play BD movies. I personally do not really care about the HD format war... at least not until titles encoded in 1080p become common fare and the necessary playback devices become affordable since the battle will not be decided before then. For the record, I do own a working Betamax... the one my parents bought back when both VHS and Beta cost over $1000.

      On the gaming side, I have no interest in the X360 and the PS3 games I am interested in won't be out until mid-2008 or later... so I'll be one of those sticking to their PS2 until something like 2009.
    36. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      The only source I'm aware of is first hand experience. I played through the Xbox version of the game which looked and sounded incredible. However, my fiance's brother was playing through the Gamecube version and I noticed the sound didn't seem as high quality though the video still looked great.

    37. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Fulg · · Score: 2, Informative

      The trade off between storage can be seen last gen. Look at the Xbox version of the Prince of Persia games compared to the Gamecube. The difference in music is easily identifiable and is caused by the Xbox using 9GB disks while the Gamecube used 1.5GB disks.
      As someone who worked on Sands of Time, I can tell you that both versions used practically the same data, so the perceived difference is probably due to the superior sound output of the Xbox (5.1 vs ProLogic II). Graphically there were some minor improvements on the textures, models and lighting on Xbox, but essentially all platforms were identical -- you got the same game no matter which platform you had.

      The Xbox version could fit on a GC disc (IIRC the entire game is about 1.2GB), but since we had the extra DVD space we included more stuff on it (bonus videos, ports of the original POP and POP2, etc). I don't recall which extras were present on the GC version.
      --
      gcc: no input sig
    38. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by toolie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd have to argue this though, the first DVD player most gamers had was the PS2. Back then VHS was still ok and no one had a need to go out and buy an expensive stand alone DVD player. Yeah, but back then everybody had TVs who bought the PS2. Not everybody has a HD-TV. That would make the expense unjustified to some who did buy the 360 already.
      --
      -- toolie
    39. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Teriblows · · Score: 1

      i'm not sure about your timeline, by the time ps2 was out dvd players were rapidly dropping in price. most people i know had a dvd player. they cost about as much as a vcr by then anyways. ps2 wasn't cheap on launch either. dvd launched long before ps2 came out unlike the hd formats.

    40. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Teriblows · · Score: 1

      well it looks like an early lead can be bought with heavy subsidy sure. but remember betamax was ahead early on as well. hddvd players are already down to $250, the deciding factor is the mainstream, not a niche. when the mainstream swings on cheap players thats when a format will become anything more than the next laser disc;) i just don't see bluray catching on in much of the world where piracy is prevalent. too much drm, too hard to press discs. low piracy = low hardware adoption rates. low hardware adoption rates=slow price drop.

    41. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by DECS · · Score: 1

      I agree, Microsoft's early lead with the 360 isn't going to hold up in the face of $8 billion in annual losses, much of which drained from from the bottom of its Xbox division. How long can it afford to pay people to buy Xbox consoles?

      "For additional perspective, the "spectacular failure" of Chrysler that caused Mercedes to dump the division like a hot potato this year amounted to losses of $1.5 billion annually, a slight fraction of Microsoft's $8 billion cash bonfire this year. Without the Office cash cow, Microsoft would be unable to dump unfathomable amounts of money into profitless exercises intended to hold back innovation and prevent competition in new markets to increasingly broaden its sphere of influence."

      BetaMax was "ahead early on" because it was the original video tape. JVC ripped it off a year later with VHS as a cheaper to license standard with longer recording times.

      Format Wars in Home Theater

      As for piracy, HD-DVD has just as outrageous of DRM as Blu-Ray. Both also have excessive titling features that demand significant processor power. And neither delivers something DVD's really can't.

      H.264 can put an HD movie on a standard DVD today. The market for HD is also not that impressive in scope. Half a million standalone HD players for the entire industry is nothing to write home about. HD-DVD has other problems outside of market penetration.

      Origins of the Blu-ray vs HD-DVD War

    42. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by donaldm · · Score: 1

      In Australia the PS2 was AU$730 (approx US$600) and that was year 2000 prices. I actually got my 60GB PS3 for AU$499 including tax (approx US$407 arround May 2007) because one of the game places offered a special deal, since I was not going to purchase a PS3 at AU$999 including tax.

      Around 2000 DVD players were more expensive than the PS2 and a DVD burner for a PC cost approx AU$1300 with single sided DVD's costing AU$15 (write once) to AU$30 RW. When the PS2 came out most gaming magazines stated that having a DVD player was stupid an added expensive and games will not need the capacity of the DVD since CD's were good enough (sounds familiar). Basically the PS2 gave the DVD market a jump start.

      Granted that VHS to DVD was a huge leap but DVD players did not record while VHS recorder/players did (stating the obvious). Basically people only started to get rid of their VHS recorders when Hard Disk DVD player/burner became affordable from 2004. The HD-DVD Bluray wars have actually reduced the cost of players within the space of one year compared to years for DVD players.

      Now all we need is HD Hard Disk recorders with Bluray and/or HD-DVD burners and they are due out in 2008 (at least Bluray ones are). I know you can get HD Hard Disk DVD recorders for a few 100 dollars that can take the output from the inbuilt HD tuner but you can only burn to DVD in Standard definition in addition the inputs are still composite or AV so you can only record in Standard Definition. DRM rears it's ugly head here.

      As to comparing DVD (Standard definition) to High Definition HD-DVD and Bluray. If you don't have a HDTV then you can hardly pick the difference but if you have a HDTV (above 26") you definitely can see the difference in fact that difference becomes painfully obvious when you look at 1080p 47" and greater HDTV's even if you have an upscaling DVD player. like it or not HDTV is taking off and SDTV will eventually become obsolete although this will take a few years.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    43. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Eivind · · Score: 1

      The PS2 also got integrated networking, optional on the early PS2s. Which undermines your point a little, though I think it still holds. Quite a few PS2-games did infact take advantage of this networking, despite the fact that it's not a standard item that is available on ALL PS2s. A few PS2-games are even "network-play only", meaning you can't use them at all if you don't have the networking-add-on (or a newer PS2 that includes it)

    44. Re:Adding New Features to Consoles by Teriblows · · Score: 1

      unlike the previous xbox this time theyown the ip, they can and will cost reduce the console until it is either break even or profitable. as for how can they afford it, microsoft is a very profitable company. they have a mountain of cash so they can afford it. sony on the other hand bleeds out of many of its divisions so its game profits basically are bled away to nothing. you can also wonder how long they can afford that as well.

  5. Well then... by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    .. they'd better also do something about the terrible noise the 360 is producing. There is no way I would use my 360 as an HTPC as long as it produces so much noise. I can live with it when playing games, but when watching a movie I want the silent scenes to be just that: silent.

    1. Re:Well then... by Cosmic+AC · · Score: 3, Interesting
      FTA:

      Anothe r[sic] big problem for Microsoft according to insiders is getting the heat and noise output from the current Xbox 360 under control so that the new device can run silently while a movie is being played. It is known that Toshiba has been working with Microsoft on this issue as it has extensive experience in notebooks and "quiet" drives.
    2. Re:Well then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, the GPU is due to be produced in 65nm from the middle of 2008, while the CPU has already been shrunk fom 90nm to 65nm a short while ago. Unless microsoft wants to further reduce production cost by using a less elaborate cooling system (unlikely due to the US$ 1 billion estimated repair costs for the current GPU cooling problems), the xbox should be available in a less noisy version by the end of 2008.

    3. Re:Well then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anothe r[sic] big problem for Microsoft according to insiders is getting the heat and noise output from the current Xbox 360 under control so that the new device can run silently while a movie is being played. It is known that Toshiba has been working with Microsoft on this issue as it has extensive experience in notebooks and "quiet" drives. I like how that reads, like it's a big secret we needed insiders to tell us.
    4. Re:Well then... by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      I really don't know why MS hasn't fixed this. I've tested this again and again with my own 360, and it is clear that the noise is not from any sort of cooling setup. It's the damned DVD drive! As long as that thing doesn't spin up the 360 is as quiet as the original Xbox (which is pretty decent), but man, how did they go from the original Xbox drive to THIS monstrosity?

    5. Re:Well then... by counterfriction · · Score: 1

      ahem... HDDVD?

      --
      Sig free's the way to be.
    6. Re:Well then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the insiders tell you that they are actually trying to fix the problem. The alternative is they could be ignoring the problem and just hope buyers will put up with it.

    7. Re:Well then... by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      The Xbox 360 has a regular DVD drive, not an HD-DVD drive - that thing is an external addon.

    8. Re:Well then... by kklein · · Score: 1

      Bravo! I'm a little embarrassed to say I took my first one back because I thought it was broken when I heard it start up. This is supposed to be my DVD player? Are you crazy? I had hoped to use it to replace my network video player, but I realized a few minutes after starting it that that wasn't going to happen.

      I was actually upset that the warranty was extended because I was looking forward to taking it apart and doing something about that fan in a year. Now I can't justify the loss of warranty to myself.

      That being said, I love my 360 for games, and I've scoffed at consoles until now.

    9. Re:Well then... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that they eat disks for breakfast. I don't know if MS has fixed the problem with the 360 damaging disks or if the units completely failing has just overshadow the disk destroying defect. What I do know is that GameFly claims to be able to identify when disks are destroyed by the Xbox360.

    10. Re:Well then... by iainl · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but a very quiet external add-on. I can't hear my HD-DVD drive over the main machine's fan noise.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  6. Better position to compete? by johannesg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unbelievable - "better position to compete"? Are they so incredibly afraid of Sony, then, despite their enormous lead? Or are things not quite as rosy for the XBox as various sources would have us believe?

    1. Re:Better position to compete? by JamesRose · · Score: 1

      Actually, it seems like a very good strategy, constantly upgrading the console, you aren't making such big losses on the high end parts, and within a short time you start outdoing your competitors. Does it not seem odd to you, these companies that make a console once in 5 years, wait for it to be completely out of date, and then make a new one that they start by making a hideous loss on.

    2. Re:Better position to compete? by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      I think the correct response to that would be shocked silence followed by uproarious laughter. That competition is obviously for last place. And Sony is already so far ahead in that competition that no one is going to catch them!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    3. Re:Better position to compete? by mooreti1 · · Score: 1

      I don't know the numbers, but I'd be willing to bet that the number of warranty repairs that Microsoft is having to perform are beginning to affect the profit that Xbox sales generates.

      --
      Oh, for the days when sig's didn't have to be cute...hey, wait a sec.
    4. Re:Better position to compete? by SIIHP · · Score: 1

      "Unbelievable - "better position to compete"? Are they so incredibly afraid of Sony, then, despite their enormous lead?"

      Or maybe it just means that adding a feature will put them in a better position to compete, period.

      What you said makes no sense at all.

      Sometimes you people post some seriously stupid shit.

      --
      I only go to buffets for the unlimited soft serve.
    5. Re:Better position to compete? by Ren.Tamek · · Score: 1

      "Unbelievable - "better position to compete"? Are they so incredibly afraid of Sony, then, despite their enormous lead? Or are things not quite as rosy for the XBox as various sources would have us believe?"

      More likely they see that Sony Games is reeling, and Microsoft is moving in for the kill while they're off balance, by introducing all the features of their competitors and more. Certainly they're already a league ahead in terms of market adoption, but due to the immense cost of producing the console, and the amount they lose on each one, Sony will need to sell a certain amount of software in the life of the console to avoid bankrupting their games division. I think someone at Microsoft had a bit of a brainwave - what would the market be like in 5 years if there were no PlayStation 4?

      --
      "If you want a vision of the future, Winston, imagine a boot stamping on a human face forever." - George Orwell, 1984
    6. Re:Better position to compete? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Why settle for a win if you can stomp out the competition? The xbox is rather weak if you are of the subset that want it to also be your entertainment center. I don't think they need it, but why give Sony any easy sales at all? There are enough cross-platform games or xbox exclusives that they can easily steal away some of those sales. Market share in the console market is always important, there's no reason for Microsoft to be satisfied - they also have a small competitor in Nintendo. Yeah yeah, different market but if the Wii market is 2x or 3x the xbox market, companies will adapt the game to run on the console rather pick a console for the game.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:Better position to compete? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Then you really don't know the numbers. XBOX has yet generated a profit in its sales history. What you mean is:

      I don't know the numbers, but I'd be willing to bet that the number of warranty repairs that Microsoft is having to perform are beginning to affect the loss that Xbox sales generates.
    8. Re:Better position to compete? by ricebowl · · Score: 1

      Unbelievable - "better position to compete"? Are they so incredibly afraid of Sony, then, despite their enormous lead? Or are things not quite as rosy for the XBox as various sources would have us believe?

      I don't think that they're trying to improve their position simply because they're afraid of Sony, but I'd suggest, as others no doubt will, that it's a process of continual improvement or innovation. Whether Microsoft are including features offered in other consoles/HTPCs, improvement, or adding new features, innovating, is irrelevant since it's always about gaining or retaining the market-leader position. The ideal situation would be that of both Sony and Microsoft, and to a lesser-extent Nintendo competing and adding features constantly in order to win over more consumers.

      Further, if a new product replaces an older product, while continuing, in Microsoft's case, to honour the extended warranties then either the consumer or Microsoft, and potentially both, can still win, this in one instance the consumer's old-model X-Box can be replaced by a more up-to-date model.

    9. Re:Better position to compete? by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Microsoft wants to own not only the console space, but also the STB space. In front, Microsoft wants to own the entire "computing" and "consumer electronics" markets.

      Imagine this Microsoft Dream World: You use Windows at work, hear about a cool new show, and schedule the recording via your Windows Mobile smartphone, and come home to your XBox, which has recorded all of your TV shows to your Windows Home Server in the closet. You can fire up your Windows Media Center computer, and watch them from there or from the XBox, or sync them to your Zune to watch on the go.

      Microsoft wants to compete with basically every technology company out there. Not necessarily unlike Apple. The goal that both companies have is domination of your computing lifestyle.

    10. Re:Better position to compete? by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1

      If by "various sources" you mean XBox Fanboiz, then yes. ;)

      XBox360 is the number 2 "next-gen" console. Which is great, but not something Microsoft will be satisfied with. Microsoft is competing to have a set-top box attached to every TV (and, right now, they have a long way to go).

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
    11. Re:Better position to compete? by drgould · · Score: 0

      Microsoft wants to compete with basically every technology company out there. Not necessarily unlike Apple.

      Or Sony. Although Sony doesn't have a cellphone and has the PSP instead of an MP3 player. They already have wifi connectivity between the PSP and PS3.

    12. Re:Better position to compete? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      They may be ahead in overall numbers, but that's only because the XBox 360 was out a full year earlier than the PS3. Accorinding to this chart the PS3 and the XBox 360 have had pretty much equal sales at the same point in their lifetime.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    13. Re:Better position to compete? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      They don't have an enormous lead, at the same month since release they sell quite similair, they just started to get there consoles out 1 year earlier or whatever it was.

    14. Re:Better position to compete? by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      It seems like a pretty crappy strategy considering the following two things:

      - Sony did this with the PS2, and nobody bought them. It was a total flop.
      - With HD encryption/DRM, they have two crappy choices. Put CableCARD slots on the device, or allow recording of OTA content only.

      Expect these to sell as well as UltimateTV, or those Linksys boxes, or MediaCenter PCs. Hell, even if these sell 10x better than all three of those things, they'll still be an utter failure.

    15. Re:Better position to compete? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enormous?

      Define that word please! It's not even "twice as many". Couple of millions hardly is an enormous lead!

    16. Re:Better position to compete? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you PS3 haters are going to pretty much have a heart attack when Metal Gear Solid, Gran Turismo, Singstar, and Final Fantasy collectively cause the PS3 to overtake everyone else.

    17. Re:Better position to compete? by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Unbelievable - "better position to compete"? Are they so incredibly afraid of Sony, then, despite their enormous lead? Or are things not quite as rosy for the XBox as various sources would have us believe?

      World wide the lead is eroding. In the US the lead is stable if not growing.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    18. Re:Better position to compete? by devman · · Score: 1

      Final Fantasy XIII exclusivity is in question, so you might see it on the 360 :P.

    19. Re:Better position to compete? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Microsoft is not "moving in for the kill." This is how Microsoft competes with EVERYTHING. Copy, copy, copy, lie, lie, lie.
      Your claim is just as silly as suggesting the Zune is Microsoft's move to "finish off" the iPod or that Vista was for Mac OS X. Their method of competing doesn't really change, whatever the state of their competitors.

      avoid bankrupting their games division The game 'division' of Sony can't go bankrupt. How long it will go on with little or no gross profit is up to Sony Corporation and the size of their coffers.
    20. Re:Better position to compete? by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

      MS hasn't made a dime off the Xbox. The best estimates are that, over the lifespan of both the Xbox and the 360, they've lost about $7 billion.

    21. Re:Better position to compete? by doyoulikeworms · · Score: 1

      It's market speak. They are actually afraid of Nintendo, so they need as much PS3 market share as they can get.

    22. Re:Better position to compete? by arkhan_jg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Imagine this Microsoft Real World: You use Windows at work, hear about a cool new show, but can't look up anything about it, because your browser been locked down by the domain administrator to stop you visiting personal websites in office hours. You try to schedule the recording via your Windows Mobile smartphone, but there's no cell signal and the battery dies shortly after from the power drain of trying to use it with your work encryption on the wireless.

      You come home to your XBox, which has tried to record all of your previous TV shows, but silently stopped working because it couldn't update the guide data, same as MCE. You spend some time trying to force it to download the guide data from your perfectly good home internet connection, but only a reboot fixes it, for no good reason. Except there's now no list of the failed to record shows so no information to try to manually reschedule a repeat broadcast with. You finally manually schedule that cool new show you wanted, and then you find out the broadcaster has flagged it with the do-not-record marker, and your xbox won't even allow you to record it. You decide to try and watch one of your previously recorded shows, only to find the last 5 minutes has been lost because it screwed up the clock. Again.

      You finally decide to download that cool new show via bittorrent, made harder by the artificial TCP connections limit imposed by microsoft on windows and your ISPs packet throttling. You'd save it to your Windows Home Server in the closet, but the mofo died from overheating in your poorly ventilated closet, and when you try to reinstall you've hit your activation limit. You'd fire up your Windows Media Center computer and watch it from there, but MCE sucks at sharing media with other MCE boxes, and besides, you don't have the codec installed. You try watching it off the Xbox, but it just red-ringed of death from overheating because you left it running all day.

      You give up on TV, and go to check your email, only to find out you've just had your account cancelled by the only ISP in your area for going over your 1GB a day limit on your unlimited super-amazing mega-expensive account, and you've just been sued by viacom for copyright infringement for downloading a show you could have watched on TV if you didn't have to work 14 hours a day to pay for your bandwidth bill and windows licences.

      Welcome to the modern world of digital media.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    23. Re:Better position to compete? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      For someone trying to point out the scariness of a Microsoft controlled world, you left out the golden idols to Gates and left in a lot of irrelevent negatives or even positives.

      You use Windows at work, hear about a cool new show, but can't look up anything about it, because your browser been locked down by the domain administrator to stop you visiting personal websites in office hours.

      So the administrator uses his privledges to restrict what sites you can go to. Except for the fact that he is your domain administrator, and thus using MS tools, this is something the admin could do on Linux (I know) or OSX (I imagine.) It may be a stupid IT policy, but to blame Microsoft for allowing administrators to administer is nothing but noise.

      You try to schedule the recording via your Windows Mobile smartphone, but there's no cell signal and the battery dies shortly after from the power drain of trying to use it with your work encryption on the wireless.

      Do you have any evidence Windows Mobile phones are especially bad at this? The only phones I've heard about totally screwing with wireless have been iPhones.

      You come home to your XBox, which has tried to record all of your previous TV shows, but silently stopped working because it couldn't update the guide data, same as MCE. You spend some time trying to force it to download the guide data from your perfectly good home internet connection, but only a reboot fixes it, for no good reason.

      Sounds like there is an annoying bug that needs to be fixed. But a reboot is the only way I can fix a ton of electronic products including by Apple, Sony, and RCA. Hell, I've even hard to reboot my TV. So I don't condsider it an MS-only problem. In fact, absent when the code I'm writing crashes it, I reboot MS devices once a week and Apple machines (typically G4's) once a week. So I consider them roughly equivalent in that regard.

      You finally manually schedule that cool new show you wanted, and then you find out the broadcaster has flagged it with the do-not-record marker, and your xbox won't even allow you to record it.

      As does TiVo, etc...

      You decide to try and watch one of your previously recorded shows, only to find the last 5 minutes has been lost because it screwed up the clock.

      Does MS have a clock problem I am not familar with?

      You'd save it to your Windows Home Server in the closet, but the mofo died from overheating in your poorly ventilated closet,

      Sounds like a user error. Heat kills all electronics.

      You'd fire up your Windows Media Center computer and watch it from there, but MCE sucks at sharing media with other MCE boxes, and besides, you don't have the codec installed.

      But in your hypothetical story, you never downloaded the show. That's why you cannot watch it over your LAN. See how easy these problems are to debug?

      besides, you don't have the codec installed.

      Again, a problem on every platform...

      You try watching it off the Xbox, but it just red-ringed of death from overheating because you left it running all day.

      My 360 does not overheat. Maybe because I do not put it in a poorly ventillated spot. I dunno...

      You give up on TV, and go to check your email, only to find out you've just had your account cancelled by the only ISP in your area for going over your 1GB a day limit on your unlimited super-amazing mega-expensive account, and you've just been sued by viacom for copyright infringement for downloading a show you could have watched on TV if you didn't have to work 14 hours a day to pay for your bandwidth bill and windows licences

      Yay. Microsoft is evil and monopolostic. ISPs are evil and monopolistic. Therefore Microsoft == ISPs. Frankly, you will have a far easier time convincing me that Comcast/ATT/TimeWarnerCable should be beaten into submission by the feds than any other part of your story.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    24. Re:Better position to compete? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Hare and the Tortous...need i say more?

    25. Re:Better position to compete? by Taulin · · Score: 1

      From a user perspective, that sounds really nice! I wouldn't care if it was all Windows or not. If all my devices got along, and talked together, I would be for it! It is also one reason I prefer developing for .NET versus the Java universe. Everything works great in .NET. For Java, there are TONS of things for it, all done by different people, and a pain in the arse to make play together right. Now, that being said, I still can't get my 360 to see my PC as a media source. Perhaps if MS made hubs also?

    26. Re:Better position to compete? by Teriblows · · Score: 1

      oh..it sure can. sonys already bleeding from many of its other divisions, its already sold off some financial units and some fabs to save on costs:P gaming profits aren't worth squat if the rest of the company pisses it away.

    27. Re:Better position to compete? by Teriblows · · Score: 1

      to be fair the "aritifical" tcp connections limit which is easily patched was put in place to limit DOS attacks. it just happened to suck for bitorrent

    28. Re:Better position to compete? by DeepZenPill · · Score: 1

      Good god, Microsoft actually wants to improve a product in order to compete and this is your response?

      If only they did this with their other products.

    29. Re:Better position to compete? by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      I don't hate the PS3 per se, but you have to admit that the platform has been bungled and mismanaged to a comical extent since its announcement. Sony could make the platform work at that price point but I'm under the impression the guys in charge of the product are completely out of touch with reality. Maybe they should get the Penny Arcade guys to manage the product going forward. They have at least some business experience and they know what gamers really want.

      I bought a 360 and generally like it, though I think the Wii really won this round of platform wars. Even so, there are games I'm interested in coming out faster than I can complete them. I got Bioshock and Blue Dragon on the same day and I'm going to be logging hours on Beautiful Katamari as well. Having fun with... what do you guys have? Lair? Over there? Ouch, sorry, couldn't resist... Heh heh heh...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  7. Retarded by realmolo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They need to make an Xbox 360 that sells for no more than $300, and includes at least a 40GB hard drive. Then they need to get more and better games. They also need to make Xbox Live! Gold memberships free for the first year. That's what people actually WANT.

    This HTPC crap is a waste of time. Both MS and Sony keep trying to turn their console into a "media center", which while a nice idea, isn't something that the mass-market really cares about.

    I swear both MS and Sony have lost their minds.

    1. Re:Retarded by alextmqazwsx · · Score: 1

      I swear both MS and Sony have lost their minds. Didn't we know this already?
    2. Re:Retarded by ricebowl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They need to make an Xbox 360 that sells for no more than $300, and includes at least a 40GB hard drive. Then they need to get more and better games.

      I'd tend to agree with the suggestions that improvement of the console is required to maintain interest, that a larger hard-drive, or allowing the use of any, generic, hard drive would be a vast improvement, particularly for games developers (if they could count on a hard drive being present then I suspect games might stream slightly better without so many obvious, and sometimes painful, loading screens. The use of a generic hard drive would also have the benefit of reduced manufacturing costs for Microsoft (though potentially also reduced profits) and also a reduced purchase cost for the consumer.

      As for the 'better games' that's a problem that's not entirely limited to MS' X-Box, every console, from the NES onwards has had more than its share of paltry games, but so long as sufficient people purchase those games they'll continue to be made and sold, sadly.

      They also need to make Xbox Live! Gold memberships free for the first year. That's what people actually WANT.

      May I ask what was your research methodology? While I believe that this would benefit MS, by encouraging people to participate in the X-Box Live! environment it'd be more likely that people would pursue that environment to other platforms (PC, older X-Box and whatever others MS might introduce). It'd also help to increase any potential advertising revenue, which might not off-set the lost income from charging, but would have far more potential viewers which should increase the value to MS and its customers (obviously in this sense 'customers' would refer to the advertisers, not the X-Box purchasers). I also, despite that last, feel that free membership to the Gold service would be valued by the customers but, among others, I don't feel it's at the top of the list. I'd hazard a guess that cheaper consoles, improved reliability, reduced noise levels and improved networking features would be further up the list, as you already noted.

      This HTPC crap is a waste of time. Both MS and Sony keep trying to turn their console into a "media center", which while a nice idea, isn't something that the mass-market really cares about.

      I'd suggest that the success and popularity of Myth TV, HTPCs, Media Center and X-Box Media Center show that there is quite a high level of interest in the HTPC and HD TV tuner addition. If nothing else I'd like to be able to control my TV, Sky, DVD and music from one place without having to get up to change channels, turn on and turn off equipment and then find the right remote for whatever appliance I'm currently wanting to use. I confess that this is 'lazy' but that's part of the innovation and improved convenience to the consumer; and if I get bored with TV or whatever and want to play a game then, with the apathy of boredom, it'd be easier if the X-Box was already plugged in, turned on and ready to go.

      And even better if I was able to store game images on the console or network, so I don't have to do the getting-up to change discs. But that might be just too damn lazy...;-)

    3. Re:Retarded by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Both MS and Sony keep trying to turn their console into a "media center", which while a nice idea, isn't something that the mass-market really cares about. The general public, nowadays, loves DVRs. ONE box in your cabinet that plays DVDs, Blu-ray/HD-DVD, games, downloadable movies, live and recorded TV, media streamed off your computer, pictures/video from your camera, CDs, downloaded music, music off an iPod, lets you browse the internet, etc. is an attractive thought. Especially when it's under $500.

      The only thing that the PS3 in my setup isn't doing is TV-watching. When the PS3 tuner comes out, I can then get rid of the TiVo and ONLY have game consoles and my receiver in my cabinet. What's even better is if I got a PSP, I could then watch any of the shows taped on it wherever I could get an internet connection. Seriously cool tech, and if the general public even realized you could do this, it would likely be huge.

      The problem doesn't lie in the fact that the features are unwanted, it lies in the fact that nobody knows about any of them because instead Sony makes ads with babies and squirrels.
    4. Re:Retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think at this point most people who want a DVR either have an old Tivo or have a DVR cable box. You might be able to convince the Tivo users to switch but most of the DVR cable box users are likely to see changing DVRs as too much of a hassle.

    5. Re:Retarded by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      You can get rid of your cable box too, though. I gave Comcast back the box and use my S3 TiVo as a tuner currently.

    6. Re:Retarded by iainl · · Score: 1

      I'd also point out that Microsoft already give new Live accounts a free month of Gold; just say that you only want it to be a Silver one while signing up, and they throw it in there for you.

      So if giving people a free taste is the aim, they're already there.

      As for the 'one remote' thing, the full Media Remote that you can either buy seperately or get free with the HD-DVD drive is one of those learning ones, apparently. I've got one but I've never gone to the hassle of programming it, because my Amp's remote is already set up to do that.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  8. What are they doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Microsoft is spreading itself thin and not focusing on the clear goal of just delivering fun games. If they think Sony went wrong, why are they trying to get into that territory? They're trying to be everything to everyone but may not end up being anything to anyone. They don't have a clear portable strategy. On one hand they say Live Arcade will deliver what would-be Wii owners crave, but on the other hand there's not a lot of good original content. They've got a movie download service which may end up competing with the added DVR capabilities, but either way there is no clear way to burn your videos to keep a hard copy. They've got a HD-DVD add-on, but have no plans to support Blu-Ray if it gains enough popularity. Microsoft Game Studios has a lot less developers under its umbrella but they say they can overtake Nintendo and keep Sony at bay. I think they're just blowing whatever direction the wind is going, and it smells a lot like their idea of how to compete with the iPod or how to make a good desktop OS.

    1. Re:What are they doing? by djsmiley · · Score: 1

      You make me lol.

      --
      - http://www.milkme.co.uk
  9. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the 3rd page:
    "Currently most iPods incorporate a Toshiba drive. "

  10. Still no SMB shares though by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The one feature that would make the 360 into a descent media centre would be support for SMB (aka Window's) shares, so you can easily access all the media from your PC or NAS. It's the thing that makes XBOX Media Centre rock. No-one wants to be forced to use Media Player 11's crappy media streaming when they could just as easily browse their network shares.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Still no SMB shares though by Kjella · · Score: 1

      The one feature that would make the 360 into a descent media centre would be support for SMB (aka Window's) shares (...). No-one wants to be forced to use Media Player 11's crappy media streaming (...) Ah, but adding SMB support wouldn't lock you into Windows now, would it? WMP11 on the other hand, that's a Microsoft-only product with a Microsoft-only protocol they can break any day of the week. Or if it's a standard today (I wouldn't know) it's a candidate for embrace, extend, extinguish. It's quite obvious Microsoft is trying to create so many interdependencies as possible to project their monopoly into other markets. I really hope it backfires on them, but don't expect them to change course anytime soon.
      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Still no SMB shares though by andrewuoft · · Score: 2, Informative

      It supports UPNP, try something like TVersity

    3. Re:Still no SMB shares though by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Not to hijack the discussion...

      But does anybody have any clue how to stream my existing MP4 movie files from my Windows Vista box to my Xbox 360? I can't even get Windows Media Player to import them into my playlist, and I think there might be some kind of codec download or something I need...

      Any links/help would be nice, thanks.

    4. Re:Still no SMB shares though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe try 3ivx's DirectShow filter:
      http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=39976

    5. Re:Still no SMB shares though by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Get TVersity. It's free and will transcode anything that the Xbox 360 won't play natively (native formats are WMV and H.264). In addition, use Miro to populate your video library with a bunch of video podcasts...many of which are in HD and more than just a few minutes long like video podcasts of days' past.

      WMP 11 is useless. It's a shame that it take a free, third party project, such as TVersity, to make the 360 worth the money. The Xbox 360 is proof that Microsoft should split itself up into a hardware business and software business. The "software" part of Microsoft insists itself upon an awesome piece of hardware and shits all over the experience.

    6. Re:Still no SMB shares though by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Is this something I have to hack my Xbox to do? I'll take a look at it.

      What's weird to me is that the Xbox supports playing MP4, but for some reason they never sent that memo to the people who made Windows Media Center. If WMC played MP4 files, I'd be done already.

    7. Re:Still no SMB shares though by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip, but that program doesn't seem to work correctly with Vista. It complained that it couldn't add from my media server because the service it installed needed admin rights; so I changed the service's login, and it still didn't work with the same error. :(

      At least it uninstalled cleanly.

    8. Re:Still no SMB shares though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can if you use a Media Center PC with the xbox or xbox360 as an extender. The xbox can already access shares on the MCE PC, but here's how to set it up to access shares on other machines on your network, for those that are interested. (These instructions are for a Windows XP MCE):

      Log in to the Media Center PC with an admin account. Modify the account properties and add a login script for each the automatically-created accounts for the media center extenders (the number of these accounts will depend on how many times you've added an extender to the MCE PC). So, go to the 'Local Users and Groups' MMC snap-in, and for each MCX account, :

      right-click user account, properties
      Go to 'Profile' tab
      in the Logon Script field, enter whatever you want to name your script, e.g.: mcxlogon.bat

      Go to C:\WINDOWS\system32\GroupPolicy\User\scripts\Logon and create the above .bat script file with the following contents:

          net use \\[PC#1]\ipc$ /u:mcx [password for 'mcx account']
          net use \\[PC#2]\ipc$ /u:mcx [password for 'mcx account'] ... ... Replacing the [] and their contents with respective computer names and password of your choosing.

      Again, do this for each of the media center extender accounts on the MCE machine (e.g., mcx1, mcx2, mcx3, etc...). The same script file (and thus the same 'mcx' account / [password] credentials) can be used for all these accounts to simplify things on the PCs you're connecting to.

      To determine which user account on the MCE PC (mcx[1...n] is being used by a specific Media Center Extender (for example, if you wanted the media center extender in the bedroom to have access to shares that you don't want the family-room to have):
          Open Media Center Extender Manager
          Double click on extender, note contents of "User Account" field ... In that scenario, you would obviously need different login scripts for the two different credential sets, assigning the correct script to the corresponding account's "Logon Script" field above. Adjust remaining instructions as needed if this is what you want to do.

      Now, go create the "mcx" account on all these other PCs (in Windows or in Samba -- for XP Home machines, it's a little trickier but doable), and assign the password you decided on to the account. Also, make sure that this account has permissions for whatever shares you want your xbox to have permissions to.

      Restart the media center extender software on the xbox [360], then do the following:

      Go to "My Videos" or "My Pictures" or "My Music" and hit the i/"more" button on remote
      Choose "Add Videos" or "Add pictures" or "Add Music"
      Choose to add folders, then check the box to add shared folders from another computer, hit next

      You should see all network shares on the PCs that you've established an IPC connection with.

      Note that there's nothing all that special about these steps in terms of basic requirements for connecting to a network share. They're simply creating accounts, granting rights, and connecting to SMB shares (with the script). The only reason why all these hoops must be jumped through is because for some ridiculous reason, the Media Center Extender software WON'T simply list SMB servers on the subnet and their shares, automatically trying authenticating to each them. This is one thing I'd like to see corrected in future versions of the MCX software.

      All that being said, I also use XBMC on a modded xbox and agree that it's a quality piece of software, and I wish MS would offer similar features (since it's obviously unrealistic to think they'd allow execution of arbitrary code).

    9. Re:Still no SMB shares though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: uShare. It works, it works pretty dang well, and you don't even have to go into "MCE" mode on the 360 to use it.

      Just remember to add the "-x" option to the startup script.

      No, its not at the "super easy stage" but its no harder to setup than Samba I think.

    10. Re:Still no SMB shares though by iainl · · Score: 1

      When you say 'MP4' files, are they actually .mp4s, or .mkvs that contain H264 files? I know it's a slightly daft question, but I've seen a few people claim to be hosting mp4s when they're really mkvs.

      Anyway, assuming they are genuine mp4 files, what audio/video format are they? I regularly use Quicktime Pro to convert 720p trailers to .mp4 files with a straight passthrough of the video, but you've got to downmix 5.1 audio to 2.0 AAC for the 360 to play them. Then, because WMP has the problem you've highlighted, dump them on a DVD+RW to put in the machine directly.

      The codec stuff will then be fine; the H264 video codec was in the Spring update, and AAC is the download for iPods, and should be sorted automatically by the 360 when presented with the file anyway.

      Part of me would like to stream, but because my PC is at the other end of the house from my router it's on wireless anyway, and that just doesn't have enough reliable bandwidth for 720p files. If you're wired, I can see why you'd like to stream, but the only way I've found is asking either Nero or TVersity to transcode on the fly, and that's both messy and a short route to poor image quality.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    11. Re:Still no SMB shares though by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I have no f-ing clue. I just made them using a program called "Handbrake" on my Mac, so it's whatever the hell format it makes. It calls them ".mp4".

      Also, holy crap, your post reminds me of a huge pet peeve I have: when is somebody going to come along and make video SIMPLE?! Doing anything with video right now is so goddamned complicated, it makes my brain hurt. For instance:

      When you say 'MP4' files, are they actually .mp4s, or .mkvs that contain H264 files? I know it's a slightly daft question, but I've seen a few people claim to be hosting mp4s when they're really mkvs.

      Anyway, assuming they are genuine mp4 files, what audio/video format are they? I regularly use Quicktime Pro to convert 720p trailers to .mp4 files with a straight passthrough of the video, but you've got to downmix 5.1 audio to 2.0 AAC for the 360 to play them.


      That's pretty much utter gibberish to me. I just want my DVDs to play on my Xbox!

      Then, because WMP has the problem you've highlighted, dump them on a DVD+RW to put in the machine directly.

      That defeats the purpose of me owning a media server in the first place. If the solution involves burning disks, I'll just watch them on my computer monitor.

    12. Re:Still no SMB shares though by iainl · · Score: 1

      Short answers, then:

      1) If you've used Handbrake, the files are fine as long as you downmixed the audio to stereo. Otherwise you're completely shafted. Handbrake does indeed make 'real' mp4s.

      2) Yes, lack of support in WMP for .mp4 files is really effing stupid.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    13. Re:Still no SMB shares though by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      So there's no solution except that TVersity program that doesn't work with my media server? Damn. Thanks anyway.

    14. Re:Still no SMB shares though by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Hmm...I use it under Vista, although they say it's not officially supported. It works fine for me to the extent that I never signed up for cable/FiosTV/satellite when I bought my house. My only thought is to run it as admin as long as your computer isn't open to the world.

    15. Re:Still no SMB shares though by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I'm not willing to let a program that does something so trivial run as admin. And, anyway, I tried that and it didn't work. (It couldn't read the files on my media server share, telling me to set the service to an admin account. I did that, rebooted, and it still couldn't read the files on my media server with the same error message.)

  11. The Evil Empire Grows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yet another Xbox model? Might as well get a PC that isn't locked down and 100% controlled by Microsoft.

  12. MCE? by jlindy · · Score: 1

    revamped "MCE" Oh great, just what I needed more machine check exceptions. I just replaced the CPU in mom's computer!

  13. Better than a tuner how about by SpeedyG5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    beefing up the hardware so it lasts more than six months without getting the 3 rings of death!

    1. Re:Better than a tuner how about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they already did this, with the 65nm chips.

    2. Re:Better than a tuner how about by SpeedyG5 · · Score: 1

      Then I assume I will be getting this deliverance when I get my box back for the 3rd time!

  14. Gee... by shakezula · · Score: 2, Funny

    I sure am glad I rushed out and stood in line to buy the original $460 version, spent another $179 to add an HD-DVD player, and now I get to buy one all over again if I want the extra sexy-ness in a single box version?

    --
    I know what you're thinking. Did I forward 65,535 packets or 65,536 packets?
  15. This generation... by Tol+Dantom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I actually really dislike the way this new console generation has gone, and am glad I have held off buying so far. There is way too much SKU shifting, with new better versions constantly being released to one up the other guy and keep the console "relevant". Its all well and good if you don't care and are sitting on the fence, but as a person actually interested in a next generation console instead of dropping a grand on a gaming PC it is really aggravating. Kudos to the Wii for avoiding this, but its not really what I'm looking for.

    Examples of this abound. The one that pisses me off the most is Dual Shock 3. Some of the upgrades have been less than necessary, such as the Elite Xbox SKU, but rumble is a novel game input that you're completely missing out on for no reason if you bought or will buy a PS3 in the next six months. Some weren't even able to make the choice to wait because Sony lied about it.

    Now with the HD tuner incorporated HD DVD Player MP3 jack extravaganda, why buy now? You know there will be a new SKU and it will make your box look like a chump. And this isn't like Apple releasing something new and you're paying opportunity cost (forgetting about the iPhone for a second), because most of these upgrades already exist and are minor. The only difference is if you buy them now you're paying probably twice as much for something that's half as well integrated with the box.

    Maybe I should just buy a Dreamcast...now there's a stable SKU!

    1. Re:This generation... by DrXym · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I actually really dislike the way this new console generation has gone, and am glad I have held off buying so far. There is way too much SKU shifting, with new better versions constantly being released to one up the other guy and keep the console "relevant". Its all well and good if you don't care and are sitting on the fence, but as a person actually interested in a next generation console instead of dropping a grand on a gaming PC it is really aggravating. Kudos to the Wii for avoiding this, but its not really what I'm looking for.

      I don't see anything wrong with this. Alaunch XBox 360 or launch PS3 is going to play new titles just as well as the new models. Mostly the new models are toying around with stuff peripheral to the core experience. On the PS3, it may even be that the new models are less desirable in some ways than the launch models since they lack BC, but on the other hand they cost a lot less too.

      As for the Wii... It should be obvious that Nintendo will revamp it at some time or another, no doubt telling people how it fixes all sorts of issues with the first one. You can imagine the sorts of things they could add - better screen tracking, rechargable controllers, more storage, DVD playback, possibly even an HD output / scaler. And when they do revamp it, many of the people who crowed how cheap the Wii was will go and buy it all over again. This is after all exactly what Nintendo have done with their handhelds for years now. How many Gameboy models were there?

      Examples of this abound. The one that pisses me off the most is Dual Shock 3. Some of the upgrades have been less than necessary, such as the Elite Xbox SKU, but rumble is a novel game input that you're completely missing out on for no reason if you bought or will buy a PS3 in the next six months. Some weren't even able to make the choice to wait because Sony lied about it.

      The Dual Shock 3 will work in a launch PS3 if you choose to buy one. So what's the problem? As for Sony lying, to paraphrase Phil Harrison, Sony were in a lawsuit / negotiations with Immersion so did you really expect them to rave how great rumble was when there was a distinct possibility that it would never happen?

      Now with the HD tuner incorporated HD DVD Player MP3 jack extravaganda, why buy now? You know there will be a new SKU and it will make your box look like a chump. And this isn't like Apple releasing something new and you're paying opportunity cost (forgetting about the iPhone for a second), because most of these upgrades already exist and are minor. The only difference is if you buy them now you're paying probably twice as much for something that's half as well integrated with the box.

      I'll believe the TV tuner story when I see it for real. It may well be that the story is BS, or that Toshiba are still desperate to get their HD DVD going and in a last gasp attempt are paying MS $$$ to licence or produce a hybrid HD DVD / console to compete with the PS3. I think Microsoft is happy to take their money but I see nothing that says they care one jot for HD DVD except to prolong the format war as long as possible.

      Anyway if SKUs annoy you, you might be happy to know that for the time being at least that the planned DVB-T twin tuner for the PS3 due in Europe early next year is an attachment. So if you don't want it, don't buy it.

    2. Re:This generation... by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      As for the Wii... It should be obvious that Nintendo will revamp it at some time or another, no doubt telling people how it fixes all sorts of issues with the first one. (snip) This is after all exactly what Nintendo have done with their handhelds for years now. How many Gameboy models were there?

      Yes, they did that with their handhelds. But their home consoles? No. All I can think of is the second SNES model, which was just a bit smaller, but had the exact same features.

    3. Re:This generation... by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1

      Buy a Wii/

      In a year or so, Nintendo will make Wiis in different colors and different software bundles, but the base hardware isn't going to change much until they release their next generation.

      The only caveat, you have to love Nintendo style games. ;)

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
    4. Re:This generation... by rhizome · · Score: 1

      How many Gameboy models were there?

      Several, and original Game Boy cartridges work in the latest DS Lites. The Game Boy platform is not a good example to use since it's the most popular video game system ever and has been completely backwards compatible.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    5. Re:This generation... by Gravatron · · Score: 1

      They also had the 64DD, and the Panasonic Q DVD playing gamecube. The wii right now lacks two important things: a hard drive/large memory storage and DVD playback. DVD playback was planned but got the axe early on, and the lack of a hard drive just hurts, given how much downloadable content they have.

    6. Re:This generation... by rhizome · · Score: 1

      ...has been completely backwards compatible.

      Oops, it seems the DS Lite cannot play original Game Boy or Game Boy Color games due to a lack of Z80 processor.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    7. Re:This generation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all this is the direct cause of Microsoft entering the market. Microsoft failed with the first Xbox, but with their massive capital, they were able to subsidize the next iteration and even release it a year early.

    8. Re:This generation... by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that rumble is nice when you have it but you'll almost never miss it when it's gone. It's not the same as say.. going to HD then back to SD again. You can buy a new controller if you really want it. It's not worth picking on unless you're the type that one that only uses the single controller that comes with your console for the life of the thing. New controller types have always been added to console platforms over their lifetime. Light guns, arcade pads, rumble packs, the first Dual Shock, programable macros, rapid fire toggles, steering wheels, etc.

      Other than that, the only thing that might improve on a PS3 is the harddrive size, and that's a user replaceable part if you feel a bigger one is needed later.
      Sony hasn't added any new features to the base system (like HDMI ports), but they might trim a few features to bring the price down.

      Why are you worrying about the typical PC, car, CE, lawnmower, power tool, garden hose fitting, *yawn* .... problem of a better one coming out next week?

    9. Re:This generation... by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Death by SKU-SKU!

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    10. Re:This generation... by grumbel · · Score: 1

      ### The wii right now lacks two important things: a hard drive/large memory storage and DVD playback.

      DVD playback is a software issue and could be easily fixed. Adding usb-storage via software would also fix any storage problems. One issue that likely needs a newer revision is lack of SDHC support, SD cards are getting very cheap these days, but without SDHC support the Wii is restricted to only 2GB cards. Also there is lack of support for using SD cards equally to the internal storage, which makes it only good for backup, but not real use.

    11. Re:This generation... by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Totally agreed.

      I really want a 360, but the problem is I don't want an unreliable console in my lounge.
      Every time I think to myself, "ok this is ridiculous, time to buy one" some kind of better upgraded model is announced or rumoured, making me want to hold off.

      I think I will wait for the quiet and reliable edition before buying one, for sure.

    12. Re:This generation... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      If you hold off on tech purchases because there's always a later and greater version a few months away... how do you ever buy anything?

    13. Re:This generation... by AbRASiON · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You weigh these things up on a cost / desire / feature / reliability ratio.
      I don't see any of the 3 new consoles being good value for money at this point in time, I'm sure others do - good for them but my criteria is more stringent than most since I like value for money (unlike most consumers)

      PS3, too expensive, not enough software - do want to support them though since MS are completely whipping them now and if MS 'wins' we're fucked - we need competition.
      Xbox 360, too many hardware problems, too noisy, cheaper than the PS3 and more games but still not value for money considering it could die at the end of your 3 year warranty (hell,.. could die? likely death)
      Wii, no thanks not for me at all, maybe for 99$ AUD but otherwise not interested.

      To get to your point, I just bought a 65nm Intel CPU, I know the 45nm is coming very soon but now was the time to buy for me, based on cost, overclockability and value for money, based on future prices in January I don't forsee there being a huge difference in performance for the same price

    14. Re:This generation... by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      You're right about Panasonic's Qube, but the 64DD was just a short-lived add-on, not a new Nintendo 64 model.

    15. Re:This generation... by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Well it was completely backwards compatible right up to the Gameboy micro model which only accepts GBA titles. The DS also only takes GBA titles.

    16. Re:This generation... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Well you could stretch a point by saying the Wii is Gamecube 2.0. But I think there will be a revamped Wii at some point and it will not be the last either. I think Nintendo popularised the practice of dumping lots of models on the market with the Gameboy / GBA / DS and they'll extend it to their home consoles. They've probably seen from Apple and from their own experience that they get a lot of repeat business just by effectively revamping and repackaging the same functionality over and over again.

      Sony and Microsoft seem to have caught the bug too to some extent. Sony did revise both the PS1 & PS2 multiple times in their lifetimes (some internal but some external), and the PS3 trend suggest they'll continue to do it. Next stop I think for them will be a slim model since the 40Gb appears to run cooler with less circuitry meaning it may be feasible. I'm surprised they didn't do it this time around since it would have sold by the shitload.

      I can't recall Microsoft revamping the original XBox except for the controllers but they appear to be getting in on the act this gen with revised hardware too.

    17. Re:This generation... by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      Well you could stretch a point by saying the Wii is Gamecube 2.0.

      God, not that again. The Wii is NOT an upgraded or overclocked GameCube with motion sensing controls. The CPU is new, the little brother of the XBox 360's and PS3's CPUs, in fact. The graphics chipset is vastly improved. The motherboard is entirely new.

    18. Re:This generation... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      God, not that again. The Wii is NOT an upgraded or overclocked GameCube with motion sensing controls. The CPU is new, the little brother of the XBox 360's and PS3's CPUs, in fact. The graphics chipset is vastly improved. The motherboard is entirely new.

      Miyamoto descibed it thusly - "The hardware is basically a GC. We've upgraded our development tools to new versions but, you can still use GC programs as they are. With that in mind, I thought we could remake GC titles for the Wii and modify them to work with the Wii remote so that they're more fun to play.". So I suggest that Gamecube 2.0 is a fairly apt description given than a leading person in Nintendo calls it such.

      The CPU is also nowhere near as powerful as the CPUs in the PS3 or 360. Not even remotely close.

    19. Re:This generation... by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Moderators and meta mods:

      Thanks to people disliking a comment I made in this article.
      http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/26/1512217

      People are going on a sad crusade to moderate my other posts down just for the hell of it.
      If anyone would like to correctly meta moderate I'd appreciate it, this place is for discussion, not childilshly taking vengeance because you disagree with someone.

  16. This means in the UK.. by Flibberdy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...to own one of these new 360's you'll need to buy a tv license as if you own any equipment capable of receiving TV signals you need to own a license. That's an extra £130/year (unless of course you have a license anyway).

    Flibberdy

    1. Re:This means in the UK.. by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Considering that the vast majority of people with a xbox 360 will also have a TV in the first place to plug it into, which is also covered by the TV license requirement, I don't see it being a huge issue. For those that don't, they just need to demonstrate the lack of an aerial and thus lack the capability to receive broadcast TV, to legitimately not buy one.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    2. Re:This means in the UK.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand the rationale (pay for the BBC etc.) but geez... that's expensive! And the whole idea of having to license a consumer device in your own home makes about as much sense to me as requiring a sidewalk usage license.

    3. Re:This means in the UK.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you use the TV tuner aspect. I own a HD TV that I use as a display for my PS3 and DVD player and nothing else and so I don't need a license (I checked on the threatening letters they send).

    4. Re:This means in the UK.. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      What are the odds someone has a video game console (which basically requires a TV for output-- yes I know there's a VGA adaptor, stop being pedantic) and aren't already paying the license fee?

    5. Re:This means in the UK.. by iainl · · Score: 1

      If you're not planning on using it to watch TV, then don't spend the extra money on the one with a TV Tuner. If you ARE planning on using it to watch TV, then you should be buying a TV license anyway.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  17. You wouldn't hear the TV though by dindi · · Score: 1

    OK, no trolling, I am a happy XBOX owner and play on live.

    BUT: first they should take care of the noise the 360 produces. For me TV/Video watching is completely ruined when you have such a loud fan noise.

    It is an incredible gaming machine, but I better use my 5+ year old DVD player than the 360 because the noise concerns.

    And before you tell me to crank up the volume: every movie has silent/low volume scenes, and usually the ones when there is important conversation or other dramatic parts..... now that is when I do not want to hear a changing pitch of fan noise.

    Other question a HDTV tuner ... OK ... if I have HDTV I have a tuner already. If it is for recording: I doubt MS is going to give questionable cool features like ad skip with it, so better a TIVO.

    Dunno, maybe this game machine as an entertainment center idea does not get to me. I would better shove a minimac/mini pc into the hifi stand and than I have all the freedom to burn, record, show pix, etc ....

    1. Re:You wouldn't hear the TV though by Detritus · · Score: 1

      A large number of HD television sets were sold without ATSC tuners. Now that ATSC chip-sets are being produced in large volumes, it's a feature that can be added at a low cost. Might as well throw in support for QAM.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  18. Toshiba Wishes by essinger · · Score: 1

    The rumor comes from Toshiba and I don't buy it. Why would Microsoft do this? They make money off movie downloads to the Xbox. Unless Toshiba is going to give MS a huge stake in the HD-DVD platform, I don't really see an upside for Redmond. I can see Toshiba making a media center extender, but I don't see MS letting them put an Xbox into it.

    1. Re:Toshiba Wishes by Moochman · · Score: 1

      Microsoft does have a huge stake in HD-DVD. They wrote the interactive platform, so I assume they're getting royalties from HD-DVD sales.

  19. Open interoperability by tji · · Score: 1

    The one thing they could do to interest me is offer the ability to interoperate with third party software.

    - Define a set of acceptable video formats that the unit will play, starting with ATSC HDTV formats.

    - Create a simple networking protocol to interact with PCs/Servers. Maybe UPnP is good enough, maybe not. It needs to stream the video and allow for flexible playback (FF/REW, Jump n seconds, jump to this point in time, pause, etc.)

    An HD-DVD player, which could also play games, and can interact with my MythTV backend and Mac OS X iLife Apps (view photos, play movies, play unencrypted music) would be a no-brainer.

    A game unit which also connects to Windows Media Center is not interesting.. Doesn't it already do that?? I'm not interested in a Windows-based media server, with all the related costs and limitations.

    1. Re:Open interoperability by SScorpio · · Score: 1

      You mean something like UPNP with DLNA certification? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DLNA

      You can do this with both the PS3 and a modded Xbox running Xbox Media Center right now.

    2. Re:Open interoperability by tji · · Score: 1

      I've tried several UPnP devices with my MythTV server (newer MythTV versions have UPnP built-in), although not a gaming box like the PS3/XBox360.

      In all cases, the video playback left a lot to be desired. Some HD programs would play back just fine, but others would only give audio + black screen. That might be better with a software based device, like the game boxes.

      But, the worse problem was the weak playback controls. FF/REW was uselessly slow. Jump FWD/BACK didn't work at all.

      In MythTV, perhaps the best feature it has is the automatic commercial detection and skipping. With the UPnP devices, you lose that sort of control. Another workaround is a good/quick implementation of 30 second skip, to manually zip through commercials. But, the UPnP devices were very poor at this.

      That's why I was saying that an open protocol/API is needed to get a better level of integration than exists with UPnP devices.

  20. Haha, I knew it was coming. by Charcharodon · · Score: 3, Informative
    Well so much for this generation of consoles being the end all be all "it just works, I don't have to upgrade every year" devices that were supposedly hamering the last nails into the coffin of PC gaming.

    Looks to me like we'll be seeing XBOX and PC gaming being synonymous in the next year or two. They've already got the hardware rating system in Vista as well as USB adapters for their wireless 360 controlers. It's just a matter of adding direct game support for XBOX titles on the PC.

    Considering how fast PC hardware advances in comparison to consoles there is no reason not too. The only thing they'll have to watch out for is letting the software developers get too far head of the average customer's hardware, the very reason many gamers have abandoned PC gaming in the first place.

    Personally I would love to see this since I have already distilled my living room entertainment package down to a PC and a 40" LCD HD TV, and don't care spoil that with the noisy, anemic, unreliable, one trick pony, 360, just to be able to play the few console titles I'm interested in.

    1. Re:Haha, I knew it was coming. by morari · · Score: 1

      Looks to me like we'll be seeing XBOX and PC gaming being synonymous in the next year or two. Great. That already ruined Oblivion.
      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    2. Re:Haha, I knew it was coming. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      You know, for all the bitching people have done about games like Oblivion and Bioshock being "dumbed down" because they were also released on the console, I absolutely cannot see where they get this. I played Morrowind, and Oblivion's UI makes MORE sense to me than Morrowind's. I didn't play SS2, but Bioshock itself is not a dumbed-down game. It might be less complex than SS2, but Bioshock's interface and controls are on par with what one expects from a PC game. Someone, please, explain this new phenomenon of whining to me if you can. Be specific.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    3. Re:Haha, I knew it was coming. by king-manic · · Score: 1

      You know, for all the bitching people have done about games like Oblivion and Bioshock being "dumbed down" because they were also released on the console, I absolutely cannot see where they get this. I played Morrowind, and Oblivion's UI makes MORE sense to me than Morrowind's. I didn't play SS2, but Bioshock itself is not a dumbed-down game. It might be less complex than SS2, but Bioshock's interface and controls are on par with what one expects from a PC game. Someone, please, explain this new phenomenon of whining to me if you can. Be specific.

      PC gamers are just used to nethack. Any game that doesn't utilize 103 keys is obviously not trying and is inefficient.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    4. Re:Haha, I knew it was coming. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
      Well it's kind of like a dog that's been kicked one to many times, it'll flinch every time someone comes near it.

      Shitty graphics, load screens every other room, weak ass multi-player support, and very crappy mouse control where the standard for console/PC releases for a long time. They've gotten alot better about the graphics and the mouse control and the load screens are a little farther apart, though still to often. Multi-player tends to still enjoy intiment relations with donkeys though.

      The only part of Oblivion that was an obvious Console left over was the inventory system. PC RPG's typically have a click and drag grid inventory, while consoles tend to have a long list scrolling inventory since that's what works better with console controlers. Other than that there was really nothing that awful about Oblivion.

      Bioshock bitterness seems to me have more to do with too much hype, too many suckers, too much DRM and not enough game.

      Gamers need to move to Missouri adopt the "Show Me" attitude instead of swallowing down everything the marketing machine spews out with the eagerness of $5 hooker between fixes.

    5. Re:Haha, I knew it was coming. by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > Other than that there was really nothing that awful about Oblivion.

      Other than the goddam compass. I like having no HUD elements at all on the screen. Thankfully I found a mod that does that for me -- no can do on the console version though.

      Still, the best of both worlds is to play the PC version from my couch. Nice that Bethesda actually supports gamepads on the PC version out of the box.

      Shame there isn't any way to improve the voice acting. Guess they blew their acting budget on Patrick Stewarts's five minutes worth of voice work, since I swear they had about three interns voice everyone else in the game.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    6. Re:Haha, I knew it was coming. by morari · · Score: 1

      I didn't find anything in the Bioshock demo to make me think it was necessarily dumbed down. As far as the aforementioned Oblivion though, the entire menu system was overtly targeted at a console audience and suffered because of it. If nothing else, just the inventory area was awful. A lot of the problems I have with Oblivion (when compared to Morrowind) aren't directly because of it having a console audience in mind, but the menu system most certainly is.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    7. Re:Haha, I knew it was coming. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Well so much for this generation of consoles being the end all be all "it just works, I don't have to upgrade every year" devices that were supposedly hamering the last nails into the coffin of PC gaming.

      Who ever claimed it was? Seriously, throw me a reference here.

      If anything, the current generation of consoles (at least the Xbox 360 and PS3) were crowing that they were going to be MORE PC-like and less console-like. Releasing multiple versions at 6-month-or-so intervals is a pretty PC-like thing to do.

      If you like PC games, that's fine. Personally, the last PC game I played was Battlefield: 2142 and it was such a gigantic ball of bugs and crap that even getting into a game with friends was a small miracle. It was bad enough that it encouraged me to always buy the Xbox version when possible. (The reporting of Bioshock's crazy DRM restrictions didn't help, either. I happily have the Xbox version of Bioshock.)

    8. Re:Haha, I knew it was coming. by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

      It's just a matter of adding direct game support for XBOX titles on the PC.


      That's pretty much impossible, seeing as how PCs don't use PowerPC processors...
      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
  21. HDTV Tuners? by zbend · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cable cards? Last time I checked, besides over the air or unencrypted HD, the only way devices that can record HD content from your cable or satellite provider is with a cable card. If there is anything that's had more hardware problems than the xbox, without any of the popularity, its cable cards. Until that whole situation gets figured out I don't see anyone providing a good HD DVR.

    1. Re:HDTV Tuners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except of course the Cable Companies whose DVR do not require cable cards.

    2. Re:HDTV Tuners? by brunascle · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, generally the only encrypted channels are the premium ones. the standard cable channels use unencrypted QAM. otherwise, there wouldnt be QAM tuners on the market.

  22. And the Banshee wail? by threaded · · Score: 1

    Like, yeah, I'd use one of these as my living room hub of choice, if it didn't blow or suck quite as much. ;-) The noise these things put out is phenomenal, and then there's the noise from the DVD drive. I have multi-core boxes running serious number cruching apps that are quieter.

    Nah, living room entertainment centre? Don't think so somehow.

  23. What? Microsoft bought the cable industry? by eudaemon · · Score: 1

    Hmm, well you have a few choices here on how this device will interface with cable:
    1) Classic Analog
    2) Unencrypted QAM
    3) Encrypted QAM*
    4) Cablecard device
    5) IPTV

    As far as I know, HD content is not offered over classic Analog, and cannot be relied upon to be supplied
    over unencrypted QAM. So now you are into connection options that require an authentication scheme
    and some sort of trusted / authenticated relationship between the device and the cable company.

    So far the closest analog (ignoring TVs with cablecard slots) is the HD-TIVO. One only has to scan the
    threads on avsforum to see the good and bad experiences people have had trying to activate what cable
    companies essentially consider a third party device on their network.

    For your average slashdot reader the integration issues are likely something we would spend time working
    through and could in fact navigate to a successful conclusion. But for the average consumer this could
    prove a frustrating and potentially hopeless experience unless Microsoft's 360/MCE is an "officially"
    supported device. And I don't see that happening without an investment from MS of some kind.

    * I intentionally separated encrypted QAM from cablecard as cablecard's replacement is ostensible
    on the horizon.

    1. Re:What? Microsoft bought the cable industry? by eudaemon · · Score: 1

      Woops, make that "ostensibly". Suck it, spelling trolls.
      And check out http://www.opencable.com/primer/cablecard_primer.html if you want
      to know more about cablecards.

    2. Re:What? Microsoft bought the cable industry? by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, HD content is not offered over classic Analog, and cannot be relied upon to be supplied
      over unencrypted QAM. So now you are into connection options that require an authentication scheme
      and some sort of trusted / authenticated relationship between the device and the cable company.

      So, basically, you're saying that either:
      A) There's no HD content broadcasted over the air
      or
      B) OTA broadcasts are encrypted?

    3. Re:What? Microsoft bought the cable industry? by eudaemon · · Score: 1

      You are correct that HD content is available from local broadcasters unencrypted via ASTC.
      However the context of the headline and the article led me to believe we were discussing
      the cable industry. Cable operators do not supply broadcast over the air (OTA) programming.

      If you want to be pedantic I also ignored options offered outside of The United States,
      and satellite providers such as DirecTV all of whom offer HD content.

    4. Re:What? Microsoft bought the cable industry? by eudaemon · · Score: 1

      What is it with me and typos today -- ATSC, not ASTC.

    5. Re:What? Microsoft bought the cable industry? by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      Cable operators do not supply broadcast over the air (OTA) programming.

      No, but they redistribute it. Connecting the coax lead directly into my HDTV brought me the ATSC signals from all the local broadcast stations (Comcast, Boston suburbs). If I could only get On-Demand programming this way, I'd dump the STB tomorrow. I also see better-quality SD reception over the coax connection than I do taking composite out of the cable box into one of the set's composite inputs.

  24. This is smart by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    The problem with upgrading consoles is that you suddenly have two hardware platforms. Do game designers design for the old platform, and limit their features, or do they design for the new platform and limit their audience? They will almost invariably choose the first. Therefore uptake on the new console is low, and consumers feel ripped off -- both the consumers who buy a useless new console, and the consumers who spent their money on the inferior old console.

    With the Xbox 360, however, it's a different deal. None of the upgrades are going to effect the gaming capabilities of the Xbox. Even the hard-drive limitation won't stop you from playing any games. What you get with an upgraded Xbox is a more capable box for movies and general home entertainment.

    On the other hand, despite this being a good technical idea, Microsoft is most likely going to flub it like they did with 6 editions of Vista. If Microsoft does flub it, people will worry about which edition of the Xbox they should buy, and hold off purchasing altogether.

    1. Re:This is smart by Saurian_Overlord · · Score: 1

      You don't think the built-in HD drive will affect gaming capabilities? What would happen if a developer created a game that could only be done on an HD disc? Probably the same thing that happened with Gran Turismo 4 and the PS2 hard drive.

      I doubt it's likely to happen for a while, as even DVD-ROM has yet to begin phasing out the 4-CD method of distributing large games. I'm just saying it's a possibility, especially when the tendency is toward better graphics, bigger game worlds, and higher-quality FMV.

    2. Re:This is smart by bluSCALE4 · · Score: 1

      What's funny is that the 360 is officially going to be more expensive for consumers if they want features found on the PS3. Worse yet is that even with all the upgrades, the PS3 will still have more features. Have you guys heard of being able to play your PS3 games on the PSP anywhere in the world? I'm not confident about this since I read it in Game Informer but I do feel confident about being able to stream content to the PSP similar to how a Slingbox works, which is one example of a feature you won't be finding on the 360.

    3. Re:This is smart by tapi_wrc · · Score: 1

      Thing is, and your point was raised by others above, that this is not a new or 'upgraded' console as such.
      It is a console incorporated into a STB/PVR and the two are integrated. There are no new features for games designers to develop for - if this comes about, a game will work on the xbox 360 and the toshiba entertainment hub. Microsoft have said all along that they wouldn't do things like, for example, allowing the HDdiscs to carry games as this would stop owners of older consoles enjoying the games. Until a completely new console (360 II, 720, whatever) comes along you will find that owners of the original first editions will be able to play the same games as any of the newer versions.

  25. Sony mobile phones by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 1

    Eh? Sony dose not have a cellphone? What planet are you from? Zune?

    why don't you pop over to
    http://www.sonyericsson.com/spg.jsp?cc=global&lc=en&ver=4001&template=pg1&zone=pg

    And quite possibly you may at some time in the future, change your mind...

    --
    I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
    1. Re:Sony mobile phones by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      You also forgot to point out that he said that Sony doesn't make regular MP3 players too, making his entire argument invalid. Current generation Walkmans, anyone?

    2. Re:Sony mobile phones by drgould · · Score: 1

      Eh? Sony dose not have a cellphone? What planet are you from? Zune? ...

      You also forgot to point out that he said that Sony doesn't make regular MP3 players too, ...

      I stand corrected.

      Of course my point was that Microsoft and Apple aren't the only companies that want to sell you a all-in-one media center solution.
  26. Feature sell machines. More features, more sales. by kitgerrits · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is adding more and more features to have poeple use their (noisy) console for things it was never designed for. With this, they hope to sell the machine to more people that were still in doubt about buying a console. Maybe they will even make a few sales to people that simply want a TV tuner with a decent programme listing, like the way people bought PlayStation2's as a DVD player.

    I'm perfectly happy with my Playstation as a Game Console and BD-ROM player.
    It's quiet and has all the outputs I need to make that perfect connection to my Home Cinema equipment.
    Yes, I have Linux on there so I can use it to watch 'downloaded' media content, but it's not the reason I bought it.
    (An XboX can't even do that without a PC with Windows Media Player 11 on a networking doing all the hard work.)
    With Linux, a PS3 can already use any linux-supported (HD)TV receiver, or any other (Linux supported) USB device.

    Because of HDTV and ever-more-powerful processors, one machine will someday sit in the living room, recording your TV shows, string your music, doubling as Internet Appliance for browsing an e-mail.
    At the very least.
    If people will still have hard-wired phones, the machine will answer the phone for you.
    Home Automation will also be interesting (toggling lights when you're on vacation, climate control, remote alarm check-up/signaling, providing access to the networked webcam in the baby room).
    The possible privacy issues are just as endless.

    Any machine successful enough gets the attention of 'the power that be' and will be used for things people will not like. Just as phone companies log your calls, ISP's keep track of all your sent and received e-mail and cars with LoJack are already monitored (Did I mention Cell Phone tracing?), every bit of information will be monitored, logged and, if you're unlucky, scanned and reported.

    Everything automated can also be controlled.
    Just like TiVO's deleting shows at the broadcaster's command and digital music becoming suddenly unplayable , someone will always be annoyed at the endless possibilities and will want to keep the possibilities within limits.

    What will -really- make the device sell is something I don't know yet.
    It's 'killer feature' maybe has not even been invented yet.

    --
    "I was in love with a beautiful blonde once, dear. She drove me to drink. It's the one thing I am indebted to her for."
  27. the Halo Gaming Platform by David_Shultz · · Score: 1

    Is the x-box not expensive enough already? I can have the option of buying an xbox or a new computer. This is getting stupid. I always tell people there are no good games for the xbox -I am baiting them for the obvious answer: "no, halo is a good game!" Yes, Halo is a good game. And Halo 2. And Halo 3. Microsoft admits they are keeping afloat on the Halo franchise. Which is why they should stop calling the system the xbox and call it what it is -the Halo Gaming Platform, or alternately, the H-Box. The H-box is the system of choice for suckers for advertising, and those people who can't identify a quality product.

    1. Re:the Halo Gaming Platform by EllF · · Score: 1

      Wow. What an amazingly ignorant statement.

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
    2. Re:the Halo Gaming Platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot and there are plenty of good games for the XBox. Unlike the PS3 on which the only good games are available on other consoles with better network support. Shut up and kill yourself.

    3. Re:the Halo Gaming Platform by jt2377 · · Score: 0

      "Is the x-box not expensive enough already? I can have the option of buying an xbox or a new computer."

      Are you retarded? Please point to me where you can buy a decent PC gaming system for less than $500! Do you hate MS so much that your hate break your common sense?

  28. PS3 TV by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The PS3 needs help developing native X drivers that work on the Cell's SPEs. Linux currently runs on the PS3 Cell's PPC core, but that doesn't even have the accelerated graphics that cheap PCs have on their videocards (the PS3 RSX is locked out to Linux). The SPEs are so much more powerful, and designed for exactly the pixel pushing that X needs. Once they're running instead of sitting there, the PS3 will be by far the best $600 HD terminal out there. Especially with home theater/automation systems on it like LinuxMCE. But it needs help across that basic milestone.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:PS3 TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think some clarity is needed on this.

      Linux on the PS3 has access to six of the seven SPEs. The guest OS exists on top of a virtualization layer that restricts access to the RSX (Nvidia's graphic chip) on purpose. You won't get native 3D graphics, because by definition it can't access the RSX.

      What you can do is create a faster software OpenGL implementation by offloading the calculations to an SPE instead of relying on the PowerPC core which is the out of box behavior of MesaGL. Of course, since most computers don't have such a thing as an SPE this would be new functionality for MesaGL.

    2. Re:PS3 TV by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      More clarity:
      That's all correct, except that MesaGL doesn't have the 3D (or 2D) graphics because it calls HW (or microcode) GL routines in the VGA (or better) chips. So that functionality would need to be ported to the SPEs.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:PS3 TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hypervisor has a security hole in firmwares 1.80 and below. Sony left a way to access the blitter in the RSX but for some reason you can also send other commands to the RSX in the last 2MB of VRAM.
      Maybe they were planning to ship a binary driver? But this has been fixed in recent firmwares.

  29. history by smash · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As anyone with a passing knowledge of consoles should know - this will flop.

    Just ask sega about how well console "upgrades" sell - eg MegaCD, 32X, etc.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    1. Re:history by Zebra_X · · Score: 1

      nah and here is why.

      the xbox is primarily a game console - that is its core focus. as people explore their consoles more - they find that there are added features such as media center, or downloadable video and content. the console focus doesn't change but we get more for our money now.

      so it's not like msft is going out and creating a set top box - they are creating a game console that can act as a set top box - as well as a game console. as we move into the future they can release new features via network updates.

      the xbox is versitle. at the moment it can play on demand content, movies, games and be used for communication such as messenger it can also video chat, and audio chat. it will continute to become more versitle with the addition of an HD-DVD drive.

      the xbox is a sleeper really. all that is needed in the future is a push by msft either marketing or software to convert current xbox users to the other features.

      the ubiquitousness and openness of the xbox is also a huge selling point as well.

      to say that the xbox is competing with the ps3 is probably not accurate - the ps3 is catching up. judging by the current state of things the ps3 has a long road ahead to catch up.

      also - sony continues to alienate their user base by couching a "price drop" with a feature removal - the loss of ps2 support.

    2. Re:history by smash · · Score: 1
      Xbox? Open? Since when? PS3 runs linux *with sony's permission* no less - the xbox doesn't.

      Back in the day, the megaCD was aimed at the sort of market MS is aiming at now - remember CD+G?

      As to the loss of PS2 support in the PS3 - this isn't as bad as you might think. The PS2 is still on sale, and cheap. Most potential PS3 owners already own a PS2. Since I've owned my PS2, i think i've perhaps used the PS1 backwards compatibility maybe 3 times - i have an unused library of 40-50 PS1 games, too...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  30. Wii = elephant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you ignoring the fact that the Wii is the best selling console?

  31. Re:Mod parent ignorant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is some evidence to the contrary. If the problem has been fixed for so long, how come there are still tons of people returning their 360s for repairs?

  32. Actually - PS3 Death Blow by RobK · · Score: 1

    What they would have said in a less politically correct world would be:

    "We intend this to be the death blow to the PS3 - an overpriced and poorly supported system, that despite our inability to provide a reliable and quiet home theater experience we're going to shove down America's throat and they'll like it."

    Well the "... and they'll like it." part is from actually from Sony but maybe MS will pic it up so that they are "in a better position to compete."

  33. Doesn't Sony get royalties from DVDs? by dbug78 · · Score: 1

    I know Sony gets royalties from DVD players; the xbox 1 DVD playback kit existed to prevent Sony from profiting off every xbox sold; but I believe they get royalties for the movies as well. It would make it a no-brainer for Sony to include a DVD player in the PS2, even at little to no profit. Encouraging DVD sales means more money with little to no effort.

    Microsoft, however, gets nothing from HD-DVD sales. It needs to be hit a price point where they can profit or at least minimize their losses.

  34. slow death of 360 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's amusing to hear people that bashed the Bluray addon for PS3 now claim how brilliant this idea is. Give Sony credit for realizing the future was in HD. MS will have problems due to capacity restrictions w/ DVD's (see Assassin's Creed). W/ 10 mil. + consoles, they are married to DVD to deliver gaming content for this generation and that will eventually lead to the demise of the 360.

  35. Different notions of 'complex' by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

    Maybe we miss games where you could do this (slightly exaggerated):

    ~
    alias rapid "toggleauto; bind t single"
    alias single "togglesingle; bind t rapid"
    rapid

  36. Another SKU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this going to be another SKU? It's getting to be too confusing to keep track of the different versions of the XBOX, and the capabilities of each. It just doesn't make sense to get one if they're going to change it every few months. I'll just stick with my Nintendo.

  37. Chicken wings and a six-pack of Bud by westlake · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Even if I had a screen big enough to enjoy the real benefit of HD, why the fuck would I want a locked down platform that goes out of its way to restrict my usage?

    Here is one example: The big game recorded off-air in pristine digital HD. Looks damn good in large screen projection - better than DVD video - even with the constraint token enabled.

    No MythBox to assemble. 2-Way CableCard support. Begin the build-up to the match with a good console sports game.

    In this beer and pizza border town that is not a tough sell.

    1. Re:Chicken wings and a six-pack of Bud by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I can record that game today on my Mac mini - and then transcode that pristine signal into a more compressed or slightly lower res for storage, and then transcode yet again a version specfically targeting a portable media player or a version for firends with laptops that would like a copy.

      Would you really be able to do all that with a 360? I'm not very sure at all it would be possible, or even to easily transver that video to any other computer much less a portable media player.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:Chicken wings and a six-pack of Bud by acm · · Score: 1

      I can record that game today on my Mac mini I didn't know that was possible until I googled it. Though, it doesn't look a whole lot easier than setting up a MythTV, which is the original point of the grandparent post. It involves third party software, setting up a VPN server, and some extra cables.

      Mac Mini to Media Center Instructions

    3. Re:Chicken wings and a six-pack of Bud by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Here is one example: The big game recorded off-air in pristine digital HD.

      Borrowing from this post, why would you want to waste time watching a bunch of presumed adults with their IQs on their shirts moving a ball up and down a field?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    4. Re:Chicken wings and a six-pack of Bud by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      It's not hard at all (with an Elgato box). The software is as good a DVR as any, I can remote schedule recordings, and there are no more cables to hook up than there would be with any other solution (one for UHF antenna and one for cable). The PVR software can also automatically transcode recorded video over to iTunes for use with an iPod or AppleTV as well, and has some basic editing ability to trim saved full-res clips down for easier storage.

      I would say it's easier to set up than a MythTV box given you cannot easily buy MythTV pre-installed (I think there may be one company doing so but it's not well publicized and I'm not sure what setup is required when you get it).

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:Chicken wings and a six-pack of Bud by AmigaMMC · · Score: 1

      And how many mainstream people do you know that would do that? Even I prefer an Xbox over a Mac. Already have 3 Win PCs, including a tablet, no need to go out and spend a fortune rebuilding my software library. People are on the street are not going to think: "Should I buy an Xbox or a Mac Mini?" for their living room entertainment... no, not really...

    6. Re:Chicken wings and a six-pack of Bud by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      And how many mainstream people do you know that would do that?

      More than would use MythTV, that's for sure. There are quite a lot of different options for using a Mac as a media system targeting consumers.

      Already have 3 Win PCs, including a tablet, no need to go out and spend a fortune rebuilding my software library.

      Crossgrades and useful included software means really minimal costs - but we are after all talking about a media system. I don't have any software on it not stock other than the PVR that came free with the Elgato box, and codec upgrades that were also free.

      People are on the street are not going to think: "Should I buy an Xbox or a Mac Mini?" for their living room entertainment... no, not really...

      And those same people sure as hell aren't going to install XBox media center, or think much about using connectors from a PC to beam media to an XBox. It's going to be a more limited and fairly technological subset of the population in all cases.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    7. Re:Chicken wings and a six-pack of Bud by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Would you really be able to do all that with a 360? I'm not very sure at all it would be possible, or even to easily transver that video to any other computer much less a portable media player.

      I would like to do it all with a 360, if that 360 were hacked and running linux, and that linux had support for all the hardware.

      Otherwise, no.

      Even if Microsoft developed software that let you do all that, it would be miserable in one or more ways, and probably include mandatory DRM. No thanks, eh?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  38. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You only need a licence to actually receive signals. If you have a TV, not tuned into anything with no arial plugged into it when the inpector calls, that's fine.

  39. Too loud, too hot by Sheepless · · Score: 1

    I keep my 360 in a cabinet under the TV to dull the noise of its massive fans. And since it raises the temperature in there high enough to bake a small cake, I can't imagine having it sitting out so I can actually use the IR remote. Anybody actually have a good experience keeping these things in the living room? Much less trying to watch a movie/show with dialog?

    --
    Social media and technology thoughts: http://jasonkinner.wordpress.com
    1. Re:Too loud, too hot by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      I keep my 360 in a cabinet under the TV to dull the noise of its massive fans. And since it raises the temperature in there high enough to bake a small cake, I can't imagine having it sitting out so I can actually use the IR remote. Anybody actually have a good experience keeping these things in the living room? Much less trying to watch a movie/show with dialog?

      Has anyone had a good experience? Well, count me for one. I bought a 360 last Christmas, and keep it on a glass shelf entertainment center with nothing to muffle the sound, and I can barely hear it. Perhaps I got lucky and got one from a good batch, but even with the 360's DVD drive running full bore, it's still quieter than the PS3 while folding (The system fan is noticeably loud), though to be fair neither of them can be heard while watching TV, or playing a game at a reasonable volume.

    2. Re:Too loud, too hot by Sheepless · · Score: 1

      I guess this is what I get for getting one of the first 360s! Stupid bathtub curve...

      --
      Social media and technology thoughts: http://jasonkinner.wordpress.com
  40. Implications for Intel by symbolset · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With their crapulent MCE OS offerrings MS has just about convinced Intel there is no market for HTPC. Now we find that MS wants the whole market with its non-Intel XBox.

    Will Intel respond with some non-Microsoft developments, or will they surrender another market to the Beast of Redmond?

    Ultimately Microsoft has to take ownership of the entire PC hardware market if they are to sustain growth. They are already an OEM of desktop PCs in India. If they take the consumer electronics space also there's nothing left but servers. How long before they're drooling over that high margin business?

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Implications for Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...nothing left but servers. How long before they're drooling over that high margin business? LOL. Microsoft & high margin servers...

      A Microsoft server would pretty much be a (--Dell++) or maybe a (HP=-1)++
      That is, NOT high margin.

      Look to IBM or SUN offerings for mid/high end, and those most likely are all running AIX, Solaris, or Linux.

  41. Re:Mod parent ignorant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe because by fixing all new 360s on the shelves it doesn't magically fix all the old 360s that are already out there or have been in some shops storage for a while?

    Doesn't exactly take a genius to answer that one. There's people who's original 360s are working fine so it's not as if it was a major issue and hence not as if it was ever going to be hard to fix. For everyone that has a failed 360 nowadays theres hundreds that don't which puts the 360 back on track with the industry average for faulty electronic goods which is something you can never really improve on no matter how hard you try.

  42. Price is less important than quality of content. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    The lack of a high capacity optical drive is on feature that's kept me from buying a 360. Even if they add one though I'm not very likely to buy a 360 just because it's stamped with Microsoft's brand and I've had to many bad consumer experiences with them. Money really isn't much of a factor though as I only expect to buy the console once and a couple hundred dollars as a one time cost isn't very important.

    Of course the real deciding factor in consoles is the games. I've yet to see any game in this generation, for any console, that is really exciting enough to buy a new console for. GTA4 might get me to buy a PS3. I've been highly disppointed that the PS3 has yet to have any games really making it worth buying. Wii looks interesting but not enough to really buy one yet - maybe when they get cheap they'll be worth the few hours I'd actually spend playing it. That's what I did with the GameCube - bought it when they got cheap, played through a couple games, and then gave it to my little sisters. The HD-DVD does apply to this metric though as I like deeply involved games so the extra storage space could make games more appealing to me.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  43. Re:Mod parent ignorant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article I provided is from today. There is no mention of the return rate falling off after fixed units are on shelves or after they started replacing returned units with properly fixed units.

    The article also says that the town has a population of 95,000. The US has a population of 300 million and nearly 8 million 360s have been sold in the US. If the town follows the national average of Xbox 360 ownership then there should be 2500 Xbox 360 owners in the town. The article also says the UPS store sees between 4 and 10 returned 360s each day. We'll assume the average is 5 per business day to err on the conservative side. This gives us an estimate of the rate of failures per year as 5*250/2500=0.5. Even if we assume that 360 ownership in this town greatly exceeds the national average this means the Xbox 360 failure rate is huge. This is also assuming that all returned 360s in this town pass through this one UPS store.

    If the failure rate is really this high, we could expect that about 25% or more of the launch 360 buyers haven't had a problem. This seems reasonable given that online we see a non-negligible number of people proudly proclaiming they haven't had a problem while a non-negligible number of others say they've gone through several of them.

  44. xbmc anyone? by bowlman · · Score: 1

    Agree with most comments so far. One basic requirement for me in a media center is that it has to play all formats and encoding schemes. The 360 is way too picky about the video it can stream. If the 360 and PS3 intend to be a contenders in this space then they have to at least match the functionality in XBMC. The original Xbox with XBMC trumps both these so-called "next-gen" consoles at the moment in media centre functionality.

    1. Re:xbmc anyone? by Floritard · · Score: 1

      This is was kills me. Here MS has a free and open source program running on their own old hardware with all of the features that people would want in a HTPC. The blueprint is right there, just build it. I heard Bill Gates was shown a copy of it running on a modded XBox once and I thought for sure they would just add all of its functionality to the 360. I mean if I could just play divx/xvid over SMB with a 360 without any MCE or other proprietary garbage running on my PC, I'd buy a 360 tomorrow. MS will never succeed in the HTPC space because they are obsessed with owning formats, even moreso than Sony. There is absolutely no need for Windows Media formats. I mean, the iPod would never have been a success if it were AAC only. People don't think in wma, they think "mp3." And they don't download wmv, they download divx.

      I mean I love my XBMC, and I blows the mind of anyone I show it to. People would love XBMC. The people behind that project really should talk to someone about building a set top box with XBMC on it. If it can run on XBox hardware how expensive could something like that be? Something like AppleTV but with XBMC running on it. I can't believe how much use I've gotten out of my old XBox with XBMC, much more time than I ever spent playing games on it. I only wish it had more horsepower to handle the future HD formats coming out, but I don't have a new tv yet anyway. Seeing as how Sony and MS can't get their heads out of their asses wrt to what people really want in a HTPC, looks like I'll just be moving to my own built HTPC, running whatever XBMC will be called once they port it to Linux.

  45. Re:Mod parent ignorant. by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
    If the failure rate is really this high, we could expect that about 25% or more of the launch 360 buyers haven't had a problem.

    The Xbox 360 failure rate in Australia during the initial launch period was about 30%, according to retailers, so your numbers sound about right.

    You might also enjoy this "enlightening" interview with Todd Holmdahl, Microsoft's corporate vice president of Gaming and Xbox Products Group.
    http://blogs.mercurynews.com/aei/2007/06/a_qa_with_todd_holmdahl_the_hardware_guy_at_microsoft_about_xbox_360_failures.html

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  46. A Strange Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Posting Anon because I'm also moderating)

    This doesn't divide or hurt the 360 and the technology that needs to go into this is minor and most of it is in place with Xbox live/MCE already.

    This doesn't set a precedent as the most popular home console of all time had a similar sibling The PSX which was $700 U.S. when I saw it at the Sony building in 2003 and didn't have any impact in the states.

  47. Toshiba produces the CELL! by AlainSchr · · Score: 1

    Did anybody keep in mind that Toshiba is one of the backers of the CELL Processor? They just renewed and extended their Joint-Venture with Sony. They also developed a "reduced" CELL Processor called SpursEngine.

    They should be working on a PS3 version, not a XBOX360 Version...

  48. neat idea but too late by amigabill · · Score: 1

    This is a neat idea. Too bad I already own an Xbox though. If you got me with HDDVD and all that from th ebeginning then maybe my 360 would be more than a games and DVD player. But that's what it is, and I've got better things to spend money on than more xbox 360 consoles. I'm not buying another one.

  49. If it was broken by design, by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

    then mine must have been faulty. I've had it and played it regularly since it came out. It never overheats, occasionally freezes up if I leave it on for a day or so, and hasn't scratched a single game. I haven't known a single person who actually had to send theirs in and I know a lot of gamers. I admit my old roomate's copy of Tiger Woods 07 got scratched up when the 360 got knocked over while we were playing it. I keep hearing how most of them don't work and how horrible they are, but I've seen no evidence of it myself. The few instances I have seen are something I'd expect such as freezing after being on a day or two, or the game getting scratched when the console was knocked on it's side. I'm starting to think it's just exageration due to hatered of Microsoft.

    --
    Someone save me from this sanity.
    1. Re:If it was broken by design, by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I only know of one person with a 360. We've been playing it for about a year and it suddenly died with the RRoD (luckily they did that warranty extension right before his died). He sent it back under warranty and the new one they sent him was RRoD out of the box. So now he's waiting for another one to be sent to him.

    2. Re:If it was broken by design, by grumbel · · Score: 1

      30% failure rate != 100% failure rate, but that seems to hard for some people to understand...

  50. Glad I never bought one by sunsfan1991 · · Score: 1

    I almost bought a 360 elite, but if they keep putting out better versions I may as well wait a few years for the 100th different version, it will surely be the best ever.

  51. Re:Mod parent ignorant. by Bigboote66 · · Score: 1

    This seems reasonable given that online we see a non-negligible number of people proudly proclaiming they haven't had a problem while a non-negligible number of others say they've gone through several of them.

    Yes, because those without problems are clearly as likely to post that they have fine XBoxes as people who have been plagued with problems.

    My 360 was periodically overheating (not a full red ring, but a partial ring that forced me to shut it off for a while). The problem was solved by moving my 360 out of my cozy entertainment center and putting it around the corner, free standing by itself.

    It seems pretty clear to me that the problem is with the spec of the 360s. We see over & over again people bitching that "I'm on my [n::n > 4]th 360!!" - it should be obvious to these guys that perhaps the problem is with the way they're using their 360s, and not a manufacturing quality issue. Maybe after their third failure they'd figure out that they need to keep the thing a little cooler.

    This doesn't absolve MS from failing to account in their specification for the fact that many people are using their 360s in hot/poorly ventilated environments; they should have realized that there would be people who had been running their previous-gen systems in environments that were already at the borderline, heat-wise, for those systems. But it's also stupid as a customer to keep doing the same thing over & over and expecting a different result.

    -BbT

  52. We're sorry... by Stele · · Score: 1

    We're sorry, gaming has been disabled because XBOX is currently recording "Everybody loves Raymond". Press "X" to watch live now. Or, press "A" to dim screen and read a book instead.

    Gaming will be enabled when recording completes, in: 28 minutes

  53. This is TOO funny... by Mark+Gillespie · · Score: 0

    Basically copying all the PS3 features available today, in a package perhaps 18 months away. In all likelyhood HD DVD will be dead by then anyway..

    Regardless, can all the PS3 owners now start ranting about Microsoft bundling the trojan horse HD DVD drive?

    You know the one that was not required, because DVD9 was sufficient... (just like HDMI was not required, and nor was HDD)...

    Unbelievable how people have been fooled by Microsoft. spending $1000 on a console bit by bit, and ending up with something that is basically obsolete...

  54. MS's way of making money by Krojack · · Score: 1


    Lets quickly put out a system. It doesn't need to be real fancy, just have lots of games. In a year we will have a new system with some new hardware and all those suckers that bought one will sell it and buy another one. Then a year from then put out another system with some more small upgrades to start the cycle over again. This is better then putting out one great system to start that is ahead of its time.
    </sarcasm>