Slashdot Mirror


The Best Tech You Can't Get in the US

DigitalDame2 writes "The US isn't always on the cutting edge of technology. We see a new product release that has just the blend of styling and features we've been looking for, but alas, it's only available overseas. From the Thanko MP4 watch to Sony's OLED TV, these are the hottest new gadgets to drool over, that you can't get here."

354 comments

  1. Wait, what? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What do you mean, can't get here? This is the post-globalist age, ffs. From TFA:

    But, that doesn't stop us from drooling over and paying for imports of new gizmos from the other side of the world.

    I'm not usually one to rag on the editors for shitty or misleading summaries, but that one was completely pointless.
    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    1. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They'll turn a blind eye to grey-market imports, but try to sell most european and asian hi-tech gizmos in america, and some fuck will sue you for infringement of some stupid american patent. I run a small business in europe, and we just don't deal with americans

    2. Re:Wait, what? by justinlindh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about things that require service that's not provided in the United States? I've heard countless times that we're behind in cell phones AND cell phone service compared to many other nations, for example.

      Or things that are region encoded, and/or not available in the English language?

      There are certainly ways that the U.S. can lag behind in tech gadgets. Available services and localization account for this.

    3. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What's the name of your company? Bigots 'R' Us?

    4. Re:Wait, what? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      damn right. First of all if it was good, they'd market it here since America is one of the top gadget markets. Either it doesn't meet our standards or it's not cost effective to market here because it sucks. All of these fancy gadgets are probably way crappier than they sound and will break before you get them home or they contain more lead than a 19th century pipe. Plus apparently the article author has never heard of ebay.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    5. Re:Wait, what? by king-manic · · Score: 1

      damn right. First of all if it was good, they'd market it here since America is one of the top gadget markets. Either it doesn't meet our standards or it's not cost effective to market here because it sucks. All of these fancy gadgets are probably way crappier than they sound and will break before you get them home or they contain more lead than a 19th century pipe. Plus apparently the article author has never heard of ebay.

      Conversely Americans tend to buy the same 3 gadgets (an iPod, a Razr, a Blackberry), while in Japan, Korea, China, and Europe it tends towards more diversity. In Japan you tout your toys like we tout our musical tastes. It's not here because the US market is so homogeneous that the niches those products fill may not exist here or we don't have sufficient technolust to get a OLED when we already have a 42" LCD.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    6. Re:Wait, what? by Prefader · · Score: 1

      Well, now, if that's really the case, then there's a strong argument here that all of these other posts claiming that Americans just don't want this stuff are fairly misguided.

      It does sound plausible to me, but I'm an American that doesn't know a whole lot about what we're like to trade with - anyone else care to weigh in on this? I mean, every day on slashdot there is an article + a bazillion posts about how our patent system stifles innovation and competition . . .

    7. Re:Wait, what? by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >What do you mean, can't get here? This is the post-globalist age, ffs. From TFA:

      "Can't get it here" just means it's not popular enough for economies of scale to lead to an affordable gray market.

      You *can* "get it here." Go there. Buy it. Bring it back with you. Easier, perhaps, for someone who already takes business trips to Asia every month or so, but not impossible to get.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    8. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about Self-Preservationists 'R' Us.

      The truth is that dealing with the U.S. really is just more hassle than it's worth in an increasing number of areas. I don't hate Americans by any stretch, but the litigiousness and brutal sense of entitlement shown by the American populous in general has just driven a few of us to throw our hands up and say "No more" when it comes to business dealings.

      So, call me what you want, and take this post for whatever it's worth to you -- it doesn't make any difference to me. But, there's a wide gap between being a bigot and being one who learns from personal misery and that of others.

    9. Re:Wait, what? by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      Unlikely. Europe sold it's bigots to America long ago. We only have lefties here :(

      Maybe we should start a lefties 'R Us.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    10. Re:Wait, what? by achilles777033 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's been patented. It's called the Leftorium.

    11. Re:Wait, what? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      I'm not usually one to rag on the editors for shitty or misleading summaries, but that one was completely pointless.

      Um, the summary was pretty much taken from the title of the article, and it's reasonably well borne out. Also from TFA:

      Not surprisingly, the majority of products we found are cell phones and PDAs not stocked by US cell phone carriers.

      So yeah, maybe you can get that shiny new Japanese phone in the US, but it's not exactly useful. It's probably true that there are very few high-tech items you can't physically obtain here, but many of them depend on infrastructure that's just not present in that giant third-world country located between Canada and Mexico.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    12. Re:Wait, what? by nschubach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't hate America... hate the lawyers.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    13. Re:Wait, what? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Residential Internet services. There may be more of us on, but at lower speeds. Coming from the home of the Internet, this is pretty sad.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    14. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more accurate description would be "the best tech that isn't marketed in the US", seeing as everyday US gadgets comes from abroad too.

    15. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't hate America, and I also have a couple really good friends who are Americans. However, I don't think you can blame the lawyers entirely... they'd be nowhere if there wasn't a long line of enthusiastic clients who revel in the thought of being a compensated victim.

    16. Re:Wait, what? by polansky · · Score: 1

      Don't hate the playa; hate the game.

    17. Re:Wait, what? by lazy_playboy · · Score: 1

      the game that the players created?

    18. Re:Wait, what? by marafa · · Score: 1

      here in egypt, voice calls are calculated by the minute and a provider has increased the "minute" to 90 seconds and we only have 3 providers

      --
      _ In Egypt Networks: Network Solutions with a Twist
    19. Re:Wait, what? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      You *can* "get it here." Go there. Buy it. Bring it back with you. ...

      _____

      Apparently you don't know what 'here' means.

      You buy it 'there' because you can't get it 'here', that was the point.

    20. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, I've had some business dealings with Americans, and here's what I've found:

      - They appear to really believe that "the customer is always right" without any limitations whatsoever, and that I should be willing to compromise absolutely anything to satisfy unreasonable requests. I'll happily go out of my way to keep customers satisfied when my product fails, but I've also been called an "asshole" because I wouldn't replace a device for free, including the cost of shipping, that an American customer's kid had run through with a knife.
      - They're not very friendly. When I receive e-mails or phone calls from American clients, the e-mail almost never starts with "hello" or any other greeting, and the phone conversations usually start with "yeah, I'm..." They also just hang up when they're done talking, and there's often no "goodbye" or anything.

      Personally, I've never been stifled by the U.S. patent system or anything, but I do find dealing with U.S. customers to be trying---they tend never to be satisfied, and they treat me like the enemy because I'm at this to make a living. I like to think of myself as a fair businessman, but I never get the feeling that I'm viewed that way by my American customers.

    21. Re:Wait, what? by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      Because you dealt with a couple of idiot customers, you now think that the entire american population are a bunch of impossible-to-satisfy, rude customers? Maybe the way you treat your customers is causing them to treat you this way when you deal with them? I'm not trying to rag on you, but I'm just saying that this is only your side of the story.

      I live in America and if I had to deal with people like what you describe I'd probably either move or kill myself. While I do run into people like this from time to time, it most certainly isn't the norm. This is especially true if I'm dealing with any sort of professional on a business deal.

      --
      I got nothin'
    22. Re:Wait, what? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      With the exception of that Samsung phone, many (if not most) of the phones listed will work fine in the U.S.

      I'm fairly certain that all of the HTC devices (Touch Dual, S630, S730) have full or nearly-full functionality on either U.S. GSM carrier.

      Touch Dual - Probably the least functional. It's only tri-band GSM, and only does UMTS2100, so no UMTS (3G) in the U.S. and might have issues with normal GSM service in the U.S.

      S630 and S730 - Both are quad-band GSM (Works on T-Mobile or AT&T) and support UMTS850 and UMTS1900 (3G with AT&T). In addition, the S630 apparently supports UMTS1700 for when T-Mobile USA starts rolling out 3G.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    23. Re:Wait, what? by jellomizer · · Score: 0

      Well it seems like you have a problem understanding different culture.
      There are even difference to differnt parts of the United States, Northern U.S. vs. Souther U.S. Vs Western...

      Our culture values money a lot, perhaps more then we should but it is a fact.
      Because of these values the following applies.
      a. It is a Sin not to buy a product or service at the best price possible.

      b. if it is not at the best price possible there needs to be a good reason to do so. Quality, good pasts experice etc...

      c. We understand mistakes happen but we only allow the company one more chance to get it right, otherwise we will feel negitive about the product. (By saying you will replace the product and not pay for shipping is a good negitive check) because as they see it when they paid x+shipping and handling and they didn't get what they wanted or at the quality advertised they will want a replacement back. Because to pay for shipping and handling twice will lead to breaking the SIn of not paying the best price possible because it would have cost the price + shipping and handling x 3.

      d. Good service usually brings good feeling and will allow b. exception to take pace so they will go back to you and pay a higher price then optimal (if no other recource for cheaper way is available) because they know they will get good service.

      It is not that customer is always right but the customer know they have word of mouth on their side and if they get poor service they can and often will spread bad word of mouth. If they are happy they will send good word of mouth.

      Hello and Good Byes for some areas of the United states are reserved for happy discource and sometimes seems to personal comunication. Just as is in other cultures such as france if you use the singlar version of you to someone you don't know is considered to intimate conversation and causes unconfort. The same with Hello and GoodBye in buisness transactions. Useing Hello and good by (In some United States Locations) feels like they want to know the person and make friends, "yeah, I'm..." means I want to talk buisness right now.

      As for the kid actually cutting it with the knife issue that is usually more extream and that isn't normally the case but in some areas of the US it may be worth it to try by force of will if all other logical methods are gone of getting the best value.

      Also be aware to most Americans Europian Accents sound Snotty to us, "like you are better then us or something" We get the image of the guy living in a huge mansion with butlers and maids that they treat like dirt. So keep that in mind as well, while you can't do much about that it does make them feel infearior, when that happends they will make their position stronger by being more agressive.

      It is all about really understanding the culture the goods and bads. Also the differnt locations of the US are differnt too. What you described sounded like the American was from New York City New England or New Jersey area, North East. While the Southerns tend to be more friendly and deal with pleasentries more.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    24. Re:Wait, what? by CajunArson · · Score: 1

      Can you point out any evidence of this or did you just put up an anti-patent rant in order to get free mod points?

      The last time I checked, every country in Europe, Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan all had patents and patent laws too. In fact, all are signatories of the Patent Cooperation Treaty as well (which makes it easier to get patent protection in multiple countries for the same invention).

          There are certainly issues with imports into the US with a few due to safety approval and environmental regulations, and others due to market factors. Americans don't always go in for the smallest and most expensive device possible, many go for the cheapest/most bling-ridden one... but that is a customer choice and not due to patents.

          Finally, many new products made in Asia that are really new are not yet made in quantities that justify mass marketing and exports to the US. The local test market is the easiest way to see if there is demand for a gadget and then once there is critical mass it will be manufactured in quantities that support export. You can talk about how there should be more manufacturing of cool stuff in the US (I definitely think there should be), but patents have nothing to do with that either.

      --
      AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    25. Re:Wait, what? by Dishevel · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      The leftists are the biggest bigots in existence. Its the elitist, leftist idiots that spend all their time telling "The less fortunate" that without their handouts and help that "The Underprivileged" are completely incapable of helping themselves. They need us. The poor, cant do anything on their own. They need rich guilty people to do stuff for them. That kind of attitude is not only bigoted, but infinitely harmful. Be strong. Look after your family and your community. Do not give handouts. Give the freedom to excel. Give knowledge and hope. Allow people to succeed and all will prosper.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    26. Re:Wait, what? by digitig · · Score: 1

      You *can* "get it here." Go there. Buy it. Bring it back with you. Find it doesn't work because it only supports PAL, not NSTC...
      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    27. Re:Wait, what? by Dishevel · · Score: 1

      What they dont tell you in that article is that the coolest bit of tech you can get in the US. http://www.artlebedev.com/everything/optimus/ Come on! A programmable 32x32 pixel display on each key. How cool is that? I so want one.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    28. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...you now think that the entire american population are a bunch of impossible-to-satisfy, rude customers?

      Only the JAPs and sometimes their husbands.

      I swear, washing cars one time, ($3 each) for a high school fundraiser in a community with a considerable Jewish population, Jew dude made us wash his car 3 times because of the dead bugs and other crap that wouldn't come off.
      At the end of the 3rd time, the teacher refunded his money and told him to leave.

    29. Re:Wait, what? by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      I live in EU and buy products from USA quite frequently. The story is pointless and you are right. It's easy to "self import" stuff from anywhere in the world. Sure, you should pay toll and whatnot, but they are not concerned about individual purchases.

      Many of you may feel angry for this, but I just uttered this to a friend of mine after ordering something from US:
      "Shit, with the current state of Euro value buying shit from Amazon feels like visiting liethuania to buy cheap booze and cigarettes" (Damn, now you know my country exactly)

    30. Re:Wait, what? by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >You buy it 'there' because you can't get it 'here', that was the point.

      You buy it "there" from someone who went "there" and brought it back. You make it worth their while to do that, either by unit price or by volume. If there was a strong market demand for these things, someone would be supplying.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    31. Re:Wait, what? by jamar0303 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Sounds like it's time to get Canadian citizenship.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    32. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Can you point out any evidence of this or did you just put up an anti-patent rant in order to get free mod points? Well, not myself, I don't need a bunch of americans hassling me on general principles (and my experience of americans is that they would). But there are other, quite large, examples, such as peugeot. Now, americans will say "oh, but peugeots were rubbish". Well, no, they're not, not when they're not trying to deal with american auto-industry patent protectionism.

      every country in Europe, Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan all had patents and patent laws too. Indeed, they're just not quite as fucking stupid (asians have use-it-or-lose-it laws for patents, not just trademarks, and europeans have a higher hurdle for patentability and competition authorities with some teeth).
    33. Re:Wait, what? by jamar0303 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nearly every cellphone sold in Japan has the English language included. The only localization that needs to be done is switching out the OneSeg TV tuner (for TV-capable models) for a US/Europe-based digital tuner, and switching out the FeliCa RFID chip for whatever the US/Europe uses (and for HK/Singapore, which uses FeliCa already, it's just a matter of creating the application to tell the phone how to respond to their specific readers). On the other hand, Japan is behind in service a bit- only 2 providers offer unlimited M2M (and on one, unlimited M2M is a separate service plan so you can't buy a minute package and then M2M), Softbank and Willcom. Willcom is also the only provider in Japan with rollover.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    34. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      When you say America, what are you saying? I am american; I live in Argentina.

    35. Re:Wait, what? by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Yep- I see that a lot, living in Shanghai. People like to show off their cellphones, and unlocked gray-market models are commonplace (particularly the Sharp 903).

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    36. Re:Wait, what? by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Actually, everything works except for RFID, and that's because there's no standardization of contactless cards in the US.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    37. Re:Wait, what? by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Japan's on NTSC, so no worry of that.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    38. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not the lawyers, it's big corporations they work for and their other guns-for-hire, politicians.

      it's really ironic. if you were to ask washington why they won't let in alot of foreign goods, they would tell you 'it's not good for the American people'. why is it not good? 'it hurts American businesses' how does that hurt the American people? 'well, it hurts the economy'...

      i don't think they even realize they've been seduced by the dark side. they think that protecting corporate IP protects the American people because these corporations have been whispering in their ears and rubbing a big wad in their pockets for so long. think about how stimulated the economy would be if there was no such thing as IP? my neighbor invents something and starts a business. i get wind of it and realize i can make an improvement on his widget. i start a business. if i become more successful than my neighbor and his business declines, i buy him out or employ him after his business dissolves. if he learns my 'secret' he sends me out of business...unless i offer better service. it's called competition or free-enterprise.

    39. Re:Wait, what? by cashman73 · · Score: 1
      if you were to ask washington why they won't let in alot of foreign goods, they would tell you 'it's not good for the American people'. why is it not good? 'it hurts American businesses' how does that hurt the American people? 'well, it hurts the economy'...

      Hasn't seemed to be a problem for Wal-Mart and China, yet?

    40. Re:Wait, what? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Though they're recently finally getting a taste of their own medicine, Qualcomm is quite notorious for squatting on US patents, and using them to extort tribute from foreign competitors. And don't forget unisys and the GIFs.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    41. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >When you say America, what are you saying? I am american; I live in Argentina.

      Sorry, Dude - nobody's gonna rise to answer the troll... better luck next time!

    42. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You should let them buy you a new keyboard. If your keyboard is operating properly, you should let them pay for remedial English classes.

      If neither of those help, then the problem is most likely genetic - ask them to pay for your vasectomy; the rest of the human race will be grateful.

    43. Re:Wait, what? by glittalogik · · Score: 1

      ...I hate you, so much.

      For anyone who's wondering, go here. It'll change your life. No, really.

      So as not to be completely offtopic, I will say this: American mobile phone providers are *evil* - between patchy coverage, ridiculous fees, vendor lock-in, and horrible customer service, it's almost not worth the bother. The iPhone drama, as much as it's riding the "cool tech" bandwagon to make it into the news, seems to be just the tip of the iceberg.

      I've been with Vodafone Australia for a few years now, and I love them. $80/mo for up to $550 worth of voice/text/data? Check. Unlocking branded handsets? All you need to do is fill in a freaking web form. Charges for receiving calls? Hell no! Customer service? Awesome, never had a problem. Number portability? I've had the same one for 8 years with 3 different carriers, doesn't matter where I am in the country.

      That, combined with better national coverage in a country with more land area than the lower 48 and less than a tenth of the population. Plus we're close enough to Asia that if we want new tech that isn't sold here, half the time we don't even get charged for shipping =)

    44. Re:Wait, what? by eganloo · · Score: 1

      What do you mean, can't get here? This is the post-globalist age, ffs. From TFA:

      But, that doesn't stop us from drooling over and paying for imports of new gizmos from the other side of the world.


      I'm not usually one to rag on the editors for shitty or misleading summaries, but that one was completely pointless.


      Can you get reception on a Japanese cell phone in America? How about getting reception for that Japanese computer with built-in TV tuner in America?

      The converse is true as well. Can you get visual voice mail on an iPhone in Asia? As the TFA points out, even if one gets their hands on these gadgets in America, some of their features won't survive the trip abroad.
    45. Re:Wait, what? by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      Hey, but while we're on the subject, think about what would happen if we imported a ton of cheap food from other countries. Especially staple crops that we can grow here. I'll tell you, it would put the farmers in the US out of business. Then if we ever went to war with a foreign power or they wanted to control our country they would be able to control our food supply. There are other things that we need to be able to produce within the US that are not actually cost-effective, like metal and lumber. If we allowed unfettered imports of materials from other countries we would kill our own production.

      As for your IP example, if you get wind of your neighbors invention and he's registered a patent, you can then register another patent covering your improvement to his invention and profit from that.

      The reason we have a patent and copyright system in place is to encourage people to share their ideas freely while still being able to profit from them. We shouldn't dissolve this system as patents catalogue innovation. We should reduce the term of patents to something that's actually sensible.

      --
      SRSLY.
    46. Re:Wait, what? by Des+Herriott · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because you dealt with a couple of idiot customers, you now think that the entire american population are a bunch of impossible-to-satisfy, rude customers?

      I'm sure you're not all rude, but I'd say the general level of customer politeness in the US is pretty low compared with other parts of the world.

      I was on holiday in Breckenridge, Colorado a few years back - one day when grabbing lunch from a stall I was told by the guy behind the counter that I was first person of the entire day to actually say "please" when ordering my meal. But that's just basic politeness as far as I'm concerned. Politeness costs nothing and makes everyone happier.

      On the other hand I have some American friends who think that the level of customer service here in the UK is really poor, since we don't have such a "customer is always right" attitude here.

      Guess it's just a cultural thing...

    47. Re:Wait, what? by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Well, when all you hear in this country is "USA #1" and "God bless America" and other such nonsense, can you blame him?
      I just came back to USA after 2 weeks in my European home country and in many ways, it was like going back to a third world country. As much as I love USA, there is no doubt it is socially a third world country. And when you see how much religion is part of the ongoing election campaign and the school system, it's no wonder USA is losing it's technological grip either. US kids are falling behind the rest of the first world kids in all areas because of lack of education funding and because idiots are destroying science education because it dares teach things that are contrary to some 2000+ year old goat herder and camel driver scifi book.

      In 20 to 30 years time, USA will no longer be considered a technological country or innovator but a theocratic country with innovation on par with the Islamic world. It's sad!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    48. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of bring anti-semitic, maybe you should just learn how to wash a car.

    49. Re:Wait, what? by MikeTheMan · · Score: 1

      I'm an American, and I can't say that the people I associate with are actually like this. I can see it happening though; there are a lot of assholes here.

      Your phone experiences sound like something straight out of a movie where people don't say "hi" or "bye," which always seemed strange to me. I just figured it was a movie thing, and people didn't actually act like that. Apparently I shouldn't be so optimistic ;)

    50. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asshole troll.

      "Americans include everybody on the north and south American continent"

      Response: "OMG I don't want to be included with those redneck cowboys in the US!"

      "Americans are just the U.S and the rest are referred to by the names of their countries."

      Response: "OMG I'm living in "America" why don't Argentinians get included?"

    51. Re:Wait, what? by Bud+Dickman · · Score: 1

      The U.S. is actually pretty big and the population is fairly diverse. Is your entire post based on anecdotal evidence that you've gathered in your travels?

    52. Re:Wait, what? by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Strangely a friend of mine owns a business in the US and has the exact same issues with people from everywhere else in the world (though they seem to add claiming the item was never received while the delivery service swears it was and get their banks to take back the money they paid, which lead to my friend no longer dealing with customers outside the US).

      That said, I rarely get emails that start with 'hello' except for my own... Most people seem to treat email differently from letters or memos in that way.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    53. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for your explanation, and it sheds good light on some of the things I mentioned in the post to which you replied. I don't wish to imply that Americans are all jerks, because it's not true. I certainly have a long list of dealings with American clients in which everything went smoothly to plan. Perhaps you're right about the accent inferiority, though, as I always get a sense that Americans who contact me are doing so ready to fight. If I sense that there's a communication problem, I do try to speak more "objectively correctly" to minimize the accent, but maybe that creates its own problem because I'm now speaking more slowly and enunciating more deliberately---it's probably condescending. Interesting...

      In any case, I'll keep your points in mind. Thanks again.

    54. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the EU isn't actually much better, and in many situations is much worse? There is a reason that many libel suits get prosecuted in the UK instead of the US, and recently we see Universal Edition sending cease and desist letters to the IMSLP in Canada(you aren't safe in Canada). If I want to sell electronics to people in the EU, now I have to worry about RoHS, and can't even use solder with lead in it! Sitting in the EU and doing business with only other EUians doesn't seem to keep you safe from lawsuits or draconian government restrictions from what I have seen.

    55. Re:Wait, what? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      And that scares the shit out of me.

      For all the racial propaganda they spread about Iran or N.Korea or whoever being a potential terrorist threat to the rest of the planet, only the USian government is both capable of that and insane enough to go through with it.

    56. Re:Wait, what? by Libertarian001 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm the guy you're talking about, asshole. So what if my son ran a knife through his gizmo; you need to replace it. For free. Including shipping.

      There, now your statement is true and not a complete fabrication. Nice job stereotyping all Americans that way. Asshole. Goodbye.

    57. Re:Wait, what? by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      You send emails to yourself?

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    58. Re:Wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plural word for "anecdote" is not data, it's "life experience", friend.

      While it would be all swell if everyone could stop being prejudiced based on their own experience, and live a preconception-free life, most people don't because prejudice, preconceptions and stereotypes *work*.

      They sometimes work by changing your perceptions to fit those templates, but often they are actually correct (for the most part, YMMV etc).

      I for one am aware that the same mechanics in my brain that makes me assume that the sun will rise and shine every morning are the same mechanics that predisposes me to divide people up in categories. I assume instinctively that if one person of category A treats me like crap then other persons of the same category will do so.
      Overriding this programming is possible, and certainly needful from time to time, but it's mostly useful programming which allows me to filter out background noise and concentrate on what I find important instead of treating every new anecdotal experience as a individual and unique snowflake.

      I'm sure that the GP is not assuming that all Americans are bad customers, just the ones that interact with him. This is a reasonable assumption for him to go on since that kind of American customer seems to be what he has experienced - which may be influenced by what he's selling, of course.

    59. Re:Wait, what? by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Well as the admin, in fact I sometimes do... Since I'm in several email groups that I often have to send messages to... I don't think that's to weird... It's not like I'm sending email directly to myself or something...

      Though in a strange way when I had to move offices I was supposed to write a request to myself to move and connect the computers in the 'new' office... I however didn't follow procedure, bad me...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    60. Re:Wait, what? by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      Im sure you're not all rude, but I'd say the general level of customer politeness in the US is pretty low compared with other parts of the world. that is incredibly untrue - firstly take a look at a world map for a minute and realize how big the US is- now compare it to the UK and think for a second how you and poland have the same culture right? well think again. I live in the bay area in california and I can say for a fact that the culture here is alien to what I saw this summer traveling in georgia and maine and new york and florida- seriously it was like another world- saying that all americans are like "X" is like saying that all black people are like "X" or all arabs are like "X"
  2. Flying Cars? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    Or even just a flying jet-powered motorcycle? Anyone? I'm looking at you Japan.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Flying Cars? by rhombic · · Score: 1

      You'd do better looking at Battlestar Galactica

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    2. Re:Flying Cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you're olde skool. I thought I was the only one.

    3. Re:Flying Cars? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      Which is exactly what I imagining! Nice.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    4. Re:Flying Cars? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Galactica 1980 was just a bad dream. It was a hoax posted to youtube. Much like Highlander II and Rocky V, it was never actually produced. /denial

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  3. it's for a reason by User+956 · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the Thanko MP4 watch to Sony's OLED TV, these are the hottest new gadgets to drool over, that you can't get here.

    They *need* cutting-edge displays like that to keep up with the continuing advances in tentacle hentai technology.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:it's for a reason by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      They probably don't sell those here because it's $1700 for an 11 inch television. That's an order of magnitude more money for something half the size of my computer monitor.

      --
      SRSLY.
  4. This is news? by mycroft822 · · Score: 1

    Yea, this is pretty well known amongst us nerds...

  5. Does not include vehicles by justfred · · Score: 1

    Personally I'd rather be able to buy a new Land Rover Defender, or better, import a 10-year old used one. Most of the devices on the list are easy enough to smuggle in.

    1. Re:Does not include vehicles by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Land Rover Defenders were sold in the U.S. from 1993-1997, so you should be able to pick one up on the off of used car lot. I just saw a 1997 on Ebay Motors for about $35K.

    2. Re:Does not include vehicles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Personally I'd rather be able to...import a 10-year old


      Fuck you, pervert. You're the kind of fuck that would photoshop-swirl your face, aren't you.

    3. Re:Does not include vehicles by justfred · · Score: 1

      Precisely; in the UK they're closer to $5k.

    4. Re:Does not include vehicles by justfred · · Score: 1

      ...and you can't get 110s or 130s (not to mention 101s) at all.

      Seriously, private car importation rules for the US are absurd. The DOT wants you to replace all the glass, and then bring in two extras just for crash testing.

    5. Re:Does not include vehicles by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Hint: Even a '97 BMW M3 will cost you a lot less, and I wouldn't put a Land Rover above an M3.

    6. Re:Does not include vehicles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said 10 year old used one, it's only pedophilia if they are virgins. You insensitive clod.

    7. Re:Does not include vehicles by justfred · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seeing as how I occasionally drive through mud puddles higher than the door tops of an M3, I put it somewhat above.

      Of course there are plenty of eurosport vehicles that also qualify for the "can't get in the US", I'm into the militutilitary flavors.

    8. Re:Does not include vehicles by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      Vehicle import laws in Canada are pretty protectionist too, though our exemption for private imports is "only" 15 years. Once landed, it's not difficult to register and license just about anything.

      We currently have a lot of early 1990s Japanese imports running around B.C. Hell, I bought one myself (1992 Mitsubishi Delica, a 4x4 diesel minivan). The Authorities are certain something is terribly wrong with the situation, but can't quite figure out what, no matter how much money the car dealers give them to come up with something. Import enthusiasts are dead set against any change to the law, unless it involves lowering or abolishing the age limit.

      ...laura

    9. Re:Does not include vehicles by rs79 · · Score: 1

      I have in my barn 4 old german cars I brought up from the states. Importing a vehicle 15 yrs old or older is trivially simple. You drive it up, show them the bill of sale and registration then pay the GST and $100 more if is has A/C (working ot not, installed or not). Then you drive away ands you have no hassles from the local registration authority even if it's something weird like a 5 cyl diesel.

      Notes and links here

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    10. Re:Does not include vehicles by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      The Japanese imports come over on car ferry ships with shipments of new cars (mine came this way), or get put in to containers. I don't know what the details are for cars across the Atlantic.

      The Feds make sure the paperwork is in order, including de-registration from the country of origin (depends on the country; required for Japan). They verify the date of manufacture (15 years is 15 years, to the day), make sure there is no dirt or foreign plants on the car, collect GST like any other item at the border, then the car is yours. It really is that easy.

      Registration and licensing in B.C. means passing an out-of-province vehicle inspection This includes things like headlights, tires, and so on, which must be both serviceable and have all the correct DOT/SAE approvals (a minor concern for most Japanese stuff). Some vehicles need extra reflectors and things, and many need daytime running lights. RHD vehicles need headlights that dip to the right on low beam for driving on the right side of the road. In the case of the Delica this means headlights from the European version Mitsubishi L300 commercial van. They come with speedometers in kilometers, which is one less thing to do.

      I also got the owner's manual, dealer service history and Shaken reports. All in Japanese, of course, but I can still look at the pictures. The owner's manual is in a very distinctive anime style. :-)

      ...laura

    11. Re:Does not include vehicles by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The bizzare coincidence is a coworker got one yesterday. He put the order in late last year and the dealer had it imported to Australia. Why can't people in the USA do the same thing? Are there government restrictions on vehicle imports or is it a Republican objection to allow the same vehicle the Queen of England drives into the country :)

    12. Re:Does not include vehicles by rs79 · · Score: 1

      " They come with speedometers in kilometers, which is one less thing to do. "

      That's only for cars less than 15 yrs old. In fact all that stuff about tires and headlights is too. For older cars they only car if it was built with A/C. Newer cars have a bunch of hurles to climb, about $800 worth.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    13. Re:Does not include vehicles by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't live in B.C. :-)

      They have gotten really strict about tires and headlights and things lately. Possibly stricter than they need to be, but if you want to register and license your prize here, you have to play by their rules.

      ...laura

    14. Re:Does not include vehicles by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but $35K for a 10 year old rust bucket?

    15. Re:Does not include vehicles by justfred · · Score: 1

      Hence my point about not being able to get them used from the UK where they're less than $10K, and the models I want (110 pickup, specifically) that were never offered in the US.

      Apologist (off-road and off-topic):

      0. $35K is way too much, of course. Actually I've found them for around $20K which is still too much. But...

      1. 10 years does not a "rustbucket" make; I have restored 40 year old vehicles with no rust, because they've been driven in the West where we don't salt the roads as a matter of course, and because...

      2. Land Rover body skins are made of an aluminum ("al-yew-min-ee-yum") alloy that does not rust; the frames are anti-rust treated; and I'd pull the painted steel body cappings off and have them galvanized the way they used to be. And even if the vehicle does rust, every panel or structural member is available and fairly easily replaceable, even by an amateur like me. One of the reasons they hold their value.

      3. The few D90s that were sold here were for some bizarre reason marketed as luxury vehicles. Probably because Range Rovers sold so well to soccer moms and hiphop rappers. In the UK and the rest of the world, they're marketed as farm and utility vehicles, which is what they are. In any case, many of these were treated as garage queens, never taken off road (which is like buying your M3 and never exceeding the speed limit). Many are actually as good as new. Mileage does matter, and while all the running gear is durable and easily replaceable as well, it tends to be expensive and need service every 60K or so - service costs more but lasts longer than similar Asian 4x4s.

      4. I actually drive a Discovery, which is great, and while more comfortable and nearly as capable off-road, it doesn't have the utility (strap stuff to the roof throw stuff in the back beat the crap out of it and drive it home) of the Defenders. But at least there's documented ways to mount a carputer in a discovery, for displaying GPS topo maps.

    16. Re:Does not include vehicles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bitch

  6. For Sale, but not to YOU! by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    Yeah, years ago a mate when to Japan for a month and brought back the absolute coolest combo radio/CD player. I checked the local Sony stores and found they didn't have it. Nothing even close to as nice as the Only Japan Market model. That was about 16 years ago. Nothing new here.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:For Sale, but not to YOU! by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      The average American consumer is very much behind the average consumer in Japan or Europe.
      Just look at cars, TVs, household appliances, household/consumer tech in general, like phones etc.
      The technological advantage in the US is where decades of DoD funding created spinoffs like the semiconductor industry.

    2. Re:For Sale, but not to YOU! by uniquename72 · · Score: 0

      Agreed. In 6th grade (1985), my homeroom teacher told us about a really cool TV he had seen on a trip to Japan -- the picture looked like a photograph. They called it "high definition". 15 years later, it became all the rage in the U.S. WTF took so long?

      Similarly, the Japanese students I went to college with (early '90s) all had super-small (almost iPod-sized) minidisc players that never even made it to the States. Very cool, esp. compared to the relatively massive Walkmans the Americans all had.

      Sucks.

    3. Re:For Sale, but not to YOU! by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      although I don't disagree entirely, that is a pretty bad blanket statement...
      PS3, Xbox 360, Nintendo Wii.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  7. The US by king-manic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The US isn't always on the cutting edge of technology. I was at a Canadian librarians IT conference last week and the speech on the second day was given by a Californian librarian considered by her peers as on the cutting edge. Like getting a lecture about technology from a Luddite. Her notions of technology were a good 20 years behind everyone else in the room and a good 25 years behind the actual technology. The audience was appalled at her patronizing attempts at "friendly jabbing at Canadian self image" with down right insulting jokes and her apparent hate of her IT guys and IT in general.

    The US is a mixed bag, on average it's far behind the technology curve. It's not population density because Canada is less dense but more in touch with technology. Some areas and industries are cutting edge but the average American seems pretty low on the tech literacy totem. At least from my interactions with Americans on trips there and on visitors here.
    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    1. Re:The US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US? Lotsa dumb people here :)

    2. Re:The US by ydrol · · Score: 1

      About 4 years ago, a US visitor here (UK) was shocked to see that nearly everyone had mobile phones, even the kids and the poor people. But my favourite story is from about 12 years ago, and a US visitor was again amazed that we had microwave ovens too :) The US is so big and there is so much variety, they can afford to be a bit more insular than the rest of us I guess :)

    3. Re:The US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! Is your penis bigger than ours, too? (rolls eyes)

      Isn't Canada the country that passed an official sanction against a dog puppet?

    4. Re:The US by CodeBuster · · Score: 1, Interesting

      the average American seems pretty low on the tech literacy totem. At least from my interactions with Americans on trips there and on visitors here.

      The result of a decades long decline in the quantity (and sometimes the quality) of the mathematics, science, and technology education in the primary and secondary school systems of the United States combined with a simultaneous and increasing trend towards outsourcing science and engineering related jobs (a one two punch really). There are still gifted students of course, who succeed in spite of the broken and backwards public education system, but they tend to go into business or law (America produces a lot of lawyers and lawsuits, about 4% of GDP last I heard) instead of science or engineering related careers. How far we have fallen from the heady days of the Apollo program and the space race, where science and engineering were respected and encouraged...hell of a shame.

    5. Re:The US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I know this is a troll because I'm a lowly American but what's with all the Yank bashing on Slashdot? It's one thing to have it happen but it's another to see them constantly modded "Interesting" or "Insightful". I can't remember seeing one trolled or not modded. I know this country's administration is a pack of fascists but we also give away hundreds of billions a year to foreign countries and traditionally were the first one on the scene of a natural disaster anywhere in the world, not so much lately, see above reference to current fascist administration. I never believed in protectionism but I've begun to wonder if we show just stay home. I'm sure there'll be a cheer from some but the tune will change once there's another world war. Yes I know we're going to start it. Here's the 411 history lesson, I wouldn't bet money on it since we didn't start either of the last two and most of the war we've gotten into were cleaning up some one else's mess. Crack a history book and see if I'm right on that one.

    6. Re:The US by hyades1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have to tell you that your concern about Canadians having larger penises is true. Did you think your girlfriend was coming up here to canoe, for crap sake? It's just common sense. Canada is always so cold the well-documented Unheated Swimming Pool Effect would render us unable to breed if we didn't have bigger penises.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    7. Re:The US by fishbowl · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I would bet that there are places in the UK where people typically don't have either mobile phones or microwave ovens. There are places like that in the US too. On the other hand, "acting shocked guy" was probably having a good laugh at your expense.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    8. Re:The US by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Funny but a few years ago we had a relative from the UK come for his first visit to the US. He wanted to see Disney World, the Grand Cayon, Hollywood, New York City, and the Kenndy Space Center. They wanted to know if we thought a week would be enough time...

      The US "lagged behind" Europe in mobile phones because of the way phone service in the US is priced. Local calls which in the US tend to cover a large area are free on land lines. That is one of the big reasons that the US lagged in broadband.
      I thought it very funny that when I was in the UK that I shocked people because I knew what the battle of Trafalgar was.
      The simple fact is that the US will almost always come off looking bad when you compare what US citizens know about a country and what the people in that country know about the US. Just about everybody knows about the US. But I would bet very few people in say the UK know much about the history of Japan. Or that many Japanese know much about the politics of Norway.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:The US by Deadplant · · Score: 1

      we also give away hundreds of billions a year to foreign countries The US is very generous with their foreign aid. Props to y'all.
      However, it is not hunderds of billions/year. Bear in mind that when the US government quotes a number of dollars given for aid they choose to include the inflated costs of weapons and 'counter-insugency' training given to 'allies'.
      I only mention it because most people think of food and shelter when they hear 'aid'.

    10. Re:The US by jollyreaper · · Score: 0

      I was at a Canadian librarians IT conference last week and the speech on the second day was given by a Californian librarian considered by her peers as on the cutting edge. Like getting a lecture about technology from a Luddite. Her notions of technology were a good 20 years behind everyone else in the room and a good 25 years behind the actual technology. The audience was appalled at her patronizing attempts at "friendly jabbing at Canadian self image" with down right insulting jokes and her apparent hate of her IT guys and IT in general. Maybe they're taking their lead in tech education by studying American abstinence sex ed. "We hate the topic and want to dissuade anyone from taking an interest in it. If you have sex, you'll burn in hell. Now, what is it you wanted to know?" Through truthfully, I do have to handle some of my end users that way. "COMPUTERS EVIL!! TOUCH ONE AND YOUR IMMORTAL SOUL IS IN JEOPARDY! HERE, USE PAPER!" But that's just out of sheer self-defense.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    11. Re:The US by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      The US is so big and there is so much variety, they can afford to be a bit more insular than the rest of us I guess :) I had this dialog last night. You ask your average American where they catch their news they say Local news here, National news here. International? What's that.

      I think the opinion of the UK is tainted by films in the 80s which joked about the popularity of cable TV.
      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    12. Re:The US by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      Ironic, considering this is being discussed on a US tech-oriented website.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    13. Re:The US by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I would bet that there are places in the UK where people typically don't have either mobile phones or microwave ovens I know people who don't own microwave ovens for health reasons. But the funny thing is, they also own mobile phones.
      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    14. Re:The US by Tenareth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We don't have a military big enough to help in the next World War I'm afraid to tell you. We can barely control Iraq and it's not all that big. We also don't have the willingness to fight a war to win, and by win you pretty much have to decide to crush the opposition and clean it up later.

      I don't think you realize how tiny our military has gotten compared to 12 years ago when Clinton shutdown so many of our bases and reduced the military force.

      The next World War will probably see us on the losing side, we don't have the innovation of the 40's, we don't have the manufacturing powerhouse we did in the 40's, and we definitely don't have the willingness to defend another country anymore. Everything that made it possible for us to Kick Butt in WWII is pretty much gone.

      Of course, we might get lucky and find another Albert Einstein to import and help us out, since our scientific prowess is completely gone and our educational system is in a shambles.

      The US is the next in a long line of Countries/Empires to be on the downward slide due to complacency, ignorance, bigotry, and self-righteousness. The only way we could turn it around is if a large portion of the country finally realized how bad we have gotten, be practical and start reforming our laws and legal environment.

      Being responsible for your own actions is out of style in the US, and that creates a basic social environment of it's never our fault, so we don't have to fix anything... it's too big a problem, so why even try?

      Read a history book about what happens when a Dynasty/Empire/Country gets a little too full of itself.

      --
      This sig is the express property of someone.
    15. Re:The US by Deadplant · · Score: 1

      $65/month 20Mb/20Mb fiber Internet service (even with the very limited service area) qualifies your country as kick-ass. You may now gloat.

    16. Re:The US by jackpot777 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think you realize how tiny our military has gotten compared to 12 years ago when Clinton shutdown so many of our bases and reduced the military force.


      The number of active duty men and women in the U.S. armed forces as of Jan. 31, 2003 ... 1.4 million. link ...but numbers don't tell the whole story. People that were shown the door a decade ago are now let in without question. Timothy McVeigh had to be happy with militia membership in his day ...now he'd be on the streets of Baghdad.

      Let's not forget what the US military DID in the 1990s. Despite commentators on Fox News (and members of the Republican Party) surrendering to Milosevic and wondering how many body-bags there'd be in the former Yogoslavia, there were no combat deaths at all in Kosovo for the US. None. Nada. Zip. You get the idea. A country with multiple warring factions and we got the job done with no losses.

      Sounds like they were playing smarter, not harder, back then. Sounds like a tactic they should be using today.
      --
      Shiny. Let's be bad guys...
    17. Re:The US by cianduffy · · Score: 1

      Generally not, the piss poor need their microwaves to heat their 69p ready meal dinners from Lidl; and need their mobile phones to keep in contact with the 8 fathers of their 8 children, because even BT won't supply a landline the rental is never paid on.

      You're more likely not to have a microwave oven than not have a mobile phone if you're not broke, though.

    18. Re:The US by sexyrexy · · Score: 1

      We don't have a military big enough to help in the next World War I'm afraid to tell you. We can barely control Iraq

      Who else could? It's all relative. The US might not have millions of fighting men ready to go or the infrastructure to pump out dozens of battleships a month, but every other "world power" has seen their military prowess decreased at a far greater proportion than the US over the same period of time.

      There is a big difference between attacking and holding a country that you don't understand, in a part of the world most of your citizenry hates, and being alone while you do it; versus defending your way of life (in the US's case, the western way of life, which includes the US, Europe, Japan, Korea) on a global scale. Most modern war machines, and the US in particular, are quite well suited to the latter, regardless of failures in the former.

      One other thing to consider that plays to the US' advantage in a WW-style conflict - we live in an age where our government knows everything. And if not everything, a damn lot. In civil situations, this sucks pretty bad. In situations where it's actually used where it's supposed to be - watching enemy countries - it's great. No one can prepare a secret army and surprise-invade Poland. Every NATO country would be watching this secret army in real-time from an HD video satellite. Everyone posting on this forum will be long dead before the US or western nations in general fall to anything.

      --

      Rex is 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    19. Re:The US by ContractualObligatio · · Score: 1

      "The simple fact is that the US will almost always come off looking bad when you compare what US citizens know about a country and what the people in that country know about the US."

      Very true. But isn't doesn't the rather absurd comparison of Norwegian knowledge of Japanese history form a strawman argument? The US tends to come off looking bad without any comparison to other countries e.g. proportion of passport holders, percentage of people able to locate the countries they're currently invading on a world map. Such measures do not rely on a population's knowledge of randomly selected foreign countries.

      "I thought it very funny that when I was in the UK that I shocked people because I knew what the battle of Trafalgar was."

      Because you're smug about being an exception? Charming. Do you mean to imply disdain for your fellow Americans that haven't managed to impress people with their knowledge? Are all your impressions of other countries based on things where you can laugh at another's expense?

      Americans are often surprised to find out I've spent time at Columbia University (I'm a Scot working in London), and why shouldn't they be? But I wouldn't so condescending as to say they were shocked. Nor do I find it funny that I have more knowledge of their country than they might expect of a Brit. That would mean looking down either on Americans for their assumptions about me, or on Brits for not knowing more about the US.

    20. Re:The US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      International? What's that. That's because nothing of importance ever happens outside of America, duh! /ducks
    21. Re:The US by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      Timothy McVeigh had to be happy with militia membership in his day ...now he'd be on the streets of Baghdad.


      McVeigh served in the US Military and was awarded the the Bronze Star during his service in the Gulf War. He went wacko after he left the Military.

      Let's not forget what the US military DID in the 1990s. Despite commentators on Fox News (and members of the Republican Party) surrendering to Milosevic and wondering how many body-bags there'd be in the former Yogoslavia, there were no combat deaths at all in Kosovo for the US. None. Nada. Zip. You get the idea. A country with multiple warring factions and we got the job done with no losses.


      The US should increase Military spending and should concentrate on bulking up air power because after all the caterwauling over Iraq, the next war will be a bomb fest.
      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    22. Re:The US by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      I think one of the things that helps Canadians embrace technology is that we have a low density on average, and we have relatively few highly dense population centres. It gives us the ability to roll out new tech infrastructure to a majority of people with little wasted lines. Also, you can connect the denser areas in fairly direct lines, with maybe 5 branches. Here's a map that will give you an idea. This is an ideal situation for fibre. And given how spread-out the population centres are, it supports our economy to have those population centres connected by technology. There's nothing like money to give the government and business a reason to do something.
      All this leads to huge penetration with e-banking, ATM density, interac usage, and other technologies that fall directly into the average person's lap.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    23. Re:The US by jackpot777 · · Score: 1

      McVeigh served in the US Military and was awarded the the Bronze Star during his service in the Gulf War. He went wacko after he left the Military.


      Right you are. His story makes for interesting reading, and there's the obligitory part about how he kept himself to himself. Always a red flag.

      The US should increase Military spending and should concentrate on bulking up air power because after all the caterwauling over Iraq, the next war will be a bomb fest.


      Bush reckons the bombs will be of one type only. Which makes you wonder why he's pushing for a missile shield when the cheerleaders are leaning more towards a James Bond-esque suitcase nuke.

      Whatever gets people (that are in far more danger of natural disasters) afraid, I guess. Whatever gets 'em scared.
      --
      Shiny. Let's be bad guys...
    24. Re:The US by Bruiser80 · · Score: 1

      "The next World War will probably see us on the losing side, we don't have the innovation of the 40's, we don't have the manufacturing powerhouse we did in the 40's, and we definitely don't have the willingness to defend another country anymore. Everything that made it possible for us to Kick Butt in WWII is pretty much gone." I think one of the major differences between now and the 40's is information - if the entire US had the same access to information we have now, I don't know if support for the war would be as great. Back then, thousands of men were dying and the losses weren't hitting home. With the lack of information, the government (through the news organizations) can gain massive support. The mass majority of the country was behind the war - working, producing, fighting, sacrificing. If you can get that level of sacrifice from most of today's population, you could wage another war on the scale of WWII. It would require a draft though - a chilling thought for those not inclined to fight. It's comforting to know that all the conflicts and wars since Vietnam have been fought without using the draft.

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in the mud. After a while, you realize the engineer enjoys it.
    25. Re:The US by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Because you're smug about being an exception? Charming."
      Not really I was shocked because a large number of people that I know from the US would know it also. I found it interesting that people in the UK had a preconceived idea that an American wouldn't know what the battle of Trafalgar was. I would be willing go guess that a large number of people in the EU wouldn't have a clue about the battle of Mobile Bay or the battle of the Alamo. History isn't everybody's thing.
      And no my comment about someone from Norway not knowing Japanese history is just a statment of fact. The current economic, social, and political climate has elevated the importance of the US. So the history or politics of say Norway is no more important to the average US citizen than the History and or politics of Japan is to the typical person in Norway. All of your examples of why you look down on Americans show a real lack of understanding. You would point at a map of Europe and smirk because a US citizen couldn't point to Scotland and feel superior because you could point to the US and Scotland. But odds are on the same map you couldn't find Costa Rica or Chad or some country. Very few people can pick out EVERY country on a map. But just about everyone can pick out the US and their country.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    26. Re:The US by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Ironic, considering this is being discussed on a US tech-oriented website. Thats why I described it as a mixed bag, you have little islands of massive technical compitence and intelligence intermixed between oceans of other. You can't tell me that the average slashdotter is representative of your average American.
      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    27. Re:The US by gangien · · Score: 1

      The simple fact is that the US will almost always come off looking bad when you compare what US citizens know about a country and what the people in that country know about the US. Just about everybody knows about the US. But I would bet very few people in say the UK know much about the history of Japan. Or that many Japanese know much about the politics of Norway.

      You know, I once read a post by a Canadian criticizing the US because none of us know much about Canada. Which is probably accurate, but i conducted an informal survey asking Canadians who the US president is, and who the Canadian Prime Minister is. I think the tally was, 8 out of 10 didn't know who their own prime minister was. They all knew who the US President was though.

    28. Re:The US by gangien · · Score: 2, Funny

      But just about everyone can pick out the US and their country.

      Except of course U.S. Americans.

    29. Re:The US by mchale · · Score: 1

      "percentage of people able to locate the countries they're currently invading on a world map."

      I think most Americans can do that. It's pretty easy to locate the US on a map or globe, then color in everything outside the continental US as "area we're invading".

      (Alaska and Hawaii get classified as 'collateral damage'.)

    30. Re:The US by ffflala · · Score: 1

      I assume you're speaking of Donna Purvis and the Libraries without Borders conference in Ontario last week. As a California law librarian myself, I am one of her regional peers. I do not know where you may have received the information that she is considered "on the cutting edge" but that is simply not accurate as to how she is regarded by her peers. Purvis may be an accomplished manager, but is certainly not known as any sort of a tech whiz. Sometimes managerial and people skills can provide opportunities to thoroughly demonstrate your tech incompetence to a skilled audience.

      Your conclusions may (or may not) be accurate, but it is certainly inaccurate to generalize from interactions with librarians --particularly those attending library/IT conferences. In my experience, librarians in general are as fluent with technology as, say, teachers in public schools. A few are very much so, most of them about as fluent as an average Dell customer, and an unfortunately large portion are absolute luddites.

      I had one once tell me in absolute seriousness that, if I were having problems with a certain catalog link, I may need to "click harder". She then demonstrated that she in fact meant, press harder on the mouse button. This librarian had previously been in charge of the purchase of an ILS for a the library for an certain branch of the state government, and was subsequently put in charge of the development said library's web site. Sigh.

      (BTW -- I'm sorry to hear of the condescending nationality slights. Raised very near the Canadian border, my accent is often mistaken for a Canadian one, and I've been the object of boorish behavior on occasion, only and always from fellow US citizens. Bigotry corresponds positively to a limited intellect.)

    31. Re:The US by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Funny but a few years ago we had a relative from the UK come for his first visit to the US. He wanted to see Disney World, the Grand Cayon, Hollywood, New York City, and the Kenndy Space Center. They wanted to know if we thought a week would be enough time...

      I don't think any of us UKians really appreciate the size of the USA until we've watched it grind by through an airplane window or discovered that, if you fly from London to California, when you cross the N American coast you're not even half way there. Even when you're on the ground everything is three times as far apart as you think it should be (usually when your legs are giving out about halfway to that place that you were sure was about 10 minutes walk away when you saw it from the car).

      This is because the Americans can't cope with the frankly ludicrous size of their country so they deliberately build all their cars, houses, trains and teenagers to 150% scale so that the land looks smaller than it really is (especially when seen on TV).

      However, the stereotypical perception of USAians of the UK - that every city that anybody has ever heard of (including Edinburgh) is basically a suburb of London is forgivable in the light of the iconic London Tube Map which is only topologically accurate and exaggerates the distance between the central London stations - so once you've found out that it is invariably quicker to walk from Kings Cross to Euston its easy to mistakenly extrapolate that (e.g.) Nottingham must be a 20 minute bus ride.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    32. Re:The US by king-manic · · Score: 1

      I assume you're speaking of Donna Purvis and the Libraries without Borders conference in Ontario last week. As a California law librarian myself, I am one of her regional peers. I do not know where you may have received the information that she is considered "on the cutting edge" but that is simply not accurate as to how she is regarded by her peers. Purvis may be an accomplished manager, but is certainly not known as any sort of a tech whiz. Sometimes managerial and people skills can provide opportunities to thoroughly demonstrate your tech incompetence to a skilled audience. Actually it was another person at a conference in Calgary. I'm too polite to name names but you probably have a good idea who. In her defense all of her good points were poached the night before by the keynote speaker. But she still came off boorish and a bit behind. Oddly I work for a law library as well. Small world. Over here I've been surprised at how in touch with technology my particular organization is and of savvy many of the people at the conference were.
      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    33. Re:The US by king-manic · · Score: 1

      It's worth mentioning that the person to poached all of this Californian librarians good points was an American librarian from Illinois.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    34. Re:The US by grumling · · Score: 1
      Except that a true world war, like the all out win-no-matter-what type war that happened in the 1940's would by necessity lead to a nuclear option fairly quickly if the US got involved. Sure, it sucks to think of such a thing, but if the commander in chief had to choose between a long, drawn out battle lasting for years (likely decades now, given the level of mechanization and increasing automation), or nuking a few dozen cities, it becomes a no-brainer. Most countries of the world want nothing to do with nuclear weapons for that very reason.

      Remember, the US was the only country on Earth to use nuclear weapons against an enemy. At the time, it was justified by the example of the carpet bombing in Europe and all the losses incurred during the fight in the Pacific. I don't know if that is a good enough reason, but that case could be made again.

      And FYI Clinton reduced the size of the military and increased the size of military contractors (mercenaries) like Blackwater. Remember this when you vote for his wife.

      Finally, people have been complaining about the lack of education in this country for ages. Sure, the unwashed masses may not know anything, but most revolutionary devices come from individuals, not groups. In fact, groups do more to destroy good ideas than anything else, mostly because the group can't see the vision of the individual.

      Examples include (in no order other than my thought process):
      • Apple ][ computer
      • PONG
      • Mass produced automobile/adapting line to manufacturing.
      • interchangeable parts for guns
      • Newtonian Physics
      • Calculus
      • World Wide Web
      • Modern helo-centric solar system

      At the time of these inventions and ideas, the world was somewhat stable, people had enough to eat, and art and leisure were considered important (renaissance, age of exploration, early US history, 1970s, late 1980s/early 1990s). If you told someone in the early 1990s that there would be software that would display information electronically with as rich an experience as a magazine, they would have said you were crazy (well, maybe not, but nothing existed outside the lab). Sure, AOL had graphics that you had to download every few weeks, but nothing like inline graphics. Then one guy made the protocol and another guy made the browser. Why didn't someone at IBM or DEC come up with it? How about someone at SUN or HP? Because they don't want individuals who are innovative, they want people who can play well with others. I don't think you can have both. But, luckily for business, our educational system produces lots of people who fit their mold every year. It also produces a few people who can fight the system and do their own thing. Wonderful thing, democracy.
      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    35. Re:The US by ffflala · · Score: 1

      Well obviously I'm not too polite to name names, but will stop guessing. It's encouraging to hear of a savvy law library operation, and I've certainly encountered many myself.

      Frankly I think a lot of the tech knowledge lag I've encountered in librarians is generational. That is, it is type of cynicism developed after a decade or two of wasting time and resources on overly-hyped tech developments that fizzled after a few short years.

      An understandable reaction, especially if it has negatively affected an organization's budget, but I think that this can result/has resulted in professionals disregarding essential technologies along with the chaff.

    36. Re:The US by dkf · · Score: 1

      I don't think any of us UKians really appreciate the size of the USA until we've watched it grind by through an airplane window or discovered that, if you fly from London to California, when you cross the N American coast you're not even half way there. Speaking as someone who does that journey (well, one very similar) fairly often, half way is about Baffin Island. And a good time to think about getting some sleep so that you're fit to drive at the other end. After all, northern Canada is very dull from the air (Iceland and Greenland are much more interesting...)
      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    37. Re:The US by initialE · · Score: 1

      I may be a bit out of touch so please answer me this. Does the average poor guy in the US have a mobile phone? They do here (Singapore), it's considered essential to modern living.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    38. Re:The US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least the US has plenty of Jesus-based spiritual technology.

    39. Re:The US by the_arrow · · Score: 1

      Actually I see some common points between the roman empire and the US. The most obvious is an upper/ruling class that has distanced itself so far from the rest of the people that it can not see any need beyond their own.

      At least the US government is still selected by election and not poisoning. On the other hand, the romans could probably throw a hell of a party.

      --
      / The Arrow
      "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
    40. Re:The US by rs79 · · Score: 1

      " About 4 years ago, a US visitor here (UK) was shocked to see that nearly everyone had mobile phones"

      The US is far from homogenious. A decade ago I was flying all over the US and cel phone usage was about the same as Toronto, my home base at the time. The sight of the odd person holding a cel and talking into it was not uncommon.

      So like, I fly to San Fransisco and again, this is 1997, get off the plane and walk through the concourse. I see a guy talking, apparantly to himself with a blank stare like he was here but not really here if you know what I mean.

      Then I notice they're all doing it. Holy shit! Zombies!

      Turns out they were just early adopters of cel phone headsets and they'd achieved near ubiquity at least at SFO. I'd never seeen these before.

      The crab cocktail and sourdough bread soothed my jangled nerves in the land of blue suited zombies that afternoon.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    41. Re:The US by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Funny when I went to the UK I found that I really liked London. I hope that I can go back some time and see more of the country. You see I have flown across the US many times. To me those are the good flight since they are just long enough to get in a good nap :) Now a Long flight is from South FL to Hawaii. That took forever and when you get their they look like freaking rocks in the middle of the ocean! They are so tiny and the ocean is so large.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    42. Re:The US by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I don't think any of us UKians really appreciate the size of the USA until we've watched it grind by through an airplane window or . . .

      . . . Americans can't cope with the frankly ludicrous size of their country so they deliberately build all their cars, houses, trains and teenagers to 150% scale so that the land looks smaller than it really is . . .


      I remember hearing a story saying that when the federal government forced the states to adopt 55 mile per hour maximum speed limits (which itself was a lesson still not understood in its implications), the governor of Texas complained that they had just made the state twice as large.

    43. Re:The US by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 1

      The US "lagged behind" Europe in mobile phones because of the way phone service in the US is priced. Not true. Land line pricing and LATA's were at best a contributing factor. The real story is that the US was out first with AMPS (analog cellular) and then there was less motivation to get digital cellular going. Europe started LATER than the US and went straight to the GSM digital standard. Standardizing GSM virtually worldwide was by far the biggest factor in European cell phone use / penetration / affordability reaching the levels that it did. Can you say "efficiencies of mass production"? It applies to cell phone towers and switches too, you know. And GSM also killed Iridium, by the way.

    44. Re:The US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...The next World War will probably see us on the losing side, we don't have the innovation of the 40's, we don't have the manufacturing powerhouse we did in the 40's, and we definitely don't have the willingness to defend another country anymore. Everything that made it possible for us to Kick Butt in WWII is pretty much gone.

      Of course, we might get lucky and find another Albert Einstein to import and help us out, since our scientific prowess is completely gone and our educational system is in a shambles...."

      Funnily enough, we were nearly on the 'wrong' side in WW2. The history books don't mention it, but Britain and Russia were seen as our two biggest enemies - Britain because of it's strangle-hold on world trade, and Russia because of Communism. We were really happy to see Britain bankrupt itself fighting alone against Russia and Germany together, and could well have joined with Germany if Britain had surrendered. Much British diplomacy was spent turning us round, and they paid a high price to do this.

      We had little or no innovation during WW2. All our 'breakthroughs' were courtesy of the British presenting us with things like radar, asdic and the jet engine, or emigree scientists like Szlizard. Our aircraft industry at the start of the war was pitiable. In fact, there have been very few inventions ever made by second or third generation Americans - most are brought in by foreigners anxious to make use of our powerhouse economy. Because that's one of the few things we do have, or rather used to have, since the growth of China...

      I don't think we'll ever be on the losing side, however. We have NEVER fought a war to defend another country - we only fight wars to win. Which means we wait, and pick the winning side to join, rather than fight for justice. As I say, that's why we were closer to fighting as allies of Germany than anyone realises.....

    45. Re:The US by kklein · · Score: 1

      I saw a presentation by a British woman on library technology not too long ago. She was ridiculously behind and had almost no grasp of statistics.

      I guess all British people are stupid.

    46. Re:The US by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      Canadian librarians IT

      Go on, just use the acronym - you know you want to...

    47. Re:The US by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, Canada's system is pretty much the same, and we didn't lag much in the broadband area. As a matter of fact, there's considerably more area to cover, and only about a tenth the population.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    48. Re:The US by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure we brits also had some form of analog mobile phone system before GSM.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    49. Re:The US by jbolden · · Score: 1

      proportion of passport holders

      And that is a very biased criteria. If an EU citizen didn't need a passport at all to freely travel within the EU you would start to have a fair comparison. Once Mexico and Canada required a passport the number of passport holders went up by millions. Yes it is the case that something like 1/2 the country doesn't want to travel abroad. But OTOH internal travel offers virtually every climate type, a huge number of different cities each with different cultural and historical objects: NY, LA, Chicago, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Washington DC, Houston, Dallas and Detroit are in the 100 largest cities in the world.

      And then you can also note that Americans take vastly less vacation. And thus leisure travel is much less important to the population.

    50. Re:The US by jbolden · · Score: 1

      There was strong US support for a war against Al Quida which attacked us. Just as there was strong support for the war against Japan. There was strong opposition to a war against Germany until the Germans declared war on the US.

    51. Re:The US by Bruiser80 · · Score: 1

      I agree that there was massive support in the war against Al Quida, and I support what's going on over there. It seems the only people that were against the war was the media, who seems to find every opportunity to report negatives in Iraq, but fails to report any of the positive aspects. I don't think that was happening in WWII - granted, the military was determining what was coming in or out of the front lines.

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in the mud. After a while, you realize the engineer enjoys it.
    52. Re:The US by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      But just about everyone can pick out the US
      I always remember it as "the bit underneath Canada."
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    53. Re:The US by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      WOW and they say that people in the US think they are the center of the world.
      "Standardizing GSM virtually worldwide"
      GSM is the standard for Europe.
      It isn't for the US, Korea, Japan, or China.
      Those seem to be some pretty big exceptions worldwide..

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    54. Re:The US by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      proportion of passport holders

      And that is a very biased criteria. If an EU citizen didn't need a passport at all to freely travel within the EU you would start to have a fair comparison. Among the following countries they don't :
      Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Switzerland, France, Germany, Greece, Finland, Italy, Luxembourg, Holland, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Norway, Iceland (not all strictly speaking part of the EU).
      By the end of the year the Czech Republic, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Malta, Slovakia, Poland and Slovenia will be added.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    55. Re:The US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US is a mixed bag, on average it's far behind the technology curve. It's not population density because Canada is less dense but more in touch with technology. Hehe, I simply LOVE the way you worded that. :)
  8. Wow, how ... by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stupid. It's a whole list of gadgets that are roughly comparable to things we already have, but these particularly ones are only available in Japan. -yawn- I'll summarize the list:

    UMPCs
    Laptops
    TVs
    Media players (including a watch with a screen guaranteed to give you eyestrain)
    Phones

    Yeah, great stuff.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    1. Re:Wow, how ... by Sqweegee · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine has that watch, the screen is actually very clear and not hard on the eyes at the 1-1.5' distance it's meant to be used at, but I only watched for about 10 min.

      It's been available here in Canada for a while via mail-order.

    2. Re:Wow, how ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      including a watch with a screen guaranteed to give you eyestrain Dad?! Is that you?
  9. Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There must be some new definition of "can't get" that I am not aware of. According to the article you can "get" all these items here in the US via specialty importers like Dynamism.

    1. Re:Odd by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      There must be some new definition of "can't get" that I am not aware of. According to the article you can "get" all these items here in the US via specialty importers like Dynamism.

      Heck, even on their websites. Not to mention that most of them are just average-looking cellphones.

  10. I guess I'm odd then by fotbr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oooh...a watch thats also a music player. Who gives a damn?

    Ooooh, and oled tv. Again, who cares?

    Most people I know don't wear digital watches, or carry music players. Then again, I don't hang around with college kids, and instead associate with people that do not live and breathe the crap put out that's considered "entertainment" these days.

    Get off my lawn! Damn kids....

    1. Re:I guess I'm odd then by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Are watches out of style? I have been wearing a watch since I was a kid, and in fact the one I'm wearing now dates back to 1993 and has only occasionally left my wrist during the day. Most of my co-workers wear watches, but I'm not exactly in the fashion industry here and we could all easily be out of touch. I know some of them have dumped their watches and just use their cellphone for time (sort of the pocketwatch for the new millennium), but that trend is hardly universal.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:I guess I'm odd then by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Most people I'm around wear analog watches, not digital ones.

    3. Re:I guess I'm odd then by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Are watches out of style?

      No, a stylish young woman I know was remarking yesterday about wanting a certain watch, and I said "why? You have a cell phone!" She just liked the design and color, it would be like a bracelet to her.

      But watches are obsolete. We have cell phones now, and they all have a clock on them. I guess iof you like redundant technology one might come in handy.

      Instead of a phone with a clock on it, I'd like to have a watch with a phone in it! Now THAT would be cool!

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    4. Re:I guess I'm odd then by Surt · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Watches are indeed out of style. A number of smaller brands have gone out of business, and there has been rumor about brands as big as rolex shutting down. The omnipresent cell phone with a clock that sets itself via network access to extreme accuracy has pretty much killed the need for most people to have a watch.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:I guess I'm odd then by nschubach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... and soon you'll have an over-the-ear cellphone that will tell you the time when you ask for it. At least that's where my money is.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    6. Re:I guess I'm odd then by residieu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A watch on your wrist is a lot more convenient for checking time than a phone (unless you're already holding the phone for some reason, and not talking on it). You're also less likely to have left it on your desk, or shut it off to conserve battery power. And my cheap phone removes the clock from the main screen if it wants to tell me instead that it has no signal (in a subway), but I'm sure there are phones that aren't that stupid.

    7. Re:I guess I'm odd then by gerbouille · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The omnipresent cell phone with a clock that sets itself via network access to extreme accuracy has pretty much killed the need for most people to have a watch.

      I don't have a watch because I need accurate time. I have a mechanical watch because:

      • it is a beautiful piece of Swiss engineering and craftsmanship,
      • it is a symbol of civilisation and ingenuity,
      • if I survive the next nuclear winter/global warming apocalypse/doomsday meteorite, it will probably be the only device still working,
      • it is the only jewel a self-respecting man can wear. :-)
      --
      This post is displayed with recycled electrons
    8. Re:I guess I'm odd then by jandrese · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it matters that the people I work with often have to go into areas where they are not allowed to bring a cellphone? When someone is setting up a secure computing space the very first thing they do is ban cellphones from the room.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    9. Re:I guess I'm odd then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wear a digital watch with an analog face you insensitive clod!
      I enjoy analog watches but without the countdown timer and alarm, i found them quite annoying.
      I liked the merging of these two styles as shown in this watch:http://media.rei.com/media/712368.jpg

    10. Re:I guess I'm odd then by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

      My phone's clock is all out of whack. It's often 20 minutes off. And the time isn't shown on the main screen. Ok, so I have an old phone...but I like wearing a watch anyway. $45 Casio from 2001 is still chugging along...which is actually more than my previous ones lasted (I got my first at age 7; 19 now).

    11. Re:I guess I'm odd then by fotbr · · Score: 1

      A watch/music player combo would most likely also be banned from those rooms as well, since it'd be considered to be portable data storage, much along the lines of, say, a USB drive.

    12. Re:I guess I'm odd then by Surt · · Score: 1

      Well, it's probably pretty unusual that your phone's clock is off, and it certainly seems likely that within two years you'll replace that phone with a new one with a working clock. The question is: when you do have a working clock on your phone, will you keep wearing a watch even though you no longer need it?

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    13. Re:I guess I'm odd then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well no one questioned that a watch/music player was worthless. But watches in general are still useful, easy to keep track of and decorative.

    14. Re:I guess I'm odd then by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to revoke your geek license until you turn in the watch. If you insist on wearing shiny objects, you may be issued a Leatherman.

    15. Re:I guess I'm odd then by rs79 · · Score: 1

      " there has been rumor about brands as big as rolex shutting down."

      Show me this rumor. It's nowhere near true. Omega in the past decade has pulled its socks up and now surpasses Rolex in every way. Cheap watches get cheaper, expensive watches get more expensive. It's never been easier to get vintage watches now as well and ebay had killed the niches and cliques that used to dabble in this stuff and make a living. All the sock drawers have been emptied and dumped onto ebay directly by their owners and the net continues to disintermediate the middle man. Dealers go hungry and watches are scare for them.

      I've been a watch freak for decades and never at any point in history that I can remember have watches been so popular now that we don't actually need them. Weird huh?

      When I wake up, strapped to my arm is a 14Kt 44 jewel MST 435 Roamer Stingray. Each of the reversing wheels has 5 ruby roller bearings. It's cool as shite but looks like just another thin gold plain dress watch. My cel does indeed tell time... wherever it is.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    16. Re:I guess I'm odd then by WMD_88 · · Score: 1

      The question is: when you do have a working clock on your phone, will you keep wearing a watch even though you no longer need it?

      Probably, out of habit. Having this watch crap out (or perhaps even just the battery) might change that, if I decide that isn't worth fixing/replacing. I'll have to let you know then. ;)
    17. Re:I guess I'm odd then by fotbr · · Score: 1

      And I never said they weren't. Just that most people I know don't wear digital watches. If they wear one at all, its usually analogue.

    18. Re:I guess I'm odd then by bensch128 · · Score: 1

      Oooh...a watch thats also a music player. Who gives a damn?

      Because It's one step closer to being dick tracy and getting the girl :)

      Cheers
      Ben

    19. Re:I guess I'm odd then by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, he can wear some shiny geek watches: http://www.tokyoflash.com/en/.

      I think my next watch purchase will be either their Barcode watch or the Twelve 5-9 L Version. I almost bought the latter when I placed my last order, but I decided I needed to save a bit of money.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    20. Re:I guess I'm odd then by Upphew · · Score: 0

      it is the only jewel a self-respecting man can wear. :-)

      Until one gets married... Oh didn't spot that self-respectin part ;)

  11. Oh, stop the lamentations... by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most of today's consumer-electronics available in US are designed and/or made elsewhere.

    That some of the stuff is not available here is not, in itself, the sign of US lagging behind, but rather that of US consumers not being interested enough for the companies to introduce these particular products here.

    If root beer is not (widely) available in Japan, it is because the Japanese don't like root beer — not because they can't afford it, or don't know where to get it.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Oh, stop the lamentations... by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 1

      it is because the Japanese don't like root beer

      It was as if I heard the lamentations of a million weeaboos, and then -- silence.

      --
      "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
    2. Re:Oh, stop the lamentations... by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      Some of the things on the list wouldn't likely be popular enough to be viable imports. The cell phones, for now, are good examples.

      But other things are kept out due to patent issues, and other sorts of regulatory absurdity. The few Cuban cigars brought into the country change hands for astronomical sums compared with what they sell for everywhere else, so the market obviously wants them.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    3. Re:Oh, stop the lamentations... by Jake73 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, and after looking at this list, I can see why. Everything on there looked like your run-of-the-mill crap. A bunch of "because we can" designs that really don't further the state of the art in tech or usability.

    4. Re:Oh, stop the lamentations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That some of the stuff is not available here is not, in itself, the sign of US lagging behind, but rather that of US consumers not being interested enough for the companies to introduce these particular products here.

      Or perhaps they don't want to worry about patent trolls and legal hustles. Or perhaps RIAA extortion issues.

    5. Re:Oh, stop the lamentations... by gillbates · · Score: 1

      If root beer is not (widely) available in Japan, it is because the Japanese don't like root beer -- not because they can't afford it, or don't know where to get it.

      And likewise, if I can't get a sub-notebook computer (think Palm Foleo form factor) here in the US, it's because joe-sixpack can't seem to find a use for it. Regardless of how much I would like to have a notebook computer with QWERTY keyboard that fits in my pocket (and doesn't cost as much as a server!), I can't get one. Palm cancelled the Foleo, and the US history of such devices is abysmal (think HP Jornada).

      The problem is that unlike beer, where I can get a good microbrew, or even brew my own (I do), I have to accept the electronics equivalent of Budweiser when it comes to technology. And the reason? Because:

      1. The effort of producing a subnotebook is beyond the resources of a single engineer working in his basement in his spare time, and,
      2. US manufacturers could care less about anything that won't sell at least a hundred million units.

      So yes, there is a US market for the cool tech the Japanese have; the problem is that Corporate America dictates what the rest of us get to buy. After all, why would you produce something that would sell a million units when, for the same engineering effort, you could sell 100 million? Why would any investor invest in a subnotebook project when the same dollars would produce much higher revenues in the PC/laptop market?

      The free market doesn't cure all ills.

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    6. Re:Oh, stop the lamentations... by 6031769 · · Score: 1

      After all, why would you produce something that would sell a million units when, for the same engineering effort, you could sell 100 million? The argument is not about the engineering effort, IMHO, because that effort has already been spent on these gadgets - they are already mass produced and for sale to the general public - just in a different country. The effort required to sell them in a new country is simply that of rejigging the marketing and translating the instruction manuals. I'm sure if a corporation thought that they could shift a million units by just translating the manual and pushing some ads, they'd do so.
      --
      Burns: We're building a casino!
      McAllister: Arrr. Give me 5 minutes.
    7. Re:Oh, stop the lamentations... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      But other things are kept out due to patent issues, and other sorts of regulatory absurdity. The few Cuban cigars brought into the country change hands for astronomical sums compared with what they sell for everywhere else, so the market obviously wants them.


      When the Cuban embargo is lifted, I expect that there will be an explosion in the sales of Cuban cigars. Mostly due to afficianados wanting to try out 'the best', and 'the forbidden'. However I would imagine that sales of such cigars would fall to the levels of every other cigar manufacturer once the novelty fades.

      It isn't so much that the market wants them, but that they hype pushes them, and the hype makes it seem like we really want them. But in reality, less people than ever are smoking, and even less smoking cigars.

      And like wine, it will become little more than a variety to be sampled, rather than some exemplar of what is 'perfect'. French wine is a good example for a similar product. Snobs will pick a region/type and declare it to be the best, a connoisseur will appreciate the differences.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    8. Re:Oh, stop the lamentations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As in free?

      Free Root!

  12. The Thanko MP4 OLED Video Watch.... by 8127972 · · Score: 2, Informative

    .... Is available at ThinkGeek.com. This watch:

    http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/watches/8e18/

    Is the same one listed in the PC Mag article:

    http://www.pcmag.com/slideshow_viewer/0,1205,l=217864&s=1562&a=217876&po=13,00.asp?p=y

    So it looks like you can get at least one of these items in the US.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:The Thanko MP4 OLED Video Watch.... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      I have one, purchased from ThinkGeek a few months ago. It's too bulky to wear daily and the watch feature shuts itself off/battery runs out after about 8 hours.

  13. Hard up for articles? by DnemoniX · · Score: 1

    Since when did a walk through of Dynamism's gadget inventory rate as a story? And not available in the US? WTF? That is exactly what Dynamism does, they are a tech importer for international product lines who also provides specialty tech support of the products that they sell.

    1. Re:Hard up for articles? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      No, I've submitted three today, the latest is a new scientist article where they say they've mapped where optimism lies in the brain. Not a slow news day, it's a "slow slashdot reader" day.

      These kids think if you can boot a computer and own an ipod it makes you a nerd.

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  14. You're wrong by G+Fab · · Score: 1

    The watch is not available at thinkgeek. Try to buy one if you don't believe me.

    This article and description are sensationalist, but the fact remains that patent law in the states is broken. It hampers innovation and keeps great products from being made or sold here.

    1. Re:You're wrong by Otter · · Score: 1
      It's out of stock until November 5th. (Perhaps due to PC Magazine featuring it in this article.) What does that have to do with patent law?

      Anyway, I can't imagine buying such a thing. Why would I possibly want a video player strapped to my wrist?

    2. Re:You're wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird cause I have one at home I got from geeks.com

      http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?invtid=MP4-NXV-WATCH-512&cat=MP3

      Please don't turn me in.

    3. Re:You're wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch tentacle porn anytime, anywhere?

    4. Re:You're wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What makes you think they aren't available? I've been using for months the one that I bought on ThinkGeek. It's a neat little video player. It's a real shame it will only play uncompressed video (the "MP4" name is quite deceptive, IMO), but that's about 0.7 GiB per hour, so you can fit one full-length movie in the standard 2 GB model. The battery lasts for about 7 hours.

      The drawbacks are that is has a non-standardly-shaped USB port and audio jack, so if somehow the cable or earbuds get damaged, the MP4 Watch becomes a paperweight. (I'm unaware of any place to buy replacement cables for it) So I think that the MP4 watch is not long for this world, at least not in its present incarnation, especially since you can now get (for the same price) the Creative Labs Rio. It is actually a better buy for a mostly-MP3-player-that-also-does-video because it has a standard USB port and audio jack.

      Personally, I'm waiting for one of these people to come out with a Rio/MP4 watch/whatever that also plays MPEG video. Even MPEG1 would be OK - just *anything* that's better than raw, uncompressed data. The video iPod doesn't suit me, but an MP4 watch that really does support MPEG-4 compression would be great.

    5. Re:You're wrong by G+Fab · · Score: 1

      the watch's in stock status has nothing to do with patent law. I was making a non sequiter observation.

      I should check the cache, but often things are "out of stock" forever, and the page is a placeholder. I was just pointing out that it's hard to find this for sale direct to the states (though of course it's going to exist.

      I could easily be wrong, of course, and this watch is available, but the fact is that there are some huge patent issues in this country that present some problems that shouldn't exist. Obvious technologies are patented, and it's a huge risk to bring the best products to market.

      Oh, and if this watch were waterproof, I would buy it for $100. Why not? 2 gigs at that resolution is a lot of DVDs. Or it would make a neat TV for my girl's doll house!

  15. US Market by BlowHole666 · · Score: 1

    I think the reason the "cool" toys are someplace else is because the American market on a whole does not care for these products. Yes a few geeks may find some of these gadgets cool but the US market on a whole does not care for it. If only 5 million people of the whole US population think the gadget is cool and of those 5 million only 250,000 would ever purchase the product; what is the point of selling it in the US? I think most companies know if you want to make it big and you have a product to sell you sell it in the US. Just like if you are a rock band and you are from another country your sales jump when you cross the pond.

    --
    I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
    1. Re:US Market by king-manic · · Score: 1

      I think most companies know if you want to make it big and you have a product to sell you sell it in the US. Just like if you are a rock band and you are from another country your sales jump when you cross the pond.

      If you want it to stay that way, don't take it for granted. The economic markers point down right now. If this trend continues you may see a day when the US isn't such a important market.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    2. Re:US Market by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      Very true. Seriously, if I am in the market for a cell phone, I want just that . . . a CELL PHONE! I'm not looking for a device that can take excellent photos (already own a dSLR), play MP3s (already have an iPod), watch TV (on a 2" screen, nonetheless?), and pick the kids up from school, cook them dinner, make sure they do their homework and tuck them in for bed,. . . Some of these devices are just a tad overkill these days,. . .

    3. Re:US Market by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Economic markers are down? Which ones are in a long term downward trend relative to Europe and Japan?

  16. Are these really that unique? by el_munkie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nine of the sixteen were just cell phones that had pretty standard variations on the normal designs of any recent cell phone. None were remarkable or any more desirable than an iPhone in terms of function or design.

    Some of the UMPCs were nice, but again, aside from the addition of colors, none were significantly better than what can be obtained here.

  17. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by sm62704 · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    It's very unslashdottish of me (I must be new here) but I actually RTFA for once. And there were only two things I can't get. One is a "Kohjinsha SH8 Series UMPC". They didn't bother defining their acronyms so I have no clue what a UMPC is so it gets a big yawn from me.

    The next is from Sony. Er, Sony? No thanks, I don't need another rootkit. They day they rooted my computer was the day I decided to never ever EVAR buy another Sony ANYTHING.

    I see a link to another article "20 of the best tech gadgets you won't find in the U.S.". It says they include:
    • HTC Touch Dual, WTF is it? Who knows? Who cares?
    • Kenwood HD10GB7 - I assume this is a stereo. I can buy a stereo here, thanks.
    • Motorola Z8, again what IS it? Isn't Motorola a US company? I bet it's a cell phone, and yes, I can get cell phones here. In fact I have one in my pocket.
    • Sony XEL-1 OLED TV. As I said, 1) Sony can shit and fall back in it and 2) I can buy TVs here too. There's one in my living room.
    • LG Prada, I swore off them too; not for being pure evil like Sony but for selling me the buggiest piece of shit I ever bought, and sending me an even buggier one when I sent it back under warrantee. Whatever it is, I bet I can find one from another manufacturer here, too, and its competitor's model might actually function.
    • Nokia N76, do they sell anything but telephones? Already have one, thanks.
    • Raon Everun, they've almost got me clicking the link, WTF is an "everun", some sort of perpetual motion machine? If it wasn't for that pesky 2nd law of thermodynamics I'd be interested, can't congress repeal that?
    • Samsung i450, is that a phone, TV, or stereo?
    • Ok, that's enough... I clicked, they got me. What do I see? Pictures of ordinary crap like phones, TV sets, and laptops that you CAN buy here.
    What's that old saying? Lets see, in soviet russia, website scams YOU? No, that's not right. Beowolf cluster of... nope, that's not it eiather. Uh...
    1) publish web page full of ads with link to another page
    2) have that page full of ads with even more links (pictures only)
    3) ???????
    4) PROFIT!!!!!

    Oh wait, it's that other thing, nothing to see here, move along!

    -mcgrew
    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  18. its not here because we wouldn't buy it by deftones_325 · · Score: 0

    The market and business majors have done thier jobs. The market for that specialized type of geek-tech just isnt here. In japan, dancing MP3 players get them all whipped up and horny. Over here? Not so much. We'd rather spend our money on cadillacs and beer. And war. yeeeeehaw!

    --
    "A gentleman never strikes a lady with his hat on." - Fred Allen
  19. Americans are poor by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So... You only get the tat, not the quality gear. A few years ago that wouldn't have been the case.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Americans are poor by BlowHole666 · · Score: 1

      Americans are not poor. Maybe some are poor but on a majority I think we are doing just fine. That is also why we rank first in GDP. So I think we just do not want to spend our money on ... shit.

      --
      I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
    2. Re:Americans are poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In total GDP (not per capita) the EU ranks first. In GDP per capita the US ranks 4th, 6th, or 8th depending on who has calculated it and whether PPP is taken into account. The EU GDP is growing at a faster rate and the US GDP per capita ranking is expected to decline as other nations GDP per capita grows faster than ours. We are not the top ranked economy in the world anymore and are not projected to be in the foreseeable future.

    3. Re:Americans are poor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I find it interesting that you say Americans are poor, when I'm betting that about 90% of them had dinner tonight.

  20. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by timster · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, it's a bunch of whiz-bang crap without any real value. The prime example is the "MP4 Watch". Besides apparently not supporting MP4 (but who really knows, at this low level of journalism) it's stupid in the first place. It's not like it's hard to make a crappy little MP3 player, glue some straps to it, and call it a "watch". Whoopdy-do.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  21. I can't get a lot of stuff in Europe, either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where I live, you can easily take the price of a certain item in dollars, replace the $ with an EUR, and multiply it by _at least_ 1.5 (it gets much worse if there are rebates for US residents).

    For example, recently I found out about a beautiful digital camera. Price in the US, after rebates? $250. Price here? 425 EUR. Seriously. You know what the best part is? If I were to ship it from across the ocean, it would cost me 500 EUR.

    Then I got interested in a particular LCD monitor that costs $600 in the US (which is more than half my monthly salary, by the way). It costs 1100 EUR here.

    Go figure.

    P.S. It would really be nice if Slashdot knew how to deal with the EUR symbol.

    1. Re:I can't get a lot of stuff in Europe, either by absoluteflatness · · Score: 1

      Well, if you use the HTML escape sequence (ampersand-euro-semicolon), it's pretty easy to write € on Slashdot.

  22. You're half right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They use their own market as a test market before trying to sell it in the US.

  23. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by lattyware · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure UMPC is Ultra-Mobile PC or something.

    --
    -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
  24. an MP4 watch??? by jgarra23 · · Score: 1

    Gimme a break. These products suck and show that whole "It's-a-new-product-if-we-add-a-clock-to-it" crap is true.

    Besides, all this junk will end up as refurbs on woot or jellyfish anyway...

  25. UMPCs by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    And there were only two things I can't get. One is a "Kohjinsha SH8 Series UMPC". They didn't bother defining their acronyms so I have no clue what a UMPC is so it gets a big yawn from me.

    I don't know what a UMPC is either, so it just isn't as drool-worthy as a good countersink flange.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:UMPCs by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      A countersink flange WOULD be nerdily drool worthy! Thank God there are still a few real nerds left at slashdot. Thank you!

      Next up on slashdot: New use found for Thiotimoline!

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  26. sigh by pak9rabid · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wake me up when I can get a Lucy Liu bot

  27. my take on the gadgets by nuzak · · Score: 1
    Now I don't speak for all Americans, but I guarantee I don't step too far outside the mainstream in my attitudes:

    • Kohjinsha SH8 Series UMPC

      UMPC's in general are met with a big yawn here, and the iPhone may well kill them off for good. The integrated TV tuner is a pretty killer feature though, though the price of the average UMPC will still chase people away the same as it did for tablets.

    • Sony Rolly

      We don't much like cutesy anthropomorphic gadgets in the USA. And there's other "jostleable" players out there, the Sansa Shaker comes to mind.

    • ...

      In a stunning display of website usability, I see no way to navigate to the NEXT ad-filled crap-laden page. So this review gets cut short. Mercifully.



    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    1. Re:my take on the gadgets by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      I'm in the USA, and the Rolly is the only thing on this list that was interesting. Everything else was just some kind of cellphone.

  28. OQO anyone? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    With many of the UMPCs (that's Ultra Mobile ...), one may not be able to buy that model, but what about the OQO? It claims to be "the smallest full featured pc" and for the masochists out there, it even runs Vista.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  29. boring by bakamaki · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ok I've had enough of Slashdot and this sort of tripe. I'm going to troll until I'm bored with that.

  30. A similar article by caywen · · Score: 1

    I saw a similar article titled "The Hottest Human Rights You Can't Get In Darfur"

    Apparently, they only make those here :-)

    1. Re:A similar article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, for a long time, that would in fact have been a funny retort. But with the record of the present administration and the general erosion of civil liberties in the last few years, I wouldn't be so smug, and worry a great deal more about the US falling behind in that area compared to other countries than about some silly gadgets.

  31. Why are we worried about this? by keithjr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why waste time worrying about which countries have the best useless tech gadgets when the US is so far behind in more important areas: internet connectivity and infrastructure?

    1. Re:Why are we worried about this? by King_TJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wish I had mod points available! Someone should mod you up! This list of "cool gadgets" was so uninspiring, I didn't even click through all of it before getting bored and irritated with it!

      If the only thing we're missing from "cool new tech in Japan" is an egg-shaped music player that gyrates around (obviously eating up the battery charge at a must faster rate than normal players), a bunch of wanna-be "iPhone killer" cellphones with various pluses and minuses, and 1 OLED TV set (a technology we're sure to see here in widespread use, soon enough, anyway) - I'll pass.

      The real shame here in the U.S. is that broadband Internet isn't faster, cheaper and more widely available! It's ridiculous that many people I know who live just 50 miles or so outside the major city I live in have to resort to satellite to get "high speed Internet" at all. The huge latency and high cost makes it vastly inferior. Those of us with "better options" are usually stuck with DSL that doesn't go above 6MBPS tops, or cable that may reach 10MBPS (at $99 per month or so, in the case of our cable company!), and be subject to all sorts of possible restrictions on usage (such as Comcast's fiasco killing torrent traffic).

      I'd even like to see some sort of unification of wireless hotspots in the U.S. Right now, you have all these individual attempts to offer customers of establishments "free wi-fi" access, as well as businesses trying to sell subscriptions to a relative handful of hotspots they maintain (in airports and so forth). I wonder when we might see this consolidated into "Pay $5 a month extra on your regular ISP bill, and receive access with your same login and password to all wi-fi access points we manage nation-wide?" AT&T half-heartedly sells this now, but it's pretty worthless for 95% of their customer base because they don't control enough access points.

  32. I'm gonna go ahead with... by zerocool^ · · Score: 1



    100mbit internet for $20/month.

    //moving to sweeden...

    --
    sig?
    1. Re:I'm gonna go ahead with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sorry ... but had to get this out...

      100mbit = 100 milli bits = 1 bit every 10 secs ... Thanks I'll stay where I am.

    2. Re:I'm gonna go ahead with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 milli bits = 1 bit every 10 secs

      Not quite true, actually. If that was the case, he would've said 100 mbit/s. He just said 100 mbit, so clearly he's fine with only getting 100 millibits per month. Man, not even a whole byte.. thinkg about how many years it would take just to send an e-mail.

    3. Re:I'm gonna go ahead with... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      just don't stop in england on your way. 1mbit = $50/month.

  33. iphone? by TwoWheelTomy · · Score: 1

    well, at least we get the iphone first!

    1. Re:iphone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yippee, you got a 2G phone that can't even exchange business cards via Bluetooth. I'm amazed they had the nerve to launch it in the EU - it's so backwards that I wonder why the default ringtone isn't the Blue Danube Waltz, because it's like something from 2001.

      And I say that as the happy owner of an iPod Touch. I got the snazzy interface and web tablet without paying extra for the rubbish phone bit.

  34. Not the point by j_166 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Its not the point that you can or cannot get these items. The point is, this article is yet another opportunity for the Sour Grapes "America Sucks" people to come on out in droves and comment about how their country in Europe or wherever is sooooooo very much better than america because (pick one) they can get mp4 watches/they have solved poverty and hunger/nobody in their country has ever even heard of guns let alone would own one/they abolished police states millenia ago/they invented interstellar travel/whatever is fashionable to complain about America this week.

    1. Re:Not the point by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      America-bashing sucks, yes. But so does mindless chauvinistic patriotism. The fact of the matter is, there are ways in which America is seriously behind Europe and Asia (no, I'm not talking about MP4 wristwatches) and there's no reason we shouldn't learn from their experience. The mindless fury with which many Americans react to any suggestion that the USA is not absolutely, positively #1 in every single way is a much bigger problem for the country than anti-American bigotry ... not to mention that a lot of the bigotry is a reaction to that particular type of arrogance.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Not the point by j_166 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I agree with you. But this article like many others before it were not in response to mindless american chauvinistic patriotism, but on the contrary, it seemed specially written to start off a fresh round of america bashing (Look! America sucks because they can't even buy mp4 watches there LOL), and many commenters readily took up the call to arms. I also agree with you that there are countless ideas we can potentially look to Europe as an example of. Cell phone tech/lifestyle integration and public transportation springs to mind quite readily.

    3. Re:Not the point by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      "The mindless fury with which many Americans react to any suggestion that the USA is not absolutely, positively #1 in every single way"

      Unlike the previous commenter, I can't say I agree with you. I've never met a single American, let alone "many," who reacted with "mindless fury" to "any suggestion that the USA is not absolutely, positively #1 in every single way".

      For that matter, I've never met any American who reacted with "mindless fury" to any suggestion, period.

      Perhaps you were exaggerating to make a point, but I don't think that's helpful in discussions like these, where we're talking about stereotypes and such. Your comment just seems like more of the same.

          - Alaska Jack

    4. Re:Not the point by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 1

      Are we living in the same dimension? Even ignoring the flag waving nut cases on pretty much every TV channel, all you need is an American college campus to see this. It's not people going out of there way to say America is #1, most of the time it is simply misconceptions that people have about the rest of the world. With the dollar being so weak, though, maybe people will come to more realizations that the US is just one of many countries and isn't as special as the civics classes back in high school make it seem.

    5. Re:Not the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you know what "chauvinistic" means. What does it have to do with patriotism?

    6. Re:Not the point by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

      I'm really not sure what you're trying to say here, so I'll just note that nothing you wrote contradicts what I wrote. Again, I've never met anyone who reacted with "mindless fury" about something so benign as a suggestion that the U.S. is not #1 in every single thing.

      "Mindless fury" is a pretty strong term: It implies violence, or at least screaming and ranting. So here's a challenge. Go down to the mall, or a fair, or any place with a lot of people. Pose as a pollster or something. Suggest to people that the U.S. is not #1 in every single thing. See how many of them erupt in "mindless fury." I'd bet it would be somewhere south of 1 in 1,000.

      "Mindless fury" is just a meaningless piece of hyperbole a person uses to describe how he or she thinks other people -- i.e., rubes and sheeple -- surely must react. Like I said, not helpful.

          - Alaska Jack

  35. Great! by radiumhahn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If that's the best tech we can't get in the US then I feel pretty good! That's some crappy junk I really don't want.

  36. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by AstrumPreliator · · Score: 1
    • A car? What the hell for, I have a horse and buggy!
    • A color TV? Pfft, I can buy a black and white TV already.
    • What is this PC thing these foreigners are selling? It must not be important or have any value.


    So basically if you don't know what it is you don't need it, if Sony makes it you don't need it, and if it's a competing product with new/improved features you don't need it. Basically to sum everything up you don't need anything. How in the hell did you ever buy a computer if you're so dead set against tech products? Someone hold a gun to your head?

    Honestly, I don't know how you were even modded up.
  37. Not all so impressive... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    I mean, can't you get your hands on a record player in the USA? Has it come to this?

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:Not all so impressive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As AC because I already modded. Anyways.

      I was just in a Best Buy yesterday (I know, I know) and they had 4 different record players for sale (including one with USB out, and 3 of them were pre-amped.) I was pretty surprised, as I am in the market for a new record player, but didn't think to look at Best Buy (still not going to get it there, I'm looking for something a bit nicer. But they still weren't awful.)

    2. Re:Not all so impressive... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      I hope you know I was just joking.

      A couple of years ago I intended to digitize my record collection. But, life was furiously happening, so I postponed this for "later". I'm glad someone is still making record players, so that when eventually I do get the time for this, they will still be around.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  38. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1
    And oh goodie on the Sony:

    Sony's much-anticipated OLED TV not only has a Japanese release date, it also has a price: 1,743 bucks for an 11-incher. Perhaps the article should really have been title "20 ways Americans are too smart to get swindled by crap"
    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  39. Sony Rolly - I'll pass. by nobodyman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Call it sour grapes if you want, but I'm not really clamoring over a hip-hop, breakdancing, mp3-playing egg.
    Although I'll gladly pay to import whatever drugs the Sony execs were taking when they gave this thing the green light.

    1. Re:Sony Rolly - I'll pass. by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      Weird, because the Rolly was the only thing on this list that I was remotely interested in.

    2. Re:Sony Rolly - I'll pass. by nobodyman · · Score: 1

      Really? You read the part about it being a breakdancing egg, right?

  40. "Americans have fat fingers" by Animats · · Score: 1

    Tiny laptops have never caught on in the US, although they've been around for years. "Americans have fat fingers". You can certainly get one in the US if you want one, but they're don't sell well. The Via Nanobook is a reasonable choice, and Sony has a whole range of them. Then there are the UMPC machines, which are little laptops partially usable without a keyboard.

    Designers are still struggling in the "too big for a phone, too small for a laptop" niche. There's a long history of duds in that space. Remember the Nokia N-Gage? (Nokia's relaunching that brand next month, with a new form factor.)

    Incidentally, the One Laptop Per Child machine is in mini-laptop scale. It fits kid-sized hands. This isn't obvious from most of the publicity pictures.

    1. Re:"Americans have fat fingers" by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Tiny laptops have never caught on in the US, although they've been around for years.

      I'd love to get one... if they weren't always at least 4X as expensive as larger, heavier laptops.

      I've got a tiny Psion 5MX I still use plenty, which works great for typing notes, appointments, and even pretty well as an RS-232 terminal, but unfortunately I often need much higher-end capabilities it just doesn't have.

      I haven't had the heart to get rid of my small 7" Compaq 486, even though it's so slow I generally can't use it anymore (boot-up takes minutes, using SSH is frustrating, etc.).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  41. US, a technological backwater? by olddotter · · Score: 1

    All of the cyberpunk novels of the 1980's were about a future, not too far from today, assume that the US was a technical backwater slum. Is this the first sign we are going down that path?

    I feel like repeating my comment from a few days ago.

    1. Re:US, a technological backwater? by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Um, since when is "technology" solely defined by consumer gizmos? How many countries outside the US have a working rover on the surface of Mars? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller...?I consider that feat a BIT more impressive than a watch that plays music, but maybe I'm just old fashioned.

      Slashdot seems to think consumer technology = technology in general. It's just not true.

    2. Re:US, a technological backwater? by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Correction... we have TWO working rovers on Mars!

      Now... if we only had a base with people in it!!!

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    3. Re:US, a technological backwater? by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let's see... techno backwater, religious loonies running rampart, ultra-rich vs. dirt-poor, importing knowledgeable people who're willing to work because the dirt-poor can't pay for education and the ultra-rich care only for partying and deem work beneath themselves (unless it's running some corporation)...

      You're not there yet, but you're heading in that direction.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:US, a technological backwater? by pravuil · · Score: 1

      yeah, but is the mars rover really making money for anyone?

    5. Re:US, a technological backwater? by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      No offense, but a device that could revolutionize the way people communicate would be a lot more important than some pictures of Mars's surface. Unfortunately, when such a device is created, other countries will have it before we do, because our current communication overlords have heavy lobbies.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    6. Re:US, a technological backwater? by dracae · · Score: 1

      Bah, veryone knows all of it is fake and filmed in a Hollywood studio.

    7. Re:US, a technological backwater? by 4D6963 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How many countries outside the US have a working rover on the surface of Mars?

      How many countries outside Europe have landed a probe on Titan? How many countries outside USSR have landed probes on Venus (in the 1970's!). Of course, if you handpick the criterion for being on the cutting edge of technology..

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    8. Re:US, a technological backwater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No offense, but a device that could revolutionize the way people communicate would be a lot more important than some pictures of Mars's surface

      Jesus Tapdancing Christ, that is a ridiculous statement. It is FAR TOO EASY to communicate with people this day and age and there is FAR TOO MUCH of it going on. Why do you need a revolution in the largest business in the world?! How can you say a like box that allows you to have some inane, and completely useless conversation, day in and day out, is more impressive than a rover on Mars.

      So that's where you want technology to head, not to the cosmos, but to a device in your pocket which allows you to endlessly waste your life talking to some other douchebags. Luckily, not everyone is as easily amused...but far too many are. Fool.

    9. Re:US, a technological backwater? by magarity · · Score: 1

      yeah, but is the mars rover really making money for anyone?
      They did sell a lot of Lego and Matchbox versions of the thing.

    10. Re:US, a technological backwater? by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1
      You fool!! If that happened, it wouldn't be long* before a portal to hell opened, and demons started pouring through!

      *where not long = the time it takes to construct bases on Phobos/Deimos

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    11. Re:US, a technological backwater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mars rovers aren't really that much indicators of technological progression, only the application of mostly well-known technology - just like most consumer products (in the early days of the US and Soviet space programs, they did represent the very cutting edge of technology, but that's less true now).

      What's impressive about projects like the mars rovers is the scale of the entire project and the reliability requirements - because you can't go there in person to fix things!

      But for something now being applied that is actually a recent invention, you need to look no further than the article summary - OLED.

    12. Re:US, a technological backwater? by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      Bullshit that that television is a cutting-edge use of OLED. My phone has an OLED display, as does my MP3 player, and both of them are 2 or 3 years old. It's pretty tried and true now.

      --
      SRSLY.
    13. Re:US, a technological backwater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US on both(ok this was a joint effort)counts. Jeez, if you are going to take a holier than thou attitude, at LEAST be right about it!

    14. Re:US, a technological backwater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah!...How many countries had the first airplane in the air? Huh???

      What? Several others, you say? Ahha, but how many other countries had the first i/c powered, man-carrying, flying-for-a-reasonable-distance, with a three-axis control set, but not worrying about take-off assistance, eh? Just AMERICA, that's who!!

      And that proves that AMERICA is the best nation in the world, and was solely responsible for the invention of ALL airplanes.....

      (repeat as required for all other technology)

    15. Re:US, a technological backwater? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      Then all your base would belong to US!

    16. Re:US, a technological backwater? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA might well have rovers on Mars, but how much use is that technology in everyday life? Not a lot. Those rovers are just a means of pushing tax dollars into NASA.

      Now, if the USA could produce a 200mph passenger train of the sort that runs on the ever-expanding European high speed train network, , that'd be worth mentioning.

      On the subject of diesels, the USA does have one very interesting line of diesel vehicles made by . They licence the engine tech from the UK...

    17. Re:US, a technological backwater? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Jeez, if you are going to take a holier than thou attitude, at LEAST be right about it!

      I'm right about it, asshole. Huygens is purely europeean. Cassini is american, and didn't do anything impressive, just like a Saturn version of Galileo (Galileo dropped a probe as well, except it was to the atmosphere of Jupiter).

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    18. Re:US, a technological backwater? by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      Compared to lcd or plasma, oled is a cutting edge display-technology, so compared to any other tv in serial production out there it is cutting edge.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    19. Re:US, a technological backwater? by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      We also don't ever see them on the market, so your point does have merit. I disagree with the me posting at midnight.

      --
      SRSLY.
    20. Re:US, a technological backwater? by Analog+Squirrel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One thing I find intersting is how many in the US like to talk about how "we" put a rover on mars, or landed and astronaut on the moon, etc, making it sound like thay had *anything* to do with it. The same is true of other countries, I'm sure. No, it's not the start and talented scientist, engineers and technologists working in labs for the government or for a corporation, it's "we".

      Smart and talented people are quite transplantable that's, after all, how the US got a lot of the smart people that landed astronauts on the moon. And yet, it's still "we". hrmph

      --
      I'd rather be flying
    21. Re:US, a technological backwater? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      How many countries outside the US have a working rover on the surface of Mars?

      I would like to know how many countries outside the US that have good tasting, drinkable tap water.

      --
      What?
  42. No sales != no demand by hellfire · · Score: 1

    If root beer is not (widely) available in Japan, it is because the Japanese don't like root beer -- not because they can't afford it, or don't know where to get it.

    What if root beer was difficult to transport far from the farm and only grew well in the US. Or Japan had a steep tariff on root beer. Or laws or companies conspired to prohibit you from making said device even if there were demand? What if the root beer made in Japan was a drastically inferior quality and no one would drink it?

    There's a good demand for the devices on this list... as evidenced that there are tons of equivalents in the US that do the same thing. 18 of 20 of the items on the list looked and behaved like things I've seen on this side of the pacific, so I don't know why from the meager article it makes the claim that these things are so special.

    One device in particular that stood out to me, however, was the vinyl to MP3 recorder. As the article said, the one you get in Japan allows you to save to any media you like. On the US side options on current vinyl recorders are limited probably due to RIAA interference to "encourage" people to buy a new copy of songs rather than re-copy the legal copies they already bought.

    Just because someone won't sell a widget doesn't mean they won't buy a widget.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  43. Well the hotels are more advanced. by MMInterface · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tech differences between the US and Japan are a mixed bag. When I'm in the bay area or Seattle area people are far more tech savvy and have far more gadgets then the people I met when I lived in Tokyo. There is some great technology in Japan but has to do with tech gadgets and at times we have better stuff in the US. In the US you have a much better selection of computers and computer parts and they are cheaper. Fujitsu and Sony don't make the greatest machines so your not missing much by not having their latest model right away. In contrast if you want a great gaming machine your options are more limited in Japan. Cell phones are one of those items people like to bring up and thats also a mixed bag. The service is more expensive and the data rates are far more expensive in Japan. My cellphone bill last month went from $50 to $200 just from sending emails to other people's phones. In contrast I have sent far more emails and text messages from my US phone without extra charges. They have some neat models if you look but most places offer the same lineup of phones who's design is more limited than the designs we see here. Take a ride on the subway and it will seem like 90% of the people are using the same model flip phone. You will see far more people using smartphones and similar devices in the US. When people in Japan saw my old T-Mobile MDA they are always amazed. Those types of devices aren't as popular there among everyday people. Here you can easily find people using smartphones and blackberrys who don't even use the email features or web browser. They tend to stick to the flip phone design with no keyboard in Japan. But they do tend use web services that are tailored to mobile devices more often. If you really want to see superior Japanese technology that is not common here go to a love hotel. The last one I went to required no face to face communication with any employees. You walk in the building take a number, go to the room number on the slip. When you get to the door a voice greets you from an intercom and then your door unlocks. You go inside, the door locks you in :( and it stays that way until you pay the talking touch screen machine that is built into the wall which bills you by the hour. In the bathroom there is a hot tub with a large plasma tv built into the wall. In the bed room is another plasma, a PS2, a Sega Genesis, an NES, a karaoke machine and a sex toy vending machine. Overall it was average for that type of establishment.

    1. Re:Well the hotels are more advanced. by emurphy42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do they have paragraph breaks in Japan?

  44. No sales == insufficient demand by mi · · Score: 1

    What if root beer was difficult to transport far from the farm and only grew well in the US. Or Japan had a steep tariff on root beer. Or laws or companies conspired to prohibit you from making said device even if there were demand? What if the root beer made in Japan was a drastically inferior quality and no one would drink it?

    That would be lamentable... Can you demonstrate anything of the kind actually happening with the products listed in the article (or closely related ones)?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  45. Re:it's for a reason (The MP4 Watch sucks. AVOID!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As an aside, responding to your post since it's (indirectly) referring to the watch.

    Thinkgeek sells that OLED MP4 Watch.

    It sucks.

    The headphones and USB cable jacks are proprietary. The headphones have the Motorola style cellphone jack, but buying a third party earbud for your headphones with that kind of jack will result in one channel being dead... presumably because the contact for Mic on the cell hands-free bud is the contact for the other speaker according to the watch. Bad.

    The sound quality on the watch is also horrendous. Crackling with music that could be considered "intensive." Not even the overcompressed stuff we complain about... but just varied, sonically. Low volume stuff would crackle if it just happened to have a full sound in range.

    Video isn't standard. It uses a proprietary codec that is basically a codec with really bad compression. Lower bitrates bring the size down, but the video quality really suffers. The Crazy Frog video was included with the watch (ANOTHER reason not to buy it! FIE!) and the 4 minute video, at highest quality, took almost 900MB.

    The strap is very clunky, tends to get caught on just about anything and isn't replacable with a standard watch band. Broken strap? SOL.

    Horrible, horrible watch. Don't get it.

    Captcha: Betrayer. Sorry ThinkGeek and Slashdot. But the product does suck.

  46. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by sm62704 · · Score: 1, Insightful
    No, more like
    • A car? What the hell for, I have a car!
    • A 52 inch color TV? Pfft, I have a 42 inch color TV already.
    • What is this PC thing these foreigners are selling? I can get one here if I want one
    Maybe if I'd clicked on each of the twenty pictures after clicking on TFA and then clicking on the other TFA I'd agree with you, but I didn't see anything revolutionary. What was there that I can't get? TFA didn't say, and neither did you.

    And yes, if Sony makes it I don't need it. I'll buy one from a company I can trust not to install rootkits into their products instead. Same with LG and their badly made crap, neither company has any sort of meaningful monopoly whatever. I don't need to be rooted, and I don't need to be swindled.

    I probably got modded up because the mods clicked on the link too. You got a flying car? I want one! You got an Escalade? You can keep it; it's not new, it's just a car, albeit a really big really expensive one.
    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  47. Raon Everun by drxenos · · Score: 1

    I agree with everyone that these gadgets are mostly crap, but am I the only one that thought the Raon Everun was kind of neat? I've been wanting something small and portable (but with a good sized display) for reading PDFs. I didn't like any of the "eBook" devices that can and went, and I think a tablet pc is too much to pay for a simple use like this. I've been drooling over e-paper is a big way. I can't wait for them to perfect it and make devices from it. I liked that device that Sony came out with except for the lack of color and back lighting.

    --


    Anonymous Cowards suck.
  48. Typo... by josquint · · Score: 1, Funny

    "The US isn't always on the cutting edge of technology...

    "The US isn't ever on the cutting edge of technology...

    There, fixed that for you.
    1. Re:Typo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>"The US isn't always on the cutting edge of technology...
      >>
      >
      >"The US isn't ever on the cutting edge of technology...

      "The US is the cutting edge of technology..." - there fixed THAT(!) for you.

    2. Re:Typo... by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Because intel, IBM, nvidia, amd, etc don't count?

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  49. The Kings from the East by Antiocheian · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...in the latest stage of an Asian space race with Japan and India The sixth angel poured out his bowl on the great river, the Euphrates; and its water was dried up, so that the way would be prepared for the kings from the east.
    -- from The Book of Revelation
  50. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1

    Well, it's not mentioned, but it should be -- automotive technology. If you're not insanely jealous of the vehicles and powertrain options that Europe and Asia get that North America doesn't, then you're part of the reason why things have stagnated here for so long.

    --

    -
    Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
  51. It's Funding by weaver4 · · Score: 0

    I have been in consumer electronics for years. The products that I have "invented" have won the innovation award at the consumer electronics shows 6 times. I have worked in Consumer Electronics for GE/RCA/Thomson, AT&T and a couple other small companies. I decided a few years ago to take some of my ideas and develop them on my own. Some of the Largest Retailers were aware of my work and told me they would be willing to carry new products from my company. To make a two year story very, very short their is no money in the US for Consumer Electronics, sure there has been some for a couple of products like Slingbox and Firefly but few others have got funding. I had sure fire product, and I finally found minimal funding in China. So I don't feel it is an innovation problem, it is a money problem.

  52. Difference in Consumer Safety, Rights by dorpus · · Score: 1

    In Japan, it's often more difficult to get a refund for a defective product. Also, consumer safety standards tend to be lower. Things that are illegal in the USA are legal in Japan, such as a batting cage that serves hardballs at 200km/h:

    http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=NMSgAs7VLTI

  53. the only thing I'd get by ksheff · · Score: 1

    Is the turntable since it would help in the process of converting old records into FLACs.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    1. Re:the only thing I'd get by grumling · · Score: 1

      I would rent one for a few days, but I don't think I'd bother buying one. Once everything is converted, why would you need to use it (assuming you have a HQ turntable already).

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    2. Re:the only thing I'd get by ksheff · · Score: 1

      That's assuming that you don't get any more records. Going to stores or estate sales that have lots of old LPs, 45s, & 78s to scrounge around for stuff that will never be released on CD can be an interesting hobby.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  54. Japanese tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of it is too small for our comparatively large hands. And you know what they say
    about guys with big hands.

    1. Re:Japanese tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, they need big gloves? they also have big feet? what?

  55. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by timster · · Score: 1

    I'm not remotely jealous of fancy cars. I do not need more 'powertrain options'. My Civic gets me where I want to go.

    Diesel cars like they have in Europe could be nice, but if the price of diesel fuel increases much more it won't be worth it.

    Love of technology for its own sake is great -- don't get me wrong. But if a given nation's consumers as a whole decide that they don't need a particular technological advance, they aren't automatically wrong or ignorant. It's important not only to have technological development, but for it to be in the right direction.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
  56. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I have no clue what a UMPC is so it gets a big yawn from me.

    HTC Touch Dual, WTF is it? Who knows? Who cares?

    Raon Everun, they've almost got me clicking the link, WTF is an "everun", some sort of perpetual motion machine?
    So, let's see. You're too lazy to look up the meaning of an acronym, so you just assume that it's something you don't need or want.

    You've got a Slashdot account, you encounter some technology you don't recognize, you neglect to Google it, but you don't hesitate to form a negative opinion. If that's indicative of the attitude of Americans, I can understand why these gadgets haven't made it over here. We're just too damn stupid to use them

    Fortunately, I know that most Americans are not nearly that knuckleheaded, so I'm comfortable in the knowledge that the reason we don't have these gadgets is something else. Perhaps it has something to do with the US being a cash cow for the multinationals. They can send us their bargain-basement garbage because we're so thoroughly trained as consumers that we'll just take whatever they give us and pay top dollar. Plus, the monopolistic practices of US corporations work against consumers, giving substandard products (Vista, anyone?) huge market share. That would explain why home internet speeds in the US are so far behind most other civilized countries (and quite a few that aren't civilized). AT&T doesn't offer really good bandwidth because they don't have to.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  57. Re:No sales != no demand by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

    1) Buy component record player

    2) Buy RCA to 9mm audio cable

    3) Plug record player into PC audio "in"

    4) Record to your vinyl to any format under the sun, probably for half the price of $device.

    5) No profit, but you probably saved a few bucks.

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  58. Fight to win? by msimm · · Score: 1

    I'd fight Nazis. I'm just not keen on killing and destabilizing in the name of terr^^^^^oil.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  59. not to nit-pick... by big_paul76 · · Score: 1

    But, just because Canada is larger than the US and has a smaller population doesn't mean the US has a denser population.

    80 or 90% of Canadians live within an hour or 2 of the US border. 85% of Canadians live in urban or suburban areas, compared with about (IIRC) 65% of Americans.

    Just 4 big cities of Vancouver, Calgary, Montreal, and Toronto account for about 8 or 9 million Canadians, or somewhere between 1/4 and 1/3 of the the population.

    The difference is, in all of Canada's huge land mass, most of it is either northern and uninhabitable, and unsuitable for any economic activity except for mining. Mining operations tend to have small clusters of people living/working in densities about what you'd find in a city.

    Whereas those vast areas of land in the US, with the exception of a desert of two, some mountains, are mostly suitable for farming.

    --
    The plural form of "anecdote" is "anecdotes", not "evidence".
  60. GSM sucks by greatgreygreengreasy · · Score: 1

    Forget getting tech from overseas, I can't even get most of the cool cellphones available IN the US because GSM is non-existent in most of rural America. Verizon will soon roll out 3G CDMA within 80 miles of my home, but I can't even get GSM service if I want to. How's that for 'Tech I can't get.'

    --
    LRN 2 SWM
  61. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by lamarguy91 · · Score: 1

    The HTC touch dual is a remarkable phone. Take the iPhone, turn it into a slider so that it has a real keyboard, subtract Apple's single-provider lockdown garbage (along with their updates that "unintentionally render the device useless"), and you have one of the best upcoming phones out there.

    http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/01/htcs-3g-touch-dual-slider-with-hsdpa-arrives-in-europe/

    The problem with this specific phone is that the European version = no WiFi, but the Japanese version has WiFi.

    I'd love to have this phone unlocked and use it on my carrier's network. It's funny that this phone has been out for quite some time now, but to see that Sprint is just now getting the original (non-slider) version of the Touch.

    Actually, it's not funny. It's disappointing that it takes this long for the technology to filter over here. It's also disappointing to see WiFi filtered off the device before hit hits Eurpoe (and most likely the US when it makes it's way over here).

  62. US gets all of the shit by harshmanrob · · Score: 1

    Why does the US get all of the shit side of the tech products? This year, Verizon introduced VCAST while Vodaphone in Europe has had television on their cell phones since at least 2002! I am getting sick of living in a second-hand flea market when it comes to products.

    The United States SUCKS!

    1. Re:US gets all of the shit by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add that you get all the bad pixels as well.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  63. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by legoburner · · Score: 1

    The real problem in the US is that you dont have Kitchen Gun, especially considering the US's love of all things shooty!

  64. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    It's just a BAD article. An acronym should be named at least once, with the exception of commonly accepted acronyms in a publication's field. In a computer magazine, it's ok to not define RAM, but it's NOT ok to not define RAM an an article in an air travel publication. At slashdot it's fine to use the acronym WTF or IANAL but again, if it's a specialized non-nerd acronym, not acceptable.

    I should never have to google anything to figure out WTF an article's writer is talking about, unless it's a specialized journal in someone else's field. That's just bad writing, plain and simple. It was a bad article, period.

    If the article were better written, NOT having me click a second article from the first article to see twenty pictures, each of which I have to click without a clue what any of these are (and they all looked like plain ordinary tech available anywhere), it might have raised my hackles.

    As it was, my response was "hmmm... somebody submitted a useless article he wrote himself for his own publication, which looks to me thats only reason is to get advertising hits".

    Now, if it had "You can get electronic paper in Europe but not the US" I would have sat up and noticed. If it had "Flying cars in Japan", ditto.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  65. Symbian WHAT ? by UberHoser · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    " the Z8 is a full fledged Symbian smartphone, "

    Um, isnt a Symbian like a vibrator on a saddle for women to go OMFG YES YES YESSSSSS ?

    --
    Guns are for wimps... Use a crossbow.. this way you can pin them to their chair when you go postal.
    1. Re:Symbian WHAT ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sybian.

      "aaaaand post anonymously...check. double check."

  66. The Red Stripe You Can't Get at Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous Coward writes
      "Slashdot isn't always on the cutting edge of flagology. We see a new flag release that has just the blend of
      white and red stripes we've been looking for, but alas, it's only available if you google image search "American
      Flag". From Picasa to Flickr, these are the hottest new flags to drool over, that you can't get here."

  67. Some Product look Lame by bmccartney · · Score: 1

    Some of these wouldn't survive in the US market. For instance, the Flybook is like a more expensive/crappier version of a fujistu's newer models. It has less battery life, less features and it still costs more than most fujitsus... That's just an example of a pile of products, many of which may never get to market... There are only a few products in the list which will be successful and not make it to the US!

    1. Re:Some Product look Lame by bmccartney · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the self reply, but you can find some of these products here http://www.geekstuff4u.com/

  68. Cutting edge?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The US isn't always on the cutting edge of technology."

    which planet are you on??

    the US is never on the cutting edge of technology!

  69. Americans are more pragmatic. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    I think Americans are a lot more pragmatic with their consumer technology. They're generally only willing to adopt some bit of technology once its fairly well established. This means the technology has been proven, its reasonably reliable and its a well-supported standard.

    People in Asia jump all over any bit of new technology. They're a lot more willing to embrace anything new, whether or not it's actually any good. As far as Europe is concerned, I don't really think they're all that different from the US. And my impression from my family there is that they're reluctant to go out and get anything cutting-edge because things there are generally so expensive.

    Look at Blu-ray and HD-DVD. Most people are reluctant to adopt either format because they don't want to be stuck with an unsupported format in a few years. Or lets say televisions in public places. When I was in Taiwan a few years ago wide-screen flat panel displays were installed throughout the subway system; they had a good dozen or two at most stations running nothing but advertising. Sure, it's cool, but is it necessary? Not really. Why spend $2000 on a flat-panel display when a $500 standard television serves the same function?

    A good example is the little known, at least in the US, format VCD. For those who dont know it was basically a CD with an mpeg file on it. These showed up between the VHS and DVD eras. In Asia, however they were huge. But they were pointless. The image quality was no better than VHS and most movies came on two CDs. There was some convenience over tape but not enough to justify the transition. DVDs offered a more tangible improvement.

    A lot of this technology is compelling merely because it isn't available to Americans. Often times when we finally have access to these products here they turn out not to be anything special. I think the only segment America truly lags in is in the mobile phone market. However, as long as service providers maintain their grip on the market that isn't going to change.

    1. Re:Americans are more pragmatic. by MMInterface · · Score: 1

      I don't think they jump over any bit of technology. I think they have different lifestyles so different technology is more convinient for them and since we don't share their lifestyle we often don't understand why. For example, not having a car and not carrying your laptop everywhere would change the gadgets that you find usefull. In Japan you really don't need a car and sometimes it can be more of an inconvinience far more so than NYC. Free wifi also isn't as readily available in establishments, but net cafes with more amenities are more prevelant and its very common for people to sleep there and watch tv. They do use laptops, they just don't carry them and use them in public as often as we do in the US. So phones with great services and gadgets that they can use on the train or while walking are far more usefull. Also street addresses and street signs are very poorly organized in Japan. Directions are more visual and things aren't as organizes as the Ave St system. Every cab I saw had GPS and without it they probably couldn't find anything that wasn't a train station or well known attraction. Many of the street names are written using characters some people haven't learned. So GPS and electronic dictionaries that are built into some kind of mobile device are very usefull. Also you spend $2000 on flat panels at a subways station because they are usually generate lots of advertising revenue (maybe they wouldn't in the US, I don't know). I don't know about Taiwan but the flat panels on the train in Tokyo were basically billboards that were put in the bussiest areas possible and the broadcast were tailored for the displays. One of them even taught english lessons so they could get people to go to their school. Not only would a standard tube not fight in the same areas, but less people who pay attention to it. Asthetics are very important and everything is built around the train stations.

  70. Nah. I've got the REAL list. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    For me a cool gadget is. . .

    A. A GPS device.
    B. A pocket cutting torch capable of melting steel. (Still sci-fi AFIK)
    C. A white LED flashlight. (My nomination for coolest, most elegant tech solution of the decade.)
    D. An Asus Eee. (To replace my workhorse HP Jornada 800
      with the busted hinge.)
    E. A lightsaber.
    F. A Trump Deck, (Amber)
    G. A Leatherman Mini (Still the very best folding pliers ever made)
    H. A SPACE 1999 stun gun (Campy as camp can be, but I was seven at the time, and the bar was forever set for cool space weaponry. Note the handy "Stun/Kill" toggle switch.)
    I. A Pentel Brush Pen.
    J. Afterbite mosquito bite instant relief.
    K. A lock pick gun (You have to have a locksmith license to own one in most states.)
    L. A humble pencil. --Possibly the best writing instrument ever invented. Still used today!
    M. A candle lantern. (Burns for hours, folds up neat and tidy. Best with the bees wax candles.)

    That's all I can think of for now. The Sonic Screwdriver is certainly neat, but with one of those, you can pretty much do away with about half the items on the above list.

    Oh, and the reason the Leatherman Mini is the best version of the now ubiquitous folding pliers on the market is that nobody has yet made a pair which when closed is as small, and when open is as large, AND (very important) which has a smooth grip that doesn't bite into your palms when you apply pressure. I find it somewhat astonishing that it was one of the very first models ever to grace the market place, and nobody has come close since. I still regularly use my original pair purchased fifteen years ago. Rugged, useful, small, comfortable to use. --The only thing I'd do to improve upon it is to remove the knife and file, which would make it even smaller and lighter than it currently is.

    Japanese twinkie-iPhoney-too-small-keypad bits of fluff seem kind of utterly useless to me.


    -FL

  71. Why translate? by gillbates · · Score: 1

    When it could just as easily be done here?

    The interesting thing is that I engineered some of the cool gadgets which are in production overseas. Strangely, no domestic company is interested in marketing them here.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  72. Re:it's for a reason (The MP4 Watch sucks. AVOID!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I think I know one of the people who works for one of the firms that make watches like this, and he doesn't like them either ...
    As for the video codec, all "MP4"-* products from China have more or less the same one. No compression, proprietary (but quite simple, if I remember correctly), limited to jaggy framerates, low resolutions.
    But the real reason why the person I know doesn't like these devices is because they're heavy, have little battery-life, and broke rather spontaneously. AFAIK, the built-in flash memory may also be faulty more often than you'd expect.
    BTW, if I haven't made it clear enough, these watches are relatively common gadgets in China, and not really affiliated with ThinkGeek.
    I think I'd like one anyway, but please with a calculator, or hell, ARM processor, wifi and UMTS or something (so I can make beowulf-clusters out of them), GPS, lasers, and whatnot.
    Just a few more years, I think :)

  73. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by AgentPaper · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hell, we're jealous of the platforms and powertrains the European models get! There's an amazing amount of innovation that goes on in the Big Three and its supply satellites. However, the vast majority of what they invent can't or won't be sold here because either:
    A) some dumb cluck Congressman decreed that every American-built car must include $GIZMO that would completely invalidate, destroy, etc. said innovation; or
    B) some dumb cluck marketer decided that "Americans will never buy" said innovation, despite mountains of evidence to the contrary.

    Every year, if you read the News and the Free Press coverage of the Detroit auto show, they're absolutely drooling over the scores of shiny, slick new models, and then it turns out that it's all destined for the European and Asian markets. Meanwhile, we just get the same lame sedan, minivan and SUV retreads with the same lame 3.0L V6 and 4.7L V8 that we've gotten every new model-year since 1997. Is it any wonder that everyone else's imports are eating our lunch?

    --
    First rule of trauma: Bleeding always stops.
  74. My congratulations to the PR firm involved. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is an obvious PR piece, and Slashdotters have swallowed it hook, line and sinker.

  75. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    I agree that the article is poorly written. But your comment indicated that you were dismissing these devices based on the fact that you didn't know what their names mean.

    Some of the gadgets looked pretty good, and in fact they are not available in the US. Technology corporations, including pharmaceuticals, use the US market as a place to dump old technology. We're supposed to have a competitive "free" market, but it works out to be just the opposite. The climate for technology companies in Europe and Asia is much more competitive than it is the US, where corporations have so much political clout that they don't have to worry about doing a good job.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  76. I imported the OLED MP4 watch by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    Or a similar one anyway.

    You're not missing much, it's real bleeding edge stuff... maybe some of these things are not available elsewhere yet because of tighter quality regulations? I mean the watch suffered "burn-in" during the first day I got it, I don't think that'd be allowed by trading standards etc in the UK or US.

  77. Yes indeed by firedragon852 · · Score: 1

    When I was living in the bay area a few years ago, cell phone calls were being dropped when you crossed the various bridges from the East Bay to the Peninsula. I could never get the latest cell phones and there were just a handful of brands and models to choose from. Now I live in Asia and I am using a 3.6Mbps HSDPA high speed mobile phone for my http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I-mode/ service. The latest phone models from Samsung, Nokia or Sony Ericsson come out every 2-3 months. Changing mobile phones is like buying new clothes for most people.

  78. Re:Technical accomplishmnet is technical accomplis by olddotter · · Score: 1

    What technical break throughs were required to put rovers on Mars?

    The thing that bothers me is that the US does not seem to respect engineering and science. In the long run the US is destined to be a back water unless that changes.

  79. Don't you mean this? by ByteofK · · Score: 1

    It's not:
    "The best tech you can't get in the US"

    it's:
    "The best tech you can get elsewhere, and no 'service provider' corporation has stripped down to a mere 10% of its actual capability by installing its own firmware"

    Give me the import gadget any day.

  80. Re:Technical accomplishmnet is technical accomplis by megaditto · · Score: 1

    Well, if we started respecting engineering and science it would discriminate against all those who cannot or do not want to study either of these.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  81. No they don't use paragraph breaks or word spacing by MMInterface · · Score: 1

    Funny you should ask that because they don't. Things are usually written in one paragraph. They don't even put spaces between the words and when you write something formal or in a book or magazine, it's written from top to botton then from right to left.

  82. Wonder? by AutoTheme · · Score: 0

    Wonder what would happen if companies said "hey, I want that, you know the thing that you're not selling here. If not, we won't buy anything from you." The world economy is still tied to the US economy. Low dollar, so what. That makes our goods more desirable because they're cheaper. If we stop buying, the rest of the world slides into depression.

  83. Re:No sales != no demand by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what you mean about the turntable. I have a USB turntable I bought from Thinkgeek. I can rip my records to any format I like (MP3, WAV, OGG, etc) that Audacity supports. Half of my Ipod library is my ripped vinyl, and I have a lot of CDs made from my record collection. And it works fine on Linux.

    --
    "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  84. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

    YOu have got to be kidding me. The Infobar2 on that page is the only candybar phone that I have ever found appealing. I'd like to know when someone can make candybar phones look good, and they did that. Ordinary crap? Hardly.

    --
    OSx86 FTW
  85. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

    Oh, you CAN get all that in the US. It'll be through an importer and cost more, though. And yes, you'd understand far better if you clicked the pictures. The PC, for example, is far better suited to being carried around than most of what US makers sell as "ultraportable". Especially the Kohjinsha- that's something that the average person can stuff in their bag and carry around at school for long periods of time(and I'm not talking about a separate laptop bag- it's smaller than most college textbooks). Most HP laptops- not so much.

    --
    OSx86 FTW
  86. Rolly... by C.+A.+McClellan · · Score: 1

    I want one of those Rolly things, but I couldn't have one. If I brought one home the next thing you know it would have fucked the Roomba and then I would have little retarded robot bastards running around everwhere.

  87. Ahh yes, by jon287 · · Score: 1

    But we made them wait to see Gigli!

    USA! USA! US... oh nevermind.

    --
    To boldly use to and too two times and get it right too! They're not gonna believe their eyes when they see it there!
  88. RDF by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

    And the USA has the iPhone.

    That device has the most advanced technology ever devised:

    A personal portable Reality Distortion Field (tm)

    It's like you can carry a part of The Steve aura with yourself!

    Try to beat that Asians!

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
  89. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by glittalogik · · Score: 1

    Someone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding is that it's a hell of a lot easier to get diesel cars running on biofuels. Seems like a worthwhile bit of futureproofing given the way the oil trade appears to be heading.

  90. Not entirely supprising.. by pjr.cc · · Score: 1

    Annoyed at the rather closed minded (and often ignorant) comments of some as usual, but anyone who's flown to various parts of asia (mostly japan), already knew all this.

    a good example is the kind of mobile phones we walk around with in the west today were old school in 2002 over there.

    But, in reality it extends to all things in ways you dont think about until you see it in use.

    Sadly if it doesn't have an intel/amd cpu and run an OS, the west is behind japan by a long shot - and always has been, always will be.

    It might be the post-globalist age if your outsourcing jobs from the US/AU/etc to india, but when it comes to building tech its a different story for a number of reasons, but japanese building technology (especially anything human-interactive) for japan and chinese speaking continents is a huge market and making it western'er worthy is often of no real value to them given then bang/buck ratio.

  91. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  92. Telephones by Nobby21 · · Score: 1

    When I arrived in the States some 10 years ago, British phones were so far ahead of the American system it was pathetic, and yet 10 years before that, America had the edge on tech stuff, therefore what goes around comes around, perhaps the Iphone is the beginning of the USA leading the world once again. Fingers crossed.

    --
    Can't think of anything clever or funny.
  93. Me too by lawnsprinkler · · Score: 0

    I just lost the game.

  94. Re:Technical accomplishmnet is technical accomplis by fractoid · · Score: 1

    I pick by technical feat. Dude, you pick a remote controlled car. Sure it's in an interesting place but when it comes down to it, it's a place that requires lots of money, not modern (post-90s) technology.

    I'm sorry, but when my phone is half the thickness of my old one, has about three times the screen resolution, plays games, music and movies, makes voice and video calls, can connect to the internet, lasts for a week on a single charge, and has a better built in camera than most commercial standalone digital cameras 5 or 6 years ago, THAT is impressive.
    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  95. No problem! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    With my all-American Barrett M468, I'll simply take you cool Jap tech. Bwahahahaha!

    http://www.barrettrifles.com/rifle_468.aspx

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  96. You've missed out one thing by simong · · Score: 1

    We've all got flying cars in Europe now. No, really.

  97. That is the american way by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    Remember the space race, all of sudden it was to land a man on the moon. That was IT, goal completed, end of race. Nevermind that the USSR then went on to spend year after year with a continues manned space presence breaking record after record while the americans blew up, that didn't count. That was the goal the americans said had to be reached, that is what they reached first, therefore they won.

    It is amazing really, american standups never got tired of joking of Mir when it was in its final stages (nevermind that it never had any accidents) but mention the Nasa blowing up schoolteachers and ooooh, that is too nasty.

    I think it is due to american tv. When I grew up in Holland if you wanted to watch another tv station,depending on where you lived, you had to watch a foreign channel (English, german or belgian). Most of europe gets far more exposure to foreign culture then americans ever get.

    Back in days long past the Discovery channel would occasionally air a program that would look at things from an other perspective. A look at the russian side of WW2 for instance, not lately, nowadays they air a program on choppers and loudly claim that ejection seats are impossible in choppers. Might come as a suprise to the russians who have had them for ages.

    Americans can't/don't/won't look outside. They can't, it is not the american way.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:That is the american way by vecctor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's simply a product of the scale of the US. You said it yourself, you grew up in a country that was so small that you got transmissions from a dozen other countries in a dozen other languages. Of course your awareness of other cultures is higher.

      When I was in Europe (actually staying with a family friend near Utrecht for several weeks) I, at one point, visited 5 countries in one day. That kind of diversity over a small area just isn't a reality in the US. You could travel for 1.5 days in any direction on non-stop freeways and you wouldn't see any kind of major cultural shift.

      Its not some sort of willful ignorance, just as it isn't a willful that you got exposed to many cultures in a small area in Europe. Its just a matter of course - what you are exposed to naturally over the course of your life.

      Whether the homogeneity of the US culture is good or bad is another thing. Seems everyone thinks it is bad now, but I can remember hearing the exact opposite years ago. People amazed that you could have so many people from so many different places still manage to create such a homogeneous culture. The sentiment being that this was a great accomplishment that hadn't been done before.

      Guess the value of something depends on how/when you look at it.

      --
      Why, yes I have been touched by His noodly appendage. And I plan to sue.
  98. Wooooo, this seems to have raised some hackles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any American who thinks they're at the forefront of technology should go and hang out in South Korea for a while...

  99. What a load of nonsense by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Innovation, production? The US didn't have these before WW2 either, in fact, they didn't have the first DURING WW2 either. That is right, check your history, the US wasn't the innovator. The jet engine came from england, the rockets after WW2 from germany, nukes were made by immigrants, and its land war tech was way behind the USSR and even germany.

    But when the americans finally accepted that WW2 was ineffitable and got their asses into gear they suddenly managed to get their production up to record speed (and with it their economy) and even get some tech going. But make no mistake pre-WW2 the US was NOT a powerhouse. If anything it was considered as backwards as russia. A land of peasants, unworthy of the attentions of the rest of the world.

    At the opening shots of WW2 american tech was inferior to the axis nations AND its allies. What suprised everyone, and won the western front was its amazing capacity to get its industry converted to war and crank up the production to unprecedented levels.

    Who is to say the US can't do that again?

    Sure sure, empires fall. It happens, but every empire that lasted for hundreds of years will have had people proclaim its downfall for every single one of those years. If you keep saying something long enough, eventually it will come true. Tomorrow, the sun will explode. Keep on saying it, someday, it will be true. I wouldn't bother placing any bets however.

    But WW3 won't happen, unless you think it is already happening. None of the powers are willing to go to war at the moment, because there is more profit in global peace with localised war. The current conflict involves a group of people who by nature can't ever mount an effective fighting force (religious extremists never can fight, Israel military might does not come from Orthodox jews, it comes from normal jews, christians and yes muslims and even sane people who are willing to fight for their country) vs the entire rest of the world who views religion as something you use, not obey blindly.

    Just consider how many muslims in the west talk big, but do nothing because Allah may be great, but Big Brother (reality tv) is greater and you got to pay of that loan for that big screen tv. If there really was such great support for the cause, you could certainly do a lot better then a few meager bombings, most of which fail. When a dozen people in a country of 60 million decide to blow something up, that is not something to be too concerned about. PETA got more activists. Greenpeace manages to organize bigger raids with more results. Remember those assaults in the US on Abortion Clinics? Hell, even the KKK managed to keep their terror campaign alive for longer. Muslim terrorists, pathetic. Check the history of the IRA for how you really do it.

    No, the US will one day fall, but not in our life-time. The current war is just another Vietnam, sucks to be Iraq but the US isn't that affected by it. Huge debt? So what, who is going to collect? Who is going to the US? Europe (nah, we are to busy fight8ng amongs ourselves) Russia? They are laughing their heads off, they like the US getting its ass kicked in afghanistan, vengeance is a dish best served cold in a hot desert.

    China? Please, they got their own populace to oppress.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  100. Yeah real smart by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    And when dutch forces called for support to stop a genocide, the americans didn't send any. The genocide happens, the dutch got the blaim and the americans showed that as ever make a lousy partner.

    Check the history a little bit closer. THe US role is not something to be proud off.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  101. Please, I beg of you! by Riktov · · Score: 1

    Enter key on your keyboard.

    "Plain Old Text" formatting.

    "Preview" button.

    Makes it a lot easier to read.

    Really.

    Thanks.

  102. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by Beale · · Score: 1

    But if a given nation's consumers as a whole decide that they don't need a particular technological advance, they aren't automatically wrong or ignorant. You mean like cars which get over 35 MPG?

  103. Re:Technical accomplishmnet is technical accomplis by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    I pick by technical feat.

    OK, then which is the most impressive, to do what we've been doing since 1971 (if you're too lazy to read, the Soviets landed a rover on mars in 1971, except contact was lost with it due to a dust storm) except make it last longer, or drop a probe on a frozen satellite 15 times farther without even knowing what hides under its thick clouds, make it land smoothly, take pictures and communicate with another probe before running out of power (due to the fact that little solar power is available under the thick clouds of Titan)?

    By any criteria you choose the martian rovers stand heads and shoulders beyond those efforts.

    Riiight. Like I said, we're just doing what we could do 36 years ago except make it last longer. Big fucking whoop.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  104. Sorry, Can't let this one stand by bjk002 · · Score: 1

    The fact of the matter is, there are ways in which America is seriously behind Europe and Asia (no, I'm not talking about MP4 wristwatches) and there's no reason we shouldn't learn from their experience. The mindless fury with which many Americans react to any suggestion that the USA is not absolutely, positively #1 in every single way is a much bigger problem for the country than anti-American bigotry ... not to mention that a lot of the bigotry is a reaction to that particular type of arrogance.

    I can agree with the statement that the U.S. is "lagging behind" on many important issues as compared with particular countries, but I would also like someone to acknowledge that this type of comparison between UK and America, or France and America, or Germany and America is quite unfair.

    Sorry to break it to you, but your total land area per country is a pittance compared to that of the U.S. Your total population is likewise trivial compared to the U.S. as a whole. European "countries" are much closer in size and composition to American "states". Compare ALL of Europe to ALL of America, you get a MUCH different picture.

    Look at California(163,707 sq. mi, 36,457,000 people) compared with France(339908 sq mi. 60,144,000 people). California is what, the 9th largest economy in the WORLD? Where is France on the list? Compare Florida to England, again, no comparison. Compare North Dakota to Poland and you might get somewhere.

    Please, try to be fair when doing comparisons.

    --
    Opinion:=TMyOpinion.Create(Me);
    1. Re:Sorry, Can't let this one stand by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 1

      Look at California(163,707 sq. mi, 36,457,000 people) compared with France(339908 sq mi. 60,144,000 people). California is what, the 9th largest economy in the WORLD? Where is France on the list?
      France would be at number 6. (Number 5 in some other lists I saw). That puts France something like a half a trillion dollars ahead of California. In terms of comparing apples to apples, what aspect of California even matches to France? They have vastly different amounts of land and people. And I agree that comparing Europe to America gives a much different picture. Their economy is $1 trillion larger than ours, and not a single country has a president that's as bad as ours.
  105. US Doesn't Import Hard-Disk Cell Phones Either by tggreen · · Score: 0

    Yeah! Finally someone has written an article on this topic! For years Nokia has been selling cell phones with built-in hard disk drives (i.e. think cell phone meets iPod classic) overseas. I've never seen any of them get into the US. The best I can get in the US is a cell phone with a small flash drive like the Apple iPhone. The only problem with this article is that it didn't mention enough products.

    Another example is the Nissan Skyline. Remember how many years it took for THAT to get into the US?

  106. LED T-Shirts Also Don't Import Into US by tggreen · · Score: 0

    I've also been wishing that some of the cool LED T-Shirts in the UK would get imported to this side of the pond. So far, no luck. For an example, see: http://www.otherlandtoys.co.uk/sound-activated-illuminating-tshirt-p-1878.html

    1. Re:LED T-Shirts Also Don't Import Into US by tggreen · · Score: 0

      I stand corrected. ThinkGeek just brought it back. As of a few months ago there was no way to import one, though.

  107. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    I've been primomising it for years, one of these days I'll actually get around to writing "indoor rocketry for children". It wil have photos of the actual pyrotechnic rockets actually being launched indoors, with children.

    No, I'm not actually normal!

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  108. Re:Wait, what? They can't count, either by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    Bad writing on my part to then, I guess. But in my defense, nobody's paying me to do it.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  109. Americans are.. obvious by gosand · · Score: 1
    The mindless fury with which many Americans react to any suggestion that the USA is not absolutely, positively #1 in every single way is a much bigger problem for the country than anti-American bigotry ... not to mention that a lot of the bigotry is a reaction to that particular type of arrogance.


    This is just my experience, but take it for what it is worth... a few years ago, my wife and I went to Paris for a week. She has a Master's in French, so right away I had an advantage that most Americans do not - the ability to break the language barrier. She'd lived in Belgium for 9 months, so there was another advantage - culture knowledge. She made sure that we blended in. There were concerns at first about going, as we arrived 2 days after Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq. But all went very well, and the trip was great. Many of our friends thought that we were crazy, that we would be chased out of the country with pitchforks and torches for being from the US. But the bottom line was, we tried to fit in. She spoke the language, and I tried. We were treated normally. It was funny, we could spot American tourists a mile away (unless of course, they were blending like we were). The NASCAR T-shirts, tennis shoes, caps, etc. They were very loud and demanding in restaurants. It was embarassing. Now you could argue that they shouldn't change who they are, but you can't expect to get 'normal' treatment if you don't respect the country you are in. I heard one man saying "doesn't anyone here speak English?!" And yes, normally they do - as I found out when a kind waiter switched from speaking French to English when he realized his English was better than my French. :) The other funny thing that people at home always asked about was how rude the French were. They may not have been hi-how-are-you friendly, but they weren't rude. The rudest people we encountered on the entire trip were by far the people in O'Hare airport upon returning home. Maybe it's just a matter of perspective. Of course I was glad to return home, and I only spent a week there. But I can certainly see why people in other countries have their opinions about us. I think the real difference is that they can distinguish our citizens from our government... they hate our government for the way it behaves. They dislike our tourists for the same reason. But at the same time, they can respect us for our accomplishments and good traits. They don't seem as ridiculous and petty as we are towards them.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  110. US way behind Japan in electronic toilets by peter303 · · Score: 1

    (Parden the pun) They have toilets with seat warmers, measure your body's vital signs, provide audio & viedo entertainment, disquise the sound of peeing and flushing, fit in your car, and so on.

  111. Left Out Cell Phone Jammers by unamiccia · · Score: 1

    What I most regret is the absence of legal cell phone jamming technology in the United States. Someday soon, most Americans will go overseas to visit libraries and movie theaters or to find a quiet place to eat.

  112. Re:No sales != no demand by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    Firstly I presume when you said 9mm you meant 3.5mm.

    Secondly most seperate turntables give a very weak output and therefore require either a seperate turntable preamp or a device with one built in. You can get turntables with line level outputs but they are the exception not the rule.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  113. Re:No sales != no demand by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

    Err... Yeah, 3.5mm... Wow... that was a major Fruedian slip...

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.