Slashdot Mirror


Samsung Unveils 64-Gbit Flash Memory Chip

Lucas123 writes "The chips can be combined to create a 128-GB flash storage device capable of holding up to 80 DVD movies or 32,000 MP3 music files. The chip was created using 30-nanometer processing technology that was developed with Samsung's self-aligned double patterning technology. Manufacturing will start in 2009; but the article quotes a Gartner analyst who reminds us, 'Samsung has had a difficult time adhering to its timelines for mass production due to the complexity of MLC architectures and ever shrinking process geometries.'"

150 comments

  1. 64Gb = 8GB = incremental improvement by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know if I want storage that can't be addressed in 4 bytes.

    1. Re:64Gb = 8GB = incremental improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>> (1024.0**3*8)/(2.0**32)
      2.0

      Just make the minimal chunk precision 16 bits (2 bytes)

    2. Re:64Gb = 8GB = incremental improvement by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yup. This is why I prefer my bytes to be 16 bits long. My memory addressing is much more efficient this way.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:64Gb = 8GB = incremental improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The storage is likely not addressed in bytes, but in 512 byte blocks.

      SCSI faces this problem in a little while (once capcities exceed 2 terabytes.)

      One interesting thing, flash will be 1-2 years late with an order of magnitude _less_ storage.

    4. Re:64Gb = 8GB = incremental improvement by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      20 bits for the win! Anyone remember THAT? lol

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:64Gb = 8GB = incremental improvement by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I want storage that can't be addressed in 4 bytes.

      Your 8GB hard drive will miss you.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:64Gb = 8GB = incremental improvement by Thought1 · · Score: 1

      Flash is long-term storage, not cache or volatile RAM. Hard drives passed this up long ago. The whole point of flash is as a faster, easier, smaller version of a hard drive.

    7. Re:64Gb = 8GB = incremental improvement by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      If you have a 32-bit address space, and your words are also 32 bits, then you get 4 Gigawords at 32 bits each, for 128Gbit. So, they have one more address bit still.

    8. Re:64Gb = 8GB = incremental improvement by Nimey · · Score: 1

      You /must/ be trolling. How big is your hard drive again?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  2. Combine by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    So you can combine 16 of these to get 128GB. Can you combine 32 to get 256GB? And what if you combine 128 of them for 1TB!? The possibilities are endless.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Combine by jimstapleton · · Score: 4, Funny

      no, no, it's not like that. Flash memory chips are like uranium/plutonium/etc - once a chunk reaches a certain mass (depending on purity), they have a habit of exploding.

      See, if you combine 16 of them, you'll probably just lose your computer, and be otherwise ok. However at 256, the room your computer is in will probably be a lost cause. At 128? Good by city.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    2. Re:Combine by William+Robinson · · Score: 2, Funny
      See, if you combine 16 of them, you'll probably just lose your computer, and be otherwise ok. However at 256, the room your computer is in will probably be a lost cause. At 128? Good by city.

      What's the point in blowing up just a room, when I could blow up entire city with half the number of chips.:-P

    3. Re:Combine by alexhs · · Score: 1

      You're talking about indirect damages right ? That's actually the damages done by MPAA/RIAA lawyers ? :P

      So the analogy would be that flash memory chips are radiating copyright infringement lawsuits ? :)

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    4. Re:Combine by MindKata · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's the point in blowing up just a room, when I could blow up entire city with half the number of chips.:-P

      256 is a more stable computer number than 128

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    5. Re:Combine by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      Typo. Meant 32.

      Whatever you do, DONT COMBINE 256 CHIPS. The world sucks, but I like it anyway.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    6. Re:Combine by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny

      Danger, Will Robinson. You have just been added to the terror watch list. So now it's 755,001.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:Combine by jack_alexander · · Score: 1

      I'm not an advanced geek, but I see a lot of humor here. Try one further in this quest...What is going to happen when the 'Storm' bot finally wakes all of the way up and takes the entire 'net over. Is that a ka-boom or what?

    8. Re:Combine by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      No, you're both wrong. You can't put two Flash memory chips in the same device otherwise they start fighting and you end losing one, especially if they are male chips.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  3. Majestic 10 incher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming to a Linux User Group near you.

  4. Great math, author. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "128-GB flash storage device capable of holding up to 80 DVD movies"

    Those must be some pretty small DVDs.

    1. Re:Great math, author. by ungybungy · · Score: 1

      The standard release size for DVD rips is (or was at some point, and depending on the length of the movie) 1400M.

      128*1024/1400 ~ 93.6.

    2. Re:Great math, author. by Ledsock · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's Mbits, not Mbytes. Therefore, 128/8*1024/1400~11.7

      Also, they specified DVD movies. Rips from DVDs are usually called AVIs, DivX, XviD, or whatever. If you compress a standard 2 layer DVD down to a little less than a single layer, then you might be able to get 4 crammed in that space, but there'd be some heavy compression.

      --
      What is mankind really? Well, it's just two words put together Mank, and ind.
    3. Re:Great math, author. by Ledsock · · Score: 1

      Actually, I reread TFA, and saw they combined 16 of the 64 Gbit chips to make a 128 Gbyte chip. The point still stands about DVDs != movie files.

      --
      What is mankind really? Well, it's just two words put together Mank, and ind.
    4. Re:Great math, author. by absorbr · · Score: 1

      No it's not. A standard single layer DVD is 4GB. So that's 32 DVD's they could fit on this thing.

    5. Re:Great math, author. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Most movies don't use an entire disk. Heck quite a few don't even use half the disk. I'm talking to you "breakout romantic comedy of the year"

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    6. Re:Great math, author. by Khopesh · · Score: 1

      It's far worse than that: "64Gbit" is not bytes; you'll have to divide by 8 to get that ... oh, that makes for an 8GByte chip. We already have those.

      "80 DVD movies or 32,000 MP3 music files" would have to involve rather small movies and music files; at that quantity on paired chips (it's a good thing the author told us that this adds up to 128GB, I'd have otherwise been stumped), a "DVD movie" is 1.6GB and an "MP3 music file" is 4MB. Most DVDs are dual-layer these days, which means 5+GB, and the average music file in my collection is 6.5MB, with MP3s ripped at a higher bitrate than vorbis (so larger average file size).

      --
      Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
    7. Re:Great math, author. by slater86 · · Score: 1

      i'm sure its not that hard to get 80 DVDs to fit into a 128-GB flash storage device.

      I think the real question is "80 DVDs...will it blend?"

      --
      When people ask if I'm an optimist, I say "I hope so". --Bill Bailey
  5. God bless the summaries... by doyoulikeworms · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that provide storage sizes in units easy to relate with, namely pirated media.

    1. Re:God bless the summaries... by T-Bone-T · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have no idea how they got 80 movies from 128GB. DVD ISOs tend to be 7-10GB and divx rips tend to be 700MB in which case you get either 10-15 movies or over 160 movies.

    2. Re:God bless the summaries... by J0nne · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have no idea how they got 80 movies from 128GB. DVD ISOs tend to be 7-10GB and divx rips tend to be 700MB in which case you get either 10-15 movies or over 160 movies. Most recent DVD rips are of the 2CD variety, so 1,4 GB total per movie (which gives us about 85 movies). You can see they know exactly what people use them for ;).
    3. Re:God bless the summaries... by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I haven't seen that before! That is really funny.

    4. Re:God bless the summaries... by whoop · · Score: 1

      Considering recent class action lawsuits against Seagate and Western Digital on their labelling of "megabyte" or "gigabyte," maybe companies are going to adopt this new unit of measure.

    5. Re:God bless the summaries... by CompSci101 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, I'm an American, and I can't think in these fancy units. I have no idea how you'd represent this in Football Fields.

      How many Car Analogies is that, and how many ripped DVDs equal a Football Field?

      Have we no standards anymore?

      C

      --
      The Sun is proof that we can't even do fire properly.
    6. Re:God bless the summaries... by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1

      Ha ha! Awesome. Those idiotic analogies always drive me nuts. The "full-grown elephants" one is another. How many adolescent-elephants does that equal? How about adult-but-undersized elephants?

      Sigh. Remember when people were expected to consider things for themselves, without infantile illustrations for the lowest common denominator?

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    7. Re:God bless the summaries... by soulsteal · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're going with the scene-standard 2CD release size of 1400MB.

    8. Re:God bless the summaries... by XdevXnull · · Score: 1

      Once it's converted to a 2 CD set, it's not longer a "DVD Movie" any more than it's a "24mm Reel Movie". By saying specifically that it's a DVD movie, they are implying that there is somewhere in the neighborhood of 4 - 9 gigs of data in MPEG-2 format. I understand what you're saying, but c'mon! This was a terrible story summary.

      PS
      64Gbit storage? Really?? Why would you specify storage in bits, contrary to the established convention? I didn't RTFA because I have WAY too much porn to view and catalog here, so I'll just assume it's the submitter and editor who are the morons, and not the article writer or the company's press release. At first I thought it was about a new kind of flash with a super high access and transfer speed, but then I realized it was just about a not very impressive thing at all.

      --
      "I'm a Laver, not a Phyto[plankton]"
    9. Re:God bless the summaries... by Debug0x2a · · Score: 1

      Last I checked the official unit of storage was 1 Library of Congress (LoC). Likewise the official unit of data transfer is 1 LoC/s. Most likely, the size of the actual Library of Congress would be considered the original storage size for the purpose of calculating the percent decrease of storage media size over time.

      --
      First post = troll. Cleverly worded post designed to enrage others = flamebait.
    10. Re:God bless the summaries... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      For our non-US readers it might help to point out that 1 US Football Field = 5000 high quality goatse jpgs.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  6. Storage size limit? by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The chips can be combined to create a 128-GB flash storage device capable of holding up to 80 DVD movies or 32,000 MP3 music files.

    Am I missing something about that statement, or is it really as stupid as it sounds?

    With some time, I could create a 128-*Peta*byte storage device with those chips. In the worst case scenario, you build a device out of multiple 128-GB flash devices.

    1. Re:Storage size limit? by obergfellja · · Score: 1, Interesting

      forget that, I want a 128 YottaByte (YB) drive.

    2. Re:Storage size limit? by Drizzt+Do'Urden · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd prefer 128 YodaBytes, and let the force hold my data!

    3. Re:Storage size limit? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for a 256 Zigabyte drive (Ziga is the binary equivalent of a zillion)

    4. Re:Storage size limit? by jollyreaper · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd prefer 128 YodaBytes, and let the force hold my data! Yeah, but then Lucas will come along every few years and make changes to your data to bring it more in line with his original vision.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    5. Re:Storage size limit? by somersault · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Surely nobody needs that many porno movies one one drive?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    6. Re:Storage size limit? by obergfellja · · Score: 0

      With the release of the 128 YottaBite Drive, there has been a record number of men in the hospital for a sudden drop in blood pressure. Doctors are baffled until they connect the dots with whats left of their IT department.

    7. Re:Storage size limit? by default+luser · · Score: 1

      With some time, I could create a 128-*Peta*byte storage device with those chips. In the worst case scenario, you build a device out of multiple 128-GB flash devices.

      But thanks to the form-factor, you're limited by maximum component count in any reasonable device.

      There's a point at which you're no longer adding value by adding chips, because the whole contraption would be too expensive to manufacture. That number tends to be around 2 chips for small USB thumb drives and mp3 players, and for the much larger 2.5" notebook drives (the target device size for their "128 gig" part), 16 chips.

      I can't wait for SSDs to become more affordable, because I am sick and tired of the failing reliability (not to mention the increasing loudness) of modern hard drives.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    8. Re:Storage size limit? by egoproxy · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the IEC standard the binary equivalent of Zillion would be Zibibyte.

  7. Oblig. Porn Comment by R2.0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So if I can hold all my porn in one hand, and work the keyboard with the other...

    How's this supposed to work, again?

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  8. My 80 Gb iPod wnats one of those. by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

    It can only dream though.

    --
    I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    1. Re:My 80 Gb iPod wnats one of those. by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      A couple of them even.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    2. Re:My 80 Gb iPod wnats one of those. by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. I'm willing to bet there aren't even 4 flash chips in the ipod. It would take 10 of these chips just to equal your ipod.

  9. This Is Great, But... by MrCrassic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has Samsung improved on the inherently bad Flash write speeds? If not, then I don't really see too much of a point for anything other than desktops (where much more revenue could be made for server or workstation-based uses).

    1. Re:This Is Great, But... by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're thinking of NOR devices.
      NAND organized flash has good write speeds but poor read speeds and NOR is the other way round.
      The controller has a lot to do with overall performance as well.

      Finally, Hynix has demonstrated a 22 die stack, but not in HVM. Samsung could *possibly* do a 16 die stack, but I'm betting on two packages, each with 8 die when this comes out.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:This Is Great, But... by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      NAND organized flash has good write speeds but poor read speeds and NOR is the other way round.

      so that's why they need to combine the chips, one to write to and one to read from!

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    3. Re:This Is Great, But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure someone could think of a way to make write-only storage very efficiently. :)

    4. Re:This Is Great, But... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I'm sure someone could think of a way to make write-only storage very efficiently.

      It has been done and I remember when it was announced:

      http://www.national.com/rap/Story/WOMorigin.html

  10. BBC by Alan_g_Dundee · · Score: 1

    At least Slashdot have a better summary than the BBC for once http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7057717.stm I contacted them as they originally claimed something similar to "The 64 gigabit (Gb) chips [are] capable of holding the equivalent of 80 DVDs.". They have since corrected it.

    1. Re:BBC by Distortions · · Score: 1

      It can hold 80 - 1.6GB DVDs movies? Huh? More like: 13 - 9.4GB DVDs 26 - 4.7GB DVDs 200 - 650MB CDs 4 days of 128kps audio 2 weeks of 32kps speech 250,000 4x6 photos

      --
      Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
    2. Re:BBC by IRGlover · · Score: 1

      More importantly - how many football pitches does that equate to???

    3. Re:BBC by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      It all depends on the amount of compression you use when copying the DVD. To fit 80 DVDs on 8 GB one needs movies of about 100 MB. Maybe for mobile phone quality movies...

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  11. Why? by darthflo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This flash based player thingie Samsung's building will extremely probably be way more expensive than it'd be using a 1.8" hard drive. OTOH they can shape it more freely (why would they? Hard drives are shaped quite like widescreen displays. Perfect for portable media players) and probably shave off a few millimeters in thickness while providing the same battery runtime.
    While this might turn out to be something awesome, I can't really imagine to be willing to pay double (or more?) just to have a 10-15% slimmer media player. Do you?

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The read data faster than hard drives.

      They use less electricity than hard drives.

      It's about way more than just thickness of the media.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While this might turn out to be something awesome, I can't really imagine to be willing to pay double (or more?) just to have a 10-15% slimmer media player. Do you? If they slap an Apple logo on it they won't be able to keep them in stock.
  12. Say Goodbye to Microdrives by wolff000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I never liked the micro drives for portable devices. I move around a lot and the micro drives tend to die on me. Where as the flash players I have had last well forever so far. The only one that died was one I dropped from 300 feet up while rock climbing.

    --
    WTF?
    1. Re:Say Goodbye to Microdrives by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only one that died was one I dropped from 300 feet up while rock climbing.

      I'm surprised you found it at all.

      I wonder if the only reason you couldn't access it was because the interface was damaged - IE you fix the USB port and it'd work again.

      Stuff as small as thumb drives tend to have a pretty low terminal velocity - 20 ft and 300 ft end up being pretty much the same.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    2. Re:Say Goodbye to Microdrives by wolff000 · · Score: 1

      Well I found all the pieces of it anyway. The flash chip looked intact as did the traces but the interface and the USB plug had broken off. I soldered on a new plug but it was dead. Not a big loss considering I paid about twenty bucks for it.

      --
      WTF?
    3. Re:Say Goodbye to Microdrives by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Eh. Not worth the cost to me. I've been getting pretty upset about the price of MP3 players lately actually. They've almost all moved totally to flash, which doesn't offer enough space and is way too expensive. I mean, hell, I've got a 7 year old iPod, been dropped countless times, and it's just finally starting to crap out on me...though I think it may just need reformatted. That tends to fix 'em usually. I've got a nano too, which is nice, but it just can't hold enough music. What happened to the old RCA lyra? That thing was perfect. Cheaper than an iPod, you had the option of their software or just drag-and-drop, so it was compatible with anything that could use a USB hard drive, it had better features (custom equalizer, FM radio, etc...), and it used a hard drive. Wish they hadn't switched that line over to all flash players...

  13. Size Matters by reabbotted · · Score: 0

    How big are these things? Could Apple fit 16 of them inside a Nano? That seems like an important piece of information that has been left out of the article.

  14. What about the limited number of rewrites? by ke_da_wei · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Until they make it possible to rewrite as many times as you can on a traditional hard drive, why would you need one so big?

    1. Re:What about the limited number of rewrites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it will last longer than a hard drive anyway? If I have to choose between a device that lasts 10 years and a device that allows me enough rewrites to last me 15 years, I'm going to go with the latter. I don't know why people are so hung up on rewrites. Maybe they think this is 2002 when flash devices really DID have a restrictive number of rewrites. But it's not 2002. Unless you're using this as a swap device AND swapping to it like crazy, it's going to last you longer than a hard drive will.

    2. Re:What about the limited number of rewrites? by pla · · Score: 1

      Until they make it possible to rewrite as many times as you can on a traditional hard drive, why would you need one so big?

      Decent wear-levelling algorithms accomplished that at the interface level almost 20 years ago. On top of that, modern flash usually has some degree of on-chip healing capability (remapping failed blocks from a small pool of reserved good ones).

      Virtually all of the traditional objections to flash no longer apply. They last longer than HDDs, they can read/write faster (at a bulk level - Each individual block still takes longer, but unlike HDDs you can basically read/write every block in the device at once), and many of them now "look" like plain ol' ATA devices, meaning you can simply use them as drop-in replacements for traditional HDDs.

    3. Re:What about the limited number of rewrites? by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      I guess for MP3 players and the like - it would get the smaller form factor flash players into the same storage range as hard drive players have currently. I'd buy that if the price is ok.

    4. Re:What about the limited number of rewrites? by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      remapping failed blocks from a small pool of reserved good ones
      Is that before or after you save data to that block?!

      Now for the serious part of the discussion: How does flash determine when a block failed? I know regular hard disks use this feature too, but how does it determine a block failed also? If a block fails, how would it be able to recover the data contained there? How does wear leveling fit into securely erasing flash storage? Even if you overwrite a block, how can you be sure it was really overwritten?

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    5. Re:What about the limited number of rewrites? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      With wear levelling they have drives (ok, not cheap USB sticks) that have above-HDD write cycles already. Not that I expect HDDs to die from write cycles anyway, they die because they're platters spinning at 7200rpm that sooner or later will wear down and break, whether I write to them or not. Seriously, it's a complete non-issue unless you're doing heavy database IO on a tiny flash card that's almost filled to the brim. If you did enough swapping for it to matter, you'd have bought another stick of RAM long ago.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:What about the limited number of rewrites? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Store for playback ripped movies to xvid. I rip and never delete. so this would be perfect for me. just stack up a crapload inside the pc case.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:What about the limited number of rewrites? by Torne · · Score: 2, Informative

      remapping failed blocks from a small pool of reserved good ones
      Is that before or after you save data to that block?!

      During. Flash blocks fail while you are writing to them (or more specifically, when you are reading back the data to verify the write), so you have the data you wanted to write right there to save to another block. Flash blocks, under normal circumstances, don't go bad when they are just storing data or having it read out.

      Now for the serious part of the discussion: How does flash determine when a block failed? I know regular hard disks use this feature too, but how does it determine a block failed also? If a block fails, how would it be able to recover the data contained there? How does wear leveling fit into securely erasing flash storage? Even if you overwrite a block, how can you be sure it was really overwritten?

      Flash block remapping normally works by detecting write failures as above, so you don't need to recover any data. HDDs do it by using ECC, usually by marking sectors as bad after errors are detected and corrected (so unless it's so bad it's gone past the ECC correction threshold you keep your data).

      Wear levelling makes it impossible to securely erase flash storage without taking flash-chip specific measures.
    8. Re:What about the limited number of rewrites? by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize that they verify what they were written, thanks for the info. With the recent advancements in SSD storage space, a lot of people are wanting them for laptops. Not being able to securely erase the data may be a problem for some. This may make encryption that is easy to use and secure a priority for manufacturers.

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    9. Re:What about the limited number of rewrites? by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      > at a bulk level - Each individual block still takes longer, but unlike HDDs you can basically read/write every block in the device at once

      yes, but unfortunately software (for instance an installation program) makes lots of small individual writes, rather than one big one

    10. Re:What about the limited number of rewrites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basement of House
      You are sitting in a dark secluded corner of your mother's basement. The only light is the glow of multiple monitors and blinking leds.
      To your right is a pile of empty energy drink cans.
      To your left is a dead horse decaying on the cold basement floor. Next to the horse is a stick.

      > pick up stick

      You are now holding a stick.

      >beat teh horse

      I do not understand the command "teh".

      >beat the horse

      You are now beating a dead horse with a stick.

      Seriously, if I have to read one more, "but teh flash wares out" posts...

      It's been dealt with, it doesn't wear out more quickly than a traditional harddrive. Can we move on, stop answering these questions as if they are legitimate and most importantly NOT mod these people up?

      There should be a -1 uninformed moderation.
  15. Bad math by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Am I the only person tired of seeing storage listed in terms of "songs"? Come on,

    32,000 MP3 music files Really, that number doesn't mean squat. I have a friend who love punk music, where the songs are on average about 45 seconds long. I have another friend who listens to classical music, where many songs are 5 minutes or more. How could you possibly equate those two?

    Wouldn't it just make a lot more sense to say it could hold X hours of music, instead?
    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Bad math by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

      How much does that work out to in Libraries of Congress?

    2. Re:Bad math by snl2587 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but a lot of consumers don't really think about that kind of thing, so it sounds better to them to hear "32,000 mp3s" with a footnote that suggests 4 minute songs than to say "2133 hours and 20 minutes of music". So in this case what would make sense takes a back seat to what sells.

    3. Re:Bad math by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it just make a lot more sense to say it could hold X hours of music, instead?

      How many hours of music are in the library of congress?

    4. Re:Bad math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. What if I have 32,000 copies of the extended, 20 minute live version of Free Bird in WAV format?

    5. Re:Bad math by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      The, "average" mp3 is just over three minutes long and takes up 4MB. 32,000 mp3 x 4,000,000 ANSI standard bytes = 128GB

    6. Re:Bad math by tomknight · · Score: 1

      I'd want to be told how many reams of sheet music. Reams? No, make that furlongs of score.

      --
      Oh arse
    7. Re:Bad math by wwahammy · · Score: 1

      That was the very first thing I thought of when I read the summary

    8. Re:Bad math by xigxag · · Score: 1

      Seems to me they provide the mp3's as a BOTE estimate, an order of magnitude for point of reference, nothing more. If anybody wants to calculate it into hours (which is meaningless without a corresponding bitrate), then they've got the actual storage space, 128GB, and can do the math themselves.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    9. Re:Bad math by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Yeah except that 128Gbit is 16Gbyte.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    10. Re:Bad math by doombringerltx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even listing "2133 hours and 20 minutes of music" is going to need a footnote of thats its of mp3s encoded at a bit rate of 128kbps. I listen to punk and hardcore and 128 kbps is more than enough for most of my stuff, but I know some people who listen to real music and will complain to no end if its less than 256 kbps.

    11. Re:Bad math by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Really, that number doesn't mean squat. I have a friend who love punk music, where the songs are on average about 45 seconds long. I have another friend who listens to classical music, where many songs are 5 minutes or more. How could you possibly equate those two? By ignoring them completely. The standard length for pop songs is three minutes. Anything above or below that is discarded as sample bias.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    12. Re:Bad math by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      I'd want to be told how many reams of sheet music. Reams? No, make that furlongs of score. Sheet music? Score? Come on, most of pop music is accompanied by the same beat box noise that's been used since the late 70's. I'd bet you could write the "score" for most top 40 music on a postage stamp and have room to spare.

      Now get off my lawn, you dang whippersnappers!
      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    13. Re:Bad math by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it just make a lot more sense to say it could hold X hours of music, instead?

      Would that be in 128kbps AACs, 256kbps AACs, 320kbps MP3s, VBR MP3s or FLACs? It's a ballpark estimate based on what's typical anyway, and you're not going to make it exact by making another ballpark estimate. In short, if you needed the first estimate it's as good as yours, and if you want it exact then your estimate is just as poor.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    14. Re:Bad math by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      But they are talking of combining 16 chips of 64Gbit which gets you 128 GByte. Of course, they are just saying "businesses can create a 128GB flash storage device". Which, while true, doesn't really mean anything apart from "you can use multiple chips in the same device".

    15. Re:Bad math by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how about us hippies that own Indian Music? A good Raga can be 45 minutes long. That and I will generally encode higher then 128 bits/second.

    16. Re:Bad math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one tired of seeing music listed in terms of "hours"? Come on.

      Really, that number doesn't mean squat. I have a friend who encodes everything at 128kbs, where the quality is a bit flat. I have another the takes his live recordings, and encodes them at 320kbs. How is it possible to equate these two?

      Wouldn't it just make a lot more sense to say it could hold X Gigabytes of data, instead?

    17. Re:Bad math by raulzero · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, you're not the only one. I, for one, will not be buying a bag of these "chips" until they can hold data other than just music and video.

    18. Re:Bad math by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      How much does that work out to in Libraries of Congress? About twenty football fields.

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    19. Re:Bad math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm sure they can hold dip, though I wouldn't recommend eating them. :-)

    20. Re:Bad math by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      And what's the bitrate?

    21. Re:Bad math by SJ2000 · · Score: 1

      No one cares about how many DVDs or hours of music it holds, who needs that crap anyway? All we care about is how many Libraries of Congress it can hold!

    22. Re:Bad math by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      What if it is "classic punk" though? Does it get longer over time?

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    23. Re:Bad math by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I prefer to measure it in pecks of mp3s.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  16. Well, aside from price... by wattrlz · · Score: 1

    There's probably a limit to the amount of chips you can fit on a controller or in standard flash drive form factors. You'd have to either have custom hardware or stack a thousand 128GB boards together on some kind of bus. So, sure, you could have a 128PB storage device, but you'd need a steamer trunk to keep it in, a full-sized AC unit to keep it cool, and a killowatt power supply to keep it running at any decent speed.

  17. And just as Gartner will remind you that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    samsung is often off, I will remind you that Gartner is normally always way off. Lets wait and see what happens.

    1. Re:And just as Gartner will remind you that... by djupedal · · Score: 1

      And we all know that anonymous cowards, with their anecdotal remarks, are always way right on.

      Samsung hasn't enjoyed worldwide success & growth since 1970 by being 'off'. As well, it is more important to focus on who will buy what Samsung produces...in this case, Apple.

      Your agenda? ...blather would be my guess.

  18. bits or bytes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is it gigabits of gigabytes? a lot of news stories don't seem to know the difference.

  19. Nobody else pointing this out? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    64Gbit is only 8Gbyte which is still fairly big, but not enough to store 40 DVD movies (hell it could hardly hold two).

    Me thinks whomever wrote the summary was a bit off to lunch that day.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:Nobody else pointing this out? by rtyhurst · · Score: 1

      128GB is what you'll need just to load Vista's successor "Microsoft ReVista, Now With Extra-Intrusive Auto Update and Ultra-Annoying DRM!".

      So you'll be able to play Windows Solitaire on your Zune.

      That's so cool -- these guys are way ahead of the curve!

    2. Re:Nobody else pointing this out? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      That's the stupidest rant I've read all day. It's only cool to hate on MSFT if you're old enough to remember using DOS. If your entry to computers was Windows 98 you might as well shut up since you don't know what you're missing anyways.

      That said, not an MSFT fan in the slightest, but if you're going to rant against them at least make sense and stop pulling rancid poser comments out of your ass.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:Nobody else pointing this out? by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      According to the summary (and TFA) you can combine these 64Gbit chips into a 128GB[yte] device.
      1 one-layer DVD ~4.5GB
      That's still only bout 28 DVDs on one of these though.
      They probably actually mean "up to 80 high-quality DVD-ripps", since they're much smaller. =)

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  20. Will they be arrested for conspiracy to commit... by Simonetta · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will they be arrested for conspiracy to commit piracy? Let's see 30,000 MP3 songs at $250,000 each time 1,000,000 chips. A lot of zeros means a lot of money! Everyone knows that if you sell a memory device that can hold 20000 MP3 songs that all but a handful will be 'pirated', that is to say copied without permission of their so-called owners. No one except loud-mouth fuckhead billionaire Steven Jobs is actually paying $30000 for 30,000 iTune songs. So if you make a device that facilitates file copying, aren't you guilty of conspiracy to commit intellectual property fraud?

        And don't tell me that there are alternative legal uses for hard drives and memory chips. After all, isn't the scope of the intellectual property crisis dire enough to overrule such petty and superficial uses of these devices? Isn't that what the entertainment industry is telling us? Aren't they the most important 'industry' in the USA and the world?

      In my town any teenager can have his life ruined by being arrested for having a little piece of blank paper in his pocket. The pigs (excuse me, I meant to say 'the Republicans') here call it 'conspiracy to possess marijuana paraphernalia', and it means just a cigarette rolling paper. And it's a serious crime with serious time.

      But every consumer electronics store in the city sells drives and media that are specifically used to commit so-called 'intellectual property theft'. Listening to music, having a little scrap of paper in your pocket, even suggesting that this is all nothing but corrupt,racist, selective law enforcement, it's enough to get you arrested and thrown into the vast American rape-torture gulag.

      But if the MPAA/RIAA is so smart and so bad, then why aren't they actually going up face-to-face, lawyer-to-lawyer against the manufacturers that make the hard drives and memory chips? Sure they'll go after single mothers making $8/hr and win $250,000 with their $300,000/yr lawyers and hand-written laws. But will they go after the Fry's, Walmarts, and BestBuys for selling the drives, PCs, and modems that make it possible for ordinary people to 'steal' their 'intellectual property'? Why not? They have the money, they have the lawyers, they have the testicles! So where's the beef?

      If they won't do this, then the entire music and entertainment global industry (it's what now, four giant companies?) should be taken over by the government as a RICO enterprise. We should make them do it. After all, it's us that are the most embarrassed by this corrupt extortion. Why aren't we doing anything about these assholes? Of course, they will self-destruct on their own, but they will do a lot of damage on the way down. We should put our collective heads together and deliver a coup-de-grace to these pathetic losers. Consider it a mercy killing. Which is legal here, but carrying a little piece of rice paper is not.

  21. Who uses 32-bits anymore (or will in 2009) by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

    At least on their main machine... My work computer, home computer, and laptop are all 64-bit already. And by 2009, so will everyone elses'

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
    1. Re:Who uses 32-bits anymore (or will in 2009) by Vexor · · Score: 1

      From a gamers perspective 32 bits is still very viable. Mainly due to the fact that there are many many games that are fully 32-bit however they only have 16-bit installers thus making them useless on a 64-bit OS (64-bit Operating Systems do not support 16-bit anything iirc)

      --
      ~Vexed and loving it!
    2. Re:Who uses 32-bits anymore (or will in 2009) by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I've got a 2GHz Pentium M with 2GB of RAM in my work laptop. Definitely not 64bit, but I'm not seeing it being replaced (or needing to be replaced) within a year. Maybe 2 or 3, but definitely not by 2009. And that's only if 64bit drivers have become more common and stable. There's still going to be a lot of 32bit computing going on well through 2010.

    3. Re:Who uses 32-bits anymore (or will in 2009) by emmons · · Score: 1

      they only have 16-bit installers

      Huh? 16 bit apps went out of style with the introduction of the 386. Any respectible compiler since has generated 32 bit binaries unless told otherwise.

      64-bit Operating Systems do not support 16-bit anything

      Vista doesn't run 16 bit applications natively, but they can be run through emulators like DOSBox. So if you abosolutely must run DOS tetris, you still can.

      --
      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  22. 30nm? by keithjr · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't like how the article doesn't state any projected costs. 30nm is on the bleeding edge of process sizes and I'd be surprised if they don't take pretty severe hit to their chip yield as a result. We'll see.

  23. Pocket PC 64? Nintendo DS 64? by tepples · · Score: 1

    My work computer, home computer, and laptop are all 64-bit already. And by 2009, so will everyone elses' Including PDAs and handheld video gaming systems?
  24. What cost ? by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and how long does such storage last before bits go bad ?

  25. The Visit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, thats enough talk, Simonetta. You will be receiving our "visit". And you can't just throw away all those blank papers and blank dvds.

    Regards,
    mafIAA
  26. 80 DVDs??? by siliconeyes · · Score: 1

    How the heck is 128 GBs supposed to hold 80 DVDs?? Even assuming these are single layer DVDs (which I don't think any high quality movie is), 80 DVDs work out to over 320 GBs. If you're talking double-layer, then it is twice this figure.

    I won't even start on the 32,000 MP3 figure. That is almost always based on somebody's arbitrary assumption on how big a song is supposed to be..

    1. Re:80 DVDs??? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      simple Compressing to Theater quality on Xvid with AC3 audio intact (2 pass) I can compress most Movies to 3Gb easily so that it looks fantastic on a 100" screen. HD content at 1080i takes 6-7gb. this is at full resolution with the black bars removed to save room. all but a very few people can tell the difference between the original and the rip. only on Ice Age2 opening sequence can you with close inspection see the artifacts easily.

      my calculation shows 240gb needed for 80DVD's. many people compress to 1.6gb for a typical 90 minute movie. that is actually viewable on a laptop or PC in a window or on a SDTV just fine. longer movies are much bigger.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:80 DVDs??? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      What are you using to convert? I've been up to 2-2.5GB using Xvid, and I still have not been happy on rips of 5GB+ MPEG2 DVD streams. I essentially gave up since anything more just isn't worth it going higher, and I can see the artifacts on my 51" HD screen. I've watched xvid on the 125" for u???net rips, but it's not really a good experience - and those guys seem to get better results than I do.

      An earlier poster suggested that maybe the 80 DVD was based on the seeminly ubiquitous 1.4GB (700x2) xvid/divx rips that float around the net. I budget for 4.5GB per movie on my server, which lets me do a 1:1 DVD rip to ISO for playback. I'm already "out of space" based on the discs in the jukebox, but I just can't bring myself to go to drop the $$ on a new raid setup, though I know I should.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:80 DVDs??? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I do it hybrid in linux/windows and use ffmpeg. I do 2 pass and it can take up to 5 hours to rip a DVD completely to a Xvid.

      windows + anydvd and copy the contents to a linux machine. then I use that machine and ffmpeg to do 2 passes with the settings for extreme high quality and 2 pass. I simply then copy the AC3 track to the file as well, most media center pc's will decode the audio into the Spdif/toslink for the receiver to give you the3 surround sound.

      I set all settings to extreme levels. I tried to do it all windows once but for some reason the windows choices for encoding always give me a crapload of artifacts. you haveto do 2 pass you have to use the highest settings, use the HDTV settings on the DVD's for better filtering of artifacts.

      some movies like the bourne supramcy cant have anything done even from a blu-ray source as there is an insane amount of movement in the film due to the "shake the hell out of it cam" filming style.. (Sony bluray DVD has a bug that bypasses encryption. boot it with Component only for video, after boot connect HDMI to your hdmi capture card. capture the movie in 1080p without encryption on your capture machine. works great for ripping blu ray disc to xvid.)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:80 DVDs??? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I've got ffmpeg on my theater machine, but am using it as just a decode-codec pack. I might have to hijack my daughter's laptop to try it out, since she's the only one with a linux machine in the house. (She's safer without windows on the 'net, and the edubuntu included games are good)

      I'm already using windvd; I wish slysoft's divx compressor (mobile) was better/more universal.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  27. Re:Will they be arrested for conspiracy to commit. by mdielmann · · Score: 1

    Consider it a mercy killing. Which is legal here, but carrying a little piece of rice paper is not. Hmm, you'd think a bunch of old people would be more worried about making it legal to kill old and/or debilitated people than they would be about teenagers smoking pot.
    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  28. 128 Yattabytes by tepples · · Score: 1

    forget that, I want a 128 YottaByte (YB) drive. Everybody say Yatta!
  29. Data lasts as long as you want. by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    You write to the device once.

    I can sell you a certainty policy that guarantees your data is safe, as long as you do not access it.

    Low annual premiums available.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  30. ProDOS 8 V1.9 by tepples · · Score: 1

    It's only cool to hate on MSFT if you're old enough to remember using DOS. I'm old enough to remember ProDOS; does that count?
    1. Re:ProDOS 8 V1.9 by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      This isn't fucking word association, pay attention. We're talking MSFT products. As in, if you haven't used a bunch of them [say from the DOS days onwards] you probably don't have anything to bitch about.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:ProDOS 8 V1.9 by tepples · · Score: 1

      We're talking MSFT products. Now you tell me.

      As in, if you haven't used a bunch of them [say from the DOS days onwards] you probably don't have anything to bitch about. I was talking about command-line environments from the MS-DOS days, not command-line environments from the MS-DOS company, and Apple's ProDOS and Microsoft's MS-DOS were around at the same time. I guess the "old enough" in your GGP comment must have confused me. Had you written "If your entry to MSFT products" rather than "If your entry to computers", I might have understood.
    3. Re:ProDOS 8 V1.9 by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Ahhh let's stop fighting. We both hate MSFT, that's good enough in my books.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  31. Because most of my music is FLAC by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

    Well, it's not just because of *me*, but because so many people encode using different codecs and at different rates. I get frustrated whenever I see an mp3 player saying that it can hold "n Hours of music!," only to see in the fine print that it's in .wma format @ 96kb/s. I'm a fan of just saying how much space, in human-readable format (df -h) in terms of GB. Not Gb, not MB or Mb, but GB....

  32. Ten MAFIAA members can't stop the Betamax by tepples · · Score: 1

    No one except loud-mouth fuckhead billionaire Steven Jobs is actually paying $30000 for 30,000 iTune songs. Pawn shops sell cheaper CDs.

    In my town any teenager can have his life ruined by being arrested for [...] 'conspiracy to possess marijuana paraphernalia', and it means just a cigarette rolling paper. Ages 13 to 17 aren't supposed to possess tobacco paraphernalia either in any U.S. state I can think of.

    But will they go after the Fry's, Walmarts, and BestBuys for selling the drives, PCs, and modems that make it possible for ordinary people to 'steal' their 'intellectual property'? Why not? They have tried, and they have failed, at least in the United States. Google will tell you all about Sony v. Universal and RIAA v. Diamond Multimedia.

    If they won't do this, then the entire music and entertainment global industry (it's what now, four giant companies?) There are six major movie studios: Columbia (Sony), Disney, Fox, Warner, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal (GE). There are four major record labels: Sony BMG (Bertelsmann), the other Universal (Vivendi), the other Warner, and EMI. That makes ten companies at the top of the MAFIAA.
  33. 32000 songs? by caywen · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, I love those 45-minute Yanni jam sessions, so it'll be more like 5000 songs for me.

  34. Don't ask "but how many writes before it fails?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Every single fucking time a flash memory article is posted some bunch of fucktards asks the same damn bunch of asshat questions or makes the same stupid "observation".

    The claim is that flash memory will somehow wear out too quickly to be useful; or "only lasts a few thousand writes" or some other stupid ass comment.

    Please please please - look up older articles and read the comments or just read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wear_levelling and shut up. Flash memory and its controllers have improved to the point where it's reasonable to expect an SSD to last longer than a typical PC or laptop's useful life.

  35. 64bit arguments are like IPv6 arguments. by name*censored* · · Score: 0, Redundant
    >> Who uses 32-bits anymore

    Windows has 90% (give or take 5%) of the desktop market. Only a small percentage of Windows users have upgraded to Vista, and only about half of THOSE are using the 64 bit version. So to answer your question, very few. (Although it's hard to say for 2009, since I can't read the future :P)
    --
    Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
  36. Re:Will they be arrested for conspiracy to commit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a suit brought by Disney (I think) against Sony for their VHS recorders which could record TV shows and other things "illegally" (namely Disney movies). This case was cited in all the Grokster file sharing legal garbage. They said that Sony wasn't responsible because there were plenty of ways to use the VHS recorders legally. In this case I'm sure Samsung is in the same boat.

  37. Standards by NeverNow · · Score: 0

    Well, you should know that there is an industry standard for MP3 length/size. It's the MTV-empty-pop-heavy-rotation-single. About 3 megabytes in size, about nil worth.

  38. Re:Don't ask "but how many writes before it fails? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only that, but most flash chips nowadays support tens of millions of writes to each block before it will fail. And some blocks can go bad and have their data moved elsewhere and just not be used anymore (just like sectors on a HDD, actually).

    Even if you wrote EVERY SINGLE BLOCK 10,000 TIMES EVERY DAY it would probably still take many years before the device was unusable. Under more normal usage conditions, they probably last for decades.

  39. No, he's right by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    He's taling about poor write speeds in comparison to regular disk drives.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_state_drive#Disadvantages

    "Slow random write speeds - as erase blocks on SSDs generally are quite large, they're far slower than conventional disks for random writes."

  40. Analogies by mrbluze · · Score: 2, Funny

    I collect baseball fields. Currently I can fit 0.0000000012 baseball fields on a flash drive, how many can I fit onto one of these?

    I used to collect Libraries of Congress, but after the first one I couldn't find any others.

    --
    Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
  41. Obligatory spaceballs ref... by WallaceAndGromit · · Score: 1

    I prefer YogurtBytes, satisfyingly funny.

    --
    Name: Mr. Anon E Mouse; SSN: 555-55-5555
  42. Re:Don't ask "but how many writes before it fails? by Eugene · · Score: 1

    MLC NAND flash typically rated for 10000 erase cycles, while SLC NAND flash are rated for 100000 cycles.....

  43. Whoa! by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 1

    That would be one ph47 stick!

    I'm already envious of it's "size" :-P

    --
    See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
  44. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SSD Flash units have been out for years now @ 64GB. I believe there are 128GB units as well. Samsung isn't the only manufacturer that makes the 64gb ones. 2.5", (whatever the normal desktop drive size is) drives have gotten to 256GB under another manufacturer I believe.
      P.S. Hah at Gbit vr GByte

  45. Don't lose the commentary tracks! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Are you including the commentaries? You have to rip those too.

    "Well in this scene...wait, weren't you supposed to be in this scene?"
    "I think that was the day the catering truck had medditerranian tuna salad wraps. Those were good"
    "Oh yah, and they had little eclairs too. I love those."
    "Hey, what scene is this now?"

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  46. Define "useful life of a PC". by znerk · · Score: 1

    I have machines that are 10-15 years old serving webpages, running databases... and so do many of my employer's customers. Windows98 is not a shock to see on a machine in a production environment. Win95 is much more rare, but still running in the wild. Just a few years ago, I worked on someone's Win3.11 machine, cheerfully doing all that its owner asked it to, on hardware that was at least as old as the OS.

    Personally, I like stuff to last long enough to give it to someone else while it still works.

    --
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.