Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Claim Infrared Helmet Could Reverse Alzheimer's Symptoms

penguin_dance writes "Ready to put on your thinking cap? There's a report out of the UK regarding an 'experimental helmet which scientists say could reverse the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease within weeks of being used'. The helmet is to be worn for ten minutes every day and stimulates the growth of brain cells using infra-red light. The article explains, 'Low level infra-red red is thought to stimulate the growth of cells of all types of tissue and encourage their repair. It is able to penetrate the skin and even get through the skull.' Human trials are due to start this summer." I wont make any nomad-based predictions, but I'll remain on the skeptic side of the fence for now.

201 comments

  1. Spaceballs The Helmet! by Zymergy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seeing the linked article's image of the 3 Doctor's holding their experimental "Prototype Cognitive Helmet", I can't help but imagine one of them wearing it while reenacting Rick Moranis' doll-play monologue from Spaceballs:

    [Playing with his dolls]
    Dark Helmet: [In Dark Helmet voice] And now Princess Vespa, I have you in my clutches, to have my wicked way with you, the way I want to.
    [In Vespa voice]
    Dark Helmet: No, no, go away, I hate you! And yet... I find you strangely attractive.
    [In D.H. voice]
    Dark Helmet: Of course you do! Druish princesses are often attracted to money and power, and I have both, and you *know* it!
    [In V. voice]
    Dark Helmet: No, no, leave me alone!
    [In D.H. voice]
    Dark Helmet: No, kiss me!
    [V]
    Dark Helmet: No! Stop!
    [D.H]
    Dark Helmet: Yes, yes!
    [V]
    Dark Helmet: Oh, oh, oh! Ohhhh, your helmet is so big!

    1. Re:Spaceballs The Helmet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I made mine out of TINFOIL!!! Ooooh! look a chicken...

    2. Re:Spaceballs The Helmet! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Druish princesses are often attracted to money and power Too true. Too true.
  2. My only question... by thatseattleguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will it work even if I'm wearing my tinfoil hat?

    1. Re:My only question... by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1, Funny

      it seems thinner than a skull but who knows. My question is, once it makes you remember what channel the sci fi network is on, will your (infrared based) remote work? Ooh you know what would be even funnier! I'm thinking it pulses IR light in patterns cuz otherwise just plain old beaming from the sun would do it too like other ppl commented. And to get through your head, they're gonna be DAMN BRIGHT so if some escaped out part of the helmet the light pulses might change your TV. So then you'd be sitting there with the helmet on and you hit the on switch and the TV starts wildly changing channels and the volume and stuff and you're like "OMG I can't control TVs with my mind with this on!" They'll have to list that on the side effects to the treatment on the commercial. "May cause dry mouth, phantom third arm syndrome, and feeling that you can control TVs with your mind"

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    2. Re:My only question... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the helmet! Before wearing this, I forgot you couldn't revoke the GPL!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  3. Sunlight? by teeleton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So how is this helmet different from just walking around in the sunshine? It's not like there isn't any infra-red light in ordinary sunlight.

    1. Re:Sunlight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If it's what I think it is, it is a specific frequency of infrared light which stimulates complex IV in the mitochondria. It has been used as a form of retinal therapy to prevent retinal cell death in methanol poisoning (at least in rats).

      In cell culture tests it can sometimes help cell growth, but I'm sceptical that it will do what they claim.

      The difference between this and walking around in sunlight would presumably be the intensity of the specific radiation. It would be many more milliEinsteins than would be received outside from a non-specific source like sunlight.

    2. Re:Sunlight? by Bearhouse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Assuming that you live in a place with a regular, consistent source of sunshine.
      Plus older people tend to avoid the sun, as they can't stand the heat / brightness, quite apart from the cancer risks...

      Still, on a lighter note:

      Doctor: I'm sorry, Mr Smith, but your wife's symptoms match either Alzheimer's or AIDS.
      Smith: *gasp* What can I do, Doc?
      Dr: Well, I suggest you take her into town, and leave here there. If she finds her way home, wear a condom!

    3. Re:Sunlight? by noidentity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So how is this helmet different from just walking around in the sunshine? It's not like there isn't any infra-red light in ordinary sunlight.

      The difference is that Virulite (the company who makes the helmet) doesn't get paid when you just walk around in the sun.

    4. Re:Sunlight? by ElBeano · · Score: 1

      The helmet is different because of the deeper (in the skull) heating effect. Me thinks a microwave would work great for this too. But only if you could master the correct power setting and duration. Burnt popcorn anyone?

    5. Re:Sunlight? by solitas · · Score: 1

      Seriously - if you'd seen the image BEFORE you read the title or the article - what would have been the first idea to pop into your head? :)

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    6. Re:Sunlight? by ultima · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      "In the human trials, due to start this summer, the scientists will use levels of infra-red that occur naturally in sunlight."

    7. Re:Sunlight? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      It's not. They say they're using levels similar to those found in sunlight.

      So go outside. On the other hand, during the winter the sunlight here isn't strong enough, so a helmet might come in handy. On the gripping hand, people with Alzheimer's tend not to get out much at any time of year, particularly in the winter.

    8. Re:Sunlight? by cluckshot · · Score: 1

      The explanation of laser vs sunlight isn't entirely one of the question above. Sunlight may in fact contain IR radiation at the color of the laser. It contains a fairly diminished amount relative to the pure output of the laser and it's penetration in brightness is diminished a lot. Sunlight IR penetrates about 1/2 inch into a person or less. That is significant and has many good clinical values which are being ignored for the most part. However; a laser by its brightness may penetrate much deeper into a person. If you take a standard 808nm laser at 200mW output (diameter small) this is bright enough to penetrate up to about 3 inches into a person. Bone and such are fairly transparent to the light. If you take a 920nm laser diode and over drive it from its stable Continuous Wave (CW)sustainable amount which is limited by diode heating and pump it up in the order of 100 times that but chop the power into short pulses of 1/10,000 sec sustaining a 1% or so on time the diode is able to heat the same with cooling as it would at CW levels. At the same time the light output is about 10,000 times or more brighter. The result is that a light that might penetrate a person 2 or 3 inches now can literally travel right through almost any short bisection distance.The helmet shows the fans that evidence the overdriving of the diodes.

      The processes involved in the IR driving of cells are very frequency dependent and in the top of the IR band. They function from the 635nm down to about 1000nm covering some visible light frequencies. The effects of each frequency are harmonically determined. The Krebs Cycle respiration of cells results in the emission of light between about 950nm and 750nm which is collected in Mitochondria substrates, doubled down to a microwave frequency and full wave bridge rectified into DC current to drive the voltage potentials in the cell. Laser light at or near this band of light directly drives cellular energy stores in a photo-voltaic process.

      The damaging of a cell by any process that results in cellular death, causes the release of Ions in the cell that are in concentrations toxic to other adjacent cells. The result is that these cells no longer can achieve by normal respiration sufficient voltage to continue life processes and they too break down and die. The resulting cascade is only interrupted by strong circulation boundaries. This is why strokes and heart attacks initially damage trivial amounts of tissue and ripen to severe damage.

      The human body develops large regions of tissue that are at sub sustainable life cycle energy and these degrade over long or short periods of time into dead tissue. Application of a laser will bring these dying or sub par function cells back up to full par. What is more cells forced into this dangerous condition by the death of adjacent cells are frequently able to recover all the way. Tissue evidence indicates that cells differentiate into the appropriate types of cells well under these conditions. This means that very nearly any degenerative disease will recover quite well under this treatment. Already Arthritis, now Alzheimer's, and many other diseases respond well. Injuries heal profoundly fast in the order of 20 or more times faster using this technology.

      I am writing this in particular in hopes that such a laser device will be applied to the soldiers in Iraq who are suffering Traumatic Brain Injury for in this case the damage can be largely stopped and mostly reversed.

      Another hope I have comes from Invetro testing with bacteria and virus that certain frequencies here are near total death to such organisms. This technology is for all intents the super weapon of medicine. It has the potential to accelerate healing, slow or stop degeneration and to kill most pathogens. It is the Atom Bomb of Medicine. For those who don't understand it, just watch it happen.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    9. Re:Sunlight? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Duh, like there is difference between putting something in the microwave and placing it on the street.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  4. It it stimulates brain cell growth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then why not use it for some personal brightening.

    Having worked with mice and memory I can tell you emphatically that teaching them something and then determining that it is memory and not lower level reactive behavior is a whole can of worms in itself.

  5. Foil, then bake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If infrared will penetrate the skull? Then people in sunny climates should have lessor incidents of the disease?

    1. Re:Foil, then bake. by JamesP · · Score: 1

      No, maaan! It works thru the nerves, duh!!

      (at least that's what I thought at first when I read this)

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    2. Re:Foil, then bake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled "lesser". Unless you also write "fewor". Did you know that "infrared" covers a large, very large piece of bandwidth? And not all these frequencies penetrate the air equally? Did you?

    3. Re:Foil, then bake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you hold your hand between your eyes and the sun, not much visible light gets through.. now hold a flashlight directly against your hand and see how much gets through. I know IR is a different wavelength, but I'd assume it works basically the same way

    4. Re:Foil, then bake. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      MS and Parkinson's, which in some ways are quite similar to Alzheimer's, have incidences with a strong correlation to latitude. Alzheimer's link to latitude isn't nearly as strong, so I suspect there isn't enough IR in sunlight to have a lot of effect. That doesn't mean their treatment won't work, just that you'd have to use stronger doses.

      One potential problem is that IR doesn't penetrate very FAR into the brain (though it definitely penetrates the skull). I have a colleague who measures cortical blood flow with IR.

      I'm not sure about the claim (in the article) that they're stimulating the growth of neurons. It's quite likely the IR is doing something else, possibly related to iron transport, which seems to be important in several of the neurodegenerative diseases.

  6. So... the next logical question is... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Won't it work even better on those of us who don't have the Alzheimer's, yet?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:So... the next logical question is... by neBelcnU · · Score: 1

      I thought the next logical question was "Where's the lemon-juicer?"

    2. Re:So... the next logical question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be illegal doping. And perhaps dangerous. Except before exams.

    3. Re:So... the next logical question is... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Won't it work even better on those of us who don't have the Alzheimer's, yet? Yes but unfortunately it still comes to late to help President Bush and his advisers.
      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    4. Re:So... the next logical question is... by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

      Really? You want your brain cells to simply grow?

      That's called a cancer. Feel free. Can't guarantee that you'd like it, though... ;)

      --
      Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
    5. Re:So... the next logical question is... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, it will work better on those of us without Alzheimer's ... you're remember all sorts of things that were best left forgotten.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    6. Re:So... the next logical question is... by Alsn · · Score: 1

      Actually, no, the definition of 'cancer' is a cell that divides uncontrollably and without stopping.(normal cells have a finite number of 'divisions' before they get old and die)

      If the suspicions that infrared light can assist brain cell growth is true then I can't see why that would be unfavourable for an already healthy person. I highly doubt that it's true however if it turns out it is then that would indeed be great.

    7. Re:So... the next logical question is... by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

      It works on brain cells, not dicks.

    8. Re:So... the next logical question is... by synaptic · · Score: 1

      Odd comment, Klaus.

      From the article:

      Low level infra-red red is thought to stimulate the growth of cells of all types of tissue and encourage their repair. It is able to penetrate the skin and even get through the skull.

      Seems like it would rather help prevent cancer by increasing the number of good, healthy cells.

      Cheers.

    9. Re:So... the next logical question is... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Low level infra-red red is thought to stimulate the growth of cells of all types of tissue and encourage their repair.

      What if you have cancer? Will it get worse or better? Can you focus it on your heart if you have heart problems? Or on your butt if you want to look like Jay-Lo? Ad nauseum... :)

    10. Re:So... the next logical question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does work, it does loads of good for my autism and depression.

      The right wavelength to use is 800-880 because that penetrates the skull the most.
      You can buy them from theledman.net. If you want to build your own, you need quite a lot of mW unless you really want to use it for 10 minutes a day. I use a couple of minutes a day my 170mW unit.

  7. Infrared or heatsink? by ady1 · · Score: 1

    WTF are the these small fans doing on a helmet which is suppose to have infrared?

    1. Re:Infrared or heatsink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a wild guess, but perhaps they're for cooling it?

  8. What's up with Alzheimer's and helmets? by Nrbelex · · Score: 1

    Interesting... similarly... "New technology developed by Emory and Georgia Tech researchers could aid the early identification of people susceptible to Alzheimer's disease. A portable device called Detect may provide an easier, less expensive way to test for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), which often leads to Alzheimer's. The test could provide potential Alzheimer's patients the chance to slow the disease's progress with medication before serious symptoms set in." Check out the nearly identical picture.

    1. Re:What's up with Alzheimer's and helmets? by ilikepi314 · · Score: 1

      Oh no!! Alzheimer's is becoming an epidemic! - They've already forgotten other people are working on helmets! They could really use a helmet to reverse Alzheimer's right now... I wonder if anyone has done that before...

    2. Re:What's up with Alzheimer's and helmets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MCI as a precursor to Alzheimer's disease doesn't exist outside of pharmaceutical fantasy land. That's why it isn't used as a screen in the population, not because the pencil and paper test takes 90 minutes (which in most cases it doesn't).

    3. Re:What's up with Alzheimer's and helmets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it works differently. All it does is present visual and auditory stimuli to the person to test their reaction time to the stimuli. So it's just a high-tech version of a pen and pencil test, the purpose of which is to diagnose Alzheimer's or other forms of dementia. The Alzheiemr's Helmet is intended to treat Alzheimer's disease and uses infrared light. Here is a direct link to the Emory article. http://emorywheel.com/detail.php?n=24934. But I will admit, they look very similar. And are both kind of Darth Vader-ish.

  9. Guess what I heard last year! by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    Scientists Claim Infrared Helmet Could Reverse Alzheimer's Symptoms.

    Now where's my Slashdot website...

  10. I've heard this before......... by Swordopolis · · Score: 1

    "We age because our cells lose the desire to regenerate and repair themselves."

    http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Cellular_regeneration_and_entertainment_chamber

    --
    Alchemist: Be Thou For the People
    1. Re:I've heard this before......... by El+Torico · · Score: 2, Funny

      "We age because our cells lose the desire to regenerate and repair themselves."

      I have this image of brain cells getting depressed and just hanging around, slowly degenerating.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
  11. Not a scientist but ... by dbcad7 · · Score: 1
    How does the light reach the brain cells ??

    Does infrared light have the ability to pass through the skull ?... sounds like snake oil to me... I'll stick with my pyramid hat.

    --
    waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    1. Re:Not a scientist but ... by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does infrared light have the ability to pass through the skull ?... sounds like snake oil to me... I'll stick with my pyramid hat.

      Yes, infrared light can pass through the skull. In fact, there's a technique called fNIR (functional near-infrared spectroscopy) which uses a system of IR emitters and detectors to measure brain activity. Some links:

      http://www.lab-times.org/methods/m_07_03.html

      http://www.biomed.drexel.edu/fnir/Contents/brain_imaging/

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FNIR

    2. Re:Not a scientist but ... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yes, definitely. I have a colleague who does IR perfusion measurements, as linked to by the other reply to your post.

  12. If this encourages brain growth by maroberts · · Score: 1

    Will this be the new way of people not affected by Alzheimers increasing their brain power?

    This could be the new way of boosting performance for exams.....

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:If this encourages brain growth by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      No... mature neurons aren't really supposed to do a lot of growing. More likely you'd be encouraging the growth of glial cells, which make up the majority of cells in the brain and are responsible for all the housekeeping tasks like structural support, making myelin and tasting the food for the neurons.

  13. All cell types?? by Stripsurge · · Score: 1

    "Low level infra-red red is thought to stimulate the growth of cells of all types of tissue and encourage their repair. It is able to penetrate the skin and even get through the skull."

    Doesn't seem to be doing much for the ol' hair follicles

  14. News Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daily Mail - source of 'News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters'

  15. head warmer? by Raptoer · · Score: 2, Funny

    It shines a light on your head in the infrared spectrum... which is basically heat radiation... So it's a head warmer?

    I know IR has more things than heat associated with it, but still... its a head warmer!

  16. Skeptical and yet... by SquierStrat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My father has Alzheimer's. Most Alzheimer's patients are very kind and sweet but my father is so bitter that he is always angry because at 55 he realizes his brain is slowly killing him. His short term memory is nil. He walks especially slow and his communication is getting poorer. He was diagnosed in October 2005 and he was showing symptoms before that.

    Frankly, This is an illustration of why our process of developing medications is ridiculous. This may not work (though I resent that "wontwork" tag) but frankly there are at least 3 very promising treatments for Alzheimer's Disease in early trials. But because of the length and the way trials work, if they are successful none of them will emerge from trials early enough to help my father. And frankly, he and my family would be willing to try anything to help him. And in the end the worse outcome is that he doesn't get better. But we will never know. 10 years from now Alzheimer's may be no worse than severe diabetes, MS, Crohn's Disease or what have you: controllable, not curable with a quality of life equivalent to most other people. But because we would rather not kill a dying person to find out if we'll kill them or save them, my father will never get benefit of this.

    --
    Derek Greene
    1. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      Sssshh, don't you know the FDA is here for the common good ? Moreover since we only exist as part of a society we have to accept its rules and its laws and beside it's all chosen by the majority vote so you can't complain. Now shut up, pay your taxes, don't forget to vote and be a good citizen.

      I am sincerely sorry for your father, it's very sad that his tragedy is made even worse through deliberate malevolence. The regulators truly deserve the harshest punishment for their actions, unfortunately they'll probably never get it.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    2. Re:Skeptical and yet... by ilikepi314 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh come on; if one of your family members was given a vaccine and a weekly later developed some severe disease and died (even if they were already dying!), you would again go with the "deliberate malevolence" argument and probably sue someone.

      Sorry, didn't mean to direct that toward you, this was actually meant to be a more general societal thing. Until people get over their sue-happy kick lately, all government entities are going to tread softly, I imagine, particularly those directly related to public health. People have sued for much less than rushing a medicine to market (coffee being hot comes to mind), so can you really blame them? Legal battles drain money from what could have funded more medicine research, etc.

      However, a serious question to the parent especially: do you know how to sign up for the trials, is it too late? Someone somewhere has to be taking it or it wouldn't be a trial. I've never signed up for something like that, so I don't know what the process is and am partially asking out of curiosity myself.

    3. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I agree that the lengthy trial-after-trial-after-trial process is detrimental to those that need help "now." There should be a work-around to allow persons who are in their later years access to in-trial drugs. Just the same, long-term trials have one important goal... they are used to determine long-term side-effects. In the case of older persons, that doesn't matter much... I mean, they might die of old age before that happens right? Let's say the drug turns out to be carcinogenic, and that after 20 years or so tumors will start to become a problem. Now, for someone who is a senior... 20 years might be far too long for them to care. There's the off-chance of living to be 120, but odds are against it. However at 55, your father has a reasonable chance of living for another two decades or more, should his Alzheimer's be cured. It might take a little imagination, but think for a moment all of the potentially WORSE problems that could result over 10-20 years of taking an experimental therapy. There have been many medications that cause all kinds of terrible maladies over the course of years, usually resulting in lots of sick people and a big lawsuit that never gets settled. I am sorry already for posting this... I feel for you, I really do... but the answer to your problem doesn't lie in getting him un-tried medicines. Drugs go through trials to keep the patients safe (and to avoid being sued). If you and your father consider it worth the risks, try to contact the makers of these new therapies and offer to participate in the next clinical trial. Again, I agree that new drugs should be made available to those who really need them (when the risk of doing further harm is minimal). What we really need is a better system, one that at the same time observes the drug industry with more diligence AND opens its doors to the public at large.

    4. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, This is an illustration of why our process of developing medications is ridiculous.

      No, what is ridiculous is that people expect medical science to fix everything. I'm sorry your father is sick (mine died a few years ago), but you better make the best of the time you have together, because we all die and every day may be your last.

      but frankly there are at least 3 very promising treatments for Alzheimer's Disease in early trials

      Yes, and they are in trials for good reason: they may be dangerous, they make make the disease worse, or they may be ineffective. The only way of finding out is to try them out under controlled conditions, not to give them out like candy.

      But because we would rather not kill a dying person to find out if we'll kill them or save them, my father will never get benefit of this.

      You say that now, but if the treatments don't work, you might be one of the first complaining that you were never fully informed about the risks, how heart wrenching it is that those evil drug companies cut short the already limited time you had with your father to make big bucks, and then proceed to demand a big financial settlement.

      Even if there were no regulations against it, any drug company dispensing experimental treatments to desperate patients would be foolish. And in the few cases where an experimental treatment is demonstrably "very promising", there are special programs to get the treatment out earlier. The fact that that doesn't exist for the drugs you consider "very promising" tells me that they aren't actually "very promising".

    5. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      New medicament is starting. Those who are too ill won't have benefit. It IS normal that there are some people which will not get benefit of something because it is too late for them. For not being in such a situation, all ill should be transported in time machine to future, where their illness is treatable.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    6. Re:Skeptical and yet... by oncehour · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The McDonalds Coffee incident != Frivilous. Quit eating the dogfood and research the actual facts. The coffee was knowingly and neglectfully above safe levels for hours.

      I will grant that we are a sue happy society, but there's a reason for that. Being an American who's lived in Canada for a couple years I'm noticing there's a lot more government support and government agencies here. The government regulates the corporations so the average Canadian doesn't even need to think of suing. In the US on the other hand, the government tends to be a bit more laissez-faire except when they want to increase barriers of entry for their friends in the industry, and as such the people are the ones that regulate the industry.

      Lawsuits are a form of regulation. Lawyers suing companies for being dickheads is actually noble behavior. I think too many people buy into the "sue-happy" stereotype without considering why it exists. Given the power of lobbying, lawsuits are the only thing that really keeps industry in check by the people.

    7. Re:Skeptical and yet... by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      But we will never know. 10 years from now Alzheimer's may be no worse than severe diabetes, MS, Crohn's Disease or what have you: controllable, not curable with a quality of life equivalent to most other people. But because we would rather not kill a dying person to find out if we'll kill them or save them, my father will never get benefit of this.

      Which is horse shit. Sorry. But there are plenty of areas outside the USA where "experimental" treatments are available right now. Places where restrictions on these kinds of treatments are non-existent. Where giving your beloved a teaspoon of bleach with breakfast is either perfectly legal, or at least never prosecuted if you throw 100 quid at the local law enforcement officer.

      Do your homework. If you feel this is really a legitimate treatment, take a flight to Mexico or Belize, or wherever your homework leads you is a good place, and make it so. No, I'm not kidding.

      Based on your post, I'd guess that you aren't willing to do this. In which case, your father isn't worth moving to Mexico or Belize in order to "save". So shut up, or move. Whining does you no good, and annoys the rest of us.

      The USA has very conservative medical oversight. That has its pluses and minuses. Deal. There's a booming industry in "medical vacations" to places like India and Mexico where Americans take advantage of treatments that are either unavailable in the USA, or are delivered much cheaper abroad.

      Read up, and good luck!

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    8. Re:Skeptical and yet... by stormguard2099 · · Score: 1

      think for a moment all of the potentially WORSE problems Once you see a family member with Alzheimer's you will realize how frighteningly short that list is for a lot of people including myself.
      --
      http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
    9. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes. My dad has advanced Parkinson's with the dementia and it's fuckin' horrible. You do NOT want that. He'd be willing to try anything promising (and he's gung-ho too, being a doctor himself) and sign a no-sue statement, no problem. But it doesn't work that way, you can't do that. It's crap.

      Even if you're one of the few lucky enough to get into a trial, half the time you're given a placebo and some other percentage get some tiny dosage that probably won't do anything. And then the trial might end and they stop giving you the drugs anyways (there was a huge fuss a year ago about that - some treatment was actually working, but they refused to continue giving out the drugs because there were some potential side effects. So everybody has to die instead.) Goddamn nanny state fuckers.

    10. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 1

      You know, as harsh as the situation is, look up the details on this. There's nothing stopping you as a private person getting together some components and having a go yourself. Hell, document what you do and you may even help other sufferers as well. Make one of these helmets and give it a go. As you say, what harm is it going to do? It can't make him worse, can it? It seems a fairly simple idea; no pulsing or signals are required, just a low level IR source in a head gear. So get some strong IR LED's, a bike helmet and cut a hole for some fans/heatsink and see how he does. Hope it works.

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    11. Re:Skeptical and yet... by ibbey · · Score: 1

      The FDA is the biggest example of "damned if you do, damned if you don't" in the US government. With the exception of a few right-wingnuts, nobody seriously argues that it should be done away with. Yet even though I disagree with Arthur B's basic arguments and probably pretty close to his whole ideaology, he is right that the FDA as it's set up today is causing almost as much harm as it is good. It fails to do it's most basic missions, whether it's ensuring the safety of medications (see Vioxx among others) or whether its ensuring the safety of our food supply (See Peter Pan Peanut Butter, and among many other massive food safety scares over the last several years).

      I suspect that the course of action that I'd take is probably pretty close to the opposite of what Artur would recommend (Arthur: If I misread your political ideaology, I apologize!). I'm no expert, but there are a few things that I'd recommend: Triple, quadruple, maybe more their inspection staff so they have the ability to inspect every food producing plant at least once a year, and a least quarterly for large volume producers and plants with a history of issues. Give them more authority to shut down plants, force recalls, etc. (I'm not familiar enough with the problems of the dug saftey side to have any quick fixes, but they certainly need to be done.) Yes, all these things cost money. It would probably add a few pennies-- certainly less than $.50-- to your average daily food bill. How much is safe food worth to you?

      One other thing that needs to happen for both food and drug safety and product saftey in general() is strict -criminal- sanctions against the corporate officers of any company that knowingly markets an unsafe product that results in someones death. Merck intentionally hid the fact that Vioxx increased the risk of heart attack & stroke. As many as 60,000 people died from heart attacks as a direct result of taking Vioxx, yet as far as I know, no one is in prison as a result.

      Anyway. It's almost 2:30am, so I've got to crash. I hope this is somewhat coherent... Please forgive me if not.

    12. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Cancel-Or-Allow · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering how complicated this thing really is. Can't I just get a bicycle helmet and wire 1000 ultra bright ir LEDs and 3 cooling fans too? I would love to see more plans on this device so I can make my own. I've been fighting anxiety for years and am willing to try alternative remedies as all of the medical ones are failing. I know it is intended for Alz but it also mentioned anxiety. Screw the FDA and the trials. If the FDA existed when penicillin was invented it would never have been approved.

      I would also love to see how this sleep helmet works.
      I hate waiting for trials too. At this point I'm willing to try anything too.

    13. Re:Skeptical and yet... by AngelofDeath-02 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except it actually works the other way around ...
      Corporations have bottomless wallets while the people don't. Your best bet is a class action lawsuit that returns almost nothing per individual, while the corporations can sue you instead.
      I cite the RIAA and the sony rootkit incident.

      Anyway, I see your point, but it's a two way street. Those with money can, and some do, abuse the system. In doing so, they ruin its reputation.

      --
      No, I am not an English major. My posts are subject to typos and incorrect grammar. Do not expect perfection.
    14. Re:Skeptical and yet... by hyphen76 · · Score: 1

      The real tragedy of Vioxx and similar medicines, was that, despite the side effects (which were broadly known about) they were actually a very powerful medication that when prescribed correctly i.e. to people who were in severe pain from arthiritis, were very much worth the risk. The problem lies in the companies then trying to push them further, and have them prescribed to people whose symptoms did not justify the (low) risk that usage of these medicines presented. In this case the pharmaceuticals were definitely victims of their own greed, but the FDA should also take some of the blame for not picking up on this mis-prescribing. Not ignoring the people who may well have died from this, the tragedy of this also includes the 1000's (or more?) of people in chronic and severe pain, who now cannot have it properly alleviated.

    15. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The McDonalds coffee was too hot. This meant she got third-degree burns instead of 2nd.

      However, the biggest point in that court case is that she was trying to drive with a polystyrene cup of hot coffee between her legs. The woman would be a prime darwin awards candidate if she didn't have kids already.

      Say what you like about the coffee being too hot, but lets face facts. The cause of the burns was her own stupidity.

    16. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Kreigaffe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, actually, the mcdonald's coffee case WAS entirely frivolous and a complete mockery of the court system

      Coffee is supposed to be brewed HOT. It is supposed to be served HOT. You spill HOT SHIT on you, and you GET BURNT.

      That woman was sold a cup of coffee that was somewhere between 180-190 F. That's hot, sure. Starbucks sells hotter coffee -- actually the crap sold by starbucks is FAR too hot to drink and tastes like it's been overroasted and brewed too hot and kept too hot for too long, but nobody goes to starbucks to buy a cup of drip coffee. That's another rant.

      Coffee is ideally brewed at 200 F. It's best served very soon after brewing. That means.. it's going to be hot. Very hot. Ideally, again, somewhere between..

      oh god, how can this be? Somewhere between 180-190 F.

      Here's a question. Do you think a reasonable person would expect to be burnt if they spilled coffee on themselves? Hey I'll give you the answer. It's "yes". If there was a reasonable expectation that coffee would NOT burn you, the woman would have a case.

      Fact of the matter is that the coffee was brewed and served correctly and the best thing to do is NOT FUCKING SPILL COFFEE ON YOURSELF AND BLAME SOMEONE ELSE.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    17. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do think a reasonable person would not expect to have destroyed nerve endings, loss of sweat glands and follicles, and loss of most of the epidermis in the exposed area. Permanent injury for a minor spill?

    18. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      Corporations have bottomless wallets while the people don't. I never understood this mentality. Do people really believe that when they're suing a corporation that the money just magically appears and isn't impacting anything down the line? The fact that most people end up sitting on that cash the rest of their lives makes it as it they've effectively pulled that cash straight out of the countries GNP, as the corporation in question WILL cut costs elsewhere to hedge the difference.

      The impact is people losing jobs or lower wages, poorer quality materials in use, poorer service, as well as this friggan warning label on my "Travel Coffee Mug" not to drink from it...

      One thing we have in Canada that helps reduce the impact of these types of suits is the fact that the courts decide what damages should be awarded to a successful plaintiff. Although I prefer this to the "I choose to sue you for amount n" method in the US, this still hasn't removed the mentality from our citizens that corporations are magical money trees.

      Isn't tanstaafl mentioned on the first day of econ101 courses anymore?
      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    19. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Pedrito · · Score: 1

      rankly, This is an illustration of why our process of developing medications is ridiculous.

      I sympathize with your father's condition, and I can certainly understand your frustration with the drug approval process. While the process has a number of problems, the idea behind it is pretty solid. It takes a long time to determine what the effects of treatments can be. Doctors pledge an oath to do no harm. Part of that is taking steps in ensuring that the treatment they give won't make things worse and the drug approval process is part of that system. It does have problems, but the risk is that they could approve something early and it could do more harm than good. In fact, some things still get through the process and do more harm than good. But the process does limit the damage.

      You might argue that people should be able to decide for themselves, but based on what? Most people don't have even a basic knowledge of biology, let alone the knowledge of human physiology and pharmacology to make an educated decision about whether or not an experimental drug is worth the risk. I'm a big supporter of individual rights, but the idea of people making these kinds of decisions for themselves, especially with some of the really insane treatments that get tested, is concerning to me. At what point do you start allowing people to risk their lives for treatment? I'm tempted to say, "Anyone with a terminal disease who's willing." I know a lot of people would be willing and it would speed up trials. The problem is, it goes against the "do no harm" policy that doctors have.

      It's a very precarious situation and while I certainly understand your father's predicament, I'm not entirely sure speeding up the trial process would be an overall positive or negative.

    20. Re:Skeptical and yet... by roadsider · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, actually the lawsuit was NOT frivolous. It was actually an exercise in corporate comeuppance.

      The woman, who was elderly and rather frail, originally asked McDonalds to reimburse her for her medical bills incurred for treating second degree burns. While it may be necessary to BREW coffee at 205 degrees, it is not necessary (or prudent) to keep it on the warmer at that temperature, which McDonalds was doing.

      The woman only brought the suit after McDonalds refused her request to compensate her medical bills. Pissed off by McDonald's stonewalling, the jury awarded punitive damages of well over $2 million. This was later reduced to just under half a million.

      The 81 year old woman suffered THIRD DEGREE BURNS because McDonald's kept their coffee 20 degrees hotter than most other restaurants. They were punished because they were irresponsible and arrogant. I remember when I used to buy coffee at McDonald's how hot their coffee was compared to other places I frequented. They deserved what they got.

      According to Wikipedia:

      Liebeck sought to settle with McDonald's for US $20,000 to cover her medical costs, which were $11,000, but the company offered only $800. When McDonald's refused to raise its offer, Liebeck retained Texas attorney Reed Morgan. Morgan filed suit in a New Mexico District Court accusing McDonald's of "gross negligence" for selling coffee that was "unreasonably dangerous" and "defectively manufactured." McDonald's refused Morgan's offer to settle for $90,000.[4]

      Morgan offered to settle for $300,000, and a mediator suggested $225,000 just before trial, but McDonald's refused these final pre-trial attempts to settle.[4]

      McDonald's refused to settle perhaps because, though there had been numerous lawsuits alleging that hot coffee was "defectively manufactured," courts had consistently dismissed the cases before trial on the grounds that coffee burns were an open and obvious danger.

      This was also reported in the Wall Street Journal. See:

      http://www.reedmorganpc.com/wsj_coffee.htm

      Frivolous, my ass.

    21. Re:Skeptical and yet... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Frankly, This is an illustration of why our process of developing medications is ridiculous. This may not work (though I resent that "wontwork" tag) but frankly there are at least 3 very promising treatments for Alzheimer's Disease in early trials. There are a lot more than 3. But think about the problems. Alzheimer's Disease develops slowly, so it takes years to tell if a treatment is working. And while this notion looks pretty benign (I'd lay money that it won't work, but it's worth trying), that is not the case in general. One of the most promising treatment ideas was an antibody against Alzheimer plaque protein. And when tried, it actually seemed to be working. Unfortunately, it also caused fatal encephalitis

    22. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey motherfucker, how about you look at actual McD policy on coffee at the time. The machine was malfunctioning, it was known, and still kept in use. The lid was improperly secured as well. Discount the second if you like but the first point even violated their own policies. So, shut the fuck up you libertarian grind-the-poor-into-salt motherfucker. Grow the fuck up.

    23. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      Oh come on; if one of your family members was given a vaccine and a weekly later developed some severe disease and died (even if they were already dying!), you would again go with the "deliberate malevolence" argument and probably sue someone


      No I wouldn't. I am a principled person.If you think this is a common behavior then it's no wonder we are ruled by an immoral bunch of criminals.
      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    24. Re:Skeptical and yet... by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      However, the biggest point in that court case is that she was trying to drive with a polystyrene cup of hot coffee between her legs. The woman would be a prime darwin awards candidate if she didn't have kids already.

      1. She wasn't driving, she was in the passenger's seat
      2. The vehicle was parked at the time.
    25. Re:Skeptical and yet... by anagama · · Score: 1

      re McD's coffee incident: Not only did they have prior notice as you note (there were numerous other incidents), the coffee in question gave her 3d degree burns in the groin area.

      To those tempted to use McD's coffee a a snarky "example" of the legal system gone awry, consider that a 3d degree burn is where the skin is totally destroyed down to the flesh, and then think about you might do if the skin was totally burned off your cock.

      People who buy into the whole "McD's coffee"="lawyers bad" argument are suckers. I've been reading "Free Lunch" (interview with author) and it's just disgusting. Like John Snow, treasury secretary, who slashed maintenance for CSX (rail freight) causing 2 billion dollars extra profit. Train derails, many injured and eight die. Caused by a switch installed backwards, held together by a rusty nail, maintenance records falsified. Eventually, 50 million awarded as punitive damages. Of course, CSX paid none of it -- because it was an Amtrack train running on CSX tracks, taxpayers paid it.

      So here you have a guy who murders people, profits, gets promoted in government, has to pay nothing for his evil acts, and people like him and his administration tell you that lawyers are the problem. Wake the fuck up!

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    26. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, jackass, coffee is supposed to be brewed at 150 degrees C.

      But that's beside the point-- the point was the McDonalds had been told, repeatedly, to lower their brewing temperatures. And they didn't. And the woman asked for help repeatedly, as she was boxed in at the drive thru, and the employees simply laughed at her. And all she wanted was the price of her skin grafts for her crotch, which was only a couple of tens of thousands of dollars.

      The judge gave her $2 million because McDonald's behaved like such assholes the entire time, and didn't seem to understand that scalding hot liquid on the genitals is torture. Like you seem unable to believe either.

    27. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, don't forget to mention the fact that the woman received second and third degree burns to her legs and inner thighs.

      I'm sorry, but if you're making coffee so hot that the second it touches your skin it sloughs it off and gives you a second or third degree burn, you are doing it wrong. Coffee doesn't need to be 200 degrees Fahrenheit for you to drink it. [Actually, if you tried to drink 200 degree coffee you would be rushing to the emergency room.]

    28. Re:Skeptical and yet... by mastershake_phd · · Score: 1

      Someone somewhere has to be taking it or it wouldn't be a trial.
       
      Ya, you might get into the trail, but you might get the placebo...

    29. Re:Skeptical and yet... by ilikepi314 · · Score: 1

      I'm quite sorry the way my wording came out, I didn't mean to accuse you of anything. I believe you when you say you are principled. I do not ever intend on such behavior myself.

      However, in intensely emotional situations, sometimes even the most well-meaning of people can loose it. Again, not saying you would, but it happens. You just lost someone close, and there's that bit of denial that it can't be happening, that then shifts into "This wouldn't have happened if it weren't for FILL-IN-THE-BLANK". If a doctor mentions a new medicine was tried, suddenly, AHA! maybe that was related somehow, because how could your family member pass away if the doctors knew what they were doing and the medicine was good? If it later comes out that the medicine was too quickly approved and had all sorts of nasty side effects, what would be the next leap in thoughts?

      Perhaps going as far as suing is a bit extreme for most people, but no doubt there would be anger and some thoughts of "YOU'RE A DOCTOR!!! You should have know what you were doing and SAVED HIM!!!" or "Stupid government!! THEY KILLED HIM BY NOT TESTING IT MORE and only acting in the interests of pharmaceutical CORPORATIONS and their PROFITS!!". Given the 300 million people in the United States, statistically there has to be a couple people distraught enough over it to sue for negligence or malpractice. And it only takes a couple people suing to put a few doctors out of work and/or get millions from the government, and ruin it for the rest of us.

      That was what I was trying to say. It's quite complicated; as someone else pointed out, medicine is kind of a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. Go slowly and carefully, then you're not helping fast enough and letting them die; speed up your work, then you rushed it and killed people by your negligence (or the profit motive). You can't win! I don't envy those jobs... or really any job in government. They all have that problem.

    30. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

      Hey- I'm not a doctor, but I just wanted to mention something you should look into if you haven't- make sure the possibility of your father having NPH has been excluded. I mention it because the early-onset age for Alzheimer's and the slow walking thing are consistent with NPH, and NPH is almost always misdiagnosed as either Parkinson's or Alzheimer's. Also, NPH can be surgically remedied- although NPH causes brain-damage, and only a limited and widely varying degree of lost function can be restored following surgery, but it can stop the disease from progressing. If your Dad hasn't been screened for NPH, you should look into this. Screening starts with an MRI, and if the MRI appears symptomatic, then there's an (unfortunately arduous) positive testing procedure he can go through.

      My Dad was diagnosed with both Parkinsons and Alzeheimer's, both early onset. I found NPH online and we asked his neurologist about it. It turns out his neurologist in an NPH specialist, and he hadn't screened my Dad for it, and it turned out my Dad had an unambiguously severe case of NPH. After the surgery, his walking recovered dramatically, he got back about 4-5 years of decline. Unfortunately, while he also improved significantly mentally, he's since lost it again. But he probably really has advanced Parkinsons in addition to NPH. A few years later, and his walking is still better than before the surgery.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    31. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      McDonald's served coffee hot, because that's how their customers wanted it. Lots of them buy coffee at McDonald's, then drive to their destination and drink it there. It's hot enough that it's still warm when it gets there. I know customers who are still ticked that they serve it colder now.

      McDonald's didn't suddenly start doing this. They'd been serving coffee hot for years and years and years. Everyone knew this. I highly doubt this woman who went through the drive-in had never gotten coffee from them before.

      Furthermore, she put a fresh cup of coffee between her legs in the car. Even if the coffee was from some other place that served it 10-2- degrees cooler, it still going to freaking hurt like hell if you have a hot cup of coffee spill between your legs. She did a dumb thing. It was frivolous.

    32. Re:Skeptical and yet... by esecallum · · Score: 1

      hi you do realize you can make this device yourself? It is not rocket science. Now I am trying to help you and your dad. From the picture it looks it just looks like 5 infra red leds with wavelength of 1072 nanometres arranged around the helmet with fans to cool them,as they must be running at their maximum rated current. you can buy 5 infrared leds easily for under $100 OR you can use a ready made security camera kit infrared flood light for about $40 to $80. The infra red flood light COMES WITH THE SECURITY CAMERA. ready made..think about it. plug and play or rather plug and heal.... look up cctv infra red LED lighting in google... Maplin Electronics,etc have loads. Maplins EVEN sells infra red leds for under 1 pound each but their wavelengh is 950 nm not 1072 nm,i don't know if this makes a difference... http://www.maplin.co.uk/search.aspx?MenuNo=80091&MenuName=Wired+CCD+Cameras&worldid=-4&FromMenu=y&doy=26m1 think about it. you could try this easily yourself on your dad with minimum risk for 10 minutes a day for 4 weeks and note any changes. THINK ABOUT IT. Or you can sit on your ass waiting,waiting and waiting and watching pop idol,waiting for santa to bring it to you in 10 years time. Now I have given you all the information to get you started and it should be easy for you to get a helmet and stick 5 leds into it as in the picture OR use use the ready made infra red led flood light that comes ready made with a security camera and stick that in a helmet.I don't know if the helmet is reflective on the inside or not....you could email Virulite for more information. You could get a geeky friend to help you in this project.

    33. Re:Skeptical and yet... by ibbey · · Score: 1

      the tragedy of this also includes the 1000's (or more?) of people in chronic and severe pain, who now cannot have it properly alleviated.


      Why not? Most of the similar medicines are still on the market-- I believe even Vioxx is still available.

      I still think that most of the corporate officers should be in prison. If the CEO was sent to prison when something like this happened-- even if it can't be proven that he was responsible, I guarantee that you'd see a whole lot fewer of these types of tragedies.
    34. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Dr.+Joe · · Score: 1

      Derek:

      My mother had alzheimers and became progressively more paranoid until she was
      medicated with SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors). It took a
      while to get the dosage right, but it was a great blessing to her to no longer
      be so upset about something over which she had no control. Perhaps
      there is hope, at least, for your father's emotional state.

    35. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      Hurt like hell != skin grafts.

      She was dumb, sure, but the consequences of her being dumb were far above what would reasonably be expected.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    36. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      Ok I see what you mean. Yes this is a very sad thing and you are right, many people tend to shy away from responsibility and point at other people. We shouldn't give in to these unfair accusations. Unfortunately, if the group of scapegoats is small enough, majority rule often destroys justice. If people cared a little more about themselves rather than other people, they would not join in. Freedom comes with responsibility, you cannot have one without the other.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    37. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      The temperature they served their coffee was entirely reasonable and proper for coffee.

      If you go to a pizza place and buy a pizza, and are handed one that JUST came out of the oven, are told "This just came out, it's real hot", and immediately bite into a slice -- you're going to have some pretty nasty burns in your mouth.
      And it's NOT the pizza place's fault. It's yours.
      If you take that pizza, and trip and fall over your own feet and land on top of the pizza and burn your hands? It's YOUR fault, again.
      Exact same deal.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    38. Re:Skeptical and yet... by Yahma · · Score: 1

      The 81 year old woman suffered THIRD DEGREE BURNS because McDonald's kept their coffee 20 degrees hotter than most other restaurants. No, the woman suffered THIRD DEGREE BURNS because she spilled hot coffee on herself! You must be a lawyer.
    39. Re:Skeptical and yet... by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      I frequently hear people trot out the spilled coffee case as the quintessential friviolous lawsuit, but it truly isn't. I became well acquainted with this case when my friend studied it during law school, and in the name of dispelling this misperception I'll point out the following facts (in this case cited from the wikipedia page on Liebeck; the stated facts jive well with my recollection of reading the case dockets):

      Liebeck was wearing cotton sweatpants; they absorbed the coffee and held it against her skin as she sat in the puddle of hot liquid for over 90 seconds, scalding her thighs, buttocks, and groin.[8] Liebeck was taken to the hospital, where it was determined that she had suffered third-degree burns on six percent of her skin and lesser burns over sixteen percent. [9] She remained in the hospital for eight days while she underwent skin grafting. Two years of treatment followed.
      So point #1: Liebeck didn't suffer something merely inconvenient or trivial... instead, she quite simply had the living shit burned out of her vagina and all surrounding regions. It's probably noteworthy that she was 79 years old at the time, with limited reaction times and limited mobility.

      Onwards to point #2: the coffee she was served as 180 degrees. It was established during the trial that this temperature is hot enough to cause 3rd degree burns in five seconds, and require skin grafts after 12 seconds. At the time this was the standard temperature at which McDonalds served drive-through-order coffee. McDonald's didn't serve it this hot because they expected people to drink it at that temperature; instead,

      [McDonalds] reason for serving such hot coffee in its drive-through windows was that, because those who purchased the coffee typically wanted to drive a distance with the coffee, the high initial temperature would keep the coffee hot during the trip.
      McDonalds knew that the coffee was hotter than people would want to consume; they admitted during trial that this was hotter than was safe to drink. This turned out to be pretty damning to the jury, but it was made worse by the fact that this was by no means the first time a McDonalds customer had been severely injured without any resulting change in the temperature of the coffee served:

      documents obtained from McDonald's showed that from 1982 to 1992 the company had received more than 700 reports of people burnt by McDonald's coffee to varying degrees of severity, and had settled claims arising from scalding injuries for more than $500,000. [4]
      The reason McDonalds didn't change the temperature, even after settling these previous suits, was bean counting. McDonalds only got sued once for every 25 million cups of coffee it served. Doing "the right thing" never entered their calculations; they simply calculated the cost of the suits as a fraction of their take from coffee sales, and in that light deemed the suits nothing more than a financial annoyance.

      Lastly, Liebeck didn't initially ask for the money she was ultimately awarded. She only sued when McDonalds refused to give her $20k to cover her medical costs.

      I think people are too quick to judge many legal cases, including this particular one.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    40. Re:Skeptical and yet... by roadsider · · Score: 1

      The point of the original poster was this was a frivolous lawsuit. The facts bear otherwise. McDonald's was found negligent. I'm no lawywer, but I agree. The temperature kept was not reasonable. McDonald's shot itself in the foot in court. It lost. Corporations that act like idiots (much like people) deserve what they get.

    41. Re:Skeptical and yet... by mgreenham · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you know about this, but I've been researching for professional and personal reasons the following: Tysabri -- a relative of mine is heavily into this as an investment due to its future use for Alzheimers, and current use for his own MS, which he claims is a dramatic benefit Hyperbaric Oxygen -- I manage a clinic for treatment of FDA-approved conditions such as wound-care, diabetic non-healing wounds, but also non-reimbursed neurological conditions such as stroke, traumatic and acquired brain injury, but also we're getting positive reports with Alzheimers. As an example, stroke and concussion patients will recover first of all in their cognitive "brain fog" lifting, and improvement in short-term memory. This week an older gentleman reminded me of something I needed to do, whereupon I said his short-term memory was better than mine, and he responded that for the first time in many years, he was at a party being introduced to lots of people, and remembered all their names. Anyway, this is a very impressive therapy, and I'd be happy to forward any information on various clinics and practitioners that are diligent and knowledgeable. It is definitely what I would do first and foremost if I or a loved one had Alzeimers, along with the other things we are learning are important, including Omega-3-6-9, CoQ10, and perhaps IR as this story reports. These things that are low-risk and high reward are worthy of following IMO Regards Michael

    42. Re:Skeptical and yet... by AngelofDeath-02 · · Score: 1

      This is ... way late =)
      But yes - the corporations pass on those costs to their customers in one way or another. Not only do they have far more money to allocate to whatever they need to, but they pull that money from other people/places to make up for frivilous spendings. This is beside the point, however...
      The point I was trying to highlight was that they can make it prohibitively expensive to sue them through delays, and could sue you as much as they want to. A few examples ... Record labels from hell ... Another one - Microsoft (this one is more on the edges of being sued and putting up with it because it's cheaper).

      I would not have sued mcdonnalds because I spilt a hot cup of coffee ... I didn't sue Wendys when their poor cup design sent soda all over my interior. I am in favor of taking responsibility for your actions, instead of pointing the finger at others.
      I pretty much agree with you: For corporations, lawsuits are a way of life - and they ARE expensive ... but we as consumers bear the brunt of that expense. Using lawsuits as a way for us to control corporations? ha... Shooting ones self in the foot would be more effective.

      --
      No, I am not an English major. My posts are subject to typos and incorrect grammar. Do not expect perfection.
  17. You will never believe me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sharks with freakin' laser beams saved my life.

  18. Symptoms may be reversed in minutes--not weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Another therapy reported in Science Daily shows reversal of Alzheimer's symptoms in minutes, rather than weeks

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080109091102.htm

    From the article:

    "An extraordinary new scientific study, which for the first time documents marked improvement in Alzheimer's disease within minutes of administration of a therapeutic molecule, has just been published in the Journal of Neuroinflammation.

    "This new study highlights the importance of certain soluble proteins, called cytokines, in Alzheimer's disease. The study focuses on one of these cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF), a critical component of the brain's immune system. Normally, TNF finely regulates the transmission of neural impulses in the brain. The authors hypothesized that elevated levels of TNF in Alzheimer's disease interfere with this regulation. To reduce elevated TNF, the authors gave patients an injection of an anti-TNF therapeutic called etanercept. Excess TNF-alpha has been documented in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer's.

    "The new study documents a dramatic and unprecedented therapeutic effect in an Alzheimer's patient: improvement within minutes following delivery of perispinal etanercept, which is etanercept given by injection in the spine. Etanercept (trade name Enbrel) binds and inactivates excess TNF. Etanercept is FDA approved to treat a number of immune-mediated disorders and is used off label in the study."

    1. Re:Symptoms may be reversed in minutes--not weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The new study documents a dramatic and unprecedented therapeutic effect in an Alzheimer's patient: ...

      Note the word "an", as in one.
  19. Over drive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmmm! What's cooking for dinner?

  20. Well by Psychotria · · Score: 1

    By the look of that helmet, I'd be able to replicate it by strapping my computer box to my head. If I then set the box to calculate some insanely difficult task, like tic-tac-toe, the heat would penetrate by brain and make me effectively immune to degenerative diseases of the the brain.

    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dear Psychotria;

      Some people have tried strapping an XBox360 to their head in order to get better at Halo. This however caused cranial overheating and the dreaded Blue Brain of Death. Survivors are only able to play World of Warcraft, and require colostomy bags. For this reason, I do not recommend it. However, if your local Best Buy Geek Squad technician says it's okay, by all means go ahead.

  21. Now I know by maroberts · · Score: 1

    ...where the PSU fans for my PCs have gone! Are they there to prevent your brain cooking while being bathed in the infrared grill? ...here!

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  22. Do you want some coffee, Mr. Tully? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Louis: [to Egon] Do I?
    Dr. Egon Spengler: Yes, have some.
    Louis: [to Janine] Yes, have some.

  23. Research Alluded to in the Article by vsage3 · · Score: 1

    I couldn't find a link to read the article but here is the abstract.

    For the lazy: Middle aged / young rats are put in a 3D maze with some middle-aged mice receiving 6 minute daily doses of IR. Middle aged mice treated with IR show (nebulously-termed) improved memory but do not navigate the 3D maze more quickly as a result.

    Doesn't sound like such the panacea the Dailymail article makes it out to be.

  24. Obviously a fake... by lordsid · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to mute my gf with the TV remote for years. Its done nothing for her.

    --
    IMAGE VERIFICATION IS EVIL!
  25. Infrared & Opacity by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

    Will it work through my tin foil hat?

    --
    Just callin' it like I see it.
  26. Where is the new obligatory... by kharri1073 · · Score: 1

    whatcouldpossiblygowrong tag?

  27. baldness by nguy · · Score: 1

    Well, it may not reverse Alzheimer's, but it will reverse hair loss! Guaranteed!

  28. Boobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stimulate the growth of cells of all types of tissue Hmmm...

    Alternatively, have the researchers tried putting an oversized suction cup plumbed to a vacuum pump on the patient's head to grow brain cells?
  29. But seriously, the weather by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

    An 80-year-old couple is having trouble remembering things, so they go
                    to the doctor to make sure there's nothing wrong.
                    After an exam, the doctor says, "You're physically okay, but you guys
                    might want to start writing notes to help you remember things."
                    That night they're watching TV when the old man gets up from his chair.
                    His wife says, "Where are you going?"
                    He says, "I'm going to the kitchen to get a glass of water."
                    She says, "Will you get me some Vanilla ice cream?"
                    He says, "All right."
                    She says, "Don't you think you should write it down?"
                    He says, "I don't have to write it down. Vanilla ice cream."
                    She says, "And could I have strawberries and whipped cream?"
                    He says, "All right."
                    She says, "Don't you think you should write it down?"
                    He says, "I don't have to write it down.Vanilla ice cream with
                    strawberries and whipped cream."
                    Twenty minutes later he walks in and hands her a plate of bacon and eggs.
                    She says, "You forgot my fucking toast."

    --
    What?
  30. Is there... by do_kev · · Score: 1

    But because we would rather not kill a dying person to find out if we'll kill them or save them, my father will never get benefit of this.
    Is there perhaps any way you could get your father into some of the human trials the article mentions?

    Presumably the people in these trials are simply patients themselves, namely those willing to accept the risks of an experimental treatment.
  31. Weasel words ftw... by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "...an 'experimental helmet which scientists say could reverse the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease..."

    "Low level infra-red red is thought to stimulate the growth of cells of all types of tissue and encourage their repair..."

    I guess I'm just a cynical bastard now, but having weasel words in a story like this whispers, "snake oil" or, "wishful thinking" to me. Maybe it's because all the people selling quack stuff are careful about how they say things for legal reasons, and now I put too much effort into scrutinizing how medical claims are worded. Call me when it's actually curing Alzheimers in a no-shit, double-blind, randomized study with more than a handful of participants.

    --
    [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    1. Re:Weasel words ftw... by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess I'm just a cynical bastard now, but having weasel words in a story like this whispers, "snake oil" or, "wishful thinking" to me.

      Uh, they're scientists engaging in very preliminary research, and you're criticizing them because they're being honest about how experimental it is? They aren't making any medical claims whatsoever. They're just basically saying "we found this interesting result in rats, let's see if it also applies to humans."

      Call me when it's actually curing Alzheimers in a no-shit, double-blind, randomized study with more than a handful of participants.

      Well yes, I'm sure if their next stage of research confirms their findings, that's the eventual plan. We'll be sure to call you when their research is complete.

    2. Re:Weasel words ftw... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The "weasel words" you point out are usually the mark of decent scientific research. Basically, we're not exactly sure, but this is a possible mechanism.

      The real snake oil tends to deal in absolutes, or at least give you the best impression possible that it's an absolute. No snake oil salesman would ever tell you that something "could reverse the symptoms...." He'd be sure to at least work the word cure in there. If he were worried about being sued he'd tell you that he's legally not allowed to claim medical benefits of his product because of a government and big pharma conspiracy, but here are a bunch of testimonials from people who took it.

  32. Infra-red light for $chlong Enlargement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA

    > Low level infra-red red is thought to stimulate the growth of cells of all types of tissue and encourage their repair.

    sounds like with the right type of "helmet" this could be a good for schlong enlargement.

  33. But... by hyades1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will it help me remember what I actually wanted when I went down the steps to the basement?

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:But... by OneoFamillion · · Score: 1

      You wanted to survive. The banging on the door, the stench of rotten flesh, and the "brrraaaiinns" howls do provide some useful clues, although I understand you might have some difficulty thinking rationally at this point. But don't worry, pretty soon you wont have to. Have a nice day :)

  34. Autonomy vs Social Obligations by Smordnys+s'regrepsA · · Score: 1
    I hate to say this, but the companies placed their time and effort (read "money") into developing this drug. They have a right to distribute that time and effort as they see fit. You can't force them to help you just because you can offer something in return for their help. As autonomous beings (or corporations) they do have the right to refusal.

    Really, they don't give a damn about your father - only the money his insurance could give them, or the money his lawyer could take away from them. Right now they're focusing on eliminating the second, while increasing the first. How much more would you pay after enduring another year of this? It's not like this is a disease that directly kills the poor bastards effected by it. How much less would they have to pay if they find there are significant permanent side effects before making the decision to sell to millions of patients?

    And frankly, he and my family would be willing to try anything to help him.
    ...and that right there is the reason the government requires these studies. Unless you want to believe me when I say, "I heard tazering an Alzheimer's patient in the left underarm while stomping his nuts will greatly improve his condition" (I'll guarantee 1 out of 10 study medications will have worse side effects with less results). It is not a question of killing versus curing, it is a question of possible torture for no result vs slight improvement (with optional possible torture).

    I really feel your pain - Alzheimer's destroys both your loved one and your opinion of your loved one, but your dad simply was born too early. Be glad that you were born at a time where you can know that in 10 years you won't have to worry about this horrendous disease.
    --
    Just -1, Troll talking to another.
    1. Re:Autonomy vs Social Obligations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The grandparent poster wasn't so much complaining about the companies but the government restrictions on access to experimental treatments. If it were legal and they weren't held liable for the horrible consequences of the treatments with unexpected size-effects, I'm sure the companies in question would be happy to sell more experimental treatments to dying patients.

  35. Because the alternative is even worse by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Godwin freaks, piss off for a bit will you.

    The nazi's had your approach, they believed that killing people if it might save others was a good idea, especially if the people were being killed were less worthy anyway. Who is going to be the subject of your medical experiments? There is an awfull lot of research that would go a lot faster if only we had human trials with less restrictions.

    To this day a lot of the research from that era is still the ONLY research available because nobody else allows us to kill people to really see what kills them. All modern hypothermia research for instance can only guess at what the limits are, because it is not acceptable to truly freeze a person to death.

    There are plenty of examples even in modern times of ethics going wrong. Google for "medical research foster childeren new york" and you will find a case where somebody without ethics decided that people should be volunteered for medical research. Nazi germany or trying to save others, others of more value then foster childeren?

    Who is going to volunteer your father? Himself, a person with reduced mental capacity? You? The facility that takes care of him?

    And what part of medical research? Part of experiments to find new medicines involve giving otherwise perfectly healthy subjects a disease so you can be sure that you are ONLY working on that disease and nothing else. Would you volunteer your father to have his back broken to research potential cures for spinal injuries?

    Sadly the current system does let people die who could have benefitted from drugs in development, but the alternative is just to horrible to contemplate. We need very strict ethics when it comes to experimenting on human beings (and for that matter on animals) because if we don't, we are no longer human.

    I rather die from some disease then live in a society where people are experimented on at the whim of drugs companies.

    Also remember this, your father is dying, he is not death yet. Where there is live their is hope. But if some researcher of on wild goose chase injects something nasty to see what happens, then he will very death indeed.

    I understand your pain, but for the sake of one human being we cannot loose our humanity.

    Also your post seems naive, are you really willing to kill your father to save someone else? Because you end the sentence with "my father will never get benefit of this." Sorry, you father would be a lab rat, society benefits, the lab rat doesn't.

    Even if the medicine your father would get would really work, the only way to be certain is dissection, your father would have to be killed after the experimental drugs were administred to be certain it was the drugs that cured him and not something else. Those lab rats that get cured from the disease they were infected with don't life much longer then the control group. All end up on the dissection table.

    Sorry, your idea is horrible, if human beings were a better type of person we might be able to do it, but humans are just to inclined to pure evil for it to not lead to horrible abuses.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Because the alternative is even worse by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Google for "medical research foster childeren new york" and you will find a case where somebody without ethics decided that people should be volunteered for medical research.

      WTF, I googled for it and it didn't return any results. They don't want us to hear the truth, dude.

      for the sake of one human being we cannot loose our humanity

      That's right, that would be just immoral and unethical to try to save that person. Not helping him and letting him die slowly from his horrible disease is the only humane thing to do.

      Even if the medicine your father would get would really work, the only way to be certain is dissection, your father would have to be killed after the experimental drugs were administred to be certain it was the drugs that cured him and not something else.

      How insightful, sounds like you know damn well how clinical trials on people are conducted.

      "Congratulations Mr. Smith! Thanks to our new retro-viral treatment we have vanquished every last cancerous cell in your body. You only had 6 months to live, now you could live to see your great grand-children grow up. Don't thank me quite yet, Mr. Smith. When you signed up for this treatment you agreed for us to kill you and cut you open to be certain it was the drugs that cured you and not something else. Life is unfair Mr. Smith, life is unfair!"

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:Because the alternative is even worse by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      The nazi's had your approach, they believed that killing people if it might save others was a good idea, especially if the people were being killed were less worthy anyway.

      I'm sorry, but WTF are you talking about? The person you're responded to said nothing about wanting to test drugs on his father against his will. As it is now, terminally ill patients can't even get access to drugs that haven't gone through the lengthy process of federal approval yet, even if they explicitly want to take the risk (since they're dying anyways).

      Even if the medicine your father would get would really work, the only way to be certain is dissection, your father would have to be killed after the experimental drugs were administred to be certain it was the drugs that cured him and not something else.

      Wow, all participants in clinical trials are dissected afterwards? That's news to me.

    3. Re:Because the alternative is even worse by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      It turns up this article and you saying that now.

      But, if you are going to be snarky, at least try not being a complete moron and don't use quotes around your search criteria in Google while at the same time failing to make a complete sentence.

      Medical journals tend to use complete sentences. So maybe try two phrases instead.

    4. Re:Because the alternative is even worse by 4D6963 · · Score: 0, Troll

      It turns up this article and you saying that now.

      Well it didn't at the time I posted because that was before Google indexed the comment I was replying too, aduuuuh.

      at least try not being a complete moron and don't use quotes around your search criteria in Google

      WHOOSH! That was the joke, you triple imbecile!

      while at the same time failing to make a complete sentence.

      What the hell are you talking about, fool?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  36. CRS by TwoBit · · Score: 1

    I want to cure my Alzheimer's, but I keep forgetting to wear my helmet.

  37. I, for one ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new infrared-emitting tinfoil hat overlords.

  38. Selection pressure for baldness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always wondered why (many) men become bald. There would seem to be no selection pressure to cause men to lose hair and there are some obvious selection pressures for them to keep their hair. (Loss of sexual attractiveness to females, old age indication to younger rivals etc.).

    Maybe hair BLOCKS infra-red light in sunlight so losing your hair when you get older helps keep your mental facilities from declining. Does anyone know if the helmet is more effective on bald people? Does anyone know if Alzheimer's is less prevalent in bald people?

    This is such a cockamamee theory that I'm posting as an A/C (and I'm too lazy to log in). Also no, I'm not bald (or getting that way) thankfully.

    1. Re:Selection pressure for baldness by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Also no, I'm not bald (or getting that way) thankfully.

      According to your theory that should be "unfortunately," shouldn't it?

    2. Re:Selection pressure for baldness by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe hair BLOCKS infra-red light in sunlight

      Apparently the white hair on polar bears acts like optic fibre. It collects light over a larger surface than the bare skin of the animal and channels it to the body to keep it warm.

    3. Re:Selection pressure for baldness by Scott+Carnahan · · Score: 1

      Apparently the white hair on polar bears acts like optic fibre. It collects light over a larger surface than the bare skin of the animal and channels it to the body to keep it warm.

      If that were true, the bear would look black (at least at near-IR frequencies). Also, this article asserts that the fiber optic hypothesis has been demonstrated false. The translucent fur is most likely a camouflage adaptation.

      --
      "Your notation sucks!" -- Serge Lang (1927-2005)
    4. Re:Selection pressure for baldness by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      Most fathering of children probably occurs in the teens and 20's in primitive societies. Once that's done, evolution doesn't much care what happens to men except insofar as they can help the survival of their children.

      Thus baldness might not be a big issue, evolutionarily speeking.

  39. It's helpful? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    [blockquote]'Low level infra-red red is thought to stimulate the growth of cells of all types of tissue and encourage their repair. It is able to penetrate the skin and even get through the skull.'[/blockquote]
    That's funny. When I leave the infrared transmitter for my wireless headphones on when I go to bed, I don't seem to sleep as well.

  40. But . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it run Linux?

  41. Wiimote by n3tcat · · Score: 1

    Did Johnny Chung Lee figure this one out too?!

  42. IR Penetrating the Skull? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 0

    The bit about infrared light penetrating the skull seems to set off the BS detector to me. Any of the sciency types amongst us have comment on that? They use ultrasound to penetrate human goo for a reason; I've never heard of infrared being used to get past skin, much less bone.

    And of course, even if it does, it could upset your2 phrenological balance :)

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:IR Penetrating the Skull? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happens all the time buddy. You just don't see it.
      And you don't try to feel it either. Go to the country.
      Whanna know why you feel relaxed there? No cables. No 60Hz fields around you.
      Just what you need. Ecosystem takes care of you if you let it.

      Unicorn

  43. infra-red light = low dose of radiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't infrared light a low dose of radiation? I remember our teacher said that once. It's not healthy at all... I'm they're trading one problem for another (Cancer).

    1. Re:infra-red light = low dose of radiation by narcc · · Score: 1

      Infra-red light, like visible light, is a form of electromagnetic radiation. The wavelength tells you nothing about the dose, however.

      The implication "radiation is bad and causes cancer" is glib and meaningless.

    2. Re:infra-red light = low dose of radiation by Mazin07 · · Score: 1

      What isn't radiation? The light emitting from your LCD monitor is a form of radiation. The FM radio that you receive via your tooth fillings is radiation.

      The idea that radiation=cancer is a gross oversimplification that means nothing. This isn't nuclear waste being attached to your brain (yet).

  44. Sergeant Detritus already has one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only his has a built in chiller as well.

    Heeeey! Maybe we can get one for PTerry so he can keep writing Discworld books...

  45. a lot harder than it sounds by alizard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    from one of the company's press releases:

    I have spent the last 10 years working with Dr Gordon Dougal, medical doctor and scientist, exploring the effects of infra red light on living cells. We started off using cold sores (herpes simplex) as a clinical model to search for a therapeutic waveband of light within the infrared spectrum. After treating many hundreds of cold sores, and utilising basic scientific principles with the help of Durham University, we were successful in identifying 1072nm wavelength light to be therapeutic with properties antagonistic to harmful ultra-violet light.


    Tried finding 1072nm near-IR emitters lately?

    I just spent 10 minutes searching, the stuff I've seen tops out at about 880 nm.
    1. Re:a lot harder than it sounds by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 1

      Granted it ain't easy to source the LED's, but they do exist; I know this purely from the fact that this study is using some of them. They didn't make them themselves, and that therefore means a company, somewhere, makes 1072nm IR LED's. Failing that, there is a pumped 1072nm laser for sale. Dunno how you could incorporate that into a treatment regimen, but it could be done, I'm sure.

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    2. Re:a lot harder than it sounds by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, and your google-fu is lacking, Sir, because a brief search of my normal LED suppliers gave me this: http://www.roithner-laser.com/LED_diverse.htm which admittedly is 1070nm (2.5mW) nominal output rather than 1072nm. However, given that it's minimum is 1020 and it's maximum 1120 i'd say you're gonna be getting a fairly hefty amount of 1072nm light out of it. I notice they also do a high-power (like 150mW) LED panel which radiates at 1050nm (peak 1000~1100nm), which again isn't right on the money but is gonna give you enough to trial, given that they were talking about this clinical trial dosing patients with about the same amount of IR as regular sunlight. Granted these diodes don't come cheap, with the quoted price for the 1070nm LED being about $20 each, which given the number you'd want could get pretty expensive. But then, what cost is health?

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    3. Re:a lot harder than it sounds by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 1

      Heh, I'm hardly "enlightened", just have an interest in doing this (although little biochem knowledge, i'm better with technology than fleshies) and experience in buying IR diodes. It is interesting however that whilst this Optical Topography they're talking about (even though it uses lower wavelengths of IR, typically around the 850nm~ band) isn't aimed at thereputic effects, it does seem to cause an increase in the levels of haemoglobin and oxyhaemoglobin in the brain, which in itself could be responsible for the memory effects noticed in the mice in this study.

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
  46. if this works on improving cognition in by alizard · · Score: 1

    Alzheimer patients, what would this do when applied to people with "normal" cognitive functioning?

    1. Re:if this works on improving cognition in by Badgam · · Score: 1

      Probably nothing; it seems like it reverses the effects of Alzheimer's and age-related degeneration by restoring the cells rather than enhance the capabilities of existing neurons to offset the negative effects. I think we'll have to find another route for our cognitive enhancement, although wearing a helmet for ten minutes a day is a pretty nice way to boost brainpower were it possible. Even so, I'd be glad just to know there's a way of preventing age-related mental decline...that's probably the worst thing that could happen to me.

  47. Reminder by phorm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't worry about that, I can remind you...

    Your last words before doing so were "mom, I'm going back to my room now" :-)

  48. The end of giant pharmaceuticals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every disease is, in essence, an anomaly on our EM fields. We're biorobots.
    Let's see them try to patent ElectroMagnetism next. That will be fun.

    Unicorn

  49. "Just what is the truth behind Madonna's by dgun · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    mysterious bruises?" Madonna's bruises take 2nd billing to a fountain of youth helmet? What type of publication are these people running?

    --
    FAQs are evil.
  50. Buy the compound to research yourself by Upaut · · Score: 1

    But because we would rather not kill a dying person to find out if we'll kill them or save them, my father will never get benefit of this.

    Actually, while a compound is still going through FDA trials, it is easier to get ahold of to the lay person then if it "passes" the trial. The chemical manufacturers are now churning out those compounds for research trials, and anyone can buy them for "non-human research only". As well as some license a "research supplier" to also handle sales of these compounds to individuals. Case in point: I am very pale, and do not tan well... So I buy Melanotan II (was mentioned in Wired a few years back)... Now I'm tanned, thinner, more muscular, and have a much greater sex drive (the pleasant side effects of this compound.. A great drug if the FDA would get off its ass and approve it.). So hunt down the drugs you have heard about, and see if its been killing any animals. Call the scientists and say you are doing a research piece on their companies work, and ask how the drug, and how much of it, is to be administered. Call them at home if possible... Most scientists love talking about their work for hours, without thinking of the consequences of the information given... I know I do...

    The only thing is, if you do that, and something goes wrong... You are kinda out of luck. But it beats a slow death without your mind any day.

    And you can find out if the company has any other offices. If they have a manufacturing branch in either India or China, then you can buy there much easier then in the USA... Though you might have customs trouble.

    --
    3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
    1. Re:Buy the compound to research yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I buy Melanotan II (was mentioned in Wired a few years back). I've been curious about this for some time, but I've not found many people having firsthand experience with Melantonan II that could/would comment on their experience wiht it. If you (or some AC who also takes the stuff) would be willing to share this info, what kind of dosage do you use, how long have you been taking it, and in what form? What outlets can you recommend for US residents interested in the compound? Anything noteworthy to say about its effects? Many many thanks...
    2. Re:Buy the compound to research yourself by xtronics · · Score: 1

      Where do you get your Melanotan II? you can contact me at karl (a t) xtronics dot com ,.,.

      BTW when I was trying to see how to contact you, I saw your journal - cracked me up - I have a cousin named Rachel Schmidt - but she is in her 50's ..

      Also, I saw your post on the second Gulf war - you were dead on.

    3. Re:Buy the compound to research yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little off topic from the point I was trying to make but... www.uslabresearch.com . Decent price, and I know the product works. http://www.supplylab.net/Melanotan_s/28.htm used to be a good site, but they recently increased their prices, and stopped including the cold-pack as a free standard... Something very necessary if your shipping from China.

      As for effects? Works almost as well as a viagra for increasing recoil (and actually creates desire, something that Ed meds ignore... Makes me feel like a soldier on a three day pass...), and I must say I have lost weight and actually have a tan now. Only side effect thats kinda odd? Freckles. Much more freckles. And it raised my bloodpressure a bit, so don't smoke or chew licorice root if your going to use this product... Mainly licorice root... Makes you feel like your going to die after a few strips...

      And while I would like to take it some other way, I have been injecting it. I push 20mg a week, every week, and after the first month I started to tan at the gym. Its expensive but not more then other vices

  51. Tin foil hats? by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

    The tin foil hats are eating the color red. All frying goes noggin into the sea. Wash the green flamingo with utmost jump.

    Over star to tape and grass. I like pie!

  52. Cell phone use by CustomDesigned · · Score: 1

    Since constant cell phone use has been shown to measurably raise brain temperature, could walking around with a cell phone to your ear have the same effect? Maybe if you put one on each ear? You could call one with the other. Reverse Alzheimers while talking to yourself!

  53. Suggestion for brand name by autophile · · Score: 1

    They could call it the Alzheimer's Subcranial Stimulation hat. Otherwise known as the... nah, I'm not going there.

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
  54. my favorite thing about sunlight by thegnu · · Score: 1

    is that it both increases and lowers your risk of cancer. vitamin d production and all that.

    but about OP's comment that he'll stay on the skeptic's side of the fence for now, doesn't that just mean you're not going to let someone put an infrared helmet on you until further tests have been done? or are you going to walk around actively disbelieving it?

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  55. What about brains that have been fried on drugs? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Could this reverse that kind of damage too?

  56. I ordered one for G. W. Bush... by mrops · · Score: 1

    ...and a handful for, wait what was I thinking, ummmm....

    Yah, I ordered one for G. W. Bush and a handful for..... ummmmm.... argh old age.

  57. Hot coffee by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    Coffee is supposed to be brewed HOT. It is supposed to be served HOT. You spill HOT SHIT on you, and you GET BURNT.


    It's also "supposed" to be served in a sturdy ceramic cup with an open top that allows rapid evaporative cooling (which is why the coffee needs to be that hot in the first place). Failing that, a sturdy cardboard cup would at least be reasonable.

    What is obviously not reasonable is a cheap styrofoam cup that gets soft when it is exposed to that level of heat, although this may not be obvious to the customer when it is stabilized by a rigid plastic top firmly in place. Remove that top (to add sugar or cream (which are provided separately so that the customer has to remove the top), and the cup is prone to catastrophic collapse from even slight pressure on the sides. And obviously unsafe to serve to customers in cars, who clearly are not going to have a table to catch most of the spill (this was hardly the first burn they'd had, just the worst).

    So yes, serve the coffee HOT if you want--but spend the money to give the customer a reasonably safe cup. If you are going to compromise by using a cup that can't take the heat, you have to compromise on the temperature as well to maintain safety.
    1. Re:Hot coffee by mrlibertarian · · Score: 1

      What is obviously not reasonable is a cheap styrofoam cup that gets soft when it is exposed to that level of heat...

      I think the disagreement between those who feel the case is frivolous and those who feel it is not stems from whether you believe there should be different standards for companies and individuals.

      For example, suppose that you and I are friends, and you ask me to make you a cup of coffee for the road. I brew some coffee at 200F and serve it to you in a cheap styrofoam cup at 190F. "Be careful, this coffee is hot," I say. "No shit, Sherlock," you reply. As you're sitting in the car, you hold the cup firmly between your knees and remove the top, so you can add sugar and cream. But then you accidentally spill some coffee on yourself. "God dammit, that was 20% my fault," you say through clenched teeth.

      You run back to me and scream, "Why did you make the coffee so damn hot? Why did you give me this coffee in a cheap-ass styrofoam cup?" I feel bad for you, but I point out the temperature was reasonable and you saw the styrofoam cup just as clearly as I did. I might be a cheap friend, but it's hard to say that I was at fault.

      If you look at the case this way, then you will probably see it as frivolous. However, if you believe the relationship between a company and a consumer should be similar to a parent-child relationship, where the parent looks out for the child, then you will probably see the case as a legitimate one.

    2. Re:Hot coffee by ckedge · · Score: 1

      YES, definitely.

      I'm in no way in favour of a nanny state - but corporations, organizations, and governments are obliged to learn from the past and learn from experience. If you serve 200 deg C coffee in flimsy cups to people driving cars, n% will suffer 3rd degree burns to significantly large parts of their bodies.

      Either reduce the temperature of the coffee, or use sturdier cups. To purposefully ignore the n% who have already been hurt is to be directly responsible for the future n% who will be hurt.

      The fact that some people, at home or at work, carefully walk to the table with sturdy ceramic mugs of piping hot cups of coffee - does not mean it's okay to serve scalding water in flimsy cups to motorists at a drive through window.

      They WILL be hurt because statistically speaking humans have accidents and make mistakes. We're not perfect. You KNOW it's going to happen, therefore you are responsible for reducing the likelihood of it happening, especially if the cost to reduce the odds are so low and so simple.

      As an organization or corporation, you can directly measure the likelihood and calculate the cost to remediate the damage. If you choose not to, you'd better have a good reason - and it can't be "oh they should have been more careful".

      If "oh they should have been more careful" was allowed - there would be no seatbelt laws, no helmet laws, no sidewalks or curbs, and no speed limits.

    3. Re:Hot coffee by bob.appleyard · · Score: 1

      If you look at the case this way, then you will probably see it as frivolous. However, if you believe the relationship between a company and a consumer should be similar to a parent-child relationship, where the parent looks out for the child, then you will probably see the case as a legitimate one.

      Uh, how about a business-client relationship... you know, what it actually is? There are obligations, expectations and so on that differ from those of a parent or a friend.

      --
      How dare you be so modest!! You conceited bastard!!
    4. Re:Hot coffee by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      I think the disagreement between those who feel the case is frivolous and those who feel it is not stems from whether you believe there should be different standards for companies and individuals.

      For example, suppose that you and I are friends, and you ask me to make you a cup of coffee for the road. I brew some coffee at 200F and serve it to you in a cheap styrofoam cup at 190F. "Be careful, this coffee is hot," I say. "No shit, Sherlock," you reply. As you're sitting in the car, you hold the cup firmly between your knees and remove the top, so you can add sugar and cream. But then you accidentally spill some coffee on yourself. "God dammit, that was 20% my fault," you say through clenched teeth. I certainly think that there should be different standards for friends. A friend is somebody with whom I have an ongoing relationship that includes a certain amount of mutual debt, for favors done in the past and for harms forgiven. So if a friend of mine does something so idiotic (I don't know if I have any friends that stupid, but never mind) as to hand me 190F coffee in a flimsy styrofoam cup, without even putting the cream and sugar in so I won't have to risk opening the cup in the car, I won't sue him; it just becomes part of the tab, and he'll make it up to me in some form in the future. Of course, a friend, if not impoverished, would surely offer to pay my medical costs without even being asked. (It is worth noted that the lawsuit occurred when Macdonald's refused to pay the woman's actual medical expenses).
    5. Re:Hot coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if a friend of mine does something so idiotic (I don't know if I have any friends that stupid, but never mind) as to hand me 190F coffee in a flimsy styrofoam cup, without even putting the cream and sugar in so I won't have to risk opening the cup in the car, I won't sue him; it just becomes part of the tab, and he'll make it up to me in some form in the future.

      Let me just make sure I understand: Your friend owes you something because he offered you a cup of coffee in a container that displeased you? All you had to do was decline his offer, and yet you think you're doing him a favor by not suing him. Now I understand why you feel McDonald's is liable.

    6. Re:Hot coffee by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Let me just make sure I understand: Your friend owes you something because he offered you a cup of coffee in a container that displeased you? All you had to do was decline his offer, and yet you think you're doing him a favor by not suing him. Now I understand why you feel McDonald's is liable.


      So if you negligently hurt your friend, you don't think that you owe him anything, not even an apology, much less help with the medical bills for the injury caused by your carelessness?

      Do you have any friends?
  58. A bit optimistic by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The wide publicity given to this report is probably unfortunate, given how many people are desperate for a cure.
    Key points:
    This is a case study of one patient.
    Treatment was not double blinded. Patient's family and doctor knew about the treatment.
    From the paper, the degree of improvement sounds a bit short of complete reversal of symptoms

    Upon returning to the clinic one week following perispinal etanercept administration for his weekly dose the patient's wife and son confirmed that he had remained markedly clinically improved throughout the week, a fact which was remarked upon by the family [see Additional file 1]. He was noticed to be less reluctant to join in conversation. On re-examination by author ET prior to repeat dosing one week after the initial dose, the patient correctly identified the year, month, season, day of week and state. He appeared to answer with less frustration, and the examiner's impression was that there was reduced latency of response, and his affect seemed improved. On the FAS test for verbal fluency when asked to list all of the words that start with the letter F in 60 seconds he listed 8 words, and named 5 animals in 60 seconds. The study author has a patent on this treatment strategy.

    Severity of Alzheimer's dementia can vary dramatically from day to day, and many patients show periods of near-complete lucidity.

    I can't help wondering how much etanercept (it is a large protein) is getting into the brain when administered in this way.

    It is widely suspected that Alzheimer's Disease has an inflammatory component, so the approach is not unreasonable, but I worry about large number of patients' families demanding etanercept based on this very preliminary work.
    1. Re:A bit optimistic by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Baaa, I couldn't think of 8 words starting with F in 60 seconds!

      Where is the helmet :-/

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    2. Re:A bit optimistic by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Wow. How old are you? I hope you at least got "Fuck!"

    3. Re:A bit optimistic by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Baaa, I couldn't think of 8 words starting with F in 60 seconds!

      There was a not very scientific documentary on TV recently in which people undergoing sensory deprivation were tested both before and after with this word-listing puzzle. They chose the letter 'F' too. Is it a standard thing?

      It seems a very bad choice, to be honest. The TV didn't show it, but I'm sure I know exactly what word number one will be from nearly everyone. I mean, really.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:A bit optimistic by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Doctor: Can you name 8 words beginning with the letter "F"

      Patient: Uh..flower, fantastic, forward, front,..um...force,..uh... fun,...uh... flimsy...uh...uh...uh...FUCK!

      Doctor: Very good.

  59. Wii by CaseyB · · Score: 1

    An infrared helmet won't cure Alzheimer's, but an infrared helmet with a Wii tracking system on their TV would blow their poor confused minds.

  60. offtopic offsmopic by dgun · · Score: 1

    It's a reference to the shitty source of the article. Of course, in order to understand that reference, one would have to actually read the article.

    --
    FAQs are evil.
  61. My personal experience with this type of device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mother bought a relatively expensive low level laser(970nm) treatment device for use on some of her post surgical injuries. I rolled my eyes when she showed me and told me about it. I had previously debunked her 'heavy metal footbath extraction equipment with some salt, a couple nails and a 12 volt battery.

    The packaging and instructions had wild claims of curing a huge variety of ailments. Again, i kind of snickered to myself, hoping she could capture at least some psychosomatic benefit from the device. You know where this is going... I thought what the hell, i'll blast my wrists(I suffer from moderate carpal tunnels). I was astonished, within 10 minutes all my discomfort was relieved. The symptoms returned, albeit not so severely about 10 days later. I spent half a day looking for some kind of peer reviewed publication that could describe the mechanism by which the device provided some kind of benefit, but found nothing but a few abstracts from eastern europe that i dont think anyone would take seriously.

    Perhaps i just experienced the placebo affect, but there was a very real benefit to me. I continue to use the device roughly once a month and have little to no pain related to my CTS. There is plenty of snake oil out there. Blueberries will not cure your cancer. But there is a real possibility there is some low level laser effect. As for the article and the laser helmet benefitting alzheimers, i have no idea.

    Sorry for the AC response, im not comfortable discussing my health and my mother's health in a public forum. Especially endorsing something that is at least a little left of center on the crackpot meter.

  62. Fascinating Captain. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apparently the white hair on polar bears acts like optic fibre. It collects light over a larger surface than the bare skin of the animal and channels it to the body to keep it warm.

    Never heard of this before. Too bad it's not true and you are propagating another "urban myth" (although Polar Bears aren't especially urban).

    Thanks for playing.

    And now back to our regularly scheduled program.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  63. Damn... by trickotomy · · Score: 1

    The helmet is to be worn for ten minutes every day Now, if only I could remember to wear it.
  64. healing power of IR light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rats blinded by ingesting methanol had much of their vision restored by being irradiated with IR light

  65. Why wait., make your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, if you're confident on the technology, you can build a thing like this yourself. Email the scientists to get the specs and go ahead.

  66. Moses supposes his toes are roses by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Coffee is supposed to be brewed HOT. It is supposed to be served HOT. I'm drinking a cold coffee as I type this.
    When I was in japan I told people that where I come from, you can't get cold coffee, and that seemed weird and alien to them.

    The point of the woman's lawsuit was that handing people flimsy cups of dangerously hot liquids at a drive-through was not a good idea.
    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  67. Cool! A Minnie Driver/Anne Hathaway love scene! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Huh. I guess Helms of Int +30 actually do exist.

    But that's not a problem for Slashdotters. Now a Helm of Cha +30, that's what's needed around here!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  68. Interesting picture ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    The thing must run awfully hot, it's got enough cooling fans on it.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  69. thanks... by alizard · · Score: 1

    that's exactly what I was looking for.

    1. Re:thanks... by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 1

      Expensive but worth a shot. I've used that company before; their stuff is top notch, and for mid-ir led's, $20 a unit ain't bad. If you're buying a lot they give you discounts too, and if you call 'em up and ask for it, they can give you a specific reading on the 1072 wavelength it emits. I'm thinking of doing this myself if it gets proven correct.

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
  70. The right temperature to serve coffee by westlake · · Score: 1
    Coffee is supposed to be brewed HOT. It is supposed to be served HOT. You spill HOT SHIT on you, and you GET BURNT
    That woman was sold a cup of coffee that was somewhere between 180-190 F. That's hot, sure

    225 consumers tasted black coffees at six different temperatures, ranking them for preference. The lowest temperature was below the pain threshold, the next below the epithelial damage threshold, the next two above. The two highest temperatures approximated to coffees served commercially.

    The rank order of preference for temperatures was 160F (71.1C)... Coffee shop serving temperatures ranged 168-187F (75.6-86.1C). Observed time from serving to drinking ranged: 2-1005 sec, (median 114 sec). The average estimated drinking temperature was 168.1F. At what temperature should you serve coffee?

    As to Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants;

    1 The coffee was sold as a drive-thru take out. That maximizes the chance of spills.

    2 The woman was 79 years old and for all practical purposesd mmobilized in her car seat. This was nothing like the geek tippimg over his cup at Starbucks.

    She was taken to the hospital, where it was determined that she had suffered third-degree burns on six percent of her skin and lesser burns over sixteen percent. She remained in the hospital for eight days while she underwent skin grafting. Two years of treatment followed.

    3 Documents obtained from McDonald's showed that from 1982 to 1992 the company had received more than 700 reports of people burnt by McDonald's coffee to varying degrees of severity, and had settled claims arising from scalding injuries for more than $500,000

    4 Liebeck sought to settle with McDonald's for US $20,000 to cover her medical costs, which were $11,000, but the company offered only $800. A mediator suggested $225,000 just before trial, but McDonald's refused these final pre-trial attempts to settle.

    In short, McDonald's attorneys gambled on the chance they could persuade a jury to decide against an 81 year old woman who had been in and out of hospital for two years.

  71. Cell phone ? by dorfsmay · · Score: 1

    So cell phones give us cancer because they heat our brain, but this helmet prevents alzheimer's because... it heats our brain ???

  72. More details here (link inside) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More details in this discussion on NeuroTalk Forum...

    http://neurotalk.psychcentral.com/showthread.php?p=197454

  73. ok ya it mite work for that BUT.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it can cure that A disease (the one where u 4get stuff, I can't spell it) but OMGosh there is NO way infrared light can do anything for blondes lyk me cuz it would just heat up the air in my head, ya know ?? :( so lyk omgosh they so need to find out how to turn air into brains!!

  74. I studied low-freq microwaves and I call bullshit by ahuard · · Score: 1

    I wrote an extensive (52 page) paper on terahertz radiation (spectra between the microwave and infrared frequencies), and I can tell you, absolutely, that this is bullshit.

    Infrared radiation is commonly thought of as heat because it is absorbed so readily by the water in your body. Near the microwave region, there are several frequency windows that can penetrate several millimeters of biological tissue, but several millimeters is not very far.

    At higher frequencies, the transmittance is even worse--there are practically no band windows that can be used for effective transmission, even when transmitting through the atmosphere where water content is much less. This is why terahertz imaging is still in research and development--stronger emitters and more sensitive detectors are needed due to atmospheric absorption.

    If an alzheimer's treatment is to be effective with this technique, the radiation will have to penetrate more than a few millimeters of brain tissue. In fact, I suspect that this radiation must penetrate throughout the entire brain. Infrared frequencies simply cannot do that, and they never will.

  75. Re:I studied low-freq microwaves and I call bullsh by MassiveForces · · Score: 1

    It is the outer few milimeters of brain tissue that starts to go first during Alzheimer's and thus if the device works it could buy quite some time for sufferers detected at early onset.

  76. Obligatory by TimTipple · · Score: 1

    - Son, what's the name of that German guy that keeps hiding my medicine?
    - It's Alzheimers, Dad, Alzheimers.

  77. Wait... by Geminus · · Score: 1

    What am I doing here again?

  78. ATP: In Soviet Russia, the Light goes into You. by Crafter · · Score: 1

    The first time I remember hearing of the trick of using IR for deep tissue healing it was being investigated for healing the Bends in Navy Divers at the University of Wisconsin in 2000.
    http://healthlink.mcw.edu/article/975450257.html

    The theory then was that the IR was being picked up in the cytochrome in each mitochondria and thereby providing a direct power feed to each cell.
    IR light forced more ATP generation at the mitochondrial level.

    How the Hell Does this Work???

    Well....
    This was thought to bypass failing transport mechanisms (like the blood stream) to get past the circulatory damage that the Bends caused in divers.
    I could see how this same 'trick' could bypass part of the failing circulation and neuron/neuron transport that might contribute to the body not being able to heal Alzheimer's Disease.

    ATP is the general power currency off the bioworld, so this is the equivalent of broadcast power for each cell.
    Tesla would be proud!

    Disclaimer: I'm not a doctor, I'm a mad scientist.
    (OK OK, I'm a biology student/researcher at the University of Kansas.)

  79. You're doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Years of work by other researchers at specific wavelengths trumps your survey work for -- oh wait, you don't tell us how much effort you put into your survey.

    Science requires you to attempt to reproduce their work.

    BTW, are we supposed to be impressed by page count?

    Whoop-D-farking dooooo, 52 whole pages!

    Wow, I never knew that page count == good science.

  80. Re:I studied low-freq infrared and I call bullshit by ahuard · · Score: 1

    I'm not an Alzheimer's scientist and I haven't studied it at all. What I can tell you is that the intensity of infrared light that would penetrate the skin, the skull, and finally reach the brain would be so low that it could be considered negligible. Transmittance decreases exponentially in the presence of water and I doubt any significant amount of radiation would even penetrate the person's scalp.

  81. Two for One tinfoil hat by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Now I can keep the aliens from scanning my head AND remember that I saw aliens!

  82. Optical topography by mgreenham · · Score: 1

    My interest is multifold -- I run a clinic that treats brain injury w. HBOT, and need a better way to watch progress than highly expensive functional MRI, PET and other such "Big Medicine" that costs thousands per look and million or so per machine ... This wonderful Hitachi device is mostly software, and as you noticed, a few pieces of hardware that you can get at Fry's. I'm a software guy in a prior life so I value software, but Hitachi will give me one of 1/2 dozen machines in the world, when there need to be thousands, cheeeeep (Hitachi price: $1/3rd mill; real price, a few $K.... time to produce these things) So, combining monitoring and testing w. therapy is the Big Deal, you can test in realtime and modify your therapy in minutes rather than months! We need this, to accelerate therapy orders of magnitude. There are 300,000 so-called vegetative patients in the country, 40% of which are called "misdiagnosed", but actually its more than that imo. These folks can think, are aware, but cannot respond, and these machines are Step One in getting them better. That's aside from the benefit of IR to the cells of the brain. W. proper software and biofeedback, you can manipulate and communicate w. the world, while you're getting better w. HBOT and future stem cell therapy... Anyway, that's my area of research, and I'm grateful if you have any thoughts in the future

    1. Re:Optical topography by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 1

      Well, believe me when I say I am no where near qualified to speak on this level and be of any help to anyone, except maybe as comic relief. That being said, the dude running these trials, one Dr. Gordon Dougal, is probably the best guy to contact in regards mixing your Optical Topography therapy with the 1072nm IR therapy he apparently specialises in. 1072 can apparently cause a whole range of GoodThings(TM) from age-restoration effects in the epidermis to significantly reduced healing times for treatment of the herpes simplex-2 virus in cold sores, genital herpes and skin herpes outbreaks. There's a paper on pubmed here http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&Cmd=ShowDetailView&TermToSearch=16046143&ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum . Hope this is of some help to you.... I'd suggest e-mailing this guy and asking him about his project. Whilst he does run/partner a company that seems to be making a whole raft of devices for the treatment of cold-sores and age-restoration therapies, he nonetheless is working with University's on it, if only to provide accurate peer-accredited evidence to back up his devices claims. They really do appear to work. It seems it is definitely worth a trial run of building one of these helmet jobs using the LED's I mentioned above and trialing it on patients for possible effects. It's been shown time and time over that 1072nm (and those near to it) wavelength light has no detrimental effect on patients, as evidenced by the fact this guy's devices are licensed for usage now. It works for stimulating cell growth in the skin; why not the brain?

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
  83. It's the Daily Mail by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    That's all you need to know, right there. As far as credible science reporting goes, they're up there with the Weekly World News.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?