Slashdot Mirror


Apple Error Leaves iPhone Developers In the Lurch

canadacow writes "iPhone developers enrolled and active in the iPhone OS 2.0 beta program got a nasty surprise today when Apple inadvertently 'expired' the recently released version. While for a beta program this typically would not be an issue, Apple has yet to release a new deployment of the iPhone OS. So developers like myself who use their iPhone for both actual phone and iPod use are bricked. Of note, this particular expired build is just 11 days old."

92 of 379 comments (clear)

  1. In Apple's defense by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    They tried to call you and apologize but you didn't answer your phone.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:In Apple's defense by hackus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic.

      I believe that people are getting incredibly stupid about all this EULA terms of service.

      I mean, on the Apple forums I am seeing posts "Well, they turned my $800 dollar phone into a brick, but schucks, I guess I deserve it because it is in the EULA."

      I mean people go BERZERK over Microsoft shutting down their systems after upgrades and their keys fail to match the hardware anymore so Vista doesn't boot.

      Apple users are just happy and content they spent $800 bucks it would seem for a phone and the company just turned it off, with no recourse.

      I can see it now: "Damn, stuck out in nowhere with a flat tire.....Darn...looks like my EULA is gone, so I will have to die out here in the heat. Darn, but I guess I deserve it."

      Absolutely amazing. I wonder if the EULA comes with a agreement that your IQ must be reduced to a 2 year old?

      The only person who is ever going to shut my phone or PC off is going to be me and when I and only I hit the off button.

      Mac Customers=Stupid

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    2. Re:In Apple's defense by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Apple users are just happy and content they spent $800 bucks it would seem for a phone and the company just turned it off, with no recourse.

      These aren't users whose phones are gone forever, they're developers (or "developers") whose platform (or phone) is down temporarily. Apple screwed up here, but "It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic" might be overstating it a bit.

    3. Re:In Apple's defense by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you missed the part where these are people choosing to explicitly install beta development software on their mobile phone. If want to be sure your phone will work, either don't install early beta software on it, or buy a second phone.

    4. Re:In Apple's defense by syzler · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would agree with you if the people you refer to used stock firmware, however we have requested and gone out of our way to use Beta firmware in order to get a head start on developing for the platform. Although I am frustrated that my phone has had bugs since I loaded the beta firmware and I am upset that my phone is not working, I recognize that I placed myself in this situation by switching to the beta software despite Apple's warnings posted in their portal about doing so. However I am mostly angry with myself for being too "cheap" to buy a test device (an iPod Touch maybe) and instead opted to use my primary phone for development.

    5. Re:In Apple's defense by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So how do you like your ibrick? After the first brick today, or after the second brick today?

      I mean seriously, how many times has this phone been bricked lately? I could be building myself a house by now with all of the bricking. /half sarcasm, half facepalm

    6. Re:In Apple's defense by Lucas.Langa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, Apple did a poor job here but it's in fact not Mac Customers=Stupid, it's rather Beta Users Wanting Production Quality=Stupid. Usually I even go saying Version 1.0 Users Wanting Production Quality=Stupid...

      --
      Build a tool even an idiot can use and only an idiot will want to use it. -S.O.B.
    7. Re:In Apple's defense by His+Shadow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Jesus. Drama Queen much? A piece of beta software exploded. It will be fixed in days if not hours. It's probably fixed by the time you posted your whiny rant. So dry your tears, Princess, and turn down the hyperbole a little.

      --

      Fiat Homos et Pereat Theos

    8. Re:In Apple's defense by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I mean seriously, how many times has this phone been bricked lately? 0, if you're a regular customer who uses the device as intended. No one should be surprised to find problems when signing up for a beta program.
    9. Re:In Apple's defense by falcon5768 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      actually its never been bricked for the consumer. Its been bricked on developers (and your dumb if you are developing on your currently in use phone but thats another story) and its been bricked by people who violated their contract with AT&T.

      But bricked by Apple legitimately? Never been.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    10. Re:In Apple's defense by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apple screwed up here, but "It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic" might be overstating it a bit.

      Come on, this is Apple. They practically have a 100% market penetration among emo kids. *Everything* is tragic to them.

    11. Re:In Apple's defense by wattrlz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple users aren't (necessarily) stupid. They just have completely different expectations. When Mac people buy something they expect it to make them cool. Any other functionality is just icing on the cake.

    12. Re:In Apple's defense by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Also, anyone who puts a dev OS on their daily phone is additionally just plain stupid.

      To the degree that real developers are getting hit with enforced downtime (which I don't know enough about this SDK to know if that's the case) they have a legitimate gripe. But, yeah, enthusiasts who play with developer releases deserve what they get.

    13. Re:In Apple's defense by Auckerman · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is no "official beta release" of the 2.0 firmware. There is a version of the pre-2.0 firmware that comes with the emulator in the SDK. In order to get that on your iPhone you need to unlock it, against Apple's say, then put it on your iPhone.

      --

      Burn Hollywood Burn
    14. Re:In Apple's defense by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unlocking isn't illegal.

      The phrases you missed from my post are "regular customer" and "as intended". That excludes unlocked phones ("jailbroken") and beta testers. Those articles all reference unlocked phones and those that install 3rd party software before Apple offered any.

    15. Re:In Apple's defense by Cornflake917 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You got away with a +5 insightful after calling Mac users stupid on Slashdot...

      You, sir, are a genius.

    16. Re:In Apple's defense by Simon80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not even a question of legality. I think the phrase you are looking for is "well-behaved customer", where good behaviour is defined by Apple. This case shows that apparently even well-behaved developers, who are worth more than customers, are still prone to getting screwed. The moral of the story, in my opinion, is stay away from locked down hardware.

    17. Re:In Apple's defense by Sentry21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What is it with the overuse of the term 'bricked' lately? These phones are NOT bricked. They are not usable as phones right now, but they can be easily fixed by restoring older firmware, or installing newer firmware. There's even a way to keep using the current firmware without the PSOD.

      So, ignoring the fact that you can only 'brick' a device once (after which point is is worthless anyway), anyone who installs as-yet-unreleased beta firmware on their phone should be fully aware that something unpleasant could well happen. If this were foolproof, Apple would have shipped out the new firmware to *everyone*.

      To mix some metaphors, if you want to play with the big boys, you're going to get burned.

    18. Re:In Apple's defense by Reapman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh tell me an OS Beta from Microsoft or any major vendor that doesn't have an expirey date? I remember running Windows 98 Beta that had an expirey date.

      From everything I read it's pretty recoverable, so if your a developer worth your weight you should be able to get your iPhone functional again.

      Apple may do evil stuff, this is not one of those times however.

    19. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot: Where we've gone from "You're stupid if you don't buy Apple" to "You're stupid if you don't buy Apple, AND buy an extra one just in case."

      No thanks. If I wanted to gamble my money away, I can go to Vegas and at least get free drinks while I do it.

    20. Re:In Apple's defense by agrippa_cash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But with OS & applications they make it expire so you can't use the beta instead of the product they are testing. With the phone, you've paid for the phone. I don't doubt that Apple is willing to charge people for phone firmware updates, but you'd think the expiration would be after the projected release date or, like Windows, set for X months after install.

    21. Re:In Apple's defense by syzler · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually there is an Official 2.0 beta release of the iPhone software available for the iPhone (current build 5A240d), however you have to be a registered iPhone Developer to download it from iPhone Developer Portal. The software in the simulator is not the same Beta software which Apple makes available for the physical phone.

    22. Re:In Apple's defense by frdmfghtr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe you are correct...iPhone SDK beta 3 has just been released(scroll down a bit to see it).

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    23. Re:In Apple's defense by DECS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, Mac users expect their stuff to work flawlessly, never have any bugs, never wear out (plastic crack, batteries die, etc) and maintain its value.

      It's other users who have zero expectations. Windows users expect things not to work, expect to spend hours futzing around, expect to replace parts frequently, and are blown away whenever anything works.

      That's why they disdainfully look down upon Mac users as "needing to be cool." I have never talked to any Mac users who were enraptured with being cool (and I've worked with lots of Mac users as a IT consultant for lots of small Mac shops). They like design, functionality, simplicity, and other things, but being cool is only an old saw dragged out by Windows Enthusiasts to account for their embarrassment in dealing with crap.

    24. Re:In Apple's defense by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but is Apple seriously trying to discourage all development on their platform? That's what's going to happen if they keep this up.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    25. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not "bricked".

    26. Re:In Apple's defense by T-Bone-T · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are obviously not the target market for the SDK if you can't imagine buying more than one device.

    27. Re:In Apple's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      your dumb sigh...
    28. Re:In Apple's defense by tiny-e · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It would be funny if it wasn't so tragic.

      I believe that people are getting incredibly stupid about all this EULA terms of service.

      I mean, on the Apple forums I am seeing posts "Well, they turned my $800 dollar phone into a brick, but schucks, I guess I deserve it because it is in the EULA."

      I mean people go BERZERK over Microsoft shutting down their systems after upgrades and their keys fail to match the hardware anymore so Vista doesn't boot.

      Apple users are just happy and content they spent $800 bucks it would seem for a phone and the company just turned it off, with no recourse.

      I can see it now: "Damn, stuck out in nowhere with a flat tire.....Darn...looks like my EULA is gone, so I will have to die out here in the heat. Darn, but I guess I deserve it."

      Absolutely amazing. I wonder if the EULA comes with a agreement that your IQ must be reduced to a 2 year old?

      The only person who is ever going to shut my phone or PC off is going to be me and when I and only I hit the off button.

      Mac Customers=Stupid

      -Hack Dude - You're a tool. Too hard for you to figure that out? Too Bad.

      I'm sure the phone can be restored to operable status by putting the official released OS back on it. You'd almost think that a person with the word "Hack" in his/her username would consider this....

      Hopefully (actually I don't really care) my flame-bait post can be modded +5 insightful as well.

    29. Re:In Apple's defense by CubicleView · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, very dumb developers. They should either have more money for iphones, or enough patience to wait for a stable release. Unless like just about every developer I know they have 2 or 3 old phones they can use for just such a relatively uncommon situation. I mean its not like it could help them to maybe release applications for the final version quicker or anything, thereby giving their apps a better chance of success in what will likely be a saturated market.

    30. Re:In Apple's defense by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's worth mentioning that no one else is doing this. I mean, my RAZR may suck, but I don't get bricked if I'm putting MIDlets on it. Qtopia's not bricking your antique green phone. Get it? Why is Apple doing this crap at all? Why do they have it locked down so hard? Why should they make it so hard to develop software for their phone? And why are so many Apple fanboy developers willing to put up with this kind of abuse?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:In Apple's defense by TrancePhreak · · Score: 2, Informative

      1. XB360 with XNA Creator's Club membership (it would be PS3 running Linux, but that doesn't support gamepads).
      2. GP32 / GP2X
      3. Unlocked HTC Tytn II

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    32. Re:In Apple's defense by Swift2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, jeez, how long did it last? Four or five hours before the new version of iPhone 2.0 became available? My God! The humanity!

    33. Re:In Apple's defense by Swift2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's not illegal. But unlocking involves using a hack to get root. That's called a bug. If Apple left it, people would be justifiedly angry. When they fix it, it will break the unlocking hack. There's a simple way out of it: refuse the updates from iTunes. No problems then.

      There are very useful things called haxies on the Mac, but every other new version of the OS breaks them, because it involves putting in an interrupt that Apple warned would break often. Then you wait a few days, and the company brings out a new version. The horror!

    34. Re:In Apple's defense by njfuzzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tag this story "idonotthinkthatmeanswhatyouthinkitmeans".

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
  2. I have an idea! by anss123 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's complain about BETA software!

    1. Re:I have an idea! by initdeep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let's complain about BETA software! Here's a better idea. Let's complain about DEVELOPERS having bricked devices so they cannot test out the Apps they are you know.... DEVELOPING! Tool.
    2. Re:I have an idea! by th1nk · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's read stories we're not interested in and complain about them!

    3. Re:I have an idea! by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here's an even better idea. Let's complain about developers who use beta software for their primary mobile phone!

    4. Re:I have an idea! by fr4nk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why not just skip the reading part and complain right away?

      Oh, wait...

    5. Re:I have an idea! by n8_f · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now I feel so stupid. You should. If you installed the betas of 10.5 or ZFS on your primary machine and then lost data, it's your own fault. Apple explicitly told you not to do that and it is simple commonsense to follow that advice. I haven't been accepted to the iPhone Developer Program yet, so I'm stuck on the simulator, but according to TUAW Apple gave the same advice for the iPhone OS betas: "Important note: Once you install the pre-release iPhone OS on your device, such device may only be used for development and testing purposes until the final (GM) version of the iPhone OS is released. In addition, you will need to install new versions of the software from time to time throughout the beta period. Failure to install the most current version will, after a period of time, put your device in a de-activated state. Updating to the most current version will re-activate your device so that you may continue testing."

      After all, it's not as if it's reasonable to expect a machine to do everyday tasks AND be used as software development platform at the same time. It is perfectly reasonable and so are Apple's requirements. If you can't afford a separate device AND can't deal with the inconveniences of running beta software on your primary device, then simply wait for the software to be publicly released in a non-beta form. Then you can develop on your primary device AND ignore Apple's advice to not run beta software on devices on which you can't afford to have bugs.

      Apple thinks it own an iPhone... resulting in features... like mandatory SDK expiration dates Hmm, I wonder why Apple would want mandatory SDK expiration dates for their beta firmwares? Maybe because they are beta firmwares and they want developers to be developing against the latest version? Additionally, the beta firmwares aren't fully tested and could have exploits or other details Apple would prefer not to leave lying around.

      The developers did nothing but buy hardware from an unethical company. ...and install beta software that they were explicitly told could do all of the things it has done and worse. You are obviously a troll, but because this idiocy seems so rampant, I thought I'd debunk it anyway.
    6. Re:I have an idea! by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. You're wrong.

      To use your first example - if you're developing on a computer and your programme hangs the machine, you reboot it. You don't go out and buy a new computer.

      Back to the situation at hand - if you're on the iPhone beta SDK programme and the phone has been locked out by the expiration of this version of the SDK, you *reset* the phone and download the new version (which is out now) from Apple.

      How is this so hard for people to understand? You reset the phone, get the new SDK version and carry on. If you were in the SDK programme you probably already knew about this expiration (and if not, *that* is the thing to criticise Apple for) so you'd have planned for some downtime today. Maybe you've even lost half a day of testing time, which you'd instead spend on the simulator or reviewing your code and sharpening up your documentation.

      Now I feel so stupid
      You should feel a bit silly after your post. Maybe not stupid, but sheepish for misunderstanding what's happening.

  3. "Brick" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is not a brick. It's a perfectly functional device with a software problem. That is not "bricked".

    1. Re:"Brick" by OrangeTide · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's only bricked if you cannot get it to work again without cracking it up and digging into some special programming connector or replacing some chips. That is, the device can serve no other purpose than to be a brick without highly technical intervention. The fact that you can update the software back to the non-expired non-beta version seems to be completely overlooked.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:"Brick" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The device functions enough that you can restore the original firmware, you know, the firmware that is stable and fully supported and not recommended for development use only.

    3. Re:"Brick" by Kolie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Brick means the only thing the device is good for, is being a brick. It means the device is irrevocably damaged, ie can NEVER be fixed. I bet a quick software update can fix this issue.

    4. Re:"Brick" by Sentry21 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I bricked my Macbook the other day, it sucked. I had to move the cursor so the screen woke up, then type in my password. Damnit Apple, why do you keep bricking this thing every five minutes? *rage*

    5. Re:"Brick" by BitZtream · · Score: 3, Informative
      Ah, but theres the problem, you can't just restore the original firmware using iTunes as the baseband has been updated by the 2.0 firmware.

      iTunes will choke at the end of the restore process if you try to 'restore' to 1.1.4 (the latest public version). When it chokes, it leaves your phone in restore mode, unusable.

      It is however, not bricked.

      The solution is relatively simple. You restore to 1.1.4 and let the process fail, which will leave you with an error 1015 at the end of the process.

      At that point you use one of the jailbreak apps to put your phone back in normal mode, which will allow the old software to work with the new baseband. I found this out the hard way myself this morning, but after being rather upset, a little googling for the 'pink screen of death' pointed me at the solution which is:
      1. 1. Put the phone into restore mode by holding the power button and the home button down until the phone shuts down.
      2. 2. Release the power button and wait for it to boot into restore mode
      3. 3. Plug the phone in and iTunes will tell you it needs to be restored, restore to the latest software iTunes will give you (1.1.4).
      4. 4. The restore will fail with Error 1015. The software was however restored, just not the baseband, and iTunes leaves the phone in DFU mode wanting to restore completely.
      5. 5. Use one of the jailbreak apps to set your phone back to normal. I used ZiPhone, worked fine first try.
      6. 6. Restart iTunes and restore your backup.
      Working phone, new baseband, but it works all the same. Am I pissed off? YES. The first thing I thought was that it expired (which Apple warns you about during the development setup process on several occasions), so I went and checked for new firmware to find that I was indeed using the latest build. Since this is my primary phone its partially my fault, but Apple certainly screwed the pooch by letting this happen when they put in such anal measures to make sure people update the software.

      If it wasn't for the fact that my company wants to port one of our products to the iPhone, at this point I would be done with iPhone development due to this mistake, there is no excuse for a company the size of Apple allowing this to happen.
      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    6. Re:"Brick" by fonik · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're just beta testing the new iPhone feature: iStopWorkingAllOfASudden.

  4. Seems easy to fix on Apple's side by CannonballHead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Couldn't they just re-release the exact same beta OS but fix the expiration date? They must know about this by now, and it doesn't seem like it'd even take that long. Maybe they are having a day off or something.

    I know this will be the theme for the whole slashdot story, but I have to say that if MS did this, I think there'd be public burnings, see-I-told-you-so's, etc.

  5. You forgot to mention by anotherone · · Score: 5, Informative
    You forgot to mention that Apple SPECIFICALLY told you NOT to put it on your phone because it was unstable- and you hacked the lockouts and did it anyway. You also didn't mention that you could simply do a restore in iTunes and get a working firmware in about 2 minutes.

    But, I guess that getting on the front page of slashdot is more important.

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
    1. Re:You forgot to mention by whisper_jeff · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would be curious, with the name "canadacow", assuming he is Canadian, how the author is using the phone as his regular phone. Given that the iPhone is not yet (officially) available in Canada. Only people who've jailbroken their phones are using them north of the border.

    2. Re:You forgot to mention by iONiUM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, so we'll just use the emulator forever, shall we? Hard to develop when we can't even test it on the fucking units. Seriously, why bother "releasing" an SDK if you didn't even put in a visual designer until last week, and still are unable to put it on actual units? Nice "release".

    3. Re:You forgot to mention by j_166 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "you forgot to read the first line of the summery."

      You forgot to spell summary correctly.

      I kid, I kid.

    4. Re:You forgot to mention by cowscows · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wah wah wah! Apple released this fancy new phone but there's no SDK and nobody can develop apps for it, this sucks, Apple sucks, everyone sucks!

      *Apple releases beta SDK*

      Wah wah wah! Apple released an inital version of an SDK for their fancy new phone and it isn't perfect and doesn't do everything we ever wanted, this sucks, Apple sucks!

      All some people do is complain. Even when someone listens to what you're asking for, and tries to meet your needs. Even when they're just starting out and testing the waters in an area that is very complex. Apple released what they had because obnoxious people wouldn't shut up about how much Apple sucked for not releasing anything.

      It'll get better. Half-finished software is the price the world pays for being whiny and impatient.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    5. Re:You forgot to mention by rockmuelle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Right, so we'll just use the emulator forever, shall we?"

      Kinda like those of us still waiting for access to the beta program? We have no choice but to continue to use the emulator forever, even if we did go out and buy devices specifically for development.

      Seriously, it's annoying enough that Apple limited the beta to a lottery, but it's even worse to hear the lucky few complain that they're unable to continue development because the beta software broke their phone.

      The whole point of a beta program is to test software and procedures on users willing to put up potentially buggy software to get valuable feedback prior to a real release. Things like this should be expected. If you don't want to be a good participant in a beta program, don't sign up for one (and release space for those of us who are fine beta testing things and made proper preparations for the inevitable bugs that will turn up).

      -Chris

    6. Re:You forgot to mention by daveime · · Score: 2

      Half-finished software is the price the world pays for using open source There, fixed that for you :-)

  6. You've been Steved! by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Consider the open source alternative, OpenMoko No worries about some sudden "change in corporate direction" screwing you over.

    1. Re:You've been Steved! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, then you have to worry about the corporation actually selling the damned devices. How far behind is the OpenMoko project now? How long have we been waiting for the FreeRunner's release?

      In the OSS world, we have a saying: "Release Early, Release Often." Apple's been following those rules to a tee, users sometimes get a bad experience, but the software rapidly converges to a usable state, as it is now. OpenMoko on the other hand, is lagging way, way behind, to the point you now have to be curious if the phone will ship at all or just remain as vaporware.

      Support the Open Alternative alright... Shame it doesn't exist yet.

    2. Re:You've been Steved! by outZider · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just what I wanted, an operating system with no devices and no users! Can it play ogg vorbis too?

      --
      - oZ
      // i am here.
    3. Re:You've been Steved! by Microlith · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, OpenMoko, the opensource alternative that is unavailable and doesn't even work.

      Oh it boots, but you can't make a phone call from in the UI. And while the command line dialer does work, no audio does. So you can call someone but not speak to or hear them.

      While I have every hope for OpenMoko, don't go flinging them as some open-source solution when it doesn't even do what it's supposed to.

    4. Re:You've been Steved! by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Funny


      Consider the open source alternative, OpenMoko No worries about some sudden "change in corporate direction" screwing you over.

      No worries about some sudden "phone call" either. :-D
      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  7. Bricked? by Kindgott · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is anyone else getting tired of the sensationalist misuse of the term "bricked" around here?

    Unless it's nigh unrecoverable, your hardware isn't bricked.

    --
    If there's anything more important than my ego around here, I want it caught and shot immediately.
    1. Re:Bricked? by exultavit · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, the term has been misused a lot lately. A device can only really and truly be "bricked" if you have intimately introduced it to a significant amount of anti-matter.

      In any other situation, you can always recover the device's full functionality simply by rearranging its constituent atoms and free electrons appropriately.

    2. Re:Bricked? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

      This begs the question, if everyone uses the phrase incorrectly is it still incorrect?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  8. Not Bricked by addikt10 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Bricked" is unrecoverable.
    "Bricked" is permanent.
    "Bricked" is having absolutely no way, ever, of interacting with the object in a manner that is inconsistent with interacting with a brick.

    This, on the other hand, will be fixed by tomorrow.

  9. Uh....no..... by iMouse · · Score: 5, Informative

    Beta testers were notified by e-mail of the software expiration that night. A new copy was available immediately from the AppleSeed site.

    My phone is fine and probably a lot of other beta testers who have a clue have a working phone as well.

    Maybe people who beta test software should have a good understanding that it is a BETA test and Apple highly recommended that the BETA software not be installed on personal or business-related phones that need to have 100% accessibility and reliability.

    How many beta testers in this program understand how to use a web browser to go grab the new release? If you're gonna be a n00b about it, don't sign up to be a tester.

  10. Now you know what Radio operators... by anss123 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now you know what Radio operators feels like when we geeks talk about "bandwidth". Perhaps it's karma ;)

  11. Re:Using your actual phone for development?? by Buran · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you RTFA, you'll see that at least one person tried to buy a phone to use just for testing -- and no one had any to sell. So what do you do -- not do the stuff your $99 entitles you to do?

  12. So it's a werebrick. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Bricked" is permanent. ... This, on the other hand, will be fixed by tomorrow.

    So it's a werebrick.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  13. This is just a reminder by erroneus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not that I suspect there was any question about the matter, but Apple is in control of your destiny not only as an iPhone developer, but also as an iPhone user.

    The expectations of developers are being shifted from the norm by actions such as these... Apple has effectively halted or paused development for the iPhone.

    The expectations of end users haven't been completely altered yet, but there's strong potential for that sort of thing to happen at Apple's whim... and it's probably already in the EULA that Apple can and probably will enable, disable and remove features at their leisure with or without the end users' consent. Some of the initial shocks have already been felt, though, where battery replacement isn't a simple matter and is instead a costly and inconvenient one. Other examples are that a user can't save attachments like pictures into the phone and cannot do even the simple things like copy and paste.

    I expect to see more things coming down, but what I cannot predict is end user response. Apple devices seem to cause reactions among their users not unlike a drug that yields a minor high combined with caffeine and nicotine. I am often surprised or awed at how much nonsense today's consumers will accept and the limits are constantly being pushed to new extremes. But generally speaking, Apple users both old and new routinely accept abuses that PC users wouldn't tolerate from a vendor... so I expect there to be a lot more user abuse without backlash.

    1. Re:This is just a reminder by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Neither the battery replacement issue nor the copy/paste issue are examples of Apple suddenly deciding to remove functionality from your device. Your iPhone's battery is the same as it ever was, and it didn't ship to you with copy/paste. This isn't some sort of bait and switch like you make it out to be.

      I never claimed it was changed or removed functionality. What I claim is that it goes against standard consumer expectations for similar devices. And it does! Blackberries, Palm phones and Windows phones all have cut and paste features and the ability to remove or change the battery is also very very common and expected.

      Generally speaking, Windows users both old and new will accept far more malware, inconsistent behavior, and horrible interface design than Apple users would tolerate.

      Agreed. But I'm talking about hardware vendors... which in this case, Apple is both. If Dell gave end users a hard time, the most common reaction is to stop using Dell and go to HP or Lenovo. There's not another Apple "compatible" vendor out there to fall back on when this sole, unique vendor starts showing attitude.

      Expiring beta versions of software are not unique to Apple, nor are they a new thing, nor are they even unusual. Worst case, either someone at Apple put the wrong expiry date in the software. Unfortunate, yes, but not a malicious act, and not some sort of cruel abuse directed towards their developers.

      Expiring beta versions are not unusual. But when coupled with not having a replacement or update available to developers who paid for the privilege of developing for the iPhone, I'd say that is not good business. Developers expect changes, but they don't expect the rug to be pulled out from under them.

    2. Re:This is just a reminder by Damvan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The common meme on Slashdot is always the delusional Apple Fanboi, who loves all things Apple, no matter what. But what I see on this site more often is the exact opposite. The raving Apple Hater, who will hate all things Apple, no matter what. The time these people spend detailing their hatred amazes me.

      If you don't like it, don't buy it. There are other alternatives out there to Apple products. Buy one of them.

      Personally, I hate dark chocolate. I think I will go on some foodie forums and post a few pages about my hatred of dark chocolate, insisting that chocolate manufacturers make dark chocolate for my taste, and insulting all those who disagree and do like dark chocolate. I am sure that will make all the difference.

    3. Re:This is just a reminder by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That email only announced the expiration. There was no alternative. I did not miss anything. Developers paid for the privilege, the beta expired early. Developers were at a stand-still with their development platform halted until Apple says otherwise. As far as I can see, that hasn't happened before... not even with Microsoft.

  14. Um, what are people smoking? by jerkychew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't get it - My "friend's" iphone expired at midnight but guess what, there was an email from the Apple beta program in my "friend's" email telling my "friend" to update their iPhone. Update, start using the phone again.

    This is just a sensationalist article using the Dvorak Method (TM) to get more hits.

  15. Testing? by phorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How else are you supposed to test something thoroughly than to use it as your primary device?
    I can understand perfectly why devs would use the iPhone as their primary. It's hard to catch the bugs unless you're regularly testing your software in a real-life environment... or do you really want the bugs (usability or functionality) to show up when the customers start using the tool in a real-life way.

    1. Re:Testing? by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Informative

      Corporations who do serious mobile phone development do not have their developers use personal phones for development and testing. They purchase separate phones for them.

      Independent developers can order a separate line with a cheap phone and have their calls redirected. Then if their development platform breaks they still have a usable phone. It's the cost of being a beta tester.

  16. Re:MS DID do similar thing! by wasteofspace77 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Hehe. In a similar vein, Microsoft's OS X Remote Desktop application Beta 2 expired on March 31 2008. You can still use it but you get a great nag screen to download the latest beta (whcih links you to, you guess it, beta 2).

    Oh, and that probably affected more users than the iphone beta expiration.

  17. Flambait as a front page article by Auckerman · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are a few things wrong.

    1. Apple specifically told you not to use it on a iPhone. You decided it didn't belong in the SDK emulator, unlocked it, and put on your iPhone. The fact that this didn't work out well for you is your problem.
    2. You can put the proper firmware for a phone, and not the one designed for development, on your iPhone at any time using iTunes.
    3. A new firmware is available. The SDK program specifically states that if you don't download the newest SDK from time to time, you will have the old one stop functioning.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
  18. It's a beta by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Suck it the fuck up, and use the emulator till there's a working firmware release.

  19. Maybe this is a misdirected AskSlashdot by indros13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Folks, don't tell him the phone isn't bricked, it just encourages him. Instead of going to a forum and asking "hey, what happened to my iPhone with this devkit installed?" he comes to Slashdot and hyperventilates about a bricked phone. And whaddya know, several people already gave him a solution (rollback firmware through iTunes - hey, great idea!) I propose we no longer act as Apple Technical Support for the Un-Bricked.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  20. ziphone ftw by chiantii · · Score: 3, Informative

    This whole thing can be fixed with ziphone. I was able to restore my phone back to 1.1.4 in less than a minute. simply downgrade you bootloader and you're golden.

  21. Re:Why do people even bother with the iPhone anywa by Bemopolis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Beyond its inherent features, people (like me) bother with the iPhone because of their experiences with other phones, which have opaque manuals that attempt to explain how the phone would actually work had the carrier not installed their custom OS on it and disabled the useful features to force you into their pay-per-use services. Oh, and some people (like me) were already with the carrier in question.

    I hope that cleared that up for you.

    --
    "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
  22. New SDK just posted by tylersoze · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just put up on the iPhone dev site, go get it.

    1. Re:New SDK just posted by artaxerxes · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.tuaw.com/2008/04/08/third-iphone-beta-sdk-is-live/

      What he said... no details about what has changed.

      --
      man kann nicht nicht kommunizieren
  23. Google has killed beta by Telvin_3d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Part of the shock that some people are feeling comes from the fact that 'beta' doesn't carry the same weight it used to. While others have jumped on the bandwagon, Google has been the big one for devaluing the term. Beta is supposed to mean a potentially unstable build released for testing and feedback purposes. It is labelled beta precisely because it might have some show stopping bugs lurking inside.

    However, many people are now used to Google's beta software, which means a functional, polished release that happens to be missing some of the blue sky features that are planned. Oh, and it might get a UI redesign at some point.

    The two uses are very different and anyone expecting one should be quite shocked to find the other.

  24. Stop complaining... by a.phoenicis · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and go download the new version: http://developer.apple.com/iphone/

  25. New SDK Is Up by vertigoCiel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Unofficial Apple Weblog reports that the new SDK is available, which should rescue any iPhones or iPod Touches from the Pink Screen of Death.

    It's surprising to see Apple drop the ball like this. You should probably post a new SDK before the old ones expire and prevent developers from working. This is an amateur mistake.

  26. Re:Why do people even bother with the iPhone anywa by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 2, Funny

    I suppose it's possible that you are the arbiter of usability, but I'm going to go ahead and suspect that's not the case at all.

  27. Why do people keep abusing the term "bricked"? by KWTm · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is it with the overuse of the term 'bricked' lately?
    Exactly! Geez, throw me a brickin' phone!

    (with apologies to Dr. Evil)
    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  28. This story has become MOOT by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes Beta 2 exppired today but Beta 3 was also released today. There was a gap of a few hours. This software is for DEVELOPERS and has not effect on end users.

  29. It's HARD to brick... by RudeIota · · Score: 5, Informative
    The iPhone is hard to break... If you hose it through a firmware update or jailbreaking it - recovery mode works regardless.
    • * Turn your iPhone on
    • * While it is on, hold the lock (button on the top) and home (button on the lower front) buttons down.
    • * Continue holding both buttons until the screen goes black (just a few seconds after the apple logo appears)
    • * Let go of the top button. Continue holding the Home button for several seconds.
    • * Plug your iPhone into your computer. iTunes will detect your phone in 'Restore mode' Recover your phone using the latest firmware. If you want to use older firmware (1.1.4 works just fine with Ziphone, BTW), hold the shift key as you click on firmware update button and you can browse for a firmware file (You will have to download an older firmware manually to load onto your iPhone using this method).
    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.