Slashdot Mirror


Name For a Community-Owned Fiber Network?

CleverMonkey writes "I'm a town representative to a newly created municipal group creating a new type of telco. This group has formed to build and operate a FTTH network, and provide both triple-play services and access to other providers, to over 20 mostly rural towns in East-Central Vermont. The project is novel because of the size of the network (a cable pass down every road within 600 square miles), the low-density of the area served, and the public-ownership/private-financing model that is being used. Some of the towns included in this group currently have nothing beyond 14.4 dial-up on a good day. This project began as a grassroots effort in a couple of towns and the name they chose was ECFiber — East-Central Fiber — or sometimes the East-Central Vermont Community Network. We hope that this network will grow beyond one corner of this state, and we would like a name that is both descriptive and flexible. What would you name a community-owned, cutting-edge, G-PON fiber-optic network covering every remote corner of two-dozen contiguous towns?"

253 comments

  1. Grassroute! by penguin+king · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Reflects the grass roots movement and that you're routing traffic down fibre (grass is a fibre!)

    1. Re:Grassroute! by ciaohound · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      John McEnroe, is that you?

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    2. Re:Grassroute! by statemachine · · Score: 1

      Network guy chiming in here: Grassroute may work with those who pronounce it as "root," but in network terms, it's generally pronounced "rowt" (rhyming with chow, not row).

      I gave up the former pronunciation because of how most people say router. When I try to say "rooter" I think of Roto-Rooter (and then Dirty Jobs). Because of that, I limit the "root" pronunciation of route to highways where router doesn't apply.

      (hmm, reading over the above sounds like a Dr. Seuss book... sorry)

    3. Re:Grassroute! by NotTheEgg · · Score: 1

      This is by far the best suggestion in this entire discussion. And it was first! Very impressive, penguin king, very impressive...

    4. Re:Grassroute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that's the best idea here. Simple, effective, and easy to remember!

    5. Re:Grassroute! by pirho666 · · Score: 1

      I see your point, but up in Vermont it is pronounced the normal way. Route 302 = ROOT 302 but a router = a rawter

    6. Re:Grassroute! by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 2, Informative

      I generally pronounce route as "root" when used as a noun, but as "rowt" when used as a verb. Thus, in the case of a router, it's pronounced "rowter" because that's what it does: it routes the packets through the network.

      However, in the case of "Grassroute", it would be pronounced "-root" because it's a noun.

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    7. Re:Grassroute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe glassroutes?

    8. Re:Grassroute! by mcvos · · Score: 1

      The glass fibre network in Amsterdam is simply called "glasvezel Amsterdam", which translates to "glass fibre Amsterdam". Works well enough, so I'd simply call it "glass fibre East-Central Vermont", although I'm sure it'd sound better if you could get it to cover all of Vermont.

    9. Re:Grassroute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Confused: why does a post contending the mispronunciation of "route" get modded "informative"? Route is pronounced "rowt" because, if you look at the letters in the word, that's how you pronounce it; if you've decided that the letters actually indicate a different pronunciation, you should at least be consistent with yourself... why would you pronounce it wrong when used as either a noun or a verb?

      It's like saying "I'm going to network the computers together using a wireless neatwoark."

      When you add a route to your router, you phonetically say "I added a rowt to my rowter". If you ever told me you added a root to your router, I'm going to ask you to clarify - you either added a superuser account to the router or you have a very interesting genetic engineering project with a plant/species named "router".

      I really like the name "Grassroute" or "Grassroutes". It should be pronounced correctly, though.

    10. Re:Grassroute! by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 1

      Look it up in any dictionary. They will tell you that the pronunciation is either. I just explained how I, and how I have observed others I know, make use of each pronunciation.

      http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/route
      http://www.answers.com/route
      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/route

      Wiktionary, and my Australian Oxford English Dictionary (paperback edition), list "root" as the official pronunciation in Australia. It seems that the the "rowt" pronunciation may originally have been an Americanism.

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    11. Re:Grassroute! by Pavan_Gupta · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      could be

    12. Re:Grassroute! by Iamthefallen · · Score: 1

      You mean like Rowt 66?

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    13. Re:Grassroute! by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      It's worse in Australian English. Just ask any Australian what they think of "rooting" and see what reaction you get (make sure they're your friend first, and best not asked in mixed company, if you catch my drift).

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    14. Re:Grassroute! by icezero · · Score: 1

      Artic Blast

  2. Easy. by The+Ancients · · Score: 5, Funny

    What would you name a community-owned, cutting-edge, G-PON fiber-optic network covering every remote corner of two-dozen contiguous towns?"

    Heaven.

    1. Re:Easy. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      What about Kibbutz?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:Easy. by Percy_Blakeney · · Score: 1

      Utah has a municipal fiber network called Utopia.

    3. Re:Easy. by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Have you considered "Internet"?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    4. Re:Easy. by jward52 · · Score: 1

      Try ecvSmileNet, since those who had used 14.4k dialup will certainly get a smile out of a fibre optic network.

  3. I'd call it... by FiestaFan · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Too expensive.

    1. Re:I'd call it... by WaltBusterkeys · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You might be right. The city of Alameda tried it with traditional cable and failed miserably. It has a bond payment due soon and revenue won't even cover the interest.

      Lowell, Michigan also tried and gave up in 2007 when it realized that the cost of upgrading the system to modern standards would far exceed the value.

      Running a telecom service in an underserved area is more expensive and complex than many people think. Often, the area is underserved for a reason.

      That said, maybe fiber will work. Or maybe it's worth it as a social value to the community, even if it's pricey. Fingers crossed for you.

    2. Re:I'd call it... by mikkelm · · Score: 1

      Excluding certain taxpayer sponsored behemoths, operating communications services most anywhere is more about managing losses than making a profit.

    3. Re:I'd call it... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      the city of Alameda is an island though, and they only went with cable tv/internet.

      this project sounds like they plan to offer triple play service (telephone/tv/internet) although more and more people are going cell phone only, in rural areas it may be less feasible since there are only so many towers and only in bigger cities and along major highways.

      They plan on building a comparable Fiber network to the one Burlington Vermont did and got 40$ of the market there. They plan on having more people in the rural area subscribe too, but I think they are naive to expect that, with long term contracts to satellite internet service etc, and lower median incomes, I would expect a far lower adoption rate, perhaps half or less... since their pricing model is based on adoption rates... i think they'll be hemorrhaging money in no time.. all because of 2+ year commitments on satellite service... and because the people there might not have the $50 'minimum' monthly payment. paying $20 or $10 a month for dialup internet now plus $20 for phone service even if it's 14.4 speed is way different from paying a minimum of $50 for Fiber to the home with TV internet and phone service.. even if you add $35 for a single tv satellite basic package, you're only up to $55 a month, and if their assumption of a $50 starting price is based on getting half the residents to sign up and the real cost winds up being $70... that's a nightmare for the 12 communities involved..

      remember some people use reception based TVs so they don't have the satellite TV bill to add in, and even if you offer just phone service, apparently there is a high cost for connecting each house (likely a fiber router that can do tv/internet/phone service, and connects to all the houses existing coaxial cable or telephone lines, as well as running new coaxial and Ethernet lines for PCs/TVs..) although if you just get phone they can just do the phone, but if you ever change your mind you have do the expensive in house cable running (usually through the basement or sometime outside the house, just drilling through the walls etc)

      if they don't have the costs of running those legacy wires figured in they will find they drastically underestimated the cost of fiber to the home. even if they go with a fiber router that includes wireless a/g/n capabilities unless they can put additional boxes with every tv then they're still going to have to either adapt existing lines or run their own lines.

      DSL may not be better, but it does have the advantage of not needing to run new lines, that's why I've seen many small towns go to DSL/TV over the phone line systems. they can offer triple play services in communities without running new wires, and even then their prices are considerably more than $50 although of course they are for profit companies...

      and yes TV over regular copper phone lines. it does exist, I've seen and watched it, although not the AT&t version. the version i saw had the normal number of cable channels (more than 40) plus they had 20 audio only channels, and the box did internet and phone service too it was an all in one box, that hooked into the existing wiring wherever possible. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/27/2315239&from=rss

      running that much fiber optics is going to be costly, if they don't get the adoption rates they wanted they're going to go belly up pretty quick.

      on the plus side, rural people tend to do a lot less on the net than big city folks, word about p2p applications doesn't get around as fast.. and even you tube uses trivial amounts of bandwidth compared to p2p.

    4. Re:I'd call it... by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Well, my city in VT rolled out FTTH, and it seems to be a fairly large success. They are orders of magnitude better than Comcast or Verizon.

  4. Obligatory by mrbcs · · Score: 3, Informative
    In Alberta, we call that the SuperNet.

    http://albertasupernet.ca/

    --
    I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    1. Re:Obligatory by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

      GOATSE! {)_

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    2. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Alberta, we call that the SuperNet.

      http://albertasupernet.ca/

      No, no we don't. Alberta SuperNet is an attempt at replacing AGNPAC (Alberta Government Packet Switched Network, the provincial govs internal backbone) with a modern network that also allows rural Albertans to have the same poor broadband service as we urban dwellers currently enjoy.

      SuperNet (run by a corp called Axia) is legally prevented from supplying 'last mile' connectivity to anyone but government and commercial customers. Residential customers depend of a dogs breakfast of regional ISPs or the default supplier Bell Canada (who must supply last mile if no one else will). This issue only concerns Internet connectivity and does not speak to provision of Voice or TV services. Last mile connectivity is also restricted to DSL or Wireless (usually 4Mbps) in all these cases.

      The only FTTH currently being trialled in Alberta is Telus' GPON solution (the incumbent telco FYI), which will not use Supernet nor be available anywhere but in newly constructed urban residential communities.

      Compared with projects such as the one mentioned in the question, or other established projects such as the UTOPIA Community Metronet (www.utopianet.org), Supernet pales. It works well in its primary function of replacing AGNPAC but is one gigantic joke w.r.t. residential and small business data services, completely forgetting so called 'Triple Play'.
  5. Newhart net? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Dunno!

  6. How about... by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

    ...Skynet?

    1. Re:How about... by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      I have an option for Skynet in my building :) We have a nice fiber network over here.

  7. frost psot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pipe dream? IPO? Comcast subsiderary?

  8. Bob by techmuse · · Score: 1

    I would call it Bob.

    1. Re:Bob by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Funny

      What, you want it to suck mightily?
      Granted, it might be the only former MicroSoft product whose name you could use without getting sued...

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    2. Re:Bob by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

      Titan A.E. reference, obviously

      --
      For context, click Parent.
    3. Re:Bob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that a TitanAE movie reference? Or was I the only person to see that flick.

    4. Re:Bob by me+at+werk · · Score: 1

      Beat ya by a minute probably more if this damn slow commenting system wasn't so damn slow

      --
      For context, click Parent.
    5. Re:Bob by fluffman86 · · Score: 1

      Hey...I really liked MS Bob. Lots of fun for a 7th grader to play around in without screwing up the whole computer. Although I did get in trouble for nearly signing us up for $20/month "Bob Email" service. That's right...no Internet, just email.

    6. Re:Bob by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      You may be the only person in the history of /. to come out in favor of Bob.
      Good news, bad news, who can say?

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  9. Isn't it obvious? by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would say CompuGlobalHyperMegaNet, but it's already taken.

    How about CutCo, EdgeCom or Interslice?

    1. Re:Isn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or zovuvazz, or compuquack

    2. Re:Isn't it obvious? by MikeTheMan · · Score: 1

      CUTCO is already taken. And so is Vector Marketing. And also, the seat to the right of Satan.

    3. Re:Isn't it obvious? by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      Amen!

  10. I've got a good title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about this:

    Vermont's Eastern/Rural Independently Zoned Open Network

    I'm sure the name has never been used.

    1. Re:I've got a good title by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you were posting in the wrong article?

    2. Re:I've got a good title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      verizon is selling their network to farpoint in Vermont.

      so you are wrong

  11. I'd call it.. by Pythor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FOG
    It envelopes everything and everyone. The Fiber Optic Gateway.

    1. Re:I'd call it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just like FOG, if you are in the Internet for too long it can cause you to have an accident!

  12. Good luck! by cromar · · Score: 1

    That is awesome; what a great idea. Please be sure to keep us posted on what it is you all actually end up doing with all that fibre.

    As for a name I dunno. Why not something simple and Vermonty like "Red Clover Rural?"

    1. Re:Good luck! by ebs16 · · Score: 1

      Please be sure to keep us posted on what it is you all actually end up doing with all that fibre. Porn.
  13. Comedic Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got 2 ideas.

    1) Backhoes are illegal 'round these parts *sound of shotgun cycling*

    OR

    2) The Community Headache ;)

  14. You're asking the *INTERNET* to name your project? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Enjoy becoming the Astley Network

    Never gonna give your packets up, I suppose.

  15. Porn delivery network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    High-speed porn delivery network?

  16. A Few Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BoonieNet

    SparseCom

    FarmNet

    AReallyReallyReallyRidiculouslyGoodNet or ARRRRGNet

  17. VT has cows. by rhoder · · Score: 1

    Cowbell

    --
    This signature is typed manually.
  18. some names by wrench+turner · · Score: 1

    The Big Green Pipe, GreenNet, VermontPublicNet

  19. Wireless (mobile) networking? by wvmarle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    14.4k dial-up, wow... how about mobile broadband? Hey even GPRS is faster than this!
    And when setting up a community network, I'm also quite sure there are reasonably fast and much cheaper wireless solutions. Not necessarily WiFi (but with strategially placed directional antennas that should do quite well too), but maybe even packet radio like solutions?
    Why laying cables in this wireless age in the first place? Cables are expensive to roll out and very hard to upgrade, especially when you are talking about low-density rural areas.
    Or what about wireless connections for the backbone, and only wire the last bits to the homes, assuming clusters of homes that you want to connect?

    1. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      14.4k dial-up, wow... how about mobile broadband? Hey even GPRS is faster than this! Yeah, I don't really know wtf he's talking about. I live in Southeastern Vermont, right about here, and I have 6 Mbps Comcast and 1 Mbps VTel DSL for options.

      East Central Vermont is right about here, in White River Junction, one of about 3-4 population centers in Vermont. Much bigger than where I live, and we haven't used dial-up here since about 10 years ago.
    2. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why laying cables in this wireless age in the first place? Cables are expensive to roll out and very hard to upgrade, especially when you are talking about low-density rural areas.

      Fibre isn't affected by rf interference, sunspots, etc.

      Fibre supports much higher speeds, w/o the problems of one person hogging all the bandwidth on an available channel.

      It's now really easy to lay even in built-up areas

      It's CHEAP!!! 12 strands @ $1.30 /foot works out to 11 cents a foot/strand. Even if you only service 12 people with 1000' of the stuff, that works out to $130/person.

    3. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by Phaedrus420 · · Score: 0

      "how about mobile broadband?" I see you've never been to VT. A lot of people don't like the idea of ugly towers sticking out the tops of their nice Green Mountains, so a lot of people vote No on cell expansion. Figure in the billboard ban, and "Heaven" is just the right word for it.

      --
      And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good... Need we ask anyone to tell us these things?
    4. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by nonades · · Score: 3, Informative

      You sir, do not apparently know how Vermont works. We have these things called "Mountains", they block these "signals" you speak of. In most places we're lucky to get cell phone reception (I live in a dead zone a touch south of Rutland).

    5. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by surgen · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a Vermonter I agree that 14.4 is out of touch, we have 56k here.

    6. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by Javarrito · · Score: 3, Funny

      14.4k dial-up, wow Yeah, I agree, that's blazing. I'm from the North-East Kingdom and I'm still taking my TCP packets to and from the ISP on foot. The bandwidth can be fairly good, but I have some serious latency and I keep timing out for some reason.
    7. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      this is be far the greatest post I've read in at least a month. Speaking as one who started out at 2400 baud, and accidentally connected at 300 baud when personally yelling at an incoming modem, I can relate.

      But hey, just last month my cousin asked me the best way to transfer 4Gb video files (professional movie dubbing work) from Montreal to Toronto and back (~600 Km, ~400 miles), and I had to tell him that driving it would be the fastest way, since none of his clients would be on any kind of ultra-fast connection.

      There are times when bandwidth is worth the latency. Just not for convenience!

    8. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      It's not cheap as soon as you are going to take the digging into account. A 1000 ft trench will easily costs you as much as the $1.30/ft for the cable.
      The summary is talking about 600 sq.mi., and then running fibre along all the roads. Could easily be 500-1000 mile of cable, or 2.5-5 mln ft. That means on cable alone US$3.25-6.5 million. That's not cheap. And this doesn't even take the digging part into account, so double that amount to a nice US$ 5-10 mln. Oh and I didn't take into account the cost of routers, relays, and the length of the cables needed from the road to the homes - which can easily add another 100 ft per household.
      Twenty rural towns, that may be like 50,000 households. If each household requires another 100 ft to get from the road to their front door, you can add another 5 mln ft of cable. So now the bill for cable alone is $9.75-13 mln for the cables alone. Double that for the digging, and you are at US$400-500 per household just to lay the cable.
      Now this network just needs the rest of the equipment - another couple million investment. And renting a fat pipe to the nearest backbone, because you have all that fibre and now you have to feed it. And you will have to do maintenance: hire some people to keep an eye on the equipment, the routers, whatever. It's not going to keep up long unmaintained.
      So US$400-500 for setting up the connection, plus easily another US$100 per month for the service - and these amounts are assuming everyone joins. In practice maybe half of the people will want this, so double these amounts. Oh and now even less people will be interested...
      Now I think it's immediately explained why no commercial business will ever put down fibre in those areas.

    9. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by yayotters · · Score: 0

      I doubt you'll be able to roll out triple-play offerings over wireless to a decent sized community.

    10. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      You can hang a 56K modem on a rural Vermont phone line, but will you get 56K? I used to work in Westford where 56K modems do 28K on good days. There are towns further out where rates aren't that high. A lot depends on where the ISP is. the connection to Earthnet from one coworker's house dropped to about 1200 baud when Earthnet moved its connection point to a different town.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    11. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by vtcodger · · Score: 1
      Everything would be OK if people in Vermont lived on top of the hills, but for some reason, they built in the valleys where line of sight is restricted. Once, a number of years ago, I had reason to look into setting up a wireless connection to a rural site in Vermont. I walked up the only accessible ridge and looked around to see what was in line of sight. What I could see was a barn about 400 meters away ... and trees -- about ten thousand trees. We actually could see a tree covered hill about three miles away, and I suppose we could have tried to negotiate a tower there. But we would still have needed at least two -- probably more -- additional relays to get to a place where we could hook up to broadband.

      Cell phone signal? Well there is spot about 500 meters down the road where you can get one, maybe two, bars if you hold the phone just right.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    12. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 2

      It's not cheap as soon as you are going to take the digging into account. A 1000 ft trench will easily costs you as much as the $1.30/ft for the cable.

      They're not digging, they're putting the fiber on existing poles.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    13. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by grumling · · Score: 1

      Dump truck/garbage truck fade. Backhoe operators tend to be much more careful around fiber optic than copper.

      And why would you price out a 12 count? That wouldn't get you very far, even with creative use of DWDM. Most backbones are built with 288 count bundles minimum. A 12 count might be used as a feeder down the street to feed a few homes, but otherwise there's not much cost savings for low count fibers, except maybe if you expect to splice all of them at once.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    14. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vermont is a mountainous state so wireless services are hard to use there.

      Even cell phones are useless in many 'towns' in Vermont.

    15. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Building on ridgelines is difficult/impossible in Vermont for regulatory reasons. On the whole I'm in favor of this though, houses on the ridgelines really spoil the view, and with the current situation you can hike through relatively populated areas but still feel like you're in the wilderness. Probably something the parent poster could get behind if his sig is an Edward Abbey quote. That and it's not a lot of fun having your house up there exposed to all of the wind and weather, as opposed to being sheltered at least partially.

    16. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by nanodec · · Score: 1

      14.4k dial-up, wow... how about mobile broadband? Hey even GPRS is faster than this! And when setting up a community network, I'm also quite sure there are reasonably fast and much cheaper wireless solutions. Not necessarily WiFi (but with strategially placed directional antennas that should do quite well too), but maybe even packet radio like solutions? Why laying cables in this wireless age in the first place? Cables are expensive to roll out and very hard to upgrade, especially when you are talking about low-density rural areas. Or what about wireless connections for the backbone, and only wire the last bits to the homes, assuming clusters of homes that you want to connect? I'm from up that way (now living in the Burlington area) the problem with RF wireless up there is that the landscape is crappy to setup antenna and get any decent coverage... mountains and such... plus people are conservative up there in regards to cellphone/RF towers... the populace doesn't like seeing the landscape up there littered with repeaters which in that area would have to be at least 120' in height to make any difference for coverage. Comcast has done some drops into towns around there, but they were reluctant to wire every area up there due to the low population of some of the towns, it would be hard to recoup the cost... satellite would be another alternative, but the problem there is decent reception during the winter months (think whiteout conditions sometimes).. Other then dialup, the only other alternative is comcast... which we all know is such a great company to deal with...
    17. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by fast+turtle · · Score: 1
      Some Good Points about the initial costs but then you forgot something; that a property owner might be willing to spend the money if it's run as a bond issue with a 25 year period. Overall, the cost needs to be less then $250 a year additional until the bond is paid off.

      Note that I live in such a rural area and would be quite willing to spend double the cost of Dialup ($40 a month) if I could get T1 speeds in both directions. Hell they wouldn't even have to provide email or usenet support (Google works well and is free), which certainly drops maintenance costs to a minimum.

      In the downtown business areas, it would be possible to offer higher speeds for increased prices that would likely be accepted.

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    18. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by surgen · · Score: 1

      I do know people who are stuck in 14.4 country, but most of the time I get 46-48Kb (or so the connection software tells me and downloads are usually 4-5KB). That might be because I dial into numbers located in Stowe or Morrisivlle, both are very local. The 1000 phone number blocks that the numbers are located in are owned by level3. I don't know much about how their network is setup, but I would assume that the signal isn't carried over POTS any further.

    19. Re:Wireless (mobile) networking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why laying cables in this wireless age..."

      Can you spell "hills?"

  20. Whatever you call it, put FFS after it by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

    Community Owned Fiber Optics Network - COFON ("cough on", or "coffin"). Coffin is kinda cool 'cause then you can be like "Put the final nail in the competition." It does open you to some devious marketing strategies by your competitors though, so maybe not.

    If "community-owned" is hyphonated you could be C-FON ("see fun"). Marketing something like "See Fun, See Progress". *shrug*

    I got it... Community-owned Light-based Information Transportation Services, or CL-ITS. That's the ticket.

  21. CommUNITY Network by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    CommUNITY Network sounds nice, gets the point across, etc.

    1. Re:CommUNITY Network by solidsnake12981 · · Score: 1

      How about "The Last Mile"

    2. Re:CommUNITY Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is a CommUNITY run by CommUNITYsts?

  22. How about COFFEE by SubComdTaco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    COFFEE as in Community Owned Fast Fiber Enterprise E-initive ?

  23. Name it Green-POoN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure how the band 'Grinspoon' would like that though.

  24. how about by opusman · · Score: 1

    Community Owned Fibre For Intense Networking

  25. Fiberoads by CFrankBernard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fiberoads, take me home
    To the place I belong
    East-Central Vermont, mountain momma
    Take me home, Fiberoads

    1. Re:Fiberoads by legoman666 · · Score: 1

      you just brutally murdered a song from my childhood.

    2. Re:Fiberoads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polar? Is that you?

  26. rethink public ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you go with public ownership, you're going to run into the same problems many community wifi projects have run into. Interference from telcos at the state and federal government level. They will be all over you, and you will end up wasting funds fending off legal challenges, and lobbying the state government to not pass legislation that would destroy your project.

    Instead I suggest the cooperative model that has worked for rural electric providers for over fifty years. A cooperative is a corporation that is owned by its customers. Using a cooperative organization will keep the government out, which I think will be essential to your organization's survival.

    Good luck!

    1. Re:rethink public ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will be all over you, and you will end up wasting funds fending off legal challenges, and lobbying the state government to not pass legislation that would destroy your project. Remember this is the state that has laws like Act 250, preventing businesses from developing land that would not be aesthetically pleasing or would alter the local habitat. A place where there are no billboards and no 100-ft McDonald's signs. Not exactly a business-friendly state. A corporation suing a VT co-op and winning? Good luck with that. Many of the successful businesses in Vermont are co-ops.
    2. Re:rethink public ownership by witherstaff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you go the co-op route, be sure to have your board stay focused entirely on your original goals.

      Electric Co-Ops end up acting like other private entities, spending money on projects outside of electricity. Wild Blue - the ka band satellite broadband service - received 10s of millions from a collection of co-ops. In turn, Wild Blue is offered - and installed by - these same electric co-ops. What satellite service and electricity have in common is beyond me.

      Let's see, my local co-op not only sells electricity but also has telephone long distance, internet service, satellite service (Wild Blue Broadband and a directv reseller), propane service, water heater and furnace installation, and I went to a nice dinner meeting where they showed off a hydrogen powered generator a few years ago. This isn't a case of a small company reselling other services for an additional income stream. Most of these are housed at their facility with support staff, installation services, support, etc ran by their employees.

      If the end goal of all these other projects was a lower electric fee I'd be happy. My co-op electric fee is no different than at a house which gets power from AEP. It appears to me that they get the bureaucratic mindset and keep finding ways to grow their organization, finding new ways to fund expansion, instead of keeping things lean and sticking to the mission statement.

      Maybe mine just sucks - the concept is a good one

  27. VERVE by wornout · · Score: 1

    It means enthusiasm, energy, vigour. Rhymes with NERVE. Good luck. I wish we had something like that here.

  28. Suggestions by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

    iNet
    [The] Technate
    ECV Technate
    Lightway
    [The] Freeway
    Digisect
    Cybertech
    Tri-county square route (or whatever instead of tri-)
    IV (Internet Vermont, IV as in intravenous therepy)
    Cybotiks Inc.
    Fiber-Comm
    Community Nexus
    Nexus Comm
    Fiberopia
    SysComm
    fNet
    LoComm (local community/communications)
    uNet (unit, your 'net, etc.)

    --
    Demented But Determined.
  29. I don't mean to be a douchebag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but are you fucking serious? I know weekends on Slashdot are typically slow, but this is ridiculous. The only thing I don't understand is why this wasn't posted under Ask Slashdot; at least that way I could have filtered it out.

  30. Too Good... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'd call it the 2G2BT network. (Too Good To Be True.)

    You don't really think that the incumbent telcos are going to let you survive to complete this, do you?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  31. Blazing Vermont Data Networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OR Blazing VD-Net

  32. CowNet by rhinokitty · · Score: 1

    CowNet: Community Owned Wired Net(work)
    It is catchy, cute, but not cutesy, and straight to the point, without too much "technical overhead."

  33. Coffin! by citking · · Score: 1
    I'd name it coffin.

    Community Owned Fiber Network, or COFN (coffin) for short.

    It fits because it'll be the death of you!

    YMMV - I was not a marketing major.

    --
    "This food is problematic."
  34. I would call it -- FANTASYWeb by NemoinSpace · · Score: 1

    Just kidding, good luck.

  35. I'd call it... by iPaqMan · · Score: 1

    ... a boondoggle. I hope all those VT citizens have a lot of money.

    When will people understand that municipalities are inept and couldn't offer a economical triple play if their jobs depended on it. Oh wait, you can't fire government employees for screwing up so I guess there jobs don't depend on it. See the problem here?

  36. First pick the acronym by BeBoxer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pick the acronym first. Then decide what it stands for. Use a 'V', it is Vermont after all. Let's say you go with "VLAN". Vermont Local Access Network. That was easy. Or "VICAR". Vermont Internet and Commodity Access Route. Another easy one. "RAVE". Rural Access for Vermont Enlightenment. See how easy it is? Just remember: Acronym first. Meaning second.

    1. Re:First pick the acronym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Announcing:
       
      Vermont
      Allied
      Grassroots
      Initiative
      Network
      Access

    2. Re:First pick the acronym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably what we did here in Utah, with our UTOPIA network.

  37. Why not keep it simple by zappepcs · · Score: 1

    CWAN
    Community Wide Area Network. You might go with Community Metropolitan Area Network but that would lend itself to being called c-man... no good.

    Then later, outside of the East-Central Vermont CWAN project, you can add the South-Western Vermont CWAN

    I'd stop short of calling it VCWAN in case McCain starts getting flashbacks.

    Technically Grid or MAN describe what you are trying to make. Metropolitan Area Network is an old term. You could put an F on the front for Fiber, FGrid or FMAN instead of CWAN...

    Finding a name is a good problem to have. Wish they had that problem around here

    1. Re:Why not keep it simple by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      CWAN

      Drop the W., it's unpopular anyway. Just call it CAN, and watch Obama advertising it (yes, we CAN!) :-)
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  38. Pipe Dream by Froze · · Score: 1

    Of course that is probably not PC enough so maybe somethings like
    The InterTube
    or
    IP Freely
    or, just
    The Special Internet Group Network Architecture Layer (The SIGNAL)

    OK OK, those are pretty bad, but I applaud your goals and wish you well in your en devour.

    --
    -- The morphemes of your disquisition are ascertainable, but they have eschewed an ambit of transpicuous exposition.
    1. Re:Pipe Dream by unapersson · · Score: 1

      I like it, what about a slight variation?

      NPD (No Pipe Dream)

  39. What's in a name? by Lorien_the_first_one · · Score: 1

    Columnity Illuminocity

    --
    The diversity and expression of human opinion is essential to human survival.
  40. Hrmmm news? by definate · · Score: 1

    WOW, they are getting really creative with slashvertisements now a days.

    What would we call it? A rose by any other name.

    --
    This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Hrmmm news? by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because if I was going to advertise a service to a very geographically limited area with about 60k people, Slashdot is the FIRST place I would look to advertise.

    2. Re:Hrmmm news? by definate · · Score: 1

      Of course, you make a good point. Although the article states they will be looking for private financing, all of those financiers will live in that geographically limited area, and they could not benefit in the slightest by raising their public profile. Hell, if something like this worked, then you'd have more people doing it, and they'd probably call them Public Relations people, then abbreviate it to something easy to say like PR. Then those fictitious people would probably create "campaigns".

      But we're smarter than that, aren't we?

      Please note the sarcasm and mockery contained above. It's hard to convey exactly how much I am mocking you and your post at the moment.

      Really... you couldn't see any other reason why they would want to advertise their service? Really?

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Hrmmm news? by rfunches · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Slashvertisement it may be, but it shows just how far some people in the U.S. have to go to get even semi-high-speed networks where they live despite the countless dollars in subsidies given to the telcos for improving network access across the country. Obviously AT&T, Verizon et al. have done so much with the help of subsidies that financiers are trampling each other like gold miners to get in on the Vermont market.

  41. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Grassroots Open Access To Serve East-Central Vermont

  42. Pick a dumb name by menace3society · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would call it IntarWeb, or Interbutts, or some other dumb slang word for the internet, and then go around and sue the pants off everyone that uses it online. This way has three advantages:
    1 - you have a lot of built-in name recognition
    2 - you have an extra revenue stream from suing idiots
    3 - you will force said idiots to stop using at least one dumb slang term, the whole world benefits!

    1. Re:Pick a dumb name by kae_verens · · Score: 1

      you forgot:

      4 - ...
      5 - profit!

    2. Re:Pick a dumb name by menace3society · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I will try harder to meet my quota of over-used memes in the future.

      In Soviet Russia, quota of over-used memes meets YOU!

      Happy?

  43. Glassroutes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're going to go with the pun I'd understate it just a little bit more. Viola, your very own glassroutes!

    1. Re:Glassroutes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about this: "Screw You, Verizon".

    2. Re:Glassroutes! by TheWingThing · · Score: 1

      If you're going to go with the pun I'd understate it just a little bit more. Viola, your very own glassroutes!

      What does providing internet service have to do with playing a fiddle?
    3. Re:Glassroutes! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You don't know the PPPoF (PPP over Fiddle) protocol? You'll soon see Fiddle to the Home networks ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Glassroutes! by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Actually, Verizon is in the process of selling its VT, NH, and ME landlines to FairPoint.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    5. Re:Glassroutes! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Selling? You mean we got sick of VZ and told them to get out, right?

      VZ sucks; I live IN BURLINGTON and couldn't get DSL from them if I wanted to. What kind of crap was that? Ah well, the city did something right with Burlington Telecom.

      This new system should link in to Burlington Telecom's... then a large part of the state would have a fiber network that private companies have failed to provide.

  44. Internet insurance? by jimjohnson · · Score: 1

    From their website "we can insure that the most modern high-speed service is available to ALL residents of central Vermont towns." I wonder how much insurance like that costs? I'd like to get some for my Internet connection. :)

  45. Conduit by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Since you are already going to be digging, you should really consider putting down large conduit, much like sewer pipes. Yes, it would be more expensive, but when you are done, you would have the benefit that upgrading would be dramatically simpler. You could also rent out the space to anyone that wants to run their own data lines. While the idea is that you will offer the data lines yourself, having the backup plan of being able to offer citizens multiple data lines from different sources would be a huge boon. Plus, local industry would be able to rent space to have their own dedicated lines for intranet service between location without having to re-dig up the road system. The just pay their monthly fee, and have someone pull the lines for them. This should also help with some of the fears associated with a government agency trying to be an ISP. If it really sucks, other players can come into the market. After all, the biggest roadblock to competition in data delivery is the cost of digging up all of the roads, and the right of way issues.

  46. conet by Edgester · · Score: 1

    conet = community-owned network

  47. In Sweden by aliquis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know if it works similair, but here in Ã-rebro/Kumla it's called "StadsnÃt":
    http://www.stadsnat.se/

    Simply "Urban network".

    The prices are right atleast, I think you can get 10 mbps for 99 sek = 10.5 euro / 16.65 us dollar.

    1. Re:In Sweden by fluffman86 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hate you.

      Need a roomate? :D

    2. Re:In Sweden by aliquis · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't have stadnat, I still have Bredbandsbolaget.

      100 mbps down / 10 mbps up for 320 sek / month.

      Was 10/10 since feb 2000 or was that 2002? for 200 sek. But then they raised it to 320 sek and offered 100/100 as an alternative for 895 sek or whatever it was with a cap at 300 GB or something and additional payments for each additional 100 GB. Now they don't offer 100/100 longer but 100 down and 10 up for everyone instead.
      But personally I think 320 sek are quite expensive, especially since I don't download much stuff and IRC are dead nowadays which was why I needed it anyway.

      But then again with cable you only get 256 kbps for 99 sek, so that suck. I hate the guy/team/company/university/whatever which invented xDSL, and especially ADSL. Crappy Internet onnections to everyone!! Hurray!

      They should have got fiber to everyone, kill the old copper telephone network, not built any new air broadcasting antennas for digital TV and just run it all over fiber to everyone. DVB looks like shit to begin with, sure it's "sharp", but there are artifacts all over the place.

      And now someone will complain that the Internet aren't good for broadcasting, well, then fix that!

      Fiber to everyone in Sweden was affordable at around 50 billion sek, stupid politicans which didn't took the plunge.

      I have no idea where you live, maybe you could have had fiber in all homes in the USA instead of war in Iraq? ;D

    3. Re:In Sweden by zsau · · Score: 1

      But personally I think 320 sek are quite expensive, especially since I don't download much stuff and IRC are dead nowadays which was why I needed it anyway.

      According to Google, 320 SEK is about 60 AUD. For 100 AUD, I'm getting 1.5 Mbps for 20 GB (upload & download) and 64 kbps thereafter. I would kill for Internet that good and that cheap.

      --
      Look out!
    4. Re:In Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that name doesn't scale well, atleast over here they included the regio name.

      It started at:
      onsnetnuenen.nl (our net Nuenen)
      jumped to the big city onsneteindhoven.nl
      and is currently spreading in the rest of the province as onsnetbrabant.nl

      Though the methods of deloyment are the same, by basically the same people, these networks are seperate entities.

    5. Re:In Sweden by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      Who's your provider, and why are you using them? That seems too slow to be cable or something, and if you're on 1.5Mbit ADSL you should have a much better choice of ISPs. Even Internode offer 55 GB/mo on 1.5Mbit at that price point, and they're not the cheapest around by a long shot. They only meter downstream too. Heck, for $105/mo you could get an 8 mbit service with 40 Gb per month (though if you're into online gaming you'd probably better staying on 1.5).

    6. Re:In Sweden by zsau · · Score: 1

      Well, the price includes line rental and a certain number of telephone calls, so it's not entirely the most honest comparison, but seeing as I don't care about the landline phone it seems a fair one to me. My parents got it while I wasn't living here (two year contract); and I've only moved back in until I move overseas later this year. (It also might actually be an ADSL2 service, so faster than 1.5 Mbps. But I don't think so.)

      --
      Look out!
    7. Re:In Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, a war in Iraq is much more productive, see how well it turned out.

    8. Re:In Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      After reading all that, I think Swedes should change the name to seksnet.

      You are likely only the second country in Europe where it's legal to trade dollars for seks. Good on you.

    9. Re:In Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in Bulgaria, at least in major cities, there are tons of ISPs that are selling Ethernet connectivity. I'm paying 20 EUR/30 USD per month for 20 Mbit to everywhere and 40 Mbit to in country sites ( traffic is not limited, neither is bittorrent use )

    10. Re:In Sweden by aliquis · · Score: 1

      And in Bulgaria, at least in major cities, there are tons of ISPs that are selling Ethernet connectivity. I'm paying 20 EUR/30 USD per month for 20 Mbit to everywhere and 40 Mbit to in country sites ( traffic is not limited, neither is bittorrent use ) As it should be then :)
    11. Re:In Sweden by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      how much congestion is there. Do you consistantly get those speeds? Do you usually get those speeds but sometimes run into congestion? Or are those speeds theoretical maximums that are never achived in practice?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    12. Re:In Sweden by de_smudger · · Score: 0
      > here in Ã-rebro/Kumla it's called "StadsnÃt":

      > Simply "Urban network".

      or perhaps.. "CityNet"? (hyphenate, punctuate or capitalise as you will.. ;)

      kin'a maybe has a better ring to it?

  48. H_O_P_E_D by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Home and Office Porn Efficiently Delivered"

  49. Gothic Reference by DaedalusHKX · · Score: 1

    "Old camp"

    Now seriously, why not call it "Our Net (tm)" ?

    Our Net might sound damn good... and give the people paying for it a measure or at least a feeling of some sort of stake in this thing.

    --
    " What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
    1. Re:Gothic Reference by knavel · · Score: 1

      I have to say I like this one. It doesnt have the pronunciation problem that "Grassroutes" does, and non-technical people will actually get the meaning for it.

      "Do you have comcast or what?"
      "Oh, we use OurNet."

  50. OOBS Fiber by us7892 · · Score: 1

    Out Of Business Soon Fibre

  51. "The Glass Routes Network" (Re:Glassroutes!) by europa+universalis · · Score: 1

    This is what I was thinking. "Glass Route Networking". Something such. Funny, but seriously usable, in my opinion. And memorable.

  52. How about.... by VonSkippy · · Score: 1

    BTF (Bound to Fail)

    Sounds like another doomed municipal project using fiber instead of wifi.

    Sorry to be the nay sayer, but come on, how many times have we heard this same wishful thinking before? They always have a "great" plan, a so-so business model, and lots and lots of town meetings were everyone agrees it's a great idea right up to the point where they have to start ponying up some real funds.

  53. I would name it... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

    ...Silk Road, to emphasize the point of connecting many people who are far apart for the betterment of them all.

    1. Re:I would name it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The People's Republic of Fibre

  54. This is Vermont by FranTaylor · · Score: 3, Informative

    Perhaps in California or Florida your argument might make sense, but this is Vermont we are talking about here. I grew up in that part of the country. There is an enormous sense of community spirit that cuts across town and even state (why isn't Hanover in on this?) boundaries. These are very small communities we are talking about here, so this basically IS a cooperative. You can see it in the way they share school systems, mutual aid for fire and ambulance support, snow removal, and the like. The towns already own their own infrastructure for water and sewer, and in some cases they own their own electrical power infrastructure. They do things for themselves and they don't need the feds or Verizon to tell them what to do. Owning and running their own computer network is not a stretch at all.

    1. Re:This is Vermont by Telvin_3d · · Score: 3, Informative

      the GP is not saying that the community is not capable of this. Or that these people somehow need the government or major telcos help to be able to pull it off.

      The GP is saying that the telcos, through lobbying and lawsuits and other means, are entirely likely to do all they can to CRUSH this effort. They have a history of similar actions. A suggestion was made that being a cooperative might help provide some protection in the legal sense. It wasn't some sort of backhanded way of saying that the communities involved weren't capable of cooperating on their own.

    2. Re:This is Vermont by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      why isn't Hanover in on this?

      There are NH regs that currently prevent this model. There needs to be an RSA to permit the town to do it, IIRC, due to the way NH power delegation to the towns is structured. Folks are working on it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:This is Vermont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This happened to my Father in Idaho actually a few years back. He could have done the contract for 1/4th of the large telcom but a lobbyist in the county (I think that was the level) passed legislation to give the job to the telcom. All the towns people were very upset at the guy, but there was nothing to be done.

      Lesson is, even in small states it happens. Watch out.

    4. Re:This is Vermont by thpr · · Score: 3, Informative
      While I would generally agree with you, in this particular case, that path has been paved already. The state legislature already took action to make such networks legal. The doubt disappeared when Burlington was tied up in court. The telcos & cable companies lost.

      You can read the case study, or just go find out more.

    5. Re:This is Vermont by mac1235 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's not like they would sue, knowing they'd lose. No one would abuse the legal system that way, certainly not a large corporation with money to burn and lawyers and lobbyists on retainer...

    6. Re:This is Vermont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and they all are 'dairy farmers'
      as they pull up in their new trucks
      that they paid for with a tax break on
      trucks (so it cost them nothing)
      and they get their dairy subsidies.

      They are so damn independant.

      I am sick of the whole 'vermont = virtue' BS
      that a lot of people
      who live in vermont have.

      Vermont is just another place
      no better or worse than anywhere else.

      Southern Vermont is a place
      for New Yorkers more than for Vermonters.

      It is all on the down-low.

      I would rather live
      East of the Connecticut river in New Hampshire.

  55. Grapevine by belrick · · Score: 1

    or Party Line

  56. hmm by niteice · · Score: 1

    I'd call it fucking awesome.

    --
    ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
  57. my vote is for.. by Deanalator · · Score: 1

    CoCeG-PONNCERCOTDCT

  58. Pardon by certain+death · · Score: 0

    if this has already been said...but how about "A Fucking Pipe Dream" ?!?!? What a genuine waste of freaking money! How many people do you actually think will pay the price, or actually care? Are you trying to attract new residents, or ??? For the sake of all that is holy, spend the money on something that is actually innovative, and quit with the rural bandwidth!!!

    --
    "My immediate reaction is "WTF? What kind of moron doesn't make things 64-bit safe to begin with?" Linus
  59. woah, wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in east-central vermont. why haven't I heard about this yet? We're still stuck on DSL, and I have friends a mile away who are still on dial up because Verizon and GMAVT don't want the expense of covering their area for the relatively small added customer base.

  60. Batshit Crazy is where my vote is going. by __aadkof7200 · · Score: 1

    How about ironing out the technical and financial details before worrying about something so important as a name? Maybe you are coming back next week to ask for out help on that. Honestly, how screwed is this project if they can't even come up with a fucking name.

  61. Server Too Busy by newr00tic · · Score: 0, Troll

    Every site you moderators link to from the front page is "Community pwned;" - The name would be 'Server Too Busy..'

    (And you cocksuckers [readers] need to get over and away with your fears of semicolons and shit; fucking faggots you be..)

    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
  62. I'd call it.... by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

    "Pipe dream"

    1. Re:I'd call it.... by Javarrito · · Score: 1

      How about First Tube?

  63. CI-Fi by dotmax · · Score: 1

    pronounced like sci fi.

    let it stand for Community Internet Fiber or something. Copyright me.

  64. FUBU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For UnBearable Users

  65. wrong place to ask for names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    pretty sure whatever you come up with will be scooped, registered, and trademarked before you can even begin to get your shit straight.

  66. If your community is made of Slashdot members... by Youx · · Score: 0

    ...I'd say omG-PONies would be a fairly good name.

  67. existing solutions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not ask gmavt.net to do this?  they have been great in my area in regards high speed dsl and are just starting to do fiber.  Seems like they are right on the border of your area, is there some restriction that prevents them from servicing you but allows for a municipal sponsored solution?  Given the large service areas and low # customers they really dont ask much of a premium compared to major metro prices.   I've also heard comcast was trying to come across from the bristol area with fiber too? 

  68. Keep Your Head Low by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    What's the name of the local electrical grid? What's the name of the sewer and water system?

    I'm very familiar with the project, and I think it'll best succeed when Internet connectivity is thought of along the above lines.

    Remember, the Internet is just an interconnection of separate networks, so having one big name isn't all that important.

    So, 'Vermont Internet Grid Area 2B' is probably fancy enough. If you want to label the people running it the 'NNE Rural Internet Authority' or something, fine, but ValleyNet already has good name recognition, too.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  69. Obvious by FrankDrebin · · Score: 1

    Got It! VERmont Independent ZONe.

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  70. How about by fotoguzzi · · Score: 1

    Road kill?

    --
    Their they're doing there hair.
  71. VECNA by Gutboy · · Score: 1

    Vermonts East-Central Network Association.

  72. what a story! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a dog; what should I name it? Post that one next!

  73. TERA Net? by SlowGenius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about The Eastern Regional Autonomous Network?

    (1) It's a play on Terra (i.e. of the Earth, appropriate for a buried cable)
    (2) I'd guess it's appropriate from a speed context (I don't know for sure, but Tbps speeds seem within reason for a light pipe)
    (3) When Verizon et al hear about this, they'll shit their pants because of the threat that other communities would join in and/or duplicate it. So they WILL come gunning for you on both the regulatory and legislative levels. They'll sow as much FUD as they can... and this way, their efforts will be known as 'The War on TERA'. Keeps things simple that way: freedom-loving people everywhere will already know which side of it they stand on, as will those who prefer to remain enslaved to our corporate masters.

    --
    Listen to what I say, not what I mean...
    1. Re:TERA Net? by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

      verizon won't shit their pants... they just sold of their land-line, and ISP operations to FairPoint in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont.

      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    2. Re:TERA Net? by SlowGenius · · Score: 1

      Apples and oranges, my friend.

      Another business competitor or regional spinoff (e.g. Fairpoint) in the marketplace is one thing.

      But a modern regional community-owned fiber network in a low-population-density setting? That notion implicitly undermines the monopolistic 'last-mile' business model of the entire RBOC legacy. It's not about retaining the negligible profits from the specific area in question. It's the unacceptable precedent this effort would represent if it is successful (especially if it succeeds economically despite the geographical disadvantages). Why keep renting local network infrastructure from a vastly profitable MegaCorp telco when you could instead band together with neighbors in your community and save a lot of money over the years to come by just building your own brand-spanking-new one?

      --
      Listen to what I say, not what I mean...
  74. Drop the Tech by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    I damn sure wouldn't give a system supposed provide "to over 20 mostly rural towns in East-Central Vermont" a name based on the technical details like "cutting-edge, G-PON fiber-optic network". A tech-based name would be contrary to the nature of the community being served.

    When a medium sized Appalachian town wanted to develop its own service, it named it its "Electronic Village". The fact that Virginia Tech is in that town didn't prevent them from naming it something that fit the town of Blacksburg. In fact, many at VT appreciate the fact of its locale, and they may have had a hand in naming it what they did for that reason.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  75. You pretty much have the name already by Soloact · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's the obvious: you mentioned that the community is already calling it "ECFiber". The only difference I might suggest is just calling it ECV instead of just the EC part. Or maybe ECF (?). Whatever you call it, kudos to your community for taking on such a great project!

  76. Optique by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

    Mixture of optical and boutique, depending on the local community demographic. Or perhaps "Bran Dex" for a generic hi-fibre network. Or "Wire WeHere" if the value proposition is king. Dunno, I'd be happy with "FRED" (an acronym for "ridiculous electronic device").

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:Optique by davolfman · · Score: 1

      And it sounds like plastique, another rather disruptive technology.

    2. Re:Optique by unitron · · Score: 1

      F.R.E.D. is actually the acronym for "Friendly Recoton Entertainment Decoder", an aftermarket add-on MTS stereo decoder for monaural television sets which could also do psuedo-stereo on monaural broadcasts.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  77. EZFiber by Roy+Hobbs · · Score: 1

    You almost had it with ECFiber, just change it to EZFiber

  78. COFFIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Community-Owned Fiber Network

    Hmm, need one more F.

    1. Re:COFFIN by sskagent · · Score: 1

      Community-Owned Fiber Network I'd nail that
  79. Home-Spun by Lord+Erix+Sparhawk · · Score: 1

    Like a spider web or from a spinning wheel

  80. Comfi by paul248 · · Score: 1

    Comfi, for Community Fiber

    1. Re:Comfi by paul248 · · Score: 1

      Never mind, looks like it's already taken by Communications Fidelity: http://www.comfi.com/

  81. ComFibe by galaxia26 · · Score: 1

    Community Fiber Easy, and slogan-able. "So ComFibe in us, your community run Fiber Optic leader."

  82. Ain't it obvious? by rathehun · · Score: 1

    GrassPipe.

  83. Vermont CommUNITY Network by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Parents has a great idea plus you can expand with it!

    VERMONT CommUNITY Network:
    Vermont UNITY Network

    Other areas could prefix the UNITY network name and you could someday unite on shared projects under one banner: The UNITY networks (which would be useful as a lobby group since that is the ONLY way to deal with gov.)

  84. Re:Grassroute! = Glassroot? by mindslut · · Score: 1

    CommOp ?
    Glass Commons ?
    High Speed Weeds ?
    R-Net ? "R" for rural, our
    High-R-Net ?

    good luck with the project

  85. SugarTap Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tie the concept of this distribution network to the collection networks used to make Vermont's signature product--Maple Syrup. This network will collect Vermonter's ideas and transport them to the Internet. Thus I suggest SugarTap Network because it's familiar sounding, Vermont-related, and understandable as a reasonable analog to a fiber network.

    --Kirt

  86. How about "CNN" by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Community Network Neighborhood.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  87. hmmm I say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0wnednet!!!!1!!

  88. I kind of like... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    VerCom. Or maybe VtCom. I'd do some work on a logo and see what looks good. then pick the name that works best from among several alternatives.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  89. Neighborhood Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The australian provider who laid coax back in the day was called Neighborhood Cable, but they're in receivership now (I think). Neighborhood Fibre perhaps?

  90. Mystic Fibrosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    (ducks)

  91. Both accurate and appropriate: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    COFfiN

  92. Looking Glass by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    See what I mean?

  93. the network should be called SHARED SHARD by scbomber · · Score: 1

    yep

  94. another choice.... by Digital_Mercenary · · Score: 1

    Grassroots
    Owned
    Autonomus
    Telco
    Fiber
    Unified
    Communication
    System

  95. Obvious. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Public Eastern Central Link
    PEACELink

    or PEACEnet, or whatever.

    Seriously, this is pretty obvious. Are they asleep at the switch over there? They've won the easy acronym lottery.

  96. Let it rain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being a fan of hipppie jam bands from Burlington, I would name it PhiOS

  97. No, no, no... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    It's deadly simple!

    It should be named COFiN.

  98. Metamunicipal by Torodung · · Score: 5, Funny

    Name it Metamunicipal: Get your fiber here.

    --
    Toro

  99. BOPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > covering every remote corner of two-dozen contiguous towns

    Big Ole Pancake Splat (BOPS)

    ALT

    Bit Order-of-magnitude Per Second

  100. Fiber Regularity + Municipalities by professorfalcon · · Score: 1

    Metamunicil

  101. Country Road Connections by Wrataxas · · Score: 1

    Connections in the network sense and in the social sense.

  102. You are promising a lot... by namgge · · Score: 1

    I think you need to be very careful about managing your future customers' expectations. Most people (non-geeks) would interpret the 'How Fast is Fibre' page as meaning you are promising consistent speeds of ca 30Mb/s to their house. We live in a world where many people want to download their entertainment via ISPs in the form of HD feature films, and contention is becoming a nightmare. namgge

  103. Star your day with BRAN, it gets things flowing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Backwoods Rural Area Network

  104. State Held Infrastructure Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the title says it all...

  105. COFiN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Community
    Owned
    FIber
    Network

    Now, that was easy, right?

  106. It;s a bit pretentious, but... by Peet42 · · Score: 1

    ...I'd call the project "Let there be Light".

  107. VULCAN by DingoTango · · Score: 1

    Vermont Universal Lightspeed Community Access Network

  108. CommFi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd name it Comm-Fi for Community Fibre!
    It can be made V-Comm-Fi (Vermont CommFi), but I'd like to leave the name open (ie. not make Vermont an integral part of the name) so that the idea can spread beyond Vermont, while preserving the name (and there is a strong relationship between the name and idea behind it!) :)

    shishir

  109. pipedream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i grew up on a farm outside a very small town in iowa and they spent a ton of money running fiber to everyone's house. its been about 9 years since the install and i haven't seen anything amazing come out of it. cable, phone, and internet run over it but the TV quality is still crappy and the internet is only 10mb. seems like a total waste of perfectly good fiber.

  110. Think of Vermont by mattr · · Score: 1

    Vermont has colleges, ski resorts like Stowe catering to the northeast, many tourists / skiers from New York, it's 2+ hours from Montreal, and the land and air are fresh enough to raise a family. That's where my sister moved to raise her family and open a restaurant. Ben & Jerry's is there, and Green Mountain Coffee.

    You know they have Vermont Fresh Network, there is a big push to use organic ingredients, and most people get along without fiber. It is mostly extremely annoying to other family members when we go visit.

    How about VINES. Vermont Independent Network Services. or Vermont Community Internet. Or FreshNet, Community Net, or Green Mountain Networks (GREEN-NET). I don't see a need to limit yourself geographically in the name. If it works well it should spread organically.

  111. Luminet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luminet?

    From 'Luminous' and 'network'. Luminous because:

    1. Fibre Optics works using light

    2. The illuminating effect it should hopefully have on the community.

    Even comes with a ready made slogan: 'Let there be light'.

  112. Re:Grassroute! = Glassroot? by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why muck about? Fairly obvious extrapolation of G-PON:

    Gigabit
    Passive
    Rural
    Optical
    Network

    G-PRON! Or G-PORN if you will, but that is just crass.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  113. If this works, let me know by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

    If this works, I'd like to know, how, and get a nice detailed report on it.

    I live in rural northern Maine, and I'm lucky to have DSL... There are many many people who are in the same boat as rural vermont, getting 14.4 on a good day.

    I would love to see the same type of arrangement expanded

    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  114. In Soviet Russia, by ROMRIX · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, community-owned, cutting-edge, G-PON fiber-optic network covering every remote corner of two-dozen contiguous towns names us!

  115. CLOTH by msauve · · Score: 1

    what do you get when you bind a lot of fibers together - Community Linked Optical To the Home.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  116. what not to call it by lophophore · · Score: 1

    I'd not recommend calling it Fairpoint!

    Seriously, if you build it, and it works, you will likely have success beyond your hopes, as neighboring communities clamor for access...

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  117. Keep your eye on the ball by westlake · · Score: 1
    "What would you name a community-owned, cutting-edge, G-PON fiber-optic network covering every remote corner of two-dozen contiguous towns?"

    "Roadkill."

    Lesson Number 1:

    Show some pity for the GIMP.

    Never ask a geek to put a name to your project.

    Lesson Number 2:

    Read Parkinson's Laws.

    You are thinking like a committee.

    Giving your time to the least important question that needs to be asked and answered.

    It is not an unimportant question. It is not an easy question. But it is not the question you should be asking here.

    Your project is a complex, expensive, high-risk venture.

    Nothing is more important right now than physical proof that you are up to this job..

    If you haven't the money to hire a specialist in marketing - someone who knows and understands the rural and small town audience you must reach - you do not belong in this game.

  118. optical pipes in VT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be called Lit Hippies.

  119. Name it for the town by John_Sauter · · Score: 1

    Take a lesson from Burlington Telecom, and name each segment for the town it runs through. If you need a name for the higher-level structure, use the name of the county or state: Vermont Broadband sounds nice. Fibre-to-the-home is inherently geographic, so using geographic names makes sense.

  120. I've got the perfect name... by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1

    Breakthrough Overland Optical Network Delivering Optimum Gigabit Grade Local Ethernet.


    Call it BOONDOGGLE for short.

  121. my suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Light Pipe Dream

  122. Vermont Communications by Count_Froggy · · Score: 1

    If you are successful, you have to plan for future advances in communications technology, otherwise you will be a dead end. If you fail, it won't matter. Keep the name general and prevent the need to change it when the technology changes.

    --
    If I am not for myself, then who will be for me? If I am only for myself, what am I? If not now, when?
  123. Re:Grassroute! = Glassroot? by mindslut · · Score: 1

    I have to admit when I thought of the change in life broad band could bring to rural communities currently stuck on dial-up, I thought

    finally, these guys in the stix can get access to the world wide library of FREE porn ... bringing broad band in the biblical sense to the bible belt

    but that is totally crass. I'm sure there are useful, meaningful life contributions high speed Internet provides...

    well, besides /.

  124. Vermicelli by brokenregime · · Score: 1

    I didn't read all comments to see if this had been suggested, and maybe it's too cutesy or off-point, but it's the first thing that flew into my head thinking of Vermont and a tangle of optical fiber cables ("Vermicelli", if you didn't notice it above in the subject). You're welcome to it, if you want it. Cheers, and best of luck with this ambitious project. I pray it'll be a resounding success that many other communities/regions will try to emulate. Regards.

  125. NIMBY by jetpack · · Score: 1

    Ignoring the technical issues of wireless, a big problem with the wireless solution is more of a social issue. People don't mind having buried cable lying around, but they really dislike having wireless towers anywhere in their vicinity. So, wireless is often not a practical solution.

  126. Or How About just "Community Fiber" by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

    "Community Fiber" could always be shortened to ComFiber or abused to ComFib, bit it indicates the tech and the social mission for the community.

  127. hmmm.. by kris.montpetit · · Score: 1

    How about "The Peoples' Fiber"? It will probably get you labelled as communists by people without a sense of humor, but that just makes it more funny for you, right?

  128. Arachne of course by rdebath · · Score: 1

    She makes the web.

  129. Re:y0_M_0-m iiojpIDOP ===== fgmopojOOIOWSWIjf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am shocked and offended by your callous disregard for my sensitive constitution sir.

  130. UberNET by yabos · · Score: 1

    Uber fiber goodness

  131. How about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    F.F.S.

    Fiber For Shepherds

  132. Vantage..., historical figure, georgraphical? by anon+mouse-cow-aard · · Score: 1

    picked the acronym first, but it still makes good sense:

    Vermont Advanced Network for Telecommunications Access & Governance for Everyone

    obviously...
    Commercial partners/lessors would subscribe
    to the advertiser supported version, Ad-VANTAGE.

    On the other hand, if it's a name for a non-profit kind of network operator, you may just want to
    pick a local revolutionary war hero.

    Molly Pitcher networks !
    Ethan Allen ...
    Green Mountain Boys

    or geographical... Green Mountain Neighbourhood

  133. RTFM by Midnight_Blue · · Score: 1

    RTFM -- Reach The Fiber Madness!

  134. Cutting edge and g-pon? by thogard · · Score: 1

    Why are they using g-pon? The splitters now cost more than a road side fiber switch and the CPE also costs more than 100 FX equipment by a large margin. Sure you have to power the switches but you can get mixed copper/fiber for that and your not far from power lines anyway. A fully switch based network has the advantage that you can go from 100 mb to 10 gb on your existing network without any changes to the fiber.

  135. BotNet by TTuuoorr · · Score: 1

    How about just calling it BotNet. That's what it will become after a few weeks anyway.

  136. Name for Network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fiber-In-Dialup-Out AKA FIDO Project

  137. CofFiN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CofFiN, obviously.

  138. Re:"The Glass Routes Network" (Re:Glassroutes!) by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

    Problem is, I pronounce "route" to rhyme with "out". I had to think about that one before it worked.

    --
    "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  139. Don't care what its called- I wish WE had it! by aqk · · Score: 1

    In rural Quebec,just north of Vermont and New York, we are now using modern COPPER to the desktop!

    Just check out our Quebec 21st Century Bell Canada Sympatico infractructure! No need for DSLAMS, RSLAMS or any of that high-speed fiber-optic nonsense!
    Rurale Quebec truly has an internet setup that can be envied!

    CHECK IT OUT HERE!
    Caution! English language may be used!


  140. Butt-Net by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey, why not?

  141. I suggest Glassroots - sounds Vermont-ish to me by SingleEntendre · · Score: 1

    Glassroots is a nice play on words, like: Glassroots Community Network, or The Vermont Glassroots Network ...

  142. the name is in the question..... by inerlogic · · Score: 1

    " Name For a Community-Owned Fiber Network?" COFiN

  143. Don't be too specific by phuzzie · · Score: 0

    Growing up my first ISP was SoVerNet https://corp.sover.net/site/, at the time it stood for "Southern Vermont Internet", the area they covered. Later on they changed it to "Vermont's Sovereign Internet Connection". I think at this point they've given up trying to apply meaning to it and it is just a name =]

    So, using your purpose or mission as a starting point may be a better strategy than pigeon holing yourself with geography.

  144. FiberPorn! by woolio · · Score: 1

    It should be "FiberPorn!".

    That's what any community network is going to be used mainly for...

    It might even keep some regular!

  145. Well... by JaBob · · Score: 1

    Nobody said you have to use network Bob...