Slashdot Mirror


The Future of Space Sports

Loether writes "Space.com has a fun article about how astronauts aboard the ISS play 'sports' in zero gravity. It talks about learning how to throw in a straight line instead of the arc we all take for granted, relay races, and using large water filled bags as medicine balls. 'We realized that you could toss and catch and then go for a ride on this big thing as it takes you away.' The astronauts also put out a request for new ideas for space sports. Have any suggestions?"

254 comments

  1. system for it to make it's own gravity and trans by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    a system for it to make it's own gravity and transporters

  2. Remember by glwtta · · Score: 4, Funny

    The enemy gate is down!

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
    1. Re:Remember by LeRaldo · · Score: 1
  3. ...'cause many of us are wondering about the.... by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

    ....mechanics of such:

    How about the horizontal mambo?

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  4. Clever "Dept." by thered2001 · · Score: 1

    Took me a beat to get the Ender reference. Good one!

    --

    If your only tool is a hammer, every problem becomes a nail.

    1. Re:Clever "Dept." by Ironsides · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Speaking of which. If they want Zero G and low G sports, I suggest reading through the Science Fiction section a bit. The Enders Game battles were some of the first to pop into my mind. Then there are the human butterfly (strap wings to yourself and fly) sports on the moon from "This place has no atmosphere". There was one in the Tom Swift series that started with "The City in the Stars". I'll have to reread it to check what it was about. Some form of low G basketball if I remember right. There was another series that had a sport where you tried to get around the (quite large) station as fast as you could. You used tow ropes to pull yourself along by realing in your line by hand. A relay/sprint in zero G if you will.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Clever "Dept." by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was thinking the same thing -- the carbon dioxide thruster games that Asimov wrote about in the Lucky Starr games, where you have a single big CO2 pressure tank with a nozzle you can aim, and your goal is to maneuver in a cubic mile of space and knock your opponent through a set of goalposts, or the (in)famous Dr. Who episode where he was stuck in space and threw a cricket ball at something, bounced it off, caught it, and knocked himself to safety. (Which they did WRONG since he would've received 1 chunk of push from throwing it, and a second from catching it again, and they only showed the second part. Lame.) Or, another Dr. Who sport: solar racing, using sails. (again, implementation lame, since they looked like ships complete with hulls and there's no way to tack, but there was a cool idea buried down in there somewhere.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    3. Re:Clever "Dept." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... if the place has no atmosphere how exactly are wings going to do anything but make you look silly? No air = no friction = no lift.

    4. Re:Clever "Dept." by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      "This place has no atmosphere" is the name of the book. The titles use of 'Atmosphere' was in the resturaunt sence. It was a pun as the book took place in underground cities on the Moon (where there is air to push against). And, as you know, the Moon has no atmosphere (above ground).

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    5. Re:Clever "Dept." by livewirevoodoo · · Score: 1

      Thats the name of the book. Anyway the whole strapping wings to your arms as a low grav sport was around before This Place Has No Atmosphere. Robert Heinlein in the short story "The Menace from Earth" had a similar idea.

      --
      If its stupid but it works, its not stupid.
    6. Re:Clever "Dept." by pavon · · Score: 1

      The first thing I though of were the acrobatics in "The Gods Themselves" by Asimov.

    7. Re:Clever "Dept." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMIGOD BATTLE ROOM!!!

      Somebody get some cheap lasertag equipment up to those Astronauts, STAT! The full-body joint-freezing suits of Ender's Game would be totally sick, but not necessary.

      The prospect of that alone makes me want to become an astronaut...

    8. Re:Clever "Dept." by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Anime, too.:) Crest of the Stars had this zero-g game that was kind of like jousting. It was achieved by tethering the two opponents with a long elastic cable.

    9. Re:Clever "Dept." by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing -- the carbon dioxide thruster games that Asimov wrote about in the Lucky Starr games, where you have a single big CO2 pressure tank with a nozzle you can aim, and your goal is to maneuver in a cubic mile of space and knock your opponent through a set of goalposts

      Perhaps it should be a can of breathable atmosphere so that you're not murdering the CO2 scrubbers every time you play?

      Solar sailing is not a Dr. Who sport. People envisioned it before the BBC was broadcasting a television signal.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  5. It's all fun and games... by HaeMaker · · Score: 1

    ...until the medicine ball full of water bursts open.

    I for one welcome our new water overlords.

    1. Re:It's all fun and games... by snowraver1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was thinking the same thing. I, personally, would not be playing with a water balloon near my life support system... But, that's just me.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    2. Re:It's all fun and games... by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I think that scenario is what will limit most "space sports" on the international space station. Until they have a large, empty compartment which can get wet and have particulate matter floating in it without problem, most "space games" will be tame, low-energy events.

      And with the price per cubic foot of the ISS, I'm guessing that nobody is planning to send up an empty room for the astronauts to mess around in. Something like a combo of racquetball and air-hockey might be a ton of fun. Have a goal to defend, and take turns winging a ball at the other person's goal. Orientation would change, and pushing off to get in position would be a huge part of the game.

      And if one were to send up a large enough unit, with enough stuff in it, a game of zero-G lasertag or paintball would be killer.

      But again, we're far more likely to see "Zero-G Paper Football" than anything interesting, least anything on the ISS get damaged. However, once the first Space Hotel is built, that all changes. I'd bet that there will be a space version of the X-Games in the first 6 months, tops.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    3. Re:It's all fun and games... by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      And with the price per cubic foot of the ISS, I'm guessing that nobody is planning to send up an empty room for the astronauts to mess around in.
      I'm sure we can find some way to justify it... "astronauts need exercise" or something.
      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
    4. Re:It's all fun and games... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I don't like playing with an ugly ball of mostly water.

    5. Re:It's all fun and games... by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't like playing with an ugly ball of mostly water.
      Er, welcome to slashdot - most of us would jump at the chance.
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    6. Re:It's all fun and games... by HaeMaker · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Slashdot, home of the paraphrased, ST:TNG, obscure quote.

      Episode 17, "Home Soil":

      "Ugly bags of mostly water!"

      It refers to humans; which make this a double-jab as geeks are notorious for not interacting with humans very well.

    7. Re:It's all fun and games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for clearing that up, Einfuckingstein.

  6. Run around the tanks? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Jogging around the water tanks à la Skylab maybe?

  7. Well hunting is out... by jbeaupre · · Score: 1
    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:Well hunting is out... by jdunn14 · · Score: 1

      hunting is out.... for now.

    2. Re:Well hunting is out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, soon we'll have explored space more. Then, someone will decide that the newly discovered populations of space deer need to be culled.

  8. Play A Man's Game by BigBlueOx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fizzbin.
    Maybe you'll be one of the few who have ever gotten a Royal Fizzbin. BTW, the odds of actually getting a Royal Fizzbin have never been computed but are known to be astronomical.

  9. Zero G Arena needed, but... by GrueMaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    While the ISS may not be the best for this, how about zero G paintball? That would kick ass. ISS is relatively confined to have much in the way of sports. Zero G Racketball could get interesting, but again, need more space.

    1. Re:Zero G Arena needed, but... by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      Two Words.

      Battle Room

      No reason it has to just be a wacko educational theory run amok.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    2. Re:Zero G Arena needed, but... by adlucem · · Score: 1

      More feasible, 3D zero-G pool or snooker. Or squash.

    3. Re:Zero G Arena needed, but... by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Ever shoot marbles? They could do that (in 3D/0g) today!

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Zero G Arena needed, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ENDER'S GAME of course \o/

      And there's this other Game... and all players just Lost now >:)

    5. Re:Zero G Arena needed, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the ISS may not be the best for this, how about zero G paintball? That would kick ass.

      ISS is relatively confined to have much in the way of sports. Zero G Racketball could get interesting, but again, need more space. Enders Game
      Blitzball
  10. Skeet shooting by gigowiz · · Score: 1

    Pull!

    1. Re:Skeet shooting by thestreetmeat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Most things in here don't react too well to bullets.

    2. Re:Skeet shooting by purpleque · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not a fan of the lady's are we Trebek?

  11. Nerf Guns! by kmahan · · Score: 1

    Nerf guns would be fun..

    Lawn Darts are probably out..

    --
    Invalid Checksum. Retrying.
    1. Re:Nerf Guns! by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 1

      paintball is probably also out.

      --
      If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
    2. Re:Nerf Guns! by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Darts with out gravity but air would be really interesting actually. Without the arc hand control would be even more important.

      Moon Golf would be awesome. I wish paintball would be there. Think of the ranges you could get.

      We need a giant dome on the Moon just to play these games. Fund future missions by sending tourists to the moon for sports.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Nerf Guns! by EnOne · · Score: 1

      but Laser Tag would be in!!! Bring on the Ender's Game references.

      --
      Calvin:Do you believe in the devil? Hobbes:I'm not sure man needs the help.
    4. Re:Nerf Guns! by Smauler · · Score: 1

      Darts with out gravity but air would be really interesting actually. Without the arc hand control would be even more important.

      Why? Darts in 1G is basically 100% hand control (judging the arc of the dart comes naturally pretty quick - any semi-decent darts player knows if they've thrown a good or bad dart). Having said that, I wouldn't mind seeing (or playing) darts at 3G or so - that would really be interesting :).

    5. Re:Nerf Guns! by humbro · · Score: 1

      I would think a game of high-G darts could end up very similar to a game of lawn darts, only on a smaller scale, due to a higher trajectory arc.

      Hmm, now that has me thinking about high-G lawn darts...
      /shudders

    6. Re:Nerf Guns! by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Variable G Lawn Darts. Where you have to thrown it from 2g, to 0 g, and back to the 2g target on the other side.

      The Spinning cylinder for simulated gravity. With targets on the other side of the Cylinder.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  12. Like the submitter who asked for console-like PC by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Funny

    games, I'm going to have to suggest "zerogfindthesausage" as a good one to play.

  13. Hmmm.... by Angst+Badger · · Score: 3, Funny

    The astronauts also put out a request for new ideas for space sports. Have any suggestions?

    You mean other than the obvious one we all wonder about?

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:Hmmm.... by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mmmmm, Street Fighter II. But how would that be different in space?

    2. Re:Hmmm.... by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Water sports? That could get nasty, not to mention smelly...

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    3. Re:Hmmm.... by cpricejones · · Score: 1

      Ping pong?

    4. Re:Hmmm.... by Boronx · · Score: 1

      In microgravity it would take hours for your finger to descend to the button, even from a tiny height.

    5. Re:Hmmm.... by zen-theorist · · Score: 1

      You mean other than the obvious one we all wonder about?
      Blaaaaaang. Wrong answer. Any activity where you use your body weight work in zero G. Thats why Sunita who ran the Boston marathon in space was able to do it. (Taking a minute to imagine how effortless the motion is..) Even lifting weights doesnt work, you'd have to use coiled springs for strength training.
    6. Re:Hmmm.... by statemachine · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm, Street Fighter II. But how would that be different in space?
      Without an atmosphere, Guile's special attack would be useless.

      And without something to push against, Blanka would look silly as a spinning ball, going nowhere.

  14. basketball by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 4, Funny

    in zero g, the white guy could finally compete with the black guy (flaimbait, i'm sure)

    --
    If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
    1. Re:basketball by iamhigh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would that be flamebait? It is merely a statement of facts. Blacks make up 12-15 percent of the population, but 90+ percent of professional athelets.

      It pisses me off to no end that we can't conlude that one race may be better at things than another (due to P.C.).

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    2. Re:basketball by doti · · Score: 1

      How can basketball work without gravity? It plays a key role in the play.

      --
      factor 966971: 966971
    3. Re:basketball by sh00z · · Score: 1

      How can basketball work without gravity? It plays a key role in the play.
      Only in the "scoring" part. If you want to play in zero-gee, just play it like today's NBA. Give each team 100 points and leave an additional seven points up to the discretion of the referee.
    4. Re:basketball by m50d · · Score: 1

      Because it would result in flames. Truth or falsity is irrelevant. This is true with all flamebait.

      --
      I am trolling
    5. Re:basketball by purpleque · · Score: 1

      Removing gravity just negates the need for a ballistic trajectory to shoot a basket. Dribbling would prove difficult because you could not keep your body planted to the surface you are dribbling on to.

    6. Re:basketball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in zero g, the white guy could finally compete with the black guy (flaimbait, i'm sure) Shhh... Next thing you know Hillary will be calling for zero g debates!

      (flamebait, indeed)
    7. Re:basketball by Sciros · · Score: 2, Interesting

      professional athletes Depends on the sport. Hockey is predominately white, though that's largely due to regional culture (that goes for "winter sports" in general, I guess). Soccer seems to not favor the athletic tendencies of any particular race. Tiger Woods is like 100 races in one so golf's a wash. In Baseball, American Football, and Basketball there are many black athletes but it's not necessarily because of their physical advantages. Certainly the greater muscle mass, height, and high vertical jump mean a lot, especially for particular positions in football and basketball. But if you look at the MVPs in both sports lately, as well as how the US has fared in international competition (in Basketball, at least), physical ability isn't the only factor that determines performance. The fact that it's important to play intelligently above all else serves as something of an equalizer. Certainly when you mix playing smarts with uncanny physical talent, as we see in players like LeBron James, you can see that perhaps the "theoretically best" (for basketball, at least) player would be black for the sake of natural physical form/ability, but that theory isn't very useful in reality.

      And if you look at trends, the NBA for instance is becoming much more international in terms of its player makeup. More players are coming from South America, Europe, and China than ever before, and I expect that to continue.
      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    8. Re:basketball by Orange+Crush · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Correlation != Causation. I don't know where you're numbers come from, but the 12-15 percent of the general population figure agrees with a quick bit of Googling. Determining the demographics amongst all professional athletes is much more difficult. Are you looking at primarilly basketball and football? What about baseball, soccer, hockey, swimming, golf, equestrian sports, etc?

      We can spout off and conjecture all we like about why blacks might dominate certain professional sports--maybe it's a mix of physiolgical differences, cultural upbringing, politics and/or economics--but is there any compelling evidence why blacks might be particularly suited for certain sports beyond having more individuals participating in those sports?

    9. Re:basketball by bennomatic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're totally right on. There was a time that a significant portion of pro basketball players were Jewish, too. Was it because of cultural or economic reasons? No, of course not. Sports pundits of the time indicated that shorter men would be better at basketball because they would have greater balance and agility... A quick Google search on "jews in basketball" reveals that and other interesting statements.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    10. Re:basketball by Gman14msu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Blacks make up 12-15 percent of the population, but 90+ percent of professional athelets.

      Wait really? What a ridiculously misguided statement! Seriously, who is modding this up? Let`s take a quick look to see how inaccurate you are.

      First off, let`s decide what sports to look at. I`ll go with the basketball and the NBA, MLB for baseball, and the NFL for football. I won't even count NHL hockey, and leave one of the biggest sports in the country NASCAR, off the board for a few reasons, A) I think you weren`t considering drivers athletes at all when making that claim, and B) them being termed athletes in the first place is a debatable claim.

      So first off the NBA, let's look at the Season Racial and Gender Report Card 2006-2007

      This states that 75% of NBA players are African-American, and during the 1994-95 season there was an all-time high of 82%. Hmm, not quite 90%+, but let`s look at other sports!

      The MLB, which is notoriously losing it`s African-American makeup, had only 8.5% African-American players during the 2005 season! 2005 Race and Gender Report Card

      Wow! 90%+ is there, but wait! It`s 90%+ NON-African-American players! And if you want to bring out Latinos and other races into the picture, 28.7% of players were Latino, and 2.5% were of Asian descent. Leaving over 50% of MLB players white! Not exactly one race being better at something than others now is it?

      Finally we can move onto the NFL. Which in 2003 had a historic high of 69% African-American players. 2004 Race Report

      So no not really 90%+ black players at all! In fact not even close in any of the major sports leagues in the United States. I`m reasonably sure the statistics are consistent for the top soccer leagues around the world, particularly, in Europe, such as the English Premiership and the Primera Liga in Spain. FIFA has made rules that these leagues require a minimum threshold of native players on the club teams so it`s less likely that the teams would consist of over 90% black players.

      Seriously though I can`t believe the parent post was so blatantly incorrect and modded up like that. Do a little research or at least have SOME knowledge of what you are talking about before you go crazy. Christ, you could watch an hour of ESPN and see that the 90% figure is wrong.

    11. Re:basketball by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      Let me guess: are you white, maybe anglo-saxon and protestant, too? I hate to make generalizations, as that would be politically incorrect, but that's the only group I know that gets pissed off at so-called political correctness.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    12. Re:basketball by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      It is flamebait for the same reason that it would be flame bait to say that blacks are predisposed to crime because they make up a larger percentage of the prison population. While it would be stupid to think that different races were separated long enough for evolution to make a difference in skin color and even height, but we could not have evolved different reaction times, hand eye coordination, muscle mass, and brain functionality.

      It is pretty dumb to think that our cultural environment is not influential enough to make any kind of statistics concerning athletic ability, intelligence, or predisposition to crime, even close to any kind of evidence for racial genetic superiority.

    13. Re:basketball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would that be flamebait? It is merely a statement of facts. Blacks make up 12-15 percent of the population, but 90+ percent of professional athelets.

      It pisses me off to no end that we can't conlude that one race may be better at things than another (due to P.C.). because there are socio-economic externalities that can explain your (alarmingly incorrect) statement.

    14. Re:basketball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how you assume that basketball=professional athletes. Go watch some Hockey and tell me how many black athletes there are.

      These racial stereotypes are ridiculous. Yes, black people are better sprinters, hands down. When's the last time a white person won the 100m sprint in the Olympics? They're just built better for it. However, sprinting/basketball != all sports, and other races are just as good if not better than black people at those.

      Get a life -- sports are fun, anyone can play, some will win.

    15. Re:basketball by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      I think we can excuse the original poster for a bit of hyperbole. The interesting question still remains: blacks are disproportionally represented in basketball and football, two sports where "athletic ability" is priced at a premium. Why is that?

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    16. Re:basketball by Sciros · · Score: 1

      Um, that they're American sports?

      There could be many reasons, anyway. In the US, sports are one of the proven ways to get scholarship money for college, and given that a lot of blacks live in poorer areas (so, worse schools) sports are easier to excel in than academics. Don't take my word for it but it makes sense to me.

      After all, "athletic ability" is important in more than just basketball and American football. It helps in soccer, nearly all "winter sports," rowing, etc. So I can't agree that blacks are altogether "more athletic," though yes they are on average taller and have a better vertical jump. So, yeah maybe on average better built for a sport like basketball (as opposed to other sports).

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    17. Re:basketball by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Blacks make up 12-15 percent of the population, but 90+ percent of professional athelets.
      Are the other other 10% swimmers?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:basketball by iamhigh · · Score: 1

      You are right... I might have been off about the exact numbers. But it is still disproportionate.

      And yes I was speaking of sports that include tons of physical activity. Baseball doesn't really count... you spend most of the time just standing there. If you take away linemen, I'll bet the numbers for the NFL grow in my favor. I wasn't too far off on bball.

      Winter sports are often "white", and there are probably quite a few reasons for that. Culture and locale are probably the biggest.

      Soccer wasn't even in my head. I know gloabally it is big, but here in the US most of us don't care about it.

      So yes, you can tear apart my non-googling comment for slight inaccuracies, but I stand by my point that was blacks seem to be better athletes and there is nothing wrong with that.

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    19. Re:basketball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Political correctness affects us all negatively. However, I think it's mainly use to suppress unpopular viewpoints and opinions and thoughts among white males, who are the only group that it's ok to openly mock.

      Go ahead, prove me wrong.

    20. Re:basketball by iamhigh · · Score: 1

      The big difference between seeing high percentages in prison and in the playing field is that all sports teams care about is winning. They are mostly owned by white people, yet blacks tend to dominate football and basketball (especially when counting the potential players from the population). Sports teams will hire the best player. period. There is little disrimination against a great black player in sports. If he wins championships, he get the job and gets paid.

      So to try to link these two is not even close.

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    21. Re:basketball by iamhigh · · Score: 1

      because there are socio-economic externalities that can explain your (alarmingly incorrect) statement. If they can be explained, why are they alarmingly incorrect? Dumbass AC.
      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    22. Re:basketball by Smauler · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because in much of the culture of Black America "athletic ability" is priced at a premium too.

      I do not necessarily believe that. The point I'm making is that there can be many cultural reasons for races being more prevalent in certain sports. If there weren't, there would not be as big a difference in racial terms between Hockey and Basketball, for example. Just because people of a certain race are overrepresented in certain endeavors, does not mean that that race is physiologically better at those endeavors than others. To claim so is perverse, IMO.

    23. Re:basketball by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I play hockey, you insensitive clod. (though I am currently wearing a George Laraque Jersey)

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    24. Re:basketball by Boricle · · Score: 1

      There have been some interesting discussions regarding the result of economic inequity or opportunity and racial distribution in sporting for a very long time.

      The first one I recall was when I was at school, roughly 1992, focusing on swimming (I'm trying to find the article, but it was a long time ago)

      The theory put forward is was that you see more people from economically challenged backgrounds in sports that require very little infrastructure and expense (running, soccer, football, basketball) compared to sports that require significant infrastructure or expense (swimming, ice hockey, skiing, equestrian)

      Since (anecdotally, I'm not going to look it up) people from specific races (usually historically discriminated racial groups) have belonged the poorer, economically challenged sections of the community, they may tend to show up in specific sports that aren't expensive to learn / play

      Of course, though, you could also make the argument that the theory above, coupled with a desiree to improve one's situation means people have a greater desire to compete well in the sports they have access to.

      The article was in regards to swimming representation from African countries versus other events like track-and-field

    25. Re:basketball by bogjobber · · Score: 1
      It pisses me off to no end that we can't conlude that one race may be better at things than another (due to P.C.).

      What an ignorant statement. By race do you mean black? African? African-American? You might be surprised to find out that these are all significantly different things. To compare whether one race has an inherent physical advantage you would first have to define race, and the political terms "African-American," "Caucasian," "Asian", et al mean close to nothing in scientific terms.

      And even if you could use those categories, what do you mean by better? Bigger, faster, stronger? Physical superiority is pretty hard to define and measure other than in small snapshots such as the 100-meter dash or a bench press maximum. Is Lance Armstrong a greater athlete than LaDainian Tomlinson? Is Dirk Nowitzki a greater athlete than Tiger Woods?

      And even if you can definitively measure physical ability, what does *that* really mean? High-level sports are about *much* more than pure physical ability. Proper training, nutrition, coaching, etc. are important in all sports. So are concentration, discipline, confidence, mental toughness, and hundreds of other factors. Unless you have some miracle experiment lined up, you can't separate the mental from the physical. Maybe black people are better at football because they are more confident than whites. Maybe they are better at basketball because an inner-city black sports prodigy is more likely to be singled out and receive individual attention from coaches. Have you ruled that out?

      You can look at track, basketball, football, etc. and come to the conclusion that blacks are much more athletic than whites. But is that because they're better athletes, or because those sports have higher emphasis in black society? In the early 1980's blacks made up almost 30% of MLB rosters. Now it's somewhere between 8-9%. Is that because blacks are inferior? Have blacks gotten worse at baseball in the last twenty years? Or is it because baseball is no longer as popular in black communities?

      I don't see anyone claiming that whites are better at baseball or swimming (or water polo, lacrosse, golf, tennis, etc.) because they have an inherent physical advantage, even though the numbers are pretty dramatically against blacks in those sports. In the World Cup, mostly white teams like England, Argentina, France, Italy, Germany, Netherlands, Uruguay, etc. have all had enormous success, while Brazil is the only mostly black team to have won it. Is it because whites are superior?

      As you can see, this is a much more complex issue than you make it seem with your four-sentence blanket statement somehow linking this with overzealous political correctness. Try some critical thinking next time before you post, it usually helps you from looking like an idiot.

    26. Re:basketball by Notegg+Nornoggin · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is, black kids never get scholarships on academic merit. RASCIST!!!!!

    27. Re:basketball by line-bundle · · Score: 1

      Two arguments against your position.

      First: American blacks are a very select class. They were drafted into slavery because the qualities they have are the same as required is sport: strength, stamina... This cannot possibly extend to all blacks on the planet.

      Second: Also consider that it's one of the economic opportunities they (think) they can get. So a lot more try to enter into the field, and thereby a lot more succeed. The whites generally don't try to enter in those fields, but I am sure if they tried as had as the blacks then there would be a whole lot more.

      It pisses me off no end when conclude one race is better than another because of limited observation. And I am sure if you are trying to conclude one race is better than another you are looking for an air of superiority.

      What I HATES about conclusions about one race better than another is that you limit opportunities for races, and end up with a self fulfilling prophecy. I was forced to play basketball in high school because of those presumptions and I absolutely sucked rock. Who could have guessed math/computers was my thing. How many more people have been lost because of (sometime subconscious) thoughts like that?

  15. Flying by David+Frankenstein · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I read it somewhere one time. Give me some wings and Zero-G, and I can use them to 'swim' if I can push enough air around. Would be even more fun with Small-G.

    1. Re:Flying by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      In zero G, I think a propeller would be more useful.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Flying by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Informative

      Are you thinking of The Menace From Earth? I know that was the first thing I thought of.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Flying by LMacG · · Score: 1

      Hmmmmm, Zero-G. And Wings. Needs a catchy name, something like . . . . Zero Wing!

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    4. Re:Flying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small-G and flying? As a kid, I was impressed by "The Menance From Earth" by Heinlein which has people flying in an "air cave" on the moon.

    5. Re:Flying by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      And Dizzying. You will need at least 4 to go in the direction you expect. One you will spin with the propeller 2 will cause you to go forward and up or down. 3 would be some diagnal. 4 blade Spinning opposit directions should do the trick.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Flying by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Power it via a hand crank. I just rotate the propeller to turn myself and propel myself in the direction I want to go.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    7. Re:Flying by $0.02 · · Score: 1

      Give me some pinto beans and Zero-G and I can fly like a rocket.

      --
      If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
    8. Re:Flying by GonzoPhysicist · · Score: 1

      You could use two counter rotating props in parallel.

      --
      horror vacui
    9. Re:Flying by duck0 · · Score: 1

      Arthur C. Clarke, 3001.

  16. What about? by Kamineko · · Score: 1

    "What about Zero-G kickboxing? Or Wimbledon?"

    1. Re:What about? by iamhigh · · Score: 1

      Wimbledon, as with all tennis, requires gravity.

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    2. Re:What about? by EMeta · · Score: 1

      Unless you use a LOT of topspin. On every shot. But better than that? A roof. And you still only allow 1 bounce.

  17. qpong by sabatorg · · Score: 1

    I have always been a fan of qpong myself.... It seams like with low gravity this may finally be a possibility!

  18. Re:...'cause many of us are wondering about the... by oodaloop · · Score: 1

    How about the horizontal mambo? Horizontal to what?
    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  19. To hell with sports by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    I wanna know if the Kama Sutra will be amended.

    --
    What?
  20. Pissing contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A 0-G pissing contest might prove interesting.

    1. Re:Pissing contest by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny

      A 0-G pissing contest might prove interesting.
      Just what we need - code review meetings in outer space.
      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  21. Mod Parent Redundant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Funny? Should be modded redundant.

    Since when does reiterating the department of an article add anything to the conversation?

    Posted by Soulskill on 2008.04.25 13:55
    from the enemy's-gate-is-down dept.
    1. Re:Mod Parent Redundant! by hansamurai · · Score: 2, Informative

      The department is usually a total throwaway that I don't even bother reading it. Kind of like most articles.

    2. Re:Mod Parent Redundant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mod Parent Redundant! (Score:-1, Redundant)
      by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 25, @02:10PM (#23200606)
      Funny? Should be modded redundant.


      MOD FAIL
    3. Re:Mod Parent Redundant! by glwtta · · Score: 3, Funny

      Huh, must've glossed over the Department.

      Rest assured, I just feel terrible about myself.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:Mod Parent Redundant! by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 1

      It's a reference to Ender's Game, and the *games* played there in zero-g.

      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    5. Re:Mod Parent Redundant! by nog_lorp · · Score: 3, Funny

      I find repetition funny, that's why I watch Family Guy.

      *someone gets hurt*
      Aah... Aah...
      Aah... Aah...
      ...

    6. Re:Mod Parent Redundant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad there is no 'Asshole' mod to use on you. Crawl back to Mom's basement, ok?

    7. Re:Mod Parent Redundant! by AikonMGB · · Score: 1

      *Whooooosh*

      Aikon-

  22. new olympic sport by purpleque · · Score: 2, Interesting

    speedfloating...neither foot can touch the ground during the entire race.

    1. Re:new olympic sport by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      Seems like you could gain the same results by testing a person's vertical. All the force one can muster in any direction can be measured with ones weight, and the average height of the jump (IE, lifting your feet and bending your knees for extra height won't work).

      On the other hand.. if you are talking about some sort of zero (or low) G race down a corridor without the use of your legs (pulling and pushing with hands, head, whatever isn't below the waist) it could be quite interesting. If you take into consideration it's just your hands friction on the walls propelling you after your initial push... In a long enough corridor this would make a big difference.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  23. Calvin Ball by LordSkippy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Calvin Ball!

    --
    My karma is in a nose dive
    1. Re:Calvin Ball by esocid · · Score: 2, Funny

      You used an exclamatory sentence in the no punctuation zone, you have to hop on one foot while I peg you with this waterballon. Now, hold still dammit. Hey, where's your mask?

      --
      Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    2. Re:Calvin Ball by SpacePirate20X6 · · Score: 1

      Your feet touched the ground! That means you have to sing the sorry song!

    3. Re:Calvin Ball by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You asked a question in the exclamatory only zone, you must now ...

      (frik i havn't read these in so long i forget the awesome penalties they made up :( hmmm)

      ... you must now mod this post insightful.

      --
      sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
  24. Don't bait us so barefacedly by OpenSourced · · Score: 0

    new ideas for space sports. Have any suggestions?"

    Please...

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  25. Aloft? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    In 2006, European astronaut Christer Fugelsang, a former Swedish national Frisbee champion, kept a Frisbee aloft inside the station for 20 seconds - thanks to the lack of gravity - to break the previous world record of 16.72 seconds for a single toss.
    Isn't the whole station aloft? I'm confused.
    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Aloft? by bostongraf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And can it be considered a world record if it takes place outside of Earth's atmosphere?

    2. Re:Aloft? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      To me the funny part is if you're going to cheat like that, you could pretty easily beat that record time just by throwing a frisbee off a very tall cliff. Being limited by the size of the station is the problem, I'm guessing. What they need to do is suit up and go outside the station, then throw the frisbee. I bet it would be possible to keep the frisbee "aloft" for at least a couple weeks then.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  26. Flying. by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't confuse Activity, competitions and sports. Sorry, I needed to gt that off my chest.

    Any ways..
    Gymnastics would be very interesting, as would wrestling.

    I suspect someone would create 'wings' that strap onto your arms to help you 'swim' around. That could be an interesting race.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Flying. by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse Activity, competitions and sports
      I'd love to see the definitions, especially when we've got bozos like Charles Barkley saying that bicycle racing isn't a sport, and ESPN saying that NASCAR is.
    2. Re:Flying. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Bicycling isn't a sport.

      It's an activity. There's a difference.

      Contact, an active offense and defense, and control or some sort of item, like a ball or puck.

      That doesn't mean it isn't hard to do, and require skill to compete well. Just because it takes physical exertion doesn't make it a sport.

      Too me.

      This came about because everybody wants there 'thing' to be a sport.

      Nascar? Hunting? Dancing? bah.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Flying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That won't work. Who the hell wants to see an "activity competition"?

    4. Re:Flying. by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      Good call. But never underestimate the word sports if you're ever in a college dorm. Any time multiple parties directly compete with a common gaol that only one of them can achieve, you have a sport. If the game is full contact hall (or ISS) frisbee, then let the games begin. The only advantage you have in space is weightlessness. Probably a lot more penalties... Of course, the major advantage of being on Earth is there isn't that pesky life support system that you need to worry about damaging.

      Have fun, guys!

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    5. Re:Flying. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Both bicycle racing and auto racing have teams that engage in both offense and defense.

      Just because you're ignorant doesn't mean you can just come up with some willhe nillhe definition to exclude things you don't like and think that it actually does.

      At issue is the question of whether a "sport" is something you do or something you bet on.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    6. Re:Flying. by sh00z · · Score: 1

      And my issue is how much of the work (using the Physics definition) is performed by the competitor. Once a machine is doing the vast majority of the work, it ceases to be a sport by *my* definition. Therefore, to me, bowling (in which a machine sets up the pins and delivers the ball) is more of a sport than auto racing.

  27. lesee... by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

    tug of war ?

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
  28. Finally... by bostongraf · · Score: 1

    The perfect opportunity to play Blurn Ball!

  29. suggestions? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

    Well, I think archery and skeet shooting are right out. I'd like to see a zero-G baseball game.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:suggestions? by purpleque · · Score: 1

      You would have to increase the size of the playing field, or change the flat surface to a curved surface and modify the rules to prevent every uncaught/blocked/foul ball from being a home run

  30. which way is up? by purpleque · · Score: 1

    I wonder how king of the mountain would work in space...

  31. Two man juggling by myxiplx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well you can't very well juggle on your own in space, and I doubt Nasa would appreciate you bouncing balls off all the equipment, but you could probably learn to juggle 5 balls between two people.

    Of course the trick is to work out a path where the balls won't collide, and to learn the direction to throw them in, but it'd make for a great publicity video if they worked it out :D

    1. Re:Two man juggling by scrib · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are a lot of possibilities for juggling in 0G. You can't do a normal "cascade" pattern, but you could do it by bouncing balls off the "ceiling."

      A three ball pattern that looked like the outline of a bow tie should actually be pretty easy to pick up. Speed could be variable depending on skill, and you could control a relatively large number of objects at slow speeds. There are actually quite a few juggling patterns that don't rely on gravity - gravity is more of a limiting factor in those cases.

      I'd love to see what an astronaut who can juggle five on Earth would come up with if allowed to play around and experiment for a while in 0G!

      --
      Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
    2. Re:Two man juggling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Start slow, speed up.

  32. Hide and seek? Or VR Descent? by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

    I imagine it'd be pretty cool to play Hide and Seek in a 3D environment, although the hiding space options would be rather limited.

    How about setting up a CAVE-like environment for some really VR Descent?

  33. first thing to remember... by mbaGeek · · Score: 1

    ...the ceiling is the floor

    --
    It ain't what they call you. It's what you answer to. http://mylyceum.us/
  34. How about by MaDMvD · · Score: 1

    ...walzees (or however it's spelled). That used to be so much fun back in elementary school. Ah, good old days in Jersey City.

    1. Re:How about by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I lived in Jersey City until I was 7 or so (and then Sayreville until 12-13), but don't remember anything sounding like 'walzees'... of course that was 30+ years ago. Maybe I was too young for it.

    2. Re:How about by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's similar to a game we imaginatively called "wall ball" in my elementary school.

      Basically, you take a tennis ball (or super bouncy ball if you have one) and bounce it off a wall as fast as you can, and try and aim it so it hits someone. If they catch it, they can try to wing it at you the same way.

      It forces you to watch for the various firing angles the other players might have on you, and it forces the other players to try and get tricky... like, if you bounce it off the mud first before the wall, you can catch someone off guard, but it'll be going slower, so it might not cause a welt.

      No rules though. Just a bunch of kids trying to give each other bruises.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:How about by humbro · · Score: 1

      Wall Ball, i.e. 2D dodge ball. At my high school we used basketballs...

  35. Red Rover by spun · · Score: 1

    Only, instead of a line of folks, you have a 2D mesh. And instead of running at the opposing team, your teammates hurl you at them.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  36. Re:...'cause many of us are wondering about the... by brunokummel · · Score: 1

    How about the horizontal mambo? Horizontal to what?
    ...eh..to the partner?
    --
    What is best in life? To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women.
  37. How about 3D Jacks? by studpuppy · · Score: 1
    My sister used to play this game (in a 2D way) all the time when she was younger (I swear... It wasn't my idea).

    But you could float the jacks around in a 3D space, then bounce the ball off some wall and try to grab all of the jacks in your hands and still catch the ball off the bounce.

    First round you have to grab one jack. Second round, two. And so on.

    --

    Hide and seek seems like it would be a bit more challenging on the space station. "Anyone seen Dave? Or his EVA suit?"

    --
    The last time I wrote code, it was Morse
    1. Re:How about 3D Jacks? by fracai · · Score: 2, Funny

      First round you have to grab one jack. Second round, two. And so on. I'm afraid I'll need at least one more data point to start extrapolating your "And so on" with any degree of accuracy.
      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    2. Re:How about 3D Jacks? by sootman · · Score: 1

      "We will begin with the firemen, then the math teachers, and so on in that fashion..."

      -----Lrrr, Futurama

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  38. Mud Wrestling by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

    It's a no-brainer ... I mean ... ZERO GRAVITY !!!

  39. Surfing in an Oneill cylinder by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

    I want to see a large cylinder ( 100+ m diameter ) with enough spin to have about 1/4 G, and lots of water. There could be waves going both directions, and a few underwater obstacles to provide breaks.

    1. Re:Surfing in an Oneill cylinder by mithluin · · Score: 1

      The Coriolis effect in a 50 m-radius cylinder gives a velocity difference of about .4 meters/second between my head and feet. So you propose a sport that combines significant vertical position changes with balancing (on water)!

      I'd be impressed to see it, but I think that's the sort of environment where you could make a sport of Extreme Standing Up Rapidly (TM).

  40. Flatulence races? by bonkeydcow · · Score: 4, Funny

    Flatulence races? Do you have enough fuel to make it across the finish line?

    1. Re:Flatulence races? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fartracing FTW!! BRILLIANT!!! Kudos good sir.

      Sadly, without gravity, the gas in your gut doesn't separate out, so, (wait for it) "in space, nobody can hear you fart".

      Thanks, try the veal.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Flatulence races? by vertigoCiel · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to believe that people do not fat in space. Flatulence comes from a build up of gasses in the intestines, not the stomach. Things are moved through the intestines by muscle contraction, not gravity, so it seems unlikely that it would function differently in null-G.

      Of course, a few words from anyone whose actually been to space would clear this up quickly. Are you listening, NASA? Inquiring minds wish to know!

    3. Re:Flatulence races? by cpricejones · · Score: 1

      You don't need Zero-G for fartracing ... just a lot of refried beans.

  41. Maybe obvious... by TheLazySci-FiAuthor · · Score: 1

    ... a good game of 'hide the capsule'?

  42. Re:...'cause many of us are wondering about the... by oodaloop · · Score: 3, Funny

    As opposed to the original kind of mambo, where one person lays down and the other one stands on him?

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  43. Tank by tbgreve · · Score: 1

    In collage we played allot of "quarters". It would also provide research for drunk astronauts.

    --
    "Be wary of the man who urges an action in which he himself incurs no risk."

    ~Joaquin Setanti

    1. Re:Tank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently in your collage they didn't teach you how to spell allot of things.

  44. Re:...'cause many of us are wondering about the... by saider · · Score: 1

    You can refer to the Kama Sutra for various orthogonal copulation techniques.

    --


    Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  45. Your taxes hard at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snipes is a hero.

    America of the enlightenment has died. RIP.

  46. Re:Hide and seek? Or VR Descent? by Clovis42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I imagine it'd be pretty cool to play Hide and Seek in a 3D environment

    Er, like outside in meatspace, maybe?? I'd like to play a 1D game of Hide and Seek.... Or a proper 4D hide and seek... I know he's around here somewhere... but WHEN??

    I suppose you mean it is 3D since you can float off the ground, but you can climb up stuff in regular gravity hide and seek too.
    --
    Clovis
    ^ Clovis, look! It's that guy you are!
  47. Semantics by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't there need to be space sports *now* before we start talking about the future of space sports? No? Never mind.

    QD's requirements for entertaining space sports:

    [1] Rotating playfield (for Coriolis effects)
    [2] Weapons
    [3] Sexy female players in tight cat suits
    [4] Sexy female referees in BDSM gear (with whips and paddles for meting out penalties)
    [5] Full contact rules
    [6] The ball? A human head!

  48. Racquetball! by FurtiveGlancer · · Score: 1

    Put a magnet in the ball and use a metal floor within a composite cylinder. Composite racquets of course.

    --
    Invenio via vel creo
  49. What the hell. It;'s Friday! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Would be even more fun with Small-G. Ha ha! Yeah! I call my dick that, too! :-)

    1. Re:What the hell. It;'s Friday! by yuriyg · · Score: 1

      Would be even more fun with Small-G. Ha ha! Yeah! I call my dick that, too! :-) I bet.
    2. Re:What the hell. It;'s Friday! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. That was amazingly weak. Also uncalled for with a goofy, self-deprecating comment. Poor form, son.

      Man, Fridays on Slashdot are not as jolly as they used to be.

  50. what's the name? by purpleque · · Score: 1

    Having no gravity would sure make that Asian gameshow where you try to jump through the styrofoam wall with a shape cut out of it while it is moving at you quite a bit easier. Could imagine an updated version where the shape changes from the beginning of the wall to the end of it

  51. Battle Athletes - Lacrosse by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

    Anyone ever see the Battle Athletes anime? They had a zero-g version of lacrosse that they played in a large enclosed room so they could push off the walls, floor and ceiling. That would be fun.

    --
    -SaNo
    1. Re:Battle Athletes - Lacrosse by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      You were reading my mind!!!

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  52. Suggestion? Get back to work. by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

    Yeah, yeah, I am being a buzz-kill here. But seriously, it has to cost a lot of money to have astronauts up there. Shouldn't maximizing their productivity be the priority here? I realize that everyone gets burned out, and probably all the more so in orbit, but there has to be a more efficient way to manage human-hours in space.

    1. Re:Suggestion? Get back to work. by purpleque · · Score: 1

      They have to do sincere scientific research on which sports will work best for when the space colonists leave earth. Without this necessary research space colonist jack will be a very dull boy.

    2. Re:Suggestion? Get back to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Counterargument: NFL/NBA/NHL make more money than god.
      NASA gets some funding out of the deal (may i suggest 50%), wicked hot cheerleaders in space, a TV audience and all the sudden there is a little more money to go around for science in space.

    3. Re:Suggestion? Get back to work. by dtolman · · Score: 1

      You a buzzkill? No way.

      You're 100% right - their ineffecient breaks from work are costing the taxpayers $$$! Think of the cost savings if we went with your ideas! Instead of needlessly ferrying them back for millions of dolalrs, we could just wait for them to commit suicide or have a coronary from liteally being worked and scheduled 24x7 for months at a time, and chuck their worthless carcases out the airlock. Of course their paycheck will be docked since disposing of the corpse instead of letting it rot in place will be a "leisure activity" in your administration.

    4. Re:Suggestion? Get back to work. by 2short · · Score: 1

      "Shouldn't maximizing their productivity be the priority here?"

      Productivity at what? They're not up there because there was anything particular we wanted to do where it seemed like putting humans in orbit was the best way to go about it. Putting humans in orbit was the whole premise, so without asking why, they spent enormous piles of money to do it. Yes, this is yet further evidence that they still haven't come up with any thing useful for ISS residents to do. Unless you count building the ISS in hopes of getting it completed before we drop it in the ocean because we don't need it for anything.

    5. Re:Suggestion? Get back to work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And would the cheerleaders need to have a bra? No gravity, no need, right?

    6. Re:Suggestion? Get back to work. by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

      Aren't they supposed to be studying the effect of zero gravity on tiny screws or something?

    7. Re:Suggestion? Get back to work. by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

      Instead of needlessly ferrying them back for millions of dolalrs, we could just wait for them to commit suicide or have a coronary from liteally being worked and scheduled 24x7 for months at a time, and chuck their worthless carcases out the airlock. Or we could plan missions with the idea of using the time effectively and getting them home again before they go stir crazy.

    8. Re:Suggestion? Get back to work. by dtolman · · Score: 1

      Brilliant! Instead of sending up astronauts on 6 months shifts to minimize costly and dangerous launches, we could spend billions extra to shuttle them up and down to the International Space Station weekly! Plus added bonus - we could thin out the astronaut corp by exposing them to extra trips inevitably killing them.

      Maybe we could send them home every weekend. I'm sure astronauts will look forward to their uncluttered weekend after working 120 hours straight.

  53. SpaceBalls by owlnation · · Score: 1

    May the schwartz be with you.

  54. Oh, you missed the obvious, man! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    J.K. Rowling took the idea of Voldemort from the same lore as Orochimaru.
    Look at your damned sig. And your username.

    Sheesh.

    Quidditch!!!

    1. Re:Oh, you missed the obvious, man! by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1

      You are so right. Get a large enough arena and that would work. Player's wouldn't have quite the control as the broom would give them, but give each player a pressurized air canister and they could move themselves around. Just to increase the look and feel of it, have them ride around on the containers but disguise them as brooms. You could even do the same to the snitch, but have the canister release at random times, in random directions. That way you get a snitch that is hard to catch. Do the same for the bludgers, but give them a bit of AI so that they try to hit the other players.

      I absolutely love this idea.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
  55. Magnetic Obstacle Course? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am thinking a small metal sphere and magnets at various angles and distances to alter the path of the sphere in such a way that you could set up a series of hoops that you had to go through. And when that gets boring there is always Super Happy Fun Ball: http://terry.kovax.org/2005/03/super_happy_fun_ball.html

  56. Sex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sex is a sport right?

  57. Re:...'cause many of us are wondering about the... by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

    just make sure you dont mistranslates its 414 for those geeky enough to know the numbers

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  58. the best idea ever by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

    They could play some sort of World of Warcraft...in space :P and call it World of Starcraft! But seriously, space ping pong would kick ass cuz it'd be like pong instead.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:the best idea ever by geekoid · · Score: 1

      well you would have a table on each sides and across the top. So your bouncing the ball through a cube.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  59. How about... by FinchWorld · · Score: 1

    ...horse racing?

    --
    "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
  60. Re:...'cause many of us are wondering about the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not very familiar with sex here, I can tell...

  61. Extreme Sports would include... by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

    Extreme sports would include skinny dipping and blowing up a balloon.

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  62. just one step closer to... by thekm · · Score: 1

    ..."Joe Klumpp's 'Zero-Gee Football - It's a Funny Old Game" being available.
    That will no doubt be regarded as one of the worst books in history.

  63. obligatory "hitch-hiker" reference by prof+alan · · Score: 1

    I heard that "53 more things to do in zero gravity" was very popular. There's sure to be something in there.

  64. Projectile Assault! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Projectile Red Rover.

    Throw astronauts at opposing teams and try to break the chain. Much fun if you can get them going fast enough.

  65. Zero G Drinking Games! by bamwham · · Score: 1

    Foot touched the wall that's a drink
    Sunrise that's a drink
    Sunset that's a drink
    passing over Europ, you guessed it, take a drink
    Houston calls last person on the communication takes two drinks. etc.

    1. Re:Zero G Drinking Games! by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      Foot touched the wall that's a drink
      Sunrise that's a drink
      Sunset that's a drink
      passing over Europ, you guessed it, take a drink
      Houston calls last person on the communication takes two drinks. etc. You act like the Russians don't already do this.
      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
  66. Zero G Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With Jim Bexley Speed!

  67. 3D strategy games by Damn+The+Torpedoes · · Score: 1

    Since you can take and leave things at will in the air, how about some good old 3D checkers? You could even do 3D sculpting with objects just hanging in space to make cool designs. As far as sports go, you could do some space polo. Much like water polo, except you best be able to get where you need to go. I would suggest a cube/cylindrical room, with hoops on both ends.

    1. Re:3D strategy games by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      Since you can take and leave things at will in the air, how about some good old 3D checkers?
      Not going to work. You can't just set things in mid air. They'll drift off. Even if you do manage to get the checker totally still, the next time somebody moves near the board it will cause air currents that will cause them all to drift. It would be easier to play 3D checkers with gravity than without.
      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. Would the Wiimote work in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm thinking the accellorometers in the Wiimote require gravity.

    So no Wii Sports in Space? Cancel my flight!

  70. Beer pong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beer pong!

  71. Why go into space? by BenSchuarmer · · Score: 1

    Isn't the main reason we're into space to get away from the jocks?

  72. What about Sex Play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanna know how Sex is in Space! do they have to tie a bungie around themselves or what??? Who were the first to have sex in space?

  73. Suggestions: by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 0

    The astronauts also put out a request for new ideas for space sports. Have any suggestions? How about watersports? I hear those are growing in popularity.
    --
    Disclaimer: I am not god.
    We may not be created equal
    But we can be treated equal.
  74. zero-g tetherball by chriscoolc · · Score: 1

    Attach a pole from one wall to an opposite wall, then attach your tether in the middle. Orient yourself however you want.

    Ask someone "you wanna play me?" and then it's game on.

  75. 3D versus 2D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without gravity - 2D games can become 3D. Hence, one could consider Pool, Billiards or Snooker in 3D. You'd probably want to use really light balls though because the air resistance won't slow them down as fast as the cloth on the table would have done...and because you don't want it to get dangerous! So pingpong-ball pool with paper cups taped to the corners of an ISS module to act as pockets.

  76. Zero-G... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...chess?

  77. A couple of ideas by ari_j · · Score: 1

    LASER CATS!

    Tiddly Winks ;)

    Darts

  78. You'd need a large space of zero G by bytesex · · Score: 1

    But if you had something like an enormous padded sportshall in zero G, one party could throw something, while the other had to catch it. That is, thrust yourself forward with an accurate enough vector to intercept it. And if you fail, you just keep bouncing. Of course, if you don't fail, you keep bouncing as well, but there'd be things to hold on to on the sides of it. Or something.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  79. Curling in 3 Dimensions by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    Hey, if someone can figure out how to slow down a curling stone, or similar object without getting knocked about or crunched, it's on!

    Shuffleboard, darts, bumper pool...

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    1. Re:Curling in 3 Dimensions by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      A "stone" with high air resistance? And instead of teammates sweeping the ice they can use their breath to influence the path of the "stone". :)

  80. Sport? by purpleque · · Score: 1

    If golf were played in zero gravity would it still be considered not a sport? What about other non-sport sports like fishing and poker.

    1. Re:Sport? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      If you can catch fish from a space station, you can call it whatever you want.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  81. Jump Rope? by AioKits · · Score: 1

    I mean, you're in zero-G granted, but can't you just try 'jumping' off the floor, then the ceiling, then repeating it while trying not to get hit by the rope?
    Eh, I tried.

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  82. Mixed Martial Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UFC.... in Space!!!!!!!

  83. Re:system for it to make it's own gravity and tran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post brought to you by Snickers..

    Feeling hungry? Grab a Snickers!!

  84. Something I've always wanted to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Space Bukkake

  85. Anyone read Heinlein? by justdaven · · Score: 1

    Space polo! (Water not pony)

  86. Throwing in a straight line, and other tricks by RabidMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's amazing how, even as a wee child, we learn to account for gravity in everything we do. (I know that it's an obvious statement, but ponder it). We learn to throw in arcs, we learn how things bounce, based on their elasticity or density, we learn how to throw higher/lighter, lower/harder to do different arcs, we learn how to throw things that are light vs heavy ...

    then, to have to relearn that in space. It would be an interesting study in learning and adapting to see how people learn this, then, when they return back to Gravity, how they re-adjust.

    --
    We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
  87. It is a Start by 32771 · · Score: 1

    But I hoped to see something like a solar sailing race. There is a nice story by A.C.Clarke called "The Wind From the Sun". It was published in 1964! So when can I get my solar sailing yacht?

    There is another nice story probably also by him where he describes runners taking part in some kind of space olympics. It was essentially a race to get the lightest space suit, which was finally genetically optimized away. I just can't remember what the name was.

    --
    Je me souviens.
  88. ball = bag by White+Yeti · · Score: 1

    It's probably a big supply bag.

  89. Spit in my mouth by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    They could play "spit in my mouth" from pretty far away. Or throw food in each other's mouth instead. Or "who pees the farthest". Or Tug O' War. Or paper plane throwing-based games (still works without gravity, but instead of falling down it just stops, which could make up for interesting plane interception games). Or throw arrows on a floating, and eventually spinning, target. Or a "blow race" : make some origami thing (or better yet blow a soap bubble), let it float still on the start "line" and blow on it to make it go forward. Or roll a rope around an astronaut, push him away and pull on the rope to make him spin. Or play Space Invaders : have an astronaut throwing a bunch of tiny objects that would serve as enemies slowly towards you and try to shoot them all away with a few other tiny objects that would serve as bullets. Make these enemies be tuning forks set to play different notes and try to make a cool tune while by hitting them. Or let pool table balls (or something equivalent, actually tennis table balls would be better) float and try to play 3D billard. Or try synchronous dance or whatever sky divers do. Make a very slow tiny RC plane (like so slow it couldn't fly on Earth, slower than walking speed), let a bunch of rings float in the air and try to make the plane go through them. Eventually adapt tiny sort of cannons on them and enjoy the possibilities. Invent a new form of break-dance. Stack up balls in mid-air and try to reproduce something similar to Newton's cradle. Try to make magnets orbit each other slowly (although I'm not sure that magnetic force is proportional to the square of the distance..). Modify a gun into shooting bullets 100 times slower and pretend it's Matrix' bullet time. Set up a bunch of parallel bars and do slomo gymnastics on them. Attach two astronauts using an elastic rope tied at their waist and let them try to run simultaneously on each other's feet. Put two transpolines on opposite walls and bounce from one to the other back and forth and try to do tricks, be they in slomo or not.

    That's all I've got so far.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  90. Doesn't have to be just flatulence by evilninjax · · Score: 1
    that you project to propel you forward!!

    (no not that, i meant spitting :) )

  91. Well hunting is out... by clint999 · · Score: 0

    Because it would result in flames. Truth or falsity is irrelevant. This is true with all flamebait.
  92. Ultimate (Frisbee) by HeyBob! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm surprised no one's brought up Ultimate (Frisbee)
    A spinning disc has lift so th throw it to some one, you'd throw it down and it would rise to them!

    1. Re:Ultimate (Frisbee) by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A spinning disc has lift


      No, it doesn't. A frisbee gets no lift from the fact that it is spinning.

      Because of its shape (it's an airfoil) it does get lift from moving forward, however. It gets *stability* from the spin, which helps maintiain the the edge-on direction of movement that gives it lift.
    2. Re:Ultimate (Frisbee) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically a disc needs to spin in order to generate meaningful lift. The OP isn't wrong; he obviously did not mean that a spinning disc would somehow levitate.

    3. Re:Ultimate (Frisbee) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      make an archimedes cork in the center so that air can in some way move through it and silently push the spinning disk upward. 90% turned you could sprint for the fastest turning disk from point A to B, the first there is the winner.

  93. Dancing by linuxpyro · · Score: 1

    What about some sort of dancing? Ballroom, maybe?

    --
    Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.
  94. Sports and Spaceports by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    Lance Armstrong, Sit Down: Dr. Sally Ride, the first female US astronaut in space, rode a bicycle across the Atlantic ocean. She did so in 15 minutes. This was done in 1983, aboard STS-7 on a stationary bike, as part of an experiment on exercise in zero g intended to reduce the problem of bone calcium loss during long missions. It stretches at least a couple definitions to the breaking point, but it's great to be able to say "rode a bicycle across the Atlantic ocean in 15 minutes". A free flight variant of this could be a bicycle race using vehicles with a human powered propeller, flying a course aboard a space station.

    The High (Frontier) Jump: I came up with this when OMNI printed an article about the first Olympics in space, and requested ideas from readers. Take two medium sized asteroids and set them orbiting about each other. The jumper starts on one, and jumps into a prescribed 3 body orbit about the pair. Jumps include: Jump from A, orbiting B, and landing back on A as close as possible to the starting point; jump from A, slingshot around B, orbit around A counter to the original direction, and land on B; jump from A, ricochet off B without stopping and land back on A as close as possible to the original starting point. 'Free style' jumps of the jumpers' own device as also included. Although probably requiring attitude thruster assistance, gymnastic moves such as spinning and somersaults during the jumps add to the scores. Also, a jump using a heads up display projected on the inside of a helmet with the faceplate blacked over test the jumper's ability to work from data instead of seat-of-the-pants sight. A variant of this and the bicycle race above could be jumping from an asteroid for initial delta V, and negotiating a marked course using attitude control thrusters. Points are added according to landing speed and how little additional delta V is acquired during the 3 dimensional slalom involved (ie. steering so as not to add speed to the starting speed).

    Earth Surfing: A danger to the Apollo flights was the possibility that due to the high Earth gravity acquired return speed, an too low a reentry angle would make them skip off the atmosphere and out into solar orbit. Make use of that. Starting from lunar orbit, perform a Earth-targeted burn with minimal in flight correction. The intention is to bounce off the atmosphere so as to lose the most velocity while still escaping Earth's gravity well (ie. coming as close as possible to reentry speed but still surfing the atmosphere back out into solar orbit). An element of danger enters when the burn might produce too steep a reentry angle causing the returnees to burn up on reentry rather than bounce. Even a well executed bounce will include significant heating, and shortening the heating time and reducing the amount would mean a more oblique surfing angle and so fewer points.

    Synchronized Swimming: Now possible in 3 dimensions, instead of the usual 2 on the water's surface. The team performs on and within a huge globule of water floating freely in zero g. Besides the points acquired from performance itself, points are lost according to how much water is splashed away from the main globule during the exercise.

    V-HALO Jump: In the Very High Altitude, Low Open Jump the astronaut athlete is given their exact orbital parameters, the location of a landing site, and placed in a reentry shielded single person module with a retrorocket built in. They get into the 'landing coffin', and at a time and with a delta V of their own calculation, perform their burn, reenter the atmosphere, and when their speed is low enough jump out and perform a free fall parachute jump. Points are gained for how low they open the chute and how close they land to the specified point. To make things interesting, rather than giving them a computer for calculating their burn time and duration, give them the technology used by the Soviet cosmonauts during the Apollo-Soyuz mission rendezvous: slide rule and stop watch.

    The Charles Duke Lunar High Jump: When Charlie Duk

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  95. Extreme sport of the future: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spacediving: You drop from orbit with nothing more than a spacesuit (specially made for re-entry, of course) and a parachute. I've always thought that would be an interesting experience.

    It'd require materials and processes we don't yet have, but I imagine there would be a few nutballs that would be into it when the technology is available.

    Posting AC because I'm too lazy to log in.

  96. Crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the current and projected energy prices it would be more appropriate to think of sports played in your close neighborhood. Some predicts, that even transcontinental and intercontinental flying will be again the privilege of a small elite.

  97. Re by Mark+Cicero · · Score: 0

    Anyone else initially read this subject as having the men be juggled? Bonus points if one of them vomits?

    --
    The opinions expressed in this post are not necessarily those of my brain.
  98. Heroines throwing men by heroine · · Score: 1

    They've never shown heroines throwing men around, but it would be one of the great moments in space.

  99. Basket Hocky by bill_kress · · Score: 1

    You can't touch the "Puck", and you're given a little hooked 2ft stick and have to slap it through a hoop.

    Also see basket racquetball.

    1. Re:Basket Hocky by Sean0michael · · Score: 1

      I believe we already have a meatspace variant of the sports you suggested: field hockey. Not exactly how you described it, but field hockey is exactly the little hooked stick into a "hoop" of sorts.

      --
      Funtime Candy Wow! - my plan for eventually conquering Japan.
  100. OMGLasers by VampirePidgeon · · Score: 1

    Laser tag comes to mind. Get a few guns up there and re-enact some scenes from The Matrix. I'd like to bring up some RC cars boats and planes, just to see what works and what doesn't.

  101. dodge phonebook... by rsw · · Score: 1

    ...is an excellent sport no matter the local spacetime curvature.

    -=rsw

  102. 3D Pong by binaur · · Score: 1

    I have always been a fan of ping pong, but gravity just gets in the way. So why not have a square tunnel where you can hit off any of the sides. There would be no need for a net, since this is kind of like racketball, you just hit it off of any of the sides but the path is straight except where spin still comes into play. This is one of those things you just can't try in the presence of gravity.

    1. Re:3D Pong by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      that's almost a 3D air-hockey?

  103. Paintball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think paintball would be great. Once again, there is the issue of the sensitive equipment.

    There is a TV show my wife watches that could be really fascinating watching them attempt to duplicate in Zero-G, Dancing with the Stars.

  104. Biliards in Zero-G by molotovjester · · Score: 1

    Biliards in Zero-G

    When you have 3 dimensions to richochet a spherical object around in - it creates many more dimensions of complexity in which there are multiple solutions to get the 'ball in the hole'.

    If you could have 'pockets' of dense and thin atmosphere for the 'ball' to pass through it would make for some interesting velocity considerations.

  105. Re:...'cause many of us are wondering about the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ground. Imagine two people dancing. Now, two people dancing horizontally. Maybe on a cushiony surface to absorb some shock. Now without clothes.

  106. Or worse! by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

    Or worse, www.3musketeers.com

  107. The ultimate geek game, hacky-sack by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    Hacky-space, start with one player upside down compared to the other, to be most similar to college days... One footbag is also little equipment and light. After improving, add other players at odd angles--hands can only be used for stability!

  108. Billiards! by bughunter · · Score: 1
    3D billiards, in a wire cage with holes in the corners and faces, using balls with a high drag/mass ratio, and cues that deliver puffs of air from a bulb at the far end squeezed by the player.

    I have no clue how one would rack in such an arrangement, however. Any ideas?

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  109. Re:...'cause many of us are wondering about the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not very familiar with jerking off while a girl shits on your chest, I can tell...

  110. Re:...'cause many of us are wondering about the... by Boronx · · Score: 1

    There are horizons in Low Earth Orbit after all.

  111. One man juggling by sean4u · · Score: 1

    Just how far away from other massive bodies, and how slowly would you have to throw the balls to get them to go into orbit around you?

  112. SuperBall/Dodge Ball by humbro · · Score: 1

    I can just imagine the fun a person could have with a SuperBall in a zero/low gravity environment. When I was younger my brothers and I would throw them around in the confined space of our hallway, usually resulting in an involuntary game of dodge ball... Hmm, that may not be such a good space game after all. I remember that it got more painful as time went on while we tried to extract revenge on one another for prior erroneous (or intended) throws. And the dodging was rather ineffective too, as the speed increased the probability of dodging an opponents (or your own) ball declined rapidly. The games usually only lasted a few minutes (the amount of time for a game ending injury or game ending mother).

    1. Re:SuperBall/Dodge Ball by humbro · · Score: 1

      Thinking about it a little more I would suggest using a light weight Nerf/Velcro ball for space games. The reduced mass to prevent damage/injuries and to reduce launch cost and the Velcro to help with storage and prevent strays (with all the Velcro they have there already it shouldn't be long before a stray ball gets captured).

      Some of the games with the ball that I can think of could be:
      Dodge Ball.
      'Darts'; using a Velcro target board.
      Hide and Seek/Hide the Thimble.
      Marco-Polo; blindfold a crew member and have them try to tag others with the ball.
      Pranks; stick one to a fellow astronaut or in their sleeping bag.
      Interceptor; like a game of darts but with a moving target.
      Air Soccer/Football; using an air current to guide the ball to the goal (no touching it!).
      Tennis; should be fun trying to guide the ball to it's target with a paddle.
      Miniature Golf; get the ball to a target in as few 'strokes' as possible (a stroke would be having it stick to an obstacle, such as another crew member).
      Zen-Ball; see how long you can make the ball float without touching anything.

  113. Cards? by humbro · · Score: 1

    A deck of cards could be used for many different games, but I have a feeling they would be hard to control in micro gravity. The astronauts would probably be playing '52 card pickup' on a regular basis... Perhaps small magnetic strips in the cards could be enough to hold them in a stack or onto a slightly magnetized surface. However, I suspect a rogue magnet roaming the space station could prove more of a problem than several normal cards running loose. On second thought, forget the magnets, just use a hair tie or scrunchy to tie up cards not in play.

  114. Re:Like the submitter who asked for console-like P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Would this be like joining the 242 mile high club?

  115. Re:...'cause many of us are wondering about the... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
    3D Snooker, Tennis, Squash, Wrestling, Rugby...

    But I think that we can rule out motorsports... Electrical RC helicopters may work - but in a modified design...

    And I think that Boxing is out too... Too messy...

    But it sure would be interesting to take a kitten into space! Only problem would be the toilet... Cats are amazing in their behavior and abilities to get around.

    Anyway - many ball games would work - even if the rules have to be twisted somewhat.

    Velodrome bicycling will have a new meaning...

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  116. Catapult and Foxtrot by buback · · Score: 1

    Why be so strict with the pattern? I'm terrible at math, but I know that there are many many patters that 6 people can form. Just throw the ball around between the 6 of them to establish a pattern for the session. Then all any individual has to do is remember who threw the ball to them and who to throw it to next. It's simple, but if you add more balls, you have to throw and prepare to catch quicker and quicker, with the goal being to keep the flow going for as long as possible. If it's too easy, just add more balls.

    My friends used to play this game in our dorm room. We called it 'catapult' for some reason. It accommodated any number of people and was very simple to understand, so newcomers were easily integrated into the group. There were often mid-air collisions as the streams crossed, and everyone would cry out like it was Jenga or something. It would be perfect for space, as I bet you could form some pretty cool patterns by tossing the balls down corridors and then circling through more open spaces!!

    Also, we often used balled up socks as balls, so astronauts wouldn't need to bring additional balls.

    Speaking of corridors, we also used to play a game in the hallways. We used a klutz product called a Foxtail, which is just a rubber ball with a tail attached. 1 person stood at each end of our hallway, which was maybe 40' long. The goal was to throw the Foxtail and try to get it to hit the wall behind the other player. The trick was that if it hit the wall or ceiling, it lost lots of momentum or ricocheted so it was much easier to block. BTW we threw the ball by holding the end of the tail and swinging it vertically, keeping it low, like waist level, so that when released it arced up from our feet and passed the other player as high as possible. You only got one throw per turn, but the ball often clipped the ground because you were trying to keep it so low to the ground to get the best trajectory. We called this one 'foxtrot.'
    good times, good times.

  117. Have fun with whats around you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Dodge the Gamma Ray" is always a great way to pass the time while in orbit.

  118. 3D pool/billiards/snooker by speculatrix · · Score: 1

    with eight pockets, per corner of cube, plus one in the middle of each wall, 3D pool or billiards or snooker would be pretty tricky game. I think you'd have to relax some of the rules about fouling, and you'd need to wear protection against being hit by a particularly fast ball!

  119. Rugby Scrum by xclr8r · · Score: 1

    1. Have a bunch of bolt on/insert starting blocks (used in track in field) set into the wall/floor/ceiling. Have the two teams form a scrum and see who can be pushed to the other side of the pitch/playfield. This would provide some good resistance for the participants which would help with maintaining bone mass/strength. 2. Harness 2 individuals, have a rope (or bungee if you want to have Jackass the Movie type fun) tied to the back of the harnesses. The playing field is a bunch of bolted in climbing wall holds to the wall. Have the two participants start in the center and climb/crawl to opposite sides of the room and try and drag your opponent with you. With bungie I imagine it would look like 3:16 time frame in this Youtube video if some one were to let go. (may not want to click on this at work) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xaf1dHFRZUU

    --
    Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
  120. My mod points.... by studpuppy · · Score: 1
    Just a question, but if they two replies to my original idea were modded as +5 and +2, shouldn't my original post be modded to at least +7?

    --

    needing all the good karma I can get these days

    --
    The last time I wrote code, it was Morse