Slashdot Mirror


Brain Interface Lets Monkeys Control Prosthetic Limbs

himicos was one of many readers to point out one recent success of scientists working to develop working brain-machine interfaces, writing "A team at the university of Pittsburgh has finally advanced a 2002 technology enough for use in prosthetic limbs, the targeted application all along. Training computer models to the firing patterns of the neurons in the parts of the brain that control motion, they are able to project the intentions of a monkey to a robotic arm, which follows the will of the animal. The sad thing about the articles is that the beauty of the mathematics used to create and train the models is totally ignored." Reader phpmysqldev adds a link to coverage at the BBC, and writes "This of course brings significant hope to amputees and other other people with physical disabilities." (Note that this research has been going on for quite some time.)

208 comments

  1. And just like that... by oahazmatt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Brain Interface Lets Monkeys Control Prosthetic Limbs And just like that, a SciFi channel original movie is conceived.
    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
    1. Re:And just like that... by maxume · · Score: 1

      "Conceived" is an awful strong word for one of those movies.

      Maybe "amorphously blobbed together" or "agglomerated" or something.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:And just like that... by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You reserve the studio in Bulgaria, I'll call Bruce Campbell!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:And just like that... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll call Bruce Campbell!

      Add Glen Campbell and make it 'Monkey Robot Overlords: The Musical!'

    4. Re:And just like that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I notice nobody here gives a toss about the pain and suffering, and terror, that this poor creature has gone through, and all for naught.

      If this technology ever makes it to humans, it will only be after HUMAN experiments are done. Of course, the frauds who call themselves vivisectionists will say that "We couldn't have achieved the human version without first torturing - sorry - 'experimenting' on monkeys", but the first human version will fail, guaranteed. They will be EXPERIMENTING on humans, until they find out what works, as simple as that.

      This bullshit is all over the news because 'those in power' want to normalise these atrocities, and even have the gall to show video of this poor animal being tortured.

      Don't tell me, having invasive brain surgery and electrodes inserted into your brain has no after effects, i.e. PAIN. And I'm sure they just magically found the RIGHT part of the brain to insert the electrodes into, the first time they did it, right? I mean, it's not as if they've tortured hundreds of monkeys with this monstrous violence, in order to find which part of their brains controls their hands, no sirree...

      Perhaps you should ask yourselves - "Why am I incapable of feeling the suffering of others, and why is that not a problem?"

    5. Re:And just like that... by mpeskett · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You'd prefer they started out by sticking electrodes into humans with no idea what they were doing?

      Of course some experimentation will be needed when they move to human subjects, but a monkey's brain is similar enough to ours that they can get a starting point to experiment around, rather than working blind on a human subject.

      One other thing to note, there are no touch/pain receptors within the brain itself - people have brain surgery done while awake so the doctors can keep them talking and know they aren't accidentally removing something important. Once you've got an opening into the skull (which would be done under anaesthetic) you can poke and prod at the brain all you want without the subject feeling a thing.

      Oh, and its on the news because its interesting and something of a step forward scientifically. Quit it with the conspiracy theories please.

    6. Re:And just like that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and all for naught

      Are you insane, or just self righteous and stupid?

    7. Re:And just like that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      "You'd prefer they started out by sticking electrodes into humans with no idea what they were doing?"

      Did you read anything I wrote above?
      I clearly explained why, when this procedure moves onto human beings, it will be in the form of EXPERIMENTS - i.e. are you seriously suggesting that the way to find out which parts of a HUMAN brain to put the electrodes in, is to examine a MONKEY brain? I see you couldn't actually address anything I wrote about the PAIN and SUFFERING the monkeys are going through. I know the brain can't feel anything - so what? Your skull sure as hell can.
      And the fact that people can have brain surgery while awake means we can EASILY do this in human volunteers (i.e. those whose limbs don't work, and want to undergo this procedure), instead of wasting time torturing monkeys.

      And again I ask:
      "Why am I incapable of feeling the suffering of others, and why is that not a problem?"

    8. Re:And just like that... by j_166 · · Score: 1

      "I see that YOU also have no conception of the suffering of others... but don't tell me, you're a wonderful, 'caring' person, right? Because you say so.."

      Get over it, monkeys are like a dime a dozen. And they would do the same to us if they could.

      Also your world view is bizarre. Did you ever consider that maybe the people who did the first artificial heart trials, just maybe, actually VOLUNTEERED for it, knowing full well that they were taking a chance with their lives? Or do you think they just installed the first artificial hearts into random people off the street? Now why do you suppose they would do such a thing? Maybe because they had no other real option at the time and figured they would take a gamble and if they lost and died, at least they were doing their part to advance the state of the art?

      If people like you were in charge, we'd still be living in fricking caves. But its a good thing you aren't in charge, because now we get to have functioning artificial hearts, and in a few more years we are going to get RoboMonkey Wars on Comedy Central. I, for one, can't wait. My money's on Chimpticus-Z9.

    9. Re:And just like that... by susano_otter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A few years ago, a baboon snatched a live human baby, tore open its skull, and ate its brain, in full view of the baby's mother. A source.

      Now, as a strict materialist, I see no reason to think that this baboon does--or should--feel any remorse for its actions. They were clearly the result of mindless evolutionary processes, just like your own feelings about animal experiments. You feel bad because your species' biological evolution compels you to feel bad. With any luck, it will also compel you to feel better, knowing that my own amused disdain for your feelings is also a simple biological compulsion.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    10. Re:And just like that... by j_166 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I still don't get what you are saying. You don't want experiments carried out on humans, because they might die, and you don't want experiments on animals, because its cruel. How then do you suggest we as a society carry out research on the level that leads to neat things like artificial hearts and robotic monkeys (aka prosthetics controlled by your brain)? At some point you're going to have to implant some probes into someone's head. It just can't be done otherwise. Theory only takes you so far.

      "Animal 'research' is a fraud. Which is why we don't have a cure for cancer yet."

      I'm not sure I see the connection between these 2 thoughts. Animal research is a fraud, therefore we don't have a cure for cancer. That just doesn't logically make a coherent argument. Maybe we just have not been able to find a cure for cancer yet because its a very complex problem. What does the cure for cancer have to do with animal research?

      "And why idiots like you still believe that 'AIDS' is caused by 'HIV', and blindly parrot whatever the MSM tells you..."

      OK Dr. Anonymous, tell me, what is AIDS caused by?

    11. Re:And just like that... by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Brain Interface Lets Monkeys Control Prosthetic Limbs
      And just like that, a SciFi channel original movie is conceived. Likewise, both will be used to hurl feces at unsuspecting people.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    12. Re:And just like that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the award goes to: ... The parent anonymous coward for "Most Batshit crazy ignorant raving lunatic psycho of the decade!" CROWD IS WILD!

    13. Re:And just like that... by j_166 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow, you don't have to be such a dick about it. Maybe people would take your insanity a bit more seriously if you weren't so frothing mad about it.

      "When did I ever say I didn't want experiments on humans, or "because they might die"? I don't remember saying either of those things."

      You said "If this technology ever makes it to humans, it will only be after HUMAN experiments are done. Of course, the frauds who call themselves vivisectionists will say that "We couldn't have achieved the human version without first torturing - sorry - 'experimenting' on monkeys", but the first human version will fail, guaranteed. They will be EXPERIMENTING on humans, until they find out what works, as simple as that."

      I drew the conclusion that you were against experiments on both humans and animals because it is the equivalent of torturing both. You your self say "first torturing - sorry - 'experimenting' on monkeys" and then in the same thought "they will be EXPERIMENTING on humans". Was this the wrong conclusion to draw from this paragraph? Perhaps you could provide a little clarification for what you originally meant then.

      "Did you not read the part where I stated "92% of drugs that pass animal 'tests' FAIL human 'clinical trials' (AKA human EXPERIMENTS)"?????

      In what way are 'clinical trials' NOT human experiments?"

      Yeah, I get you are against animal testing for whatever reason. But you consistently link that idea to the idea of human EXPERIMENTS. What am I supposed to think then? Maybe you can work on your paragraph structuring or something. Learn how to link coherent thoughts together?

      "Jesus. Where do I begin? Animal research has been touted as the CURE for all our ills."

      Touted as the CURE for all our ills by whom?

      " You yourself stupidly stated above that if we don't have animal research, we don't have ANY research!""

      No I didn't. I just happen to think that animal research is a very important part of basic science and medicine.

      Man, you are fucking batshit crazy! Hit me with some more of your colorfully worded 'wisdom'. Its entertaining to me.

    14. Re:And just like that... by JCOTTON · · Score: 1
      "...there are no touch/pain receptors within the brain itself - people have brain surgery done while awake so the doctors can keep them talking and know they aren't accidentally removing something important...."
      And when the doctors actually do remove something important, then what? They put it back, maybe?

      sig: "Hello, world"

    15. Re:And just like that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll

    16. Re:And just like that... by m-kirkcaldie · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you're trolling, but the surgeons use weak electrical stimuli to determine whether a particular piece of brain is involved in speech, for example, before cutting anything.

    17. Re:And just like that... by m-kirkcaldie · · Score: 1

      Ever eat meat? Wear leather? Eat an egg? If so, you've sanctioned animal suffering just for the sake of satisfying your hunger or keeping your feet dry. In contrast, this work has direct consequential benefits for people missing limbs or paralysed by spinal cord injury. In addition, your depiction of the experiments as "torture" is an outright lie; even if the experimenters were callous and inhumane, their access to experimental animals is strictly regulated by requiring them to pass stringent approval processes detailing every aspect of the research protocols. The basic assumption of such approvals is that the animals feel pain in the same way that humans do, and therefore all procedures are done under full anaesthesia and analgesia, including post-surgical recovery, exactly as would be done for a human. This is far more care and consideration than is afforded the millions of animals who are killed each year to make hamburgers. Not only are the institutions responsible to the public, ensuring that they impose the most stringent standards imaginable to research, but it also makes sound scientific sense. An animal in distress or pain is not able to behave normally, which is the precise thing the researchers are interested in. If researchers are interested in behaviour, their own studies are better served by taking the utmost care to avoid any pain or suffering. Presumably you've already made up your mind, but I hope you will at least take the time to think about it instead of just reacting with emotive and inaccurate assumptions.

    18. Re:And just like that... by j_166 · · Score: 1

      Monkeys aren't somebodies. They are somethings. So I'm not sure who the 'somebody else' is that you are referring to. Also, the monkey in the video didn't look like it was hurting anyway, so I'm not even sure where you get that from. Care to let us in on that one?

      "Here's another nice question for you: when did you CHOOSE to be born a human, rather than a monkey? How would you stop yourself from being born a monkey? Since you didn't CHOOSE to be born human (nor choose to be born at all), why do you identify with only humans, when you could just as easily have been born a monkey, and therefore have been put through the hell the monkey in the video has been through?"

      Animals are here for our amusement and because they are delicious. That is all. There is nothing sociopathic about it, because they aren't part of society. BECAUSE THEY AREN'T FUCKING HUMAN! I am assuming since you have such grave concern for animals, that you must be a vegetarian, so what about the horrors that you put everyday plants through to continue to live? Why do you only identify with animals and not every living thing? When did you choose not to be born a plant? I guess the answer is: because you're a fucking maniac. But that answers many questions about you.

      "Did you read up on HIV and AIDS yet? Of course not - the TV didn't tell you to..."

      No need to. I'm actually quite familiar with the conspiracy theories around this issue. Sorry to say AIDS is pretty well established as to where it came from and what causes it: It was put here by the british royal reptilians to kill off the homosexuals and drug users so God didn't have to come down here with his 12-gauge and do it his damn self. I'm pretty sure that's what it says on the internet some place anyway.

    19. Re:And just like that... by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      "are you seriously suggesting that the way to find out which parts of a HUMAN brain to put the electrodes in, is to examine a MONKEY brain?"

      Yes. Yes I am. The brain as an organ has evolved incrementally - starting with simple nerve clusters and ganglia in very simple forms of life, then building up to a spinal column, brain stem etc (all just a rudimentary I/O system of stimulus to reaction). They can identify the parts of our brain that also exist in reptiles; the parts for motor control, sensory input, base reactions like fear and etc.

      Monkeys are almost identical to us genetically, their brains astoundingly similar to our own. So yes, we can get a very good idea of where to position an electrode by studying the brain of a monkey. Hell, we'd get a rough idea from the brain of a crocodile - motor control won't have changed massively brain-wise since then. But a monkey is that much easier to avoid being eaten by.

      As I said, the brain can feel no pain. The skull would be operated on under anaesthetic, and presumably they use the same methods on the monkey as a brain surgeon would on a human to prevent any pain for the part of human surgery when the skull is opened. It's not beyond the wit of man to administer some painkillers...

      We couldn't do this straight away on human volunteers because as I said, we would be shooting blind - not even a starting point for where the electrodes should go. I agree it's unfortunate that we have to take these risks on animals first, but it would be far more of an ethical problem if we did it on a human being.

      You seem to be here to pursue an agenda of your own against any kind of animal testing. I can sympathise - I think some uses of animal testing (cosmetics springs to mind as an example) are abhorrent and rightly banned (or if they aren't they should be). But this kind of trial just couldn't be done straight away on a human being.

  2. Gives new meaning to... by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 0

    Get your stinkin paws off me, you damned dirty ape!

    1. Re:Gives new meaning to... by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

      You mean, "Get your stinkin' ROBOTIC paws off me, you damned dirty ape!"

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    2. Re:Gives new meaning to... by beckerist · · Score: 1

      You mean, "Quit thinking of putting your stinkin' ROBOTIC paws ON me, you damned dirty ape!"

  3. Ready for a run chummer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I want my datajack already! I've got essense to burn.

  4. sci-fi pondering by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if/when we invent lightsabers, we should have the robotic limb problem solved. other than that, this should help paralyzed people move again

    --
    If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
    1. Re:sci-fi pondering by somersault · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you merit all scientific advances purely by how much closer they're going to get us to the Star Wars universe? ;) I don't think that lightsaber mishaps are the only type that require the victim to use a prosthetic.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:sci-fi pondering by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 3, Funny

      True. Crashing my X-wing could necessitate one.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    3. Re:sci-fi pondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you merit all scientific advances purely by how much closer they're going to get us to the Star Wars universe? That's a little narrow minded... we also use Star Trek as a reference :)

      I for one, welcome our new Borg... monkeys.
    4. Re:sci-fi pondering by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Or not letting the wookie win. Then you'd need two!

    5. Re:sci-fi pondering by j_166 · · Score: 1

      "Do you merit all scientific advances purely by how much closer they're going to get us to the Star Wars universe?"

      I think the bigger question is "Don't you?"

    6. Re:sci-fi pondering by somersault · · Score: 1

      Oooh, I am not one of you! Shun me!

      Fine. I admit it; I've always wanted a lightsabre.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:sci-fi pondering by j_166 · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, I think Sci-Fi in general is a huge motivator behind alot of the scientific thinking of our time. An idea has to be dreamed first, then visualized, then made real by some obsessive geek who finds a way to build a working Tie Fighter in his basement.

    8. Re:sci-fi pondering by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      No, I rate them by how much closer they get us to the Star Trek universe, of course. It's highly logical.

    9. Re:sci-fi pondering by coren2000 · · Score: 1

      Or not capitalizing Wookie you insensitive clod!

    10. Re:sci-fi pondering by Brieeyebarr · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or misspelling Wookiee, you insensitive clod!

    11. Re:sci-fi pondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      J.K. Rowling took the idea of Voldemort from the same lore as Orochimaru. Really? How do you figure?
  5. Explain the beauty? by _bug_ · · Score: 1

    Would the OP or someone else in the community care to take a moment to explain the beauty of the math for us non math-majors?

    1. Re:Explain the beauty? by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

      Imagine the Mona Lisa...only if were a Paint by Numbers.

    2. Re:Explain the beauty? by kalirion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How would you explain the beauty of a sunset to the blind?

    3. Re:Explain the beauty? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Make them some prosthetic eyes?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Explain the beauty? by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yea that will be a big hit, for the general public. Showing all the math that needs to be done. or Show a picture of a monkey with a robotic arm. Lets face it math is not a spectator sport. To observe the beuity of it you will need to sit down and look at it proove it to yourself then you can admire it. However Most people don't have the time to sit down and follow equations that most mathamatitions follow the old scheme of using Greek symbols as shortcuts to (porposly) make it very difficult to read for non math majors. Heck I have a Math Minor and the symbols require me to look them up, and figuring out in what area the math is used the same symbol can mean different things. A simple example Pi in Geomontry is different then Pi in Statitics. Math is not a spectator sport to appreate its beuity takes time, if you are not intimatly involved with it it gets that much more cryptic.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Explain the beauty? by Creepy · · Score: 1

      I agree - you could have the most beautiful math equations in the world and 99.999% of the population wouldn't give a rip. That includes me, and I minored in math and may even know what they're talking about if I cared enough to read the equations.

      Monkeys with bionic limbs is another story entirely.

    6. Re:Explain the beauty? by hansraj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am amazed at the number of responses being just smug and claiming how you need to do math to appreciate the beauty. Reminds me of a guy doing PhD is Chemistry about effects of certain chiral isomer of nicotine on cancer. His first response when I asked what he worked on was "You won't get it". I am a PhD student in computational geometry and I frequently have to explain my work to relatives who have no idea about geometry. When I pestered the guy that whether or not he can explain his work to a layman reflects his understanding about his work, he agreed to try. Of course I could understand the central part once he replaced the technical name of the molecule with "a chiral isomer of nicotine". I am sure it could have been further simplified as "mirror image molecule of the stuff in tobacco" in case I didn't remember what "chiral" and "nicotine" are.

      On the topic, I am not entirely sure about the exact math used in the said experiment but based on the fact that the link points to the notion of "information content", here is my guess how it should work (at least in principle). I will try just because no one else seems to. Feel free to correct me.

      The state of the neurons of the relevant area of the brain (relevant for the goal in the experiment - say pick marshmallows or open the door) could be modeled as a random variable. The first problem when trying to figure out what a certain electrical activity in brain represents would be to figure out whether you are looking at a random electrical activity (brain doing lots of background work maybe) or some order (brain trying to focus and activate the subroutine for "move hand and open door"). This difference between order and chaos is captured in a neat formula describing the entropy or the information content of the random variable. Naturally, the less the entropy the more the order. I have no idea what possibly goes on after this step.

      In any case, now coming to the "beauty" part. Of course you need an eye to appreciate beauty for the notion is quite subjective. The remarkable thing is that a simple formula captures the vague notion of "order" that we all have. The formula might not be the most beautiful thing because as I understood from the article, the log term is somewhat forced to make sure different things add up nicely. But then, one could think of this very fact (the extra log term) as a neat mathematical representation of the notion that disorder should be able to be combined with another disorder to create something bigger.

      I hope my response is better than "drop whatever you are doing and go do a PhD in math before you can understand the beauty of math".

    7. Re:Explain the beauty? by dezert_fox · · Score: 5, Informative

      Shannon entropy has been a standard tool in data communications for a very long time--telcos use this math to make your phones work. It's effectively a way of quantifying the informational content of a signal, which can be used to determine exactly what kind of bandwidth you need in a bandwidth-limited environment. I'm uncertain what it's used for in the context of a brain-machine interface.
      Any good data communications textbook would have some nice examples in it, and actually that wikipedia article posted is very readable and informative.

    8. Re:Explain the beauty? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      Showing all the math that needs to be done. or Show a picture of a monkey with a robotic arm.
      It's just the same here. Consider:
      • I for one welcome our very hard mathematics doing overlords
      • I for one welcome our new bionic monkey overlords
      In Soviet Russia the same league isn't even in THEM!!!!
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    9. Re:Explain the beauty? by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1
      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    10. Re:Explain the beauty? by somersault · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Didn't say it hadn't, but the colour and resolution on those things isn't going to be much use for watching a sunset :P

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:Explain the beauty? by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right. What's really sad is the number of sighted people who can but simply don't bother.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    12. Re:Explain the beauty? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I've even spent time just watching them in games like Grand Theft Auto, and a nice sunset in Uncharted (although the sun never actually goes down in that scene) - they're pretty good approximations :) The last real sunrise I went to see down at the beach was a bit of a let down, cloud in the way, and the sun was tiiiiny!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    13. Re:Explain the beauty? by Crazyswedishguy · · Score: 1

      Good thing you don't have an English minor, because with that spelling... Beuity? ...seriously?

      "beuity", "proove", "mathamatitions", porposly", "geomontry", "statitics", "appreate", "intimatly"...

      There are jokes about how a thousand monkeys hammering on typewriters for a million years could recreate Shakespeare's whole life's work. Did a thousand monkeys with bionic arms post your comment?

      --
      This space up for sale.
    14. Re:Explain the beauty? by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      math is not a spectator sport

      Then you're doing it wrong.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    15. Re:Explain the beauty? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Then please make a TV show that shows math and have people interested in it. And you need to cover all the topic not just a couple of cool little topics.

      The Nasa channel had a rather good show that covered a lot of highschool math it explained it well and really let people visualize the math... However If I had to choose that or watch Monkeys with robotic arms... Ill choose the monkeys.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    16. Re:Explain the beauty? by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      Heck I have a Math Minor and the symbols require me to look them up... Yikes, that must have been a math minor program with light requirements, because all I see are summation and integral symbols, a few log's and ln's (apologies to the apostrophe Nazis), a trace and a "for all." I looks like a lot of the domain-specific stuff either has a link to a relevant article or is explained in the article itself.

      Of course, for the general public, I agree that including any math at all causes eyes to glaze over and back buttons to be clicked or channels to be changed. :)
      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    17. Re:Explain the beauty? by chipmeister · · Score: 0

      Not sure what entropy has to do with it. I always thought they used time differences in neuron spikes to cluster neurons into groups to predict behavior.

    18. Re:Explain the beauty? by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a guy doing PhD is Chemistry about effects of certain chiral isomer of nicotine on cancer. His first response when I asked what he worked on was "You won't get it". I am a PhD student in computational geometry and I frequently have to explain my work to relatives who have no idea about geometry. When I pestered the guy that whether or not he can explain his work to a layman reflects his understanding about his work, he agreed to try. "If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't really understand it." -- Richard Feynman*

      * Maybe, it seems this quote sometimes gets attributed to Einstein as well.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    19. Re:Explain the beauty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is brain wave analysis, wouldn't the math be based all on frequency analysis and feedback systems. I would think it would be based on signals seen at certain frequencies and if they go above a threshold. I could be way off, I just drive the school bus at the local high school and listen to the kids talk about this stuff.

    20. Re:Explain the beauty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last real sunrise I went to see down at the beach was a bit of a let down, cloud in the way, and the sun was tiiiiny!

      The obvious solution: move to Mercury.

    21. Re:Explain the beauty? by j_166 · · Score: 1

      OK, how about this for a pitch:

      "Debbie Does The Math".

      Episode 1x01: "Addition": Debbie has 2 boobies. In the pilot episode of this ground-breaking series, Debbie finds out how many boobies she would have access to if she got involved in a threeway with Amber and Chrissy.

      Season 2 will explore differential equations, and I don't want to give anything away, but it involves motors, whipped cream, and plenty of latex body mods.

    22. Re:Explain the beauty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please... whoever modded this informative? Shannon entropy has about nothing, nada to do with the marh at hand.

    23. Re:Explain the beauty? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I haven't watched it in a year or two, but "Numbers" "shows math" and I believe gets good enough ratings to have been renewed for another season.

      While people will claim it is as close to reality as CSI is to real crime work, they do (or at least used to) bring some real math into it, though he usually explained it verbally.

    24. Re:Explain the beauty? by coren2000 · · Score: 1

      You say "the sunset is really beautiful."

    25. Re:Explain the beauty? by lawn.ninja · · Score: 1

      would you test them on a monkey first?

    26. Re:Explain the beauty? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Would you try and explain the beauty of a sunset to a monkey? Does this monkey have no eyes?

      --
      which is totally what she said
  6. Forget Replacement Limbs... by crymeph0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about custom appendages? If the brain can be trained to independently control a new arm, why couldn't it learn to control a genuine Doctor Octopus suit?

    --
    It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.
    1. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by PachmanP · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about custom appendages? If the brain can be trained to independently control a new arm, why couldn't it learn to control a genuine Doctor Octopus suit?
      Speaking from experience, it is because the grant money is better. If you say you need money to research brain/machine interfaces for prothetic limbs to help disabled people, you are more likely to get it than when you say you need the research to give yourself/your_cyborg_army superhuman appendages to be used for world domination.
      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    2. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that make them spider monkeys?

    3. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by crymeph0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fair enough, but can't this research be directly applied to my one-man-cyborg-army-of-the-apocalypse idea, even though that's not the PR angle they're going for?

      Once this technology advances to the stage where we can get genuine Darth Vader(tm) brand prosthetics after our various lightsaber mishaps, I'm just hoping that some entrepreneurial young Doctor will implant the control chips in perfectly healthy people for a fee, which you could then hook to the hardware of your choice. Of course, this may have to take place in a third world country where the FDA doesn't hold back novel ideas just because they aren't "medically necessary", or because it's an "abomination before God", or some such drivel.

      --
      It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.
    4. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because then you'd also need to research a special device that keeps the mechanical arms from taking over your brain.

    5. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by schmu_20mol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because the prosthetic is controlled by the very neurons which are normally used to control the monkeys now restrained arm. The research focused on using already 'trained' and known neurons within the brain and how to interface them with a prosthetic. Afaik, there's currently no research going on about using 'unnatural' or to the brain formerly unknown limbs.

      --
      "Nae Kin! Nae Quin! Nae laird! Nae master! We willna be fooled again!"
    6. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by khayman80 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I would imagine the mental map we have of our bodies has four limbs. This would mean that, for purposes of sensation, motor control and proprioception, we can't operate more than four limbs at once. Why would we evolve the ability to control limbs that we don't even have? I mean, brains are flexible, but I would guess that trying to push the "body control/sensation/proprioception" map past four limbs may have some unintended (and possibly bad) consequences.

      An alternative might be the use muscles in the face to control extra limbs. Frowning would perform one action with the prosthetics, smiling another, etc. But this would be considerably more clumsy than the intended use- replacing a limb that doesn't exist on the physical body, but does have a designated place in the brain that controls it.

    7. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Fumus · · Score: 1

      Just say that by using this you can fight teh terrists!

    8. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Dusty00 · · Score: 1

      Aside from the grant money the idea of making additional cybernetics is a more difficult one. With prosthetic limbs the idea is to detect the neurological activity associated with executing a task one's nervous system is trained to do. For lack of a better term, the nervous systems base instruction set is insufficient to control limb it doesn't have.

    9. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by DrHackenbush · · Score: 1

      Maybe but you would need at least eight monkeys at all times to help you run it. Come to think of it, eight monkeys and an octopus suit sounds like the basis for a great party.

    10. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The mental map can easily be extended, however controlling them simultaneously could be extraordinarely hard to learn - you'd learn quickly to operate any extra limb because of the mental map, but the synchronity of the limbs would be built on the idea of four limbs.

      Which, ironically, would be easier to learn if you were born quadraplegic.

      I, for one, welcome our new previously-quadraplegic cyborg overlords.

    11. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by crymeph0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But in this case, the monkey was trained to use the robotic arm not as a replacement for a missing arm, but as an entirely new arm. That is, even though the apparatus was similar to an existing limb, the brain still had to learn to control a brand new limb independently from the old ones. If nothing else, this means we can give ourselves at least a third arm, and probably more. The brain is fairly malleable, and I bet with training, we could adapt ourselves to a wide variety of "appendage upgrades".

      Of course, because of the "abomination before God" factor, nobody in the medical establishment will ask this question officially for years, if ever. But I'm sure some geek amputee will start playing around with modding his new arm/leg/ear, and if he doesn't turn into a bloodthirsty cyborg, or get lynched by fundamentalists, he'll become very rich and famous by enabling us to reach way beyond what we thought our full potential was.

      --
      It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.
    12. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by street+struttin' · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Speaking from experience, it is because the grant money is better. If you say you need money to research brain/machine interfaces for prothetic limbs to help disabled people, you are more likely to get it than when you say you need the research to give yourself/your_cyborg_army superhuman appendages to be used for world domination. You have GOT to be kidding! Getting government grants to find military applications for otherwise harmless things is a staple of the defense program. If you have an answer to "How many Commies/Terrorists can it kill", you've got grant money.

      So go ahead and build your cybernetic superhumans to do your bidding, but you might have to sign a contract that says you'll do the bidding of the US government, too.
    13. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by BattleApple · · Score: 2, Funny

      You may be on to something. I've been trying to gain control of my third leg for years, but it seems to have a mind of its own.

    14. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I might be recalling this incorrectly, but I think it was even shown a while back that most tool use comes about by this mechanism. Basically our mind remapping external objects into our body interaction.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    15. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you consider the fact that you can fairly easily learn to use tools that pretty much work as an extension of yourself, I'd say that learning how to use an extra limb should not be a problem for our brain.

      I imagine it'd take a long time learning how to use it, though.

    16. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by pluther · · Score: 3, Funny

      So go ahead and build your cybernetic superhumans to do your bidding, but you might have to sign a contract that says you'll do the bidding of the US government, too.

      Sure, go ahead and sign the contract.

      Just remember that when all's said and done, you're the one with the army of cyborg supersoldiers.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    17. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Military Contractors would have a field day with this.

      1. Spin it as a military application
      2. Profit!!

    18. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Crazyswedishguy · · Score: 1

      Too bad your prosthetic leg is running Windows and you have to "reboot" it every few hours.

      Let's not even talk about the viruses.

      --
      This space up for sale.
    19. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Atriqus · · Score: 1

      Well, that really depends on who your target donors are.

      --
      Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    20. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Rigbyd · · Score: 1

      While at the moment I certainly can't give links, but off the top of my head I remember reading an article or two that indicated that the brain was flexible enough to learn to adapt to new forms of stimulus. The one study I do remember is them placing a belt on the test subjects that indicated which direction was north at all times through vibration. Plus, if you look closely at the video, I'm pretty sure the monkey has all it's limbs. That would seem to indicate it's learned to control a new limb.

    21. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Children with syndactilism show one area of touch sense. Now after surgery to separate fingers, their areas change, to have support for the five fingers.
      The brain is that plastic: It doesn't know how much fingers we have: It knows we do have fingers.

    22. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Atriqus · · Score: 1

      It all comes down to practice. Most people practice walking and using their arms for basic operations on a daily basis. But not all of us can perform a Joe Morello drum solo (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsKq3HD0EFc). But if you practice using those limbs enough, it could become 2nd nature.

      --
      Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    23. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      Speaking from experience

      If you really do have experience on the differences between applying for grants "to research brain/machine interfaces for prothetic (sp) limbs to help disabled people" and grants "to give yourself/your_cyborg_army superhuman appendages to be used for world domination" then you must also have experience walking with a 20 pound scrotum swinging between your legs.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    24. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a good idea... I've always wanted multiple penises...

    25. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You are forgetting that not a long time a go we had tails. In fact, we all have something left of it. Why would you think that our brain can not map a fifth limb anymore?

    26. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An alternative might be the use muscles in the face to control extra limbs.

      Damn. There goes the statement about "When someone pisses you off, it takes 43 muscles to frown - but only 4 muscles to bitch-slap 'em across the room."

    27. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by someone300 · · Score: 1

      I propose we go a step further: forget real world appendages entirely. Lets go virtual appendages. If we can figure out how to translate thoughts into movement, assumably we could disable the actual arm's ability to move and feel with anaesthetic or something. All we need then is some sort of method for communicating sensory data back into the brain from the computer. Obviously that's not as easy done as said, but still... I hope it's possible.

      One step closer to being able to shed this shitty world and move into a virtual house with an 750GB cupboard full of old records that are invulnerable to damage and fully indexed. :)

      It'd could be like the device on that American Dad episode.. "Vacation Goo".

    28. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      So you weren't going for DoD money?

    29. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would imagine the mental map we have of our bodies has four limbs. This would mean that, for purposes of sensation, motor control and proprioception, we can't operate more than four limbs at once. Why would we evolve the ability to control limbs that we don't even have? I mean, brains are flexible, but I would guess that trying to push the "body control/sensation/proprioception" map past four limbs may have some unintended (and possibly bad) consequences.

      Personally, I see this problem as more the case that we've only been conditioned to handle that many limbs over years of experience versus any sort of hard limit being imposed. (Not to mention it kind of runs across the grain of that whole "evolution" thing being needlessly debated...)

      There have been numerous examples demonstrating that our brains are not only highly adaptive to new situations (such as the brain redistributing certain functions to different areas to overcome damaged areas), but are also highly receptive to new forms of input from external sources (such as invasive probing of the brain to create crude brain-to-computer interfaces to control simple devices, such as an on-screen cursor.)

      The larger issue is really more of a case of creating a proper and convenient interface for cyborg-like add-ons. For example, do we necessarily have to invade the brain directly, or can we simply use existing connections by connecting jumper cables to the nerves running down the spine. And if that isn't an option, can we create or add extra, custom nerve sets to the spine and create connections to the brain that way?

      Considering all that, a "third arm", or similar contraption is probably within the realm of possibility, but it may take time to adapt to and fine tune the system before it becomes effortless (or closer to that) to use. It's actually not all that dissimilar to the steps you have to go through for setting up a decent voice recognition system.

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
    30. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 1

      For some reason I get the feeling that they weren't trying to implant a new arm, but rather that it would've been considered cruel to cut off a monkey's healthy arm before the experiment.

      But maybe I'm just being cynical about red tape in research.

    31. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 1

      I would imagine the mental map we have of our bodies has four limbs. Are you sure you don't have a tail still stuck somewhere in your motor cortex?

      Come to think of it, a tail would be kind of useful every once in a while.
    32. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can easily create thoughts which would encompass the control of extra limbs, the tool works off of thoughts, why would that not work?

    33. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by HandleMyBidness · · Score: 1

      I would imagine the mental map we have of our bodies has four limbs. You have 10 fingers, 10 toes (or 8 and thumbs). If you wanted a simple pincher on the end of each appendage I don't see how limb control would be your bottleneck.
    34. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by acheron12 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. One would hope that for replacement limbs, they'd connect directly to the severed nerves rather than requiring brain implants. Once you have the implant, you might as well add extra arms, a back scratcher, a coffee machine...

      --
      there is no god but truth, and reality is its prophet
    35. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by Jaazaniah · · Score: 1

      Good point, if this technology is tuned to listen to those control centers, any applicable use for extra limbs would have to be trained into those centers and mimic the formating for movement of existing limbs, something that may be difficult even for introspectives.

      But, here's a thought for you; exo-suits. Why try to take over the world with a clumsy set of limbs you've only had 2 years practice with when you could gain current your dexterity inside an alloyed plated exo-suit and basically gain the servo and dermal strength with little to no loss? The drawback, of course, is now we need a 3 inch arc reactor.

    36. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... by TheLink · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "This would mean that, for purposes of sensation, motor control and proprioception, we can't operate more than four limbs at once."

      I'm sure that's wrong.

      We extend our mental maps to include vehicles, devices and tools that we operate on a regular basis. Believe me, some of us even feel pain when we ding our car on something. Some even feel pain if they get shot in a video game.

      The fact that many people can be trained to see with their _tongue_ means the brain is very adaptable.

      The Seeing Tongue:
      http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1200/is_9_160/ai_78681631

      Just because you start seeing with your tongue does not mean you lose sight in your eyes. So I do not believe that we are limited to controlling 4 limbs. When people use a tool they are skilled in, that tool becomes an extension of their body - and it does not even have to be physically connected to their body - ask people who do stunts with RC helicopters, or play FPS/RTS games.

      Once you practice enough, it becomes learnt and integrated into your brain, you no longer think "Ah I must press this to do X", you just think "I need to go here" and you do whatever it takes to get it done.

      A skilled typist does not think of each key stroke independently, the typist just thinks of the phrase (or sees stuff to type) and all the 8 fingers and 2 thumbs get it done. So controlling more than 4 limbs shouldn't be a huge problem.

      However, just like when you concentrate on something a lot, say drawing an intricate design, you may lose awareness of what's going on with your little toe (until something significant happens to it, or even is about to happen to it - incoming object via peripheral vision - in which case the rest of your brain brings it to your attention).

      --
  7. Adapting the technology by utnapistim · · Score: 4, Funny

    So ... I realize that this will ultimately be adapted to humans, but could it be adapted to something else?

    Specifically, I'm thinking of adapting a laser prosthetic arm, to be used by the poor, armless sharks ...

    It's just an idea ...

    --
    Tie two birds together: although they have four wings, they cannot fly. (The blind man)
    1. Re:Adapting the technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So ... I realize that this will ultimately be adapted to humans, but could it be adapted to something else?

      Specifically, I'm thinking of adapting a laser prosthetic arm, to be used by the poor, armless sharks ... You're worried about the sharks? I'm just stoked that in a few years I'll be able to type with two hands again =)
    2. Re:Adapting the technology by Yogiz · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm just stoked that in a few years I'll be able to type with two hands again =) And I with four.
    3. Re:Adapting the technology by aug24 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, no.

      The poor, armless sharks are also poor, arm-controlling-neuron-less sharks.

      They will just have to make do with traditional head-mounted lasers.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    4. Re:Adapting the technology by kitgerrits · · Score: 1
      --
      "I was in love with a beautiful blonde once, dear. She drove me to drink. It's the one thing I am indebted to her for."
    5. Re:Adapting the technology by hansraj · · Score: 1

      Soon if you tell someone that you are typing with two hands, they would scream and think of you as a pervert.

      I can't begin to imagine the shock if someone says they are typing with just one then.

  8. Other other... by Taibhsear · · Score: 2, Funny

    This of course brings significant hope to amputees and other other Mad Scientists Fixed that for you.
  9. PLEASE tell me it makes them type faster by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've got 1,000 of these smelly bastards sitting in a room full of typewriters, and NOT ONE of them has produced the works of Shakespeare yet.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:PLEASE tell me it makes them type faster by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful
      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:PLEASE tell me it makes them type faster by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Pray for Mojo.

    3. Re:PLEASE tell me it makes them type faster by mazarin5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      But for some reason, the bionic monkeys seem to produce "Kill all humans" an unexpectedly large amount of the time.

      --
      Fnord.
  10. monkeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    if i were unfortunate enough to be an amputee, i would not like a monkey to be operating my prosthetic limbs.

    1. Re:monkeys by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If you allow for genetic drift, there's no difference.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  11. Of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This of course brings significant hope to amputees and other other people with physical disabilities.

    Yes, if you are depressed because you can't walk, you can now be cheered up by watching cybermonkeys fling faeces at each other with ever greater velocity!

  12. Other X-creatures by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's nothing, I know tons of girls like Rogue, that can steal your powers by touching you.

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Other X-creatures by Inda · · Score: 3, Funny

      How many more times..? It's not stealing, it's copyright infringement.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:Other X-creatures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing, I know tons of girls like Rogue, that can steal your powers by touching you. "That's nothing, I know tons of girls like Rogue, that can steal your "MONEY" by touching you."

      There I corrected your typo.
    3. Re:Other X-creatures by genner · · Score: 1

      I know a few more that make you loose conciousness when you touch them.

  13. hope to amputees by Paul+Rose · · Score: 5, Funny

    >>This of course brings significant hope to amputees
    As long as they don't mind carrying a monkey to control their prosthetic arm...

  14. So will that mean by poeidon1 · · Score: 1

    that my (special) hands can work for me while I am on a vacation?

    --
    They called me mad, and I called them mad, and damn them, they outvoted me. -Nathaniel Lee
  15. Daily Planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So many science stories on /. appeared months ago on Daily planet (www.discoverychannel.ca/dailyplanet). Since people here are clearly incapable of reading an article, maybe people should watch the show and then be ready to discuss the story when it appears here (without even reading the article).

  16. No typing required! by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now the infinite number of monkeys will only need to *think* about Hamlet.

  17. OnTopic? by tezza · · Score: 1

    Monkeys, mind-control, robots, maths and electronics

    -- just what is this doing on Slashdot?

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
    1. Re:OnTopic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of those five is not awesome?

  18. PITA! by AltGrendel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This is the kind of research they want to stop.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:PITA! by Jor-Al · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why does a piece of flatbread want this research to stop?

    2. Re:PITA! by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2, Funny

      PITA is a bread?! I thought it was an acronym describing my wife. She sure does love the monkeys

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  19. Monkey's opinion by nategoose · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The monkey in the pictures had his own arms restrained within tubes so that he/she would be forced to use the mechanical arm in order to get the marshmallow, and the mechanical arm isn't oriented so that the monkey could possibly mistake it for his/her own arm. I can't help but wonder what the monkey's opinion of all this is. It's got to be more than a little confusing.

    1. Re:Monkey's opinion by maxume · · Score: 1

      Clearly, it likes marshmallows.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Monkey's opinion by nategoose · · Score: 5, Funny

      He/she might be thinking "I wish this @#$@ing robot arm thing would quit stuffing those @%#$ed marshmallows in my mouth!"

    3. Re:Monkey's opinion by Jor-Al · · Score: 1

      So monkeys think in the voice of Sam Jackson?

    4. Re:Monkey's opinion by street+struttin' · · Score: 2, Informative

      He/she might be thinking "I wish this @#$@ing robot arm thing would quit stuffing those @%#$ed marshmallows in my mouth!" I'd think it'd be more like The Terminal Man. In it, they discuss the addiction to the stimulation. If you could have a marshmallow whenever you wanted (a good thing) just by thinking about it, eventually you'd just never stop thinking about it.
  20. Almost by speroni · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Almost in time for our war with largest incident of severed limbs due to IED's.

    I knew a guy in college who was working in this field. He went on to do master's work at Cornell. Incidentally he had no arms.

    This will be great to improve the standard of living for many of the returning soldiers.

    --
    Eschew Obfuscation
    1. Re:Almost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hemingway wrote a novel about that 80 years ago.

    2. Re:Almost by pizzach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This will be great to improve the standard of living for many of the returning soldiers.

      You would be surprised how people adapt. For many amputees this is a non-issue, and they move on. The key is time and the correct mental attitude.

      I have a prostetic leg, but I like my crutches. I'm agile on my crutches. I can do interesting things on my crutches I can't with a real leg. If I had to choose between my artificial leg and crutches, there is a good chance I would choose my crutches.

      If you look at a person who has an amputated arm, if they go for a prosthesis it is often "the hook." It's because it's a damn lot more useful than a robotic arm. It feels like it is an extension of their body because they can count on it and have direct control. There are no battery, motor, or sensitivity problems.

      The people who more often get most hung up on these ideas of helping amputees be 'normal' again are the non-amputees. It's a visual thing that I think actually times make the problem worse. I want to punch anyone who brings up grafting donor appendages. I really do.

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    3. Re:Almost by speroni · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as normal. That being said being an amputee doesn't make you not "normal".

      The robotic arm technology is still in development. I've seen some shows about the robotic arms and they still look really clunky so I can see where you are coming from. I imagine if the technology gets good enough then there will be people who would like it. Probably people who have the opportunity to access the option early on, before getting used to other options.

      My friend in college with no arms, sometimes he'd wear one of the hooks, sometimes two, sometimes none. At the same time he was studying bio-mechanics so he could come up with a better prosthesis.

      *Braces for Punch* Out of curiosity, apart from the obvious medical complications such as rejection, what would be the problem with grafting a limb if someone wants it?

      --
      Eschew Obfuscation
    4. Re:Almost by pizzach · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, apart from the obvious medical complications such as rejection, what would be the problem with grafting a limb if someone wants it? Unlike an internal organ, it's something that's outwardly obvious that it isn't part of your own body. It'll have different skin color, hair texture, size, shape, and smell than that of your own body. Plus you'll be in constant fear of your body rejecting it, meaning you would have to get used to another person's arm. I also can't help but think having random arms grafted to your body would have to have some kind of strange psychological effects. If you're growing, I can't help but think some strange complications might pop up with maligning tissue/bone.

      My friend in college with no arms, sometimes he'd wear one of the hooks, sometimes two, sometimes none. At the same time he was studying bio-mechanics so he could come up with a better prosthesis.

      The problem with most prosthetics is that they only sort of work. While in some situations they are helpful, in others they are down right in the way. The advances that they have made are nice, but until some of the inherant problems are gone, things like crutches and hooks are probably going to still take first place for a lot of people. The two major issues would be comfort and control.

      An example of comfort is that I don't feel like I can stand or sit relaxed with my prosthetic leg. Something is always poking somewhere uncomfortably, and standing takes more energy and concentration than it should. I can't sit with my legs crossed. I can't sit in the Japanese seiza position. I can't wear your prosthesis all of the time, because of sweat and grim build up. It feels disgusting and slimy in the socket.

      Control wise, the more complicated the prosthetic limb is the less you can feel in control of it. That is where the bio-mechanics are coming in and they will help. But right now we have a bastard child where the CPU's of these limbs are trying to guess what they should be doing instead of the human. There are other problems concerning leverage too, here the amputee's stumps are not long enough to exert the force they want. The shorter the amputee's stumps are, the more likely they will reject using an artificial limb. The fact that the prosthesis is not directly connected to your bone also negitively effects control.

      While technology is improving, I still haven't gotten the feeling that any of it is a clear improvement. I just try to use the right tool for the right job. When biking, skating, or rollerblading I wear my artificial leg, but when skiing, sitting for a long time, or walking around the house I tend to use crutches. I use either or when walking on nails, coals. In the end this may all be just stop-gap solution until organ cloning becomes possible.

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    5. Re:Almost by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I think the other thing with transplants is you also get their stem cells.

      The stem cells move around. Depending on what happens it could be more of a merger than an acquisition.

      So if they are prone to cancer you might get cancer too.

      Some people suspect that you might even get some personality changes. I won't be surprised if some of it is true - since the stomach and other organs are likely to have some influence over what you like to eat (after millions of years, animals should be more likely to eat what their organs feel like having).

      The main problem with prosthetic limbs is probably bandwidth and latency in the human-device interfaces. Once you get a way of talking with the brain fast things should improve drastically.

      It may require a more direct connection to the brain. So you might be controlling your prosthetic leg, but not via the nerves on your leg, but via a connection straight to your brain.

      You can move about in a computer game without using the nerves in your leg. So in my opinion prosthetic legs do not need to be controlled by leg nerves.

      I do think that some computer processing is needed (no point having your brain doing the stuff that can be automated), but I also think that for some humans their brains might be able to adapt well enough for a more direct and thus full control (say in event the prosthetic limb is damaged, you might wish to improvise - rather than move like an insect with broken limbs - insect limbs seem a bit more automated).

      --
    6. Re:Almost by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. My dad lost both his hands when he was a kid. He doesn't bother with those fake arms with hooks on them. He has had a couple of sets made up over the years, but they were never good enough. Now he's 50-ish and the most complicated artificial limb he uses is a pen, and that's only when he's typing. Oh, and he's a very successful software developer.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  21. When servicing the equipment... by cruff · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget to always mount a scratch monkey.

  22. what about the monkeys? by tjstork · · Score: 1

    I'm hardly an animal rights advocate, but has anyone stopped to ask what sort of ethics has us cracking open a monkey's head to perform these experiments?

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:what about the monkeys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      cracking open a monkey's head to perform these experiments?
      Mmmm, tasty monkey brain.
    2. Re:what about the monkeys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you volunteering to replace them?

  23. Not impressed. by JoeD · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get back to me when they can use the robotic arm to fling poo.

    1. Re:Not impressed. by alxkit · · Score: 0

      they already do: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadarm. they are not using it to its full potential though.

      just imagine: flaming poo from the sky coming at you at 3000 mph!

    2. Re:Not impressed. by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering when the monkeys will learn to use their new arm to, you know, -ahem- spank the monkey. (poor things ... locked alone in cages ... arms immobilized ... a monkey's gotta do SOMETHING to relieve the er, boredom, right?)

      On a separate note, when can I get my cyborg-enhanced trunkmonkey> ?

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  24. Angelic Layer. by Shinmizu · · Score: 1

    Sweet, that's a definite big step. So, when can we start having Angelic Layer tournaments? (For the likely great number of you unfamiliar with the series, imagine "mentally controlled kung-fu action figures." Sure as hell beats Magic: The Gathering and Halo tournaments.)

    1. Re:Angelic Layer. by VickiM · · Score: 1

      We can start having tournements when we find enough people with self-esteem issues that like to yell them at each other in the middle of a crowded stadium.

    2. Re:Angelic Layer. by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

      I would personally love to see some sort of Angelic Layer type implementation, even as video game using neural input. This is probably closer to the realm of The Sims, only with more far-reaching philosophical implications. (Such as, "can a virtual being be considered human if it's driven entirely by a human brain?", among other such questions.)

      In some sense, it almost enters Ghost in the Shell territory.

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
  25. OMG Old! by ggalvao · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Miguel Nicolelis is doing this kind of job and seems to be much more advanced. http://www.thinkartificial.org/machine-interfaces/monkey-brain-makes-robot-walk/ He actually made a monkey in the US control a robot in Japan by walking on a treadmill. The monkey had a screen showing the robot. After realizing that she (the monkey) could actually move the robot by thinking, she developed in her brain something that enabled her to control the robot and not have to walk herself. Thus, she could earn the rewards and not have to spend her energy. Very interesting stuff.

  26. How long until.... ? by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

    How long until one of these monkeys kills the scientists with his robotic arm, in retaliation for them removing his perfectly good arm?

    --
    Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    1. Re:How long until.... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apeaggedon.

    2. Re:How long until.... ? by 117 · · Score: 4, Funny

      How long until one of these monkeys kills the scientists with his robotic arm, in retaliation for them removing his perfectly good arm? If they keep interrupting me whilst I'm trying to post on /. , then not much longer....
    3. Re:How long until.... ? by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      No worries, they're completely (h)armless.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  27. Whatever happened to.. by RevWaldo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the early 80s there was major buzz about using computers to restore movement to people paralyzed by spinal injuries. In a nutshell, a computer would send properly sequenced jolts to the person's leg muscles, enabling them to walk. In tests this more or less worked. The electronics at the time were too big to make it practical but the hope was that in the future (now) computers would be portable and powerful enough to do the job. I recall a number of hopeful reports on "60 Minutes" regarding this research, and even a TV movie about the researcher leading the effort. But all this seems to have fallen off the radar.

    Anyone have the straight dope on this research? Because if it does work it stands to reason that if a person could control an artificial limb with their thoughts controlling real limbs would also be possible.

    1. Re:Whatever happened to.. by Molochi · · Score: 2, Informative

      As I recall, direct electrical stimulation, eventually killed the nuerons. Though I don't know why they couldn't eventually have a mechanical-to-biological interface that duplicated the natural one non destructiveness.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    2. Re:Whatever happened to.. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Informative

      >Though I don't know why they couldn't eventually have a mechanical-to-biological interface that duplicated the natural one non destructiveness.

      That's a difficult engineering problem because it's a complicated chemical process. Nerves talk along their length by depolarization, which is essentially an electrochemical process. A nerve pumps sodium and potassium ions in opposite directions across its cell membrane to form a gradient -- think potential energy, like an anvil sitting on a table -- and when they propagate a signal along themselves, they open pores and let diffusion happen so the gradient vanishes. That signals adjacent pores to do the same thing. (A side-note: nerves are covered with something called a myelin sheath, a cell that is wrapped around like a scroll, to minimize the volume of liquid outside the nerve so it doesn't have to pump as hard to get a good gradient. Many neurodegenerative diseases, like MS, involve this sheathing cell to break down. It's not insulation, but it's sort of related.)
      But when nerves talk to each other, they do so across synaptic membranes, which are points where the nerves are almost in contact, separated by a narrow cleft. One nerve extrudes a bunch of bubbles of protein, filled with neurotransmitters, which diffuses across the cleft and joins/merges with the other nerve. At that point, as the bubble merges, it basically bursts, dumping all the neurotransmitters into the other nerve and starting it depolarizing in that area, which then propagates down the nerve.
      Neither of the processes -- depolarization or neurotransmitter diffusion -- are easily built by anything we can create. We can simulate depolarization by abusing the nerve (there is an electrical field that changes as the sodium and potassium flow back to their baseline concentrations) but that's apparently not good for the nerve in the long-term.
      (I may be wrong in some of the details: it's been fifteen years since I took neurobiology courses.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  28. So let me... by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

    (Brain Interface Lets Monkeys Control Prosthetic Limbs) + (New Robots Developed to Climb Walls) + (U.S. Plan for "Thinking Machines" Repository)

    *sigh*

    I, for one, welcome our new U.S. monkey brain controlled wall climbing robotic thinking machine overlords.

    This isn't as easy as it used to be...

  29. Still a long way to go by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    Clumsy movements at best. The monkey grabs the marshmallow by moving its head instead of really using its prosthesis. It looks like it has only one degree of freedom. Still, a good achievement but nowhere near what is needed for a tree cyborg body :-)

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    1. Re:Still a long way to go by CanadianRealist · · Score: 1

      I think that you are being a bit too negative. Look at the large images and go back and forth between images 3 through 5 a few times. The monkey barely moves his head compared to how much the arm moves. Without being able to move the arm, the monkey would never get the marshmallow.

      As for the question of degrees of freedom, I was trying to figure that out but it's hard to say. It looks like there could be both "shoulder" and "elbow" joints, but it's not clear. However looking at images 2 and 3, the fingers definitely close to grab the marshmallow. Does that count?

      "tree cyborg body"?
      Unless that's a typo, that would seem to be pretty simple since all I would expect of a tree cyborg is for it to sit there and do nothing. I think even I could manage to build something like that.

  30. Re:God hates amputees... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That's why humans are making this instead of leaving it up to God.

  31. At last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The perfect butler!

  32. Not very practical... by stilltron · · Score: 1

    How are we going to attach a monkey with robot a robot arm to our torsos?

  33. not for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't want a monkey brain to control *my* prothetic limb!

  34. ball moving by alxkit · · Score: 0

    "In experiments published in the June 7 issue of the journal Science, monkeys were able to move balls around in 3D space on a computer screen just by thinking about it"

    i can move balls around in 3d space just by thinking about stuff, too. don't ask "what" stuff - that's a trade secret. ok, ok.. i'll give you a hint: it rhymes with prom and born.

  35. A++ WOULD LOL AGAIN by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 0, Troll

    This post totally made my morning. I salute you!

  36. This was already done. by Universal+Indicator · · Score: 1

    This was already done in 2001 (the year, not the movie): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1ZGIrNf71Q

  37. It's been done by tom17 · · Score: 1

    They used a monkey controlling prosthetic human limbs before.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YB08leFMRnM

  38. obligatory... by NotYoMama · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new Robotic Arm Poo-Flinging Monkey Overlords

  39. Great idea! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Real-life tentacle hentai may finally be made possible!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  40. The Next Step? by camperdave · · Score: 1

    I have no idea what possibly goes on after this step.

    I don't know what would go after this step either, but the one after that would be Profit!!!

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  41. This is only phase one complete... by Upaut · · Score: 1

    Phase two will end up something like this: http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39133

    --
    3 degrees of separation from Vladimir Putin
  42. Is this what people want? by ebcdic · · Score: 1

    I think that if I had a prosthetic limb I'd be very wary of letting monkeys control it.

  43. Best use by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    Quick! Attach one to a dog so he can finally make a fist!!!

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  44. This is "old" news by ittybad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw this technology on a video on either TLC or Discovery SEVERAL years ago. The monkey could move a robotic arm with its brain waves. Old news. On the same episode, they showed a fella moving a cursor on a computer screen with the same technique. Also cool, on that episode, was a prosthetic leg for a guy who had his amputated above the knee. They bolted a titanium socket into his femur that protruded out of the bottom of his "nub" that could "jack" into the prosthetic knee and leg. He could, in some fashion, sense touch on the prosthetic (vibrations or something up into his real leg).

    --
    No single raindrop believes it is to blame for the flood.
  45. But But... by IdeaMan · · Score: 1

    it's for FIGHTING TERRORISM!

    Surely that's good for a coupla hundred mil. Just making IED detecting appendages should double that figure.

    --
    They ARE out to get you simply because They are in it for themselves and they don't care about you.
  46. The videos are fun but the science is awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Anyone have the straight dope on this research? Because if it does work it stands to reason that if a person could control an artificial limb with their thoughts controlling real limbs would also be possible. I work directly in this field and can tell that the science underlying this work is actively looked down upon and has been largely rejected. What remains are some 'neat' videos that do not shed much light on how the brain actually controls movement, if anything, it actively obscures reality. In the long-term, technology based on this science is going nowhere.

    A common argument is that although scientifically questionable, such devices pose an interesting engineering problem that has a very useful purpose (i.e. helping paralyzed people). That is fine, but if you ask a paralyzed person, what they want is to control their bowels, blatter and sexual function far more than their arms.
  47. Plasticity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's only one problem with their approach: you can't leave the electrodes in long-term. Scar tissue forms after a few weeks, and then it's surgery time.

    Non-invasive approaches are where the big money is.

  48. Re:sci-fi pondering .... Sounds like.... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    "Monkey Business" to me.

    This might be useful to the men who have been "Lorena Bobbitized". Any man who has been or will be 'Lorena Bobbitized' can be outfitted with this '*ickhead apparatus' and be forgiven for using one head to MANipulate, make CONgress and PROgresr with his lower brain, and in his case, scex will no longer be a 'no-brainer'... ...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  49. Re:The Next Step? At the risk of "redundant"... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    What comes after this, after "Profit", is well... umm,

    # MONKEY BUSINESS...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  50. Re:Forget Replacement Limbs... What? No Donkey by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Kong Army?

    As for another post "How about custom appendages? If the brain can be trained to independently control a new arm, why couldn't it learn to control a genuine Doctor Octopus suit?".... I'm going out on a LIMB here.... But...

    Is that headed toward Dr. StrangeLove, or Dr. StrangeGlove?....

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  51. Damn....another monkey on my back.... by bodland · · Score: 1

    I guess I should of quit smoking when I lost my arm...

  52. At least it'll be better than the alternative.... by rpbird · · Score: 1

    ..."Robotic Arm Controls Monkey Brain."

  53. Prosthetics Don't Have to be Replacements by rdmiller3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The really cool thing that they're totally missing is that prosthetic limbs aren't limited to replacements.

    Research has shown that the brain has the ability to handle additional limbs and/or senses. So if an amputee can learn to control a replacement arm, then a normal person could also learn to control an extra pair of arms. The neat thing is that the brain would just adapt to it and it would seem natural.

  54. Coming soon... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    William Gibbons' Cyber-Simian

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  55. I can just hear it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Bow to your cybernetic monkey overlords!"

  56. BSOD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gives new meaning to the term.

  57. The Real Sad Thing by DynaSoar · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The sad thing about the articles is that the beauty of the mathematics used to create and train the models is totally ignored."

    The sadder thing is that the discovery of response patterns of amputated limbs being mapped to other parts of the body is totally ignored.

    A man had his arm removed. A psychiatrist attending happened to note that the man claimed to "feel" things in his missing hand when other parts of his body were touched. After careful mapping, three different response maps were found -- one each on his arm, chest and back. Each was so sensitive that individual fingers could be stimulated and he could correctly tell which.

    This major discovery in neural plasticity makes it totally unnecessary to try to decode signals from electrode either drilled through the skull, or else placed on the surface and reading signals though the scalp, skull and dura mater, which reduces the signal by 3 orders of magnitude. Either way, these signals require some massive processing because a significant command/response signal (ie. an electrical response representing a single Hebbian cellular assembly that can be clearly decoded to an intent as stated in the article) comes from 0.3% to 3% of the neurons in the region being detected, the vast majority of the signal needing rejection as false positive or noise. Using the mapped response regions allows for signal analysis based on EMG patterns that are not expected at all in the area under the electrodes, making detection and analysis trivial.

    TFA and most such research is not about giving amputees mobility. It is about decoding and using neural signals. If it were about the former, easier ways would have been used and the job already accomplished. It is about the latter because such things make more news, get more recognition, and therefore result in more grant application success.

    The resulting technology will only be applied to prosthetics as a secondary result. Its primary use will be in such as hands-off controls for fighter pilots (see Clint Eastwood's "Firefox" for your obligatory Slashdot sci-fi/movie reference), tank crews and mobile missile launchers. Maybe this is the saddest part of all, but ignoring a more certain path to success as far as prosthetics is a sad piece.

    Also sad, with a touch of irony, is the fact that the weaponry applications will be untenable because of the heuristic nature of neural processing -- getting it close but error prone will be fast, getting it right will be no faster or require less effort than hand operated controls. The slow speed and so the ability to use real-time perceptual feedback with prosthetics will make that far more successful. It remains to be seen whether after the war applications fail the research continues (ie. there is adequate funding offered) with respect to prosthetics. If someone like the US Veterans Administration picks it up when DARPA drops it, it might. I'm not hopeful.

    The portion of the above that's assertion or opinion is based on the same professional experience as the portion that's not. That experience includes development of some of the "beautiful" maths decried as being ignored. Having been prosthetic-wrist deep in the research and from both directions, I find that a minor point to consider as "sad".

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  58. Human level experiments coming soon by Sir+Fredman · · Score: 1

    There is talk about clinical trials on people using this technology. I'm very interested about the feedback they can give, although I suspect it will be something like 'I just move it, I don't know how, dammit'. Now, what would happen if you connect this BMI to an artificial neural network...would it be incorporated by the brain? Sounds like a nice thing to tinker with...connecting software interfaces to other stuff (cams, mics, calculators, whatever) and see what happens. What happens if you attach it to a distributed neural network ? Oh dear, Skynet is human after all :)

    --
    - there are no frogs here ...
  59. Some seem to cope fine with 12 fingers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTrP9HQsUuk

    so why not 3 arms?

  60. The Maths by Gonzoisme · · Score: 1

    I can't speak specifically about this research without reading the paper, but mathematical transformations in similar studies have used surprisingly simple linear algorithms. It turns out very little work needs to be done to turn the neural data into something useful: just pick arbitrary thresholds for movement in different degrees of freedom, and the motor cortex reorganizes itself.

  61. Not really new... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While this technology is totally cool, this isn't exactly new news.

    IIRC Duke University published a study some years back with monkeys and joysticks controlled through a neural interface.

    Japan and Germany both have some pretty neat stuff in the works as well, and there are several end-user products that are supposed to be coming to market soon.
    Of course, this is just the start, and nobody is doing neural feed-back yet, but it is still very exciting to the Gibson fan in me.

  62. what happened to the monkey's arm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I think this research is excellent news, I have to wonder what happened to the monkey's original arm... did they cut it off so that they could do this research? how evil...

  63. monkeys control prostitutes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was so hoping this was going to be "Brain Interface Lets Monkeys Control Prostitutes" when I saw the live bookmark

  64. The math is totally unimportant here by CarpetShark · · Score: 1
    Yes, math is nice, but the math is totally unimportant here, in the grand scheme of things. The poster says:

    The sad thing about the articles is that the beauty of the mathematics used to create and train the models is totally ignored


    But we're talking about a technology that could give millions of kids back something akin to the legs they had blown off from landmines. People who are blind and crippled after suffering years of diabetes being able to walk again. Mothers being able to lift their kids again. Anyone who talks about the beauty of maths in this situation just doesn't get it. Science, like any human endeavour, is first and foremost about people.
  65. Angelic Fight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For you Anime fans, check out 'Angelic Layer' if you haven't done so already. If only life imitated fiction we'd all be controlling mini robots ;)

  66. Uh... sad? by obeythefist · · Score: 1

    I don't want to go all PETA or anything, I love food animals and the way their meat tastes, but this is just exceedingly assinine:

    "The sad thing about the articles is that the beauty of the mathematics used to create and train the models is totally ignored."

    I would have thought the sad part of the article is that we're still experimenting on live animals, presumably with some sort of horrible animal torture going on. Yes, there are tremendous benefits from this research. Yes, there is also a cost. And that cost is not, believe or not, that we might "miss some beautiful mathematics".

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  67. Electrodes? Same old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've been sticking electrodes into brains for ages. It's great to see medical applications come out of it, but it's not a fundamentally paradigm-shifting technology. The really interesting stuff is this. Look Ma, no electrodes!

  68. No, we just need less monkeys by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    Now that each monkey has +1 limb, it means that we need only INF/3 monkeys.