Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Wireless To Buy Alltel For $28B

CWmike writes "Matt Hamblen reports that Verizon Wireless has officially announced an agreement to purchase Alltel for $28.1 billion, which would make the new company the largest wireless carrier in the U.S., with 80 million subscribers. The deal will undoubtedly provoke scrutiny by the Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Justice, they acknowledge. Who loses? 'This [deal] is another nail in the coffin for Sprint," said Michael Voellinger, an analyst at Telwares in Parsippany, N.J. 'Alltel is a highly valuable and strategic roaming partner to the top four providers, and this acquisition would put long-term pressure on pricing and terms of those arrangements.'"

207 comments

  1. Obligatory by Skeet112 · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Nails
    2. Hammer
    3. Coffin
    4. Profit!!!

    1. Re:Obligatory by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Informative
      This sucks.

      I've always had Sprint as my cell provider since I got my first phone about 10 years ago. I've been happy with their service, phone plans, and coverage.

      I keep hearing nothing but horror stories about other carriers.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Obligatory by Skeet112 · · Score: 1

      And on the other side of the page, this is horrible news for people that like Alltel's service, but dislike the pricing/support/service of Verizon...or Sprint for that matter. The only people who seem to be winning here is Verizon and it's customers -- nothing really changes for them.

    3. Re:Obligatory by jcwayne · · Score: 0

      Actually things will get better for we Verizon people. I live in one of the great tracts of 100-year, government sanctioned, Alltel monopoly territory. Verizon's data services never quite work right here. But, it's a company phone so I'm stuck.

      --
      Failure to follow this advice may result in non-deterministic behavior.
    4. Re:Obligatory by mapsjanhere · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, I'm one of the Alltel customers, I found out when I got a call from an unknown number, asking me
      "Can you here me now?"

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    5. Re:Obligatory by contrapunctus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I had verizon. I hated the phone lockdown. So I switched to Midwest Wireless. They were awesome. They didn't mess with the phones. They were friendly. If you canceled or got a new phone they would prorate the cancellation penalty (If you sign a 2 year contract, and cancel after 1 year, you would only pay half the penalty, etc).
      Alltel bought Midwest Wireless. I can't get google calendar notifications (until very recently) anymore. Not so friendly. I was pondering leaving Alltel.

      It's full circle, if Verizon buys Alltel, I'm back with Verizon.

      Fuck it. Time to get an iPhone.

    6. Re:Obligatory by blair1q · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, Sprint has always had the worst coverage anywhere I've used it.

      Last time I tried it, I had it for about 2 weeks. 75% of my calls were dropped, and 100% of calls when I was driving. And there were constant dropouts in the conversations.

      I got T-mobile and was happy with it. A year later, I sold my Sprint phone to a friend and he signed up with Sprint. He was okay with the service, but when I called him I recognized the dropouts and dropped calls. I warned him before, and I kept pointing it out, but he said he didn't have a problem with it.

      I've switched from T-Mobile to Verizon (T-Mobile reduced its handset offerings). And they're about the same. Almost no calls get dropped with either one. And Verizon's data transfer rate is literall 10X as fast as what I had with T-Mobile.

      If you have a problem with the conglomeration, complain to your legislators. Slashdot doesn't have a vote.

    7. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you already forgot about hating "phone lockdown" if you're going to an iPhone.

    8. Re:Obligatory by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Jobs went with ATT because they were the biggest carrier. Would not surpirse me if iphone were now exclusively for Verizon.

    9. Re:Obligatory by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had T-Mobile for my contractually mandated time. During that time, I couldn't even keep a call going in midtown Manhattan, let alone suburbia. I hated going to Verizon because I've had bad experiences with their billing people screwing things up, but I did it because I at least wanted the service I was paying for.

      Well now I've got FiOS and Verizon Wireless and so far have been happy. My expectations of horrifically screwed-up billing never did come true, so I can say that right now, at this moment, I'm a happy customer. I make no claims or prognostications concerning next week.

      I know people in IT at ALLTEL (used to work there myself), and they're in the phase of wondering what's going to happen with their jobs. Verizon is a company of some considerable size, and may find a few "redundancies" in the new organization. They've been trying to convert to consultant staffing for a while now, probably to reduce the number of actual layoffs (and accompanying severance packages) when the time came. Hopefully VZW can find other jobs within the company for those who are left.

      ALLTEL forms a pretty big part of the local IT job market where I'm from, and I'd hate to see those positions closed.

    10. Re:Obligatory by Aldenissin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My girlfriend is with T-Mobile. I ditched Verizon, T-Mobile and Sprint over the years. Last time I wanted to get Nextel, but Sprint bought them out. This time I wanted to get Alltel, and she was going to come with me, but Verizon has bought them out. I guess I didn't need a cell phone as badly as I thought. Well, time to find another reason to spend some of my "tax refund" check since we planned on buying our own phones in case Alltel ever did something really stupid. At least I saved the cost of buying the phones.

      --
      Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
    11. Re:Obligatory by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Last time I tried it, I had it for about 2 weeks. 75% of my calls were dropped, and 100% of calls when I was driving.

      Good. Maybe you should thank them.

    12. Re:Obligatory by RevMike · · Score: 1

      Well now I've got FiOS and Verizon Wireless and so far have been happy. My expectations of horrifically screwed-up billing never did come true, so I can say that right now, at this moment, I'm a happy customer. I make no claims or prognostications concerning next week. I've been using Verizon for a while. In terms of coverage, speed, and service reliability they really can't be beat. This merger makes a lot of sense because Verizon and Alltel run compatible systems but their markets don't overlap a lot. In this way one company can offer nationwide service on their own network. I expect the market to consolidate into two players over the next few years. The costs of enhancing the infrastructure are so high that, like many quasi-utilities, it doesn't make sense to have too many players. The interesting angle to this is that Verizon has already committed to moving to LTE, the network technology evolved from and slated to replace UMTS/HSPDA. That means that CDMA2000 is effectively dead, only Sprint will remain (and how long will that last). When the iPhone 4G is released, it should be technically capable of running on Verizon's network. The world is converging on a single system merging the software stack derived from GSM, and the radio technology derived from CDMA.
    13. Re:Obligatory by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 0, Troll

      Thank you for shattering the myth that a low UID automatically means insight, knowledge, and intelligence.

    14. Re:Obligatory by Nemo's+Night+Sky · · Score: 1

      Alltel is my wireless provider. Verizon is my DSL provider (albeit a different department than their wireless, i still make inferences) Alltel has the best customer service I've ever seen, depending on which state, and thus what call center your routed to. Verizon has been the worst. There was one instance I was late on the bill and they cut my service off. my fault but the process could use some warning first. The buyout is comical since alltel had acquired somehow a part in home dsl and similar services, and not too long ago they dumped it into a separate company. Anyway, this purchase can only result in something like greywater. this better not stop Chad from making all the networks look dumb in commercials.

    15. Re:Obligatory by billcopc · · Score: 1

      The only thing a low UID implies is age, and age implies cynicism, and..

      oh fer fnarg sakes GET OFF OUR LAWN!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    16. Re:Obligatory by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      Considering that Apple has a three-year exclusivity contract with AT&T and that the iPhone so far has only had GSM capability (Verizon's network is CDMA), you certainly should be surprised if that happens.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    17. Re:Obligatory by SeaFox · · Score: 0, Troll

      Would not surpirse me if iphone were now exclusively for Verizon.

      Then you must be a moron, since the exclusivity agreement between Apple and AT&T was for five years , to say nothing of the fact the iPhone is a GSM phone. It would have to be redesigned to work on Verizon/Alltel/Sprint.
    18. Re:Obligatory by Pascoea · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I want to qualify the following statement(s) by the fact that I currenty have both an Alltel and a Verizon Razr. One is my work phone. (one is a v3c, other is a v3m)

      I love my Alltel Razr. I can change the function of all the softkeys, re-order the menus, download my pictures thru bluetooth, the UI is fast, responsive, and intuitive.

      As far as I'm concerned, Verizon can keep their phone and their service. Take everything I listed above about my Alltel phone and throw it in the trash. Their UI is complete shit, nothing is where you would think to look for it, it's slow as hell, I can't change the functions of any of the softkeys, etc, etc, etc. (no, I dont want to get pix and flix. I want to know where my fucking pictures are, and I want to be able to download them without having a text message plan)

      Argh. Sorry Verizon, you loose.

    19. Re:Obligatory by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      The 3 year exclusivity thing is a problem, but honestly, I doubt Apple's engineers would have much problem making a CDMA version of the phone.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    20. Re:Obligatory by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Talking while driving isn't always a bad thing. I live 20 miles outside of where I work (even the town where I work is only 5000 people - on the drive home it's through a forest). The road is straight and in that 20 mile drive I may see a dozen cars or so on my way home (that's if I take the regular route - take the more scenic detour and I've gone nearly half the trip without seeing another vehicle). We're talking about a drive that I could almost take a nap on. Talking on the phone during this time isn't going to cause me any problems. Then again, I only get a signal for about half of that distance anyways. On the flip side, I don't bring it out while I'm actually in any level of traffic (such as while I'm actually in town).

      So yeah, it's often bad, but I wouldn't automatically assume that driving+phone is evil 100% of the time.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    21. Re:Obligatory by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      Certainly, but the combination of the two makes it all the more unlikely. It would be a big surprise if Apple went through a bunch of effort to create a CDMA version of the iPhone just so that they could turn around and break a highly publicized carrier exclusivity contract with it. If they were going to break the contract (and this is certainly the less plausible of the two) then you'd think it would be with T-Mobile, rather than creating new equipment whose existence would be sure to leak the news ahead of time.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
  2. Great... by cjb658 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Now our only choices will be AT&T and Verizon.

    I for one welcome our new corporate overlords!

    1. Re:Great... by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even though T-Mobile doesn't have the greatest penetration in the US, they are (AFAIK) turning a profit, and have even bigger corporate backing from DT in Germany. That same backing also (hopefully) reduces the chances of a buyout.

      Sprint, unfortunately, has neither of those advantages.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:Great... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Sprint does, however, have the cheapest wireless data plans in the US. I guess we can kiss those goodbye soon.

      I guess I can hope the FCC says "no" to this deal...

    3. Re:Great... by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      Actually, T-Mobile has the cheapest. According to Sprint's site, a data plan is $30 a month. I pay T-Mobile $20 for my BIS* package. Granted, it's EDGE, but it's fast enough (usually ~300kb/s, tops out around 500), and tethering is free. However, Sprint's $99/mo pure unlimited does beat out T-Mobile's (which doesn't include data).

      *BlackBerry Internet Service

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    4. Re:Great... by Theoboley · · Score: 0

      Good, now maybe i can get a decent phone if i roll over to Verizon (just like Cell-One did for customers rolling over to AT&T w/o waiting out a contract)

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    5. Re:Great... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      If you have a PDA phone, Sprint's unlimited data plan is $15/month including tethering via bluetooth.

    6. Re:Great... by bryantthesmith · · Score: 1

      I just use the $6.99 t-zones from t-mobile and get unlimited data and tethering via bluetooth/usb. I takes a little messing with my proxy settings, but with the switchproxy add-on and Firefox that isn't a big deal.

    7. Re:Great... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, "great" is right.

      Lord knows we've already got too much competition in the telecom space, right?

      Pretty soon we'll have two airlines, two telecoms, two oil companies, two pharmas and two entertainment conglomerates. Oh, and two companies that own all the newspapers, TV networks, etc and those will be two of the companies from the list above. Two companies that make airplanes in the US (or is it down to one now?). Two banks, of course, and they will also be the only two brokerages.

      What the fuck is our justice department doing? Have any of them heard of anti-trust?

      Ain't the free market grand?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Airplanes?

      Mooney, Cessna, Beechcraft, Ratheon, Piper, Cirrus, Navion. There are more, but those are just the companies I called today.

    9. Re:Great... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What the fuck is our justice department doing? Have any of them heard of anti-trust?

      We've got two political parties.

      Both of them money from the two telecoms, two oil companies, two pharmas, two entertainment conglomerates and the two "news" companies.

      What do you think?

      Oh, and the two airline companies are too busy losing too much money to do much of anything else.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  3. Consumers? by HaloZero · · Score: 1

    Could someone with a bit more enlightenment spell out what this means for subscribers, please?

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
    1. Re:Consumers? by robo_mojo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fewer choices and greater prices.

    2. Re:Consumers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could someone with a bit more enlightenment spell out what this means for subscribers, please? E17 will be in better for another year.
    3. Re:Consumers? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The good: Verizon will likely merge Alltel's network with their own (relatively easy, since they use the same tech), boosting coverage for subscribers on both networks
      The bad: Verizon will definitely replace Alltel's stock firmwares on new phones with their own, locking out features and making them consumer-hostile.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    4. Re:Consumers? by fluffman86 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't kid yourself: Alltel already locks down their phones.

    5. Re:Consumers? by mapsjanhere · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think so, my Alltel Razor talks to my desktop using usb, my office mate's identical Verizon model is locked up.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    6. Re:Consumers? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Alltel firmware is the hot download for frustrated Verizon customers. Verizon knows what is best for everyone. I am just waiting for them to (cough) open up the network like they told Google they would.

    7. Re:Consumers? by GweeDo · · Score: 1

      Alltel runs the most liberal off all firemware's you can find. There is a reason that most hacking/modding sites for Sprint and Verizon sites have people load up Alltel's firmware first and foremost. As an Alltel customer this is the one thing that concerns me the most. But then again, I run a Windows Mobile phone (HTC Touch) that can be hacked the crap out of on all carriers (yeah GPS support!)

    8. Re:Consumers? by prockcore · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I'd use the term "lock down". Alltel installs some crap on their phones, but they've stopped disabling features (other than MMS, which they're actively trying to kill).

      However, all the big alltel phones are HTC, and it's trivial to flash a new rom on there anyway, so even if they "locked it down", it takes no time at all to put a completely custom rom. I'm running WM6 on my HTC Apache.

    9. Re:Consumers? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Then as an Alltel user, I maybe should find out how to back up my firmware.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    10. Re:Consumers? by AtariKee · · Score: 1

      I signed a two year contract with Alltel in April of 2006, and find that I use my phone for text messaging 99% of the time. $55 a month (2 phones @ $110/mo, actually) is wayyy too much to pay for text messaging.

      I'm going back to cheapo Tracfones when my contract is up; that is, if they still have the phones that only charge you units for sending and not for receiving texts.

      --
      "You're getting brutal, Sark. Brutal and needlessly sadistic."
      "Thank you, Master Control"
      -Sark and the MCP
    11. Re:Consumers? by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Until recently, most phones lacked over-the-air firmware upgrade capability.

      Verizon aren't going to force an upgrade on 80 million customers -- at least not in the near future. They're stupid, but not that stupid.

      Besides.... the networks are compatible. There's really not much "transition" to take place at all. I wouldn't be surprised if the two networks were completely merged within a few months of the deal being finalized.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    12. Re:Consumers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... my Alltel Razor talks to my desktop using usb, my office mate's identical Verizon model is locked up. Same here. This just stinks. Well it was good while it lasted. I will miss the quality service and hassle free customer support.

      Sob.
    13. Re:Consumers? by RaNdOm+OuTpUt · · Score: 0

      TRACFONE PRICING:
      1 unit per minute/partial minute for in/out calls, .3 units per text out, free text in. Ringtones are painfully expensive (~$4).

      --
      13. Any legal action is absolutly excluded. (Pi World Ranking List rules)
    14. Re:Consumers? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1
      Re-read my first post:

      replace Alltel's stock firmwares on new phones
      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    15. Re:Consumers? by bcattwoo · · Score: 1

      Fewer choices and greater prices.

      Great meaning large or immense, we used it in the pejorative sense!

    16. Re:Consumers? by AtariKee · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I used them for years until I got this Alltel phone. Paid about $20 every 2 months for minutes, occasionally breaking that if I made any calls. I don't care about ringtones, so that's no biggie for me.

      I see nothing has changed with them. Good.

      Thanks for the info.

      --
      "You're getting brutal, Sark. Brutal and needlessly sadistic."
      "Thank you, Master Control"
      -Sark and the MCP
  4. Can't Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait until we have only one phone company!

  5. Can you say "Monopoly" ? by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    say it. now spell it.

    because this is it.

    although im a capitalist, im increasingly starting to think that big corporations need a MAJOR whack on their butts so that competition can be a possibility again.

    1. Re:Can you say "Monopoly" ? by cjb658 · · Score: 2

      although im a capitalist, im increasingly starting to think that big corporations need a MAJOR whack on their butts so that competition can be a possibility again. And we all thought we were getting a good deal when the 700MHz spectrum was sold...
    2. Re:Can you say "Monopoly" ? by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      I could, but that ATT and Sprint are still out there means that Verizon isn't a monopoly. Even if they are... When ATT was *THE* phone company, we didn't have any of those annoying pin-drop adds or John Stamos and his stupid 10-10-220, telemarketers calling to ask if we wanted to switch long distance services, etc.

      I'm pretty happy with Verizon.

    3. Re:Can you say "Monopoly" ? by LandDolphin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, you did not have as many annoying commercials, but you paid $5 a month to rent a home phone and $0.50 a min for a long distance phone call.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    4. Re:Can you say "Monopoly" ? by Itchyeyes · · Score: 1

      now spell it. I'll go one better.

      mo-nop-o-ly
      1. exclusive control of a commodity or service in a particular market, or a control that makes possible the manipulation of prices.
      2. an exclusive privilege to carry on a business, traffic, or service, granted by a government.
      3. the exclusive possession or control of something.

      Notice a trend here? I think AT&T (27% market share) and SprintNextel (23% market share) and T-Mobile (11% market share) might have something to say about that whole exclusive bit.

      I realize that we're all supposed to hate corporations here on the Internet and bigger inherently equals worse regardless of those pesky exceptions when economies of scale kick in. But can we at least have one of these conversations without people throwing around the "M" word like it applies to any and every situation involving a public corporation?
    5. Re:Can you say "Monopoly" ? by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But can we at least have one of these conversations without people throwing around the "M" word like it applies to any and every situation involving a public corporation?


      Yeah, its really annoying when people say "Monopoly" when the right term is "Oligopoly".

      Even without Alltel being bought by Verizon, the four-firm concentration (combined marketshare of the top four firms) in the wireless market is over 80%.

      What it certainly is not is a open, competitive market.
    6. Re:Can you say "Monopoly" ? by unity100 · · Score: 1

      there is no difference in practice, before all those oligopoly corporations belong to the same good old boys group, who act together.

    7. Re:Can you say "Monopoly" ? by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Feel free to start a telecom. It's not like anyone is actively stopping you.

    8. Re:Can you say "Monopoly" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well -- the other thing to consider is that while these may not be monopolies when looking at the whole US, they are monopolies when you look at specific regions. In many areas, even though you can get another service provider, the service quality is so low that its not a reasonable option. The pricing for service is not the same nation wide for most carriers and in many cases providers seem to recognize their monopoly status in specific areas.

      Courts have also recognize this in several cases. When Cingular and AT&T wireless merged, they had to divest their service in many regions (/'markets') in order to merge.... However, in my opinion, theres too many borderline area where one service is by far the best and the companies price like a monopoly -- but courts and/or state governments didn't feel the need to force divestitures.

  6. Come and get your love! by funky49 · · Score: 1

    I'm VZ for work and home. My girlfriend is Alltel. Now I don't have to worry about not being in her circle!

    --
    --- rapper/producer/bachelorette party stripper
    1. Re:Come and get your love! by kingcool1432 · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend is Alltel. Gawd, you must be devastated!
    2. Re:Come and get your love! by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Funny

      My girlfriend is Alltel. Dude, your girlfriend's worth $28 billion? That's pretty sweet.
    3. Re:Come and get your love! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't have to worry about being in her circle, all you've got left is worrying about being in her box.

      *snare rimshot*

    4. Re:Come and get your love! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't want to be in her circle? I'll be in her circle. Could be a good time

    5. Re:Come and get your love! by Jor-Al · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now I don't have to worry about not being in her circle! That's because her new boyfriend was instead.
    6. Re:Come and get your love! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until you go shopping with her...

    7. Re:Come and get your love! by funky49 · · Score: 1

      I didn't know my humor was too dry for slashdot. Yes, circle was a euphemism for box. It's a bit idiotic to think I wouldn't be in her circle.

      --
      --- rapper/producer/bachelorette party stripper
    8. Re:Come and get your love! by tiny1877 · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm the only one that got your joke... ;-)

    9. Re:Come and get your love! by Jor-Al · · Score: 1

      I think it is you who missed MY joke.

  7. That Alone... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Alltel is a highly valuable and strategic roaming partner to the top four providers, and this acquisition would put long-term pressure on pricing and terms of those arrangements.

    That alone should be more than sufficient to nix the deal. Anything that would upset the balance in the market this much should require more than stringent guarantees of access at current prices for the next century -- and not for the next 18 months as would be more likely proposed.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:That Alone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm posting as an anonymous coward, but I'm the author of the quote - you hit the nail on the head. It's my opinion that the deal will go through with some market divestitures, but the roaming component will probably get overlooked because the deals are longer term (2010-2012), it's an election year, and the volumes of b2b traffic will be the "perception" that helps to keep access in line with market. We wait and see now.

  8. yeah.. but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when nextel and sprint merged they were hailed as the next big thing.. take over the industry.. yada yada yada.. now look at them..

    1. Re:yeah.. but.. by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nextel == iDEN phones & network, running nothing of note
      Sprint == CDMA phones & network, running J2ME
      Result: disaster

      Verizon == CDMA phones & network, running BREW
      Alltel == CDMA phones and network, running BREW
      Result: probably much better

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:yeah.. but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon locks down everything, Alltel is freedom. This is bad for Alltell customers in that respect!

    3. Re:yeah.. but.. by oahazmatt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Verizon locks down everything, Alltel is freedom. This is bad for Alltell customers in that respect! Yes, Verizon locks down quite a bit. I have to use BitPim just to do some file transfers.

      However, having a $22 Billion debt is not good for Alltel customers, either. They may have "America's largest network" but they don't exactly have America's largest customer base, (The article I read this morning had them at about 15% and 20% of the Verizon and AT&T customer base, respectively) and in order to continue providing to its customers, the company needs some relief.

      Is this a good thing? Maybe. I'd like to think the two networks will operate under a large umbrella and Verizon and Alltel might remain as independent as possible, just provide a more complete network coverage.

      Is this a bad thing? Maybe. Alltel customers may be turned off if sudden phone lockdowns come out of this.

      Guess we'll just have to wait and see.
      --
      Those who believe the Internet is private,
      find their privates are on the Internet.
    4. Re:yeah.. but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Verizon == CDMA phones & network, running BREW
      Alltel == CDMA phones and network, running BREW
      Result: probably much better Yeah, but you forgot one thing: Verizon has tight control on its handsets and the software that runs there. Don't expect to run any software without paying a fee for that right. Verizon even turns off basic features on their cellphones so that they can sell you their service on a month-to-month basis.

      If you think this sounds better than the Sprint model, you don't run ANY applications.
    5. Re:yeah.. but.. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Running nothing of Note? Nextel IS the phone of large companies.

      NexTel started out as fleet dispatch frequencies and moved into the cell phone range. NexTel has always been an excellent niche between 2 way radios and full blown cell phones.

      Our factories have numerous repeaters in them so that we have full coverage in the building. Push to Talk is used constantly. It seems to be the same for all other friends of mine that work in the manufacturing world. AT&T, Verizon are great for upper management and executives but anyone that might get grease on their hands uses a NexTel

      J2ME, BREW is all junk for our work. Most of our phones show 4 lines of black on green. They'll all survive a drop from a second story building, being plunged under water and being left in dash in the sun. The batteries also last twice as long as any 'consumer' cell phone I've used.

      NexTel definitely has something to bring to the table.
      -
      While I've never used them AllTel has seemed to drive a bit of competition. First they had the "5 friends" thing then it seems everyone had that. Now they're up to "Any friend on any network" which other people seem to be copying.

    6. Re:yeah.. but.. by ChilyWily · · Score: 1

      ...running J2ME
      ...running BREW
      What difference do any of those make when the phone is locked down so you can't get to either of them? Also, why is there a $1,500 cost to get started with BREW? [ref] The network operators treat their networks like toll roads, except that it's more like highway robbery with a slimy layer of PR that states that all this is "for your protection". I call shenanigans. Verizon has an especially bad reputation here. I wonder, why not instead work with an open specification, with sane rules for mis-behavior (malware, network abuse, etc.) and compete on services rather than lack thereof.
    7. Re:yeah.. but.. by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      Sure, NexTel is great in the manufacturing sector, but I have to tell you, when they opened up "Push to Talk" to the regular consumer market, they put a knife in their foot. I can't stand that lame blip every time someone Mr. Doe has to ask Mrs. Doe what type of flour to buy at the grocery store.

    8. Re:yeah.. but.. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I think push to talk is a stupid feature to start with, but the audible cue every time the phone makes or gets a "message" is godawful annoying.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    9. Re:yeah.. but.. by chrispatch · · Score: 1

      Everybody, go get your brooms!

  9. Meanwhile Sirius and XM get the shaft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    F the FCC

  10. I love merger's by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In my area, there are two choices if you wish service outside the metro....Verizon and Alltel. I've been with Alltel for a couple of years and I switched from Verizon. I left Verizon for a reason, and I'm sure many of you know what that is. Poor customer service, billed for things I didn't have, etc, /etc. Alltel has had a few issues with my account, but at least they've resolved them when I call in.

    Help me Obi-Wan Kenobi, you're my only hope!

    --
    brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    1. Re:I love merger's by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In my area, there are two choices if you wish service outside the metro....Verizon and Alltel.

      With the reduction of providers competing for your business from 2 to 1, do not expect your rates to be going down any time soon.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  11. Thank goodness by Jor-Al · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does that mean now that the horrible Alltel commercials will finally end?

    1. Re:Thank goodness by jcrousedotcom · · Score: 1

      God I hope so. Just discussing that with a fellow friend and Sprint user (yes, it was much better than Nextel for high speed Internet and I didn't have to sign another contract).

      Good Riddance!

      --
      Illiterate? Write for free help!
    2. Re:Thank goodness by Skeet112 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, although having a personal wizard to summon at will would still be pretty damn sweet.

    3. Re:Thank goodness by SeaFox · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope they make one more with the Verizon guy riding the Alltel guy like a pony shouting "WHO'S MY BIATCH NOW?"

    4. Re:Thank goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that mean now that the horrible Alltel commercials will finally end? WIZZZZARRRRRDDD!!!!
    5. Re:Thank goodness by Cypher04 · · Score: 1

      Does that mean now that the horrible Alltel commercials will finally end? Most likely, but only to be superseded by the horrible customer service of Verizon.

      Us Alltel customers are not amused. Based on my previous experiences with Verizon in general, I will be switching services.
      --
      "If my doctor told me I had only six minutes to live, I wouldn't brood. I'd type a little faster." --Isaac Asimov
  12. Monopoly 2.0 by TheLazySci-FiAuthor · · Score: 1, Redundant

    What even defines a monopoly anymore?

    Shouldn't there be some cap on the ratio of providence of a service or product to demand or something?

    Obviously 80 million wireless subscribers is approaching a significant portion of the US population. And let's do the numbers on AT&T.

    double-u tea eff question mark exclamation point.

    1. Re:Monopoly 2.0 by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      Mono -- one. As long as Verizon and At&t don't merge, there's a choice. As long as there's a choice, it's not a monopoly.

    2. Re:Monopoly 2.0 by Manchot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not true. There are many places where only one of those options is available, in which case there is a local monopoly. Not that it matters anyway, since a two-company oligopoly will be just as bad. AT&T and Verizon won't merge: they know that with the highly probable changing of the guard at the Justice Department this year, they'd be broken up instantly. No, what's far more likely is that unspoken collusion will occur, and they'll independently decide to stay off each other's turf. In a very real sense, two monopolies will exist side-by-side. And since all the good spectrum is locked up, it won't even be possible for competitors to form. The telcos need to go the way of the utility companies.

    3. Re:Monopoly 2.0 by indiejade · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is true. However, it is an oligopoly in which collusion and cartels are more likely. And this means the FCC still has pull.

      Verizon probably won't win the early termination fees suit if it goes to the US Supreme Court, and it knows that, so it's doing the next most predatory thing it can.

      The article in the OP stated: "The companies noted that Alltel is serving 57 mostly rural markets that Verizon Wireless does not serve." In other words, Verizon is buying out the rural markets, giving those people less choice, even if -- and especially if -- the suit does go to the Supreme Court.

      It's probably very interesting to note what kind of correlation there is between the states' litigation against Verizon (and its cronies) and the areas Alltel serves: like "dollars of litigation" total in rural states vs. the "dollars of litigation" in the cities that Verizon tends to serve. Very interesting indeed.

    4. Re:Monopoly 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article in the OP stated: "The companies noted that Alltel is serving 57 mostly rural markets that Verizon Wireless does not serve." In other words, Verizon is buying out the rural markets, giving those people less choice, even if -- and especially if -- the suit does go to the Supreme Court.


      1 - 1 + 1 = 1. That's not exactly "less choice."
    5. Re:Monopoly 2.0 by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      The article in the OP stated: "The companies noted that Alltel is serving 57 mostly rural markets that Verizon Wireless does not serve." In other words, Verizon is buying out the rural markets, giving those people less choice

      How are they getting less choice? As you said, neither Verizon, nor AT&T serve that market, but Alltel does. After the merger, Verizon and whatever local providers will still be there, but no AT&T. How has anything changed?

  13. Re:Great...Ordering of Priorities by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Protect our freedom first, then worry about our safety

    It must be pointed out that without safety, and "freedom" being used as a shield for attacks against our society, there is no freedom left to protect because you aren't safe to exercise it any longer.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  14. uh what? by poetmatt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What the heck are you talking about? unsuccessful troll.

    Sirius/xm was approved.

    1. Re:uh what? by Applekid · · Score: 1

      Actually, no.

      GP post referenced the FCC, who now have to approve the Sirius/XM merger. The DOJ gave the ok but it's only part of the pie. Their merger plans are at least a year and a half in the making... I wonder how long THIS Verizon/Alltel merger was on the drawing board.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    2. Re:uh what? by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      It's the FCC on a huge merger. Of course it's going to be slow. I hate to say it, but thats not a surprise nor is it likely aimed at XM/Sirius. It's more likely that they just work that slow period. Even if FCC disapproves I suspect there may be an appeal process ( I don't know myself) but it would be just as lengthy.

  15. I Hope... by dougmwne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope this isn't the final nail in Sprint's coffin. I happen to be very attached to my $30/month everything unlimited SERO plan.

  16. Re:Come and get your love! FOOLISH by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    I'm VZ for work and home. My girlfriend is Alltel. Now I don't have to worry about not being in her circle!

    You're foolish enough to think that a VZ and AT merger will benefit you as gaining the feature set of VZ + AT = both of you.

    Expect more likely, both of you = - (VZ + AT).

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  17. obviously this isn't illegal by thermian · · Score: 2, Funny

    We should therefore stop arguing, and accept that theirs is the superior intellect, after all, what could possibly go wrong?

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    1. Re:obviously this isn't illegal by Theoboley · · Score: 0

      What could possibly go wrong? Lets see... My current phone bill could sky rocket to 3x the amount that it is now, in which case f8ck the cellphones all together... I'll use my old rotary phone.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    2. Re:obviously this isn't illegal by thermian · · Score: 1

      What could possibly go wrong? Lets see... My current phone bill could sky rocket to 3x the amount that it is now, in which case f8ck the cellphones all together... I'll use my old rotary phone.

      I'm guessing you missed the Wrath of Khan reference.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    3. Re:obviously this isn't illegal by Akardam · · Score: 1

      ... and accept that theirs is the superior intellect ...
      Oh man, no bueno! Last time somebody said something like that it was stilted speeches and OMG that's his real chest all the way to the Mutara nebula!

    4. Re:obviously this isn't illegal by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Joachim: Yours is the superior intellect.

    5. Re:obviously this isn't illegal by Theoboley · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that i obviously did, since i haven't the slighes

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    6. Re:obviously this isn't illegal by Theoboley · · Score: 0

      slightest idea what the wrath of kahn is. sorry about the double post... /. went all goofyass on me

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  18. My Condolences by bogie · · Score: 1

    Welcome to turdville. Population? You. You'll be happy to learn that at least you'll have the best coverage available. Oh and hurray for taking one more giant step towards a single company owning everything.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  19. SPLIT by llZENll · · Score: 1

    Just for trying this crap they should split Verizon in twain. Veri gets the even phone numbers, and Izon gets the odd ones. Ready... Set... Compete!

  20. First of many by afidel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As many market watchers have pointed out the weaken US economy combined with a likely end to the lazafaire practices of the Bush administration means there are likely to be a fairly large number of mergers started in Q2 and Q3 so that they can get past regulators before a new government is in place.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:First of many by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

      Consolidation during periods of lax regulation and other useful negligence will continue. So will the price of gas/fuel.

      Watch Revol merge with T-Mobile, Virgin Mobile, and produced RevolTing Virgin Mobile.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    2. Re:First of many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Seriously, "lazafaire"?

    3. Re:First of many by glwtta · · Score: 1

      the lazafaire practices

      You can't be serious.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:First of many by afidel · · Score: 1

      fine, Laissez-Faire, Google and Firefox didn't yell at me for lazafaire. French isn't my native language and phonetically it works =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  21. Welcome to Canada. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sentiment is great until the new big few realize that indirect collusion can make for greater bottom lines for the companies involved. You'll end up like us paying some of the highest prices in the world for the least amount of service.

  22. Re:Will Verizon convert Alltel to CDMA? by Al+Wold · · Score: 0

    Uh..isn't Alltel entirely CDMA currently? I've never even heard of them having GSM.

  23. Great, no more stupid commercials by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    We can say good by to those stupid commercials now.

    Other then that, having a even larger company with more control over their customers so they can screw them more is all i see coming out of this.. Good thing i dont use a cell phone, or believe in them.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Great, no more stupid commercials by maxume · · Score: 1

      Have you made a cell phone vanish in a puff of logic yet?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Great, no more stupid commercials by lmnfrs · · Score: 2, Funny

      We may be able to say goodbye to "those" commercials, but do you really think they won't be replaced? From now on expect only 3 dorks in a van. They'll be looking for their red-shirted friend only to discover that he's hanging out with his network, and that said network is now partially comprised of wizards.

  24. Re:Great...Ordering of Priorities by DigDuality · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and if you give up your freedom for safety/security, then you're protecting nothing.

  25. Re:Will Verizon convert Alltel to CDMA? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

    Which is funny, since GSM providers like AT&T and T-Mobile (I have T-Mobile) are moving to 3G standards such as UMTS/HSDPA, which are CDMA-based. =)

  26. Phone software by Draconistarum · · Score: 1

    There goes my uncrippled phones.

  27. Alltel commercials by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I wonder what effect this will have on the Alltel commercials: The Verizon kid is the nastiest, most obnoxious of the lot.
    </humor>

    1. Re:Alltel commercials by Sabz5150 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Chad... suck my balls. /cartman

      --
      "Who modded this informative? Whoever it is must've been smokin' some of that martian pot!"
    2. Re:Alltel commercials by Skeet112 · · Score: 1

      Well, considering the fact that they are now bought out by Verizon, I very much doubt there will even -be- more Alltel commercials.

    3. Re:Alltel commercials by oahazmatt · · Score: 1

      My guess? The Verizon kid will obviously distract Chad, while "The Network" just swarms him from behind and burns down his store.

      Network Guy: "Say it!"
      Chad: *whimper*
      Network Guy: "Say it! [bleep]ing say it!"
      Chad: *sniff* "Can--- can you hear me--- now?"
      Network Guy: "[bleep] yeah."

      --
      Those who believe the Internet is private,
      find their privates are on the Internet.
    4. Re:Alltel commercials by rk · · Score: 1

      That is hilarious... I can see that on a YouTube already. If I had a video camera and a spare weekend, I'd film it myself. Brilliant. ****1/2 Starts Friday in select theatres.

      Signed, a guy who just finished his Cingular contract, getting away from AT&T, to switch to Alltel to stay away from Verizon. When this contract is over, I'm going back to smoke signals.

    5. Re:Alltel commercials by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 1

      Or just end your service when the merger happens... Most contracts can be ended when things like this happen.

    6. Re:Alltel commercials by JKSN17 · · Score: 0

      Verizon Guy: Where is your wizard now? Bitch!
      Chad: *Wimpers*

  28. wwwizzzzzaaaarddddd by Theoboley · · Score: 0

    You cannot tell me that you don't enjoy summoning the wwwizzzzard for hours on end. He doesn't show up though... because it's family time. /redundant

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    1. Re:wwwizzzzzaaaarddddd by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Funny

      You cannot tell me that you don't enjoy summoning the wwwizzzzard for hours on end.

      Of course, but at least I wash my hands afterward.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:wwwizzzzzaaaarddddd by Theoboley · · Score: 0

      But he still doesnt show up... Must be pretty tough on the psyche' /fail at summoning the wwwwizaaahhhdd

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  29. So does this mean... by greymond · · Score: 1

    I can use my cell phone on top of Halfdome cause that would be pretty nice.

  30. Gold plated prison. by argent · · Score: 1

    If I could use my SIM card in it, I wouldn't care if my phone used TDMA, CDMA, GSM, BDSM, or Avian Carriers.

    But after 2 years with Sprint hoping my piece of junk phone would hold out long enough for me to escape to T-Mobile without having to sign up for another piece of junk phone from Sprint because I can't just buy a used piece of junk phone (there pretty much aren't any non-piece-of-junk phones out there) and stick my SIM in it... I'm done with CDMA, thank you very much.

    1. Re:Gold plated prison. by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      As a T-Mobile customer who loves them, I'm sure you'll find them much better than Sprint.

    2. Re:Gold plated prison. by argent · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sure I'll hate them ten different ways, but before Sprint I was on Verizon, who was even less fun than Sprint... but that was a company phone so I could let someone else deliver the hate, and before that on Cingular... all phones are pieces of junk, all cellular companies are hateful, but at least with GSM I can ration the hate out in tiny packages... :)

    3. Re:Gold plated prison. by sporkme · · Score: 1

      There are not many people who prefer Sprint to Verizon.

    4. Re:Gold plated prison. by argent · · Score: 1

      Sprint and Verizon both lock you into a phone, which is hateful, but Sprint had much better coverage for me, and didn't actually manage to lose my number the way Verizon seemed to for a while. That's enough to tip the scales.

  31. Re:Will Verizon convert Alltel to CDMA? by maxume · · Score: 3, Informative

    Alltel is CDMA.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  32. Re:Will Verizon convert Alltel to CDMA? by sabre3999 · · Score: 1
    Yeah, they've provided over CDMA for as long as I've known of them...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alltel#Network_technology

  33. What happens to Chad? by Electrawn · · Score: 1

    From an email discussion earlier:

    So in the Alltel commercials, does the Verizon tech lookalike now get to noogie "Chad," and make him drive the "Wizard" van?

    1. Re:What happens to Chad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see him get shot by the verizon guy in a drive by shooting from the van, then Chad's fav's are kidnapped and placed inside the van against their will....

  34. Customer backlash? by jyunderwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No doubt the Alltel customers who are use to My Circle and relatively un-crippled phones compared to Verizon will not like this.

    Would customers be able to get out of their contacts when they merge?

    1. Re:Customer backlash? by callmetheraven · · Score: 1

      I wish I had points to mod you up.

      --
      You can have my SIG when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
    2. Re:Customer backlash? by QuantumPion · · Score: 1

      I hope so. Currently with Alltel, I can tether my phone to my laptop (an EEE PC) and get cellular internet access with DSL speeds anywhere in the City, and even out in the boonies. All this, for no extra monthly fee. Alltel lets you (or tolerates, anyway) using data without a data plan, it just uses your anytime minutes (which are unlimited on nights and weekends). This is great for me, since I only occasionally want to connect to the net wirelessly.

      What other cell phone company offers such a convenient and fair offering? I think this may be the end of my ability to wirelessly surf without paying more per month then I do for my cable modem.

  35. Not sure if this is good for me or not by GweeDo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a very happy Alltel customer I am not sure what to think of this. While being part of a larger provider does offer more features and phones and what not, Alltel is crazy liberal with what they let you do with your phone. Basically if the MFG supports it, GO FOR IT! Verizon on the other hand is the exact opposite. If you don't pay for their branded apps (other than hacking) you don't get it.

  36. Oh Joy by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been a happy Alltel customer since December - glad to know I can look forward to higher prices, lower customer service, and a throttled internet connection - now likely to be run straight through NSA central. I'm thrilled.

  37. Re:I blame George Bush by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    Write back when you get sober....

    Or when Limbaugh fires you....

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  38. No More Alltel Commercials Please!!! by EvolutionsPeak · · Score: 1

    If this ends those annoying Alltel commercials with the dumbass blonde "cool" guy and the dumbass pseudo geeky guys I am all for it!

  39. You might have a conspiracy point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    were his rant not identical to a majority of the commentary at any of the large lefty blogs. Nice try, though.

    1. Re:You might have a conspiracy point by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      The difference between fringes on both sides are difficult for even experts to detect, as they're almost the same. It's a circular, rather than directional, politic.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  40. Re:Will Verizon convert Alltel to CDMA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alltell is and always has been CDMA. Are people terminally stupid when it comes to cell phone technologies? I see more misinformed people posting (on /. of ALL places) about cell phones than any other topic.

  41. Re:Consumers, Subscribers, Pee-Ons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your sucky Alltel service is now suckier Verizon Service.

    Look for a new scam^H, err... added feature where you now are automatically extended to a new two year contract. But that's OK because you can always opt out by calling their Customer Retention Service and be put on hold for an hour before being hung up on.

    Makes me want to get drunk in..... wait for it.... more bars in more places.

    Kinda sucks for anyone who left Verizon due to shitty service and chose Alltel.

    Yes, I know it is spelled peon. But this seems more accurate.

  42. Corporations by just_forget_it · · Score: 1

    Corporations shouldn't be allowed to buy other corporations. It wasn't like that in the beginning, but railroad tycoons wanted to consolidate and argued that corporations should have all the rights (but none of the responsibilities) of an individual person.

    Allowing corporations to merge is against every principle the free market stands on.

    1. Re:Corporations by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      If you could not sell a corporation there would be far less incentive for investors to put money into a startup - which would be a huge problem in terms of stimulation of economic growth. Nor could corporations sell themselves by issuing stock in order to raise money for expansion.

      Corporations are assets with value to be bought and sold just like everything else. It is an essential part of modern capitalism.

    2. Re:Corporations by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      No, you don't get it. Corporations aren't assets. They're evil sentient beings.

      Or at least I have to assume that's what the "corporations have all the rights and none of the responsibilities" horseshit is about. God I love when hippies go off on meaningless rants.

    3. Re:Corporations by sporkme · · Score: 1

      Thanks, and agreed. It seems that people fail to realize that there is no "capitalism rulebook" by which all free trade is conducted, and that the concept evolves and changes constantly with each free market experiment and each limitation imposed.

      Your quote of the day:
      "When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first thing to be bought and sold are legislators." --P. J. O'Rourke

    4. Re:Corporations by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      So how does this 'fair tax' work if you don't have a 16th amendment? It seems to me that if you are going to tax based on something other than head count you need the 16th.

    5. Re:Corporations by sporkme · · Score: 1

      It is a sales tax.

      16th Amendment: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."

      This allows the legislature to directly levy taxes on the constituents of the states without the burden of considering the reprocussions. The removal of this amendment returns the taxation rights, constitutionally speaking, to the states, whose representatives in turn ratify the new taxation system bill. The bill includes specifically defined taxation rights for the federal government: a simple sales tax. Because this collection method is also independent of a census, it upholds the concept of fairness in taxation but returns the method of taxation to an easy to understand system.

      In short, FairTax tosses out the complex, evadable and unequal 17,000 pages of the IRS tax code. Everyone keeps 100% of what they earn. On a regular cycle, already existing methods of payment deliver a "pre-bate" credit to every household, covering the calculated taxes they will pay on the basic necessities of life. Prices drop because the incredible embedded tax burden on domestic producers is alleviated. Domestic production is more competitive with foreign production because both are taxed in the same system. Black markets and foreign nationals now participate in the tax system. By saving and spending frugally, Americans can potentially reduce their tax rate to below 0%. On new goods only, a 23% sales tax is imposed. Used cars, used homes, used anything is not taxed. Keep in mind that income is not taxed one bit by the Imperial Federal Government in this plan, and the tax system participant is free to determine his own tax rate.

      The key is that the current rate of taxation is printed on every receipt. When you see a price tag on the shelf: Video Card - $100, your receipt will say:

      Video Card 1 @ -- $77.00
      Fair Tax 23% -- $23.00
      Total -- $100.00


      There is more to it, including inherent compliance, company-to-company trades and more, but ultimately the plan is the single largest transfer of power from the government to the people in the history of the United States. It seriously stimulates the economy, adds foreign nationals and evaders to the tax base, and taps a much more stable source of taxation. Best of all, it is truly fair -- it is up to you to decide how much tax to pay, at last, and you no longer wonder how much tax you pay to the feds. April 15 is just another day.

    6. Re:Corporations by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      You did not answer the question. If the 16th amendment is repealed as the Fair Tax web site you link to advocates, the Fair tax that you describe would be just as unconstitutional as the original income tax was because it is not apportioned among the states according to the census.

      Look, I am very sympathetic to the idea that taxation is one of the greatest impositions on personal freedom there is in the modern world. But tax reform is barking up the wrong tree. No matter how tax is allocated it is going to gore somebody's ox. AND THE FUNDAMENTAL RULE THAT PEOPLE FORGET IS THAT YOUR TAXES EXACTLY EQUAL WHAT GOVERNMENT SPENDS. It doesn't matter if you write a check for that amount to the government or not. Those tricky guys can just print as much money as they want and spend that, thus reducing the value of your savings (take a look at the trends regarding the value of the dollar). Or they can sell bonds and other instruments of public debt that will bite you in the butt later. Or sell public (i.e. YOUR) assets like land, highways, natural resources or whatever. Or they can create entitlement programs that create 'obligations' that grow without limit even though they sound like a good idea at the time.

      Control of and reduction of government spending is the only true act of tax reform that matters. Everything else is just moving the pain from one place to another.

  43. Re:No, that is a dictionary definition by drhamad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's a dictionary definition. That is NOT a US antitrust law (or anyone elses antitrust law) definition. A monopoly market exists when one firm (or a small number of firms) have the ability to raise prices above the [competitive] market level. That alone is not an antitrust violation though. You also need to have them actually do something which is detrimental to the marketplace (predatory pricing, pricing below cost, etc).

    --
    -Daniel
  44. Re:appeals process by drhamad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To appeal the FCC decision they'd have to go to the courts. Since the FCC is an administrative agency, the courts will basically look only at whether or not the FCC's decision was arbitrary/capricious. That's a pretty tough standard.

    By the way, one of the main reasons XM/Sirius was likely approved was because they both lose craptons (that's the technical term) of money. If the choice is zero providers of a service, or one, we prefer taking the one. The other reason it can/has/will be approved is that there's many ways to get music in your car... FM Radio, HD Radio, CD's, iPod's/podcasts, etc. Between the two of these things, they came up with enough reason to approve it.

    In the case of VZW/Alltel... well certainly there's no danger of VZW going bankrupt. Alltel is a different story. Their financial picture isn't all that pretty. But just one of them being in trouble won't necessarily be enough to approve it. And certainly there's no other way to get mobile phone service than to use a... mobile phone. But of course there's still 4 major cell carriers. I'd bet this is approved, but for different reasons than XM/Sirius.

    --
    -Daniel
  45. Re:Will Verizon convert Alltel to CDMA? by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

    And yet you will still be using a GSM phone network and have sims... Are there plans to have sims for CDMA networks such as Verizon or Sprint ?

    --
    waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
  46. Re:No, that is a dictionary definition by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

    Does that mean Starbucks is a monopoly?

  47. Well, that was fun.... by Delecron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Verizon now has a network that no one will be able to touch for years. Even if ATT bought everyone else it wouldn't have such dominate coverage (That's after getting the technology integrated). In the end ATT will never be able to catch up. Verizon and Alltel are both on the same path to LTE, will have little to no technology integration issues and will save billions in operating and roaming costs. Between their acquisition of MCI, FIOS TV and Internet and now this dominating wireless coverage they pretty much own any kind of retail data you could want to purchase. Wimax is going to be relegated as the last huge failure by Sprint as they fade into the background. Only thing to do is sit back and wait for the commercial where the VZW guy stretches his hand out to Chad and says "Your not such a bad guy". As Chad cracks a tear and puts his hand out the VZW guy rips it off and beats him to death with it.

    1. Re:Well, that was fun.... by vaporland · · Score: 1

      that visual made hot coffee squirt out of my nose. maybe FARK will have a merger photoshop ad mashup contest...

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
  48. Re:Consumers, Subscribers, Pee-Ons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yuck. If they try that on me, I'd take 'em to small claims court. There's nothing in my contract that gives them the right to extend it by two years just because they bought Alltel. It's bad enough that the only cell provider I didn't hate is being eaten by Verizon ... to be forcefully switched to the provider I hate the most? Not cool.

  49. That might put a stop to those commercials by ASMworkz · · Score: 1

    Yaaaa, no more annoying Alltel commercials. Finally Nerds can be nerdy in peace!

    --
    Learn about Programming (C++ ASM) and Web Design and Development (PHP, CSS, Photoshop) from InfernoDevelopment.com
  50. What a bunch of f'n Monopolist Oligopolies... by tyrione · · Score: 1

    I haven't renewed my Verizon plan for 5 years. I sure as hell won't when the 3G iPhone arrives and this consolidation of competition makes me want to vomit.

    Capitalism my f'n ass.

    Where is the broad competition? I see a group of Lords running the Phone companies, once again.

    This f'n country just loves to sodomize it's patrons over and over again.

  51. You might be a redneck if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might be a redneck if you read this article and think to yourself "I wonder what this will have with the sponsorship deal of NASCAR's Ryan Newman's #12 Alltel Dodge?"

  52. Nooooooo by fabu10u$ · · Score: 1

    Alltel should have merged with another multi-regional instead, so we could have had a third national carrier. (I would count Sprint Nextel if anyone I knew could reliably get a signal here in the 9th largest MSA.)

    [Damn lameness filter!]

    --
    They say the mind is the first thing to ... uh, what's that saying again?
    1. Re:Nooooooo by sporkme · · Score: 1

      This is not so much a merger proposal as it is a buyout. Find me a regional carrier with $28 billion capital and I'll eat my cellphone.

    2. Re:Nooooooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, $6bn in Capital and $22bn in assumed debt.

    3. Re:Nooooooo by BBandCMKRNL · · Score: 1

      Alltel should have merged with another multi-regional instead, so we could have had a third national carrier. (I would count Sprint Nextel if anyone I knew could reliably get a signal here in the 9th largest MSA.) I live in the 8th largest city in the U.S. and when I changed jobs several years ago, I could no longer get a signal from Sprint in my place of employment and outside was marginal. When my contract was almost up, I surveyed my co-workers and discovered that each one had a different national carrier and AT&T was the only one that provided a signal into our building. So I switched to AT&T. The good news is that I got a GSM phone and as a bonus, the signal at my house went from marginal to strong. The bad news is that for me, there is effectively only one national carrier here.
      --
      Without the 2nd Amendment, the others are just suggestions.
  53. Re:Come and get your love! FOOLISH by edmicman · · Score: 1

    Ummmm, didn't the press release say that now all Alltel customers would now be part of Verizon's IN network? I.e., now all customers on both Verizon and Alltel can call each other without using minutes or anything.

  54. Verizon will close smaller markets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like it did in northeast with the smaller rural cities it once served. Of course, this will mean higher prices and less choice.

  55. Some Insight: rural areas and future access by vinn · · Score: 2, Informative

    I learned something interesting today.

    However, before we get to that, let me just say I think this is a good thing. I've managed several large cell accounts (500+ handsets) and I've had great experiences with Verizon - their business side is great. At least the reps I've dealt with. Conversely, the company I work for now has Alltel and I think they f*cking suck. For reference though, AT&T is the worst company I've ever deal with (500+ account). Then again, I've never dealt with Sprint. This is probably a regional thing, YMMV.

    Anyway, our rep had some interesting news today. Now, Alltel services some VERY rural areas including this remote area of Montana that I live in. According to her, Alltel in Montana will never be operated as Verizon, it is impossible due to FCC regulation. After the sale is complete, Verizon will have to divest our market and any others acquired in which there was direct competition (A & B side carrier designation).... to yet another carrier. This will be a good chunk of real estate so the expectation is that it will be to another major player.

    So what does that mean? Verizon is going to suck up a lot of urban areas and urban customers and rural customers are likely to get shafted. Shafted meaning they will be transferred to odd little local carriers (yes - they still exist), such as Chinook. Why? Because Sprint still hasn't built out their PCS network in lots of rural areas. AT&T's GSM still has poor coverage in many areas too compared to Verizon & Alltel's older CDMA technology. Also, rural areas are very expensive to install infrastructure in, especially if you're dealing with mountains.

    My recommendation for anyone maintaining a large cell account: stop buy equipment and renewing contracts. This deal will likely take 6 months for acquisition, and then a year for assimilation. That means, get your existing contracts as close to expiration as you can so that you're not incurring costs to break your contract. Right now breaking an Alltel contract is approximately $175 /line.

    --
    ----- obSig
    1. Re:Some Insight: rural areas and future access by sporkme · · Score: 1

      Interesting. So AllTel was allowed to compete with Verizon, but in buying AllTel, Verizon will not be allowed to be a sole provider, and even worse will be forced to yield the turf to another competitor, who will then be their competitor for that area? Is this only for markets where only AllTel and Verizon exist? I can believe that the regulations would stipulate something so ridiculous, but it seems that all Verizon would have to do is to spin off something like "MontanaTel" in which to entrust the market, while holding a controlling interest. Also, the very fact that we're basically fresh out of CDMA providers providers makes the FCC the bad guy in this, in that ultimately it is their regulation that sticks it to the rural providers.

      As an aside, we just had a major set of tornadoes rip through a rural area of my state, and the only provider that kept the network up was Verizon. Days later, power is still out 1/2 hour to my south, but they have kept the generators located at many towers fueled. The same was true a few years back when a tornado took out the grid to a large portion of my metro area... we were able to conduct business by having our lines forwarded to a few Verizon phones.

    2. Re:Some Insight: rural areas and future access by spockman · · Score: 1

      This may become very interesting. I live in a rural area, well really 10 miles from a major city, and since last Jan when Verizon bought a local provider (Cricket) my connection at home has been terrible. I used to connect to an Alltel tower in extended mode and had full signal. After the buyout I ended up connecting to the nearest Verizon tower which is 10 miles away and berely have any signal. All calls and emails to Verizon said they are looking into putting a tower up between us and another small town, that was over a year and a half ago and still nothing. If this means that I can again connect to that Alltel tower, which is only 1 mile away it would be great! I have my doubts but I guess I have to wait and see.

    3. Re:Some Insight: rural areas and future access by stands2reason · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess lucky me. In the rural Florida area where I live, a $10 Tracfone that we picked up actually has better coverage that our Alltel phones. Probably has something to do with the GSM technology vs. CDMA. Which is good news for me 'cause I feel like switching soon.

    4. Re:Some Insight: rural areas and future access by vinn · · Score: 1

      This probably has more to do with a tower/repeater location than anything having to do with CDMA or GSM. You probably have a GSM tower much closer to you than a CDMA tower. It could even have to do with the size of the antenna on the Tracfone.

      --
      ----- obSig
  56. ads by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    So how do you think they're going to kill off the verizon guy in the alltel commercials?

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  57. Re:Will Verizon convert Alltel to CDMA? by nnull · · Score: 1

    I wish AT&T's data could even compete with Verizons or Sprints, currently it sucks. As for T-Mobile, well, they've been promising us a workable 3G for years and still have nothing. Better phones, better service, but crappy data and really crappy data plans as well.

  58. In CA Verizon best by wshwe · · Score: 2, Funny

    In California Verizon has the best overall network. The big losers in this deal are Sprint and T-Mo. AT&T doesn't need to worry because it's got Apple on their side for 4 more years.

  59. Firmware versus new phone by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Until recently, most phones lacked over-the-air firmware upgrade capability. True but generally the phone manufacturers don't exactly spend a ton of effort on firmware upgrades either. They'd rather you just bought a new phone.
  60. Re:Will Verizon convert Alltel to CDMA? by sporkme · · Score: 1

    Are people terminally stupid when it comes to cell phone technologies?

    Yes, and about economics. Wireless phone service is a natural mono/oligopoly, just like wired connectivity in phone and cable, and energy, and many other services we buy. It is a question of favorable economy of scale, prior investment, knowledge and capability. The whole "Go start your own wireless company then" argument is asinine.

    Furthermore, I don't consider the customer service of either company to be below average for wireless providers. I consider both to be well above average compared to most utilities and companies with call centers, speaking from my experience.

  61. Re:Come and get your love! FOOLISH by funky49 · · Score: 1

    mmm, i was making a joke... tough guy.

    --
    --- rapper/producer/bachelorette party stripper
  62. I don't call long distance much at all. by FatSean · · Score: 1

    So...uh...Yeah I'd rather have the fewer annoying commercials.

    --
    Blar.
  63. Well if you don't like the price... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    ...don't pay it!

    That's what I did. Cellphone free for well over a year. Don't miss it. Still have broadband and land lines for communication.

    --
    Blar.
  64. Cute. by FatSean · · Score: 1

    But the rich guys will always have their loop-holes, only now they have more.

    Or will there be sales tax on stock purchases? Yacht and real-estate purchases? Other kinds of investments?

    That website is full of bravado, low-brow trash talking and merchandise. The realm of the $50,000/year and under drone. No thanks, we need more taxes not less taxes to pay for this failure of a 'war'

    --
    Blar.
  65. Bahahaha I knew it...no tax on investment purchase by FatSean · · Score: 1

    So the regular shmoe who spends most of his income on neccessities gets taxed to the hilt, but the rich can get richer at an accelerated rate because they don't pay tax on the majority of their spending: investments! There is also no tax when you sell an investment either!

    Anyone who's not a Millionaire and who supports this plan is a fucking retard. It shifts the tax burden off of those who can most afford it and who have proftted the most off of the nation...to those who do all the real work.

    Such crap, no wonder the front page panders the the white trash bitch-sites.

    --
    Blar.
  66. OH GOODY!!! by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Now maybe we can stop torturing ourselves with Alltel's lame-ass "Wizard" commercials. They're sucking my will to live! Oh the humanity!

  67. Re:Bahahaha I knew it...no tax on investment purch by tiny1877 · · Score: 1

    I'm not a millionaire. Hell, I'm not even a hundred-thousandaire. I support the Fair Tax movement. Just because the "less fortunate" screw themselves with more taxes spending on their money on beer and cigarettes doesn't mean it's not fair. Besides, with their welfare checks, it's likely that the tax will be waived for them...

  68. The Wizard has been.... by cryptodan · · Score: 1

    summoned to take over Alltel. So I guess the circle guy will now be wearing a Verizon shirt in the commercials.

  69. Wait, are we back to Ma Bells again? by hacker · · Score: 1

    Wasn't the whole point of breaking up the telecommunications monopolies specifically to STOP this kind of re-merging in the future?

    Who do we have now? Verizon, AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile. I'd call that a failed attempt at making sure there are no monopolies in this space.

  70. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  71. How about Verizon embracing Alltel's ideas? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think as a society (and also as history has proven), we are afraid that the bigger companies with less flexibility tend to swallow up the smaller companies for the shear intent of profit and "screwing over the customer."

    Did anyone forget when Apple bought NeXT? That happened when Steve Jobs moved back, yes, but at the same time, they took valuable technology from NeXT and incorporated it into what is now OS X. Why do we simply assume that Verizon is going to screw over Alltel customers as well?

    What I'm hoping for is that it will be the other way around. Verizon will see that there is a benefit to Alltel's business model and that in order to compete with AT&T, they need to have more flexibility and customer service. On /. (and HoFo), Verizon and AT&T are always compared. Verizon's flexibility sucks, phones are locked down, cancellation fees are high, changing plans is difficult (especially when downgrading), and phone choices are abysmal. AT&T's coverage sucks, customer service also sucks, but phone choices are better. Each one has their advantages.

    I know this because I'm a customer of both. I have a Verizon phone to talk to my family and an AT&T phone to talk to my friends and girlfriend (who have switched to AT&T simply because the phones are better). I want Verizon network stability with AT&T phone choices! Alltel's phones were generally better and more flexible than Verizon. I hope this merge will bring that to Verizon.

  72. More like food, utilities and clothing... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    All but the absolute skid-row bums spend far more on food, clothes and utilities than they do on beer and smokes.

    I forsee a booming business in counterfeit 'I'm poor and don't need to pay this extra sales tax' ID cards.

    It's naive plan in concept, and a non-starter for actual implementation.

    --
    Blar.
  73. Correlation? by hikaricloud · · Score: 1

    Sprint Nextel's dying. It has to vacate it's Direct Connect spectrum by the 26th of this month, killing millions of users and losing a great bit of their coverage, which will effectively cripple the company.

    Alltel was the bottom wrung of the five main companies. (Though the commercials were funny.) So Verizon scooped them up, making them the number one carrier with the extra customers.

    AT&T is planning on acquiring US Cellular, which will only net them around 6 million extra customers...

    After this month, really all that's left is AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile.

    Monopolies aside, if Verizon is allowed to acquire Alltel, AT&T should be allowed to acquire T-Mobile. Then we'd have two giant companies vying for power of America's network, while a bunch of itty bitty little local companies (Cricket, MetroPCS, Qwest) and a bunch of prepaid companies (Boost, Virgin Mobile, Helio) flit about like flies.

    Two colossal companies. Hmm. Microsoft and Apple?

    However this goes, I am interested to see what Google can bring to the table, whenever they figure out what's shakin' in their court.

    --
    There's a lot of fucked up shit on the internet. And I've downloaded it all.