Slashdot Mirror


Meet the Laptop You Will (Won't?) Use In 2015

robert2cane writes "The Compenion concept notebook, designed by Felix Schmidberger, eschews the familiar clamshell design in favor of two superbright organic LED panels that slide into place next to each other, making the notebook just three-quarters of an inch thick." Really this page is just some renderings of some concept computers that are pretty far out of practical production reach. Some interesting ideas, but mostly a whole lot of 'Yeah, right.'

231 comments

  1. The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, great! by damburger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lets just hope car AI has been perfected by 2015 or we are all going to get mown down by someone who just has to check their facebook profile.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  2. Uhhh OK. by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >Really this page is just some renderings of some concept computers that are pretty far out of practical production reach. Some >interesting ideas, but mostly a whole lot of yeah right.

    Then why is it on /.?? Slow Monday morning?? Whatever happened to the "stuff that MATTERS" part of the slogan??

    1. Re:Uhhh OK. by Kokuyo · · Score: 5, Funny

      You must be new here...

    2. Re:Uhhh OK. by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 4, Funny

      Some interesting ideas, but mostly a whole lot of yeah right.

      Actually, mostly a whole lot of 500 Internal Server Error.

    3. Re:Uhhh OK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of an article we saw a while back on /. . It composed of 'pictures' of some future laptop. It was obviously a hoax as it had something like 4TB of flash memory and an insanely fast CPU. I just can't remember the details and I'm not having much luck searching /. for it :(

      Can anyone recall this and find the article? It was a few years ago now so it would be interesting to see just how "out there" it was.

    4. Re:Uhhh OK. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      >Really this page is just some renderings of some concept computers that are pretty far out of practical production reach. Some >interesting ideas, but mostly a whole lot of yeah right.

      Then why is it on /.?? Slow Monday morning?? Whatever happened to the "stuff that MATTERS" part of the slogan??

      This probably mattered to someone A MONTH AGO when it was posted. Look at the date on the blog.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    5. Re:Uhhh OK. by hesiod · · Score: 5, Funny

      Meet the web server you won't use in 2008.

    6. Re:Uhhh OK. by timster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh, come on. "Stuff that matters" used to be 90% case mods. That's why so many sites were "slashdotted" back in the day -- they were all people's personal Web sites where they had posted their leet case mods.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    7. Re:Uhhh OK. by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 4, Funny

      Meet the web server you won't use in 2008.

      Just what I wanted, a Diet Code Red Mountain Dew sinus rinse and keyboard wash.

    8. Re:Uhhh OK. by mikael · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    9. Re:Uhhh OK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it was none of them. Its a /. article I was looking for and it looked more conventional, it's just the specs were way out there, especially the CPU and storage.

      The pics made it out to be real and 'now'.

    10. Re:Uhhh OK. by tsjaikdus · · Score: 1

      I guess the 256-processor laptop is used to host the server

    11. Re:Uhhh OK. by skraps · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? I thought they stopped making Diet Code Red. Where do you live?

      --
      Karma: -2147483648 (Mostly affected by integer overflow)
    12. Re:Uhhh OK. by zrq · · Score: 1

      Cool, thanks for the links, some of those were very interesting.

    13. Re:Uhhh OK. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Meet the web server you won't use in 2008.

      Indeed, the whole site appears to be 403 Forbidden now. It looks like freehostia.com has yanked it for being too popular.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    14. Re:Uhhh OK. by mikesd81 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Google Cache.

      Now scroll down and see the date is: This entry was posted on Saturday, July 5th, 2008 at 9:26 am and is filed under future design. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. That would ....2 days ago not a month.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    15. Re:Uhhh OK. by canUbeleiveIT · · Score: 1

      In the US Midwest. But I travel a lot and I can't ever recall having trouble finding it. Within the last year I found it in UT, IN, OH, KY, IL, MO, NM, TX that I can remember for sure. Maybe your local Pepsico bottler doesn't produce it?

    16. Re:Uhhh OK. by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's just a common conversion mistake, happens when people use improper unit notation.

      GP was actually using Internet months, which pass roughly 15 times faster than Meatspace months. Well, at least now they do, the conversion is increasing exponentially; for example, "All Your Base" was a popular meme for one Internet Month, but that worked out to about 3 months in meatspace, and presumably the next Internet Month-long meme (I predict it will have something to do with Anime, we haven't seen one of those in a while and we're about due) will only last in meatspace for a matter of days, if not hours.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    17. Re:Uhhh OK. by finkployd · · Score: 1

      Meet the soda you will not drink in 2015

  3. hmm by Venture37 · · Score: 1

    so by 2015 we'll have finally migrated to windows vista??

    1. Re:hmm by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I am not sure. it could be a laptop finally able to run vista by 2015, or it is some linux users boredom who are running kde 5.2 with a Vista icon set and backgrounds.

      The task bar that is 1/8 of the screen is the clue.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:hmm by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Chances are that in 2015 laptops will be more able to run ReactOS as it is finally released in the 1.0 golden release, than Windows Vista. I am sure Microsoft will have Windows 8.0 by then which still won't be able to be run by any laptop.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  4. I bet... by God+of+Lemmings · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that Felix Schmidberger looks at his fingers while he types.

    --
    Non sequitur: Your facts are uncoordinated.
    1. Re:I bet... by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      that Felix Schmidberger looks at his fingers while he types.

      Hah, onlu dumb peopke meed to look ar their fongerd ti write.

  5. The future - same as today ... by trolltalk.com · · Score: 4, Funny

    Internal Server Error
    The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

    Please contact the server administrator, support@freehostia.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

    More information about this error may be available in the server error log.

    Apache/1.3.33 Server at future-design.freehostia.com Port 80

    BTW: You can have my keyboard when you pry it from my cold dead hands!

    1. Re:The future - same as today ... by houghi · · Score: 1

      BTW: You can have my keyboard when you pry it from my cold dead hands!

      No problem. That can be arranged.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:The future - same as today ... by craagz · · Score: 1

      so much talk about RTFA! how can a soul RTFA when there are "500 Internal Server Errors" pluralized for comic effect

    3. Re:The future - same as today ... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ways To Know You've Failed As A Comedian:

      1) You need to point out your jokes.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:The future - same as today ... by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yup, the site is pretty overloaded. Coral cache to the rescue!

      (Not that the site is really worth the effort...)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:The future - same as today ... by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      Error: 500 Internal Server Error

      Server CoralWebPrx/0.1.19 (See http://coralcdn.org/) at 129.74.74.16:8080

      Well, at least the cached copy is kinda up to date :P

      Coral Cache has never worked for me. I really don't know what all the fuss is about.

    6. Re:The future - same as today ... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Ways To Know You've Failed As A Comedian:

      1) You need to point out your jokes.

      2) You are posting your jokes on Slashdot.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:The future - same as today ... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      For me, I only get consistently good results when I use port 8080. Supposedly, they made it so that you don't need to add port 8080 to the url, but when I do that it often doesn't work for me.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:The future - same as today ... by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Ways To Know You've Failed As A Comedian:

      1) You need to point out your jokes.

      2) You are posting your jokes on Slashdot.

      3) Someone on Slashdot actually mods your post as funny, even when in reality it is not. It just means they were too drink to click on troll.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    9. Re:The future - same as today ... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Ways To Know You've Failed As A Comedian:

      1) You need to point out your jokes.

      2) You are posting your jokes on Slashdot.

      3) Someone on Slashdot actually mods your post as funny, even when in reality it is not. It just means they were too drink to click on troll.

      4) "drunk" accidentally becoming "drink" reminds you of the joke about putting "U" and "I" together. Whose stupid idea was that anyway?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    10. Re:The future - same as today ... by Hari+Kant · · Score: 1

      Forbidden You don't have permission to access /future-design/meet-the-laptop-youll-use-in-2015/ on this server. Apache/1.3.33 Server at future-design.freehostia.com Port 80

    11. Re:The future - same as today ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or in other words, you're Carlos Mencia.

    12. Re:The future - same as today ... by craagz · · Score: 1

      Ways To Know You've Failed As A Comedian:

      1) You need to point out your jokes

      in italics!!

    13. Re:The future - same as today ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW: You can have my keyboard when you pry it from my cold dead hands!

      Your proposal is acceptable.

    14. Re:The future - same as today ... by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      Anyway, as I understand it, it doesn't matter at all if you have or haven't RTFA. Everyone is commenting it anyway. Evolution is much slower than expected, I was thinking the laptop become extincted by 2015.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    15. Re:The future - same as today ... by duckInferno · · Score: 2, Funny

      5) You're replying to a temporary meme thread on slashdot, each post of which is decremental in funny score to the last.

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
    16. Re:The future - same as today ... by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      5) You're replying to a temporary meme thread on slashdot, each post of which is decremental in funny score to the last.

      6) You've run out of ideals for jokes, but still seem able to add one last one in that is worse than all of the other ones, yet it gets a reply to keep the joking going on for another 15 seconds before it finally dies at Slashdot.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    17. Re:The future - same as today ... by duckInferno · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about my post or yours?


      ... oh.

      --
      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
  6. Tactile response by Swizec · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what's the tactile typing response on those advance touchscreen keyboards of the future?

    I bet there will be a lot of disgruntled programmers/novelists/actual-users-of-computers in the future.

    1. Re:Tactile response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is one big issue that was discussed in some HCI rings when talking about touch screens and touch screen keyboards. Either people will get used to the idea of no tactile response or... something new will need to be created.

    2. Re:Tactile response by paradxum · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I love that argument! Simply because the answer is so obvious. Most (newer) laptops have bluetooth integrated in them. If you just NEED a keyboard (really, nothing wrong with that... I NEED one for what I do) just get a bluetooth keyboard for when you are "working" ... there are even roll up ones to take when you are traveling.

    3. Re:Tactile response by Swizec · · Score: 1

      Yes people could get used to no tactile response, but you forget they have been evolving with tactile response in mind since ... well, the beginning of evolution really. Kind of difficult to circumvent a few million years of hard-coded knowledge.

    4. Re:Tactile response by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      A tactile touchscreen? Perhaps something that gives a slight tap back whenever a keypress is registered?

      Alternatively,a clear keyboard with a screen underneath it would allow for tactile feedback, as well as the advantages of a touchscreen board. The overlay could also be removed so that only the touchscreen is accessible....

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:Tactile response by bhima · · Score: 1

      There's already been a patent on a tactile touchscreen... I probably read here too.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    6. Re:Tactile response by Jurily · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oblig.

      First of all, the E70 has a full keyboard, not some shitty stripped down, tap-and-pray smudgy piece of shit. Nokia uses a technology that's even more advanced than the iPhone's tap screen, allowing you to actually feel the keys you press as you're pressing them! The technology is called "tactile response," and it allows you to do things like dial a phone number without staring at your screen like a shit-chucking ape. In fact, every other cellphone ever made has this technology, sometimes called "buttons."

    7. Re:Tactile response by AngelofDeath-02 · · Score: 1

      why not include a few electric contacts, so that your feedback is a slight tingling sensation?

      I guess someone would horribly misuse it eventually, but that's what disclaimers are for. heh

      --
      No, I am not an English major. My posts are subject to typos and incorrect grammar. Do not expect perfection.
    8. Re:Tactile response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite obviously it gives you a small electric jolt on each keypress as feedback.

    9. Re:Tactile response by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      With a little luck, and some help from engineers, they will still have tactile feedback. I'm actually rather anxious to try one of these Nokia "haptic" screens.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    10. Re:Tactile response by Saint+Gerbil · · Score: 1

      The Compenion concept notebook two very shiny screens which lay flat so would be hard to see. No tactile response on the keyboard(unless the surface is electrified.) and a pen with no where to store it when your on the go. The Canova concept notebook looks like the EeePC V2. again same problems except that it can bee tilted and isn't as shiny and has ports. The Cario concept notebook Seperate keyboard pannel with no buttons requiring an on screen keyboard (WTF!) why design a laptop which can be used in a 20 year old car ?

    11. Re:Tactile response by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Why include a keyboard at all then?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Tactile response by clickety6 · · Score: 3, Funny

      microscopic ray guns built into every pixel that fire tiny repulsor beams into your fingertips as you type, creating the illusion of feedback. Plus tiny speakers also built into each pixel that creates the sound of clacking springs. the deluze model has miniature tractor beam guns bulti in for those who want that "spilled the coffee / ate a doughnut over the keys" slightly tacky feel...

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    13. Re:Tactile response by digitig · · Score: 1

      To configure bluetooth for the external keyboard.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    14. Re:Tactile response by jsiren · · Score: 1

      I have seen the future and it's Das Touchscreen.

      --
      Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
    15. Re:Tactile response by fhage · · Score: 1
      what's the tactile typing response on those advance touchscreen keyboards of the future

      Simple. Like the Wiimote when it points at a button on the screen, the touchscreen will "thump" using an inertial device when the pressure threshold is reached and the keystroke is registered. It's very effective.

      However, I hate finger prints and smudges on my screen. Using a stylus for long periods gives me cramps. IMO, This is the fundimental flaw with touchscreen technology.

      The need for keyboards with separate, physical keys will be around for a long time.

    16. Re:Tactile response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So with a huge amount of money, time, and brainpower these geniuses have replicated something that has been around since the late 1800s?!?

      Great. I think we can start loading the B-Ark now.

    17. Re:Tactile response by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Quite obviously it gives you a small electric jolt on each keypress as feedback.

      Obviously. It also projects the Windows Navigation sound (that's the click you turned off because it was so annoying - remember?) into your head using this.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    18. Re:Tactile response by *weasel · · Score: 1

      In any respectable future we have at least foolproof voice-to-text, if not sub-vocal mics and/or brain-interfaces.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    19. Re:Tactile response by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see a "computer-in-the-screen" laptop with a snap-on Bluetooth keyboard and built-in hinge stand for the screen so that you don't have a hinge with cables running through it but still have the portability of a laptop (for the most part).

      Other things I'd like to see:

      • Keyboards that recess when the laptop is closed so that they can't touch the screen and create smudges/scratches/creases.
      • More reliable hinge construction that isn't so subject to metal fatigue. Hinges on my door don't fail after two or three years and they hold a hundred times more weight. Enough with the cheap pot metal already.
      • More reliable wiring through the hinges. Ideally, don't run wires through the hinges, but instead, use the left hinge itself to carry power and data and the right hinge as a ground. Use high voltage, low current DC through the hinge (post-inverter) and multiplex send and receive data on the power side in a half-duplex fashion isochronously alternating between the two directions. All you have to carry is a stream of pixel data changes and data for the mic/camera/wireless.
      • Screens that are easier to clean. Smudges suck in sunlight, and plastic screen faces are really hard to clean. Glass, though, is probably too fragile unless you reinforce the screen dramatically. Not sure what would be a good alternative. Maybe some easy-clean coating on the plastic screen. Dunno.
      • Ultracapacitors instead of batteries (when the energy density gets there).
      • Better HD reliability
      • Triple screens with two that slide sideways in opposite directions, then slide forwards/backwards into the same plane and hinge in such a way that the front edges of the screen stay nearly together/borderless, this giving surround visuals and more screen real estate without sacrificing footprint size when closed.

      Maybe it's just me?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    20. Re:Tactile response by emilper · · Score: 1

      they'll have some tiny, almost invisible needles in those screens. You will also get an electric shock when making spelling errors.

  7. 2015 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, well. It seem that 2015 will not be the year of the Linux desktop.

    1. Re:2015 by joaommp · · Score: 1

      does that look like a desktop to you? seriously. you will have X-Surface though.

    2. Re:2015 by Ruvim · · Score: 1

      But it will be! The only OS-specific reference on the page is "Apache/1.3.33 Server" and we all know what is Apache's native OS!

    3. Re:2015 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, well. It seem that 2015 will not be the year of the Linux desktop.

      Duh, it won't need to be. All of 2009,2010,2011,2012,2013 and 2014 will be the year of the Linux desktop.

    4. Re:2015 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, well. It seem that 2015 will not be the year of the Linux desktop.

      Not unless Windows 7 comes out in 2015.

    5. Re:2015 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we'll totally be using windows vista in 2015

  8. old news by hansraj · · Score: 3, Informative
  9. I already have it by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a Sony Vaio 280p Micro PC. I bought it in 2007, though it came out in 2005. It's small enough to fit in a jacket pocket and I can walk and browse at the same time. It's got wi-fi, bluetooth, 2 cameras, a USB port, a fingerprint reader, et al. Granted, it still has XP on it, but I'm going to put Ubuntu on it one of these days. I'm not about to go back to a full-size laptop, no matter how much cooler it looks.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:I already have it by sm62704 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      For the life of me I can't figure out why anyone would buy a computer that was manufactured by a company that would put rootkits on music CDs.

      You would buy a computer from Sony? What were you thinking?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    2. Re:I already have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the usefulness behind having 2 cameras? Is there something one just can't pull off?

    3. Re:I already have it by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      One is a webcam pointed at you. The other is higher quality on the other side for taking pics/video.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    4. Re:I already have it by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm not thrilled with Sony, but I'm hard pressed to find anything like the micro pc that I like. The memory duo whatever card slot is useless, as everything else I have uses SD. It came with a lot of junk I had to uninstall, but other than that I love it. Hopefully they'll get their act together and actually adopt a standard everyone else uses for once instead of making their own.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    5. Re:I already have it by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hopefully they'll get their act together and actually adopt a standard everyone else uses for once instead of making their own.

      Sony? You must be new here. And by here I mean Earth.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:I already have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      much easier to have the rootkits pre-installed

    7. Re:I already have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rookkit would only infect doze users, so what's the problem? Their boxes are already spambots full of junk controlling their machines. One more makes little odds, assuming there was a single case of it happening.

    8. Re:I already have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony have good hardware engineers, the problem is they're in a a constant state of internal warfare with Sony BMG and similar copyright / DRM obsessives in their media wing. The current mp3 player market could mostly have been theirs given that MiniDisc launched years before, if only it hadn't been horribly crippled by stupid DRM and terrible transfer software.

    9. Re:I already have it by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hopefully they'll get their act together and actually adopt a standard everyone else uses for once instead of making their own.

      Sony? You must be new here. And by here I mean Earth.

      I am from Regina in the Deneb sector, and even I got that joke.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    10. Re:I already have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, without a decent OS, what do you use that for? installing XP every other month?

  10. New machines need new operating systems... by ClaraBow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hardware designers may come up with some beautiful and innovated designs, but there needs to be a new OS to go with the hardware which will take advantage of the machine's unique design. The iphone works because the software and hardware work together and provide a good user experience. I say this because I noticed on the screenshots that these new amazing machines were running Vista. I know they are just rendered images, but nevertheless, it takes away from the hardwares' appeal. Tablets could have been a great success if the hardware manufactures had used a better OS than XP with some extensions.

    1. Re:New machines need new operating systems... by Tom · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, one of the screenshots had a clearly visible logo of XP. That's interesting, if it's meant for 2015...

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:New machines need new operating systems... by craagz · · Score: 1

      i am sure, XP will be extinct (M$ poaching) by then and having XP logos on wallpapers will be considered retro

    3. Re:New machines need new operating systems... by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, one of the screenshots had a clearly visible logo of XP. That's interesting, if it's meant for 2015...

      That's because by 2015 Microsoft still won't have an operating system better than Windows XP.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:New machines need new operating systems... by Hoplite3 · · Score: 1

      Hey. Don't rub it in our faces that you got to see the pictures before the server flamed out.

      --
      Use the Firehose to mod down Second Life stories!
    5. Re:New machines need new operating systems... by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

      Hey. Don't rub it in our faces that you got to see the pictures before the server flamed out.

      Cached version here:
      http://future-design.freehostia.com.nyud.net:8090/future-design/meet-the-laptop-youll-use-in-2015/

      I can really recommend the Slashdotter extension for Firefox. Among other nice functions it adds links to cached versions after all links in the summary.

    6. Re:New machines need new operating systems... by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

      That's because by 2015 Microsoft still won't have an operating system better than Windows XP.

      You know, this got modded funny but that's only 7 years away. If Windows 7 sucks like Vista and is delayed like vista (both of which seem not entirely unreasonable hypotheses), it could very well be that in 2015 they still haven't improved over windows.

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
  11. 'Futurism' reflects the current age by Langfat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok, not all of it, but most of it.

    Case in point? Look at the holographic shark that jumps out of the cinema and bites Marty McFly in Back to the Future II. It looks so 80s because, well, it was made in the 80s. It is likely that even 7 years from now there will be technology which hasn't been invented yet that will be incorporated in every computer -- that is, assuming notebooks are even considered reasonable any more... i personally expect things to go more the way of the iPhone/Archos for portable computation.

    1. Re:'Futurism' reflects the current age by that+IT+girl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mod parent up for mentioning Back to the Future, which I don't think I'm far off the mark in saying is the best movie ever. :) Seriously, though, you are quite right. By 2015 it's possible that the traditional idea of the laptop/notebook will have been forgone entirely for a whole new design we haven't thought of yet.

      In speculation... although I enjoy typing, I'd like to see some voice recognition in place for dictating (useful when on the road, if you must use your computer there) rather than the usual manual entry, at least for things like emailing or putting together a speech. But, as with everything in the future, all we can do is wait and see. And create.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    2. Re:'Futurism' reflects the current age by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      I'd like to say that I agree that the marketplace will fulfill and push, but instead I see us waiting for the patent from something that was patented some time ago to change our lives when the patent finally expires.

  12. Sites down by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I guess the site was running on the laptop and it went back to 2015.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    1. Re:Sites down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redundant? I think it's funny...

    2. Re:Sites down by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. With a latency of 204640924123, it's no wonder the site went down.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  13. Obligatory conversion by Knx · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because there are still a few countries which haven't yet adopted the U.S. customary units (just joking, hey ... but go ahead and start bashing me now): three-quarters of an inch is approximately 1.9 centimeters. Which is not *that* thin, IMO. At least for a 2015 laptop, I mean.

    --
    The problem with Slashdot memes is that YOU INSENSITIVE CLOD!
    1. Re:Obligatory conversion by oodaloop · · Score: 0, Troll

      What's that in African male elephants?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:Obligatory conversion by Slashidiot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to wikipedia, African male elephants are about 3.64m tall, so that would be 0.005234 African male elephants.

      Just FYI, it would also be 0.00635 African female elephants, or 0.0127 zebras.

      Actually, when expressed in these units, it definately looks a bit too thick for a laptop.

      --
      Tis women makes us love, Tis Love that makes us sad, Tis sadness makes us drink, And drinking makes us mad.
    3. Re:Obligatory conversion by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      We use metric when describing our NUCLEAR WEAPONS!!!

      (That's a "Civilization" reference, not a threat...)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Obligatory conversion by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      A laptop that's three-quarters of an inch thick? That's crazy talk!

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  14. Scary! by sm62704 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The last picture in the series has a guy in the driver's seat of a car. Presumably he's parked... but there are some incredibly stupid people out there. On my way to work this morning I saw a guy trying to glue his rearview mirror on (no kidding).

    There are enough distractions as it is - a mayfly buzzed past my face while traveling Friday, and I thought it was a wasp and almost wrecked the car.

    Whoever laid out that series of photos, why can't you be a little more responsible? People are stupid. Please don't encourage dangerous stupidity! It's bad enough that kids think it's safe to text on their cells while driving, you'll have them thinking it's ok to use your computer while driving.

    That was an incredibly irresponsible photo, whoever posted it should be ashamed of him/herself.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:Scary! by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Troll

      There are enough distractions as it is - a mayfly buzzed past my face while traveling Friday, and I thought it was a wasp and almost wrecked the car.

      Wow, what an asshole.

      I got stung on my right eyelid by a bee once as a kid. I didn't almost wreck my bike.

      You're piloting a ton of steel down the road, and you almost wrecked the car because of a bug? If a black widow is on your forehead, you'd better fucking pull over before you smack it if you're going to swerve otherwise.

      You'd better learn to take one for the team.

      why can't you be a little more responsible? People are stupid.

      Obviously.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Scary! by Vornan19 · · Score: 0

      An acquaintance once related to me how during a bus trip he saw some guy driving next to the bus with a laptop in the passenger seat, newspaper over the steering wheel, and a cell phone in his hand!

      Said he was glad to be on the bus and not another car!

    3. Re:Scary! by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Looking at your sig... oh, the irony.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    4. Re:Scary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      something stupid.

      Now if he replied to this, that would be irony.

    5. Re:Scary! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Thank you. His username as well, I wonder how many DUIs he has. Not much is as distracting as a few drinks too many.

      As if he has never been startled by anything.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    6. Re:Scary! by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      You're welcome. I agree, it's not like MOST people would be able to keep completely focused with a large, buzzing, potentially stinging insect flying around their face. And your point about the photo with the computer is valid. Just because we know that it's just for display and not ACTUALLY SUPPOSED TO be used that way, doesn't mean that Joe Dumbass out there knows that. I have met some stupid, stupid people in my time.

      Anyway, Mr. High and Mighty over here just joined my (small) list of foes. Have a nice day :)

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    7. Re:Scary! by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I'll try. This isn't my best weekend; my anniversary was thursday and it gives me a bit of trouble on years that I don't have a girlfriend. I certainly hope you're having a better day than I am!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  15. In 2015: Internal Server Error by tensop · · Score: 1

    Perhaps in 2015, This laptop will have enough power to circumvent 500 Internal Server Errors.

  16. No touch screen keyboards please! by jabjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why on earth would I want a touch screen keyboard? You can't feel the keys! I touch type solely on the feel of the keys. Why would I want to have to go back to looking down? If I using my hands to input, having to look at them as they do so is wasting my time. Yer they look good on a set of star trek, but in reality that ship would have been destroyed long ago but villains with keyboards they don't have to look down at to press fire. Until the touch screen raises where buttons are, you are using one sense less while working, and if you aren't using that touch screen to look at, what is the point?

    1. Re:No touch screen keyboards please! by craagz · · Score: 1

      maybe the touchscreen is calibrated so that different keys give off tiny little electric shocks unique to those keys. You know 2015.. it could be anything..

      Then there will be discussions based on "H key is my fave key, it gives off a holistic shock!"

    2. Re:No touch screen keyboards please! by rootooftheworld · · Score: 1

      how about simple soundsg given off at keypresses

      --
      I know full well that tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack
  17. Too Much Touch by Tom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm a big fan of multitouch, and in fact am an early adopter, and one of the probably 2000 or so people who bought a TouchStream (the first multitouch keyboard on the market, many years ago, long before TouchStream went bancrupt and was then acquired by Apple...)

    But exactly that experience has taught me one thing: You can't beat tactile feedback for keyboard input. As long as your display doesn't have tactile feedback, multitouch sucks and won't replace a regular keyboard.

    What multitouch is great at is analog input, i.e. the stuff we use the mouse for right now. Dragging stuff, resizing stuff, drawing shapes (for gestures or graphics, or to select, whatever) all that kind of things. But when it comes to typing text, you don't want to do that on surface that doesn't give you tactile feedback. FWIW, I can type more error-free with my eyes closed on a regular keyboard, than with my eyes open on a touch-keyboard.

    So if those designers could shed their fanboyship of multitouch surfaces for a while, and do what designers ought to do for a change, namely look for the meeting point between form and function, they'd find a lot more and better applications for multitouch displays than keyboard replacements.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:Too Much Touch by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      Keys that automatically fit to your hand size. Keys that move to be under you fingers. Keys that teach you how to spell. Resizable keys. Keys that change color to fit your mood or chosen scheme. Keys that fade if never used. Keys that rearrange themselves for new kinds of games. Keys that align themselves by application to make some combinations faster to type. Keys that show different characters by character set and language. Who wouldn't want one of these?

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    2. Re:Too Much Touch by Shaitan+Apistos · · Score: 1

      I'm a big fan of multitouch, and in fact am an early adopter, and one of the probably 2000 or so people who bought a TouchStream (the first multitouch keyboard on the market, many years ago, long before TouchStream went bancrupt and was then acquired by Apple...)

      But exactly that experience has taught me one thing: You can't beat tactile feedback for keyboard input. As long as your display doesn't have tactile feedback, multitouch sucks and won't replace a regular keyboard.

      What multitouch is great at is anal

      I was reading slashdot on my cellphone, this is how my phone's browser decided to render your comment.

    3. Re:Too Much Touch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other thing most people do not seem to realize with this interesting idea (it is at least that), is heat. Not quite sure how well those screens would hold up to something at about 90-130 degrees right under the pixels (i am looking at you cpu). Better be some bad ass cooling or shielding. I am sure people would love having this weird splotch on the screen.

      If they could also come up with some sort of tactile thing that overlays the screen that is reconfigurable. THAT would be interesting. Such as raised bumps or something...

    4. Re:Too Much Touch by danaris · · Score: 1

      If they're already talking about some sort of force-feedback for the iPhone today, I find it very hard to believe that by 2015 they won't have something working for the high-end touch devices to run highly customizable tactile feedback for a variety of different applications. I'm quite sure that a touch keyboard will be among the first things they give such feedback to.

      Once we can do that, we will be freed from having to use the exact same keyboard for word processing, programming, multimedia editing, math, and gaming, and the Optimus Maximus will seem less like a really awesome novelty, and more like a good first step :-)

      I am increasingly convinced that the computer as we see it today is very much an intermediate stage, and that it will be when it changes to match the real-world paradigms it imitates, rather than bending those paradigms to fit within its limited capacities, that we will see the beginning of the end of the infancy of the computer age.

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    5. Re:Too Much Touch by booch · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have a usable keyboard that you can use with one hand, without having to rest the keyboard on a surface. (Think of something like an umpire's counter.) Such keyboards exist, but they've not caught on to any degree.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    6. Re:Too Much Touch by Tom · · Score: 1

      Once we can do that, we will be freed from having to use the exact same keyboard for word processing, programming, multimedia editing, math, and gaming, and the Optimus Maximus will seem less like a really awesome novelty, and more like a good first step :-)

      Again, I think that's design gone off the wrong edge.

      I like my keyboard staying the same. It allows me to hit a key without having to think or look. I know where it is, and it doesn't move around, and I don't have to check in what "mode" the keyboard is in.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    7. Re:Too Much Touch by Tom · · Score: 1

      Who wouldn't want one of these?

      Me.

      I positively hate the stupid "hide unused menu options" crap, and I would absolutely hate if keys disappear just because I don't use them often.

      I would hate for my keyboard to change size, location or even colour. Maybe one initial setup step ok, but after that, stay the fuck the same because I want to hit my keys without searching for them first.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  18. Same old same old by neokushan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Every year we see all sorts of concepts for computers that we'll be using in 5, 10 or 20 years time. Yet 5, 10 or 20 years ago, the devices we used then are still largely the same.
    Sure, they're faster and have more memory, as well as maybe more colours on their screens, but ultimately they don't look all that different.
    I very much doubt any of these concepts will see the light of day unless they offer something truly useful and innovative.

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    1. Re:Same old same old by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      largely the same? o_O

      Released in 1989.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_Portable

      Now
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacBook_Air

      although I have a mobile phone more powerful then most desktops from 1989.

    2. Re:Same old same old by neokushan · · Score: 1

      Macs are a slight exception to the rule as they tend to focus on changing their style, but the only thing that's really changed (When you think about it) is the size of the device.
      They both still essentially are made up of a keyboard, screen and some inputs here and there.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    3. Re:Same old same old by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      At first, I wanted to reply with something snarky, "oh this one has a crystal ball". But then I realized the first thing I do when my laptop is booted... is opening a terminal emulator... to get to the UNIX commandline. Which was created in 1969, almost fourty years ago.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    4. Re:Same old same old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet 5, 10 or 20 years ago, the devices we used then are still largely the same.

      Mobile devices change rapidly. Today, typical mobile phones can take photos and record video, and almost everybody I know has one. 5 years ago, typical mobiles phones could send text messages. 10 years ago, typical mobiles phones just had address books. 20 years ago, I have no idea what typical mobile phones were like, because hardly anybody had one.

    5. Re:Same old same old by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      Sorry but that's bull. Processor speed, memory, graphics, storage methods. Even input devices (touchscreen, optimus keyboards, voice recognition), display devices like smart projection systems, 3-D displays, biometrics, high speed internet, terabyte desktops, etc.

      I don't know what your making your comparison on but it isn't reality.

    6. Re:Same old same old by neokushan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      None of what you mentioned, apart from the touch screen, has changed what the design of laptops or computers in general look like. I already said they got faster, more memory, clearer screens, etc. but when it comes down to it, they're still pretty much the same kinds of machines we used a decade ago.
      Optimus keyboards? That's still just a keyboard, it may be a keyboard with fancy lettering on it, but it's purpose and use is identical to the IBM keyboards of the 1980's. 3D Displays? When was the last time you actually seen one of those on a laptop? Even in "real life" situations, nobody's PC or workstation has a 3D display, nearly everything of those that we've seen are just concepts like any other and the production models that DO exist aren't very practical.
      When it comes down to it, mobile devices have made the biggest leaps in the last 5 years, mostly because of miniaturisation of existing technology, but nothing really revolutionary has hit us yet. The touch screen you mentioned has been around for a good 10 years or so, but only recently have they become all the rage on the iPhone/iPod touch - how many people do you see with tablet PC's running around, as useful as they are?

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    7. Re:Same old same old by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      Not sure how you got modded insightful. They are not the same machines we had 10 years ago. I can only assume you were not using them 10 years ago.

      It is like saying Cars are like cars 10 years ago, they still have tyres and doors and windscreens so nothing has changed with them.

      "Optimus keyboards? That's still just a keyboard, it may be a keyboard with fancy lettering on it,"

      No it isn't. It is a keyboard that can dynamically change the key caps depending on the situation. There was no such keyboard in existence 10 years ago.

      "3D Displays? When was the last time you actually seen one of those on a laptop?"

      Last month. It is quite a nice add-on for those with the gaming rigs to handle it. Certainly a PC from 10 years ago wouldn't be powerful enough to render the level of graphics you get these days.

      "how many people do you see with tablet PC's running around, as useful as they are?"

      Well obviously you have never used them. I own two (Samsung Q1 + Lenovo X61). They are very useful and more comfy to use then standard keyboard. But to say they are the same as technology from 10 years ago is laughable.

    8. Re:Same old same old by neokushan · · Score: 1

      I think you're getting my point a little bit confused. Allow me to clarify:
      I'm not saying that technology hasn't advanced in the last 10 years - that's absurd for anyone to think, but what I'm pointing out is that the designs of the devices that utilise this technology is still more or less the same.
      Sure, things may be a bit thinner or a bit curvier, but the general design of a laptop from 10 years ago is still the same as the general design of a laptop today - flip closed top with screen in it that covers a keyboard with some sort of mouse input just below it.
      Tablet PC's are the only major change in this area and they're still not all that popular. I love them as much as the next technology enthusiast, but they still don't have a huge marketshare, do they?
      There's always exceptions to every rule, there's always one design of a product that really does stand out from the crowed, that doesn't mean it's popular and in 5-10 years time, I still wouldn't expect touch screens to be a laptop's standard feature. It's a shame, but that's how it is.
      We're just too set in our ways, which is kind of what I'm getting at - Technology moves forward, but we (As in, people in general) do not.

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  19. Rollable displays and virtual keyboards by backpackcomputing · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future but in terms of display technology, I think rollable displays will be common by 2015. The rollable screens have an obvious form factor appeal. The devices will probably be cylinder shaped (think paper towel tube, but a bit smaller) with a virtual keyboard. There are already early versions of both rollable displays and virtual keyboards in existence, see http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/06/technology/06novelties.html?_r=1&ref=technology&oref=slogin and http://www.virtualdevices.net/Products.htm, respectively. By 2015 rollable displays will have full color, etc. and virtual keyboards will hopefully have haptic attributes. This is just my best guess before my morning coffee! http://backpackcomputing.com/

    1. Re:Rollable displays and virtual keyboards by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rollable makes little sense because you'll just look like you have a donkey dick in your pocket. It needs to be something that folds up. The ideal interface would just locate your eye and shoot a laser beam through it, some nice people at MIT built some glasses that used lasers mounted to them, that is just the next evolution. When your cellphone is capable of just painting a reality overlay on your retina, you're going to feel stupid carrying a roll of toilet paper around in your pants (especially when everyone is using the three seashells anyway.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Rollable displays and virtual keyboards by fprintf · · Score: 1

      Then let's hope these rollable displays have a way of also flattening back out properly. I hate it my kids bring home a school project that has been nicely rolled into a tube, and then it takes reverse rolling, weights and humidity to flatten it out. It keeps curling up maddeningly! Wouldn't it be crazy if the display kept curling at the edges?

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    3. Re:Rollable displays and virtual keyboards by Shaitan+Apistos · · Score: 4, Funny

      Rollable makes little sense because you'll just look like you have a donkey dick in your pocket.

      It already looks like I have a donkey dick in my pocket, you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:Rollable displays and virtual keyboards by TuringTest · · Score: 2, Funny

      The ideal interface would just locate your eye and shoot a laser beam through it

      What can I say? Your ideas about the ideal interface differ from mine.

      --
      Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
    5. Re:Rollable displays and virtual keyboards by renoX · · Score: 1

      >Rollable makes little sense because you'll just look like you have a donkey dick in your pocket.

      Bah, you could wear it like it a light saber (though rain may be an issue).
      The problem I foresee is that when you unroll it, you'd want to have the screen to become like a book: flat and rigid: I don't see how it would be possible.

    6. Re:Rollable displays and virtual keyboards by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Bah, you could wear it like it a light saber (though rain may be an issue).

      Sir, I pass my nerd badge on to thee. Wear it proudly, next to the many others.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. you're missing the main point! by thermian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its organic!. Therefore it's obviously better for you in every possible way!

    Or does that mean its steeped in unprocessed manure?

    I always get those two mixed up....

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
  21. Free Hosting? by miakeru · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did Slashdot really just link to a page with the words 'free' and 'host' in the URL?

    1. Re:Free Hosting? by Idbar · · Score: 1

      And I guess that I'm not living to see it :(

      You don't have permission to access future...

  22. Rejected technology by just_forget_it · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Tactile response is a huge reason we have keyboards. The technology that can replace them is here now, and has been for quite a while. But nothing can beat the practicality of a keyboard. Replacing it with a touchscreen is just impractical. There's no tactile response, and banging your fingers on a hard, unyielding surface is going to cause typing fatigue much quicker. Then, there's the fingerprints and smudging you have to deal with, along with scratches.

    There are plenty of technologies that came along that were poised to replace something but never quite made it. Remember the "push button transmission" in the mid-50's Dodge models? Of course you don't. It was supposed to do away with that antiquated lever system used to switch gears. But people LIKED the lever, and with the push button controller you could do something that the lever didn't allow you to: place your car into reverse directly from drive, which is obviously extremely dangerous.

    Then in the 1980's we saw another phenomenon: the digital dashboard. Instead of using those antiquated analog dials, automakers started using digital readouts instead. It was all computerized and cool and futuristic...and was gone by the early 1990's. People wanted the old-fashioned dials.

    To predict that the keyboard will be gone in less than 10 years is like predicting the steering wheel will be gone by then, too.

    1. Re:Rejected technology by xonar · · Score: 1

      To predict that the keyboard will be gone in less than 10 years is like predicting the steering wheel will be gone by then, too.

      Sheesh, I hope autopilot is available in 2018 :/

    2. Re:Rejected technology by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Actually its demise had something to do with how the park mechanism worked. Shifting a car out of park while on a hill requires more force then one can provide by just pushing a button and the electric assist motors of the time period proved unreliable.

      As for digidashs, they suffered from the same problem, faulty electronics. Many times they would simply go dead. The only improvement that stuck from the digidash era was the electronic speedometer sender system, it was much more reliable then the mechanical cable driven speedometers of the past.

    3. Re:Rejected technology by just_forget_it · · Score: 1

      Ahh, thanks for the revelation. I had an '88 Chrysler New Yorker with a digidash and one night my instrument panel blew a fuse, leaving me with absolutely no speedometer, gas gauge, or anything else. Turns out I used one of those compressed air pumps that plug into your cigarette lighter which was on the same fuse as the instrument panel, and it draws more than 2 amps.

      At any rate, the basic reason these "improvements" failed was that they were overly-complicated and thus more prone to failure. I've seen drive-by-wire concept cars and can't help but think what will happen when someone is driving along and all of the sudden their steering and brakes are completely gone. If something is electronic, it WILL fail, period.

    4. Re:Rejected technology by purpleque · · Score: 1

      To predict that the keyboard will be gone in less than 10 years is like predicting the steering wheel will be gone by then, too.

      In future news, auto makers have decided to stop using steering wheels in favor of laptops without keyboards.

      Check out the concept photo.

    5. Re:Rejected technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digital dashboards haven't been rejected, at least not by me. I LOVED the digital speedometer in my '88 Grand Prix, and the digital heads up display was one reason I replaced it with another Grand Prix in 2004. I guess I'm in the minority, but I certainly wouldn't call that 'rejected' tech.

    6. Re:Rejected technology by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Most vehicles today are drive by wire throttle. Direct injection diesel and gas cars have no other choice because they lack a throttle body to control acceleration in the traditional way, the pedal is literally a sensor that plugs into the car. The main reason for the switch is better fuel economy as a computer can smooth out the variations in pedal pressure some people tend to do without noticing. Steering is electronically assisted on many cars vs. the classic hydraulic assist since its cheaper to maintain. The steering rack is still connected direct so if you loose the assist you are still steer the car.

    7. Re:Rejected technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cell phone is perfect. Everyday more and more people are using one. I remember when cell phones started out about the size of a motorcycle battery.

      The corporate desktop computer on the otherhand generally has poorly written software for daily use. Many passwords are requried that are time consuming to enter and often impractical to create with the typical password guidelines. Data entry and retreval is also typically awkward. Most people require two screens which creates it own set of problems. The mouse is a great necessary toy as is the built-in finger scratch mouse/pad but are a time-consuming nightmare for anyone trying to do even low level data entry where the wrist moves back and forth countless times a minute to and from the keyboard homerow even during a half hour sitting.

      Laptops are generally way to heavy, need the OLPC type screen and good battery life, standardized batteries, of course, and decent keyboard. Ironically, speed is not the issue nor is rom or ram memory and never has been.

      Laptop audio visual presentation use has increased but is hopelessly problematic because of the vast number of different laptop hardware and software functionality and incompatability. Add to the mix several security passwords and the whole operation is hit or miss.

      Nobody I know has to use the top row F1 to F12 keyboard function keys (other than an F1 bios access interrupt), so there - that space sits wasted. But the arrow keys along with the delete, backspace and enter keys take shapes, location, and configurations to frustrate most anyone.

      Notebooks are a bit slow in coming but will likely see the biggest improvements like the cell
      has.

      The fun and excitement will be when the first notebook comes along that everybody has to have and they won't be able to keep them in stock. It is still probably a couple of years away.

                   

    8. Re:Rejected technology by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      The main thing people like about dials is that it is analogue, so very easy to read. Albeit less accurate, but who cares whether you're going 104, 105 or 106 kph. The position of the needle on a dial is what you are after.

      In many industrial settings, control dials are used a lot, and they are all turned in such a way that the needle has to point straight up in normal situation. So again the operator can easily see whether a dial is "normal" or "not normal" and thus needs more attention.

      Modern aircraft do not have mechanical dials anymore - they use electronic displays. And on that display: images of dials! Again for the ease of reading them.

      And if still not convinced: digital watches are gone for the exact same reason. A glance at the watch gives you the time virtually instantly, while a number requires interpretation.

      Admittedly digital dials give a more exact reading (not necessarily accurate, many people mix those two up), but reading is harder than an analogue dial.

      My multi-meter is analogue, because in 90% of the time that I use it, I need to know "is there a small or big resistance, or no contact at all" or "is there voltage here or not". I don't care usually about the exact value, and when I do, the analogue dial still gives me the required info.

    9. Re:Rejected technology by just_forget_it · · Score: 1

      Where I work we designed a new electrical controls system for our hot water heaters and had a touch-screen operator interface. All of the indicators I made are images of analog dials.

    10. Re:Rejected technology by znerk · · Score: 1

      The drive-by-wire cars were discontinued (rejected) because of the lack of feedback; the driver felt disconnected from the driving. It appears that we humans like to have something push back when we do stuff.

      I wish I could find the article again where I read that, I hate not citing things.

      --
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
    11. Re:Rejected technology by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Then in the 1980's we saw another phenomenon: the digital dashboard. Instead of using those antiquated analog dials, automakers started using digital readouts instead. It was all computerized and cool and futuristic...and was gone by the early 1990's. People wanted the old-fashioned dials.

      Many cars released now have both digital and analogue displays. My last car was a 2005 Holden Commodore Acclaim (Holden is the GM brand in Australia). I found myself looking at the digital speedometer far more than the analogue dial, as it was simpler quicker to read and "felt" more precise (I'm sure it was probably equally as precise, or perhaps even less so, but that's not how it felt).

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    12. Re:Rejected technology by jsiren · · Score: 1

      The main thing people like about dials is that it is analogue, so very easy to read. Albeit less accurate, but who cares whether you're going 104, 105 or 106 kph. The position of the needle on a dial is what you are after.

      You have a dial that displays keystrokes per hour? Cool.

      --
      Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
    13. Re:Rejected technology by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to be stupid or just xenophobic American?

    14. Re:Rejected technology by jsiren · · Score: 1

      Not being American or xenophobic, I'll have to take stupid :)

      Sorry about the nitpicking. I know you meant kilometers per hour, kph being a relatively common misspelling. Thank you for using an internationally understandable unit. I understand it's logical to extend miles per hour = mph to kilometers per hour = kph. Only it depends on the reader making the connection, which many people outside the USA and UK will not. Everybody else abbreviates kilometers per hour the standard way, km/h.

      --
      Usage: km/h for speed (kilometers per hour); kph for very slow impulses (kilopond hours).
  23. SCARY by phrostie · · Score: 1

    that last one with the laptop fitting to the steering wheel is just scary.
    does this come with an autopilot?

    still, that's the last thing we need.

    1. Re:SCARY by mspohr · · Score: 1

      It's so last century to fit your laptop to the steering wheel. Actually, they will fit a steering wheel to the laptop as the new input device. You just plug the car into the laptop when you want to drive somewhere... just remember... nothingcangowrong.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    2. Re:SCARY by Atti+K. · · Score: 2, Funny
      Just imagine:
      "Drivecar.exe has performed an illegal operation and will be shut down."

      Or...

      "Inflate airbags: Cancel or Allow?"

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    3. Re:SCARY by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand. That is the "grocery getter 2.0" peripheral. It snaps into a small slot in the back of the computer. Oddly it is not the largest peripheral available. However, there is a limited market for ICBM 3.2.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:SCARY by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I always thought the Blue Screen of Death needed a little bit more Death.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  24. Stereoscopic 3D by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

    Is there something one (camera) just can't pull off?

    Stereoscopic 3D photographs (or even video, if the capture rates is fast enough).

    I don't know what the camera placement is on this particular model though.

  25. just like phones, cars and televisions by petes_PoV · · Score: 2, Informative
    When a human-interfacing technology gets past the experimental stage, the major aspects (size, weight, function, layout) tend to remain static. Partly because that's what people expect - and there's a cost to having people change their habits, and partly because they work well.

    So it will be in the laptop of the future. Keyboards won't get any bigger or smaller, same with screen sizes. So the LotF will be the same size as todays (and 10 years' ago's, too). Functions will probably be similar, also: documents, games, media, communication.

    Yes, they'll be faster, but all the extra DRM and security features (such as having everything encrypted) will take away most of the gain. Disks will be gone - hello SSDs - but that's an easy prediction, as is wireless connectivity. the O/S and applications will be so transparent to the user that who owns/makes them will be irrelevant.

    The only major change I can foresee is the need for personal identification and possibly a built-in payment mechanism, for all the media - whicj will have to be paid for, before you can view it.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:just like phones, cars and televisions by dontPanik · · Score: 1

      A built-in payment mechanism? Like a coin slot? And then a strange sweaty man comes by every week to empty your laptop?
      But seriously I do see what your saying. I just purchased a new cell phone and the whole purpose of it is to get people to spend money on media on their phone. Hopefully computers will not go this route. I'm optimistic that computers will avoid it because there are more open-sourse applications on computers as opposed to phones.

      --
      "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - Pablo Picasso
    2. Re:just like phones, cars and televisions by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Laptops will keep the same form factor, I'm sure. But things do change.

      The keyboard will remain the same size: this is based on the average size of a human hand, and that's pretty much a given. My EEE has a much smaller keyboard, but I wouldn't use it for coding or other bigger jobs. Maybe for posting on /. but even then I prefer my iBook with full sized keyboard.

      The display is another matter: that has been growing. Surface areas have about doubled, and pixel counts quadrupled over the last ten years or so. Cost is a major aspect here: it simply gets cheaper to make higher resolution, bigger panels. And as a result we see laptops with 19" screens - about as luggable as the colossus my father used to work on, now about 25 years(!) ago. That was one of the first laptops (at the time we talked about portable computer) invented. I think it even had a hard disk already but not so sure.

      Screens is I think where the main innovation will be. As others argued, there is no replacement for a real mechanical keyboard - I do understand though the use of a tablet. It's still waiting for the iTablet, knowing Apple's track record that will likely shake up the industry properly. As long as it is light enough to hold up on one arm while standing in the train, I can imagine a serious use as e-book reader. Weight is a major issue here, and batteries are the main culprit these days.

      Hard to predict what the laptop future will bring, or the computing future in general. I'm looking forward to it!

  26. Camera placement front/back by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

    Quick surf answered my questions ;

    It has a 1.3Mpixel camera at the back, and a 0.3MPixel one at the front. Presumably it's so you can take photos, while you videoconference.....

    I liked my idea better.

  27. And what is new about it? by houghi · · Score: 1

    I see no real new ideas that I think are worth mentioning. They still look the same as we have them now.

    No real new ideas. I am looking for something that is small enough to fit in my pocket, like a cellphone AND large enough to be able to have 1600x1200 in a readable manner AND use an easy way to enter data AND being able to add modules that I need AND ...

    All I see is OR/OR ideas.

    Why do people buy expensive phones? Two reasons. because they want to show off and because they want to have these different functions in one system.
    Why do people walk around with portables? Because they have no serious other option.

    What I see as the future is having one more things that are small enough to have with you, yet power full enough to connect to a screen and a keyboard at where I work and at home.

    Something like a Nokia Communicator. Add an interface that connects to whatever is needed and you are done. Come to think of it, this is already possible. Just mount your portable device and you have the data.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:And what is new about it? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm still a fan of the "hub PC" or home server model. I think that it makes your devices smaller and cheaper.

      For instance, I have a rather limited iBook G4 that could NEVER be my main PC. Not enough space, smallish screen, etc. However, since I have my PC online and available via SSH, there's almost no downside to having a cheap, low power, limited storage portable. Similarly, since my PC is hooked up to my TV/stereo in the living room, I don't need to have an expensive system in there - I can just play my music and videos via the computer, which does a better job organizing media anyway.

      Now this "home server" doesn't need to be in your home... even I've moved to Gmail for "cloud" email, Mozy for backup (and remote access to files in a pinch), Flickr for sharing photos - and hopefully media sites like mp3tunes.com will win out in court eventually making even my home-PC-as-media-center concept obsolete.

      Anyway, hopefully my rambling hasn't made me lose my point - I think that devices that "do it all" will take a back seat to devices with "access to it all".

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  28. Best thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That one of the laptop still runs XP in 2015.

  29. Moving parts? In 2015?? by ThePhilips · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope by 2015 notebooks would have no moving parts - no sliding things either.

    I just want a normal notebook. Just normal notebook from Sci-Fi: no physical parts, voice interface, 3D projector and virtual keyboard. All that packed into watch.

    Google can't find images - but something like it was in Heroic Age anime.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    1. Re:Moving parts? In 2015?? by Cairnarvon · · Score: 1

      A voice interface for something meant to be used in public places strikes me as a terrible idea, unless it uses a microphone quite close to your mouth, which is less than convenient.
      And if the 3D projector is supposed to replace the screen altogether, it's going to be pretty hard to have any privacy in public too. At least a laptop can be turned away from people.

      Also, virtual keyboards suck ass. There's a lot to be said for tactile feedback, and a good reason that laser-projected keyboard hasn't taken off.

      I'll keep my physical laptop, thanks.

    2. Re:Moving parts? In 2015?? by ArieKremen · · Score: 1

      Voice Interface?!?

      Imagine sitting in a train/airplane with 50% of the people on their cellphones. Now add to this the noise of the other 50% dictating/instructing their laptop.

      I hope noise cancellation headphones will still be around in 2015.

      --
      -- Cave quid dicis, quando, et cui
    3. Re:Moving parts? In 2015?? by ThePhilips · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Privacy (esp in public places) is interesting point.

      But honestly, my first association with notebooks somehow now is "desktop replacement". I use right now laptops at home and in office. (And frankly, have no wish to carry one around - I get enough of computer everywhere else. YMMV.)

      What we do right now with laptops and more importantly how we do it, would change in coming years. Think of text/image/video-blogging - that is mostly public activity anyway and doesn't require privacy. Though yes, lack of physical entity has implication for privacy and security if such is needed. (e.g. Wi-Fi didn't yet sorted out all the problems with misuse and abuse - and all they did was to move from physical material media (wire) to immaterial media (radio waves).)

      One can imaging devices now under development which try to project image right into ones retina. And - OMG - they already have wikipedia page:

      A "virtual retinal display" (VRD), also known as a "retinal scan display" (RSD)

      Should be nice solution to privacy problem. (If it doesn't burn out one's eyes, of course.)

      For corporate lappy, privacy is must. Do not see solution other than having "physical laptop." Do not want my manager to see what I am really doing with my time in office ;)

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    4. Re:Moving parts? In 2015?? by Lysdestic · · Score: 0

      Imagine sitting in a train/airplane with 50% of the people on their cellphones. Now add to this the noise of the other 50% dictating/insulting their laptop.

      Fixed that for you.

    5. Re:Moving parts? In 2015?? by mgblst · · Score: 1

      So you want a keyboard the size of a watch? brilliant! Lets bring back those calculator watches that all the cool people used to wear.

  30. Working coral cache link by sammydee · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Working coral cache link by Tyr_7BE · · Score: 1

      That didn't work, but Google caught it

  31. hosted.... by custerfluck · · Score: 1

    on a laptop (not being used?)

  32. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by bhima · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm pretty sure that future is here now.

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  33. Well, I won't be using it by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    Since it's been slashdotted to hell.

    Sheesh, what kind of a wunderbar laptop could it be, if it couldn't even handle a little slashdotting...

  34. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    by 2015 no one will be checking facebook.

    Hell by 2009 no one will be checking facebook!

  35. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by Vornan19 · · Score: 0

    I bet they'll be Twittering the road signs.

  36. Or separately... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Presumably it's so you can take photos, while you videoconference.....

    1.3 for photos, on the outside of the device, pointing away from you, aimed through the screen.
    0.3 for video, on the inside of the device, pointing at you, again aimed through the screen.

    You don't need much bigger than 0.3Mp for video-conferencing, while every extra pixel would be useful for photos.
    And having only one camera would make one of the options unusable - unless the screen or camera was rotatable so you can aim the camera for photos AND again aim at yourself so you see the person who you are video-conferencing with while they see you too.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  37. Good for you... by denzacar · · Score: 0, Troll

    Great. I am happy for you.

    But there ARE people out there that DO need larger screens, optical drives, full-size keyboards etc.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  38. Overdue by michaelmalak · · Score: 1

    Why are we carrying around physical media, computer screens, and keyboards? How geeky can one get? Why hasn't the day arrived when everything on our hard drive exists on the cloud instead?

    1. Re:Overdue by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Why hasn't the day arrived when everything on our hard drive exists on the cloud instead?

      Because we can't trust kiosk hardware/software with our data, including passwords. The true computer geeks will insist on complete (portable) personal systems while the techno-illiterati will eventually use private and public kiosks (and get their data owned occasionally). Even if these public kiosks are just docking stations with keyboard/video/mouse/NIC wireless connections to a personally owned smart-phone, the docking station can't be trusted not to store/redirect data transfered.

  39. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by damburger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They will, because facebook will be one of the four web sites you can actually access through your entry level 'internet' package.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  40. 113 Comments... by GradiusCVK · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been trying to access TFA since about 8:50 and it's been down the whole time... yet there are already 113 comments on this story, 13 of which are rated 4 or better. I love Slashdot, I really do :-)
    *reflects on the hypocrisy of this post*

    1. Re:113 Comments... by PReDiToR · · Score: 3, Informative
      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  41. It used to be....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That an interesting idea was when someone showed you 20 pages of detailed sketches with all the internal mechanics electronics mapped out. Now'a'days, an interesting idea is when some 14year old spend 10 minutes in a pirated version of 3dsmax and created a tablet mac that folds out to cover 3 square meters on a floor, or can be used in a minimode, as a iPhone, and has a caption that states it has GPS, 7G and a builtin coffee machine, with frikin lasers on its head.

    Why is this news?

  42. What about haptics? by deoxyribonucleose · · Score: 1

    Tactile response is a huge reason we have keyboards. The technology that can replace them is here now, and has been for quite a while. But nothing can beat the practicality of a keyboard. Replacing it with a touchscreen is just impractical. There's no tactile response, and banging your fingers on a hard, unyielding surface is going to cause typing fatigue much quicker. /.../

    This seems promising...

  43. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    Have them twitter this sign...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
  44. Apple drew this 15+ years ago... by volxdragon · · Score: 1

    Yawn! Apple had "futuristic drawings" like this 15+ years ago, I remember seeing a video of the "laptop of the future" at a MacWorld ages ago that looked, shockingly, just like this.... I'll bet they bring one to market long before 2015 (and long before this guy).

  45. Why emulate the keyboard? by bitRAKE · · Score: 1

    If we are going to get rid of the keyboard - get rid of the keyboard!

    New type of keyed interface: Maybe the cell phone generation might adopt something new, but anyone who's parents learnt to type on a typewriter isn't likely to make the switch.

    Voice recognition: Is this just too hard to do right? As a replacement for the keyboard voice recognition doesn't have a chance unless combined with another tech.

    Gesture recognition: Video cameras are everywhere, but this has the same problems are voice entry.

    I'm hoping the synergy of all three can finally kill the keyboard - then I can get my hands on something else. (c:

    1. Re:Why emulate the keyboard? by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      Morse code input.
      Every laptop needs a port to hook up an iambic paddle.

  46. Password??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Help, I can't login...what's my password?

  47. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 0, Troll

    Chances are Facebook and MySpace will be bought out by Google and merged with their social network web site renamed Google FaceSpace. But due to Net Neutrality your IP filters packets to it because it also uses BitTorrent or some other P2P utility to share files, and Google bought out so many web companies that it cannot afford to pay your ISP to allow you to surf their site at normal speeds. That is if the government content filter built into your OS by law, doesn't filter out that web site because people wrote things on it that criticize your government.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  48. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by damburger · · Score: 1

    All of that will be irrelevant however, because the 'fair use' chip in your head will prevent you being able to perceive and/or remember most content.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  49. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's already bad enough getting rear-ended by some asshole at an intersection who can't wait until he gets home to ask his daughter how her fucking math test went, or ending up in a pileup because some exec suddenly realizes he's not checked his email in *over 2 minutes* as he's driving along the interstate at 70 mph.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  50. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's hoping you guys get on anti-psychotic meds by 2015.

  51. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by damburger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We won't have a choice, that'll be part of the whole Trusted Cognition(tm) package

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  52. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 0, Troll

    All of that is irrelevant today already, because most content is really manipulations of fear and hate and really propaganda instead of content and fact, so most people cannot perceive and/or remember most content from the past, because they have been conditioned to be reprogrammed by news and media companies and Internet web sites like blogs to either blame others or spend all of their money on useless products they don't really need to make faceless corporations that control the news and media and Internet web sites and blogs their money.

    I seem to be the only one who remembers the truth, and knows what is really going on, and everyone else seems to have forgotten.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  53. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by damburger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously unlikely you are alone; its just socially unacceptable to dissent. It doesn't fit in with the whole, happy-go-lucky Friends coffee house aesthetic that everyone seems to have accepted.

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  54. Thinner than a Macbook Air! by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

    Thinner by 0.01 inches - that's 7 years in the future for you!

  55. The future is 403 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have permission to access /future-design/meet-the-laptop-youll-use-in-2015/ on this server.

  56. She sells sea shells..... by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

    The only thing I hate more than the three sea shells is that damned head-mounted orgasmatron thing. That, and Taco Bell.

    --
    Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
  57. Roasting nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The laptop of the future, will it still roast my nuts?

  58. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it looks like that technology is "403 Forbidden"

  59. Forget laptops... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    I want my hoverboard, damnit! And a hover-conversion for my car, if I can afford it... So I'll be almost 40 by then - I'll just have to stay in shape...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  60. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you think 70 mph is fast on the interstate??

  61. Monthly BIOS license fees, DRM enabled login by heroine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The laptop you use in 2015 will require monthly BIOS license fees, monthly service plans to log in, & fall apart in 3 weeks. It'll be made by 5 year old slave kids in Kazakhstan. All data storage will be through wireless networking to the giga corporation & monitored by the FBI for signs of the word "republican" or negative comments about the giga corporation.

    However the display will be made out of organic LEDs.

    1. Re:Monthly BIOS license fees, DRM enabled login by robert2cane · · Score: 1

      The hosting is down. You can find the article here: http://future-design.uni.cc/concept-design/notebooks-of-the-future/

  62. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by fellip_nectar · · Score: 2, Funny

    In 2015, I won't be too concerned about being mown down by an 'old road car'...

    I'll be much more worried about being landed on by a flying DeLorean.

    --
    Worst. Signature. Ever.
  63. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can't wait until he gets home to ask his daughter how her fucking math test went

    I never thought of Health class and Mathematics as a combination for Interdisciplinary Studies courses. The only math remotely involved is basic counting.

  64. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by SonicEarth · · Score: 0

    Looks like a giant Nintendo DS.

  65. New old idea... by argent · · Score: 1

    I tried using a PDA as a laptop replacement. The keyboard is the big problem: anything less than a latop keyboard with a full set of physical keys is a pain in the neck (as well as fingers, wrists, forearm, elbow, and shoulder).

    The best one was the stowaway portable keyboard, unfortunately when they came out with a bluetooth model they abandoned this almost-full-sized keyboard and replaced it with one that didn't have a full set of keys, and even though it was slightly smaller it more or less failed to serve the intended purpose.

    Of course most of these "laptops of 2005" have appallingly bad keyboards as well.

    What I'd really like is what I asked for in 2000... the computer itself has a minimal display, PDA sized or smaller, and larger displays and better input devices are connected as needed. Give it a USB device+host port and a video-out port, in a form factor so you can plug it into a standardized layout of a video-USB-power socket in a "docking station" or mix and match.

    The whole thing shouldn't be any bigger than a thin CDROM drive or a paperback book. and potentially as small as a pen or keychain fob.

  66. I don't need superbright LED's by caywen · · Score: 1

    I don't need LED backlighting that is superbright. I don't need my display barely readable outdoors, yet burns my retinas indoors. I need a display that works equally well in all lighting conditions and doesn't drain battery life unnecessarily.

    1. Re:I don't need superbright LED's by rootooftheworld · · Score: 1

      i second that notion. this fsckin' amilo is a fuckin flashlight!

      --
      I know full well that tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack
  67. It's ORGANIC! by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

    And probably comes in a green colored case, too!
    Healthy for me and the environment!
    I can hardly wait to buy one.

  68. switches,keyboard,GUI, Touch? Voice? Eye tracking? by BlueHands · · Score: 1

    I don't think that is true, that things are largely the same.

    The nature of information is the same, since words haven't been eliminated, and keyboard are FANTASTIC form for getting alot of text information in, and text is most of what we put into a computer. But we are also on the cusp of touch being an important means of interaction with our computers. Already I find myself reaching for my LCD screen to interact with my computer thou my PC does not have a touch screen.

    Then I remembered my main computer is not the $1200 PC on my desktop but the cell phone in my pocket.

    And strangely enough I think it is apparent that touch is at the same cusp that mice were in the mid/late 80s. Touch is available on a few, limited platforms and has quickly became the only thing that made sense in that space, that people love interacting in that fashion and that in some drastic difference will occur once it becomes common.

    A GUI is not just a command line with a few extra options. Touch won't be either.

    --
    I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
  69. Wow! by denzacar · · Score: 1

    You call THAT a troll?

    Someone obviously never saw me troll.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  70. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by renegadesx · · Score: 1

    You will find if you visit now, the model has already been upgraded to the new 404 Not Found model. I guess they did say 2015.

    --
    Make SELinux enforcing again!
  71. Re:The laptop that fits into a steering wheel, gre by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Well I didn't use to be alone, but people I knew that knew what I knew, ended up killing themselves or dying young of some mystery illness.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  72. FTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those of you too lazy to read the full article...

    Quote "
    Network Timeout

    The server at future-design.freehostia.com is taking too long to respond.

    The requested site did not respond to a connection request and the browser has stopped waiting for a reply.

            * Could the server be experiencing high demand or a temporary outage? Try again later.
            * Are you unable to browse other sites? Check the computer's network connection.
            * Is your computer or network protected by a firewall or proxy? Incorrect settings can interfere with Web browsing.
            * Still having trouble? Consult your network administrator or Internet provider for assistance.
    "

  73. Re: Meme Jokes! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    7) You can't bear to be left out of the fun, so you have to post your contribution to the meme-joke.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  74. Re:Laptops by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    I have rebelled against getting one. A desktop workstation will have the space for better quality parts.

    To be mobile, I am looking towards SmartPhones with plug-in Monitor & Keyboards. These can be commodity resources at public places, and only your small data-unit is what you take with you. I'd say the industry needs another 7 years to perfect it.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  75. Re: Meme Jokes! by thexile · · Score: 1

    8.) The post here is just to troll along.

  76. Re: Meme Jokes! by rootooftheworld · · Score: 1

    so true

    --
    I know full well that tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack
  77. Re:switches,keyboard,GUI, Touch? Voice? Eye tracki by rootooftheworld · · Score: 1

    A GUI is not just a command line with a few extra options.

    agree, its a comandline with LOTS of extra USELESS options. all the touch we need is touchpads, IMHO, to help out with vi-sesions. (/retro-comand-line-nazi)

    --
    I know full well that tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack
  78. Beating us over the head with known mistakes by try_anything · · Score: 1

    Why do "forward-thinking" designers keep trying to force tried, rejected, unwanted features on consumers? Are they hoping that the new, improved consumers of 2015 will accept keyboards with zero key travel and no tactile differentiation of the keys?

    Oh, wait, I forgot about force feedback -- now there's a good reason to give up half my typing speed! It's not like entering text into a computer is an important, time-limiting part of my lifestyle or anything.

  79. Slashdot kills websites. by mjoseff · · Score: 1

    Your website has been suspended! The web hosting account that hosts this website has been blocked! If you are the owner of this website, please contact the support team to resolve this issue. If you are a visitor to this website, please access this page later.