Slashdot Mirror


Surviving Outsourcing?

An anonymous reader writes "As some of you may know, HP is negotiating with DPWN, parent company of DHL, to take on outsourced parts of DPWN's global IT Services business unit. As a worker in that business unit, I and my colleagues are part of what HP is negotiating for. I moved into my current position fresh out of university and so far haven't experienced corporate shake-ups or outsourcing initiatives. I enjoy my work and the opportunities that go with it, which is why this announcement was so distressing to me at first. Then I began hearing about the opportunities HP has internally. If you've been through a similar experience, what advice would you give for someone being outsourced? Should I 'ride the wave' and join the new company and culture, or dust off the old CV/resume?"

234 comments

  1. Why not try it? by F'Nok · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's always a good idea to have the CV up to date, but I don't see why you shouldn't ride the wave for a while until you can determine just how good the surf is.

    If you don't like them, you can always leave then.

    1. Re:Why not try it? by Nursie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just what I was thinking - do both!

      I went through something similar a couple of times within a few months a little while ago. First time round I got a lot of reassuring "we want your expertise" noises, then a payoff and a goodbye. Then I got a new job at a small company and it happened again.

      Second time it was another big company (let's call them "large indigo") and we had all the same talks and speeches and the same reassurances, only they actually meant it. Unfortunately it's very hard to tell this. Anyway,I'm still with them and am not only very happy (and in the same job) but it's kinda cool having the opportunity to move around the company and the world once you're on the inside.

      So, YMMV, but don't be too pessimistic.

    2. Re:Why not try it? by VdG · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This would seem to be the obvious thing to do.

      I got outsourced a couple of years ago, (not to HP) and I couldn't say it's any better or worse than it was before. I do have the advantage of UK employment law on my side, which in theory ensures I remain on cmparable terms and conditions. I ended up with a poorer pension scheme but a higher salary to make up for it, and a few minor changes in other benefits - mostly good.

      Not everybody stayed on, but most people did. One guy left, then got re-hired because he was too valuable to lose. Most of us are doing pretty much the same job as we were before, although those in leadership roles probably have more responsibility than they did before.

      In theory there are more opportunities for me. A lot of that is going to depend on me seeking them out. At the least, I shall end up doing work for other customers besides my original employer which gives me exposure to different ways of doing things.

      In my limited experience - I got sort-of outsourced once before: massive reorganization which involved setting up a new company to handle IT for the whole group - it needn't be bad for you. I certainly think that some of the other posters are being needlessly alarmist and cynical. Go with it, and try to be involved in the changes.

    3. Re:Why not try it? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Listen to Nursie, buddy. Do both FTW! Unless they keep paying you through a downturn, you're employer isn't thinking in terms of loyalty to you, so don't get emotionally attached to a job (not in this industry at least).

      Stay flexible, market yourself and always keep an eye on the door (to see who's coming in and going out).

      Good luck. This kind of experience can be really stressful, so this is a good time to learn to relax and take care of yourself.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Why not try it? by supremebob · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah... I wouldn't worry about finding a new job quite yet. As someone who's currently in the middle of an IT outsourcing to HP, I noticed that most folks have at least six months after the official announcement before they start laying people off.

      That said, I wouldn't put too much faith in finding something on the HP internal job board. You'll soon have tens of thousands of EDS employees looking at those jobs as well.

    5. Re:Why not try it? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Until you've personally proven yourself to a management chain that's proved itself all the way up to the CEO, be ready to be fired at any time.

      That means have your resume ready, credit cards paid off, and a savings account. If you can't go six months without any income, just start looking for a job right now.

      If you're one of those guys that "does everything" but really has a nebulous job that no one can define, be ready to be fired soon. I've been through three of these things and survived them all, but by God at times I wished they would just fire me and get it over with.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    6. Re:Why not try it? by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      As someone who's currently in the middle of an IT outsourcing to HP, I noticed that most folks have at least six months after the official announcement before they start laying people off.

      Well at least you won't be lonely if you're all suddenly looking for a job at the same time!

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    7. Re:Why not try it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As someone who was bought out by HP in the past year here's some personal insight.

      Every process inside HP is purposely filled with so much red tape it's designed to make you want to quit and not do it. Example buying a piece of software from a vendor, it takes 3+ months and 14+ sign offs, plus like 5 forms that need to be filled out. Someone in legal said this was on purpose to discourage people spending company money.

      Internal IT support for anything? Get ready to spend 90+ minutes on hold to a call center in India, that can't escalate your call no mater what...because they have no one to escalate it to.

      Want to move a server into internal IT supported data centers? 200,000 bucks charged to your department, and it'll take 6 months. It must be the latest patched OS, on HP hardware, and if it's a *nix, it must be HP-UX. No Solaris, No linux of any kind.

      401K/Pension matching was just lowered by 20% for all new hires/aquires as well.

      Hurd goes through each year and picks a division where he cuts it by like 60+%, suddenly goes woo saved money!, and moves along to the next.

      The sales reporting tools are so horrid that they can't even show product sales over the last 24 hours. The report times out after 30 minutes.

      So for advice, polish up the resume and start looking. If nothing cool comes along then join up until something better does appear, then take it.

    8. Re:Why not try it? by xystren · · Score: 1

      Realize that there is no such thing as "Job Security" anymore. There is someone who is willing to do your job for cheaper than you, around every corner. In stead of thinking in terms of "Job Security" think of it as "Employability." You might not have the same job, with the same company, but you will have "employment" somewhere. Keep your skills current, your resume' up to date, and you will be fine.

      Working your way up the ranks in a company tends to be a thing of the past.

      Cheers,
      Xystren

    9. Re:Why not try it? by Nursie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IMHO, it depends on the company, but expecting much in the way of loyalty from your employer is misplaced. On the other hand, if they find you valuable (and you're making them money) then they have every reason to be happy with you.

    10. Re:Why not try it? by geektastic · · Score: 1

      Definitely move over to the new company and see what they have to offer. When it comes time to make the move, ask questions like "what's the negotiated policy on retaining years of service?" Every company negotiates this for its outsourced workers, and it can really affect your experience. On the account I'm on now, the people who came over to my company retained their years of service for the first two years of the contract. Now that that's done, they are starting over from zero. A co-worker who had 25 years in the old company and could have retired but chose to stay is now kicking himself, since he basically threw away his pension. Also -- ask about the possibility of rehire if the outsourcing doesn't work. There are times that outsourcing fails and then the client company tries to rebuild its former organization. Ask if you can be rehired and if so, what restrictions there might be on that arrangement.

    11. Re:Why not try it? by AngelofDeath-02 · · Score: 1

      I can answer at least the first one.
      we are supposed to retain 100% of our previous seniority with HP.

      Now, mind you, nothing is in writing yet, so that can change...

      --
      No, I am not an English major. My posts are subject to typos and incorrect grammar. Do not expect perfection.
    12. Re:Why not try it? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      I agree with this but I also think you should do what you can to improve your position in the new environment. I would not recommend waiting and watching. Find out what this entails, find out who will be managing it, find out what you can do to be a more important part of it from them. Try and be a facilitator and not a mushroom nor a suck up.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    13. Re:Why not try it? by lcstyle · · Score: 1

      A bunch of people from EDS are already jumping ship.

  2. From my experience by jskline · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You should do both. Face it. The reason the shake up is there in the first place is because someone in the food chain isn't making enough money and wants to change things around so that they make more.

    This likely will result in a possibility you come on to the new company... or not. Remember a lot depends on how much you are willing to accept as a reduction in pay which ultimately will happen at some point.

    In the event that they don't want to pay you what you believe your worth, they will go for the lesser costing options (other people), and you would ultimately be out looking elsewhere.

    Been there; done that.

    --
    All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
    1. Re:From my experience by ShannaraFan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "This likely will result in a possibility you come on to the new company... or not. Remember a lot depends on how much you are willing to accept as a reduction in pay which ultimately will happen at some point."

      I've been through two corporation acquisitions in the last 10 years. First time, I wound up making $5K more per year, as an incentive to stay, doing the same job. Second time, I was offered a different job in the new company, making $11K more per year. We've all heard the stories about people being forced to take pay cuts to keep their jobs, but I personally don't know a single person who has experienced that.

      The OP should ride this out, keeping a positive attitude and an open mind. Opportunities are born out of situations like this.

    2. Re:From my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Survival of the fittest", that's my motto.

      Seriously, get known by the people who are acquiring you, develop new contacts/friendships, know who's who, and establish yourself some latitude.

      Riding the wave is passive, and you usually get pushed/shoved into positions/mandates that may not necessarily interest you, and to the point that you start hating your job afterwards.

      Granted, be careful, since your immediate boss won't like the fact that you're just running-off on him. I've been through 3 similar events in my lifetime, always a little fun to play the corporate mayhem.

    3. Re:From my experience by LifeWithJustin · · Score: 1

      The reason the shake up is there in the first place is because someone in the food chain isn't making enough money and wants to change things around so that they make more.

      Or maybe you know... making sure the company stays in business, but hey, don't let logic get in your way.

    4. Re:From my experience by jskline · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it has nothing to do with "logic". Fact is not all downsizings are for the express purpose of saving the business. A lot of companies simply need to improve stockholders portfolio entry valuations, and maybe changes in middle/upper management.

      I have been through 5 companies in 5 years, and that the only reason they outsourced and downsized was to pay larger amounts of money to the upper management personnel and nothing else. Everyone there knew it, and saw it. The companies were healthy and doing a lot of business enough that it kept all of us very busy.

      I learned through this to "follow the money". It's not always this way admittedly, but it's a larger percentage than many people will believe.

      --
      All content in this message is copyright (c) 2008. All rights reserved. RIAA is prohibited here.
    5. Re:From my experience by LifeWithJustin · · Score: 1

      Agreed that this can be the case.

      But coming from Michigan, more often I see the flip side of the case. I see places closing down due to the fact that they didn't move quick enough cost cut (or understand what a sunk cost is for that matter.)

      I know too many people looking for work due to this. Yes there is too much greed at the top. Remember if you have a lot of business and you are really busy that doesn't mean the company is healthy. I'm sure yours was, but that's not always the case.

    6. Re:From my experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Intentionally posting anonymous)

      I work for a very large financial services company in downtown Manhattan. In the last month, EVERY contractor and consultant was forced to take a 10% pay cut. Their contracting firms were forced to pass it on down. Every full-time employee lost their bonus for 2008.

      Why?

      Because the market turned sour and they reported a large number of losses in Q12008. If we get another bad quarter, we lose another 10%... or we lose our jobs; our choice.

      People do have their salaries cut more often than you think.

  3. Join the internet instead by unity100 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    we are becoming a separate nation, hell, world on the internet. by 'we' i mean all of us here.

    join it. be flexible. go with the flow. accept outsourcing yourself. if there are people outsourcing, there needs to be firms accepting outsourcing. go post a listing in elance - they post anything there these days, from technical writing to cad/cam. post in other agency sites. make a name for yourself.

    1. Re:Join the internet instead by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Obligatory Dilbert

  4. Been there - Survived that by Onetus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's how it works when you get outsourced:
    1. You have your job and you do it.
    2. You/Your section get outsourced.
    3. You have your new job, which is the same as your old job, and .. you do it.

    If you weren't dusting off your CV/Resume at your current job, why would you suddenly do it now? You're going to get the same money for doing the same tasks that your currently doing. If nothing is broke, most likely no-one is going to try and "fix it". You're likely to see less change than if your bosses boss resigned and was replaced by someone new.

    Disclaimer: I worked in IT and my area was outsourced. After a little bit in the new company, I moved away from maint/support roles into development roles that just weren't available in my old company. YMMV

    1. Re:Been there - Survived that by jrumney · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're going to get the same money for doing the same tasks that your currently doing.

      That might be true in some states, and it is certainly true in the UK where TUPE regulations protect employees' packages when transferring to a new company, but my impression from other discussions is that in general US workers don't enjoy many rights, and a pay cut or redundancy with little/no compensation and immediate hiring of someone cheaper could well be on the table.

    2. Re:Been there - Survived that by Nursie · · Score: 3, Funny

      "UK where TUPE regulations protect employees' packages when transferring to a new company"

      I'm certainly glad my package is protected, otherwise new managers could be real ball-breakers :)

    3. Re:Been there - Survived that by tdp252 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That isn't always the case. While your salary may remain the same, chances are if your new employer can do the same job for less you are loosing benefits. I worked for AT&T back in the 90's. When we were outsourced to IBM-GS we were giving crappy health care plans, and lost many of our other benefits. Don't believe the hype.

    4. Re:Been there - Survived that by squoozer · · Score: 2, Informative

      While TUPE does protect the employees rights to some extent it's not half as strong asmany people think it is. Having just been through it and seeing both sides it was quite clear to me that people could be shed for any number of reasons. Don't bank on TUPE saving your job long term.

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    5. Re:Been there - Survived that by LoaTao · · Score: 1

      4. New company off-shores your job to save money.

      At least that seems to be the CSC model. I don't know about HP.

      --
      The smartest man in the whole, wide world really don't know that much. - Mose Allison
    6. Re:Been there - Survived that by RMH101 · · Score: 1
      TUPE isn't all that long term. If an employer is outsourcing, chances are the outsourcing company that they're using wants to send a quantity of that work to an area of the world where labour costs are much lower: such as india. I've been through this a few times from both sides of the fence.

      Basically, the job market's not all that secure. In order to reduce your personal level of mither you want to take control of your level of risk: this means having your CV up to date, your skills current, and having a good idea of how to make yourself employable.

    7. Re:Been there - Survived that by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

      I work in the US and I am glad we don't have anything like TUPE. Regulations like that prevent employers from creating jobs in the first place. My job security comes from my own skills and my ability to work well with others. Combine that with a vibrant tech sector that creates jobs and you've got job security without any well intentioned TUPE like laws. Why do you think Silicon Valley happened and persists in California? Because startups can create jobs from nothing and then shed them as needed. Employees win in that culture because someone else is always creating the next job.

    8. Re:Been there - Survived that by jrumney · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If employers are thinking about the ability of a future purchaser of their business to screw over their employees when they make the decision to create a job, then they are probably not worth working for. But I'm sure your corporate overlords are grateful to you for drinking the kool-aid and accepting your 2 week vacation, unpaid overtime, at-will employment.

    9. Re:Been there - Survived that by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      "I work in the US and I am glad we don't have anything like TUPE. Regulations like that prevent employers from creating jobs in the first place."

      because clearly California is known for its lax regulatory environment.

      oh, wait, it's not.

      Business costs are quite high in CA. You ignore other reasons for Silicon Valley spawning in CA, namely the proximity of several excellent schools and San Francisco's history as a banking and shipping center on the west coast. If regulatory environment were the only issue, then states like South Dakota would be best. http://www.sbecouncil.org/uploads/BusinessTaxIndex2008.pdf

      California's the 48th. Not very encouraging.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    10. Re:Been there - Survived that by VdG · · Score: 1

      TUPE certainly serves to protect employees during outsourcing. But it also prevents the employer using outsourcing as a cheap way of cutting staff. Both of these seem like good things to me.

      TUPE doesn't mean that you get to keep your job: there's no requirement for the new company to take you on. If they don't want to, the original employer can either keep you, or get rid of you under their usual terms. What they can't do is pass you over to the new guys and let THEM sack you under worse terms.

    11. Re:Been there - Survived that by homer_s · · Score: 1

      But it also prevents the employer using outsourcing as a cheap way of cutting staff. Both of these seem like good things to me.

      Why do you think that anyone has a right to "their" job?
      A job is just a commercial agreement between two parties. Would you advocate a similar law to 'protect' a hardware store so that a customer cannot just move to a newer store to buy cheaper widgets?

      I never understood why people think that a job is a special kind of contract that needs special laws.

    12. Re:Been there - Survived that by VdG · · Score: 1

      I don't think I have a "right" to my job. I do think that it's reasonable to expect my employer to live up to the terms of their contract with me and not to use outsourcing as a way of weasling out of it.

      The widget seller IS protected by law, though more so their customer. The customer can't return the widget just because Joe Bloggs' Widget Emporium is selling them for thruppence less. If the customer signs a contract to have a widget delivered to their home every Thursday for the next year, their stuck with that, too. They can probably get out of that contract, but they'll have to pay for the privilege.

      Employment laws aren't special. Remember that laws are made for the benefit of people who for the most part are employees rather than employers. It's scarcely surprising that those laws favour them. If a company doesn't like it, they can take their business elsewhere, (as some do). Sure: there's a balance between the citizenry protecting its employment, and encouraging businesses so that they will provide that employment but that certainly doesn't require us to do away with all employment protection legislation.

      Those who disagree are at liberty to live in a country with a different approach (I assume we've got the Atlantic between us) or lobby their representative(s) to change things.

    13. Re:Been there - Survived that by Nursie · · Score: 1

      No, it's not stopping anyone making jobs. In fact if anything the only thing it'll do is encourage them to make their own rather than buy in.

      It's not long term protection, it just ensures that on takeover you are considered as having been continuously employed in one company, and get the rights and responsibilities that come with it.

      There's no reason at all you can't lay people off, it's just that they enjoy (under TUPE) the same rights as other workers in your organisation. Don't see anything wrong with that, personally.

    14. Re:Been there - Survived that by homer_s · · Score: 1

      I do think that it's reasonable to expect my employer to live up to the terms of their contract with me and not to use outsourcing as a way of weasling out of it.
      If your employer has a contract with you, then why do you need special laws? The normal contract law would suffice.

      Those who disagree are at liberty to live in a country with a different approach
      Would you be comfortable with Iran using the same logic when they crack down on homosexuals? (And this has nothing to do with democracy - there are plenty of such issues in India as well.)

      Remember that laws are made for the benefit of people who for the most part are employees rather than employers.
      Again, would you be comfortable with laws favoring whites since they are the majority?

      (I assume we've got the Atlantic between us)

      No, we have the Arabian sea between us.

    15. Re:Been there - Survived that by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with at-will employment?

    16. Re:Been there - Survived that by VdG · · Score: 1

      We need laws to ensure that people keep their contracts. You might just as well ask why we need any laws at all to cover civil matters. Like I said: it's to prevent them from weasling out of the contract. If you like, you could say that there's an implied contractual term that my employer sticks to the civil law of the country. Saves a lot of faffing around with lawyers.

      Democracy is difficult. Minorities are always at risk, at least in theory. But TUPE and similar laws have nothing to do with that sort of unfair discrimination: it's to do with social policy and in that area I'm happy to see different countries have different ideas. I think things would be better, (for me primarily, but incidentally for most other people), if every country in the world was governed by some sort of liberal democracy but that still leaves plenty of scope for variety: UK != USA != France != ...

      Sorry for the assumption: your ideas sound very American. Not sure about having the Arabian sea between us though: it depends which map you use. For some of them that would put you in southern India, others in Western Australia and I think it could also manage Antarctica. If you're thinking about the real globe, then welcome to Earth. :-)

    17. Re:Been there - Survived that by homer_s · · Score: 1

      We need laws to ensure that people keep their contracts.

      There are already laws to ensure people keep their contracts. Why do you need special laws that only apply to employer-employee relations?
      The answer is the "implied contract" part. Most governments do not want the employers and employees to negotiate contract directly (thinking that this puts employees at a disadvantage) & hence put in various laws that favor the employee. *This* is why you need special laws that go above and beyond the normal contract law.

      In my hometown in India, there were/are very strict labor laws and until about 2000 & labor disputes were very common. Nowadays however, the workers do not want to join unions, they don't even care if their job is on the record/permanent/registered/etc.

      They get huge benefits because of the labor shortage - benefits that no govt edict or union would be able to obtain. There are virtually no labor disputes that I've heard of in recent years. The norm 5 years ago was a strike every year. Now, workers just leave and take another job if they don't like the working conditions, salary, etc.

      And all this is voluntary - nobody is forcing the employer to provide such benefits (except his desire to make more profits).

      (I live in Chicago at the moment - I am originally from India).

    18. Re:Been there - Survived that by VdG · · Score: 1

      "Normal" contract law just covers the basics. There are loads of laws to cover contracts in specific areas, all of which in principal cold be covered by a single piece of legislation - if everybody carried a contract lawyer in their pocket.

      If I buy a TV I don't want to have to make sure that the fact that it'll work is in my contract with the retailer. I don't want to have to check that the bank I'm saving with isn't going to fritter my money away on a new yacht for the chairman. Why should my contract with my employer NOT be dealt with in the same way?

      It's good that people back in India are doing well, but as you said: "They get huge benefits because of the labor shortage...". Workers will tend to have better conditions when they're in short supply. What will happen when that's no longer the case?

      Trade Union membership in the UK is much lower than it's been in the past. There are several reasons for this but an important one is that many of the protections they fought for have now been enshrined in law. I think that's a far better situation than to have workers continually engaging in industrial action just to make sure that their employers don't take unfair advantage of their (generally) stronger negotiating position.

    19. Re:Been there - Survived that by homer_s · · Score: 1

      If I buy a TV I don't want to have to make sure that the fact that it'll work is in my contract with the retailer.

      I can buy a TV that'll work for 50 years with average picture quality. I can also buy a TV that'll work only for 6 months with excellent picture quality. I might also want to buy a TV which only works for 1 day with really bad picture quality. Which standard would you recommend be enshrined into law?

      The information necessary to arrive at a contract - the price I'm willing to pay, the reputation of the merchant, aesthetics & other intangible items - are only available to me and the merchant at the time of sale. Trying to capture this information and codifying it into law only leads to inefficiency and higher cost.
      For example, the state of Illinois here has codified a standard for health insurance policies. I really do not want insurance protecting me for Aids/diabetes/etc, but I still have to pay because the state followed your idea & took away the ability for me to negotiate directly with the vendor.

      It's good that people back in India are doing well, but as you said: "They get huge benefits because of the labor shortage...". Workers will tend to have better conditions when they're in short supply. What will happen when that's no longer the case?

      You did not understand my point. Why were jobs scarce in India for 50 years and suddenly, in a span of 5 years, workers are in short supply? What caused this shift that resulted in better working conditions for workers?
      India had several laws "protecting" the worker in that 50 year span and yet jobs were scarce and strikes and disputes were the norm. Something was done in the last 10-15 years that gradually changed that.

      The Indian government, starting in 1992, dropped a lot of regulations which among other things, made is easier to hire and fire workers. That is what caused the betterment of workers.

  5. No brainer. by TeraCo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Join the new company, there's more opportunity for you being 'an IT guy in an IT company' than 'An IT guy in a widget company.'

    --
    Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    1. Re:No brainer. by mh1997 · · Score: 1

      If the new company has someone with the same position/title as yours in the old company, start looking for a job.

    2. Re:No brainer. by entmike · · Score: 1

      These words ring very true. I'm currently an IT employee at a paper company, and have been fortunate so far to not be displaced by EDS or others. What's funny is that the quality of work (did it really get fixed? how long did it take?) has been very bad, but the higher-ups are willing to accept that in return for less money spent.

    3. Re:No brainer. by TeraCo · · Score: 1

      No doubt HP has hundreds, if not -thousands- of people who have the same position as this guy. That's the point. He can work in his job for a few months and see what is available in the company. There's a lot more opportunity to move in the X thousand staff new department than his 5,10,X man department in his old company.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    4. Re:No brainer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't work @ hp.

      Here's a hint: We're an engineering company, not an IT company.

  6. India or Bust! by feedayeen · · Score: 5, Funny

    You could move to India, the land of opportunity.

    1. Re:India or Bust! by Sesticulus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not so much anymore. I work for a big company who a few years ago did a lot of off shoring (not outsourcing, they were employees of the company) to India. We learned a few lessons, including that it's not really the bargain management expected. There's good, there's bad, but it's no free lunch. Now Romania is the new India. I expect the outcome to be the same.

    2. Re:India or Bust! by OzPeter · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In episode 2 of the second season of "30 days", they tracked a US worker who did just this. They moved him over to India and had him go through the whole process of applying for a job and working for a call centre. It made or very interesting viewing.

      Here is a link to the episodes of season 2 of 30 days

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    3. Re:India or Bust! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep! And you'll even get paid to go to the loo:

      http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/07/07/india.toilets/index.html

    4. Re:India or Bust! by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      I thought Brazil was the new India?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    5. Re:India or Bust! by DarkAce911 · · Score: 2, Informative

      We love our Romania helpdesk, they actually speak understandable English there instead of "Indian English". The only problem is our current contract they are more expensive per call than the Indians, so only the Europeans get to use them all the time.

  7. Been there, done that. by jimicus · · Score: 1

    Life doesn't offer you a great many opportunities. It does, however, throw a great deal of crap your way.

    If you see a chance to turn the crap into an opportunity, go for it.

  8. what should you do... by KillerCow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Should I 'ride the wave' and join the new company and culture, or dust off the old CV/resume?"

    1) You should always have an up to date resume. Especially when there is some kind of "restructuring" going on.

    2) You can do both. Try on the new company. If you don't like it, you can always leave. You can even spin it to new employers as "I stayed on to ensure a smooth transition" to make you look like a team player. This is a great way to get into a new company without having to wade through the throngs of HR drones trying to screen you out of new-hire interviews.

    Jumping ship before the move is kinda dumb -- as long as they don't make you sign anything ridiculous. It could be a much better place. Why would you leave when you don't have a reason to? What would you leave for? An unknown new company? Then you are no better off then where you are right now.

    1. Re:what should you do... by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      I agree. Put your CV out there. If nothing else, you'll at least get a feeling for what you're worth in the economy. If you like the new company, great, your problems end there. If not, you've already got a head start.

    2. Re:what should you do... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 3, Informative

      1) You should always have an up to date resume. Especially when there is some kind of "restructuring" going on.

      2) You can do both. Try on the new company. If you don't like it, you can always leave. You can even spin it to new employers as "I stayed on to ensure a smooth transition" to make you look like a team player. This is a great way to get into a new company without having to wade through the throngs of HR drones trying to screen you out of new-hire interviews.

      3) I collect job adverts from newspapers. I know this sounds dumb, who uses newspaper adverts to find personnel these days? well some employers do and I find it is useful to do this. Even if it is only to find out who in my locality is doing .Net, Java C/C++, Web development, App development, Embedded etc.... I also like to keep regular track of what is on offer at online job centers/forums even if I am not in danger of being laid off or thinking about moving, for much the same purpose. At the very least it results in me being able to target my job search more accurately.

      Jumping ship before the move is kinda dumb -- as long as they don't make you sign anything ridiculous. It could be a much better place. Why would you leave when you don't have a reason to? What would you leave for? An unknown new company? Then you are no better off then where you are right now.

      In my experience when a merger or a wholesale outsourcing happens, the PHBs/corporate-weasels running the transition will either lay off the entire complement of people employed by the 'victim' or they will pick and choose. They will keep the best employees from either side and lay off a whole bunch of others. Few things get a PHB more brownie points than saving personnel/wage costs for the company. The employees that will qualify for the great "...opportunities HP has internally..." are the best and most experienced ones except maybe if this happens during an economic boom period, then you may have a better chance if you are young and less experienced. If there is one thing new arrivals on the job market should learn quickly is that companies will demand loyalty and hard work from you but reserve the right to drop you from the payroll the instant it takes their fancy do pep up their quarterly profit returns by reducing costs. Get used to being stabbed in the back a lot, recover quickly and be prepared to find a new job even before it happens. Choosing carefully what jobs you take is important not only because of the wages you will get but also because of the experience you will get. They pay may be good but can you market that experience easily next time you are looking for a job? I know a few people who fell into the trap of considering only the money.

      Hope for the best, prepare for the worst.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    3. Re:what should you do... by VdG · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with looking for a new job. If it were me, I wouldn't just take the first thing that came up. With employment assured for at least a little while and the chance that you might actually like HP, be choosy. You're not under immediate pressure to leave so you can cherry pick the opportunities.

      By the time you've had some interview practice you should have a better idea of whether you're going to get on with HP.

    4. Re:what should you do... by sshir · · Score: 1

      I collect job adverts from newspapers. I know this sounds dumb, who uses newspaper adverts to find personnel these days?

      That's not dumb - that's green card process. They're required to post an ad for an H1 position by the Labor Department.

    5. Re:what should you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not dumb - that's green card process. They're required to post an ad for an H1 position by the Labor Department.

      Well, I'm a European... Are you saying that in the US these adverts are only a front? Apart from the 3 months I spent looking for a job in the wake of the .com bubble It has never taken me more than a month to land the first job offer. I have had more luck with newspaper adverts than employment agencies.

  9. Some outsourcing insights by technormality · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Outsourcing is always done for one thing and one thing only. To save money. What this means is that those who get outsourced are expected to do the same work or more work for less cost. It wont be apparent immediately, often you move over to your new organization with your salary and most of your benefits intact. What happens over time is salary increases and bonuses become smaller than they would have been had you not been outsourced. Also your new employer may not backfill workers who retire or quit. Other places they start to pinch would be training and travel budgets, maybe even redo your 401k contributions to give you less, etc. Over time they will reduce costs one way or another. Hard to give advice on this since its a very personal decision. How confident are you that you can move to another job? Do you like your current job and coworkers? You need to factor these things in when deciding to move over or find a new employer. You may want to ask if you would be entitled to a severance package if you decline to move. If severance is a sizable chunk of money its another component to factor in. Best of luck!

    1. Re:Some outsourcing insights by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I work for a company which, among other things, does outsourcing of IT projects. I didn't come in on an outsourcing deal myself, and I joined the project side of the company rather than the outsourcing side, but the people that I've worked with who were "outsourced in" from clients have been more than happy with their decisions. Essentially, it's cheaper for an IT company to run a dozen IT departments than it is for a dozen separate widgets companies to run their own IT department. Sure, someone might get cut out of the chain, but that's what redundancy packages are for. I can't speak for DHL/DPWN/HP, but ours are pretty generous.

    2. Re:Some outsourcing insights by riperrin · · Score: 0

      I am studying for and MSc purchasing as well as doing my current job. Having read quite a lot on this I would actually say the biggest cause of wasted money is bad management, something which outsourcing slowly removes. Its by no means always right, always works or just replaces with different bad management, however this is what outsourcing is actually trying to get rid of.

      G

    3. Re:Some outsourcing insights by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      Essentially, it's cheaper for an IT company to run a dozen IT departments than it is for a dozen separate widgets companies to run their own IT department.

      I think you've got to the meat of the issue here. In all likelihood the OP is going to end up not only working for DHL, but for several other company's IT departments as well.

      Personally I think that's a really good thing. You get experience of how other company's are setup, and potentially get to play with things that you wouldn't have otherwise.

      There's also the advantage of working for a company that makes it's money from IT, rather then a company that sees IT as a money sink, which generally leads to a much nicer environment to be working in.

    4. Re:Some outsourcing insights by tgd · · Score: 1

      No, outsourcing to a new staff is done to save money. Selling an entire department to a new company to manage while continuing to do the same job they've done all along is done for many reasons, costs rarely being one of the primary ones. Expense predictability, project management skills, increased accessibility to deeper support services, etc, are all MUCH bigger reasons to take an existing staff and shift their paycheck to another organization.

    5. Re:Some outsourcing insights by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing is always done for one thing and one thing only. To save money.

      Not true. It's done (if you're doing it correctly) to improve the performance of the business, which is subtly different. I have worked for Accenture, who is on the receiving end of outsourcing, and currently work for a company who is outsourcing functions to Accenture, while receiving outsourced business functions from other companies. I've been and currently am on both sides of this.

      Companies can end up ahead after outsourcing through the outsourcer being better at managing the function than the customer was. The customer can end up better off from being able to reduce management load by offloading this to the outsourcer. In my company's case, to be blunt, I think we sucked at managing the IT functions that we are outsourcing, and I expect Accenture to be better at it. I think some folks are going to lose their jobs, but, you know what, they shouldn't have had those jobs in the first place if we were doing our job. I know, that's small comfort to them, but hey, the world can be a harsh place. You don't own your job, your employer does.

      Now, that is actually agreeing with parent's point, that the employees will be probably expected to be more productive. In the case of my own company, many employees can be made to be more productive, simply by moving under the Accenture management structure, which in my experience was far more productive than most other companies I have worked for (disclosure, I left AC as a senior manager). At AC, we got more done before lunch than we do all day at my current outfit. And I didn't work a lot harder.

      Why did I leave, you ask? Travel and kids. AC was the best job I've had in my career.

      In all this ranting and raving, it would be good to remember that -all- businesses inherently are outsourcers. We're all doing something for someone else that they could be doing themselves.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    6. Re:Some outsourcing insights by phlamingo · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing is evil.

      I mean that. I've been on both sides of it, and, although the public reason is to save money, or improve productivity, often the real reason is so that some VP or CIO can put "successfully outsourced IT department and saved $X million over $Y years" on their resume'.

      Of course, X and Y come from an analysis done by the PHB who brokered the deal. And then he leaves for a better job six months later, before everyone involved realizes that the friction of extra management layers, the divided loyalties of the trench workers, and the cost pressures of the outsource company are all resulting in lower satisfaction for the customer, the provider, and the workers.

      But the Big Important MBA got his new job at a bigger company, and gets to polish up his resume'. That's what is important, isn't it?

      --
      I had forgotten how much cooler teenagers look when they are smoking. Oh, wait ...
    7. Re:Some outsourcing insights by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      I think we sucked at managing the IT functions that we are outsourcing, and I expect Accenture to be better at it.

      Man, you must have *really* sucked!

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  10. Based on my experience by sthomas · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been on one side or the other of 35 acquisitions. My experience is that the only people absolutely guaranteed of a job when it's all done are those who are have a written retention offer as an incentive to keep them in place and not bail prior to the merger closing. Many people will keep their jobs, some will lose them, and no one other than the aforementioned can be certain of either.

    If you are uncomfortable with the uncertainty around your continued employment, then there are two options: live with that stress and all of the potential negatives and positives continued employment or sudden termination bring -OR- take your fate into your own hands and go in search of employment elsewhere ahead of time and on your own terms. No one can really tell you which is better, as you have to determine what your threshold for uncertainty and stress is.

    I have known many people who have done both, and have had it work out better or worse for them. Some can handle the stress of uncertainty, some really can't. For those latter ones, taking the initiative to determine their own fate was far better for them health-wise. I have always stayed on through the acquisitions, and it has always worked out well for me personally.

    One last word of advice I have for everyone I have ever worked with, for, or over: always keep your resume up to date! Don't wait until you are in fear of your job or suddenly terminated to get it out and "dust it off." Changing jobs is stressful, and this is one thing you can do in happier times to help see yourself through the rough ones. Also, it's great to update it with accomplishments when they are fresh in your mind.

    I always encourage my employees and peers to get out their resumes and update them no less than yearly, but ideally as often as quarterly. At the successful completion of any large project, I let my teams know "that is resume-worthy, and these are the points you should include" and list the things I think they should be proud of accomplishing.

    Don't let your resume get stale, or when you're out of a job it's one more roadblock to getting yourself back in the saddle.

    Good luck with the acquisition, whatever you choose to do!

    1. Re:Based on my experience by BVis · · Score: 1

      If you are uncomfortable with the uncertainty around your continued employment, then there are two options: live with that stress and all of the potential negatives and positives continued employment or sudden termination bring -OR- take your fate into your own hands and go in search of employment elsewhere ahead of time and on your own terms. No one can really tell you which is better, as you have to determine what your threshold for uncertainty and stress is.

      The first choice is a non-starter. With employment law as it is in this country, nobody is assured of having a job for the next ten minutes under the BEST of circumstances. Add a merger, acquisition, $bullshit_MBA_speak_for_were_going_to_screw_you_over, whatever, and things become even less secure.

      The way you can tell if your job is in jeopardy in this situation is this: Do you do actual work? If so, do you get paid the industry average or better? Then you have to assume that you're done, and you can be laid off at any given moment in the name of 'cost-cutting' and 'consolidation'.

      Get a new job now. RIGHT NOW. Don't wait for some management douchebag to decide that you're non-essential and can be trimmed off as 'fat'. If everyone took this option, 'brain drain' would become more of a deterrent for mergers/acquisitions/etc, and MAYBE those who make money off others' hard work would think twice if there were more serious consequences for their bad behavior. (Yeah, I know, that's awfully glass-half-full for me. Sue me.)

      tl;dr GET THE FUCK OUT NOW. These things always end badly for people who do actual work.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    2. Re:Based on my experience by mrand · · Score: 1

      (Great post, BTW. You sound like a good team-lead/manager)

      I've been on one side or the other of 35 acquisitions. My experience is that the only people absolutely guaranteed of a job when it's all done are those who are have a written retention offer as an incentive to keep them in place and not bail prior to the merger closing. Many people will keep their jobs, some will lose them, and no one other than the aforementioned can be certain of either.

      Perhaps pointing out the obvious, but even a retention offer isn't a guarantee of employment. It could be retracted at any time. And in fact, if the retention offer includes bonus after X amount of time, that could actually be a subtle reason for the company to not keep you employed for X time. Exactly this happened when MCI sold a support division to EDS back in the late 90's... people looking at healthy bonuses if they stayed on for 9 months (as memory serves) got canned right before they could collect. Note that I am most certainly not saying this happens every time. In fact, I collected a 10% retention bonus from a company takeover last year.

            Marc

      --
      -- PGP keyID: 0x4C95994D
    3. Re:Based on my experience by mrand · · Score: 1

      [...] If everyone took this option, 'brain drain' would become more of a deterrent for mergers/acquisitions/etc, and MAYBE those who make money off others' hard work would think twice if there were more serious consequences for their bad behavior. (Yeah, I know, that's awfully glass-half-full for me. [...] These things always end badly for people who do actual work.

      Always? You mean so badly that I received a 10% bonus for staying on, the management is better, the hours are more sane, and the office is now closer to my home?

      Your glass isn't even quarter-full, much less half-full. Not all M&A activity is bad - and in a capitalist system, it is a necessary component.

            Marc

      --
      -- PGP keyID: 0x4C95994D
    4. Re:Based on my experience by BVis · · Score: 1

      Then you're the exception that proves the rule. How many of your co-workers left/were laid off/took a cut in pay/$other_way_to_get_screwed?

      Not all M&A activity is bad - and in a capitalist system, it is a necessary component.

      I disagree. Greed requires this behavior, not capitalism. There's a very fine distinction, I know, and the union is nearly the size of either result set. Capitalism concentrates money/power at the top, not the bottom (where the 'rubber meets the road', so to speak, meaning 'people do do actual work') and those without power get screwed. Sure, you'll hear about someone acting contrary to this trend (like the Oreck guy after hurricane Katrina, look it up) but most companies are REQUIRED under penalty of stockholder lawsuit to be as piggy and greedy as possible.

      The point I was trying to make was that NEARLY ALL of the people who do actual work get screwed as a result of M&A. (The case study I like to refer to is at HP.. they bought Compaq, choked on it, laid off like 10,000 workers, and the CEO walked away with nine figures after getting fired.) If I had to guess, you're either in middle management, or someone listened to you when you told them that, despite your doing actual work, you were essential personnel.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    5. Re:Based on my experience by sthomas · · Score: 1

      Yes, the retention incentive usually just confirm your place through the close of the deal; though I have seen them with clauses offering comparable positions (in terms of compensation and title) in the newly-merged organization, also.

      Good point on the MCI/EDS situation. I would argue that the costs associated with payouts on retentions are part of the acquisition costs, and thus are tax-advantaged / shareholder value-advantaged, so in my experience companies are more apt to see the retention through and pay out because a) it's good for morale at a time when morale is taking major knocks b) it's a PR nightmare when the lawsuits hit the front pages of papers, with "I got fired minutes before I was due to receive payment for my work and dedication" c) no merger process wants to add more employment tort cases on top of the lawsuits that are likely to hit from shareholders already, because it adds to the "it was a mistake" argument.

      In merger activity that is already taking negative press and/or destroying shareholder value, all bets are off - no one cares about individual raindrops in a storm :)

  11. Lie like you have never lied before by DCFC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Although many factors are beyond your control, you can give the impression that you are really positive about the whole thing. Cooperate enthusiastically about the whole process. You can't stop it, or even slow it down, your goal should be to ensure that management think you are "part of the team" and "have the right attitude".
    You need to do wholly BS stuff like ask those controlling this mess if there is some way you can help.
    As a techie turned CIO turned headhunter I laugh openly at the "great opportunities" at HP or any outsourcer. My former colleague at PC Magazine Guy Kewney refers to these as "Industry Standard Lies".
    They have as much credibility as the many fine offers I get in emails from Nigeria and China for wealth and health.
    But you must not share my laughter.
    You must sound impressed with these fake offers, maybe even apply for some. This is best done as innocent questions, like asking the new management about them, and how you could apply. They will be selling them to you, so we now have both of you faking it to each other. That will look good when they decide who to dump.
    You may wonder if they will be taken in by this fake enthusiasm. The odds are better than you think, unless you have already met some HP managers, and then been amazed that people like this are allowed to be in charge of anything.
    They're not exactly very bright are they ?
    You will want to leave of course. Anyone who has seen outsourcing knows that the good people will want to walk.
    But in any market, you want to be the one who decides when you leave. Buy some time and maybe the horse will learn to sing.

    --
    Dominic Connor,Quant Headhunter
    1. Re:Lie like you have never lied before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will want to leave of course. Anyone who has seen outsourcing knows that the good people will want to walk.

      Good advice. I have been through two outsourcing deals now. The first time, I stayed on and tried to adapt to the new culture. The outsourcing team never quite accepted me. I wasn't part of the club.

      After a year of agony without being invited to meetings or being invited just minutes before the meeting started (with no time to prepare), I decided to leave.

      Recognize these signs and leave soon:

      - Your current job title or unit isn't listed on the new (yet nameless) org chart.
      - Your current job title is the same of someone already on the outsourcing team
      - You are not invited to meetings where the future organisation is decided
      - You are not Cc: on emails about outsourcing
      - You are not introduced to outsourcing management when they first visit the site

      If management truly wants you to stay after the outsourcing deal is complete, they will say so openly, and will be very clear. If they don't state so clearly, you should ask yourself why.

    2. Re:Lie like you have never lied before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in the outsourcing industry and I can assure you that not every manager is taken in by this sort of kabuki theatre. Can't speak for HP though.

    3. Re:Lie like you have never lied before by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      For anyone going through a merger, or really anything that involves a new CEO or significant part of upper management (new CEO will mean lots of new upper management), this is exactly right. Don't let the awful formatting fool you, this post is a map telling you exactly how to survive.

      It's especially bad if you're in a critical position. The instant you think they're going to fire you, you'd better go, because if they think you're going to go they have to get a replacement, and then what do they need you for? Of course, unless you're an idiot you know this, so as soon as you think they think you're going to go, you have to go. Somewhere in there someone's going to think you're gone. It's a lot like being in love. If you both lie to yourselves properly, you'll end up staying together, but that's a rare and wonderful thing.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    4. Re:Lie like you have never lied before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is so true.

      The main reason for outsourcing or one company buying another is cost reduction.

      For example: company A makes 10% a year and company B makes 20% a year. Which ever company has the deeper pockets will buy the other before it becomes too big to buy and the only reason is to eliminate duplicate effort so that instead of making 15% per year on average, they combined make 25% per year because they let some duplicate jobs/people go.

      And the merged company can then go to a bank and say: "look, last year we had a ROI of 20%, now our ROI is 25%, give us more money" and the bank of course thinks that's a good business and gives them the money and they buy even more companies.

      The more a wage worker makes, the more likely he is going to be fired. Most workers in this situation think: "The more people I can replace, the more likely I'm going to keep this job". That's a very dangerous thought for coworkers, but all of them are in the same situation.

      If you are a CIO, how productive is your section? If the other guy being acquired runs a more productive environment, you are going to be fired first. Typically bosses tend to keep their good friends under them, so getting close to the new management and offering for help is definitely the way to go. That and showing off, learning new stuff required in the market, getting certified, etc.

      Why do good people leave?

      I've been through acquisitions and outsourcings and most of the time they leave because they have better offers that look a lot more stable and better paying (although in the long run they get also acquired, so good people seem to be job hoping every few years anyway). Just remember: When you are asked why did you leave that and that company, simply respond that you were approached with a better offer that could not be matched by the current employer at the time and you were not looking for a job. They always like it when people have a good reputation, it is like when you buy a Mercedes for the price of a Ford.

      Managers know how to use Excel and therefore they know they are saving some money if the missing person is replaced by the people who still have a job, so expect to be filling in a lot of the time and get used to do more in less time and not be able to finish on regular working hours. If you are any good, you don't expect to be doing something that any looser can do, but if you are below average, replacing your boss may seem like a good opportunity to you, and having the right attitude may help. They may think otherwise because of your lack of people skills, so polish them, learn how to speak and eat correctly, how to motivate people, read about history and art, etc. Travel if you can. Learn geography and new languages, not just C++ and Haskell, but French and Russian, or Chinese and Hindian if you prefer to work there.

      Showing results is the way to differentiate yourself from the rest of the flock, the problem is that you don't know what the new managers want to replace and what they want to promote, beware that also your coworkers may feel jelous if you brag too much or you show results too early to your boss or new management, so try to do this behind closed doors. Your coworkers may feel tempted to hide or conceil their information, specially the way they work, because of fear of being replaced. If they have fears and they haven't moved to other companies is because they are not very efficient anyway or they are perceived as a threat to management, specially if they complain too much, so by all means, don't complain. Behind closed doors you can complain with your coworkers on one on ones, but just to change their mood and predispose them against management. A smart guy will never complain to a boss, nor will he will say something that could be taken as a complaint, if he thinks something is not working he is already working on a solution and wants his boss to look at the solution that is already ready to be tested.

      Not being assigned new stuff to do is typically a way to tell you that your

    5. Re:Lie like you have never lied before by metlin · · Score: 1

      but French and Russian, or Chinese and Hindian if you prefer to work there.

      Umm, Hindian is not a language. Hindi is a language; and India has way too many languages to be learnt if you want to go that route.

    6. Re:Lie like you have never lied before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You beat me to that.

      As for many languages goes, learning Hindi for "IT guy going to work in India" would not be much of a help in most cases - either inside the office, or outside. In any Indian IT firm, English is the only and only possible language, because the IT force may come from any part of the country, and most people from South India do not prefer to use it. Outside, if it is Bangalore or any of the South Indian cities, forget using Hindi - you might as well learn Kannada or Tamil or just forget about it.

    7. Re:Lie like you have never lied before by WNight · · Score: 1

      Nobody is being taken in except the employee who thinks he's putting something over on his boss. By playing along with the system he is their ideal employee, despite his dislike for the system. They don't need or want his approval, just his function.

      You can't guarantee happy workers, or non-saboteurs, so you create a process (document the requirement) for independent verification of results.

      Happy employees have extra value, but for most companies a steady 30% output is preferable to a temperamental genius. Especially companies who have figured out a formula for something simple (low-mid range IT) and just need zombies to check that things are plugged in and basic admin tasks.

  12. you work for HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since HP dumped PA-RISC they've just become another bottom-of-the-barrel outsource/mass market printer ink and Dell clone supplier. DECHPaq comprises the dregs of a fairly cunning coup by Intel, via the Itanic, to destroy what were the only two interesting competing CPUs (remember this is pre-amd64).

    And on the prosumer end with their once excellent RPN calculators, they fired their employees, tried to outsource development to the Far East, failed, endeavoured to get assistance from their ex-employees (who helped for a while but were horrendously treated), then a couple of years later abandoned the platform entirely - and are how selling high end calculators with no updates.

    This is pretty much a standard pattern for HP, and it's happening to you now. HP are rotten to the core. Unless you're more interested in your paycheque (by sucking up to the right managers) than your integrity and productivity as an engineer, hand in your notice yesterday.

  13. Don't be easily boxed by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I.e, don't be just a programmer; learn server management too (if nothing else, you should know how servers work to help you be a better programmer), and get involved in areas outside your job scope as much as possible. That way they can't containerise you easily and therefore know fully the impact of you not being there any more. Not to mention it's more interesting to have a broader skill-set.

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
    1. Re:Don't be easily boxed by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dumb advice.

      They will look at how you're performing your primary job. All that other stuff you do, they probably won't even know about, and if they do they won't care. If you're doing all that other stuff, you're not doing your primary job as well as you could, and probably not as well as it should be done even as a baseline.

      When they fire people there will be lots of slack to pick up. Wait for that. Pick it up very visibly and you might get promoted.

      I've been through three of these things, and the story is always the same. Those guys are the first to go.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    2. Re:Don't be easily boxed by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 1

      They will look at how you're performing your primary job. All that other stuff you do, they probably won't even know about, and if they do they won't care.

      Actually, my point is more to volunteer for tasks outside your primary job-scope. Employers like flexibility, and the cross over is very relevant. For example: You're an asp.net programmer - learning the intricacies of IIS admin through some kind of additional SCM role will benefit your coding skills, broaden your skill-set in general AND dig your claws into the project that little bit more.

      --
      throw new NoSignatureException();
    3. Re:Don't be easily boxed by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      See I've been that guy, the jack of all trades, who picked up the slack when needed and did more than just my "core job." If you're getting your primary responsibilities and tasks and projects done, there's no reason why you can't be "that guy" helping out wherever possible. More people know you, sing your praises, and spread word about your skills to others, including to their superiors.

      Then again, I've only done this in companies smaller than 2000 people, you YMMV.

      Then again, it has burned me when two projects I was involved in started both turning sour at the same time - you're boss has to know what's going on and let him prioritize things. If other people need your help, they'll make their case to your boss - let him deliver the bad news.

    4. Re:Don't be easily boxed by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Learning how systems work WILL make you a better programmer. It will cost you in terms of time spent at work. The big difference is that your code will be better performing, and easier to maintain.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    5. Re:Don't be easily boxed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While having some knowledge of server management can certainly be helpful to a developer.

      It's a big step down on the seniority scale. It's like asking the elevator repair guy to learn how to clean toilets.

    6. Re:Don't be easily boxed by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      Dumb advise.

      "That way they can't containerise you easily and therefore know fully the impact of you not being there any more"

      So the manager will have on one side a savings for certain (your wages) against an uncertain loose.

      *If* after the merger/aquisition management are pressed for savings (and you can bet most probably they will, since their own positions are as much in danger as yours) then who would you go against? Those you know their cost/revenue for certain or those whose costs are for certain but revenues ignored -so the company won't percieve it as a lost but too late if anytime?

      Think like a manager: if I do not know what exactly is this guy doing for the company, he surely can't be so important.

    7. Re:Don't be easily boxed by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      Sysadmin skills are a commodity. Highly specialised application programming skills are an asset. I think your advice is wholly incorrect.

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
  14. Don't panic by cerberusss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A comparable thing happened to my wife. When she told me, I started mirroring her fears and it turns out that wasn't a good idea. I gave her the advice to look around. That was just one possible advice, fueled by anxiety. She basically had to solicit for her own position. We did so, but actually aimed higher. Turns out in the new situation she's much better off.

    Now I'm not saying that's going to happen here. First, take the FUD out of your head and put it besides you on the couch. Then, ask around. It's better to find out more from your manager and HR if possible. In the new situation, what kind of jobs are availailable. For young people there are often opportunities here. Keep all options open, but shop around internally as well.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  15. Was in a similar position last year. by dragonlady726 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am employed by HP through an acquisition and wish I had started looking for a new job instead of waiting to see what the new organization had in store for me. The reality of the situation for me was that it took so long to complete the acquisition that our team was effectively in limbo for almost a year. Those of us that did weather the long painful integration jumped through tons of hoops just so we could get back to some sort of daily routine. As someone in a customer service role, I could see how the constant internal policy changes drastically affected customers. Not to say that acquisition is always a bad thing. Depending on where you fall on the org chart there may be opportunity to work on logistics for the acquisition/integration itself, the individuals in our group that performed this function got the recognition and the nice jobs elsewhere in the company. However, these people were few and far between, far fewer than those that left the company and didn't stick around to go through the integration exercises. I'm in the process of looking for a new position now, but in retrospect I wish I hadn't wasted my time waiting as it resulted in a year of needless headaches, IMHO.

  16. I work for DHL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know who you are, now stop posting to Slashdot and fix my printer. No wonder you're being outsourced =P

    1. Re:I work for DHL by superskippy · · Score: 1

      -1 Flamebait??? Come on- this is funny!

    2. Re:I work for DHL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm trying to work out who you are.

      I believe you're from the UK, that you work for DHL, and that you have knowledge of specific IT scenarios. I think you are the original submitter. I think you work in Ipswich.

  17. Re:Why not try it? Its experience by kubitus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You get an opportunity there! Write down the differences of both. Learn as much as you can. Take good old common sense to see what was good in the one and whats good in the other place. And also note what was bad in the old and what is bad in the new place. Then after some time look at your CV, add your new experience and rethink if you are better off at a different place.

  18. Enjoy by jandersen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just to be sure: Your company/department is being bought by HP, right? I don't how HP works at all, but it is my impression that they aren't all that bad; though, there was a rough patch some years back.

    Some 5 years ago I was in a small, but successful company that was bought by Informatica - I'm still here, in case you wonder. I think for the first year or so we all hated it; we really felt like we were pariahs - part of that was our fault; we we resented the whole thing, for a large part because nobody asked our opinion, and I think we all felt rather betrayed. Since then we have worked out our differences, but it didn't happens automatically - management, from the very top, understood that there was a serious problem, and they have consistently tried to do all the right things and address the real problems (as opposed to just trying to look good).

    It is very important to feel welcome in a new company, and to feel that you and the way you do things enjoy respect and are valuable. In the beginning I would have left, given half a chance; now I would be very reluctant to change job.

    It is very important that feel confident in yourself if you stay in your new company - they have bought you guys because they believe in your product, but also because they believe in you guys. Where the problems can come in is when the lower to middle managers aren't willing to give an inch; they have more direct influence over your daily lives than upper management.

  19. There's always a killing spree!!! by tjstork · · Score: 1, Funny

    But don't do something with guns, otherwise, liberals and weak old ladies will get bent out of shape and vote to ban them. Bring swords to work and maybe a bunch of slings and big rocks.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:There's always a killing spree!!! by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      Hi Marcus. I have a Snicker's and some new pens for your crazy pocket.

  20. Not necessarily by Nursie · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Remember a lot depends on how much you are willing to accept as a reduction in pay which ultimately will happen at some point."

    Not necessarily.
    Been through 2. First ended in a payoff and redundancy, the second resulted in more money as they realised how useful I can be when properly motivated :)

    1. Re:Not necessarily by somersault · · Score: 1

      the second resulted in more money as they realised how useful I can be when properly motivated :)

      I wish my motivation realised how useful it can be when properly motivated, then I wouldn't need external factors to do the metamotivation :/

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Not necessarily by runningduck · · Score: 1

      Outsourcing occurs for many reasons. One of the most common is that management in the organization does not have the necessary skills to build an appropriate technology management team. It is easier to purchase this as a service rather than build it if you do not know how. There are only so many good CIOs and CTOs around. If you hire the wrong one you can easily drive a business into the ground.

      Another reason could be to shift variable labor costs into a fixed contract fees. Not all dollars are equal, especially if the organization is looking to position their finances to secure external capital or make large purchases.

      Of course it could be the case that the IT department is loaded up with seat fillers. If this is the case, just work hard and keep your eye open for possible opportunities both inside and outside of the organization. If you have value to provide it will be identified and rewarded.

      In any case, you should ALWAYS keep your resume up to date if for no other reason than as an exercise in reflecting on your own skills, capabilities and weaknesses.

      --
      -rd
  21. Be prepared by Confused · · Score: 1

    It all depends on how much you depend on this one job. You say that's your first job after university, I assume you're quite young and I hope you don't have too many mouths to feed.

    Try to be open and give the outsourcer a chance. Sometimes new avenues open up and you can move into directions you didn't expect before.

    Start looking for a new job. The outsourcing is a change, and while you're changing, you might change to something better, if it presents itself. That makes the outsourcer compete with the regular job market.

    After the outsourcing there'll be a lot of shuffling around and your new overlords don't know you. Visible people tend to get noticed more, the quite guy sitting in his corner and doing a good job is often missed. Try to be welcoming to them, appear cooperative and friendly. At the same time expect to be fed only bullshit, but that should be business as usual.

    At the same time, don't take any crap - if you can afford it. If you don't like your new employer, this might be your one chance to fight for your rights and find out what your right are. Give the new employer good reasons to believe you won't go silently and go though all those fun worker protection regulations. Outsourcer really hate that. They want sheep they can slaughter in piece and who'll run to the abattoir on their own and wait silently in the queue to be processed. This obviously doesn't work if you have seven kids to feed and it's the only job you'll ever get.

    If you don't want to stay there, it might be worth waiting for a decent severance package. Very often, at some points packages are offered and it would be waste if you left on your own without it shortly before it came availble.

  22. Do both by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    One of the worst mistakes that people make when changing jobs is underestimating the need for a "plan B."

    1. Re:Do both by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      I don't agree.
      There is only Plan A - make enough money to continue to live. If you get that right, then you can make choices. There is no point in changing jobs with the sure knowledge that you don't want to work there really. Unless there is a financial advantage, but why then would it be short term. Change jobs, make money, get on with life. If another opportunity comes up, weigh it up and proceed. No need to have several moves planned out in advance. If you are trying to get to a certain point, then it might make sense, but life is for living, not working. If shit happens, you rely on yourself to get out and keep providing, no matter what the source of income. Too many people think they can corral their ambitions and not suffer for it.

  23. Opportunities in HP are fleeting ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even as you hear of opportunities in HP keep in mind that they too are constantly restructuring. One of their support centers in Colorado is moving to New Mexico and the current workers have essentially been told "move or find a new job" (and since they aren't being laid off there's "no package").

    Also keep in mind that the Ann Livermore (Executive VP, Technology Solutions Group) has openly stated that her job is to outsource (in most cases this means offshore) as many of hp's jobs as quickly as possible. This is done to improve hp's bottom line but obviously impacts the displaced workers even more.

    Make sure your parachute is packed well and ready for deployment.

    1. Re:Opportunities in HP are fleeting ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd stick it out, but keep your resume updated. I used to work for HP. The current executives there are very interested in saving money. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but it can be at the expense of the employees. Things like low or no raises are common, even when your review is positive. Also, don't believe anything until you see it in writing.

    2. Re:Opportunities in HP are fleeting ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the entire call center is being relocated and there are more than 50 employees, they have additional rights under the WARN Act.

  24. Redunancy money by superskippy · · Score: 1

    If you think the end is nigh, it often pays more to be pushed than jump. I'd cling on and see if I could land a redundancy payment.

    1. Re:Redunancy money by OSXCPA · · Score: 1

      If the orig. poster is straight from school, in the US s/he is unlikely to get a decent severance package - my experience is 1 weeks pay for every year with the firm, with no one getting less than 2 weeks, maybe a month. Maybe different elsewhere, but I've seen this dance at three employers, and for newer employees, there is seldom a good incentive to stay. Can't hurt to ask, though.

    2. Re:Redunancy money by Erwos · · Score: 1

      I work for AOL-TWX, and the folks who bought it last time got significantly more generous severance packages than that during the lay-offs, like "4 months paid". Clearly, there's no iron-clad rule. I'd stick around.

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  25. GET OUT NOW !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked for @Home internet service for about 2.5-3 years before it was taken over by Comcast. In less than two months after the take over, nearly ALL of our network access was stripped away, our troubleshooting tools were stripped away, and our ability to provide support to not only the customers but also our field technicians was dwindled to nothing.

    Everything that we had before (tools, access, etc.) was replaced with internal "web based" tools that were 20% accurate at best.

    On top of that, the company turned our senior level support group (which was rated #1 in the country before Comcast came in) into a living nightmare. Myself and the rest of my group suffered on with the company for about another 3-4 years before we all finally got so fed up that many of us ended up quitting the company without having another job to go to.

    I can't speak for HP as I've never worked directly for them but my ordeals at Comcast are not in short supply across the corporate business models of the world. I would hang on for a while to see how things work out after the take over. Though at the first sign of things going south, start looking for a new job ASAP and save yourself the stress and eventual rage that ensues.

  26. If you're green, you're fine by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    If you are fresh out of school, chances are you will be the last person to go during a transition like this. You are cheap, and best positioned to pick up on the newest technologies. The company will prefer to buy out people who are close to retirement, so as long as there is gray hair walking around your office, you are probably just fine.

    A friend of mine works for a company who was bought by HP a year ago and they didn't let go of anybody. Not that it's a guarantee, but I think it's false to assume that a merger means layoffs all the time.

  27. Read your new contract carefully by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One reason to outsource people for large companies here is to circumvent work councils. Many large companies here have pretty good social plans for their workers, good pension plans, good health plans, and a key incentive to move your workforce into some subsidiary is to cut those costs.

    So read your new contract very, very carefully. Just because something was a given in your old contract doesn't mean it will be in your new contract. If it's not there, consider it gone. This can include things like a cafeteria that was free for the workers (i.e. part of the social plan) suddenly charging you for your meal.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Read your new contract carefully by TheHappyMailAdmin · · Score: 1

      I second the parent comment - know exactly what you're getting and take nothing for granted. I worked for a large outsourcing company where the "original" company offered premium benefits in all areas from healthcare to time off to retirement. The outsourcing company offered middling to poor benefits across the board. That may not be important to you, but if (for example) you have a family and your total health care costs will double as a result of being bumped to a different provider with less comprehensive coverage, make sure you take that into account.

  28. Always Dust The Resume by lousyd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Should I 'ride the wave' and join the new company and culture, or dust off the old CV/resume?"

    Dust off the resume! *Always* dust off the resume. Keep that baby dusted even when you're happy and foresee no imminent change. I'd ride the wave for now. You'll know when the time is right. But keep the resume dusted.

    --
    If aspiration is a virtue, achievement cannot be a vice.
    1. Re:Always Dust The Resume by kilgor · · Score: 0

      Based on my experience, you can't trust anything they say about job openings at the new company, or about the future of your job. Their goal is to keep warm bodies in chairs as long as they need them and they'll blow smoke up your ass to keep you there. Unless you have signed papers saying they'll keep you, they have no intention of doing so. You are a headcount and nothing more.

      Personally I'd be shooting resumes out as fast as possible in that situation, but I'm supporting a family of six and can't really risk being out of a job.

      Good luck!

    2. Re:Always Dust The Resume by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Keep that baby dusted

      I believe I'll dust my broom.

      (Note to mods: this is probably a little obscure, but I'm sure it applies to many a lonely /.er with the #0000FFs.)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Always Dust The Resume by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Dust off the resume! *Always* dust off the resume.

      But I am a soil analyst by trade.
         

  29. I know the feeling. by OSXCPA · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Happened to me. I learned that if you are not considered a 'revenue center' you will likely be the first to go - IT Departments, internal audit, accounting are all 'cost centers', and since businesses live to minimize costs...

    Given what you do, moving to HP or one of their ilk (Accenture, etc.) will make you such a revenue center, and thus less likely to be laid off. In those environments (where I currently work) if you do good work and have a good senior manager (director level, selling work to clients) you will remain chargeable, and therefore, employed. It can work out well. One thing I do recommend, though, to someone straight from University - don't fall in love with your job, because it won't love you back, and it may break your heart. Good luck!

    1. Re:I know the feeling. by ArminK · · Score: 2, Informative

      Same here.

      Our IT department was outsourced to HP several years ago. At the time I was glad I was not in the IT department, although I work mostly with IT things.

      In the meanwhile my view has changed completely:
      - the people who were outsourced have safe jobs at HP. Some changed to better jobs inside HP, others are still doing the same job.
      - My own company has started moving everything offshore and laying off more and more people. No chance of any career or promotion any more.
      - The people who stayed are now fighting for their jobs every day, while the people who were outsourced have safe jobs and can even move to other parts of HP.

      If you are asking for advice:
      - Don't Panic
      - keep your CV up to date (this is always good)
      - see what HP offers to you. Usually they pay the same, but raises and promotions may be handled differently.
      - Quickly Switch to HP mentally: you should now do what is best for HP, not what is best for your old company.
      - look for a career at HP: they will probably offer better opportunities than your current employer.

    2. Re:I know the feeling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been in this situation. It starts off well (welcome to one big happy family), but it goes down hill very quickly. 2 years after we were absorbed, the support my site provided was off-shored to KL, India, and Manila. The retained staff was cut and the people who were left, were moved into other jobs. My boss did a good job of saving those he wanted to save but no one is happy.

      Remember this. If a company is outsourcing the new company has to do the job cheaper...how do you think they do that? They cut jobs and off-shore.

      With that in mind, keep the resume up to date and keep you eyes open, especially internally.

    3. Re:I know the feeling. by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      I have been in this situation. It starts off well (welcome to one big happy family), but it goes down hill very quickly. 2 years after we were absorbed, the support my site provided was off-shored to KL, India, and Manila. The retained staff was cut and the people who were left, were moved into other jobs. My boss did a good job of saving those he wanted to save but no one is happy.

      I've had it worse. The company I used to work for got bought out by another. The new company put on this huge presentation about how they were excited about the new direction blah blah blah.

      TWO WEEKS later they took us en masse into a few rooms and told us that they were moving most of the operations to Canada, including my entire division.

  30. My experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My unit at IBM was sold to another company a couple of years ago. My experience is:

    • There are likely to be redundancies, but if you are recognised to be good at your job, they will keep you
    • In the UK at least, it's worth waiting to see if you get redundancy money. I'd have loved to have been made redundant: with long years of service, I could have funded at least 6 months of traveling.
    • There are other advantages to being pushed rather than leaving - you get assistance in jobhunting for one.
    • If you still have a job, it's worth seeing how the new owners treat you. You might even prefer it. If not, you're in a secure position from which to explore the job market.
  31. Redundancy isn't necessarily a bad thing. by WibbleOnMars · · Score: 1

    One thing I wouldn't suggest is to leave now -- you can always quit after the shakeup if it doesn't work out for you, but even if there are layoffs and your job looks shaky, stick around until after they've happened; they may keep you on after all, and even if they don't, there ought to be a payout for making you redundant.

    You should definitely make sure you CV/resume is up to date, though -- if the worst happens, you'll need to get it out there quickly.

    A friend of mine was made redundant in a shakeup like this. It was the best thing that ever happened to him. (well, best work-related thing, anyway... ;-))

    He had been there a number of years, so he got a really decent payout when they made him redundant (tax-free in this country too! don't know whether that's the case everywhere), and he went straight from there to a better paid job.

  32. stand back by nimbius · · Score: 0

    do what you love. let corporations collide. in the end mergers, outsourcing and smartsourcing mean very little to anyone but stockholders.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  33. It depends where you are located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you are part of the DPWN staff in Germany then sit tight. The German laws make 'rightsizing' very difficult.
    IF you are elsewhere, be afraid, VERY Afraid.
    Watch out for the HP tactics of:-
      1) Moving your location by hundreds of miles/km
      2) Moving you to and existing HP facility where there are :-
              a) Not enough desks for the existing staff
              b) Not enough car parking for the existing staff.
      3) The sudden appearance of Indian IT staff who have come to learn your job
    This is all to get you to leave on your own without them making you redundant/laid off/rightsized.

    You mangers may well have hidden targets and therefore bonuses for getting rid of say 30% of staff.

    If you are not someone who is a 'Yes Sir, Three Bags full, let me lick you boots sir, kinda guy' then beware the arrival of the pink slip within days of the takeover being completed.

    I survived the Compaq takeover of DEC but got the chop 2 days after HP took over. Then went back as a contractor to complete the multi million $$$$ project I was working on. HP is one place I wouldn't ever work again. They SUCK royally.

  34. Embrace it and enjoy the ride by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    Although I've never been 'outsourced' myself I have worked at an outsourcing company alongside many people who had. This wasn't HP so I don't know what they're like but my experience is that it is, in general, a fairly positive experience.

    You may not end up doing exactly what you were doing before, or in exactly the same way which might be an issue for you but on the other hand you ought to have a lot more opportunities to get involved in different things which may not have been available to you before.

    One thing I did notice is that people outsourced from the same company do tend to form their own little cliques within the new company which could work well for you if a lot of your management is also being outsourced or not so well if you are a smaller company.

    For example although most of the management had come in on specific contracts/projects related to the company they came from at the beginning after a couple of years they'd be doing something totally unrelated to the company they were outsourced from and yet their team would still mostly be comprised of their old co-workers.

    The other option ( in the UK at least ) is an excellent chance of a fairly generous redundancy package so I'd say if you want a big lump of cash take redundancy and leave to do something else or if you prefer career development go with the move.

  35. Except it rarely makes sense by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "If nothing is broke, most likely no-one is going to try and "fix it"," is a good principle, but obviously doesn't apply when the whole deal is aimed at fixing it. If nothing were broke, DHL wouldn't "fix it" by pawning off the whole department.

    Anyway, the fact is, DHL thinks it can save some money by passing these guys off to HP. Going by your scenario, it means that, basically we have two sums:

    X = how much DHL pays for these guys, managing them, computers, electricity, building rent, overhead, etc

    Y = how much DHL would pay HP for the same results

    Now DHL thinks X > Y, and HP must think that Y includes a profit margin for itself _and_ pay for whatever they bought that department for. (It's not signing this just to subsidize DHL.) It makes no sense for Y to be the exact same old X plus a positive profit. Basically for your scenario, you have simultaneously X > Y, Y = X + P _and_ P > 0. Something doesn't add up, according to the maths as I know it.

    One possibility that happens rather often, is that actually HP will end up fleecing DHL. I.e., that (maybe after a short time) actually Y > X. Quite a few companies found themselves at the bad end of that kind of a deal. (Though in the short term HP takes a small loss to sweeten the deal, the new CEO/beancounte/PHB can show some positive financial results in that quarter, and the shareholders cheer.)

    The other possibility is that HP _will_ reduce the costs somehow. Maybe they'll force everyone to do more projects in the same time, so it's not going to be really the same job for the same money. Maybe they'll phase some people out after a while and move some of those jobs to Elbonia. Or maybe after a while they figure out that they can't make that much money there, gut the department and keep just some maintenance or service contract with DHL. Or whatever.

    There _are_ a few such outsourcing or privatizing deals done just so someone else gets to fire those people, or ask them to take a pay cut.

    So basically indeed YMMV. I'm glad it worked out well for you. Sometimes it does. In some other places it doesn't work like that.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Except it rarely makes sense by superskippy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      DHL doesn't necessarily think it can save some money. Y might be larger than X at the offset, but Y might be lower risk. That is to say, DHL might be able to negociate a fixed deal with HP, but if DHL employ staff themselves it might seem cheaper, but costs could be highly variable.

      E.g. suppose a load of your staff leave. Your faced with costs of hiring, and costs of getting expensive contractors in to fill in. X has rocketed here. HP will have to pick up the tab if that happens. Or suppose a project goes titsup. HP will end up paying to get it straight under the new scheme, not DHL.

    2. Re:Except it rarely makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      From what i have seen at HP is that they already have a system where they can have low-knowledge ppl onsite (and get rid of a few from the site) and then throw in some of their consultants whenever they need. Also they have a "working" system of employee-resources from everything from salary to education. So what they are basically doing is just taking the production, reduce the local workstaff and then using the already existing staff within HP for anything a bit more advanced. (ie fire all the good guy's and keep the low salary ppl)

    3. Re:Except it rarely makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite a few companies found themselves at the bad end of that kind of a deal.

      No, frankly, why is everyone talking about Motorola these days??

    4. Re:Except it rarely makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was part of a company acquired by HP recently, and am still an HP employee. I don't consider myself as having "drank the kool-aid" but take all this as you will.

      1) HP specializes in data center automation, doing more with less, and due to the fact they own the software that would otherwise have to be leased there are immediate savings to the tune of a few million.

      2) HP is a technology company, and has a LOAD more opportunities for an IT professional. As others have said, it is far better to work as a technologist in a technology company then as a technologist in some other industry.

      3) If the entire staff is not maintained, it is entirely reasonable to expect people would get shifted to other projects. The load of work when the EDS acquisition is completed means that they will need to "fill the gaps" as the companys are merged, opening opportunities, and things have been good for HP so the EDS stuff aside there is a lot of growth. I know my division has openings they are looking to fill right now.

      I was wary at first about being acquired, but over time realized it was a giant win, for my career and for my colleagues. HP is a great company, the benefits are good, and they honestly try to make everyone feel included. Obviously some people don't like working for big companies, but you were already working for a big company so *shrug*

  36. Develop alternate revenue streams by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    Your CV/Resume should always be kept up to date no matter what, even if you're currently not looking for another job.

    That said, you should learn a separate skill in another field so you're not totally dependent on your "day job." I'm a software engineer in my day job but I'm a "finance nerd" at home. I develop day trading software on the side to sell, and for my own use. The whole field of trading is intellectually stimulating; if you're really good at it you might even be able to ditch the day job one day.

    Remember that being an entrepreneur doesn't necessarily "taking the plunge" and quitting the day job and joining a start-up. A creative and focused person can develop a side business for extra income. And who knows? Maybe it'll take off. You're young enough to develop this entrepreneurial habit. Think of the possibilities!

  37. Both (as others have said) by rindeee · · Score: 1

    Your CV should always be up to date. Always. No exceptions. That said, outsourcing can be lucrative for the employees. Often you'll get a bump in pay or a retainer bonus. Replacing a mass exodus immediately after an outsourcing deal is highly problematic and most companies will do all they can to keep staff and convert them.

  38. Ah, the sweet feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing like having the pee in a cup, again, to work for the same company.

  39. PWNd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely someone whose job got eliminated as a result of this would feel a bit... D-PWNd? (/ducks) /CF

  40. Mod entire page and comments 'insightful' by edmicman · · Score: 1

    Thank you, thank you, thank you! I am going through this exact thing - our small company was recently acquired by a much larger company (and our previous #1 competitor to boot!), and I am seeing myself in both the original question and all of the comments. The fear of the unknown, the apprehension, the prospects of putting my resume back out there....they're all there.

    I, too, felt disillusioned in the system, frustrated with the powers-that-be, and distrustful of the whole thing. My initial thoughts were that this whole mess wasn't going to be for the better at all, and that we were getting sucked in to their crappiness. I've decided to keep my eyes open a little more for whatever opportunities are out there, at least moreso than I was before. But I'm going to wait awhile longer to see how things pan out. Corporate communication throughout the whole thing has been little to non-existent, though. The biggest struggle I've had is that my job role has changed. Well, no one has actually told me it has changed, but my previous role was lead developer in our small company - and the new company outsources all of their dev work to India (which is VERY subpar quality work I might add). I get the feeling they've got all these new people now, and don't really know what to do with them. I'd really rather be doing software development and programming that "managing" or doing this "project leader" BS.

    I've either learned that things will begin to smooth out, or that I should just stop caring about putting out a better "product" and giving everything my best effort. If upper management only cares about the bottom line, no matter how crappy the quality of our company's product and service, why should I bother?

  41. As a Manager by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

    As a manager I can tell you the list of employees that will have "protection" has already been made by management opinion. No use trying to change yourself now.

    I would suggest updating the CV, but stay on, and keep a positive attitude about the shift in culture.

    1) If you're getting downsized, they owe you severance. If you leave, you don't get it. After 8 years, it might be worth it.

    2) People who are negative usually go first. Look at the positives, do some preliminary work researching the new systems, culture, expectations etc which will help you make new contacts and increase your "corporate worth". Make sure to name-drop those connections and forward looking technologies around your manager and higherups.

    3) Ride it out. If you're a good employee, you'll survive with more opportunity then you think. If you were a sub-par employee always doing the minimum, you can ride it out for the severance. Either way you're covered.

    4) Put your feelers out to headhunters. They may be greedy, pushy, and rude, but they're on your side and have a better idea of your market value then anyone else. Just don't use a headhunter that is corporately known. People looking for a job has a way of leaking out, especially if Management deals with them on a regular basis.

    I survived a few downsizes and shifts. My positive attitude while the sky was falling was always greeted with appreciation by the new overlords.

    Yo Grark

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
  42. Outsourcing is pain by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 1

    Outsourcing is pain. Anyone who says differently is selling something.

    The expectations are not going to be lower, so outsourcing just means there is another set of mouths to feed in the corporate food chain between your work and the company's income. In my experience, from a worker's point of view, there is very, very little good that can come of it: if you were a cost before, you will still be a cost. The CIO is trying to avoid actually being accountable for anything or the company is playing games with its "revenue per employee" statistic to pull the wool over investors eyes.

  43. Some tips from the "other side" by saigon_from_europe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems that I am on the other side of the story (dark side?) since I actually work in an outsourcing company. I work in Serbia, and we provide some programming for one company in USA.

    It may be that we are not a typical example, but in our case there are about 60 employees in USA and 20 here in Serbia.

    Complete R&D, marketing, and all top-jobs in IT are done in USA. Here in Serbia we do very basic tasks only.

    In our particular case, we are not doing the job very well. Successful outsourcing requires very good communication channels. Due to geographical difference and esp. if there is time zone difference (like USA - India) communication must be perfect. This is very hard to achieve. That would require trained people in USA to write good specs, to know how to handle tasks and everything. For a beginning, just to know what they want as a product. In practice, that would mean that good managers will do some good work and bad managers will do some bad work, just as if there was no outsourcing. Outsourcing will just make existing communication problems bigger.

    In our particular case, since we work in extremely regulated industry, things are even harder. Everything in the process has to be double-checked, documented and so on. In theory, this makes things more easy to outsource, but in practice, as major job has to be done in USA, outsourcing does not seem too beneficial. In our case, only thing you can outsource are junior jobs. But they have problems figuring this, and they try over and over to send us any tasks they find "labor intensive". This won't work. Outsourcing company is not a cavalry you call when you are in trouble. If you want to treat it like a cheap labor for boring tasks, you'll be in a huge problem.

    As a complete surprise to a geniuses who believe that outsourcing is a solution for poor business practices, people that work in outsourcing companies are human, too. When treated as junk, they treat their employers as junk, so they tend to leave for small increases in salaries, since their job satisfaction is low and salary in only measure. Even more surprisingly, if treated as humans, outsources tend to behave just every normal employee. They learn about their jobs, they are ready to spend some time there when salaries are not the highest in the city and so on.

    It's a bit different story when large company, like HP decides to outsource entire department. I don't see how this could be efficient. It's not a problem to replace junior John Doe with Asok in Delhi, but if you need to replace every trained team-leader, every mid-manager with the Indian counter-part, it seems to me like a recipe for disaster.

    --
    No sig today.
    1. Re:Some tips from the "other side" by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      Interesting info. This fits with how it looks from this end also.

      I think the dynamic you describe is also pretty typical for interactions between departments and branches within the US. There are divisions or headquarters which have power, within which there are a lot of politics and scrambling for position. Then there are divisions or satellite offices where people are relatively powerless and the work is boring, since everything is organized to benefit those who are in control.

      I expect that companies which manage to function in a more civilized manner can probably kick ass in their markets, because the feudal way is pretty inefficient.

    2. Re:Some tips from the "other side" by sheldon · · Score: 1

      As a complete surprise to a geniuses who believe that outsourcing is a solution for poor business practices,

      I like that phrase. I'm going to borrow it. :-)

    3. Re:Some tips from the "other side" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What company is this, we need to start a boycott list for outsourcing..

      thanks...

    4. Re:Some tips from the "other side" by saigon_from_europe · · Score: 1

      If I were you, I would not boycott it. The company is very innovative, and it does a very good job to USA economy.

      I believe that our company does not do the outsourcing in "bad way". If there was no outsourcing, this company would never existed, as they had so small amount of money when they started, that they simply needed to do the initial job somewhere cheaply.

      After that, company had an exponential growth. As a result, it employed 60 people in USA. From 1:1 ratio of employees in USA compared to Serbia, it is now 3:1, and the best jobs are in USA. I firmly believe that this was a benefit for USA's economy.

      (And quite surprisingly, all hardware is done by a contractor in USA.)

      --
      No sig today.
  44. When a company outsources it's IT by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It starts the downward spiral in efficiency since there will be a lot more overhead in the process of doing IT support.

    An IT person that's roaming the corridors and works inhouse can always stop by and fix things on the fly while an outsourced IT person always has to get the issue through the issue tracking system in order to motivate the salary. This means that it can add hours upon hours of delay before an issue is resolved.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    1. Re:When a company outsources it's IT by DMoylan · · Score: 1

      and when you piss them of by out sourcing then sometimes they may seek revenge.

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/06/01/outsourcing_porn/

    2. Re:When a company outsources it's IT by Icarium · · Score: 1

      That sounds very much like an end-user perspective of IT.

      Yes it's a lot faster and more convenient when Bob the IT guy is willing to fix a problem when passing through, but when the PHB in charge of Bob starts asking PHB questions (Where were you 20 minutes ago? Oh, you were fixing Jane-in-accountings printer? Where's the incident report? There isn't one? Hmmm...)

      Every end user I've ever dealt with (very few, fortunately) seems to think along the lines of "Well Bob helped me last time, and I have his direct extension, so I'll just give him a call to pop round and fix this". No regard for procedure, no regard for whether Bob is busy or not, or that there might be other more important issues for Bob to resolve first.

      Every single time I've made the mistake of being helpful to an end user that decided to bypass our procedures, that user has decided that that was a green flag to do so in future. Being bombarded by requests for help, often with issues outside your expertise or responsibilities is a royal pain in the ass.

      No incident report, no help.

    3. Re:When a company outsources it's IT by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily; usually the whole IT department isn't outsourced, just specific functions, so you still have your basic maintenance dudes.

      The real problem is with long term systems changes. The sort of stuff you can make your salaried guys do on top of their regular work, requires you to contract specific services with an outsourcing company. That can cost a ton.

      You also lose internal R you can test stuff out, see if it's worth deploying, see if its going to be cost effective. When you're outsourced, you get to listen to sales pitches which are inevitably slanted to favor the good points and obscure the bad points.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:When a company outsources it's IT by Z00L00K · · Score: 1
      And no consideration for the overall impact company-wide of the delays issued by the incident report system.

      And I have been on the IT department side. Time report/tracking systems SUCKS.

      The best way to measure the effectiveness of the IT department people is their idle time. If it's too high they are overstaffed, if they are pulling overtime they are understaffed. Tracking issues will cost a lot of time that just wastes money.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  45. therapy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "I moved into my current position fresh out of university"

    "I enjoy my work and the opportunities that go with it, "

    in other words, you never had to deal with
    reality? you seem to think somehow you will be guaranteed a job in 'the new company', as if you have a choice to stay or go.

    the point of outsourcing is supposedly to reduce headcount and get rid of labor costs... ie, you. dust off your 'cv' no matter what. its like your lifeboat, think 'titanic'.

    and go read dilbert books.

    1. Re:therapy by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Hate to agree with the AC, but it's best to be prepared for the worst. Getting a job with the company your company outsourced to is a crapshoot.

      They offer those positions so their people can pick your brain, let you keep things running well while their staff get up to speed, and then they'll drop you a few years later.

      Or they'll find out you sold yourself well, but really your skills are inferior to someone they've already got, and they'll let you go sooner.

      Or they're keeping you around to maintain some system that they've decided is going to be replaced, and when it's gone, so are you.

      The only good option is that they may be impressed with your skills and offer you a position. But that is never going to be their first thought.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  46. Depends on if you are the buyer or buyee by Royale_With_Cheese · · Score: 2, Informative

    If your company is being bought you should generally leave, or at least prepare to. I'm yet to see happy developers that stayed with a company that got bought out. If your company is the one buying the other then you get to raid the other company's resources (people, servers, software, etc) keeping what you want and getting rid of the rest. Much better to be on this end than the other.

    1. Re:Depends on if you are the buyer or buyee by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      I can immediately think of two counter examples. My own company was purchased 18 months ago, and I couldn't be happier. I played golf this weekend with a guy from Aquantive, purchased by MSFT a year ago, and he was also quite satisfied.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
  47. He got outsourced by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

    Tag this story "dpwned".

  48. Opportunity knocks by ShannaraFan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Opportunities are born out of times like this - ride it out, keep a positive attitude and an open mind, look for new people to hook up with, expand your network to include people in the "new" company. You very likely will find yourself presented with a chance to do something new, without having to leave the company.

  49. Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I was in that exact position with HP and a large canadian financial institution about 5 years ago. It went pretty smoothly for some (including me) but not for everyone. The shift to HP's culture was a hit and there was many waves of layoff's.

    Stick it out and see what happens. At the very least you can put "HP" (for whatever that is worth to you) on your resume.

  50. Take some time by ladquin · · Score: 1

    If I assume you live and work in USA, so you will be under the same worker laws, I guess you should not worry about being outsourced, specially if we speak about HP. I live in Argentina and work at a HP facility, but I'm NOT a HP employee, I'm an outsourced problem analyst, and there is a big difference. I don't just speak about salary, it's about worker's internal rights and responsabilities: if something goes wrong with something I'm working on, It's all my fault; but if it turns out to be a good job, my (HP) manager will take the credit for it (anyway, here everyone knows it happens without even being outsourced..). Of course, he will not forget to congratulate me by e-mail. Now, if I have something to complain or ask about, it's not HP I have to deal with, it's my outsourcing company... I still think you shouldn't leave (yet), just take your time to evaluate all the implications, but specially how you really want your job to be like. Good luck.

    --
    If your name is Anonymous Coward, don't bother replying. I already guess how smart you are.
  51. surviving the corepirate nazi holycost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    better days ahead. see you there?
    the lights are coming up all over now. conspiracy theorists are being vindicated. some might choose a tin umbrella to go with their hats. the fairytail is winding down now. let your conscience be yOUR guide. you can be more helpful than you might have imagined. there are still some choices. if they do not suit you, consider the likely results of continuing to follow the corepirate nazi hypenosys story LIEn, whereas anything of relevance is replaced almost instantly with pr ?firm? scriptdead mindphuking propaganda or 'celebrity' trivia 'foam'. meanwhile; don't forget to get a little more oxygen on yOUR brain, & look up in the sky from time to time, starting early in the day. there's lots going on up there.

    http://news.google.com/?ncl=1216734813&hl=en&topic=n
    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/31/opinion/31mon1.html?em&ex=1199336400&en=c4b5414371631707&ei=5087%0A
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/29/world/29amnesty.html?hp
    http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/02/nasa.global.warming.ap/index.html
    http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/weather/06/05/severe.weather.ap/index.html
    http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/weather/06/02/honore.preparedness/index.html
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/01/opinion/01dowd.html?em&ex=1212638400&en=744b7cebc86723e5&ei=5087%0A
    http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/05/senate.iraq/index.html
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/17/washington/17contractor.html?hp
    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/03/world/middleeast/03kurdistan.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin
    http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080708/cheney_climate.html

    is it time to get real yet? A LOT of energy is being squandered in attempts to keep US in the dark. in the end (give or take a few 1000 years), the creators will prevail (world without end, etc...), as it has always been. the process of gaining yOUR release from the current hostage situation may not be what you might think it is. butt of course, most of US don't know, or care what a precarious/fatal situation we're in. for example; the insidious attempts by the felonious corepirate nazi execrable to block the suns' light, interfering with a requirement (sunlight) for us to stay healthy/alive. it's likely not good for yOUR health/memories 'else they'd be bragging about it? we're intending for the whoreabully deceptive (they'll do ANYTHING for a bit more monIE/power) felons to give up/fail even further, in attempting to control the 'weather', as well as a # of other things/events.

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=weather+manipulation&btnG=Search
    http://video.google.com/videosearch?hl=en&q=video+cloud+spraying

    dictator style micro management has never worked (for very long). it's an illness. tie that with life0cidal aggression & softwar gangster style bullying, & what do we have? a greed/fear/ego based recipe for disaster. meanwhile, you can help to stop the bleeding (loss of life & limb);

    http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/28/vermont.banning.bush.ap/index.html

    the bleeding must be stopped before any healing can begin. jailing a couple of corepirate nazi hired goons would send a clear message to the rest of the world from US. any truthful look at the 'scorecard' would reveal that we are a society in decline/deep doo-doo, despite all of the scriptdead pr ?firm? generated drum beating & flag waving propaganda that we are constantly bombarded with. is it time to get real yet? please consider carefully ALL of yOUR other 'options'. the creators will prevail. as it has always been.

    corepirate nazi execrable costs outweigh benefits
    (Score:-)mynuts won, the king is a fink)
    by ourselves on everyday 24/7

    as there are no benefits, just more&more death/debt & disruption. fortunately there's an 'army' of light bringers, coming yOUR way. the little ones/innocents must/will be protected. after the big flash, ALL of yOUR imaginary 'borders' may blur a bit? for each of the creators' innocents harmed in any way, there is a debt that must/will be repaid by y

  52. Don't think like an engineer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The reason the shake up is there in the first place is because someone in the food chain isn't making enough money and wants to change things around so that they make more.

    One: it depends on who's doing the figuring. Two folks, equally honest, can come up with two vastly different figures for a particular business unit. I has an issue like this once where one guy was attributing more of the company overhead to the unit than the other, so his "costs" were vastly greater.

    And when you outsource, the costs are calculated very differently. That's the mistake a lot of folks make is that they don't look at the acid test: cash flow. Trump once said cash is king! The big corporate types have a tendency to forget that. I blame MBA programs. Watching cash flows was never really taught.

    Two: Numbers in the business world are NOT based on physical laws as they are in engineering and science. Many times, the numbers are someone's best guess - estimate, pulled out of their ass, etc...

  53. money is not the whole story by Tzinger · · Score: 1

    Reducing costs is part of the story for outsourcing, but it is not always the entire story. It consumes capital and intellectual capital to manage as much as 15% of your business. Maybe the company is better off to invest elsewhere.

    Many companies do not manage their own payroll. It is not immediately apparent they do this to reduce costs. However, relieving staff of figuring out how to garnish wages, pay all the separate taxing bodies, .... We might spend too much time on something that is not essential to the business process.

    For outsourcing IT, you should look at the application space. If all the services provided are accounting and payroll, then you can run for the door. These things can always be outsourced and costs are the primary factor.

    If the applications work really enables the business to serve its customers, then the company may be experiencing many problems with the manner in which development is performed and is throwing in the towel.

    Whatever, if you decide to follow HP, you should look at its reputation. Look in Fortune Magazine and look at HP's track record on both its business and its ranking as a place to work. If you would buy HP's stock and you believe it serves its employees well, I would fight for a job at HP. In any case, dust off the CV. The new company is going to interview you regardless.

    --
    "If all the American people want is security, let them live in prisons." Eisenhower
  54. Backup Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever you decide to do, have a backup plan. Don't be one of those worried whimpering dudes who fear change, and don't be one of those guys who suddenly find themselves plummeting without a net.

    Plan ahead. Always.

  55. HP sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HP used to be a great place to work. It isn't that way any more, and it continues to get worse. HP is now run by bean counters, whose core competency is cutting costs. You probably won't enjoy working for HP. See all the negative comments on Glassdoor.com.

  56. Do both. by pla · · Score: 1

    Should I 'ride the wave' and join the new company and culture, or dust off the old CV/resume?"

    You should do both - Start looking for a new job ASAP, but don't burn any bridges. In six months to a year, when they come to greatly regret the decision to outsource, as someone who already knows your job, you'll find yourself in a position to demand just about anything to come back.

  57. NEVER EVER ride a sinking ship! NEVER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On average I am laid off every 2 years due to outsourcing, layoffs, downsizing, buyouts, you name it, and I have barely been in the "real world" for a decade. DO NOT EVER ride a sinking ship. It does nothing but crush your morale, and in the end, you get screwed no matter what. I have learned that it does not matter what you know, but who you know.

    Get your resume up to date, and always keep it up to date every few months. Surf monster.com routinely at work if you have to, and keep your resume bumped up to the top. Most headhunters are usually a waste of time and resources, but occasionally you find a good one. Also consider moving. I learned the hard way early on that Ohio is nothing but an IT black hole, and will move when I find the right offer, never to look back.

    In a nutshell, company loyalty is a relic from decades ago, and has not existed in my lifetime. Only be as loyal to a company as it is to you, which is pretty much non-existent these days.

  58. Give me a break.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, if I understand correctly you are working for a company that was hired by DPWN to "outsource" some of their positions and now HP is taking over that outsourced portion of DPWN's work? DPWN is just switching contracts then right?

    Why are you so upset? You were the one that displaced someone elses job at DPWN when they first outsourced those positions. Seems to me if you live by the sword you should die by the sword...

    If the same people are sticking around and doing the work, then you are really just an IT whore and you had your pimp changed. Get used to it...

  59. Use it as an opportunity by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
    You will have the right to apply for other jobs within your new employer.

    Obviously it depends on what the regulations are in your particular country, but here you become a fully fledged employee of the new company. That gives you the seniority you transferred from your old job (status, number of years employed, rights etc.) and it also gives you the right to apply for internal vacancies with the same status as anyone else within the new parent company.

    Don't feel therefore that you have to continue doing your old job - look around in the bigger organisation for something you may prefer and go for it.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  60. None of the above by HangingChad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Should I 'ride the wave' and join the new company and culture, or dust off the old CV/resume?

    I don't like either of those options. Back in my day job days this kind of thing would go on all the time. Outsource rumors and buy outs in private industry, contract changes in military contracting. Either way you're still an employee subject to the whims and petty rules of your employer.

    Another option is thinking about banking some cash and starting your own gig. It's harder work and pays less but ultimately you'll be happier. You have to learn about things like quarterly taxes and professional liability insurance, business licenses and what advertising works and what doesn't. The nice thing about tech is you don't need expensive offices or a lot of overhead to get going. You will need enough cash to survive until you have money coming in, which takes longer than you think.

    Most people have ideas about what it takes to start a business and those ideas are almost universally wrong. You may not get fabulously wealthy but with hard work and miserly habits you can make ends meet. I was doing okay and it eventually led to a job that is, essentially, layoff proof. And I get an equity position if the company gets bought out. Plus I'm in the envious position of being the person with the whims who makes up the petty rules. Life is a lot better being on that side of the equation.

    Having your own gig gives you the leverage to take a pass on the crapass, dead end, corporate cubicle jobs. You'll be happier in the long run. What seems strange to me are people who will argue for the financial security of a day job. Talk about a false sense of security. You can work in the same place 20 years and get fired the next day and won't get squat.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  61. The World is Flat by fr175 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I would suggest reading The World is Flat by Thomas L. Friedman.

    Friedman goes through great effort to explain how and why jobs are being outsourced, and also provides some guidance on what we can do to survive in a "flat" world. I would call this book required reading for anyone working in any level of IT.

    If you're not the reading type, there's a video of Friedman at MIT where he coveres much of the first three chapters.

    1. Re:The World is Flat by my_left_nut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, "The World is Flat" - for now, and for IT in the foreseeable future. Anything which can fit through an Internet connection can be potentially outsourced, quite easily.

      Industries that produce things that can't, like manufacturing or farming, will only be capable of being outsourced while energy costs are still relatively low. Once energy costs start to severely cut into profit margins, it's going to be hard to ship raw materials to China, and get finished goods back, and still sell them cheaply here in the US. That time is fast approaching.

      Also, trades like plumbers and electricians, and medical professionals, although they really can't be outsourced, can be "insourced". This is already happening in the nursing profession. People from overseas are willing to come here and accept lower salaries to do work that US citizens used to perform for higher rates. However, as the standard of living decreases here in the US, things will probably even out as US citizens are willing to accept a lower salary to do the same job they did 10 years ago, simply because they won't have a choice.

      So, yes, the world is "flatter" than it used to be, and will probably remain that way provided that the earth continues to have a soft, creamy, cheap, and easily available nugget of fuel that we can easily suck on indefinitely.

      However, I think that it's most likely to get less "flat" in the near future, since that is most definitely not the case.

  62. Do Both by Frightened_Turtle · · Score: 1

    "Should I 'ride the wave' and join the new company and culture, or dust off the old CV/resume?"

    Do Both. There's a chance to get into HP as an employee, but buyouts rarely go well for the employees of the purchased business. I hate sounding like a pessimist, but I like being prepared for all possibilities.

    Looking at the ugliest scenario, consider that HP already has considerable IT resources. Are you bringing skills and talents to the table that would be of extra value to HP? Or would your skill set be redundant? If you are the GoTo guy in your organization — the guy folks go to when they need issues solved or just want to shoot the breeze — then you can assume that you'll be reasonably safe. Otherwise, you may want to brush up on your people skills.

    On the other side of the spectrum, you've already noticed that this could be a real opportunity! Try and find out what your new employers really need and make sure your resume and skills reflect that. Go to HP's web site and look up employment opportunities within HP, and see if your skill set matches anything that they are looking for. Even if your business unit is slated for disassembly or restructuring, you could stand a good chance to get transferred to where you are needed instead of being laid off.

    When your new overlords- er, uh, I mean "employers" — arrive to take control, make sure you make a clear effort to learn how they want things done. Don't be a kiss-up. Make a real effort to adapt.

    Good luck with it. This could be a great opportunity for you, regardless of whether it goes positively or negatively. If they like you, but your position still has to be cut, you will run a better chance of either scoring a transfer or getting a decent recommendation/lead on a new job with another company.

    --


    Whew! This water sure is cold!
  63. It will suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get the hell out of there.

    DHL does it to save money
    HP does it to make money

    The employees in the middle get screwed over as its actually impossible to do both, something has to give, and it will be your pay and benefits.

    I work for a bank that has some IT outsourced and some in-sourced. I work for the bank. Getting anything done is a nightmare and actually costs the bank far more than i really would if they did it themselves.

    But, it doesn't actually look at way to the person who got a bonus for signing with the outsourcing company and reporting to the board.

  64. Do what is best for you by slashname3 · · Score: 1

    Like many have recommended you should keep all options open. Maintain an updated resume. You never know when someone will mention they are looking to hire. And don't get drawn into the company line about people being their number one asset or any such bullshit. People are one of the first things a company will jettison if they think it will help the bottom line. The days of cradle to grave at a company are long gone. Employment is pretty much at will everywhere.

    The one thing to keep in mind is that if/when you decide to make the move, just make the move. Don't look back and don't dwell on what could have been. It won't do you or anyone any good. Don't burn any bridges but don't hold fret about the old job. If the new one sucks (which most of them do) then work it until you find something else.

  65. Depends on the Deal by Relden · · Score: 1

    A lot of it depends on your exact job and the deal between HP and DHL. If you job involves systems that are unique to DHL, then you should be safe for a while. If it is a job like looking after a Windows server or Oracle DBA, I might start looking. If HP is going to start taking possession of DHL's servers and systems and moving them to their own server farms, then I'd start looking right away. If not, you'll find that much of your time in the future is spent training others how to do your job. That's what happened in my last job. Keep in mind that HP is buying EDS and there is going to be some rationalizing there. Even without the merger, these companies are looking for the cheapest IT labour possible, which means they are going overseas. So I would not count on any future in HP. Also oursourcers love to outsource. You job might not even be done by HP: it might be somebody they've contracted to do it. I once had a problem that involved five separate companies, five levels of outsourcing. It felt like I was working for the government or something. If you hang in through the transition, be prepared for the effect this will have on your relationship with your non-IT colleagues at DHL. I found this really stressful when it happened to me. I could not talk to anyone in our company unless they went through the outsourcer first. Then the outsourcer might not assign the task to me. I used to be the only computer guy for one of our sites. When somebody needed a new program installed on his computer, he called the help desk. They assigned it to a company they outsourced desktop maintenance too. I then had to show the person who came in from 100km away how to install the software on this person's computer. After a while this changes your colleagues relationship with you: you become more and more of an outsider. Soon they start to check to see if you might have a better office than they do.

  66. 100 plus comments... by kipkuch · · Score: 1

    and still on topic. Well done Slashdotters!

  67. Outsourcing!! by bjverzal · · Score: 1

    I can't believe companies still do this. Actually, yes I can. I often work with offshore people and it is difficult. Language barriers are huge. I've been axed because of outsourcing. As soon as the contract with the outsourcer was completed, my old employer began a project to insource and return systems to their new data center. Go figure.

  68. Depends- how specialized/desperate are you? by edremy · · Score: 1
    While not exactly comparable since I work in academia, I went through a period recently where the college I worked at was going through a reorganization. This was telegraphed well in advance, and I instantly put out the resume to as many places as I could find. The problem? I'm specialized (instructional technology) enough that finding a comparable job within geographical constraints (basically, close enough to drive to our families) was tough- there were exactly *2* jobs I actually wanted in the 3 months I looked, and another 4-6 that I would accept. I also have a wife and two kids, so a prolonged period without a job isn't an option.

    If you're in my shoes, you have to start looking and start looking early- you just can't afford to wait since the total might well be 0 next week. My job did get canned- they moved me into a vacant programmer position that I didn't want but I took since I needed the health insurance for my kids. Two days later I got the inital interview call from my top choice, and I was out of the old job in a month and a half, but even so it was a really, really stressful time. If you're in a high-demand area or simply have a lot of possible options (and have no family) then sit still and see what happens, although other posters are right- check the new benefits package very carefully. My old job also cut retirement benefits during the reorg.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  69. as someone who worked for hp and did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i used to work for HP as a solution architect and did these kind of deals. What u usually notice is that after the negotiated period of "no layoffs" is over, we will thin out the original departments and integrate them into our own operational departments.

    This does not necessarily mean that you will loose your job, or that anyone will. But your department will be integrated into the standards and procedures of HP. People will be moved around to where they are most needed, sometimes this means you will no longer be working on the DHL account (cause your company now becomes an account)

    HP is actually a great company to work for, and if you are a capable and qualified person, they will notice you. My one piece of advise is not to work counterproductive during the transition and transformation phase. HP engineers will come to you for information, work with them, show them your skills, and they will recommend you. If you are counterproductive, expect your pink slip soon.

    Brush up your CV in any case, it never hurts to have it up to date, perhaps some HR person within HP will ask you for it.

  70. Follow your path by bahanzai · · Score: 1

    I've been there, I was outsourced to HP and this is what I saw:

    1- Business as usual for about 2-3 years. Yes processes will change, you will be pissed off at certain things, but overall, HP managed well its new employees, both at the beginning and during the cost reduction phase.

    2- People are usually unhappy because the service level changed (more often than not it deteriorates).

    3- Outsourced people are unhappy because the peculiar business of a service provider is not to help the client as a member of the "client's corporate family" but to make money first while providing a service to the client. As such, initiatives are sometimes not welcomed, you have to go by the book; you are now providing a service and as such you must not do more then what the service level agreement stipulates. It can be very frustrating at times, especially when you were used to suggest ideas to improve things with your colleagues. They are no longer your colleagues, they are now employees of your client. You have to change your perspective: the target for your initiatives is now HP, not your former employee.

    5- After about 2-3 years, cost reduction phase starts more aggressively: HP is there to make money and they will try to get rid of the "redundancies" (the said fashionable term changes pretty regular according to the management gout-du-jour). They will also try to "share" the good resources so it can be an opportunity to work for other clients: can be very interesting.

    So basically, after the understandable denial phase of your grieve process, try to not resist the change and see what's there for you, what's part of your path.

    Of course, in any case, dust off your resume.

    Good luck!

  71. Go with your gut. by rgviza · · Score: 1

    My way of dealing with corporate talk like this is not to be a victim. I worked at a major financial firm that wanted to move my team to Ohio to "integrate" with the rest of the units that handled online business, after several mergers.

    "Integrate" is a fancy corporate way of saying "downsize" or "trim the fat". As soon as they made the announcement that we were moving within a year and described why, I dusted off my resume and started looking.

    3 months later, I got an offer the day they announced the actual date in a short notice meeting. Around half my team stayed with the company and moved, I put my notice in right after the meeting and started working at a security startup 2 weeks later.

    Around 6 months later I got an IM from a former coworker that most of the team was getting laid off *after selling their houses and moving to Ohio*. Most bought houses in Ohio, which is pretty depressed right now. Needless to say they are more or less stuck there. There aren't many jobs there. Their mortgages didn't even have time to season.

    The moral of the story is: Go with your gut feelings and intuition. If you smell something bad, chances are there's something bad coming. Your gut won't lie to you.

    The sooner you make your move the better off you'll be. Right now you have time to get what you want. If you wait, and end up in a bad situation, you might even have to take the first thing you find.

    -Viz

    --
    Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
  72. Having been through this stuff before by Tragedy4u · · Score: 1
    It's not usually a fun situation to be in. I've been through 2 corporate restructures, 1 merger and 2 company buyouts during my career. The restructures put me in a new department and very different, and in both cases less ideal, corporate culture (bad new managers etc). The merger left me unemployed as my position was made redundant, even though I helped the company through the entire transition the writing was on the wall for me from day one. I got a nice "Thank you for all the help, and though you're a great employee you're not needed anymore.". Finally the company buyouts, I left because both times my career advancement was blocked by the new management who put their people in the higher positions and pigeon holed the rest of the existing staff.

    Based on my experience, I will never be one of the "conquered" or part of the "acquired assets" again. Each time I've gone through it I've left because I grew tired of being treated like a second class citizen and felt punished even though I've worked hard to earn the new regime's trust and have tried hard to prove I'm "on board" with the new company values.

    Your mileage may vary, thanks for reading.

  73. Keep your eye on the higher-level management by Dunkirk · · Score: 1

    You seem to be in that middle ground where there's a big move afoot, and the company isn't saying that there's going to be X and Y happen, and this is how many people we'll be cutting. Without -knowing- that something drastic is going to happen up-front, everyone's going to be telling anyone who will listen that everything will be great for everyone involved. That just can't be true. (I'm sorry, but it can't.) I think the problem is that these sorts of deals are VERY difficult to evaluate, and the results of them can only be discovered when the rubber meets the road. What you may find is that it's good for -you-, or maybe not so much. During this time that it takes for the "higher ups" to figure out how this is going to work long-term, you need to watch them closely. I've been through a downsizing, a merger, and a divestiture. How the move affects the company is telegraphed by upper management. If, after the outsourcing, many of the key people from one company start "taking other opportunities," then you can bet hard-earned money that the culture of the company is shifting the other way. In my merger experience, this was a Very Bad Thing (and a VBT that continues to reverberate in the divested company). Ultimately, I watched and waited to see what was happening in the divested company, and, as soon as it became clear that I wasn't going to like what that was, a door was opened for me to leave, and I took it. (I, personally, believe that it was a move of God in my life, but YMMV.) But my point here is that it took a little over a YEAR for everything to get sorted enough for me to figure out HOW it would affect me. So, be patient. Again, these monster companies can't turn on a dime. (I now work for a startup.)

    --
    Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
  74. You'll be OK... by sitarlo · · Score: 1

    If they outsource your job there's nothing you can do about it so don't waste stress/energy thinking about it. If you are offered something with HP, consider your options carefully. Having worked for them in the past I can tell you that the HP experience can be either good or bad depending on which section you are in and who you work with/for. There are some serious a-holes at HP, yet there are some really great people as well. Their corporate culture used to be really cool, but I think a lot of that has changed and now they operate "New Delhi" style.

  75. Do Both by pasm · · Score: 1

    It will not harm you to have your CV up to date for your new outsourced company, as well as for any potential new jobs.
    Having been through the outsourcing process a couple of times, I can say that it often favours those outsourced rather than those who are left. Since those staying with the parent company have to deal with many who were once colleagues through a layer of SLAs and Relationship Managers. Whereas those going often find themselves in a greater world with a nice new company on the CV to boot.
    As ever life is what you make of it - it might just be as well to find out what the new place is like and get some new experiences before moving on!

  76. Frying pan into the fire. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at Glassdoor for employee comments about HP. They are fairly representative and job security is a myth. The only thing that has changed from the Carly years is that the bottom line looks much better. HP is in the process laying off or having mandatory transfers to core sites for most of their IT people. In short, IT people at HP are experiencing something very similar to you. Obviously, working as an on-site rep for HP is different and will probably be secure as long as HP has the contract with your company and they don't figure out a way to centrally administer or automate your job away.l

  77. You're changing employers regardless by phone-home · · Score: 1

    Do both. As has been stated, it's always a good idea to have an up to date CV. Keep in mind that whatever you decide, you won't be working for your current employer. So in effect, you _will_ be changing jobs. Things probably won't change much initially, but you will need to acclimate to the culture of the new organization, just like any new job. Over time, you may find yourself assigned to a "different account", i.e. you won't be working on the DHL account, but will work with a different client, while still getting your paycheck from HP. Also remember, HP is in this deal to make money, so they're going to try to charge DHL as much as they can, while doing as little as possible with as few people as possible under the terms of their contract. Which means you could end up getting "downsized". There are really no guarantees. This is basic stuff, but you need to be aware of it.

  78. Stay Smart by labmonkey09 · · Score: 1

    Stay alert and engaged. Shakeups and crisis are nerve racking for sure, but with change comes opportunity.

    It never hurts to float your resume in a large market or talk to a "good" recruiter every year or so. You need an outside perspective, even a self-interested one, on a regular basis. Some companies go a long way to make sure that their employees work in a closet. "Yeah, sure, 45K is what all the nuclear particle scientists make. And don't forget bread pudding Tuesdays in the mess."

    --
    /LabMonkey09
  79. Stay away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stay the hell out of HP IT. You don't want to work there. If you have a chance to get hired as an internal though, you should look into it. The internal job board is better than the external one. Try to get an R&D position somewhere, especially in the printing division.

  80. out-outsourcing the call center operations .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    So basically they're out-outsourcing the call center operations to eastern Europe and IT operations to the US and Malaysia ..

    "Deutsche Post World Net expects to save at least 1 billion euros over the next seven years by driving down overall IT costs"

    The only way of doing that is having half the people doing twice the work for three times the return. If it runs like any other IT place I've ever worked for, expect a huge turn over in staff, burn out in ten months, unless you learned to talk management speak in the mean time. Like, "driving down overall IT costs and "leveraging IT resources", which excites senior management almost as much as p0rn .. :)

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  81. Outsource management! by sperm · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is when will we be outsourcing management? That is where the real savings are!!! How hard can it be? Yes/No/Delegate/Yes/No/Delegate.

    1. Re:Outsource management! by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      You go it on the first try, but they're to busy protecting their own butt's by placing the rest of us on firing line.

  82. Who stole my cheese! by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Large indigo" assimilation is all fun and ballons until one day when you find yourself sitting in a packed theater watching the "who stole my cheese" video.

    In reality nobody can expect a life-long career based on one industry, let alone one employer. For example, I started my full time working life in 1976 as HS drop-out pumping petrol - driveway service went extinct a long time ago where I live. In my early 20's I had a wife and kid and I worked/lived at an old growth sawmill in the middle of nowhere for a year or so - the forestry lease ran out in 1984 and the area is now a national park. Worked on scallop trawlers (fishing) for a year or so - few boats left after the govt. bought back licenses to stop overfishing and protect fish breeding grounds. Worked shift work in a nylon spinning plant in the late 80's - govt signed a treaty and phased out the corporate welfare (tarrifs). Been a well paid geek since ~92-93, whodathunk it?!?

    I'm 49, not counting jobs
    BTW: I agree a big diverse employer can offer a great deal in the way of internal opportunity.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    1. Re:Who stole my cheese! by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Cool!

      That all sounds like the makings of a really varied and interesting life to me. I'm hoping someday I'll have the guts to leave my comfort zone (software engineering), but the thing is I'm good at it (most of the time) and it's difficult to launch off into the unknown.

      Yeah, there's no guarantee of anything much in this life, but also no harm in taking a relaxed look at your options rather than jumping ship at the first sign that something might go wrong. Things will go wrong :)

    2. Re:Who stole my cheese! by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "I'm hoping someday I'll have the guts to leave my comfort zone (software engineering)"

      No need to leave a good thing, you might be able to step out of the comfort zone elsewhere (do both as you suggested). If by 'comfort zone' you mean that a lot of the time your working life doesn't really feel like work then that's obviously worth keeping. I get a similar "joy of creation" from software engineering as I got from working as a builder's labourer 30yrs ago, (aside from the paypack) the difference is that other people can rarely see the full size and complexity of software as easily as they can see a multi-storey car-park.

      Personally, I was married for 20yrs and divorced for 8, my eldest moved out a year after the break up to live with his g/f who's parent eventually helped then buy a house. I looked after my daughter until she was 19 and then rented the house to her and her single mum friend. I just finished helping her and her new husband buy the house (at a considerable discount) so both my kids now have a home so I am 'free' of any sort of financial responsibilty that comes with a family (including a 'bored' alcohlic housewife running the books). I find myself with a healthy bank balance when compared to the other credit crunches, stock/oil crises, etc, that I've lived through and there is no one 'depending' on me.

      At the moment I'm 'comfortable' with my unexpected emancipation and I would like to stay where I am (large Japanese company) until I retire. I could get considerably more money by taking on more work but I'm just not interested in a 60hr week these days. Japanese culture respects loyalty a lot more than western culture and according to our Japanese2English language mangler the mother-ship's latest memo says our little sub-kingdom of ~20 old-farts is "Good bossiness! A milk cow for the company!".

      Having said that the corporate winds can change rapidly and I rarely write software as a hobby these days, my latest 'hobby' is building a couple of townhouses in the backyard of an old house I just bought in 50/50 deal with my lady friend. Two minutes from the beach, high density zone, two massive hardware stores within a 10 minute drive, and the current "buyer's market" meant I was the only bidder at the auction. :)

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  83. opportunities in a call center ? by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "I moved into my current position fresh out of university and .. I enjoy my work and the opportunities that go with it"

    You really enjoy being chained to a desk and having to ask permission to take a leak? Like, the only reason they hire fresh out of Uni is you're the only people that will put up with the such BS.

    Don't delude yourself about the opportunities. Have you noticed that no one in top management has any real experience of IT. They're all hired in from outside. The only opportunities you are going to see is being down-sized in the next clean sweep. Look around you, how many of those people were there ten months ago, how many will be there in another ten months.

    Now lets all pause, go up stairs and have a meeting where no one is allowed to speak and the PHB reads out of a magazine .. :)

    kdawson says: insert free advert for Call Centers here

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  84. Going thru that here too by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    1. Like others have said, get your resume in shape. Always have your resume in shape. Look for things involved in the transition that might improve your resume.

    2. Look at things carefully in the new company. The salary might be the same, but they can stick you on benefits. It is your total salary that might not stay the same. They wrote special into our contracts because some people would lose some vacation time if they didn't. Plus we had to sell back our banked vacation. That is a plus/minus deal - I mean 4 weeks pay was great, but I never got to take the 4 weeks vacation as an option. And where I got stuck was in the prescription drug benefit. They think they have a good plan, but it sucks compared to what we used to have.

    3. Assume that you are going to be let go, until it is proved otherwise. Especially if they write in that you are garunteed of employment for x months. That's a big sign that says we are going to lay people off starting then.

    4. If you are a consultant at the original company, RUN - you are gone first.

    5. With HP as the new parent, really, get your resume ready. Look, look hard.

  85. Both by a9db0 · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Prepare to walk away. That means update your resume/CV, touch base with contacts in other companies that might be of assistance should you need to leave, and check your own finances.

    Step 2: Be supportive of the transition. Help make it smooth, be one of the positive forces in the process. There will be many who try to impede simply because they don't like change. Be positive about it, and be sure your contributions and attitude are noticed by your new corporate overlords.

    Step 3: Analyze HP's offerings and see if they track along your chosen career path. Look at what you want to do, and what HP might be able to offer you. Then decide whether to stay or go.

    It may seem a bit two-faced, but it's a viable action plan. It helps you keep some control over the situation. The objective is to not be forced into a decision, but to make it when you're ready, and be sure that you don't burn any bridges in the process. You want to be able to either jump ship but leave behind a positive impression, or to quickly move forward within the acquiring company (HP).

    Good Luck!

    --
    -- "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity." - R.A.H.
  86. HP is an odd step-parent by diGitalRchitect · · Score: 1

    Although I never worked directly for HP, several people I worked closely with at a fortune 100 company were spun off to HP with the rest of their department. At that time (about 8 years ago), Hp had a policy where you were essentially on probation for about a year. Since it did not happen to me directly, I can not speak from direct experience about how it happened, but after 12 months, only about 1/3 of the individuals I worked closest with still worked for HP. I believe most left of their own volition. Within another 12 months, several of those who left returned, some to HP, but most to other positions within the original fortune 100 company or to other sub-contractors working with either HP or the original fortune 100 company. As I remember, as people left, more work fell upon those who remained, although some efficiencies were also introduced into their jobs. Of the ones who remained after the initial 12 months, most were willing to take on extra work, and were the ones responsible for introducing the efficiencies mentioned earlier.

    No matter what, make sure your Resume/CV is up-to-date. Pay close attention to the terms of your employment under HP. Understand exactly what benefits (both HR-related and other) that you will be afforded. If you start fishing for new employment, it is possible that HP will notice this and treat you accordingly. That has both positive and negative aspects, but most likely, I would not expect that they will make a counter-offer if you are offered a job at another company.

  87. The outsource vendor's perspective by gregwbrooks · · Score: 1

    Although we don't handle IT, outsourcing is a growth area for my company and I can tell you a bit of what it looks like from our side:

    * We want to keep the existing talent. We never claim to know the ins and outs of a particular client's culture and processes as well as the existing staff, and that's why we want to hold onto them. Do we hold onto everyone? No, because we get engaged is to reduce costs. But if you're talented and not just taking up space at a desk, we certainly want to keep you around.

    * One of our biggest challenges is overcoming culture shock. We'll often move into situations where the prevailing culture is one of under-utilization -- an eight-hour day might have no more than four hours of actual work in it once you scrape away meetings, pointless process overhead and water-cooler idle time. While we want people to thrive, we want them to thrive in a high-utilization environment; at the same time, we're not interested in being slave drivers. So what's the answer? For us, it's been steep incentive curves -- if you want to make more money, we're very up front about giving you all the tools you need to essentially define your own salary based on productivity. (And I'm not merely talking about working more hours -- there are lots of ways to get more productivity without boosting hours.) The biggest challenge we find in taking employees out of an existing culture and transitioning them into ours is instilling that entrepreneurial spirit, the notion that if you want to make a third more next month or next year, it's within your power to do so.

    --


    "It was a summer's tale: Just a boy, his Linux, and a head full of dreams..."
  88. Get ready to jump by mollog · · Score: 1

    I understand your distress. You've made a commitment to a company only to find out that what you've committed to is about to change. You've been focused on doing your job, thinking that doing so would advance your career, and now you need to focus on doing your career instead.

    If you like working at a smaller company, go ahead and start interviewing for another job. You might find that you hate working in a large, impersonal institution. On the other hand, many people seem to thrive when they enter the belly of the beast. But keep your head up and your eyes open because change is coming.

    Good luck.

    --
    Best regards.
    1. Re:Get ready to jump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is, DPWN has a slogan, "The Power of One"

      It's supposed to stand for a unity of front.

      Ironic, that the Drivers have always been outsourced, IT will now be outsourced, and even our deliveries are now outsourced through UPS and USPS.

      Unity of front my ass.

      Anyway, I think, personally, the worst part about all of this was that DPWN knew they'd lose money in the US. They had projections of just how much they would lose. We were meeting those projections as a US market. If they truly wanted to save money on IT maybe they should have invested money into getting a backend system that works - not one riddled with incompatible layers to incorporate ABX into DHL networks ..

      Maybe I'm just jaded, because I've never seen an internal companies IT problems, but it's pretty rediculous just how often things go wrong and why ..

  89. Same desk, same job, different employer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got outsourced about 8 years ago. I felt terribly betrayed. I almost bailed, but I didn't, and I'm glad. I think the best advice is the try it and see how if feels for a little while. In the end it's the same desk, same job, different name on the paycheck, and I've actually been getting better raises than before.

  90. look for opportunities in every change by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Rather than dwell on the difficulties of change. And you will find the opportunities. It is distressing to experience major upheaval. But I also find it invigorating because of the new opportunites presented.

  91. Re:When a company outsources its IT by sohp · · Score: 1

    What's interesting though, is that important (noisy senior management) people still get their stuff fixed quickly, because the outsource group soon figures out who butters their bread and makes sure to focus on those people and systems. It's all the rest of the schmoes in the client company who see a big spike in response times, lost tickets, crappy service, etc. True story example: Two days to get a password reset.

  92. Know your worth to the company, keep resume sharp by garylian · · Score: 1

    I've been working in the same position/job for 9 years, now. In that time, my job/software division has changed companies a half dozen times.

    First thing is, know how important your job really is, and know how many of your fellow co-workers are planning on jumping ship. In one of the transitions I went through, I ended up with an extra 1,500 stock options, a large cash bonus, and the right to work from my house just to stick around, because everyone else in my department found other employment. Since I work in a small group in a big company, losing 75% of the staff and the only U.S. based person wasn't an option the company could afford, so they made it worth my while to not job hunt.

    The second thing is, your resume should NEVER be dusty, unless you already have your dream job and security out the wazoo. You should also consider keeping your interviewing skills sharp by going on a job interview once a year, even if you don't plan on taking the job. You don't want to blow the interview because you're rusty, or feeling too much pressure to HAVE to land a job.

    It sucks to go through this, but you will survive it. Just be smart, don't close yourself off from various opportunities by moving too fast in one direction, and good luck!

  93. Been in there. Done that. by $criptah · · Score: 1

    Don't panic. This is the only advice that I can give to you becuase no matter what you do now, chances are that your role has been already been discussed and realigned by somebody. If you start worrying and stressing about the situation you will eventually hurt yourself (well, your health) and become miserable. Stay calm, update a resume and start looking for a job.

    If you have never worked for a very large company, you will be in for surprise. As somebody has posted already, guys like HP, IBM and MSFT are different. Too much red tape. Takes forever to get simple stuff done. Internal IT help is non-existent (everything is outsourced to somewhere in India). In other words it is highly likely that you're going to be in for a chnage.

    I have been on both sides of the equation and I can tell you for a fact that a regular Joe can do very little to affect his position. Unless you have a written contract in writing, your fate is up in the air. I guess you can really screw things up and act all negative about this deal. This way HR will blacklist your name and you'll become expandable right away. So stay calm, review your resume and enjoy the ride.

  94. You will be lied to as well by DCFC · · Score: 1

    You will also have been made promises by your current employer.
    These now have no value, indeed reminding them of their commitments, even when made in writing will just get you added to the list of "troublemakers", which will hurt your chances of choosing when you leave.

    As well as the "great opportunities in HP" BS, there will be loads of what sound like firm promises of training in new sexy tech, promotion, or whatever they think will convince you to stay for a while.

    Also be very aware that outsourcers really do not care if the work you do is critical or hard to replace.

    I'm a headhunter, so I genuinely believe job ads.
    Yes. really.
    I believe HP job ads that say
    "Business Development $X+ share options"
    "Pre Sales Support $X/2 + Package"
    "Post Sales Support $X/4 + Free Coffee"

    Getting the business is what they care about, delivery is simply not an issue. HP are not much worse than any other outsourcer, it is simply the way that sort of business operates.

    --
    Dominic Connor,Quant Headhunter
  95. Start sending out your resume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for HP right now, but will be quitting in a few weeks. You definitely don't want to work for a cost-cutting crazy CEO. Far too many complaints that I have working here, so I'm leaving. I worked there for six months and I am the 6th person under my manager's manager, who only has about 30 people working for him, to quit.

  96. How do you "outsource" when you're everywhere? by nobodyman · · Score: 1

    (Note: I left DHL for another company shortly after their takeover of Airborne, so things may have changed since then)

    Well, for a multinational like DPWN, the term "Outsourcing" from a geographic sense is a bit tricky to define. They are based in Germany, and have major data centers in Asia, the US, and Europe. Furthermore, since DPWN and DHL both farmed out a lot of their development to Indian and Romanian subcontractors, "outsourcing" to HP in the logical sense may bring more jobs to countries like the US.

    It's interesting that DPWN is doing this. When I was working for DHL I remember the business units having an rather contentious relationship with IT (I'm sure that's true at a lot of places, but it seemed more pronounced at DHL). And many clients feared "upgrades" of the DHL EasyShip software because they often came with more bugs and performance issues than the versions they replaced.

  97. Get ready for a one way ticket to hell by prontissimo · · Score: 1
    Hi there all,

    I've been through exactly the same thing, 2 years ago. And it's been quite a torment. You don't specify if you're married with kids, but think of your family first. And please forget everything about corporate belonging, you are being sold as merchandise, albeit too expensive to maintain.

    Since you're an IT guy in an non IT company, you are part of a team that fixes things so they end up working, not necessarily according to some grand master plan of IT management and profitability. You have skills that are sought by other non-IT Co's.

    If DHL is signing you away, it's to lower costs. HP signs knowing they must slash to cut costs. This will end up in disarray, customer dis-satisfaction and a major loss in company culture.

    This spells trouble; maybe the last managers tried it, now a B-I-G IT corporation will try to do better. I don't know about HP, maybe they are swell, most likely, it will depend on your manager which may be your current one. I would recommend that you leave ASAP. First, because you can still flee the sinking ship, and it is one. Second, because you don't want to end up going home all messed-up with your kids and your wife get to see you depressed because things are going hay-wire, and they will!!

    I have a friend that left before the contract was signed, and I endured for 18 months. He's way better off than I am, and I wish I would have known what I know now, back then.

    Your call.

  98. good to move around when you're young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bounce...this is a good excuse. Your salary will ne ver keep up staying at the same place while your young. Take your experience and apply it somewhere else for better pay. You can always come back...and you'll be making substantially more money even if you come back to the same position.

  99. Do Both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send out some resumes. Then taste the new Corporate Kool-Aid. If it tastes like bitter almonds, send out more resumes. You don't have to take a job that isn't better than what you already have.

  100. It depends by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    If it's a "hostile outsourcing" where the outsourcing company bullies the client into accepting their services, you might not want to be involved in the resulting bad blood with the surviving rank-and-file. In that case I'd say it's time to move on.

    If you don't think the new company is a good fit, it may be time to move on.

    If the culture/pay (whatever you're after) is good and the level of hostility is low enough, (or you don't care) go for it.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  101. Outsourcing Sucks - Dont Let Anyone Fool You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Then I began hearing about the opportunities HP has internally.."

    Thats the brainwash statement. There are no opportunities when it comes to outsourcing. Take it from me, I have 24 years of software development experience.

    EVERYONE loses. You lose your job. The local economy loses your tax revenue and your purchasing abilities. We, the customers of HP lose in terms of quality (yes, its true corporate America, the quality of items, software or not, produced in India and China and elsewhere SUCKS at best). And, eventually, the employer loses because we, the customer leave.

    Thanks for the heads up. I like doing business with American companies who keep jobs here, the tax-base here and the spending power here. I like purchasing American only products NOT because I dont like India or China, but because things made in the USA are always better. At least they used to be. They used to be made with pride.

    Thanks to these new-fangled corporate buffoons, employees here in the USA have nothing but comptempt for their employers.

    Yea.... keep that resume handy. Eventually the interviewer will ask if you are capable of saying "would you like fries with that order", since all of the high-paying jobs as leaving this country and being replaced with jobs at Target, Home Depot and Borders.....

    Outsourcing sucks no matter which way you slice it and no matter how much people try to sugar coat it.

  102. Blah Blah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read "Who moved my cheese" by Spencer Johnson. Then get your commercial pilots license, move to Alaska and fly tourists around the bush. Worked for me, and I haven't worried a single minute since about this crap.

  103. Do the Tripple play! by Conficio · · Score: 1

    I think you are doing the right thing and assess your options.

    Here are the three things I'd do.

    * Make a list of what you like and dislike about the current job. Assess your skills and accomplishments and what you have learned. Brush up your CV/Resume.
    * Brush up your network and networking skills. Reconnect to old friends and work colleagues, project team members. Check who has gone where and what they are doing now. Write birthday e-mails and Holiday cards. Talk to your parent's friends as well. Update your networking tools (Addressbook, social networks, LinkedIn, Plaxo, Suit, Tie, etc.). Let your network know you are merged and don't know if you might move on. Discuss with your network what they like about their jobs.
    * Look at the current job market under your other life constraints (i.e. stay local, no travel, ...). See what jobs you might qualify for and seek out some recruiters, may be even get some Interviews (just for training purposes).

    Armed with that you will have the confidence that you'll need to negotiate what ever comes your way. And you can move into job search mode at a moment's notice. And may be just may be you find an opportunity you can't refuse, before anybody ask you to make a decision. You are in control!

    --
    Busy helping non technical users of OpenOffice.org - http://plan-b-for-openoffice.org/
  104. put eggsIn 1 basket by BradleyAndersen · · Score: 1

    If there is no way for sure to know, get the CV ready, but don't be surprised if you don't need it. I was recently employed by a Big Ten School that had talked for years about consolidation of tech departments ... which would likely have eliminated my job ... turns out it was just a big shot at the university-level trying to pad his own resume.

  105. Keep an open mind by deets101 · · Score: 1

    I found myself in this position a few years ago when HP bought my company. The biggest changes were
    1. My paycheck looked different.
    2. Management red tape doubled.

    That is about it. No change in pay, etc. As far as looking for postings inside HP, good luck. Once EDS is brought in there will be more jobs to choose from. Yes, the EDS employees will be going for the same jobs, but the EDS jobs will be available as well. I fully expect for EDS to take over support of internal IT functions very soon, however. This is so the company can more fully digest EDS into one business - For now it will be known as EDS, An HP Company.
    the thing to remember is that HP is a very large comany. That means there are pro's and con's to it. I personally don't see it as the "Land of Milk and Honey". Lot's of crap to put up with, but for the most part my job is very stable. I am in the outsourcing division and have a contract covering me. One reason I have not moved over to internal support is because those are the jobs that get moved and/or cut first.
    I would recomend getting your resume out there and start looking. Why? I have found it much better to find a better job while you still have one. Also, if this is the only place you have worked since college, then I would recomend interviewing soon. The reason is to get used to the process. This will allow you to see the process and what companies are looking for. (I always get nervous being pushed in front of strangers and having to explain why I should be hired). This can give you the confidence to do better in the interview when you need it. This will give you the time to find the right job for you, with better pay and benefits. If you don't, you still have your job. If your job goes away, you have already started the process. I would allow at least 2 months to find a good job in an OK market. I am talking to one employer that has taken 1 month to just get to the formal interview. If I were out of work, I would panic!

    Just my 2 cents worth.

    --

    --
    My parents went to Slashdot and all I got was this lousy sig.
  106. Best advice so far by GeneralTao · · Score: 1

    That means have your resume ready, credit cards paid off, and a savings account. If you can't go six months without any income, just start looking for a job right now.

    If you're one of those guys that "does everything" but really has a nebulous job that no one can define, be ready to be fired soon.

    Truer words have never been spoken. All of us should constantly be looking for better opportunities. It's much easier to turn a job down than it is to find one when you really need one.

    - 6 months of savings.. make it a priority.
    - Eliminate debt. Priority number one. What little savings you have will last longer if you have small monthly obligations. ie: what is 6 months of savings? That depends entirely on how much money you need per month.
    - Look for some on-the-side work. If you have even a sleepy little consulting gig going on, you can wake it up in times of need and that will buy you some time when looking for something else.

    --
    --- Tao
  107. Yep by GeneralTao · · Score: 1

    You never want this to be you:

    "We need to eliminate one person from your team."
    "Crap. But who?"
    "What about this guy, what are we paying him for?"
    "Not sure."

    --
    --- Tao
  108. How do you feel about moving to India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And when will we see the first outsourcing of India based IT Support companies?

  109. Read: The World is Flat - By Thomas Friedman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The World is Flat - By Thomas Friedman is a MUST read for anyone concerned with outsourcing and off shoring. In a perfect world, this book would be required reading for high-school students nation wide.

  110. Get ready to move on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As someone who is still working for HP post acquistion (Compaq) I can say, don't be seduced. Get the resume' ready, move on. The job opportunities are smoke and mirrors, and HP does not believe in giving raises to the rank and file, just the top. Save yourself years of hoping for change, find something else.

  111. This is phase two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was there for phase one, when DHL bought Airborne Express. The IT department was outsourced to Scottsdale from Seattle because -- hey, cheaper labor! Those who made the move were told they shouldn't expect a raise until their peers' salaries caught up to theirs due to inflation (not that Airborne was ever prone to delivering big pay raises), perhaps a decade-long wait for many. I took the severance offer (6 months' salary) and bid tschuss to Deutsche Post. Never regretted it.

  112. Get out of computer work! by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Study business management or some other field of work. The trend to outsource computer jobs will never stop. Find something else to do for a living.

    Either that or learn a foreign language so you can travel to foreign nations to train the new employees how to do computer work. Invest in a Rosetta Stone CD.

    You also could start up your own small business and try to run your own company. I would suggest small business courses at a community college while on unemployment to learn and talking to the SBA as well. You might be able to win some short term contracts and do computer work from home and be able to pay yourself with some money left over to hire more people. Also look into IT moonlighting web sites for small project work.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  113. Why not just ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move to India, or wherever the jobs are going this year? After all, if you can't beat them, join them. (And maybe snag a wife who can make a decent curry.)

  114. Re:lonely /.er with the #0000FFs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since outsourcing eliminated most of my work, I have been feeling something. I was on Celexa, Lexapro, Paxil... But it was all because I was a lonely /.er with the #0000FFs. I have never heard it put that way before, but that is it. Very clever :-)

  115. Buy kneepads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming that you don't get "let go" or "laid off", the first thing you will want to do is to buy kneepads if you don't already own a set.

    This way, you will be comfortable when you suck your new managers' dicks.

    And, you'll be doing it a lot, because there will be more managers than ever, all of whom being paid more than you, while spending most of their time moving from meeting to meeting to conference call to IM session while they demonstrate their cluelessness to anyone with any technical skill.

    You'll be called upon to do more, with less, to "cut costs" - the largest additional cost being, of course, the overhead of the above-mentioned managers, who generate no revenue at all.

    For the interminable meetings and conference calls that you get roped into for no point whatsoever (they'll pretend to listen to your suggestions, but won't take them, unless it's to take credit for them themselves later), there's Bullshit Bingo.

    But, you'll still be expected to do your work, too, so prepare yourself for longer hours with no additional pay.

    And if they can get away with it, minor distinctions such as "exempt" and "non-exempt" will be happily ignored whenever possible as a cost-saving measure, trusting that the peons will be too cowed to actually do anything about it... and if they do, well, they can always be fired or "downsized".

  116. my story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Myself, as well as almost the entire IT department (many people spread of over a dozen offices all over North America), including six good friends of mine, were all offshored to Pakistan at different times.

    If I could go back, I would have taken the first offshoring as my cue to leave. Nothing good can come of this. But it worked out for the best, as I'm now a programmer for a smaller company, and they do not want to offshore work here at all. If any signs start pointing to it in the future, I'll get out when I see that. I'm not going to be offshored twice in my lifetime.

    Anyhow, it's interesting to know that I had to do support for telecom and VoIP for these two call centers in Pakistan. It was a nightmare. The reps were shoving their mics down their throats, and when customers complained they couldn't understand the reps, the reps would yell louder into the mics - monitoring these calls was both funny and frustrating. I had to try and explain to these people many, many times to talk in a normal speaking voice and keep the mic off of their tongues.. Another thing that was funny was that whenever one IT was replaced, he had to be replaced by two or three people in Pakistan, and they still couldn't get the job done in a timely manner, so the benefits of paying less money were basically gone. I'm sure there are people over there who know what they're doing, but almost all of the people I had to deal with were pretty dense and didn't seem to have the skills even close to approaching anyone they were replacing.

    Anyhow, if your job is offshored to a company of morons, it couldn't have been great to begin with. Mine wasn't, but the money was good for this small city. I'm in a much better position now, so it really was a blessing in disguise.

    If I were younger, I'd probably go into a trade. It's difficult to outsource or offshore a plumber or a roofer.

  117. Make HP back up promises with Exit Agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If HP does not intend to replace your entire unit with one of its own and you are an essential employee, HP should have no qualms about signing an Exit Agreement with you now, to keep you onboard. The agreement is good for them if they are being honest, because it keeps you from worrying about them eliminating your position and letting you go. IT is the first department the buyer makes changes, as that's where the buyer gains the most control.