Slashdot Mirror


Inferring Personality From Email Addresses

paleshadows writes "Three researchers from the University of Leipzig published an interesting paper titled 'How extroverted is honey.bunny77@hotmail.de? Inferring personality from e-mail addresses' (PDF). From the abstract: 'Email addresses represent the thinnest slice of information that people receive from one another. Using 599 e-mail addresses of young adults, their self-reported personality scores and the personality judgments of 100 independent observers, it was shown that personality impressions based solely on e-mail addresses were consensually shared by observers. Moreover, these impressions contained some degree of validity. This was true for neuroticism, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and narcissism but not for extroversion."'

309 comments

  1. What next? by hezekiah957 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Next: scientists discover that how you look and act reflects on your personality, too.

    1. Re:What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I AM HARRIGAN FLEMMING EARL THE THIRD! It would seem that this confounded science has made a mockery of my stature once more! Why, if this were the old days, I would have made a suttle investment to run that hooligan out of town!
      This Science fellow is most definitely not good for mine future investments!

    2. Re:What next? by bob_herrick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bollocks. The correlations are weak, at best, and are barely distinguishable from chance. E.g., Consider Table 2. There are 196 entries in the top section of the table. The excess of postive correlations over negative corrlations is a grand total of 8. Assuming 50/50 odds, that excess will happen about 11% of the time just by chance alone. When you factor in the conditional probablity of publishing results (i.e., the argument that if they were any weaker, the data would never have been published), this has to be an extraordinarily weak finding.

      The average correlation (without regard to sign) in the same section of Table 2 is a whoppping 0.067, suggesting an average explanatory power on the order of 0.5%. I suppose such power might have some benefit to someone that sends a lot of e-mails to random addresses like spammers, but for the odinary Joe or Jo, this is not a lot to go on.

    3. Re:What next? by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      There you go, doing it again, putting facts in the way of discussion...

      If those researchers would know the first little bit about statistics that paper would be used in the loo instead of published.

  2. Erste gepostung by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 4, Funny

    How extraverted is honey.bunny77@hotmail.de

    I don't know, but I have a suspicion that he/she doesn't have much of a sense on humour.

    --
    It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    1. Re:Erste gepostung by MarkOden · · Score: 1

      Malware/Spam/Phishing Mail.... Delete it automatically.

    2. Re:Erste gepostung by pandrijeczko · · Score: 0, Redundant

      We already know that.

      Note the ".de" - she's German, she has no sense of humour.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    3. Re:Erste gepostung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but she/he does.

    4. Re:Erste gepostung by canix · · Score: 1

      Whoosh!

    5. Re:Erste gepostung by Arkham · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How extraverted is honey.bunny77@hotmail.de

      My first thought was "spammer". I suspect that says more about me than the owner of the email.

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
    6. Re:Erste gepostung by oldspewey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Germans have a sense of humour ... it's just that it's painfully unique to Germans.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    7. Re:Erste gepostung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a German 'friend' at university. He used to slap people in the face and laugh when he was drunk. Is that the German sense of humour or was he just being a twat?

    8. Re:Erste gepostung by neumayr · · Score: 2, Funny

      My guess is that he tried to emulate what he knew about American humor from watching MTV.
      In other words, he was being a twat.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    9. Re:Erste gepostung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying she is a "Pulp Fiction" fan without a sense of humor? May Quentin Tarantino go medieval on your ass.

    10. Re:Erste gepostung by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 2, Funny

      Were the people American or French? Trust me it's important...

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    11. Re:Erste gepostung by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      My first thought was that they watched Pulp Fiction right before choosing it, but then I watched Pulp Fiction last night, so i must agree with you. BTW - has anyone emailed honey.bunny77@hotmail.de and just asked them?

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    12. Re:Erste gepostung by D-Cypell · · Score: 1

      Yes, my thoughts ran immediately to pulp fiction too. In fact, if I was asked to infer what this email address tells me about the owner, my reaction would have been, "Samuel L Jackson has used Tim Roth as an intermediary to tell that bitch to be cool" :)

      Funny what pop culture does the mind.

    13. Re:Erste gepostung by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Funny

      Was that one of theirs or one of ours?

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    14. Re:Erste gepostung by aetherworld · · Score: 1

      Erste gepostung

      Please. If you want people to believe you speak german, next time don't run the phrase through babelfish.

    15. Re:Erste gepostung by srussia · · Score: 1

      honey.bunny77@hotmail.se on the other hand...

      hey, it's just one key over.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    16. Re:Erste gepostung by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      Babelfish translates "first post" as "erster Pfosten", so you totally fail it.

      Unless you were joking, though that wasn't exactly a great success either.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    17. Re:Erste gepostung by aetherworld · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless you were joking, though that wasn't exactly a great success either.

      Proves that Grand-grand-grandparent was right. Us germans really have no sense of humour :(

  3. To open... by zapwow · · Score: 1

    ...you must add the .pdf extension.

    1. Re:To open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...if you're using an OS that relies solely on file extensions to determine filetype.

    2. Re:To open... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you're using an OS that determines the type of file just by looking at the file name extension ...

  4. honey.bunny not extrovert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    honey.bunny spam name

  5. How about... by bakes · · Score: 4, Funny

    What does the address chunkylover53@aol.com tell you?

    --
    Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
    1. Re:How about... by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 5, Funny

      mmmm, chunky peanut butter....

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    2. Re:How about... by Saint+Gerbil · · Score: 1

      Either "Doh!","Mmm Dounuts" or "WHY YOU LITTLE." But recently he has been trying to get me to install stuff. http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2008/07/13/homer-simpson-is-a-hacker-botnet-pusher-chunkylover53aolcom/

    3. Re:How about... by wuulfgar · · Score: 1

      A Daffy Duck as Robin Hood reference. F*&#ing gold, man. F*&#ing goooooooooold.

    4. Re:How about... by bob.appleyard · · Score: 1

      You didn't use those n-million free trial CDs as coasters, like any sane human being?

      --
      How dare you be so modest!! You conceited bastard!!
    5. Re:How about... by k2r · · Score: 0

      > What does the address chunkylover53@aol.com tell you?

      Chunky! Bacon!

    6. Re:How about... by thewils · · Score: 1

      It tells me not to expect any intelligent comments from them on forums like /.

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  6. Ummm by christurkel · · Score: 1

    Okay my email starts with zizban@...so what does that say about me?

    --

    CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    1. Re:Ummm by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 4, Funny

      From that I can tell you are a some what a geek who visits sites like SlashDot. It also tells me that you are concerned about your email address being harvested and eventually being used as a target for spam.

      Now do me. My email address is: useless.research.nominations _at_ elmuerte.com

    2. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zizban, youâ(TM)ve got that smooth, mature kind of sexiness that does really well only at the knitting conventions.
       

    3. Re:Ummm by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      You jive with British fantasy/humor authors and their world views more than the average Slashdotter. Probably dig Doctor Who on a soul-level.

      That is, if you're not a black rapper replicating street slang of some kind.

      How close was I? Cigars today?

      -FL

    4. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This shows me you're one of those *cof* prestigious research workers that try to hide their e-mail adress from spambots but instead accomplish the contrary. Search engines don't allow you to search for "@" but a simple search for "_at_" in google will give lots of random spam targets to annoy.

    5. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not how spammers work. They spider the web looking for email addresses in the form of xxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz. They don't just plug values into search engines.

    6. Re:Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says spammers can't evolve?

    7. Re:Ummm by BrotherBeal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Creationists.

      --
      I'm disabling ads until because I choose not to reward redesigns that are less usable than "view source".
    8. Re:Ummm by christurkel · · Score: 1

      Your email addy says it all.

      --

      CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    9. Re:Ummm by srussia · · Score: 1

      Now do me. My email address is: useless.research.nominations _at_ elmuerte.com

      "elmuerte"? You failed Spanish?

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    10. Re:Ummm by WithLove · · Score: 1

      This shows me you have a great technical understanding for things, and that you don't care if your email address is harvested.

      Mister "xxxxx@yyyyyy.zzz".

      How did I do?

    11. Re:Ummm by xenn · · Score: 1

      funny.

      my suitcase has the same combination

  7. Bad example? by Prien715 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So the article summary starts with:
    How extraverted is honey.bunny77@hotmail.de? Inferring personality from e-mail addresses

    And ends with:
    Moreover, these impressions contained some degree of validity....but not for extraversion

    So the only example in the summary is wrong. And you can tell by reading the summary. Bravo.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    1. Re:Bad example? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually a step in the right direction.
      Usually you have to read part some of the article to realize the summary is completely wrong.

    2. Re:Bad example? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the only example in the summary is wrong.

      Except it wasn't really an example. It was merely a question that was posited. And the answer to the question is "you can't tell."

    3. Re:Bad example? by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      No, you are wrong. the summary starts by asking a question, then finishes by answering it. And you are considered insightful ?

    4. Re:Bad example? by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      To clarify, parent is talking about the summary (abstract) in TFA, not the /. summary

    5. Re:Bad example? by WK2 · · Score: 1

      Whether he was right or wrong, he bashed the Slashdot summary, and by association, the editors. That's what we do here. Please take your facts and your common sense elsewhere.

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
  8. It says a lot by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, consider an address like "leatherdude@hotmale.com", "bottom4lrgck@gmail.com", or "cowboyneal@slashdot.org" It's fairly safe to assume they're into the gay scene.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  9. And That's Why I hate Making new Email Address! by CFTM · · Score: 1

    Is it weird that I don't really like having my email addresses tell other people much about me other than the basics, like my name and unfortunately I'll throw in the YOB just because it's a number I won't forget...

    1. Re:And That's Why I hate Making new Email Address! by Wiarumas · · Score: 1

      It goes both ways for me. I want to be simplistic and professional so I want to use my name. As a bonus, my name is incredibly unique and there is literally zero probability of anyone else having it. In the other hand, I don't want to use my name for privacy reasons...

      --
      I will bend like a reed in the wind.
    2. Re:And That's Why I hate Making new Email Address! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      That is why you have 2 or more email addresses. One is a professional with your name. As you want people who get your email know who you are. And an other for posting or having an email that protects your idenity. jellomizer@domain.high_level_domain you only risk getting spam if it is posted, (virus if you use that Other OS)

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:And That's Why I hate Making new Email Address! by ADRenalyn · · Score: 1

      Hah! He said it goes both ways...

    4. Re:And That's Why I hate Making new Email Address! by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Interesting

          So, what you would want to do is make up a persona. Name, DOB, address, phone number, job, etc, etc. All of the facts need to appear legitimate at surface review. Pick something that isn't obviously wrong. Like, don't say you're the lead researcher at an outpost in the Antarctic. If you, say were to be in the New York metro area, and your addresses is a drop box in Manhattan, that's more reasonable. 18.8 million people live in the NYC metro area. Be careful though, use a metro area that you're familiar with. If you claim to live in New York, but you've never even visited there, it's going to be obvious if someone asks any questions.

          That's who JWSmythe is, and it's spelled out almost as such on my site. JWSmythe is my online persona, who I use for everyone online. If you search around for Mr. Smythe, you'll find lots of information (and lots of disinformation). Identity thieves have a goldmine of information on Mr. Smythe, but it's all false, therefore worthless. If you search my real name, you'll find lots of information also, but they're all for other people. I'm very pleased with that. Even if you use a background search service, you may find bits and pieces of me, but it will be mixed in with so many other people who aren't me (but have the same name), it's worthless info.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    5. Re:And That's Why I hate Making new Email Address! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a bi-sexual!!!

    6. Re:And That's Why I hate Making new Email Address! by genericpoweruser · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Ted, that was the joke...

      --
      A fool and his lamb are worth two in the bush.
    7. Re:And That's Why I hate Making new Email Address! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Poster's real name: John Smith

    8. Re:And That's Why I hate Making new Email Address! by GregNorc · · Score: 1

      I take it a step further and use mailinator. All you do is enter a username, no password. (obviously you should take pains to make your email unique so no one else uses your inbox)

      All you do is type in say, cowboyneal@mailinator.com on some service you suspect will spam you. Then you can get the validation url or whatever it is the site sends, and you're good to go.

    9. Re:And That's Why I hate Making new Email Address! by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 3, Funny

      You've got a good start your name and DOB in there, but if you really want to obfuscate and anonymize you need to add your social security number.

    10. Re:And That's Why I hate Making new Email Address! by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Very good, you get a cookie. :)

          "John Smith" became "Jon Smith" became "Jon Smythe" became "Jon W. Smythe" became "JW Smythe" shortened to "JWSmythe"

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    11. Re:And That's Why I hate Making new Email Address! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My professional address is the first eight characters of a DES hash of my middle name. It's absolute nonsense and implies nothing about me (except perhaps that I'd rather avoid The Google.)

      Posting as AC to avoid The Google.

  10. Mine fits... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    One of my email addresses starts with 'None_Yobidness@....'. That fits my personality; when someone asks for my email address, I can truthfully say that it's None Yobidness!

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    1. Re:Mine fits... by xerxesVII · · Score: 1

      Oh man! You got some cheeky attitude in there (the none of your business part), and even managed a little bit of "urban" cred (bidness instead of business). You must be some kind of genius when it comes to clever e-mail handles.

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    2. Re:Mine fits... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I think so. 8-)

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  11. "Sexy". by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1, Informative

    If a girl has the word "sexy" as part of her email address, don't fall in love with her. No matter how hot she is, no matter how freaky she is.

    Just don't. :(

    --
    "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    1. Re:"Sexy". by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Funny

      also, if he's got "creepy" in his username...

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:"Sexy". by Korbeau · · Score: 1

      Isn't there a universal rule stating that the more sexy a girl's email address is the less she is herself? ... or the less human :)

    3. Re:"Sexy". by mrsquid0 · · Score: 1

      The sexier a girl's e-mail address is, the lower the odds that the person is a female.

      --
      Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
    4. Re:"Sexy". by mooper · · Score: 1

      Solid advice. Same goes for "phister".

    5. Re:"Sexy". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hotgirlwhodoesnthavevd@hotmail.com

      There are three things wrong with that email address...

    6. Re:"Sexy". by sm62704 · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...says the guy whose username starts with "Mrs" and ends with "Guido"?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    7. Re:"Sexy". by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      looks like 'mrs q: uid(user ID) 0' to me.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    8. Re:"Sexy". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That could be Mr S. Guido, you insensitive clod.

    9. Re:"Sexy". by yanyan · · Score: 1

      d00d, that's a "q", not a "g". Mr Squid 0.

    10. Re:"Sexy". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew someone who was given the random email address sl33z by the universities vms system. 5 months later he was charged with possession of child porn.

    11. Re:"Sexy". by g0at · · Score: 1

      ...or his username deliberately rhymes with "hairy vagina"...

    12. Re:"Sexy". by kaos07 · · Score: 1

      Woosh...

  12. Extraversion where? by Woundweavr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Personality tests are (reasonably) based around extroversion in normal social interactions. I think its fairly well accepted that one's introversion/extroversion on the Internet is not necessarily the same as in "meat space". Perhaps "honey bunny" is shy in real life but using the freedom and anonymity of the web to act as she would like to be able to act in real life without consequences. The reserved accountant in real life could be the brash bon vivant at their computer.

    Granted, a similar variation would be likely for other attributes, but I would be surprised if extroversion was the trait most likely to have a radical change (increase).

    1. Re:Extraversion where? by shoutatchickens · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personality tests are (reasonably) based around extroversion in normal social interactions. I think its fairly well accepted that one's introversion/extroversion on the Internet is not necessarily the same as in "meat space". Perhaps "honey bunny" is shy in real life but using the freedom and anonymity of the web to act as she would like to be able to act in real life without consequences. The reserved accountant in real life could be the brash bon vivant at their computer.

      Granted, a similar variation would be likely for other attributes, but I would be surprised if extroversion was the trait most likely to have a radical change (increase).

      Maybe, just maybe, HoneyBunny77 is a 31 year old who likes the movie Pulp Fiction?

    2. Re:Extraversion where? by unfasten · · Score: 1
      The summary covers this:

      Moreover, these impressions contained some degree of validity. This was true for neuroticism, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and narcissism but not for extraversion.'

      They agree that you can't assess extraversion from the email address.

    3. Re:Extraversion where? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      I suspect that for "honey bunny", "face.like.a.bulldog.chewing.a.wasp@hotmail.de" might be more appropriate.

      Believe me, I have met German women...

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    4. Re:Extraversion where? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      >This was true for neuroticism, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and narcissism but not for extraversion.

      The only reason for the last bit is purely because when confronted by a question about why they would choose such a extrovert name, they ran to avoid answering. This led the scientists to believe that these people were really introverts.

    5. Re:Extraversion where? by pablo.cl · · Score: 1
      Dr. Mitja Back is a man.

      http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~diffdiag/img/back_g.JPG

      From the article

      Corresponding author.
      E-mail addresses: honey.bunny77 AT hotmail.de, mback AT uni-leipzig.de (M.D. Back).

    6. Re:Extraversion where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, one of the hottest women I've ever met is German.

      Except that I'd be afraid to try to score with her, since she's an attorney. What if I didn't perform to her expectations and I wound up in court over it? :o

    7. Re:Extraversion where? by srussia · · Score: 1

      They agree that you can't assess extraversion from the email address.

      Unless it's George Lucas' e-mail.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    8. Re:Extraversion where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are safe. If you didn't perform to what she wanted, roles would reverse and she would show you how she likes it. Remember, plastic doesn't need resting.

      -- anon because the truth hurts. I almost found out the hard way with a German girl I met in Atlantic City NJ. I left the room when she said "I'll show you how we do it in Germany" as she was stepping into the harness.

    9. Re:Extraversion where? by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      she'd suck you dry :)

  13. In other news... another irrelevant study! by cwAllenPoole · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it was shown that personality impressions based solely on e-mail addresses were consensually shared by observers.

    ... So someone paid one hundred observers and who knows how many research administrators to find out that if a group of people look at the same word(s), they will have a similar reaction? Strange, I thought that was the primary purpose of language. Silly me...

    Moreover, these impressions contained some degree of validity.

    And this says absolutely nothing. At all. "Some degree of validity" includes such conditions as "My father's, brother's, nephew's, cousin's, former roommate felt that way".

    --
    http://www.allen-poole.com/
    1. Re:In other news... another irrelevant study! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ... So someone paid one hundred observers and who knows how many research administrators to find out that if a group of people look at the same word(s), they will have a similar reaction? Strange, I thought that was the primary purpose of language. Silly me...

      Except these are made up words with little or no agreed-upon meaning. That's entirely different from language.

      I would not expect different people to have the same reaction to regular names. Someone whose sister is named Sarah will jump to completely different conclusions about someone else with that name than will a person who has three exes with that name. So why would I expect it of email names?

    2. Re:In other news... another irrelevant study! by encoderer · · Score: 1

      Well, you got 1/2 of it right.

      They then compared peoples reactions to the self-reported personality types of the people who submitted their email addresses to the researchers.

      And, as it turns out, they found correlation on each of their metrics, the only exception being "extroversion."

    3. Re:In other news... another irrelevant study! by joepa · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. This is what makes the study interesting. The fact that you can accurately infer a wide range of information about a person's personality from a few letters is rather shocking, imho.

      As for the relevance of the study, if you are at all concerned with understanding what makes us who we are as human beings, then the study should be relevant to your concerns. The study is informative in this respect insofar as it tells us something surprising about ourselves.

      Of course, if you're not concerned with understanding what makes us who we are, then this study may not interest you. And that's fine. But it doesn't follow from the fact that it doesn't interest you that the study is irrelevant, full stop. Perhaps it is irrelevant to you, but certainly not to human concerns more broadly.

    4. Re:In other news... another irrelevant study! by cwAllenPoole · · Score: 1

      Except these are made up words with little or no agreed-upon meaning. That's entirely different from language.

      But unless random characters are chosen for an email address, the address will automatically have some form and meaning associated with it -- even if it is simple as "I like the letter y a lot". More often, however, the address is something which has alternate meaning or can be read to be understood in a language.

      I would not expect different people to have the same reaction to regular names. Someone whose sister is named Sarah will jump to completely different conclusions about someone else with that name than will a person who has three exes with that name. So why would I expect it of email names?

      How many people do you know who have chosen their given name?

      --
      http://www.allen-poole.com/
    5. Re:In other news... another irrelevant study! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Being able to infer a wide range of information about a persons personality from a few letters that they specifically chose to describe themselves is not even close to shocking. This is the whole point of language. Now, it would be interesting if they found that you could accurately infer a wide range of information from your given name. But a study that determines you can infer information about people how people perceive themselves by seeing how they decided to describe themselves falls into the 'Lets do a study to see if circles are round!' category.

    6. Re:In other news... another irrelevant study! by joepa · · Score: 1

      Do you really find this result unsurprising? Given that the big-five personality factors have been shown to be nearly orthogonal, it is indeed surprising that a single word could lead to third-party personality assessments that significantly correlate with people's actual scores for four out of these five factors. To my mind, the fact that the word was chosen by the target to describe themselves doesn't make the predictive power of that word for accurate personality assessments any less surprising, given that near orthogonality.

  14. Everyone thinks I'm gay when they see my email by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    "Knob Gobbling" has a COMPLETELY different meaning in New Zealand, people!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Everyone thinks I'm gay when they see my email by Magada · · Score: 1

      It being NZ, I suspect it has something to do with sheep, no?

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    2. Re:Everyone thinks I'm gay when they see my email by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      It's a Maori-tribal-tattoo/Peter-Jackson-barefoot/Lucy-Lawless-in-leather kind of thing.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Everyone thinks I'm gay when they see my email by Verteiron · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't worry, it has a different meaning here, too.

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    4. Re:Everyone thinks I'm gay when they see my email by srussia · · Score: 1

      "Knob Gobbling" has a COMPLETELY different meaning in New Zealand, people!

      Karl Pilkington: "Tell me about it."

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
  15. This is a privacy issue to be sure. by srobtjones · · Score: 1

    This is part of the reason why many courts world wide regard email as privileged. Not just because it may contain communications between a person and their attorney or priest or doctor; email can reveal private information that only the person should be allowed to disclose. Of course, once someone sends an email to another, they no longer have an expectation of privacy with that individual. However, I should not have the right to read your private email without your consent. Work email is another matter. Work email is often the property of the company, and can often be read without notifying the account user. Of course, your local laws may vary on this point.

  16. Dear Researchers at Leipzig University... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 5, Funny

    You clearly have far too much spare time & not enough to do.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:Dear Researchers at Leipzig University... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear, Researchers.

      I cleaned up that redundancy for you.

    2. Re:Dear Researchers at Leipzig University... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you judge this using their published techniques according to their e-mail addresses?

  17. When reading this... by Omniscious · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...one question comes to mind: Is psychology really a science?

    1. Re:When reading this... by Z80xxc! · · Score: 1

      Well... that depends on how you look at the matter.
      http://xkcd.com/435/

    2. Re:When reading this... by slashgrim · · Score: 1

      ++ my kingdom for a mod point

    3. Re:When reading this... by nyctopterus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, it's not a good idea to base what you think of a large and diverse scientific research program on a single article linked to from slashdot. I don't know how this research links in to larger questions in psychology, and I bet you don't either.

    4. Re:When reading this... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking this one: http://xkcd.com/451/

      Only substitute "psychiatrist" for "critic"

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    5. Re:When reading this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When reading this... ...one question comes to mind: Is psychology really a science?

      No it is not, it is a study. Anything that ends in "ology" is not a science by definition (especially health "sciences").

      There are very few pure sciences: Mathematics, Chemistry and Physics. That is it.

      So every time a news headline reads "Scientists did such-and-such or say so-and-so", bear in mind the odds are pretty damn small that it is really science that they are talking about. The misconception about this among the general public is huge, and these charlatans masquerading as scientists are doing damage to the reputation of genuine science.

    6. Re:When reading this... by joepa · · Score: 1

      "This is no science. It is only the hope of a science."
      - William James, The Principles of Psychology

    7. Re:When reading this... by cwAllenPoole · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Oh come on, XKCD has a better one.

      --
      http://www.allen-poole.com/
    8. Re:When reading this... by yali · · Score: 2, Informative

      "This is no science. It is only the hope of a science." - William James, The Principles of Psychology, 1890

      There, fixed that for you. And seeing as how James is generally credited for establishing the field of psychology in America, I think he can be forgiven for limiting himself to some cautious optimism.

    9. Re:When reading this... by 31415926535897 · · Score: 1
      Since everyone seems like like posting links to xkcd around here:

      <obligatory>http://www.xkcd.com/435/</obligatory>

    10. Re:When reading this... by joepa · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, for sixty years after James wrote his Principles, we took a huge step backward in the form of psychological behaviorism. Only recently (within the last twenty years or so) have we fully embraced Jamesian ideas about the importance of internal processes to understanding human psychology, thus opening the door to real progress, and the establishment of psychology as a rigorous science that accurately describes human experience.

    11. Re:When reading this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does talking about mental states make it a science? Since mental states can't be quantified or even observed (and no fMRI does not count), it would seem that talking about mental states may be fashionable but it's certainly not scientific.

      Do you have even a single example of how psychology accurately describes the human experience? For example, an equation that makes accurate predictions better than 95% of the time?

    12. Re:When reading this... by joepa · · Score: 1

      The aim of science is often to provide quantitatively rigorous and accurate descriptions of the world based on repeated observation. Behaviorism was quantitatively rigorous and based on repeated observation. However, it didn't accurately describe human experience. So talking about mental states makes psychology a science insofar as there actually are mental states.

      So do mental states exist? There is a very complex and sophisticated philosophical literature on this, which I won't rehash here, but that you can review by taking a look at major publications within the last forty years or so by Jerry Fodor, Dan Dennett, and Paul Churchland (among others). The current consensus is that there are indeed mental states, and that we are at least pragmatically licensed in believing this, because of the explanatory power of such states.

      Can mental states be quantified and observed? The answer to this depends heavily on your metaphysics of mind. If you believe that mental states are soul states (states of an in-principle unobservable entity), or if you don't believe there are mental states at all (a la Churchland), then no. But if you believe that mental states are fundamentally brain states (which seems to me a pretty reasonable position), then you have to allow brain imaging to play a role here (which, for some unspecified reason, you don't).

      If mental states are brain states, then they can most certainly be directly quantified (and perhaps even observed, in some sense) using brain imaging -- see, for instance, James Haxby's 2001 Science paper on multi-voxel pattern analysis. Using this and similar methods, numerous researchers have now developed models that are capable of predicting greater than 90% of the time what a person is thinking and experiencing. Although we still have a long way to go (due in part to being distracted by behaviorism for so long), this is clearly a huge step in the direction of staking a claim for psychology as a science, a practice that provide quantitatively rigorous and accurate descriptions of the world based on repeated observation.

      What do you think?

    13. Re:When reading this... by joepa · · Score: 1

      If mental states are brain states, then they can most certainly be directly quantified...

      Perhaps I should have said "indirectly" here, since I go on to talk about fMRI, and fMRI doesn't directly measure brain activity, but rather changes in blood flow, which seem to have a very high correlation with actual brain activity. However, there are more direct ways of measuring actual brain activity (e.g., EEG) with which you could use methods similar to multi-voxel pattern analysis (although I'm not familiar with any particular studies that have done this, yet). So, ultimately, I would still hold that mental states can be directly quantified, if mental states are brain states.

  18. Hmmm... by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

    So, if somebody's address is 'metalhead@domain', it's safe to assume that he likes Iron Maiden -- or has a plate in his skull?

  19. Your address DOES say a lot by autocracy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of my favorites, though, is the story of a guy applying for a job at Yahoo! He registered the email account "iwanttowork(@yahoo.com)," and used that to send his resume. They hired him.

    I wish I could find my source for that, but I'm damn sure it happened.

    --
    SIG: HUP
    1. Re:Your address DOES say a lot by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Dude, it was my sister's friend's brother's aunt's uncle's nephew! I heard the SAME story! ;) Sorry, I couldn't resist...

    2. Re:Your address DOES say a lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      One of my favorites, though, is the story of a guy applying for a job at Yahoo! He registered the email account "iwanttowork(@yahoo.com)," and used that to send his resume. They hired him.

      I live in Sweden, and here the unemployment benefits are great. One of the conditions for receiving benefits is that you keep looking for a job...
      Hence, I was once presented with an application sent from a guy with the illustrious address of lazybastard@coffebreak [rest of address withheld].

      True story.

    3. Re:Your address DOES say a lot by drspliff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hrm, I should try that, after a series of unfortunate events I'm now unemployed and thinking of signing on for benefits.

      mentally.unstable@i-kill-kittens.domain

  20. That's funny by hellfire · · Score: 1

    But the first thing I thought when I saw "honey.bunny77@hotmail.de" was that it was a spam address.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:That's funny by fellip_nectar · · Score: 1

      I would have thought that "honey.bunny77@hotmail.de" would belong to someone who robs liquor stores and the occasional coffee shop.

      --
      Worst. Signature. Ever.
  21. Not since Milgram's death. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

    It stopped being science when Stanley Milgram died.

    1. Re:Not since Milgram's death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In his most famous experiment Milgram had no control group, the subjects were self-selected and he was directly involved in the experiment. Doesn't sound very scientific to me.

    2. Re:Not since Milgram's death. by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Like I said: the best of a bad lot.

    3. Re:Not since Milgram's death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one of the best ripostes I've ever seen. Touché.

  22. Poor Cowboy Neal! by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 1

    Then again, I have this suspicion that being one of the early guys at /., he's crying all the way to the bank: he's getting the last laugh.

    1. Re:Poor Cowboy Neal! by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Imagine what Commander Taco means? :)

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:Poor Cowboy Neal! by xenn · · Score: 1

      well, I had masterxenn@ ...com

      well, because my name actually is Xenn, and it was more of a play on zen master, and I'm not married so master rather than mister, so...anyway, it eventually occurred to me that people probably presumed occasionally that was an indication of my night time vocation. which it isn't, but who cares?

      funny haha.

  23. I thought everyone did this. by acedotcom · · Score: 0

    Maybe i have been online to much but i have always profiled email addresses and screen names. and to determine everything from age to race. It always is a good indicator that lets me know what to expect.

    here are some fun examples... african-americans tend to type the addresses in all caps.

    Younger people tend to show there age at the time the create their in the address and older people usually put their year of birth in the address.

    artists might use European spellings in there words in the address.

    There are alot of things you can use to determine who your emails are coming from, i just wish i could have gotten some of that funding instead of actually having to work.

    --
    they say it is often more relevant then the comment above, all we know is its called the Sig!
  24. How to choose a roommate by their email address by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Funny

    A friend of mine and I were looking for a 3rd room mate to share the costs with. We previously had a female friend of ours and we got along just fine (she got married and moved out) so we figured male or female was okay, so long as the personalities matched-up. So he put an ad online.

    One of the responses was from a girl who said she was fun and easy to get along with and had no problem rooming with guys. My friend was about to call her, but I noticed that her email address was some sort of obfuscated leet-speak, and after staring at it for a moment I realized it was her bra size + some other personality attributes. I decifered it and did a google search only to find some prom pictures that would make a porn star blush. We decided to keep searching. (Yes, many readers will call me crazy for that. Choose your roommates carefully guys.)

    Lesson learned: email addresses can say a lot about someone.

    1. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, now I'm curious as to what the email address was...

    2. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by Grashnak · · Score: 3, Funny

      One of the responses was from a girl who said she was fun and easy to get along with and had no problem rooming with guys. My friend was about to call her, but I noticed that her email address was some sort of obfuscated leet-speak, and after staring at it for a moment I realized it was her bra size + some other personality attributes. I decifered it and did a google search only to find some prom pictures that would make a porn star blush.

      So, of course, you called her immediately and asked her when she could move in?

      You tell this story like it was a bad thing...

      --
      Life needs more saving throws.
    3. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      (Yes, many readers will call me crazy for that. Choose your roommates carefully guys.)

      Whoa. Crazy? No, 'crazy' would have been the house you'd have if you invited her in. Been there, and not because the landlord listened to my suggestions. I've lived with some very interesting people from all across the social spectrum, and it IS fun and enlightening, but the stress level eventually forces a dramatic shift of some kind. I wouldn't go back and change a thing with my experiences, but they were by no means a walk in the park. I have a lot of very fond memories from my room-mate years, but it was hell on earth at times. There is a time and a place for both adventures and for quiet.

      -FL

    4. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by hey! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I imagine the problem wouldn't be so much with the roommate, as the people who come ... er ... are associated with her. It's wise to remember that when you get a roommate, s/he comes with relatives, friends, acquaintances and possibly clients of sorts. Orgy girl's party might be fun to drop in on, but you wouldn't want to live there.

      Still, it might be interesting to be persuaded otherwise.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Yes, many readers will call me crazy for that.
      Including me.

      Choose your roommates carefully guys.

      That's the reasoning I'd use for actually calling her.

    6. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      So, uh, what was her email address again? -wink, wink, nudge, nudge.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    7. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kinda like someone who rejects to live with an amateur pornstar kinda of girl, which is on lesbian foursomes with some hot asian, latina, black and eastern european girlfriends, will have an email address of his own like: "mommaboy777 @ ilovemymom.com", "fishholedweller @ ilovefish.com" or "boysrfun999 @ iloveboys.com"?

    8. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Amen. Charlie (she's a girl, guys; journal nsfw) wanted to move in with me. I had to tell her she could crash there for a few days, but I'm not taking in any roomers. I've had a few in the last year (ioncluding her over a year ago), and they were all pains in the ass one way or another.

      The next woman that moves in with me is going to have to be my lover in a monogamous relationship.

      One would think from my username that I'm into S&M, but my username is my initials and the zip code I was living in when I registered my /. account. So out of a sample of one, the research is bogus.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    9. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by Rycross · · Score: 1

      Given what you put in your journal, I wouldn't peg you as someone wanting to get into a monogamous relationship. Off-topic, I know.

    10. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by spun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My favorite hot girl roommate was a paranoid schizophrenic model. Seriously. "Do I look okay? STOP LOOKING AT ME!" You'd think having a hot girl run into your room at night and jump into bed with you and your girlfriend would be, well, hot. But not when she's screaming about the demon voices and begging you to protect her from Satan.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    11. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by filterban · · Score: 1

      I realized it was her bra size + some other personality attributes. I decifered it and did a google search only to find some prom pictures that would make a porn star blush.

      So, you did a Google search for something like "38DD 31337" and were surprised by the fact you found some lascivious pictures? Why even bother with the Google search?

      It probably was so that you could find those pictures. :)

      --
      rm -rf /
    12. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Wanting something and being able to find it are two different things. And having the roommates (especially female ones) makes it that much harder.

      I've had people in meatspace tell me that it surprises them that I'm looking for a serious relationship, too.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    13. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by u-bend · · Score: 1

      after staring at it for a moment I realized it was her bra size + some other personality attributes.

      Uh. Not to mince words, but with a few notable exceptions, a woman's bra size is not classifiable as a personality trait. Just saying.

      --
      u-bend
    14. Re:How to choose a roommate by their email address by Bugs42 · · Score: 1

      My friend was about to call her, but I noticed that her email address was some sort of obfuscated leet-speak, and after staring at it for a moment I realized it was her bra size + some other personality attributes. I decifered it and did a google search only to find some prom pictures that would make a porn star blush.

      Sir, I find this story to be completely outrageous and unbelievable, and I will not be convinced of its veracity until you provide me with said e-mail address for... uh... independent research and verification.

      --
      Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
  25. So I guess this means by SirLurksAlot · · Score: 5, Funny

    that if you have multiple email addresses you have multiple personalities?

    --
    God, schmod. I want my monkey man!
    1. Re:So I guess this means by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1
      Multiple personae maybe.

      I have email addresses for particular purposes:
      • one for job applications (my full first and last name separated by a period)
      • one for friends (my last name, just because I could, and got in early on the gmail rush)
      • one for ebay selling (not really much to that one)
      • one for spam (that one is pretty blunt in that anyone with half a brain would know I don't read that account... it gets the least amount of spam of all my addresses)
      • one for my business (the business name @gmail.com)
      • and one for mystery shopping use.

      And that's not even including all of the email addresses I have at my actual business domain address.

      So... yeah... either I'm completely schizophrenic, or I simply compartmentalize my life. Oh, and I also have two different email addresses for the purposes of posting "anonymously" to other forums that don't allow anonymous postings... these accounts have their own personae associated with them, and are used to post specific styled comments (not flamebait, trolling, or crap, but comments that are not in line with my actual thoughts and beliefs... it's good to play devil's advocate from time to time to keep a conversation good).

      So, yes, an email address could mean multiple personae.... oh... wait... you were joking... Sheesh! now I need another email address: whoosh@idiot.com

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    2. Re:So I guess this means by S-100 · · Score: 1

      Or you have multiple personalities and one email address as in: BradAndJulie@aol.com. These people also have the annoying tendency of not signing their emails, leaving you uncertain who to respond to. Is it Brad? Is it Julie? Is it some DNA hybrid of Brad and Julie, reminiscent of Jeff Goldblum in The Fly? Or does this person have the unfortunate name of Bradand Julie (or perhaps (Brad Andjulie)?

    3. Re:So I guess this means by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Is it some DNA hybrid of Brad and Julie, reminiscent of Jeff Goldblum in The Fly?

      Yeah, I saw some of those... things at work, it was (shudder) take your daughter to work day!

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    4. Re:So I guess this means by theMatrix777 · · Score: 1

      that if you have multiple email addresses you have multiple personalities?

      And, if you try all the normal stuff and it's all taken, the site starts suggesting stuff, is that then the sites personality?

  26. goatse@me.com by neonux · · Score: 1

    With my new email I probably score good in both openness and narcissism!

    --
    @neonux
    1. Re:goatse@me.com by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      With my new email I probably score good in both openness and narcissism!

      I don't know whether to laugh or barf!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  27. meh by legoman666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I chose my screenname/email address when I was in 4th grade. I'm now a Junior in college. So the only thing you can infer from my email address is about my personality ~10 years ago.

    1. Re:meh by ZerdZerd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Personality never changes, legoman666! Once a legoman666, always a legoman666.

      --
      I'm not insane! My mother had me tested.
    2. Re:meh by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I chose my screenname/email address when I was in 4th grade. my email address is about my personality ~10 years ago.

      I'm 56, and even I'm not much at all like I was ten years ago.

      Ten years ago I was married with a teenaged daughter and a preteen daughter, smoked cigarettes, wore coke-bottle glasses and a mustache, played a lot of videogames, almost never went out, had a fairly popular quake site.

      Now I don't smoke, don't wear glasses, wear a goatee, and live alone (I raised the daughters by myself after Evil-X left us; they're grown now). I go out damned near every night, abandoned the Quake site.

      I'm not as nerdy as I used to be, although I'm a cyborg now but wasn't then (my implant is my favorite piece of technology).

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:meh by strabes · · Score: 1

      I shudder to imagine your spam folder. A decade of being shuffled through various spammers' databases...

      --
      Its = possessive. It's = "it is"
    4. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that you've kept it, we can be pretty sure it still reflects you.

    5. Re:meh by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      I've got a wide array of e-mail addresses myself, I tend to use <recepient>@mydomain.tld when sending mails or giving out my address to non-trusted recepients.

      I also have an old email address from the university computer club, it's m@theirsubdomain.domain.se since they had no limitations on username length. I wonder what that says about me...

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    6. Re:meh by tek1024 · · Score: 1

      To some extent I'm sure that's true. On the other hand, it does say something about your personality that you've retained it since that time. My first screenname was "Wanderer88," but I've mostly dropped that, since (based on the hypothesis that most people use the last two digits of their birth year as a common way to augment their favored screenname) it made me look much younger than I was. It says something about me that I'm self-conscious about my age in any case (profession: research; background: computer science, experimental psychology, philosophy), just as your having retained that name for ten years actively says something about you. (Notice that I'm not implying that whatever it might "say" is not necessarily negative.)

      --
      The possible ranks higher than the actual. --MH
    7. Re:meh by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      wear a goatee

      You know you've been reading too many of the wrong forums when you read that as 'goatse'.

      --
      Squirrel!
    8. Re:meh by xaxa · · Score: 1

      A 7-digit UID suggests you still use the name.

      (I'm the opposite, I use an alias for about a year, then get bored with it and pick something else. I think xaxa is from early 2005.)

      My email address is firstname@lastname.countrycode, I think the only thing you can infer is that I know enough about computers to sort that out.

    9. Re:meh by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      When I was in the 4th grade, all they had were smoke signals and pony express.

      Seriously, though, there wasn't any e-mail, personal computers, or wide area networking. Ethernet had just barely been invented.

      Sometimes I wonder if it would have been better or worse if I had access to computers when I was 10 years old like kids do today. I know that once I did get my hands on a machine (a time-sharing system my sister used for some college programming classes), other than a few games, the only real thing you could do was write your own programs. That's what got me going into the business. I was writing keyboard drivers for my first in-house computers because you had to.

      Today, I'd think the distraction of PC games, console games, the Internet in general and social networking sites specifically would lead to a lot less programming and hardware skill, although much more familiarity with general computer skills.

      Now, get off of my lawn.

    10. Re:meh by legoman666 · · Score: 1

      eh, it's a unique name. I think I've only run across one website in all my wanderings where the name legoman666 was already taken.

    11. Re:meh by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Considering how close the S is to the E, I'm just glad I didn't accidentally type that!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    12. Re:meh by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I chose my screenname/email address when I was in 4th grade. I'm now a Junior in college. So the only thing you can infer from my email address is about my personality ~10 years ago.

      We can also infer that you're content with yourself and tend towards the utilitarian.

      Heh, where I use a screen name, it was chosen on an C-64 when I dialed into a BBS that required registration, and the name I chose was a contraction of the first object I saw in the room to fit into 8 characters.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    13. Re:meh by XexyzChronos · · Score: 1

      what do you guys think about my email handles, BloodFartColada is one of my faves for people I don't want to have my real email address, and XexyzChronos, or my old spam address, which was sisterfucker@sorryifuckedyourwife.com

  28. Tea leaves are more reliable... by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

    at least you get to have a cup of tea with someone and chat before you "read the leaves".

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  29. Oversimplification by blacknblu · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who doesn't open email from a sender I don't know? If I know someone, hasn't the initial impression already been set?

    In other news... A 64 year old may using the email address honey.bunny77@hotmail.de has been arrested for multiple counts of pedophilia - More at 11

    --
    "Does this wine taste funny to you?" -- Socrates
    1. Re:Oversimplification by maxume · · Score: 1

      If you really never open email from senders you don't know, I would assume that you are in the minority, and maybe even in a small minority.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Oversimplification by blacknblu · · Score: 1

      Now I should probably clarify. To say I never open an email from a sender I don't recognize would be an incorrect statement.

      That having been said, In order to see the email address, I have to open the actual email. In my Inbox, I see the name configured for the email address. If I don't recognize the sender, I (generally) don't open the email.

      --
      "Does this wine taste funny to you?" -- Socrates
  30. Chair alert by elgatozorbas · · Score: 4, Funny

    If his/her address is s.ballmer@microsoft.com, they might be short-tempered.

    1. Re:Chair alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, if I never read another damn chair joke about Steve Ballmer again, it will be too soon. Sure, the dude's got a short temper, and he works for a company that many (including myself) love to hate. Do people still find this funny? I guess they do. Can this one please make the transition to something that's been so overdone that it gets modded down instantly like "in Soviet Russia..."?

      But feel free to ignore my rant if this is a joke whose shelf-life has not yet expired. :)

  31. Occupations from E-mail addresses by dj245 · · Score: 1

    By that logic, roger@rogertheshrubber.net is some sort of arranger, designer, and seller of shrubberies.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Occupations from E-mail addresses by RadioElectric · · Score: 1

      That's not what it would mean here in the UK ;)

  32. Email Evolution by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
    When I first started getting Email addresses, unless they were assigned by school, I would just use whatever random cartoon character name from whatever comic book or cartoon I happened to be reading at the time. As time passed, things happened:

    .

    1. Other people besides me started using the Internet, and no matter how obscure a cartoon character was, somebody already took it. Also, Japanese cartoons and comic books became more popular, so formerly obscure characters I'd use suddenly became well know.

    2. People would get annoyed at my weird Email addresses, "So, you're JustyUekiTylor@xyz.com . How do you spell that?"

    3. It was too much information about me to be giving out, and of course, I'd end up giving these Email addresses to employers and potential employers (fortunately it was the dot.com boom, so I got hired anyway).

    Nowadays, my Email address are (first intial)_(middle initial)_(last name)_(random number)@xyz.com , I can give them out to anyone, business or personal, and they don't tell anything about me except a little bit about my ethnic ancestry. I also have a few old cartoon character Email addresses hanging around, which I use for dubious Websites that I want to be (semi)anonymous on.

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  33. Email harvesters, by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 1

    come get your emailadresses here!

    "My email is notsobright@spamheaven.com, what does that say about me?"

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
  34. Or Creativity!! by clonan · · Score: 1

    I mean seriously...at least 76 other people have honey.bunny!

    Think up something new!

    1. Re:Or Creativity!! by pablo.cl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think she is 31 years old.

    2. Re:Or Creativity!! by schoschie · · Score: 1

      No, no, it's because she was born in '77.
      At least so much for creativity.

    3. Re:Or Creativity!! by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      You mean he.

  35. easy! by cashman73 · · Score: 5, Funny
    You could almost guess personalities by domain names:
    • Any email address ending in @fark.com means the user is an alcoholic; double whammy if you've got drew@fark.com.
    • Any email address ending in @aol.com means the user is a clueless n00b, and should probably be shot to spare them of their misery online.
    • If you're email address ends in, @yale.edu, or @duke.edu, that means that the user is some rich punk living off of mommy and daddy's trust fund,...
    • Email addresses ending in @mit.edu or @cmu.edu are for nerds and geeks.
    • Any email address ending in @*.info is not a real person.
    • If you're email address is president@whitehouse.gov, you're just a dumb Texan who enjoys surfing these "series of tubes" known as the "internets" and fscking the country over and over,...
    • If you're email address ends in @house.gov, @senate.gov, or @riaa.org you're most likely a criminal.
    1. Re:easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're email address is president@whitehouse.gov, you're just a dumb Texan who enjoys surfing these "series of tubes" known as the "internets" and fscking the country over and over,...

      I wasn't going to make fun of you for getting you're/your mixed up or for the unnecessary and incorrect commas you put at the end of your sentences, but I thought I should let you know that Bush is from Connecticut, not Texas. Also, he's not the person who made the "series of tubes" comment.

    2. Re:easy! by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      > or @riaa.org you're most likely a criminal.

      Or a perfect target for "powdered remedy" spam.

    3. Re:easy! by cashman73 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Oops! Forgot one!

      If you're email address contains the words "anonymous" and/or "coward", you're apparently either an anal-retentive grammar nazi, or you like to pick apart people's jokes until they're not funny anymore,...

    4. Re:easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So my email address is [firstname]@[surname].name - what does that say about me?

      Also, did you know that email addresses are permitted to have whitespace and comments in them?

    5. Re:easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      • If you're email address ends in, @yale.edu, or @duke.edu, that means that the user is some rich punk living off of mommy and daddy's trust fund,...
      • If you're email address ends in, @mit.edu or @cmu.edu, that means that the user is some rich punk living off of mommy and daddy's trust fund,...

      Fixed it. Hey, I calls em as I sees em.

    6. Re:easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think the key you're missing here is that it wasn't funny in the first place.

    7. Re:easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could. Almost.

      digitaldeath@hellokitty.com?

    8. Re:easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and if your e-mail address is vicepresident@whitehouse.gov you invented the Internet.

    9. Re:easy! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      If you're email address ends in, @yale.edu, or @duke.edu, that means that the user is some rich punk living off of mommy and daddy's trust fund,...

      Fixed:

      If you're email address ends in, @yale.edu, or @duke.edu, that means the user is somebody who likes to make fun of kids who couldn't get in and don't know how to segregate their homonyms.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    10. Re:easy! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      So my email address is [firstname]@[surname].name - what does that say about me?

      That unnecessary redundancy doesn't bother you?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    11. Re:easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true!

    12. Re:easy! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Nah, Bush isn't a Texan. The entire Bush family are Yankee bluebloods from Connecticut. Come on, trust fund, Yale, secret societies? Not exactly what they do in Houston or Beaumont...

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  36. What does mine say... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    about me?

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    1. Re:What does mine say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welsh?

    2. Re:What does mine say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are more sexwi than Imals?

    3. Re:What does mine say... by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      You love your dog?

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    4. Re:What does mine say... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mac user.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    5. Re:What does mine say... by S-100 · · Score: 1

      naaah, mac users dont use capital letters or proper punctuation..........

    6. Re:What does mine say... by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Sex with Animals!? There's no TIME man!

    7. Re:What does mine say... by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      You are not a furry.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    8. Re:What does mine say... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      What's awesome about all the replies to my post, is that most of them are right.

      I am actually a mac user (typing this from my MBP), and even though I know that the poster who said that is a well-known (and foed by me) troll, he is correct in this instance.

      Also, I am not a furry, and want you all to yiff in hell.

      And I am a big ATHF fan, too!

      The only miss was that I'm not Welsh.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    9. Re:What does mine say... by Foerstner · · Score: 1

      whineymacfanboy@gmail.com

      Unhealthy obsession.

      --
      The US free market: two halves of a government-granted duopoly are free to set the market price.
    10. Re:What does mine say... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Unhealthy obsession.

      Well of course, I've got 'mac' in my nic/email.

      You were referring to the way all Mac users have an unhealthy obsession with their PC don't you?

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  37. Please: spelled extroverted / extroversion by toby · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    you had me at #!
  38. Inferring Personality From Useless Studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Scientists" have discovered that 9/10 people can deduce the personality of people by the studies they are conducting.

    "People judge me as having a God complex," Dr C. Heesenfeed commented, "mostly because I have mice running through mazes all day. But my studies have proven that 87% of all mice will go for a delicous piece of Emmental rather than for Brie. Cheese produces claimed that I was biased towards the rich and full flavour of the delicious Emmental, as opposed to plain old Brie. My friends avoid me these days because I always play with mice."

    But statistical analysis has indeed shown that most people judge scientists by their statistical studies. 50% of people find most studies frivolous or useless, 30% found them to be an utter waste of time, while only 20% responded they liked to read about pointless statistics in the newspaper.

    "People tell me that sometimes I'm really out there,", spoke Dr W. Ellhung, "especially when I tell them about my studies into the mating behavior in humans and finding a link between what food people eat. It's not really out there, because I've found sufficient evidence that eating very large amounts of chili on a regular interval decreases your chances of scoring... I mean, decreases the attraction coefficient."

    According to an anonymous source "Statistics don't always have to be meaningless. When interpreted correctly they can be very useful, for example, I am currently trying to predict next week lottery numbers by calculating the chance that a certain number will be picked using collected data from over 25 years. When I'm a millionaire, no one will be laughing with me anymore. I'll show them, or my name isn't Pjotr Orb'stard". He was then seen running towards the exit while laughing diabolically before impacting against the automatic door. "What are the odds of that happening to me???" he yelled.

    What are the odds indeed

  39. Missing the point by Woundweavr · · Score: 1

    They tested for normal extroversion. However, extroversion on the Internet - where the email name is most relevant - and extroversion in real space is not necessarily the same.

  40. why don't you email him by toby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and ask.

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:why don't you email him by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      he's clearly busy working...

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    2. Re:why don't you email him by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      you might want to try ihatethosebastardsthatfiredme@yahoo.com as well, just to be safe.

    3. Re:why don't you email him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But only if you're using a SANE email address to send your query with. Please Avoid using "anusman@goatse.cx" or "friendly_giant99@hotmale.com" or "cmdrtaco@slashdot.org". Those will just land you in the spam box.

  41. Slow News Day by TheMonkeyhouse · · Score: 1

    tomorrow on /. we look at what your mobile phone number says about your future!

    pathetic.

  42. stupid e-mail addresses by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 0

    I don't care if you have the address honey.bunny77@hotmail.de, just stop applying for jobs with it.

    --
    I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
  43. What about mine? by bizitch · · Score: 1

    Mine begins ciscogod@ ....

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  44. Serious email addresses... by colinRTM · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...are necessary. I once received a CV from "slap_head_dave@..." He didn't even get an interview.

    That sort of jocular email address is fine for your friends' use but you need to use a serious one for business / applying for jobs etc. or else nobody will take you seriously at all.

    1. Re:Serious email addresses... by joebellis · · Score: 3, Funny

      One person that I had business dealings with had stoned@... for his business email address. The firm's email addy convention was lastname, first initial. It did make for intersesting conference calls. Later it was changed to lastname.firstname as he moved up in the company.

    2. Re:Serious email addresses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like someone would 'need' to wear a damned suit and tie to an interview with our company? No, thanks.

    3. Re:Serious email addresses... by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Yep.
      I chose the email address most of my friends to contact me, 20 years ago. Guess what? I've grown up a bit since then, and 'swordsman' (it's not, but it's close) just doesn't cut it, so to speak, for job searches.

      Here's a weird thing, though: I have several email addresses, and I use them specifically for different purposes. The old one I've used forever is how I run my webpages/chat with old friends. My name is the one I use for jobs. A cheesy yahoo-sounding name, fastfreddy588 or whatever, is what I use when I'm poking around on places that sound dubious and I expect they're going to send me spam. So here's the thing: I tend to use the latter one when I check out dating sites or what-have-you, and when I actually interact with someone I use an actual-name email because it doesn't sound like I'm some cheap loser who couldn't get a name without a bunch of numbers in it. Which is to say: I semi-consciously rely on the email name I'm using to form an impression. That tends to support their silly study.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    4. Re:Serious email addresses... by 615 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I once received a CV from "slap_head_dave@..." He didn't even get an interview.

      Did you "seriously" shitcan Dave's CV because the username part of his email address failed to meet your threshold for seriousness?

      Call me an idealist, but even if your petty dismissal of an otherwise qualified applicant (I'm giving Dave the benefit of the doubt) is SOP in the "real world", I wouldn't expect you to be so smug about it!

    5. Re:Serious email addresses... by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      Exactly! While I still think my Like2Byte moniker is rather clever for 1993 (when I made it and ,dare I say, on AOL when they were about the only game in town). When I wanted a serious position within a company I patterned my new email address after my last name, first name and middle initial. It just so happened that it also turned out to be another, somewhat, catchy email phrase/addy. carmoca@%somesillyisphere%.com

      It netted me more interviews than my old non-professional email addy.

      carmoca - Professional addy.
      Like2Byte - Only long-term friends use that one anymore.

    6. Re:Serious email addresses... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Look at it this way: he did Dave a favor. Would you want to work for a boss like that? ;-)

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  45. Elemental, Watson by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    One of the things i hated about Sherlock Holmes novels were their "deductions" based on small hints. From a scratched clock he deducted (turned up that "correctly", oh, author power) all a family story, while could have been a lot of ways to get the same result.

    With emails could be the same. Being into the highly creative and imaginative sector of the population that uses his name as base for the email address, cant stop thinking in names that could lead to wrong conclusions with this methodology (or at least, where you dont know if the address is because matches name or some weird personality).

    And the same could apply to other ways to choose email addresses. But i agree that for some this kind of study can be a mostly safe bet

  46. That's why I use my fullname and SSN... by rivaldufus · · Score: 4, Funny

    as my email address. That way, anyone can learn anything they want to know about me.

    1. Re:That's why I use my fullname and SSN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as my email address. That way, anyone can learn anything they want to know about me.

      "Rival Dufus" is a pretty lame name. You should talk to your parents about that.

      PS: 634820 is a really good SSN, though.

  47. German humour by rduke15 · · Score: 1

    Who was it, who once described it as: "German humour is just like jewish humour, except it's not funny"?

    1. Re:German humour by k2r · · Score: 4, Informative

      I still feel insulted a little when I read things like these. While I agree on German humour being kind of special I think that it has some very funny ways. For example we have a sense for the humor of very elaborate and absurd situations - for absolutely no reason.
      Have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicco_von_Buelow or some of his work at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70Dd5dosUhk or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rypULAp99ao or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVCk8Inkav4

      The English have a humour that quite sometimes is similar to aspects of our humour, neither nation would admit it, of course.
      Proof: Watch http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9105942950207814319

        for example.

    2. Re:German humour by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      Sorry if you really felt insulted. My intention was only mild teasing. (and a genuine wish to know who that quote was from).

      I must admit I know nothing of German humour, even though I had a few German grand-grand-parents. If I think about funny things in German, the little I know tends to be Austrian (like Wilhelm Busch or Georg Kreisler).

    3. Re:German humour by k2r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It not so much insulting - it feels like having a close relative who's not very good looking but has a beautiful voice.

      German humour often works requires understanding of the German culture and the many degrees of freedom the German language has, which often transport fine differences in meaning.

      I find it quite difficult to grok japanese humour and I think German humour may be as difficult for non Germans.

      And I still remember my - usually very distinguished - physics teacher having difficulties breathing because he laughed so hard when we watched "Pappa ante portas" in the class before christmas.

    4. Re:German humour by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 2, Funny

      I still feel insulted a little when I read things like these.

      You started it!

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    5. Re:German humour by Doc+Ri · · Score: 1

      Don't mention it!

      --
      617B3B7F7E7C7D7F00EOF
    6. Re:German humour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think they tried to supplant the jewish race?

    7. Re:German humour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still feel insulted a little when I read things like these.

      You started it!

      DON'T mention the war!!!!!

    8. Re:German humour by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, the Germans I occasionally work with always seem very serious but are amongst the first to start laughing whenever someone else cracks a good joke.

      It's just stereotyping humour - we British think you Germans have no sense of humour while you Germans think we eat nothing but "Fish and Chips"...

      Mind you, you make the finest sausages in the world but we make the best beer.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    9. Re:German humour by unikussituation · · Score: 1

      "You English and your sense of humour. During your brief stay I look forward to learning more of your wit, your punning and your amusing jokes about ze breaking of ze wind. How lucky you English are to find ze toilet so amusing. For us, it is a mundane and functional item. For you, ze basis of an entire culture." - Baron von Richthofen to Capt. E. Blackadder (Blackadder goes Forth, "Private Plane")

      --
      > Better dead than Smeg!
    10. Re:German humour by unikussituation · · Score: 1

      "We did *NOT* start it!"

      --
      > Better dead than Smeg!
    11. Re:German humour by KillerBob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I find it quite difficult to grok japanese humour and I think German humour may be as difficult for non Germans

      Japanese humour, like German humour, and indeed, everybody else's humour, has multiple levels. There's more intellectual stuff which relies on cultural knowledge, but you also do see slapstick, absurdity, and other genres of humour. Lots of people like to moan about how high brow British humour is, for example, but that's the same nation that gave us Benny Hill and Red Dwarf. Not exactly high brow. Japanese humour isn't really any different.

      Take, for example, the Japanese comedy Ping Pong Bath Station (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0169126/). Absolutely hilarious. And one of my favourite Japanese movies. It's about a hot spring resort that decides to rejuvinate its business by hosting a ping pong tournament. The thing is that alongside cultural reference humour that you may or may not get, one of the characters is transgendered, and used as comic relief. There's still some cultural humour in that character, but it is a level of humour that's much closer to what an American audience will be used to.

      Ultimately, it's a question of where you go. Some German humour, you'll get. Some you won't. The same can be said for the rest of the world.

      Anyway... no real point. Just felt like mentionning that you can't lump it all together. And obligatory disclaimer: my mum's family is Scottish/Irish, my dad's family is German, and I studied Japanese in University. It's American "humour" that I don't appreciate....

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    12. Re:German humour by severoon · · Score: 4, Funny

      I still feel insulted a little when I read things like these.

      So let me get this straight. I'm guessing you are probably of German descent, and you're insulted that someone was coyly and humorously teasing Germans...for lacking a sense of humor?

      I just wanted to make sure I didn't miss anything... :-p

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    13. Re:German humour by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      I can verify the fish and chips thing from a recent road trip through the north part of England.

    14. Re:German humour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, what?

      I *am* German, and I can't believe you brought up Loriot as an example of decent German humour. Seriously, is there anything or anyone in the world less funny than him?

      Well.. OK, actually, the answer to that is "yes, quite a bit", from Didi Hallervorden to Karl Dall to Rudi Carrell to Otto Waalkes, but I think that just proves my point.

      Loriot isn't funny. He never was, and I have no idea why some people think he is. That's not to say good German humour doesn't exist, but Loriot isn't it.

    15. Re:German humour by RancidPeanutOil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ha ha rofl! Stop it, you're killing me! My mountain dew came right out of my nose when I saw your articulate protestations and well-cited hypertext links. Subtle, but appreciated.

    16. Re:German humour by weg · · Score: 1

      I'm Austrian and I'm living in GB at the moment.. I can confirm that Germans have no humour (but as you say, their sausages are great), and British humour is amazing (your sausages are a joke, too, and don't get me started on what you call "beer").

      --
      Georg
    17. Re:German humour by xealot · · Score: 0

      Yes you did! You invaded Poland!

      --

      --Drive carefully. 90% of people are caused by accidents.
    18. Re:German humour by rduke15 · · Score: 3, Funny

      But that was Austrian humour

    19. Re:German humour by k2r · · Score: 1

      > Ping Pong Bath Station

      Thank you very much, I'll watch it in a few weeks with some friends.

    20. Re:German humour by k2r · · Score: 1

      > I'm Austrian
      > I can confirm that Germans have no humour
      I use to work in Austria a lot and have some close Austrian friends. While I obviously disagree on us Germans being humouristically challenged, I have to admit that the cultural differences between Austrians and Germans are bigger than between Australians and Germans, ESPECIALLY in the area of humour and sarcasm.

      It is still extremely difficult to understand for me if an Austrian is serious or joking, which makes the first months of a business relationship a very dry experience.

      However, I always felt very welcome in your country.

    21. Re:German humour by k2r · · Score: 1

      > but we make the best beer [greatbritishbeer.co.uk].

      I really like the british sense of humour.

  48. That's... ridiculous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My personal email address is 5@.. and I chose it because I'd never change it, because it *doesn't mean anything.* I'm not five years old, my birthday lacks a five in it anywhere, it's not in my driver's license number, my name isn't five letters.. It doesn't mean anything, and that's why it works.

    So, I fail to see what this "study" says about me.

    1. Re:That's... ridiculous. by famebait · · Score: 2, Funny

      It reads "aspergers" loud and clear, dude.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    2. Re:That's... ridiculous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet it means something. Here is a ruler. See.

  49. Email Address as a First Impression by StephenW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's for perceptions such as this that I recently moved from an old high school GMail address to a more generic MyName@MyPersonallyBrandedDomain.tld address. The former was hindering my professional development, whereas the latter is enhancing it. It's a small thing, but your email address is often a first impression. Ask yourself, "What does ChronicCommenter@Slashdot.org saying about me?"

  50. Well... by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 2, Funny

    We all can't be ladiesman217.... :)

    --
    Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
    1. Re:Well... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      We all can't be ladiesman217.... :)

      Give us the e-bay item!!

      Seriously dude, it's a good thing this is Slashdot, because anywhere else and people might not have gotten the reference. ;-)

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  51. fail. by drunkennewfiemidget · · Score: 1

    The local part of my e-mail is drunkennewfiemidget.

    I don't consume alcohol. At all.
    Although my father is a newfie, I was born in Toronto.
    I'm 6' tall.

    It's just a fun name I made up.

  52. my email by Stooshie · · Score: 1

    bubbaforjesus2010@bringontherapture.com

    you aint gettin nuthin from my intertube address geeks!

    --
    America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
  53. bad thinking? by SmellMyTeenSpirit · · Score: 1

    So the only example in the summary is wrong. And you can tell by reading the summary. Bravo.

    They looked at six personality traits (neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness and narcissism) and found that extroversion was not consistently predicted based on email address alone.

    The other five traits were not only consistently agreed upon by the participants, but they matched up with user's descriptions of their own personalities.

    Apparently by skipping the entire content of the paper you missed the point.

    Bravo.

    --
    "Cornflakes are not the innocent critters they seem"- Sterling Morrison
  54. Re:chunkylover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bulimic anorexic. she loves chunks right?

  55. Re:multiple emails = ? by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    They're Shards.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083791/
    The Dark Crystal (1982)

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  56. Honey Bunny suggests... by etwills · · Score: 1

    ...yellow, not green!

    (geekily noting that extravert would actually be the Jungian [and therefore technically correct] spelling but for this other word).

  57. Tough call... by famebait · · Score: 0, Troll

    How extraverted is honey.bunny77@hotmail.de?

    That's a tough one.
    I guess what it boils own to is "is executing every motherfucking last one of you and extroverted or introverted thing to do?", and does it matter if you're the 77th one to do it?

    --
    sudo ergo sum
  58. Re:multiple emails = ? by SirLurksAlot · · Score: 1

    Careful, you're dating yourself there ;-)

    --
    God, schmod. I want my monkey man!
  59. Is psychology really a science? by Lafeek · · Score: 1

    No.

    1. Re:Is psychology really a science? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientology isn't real.

  60. Hmmm... by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 0

    How extraverted is honey.bunny77@hotmail.de

    Germans are about as extraverted as it gets. I remember a couple from school who didn't even bother going in the bushes to smoke...

  61. All the more reason to.... by Amphetam1ne · · Score: 1

    .... only use firstname.surname@isp.tld for job applications. Mine is not used for anything other than job applications and other official business. It's not linked to anything that can be googled either. In fact aside from the small group of people that I socialize with both oti and irl, there's nothing to link the real me to my online persona. The interenet is just entertainment and nothing that happens there should impact on real life.

    --
    I only buy pepper spray that's been tested on anti-vivisectionists.
  62. Smitheroonies at gmail... by de_smudger · · Score: 1

    >> Email addresses represent the thinnest slice of information that people receive from one another.

    In mine and many others' cases it means: I have a very common firstname/surname pair and turned up late to the gmail party.

    I want something people will remember and that's not too easy to mistype, so dan.smith10789 just won't really do.

    Though of course once in that situation, the choice of memorable nickname you actually go for may well say something about you - just saying the fact someone has something that's not their name doesn't in itself mean they're a bit loopy :)

  63. Required by EU directive 4467.88.111 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This directive requires ALL workers to have far too much spare time & not enough to do. It's a basic human right.

  64. Poker players knew it by Dekar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We've been using nickname tells in online poker for years now. Poker is a game of imperfect information, so any little edge is good.

    Obviously, someone like ShipItThx will usually be much better than jimmy35 or CIVIC4LIFE. Good players have even started to use reverse nickname tells, always thinking one step ahead.

    These days, we usually look at the nicknames only to know in what range a player will be. Some names tell us he'll be an average player at best, while others tell us he'll either be a very good player or a complete donkey, but rarely just a semi-decent guy.

    Next time a chunk of money comes aroun for random researches, give your fellow poker players a call. We know a thing or two about gaining information from pretty much anything.

  65. brand attractiveness by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    Interesting.
    I use a gmail address specifically because I think it's classier than yahoo or whatever, and easier to remember than the address I've had for 15 years or so. Anyone can remember joesmith@gmail.com, while joesmith588@yahoo.com sounds like a loser and joesmith@mail.onrampsacramento.com isn't going to stick in someone's head for even three seconds.

    It'd be useful to see what other people think about the perceived value/worth of a domain name, and what running your own domain says about you. The guy who made the LEGO Babbage engine has his page up at woz.org, which *I* think is just the coolest thing ever, but normal people aren't going to recognize that, so that's a gamble: if someone DOES know what that means, the person is going to be very impressed indeed.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    1. Re:brand attractiveness by StephenW · · Score: 1

      In my case, smellsofbikes, showing off that I run my own domain is the key point. I'm a web professional, and my email address' domain name is the same as my blog, so it serves a dual purpose. First, it immediately identifies the fact that I have the know-how to run my own site (obviously useful in my line of work). Second, it provides free advertising for my blog to anyone with whom I correspond. Either is a great way of boosting my profile in the eyes of potential employers and clients.

      Your point about woz.org is an interesting one. I would argue that impressing average users is irrelevant, at least as far as personal branding goes. What really matters is impressing the handful of people with whom you need to build trust and authority. If your email address can help you pull that off, I'd say it's a big plus.

  66. So what does it mean by Phred+T.+Magnificent · · Score: 1

    when a person has several different email addresses, at several different domains, with real names, fantasy names, numbers and everything, along with a huge list of Mailinator addresses?

    --
    Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
    Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?
    1. Re:So what does it mean by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
      Multiple personality disorder?

      Have you seen a psychologist recently?

      Better check your credit cards, maybe another of your personalities has been seeing him without your knowledge.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    2. Re:So what does it mean by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      when a person has several different email addresses, at several different domains, with real names, fantasy names, numbers and everything, along with a huge list of Mailinator addresses?

      It means there is a lot more information to work with when doing a psyche profile on you. Unless you are gaming the system by deliberately creating misleading 'cigars' for a psychologist to trip over, then you are revealing your soul. Fantasy names? Sheesh! A person's fantasies tell you gobs of stuff about them.

      There are limits, of course. A fantasy name on its own needs a reference point to be truly revealing. "Fuzzyfox123@dot.com" (for example) offers a fair bit of insight on its own, but if people know it's connected to you, then your whole life is pretty much an open page.

      -FL

  67. 600 from how many billion emailrs? by petes_PoV · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A sample of a few hundred, using a self-assessment method, with an average age in the teens? Come on, this isn't science - it's a party game.

    Given the infinitesimally small size of the sample, the researchers have effectively one, single datum, except it isn't even that. The completely casual method of assessment (filling in a questionnaire about yourself - self-image, much?) gives utterly irreproducible results. The complete lack of any numerical or quantifiable data makes drawing conclusions impossible.

    Here's a quick assessment of personality of a group with an average age of 16. They're all immature. Some are more mature than others, some will grow more mature with age - others won't. The link with emails addresses is random, as most won't have been able to get their first-choice addresses anyway (the grown-ups will have those).

    This is one for the ig-nobel awards.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  68. Control for Milgram's experiments by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

    Thanks. Besides, how would Milgram have created a control group? Would he have ensured that some of the subjects knew that the guy in the booth was an actor? Could he have ensured that he himself didn't know who was in on the gag and who thought it was for for real?

    1. Re:Control for Milgram's experiments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, shite. I was thinking about the Stanford prison experiment by Philip Zimbardo. The Milgram experiment is much better. As far as I know his subjects didn't have as much information as the Milgram subjects did. A control group would be difficult but Milgram repeated the experiment in many different forms so his data is much better than Zimbardo's who only did his experiment once.

    2. Re:Control for Milgram's experiments by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about it. I've noticed that a lot of people tend to mix up Milgram and Zimbardo. It doesn't help that The Lucifer Effect is easier to find than Obedience to Authority (and has a snappier-sounding title). As for Zimbardo only running his experiment once: can you blame him?

    3. Re:Control for Milgram's experiments by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      Not him but the the psychological community's reaction to his study. If he could repeat his experiment in the same way Milgram did we would know a lot more or at least be more sure of what we know. However, it might be a good idea to end the experiment as soon as someone suffers a breakdown. I've completely lost my marbles once for a short while and while it wasn't a nice experience it wasn't harmful to me and I found the experience quite illuminating. In other words: I don't really understand why the experiment was considered so unethical.

  69. Unless... by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

    Good luck finding out what type of person I really am. Bi-polar, multiple personality, having conversations with oneself, I'm a different person every day!

    I guess you would then equate VeNoM > crazy?

    --
    Disclaimer: I am not god.
    We may not be created equal
    But we can be treated equal.
    1. Re:Unless... by Shados · · Score: 1

      No, but the mix of lower and upper case letters shows that you're an up & down kindda person!

    2. Re:Unless... by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

      Judging by your username's flaming cliche dorkiness, I'm guessing you are an average white male younger teen-aged nerd who plays a lot of video games and has little experience with women.

      (Hah hah, the deck was loaded, that is 90% of the /. population!)

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  70. What do misspellings imply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, I know everyone misspells words occasionally, but what does it imply when a user name includes a misspelled literary reference?

    Personally, I think it implies that the person has delusions of grandeur that are completely out of range of his merely average intellect, combined with breathtaking carelessness and inattention to detail.

    But then, I actually know the guy.

  71. Every action a person takes comes from their mind. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My personal email address is 5@.. and I chose it because I'd never change it, because it *doesn't mean anything.* I'm not five years old, my birthday lacks a five in it anywhere, it's not in my driver's license number, my name isn't five letters.. It doesn't mean anything, and that's why it works.

    Dude, everything means something. "5@" is loaded with information.

    1. Who the heck gets an email like that? Either a very early adopter, a supporter of a very small ISP or somebody with access to a unique webhost. If you're using one of the giant internet providers, you are tech-savvy enough to know how to tinker with email identifications. Many companies and institutions which have their own email host require employees to conform to email naming standards, so either you didn't acquire that email name through work, you're a guy who buys his own web hosting or works high enough up some sort of chain to be able to do goofy stuff without comment from superiors. The common factors one or both of the following deductions: You're a guy who knows his way around a computer thank-you-very-much or you hold an important (but not too-important, or you wouldn't have such a weird email address) position of some kind. That takes care of the broad guess information. The personality reading is much tighter.

    2. You're a guy who doesn't want to advertise silly nonsense in an email name. This doesn't mean you can't be an anime geek, but it does mean you're aware enough to know that such an email name is kind of silly, and you don't want to come across that way. Whatever the case, a name which gives away nothing is consciously chosen for that reason. This suggests you are a cautious person with some pretty good brains, which tells me a lot about how you can be expected to handle yourself in any number of scenarios. Any confidence you have in social situations probably comes from a studied investment of will power rather than a naturally bubbly charisma. This gives me the general locations of a ton of probable fear, anger and happy buttons I could poke around for if I wanted to manipulate you. --Don't worry. I don't do that! :)

    3. It's possible that you are also one of those guys who has a no-nonsense somewhat self-important and conservative (though not necessarily in the political sense) attitude who spends a fair bit of energy devoted to sighing heavily at people who ARE silly and thoughtless.

    One might be tempted to ask, "Why 5 and not some other number?", but that's too squishy an area to really tread in. Though one might note that had you picked a "1" it would suggest some outward self-importance which you either couldn't embrace or chose not to for some reason. 3 and 7 are 'magic/biblical' numbers, whereas 5 suggests balance and digital thinking. But like I said, that whole area is a bit too squishy for my liking.

    In any case, that's all just from a number "5". I know what you're not, and that gives me a ton of profile to work with. I could be wrong about all of it, of course, but those patterns do jump to mind first.

    -FL

  72. Re:multiple emails = ? by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

    not necessarily. That movie is older than I am, but I still know it and love it. And dream about it...call it on weekends...send it embarrassing text messages...

    Er, that is, uh---it's a good movie. I have to go now.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  73. Meta... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May be.

    But what does it say about a guy who collects and also remembers such email addresses?

  74. what does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cheapcrackwhore@gmail.com say about me?

  75. not me by HappyEngineer · · Score: 1

    The only major differences between me now and me 10 years ago are that I'm a better programmer, I have better Halloween costume making abilities, play slightly fewer videogames per year, and have a girlfriend.

  76. That's Complete CRAP !!! by Namors · · Score: 1

    You couldn't work out anything about me from my email address

    --
    Dual Century Programming: Yeah I know ... But it sounds Good
    1. Re:That's Complete CRAP !!! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      SickofBeing@hotmail.com

      You don't like Hotmail. Therefore, you consider yourself knowledgeable about all things computer, probably to the point of arrogance, since you must look down upon all those who can't tell the difference between a web service you consider lousy and one which you consider decent. You have an awareness of privacy issues, suggesting intelligence above average which you stake rather a high degree of your personal sense of self-worth upon, suggesting you contain well-concealed (even from yourself most of the time) personal doubts about other aspects of your life. Your sense of humor is dry and your personality is such that you probably hide behind a rationalist behavior set to avoid the challenges brought by strong emotions. You're probably white with a middle-income background which allowed you to own the expensive computer gear with which you were able to evolve your knowledge base, and (this is going out on a limb) you believe in gun ownership though you don't have one yourself, and you think Barak Obama is an ass, but you'll probably vote for him anyway.

      How'd I do?

      -FL

    2. Re:That's Complete CRAP !!! by Namors · · Score: 1

      You don't like Hotmail.

      I love hotmail, I've used it for about 10 years, after loosing my email account (for the 5th time) for not logging in, I created this account once again at hotmail. The local-part was an attack at myself for not setting up a web based email system of my own

      Therefore, you consider yourself knowledgeable about all things computer, probably to the point of arrogance,

      Whilst this Bit of a jump, (maybe I had to have an address there). The latter part is true but I always play teacher before IT Jerk.

      since you must look down upon all those who can't tell the difference between a web service you consider lousy and one which you consider decent.

      I teach and let people make their own informed choices.

      You have an awareness of privacy issues, suggesting intelligence above average which you stake rather a high degree of your personal sense of self-worth upon,

      yes I deal a lot with privacy, but its got nothing to do with a high IQ.

      suggesting you contain well-concealed (even from yourself most of the time) personal doubts about other aspects of your life.

      That would be great, then I wouldn't have to worry about family, time or what else do I want to do with my life

      Your sense of humor is dry and your personality is such that you probably hide behind a rationalist behavior set to avoid the challenges brought by strong emotions.

      I'm a clown, and in the immortal words of Homer j. Simpson "I want it all! the terrifying lows the dizzying highs, the creamy middle"

      You're probably white

      Mixed - 90% of people think I'm Chinese

      with a middle-income background which allowed you to own the expensive computer gear with which you were able to evolve your knowledge base,

      In my final year of high school (that totaled $170 including books) I used a second hand 386 while others had Pentium based (This is what taught me my real programming skills)

      and (this is going out on a limb) you believe in gun ownership though you don't have one yourself,

      100% COMPLETELY AGAINST private gun ownership,

      and you think Barak Obama is an ass, but you'll probably vote for him anyway.

      and finally I think he's a star and am just waiting for some bullshit to stop him becoming president, but I will not vote for him because I'm Australian

      How'd I do?

      Don't give up your day job, unless it's profiling

      --
      Dual Century Programming: Yeah I know ... But it sounds Good
    3. Re:That's Complete CRAP !!! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      You had me on the first line, (assuming it's true.) Everything branched off from that first assumption which, since you love Hotmail makes all other assumptions totally baseless. Gosh, a person who loves Hotmail would offer up a completely different profile!

      Thanks for responding! I can always use a good kick in the ass when deserving. --Life is complex and while you can certainly measure people based on behavior and put together logical pathways based on seed information, this is just another example of why it's important to gather as much of that seed info as you can before storming off in what seems like an obvious direction.

      -FL

    4. Re:That's Complete CRAP !!! by Namors · · Score: 1

      Life is complex and while you can certainly measure people based on behavior and put together logical pathways based on seed information, this is just another example of why it's important to gather as much of that seed info as you can before storming off in what seems like an obvious direction.

      I agree, I just think the possibilities are endless, and as you pointed out, if you can't see that i'm telling the truth from a response, what chance is there really for an email address ?

      -N

      --
      Dual Century Programming: Yeah I know ... But it sounds Good
  77. Someone please tag this "pseudoscience" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when can horseshit like this get away with masquerading as "science"?

  78. XexyzChronos by XexyzChronos · · Score: 1

    So, my spam email address is bloodfartcolada@gmail.com, what do you infer from that???

  79. Common address by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

    Whenever I look at my mailing list requests, some guy with the address fuck@you.com keeps signing up. What does that say?

  80. paper missing important details by Sebastopol · · Score: 1

    What was their basis for defining "neuroticism"? This is a very difficult condition to diagnose. The rest are also quite subjective, I would have liked to have known how they arose at just these criteria, and not something like "leadership" or "experienced". The criteria are so not-broad that I'm not surprised those narrow designations reinforced their conclusions.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  81. firstname.lastname@gmail.com = lazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    firstname.lastname@gmail.com = lazy

  82. The culprit is in the translation process by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    Not all jokes can be translated because they rely on the history and culture that is typical to a region. In spite of that, many people continue trying to translate jokes, thinking they are doing it right.

    The solution is to substitute jokes with local equivalents (if any), thus engage in a serious joke l10n project.

    Of course, some jokes are culture agnostic, and are instead tied to a certain professional field (like the one about perfectly spherical horses moving in vacuum) - those cannot be understood by folk with a different academic background.

    Cultural context is very important for jokes, trying to tell a joke out of context is like %insert car analogy here%.

  83. What do we know about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    chunky-lover53@aol.com

  84. Re:Every action a person takes comes from their mi by sarts · · Score: 1

    One might be tempted to ask, "Why 5 and not some other number?"

    I can answer that: 1 to 4 are mine, and I own the mail-server :-)

  85. ugh by kisrael · · Score: 1

    Do people think my new usual nomme de web "kirkjerk" means I'm a jerk for real?

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  86. junk science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the sample sizes are far to small

    now this might be a neat concept to look into, seeing as how people often select names to reflect aspects of their person they wish to highlight, but this smells mostly like bullshit

  87. Graphology-like by gacl · · Score: 1

    I guess this similar graphology. A pseudo-science, that is.