Slashdot Mirror


Coating a Motherboard In Thermal Resin?

Bat Country writes "I've had an idea in the back of my head for some time (and I'm surely not the only one) that it would be a worthwhile project to coat a motherboard in thermally conductive electrically insulating resin — complete with all of its various components — for the purpose of immersion, shock resistance, whatever. I'm curious to find out if anyone's undertaken a similar project or if it's known to be a shockingly bad idea (due to shrinkage during the curing process) already. Thoughts?" If you've done anything similar (even an experiment that failed), how did you go about it?

272 comments

  1. Conformal Coating by DeathOverlord3 · · Score: 5, Informative

    yeah, it's called conformal coating

    1. Re:Conformal Coating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Conformal coat is generally a thin film applied over the board and components. I get the idea he is talking about something more like 'potting'.

    2. Re:Conformal Coating by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Informative

      Conformal coating is protection against a lot of things, and submersion is not one of them.

      Those of us who work in the electronics industry know that doing CC in-house is a bitch and inspecting an outsourced job is an even bigger bitch, especially when you're dealing with military parts.

    3. Re:Conformal Coating by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

      Right, it's conformal coating. People do that all the time. I've used Fine-L-Kote on boards.

      Boards with connectors or jumpers have problems. If the CPU and RAM are soldered to the board (as they often are in industrial, consumer, mobile, and automotive devices), just mask off the connectors, jumpers, switches, battery contacts, etc. with masking tape and start spraying. Fine-L-Kote is transparent, but glows in UV, so you can use a UV lamp to check if you missed anything. There are much heavier coatings, ones that really encapsulate the board, and those are widely used for automotive, boat, and aircraft applications.

      PC-type motherboards aren't a good choice for this, because of all those connectors. Those are a weak point for corrosion anyway, so protecting the soldered-in components may not be all that useful. But if, say, you're putting something like a single-board PC on your boat, it's quite reasonable.

    4. Re:Conformal Coating by Raistlin77 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except that conformal coating would not be the greatest idea for use with immersion cooling. You would have to coat everything together, including memory modules, pci cards, power connectors, etc..., making them permanently attached and impossible to replace if/when necessary. Since it seems Bat Country's intention for this is so that a non-conductive coolant is not required for immersion, leading me to believe water or some other electrically conductive coolant is to be used, you add the risk that the coolant may enter through small holes and cracks that may develop at the places where the components are connected, immediately bringing everything to a halt.

      For immersion, the only sensible means is to use a non-conductive coolant and not worry about having to protect your hardware from the coolant it will be immersed in. It might be more expensive than just cooling with water, but it will likely be cheaper than having to replace ALL of your hardware that you just fried.

    5. Re:Conformal Coating by effigiate · · Score: 5, Informative
      We conformal coat our circuit boards at my current job and I can assure you that it is not what he's looking for.

      Conformal coating is typically a thin layer of silicone/urethane/acrylic used to keep moisture from getting at the parts on the board. It can not sustain immersion in liquid.

      He's looking for epoxy potting, which we also do occassionly. The trouble with epoxy potting is getting the heat out of the board. You need to leave the thermally conductive parts outside of the potting so that you can remove the heat. The epoxy itself isn't thermally conductive enough to get processor heat out, even on a processor with passive cooling.

      You can do this yourself if you have enough time and epoxy, though I'm not sure how much success you'll have. A failed attempt probably means a board that is no longer useable.

      The very best ones get cured in a vacuum so that all of the air bubbles are pulled out. There are many other types you can use that don't require a vacuum.

    6. Re:Conformal Coating by DeusExMach · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Same industry, and yeah, you're right. Also: with conformal coating you CAN NOT get that stuff on the contacts if you want the components to work correctly. And if you're not sealing up your connection points, you're still going to get a short if you use a non-electrically neutral fluid (like water) to cool your system. You CAN use CC if that really floats your boat, but considering the cost way outweighs the benefit on personal electronics equipment, I don't know why you'd want to...

    7. Re:Conformal Coating by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Conformal coating is protection against a lot of things,

      I think most conformal coatings are not good at heat transfer, which might make coating a PC motherboard problematic.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    8. Re:Conformal Coating by MHz-Man · · Score: 1

      Have you ever used that stuff? It STINKS, and I mean in a way nothing I've smelled before or since has. It had this chemical smell that stayed with me for the rest of the day and ruined my dinner several hours after I was around it.

    9. Re:Conformal Coating by rickb928 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's what he wants to do?

      pfft. Waste of time and hardware. A leak will kill it.

      Use something cool, maybe some old Cray coolant. It's out there.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    10. Re:Conformal Coating by Zadaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wonder where he could readily get a vacuum chamber big enough to pull the air out. Getting the air bubbles out is going to be pretty vital to not baking the mobo, especially the cavities under components.

      The most readily available vacuum pumps are smaller than a full motherboard + components, used either for basic science, paint or latex molding. Maybe call up Tap Plastics or your local university and see if they have a big one you can borrow. Because you're going to need a real one. A vacuum cleaner on a Tupperware box or a concrete vibrator isn't going to get what you need.

      But my main worry is about thermal expansion. When motherboards get hot they don't expand evenly. Locking everything in resin, not mater how thermally stable, will put a lot more physical stress on the components. And you won't be able to do a damn thing about it except chuck it in the bin and start over again. Though this would probably be lessened with a smaller form factor and lower energy components.

    11. Re:Conformal Coating by Ngakaukawa · · Score: 1

      Any decent industrial electric motor shop should have a VPI tank. I think this one is big enough... http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/818736 (10'x10' VPI tank)

      --
      "Strong like bear, smart like rock."
    12. Re:Conformal Coating by hey! · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing: epoxy isn't conductive enough. However, I wonder if it might no be possible to use a thin epoxy like coating and some kind of liquid coolant that could carry heat away from hot spots -- I'm thinking out loud here.

      Of course, my experience is that in a properly cooled PC board, the least reliable components are connectors.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    13. Re:Conformal Coating by veganboyjosh · · Score: 4, Funny

      "a concrete vibrator isn't going to get what you need."

      best slashdot quote ever.

    14. Re:Conformal Coating by Cor-cor · · Score: 5, Informative

      The trouble with epoxy potting is getting the heat out of the board. You need to leave the thermally conductive parts outside of the potting so that you can remove the heat. The epoxy itself isn't thermally conductive enough to get processor heat out, even on a processor with passive cooling.

      Coming from a materials engineering background, this was my first thought about the question. A material which is very thermally conducting while also electrically insulating sounds like a pretty tall order to me. The reason is that one of the primary methods of heat transfer is through transferring excited electrons.

      The two others are phonon transmission through the lattice and radiation. A lot of things which block electrons also block phonon movement (basically heat transfer through vibration) and I'm guessing radiant heat is not going to be sufficient. The one material I do know of which has high thermal conductivity and low electrical conductivity is diamond. It's kind of an oddball, though. I'd be interested to know if there are other, more common materials that would suit this application.

      Then there's also the CTE mismatch issue mentioned later in the thread. Whether you design the specs for the high-heat state while it's in use or the cool state when it's off, the other state is going to put a lot of thermal strain on your circuit board components. I'd imagine you could solve some of these problems, but I doubt you're going to be able to take care of them all.

    15. Re:Conformal Coating by Verdatum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most resins outgas really nasty fumes. Smell-wise, epoxy resin isn't nearly as bad as polyester (aka fiberglass) resin IMHO. Any major resin work should be done outside or in a professionally designed cross-ventilated room. A carbon respirator is also worth its weight in gold. Cancer and Nerological damage are pretty good things to avoid.

    16. Re:Conformal Coating by Limecron · · Score: 3, Informative

      The amount of vacuum needed for most of these kinds of epoxies is pretty minimal (usually a few inches of water).

      Not that this is the recommended method, but we were able to successfully cure epoxy of this nature in a make-shift vacuum chamber. (A plywood box sealed with silicone and a shop-vac.) We even put a clear acrylic window on the front. Of course a real vacuum pump could probably implode our setup, but it was good enough for the epoxy and significantly cheaper than the alternatives.

    17. Re:Conformal Coating by Verdatum · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are alternatives to vacuum degassing for removing airbubbles/pinhole flaws. What is often done is to use pressure instead of vacuum, in a device called a "pressure pot". instead of trying to pull a vacuum on an object the size of a desktop, it is MUCH cheaper to put it in a pressurized chamber. This has the effect of bringing the air bubbles into solution so when the resin has cured the airbubbles are shrunk to a nonexistent size. Usually in molding and casting, you just vacuum degas the mixed resin in a bucket; then carefully pour the mixture and pressurize the mold. I've been considering homebrewing a vacuum chamber for exactly this reason recently, and the quality of pump needed to pull a sufficient vacuum to degas resin is hundreds of dollars more than a compressor sufficient to bring a chamber up to 30 PSI. Granted, in either case, the chamber isn't cheap. Pressure pots are usually made from cast aluminum, but you can get away with using modified pressure cookers or other devices if you are clever (and careful!).

    18. Re:Conformal Coating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polyester is not the same as fiber glass. Polyester is a ductile plastic. Fiber glass is... glass.

    19. Re:Conformal Coating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use an old fridge, window AC or freezer compressor as a vacuum pump in a pinch. You won't get a vacuum under 10000 micron but it's better than nothing. An HVAC pump is about 300$ and can do 10 micron.

    20. Re:Conformal Coating by Amouth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but epoxy isn't a good thermal conductor.. so even if your layer is only .001mm thick it is still an insulator between he heat source and the coolant..

      infact epoxy makes a very good insulator - there for the heat would not go through it at all (to any reasonable measure) until it has blead out through the rest of the board.

      what you would need to do is take your heat sources and place passive heat sinks connected via thearmal conductive glue - then epoxy the rest of the board leaving the heat sinks exposed for the coolent to move heat from

      only issue is you need to seal the epoxy edge and the heat sink edge - that isn't going to be easy as the epoxy isn't going to expand or contract nearly as much as the heatsink is.

      sealing something for full emersion into a conductive fluid and having it work .. is no simple matter

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    21. Re:Conformal Coating by travbrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Another option of course would be to just buy faster hardware in the first place (it sounds like this is for a single PC/mobo), which should be cheaper and easier than immersion. If you already have the fastest hardware available and have a lot of money to blow, then go for it. I'm just not sure it's worth the time/cost/effort to encode videos at 200FPS instead of 180FPS, or get a few more points in 3dmark. Don't get me wrong immersion is pretty cool, but it's just not that practical most of the time.

    22. Re:Conformal Coating by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      I'm glad you know that. However, polyester resin is popularly used WITH fiberglass, so some companies call it "fiberglass resin".

    23. Re:Conformal Coating by johannesg · · Score: 1

      I wonder where he could readily get a vacuum chamber big enough to pull the air out.

      We have a 2300m3 one at work ;-)

    24. Re:Conformal Coating by Artraze · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm surprised someone with a materials engineering background hasn't heard of it, but Beryllium Oxide would be the other big thermal conductor/electrical insulator. It's a little more popular than diamond since you can actually sinter it into large objects. However, like most beryllium based things it is rather pricey.

      I think the OP's best bet is to coat the mobo with a CVD diamond film and hope that the liquid cooling keeps the temperature down low enough the film doesn't crack.

    25. Re:Conformal Coating by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      So why not run pipes all round the motherboard, seal the whole thing up with rubber gaskets where the pipes exit, and then run coolant in through the pipes and keep the heatsinks completely external?

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    26. Re:Conformal Coating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pure water is electrically neutral.

    27. Re:Conformal Coating by nikolag · · Score: 1

      I don't think that is what he ment.

      My friends digged some web page with images of wireless router, made from standard PC, dipped in 5-6 liters of common vegetable oil. They wanted cooling and protection from moisture. I think it was in Spain.

      Oil provided cooling and system worked, so he said to me, but I never tried it myself. I guess that oil will need to be changed every year or two?

      On the other hand, I know a man that worked on potting elcetronical circuits before installing then in enviroment where anything could happen - vibration up to 9G's, rain, snow, ice, You name it. It was very expensive resin, and we coul not get it easily, but than again that was 15 years ago when he worked on missle guidance systems.

      I am not much of help, am I?

      --
      Doing a good job is like spilling coffee on a dark suit, you feel warm all over, but nobody notices.
    28. Re:Conformal Coating by rot26 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just be careful pressurizing ANYTHING you made yourself.

      30 PSI is enough to kill several bystanders.

      --



      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    29. Re:Conformal Coating by zach_d · · Score: 2, Informative

      and pretty much non-existent in nature.

    30. Re:Conformal Coating by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Thank you for mentioning that, I couldn't agree more. As I understand it, the early days of pressure cookers caused many fatalities.

      Also a note to anyone interested that for pressurizing larger items, one usually uses an autoclave, which can be found as large as a schoolbus to pressure cure things like fiberglass boat hulls.

    31. Re:Conformal Coating by Amouth · · Score: 1

      the heatsinks i am talking about would be the block you would use to transfer heat from the IC to the coolant.. piping arround the coolant is pointless as we are talking about full submersion here

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    32. Re:Conformal Coating by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Chances are they have, and avoid it for a good reason. The problem is even small traces of it can cause Berylliosis which is really a bad thing to get and can end up with a slow painful death in the end.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    33. Re:Conformal Coating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creating a large enough vacuum chamber is trivial and inexpensive.
      I built one a while back using a cylinder of large diameter PVC pipe and two thick sheets of plexi glass. Seal with regular silicone and drill a connector hole for the pump into the PVC wall, thread and seal.
      Costs a few â and takes less than an hour even with household tools.

      The quality of the vacuum pump will be the limiting factor of how high vacuum you can get, within reason.

      Don't forget to run the mechanical deformation numbers through your calculator if you skimp on material thickness.

  2. Correct me if I'm wrong... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1, Funny

    But won't the fans stop turning and cause it to melt down?

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you use immersion, why do you need fans?

    2. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong... by tmosley · · Score: 1

      You only need fans when the board is exposed to air. This is for immersion in a liquid of some sort. If I'm not mistaken, you can actually take a regular motherboard and submerge it in oil with no other preparation as a super heatsink without damaging it.

      A handy side effect is that you can use it to fry up some food right in your case without even having to get off of your fat ass and go into the kitchen.

    3. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong... by Now.Imperfect · · Score: 1

      without any sort of fluid movement the board still heats up really fast. I recommend either putting pumps in it or placing some fans in it to move the fluid around, even better if you can force the fluid through a radiator.

    4. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong... by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

      I think the fan comment was an attempt humor (successfully to me)
      Maybe the responders are trying to be funny too, but mostly they
      just seem kinda clueless.

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
    5. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      without any sort of fluid movement the board still heats up really fast. I recommend either putting pumps in it or placing some fans in it to move the fluid around, even better if you can force the fluid through a radiator.

      Hot water is less dense than cold water so it should rise, while cold liquid falls to take its place... and so some sort of natural cycle should take place shouldn't it?

      As long as you are using a liquid where heating it makes it less dense this should work.

      Granted that pumping it etc would keep it even cooler, but if it can be kept cool enough without it, not having to pump it would make it completely silent.

    6. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong... by Drakonik · · Score: 1

      True, but if the components heat the oil faster than it can cool off, then you'll eventually end up with a fryer.

      Trying piping the oil through a radiator system buried a few feet under the ground. Earth is the biggest radiator imaginable.

    7. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong... by PsychoElf · · Score: 1

      To make it swim like a fish!

    8. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong... by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Actually you can generalise "As long as you are using a liquid where heating it makes it less dense this should work." to "As long as you are using a luquid that changes its density linearlly when heating".

      If it decreases in density you put the item being cooled at the bottom and if it increases then you put it at the top.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    9. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong... by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

      by "radiator" you mean heat sink

      I read about someone cooling a computer via such a system, but I am currently full of fail trying to find it on google.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  3. Cray blood by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Probably a lot easier to source yourself a few liters of Cray blood (or some similar non-conductive coolant) to submerge the board in instead.

    Cheers,

    1. Re:Cray blood by COMON$ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ya I had a friend do this with a web server, for kicks of course, the sucker ran fantastic. Was some kind of nonconductive fluid he got on the cheap. Only trick was he had to separate the CD-ROM and hard drive but other than that it ran for a long time, fans and all.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    2. Re:Cray blood by SoapBox17 · · Score: 1

      You're probably thinking of fluorent, which is an inert (doesn't conduct electricity) liquid used for a variety of tasks. That'd be a good idea except:
      1) That stuff is usually really expensive, which wouldn't be so bad except...
      2) The stuff evaporates really fast, and
      3) If you get any dirt/etc in it then you will need to filter it or completely replace it.

    3. Re:Cray blood by gardyloo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      2) The stuff evaporates really fast

      Some does, some doesn't. I've worked with the HFE-7500 stuff, which DOES evaporate really fast (much, much faster than water) -- as a result, you can also smell it a little bit, which can be annoying after a while. It also has a pretty low viscosity, which means that it tends to leak through any seals.
            On the other hand, the FC-73 stuff (which I've also worked with, though not as much) doesn't evaporate NEARLY so fast as water, and is more viscous, so it doesn't leak very quickly. It also doesn't attack silicone seals nearly so much as the HFE. For home hobby stuff, I'd recommend FC-73 over HFE.

    4. Re:Cray blood by hitmark · · Score: 1

      thats what one have esata, firewire and usb for.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    5. Re:Cray blood by adolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Either you're new here, or you've misspelt "ethernet."

    6. Re:Cray blood by ChronoReverse · · Score: 0

      eSATA stands for External SATA and is indeed a competitor to Firewire and USB for external hard drives. The current specification doesn't include a source of power though so eSATA is only good for speed. The next revision is supposed to have power too.

    7. Re:Cray blood by Prune · · Score: 3, Informative

      FC-77 is intended for computer use, not FC-73 (my friend's father works at 3M)

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    8. Re:Cray blood by hitmark · · Score: 1

      well thats also a option, but one i would usually consider for more elaborate and distanced setups.

      as in, you usually need two working computers for a ethernet based storage system to work.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    9. Re:Cray blood by ragethehotey · · Score: 1

      Probably a lot easier to source yourself a few liters of Cray blood (or some similar non-conductive coolant) to submerge the board in instead.

      Cheers,

      A Google image search brought up nothing for cray blood, could you provide a link?

    10. Re:Cray blood by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      I have seen PCI(e) eSATA boards that have a round power out port right next to the eSATA port.

      --
      Good-bye
    11. Re:Cray blood by Surt · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    12. Re:Cray blood by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      It's pronounced cooking oil. Add some red food dye if you want Pimp.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    13. Re:Cray blood by v1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      didn't someone put up an article awhile ago here on Fluorinert?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    14. Re:Cray blood by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      FC77 and 73 also are longterm environmental hazards and attack the ozone layer. Which is why the HFE family was invented. Like most things of this ilk, the older stuff is better for the task (R12 Vs 134a anyone?)

      I use FC77 and HFE7100 as thermal transfer fluids for ultra-cold applications (-60C and lower) in semiconductor testing. Wicked cool stuff.

      IF you do manage to buy/acquire enough HFE7x00 remember it eats plasticizers for lunch (gloves are almost useless, better just to be careful).
      As such I strongly recommend glass enclosures with as few seams as possible (bend two horseshoes of glass fit them together very tightly then seal with a torch). Obviously a hole for the MB to slide in would be helpful. A tight fitting lid will help to reduce evaporation.

      In our professionally built system, a Temptronic Atlas series chiller and thermochuck (http://www.temptronic.com/Products/ThermoChuck_Overview.htm) we lost about a pint a month of HFE7100 under heavy load.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    15. Re:Cray blood by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      According to the MSDS for FC-73, it is NOT a threat in any way to the ozone layer. However, it *is* a long-term greenhouse gas.

    16. Re:Cray blood by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      really?
      my bad then.
      my experience is with FC-77, which as a perflourocarbon should be a ozone eater...
      I (wrongly) lumped 73 in with it.
      Off to do some research to ensure I didn't just lie ;-)

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    17. Re:Cray blood by Surt · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, I referred you to 'cray cooling fluid' but 'cray blood' google image search actually does return the right thing, and on the first page of results no less.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    18. Re:Cray blood by networkBoy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Looks like I should read my MSDS more often...
      FC-77:

      ATMOSPHERIC FATE:
      Perfluoro compounds (PFCs) are photochemically stable and expected to persist in the atmosphere for more than 1000 years. PFCs
      have high global warming potentials (GWP), exceeding 5000 (100-yr-ITH). The Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP) is Zero.

      HFE-7100:

      ATMOSPHERIC FATE: Zero Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP). Atmospheric Lifetime: approximately 4.1 yrs. Global Warming
      Potential (GWP): 280 (100 year ITH, IPCC1995 method). Global Warming Potential (GWP): 320 (100 yr ITH, IPCC2001 method).
      Atmospheric degradation products are expected to include: for methyl nonafluoroisobutyl ether: predominantly isoperfluorobutyric
      acid, CO2, HF, and perhaps also CF3COOH; for methyl nonafluorobutyl ether: n-perfluorobutyric acid, CO2, and HF.

      The HFE was developed to address the environmental persistence of FC by photo-decomposition. The byproducts, however, still look to be a BadThing(tm)

      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    19. Re:Cray blood by woolio · · Score: 1

      Some does, some doesn't. I've worked with the HFE-7500 stuff, which DOES evaporate really fast (much, much faster than water) -- as a result, you can also smell it a little bit,

      I'd suggest you probably don't want to be *breathing* that stuff...

    20. Re:Cray blood by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      But, but... It's so scrumptiou--- ooh! shiny!

    21. Re:Cray blood by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Whats the point of eSATA when USB 3.0 is out. FIrewire, OK, I undrestand but eSATA?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    22. Re:Cray blood by silicone_chemist · · Score: 1

      Couldn't you just use a silicone fluid like Dow Corning 200 Fluid? It's available in a wide range of viscosities to suit your pumping, flow, and evaporation requirements. We use it as a medium for Dk and Df testing on microwave lamiantes. http://www.dowcorning.com/applications/search/products/?Ntt=200&N=0&Ntx=mode+matchany&WT.svl=3&Nty=1&Ntk=ProductFinder_en

    23. Re:Cray blood by adolf · · Score: 1

      This is 2008. -Everything-, from my cable TV box to my iPod to my 1TB drive has Ethernet, in one form or another, although I'd be hesitant to call any of them "computers.". You can even boot over it.

      *shrug*

      Besides, you're ruining a perfectly good joke with all that seriousness.

  4. Not sure by linxdev · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The issue I see is with immersion. Sure you can coat the MB but what about the USB, VGA, etc connectors? Can you guarantee water will not leak in. Water has a way of getting inside any way it possibly can. Coating may be beneficial when you do not intend to put in case. Maybe to protect the MB as a bench system.

    1. Re:Not sure by MozeeToby · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's why you don't use water, you use something non-conductive. Mineral oil is a relatively cheap and widely available option (just go to your vet and ask for a few gallons of horse laxative) if you don't want to spend the money on commercial grade cooling fluid.

    2. Re:Not sure by Lurker2288 · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...or just go buy mineral oil and spare yourself some strange looks at the vet's office.

    3. Re:Not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You: Hello Doctor! 5 gallons of your finest horse laxative please!

      Vet: Oh, got a sick horse then? Are you it needs a laxative?

      You: No, it's for me, eh I mean, it's for my computer!

      Vet: Ah, the computer! I see. Say no more. *wink wink*

    4. Re:Not sure by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      Now what would be the fun in that?

    5. Re:Not sure by Anti_Climax · · Score: 3, Informative

      From my experience with submersion cooling in mineral oil, if your connectors are submerged they will wick oil up the interior through capillary action. If you build a system similar to that made by Puget Systems it probably won't be a problem, provided you leave some head space at the top of the case. When I built a system similar to theirs I made a short socket extension for the power cord so it didn't have to go under the fluid. everything else was able to stay above the surface of the oil.

      If you submerge your video cards and intend to use the fans as impellers, make sure they can start turning against the resistance of the fluid. All my fans worked when submerged except the video cards.

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    6. Re:Not sure by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      I've seen mineral oil used. In the summer of 94' I went to The Icon Byte Bar and Grill in the SOMA area of SF and they TVs and a computer submerged in mineral oil with the covers taken off sitting in fish tanks. It looked cool and they seemed to work just fine.

      P.S. It was also the first internet cafe I went to, they had a "blazing fast" 14.4 SLIP line and I thought this silly black on grey World Wide Web was a waste of time compared to Gopher.

    7. Re:Not sure by Anti_Climax · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is important to keep in mind that light mineral oil like that, while not as bad as other choices, will leech plasticizers out of insulators. The power supply wiring on my machine very quickly became stiff and brittle and it dissolved the soft rubber that was holding the fan assembly to the processor's heat sink. Not sure if it will have any long term effect on the plugs of the electrolytic caps on the board but I wouldn't be surprised.

      If you can afford to split the difference between mineral oil and florinert (perfluorocarbon), you might consider a low viscosity silicon oil. That should bu much nicer to natural rubber compounds and plastic insulators.

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    8. Re:Not sure by itwasgreektome · · Score: 1

      Water is an extremely poor conductor (ultra pure water is basically non conductive). Everyone forgets that. I've been on the wrong side of the argument before. Technically, if the board didn't release anything into pure water (dust and whatnot), it would remain non-conductive.

    9. Re:Not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The parent's example sounds best when envisioned as an exchange between Radar and Colonel Potter.

      Really. It almost sounds like something out of the show.

    10. Re:Not sure by maxume · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ultra pure water is also a pretty good solvent (which is probably where the problems start to begin).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:Not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water is also an extreamly good solvent. Good luck getting a board that won't have anything water soluble in it.

    12. Re:Not sure by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Vet related too (I do the IT for a group of clinics) but not that relevant:

      Customer: "Are gherkin (pickle) slices bad for dogs?"

      Receptionist: "I'm not sure - I'll ask the vet...well, the vet says in small quantities they should not be harmful...has your dog swallowed one?"

      Customer: "Oh, no, we just wondered whether we should remove it when we buy our dog a burger at the drive-thru"

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    13. Re:Not sure by Anti_Climax · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thought about this a little more and I think I should put this into perspective a little bit.

      The first machine I submerged was done in a plastic tub and covered with 5 gallons of Tractor Oil (no, really) that I bought at the wal-mart for $20. It smelled, it was fairly viscous and it definitely leeched plasticizers and crawled up the interior of cables. I ended up with a small puddle of oil under my optical mouse. Wireless worked okay through it though. I tried submerging hard drives after covering the breather holes - I figured if I was keeping them in a fairly narrow temp range they shouldn't need to equalize. Unfortunately none were sealed sufficiently and all eventually died, though one did make it a month before it flooded.

      The next machine was a recreation of the Puget Systems submerged machine. I went with light mineral oil from the local feed and tack store but was seriously considering silicon oil in it's place. Light mineral oil was going for about $17 a gallon, was less viscous than the first oil I used, didn't stink and hasn't effected the components as quickly. I can't find it now but I recall silicon oil being somewhere around $100 a gallon. If I had the money to spare I would have gone that route. Looking online the best price I can find for appropriate Fluorinert is around $1,000 a gallon.

      So for 5 gallons of submerged cooling you're looking at $20-$5,000. When you consider the effect it'll have on components, it's probably worth it to use the $500 fill of silicon oil over the $100 fill of mineral oil.

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    14. Re:Not sure by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 0

      Hey, as long as you aren't the kind of person to feed your dog a merkin.

    15. Re:Not sure by geoskd · · Score: 1

      It is important to keep in mind that light mineral oil like that, while not as bad as other choices, will leech plasticizers out of insulators. The power supply wiring on my machine very quickly became stiff and brittle and it dissolved the soft rubber that was holding the fan assembly to the processor's heat sink. Not sure if it will have any long term effect on the plugs of the electrolytic caps on the board but I wouldn't be surprised.

      Actually, Mineral oil didn't seem to do any real damage to my rig, even after two years in the tank. I'm guessing that even if the Mineral oil does leech into the caps, that its electrical properties are close enough to the designed insulator that it doesn't matter. My biggest problem was the tank I had it in was four pieces of glass connected by silicone seal at the edges... Took two years for one sides to fall off, and the others weren't far behind.

      -=Geoskd

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    16. Re:Not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      leached

    17. Re:Not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you don't use water, you use something non-conductive. Mineral oil is a relatively cheap and widely available option (just go to your vet and ask for a few gallons of horse laxative) if you don't want to spend the money on commercial grade cooling fluid.

      Good idea. Now if we can just get somebody to fill the ocean with horse laxative, instead of all that salt water that is there now. He's asking about how to toughen up a computer for a marine environment. And if he's not, he should be! How do you toughen up a computer so that it can survive a marine environment? Salt water, salty air, poor ventilation, shock and vibration? I bet you need a special boat computer!

    18. Re:Not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that even if the Mineral oil does leech into the caps, that its electrical properties are close enough to the designed insulator that it doesn't matter.

      Electrolytic capacitors contain an electrolyte. Mineral oil is a dielectric. Those are very different properties. There are capacitors that use dielectrics. They used to use PBCs, but now use ultra pure mineral oil. However, these are use in high voltage systems and I've never seen one on a motherboard. Actually, I've never seen such a cap outside of high power RF systems.

    19. Re:Not sure by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      I wonder about that. Sure silicone oil is a lovely nonelectroconductive fluid (though it also evaporates). My concern is that silicone oil weakens or dissolves any silicone rubber present on the board. I know most components are insulated with PVC, but is anyone certain there are no critical silicone components on a MB?

    20. Re:Not sure by shaitand · · Score: 1

      'How do you toughen up a computer so that it can survive a marine environment?'

      You submerge the components in something waterproof, something that can be used to conduct heat, something that will equalize shock and vibration... oh wait, how about mineral oil?

    21. Re:Not sure by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

      I can't say I'm certain there are no critical silicone components, but I can say with fair certainty there are critical rubber and plastic ones. Of course, for all I know the plugs in the electrolytic caps *are* silicone rubber.

      I'm sure a manufacturer will start a line of boards specifically for mineral oil submersion, with epoxy over the rubber end of caps and such.

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
    22. Re:Not sure by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      How about a pipe to the outside for the drive breather hole?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    23. Re:Not sure by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ok, now I imagined a school of hard drives swimming in a tank, all huffing oxygen through a straw :D

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    24. Re:Not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the guy at the feed store gave me a funny look when I bought a gallon of mineral oil to submerge two kilos of Sodium metal in. I had to ask to make sure it was 100% mineral oil... NO water...

    25. Re:Not sure by Anti_Climax · · Score: 1

      The breather hole description was a bit misleading I apologize. Frankly, the drives I tried had no real breather holes to speak of. The first was a quantum fireball that had a foam rubber type gasket around the lid. It became apparent quickly that oil was seeping through and it died within the day.

      The next was a Maxtor white label that seemed to have a resin seal around the cap and no breather opening to be found elsewhere. I even pulled the controller board off to make sure it wasn't hidden under there. That's the one that lasted a month. Turns out it had an air channel under a brushed aluminum looking decal that blended perfectly with the body of the drive. The oil ate the adhesive and it allowed the oil in there.

      My last attempt was when I first commissioned the pugetsystems type fish tank rig. I took my seagate 300GB drives, pulled the boards off and traced with superglue around the edges of all the sealer decals on the body - there were something like 8 to 12 on each drive. You'll usually see something similar on the side of drives next to the platter, probably used for calibration of the heads after assembly. They were under the board as well. Those made it a day or 2.

      If I try it again, I'm going to put epoxy over all of them and around the cap to be safe. It's not really a question of letting it breathe, it's keeping that damned oil out ;)

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  5. A Bad Thing (tm) by oni · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wouldn't that conduct the heat from the CPU over to the other components?

    1. Re:A Bad Thing (tm) by tmosley · · Score: 1

      A little bit. Most of the heat would spread out into the water or oil through the resin and get conducted away like that.

      Theoretically.

    2. Re:A Bad Thing (tm) by Trogre · · Score: 1

      yes, and that's kind of the point.

      We need to remove heat from objects such as GPUs, CPUs and RAM chips that both produce large quantities of and are sensitive to heat. Since us humans haven't yet worked out a way to destroy heat, we need to move it somewhere else. Traditionally we've used large heatsinks to create a bit of thermal inertia and radiant area, and fans to transfer heat to the surrounding air. Problem is, air doesn't have a great deal of heat capacity and radiant heat transfer is too slow. Conduction to other solids (or liquids) are extremely good ways of spreading thermal energy - it's spread across the entire surface of the circuit and, usually to a much greater extent, the conductive medium.

      So while heat is being transferred from that powerhouse GeForce8800GTX++ and spread evenly across all your precious components, the temperature of your 5V voltage regulator probably isn't going to go up. You may even find the thermal gradient goes the other way.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  6. Technical Term by aero6dof · · Score: 4, Informative

    The technical term you're looking for is Potting.

    1. Re:Technical Term by electricbern · · Score: 3, Funny

      How will smoking marijuana help him?

      --
      alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls /dev > il && tail daemon.log'
    2. Re:Technical Term by oldspewey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Smoking marijuana helps everything

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    3. Re:Technical Term by Khyber · · Score: 0

      It helps everything?

      Tell that to a person suffering from pneumonia. The LAST thing you want to do is give them something to smoke.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Technical Term by Facegarden · · Score: 3, Informative

      Then give him brownies!
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    5. Re:Technical Term by ReverendLoki · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, that's what the brownies are for...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    6. Re:Technical Term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      3: Insightful

      Really, is this what we've degraded to? Hurr hurr.

    7. Re:Technical Term by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he will go and watch Buffy instead of dipping his motherboard in polyurethane.

    8. Re:Technical Term by Smoke2Joints · · Score: 1

      do i even need to comment on this?

    9. Re:Technical Term by dafrazzman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Insightful, not funny? I think this is slashdot (the community) indirectly declaring their political views.

      --
      My preferred name is frazz, but someone keeps taking it. If you see him, tell him I said hi.
    10. Re:Technical Term by chubs730 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's slightly depressing when opinions on drug use are political views.

    11. Re:Technical Term by chubs730 · · Score: 1
    12. Re:Technical Term by oldspewey · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think it's slightly depressing

      Some marijuana ought to cheer you right up!

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    13. Re:Technical Term by Khyber · · Score: 1

      How does giving a person brownies HELP WITH PNEUMONIA? Last I checked THC wasn't something to rid your lungs of fluid.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re:Technical Term by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Vaporizers produce water vapor, not something a person with pneumonia should inhale.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    15. Re:Technical Term by chubs730 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should have clicked the link I supplied. In this case it would be dry vapor composed of thc, which is a bronchiodilator (sp?), and would allow for easier breathing.

    16. Re:Technical Term by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Not one single vaporizer on the market removes water vapor from the smoke. Before THC even reaches it's vaporizing point H2O has already begun evaporating from your material to be vaporized.

      But hey, I'm a medical marijuana patient that according to you knows NOTHING about the medicine I use, and it's many forms of consumption, nor do I know the basics of the states of matter when going from liquid to a gas. As if I haven't discussed these matters with my doctor before.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    17. Re:Technical Term by chubs730 · · Score: 1

      Never did I suggest that you know NOTHING about marijuana or vaporizers. I did assume that you were confused as to which type of vaporizer I was referring to, since there are several made solely for the purpose of producing water vapor (humidifiers). That is why I suggested reading the link.
      While you are correct that no vaporizer removes water vapor, it is very possible (and common practice around here) to remove it yourself prior to vaporizing. Yes, it is difficult to remove 100 percent of the water vapor but if necessary you can remove enough so that the remainder is negligible.

    18. Re:Technical Term by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The remainder is never negligible when dealing with pneumonia. I've had it many times, from varying causes like concrete dust inhalation (silicosis,) to nasty molds from living in an old and unkempt house. When I asked the doctor about smoking or vaporizing, I was told in no uncertain terms to not use a vaporizer, and to avoid adding ANY extra fluid to my lungs, and that smoking was dumb.

      While the above mentioned brownies might help with a symptom of pain and discomfort, it does not help the actual condition itself - that's the point I was trying to make.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  7. SUN used to do it. by UseTheSource · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When they offered the SUN Crypto Accelerator cards for offloading SSL computations, almost the entire PCI card was coated in resin to prevent tampering. I don't think they're still available for purchase from SUN but I'm sure we've still got a few in storage at work somewhere.

    --
    "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Führer." -Adolf Hitler
    "We are one Nation, we are one People." -The One 'leader'
    1. Re:SUN used to do it. by ntcleric · · Score: 1

      I've seen several types of circuit boards similarly lathed in a resinous substance on later model cars. The substance was hard enough to prevent any real tampering of the board without potentially damaging the entire component. I hadn't considered at the time that this was a thermal insulation method, but these boards (being under the hood of a vehicle) would be exposed to higher temperatures than the typical desktop or laptop system.

    2. Re:SUN used to do it. by Asmor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I saw a documentary on card cheating devices, and one of the early card-counting computers was dipped in something to prevent people from backwards engineering it. It included a failsafe, as well, a thin filament wire designed to be pulled off if the stuff protecting the computer was scraped away, and without that wire in place it would malfunction.

    3. Re:SUN used to do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      When they offered the SUN Crypto Accelerator cards for offloading SSL computations, almost the entire PCI card was coated in resin to prevent tampering. I don't think they're still available for purchase from SUN but I'm sure we've still got a few in storage at work somewhere.

      nCipher does the same with their cards. The coating was an epoxy. The thought was that you would not be able to remove the epoxy without destroying the chips, there for removing any ability to pull keys off the card.

    4. Re:SUN used to do it. by noidentity · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Someone guy unpotted a Votrax module and refurbished the damaged components so that it still worked afterwards and he could reverse-engineer it. It's interesting and has lots of pictures of before and after. The thing starts out as a a big block of epoxy and ends up a normal-looking circuit board.

    5. Re:SUN used to do it. by Puzzleer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to work for a company that makes cards like this (high security tamper resistant encryption cards).

      While it is true that you can encase a card in resin (as a previous poster mentioned, it's called potting), you have to take into consideration the thermal profile of the components on the board. You can't just do it to any old card, and in our case it actually affected which embedded processor we went with.

    6. Re:SUN used to do it. by juiceboxfan · · Score: 1

      Someone guy unpotted a Votrax module and refurbished the damaged components so that it still worked afterwards and he could reverse-engineer it. It's interesting and has lots of pictures of before and after. The thing starts out as a a big block of epoxy and ends up a normal-looking circuit board.

      That is pretty cool but I suspect it would be a bit more difficult to do this with technology that is less than 25 years old (note the 1982(?) copyright under the logo).

      Today the "chips" will probably be bare dies glued to the PCB with very delicate bond wires connecting everything together. Not very conducive to being exposed by a heat gun;-)

    7. Re:SUN used to do it. by shippo · · Score: 1

      I had to install several of these types of cards a few years back. Each one had a liquid crystal thermometer attached, as they had a tendency to get very hot. If they were fitted in a chassis with inadequate ventilation they could exceed the maximum operating temperature, so the thermometer was a must.

      In this case the resin covered both sides of the PCB, encasing everything bar the ports and switches on the blanking plate.

    8. Re:SUN used to do it. by Abreu · · Score: 1

      I remember there used to be a brand of guitar amplifiers (one of the smaller, handmade-type shops) that used to cover their "secred ingredients" in huge blobs of silicone rubber.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  8. Oil PC going for $140 a barrel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tomshardware had a computer in a fishtank full of mineral oil a bit ago. Works well but what a mess.

    http://www.pugetsystems.com/submerged.php

    1. Re:Oil PC going for $140 a barrel by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      Tomshardware had a computer in a fishtank full of mineral oil a bit ago. Works well but what a mess.

      You're supposed to take the fish out of the tank first.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  9. Something similar is done... by jamieswith · · Score: 1

    ...with electronics sometimes using a type of Epoxy... sometimes it's just to protect the circuit physically, but I've also seen it done (with a high temp resin and a black pigment) when distributing early samples of products-in-development in order to help protect the circuit from prying eyes... in order to make it a little less trivial to copy etc...

    I've not known it done for the purposes of heat disspation though, I'm not sure how-efficient of a thermal conductor a non-electricly conductive solid resin would be...

  10. I've done it. by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Funny

    This sounds almost exactly like something I did back in nineteen dickety two. We had to say "dickety" because the Kaiser had stolen our word for "twenty." I chased that rascal to get it back, but gave up after dickety-six miles.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:I've done it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Grandpa Simpson, the 1990s wants its joke back.

    2. Re:I've done it. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had an onion on my belt, which was the the style at the time.

              Brett

    3. Re:I've done it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a really well-timed comment. I'm going down the article reading with interest about tamper-resistant encryption hardware, and I innocently begin reading that line.

  11. Check out mineral oil submerged systems.... by teambpsi · · Score: 1

    Do a google search on it, or check out the funky aquarium at:

    http://www.pugetsystems.com/submerged.php

    --

    Old age and treachery almost always overcome youth and skill.
  12. Apollo Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA did something like this for the computers on the Apollo missions.

  13. Extensibility might be tough. by lottameez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd imagine you'd want to sort out your future memory or disk capacity needs before dipping.

    --
    Yeah? Well I think you're overrated too.
    1. Re:Extensibility might be tough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      640k should be enought for everyone

  14. Look into Fluorinert by grimsnaggle · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorinert

    It is electrically insulating and is commonly used for cooling electronics (think Cray supercomputers).

    Part of the problem with conformal coat is that it makes it hard to service the electronics after it is cured. It also may or may not be uniformly distributed and thus may not pass muster in a tank of conductive liquid.

    There are conductive epoxies like Stycast, but they're not particularly good conductors. The only reason to do immersion cooling is for good thermal contact to all components. A thick epoxy layer between your components and your liquid will quickly destroy that advantage.

    Also, if you have connectors to the circuit board (like PCI connectors), then you cannot fill the pins. Last time I checked, most PCI connectors are just slots and have no bottom fill. Water will certainly get in under the coating through the slot.

    1. Re:Look into Fluorinert by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      Mineral oil works just as well and isn't so expensive.

      It will "creep" up cables though.

      Also, if you take all the standard fans and immerse them in oil, the current draw goes through the roof and may burn out the motors.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    2. Re:Look into Fluorinert by ulash · · Score: 1

      Mineral Oil, i believe, is more likely to corrode components and does not have one important thing Fluorinert has going for it: Flourinert will evaporate. Of course as mentioned before it is VERY expensive.

      For those who missed the discussion on this, check out the earlier thread from August 27th.

    3. Re:Look into Fluorinert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorinert [wikipedia.org]

      It is electrically insulating and is commonly used for cooling electronics (think Cray supercomputers).

      Cray, yes... but for what it costs it'd probably be cheaper to go with no cooling and replace parts as they fail than to get the gallons required to submerge an MB/Video combo.

      It may approach a viable solution for a water replacement in a water cooling system, but it's too expensive for the submersion approach.

    4. Re:Look into Fluorinert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fluorinert FC-40 is on the order of $2 USD per milliliter. You'd probably spend $2,000 - $4,000 just on coolant...

    5. Re:Look into Fluorinert by treat · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorinert

      It is electrically insulating and is commonly used for cooling electronics (think Cray supercomputers).

      It is commonly used for cooling Cray systems? I can't find a model made since the 80s that uses Fluorinert. The Cray systems mentioned on their website are all air or water cooled.

    6. Re:Look into Fluorinert by grimsnaggle · · Score: 1

      Cray has since moved on from the stuff for their middle range computers, but their iconic old big cylinder super computers were completely chock full of the stuff. I found something from 2002 that indicates they still use it in their highest end equipment: http://www.cray.com/downloads/crayx1_dhbrown.pdf

      It's also used at SLAC for cooling electronics: http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/bfactory-decom/Talks/Wisniewski2.pdf

      Looks like it's also used to cool industrial equipment that can't be exposed to reactive chemicals, like wafer ion implantation systems: http://multimedia.mmm.com/mws/mediawebserver.dyn?6666660Zjcf6lVs6EVs666YNqCOrrrrQ-

  15. Old skool by srealm · · Score: 0

    Hrm, RESIN! what an idea!

    I tried coating my motherboard in the coolant H2O a few years back, did not improve my motherboard's temperature one bit ... nor the performance for that matter.

    1. Re:Old skool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always try vegetable oil http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/strip-fans,1203-4.html

  16. iPod in resin by RomulusNR · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  17. No that's different by pavon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Potting is used to keep the components from moving (usually in high-G environments. Sometimes you use it to keep close conductors from shorting (like solder-cup connector), but again the risk there is mostly movement of the conductors, not the environment. Potting materials usually do not have good thermal dissipation properties, and aren't really the best thing for environmental protection (humidity, liquid immersion etc) either. Conformal coating is what you want for the latter.

    1. Re:No that's different by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      You need to read the link first. It includes the exclusion of moisture and corrosives.
      From what I'm seeing, though, thermal conduction is his big problem. You can get everything but that easily enough. In fact, the GP's link mentions silicone, which would be quite effective in a thin layer (say 0.5 to 1 cm), which would have very few issues with thermal expansion, but you'd have to expose thermal transfer points (heat sinks, etc.). And if your coating doesn't stick exceptionally well to your heat sinks, you'll get seepage, which will still ruin your system.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  18. You should see the IBM version by sirwired · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The IBM crypto processors had the module containing the key wrapped in wires (which, if broken, or changed in length, would erase the key) and internal to the module were thermal and x-ray sensors to prevent sniffing the contents of the module that way.

    SirWired

    1. Re:You should see the IBM version by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      i'm not that knowledgeable when it comes to hardware/electronics, but do you happen to know why they would need thermal and x-ray sensors for security--or how the contents of a microchip can be sniffed without firmware access?

      i mean, i'm sure it's possible to do. but i'm just curious about the process and how difficult it would be. and is this how things like the Playstation or Xbox are hacked?

    2. Re:You should see the IBM version by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      i'm not that knowledgeable when it comes to hardware/electronics, but do you happen to know why they would need thermal and x-ray sensors for security--or how the contents of a microchip can be sniffed without firmware access?

      my guess: it sounds plausible and they can do considerable mark-up on it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:You should see the IBM version by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      IANAHCA - I am not a hardware crypto-analyst.

      If you don't know what is inside the chip, but you have some idea of what it does, and you can give it a known input, and read the output, then by monitoring changes in the chip, somehow, like thermally, using radio frequency, or inductance, etc.. you can implement what is called a side-channel attack.

      Basically, using probabilistic analysis you can determine what the chip does. For instance, if you have a CPU you could figure out how to recognize add instructions vs. multiply instructions, and then monitor it when you process your cryptographic key, and then figure out what the secret algorithm is.

      X-rays, might enable you to directly look at the pattern of diodes on the chip to to figure out its function.

      Ways to prevent a side channel attack include introducing random delays in your code so that each time your secret code runs, it looks different, and can't be statistically analyzed. Other technologies such as clockless microcontrollers, which have yet to make it to market, would help prevent side channel attacks because of their very low RF emissions.

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    4. Re:You should see the IBM version by swillden · · Score: 1

      i'm not that knowledgeable when it comes to hardware/electronics, but do you happen to know why they would need thermal and x-ray sensors for security--or how the contents of a microchip can be sniffed without firmware access?

      my guess: it sounds plausible and they can do considerable mark-up on it.

      Bad guess, since the IBM cards are some of the cheapest on the market. When introduced they were about $2K, while the next-cheapest competitor was $25K -- and considerably less secure. Since then, some of the competition has ramped up the security (there are now several that are certified FIPS 140-2 level 4 -- IBM's was the first) and brought the prices down, but IBM's may still be the cheapest.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:You should see the IBM version by plover · · Score: 1

      Ross Anderson at Cambridge has done some great work on the topic. There are many attacks that are documented, and I'm sure there are others. He's used a microprobing workstation to directly access chip features. They've used optical microscopes to view the state of fusible memory cells (such as you might find in a PROM.) This lets them directly read the contents of a chip. To expose the chip, they typically grind through the outer package, or use fuming nitric acid to dissolve the case.

      Other, more clever attacks include active testing, where they attempt to get a functioning chip to reveal secrets while it's running. The general idea with this is that you set up a test bench that repeatedly uses the chip to encrypt a known input, change something on the chip (called "fuzzing"), and then check the output is always the same. They've used X-rays to fuzz memory locations. The X-ray beam is used to alter a memory location on the chip -- it almost doesn't matter what spot, really, as long as it causes an error in the output. You then move the X-ray beam to another spot on the chip, and repeat. The idea is that corruptions in a block cypher based on the principles of key rounds (such as DES, AES, Blowfish, Twofish, etc.) will manifest themselves as bits of key material if they corrupt the right round at the right time.

      This same sort of principle was used by dropping the chip power at the right time in the encryption algorithm. By causing an error during the encryption process, that error can identify bits of the key.

      It's up to you to decide if operating a micro probing workstation, building a precision guided x-ray machine, or bathing chips in fuming nitric acid is "difficult". As far as I'm concerned, yes, I think it's difficult, but I don't have access to that kind of equipment. You might have all of that down the hallway, for all I know.

      --
      John
  19. Good luck with that by Mishotaki · · Score: 1

    If you'd do that, you would have to do it after you sintalled every component... and sealing all the wires, including the ones to the power supply and case, so if some component would have to be changed, it would be a nightmare and you would basically have to remove the whole sealant or scrap the computer...

  20. It's common on high-tech boards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My degree is Materials engineering, and I remember an undergrad design course where one of the groups was working with Rockwell Collins on this exact project.

    They already commonly coat their boards in stuff for the very reasons you've listed. All kinds of circuit boards for radios, radar, anything electronic inside a jet fighter. The project was to find less-toxic alternatives that could match performance and cost.

    1. Re:It's common on high-tech boards by RMB2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ... and damn myself for posting that comment as AC. Thought I was logged in....

      --
      [/sarcasm]
    2. Re:It's common on high-tech boards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Stop trying to steal my post. Material engineer, pah, you wish!

  21. Try Mineral Oil by vtcodger · · Score: 4, Funny

    People have been running PC electronics submerged in mineral oil for decades.

    Advantages:
    1. Not too hard to do
    2. If push comes to shove, you can can probably burn the PC in your fireplace or other suitable container to keep warm. Or just because you are pissed at it.

    Problems:

    1. It's messy.
    2. The oil tends to creep up any wires to the outside world (capillary action?) and eventually show up at the other end.
    3. I'm not sure if non-gas tight connectors are used in modern PCs, but if they are, they may be a problem.
    4. It's messy.

    Did I mention that it is messy?

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    1. Re:Try Mineral Oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if there is a way to gel mineral oil to make it less messy?

    2. Re:Try Mineral Oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need the convection.

  22. Old news by gbrandt · · Score: 1

    Power supplies for the C-64 were 'potted' as were many power supplies of the day. Can't see why it would not work.

    Gregor

    1. Re:Old news by Lisandro · · Score: 3, Informative

      Power supplies for the C-64 were 'potted' as were many power supplies of the day.

      The original C64 psu was renowed for its poor reilability, which was caused for the poor heat dissipation due to that very epoxy potting. They used big TO-3 transistors which got quite warm during normal operation.

  23. Potting blocks air cooling, of course by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    Electronics has to be designed for potting, at least if it dissipates any significant power. You have to provide a heat path (usually a metal heat sink) out of the potted block. This is done routinely for DC-DC brick power supplies. But it's not going to work on a PC motherboard.

    1. Re:Potting blocks air cooling, of course by nimbius · · Score: 1

      true. pot an entire motherboard and watch it turn into a candle....

      or liquid cool it....huh....

      --
      Good people go to bed earlier.
    2. Re:Potting blocks air cooling, of course by iwein · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If you take some mobile processors, underclock them and use heat-pipes to dissipate the heat you should be ok I expect. Anything that survives without a fan should survive better in a pot with a heat pipe. Air is one of the worst conductors anyway.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_pipe

      --
      Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
    3. Re:Potting blocks air cooling, of course by CountBrass · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're right air is a poor thermal conductor but, unlike a coating, air can carry heat away by convection.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    4. Re:Potting blocks air cooling, of course by tacocat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you use the low power VIA chipsets like Eden you only have to dissipate under 10W of power, which these thermal goos could handle. But potting is very insulating compared to open air.

      Don't forget the SSD. Standard hard drives won't handle any of this.

      It might be useful to rethink the process and figure out what it is you are trying to address. Just moisture - conformal coating. Just vibration - make a better box? If you are strapping this to the outside of a Mercury outboard motor I would go with a better box.

    5. Re:Potting blocks air cooling, of course by Herby+Sagues · · Score: 1

      But if you make the MB submersible, you can cool it via WATER convection. I would bet that a MB that's been covered in resin and submerged in water stays cool even with a tick coating.

    6. Re:Potting blocks air cooling, of course by iwein · · Score: 1

      True, and that is most of the dissipation in a fanless setup. My comment about conductivity wasn't very relevant. The point is that a heatpipe to the outside of the block will do much more good than the convection will do if you leave the hardware in the open.

      --
      Show a man some news, distract him for an hour. Show a man some mod points, distract him for the rest of his life.
  24. Be aware of by scott792283 · · Score: 1

    the curing properties of whichever material you choose. The ratio of resin to hardener can affect the shrinking, which can disturb components. Also, the heat kicked out by a CPU may be able to melt the coating if the mixture has too little hardener. If you go ahead with it, bang it on a blog, I'm sure there are others who would like to read it.

  25. My disaster Project by nickswitzer · · Score: 1

    I figured I'd save a few bucks by doing my own water cooling and using some seals from a hardware store. The problem was that the seal wasn't perfect and it melted to part of my pc. Needless to say, if you are not worried about ruining your hardware, then by all means, go for it. But I would google anything you are trying to do/use and make sure the parts are definitely capable of withstanding the punishment you are about to put on it. If not, your great idea may go to the wayside because of insufficient materials.

  26. Obligatory by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    "You shot my heat sink! Now where am I supposed to sink my f***in heat?"

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  27. This is called potting... by Lisandro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...and it's a well known process - i've seen devices from the '80s with epoxy encased parts. Keep in mind though potting does practially nothing for heat dissipation. Even if you managed to get your hands on some thermally conductive resin, in PCs the principal way of heat dissipation is forced convection (coolers, that is), which allows to use very small dissipators for the given power. I don't think you could find a substance that allows good thermal transfer without a large surface area - meaning, a lot of resin.

    If you're planning to pot and then submerge in Fluorinert or a similar compound, the resin coating, no matter how good transfering heat, will only raise the working temperature of the parts.

  28. cockroaches by doug · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Years ago I worked at a company which had had problems with some telecom equipment in the field and no one could ever find any smoking gun. Random problems pointed to several different places on one particular board. One technician must have been working late, because apparently the CO filled with cockroaches once the sun went down. One of the theories was that bugs crawling across the board caused random short circuits. The customer was getting pissed, so management opted for a shotgun approach. Half a dozen shot-in-the-dark fixes were made, including adding an insulating coating. No one knows which one (or combination) of the fixes did the trick, but the random outages went away. That was engineering at its finest.

    1. Re:cockroaches by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Informative

      A bag of moth balls in the equipment would have been cheaper to guard against roach piss.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    2. Re:cockroaches by Bardez · · Score: 1

      You mean Mountain Dew?

      (Sorry, people give me shit for drinking it all the time...)

      --
      Perception is the thin dividing line between reality and fiction.
    3. Re:cockroaches by Pheersome · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I read "shotgun approach," my first thought was naturally, "I'm not really sure that a shotgun is the best way to kill roaches...."

      --
      Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness.
  29. What's so odd about that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > ...or just go buy mineral oil and spare yourself some strange looks at the vet's office.

    I'm sure the vet will be understanding when you explain that you don't actually have a horse, you just want to dump the laxatives into your computer. Why would they give you strange looks?

  30. Potting compound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MG Chemicals' Part number 832-TC. Conformal coating doesn't conduct heat well and is designed for a very thin coating.

    You'd probably want to make sure any heatsink fins are exposed though.

  31. Solder directly by Weaselmancer · · Score: 0

    I agree - immersing a contact connector is a bad idea. The fluid will eventually get in between the leads. So, just solder jumper cables directly to the motherboard and have them poke up out of the brine.

    Probably a good idea to solder your PCI stuff directly to the board too, if you can.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  32. Golden Shellback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean with something like this?: http://golden-shellback.com/

  33. How about an oil cooled submerged PC by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/strip-fans,1203.html

    This is pretty much your guide to getting it done.

  34. Re:Cray blood - or Cheetah blood ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    ... if you want the system to run faster.
    • Fry: Go after him, Leela!
    • [Leela pushes the throttle forward. The engines struggle.]
    • Leela: It's no use. We were going full speed when we fired him so he's going even faster than that.
    • Fry: You mean we can never catch up to him? Not even if we rub the engine with cheetah blood?
    • Leela: I don't know how to say this, Fry, but Bender is doomed to drift through space ... forever.

    Thank you Futurama:

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  35. Plasti-Dip by Telecommando · · Score: 1

    http://www.plastidip.com/

    I've used this for years to coat electronics for exposure to the elements. Boards up to 6x6".

    It can be cut away and removed if necessary and then reapplied.

    Not sure about the heat tranfer characteristics, tho.

    Your mileage may vary, etc.

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
  36. Yeah... by msauve · · Score: 1

    and if you're cheap, people will actually pay you to take PCBs off their hands.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  37. That resin may conduct better than somethings by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

    Like most thermal compounds it may conduct heat better than most non-metals but unless it's a brand new material everything on the market currently is going to be a far worse conducter of heat than air. Encasing thermal components in a material with worse performance than air is going to make them get much hotter.

  38. Very old idea by BCMcI · · Score: 1

    I had a mackintosh (sp?) vacuum tube amplifier in a metal case circa 1950. When the top was removed all one could see was black potting compound enclosing all the components except the connectors and tube sockets.

  39. Industrial Electronics by Mike+Rice · · Score: 4, Informative

    In my former life I worked as an industrial electronics technician. My job was, in a nutshell, to modernize a manufacturing plant from its 1950s style, analog (pneumatic) technology, to digital electronic distributed control systems.

    The environments these devices need to work in are quite harsh, with extreme temperatures and often corrosive atmospheres. The pneumatic control systems were quite robust in those environments... electronic devices need a lot of beefing up to survive these conditions.

    One aspect of this was to treat all circuit boards with a conformal resin coating. The trick is to make sure the thermal coefficient of expansion of the resin, matches the expansion of the circuit board material. I am not a chemist, but I do know such coatings are available.

    Another consideration which has been mentioned is how to treat connectors. The usual method is to apply a rubber like sealing compound after a connector is fitted and tested.

    For less extreme environments, a much less expensive, but quite effective alternative, is to apply a cheap acrylic coating, using readily available sprays such as Krylon 1301. The procedure is...

    Assemble the device (uncoated) and test thoroughly.
    Disassemble the device.
    Apply tape and / or petroleum jelly to connectors and contacts, to prevent damage from the spray.
    Apply the spray to each component.
    Assemble and re-test.

    Hope this lights a bulb for you.

    1. Re:Industrial Electronics by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      For less extreme environments, a much less expensive, but quite effective alternative, is to apply a cheap acrylic coating, using readily available sprays such as Krylon 1301.

      I've done this several times to protect printed circuit boards from moisture with great results. I don't know if i'd expect much more from it though.

  40. Characteristic Impedance of High Speed Signals by gwait · · Score: 2, Informative

    The characteristic impedance of the surface traces will change.

    The surface traces were designed with the assumption that there is air above the traces.

    Loading up a bunch of gunk will change the impedance, and could screw up your signal integrity. PCI Express or Gig Ethernet could fail for example.

    Google stripline vs microstrip and signal integrity of high speed differential traces.

    I'd be curious how the conformal coating people manage this too, I'd assume the copper trace widths would have to be designed knowing the board was going to be conformal coated.

    --
    Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    1. Re:Characteristic Impedance of High Speed Signals by DeathOverlord3 · · Score: 1

      That's not quite true, the traces on the surface of the motherboard are microstrip regardless of whether there is conformal coating or not.

      Stripline requires conducting planes below and above the trace, and no coating material is conductive.

      The permittivity of silicone or acrylic is on the same order of magnitude as that of free space so conformal coating would not really introduce dramatic impedance mismatches in microstrip.

    2. Re:Characteristic Impedance of High Speed Signals by gwait · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I wondered how the conformal coating would affect the impedance.

      Having used some impedance calculators that care how thick the solder mask layer was, I assumed that conformal coating would also have to be accounted for.

      Knowing that, I wonder if a "potting" material could be found with the same ballpark permittivity as air to avoid the impedance problem?

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    3. Re:Characteristic Impedance of High Speed Signals by DeathOverlord3 · · Score: 1

      I guess conformal coating or potting or even soldermask would turn it into an embedded microstrip problem but I am not aware of any impedance calculators that solve embedded microstrip for different relative permittivities above and below the trace, but then again I just deal in slow 100MHz logic which would work fine even with 30% deviation in characteristic impedance.

    4. Re:Characteristic Impedance of High Speed Signals by gwait · · Score: 1

      Polar Instruments has one, with a time limited trial:
      http://www.polarinstruments.com/calc.htm

      We've been building PCI Express and 1 Gig Ethernet (via SGMII, another 2.5 gig hz differential scheme) so had to take a look at it.

      The crunch was getting 100 ohm differential over flex cable without paying a fortune for the cable..
      Cheers,
      Gord Wait

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
  41. The material you want is ... by mapsjanhere · · Score: 2, Informative

    a diamond coating. The only material that fulfills your demand for high thermal conductivity and good electrical insulation at the same time. The only problem is that the one good method to apply a diamond coating is chemical vapor deposition, and that is mostly line of sight. So you'll have a real tough time coating around those 1000 pins under your cpu.

    --
    I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
  42. military applications by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Potting boards is common in military applications. But it makes 'em harder than heck to repair.

    If it's just a coating, you can sometimes scrape it off enough to put in a new component, and then pot over it. The potting residue makes it difficult to solder and trying to remove it puts the traces and pads at risk. Nasty, but can be done.

    But if it's completely potted, like a brick in which you can dimly see components, when it fails you just throw it away. No point in trying to fix it.

    In your case, you have to ask yourself things like how you're going to replace the bios battery.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  43. Re:Conformal Coating Stinks? Like what? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Was it a crossup of lung-searing odors like magma of fresh/raw bowel-manure (laden with fast-food/processed-food chemical additives), burning rubber, oozing/gangrenous pus, aged milk and off-brand bleach? You'd need not only a HEAT sink, but also a STINK sink. PHEW...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  44. Re:Not sure And, if you get it wrong... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    That computer board will be worth less than a molten pile of horse shit. Horse shit is recyclable. Even some of the hay in it. But, a molten/slagged, PCT/other chemicals-infested MoBo?

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  45. High cost solution looking for a problem to solve by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

    Yes this can be done. It is done. But in engineering we typically work from a set of requirements. This means we get a spec that says the part must fit in a given space or use only so much power or whtever. What you have is a solution looking for a requirement. In other words "I want to epoxy pot my M/B - Why would I do this"

    If you must use this type of cooling why not simply us a nonconsecutive liquid? If you potted the M/B you'd have to pot all the conctors too. You never be able to replace a cable or RAn or move a jumper

    The other thing that engineers get paid to do is come up with cost effective designs. In terms of cost this is just the wrong way to go.

    The best way if you wont a compact and silent machine is to use the case itself as a heat sink. Conduct the heat to an aluminum case and let it radiate. Use a termally controlled fan as a backup for hot days and high loads. Oh wait isn't that what Apple does?

  46. Yes it works by John+Sokol · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was doing a start up called Nisvara 2002 (now dead) we were building Silent computers and server rooms that didn't require air conditioning. Something like 50% power savings!

    I was able to Pot or coat, power supply's, hard drive and motherboards in various materials.

    The key is thermal conductivity. Yes some one here mention diamond, but that is expensive in unrealistic although diamond dust power was available from GE at a much lower cost then I expected. Carbon Fiber and other carbons are great except they are electrically conductive so they are ruled out (except diamond that is).

    What worked great was epoxy with silicon carbide which is dirt cheap and sold as sand basting powder. Also boron nitride works great too, but this is a messy white powder and expensive.

    Also a thin layer of silicon carbide or boron nitride epoxy could be applied then a layer of cheaper carbon black or chopped carbon fiber mixed epoxy could be use for making a thicker layer if needed. Non-metallic heat sinks work great using these materials.

    We were able to take a Antec 450 Watt Power supply and run it at full load with no fans or heat sink fins as just one big white sold block of epoxy with boron nitride.

    --
    I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Yes it works by ill+dillettante · · Score: 1

      Can you give any more details on this? What ratio of silicon carbide did you use?

    2. Re:Yes it works by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

      I spent about 4 months of experimentation on different epoxies and vendors of silicon carbide, different grit sizes and viscosities of mixtures.

      Don't have my notes any more, but making sure your epoxy doesn't expand or contract on hardening is critical. Using and Oven to cure it helps, being electronics you can't take it too hot, 150F to 200F in an adapted toaster oven.

      We found Jeffco Epoxy as one of the best
          http://www.jeffcoproducts.com/productsnew.html

      And a mix of different Silicon Carbide grain sizes Larger grain some are as large as 2 mm are excellent thermal conductors, then a mix of some finer powder to thicken the mix and fill in the gaps. Think cement with gravel and sand mixed.

      As far as the and exact formulation it's more like doing it by feel, to get the ratios right.
      The problem is the Silicon Carbide will sink to the bottom and you will end up with plain epoxy pooling on top if you mixture isn't thick enough.
      This is where boron nitride was nice it that thicken and stayed mixed.
      Another option was to allow the mix to cure a little them mix again before pouring so it wouldn't settle out.

       

      --
      I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:Yes it works by ill+dillettante · · Score: 1

      Thanks for this. It is posts like yours that make reading slashdot worthwhile :)

  47. A classmate did this as a college project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His project was to create a submersible CPU. He ruined several motherboards before perfecting it. He did use an industrial sealant, but it was not thermal resin. His problem was making a completely sealed unit as the motherboard was completely dunked in water.

    I think I have his project notes around somewhere. I'll see if I can find them for you.

  48. Conductivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thermally conductive materials are generally pretty good electrical conductors. It ain't gonna' happen like you asked.

  49. Does two-part epoxy count? by itomato · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I typically remove the plastic casing from all my little dongley peripherals and coat them with a clear, two-part, quick-setting epoxy. I've been at it for years now, and the only problems I have had have been cosmetic.

    The trickiest part of the process is masking the pins, sockets, and other areas where you do *not* want to apply a clear, two-part, quick-setting epoxy.
    I'm sure Vaseline or some similar masking agent can be applied and removed cleanly, given the right environment.

    I usually do it on my kitchen table with a plastic knife. YMMV.

  50. Whiskers by intangible · · Score: 1

    I also wonder if this would help stop the spread of Tin Whiskers http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whisker_(metallurgy)

    1. Re:Whiskers by Detritus · · Score: 1

      I've seen some pictures that show that tin whiskers are very good at punching through other materials. According to this, one layer of conformal coating will not stop them.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  51. Nothing like lots of non-help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It sounds like you might have luck using a thermally conductive epoxy. There are many grades, and they vary in viscosity, conductivity, strength when cured, and operating temperature. Have a look at those offered by Epoxies, Inc. at http://www.epoxies.com/therm.htm
     

  52. Heah, /. did ran a blip back in '00 by buss_error · · Score: 1
    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  53. Just try it. by Plasmic · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a few hundred dollars, at most, to test this theory. Go try it. I promise the results will be more useful and interesting than anything you'll get back from Slashdot (e.g. theories on mineral oil suspension, stories on potting mainframes in the 70s, etc.).

  54. Air Force Circuit Emersion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 years ago when I got into this racket super cooling Durons to hit the 2Ghz mark with stuff like Vodka and Peltier Plates, I ran into an old air force MI guy. He said back in WWII/Korea they used to completely emerse their high altitude aircraft electrical circuits in vats of dielectric oil, and it's in these tubs that they ran. It prevented water moisture, prevented freezing and brittleness, prevented everything. The only two drawbacks to it was it was heavy and it was messy. But back in the day, this is how it was done.

  55. Jomby... by actionbastard · · Score: 1
    --
    Sig this!
  56. Someone else already had a better idea by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

    If you want to do this for cooling purposes, why not immerse the entire system in a non-electrically-conductive coolant?

  57. What you do is.. by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Informative

    use a non-conductive liquid for cooling, such as oil. This has been done before, and even a cursory google turns up lots of interesting results.

    Coating is a waste of time, and it's very difficult to get a good coating over empty expansion slots, USB slots, etc., let alone those with cards in them.

  58. Not just immersion by Bat+Country · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I see a lot of comments about the immersion side of things, for which I know it would probably be a lot cheaper to just pick up some nonconductive coolant.

    How about other reasons for doing it - specifically shock resistance and hardening against slippage caused by vibration?

    Additional value could be found in potting the board in marine/cave/jungle environments where the hardware might be exposed to caustic and humid air.

    Also, presumably resin coating might get around problems with hungry insects. I'd imagine a really well designed medium-tight case suspending the components in a nonconductive coolant might work, but it seems like it would be a more bulky solution.

    However, I'd be interested to hear of better solutions than coating the whole shebang in toxic goop.

    --
    The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
  59. already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    toms hardware had an oil cooled one using silicone of all things

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/strip-fans,1203.html

  60. Been done by tietokone-olmi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Immersion in mineral oil. Need to remove all fans and other spinny things, and you won't be upgrading anything afterward. But it does work, and permits totally quiet computing.

    Long as you don't mind the, you know, tank.

  61. Encapsulation of electronics... by Grog6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are such resins, but:

    1. They are really expensive; $100 is about 2" sq, half an inch thick.

    2. It has to be cast around the electronic assembly in a vacuum; this is harder than it sounds.

    3. To cure properly, and without voids, it has to be poured into a custom mold at around 150C. In a vacuum. :)

    I have seen electronics cast like you are talking about, but I doubt a mobo would take the process and live. The casting temperature is too hot, and kills most electronics.

    If it worked, you could dunk the whole thing to cool it. Liquid Nitrogen would even work, as long as the thermal shock was controlled. Cool or heat it too fast, and the stuff breaks.

    The standard procedure for the assemblies I saw,was to make 10, and hope a few work afterward.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  62. heat conductive electrically insulative by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    I don't think you could find a substance that allows good thermal transfer without a large surface area - meaning, a lot of resin.

    This Google search turns up some neat materials.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:heat conductive electrically insulative by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      This Google search turns up some neat materials.

      Yeah, but not of resins. There are a lot of fairly good electrical insulators with good thermal conductance, but i don't think you'll be able to find one in the form of resin. This search turns some interesting stuff; besides a carbon fibre composition with 100 W/mK (which happens to be electrically conductive), the best i found was an inorganic resin that tops at 10 W/mK.

      This is a measure of how effective the material is transferring heat. For example, Aluminum has a thermal conductivity of about 230 W/mK, and Cooper tops at 400 W/mK.

    2. Re:heat conductive electrically insulative by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but not of resins.

      I'm obviously not a materials scientist, but this one says it's a two-part epoxy with a 5 minute pot time and a Shore D hardness of 80, which I looked up to be equivalent to nylon. That's a resin, no?

      Though at .84 W/M K it's not nearly as efficient as the one you found. Neat.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  63. Alternative by t0y · · Score: 1

    It's not resin, but it's also a nice alternative
    http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/Silent-But-Deadly.aspx

  64. I'm reminded of first semester design lab... by Chris+Snook · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The contest was to build the most weight-efficient bridge, using only balsa wood sticks and wood glue. Efficiency was judged by (failure load)/(bridge mass). The highest load, by far, was born by a bridge that had been totally coated with wood glue. Unfortunately for them, this coating raised the bridge mass by nearly 50%, so their bridge was still less efficient than my team's, which used a more conventional truss design, with a coating of glue around the joints. Nearly every bridge in the class failed first at a joint, so reinforcing the beams themselves was a waste.

    The point is that applying the same reinforcement everywhere tends to be a serious waste of resources that would be better applied to the most critical areas. This is why my shiny new motherboard has a few components embedded in epoxy, surrounded by metal heatsink-like rings. Unlike other motherboards I've used, this one has no large components sticking up from the PCB, so I'm guessing that they singled out those bulky components, shrunk them down, and then added the epoxy and rings to allow them to operate safely at a smaller size.

    --
    There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
    1. Re:I'm reminded of first semester design lab... by Inda · · Score: 1

      "Nearly every bridge in the class failed first at a joint"

      Then the joints were badly formed. Having worked in wood for 8 years, I can say that joints held with PVA will not break first. Try it yourself sometime with two long pieces of planed 25x50mm.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:I'm reminded of first semester design lab... by Chris+Snook · · Score: 1

      Of course the joints were badly formed. We were cutting 1/8" x 1/8" sticks of balsa wood with box cutters. Part of the lesson was to minimize complexity. This is an important consideration in industrial construction as well, due to the law of large numbers. No matter how strong your average joint is, there will always be some that are much weaker. Once one bad joint goes, the rest will soon as well due to the shift in stress. If you have more joints (and thus more bad joints) you're at much greater risk of losing enough joints to bring the whole thing down. This is one of the reasons many bridges are overengineered by several orders of magnitude, and why some still fail in spite of that.

      --
      There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
  65. Just pour in a pound of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beryllium Oxide powder and turn on the fan. That will really cool it down. Beryllium Oxide is an excellent insulator and heat conductor. ahem.

  66. Low viscosity thermally-conductive epoxy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there such a thing?

    Would that work for many situations where one needed both thermal transfer and sealing, both?

    It couldn't be impossible, could it?

  67. Tried potting decided on conformance coating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A company I worked for used to pot their circuit boards but changed over to conformance coating instead due to issues already pointed out by several people in this thread.

  68. epoxy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They do make thermally conductive epoxy, but the CPU will still need a dedicated heatsink/fan
    http://www.mgchemicals.com/products/832tc.html

  69. Except finishing the project... by NevDull · · Score: 1

    Pot? Check!
    Bong? Check!
    Big hit? Check!

    Err... what the hell was I doing with 5 gallons of horse laxative?

  70. Masterbond Potting & Encapsulation by nevergroundbound · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think this is a product that should do what you're looking for. I haven't had a chance to use it yet, but the info at the link leads me to believe it could fit the bill. Masterbond-Potting & Encapsulation Materials http://masterbond.com/produse/produse_pe.html

  71. Resin overview by Verdatum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Molding & Casting (through replica propwork and creature prosthetic effecs) is a hobby of mine, so here's what I know about resins. Maybe it will help

    Epoxy resin is good at holding up to high temperatures. It comes in a variety of cure times and is available in small quantities at hardware stores and large quantities at marine supply stores. The fumes are smelly and unsafe, but they at least dissapate soon after curing.

    Polyester resin (aka fiberglass resin) is cheaper than epoxy. It is generally weaker. It's fumes are quite nasty and hang around for days, so it's really an outside thing. It's probably no good for this task as uncured resin ravenously dissolves polystyrene (I don't know if PCs ahve polystyrene, but I wouldn't risk it).

    Polyurethane resins come in the widest variety of formulations. It varies from hard as rock to a very flexible rubber, and any mixture inbetween. It is very low odor, but the fumes are still nothing to mess around with. Some formulations use metal fillers like aluminum (reduces shrinkage/thermal warping), so look out for that. It will certainly shrink a bit, so thicker coatings should be done with more flexible varieties. Shrinkage can be reduced by adding loose chopped fiberglass, though this does raise thickness.

    Silicone rubber, particularly Platinum cure silicone has low to zero shrinkage. It's also by far the least toxic. It's also the most expensive by volume. again wide range of cure times, thickness/thixotropy can be adjusted by adding fumed silica (just don't breath the stuff). It is thermally resistive, so you will want to keep coatings thin, and suppliment it with submersion. Still, if I was tinkering around with such hardhacks, I suspect I'd go this route. Silicone is a great electrical resistor and has fantastic waterproofing abilities

    for thin coats of any of these materials, you'll want to brush or spray the liquid to minimize airbubbles. All types resins have sprayable formulations, either by using specialty spray devices sold by the resin manufacturer, or by thinning the resin with the appropriate solvent. The more solvent you add, the more shrinkage is an issue, which is supplanted by applying thin coats in good ventilation.

    I've done business with all the major online (US) retailers. I've had excellent experiences with all of them; be sure to take advantage of personal customer support. For more information check out http://polytek.com/ http://smoothon.com/ and http://tapplastics.com/

  72. Sticks and Glue. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hm. I remember doing that exercise as well. --I think the scoring formula needed to be adjusted, because my solid bundle of sticks soaked in glue creating basically a polymer enhanced log could take all the weight the testing apparatus was able to provide, plus that of the teacher and two students standing in a rope looped over my 'bridge'. It never broke, thus my ham-fisted design won the contest despite the ridiculous number of pieces used to make it.

    It was also generally agreed that I was an ass and that the real winner was the team which had came up with one of those conventional erector-set type designs.

    The point which led me to this idea was that I'd noticed in the scoring formula there was no limit on the amount of glue we were allowed to use. I'd considered making a solid log of glue with a single strut buried inside it, but the drying times wouldn't have allowed me to finish the project before testing day. I think one of my purposes in going through the school system was to spend as much energy as possible challenging the silliness of conventional thinking, though at the time I was giggling too much to take notice.

    -FL

    1. Re:Sticks and Glue. . . by Chris+Snook · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think someone pulled the same stunt on our professor in the past, which is why we were given 6 36" sticks to build a 20" x 2" span. That enforced a somewhat more conventional approach. It's rather difficult to drive a car across a rope.

      --
      There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
    2. Re:Sticks and Glue. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think someone pulled the same stunt on our professor in the past, which is why we were given 6 36" sticks to build a 20" x 2" span. That enforced a somewhat more conventional approach. It's rather difficult to drive a car across a rope.

      Suspension bridges are essentially made of rope. --It would take a lot of work, (and probably earn one of those dreaded high marks I routinely tried to avoid), but my immediate thought given the scenario you describe would be to game the system by building a suspension bridge using ropes made out of lines of glue strengthened with fibers from crushed up sticks. I'd probably find some way to lock my bridge the to table as well, even going to far as to drill holes beforehand, because I bet the rules didn't say you weren't allowed to modify the testing apparatus itself. That would raise some eyebrows, and that's the point.

      Anything to avoid thinking as instructed. --The unspoken prime directive of the school system is to make people willing to limit themselves within authority structures. (You can only use X number of beams, because those are the RULES, despite what the real world might be like, you WILL get used to there being absolute definitions of reality so that when you do enter the real world, you will be pre-conditioned for easy control. You will ASK to go to the washroom and you will believe your text books!) --And this absolutely infuriated me on a fundamental level. It's the reason Slashdot is so incredible; these pages contain posts from literally hundreds upon hundreds of very smart people who nonetheless think in nonsensical absolutes without even being aware that they have been trained into a kind of blindness; all while truly believing that they have a superior level of awareness even while reality orbits in the most astonishing of ways few of them are able to see. It breaks my heart some days. But it is changing. I see a lot more people around here these days who question things.

      My objective in school was to force the system to fail me even while completing the tasks assigned with more grace and skill than the 'good' students, thus demonstrating the fact that the objective of schooling is NOT the cultivation of creativity or intelligence, but rather the instilling an underlying and nearly-invisible level of social obedience at all costs.

      I proved my point with flying colors, and despite being bounced from the system, (resulting in some very pissed off teachers and professors and zero student debt; I gamed that system as well), went on to be successful in life and even asked to return to lecture in a few cases. My only regret, (and it is a big one), is that I wish I could have done all of this without giving into anger and arrogance during the process. Because while I did find it funny, it was an angry kind of funny. If I had the chance to do it all again, I'd make one of my objectives to hold a sense of love and compassion throughout. It would have been a thousand times more effective than the combative route I chose.

      -FL

    3. Re:Sticks and Glue. . . by Chris+Snook · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In our case, it was considered an engineering problem, so there were certain inviolable constraints, but as long as we satisfied those we were free to do whatever we pleased. I'm sure plenty of composite construction techniques could have improved our results, but given the time constraints and the fact that any wood used in testing came out of the total available for construction (quite reasonable real-world engineering constraints) we were forced to innovate conservatively. We hadn't been taught anything about surface lamination, so the glue technique was certainly creative, but applying that reinforcement indiscriminately turned out to be less efficient than applying it judiciously in the places where it was needed the most.

      Engineering doesn't stifle creativity, it just guides it in a more practical (and often less exotic) direction than pure science. If my motherboard had been designed by scientists, maybe it would have used the original poster's proposed technique, but it would have cost much more, and I would have bought a different one instead.

      --
      There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
    4. Re:Sticks and Glue. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      In our case, it was considered an engineering problem, so there were certain inviolable constraints, but as long as we satisfied those we were free to do whatever we pleased.

      That's really the key. In our current society, engineering problems are efficiently solved when the team is content to work happily within limited rule sets. "You have X materials and Y time. Go!" --And so people agree to work and learn within an artificial set of constraints, knowing full well that the limits are artificial. --And under the best of circumstances, this is an entirely valid choice. But the truth must not be forgotten that in this world, nothing is ever entirely limited. I've known people who are very good at saying, "Okay. But if you don't mind, I'll just tweak reality so that X materials becomes X + something; I know a guy who is willing to trade that for this, and there's a woman who is dumping a whole bunch of something we could use if we altered our designs slightly, and if we ask nicely, there's this awesome facility we can use for the whole month free of charge. . , etc."

      Such people are best placed in management roles. And that's interesting, isn't it? Power comes directly from refusing to accept arbitrary limits. But there is a time and a place; there are fun lessons to learn in deliberately working within artificial limits while somebody else is in charge of keeping the heat on and the paychecks coming. After all, in our society, it's important to have people excited and willing to work beneath management directives. So there's a place for everybody, and that's wonderful.

      The thing about the school systems I was fighting against however, (particularly during pre-secondary education, where I did my bridge-building thing), was that this choice was never offered. That all students would be willing followers was not just assumed, it was enforced. The only way to cast yourself into a different role was to A) recognize the nature of the limitations and, B) fight against them. Problems arise because teachers and administrators sometimes have egos which are easily bruised. Saying, "No" is sometimes seen as saying, "You are personally inferior." It doesn't help when the student doesn't fully understand the problem and is pissed off and frustrated. Thus you end up with the sad scenario where you have grown adults trying with all their might and resources to crush the will of certain kids.

      It becomes a further problem in that the pattern of obedience extends far beyond practical engineering problems; into every other aspect of life.

      I've known and worked with people in areas where conservative obedience held no rational advantage, (which I would argue is the case more often than not), and it was common for people to get very upset when I pursued alternative methods to achieve goals, who even upon achieving results far beyond expectations, had a lot of trouble dealing with the fact that we'd left the beaten path. Comfort didn't come until they found some sort of perceived authority figure to pat them on the heads and praise them for their efforts, thus making the new approach socially acceptable.

      It goes back to how we approach life. More than once I've heard people complain in some manner. . .

      "But I did everything they asked! I was good! But look at where it has brought me!" Or. . , "HE didn't do as he was told! It's not fair that he should gain respect and reward while I haven't!"

      It's a tough lesson, it hurts terribly when you realize you've been duped, and the first natural instinct is to deny the true shape of things, to cast the disobedient one/s as villain/s who must be punished so that your own obedience is validated. "See! See what happens if you break the rules and think too highly of yourself? (People like me will attack you because we are scared to dare ourselves.)" --I've been through it on that side and I remember being royally pissed off for ages, but luckily I was just a young kid when I figured it out and ha

    5. Re:Sticks and Glue. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bla bla bla, waa waaa waaa, you are a unique creative snowflake, etc.

      Sooner or later you'll grow up and realize you were blowing things way out of proportion.

    6. Re:Sticks and Glue. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Sooner or later you'll grow up and realize you were blowing things way out of proportion.

      Just thinking out loud and at length; I'm in the middle of dealing with a variation of this in some difficult friends, and so all these patterns are at the top of my mind at the moment and need processing. Slashdot happens to be my think-pad of the moment despite the fact that it may not be entirely appropriate. I don't usually let this happen, but things got away from me this week. I appreciate everybody's indulgence.

      Cheers!

      -FL

  73. Re:Myt Dog loves pickels Ugg !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Chinese food Holy diarrhea.
    fsck /.

  74. Behold - the wonders of Fluorinert by kwabbles · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Just disrupt the deflector shield with a tachyon burst.
  75. Rugged Mobile PCs exists. by webweave · · Score: 2, Informative

    "--for the purpose of immersion, shock resistance, whatever."

    Eurotech Finland http://www.eurotech.fi has some nice candy, look in http://www.linuxdevices.com for other manufacturers.

  76. Cray coolent is a bit pricey by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/27/1930214

    I don't have time to check that link again, but I recall it was hundreds (maybe a thousand?) £ per litre. Looks awesome though!

    --
    Nick
    1. Re:Cray coolent is a bit pricey by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      $500/gallon for the fluorinert solution (from 3M).

      Link within comment points to a few tests that were made (don't make this stuff too cold).

      Otherwise search for pc cooling with mineral oil. There's a few overclocking websites for this.

      I am actually just waiting a couple years for this "technology"/idea/concept to mature, for when I buy a new PC. I recommend the same, hopefully the price has gone down quite a bit or at least become more commercially available...

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    2. Re:Cray coolent is a bit pricey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fluorinert is already a mature technology. It has been around for a long time and is used in niches where it's useful. It is expensive and will remain so because said niches are tiny.

      I recommend not trying to cool a PC with it. You are almost certain to kill it in the long term, because use of Fluorinert requires that the system is engineered from the ground up to support it. Fluorinert is not compatible with all materials and chip packaging and you must take a great deal of care in the design of a board/system intended to be cooled with it.

      Besides... Why do you want to use it? What do you hope to achieve? You certainly don't need Fluorinert cooling for a PC. It's completely unnecessary.

    3. Re:Cray coolent is a bit pricey by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      Fluorinert is not compatible with all materials and chip packaging and you must take a great deal of care in the design of a board/system intended to be cooled with it.

      It's already been used in common PC setups, see the link in the comment for home tests done with it.

      Besides... Why do you want to use it? What do you hope to achieve? You certainly don't need Fluorinert cooling for a PC. It's completely unnecessary.

      Then I suppose you don't need that heatsink or fan on your PC? Technically because of heatsinks/fans, your computers are being overclocked. This cooling allows us to overclock them further, thus creating faster computers. This technology hasn't "matured" because it isn't common enough to buy from major dealers with liquid cooling.

      It is expensive and will remain so because said niches are tiny.

      Since when does size = cost? The first home computers made were expensive because they had "tiny" chips. Multiple reasons have made them cheaper (more factories, better computers making the old ones less useful, and the production lines within factories - making it more streamlined).

      Seeing how you're AC I don't expect you to read this and become informed, but please do not squash the idea for those who are interested in this technology.

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
  77. SACDIN / SACCS by skogs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I once had the pleasure of 'removing for proper disposal' a great deal of circuit boards used in the SACDIN systems. (http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/c3i/saccs.htm)
    I remember they were glossy, and for fun we tossed them around, hit them, generally tried to break them...but could not. They were nuclear radiation and EMP hardened, and when I struck them with my Air Force ring, containing a stone that is supposed to be extremely hard to scratch, the ring scratched instantly and deeply. I've scraped it along a great deal of metal and stone objects, never adding any new scratches.
    Finding the right stuff such as the SACDIN boards were coated with can be very fun indeed.

    --
    Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
  78. Propylene glycol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As mentioned a million times already, hard coatings are more insulative and will keep heat in. So a liquid is the way to go.

    How about propylene glycol?? Any chemists out there? Automotive propylene glycol- $10/gallon- less on sale. Should be very non-corrosive. Hmmm- might be electrically conductive, which would kill the board. I'll go run some tests...

  79. Try before you Post? by KlausBreuer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ummm... why don't you simply try it out? Motherboards are pretty cheap these days; try doing this, and write of your experiences. Much more interesting than simply asking "Should I do this?".

    --
    Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
  80. f**k Fick!" by MancunianMaskMan · · Score: 1

    'nuff said

  81. Already been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was done quite a few years back by some NZers who immersed the entire working computer in some liquid from 3M(I think)
    At the time it was 1500US dollars a liter.
    They overlocked some Celeron 300A I think to around 600 or so mhz, no idea if the pics or info of it is still around

  82. Pressure housing by jonniesmokes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its not clear what the poster is trying to do. Conformal coating or potting may not be a good option. Is he trying to protect the board from dust, an occasional spraydown, or condensing humidity? Maybe CC or potting would work. THough the heat issues would be pretty bad as mentioned 100 times above.

    I would recommend a pressure housing with o-rings and proper feedthrus or liquid proof connectors. For high pressure and heat dissapation, filling the pressure housing with Flourinert would be a nice solution, just put a small pressure compensating bladder on the pressure housing so little air bubbles aren't a problem.

    If one is pressed for time, a really good ziplock bag filled with Flourinert, and a potted feedthrough for the wires would also work in a pinch.

  83. Still Need to Remove the Heat From the Resin by Frightened_Turtle · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine produced a hand-held electronic device in which he had sealed the electronics with a fairly thick epoxy coating. This had the effect of making it water-, shock- and crushproof.

    However, it never generated any waste heat during use. So I don't know how well this would work on a motherboard, which we are all aware can generate a lot of heat!

    My approach using this technique would be to give the motherboard an initially thin coating. Then, carefully lay some tubing for water cooling over the motherboard, with extra loops around the CPU and other components that might generate more heat than others, and then give the whole assembly a thicker coating of resin to finish it.

    I suggest adding water cooling, because even though the resin may be thermally conducting, it is also going to be conducting that heat in three directions. For example, not only will the resin be conducting heat away from the CPU, it will be delivering that heat to the components around it until the heat begins to bleed out of the surface of the resin. So it would be wise to add cooling to remove the heat from the resin as quickly as possible.

    --


    Whew! This water sure is cold!
  84. I used google. by hellop2 · · Score: 1

    http://www.heatsinkfactory.com/non-conductive-coolant.html Cheap non-conductive coolent. $64/gallon

    --
    How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
  85. Been there, waterproofed that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  86. changes the capacitance by Uzik2 · · Score: 1

    Parts of the mother board run at very high frequencies (the cpu pins). The change in capacitance between the pins may play havoc with the functionality. The guys who oil cooled their pc ran into it.

    --
    -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
  87. Okay, what about a compromise... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    Seeing as you're getting a lot of comments about cracks, immersion shorts, replacability, and cost, what if you modified the idea a bit...

    I'm thinking, immerse the board in oil:

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/strip-fans,1203-4.html

    Then seal it in watertight container, maybe something like:

    http://www.opticsplanet.net/pelican-1450-protector-medium-waterproof-case.html

    So this would be:

    thermally conductive - check
    electrically insulating - check

    immersible - check
    shock resistant - maybe?

    You'd need to puncture the case to allow for heat exchange, cabling, etc, but the oil would leak out of any water-permeable joints, so a completed project would likely be quite well-sealed.

    If you wanted a completely-contained PC, and clear plastic and an LCD to the side. Plus Wifi and Bluetooth, waterproof keyboard/mouse/whatever. You could have quite the critter on your hands.

    Just a thought...

  88. Sounds to me like by IdeaMan · · Score: 1
    --
    They ARE out to get you simply because They are in it for themselves and they don't care about you.
  89. Bah try E.U.N.U.C.H by sce7mjm · · Score: 1

    Try ice

    www.totl.net/Eunuch

    486 & Half Life Ha Ha

  90. just stick it in a bag full of sand. by carn1fex · · Score: 1

    fill a big ziplock bag with sand, stick your board in there and cackle.

    --

    ---------

    No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

  91. Oil filled cube with spring suspension by WinterSilence · · Score: 1

    I once saw on the net somebody who made a video of them immersing an entire setup (except the PSU) into heat conducting non-electrical conducting oil for a serious overclocking attempt. Of course all chipset and graphics card fans were removed or deactivated. That worked great for the heat. If one could suspend a computer setup in an oil cube casing then it would get both superior cooling and also be very schock absorbing. That would also open up for a pump or sort of external oil cooling system to be used, if the heat exceeds the oils capacity to coll the setup. So if you imagine 8 springs holding a mouting backet/plate in mid air attached to the 8 corners (and perhaps a couple of sides) inside a closed cube that is filled with high density non-electrical conduting oil and having no air (cube filled to max. possible) , then thats my idea to make a schock absorbing, high cooling solution. Of course this would also call for the usage of solid state disks, since they don't rotate and need a breathing hole. And SSD's are very shock proff too :)

    --
    What kind of dog barks "BOFH! BOFH!"? A rootweiler of course...
    1. Re:Oil filled cube with spring suspension by atomic-penguin · · Score: 1

      Is this the oil rig you were thinking?

      http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/strip-fans,1203.html

      --
      /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
  92. Re:Conformal Coating..and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's just about the most annoying thing a technician will ever have to spend an hour scraping off with various spoons sporks knives and picks only to fix 1 burnt trace and then reconform it.

    It's really an EXTREMELY annoying coating as it renders a lot of otherwise simple pcb's not practical (due to the costs of human scraping) for repairs.

    That aside, I'm a bigger fan of the notion of heatsinking and proper housing design than the "let's just coat the sucker in half an inch of glue-gun crap" approach some manufacturers opt for.

  93. Mmm, Fluorinert. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ah, yes. 3M Fluorinert. That stuff seems to pop up here in discussion every once in a while. I don't believe they actually manufacture it anymore -- what you can buy is basically "New Old Stock" -- and it's staggeringly expensive. (For the home hobbyist, anyway; if you're actually maintaining a Fluorinert-cooled system in production, it's probably nothing.)

    The common alternative you can play with at home is mineral oil, although it's not nearly as good. What makes Fluorinert useful is its relatively low boiling point. It's liquid at room temperature and on most idle parts, but on a hot component, it will boil. It's the boiling, not just the submersion in liquid, that draws the heat away so effectively. Most home liquid-submersion experiments miss this entirely.

    Personally I've always wondered about coolant solutions that use the solid/liquid state change rather than the liquid/gas one; maybe a slurry of solid, low-melt-point crystals suspended in a liquid carrier. I've worked with some plasticizers that have basically room-temperature freezing points, but I've never seen that particular property taken much advantage of. (Most of them actually become more dense as they freeze, rather than less dense like water, so you could put your hot parts at the bottom of a tank filled with slurry, and when the coolant melted the liquid would rise to the top and more frozen coolant would fill in over the part. It would be similar to Fluorinert boiling, but without the gas production.)

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  94. Parylene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look at the Parylene process. The ultra thin coating does not interfere with cooling (conductive, convective, or radiative)

  95. C-64 heat issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember the wavy lines that used to go across the screen after the "FIBERGLASS" motherboard got too hot?

    ROTFLMAO!!!

    Gotta admit though... they pumped out a shitload of those and most of us got a start on them at that young age.

    YAY Commodore!

  96. Re: Flourinert by Spiralis+Fractus · · Score: 1

    The electrically non-conductive Cray coolant is called Flourinert.

  97. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I still upgrade my RAM, video card, etc? If not, sorry, come up with something better, because this is simply insufficient.