Slashdot Mirror


Sub-$100 Laptops Have Finally Arrived

Roman Phalanx writes "OLPC had promised that it would be possible to mass produce a sub-$100 laptop. The folks at OLPC tried to realize that dream by re-imagining what a laptop looks like. How large of screen and keyboard it has. What OS runs on the laptop. Now that OLPC has decided to super size their systems to run Windows XP, the $100 price point has slipped beyond their reach. A Chinese firm has realized that dream. Taking the best from both the OLPC and EeePC. They ditched x86 compatibility and switched to a MIPS architecture to further reduce production costs. HiVision has managed to create a UMPC that sells right now for $120.00. They say they have refined the manufacturing process and have learned from building this laptop how to mass produce a laptop that will sell for $98.00." (More below, including a link to a video of the device.) "The new HiVision MiniNote is due out in October of 2008. TechVideoBlog has footage of one of these Mini Notes being shown off at a trade show in Germany. They have managed to borrow a unit overnight for a while and have done a quick review on it. Overall it looks pretty good. MIPS based processor, WiFi, 1GB flash storage, it runs Linux, has 3 USB ports, Ethernet, SDHC card reader, audio in and out, multi-tabbed Firefox browser support and Abiword for word processing. Running a custom Chinese Linux distrubution named Xip.

Overall performance seems snappy and no problems connecting to WiFi. Other than the lack of a webcam and the Adobe Flash Player it seems perfect. For $98 it looks like quite a value."

437 comments

  1. Because the interweb is unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a quick link to a youtube video:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKQbN6tpYXw

    And I promise, it's not a rick rolling.

    1. Re:Because the interweb is unreliable by palegray.net · · Score: 1, Informative

      The parent link is valid. It points to YouTube content showing off the laptop.

    2. Re:Because the interweb is unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The HiVision site is down (slashdotted)... Site must be hosted on a sub $100 server.

    3. Re:Because the interweb is unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "some kind of linux is here" - funny

    4. Re:Because the interweb is unreliable by Qalthos · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, I should be watching, interested in the video and the technical details and how it handles and all, but I watch the video, and listen to the guy talking, and I just start laughing...

      "It has *real* Linux... looks like Linux, uhhh, some kind of Linux is here..."

    5. Re:Because the interweb is unreliable by fbjon · · Score: 1

      He sounds like he needs to slow down once in a while..

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    6. Re:Because the interweb is unreliable by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where can someone in the US order some of these from? At $120 i could make a nice chunk of change selling them right now. I have some amateur astronomers that would love this thing,just hook up their USB webcams and Hello,instant feedback! Plus there is a college less than 12 blocks from my house,so no problems moving laptops at that price. So anybody know where we can actually get our hands on one,or is this another one of those "coming soon" that never seems to come out deals? But as always this is my 02c,YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    7. Re:Because the interweb is unreliable by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Anyone know if this is the same company that created the Hi-Vision MUSE Laserdisc system? They were HDTV discs/players ten years before Blu-ray and HD-DVD. Expensive as Hell, though.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:Because the interweb is unreliable by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 5, Funny

      "some kind of Linux is here..."

      New slogan for /.? Or at least new annoying meme?

      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    9. Re:Because the interweb is unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that was a Japanese company, no relation

    10. Re:Because the interweb is unreliable by TravisO · · Score: 1

      After watching the video, listening to those guy's questions to the lady were more annoying that any Rick Rolling I have ever fell victim to.

      I want to say he's just not translating his questions well, but if you ignore the wording and listen to what he's asking, he sounds like an idiot.

      "Does it come with the keyboard, and the mousepad?"

    11. Re:Because the interweb is unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was the commentator in that video Carl Sagan's long lost son?

      I'm sure they will sell billions and billions of these things. ;)

  2. video resolution...bleh by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    looks like 800x480 is becoming the new 1280×1024.

    --
    never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
    1. Re:video resolution...bleh by emj · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And 128MB ram is the new 2GB.. Actually it seems like it has either 128MB or 64MB, so guess what the cheap model will have...

    2. Re:video resolution...bleh by palegray.net · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Oddly enough, I've been seeing an increase in visitors browsing my site at 800x600 over the last couple of months. It's at 11% now, and probably still climbing.

      Maybe lower-resolution devices really are on the usage upswing.

    3. Re:video resolution...bleh by Naughty+Bob · · Score: 3, Informative

      Follow the HiVision link in TFS emj, it has half a gig of DDR2.

      --
      "Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"
    4. Re:video resolution...bleh by xx_toran_xx · · Score: 5, Informative

      and $100 is becoming the new $2000

      --
      Arrrrrrr
    5. Re:video resolution...bleh by emj · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually I looked at the Video and it said RAM: 64M/128M

    6. Re:video resolution...bleh by quantaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      looks like 800x480 is becoming the new 1280×1024.

      Dude,

      It's $98 and runs Linux.

      I'm willing to forgive them for a lower than average screen resolution.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    7. Re:video resolution...bleh by melikamp · · Score: 1

      You homepage link generates 403.

    8. Re:video resolution...bleh by daenris · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm fairly certain that none of those Low Cost PC laptops on their site are what this summary is about. First of all, all of those are using VIA C7 processors, not MIPS. And in the linked video he says it has 128MB of RAM. Those also all say Linux/Windows Vista (or XP). While in the video they say it runs either Linux or Windows CE.

    9. Re:video resolution...bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the salvation army is becoming my new cafeteria...

    10. Re:video resolution...bleh by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is that a "Too Many Pixels" error?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    11. Re:video resolution...bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never ever run my browser window maximised. I'd like to be able to report back that I'm using 800 x 600 too, cause that's about the size my browser window is generally at.

      Otherwise in a couple of years "optimised for 1280 x whatever" is going to be the new 90% browser market target.

    12. Re:video resolution...bleh by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2, Funny

      And 128MB ram is the new 2GB.. Actually it seems like it has either 128MB or 64MB, so guess what the cheap model will have...

      Either way it's a massive amount of memory.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    13. Re:video resolution...bleh by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Luckily not, what with the popularity of all these small laptops and mobile phones, i think the days of browsing with a small window will soon get better. What i do hate tho are fixed width sites, sometimes i want to browse using a small window, sometimes i want to browse using a wide screen...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    14. Re:video resolution...bleh by Naughty+Bob · · Score: 1

      Well, the model numbers are the same....

      --
      "Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"
    15. Re:video resolution...bleh by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      I'm using GeoIP restrictions on ClassHelper.org. Are you browsing from a U.S./Australia/U.K.-based IP address? If you are, and are still getting blocked, I'd like to know about it. Thanks!

    16. Re:video resolution...bleh by dangitman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's $98 and runs Linux.

      So is your mom.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    17. Re:video resolution...bleh by Parasome · · Score: 0

      640k ought to be enough for everybody!

    18. Re:video resolution...bleh by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      yes i am, and yes i am being blocked

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    19. Re:video resolution...bleh by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      Yup, from a Virgin Media .co.uk IP address.

    20. Re:video resolution...bleh by Handlarn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What old laptop you buy from a friend for $50 wouldn't be capable of running Linux and have a higher screen resolution?

    21. Re:video resolution...bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why in hell developers are unable to code resizable pages!

    22. Re:video resolution...bleh by bryce4president · · Score: 1

      Why exactly are you restricting based on IP? Who the hell really cares where someone lives?

    23. Re:video resolution...bleh by bryce4president · · Score: 1

      If only I had a few mod points...

    24. Re:video resolution...bleh by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      a friend [...] running Linux

      JUMBO SHRIMP!

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    25. Re:video resolution...bleh by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      one that didnt have built in wifi?

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    26. Re:video resolution...bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and $100 is becoming the new $2000

      It's called inflation and the falling value of the US dollar.

    27. Re:video resolution...bleh by b0bby · · Score: 1

      ...or a battery that's going to cost $100 to replace? And weighs 5lbs?

    28. Re:video resolution...bleh by SharpFang · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...and have a working power supply and battery that lasts longer than 10 minutes.

      The market for old laptops is saturated. The bottleneck are power supplies (I wonder why...) and batteries (long dead).
      I could get a decent 800MHZ 1024x768 screen laptop without a power supply for, like, $40.
      Then I need to spend $30 for a new power supply, and I won't find a new battery, no matter where I look. And if I find it, either it will be long dead or cost at least $60.

      Forget sub-$100 second-hand laptops as anything other than 'portable desktop'. They run fine on power supply, but they usually go so cheap because the batteries need to be replaced and the new ones cost marginally less than new laptops.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    29. Re:video resolution...bleh by donstenk · · Score: 1

      Very true, the AOL mail page sucks on the original Eeepc. My grandad has to scroll left to log-in.

      --
      Dennis Onstenk
    30. Re:video resolution...bleh by orasio · · Score: 1

      And what do you suggest for those of us who like to use our computers unplugged? To buy an extra battery? Do the math again, please.
      And no warranty.
      And you would be ripping off your friend, also, because laptops older than 2 years don't have good Linux driver support. He could get a better deal on ebay

    31. Re:video resolution...bleh by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      I *wish* I had friends like yours....

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    32. Re:video resolution...bleh by TravisO · · Score: 1

      I see you're a true internet traditionalist, taking down your entire site to "rebuild" it, good for you.

    33. Re:video resolution...bleh by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      You wonder why fixed-width is still around in 2008...

      True story: in 2003 I was working as a tech writer for a company in the Bay Area. One of my co-workers was a guy who'd been moved from something else to working on the company Web site. When the Pubs department decided we needed a new look on our internal site, we met with this guy to talk about the changes and showed him our proposed design.

      He said "You can't do that. You don't know what resolution visitors will have on their monitors" and then, I'm not kidding, he said "There's no way to get the page to fill the screen at every resolution."

      I about fell out of my chair. It's still an "inside" joke between some former coworkers and myself to say "There's no way to get the page to fill the screen!"

      Hilarious. Or maybe you had to be there :o)

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    34. Re:video resolution...bleh by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Do you have a specific set of pages for that resolution? If not, how can you determine what resolution people are using to browse the site?

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    35. Re:video resolution...bleh by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the heads up! I've updated the GeoIP database, and added some more country code exceptions. Hopefully this will correct some of the problems.

    36. Re:video resolution...bleh by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      I don't have a specific set of pages for 800x600, but have been trying to modify all my page layouts to better handle lower resolution devices. The majority of my visitors are browsing at 1024x768 and higher, but I'd prefer to offer layouts that are usable by everyone where it's possible.

      I'm using Google Analytics across the site to gather usage stats, which gives me a lot of nice information (including browser types and screen resolutions).

    37. Re:video resolution...bleh by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      I don't care where someone lives; I care about bots scraping content from my site in an abusive manner. I also care about spambots that abuse various resources on the site.

      Unfortunately, I've found that restricting access by country code is the only efficient way of dealing with these problems. It doesn't eliminate all of the issues, but it does mean that in cases where abuse occurs I have a decent chance of my complaints actually being acted upon by the abuser's ISP. In other regions, specifically ones outside US/UK/AU jurisdiction, there's very little I can do to get offensive behavior stopped.

    38. Re:video resolution...bleh by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      He wasn't complaining about the fact that the resolution is low. The reason he drew the relation to 1280x1024 is that they are both non-standard aspect ratios. 1280x1024 stuck out like a sore thumb because it was not a 4:3 aspect (instead it is 15:12). 800x480 is similarly non-standard - because at 10:6 it is somewhere between the standard widescreen monitor ratio of 16:9 and the standard widescreen tv ratio of 16:10.

    39. Re:video resolution...bleh by daenris · · Score: 1

      The summary doesn't list any model numbers. It just refers to it as "Mini Note." The paper listing the specs in the video has them listed as the PWS700A and PWS700B, which are not the same model numbers as on their website for those other systems. So no, they're not the same model numbers.

    40. Re:video resolution...bleh by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I will still take the old classic $2000

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    41. Re:video resolution...bleh by HankYarbo · · Score: 1

      What old laptop you buy from a friend for $50 wouldn't be capable of running Linux and have a higher screen resolution?

      What is this "friend" thing that people keep talking about?

    42. Re:video resolution...bleh by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      I'll buy any number of working laptops for U$ 50. (capable of running Linux and have a higher screen resolution)

      Why? I live in Uruguay.

      See, its not that simple :)

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    43. Re:video resolution...bleh by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      I got only 0.18% of 800x480's on this site. How many unique visitors make up your 11%?

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    44. Re:video resolution...bleh by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      I actually don't have any 800x480s, but I have had 411 unique visitors in the last 30 days with screen resolutions set to 800x600.

      Neat site you've got there, btw.

    45. Re:video resolution...bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I *wish* I had friends like yours....

      I'd be happy with just some friends.

    46. Re:video resolution...bleh by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      Seems to be working for me now. I didn't even give you my IP :S

    47. Re:video resolution...bleh by Naughty+Bob · · Score: 1

      These sites disagree.

      I guess it's down to whether or not you believe the video made by manufacturers of a competing product...

      --
      "Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"
    48. Re:video resolution...bleh by daenris · · Score: 1

      Maybe I just have no idea who the guy in the video is, but why do you think it's a video made by competitors? It's some guy at a trade show looking directly at the Hi-Vision booth/products, and I got the model numbers from an info sheet in the video about their products. Your more plausible alternative is that these other random sites are right and the manufacturers own website is wrong about the specs of their machine? Also, your third site is just referring back to the first site for the info. In addition that site actually has a Youtube video of the same video linked in the summary. If you jump to 3:58 in that video it shows you the model numbers.

    49. Re:video resolution...bleh by Naughty+Bob · · Score: 1

      Dude. Google the model number (NB0700, but don't take my word for it) on the manufacturer's site. Revel in the many 'First sub $100 laptop' results returned.

      Not sure how you arrived at the supposition, but no, the manufacturer's website is not wrong about their own product.

      --
      "Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"
    50. Re:video resolution...bleh by daenris · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that's not the sub-$100 model number. That model is:

      CPU:VIA C7-M 1.6GHz 400MHZ FSB
      RAM:512 DDR II Memory
      HDD:30GB
      OS:Linux / Windows XP / Windows Vista
      Windows Vista:7" WVGA LED Backlights (800 x 480)
      Net work:Wireless Lan 802.11 b/g
                                      10/100M Ethernet Controller
      Card Reader:Push-push SD socket
      Audio:Built-in Microphone and dual speakers
      Input/Output:USB 2.0 X 2 VGA
                                                  Microphone jack
                                                    Headphonejack RJ45
      Battery:3 cell/3 hours
      Weight:900g (including battery)

      Which is NOT the one in the video -- and is not the model number in the video. If that model number IS the sub-$100 notebook, then either the manufacturer's specs are wrong on the site, or they have two models with completely different specs with exactly the same model number.

      From http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS9413803799.html (the 6th link when googling for that model number): "HiVision's site, which offers pages devoted to its NBx line of notebooks, but which at press time has yet to post information on the new miniNote, should be available here."

      The MiniNote is NOT the NB0700

    51. Re:video resolution...bleh by Naughty+Bob · · Score: 1

      This Story states that the video shows a 'test' version of the model, and that the production version will be as per the manufacturer's site. Who knows? Not me.

      --
      "Be light, stinging, insolent and melancholy"
    52. Re:video resolution...bleh by melikamp · · Score: 1

      Yep, it works now.

    53. Re:video resolution...bleh by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      Dude,

      It's $98 and runs Linux.

      Dude, everything can run Linux.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    54. Re:video resolution...bleh by TLSPRWR · · Score: 1

      What old laptop you buy from a friend for $50 would include a power adapter (common reason to get rid of old laptops for cheap), and a battery life greater than 20 minutes?

    55. Re:video resolution...bleh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What old laptop you buy from a friend for $50 wouldn't be capable of running Linux and have a higher screen resolution?

      plus $100 for the new battery ... and $20 for the new keyboard... and $15 fir the memory card reader.... and the usb ports... and the 6 extra pounds... i'll prefer the netbook :)

  3. heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Strange times.
    A pc for under 100$ and a shiny phone for over 400$. both made in china.

    1. Re:heh.. by pipatron · · Score: 4, Funny

      And neither is able to play flash. O brave new world!

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    2. Re:heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Indeed! Phones and netbooks will help us eradicate Flash from the Web!

    3. Re:heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "O wonder!
      How many cheap laptops are there here!
      How Flash and Silverlight-free their browsing is!
      O brave new world
      That hath such corporations in't!

      There, fixed it for Aldous and Shakespeare.

      Let it be known that even the greatest writers in history are not beyond the arrogance of a Slashdot AC. Along with the dreadful and degrading words: 'There, fixed it for you.'

    4. Re:heh.. by rs79 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I took a good long look at everything they make on their website and was pretty excited until the realization of the mips processor hit home. You see, I used to have an Amiga...

      Can a computer REALLY be called "on the internet" if it can't look at youtube videos? You and I may know and understand and if it's exchanging packets it's on the net, but grandma or the kids run firefox and try to watch something on youtube and it doesn't and won't work then their reaction is gonna be "uh, do you have a computer that works with the internet?". No flash is, sad to say, a non-starter.

      But damn they're close. Real close. They've done some great work with these machines.

      What they need now is an OLED display at 1280 pixels across and a touch screen. Oh and a cam. And I hate to say it because I've been rabidly raging against these things for literally decades now, but, yeah, an x86 cpu.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    5. Re:heh.. by nobodyman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can a computer REALLY be called "on the internet" if it can't look at youtube videos?

      No offense, but please go die.

    6. Re:heh.. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      How Flash and Silverlight-free their browsing is!

      Sounds like Yoda.
      Now if you could put music to it, you may have a hit!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    7. Re:heh.. by pegdhcp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The dilemma is that, for me flash is the best indicator for a web site that has a suckage factor close to 1, it is unfortunate that for the bigger (like 90%+) portion of Internet users, flash means classy (flashy?) web site. This device and relatives, while being very very good for people doing field services, away from office jobs, who need a 9600,8,N,1 interface anywhere they go etc. is not very good for people who "just surf the Internet" -after 13, 14 year I still hate the verb "surfing"-.
      And, for those of you people who do not need to care about economics in their jobs, if you cannot sell to Internet crowd, you can forget IT crowd as well, as your company will sink before you know what hit you.

    8. Re:heh.. by celle · · Score: 1

      Celebrate! Celebrate! Dance to the blank screen!

    9. Re:heh.. by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Install Gnash or Swfdec, they play Youtube videos. Now if only God would magic the code into existance and free us from Adobe.

      I mean, seriously, has anyone read Adobe's penguin.swf? x86_64 is THE number 1 request, but instead they're working out bugs and other shit for a dying architecture (x86) and people who ask where x86_64 support are receive nothing but a snide, mocking dismissal from the guy who runs it.

    10. Re:heh.. by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 1

      We talk of how the internet is evolving all the time, yet when someone points out one such evolutionary route such as YouTube, they must go die.

      It is broken. It is morally and ethically challenged. It sucks at spelling. It is anonymous and cowardly. It is the internet.

      A browser that doesn't run Flash and other plugins is an incomplete browser. The full internet experience is already what it is. Let us live with it. We do not have to go die.

    11. Re:heh.. by tubs · · Score: 1

      Why would using an Amiga have anything to do with a mips processor?

      --

      try to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, then you die

    12. Re:heh.. by bryce4president · · Score: 1

      So what you really want is a $3000 laptop? At this point the screen alone would cost you $2000, then add touch.... and what is this fetish with built in web cams? Did I really miss something here? Who actually uses them? I admit, I got suckered back in the day too, ooohhh aahhhh gotta have a webcam.... for what?

      Then I look at your sig, and understand... price isn't something you are worried about...

    13. Re:heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can a computer REALLY be called "on the internet" if it can't look at youtube videos?

      No offense, but please go die.

      Well here in the UK the ASA (Advertising Standards Agency) ruled that Apple couldn't claim that the iPhone provided access to the whole of the internet because it didn't have Flash (and Java).

    14. Re:heh.. by numbski · · Score: 0

      Might I interject for a moment?

      Why *can't* this device run flash? Seriously? It's Linux. There are license restrictions, but it runs Firefox. Just go grab the binary installer and load it. I've done it at least a dozen times - it's not exactly hard. It isn't user friendly - yes, I know. There's not much that can be done about that until Adobe makes an effort to make it easier, but still - it's just a binary installer, not really any worse than Windows in that regard. Is the thing not x86 compatible?

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    15. Re:heh.. by pheared · · Score: 1

      Maybe because Adobe doesn't release the source code? Didn't the article say it runs a MIPS processor? You're at the mercy of Adobe.

    16. Re:heh.. by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

      Gnash and swfdec aren't super-reliable yet, in my experience, but I highly recommend youtube-dl

      http://www.arrakis.es/~rggi3/youtube-dl/

      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    17. Re:heh.. by orasio · · Score: 1

      Should be gnash, because Adobe didn't release a MIPS binary.
      This multiplatform thing might prove once again the convenience of free software.

    18. Re:heh.. by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Can a computer REALLY be called "on the internet" if it can't look at youtube videos?
      No offense, but please go die.

      My eight year old wants a laptop. I've seriously thought about getting something like this for her. Now she mainly place flash web games or watches you tube. So I'm not interested in a cheap laptop that doesn't do those two things.

      So although you may be feeling "old" that youtube is the internet, todays generation demands things like facebook/myspace/youtube to be the internet. It's like saying is internet really the internet without slashdot? I mean if you can't do what you want or have previously been able to do, why would you be interested in that platform again?

    19. Re:heh.. by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      Bad news - most new Sony Ericsson or Nokia phones are just fine with flash. Some samsung or LG devices code their UI in flash now.

      Of course this is not "browser" flash, but standalone swf file works just fine.

    20. Re:heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm fully convinced that so many developers/designers are moving to Flash-based websites due to the absolute rats-nest disaster that is HTML/CSS/Javascript. Yes, we've come a long way since the 1990s, but trying to design a good-looking, modern website capable of interoperability with Firefox, IE, Safari and other browsers is still akin to pulling teeth. CSS combines the elegance of COBOL with the power of GWBASIC. We're trying to use tools specifically designed to create static content, and twisting them to make complicated, dynamic applications. It's lipstick on a pig, plain and simple.

      It's high time we develop a new, open standard language from scratch for website development, and I mean a real programming language describing the entire web page and running client-side in a secure sandbox, not a markup language with bastardized VBScript/JavaScript glued on like warts. The modern web really needs it.

    21. Re:heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While you're at it, please die in a hilarious way and film it so someone can put it up on youtube to amuse the rest of us.

    22. Re:heh.. by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      My eight year old wants a laptop. I've seriously thought about getting something like this for her. Now she mainly place flash web games or watches you tube. So I'm not interested in a cheap laptop that doesn't do those two things.

      Eight years old? EIGHT YEARS OLD and she wants a lah-di-dah laptop? Pah! People tell me that "kids are so sophisticated these days", but too bad. Tell her she's getting one of these, and tell her she can like it or lump it! Speak and Spell were good enough when I were a lad (*), so that's practically luxury :)

      If she whines and you want to be really horrible- or just silly- get her this one and before you show it to her tell her you're not *quite* sure if it runs Flash.

      (*) Strictly speaking, this isn't true. I didn't have a bloody Speak and Spell when I grew up... and that *is* true :'-( Though I realise now that if I had I would have been bored of it within the first day and only used it out of guilt :/

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    23. Re:heh.. by thompson.ash · · Score: 1

      Please don't take this as a negative but I worked for a while in an electronics store and I saw plenty of people buying laptops for the under-10s...

      Why? What could someone under 10 possibly need with a laptop?

      Sure they might WANT a laptop for entertainment. The same as wanting a games console or even a puppy or some such but WHY does it have to be a laptop?

      As much as regulatory insitutions try, the internet is a dangerous place and, in my opinion, children have no place there.

      Now I'm not a parent and I don't presume to tell anyone who is, how to raise your child. You're a bigger man than me!

      I just fail to see the sense in buying an 8 year old a laptop. They are sophisticated, they are fragile and all it does is grant them access to somewhere they don't belong...

      Thanks for listening, rant over :D

      --
      I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was going blame you for it!
  4. Flash won't be here soon by JackassJedi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think from past experience (Linux 64-bit) that we'll be waiting a long time for Flash on this one... other than that it seems like a great idea to do what they did!

    --
    Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many.
    1. Re:Flash won't be here soon by martinw89 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Gnash already has MIPS support. As this project is actually still moving right along, we can only hope for more. Plus, Gnash already supports YouTube (although it seems people are still having problems).

      Bottom line: Thoughts of Adobe supporting Flash on MIPS is a joke. Gnash already supports MIPS but we'll have to wait a little longer for Gnash to support more advanced features.

      NOTE: Swfdec also supports MIPS. I have had more luck with Swfdec, and some distros are making it the default free Flash player. Plus, it seems to have more advanced feature supported.

    2. Re:Flash won't be here soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adobe Flash doesn't even support x86_64, no way in hell they're gonna support MIPS!

      And isn't Gnash based on Swfdec, shouldn't the projects work together? Alas, the sub-optimization that can happen in the open source world....

    3. Re:Flash won't be here soon by Tester · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are versions of Flash available for ARM and MIPS if you pay for them.. Example: the Nokia N8x0 devices...

    4. Re:Flash won't be here soon by stinerman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Negative.

      Gnash is based on GameSWF. Swfdec is based on...swfdec.

      For why don't they work together ... they do. See this interview for more information.

    5. Re:Flash won't be here soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flash works fine with 32bit firefox under linux 64bit.

    6. Re:Flash won't be here soon by evilviper · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think from past experience (Linux 64-bit) that we'll be waiting a long time for Flash on this one...

      Flash animations, and Flash Video are two very different things, and almost entirely separate.

      FLV is already supported everywhere, thanks to libavcodec. You just need to parse the SWF player and find the actual file to play.

      SWF animations, however, require a full-fledged player, and won't be supported. Still, how big of an issue is that going to be? Are there many websites out there that provide no alternative to their SWF menus?

      For games, and the like, there is a standalone SWF player for MIPS Linux (found on similar portables--see my recent posts), which would trivially allow SWF animations launched by web pages to be played separate from the browser.

      So that's a fairly narrow case of SWF that doesn't work on this sytem, and I suppose that might be worked around as well by somehow sending feedback between the standalone SWF player and the browser.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Flash won't be here soon by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't really need flash for those video sites like youtube, and most everything else is just advertising - check out this info about how to download the videos as mp4 files:

      http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/04/download-youtube-videos-as-mp4-files.html

      In the comments there are a lot of sites listed that will automate the process for you.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:Flash won't be here soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use GNASH and it works perfectly for me as a 64bit user for every video site I go on. Like I imagain most people I only use flash for video and for this purpose it's fine.

    9. Re:Flash won't be here soon by Drantin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This which is linked to from here seems to say something...

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    10. Re:Flash won't be here soon by martinw89 · · Score: 1

      Yes but 64 bit is not MIPS, the architecture in question. Not to mention ARM, PowerPC, etc. that are also in use these days, which Adobe additionally does not support. Also, that blogger called Ubuntu "Unbunu", which seems to say something...

      To his credit, he apparently typed this on an iPod. Since I have not used an iPod to type anything, I can only assume it's like typing on an EEE PC with your elbows.

      Cheers!

    11. Re:Flash won't be here soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You mean that I miss out on all those great flash based ads?

      I realise that I am in the minority in not having flash on any of my desktop PCs (3). When buying online, businesses with sites requiring flash don't get my money. There is little in the way of downside in not having flash installed.

    12. Re:Flash won't be here soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Gnash is powered by a dancing Richard M. Stallman.

        href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7C6r6fG4k40

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pube5Aynsls

    13. Re:Flash won't be here soon by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The Nokia n800 series seems to play flash, did adobe port it to ARM?

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    14. Re:Flash won't be here soon by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

      i know i link to this video every time someone mentions gnash, but i do it because it's important.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoNvsiBTQDE

      basically, without a lot of help, the gnash developers' hands are tied through legal restrictions.

    15. Re:Flash won't be here soon by Cato · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thanks for the link, great interview with Rob Savoye of the Gnash project. For the impatient: anyone who's ever installed the Flash player plugin can't work on Gnash, which is quite a heavy restriction. If Adobe lifted this it would really help Gnash a lot more than releasing specs that Gnash figured out some years ago.

    16. Re:Flash won't be here soon by donaldm · · Score: 1

      I think from past experience (Linux 64-bit) that we'll be waiting a long time for Flash on this one... other than that it seems like a great idea to do what they did!

      I run 64 bit Fedora 9 on my HP laptop and flash runs fine within my 64 bit Firefox browser. Most of my applications also run 64 bit with the only exceptions being my SNES (zsnes) and Sega Genius/Megadrive (Dgen) native rpm installable (not Wine) emulators and they run fine with a nice GUI front-end as well (Ah nostalgia).

      The only thing I can't do on my Fedora laptop is run Microsoft Office since I am not willing to pay for it or pirate it, but who cares since I can run Open Office. For more sophisticated jobs I can use 64 bit software that in the majority of cases is legitimately free.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    17. Re:Flash won't be here soon by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the "narrow" case applies to normal people using a web browser in the normal way. That doesn't sound very narrow to me.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    18. Re:Flash won't be here soon by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      anyone who's ever installed the Flash player plugin can't work on Gnash

      If that is so I'm really impressed there are people who can still work on it. Particularly considering that gnash developers must have some personal interest in flash technology.

      Unless they really mean "installing" and not "having it pre-installed and using it"

    19. Re:Flash won't be here soon by evilviper · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the "narrow" case applies to normal people using a web browser in the normal way.

      I suggest you try reading my post again, because you clearly didn't get the idea the first time through.

      Linux/MIPS can play FLV, and Flash, it just won't be embedded, and info can't be passed back and forth.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    20. Re:Flash won't be here soon by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      By "it won't be embedded" you mean "it won't appear within the page in the browser as it does in IE", yes? That is the normal way people use Flash (not that they typically know that's what they're doing), so if it doesn't do that it doesn't work for the normal case. If it doesn't do what IE/Firefox/Safari do, if it opens a new window or they have to go through some machinations to see it at all, as far as they're concerned it doesn't really work properly.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    21. Re:Flash won't be here soon by evilviper · · Score: 1

      so if it doesn't do that it doesn't work for the normal case.

      That's a bit like saying, if a car has more than 4 wheels, it doesn't work.

      Just because it will appear differently (it's own window), doesn't mean it won't do everything they want it to do.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    22. Re:Flash won't be here soon by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      It's more like saying a car has six seats when four of them are on the roof. There are six seats, but you're not getting what you imagine when you think of a car with six seats.

      Just because it will appear differently (it's own window), doesn't mean it won't do everything they want it to do.

      What if they don't want it in its own window? What if they want it to appear in the web page as it does on their real computer, as the designer intended, as it should?

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    23. Re:Flash won't be here soon by evilviper · · Score: 1

      What if they don't want it in its own window? What if they want it to appear in the web page as it does on their real computer, as the designer intended, as it should?

      And what if they DO want it in it's own window? They'll be pissed when they go back to their "real computer" and can't get it to work that way.

      There are two ways to do it, and each is different. You've utterly failed so far to demonstrate that there is anything better or worse about doing it one way, versus another.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    24. Re:Flash won't be here soon by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Oh, get a grip. It appears in its own window because its an incomplete implementation, not because it's better that way. It cannot present web pages as they are designed; that's not a feature, it's a deficiency. It's worse because it's not what was intended when the pages were designed and it's not what users have come to expect.

      Were you a used car salesman in a former life?

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    25. Re:Flash won't be here soon by evilviper · · Score: 1

      It's worse because it's not what was intended when the pages were designed and it's not what users have come to expect.

      HTML is a markup language. You don't have any control over how the user chooses to display it.

      Setting a minimum font size so I can actually READ what's on screen? Disabling javascript pop-ups? Clearly bad things, because it's not what was intended, and not what the users have come to expect.

      This thing boots up in 10 seconds. That's certainly not what users have come to expect, so it's clearly a deficiency that should be "fixed".

      Were you a used car salesman in a former life?

      I could ask if you were a mindless marketing droid...

      You've still got nothing but baseless assertions.

      Goodbye.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    26. Re:Flash won't be here soon by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Is Flash on MIPS your work? You seem unusually keen to defend it. I can't imagine any other reason why you'd go through such mental gymnastics to not merely attempt to justify its deficiencies, but claim they are in fact benefits.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    27. Re:Flash won't be here soon by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      What a load of shit. That's gotta be the "Best Unenforceable EULA Clause" ever.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  5. useable? by B5_geek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ahh, but can you type on the damn thing? I love my Eee, but I hate using it. The keys are too damn small to type on. Screen size I can live with, but IMHO it's only good for a few non-interactive things. (I know I could add an external keyboard, but that defeats the portability that I was after.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:useable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm typing this on my eee 701, and while i wouldn't want to write a book or program on it, its just fine to tooling around on forums, slashdot, and normal emails. I'd definitely be interested in trying out a 10" version of the keyboard to see if its more reasonable without taking away the nice small form factor.

    2. Re:useable? by Endo13 · · Score: 1
      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    3. Re:useable? by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am hoping that some day soon, people that offer free WiFi (and other places) have a couple of tables with a basic pc built into them, kind of like those old table style video games. The trick is that to use it, you have to have a thumb drive (or something like it) that plugs in, providing storage, OS, personal files etc. There are several distros of Linux that could do this, and there would be some performance issues, but it would certainly turn just about everything (with these or similar systems) into Internet cafes... or whatever you like to call them.

      When you are mobile, you plug it into your PDA/phone or other mobile device. When you arrive at home, just plug the thumb drive module into your desktop and you're off.

      Yes, I realize that anyone could poke technical holes in that description. I'm just trying to give the basic idea. As storage physical size shrinks, this will become more possible. I'd like to see it. It would not work for absolutely everything, especially storage intensive applications, but for a lot of things it would work. Who carries their porn collection around with them anyway?

      I'd also be happy with a mobile device/phone that allowed not only this module to plug in, but additional storage USB devices (mp3 etc) so that the modules become common place. usb storage module for your mp3 player can be plugged into your phone also, as well as your mobile computing device.

      you should get the option of phone sized pda, or maybe sidekick style option etc.

      Again, I know there are a lot of reasons that this is a problematic goal, it's just a wish list top 10... for me anyway.

    4. Re:useable? by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I can type on my EEE - I only miss "c" 75% of the time, and I can't reliably hit ctrl-anything without dedicating an index finger for ctrl. And wtf was with putting the only function key on the opposite side of the keyboard from the keys you use it with?

      But aside from that, I do love the thing. Use it all the time. I've typed hundreds of pages on it. With numerous corrections, of course. But it's usable. And it bounces. That's really the main selling point.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    5. Re:useable? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but can you type on the damn thing?

      Type how fast? I can type on my Zaurus SL-C3000, not very fast but fast enough to pound out rough drafts of poems and essays while on the go. It's about the size of a pack of 3x5 index cards; I would love to find something that size with a more standard architecture. I guess the Nokia 810 is the closest thing in current production; but that sliding keyboard looks like the suck, the Z's clamshell formfactor blows it out of the water.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    6. Re:useable? by woot+account · · Score: 0

      Replying to undo moderation. I hate the one-click moderation shit.

    7. Re:useable? by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      huh? A moderator that changed their mind? Sorry I wasted your point....

    8. Re:useable? by centuren · · Score: 1

      As portable devices get more powerful and more capable, why are PCs even needed in this situation? Forget the thumb drive, plug your next-next-gen phone into your table, flip up the monitor, and use the full-sized keyboard (with touchpad, I suppose).

    9. Re:useable? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      So all it needs now is a folding screen and an external drive ? :)

      I have a machine that displays in 1024x480 (panoramic before it was trendy) and it did require working a bit differently. The virtual desktop are essential. No idea how you can use it in Windows.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    10. Re:useable? by tonzack · · Score: 1

      Like how the original Apple Macintosh could have everything you could possibly need on one 400K floppy disk--operating system, an application or two, and some space for your documents. You could take that floppy to any Mac, boot it, and it'd be your own self-contained, mobile instance of a Macintosh system.

      And if you wanted more applications, you'd make a new system disk and copy the applications to it. You could customize the system to only have the resources (like fonts and desk accessories) you need to actually make your applications run and be useful to you.

      And now you're talking about having that on a USB stick? Man, how things come full-circle!

  6. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yea, this laptop is so good with WIFI I got first post!

    1. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might wanna get a refund, then.

    2. Re:First Post by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Yea, this laptop is so good with WIFI I got first post!

      I think you need to upgrade your madwifi kernel module or something.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    3. Re:First Post by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      No, he's right. He got the first post... in China's Timezone.

    4. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China only has one timezone?

    5. Re:First Post by timster · · Score: 1

      Why does China need more than one timezone? Who cares what the numbers on the clock say?

      The numbers on the clock are stupidly arbitrary anyway -- few people wake up at 0:00.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    6. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. China has only one time zone, UTC+0800.

      Interestingly, China borders India, which has the time zone UTC+0530. So, when travelling across the India-China border, you get to change your clock by two and a half hours. :-)

      Here's a random time zone map I found through Google...

      Oh, and the captcha is warping. ;-)

  7. MIPS will make it a hard sell by AuMatar · · Score: 0

    No precompiled apps to download, since no one has download links for MIPS and no proprietary company would bother with such a tiny market. You're going to end up compiling everything you want from source and hoping it works. It will sell only to a subset of geeks.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    1. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by quantumplacet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it only has a 1GB HD. I think the idea is it's an appliance, not intended for you to really add apps to it. Theoretically it comes with what you need for what it's intended to do. It may or may not find a mass market, but only a subset of geeks will try to see what else they can run on it...

    2. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the spec says 30Gb.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Informative

      Windows CE runs on MIPS. There are plenty of WinCE programs compiled for MIPS. And so does linux, X, KDE, GNOME, etc. Are you implying that KDE/GNOME/X/GNU/Linux sucks?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by JackassJedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they really start selling it for $98 I expect a *lot* of geeks to adopt it, and in that case I think we can be sure someone will start a distro(-fork) for MIPS for this device.

      --
      Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many.
    5. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by evilviper · · Score: 2, Informative

      No precompiled apps to download, since no one has download links for MIPS and no proprietary company would bother with such a tiny market.

      So, you've never heard of Linux before, eh? Welcome to /.

      apt-get, yum, and the like will function just as well on MIPS as they do on x86, automatically downloading the pre-compiled binaries for your arch.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Is that a sure thing? If you make a lot of cheap useful mini-computers and include good developer tools, why won't the users make their own? Don't think of it like a PC, think of like an open PDA or phone. Done right they could have a very healthy community app selection quickly.

      Just don't be surprised if most of the apps are in Chinese first.

      (We can call it the Little Red Notebook!)

    7. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      It's a head in the cloud.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    8. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by cptdondo · · Score: 1

      Actually....

      This looks like a perfect platform for Angstrom

      angstrom-distribution.org

      Lots of apps, and more machines like this the better. Fro $98 I expect this will sell like crazy. Beats the crap out of a Sharp Zaurus....

    9. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux runs on MIPS, and QEMU can emulate a MIPS machine with the elbow room to build what you need. If these take off, somebody will take on the challenge and share their precompiled binaries.

    10. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by oldhack · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's about time we ditch the deranged lunacy that is x86 instruction set, especially when even Intel is going on multiple-core strategy. I'd love to see ARM- or MIPS-based multi-core chips take over.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    11. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by pipatron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funny. I'm running a full linux on a MIPS machine I have here. I can install binary packages of everything I have wanted to install by just doing "ipkg install ". Check out OpenWRT if you're interested.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    12. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Xtifr · · Score: 4, Informative

      No precompiled apps to download,

      Yeah, there's only a little over 20,000 precompiled MIPS packages here. (Well, technically, somewhere in here, with an index located here.) I tend to think that 20,000+ is a little bit more than zero, but maybe that's just me. :)

    13. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Korin43 · · Score: 0

      Just because Aptitude works doesn't mean there's any MIPS packages to download.

    14. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

      Speaking of MIPS, isn't that something you measure x86 chips (or any chips) with? As in millions of instructions per second. I've never heard of an architecture based off a speed rating.

      --
      Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    15. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or...it will sell to people who only want to do IM, email, web, video chat, voice chat, documents, and listen to music.

      basically everything about 75% of computer users actually need in its entirety.

    16. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by evilviper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just because Aptitude works doesn't mean there's any MIPS packages to download.

      No, of course not.

      It's the fact that:

      it's trivially to compile for MIPS once you've got it compiled for every other major architecture.

      the likes of Debian and other non-commercial distros have policies to ensure that all possible architectures are fully supported.

      MIPS is an extremely popular architecture (Embedded, PDAs, SGI systems, etc.) ...that means there's tons of MIPS binary packages available for download.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    17. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MIPS is supported by Debian, so there are plenty of packages to download.

    18. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by McDutchie · · Score: 3, Informative

      No precompiled apps to download, since no one has download links for MIPS and no proprietary company would bother with such a tiny market.

      I take it you never heard of Debian? They have precompiled binaries for pretty much every current processor architecture, including MIPS.

    19. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Xzzy · · Score: 4, Funny

      What are you talking about, 20,000 has 4 zeros in it!

    20. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by evilviper · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've never heard of an architecture based off a speed rating.

      No? Have you heard of acronym collisions before?

      Millions of Instructions Per Second

      vs.

      Microprocessor without Interlocked Pipeline Stages

      And don't get me started on "POWER"/"PowerPC", because, of course, those terms would never refer to anything other than a CPU architecture...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    21. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just because Aptitude works doesn't mean there's any MIPS packages to download.

      True, but all it takes is a source repository, a cross compiler, and a huge botnet to turn things around.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    22. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Out of interest, it's a 32-bit XBurst CPU from Ingenic Semiconductors.

      http://www.ingenic.cn/eng/productServ/XBurst/pfCustomPage.aspx

    23. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No precompiled apps to download, since no one has download links for MIPS and no proprietary company would bother with such a tiny market.

      Are you kidding? What are you planning to do with this, have it as your main desktop?

      At $98, I'll buy 2 or 3 of them to throw around the house for quick browsing. If they can get Flash, it'll be full-blown awesome.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    24. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Xtifr · · Score: 4, Funny

      And four zeros is more than (one) zero. I rest my case. :)

    25. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      See, it's comments like this that make me ignore anyone with a /. UID over a million. MIPS is one of the oldest RISC architectures (actually predating the term RISC, which came from another competing project from the same era) and is one of the most popular instruction sets in the world (I think ARM overtook it at some point in the last decade, but it's still well ahead of x86 in terms of installed-base).

      To the grandparent, I think you'll find lots of precombiled binaries to download for MIPS.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    26. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 5, Informative

      Speaking of MIPS, isn't that something you measure x86 chips (or any chips) with? As in millions of instructions per second. I've never heard of an architecture based off a speed rating.

      MIPS was one of the first successful manufacturers of a CPU chip with a reduced instruction set (from which of course the RISC acronym arose) as an alternative to the Intel x86 complex instruction set (CISC). The idea was that you could get a faster computer by being able to execute an entire instruction in a single clock cycle, rather than accept the overheads in silicon required by an architecture that takes more than one clock cycle to execute a single instruction. If you can do it in one clock cycle, it means that the whole instruction must fit within the instruction register, that is operation code, address, and any modifying flags that go with it. CISC instruction sets have to make a branch decision based on the opcode as to whether there's more to read into that register before the operation can complete. Less silicon to navigate meant more efficient structures, thus higher speed.

      For many years, this worked quite well. Intel had to work very hard to make their CISC instruction set as fast as it is; market forces meant that MIPS couldn't keep up in the prime PC market, thus settled out into the small, high efficiency and inexpensive niche. You still see a lot of embedded systems using RISC chips.

      This is also the basis of the controversy you encounter when using the term "MIPS" in it's meaning of "Millions of Instructions Per Second" as a fundamental metric of computer speed -- it's hard to compare a million RISC instructions with a million CISC instructions, in the same way that it's hard to rate an engine by the number of cylinders it has. Myer-Drake Indy cars had a lovely 4-cylinder engine that burned pure alcohol (the "Offenhauser", or "Offy") for many years that had a much higher output than your commercial V8. It's difficult to find a good standard metric some times.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    27. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by againjj · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are lots of MIPS Linux distros (Main Page), but that doesn't invalidate the GP post. The only apps you get are the ones in the distros. No one compiles for MIPS, since the market is miniscule. This means it is a crap shoot as to whether the source compile works, and you get nothing if the source isn't available. I had the same problem for PowerPC back when I had Linux on my old Mac, and I would wager that PPC is at least a big a market as MIPS would be.

      One of my favorite bug hunts was when I found out the implementation difference in varargs between x86 and PPC: in x86, it is a pointer, which means changes in a called function don't propagate, while it is a pointer to a struct on PPC, which means changes do propagate -- thus the missing va_end only affected things on PPC.

    28. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Here's the thing about software:

      Once you standardize the hardware, you compile the software ONCE, and then everyone can copy it.

      Expect a website to appear to collect all of the compiled apps for this thing. From then on there's no effort or cost for new users to obtain new software.

      Of course, there are a hundred security issues with this, but for $89 retail you aren't going to get a secure platform.

    29. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by blair1q · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The deranged lunacy turned ranged a long time ago.

      The core instruction set has had multiple sets of custom enhancements over the years, and can now do some pretty amazing stuff "in a single instruction."

      It's the RISC methodology that can no longer keep up except under specific constraints to the problem set. That's why Apple switched to keep up in general-purpose and multimedia computing, and you'll find PowerPC only in embedded and HPC any more.

    30. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No precompiled apps to download, since no one has download links for MIPS and no proprietary company would bother with such a tiny market. You're going to end up compiling everything you want from source and hoping it works. It will sell only to gentoo users.

      fixed.

    31. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by rtechie · · Score: 1

      The OP is absolutely right.

      To all the people posting about MIPS support in Debian (the only Linux distribution with generic MIPS as a target): Do you have a working GUI? I couldn't get anything but pure X to work on MIPS. Most Linux MIPS development is for headless systems, so absolutely no effort has been put into porting GUI apps as far as I can tell.

      How many major graphical distributions (Fedora, SUSE, Ubuntu) have MIPS versions? ZERO. Debian is it, and Debian doesn't work right. Gentoo will probably also sort-of work, just like Debian.

    32. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by rtechie · · Score: 1, Troll

      The OP is absolutely right.

      To all the people posting about MIPS support in Debian (the only Linux distribution with generic MIPS as a target): Do you have a working GUI? I couldn't get anything but pure X to work on MIPS. Most Linux MIPS development is for headless systems, so absolutely no effort has been put into porting GUI apps as far as I can tell. I suspect the GUI apps that come with this laptop will be all you'll ever get, and I bet they're buggy as hell.

      How many major graphical distributions (Fedora, SUSE, Ubuntu, etc.) have MIPS versions? ZERO. Debian is it, and Debian doesn't work right. Gentoo will probably also sort-of work, just like Debian.

    33. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by quantumplacet · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm, now I'm confused. TFS says 1GB, the HiVision website lists the NB0700 as it's cheapest laptop, and a quick google search says the NB0700 is the "First $100 laptop." However, the specs on the NB0700 are very different than TFS.

    34. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by PsychoElf · · Score: 1

      Damn kiddies with that infernal extra one in front of their #.

    35. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MIPS may make it a hard sell for another reason... As I understand it, there are patents on MIPS, and some Chinese companies are manufacturing unlicensed MIPS processors. If there's an infringement, they'll put the smackdown on any large-scale importing.

    36. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by RustinHWright · · Score: 1

      You mean the "subset of geeks" who constitute the likely half million or more users of these types of boxen in another six months?

      Things are changing fast, my friend.

      --
      It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
    37. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by RustinHWright · · Score: 1

      No sweat. I've got a 4GB flash drive and a 20 GB Little Disk. Beyond apps and OS, what do I need or even want an internal HD for? Using external drives is far more secure and modular.

      --
      It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
    38. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Anonymous+Cowhead · · Score: 1

      Thanks for finally getting around to the car analogy. I really didn't understand all that MIPS CISC RISC stuff, but that cleared it up!

    39. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "standard metric"

      Heh.

    40. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      How does that make any sense? The internal instruction set of a modern x86 processor (AMD/Intel) is RISC and further more Apple switched for two reasons: IBM not meeting capacity and deadlines and leakage; Apple wanted badly to stay competitive in the laptop market. The G5 ran hot and had leakage problems even in its deepest sleep state which hindered it from ever being brought to market in a powerbook.

    41. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Beats the crap out of a Sharp Zaurus....

      Formfactor-wise, nothing beats a Sharp Zaurus SL-C3000 (or 3100/3200). It's pocketsized, clamshell, with a QWERTY keyboard usable for two-finger (or thumb) typing.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    42. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      And only one non-zero. Making it 80% zero, and 20% non-zero.
      int total = (0 * 0.8) + (2 * 0.2);

      So there we have it. 20,000 == 0

    43. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That's why Apple switched to keep up in general-purpose and multimedia computing,

      I can't speak for the larger issues of RISC vs CISC and whathaveyou... but Apple almost certainly did not switch because of those. Apple switched because IBM did not have the interest or capability to pump out cheap, high-performing chips like Intel can. The G5 was impressive, but useless in a notebook.

      I don't see why a RISC chip would be inherently harder to build than a CISC chip... Hell, the current Core chips from Intel are RISC chips with a big honking translator slapped onto them.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    44. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Charan · · Score: 1

      The core instruction set has had multiple sets of custom enhancements over the years, and can now do some pretty amazing stuff "in a single instruction."

      Even though the instruction set exposes a CISC interface, some modern chips decompose those instructions down into micro-ops. So internally, the processor could still resemble a RISC architecture.

    45. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by armanox · · Score: 1

      On my SGI Octane (MIPS IP30), I have full X running KDE 3.5.9. Does that count? Gentoo BTW....

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    46. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Just because Aptitude works doesn't mean there's any MIPS packages to download.

      True, but all it takes is a source repository, a cross compiler, and a huge botnet to turn things around.

      Fix the compile errors and win an ipod?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    47. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      That's really odd. I found this old archived gcc post, saying it shouldn't be a problem anymore with egcs. So yeah, the post is from 1998. I'm guessing that all of those weird differences have been smoothed out by now.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    48. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A single instruction is only as fast as the clock cycles it takes to execute it. Give me one instruction per clock, please*. Many Intel instructions take way more then one clock cycle to complete. If the core (Intel and AMD) was not of a RISC design then out of order execution would be nearly imposible also high clock speeds become problematic. If CISC was so great why has nobody designed a new CISC instruction set besides X84-64? Writing CISC assembly can be painful due to the large instruction set, also does it take longer to execute this one instruction or is it faster to use these 3 instructions. However 68k was pretty easy to write and use. RISC is usually easier to write and optimize. RISC also rules when it comes time to write compilers for your architecture. PowerPC is the bees-knees when you compare it x86. Why Apple switched to Intel was because it was getting too expensive to build new super fast chips and main boards. Apple simply didn't and still doesn't have the volume to compete with Intel and AMD. It simply got too expensive. BTW, nobody in their right mind would try to make a new CISC architecture, it gets to complicated. Power PC is proving it self in the Gaming Consoles, it's fast but not energy hunger.

      *I realize that it can take to much die space to certain instruction to execute in one clock.

    49. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1

      One of my favorite bug hunts was when I found out the implementation difference in varargs between x86 and PPC: in x86, it is a pointer, which means changes in a called function don't propagate, while it is a pointer to a struct on PPC, which means changes do propagate -- thus the missing va_end only affected things on PPC.

      Actually, you don't have to go as far as MIPS or PPC for that -- I discovered the same thing on x86_64. I reused the same va_list variable in two subsequent calls to vsprintf, which didn't make my program happy at all. I might suggest reading up on va_copy(3).

    50. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see why a RISC chip would be inherently harder to build than a CISC chip.

      That's not the problem because RISC CPUs *are* easier to build. The problem is in *using* RISC CPUs. Each instruction is simple, so you need many instructions to do the same thing that one instruction does on CISC. So the code size grows. Also instead of fetching one MOVSx and chewing on it until you transfer the whole block your RISC CPU may need to sit in a tight loop and load/store word by word, and fetch the instructions also - hopefully from a local cache but it's still work.

      Basically RISC and CISC are ways to optimize the distribution of work between different pieces of a computing system. If your memory is fast and cheap go RISC. If your memory is not very fast then you get a major hit in performance. But a RISC CPU is simpler. I can understand that when CPU of IBM/370 took a large room it was a valid point. But today IC designers literally don't know what to do with the silicon real estate that they have on each die. So it makes sense to throw FETs at the problem and save the precious memory bandwidth for things that truly must be in RAM - your data, or your efficiently packed machine instructions. RISC has advantages only when your CPU must be simple and run cold, and when RAM is faster than your CPU - and that is the case in many embedded systems.

    51. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by ozphx · · Score: 1

      Any of pda-phones made by HTC absolutely pwn that hands down (unless you consider running Linux a must-have).

      Thumbable qwerty, wifi, bluetooth, sd/mmc, gps, touchscreen, stylus, handwriting recognition, audio io, gsm phone, network projector support, are all base functionality these days.

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    52. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1

      If cheapo MIPS machines prove popular, you can bet the situation will improve in a hurry.

    53. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by kge · · Score: 2, Informative

      This laptop is already being sold here for a couple of months in the Netherlands as Trendtac (http://www.trendtac.nl) I'm typing on it right now.

      Take a look at http://www.littlelinuxlaptop.com or http://trendtac.hyves.nl to see what it can do.

      Gert

    54. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a little bit more than zero is only a little 1, not four zeros.

    55. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      There are lots of MIPS Linux distros (Main Page), but that doesn't invalidate the GP post. The only apps you get are the ones in the distros. No one compiles for MIPS, since the market is miniscule.

      Install Gentoo, problem solved !

      Want OpenOffice for MIPS ? Just, uh... Wait, let me get back to you on that one.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    56. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Windows CE hasn't been supported for years.

      Windows Mobile, however, is, and that's only supported on ARM processors AFAIK.

      There are other embedded versions of Windows which probably do support MIPS, however, and I'm sure someone in Redmond can figure out the concept of developing code on some architecture other than x86.

    57. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Gentoo will probably also sort-of work

      That's the whole point of Gentoo, isn't it?

    58. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      This thing is slow as it is. Do you really want to knock it back to single-digit MHz equivalent with a software CPU emulator?

    59. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one compiles for MIPS, since the market is miniscule

      For now

    60. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by nickos · · Score: 3, Informative

      (Don't know who modded you Insightful)

      All x86 chips have a RISC core these days.

      The main reason why x86 gives more bang for the buck is because of competition, and is despite it's clunky architecture.

    61. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      MIPS arch in china? Hmmmmm. Where did we hear about that yesterday.
      China is about to gut the EU and American hardware companies. My guess is that the chip will not be a MIP, but will be the Godson chip. In addition, I suspect that the laptop will be available initially with the slow chip, but will increase quickly to the godson-3 as it will be subsidized by the chinese gov. Smart on their part, but foolish on others.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    62. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      no it was saying that egcs would support va_copy allowing code that misuses va_list to be fixed more easilly but the code still has to be fixed.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    63. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Geminii · · Score: 1
      I'd grab one to stick on the home network. All it would do is cache local copies of a couple of files - like my to-do list - that I like to be able to glance at in the morning without waiting to fire up all the components of the main rig.

      Heck, it could be a control panel for any home automation stuff. Or display a video feed from security cameras. Or hell, be a friggin' _clock_.

    64. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      But today IC designers literally don't know what to do with the silicon real estate that they have on each die.

      The rest of your post makes sense, but this statement isn't true at all. Die shrinks are constant, and really the major way to save costs. On-die cache is still really expensive because it uses up valuable chip real estate. Hell, even the MIPS literature espouses the small die size as one of the big benefits of the chip. And the amount of circuitry directly correlates to power draw.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    65. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I am not aware of any PCs ever to include MIPS chips. SGI used MIPS64 chips in their systems for a long time (until they switched to Itanium) as did a few other UNIX vendors, and they are found in a huge number of embedded systems, but they never really aimed for the midrange systems.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    66. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Ah, ok I see that now. I'm still not sure why it would be a difference due to processor architecture. Is varargs really implemented on that low of a level?

      on a slashdot side note, my previous post didn't appear for hours. I thought it had been lost somewhere along the way. Anyone else experience that before?

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    67. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by againjj · · Score: 1

      In my case, it was a bug in the code that simply didn't rear its head on x86, but did on PPC. Basically, va_start must be bracketed by va_end, and va_start must be called each time you want to run through a function's args again.

      /* Works on x86, not on PPC */
      void f1(int n, ...) {
      va_list ap;
      va_start(ap, n);
      for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
      g(ap)
      }
      va_end(ap);
      }

      /* Works on x86 and PPC */
      void f1(int n, ...) {
      va_list ap;
      for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
      va_start(ap, n);
      g(ap)
      va_end(ap);
      }
      }

      void g(va_list ap) {
      /* do something with ap */
      }

      Sorry, I can't seem to get the above indented.

    68. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by avandesande · · Score: 1

      That's rather ironic when your UID is over 24 million!

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    69. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by avandesande · · Score: 1

      OOPS! looking at the wrong number! No irony found, carry on ;)

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    70. Re:MIPS will make it a hard sell by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      note: the below information is based on my knowlage and information I have gleaned from the web, there may be errors in it.

      Implementation of va_list is a platform abi (sometimes known as the C abi since C is the standard language on most operating operating systems) issue. The platform abi defines such things as the sizes of standard types and the calling conventions Generally the platform abi is standardised for a particular OS/CPU architecture combination. Changing it would break binary compatibility.

      Remember that in C you DO NOT have to declare functions before using them. And even if you do declare them you don't have to declare thier argument list. Therefore a function with varargs MUST have the same ABI as a function that takes the same arguments in the normal way.

      i386 linux has a very simple C abi with all parameters on the stack, this allows va_list to simply be a pointer to the first varidic argument and then the retrival function simply moves the pointer by the size of the argument retrived.

      Architectures with more general purpose registers tend to use those registers for passing parameters. Since some of the parameters are not on the stack va_list clearly cannot simply be a pointer but must deal with multiple lists of values retrived from different types of registers as well as a pointer to parameters that were passed on the stack.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  8. Flashlessness kills it by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it doesn't run the Flash plugin, it's out of the Interweb game for most people. I'm sure someone will port GNU Gnash to it, but that's hardly a substitute. If the buyer only cares about some specific function like word processing, this might not matter. But the usual idea of netbooks is that they are more or less fully web-enabled.

    1. Re:Flashlessness kills it by TheNarrator · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The iphone doesn't run flash and it costs twice as much. No one will ever buy one!

    2. Re:Flashlessness kills it by martinw89 · · Score: 1

      Gnash has already been ported to MIPS, so has Swfdec. See my above post. I definitely agree though, at the moment Gnash (and to a lesser extent Swfdec) are not a good substitute for Adobe Flash.

    3. Re:Flashlessness kills it by dbIII · · Score: 5, Funny

      Most flash can be simulated. Most people can do it by banging their head hard on a desk three times. For IT people it is easier - get somebody to stand behind you to repeat the incredibly stupid term "interweb" and your head will hurt just as much as if you've seen nearly any flash content on the net.

    4. Re:Flashlessness kills it by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

      The iphone doesn't run flash and it costs twice as much. No one will ever buy one!

      When you buy a computer smaller than your hand you pretty much accept you won't get a full browsing experience out of it. Not so with a netbook, which despite its size is still basically a cheap laptop, and comes with laptop expectations.

      To me the interesting thing about the rise of the netbooks is that they mark the death of the upgrade cycle that Microsoft and Intel have fed off for many years. Basically you're getting a laptop with the power of a four year old model, but lightweight, cheap, and with a new warranty. These MIPS-based models satisfy all of those benefits, but the compatibility issue will make this a non-seller for most people.

    5. Re:Flashlessness kills it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From tfa and guessing I found the distro they run... xipos.
      and supposedly they DO support flash... yeah, it's only up to flash 6, but... well...yeah.

    6. Re:Flashlessness kills it by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Umm, what's it run then? Youtube seems to work.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:Flashlessness kills it by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Ah, no Flash, eh? This feature list just gets better and better. How did they keep Flash off of it? Apple figured out how to block it from iPhone, and if they could just figure out how to block it out of OS X, their marketshare would undoubtedly spike. I just wish those malware writers could find something better to do with their time instead of Flashing us with the 3rd Great Scourge of the Internet, after spam and viruses.

    8. Re:Flashlessness kills it by McDutchie · · Score: 3, Informative

      Umm, what's it run then? Youtube seems to work.

      The iPhone's got its own YouTube player.

    9. Re:Flashlessness kills it by fermion · · Score: 1
      Yes which means it is a work machine. Give this to the employees, students, etc, and it is possible they might be productive instead of watching p0rn all day. There are enough resources that don't depend on flash that it might make a good choice for the kiddos at home.

      But seriously, if this can log onto a webdav partition, and run LaTeX, it might be a serious writing machine, akin to the Tandy 200 that was my mainstay for so long. It certainly runs OO.org, which allows one to make presentations, that should be able to be saved to flash, if not run.

      Depending on what the final specs and availability are, i would certainly buy this for the days that I do not wish to carry the expensive machine.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    10. Re:Flashlessness kills it by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ahh I see. More epic Safari fail I guess.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    11. Re:Flashlessness kills it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're dead right and I'd be amazed if the flash guys aren't pondering an iPhone port pretty soon which would be a 'good thing' and might hopefully make porting to other platforms more viable.

    12. Re:Flashlessness kills it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough with the epic and the win and fail. Go back to 4chan with that crap.

    13. Re:Flashlessness kills it by QuantumG · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's called culture. Just cause you don't like it, doesn't mean you have the right to silence others.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    14. Re:Flashlessness kills it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called culture.

      No, it's called "dumb", knuckle-dragger.

    15. Re:Flashlessness kills it by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He's not silencing you (as evidenced by the fact that your post did not, in fact, disappear), just rightfully calling it crap.

      The deliberate confusion of "censor" and "criticize" is the first resort of the thin-skinned idiot.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    16. Re:Flashlessness kills it by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      When someone says "shut up" they are "silencing" you. The phrase has that meaning, at least in my dialect of english.

      It *can* mean that someone is being censored, but that's not what I intended.

      It can also mean that someone is being killed to keep them quiet, but that's not what I intended either.

      That's the thing about communicating, you have to *want* to understand what the other person is saying. Otherwise we all have to talk to each other in legalese.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    17. Re:Flashlessness kills it by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      As I understand the word, "silence" would only include being told to "shut up" if the person doing the telling had some power over you. For example, having your mother tell you to shut up means you are being silenced. Having some random stranger on the interwebs tell you to shut up is not.

      This was the point I was trying to make. This person has no power over you, and thus you are not, in fact, being silenced. Your protest is therefore weird and pointless.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    18. Re:Flashlessness kills it by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      So you're arguing over the semantics of "attempted silencing" vs "silencing". And geeks wonder why people don't like them.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    19. Re:Flashlessness kills it by ozphx · · Score: 1

      Troll moar?

      --
      3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
    20. Re:Flashlessness kills it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old nerds... this is exactly what they warned us for in the eighties.

    21. Re:Flashlessness kills it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're arguing over the semantics of "attempted silencing" vs "silencing".

      Absolutely. It's just as picky as (say) distinguishing between "murder" and "attempted murder", which are essentially the same thing apart from the small matter of someone being dead or not.

      Asshat.

    22. Re:Flashlessness kills it by cazzazullu · · Score: 1

      Twice as much?? Come to Belgium: An Iphone (the SMALL memory version) goes for 550 euros here (but with no strings attached, like subscriptions). With the current low dollar, an Iphone costs an amazingly 8 times as much as this 100$ thing.

      --
      int main(void) {while(1) fork(); return 0;}
    23. Re:Flashlessness kills it by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      Well, uh, yeah. In one instance you are still free to speak. In the other, you are not. Seems like a worthy distinction to me!

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    24. Re:Flashlessness kills it by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      You really are baffled aren't ya?

      Yes, there is a distinction. But, you know what I mean and you're just being deliberately uncooperative.

      That's the anti-social behaviour that results in you being hated. Of course, you probably wear that as a badge of honour because you think being "right" is more important than getting on with it. Whereas the normal people think that ignoring bullshit semantic arguments is the way to go because there's so much more interesting things to be discussing and there's only so many hours in the day.

      Of everything I've written here there's millions of possible interpretations.. the fact that you can read it and get even a glimmer of what I'm trying to communicate to you is just remarkable. I don't mean that as an insult. I mean that on an evolutionary scale it is remarkable that humans are able to communicate with each other at all, let alone via the written word, let alone over a global electronic packet switched network. So to have a multi-hour conversation over the meaning of the verb "to silence" is just absurd and worthy of spite.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    25. Re:Flashlessness kills it by Raenex · · Score: 1

      That's the thing about communicating, you have to *want* to understand what the other person is saying. Otherwise we all have to talk to each other in legalese.

      The thing about communicating is you have to use words with the right connotation and avoid easily confused ones if you want to get your message across. Otherwise you end up with: 'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone,' it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less.'

      When I read your original post it sounded exactly like special pleading to avoid being censored: Here's the sentence again: "Just cause you don't like it, doesn't mean you have the right to silence others."

      You talk about Slashdot culture. Well Slashdot's culture is all about open-ended criticism. Whining about how somebody has no "right" to say such a thing on Slashdot is a joke.

    26. Re:Flashlessness kills it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft and Intel? What the fuck about apple. You can in most cases keep the same machine and change the OS & Processor, you cant with Apple. Apple is the BIGGEST violator in this are. They LIVE on making their own products apis and technologies obsolete.

    27. Re:Flashlessness kills it by glindsey · · Score: 1

      If you don't understand that "interweb" is a tongue-in-cheek term, then you don't deserve to be on the interweb.

    28. Re:Flashlessness kills it by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's starting to get real use from idiots - just like "internets".

  9. A feature, not a bug by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 5, Funny

    No flash? That's a feature, not a bug!

    1. Re:A feature, not a bug by prestomation · · Score: 1

      The lack of a webcam is also a feature.

    2. Re:A feature, not a bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's NOT funny. It's the damn truth. who the hell gives a flying f*ck about utube. The internet is about TEXT and supporting graphics. everything else is crap and if you need such tripe, use a "big" computer.

      ssh and a browser is all that is needed for 99.9% of internet use.

  10. Wake me when they ship by tfrayner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They say they have refined the manufacturing process and have learned from building this laptop how to mass produce a laptop that will sell for $98.00

    So... "Sub-$100 Laptops Have Finally Arrived". And yet... they haven't. It'd be nice (although, apparently, unrealistic) to think that we've learnt by now not to give credence to vaporware. Color me unimpressed.

    --
    The best newspaper in the USA: the Anderson Valley Advertiser.
    1. Re:Wake me when they ship by eclectro · · Score: 5, Funny

      Color me unimpressed.

      I too refuse to be satisfied until it comes with my happy meal.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:Wake me when they ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's no doubt it's possibly vaporware.

      But, there are 2 things to consider. 1. The model they displayed is 120--not too far off from 100, really. 2. The 98 model is due out in october, which is one month away. It might be that it is perpetually 1 month away, but I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt until november.

      The real question for me is the usefulness of it. That thing looks like it's slightly larger than a Nintendo DS, which is pretty small. I'm wondering just how easy this thing will be to use, or if I'll have to resort to hunt and peck, or thumbing the keyboard to type in what I want.

    3. Re:Wake me when they ship by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      So... "Sub-$100 Laptops Have Finally Arrived". And yet... they haven't.

      Watch the video. They show the upcoming model (the black one) that is $98.

    4. Re:Wake me when they ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stuff flash. I need it to run the Citrix ICA client

    5. Re:Wake me when they ship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too refuse to be satisfied until it comes with my happy meal.


      ÙÛOE ÙÛ' ØØ ØÚ© Ú©Ø ØØ ØÛ' ØØØØ ÙÛOEÙ¾ ÙØÙ¾ Ù...ØØØØ±Ù کرØÛOEØ ÛÛ'.. ØØ ÙÛOE

      Translation: Seriously, do you really buy happy meals? I was eating Big Macs before I was even one year old.

  11. Want it! by JackassJedi · · Score: 1

    OK after watching the video i can only say: totally want!!

    --
    Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many.
  12. I still don't understand OLPC by linzeal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OLPC was a noble idea, but one that was fundamentally flawed; this is because the specs did not originate from the areas of the world that would be using it but were spun out of a pie in the sky engineering lab. The scale of the OLPC was immense and impractical and the fact that they attempted it at all they should be given alot of credit for dealing with the political, economic and technical problems.

    1. Re:I still don't understand OLPC by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Bah, the problem was too much press. If they had just quietly done what they wanted to do, they would have gotten the sales they needed without Intel and Microsoft butting in. But no, NN had to go toot his horn.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:I still don't understand OLPC by linzeal · · Score: 1

      The same could be said for Theo and OpenBSD but Theo is still at the helm and is becoming a less cantankerous curmudgeon with age, too bad OLPC could of seen such stubborn leadership because at least some kids somewhere would have laptops that could shoot lasers at the junta soldiers or christian missionaries.

    3. Re:I still don't understand OLPC by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Theo didn't need billions of sales to make his business model work.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:I still don't understand OLPC by echion · · Score: 1

      OLPC is still shipping laptops with F/OSS software to kids in developing countries, and is about to start another Give One, Get One program.

      But don't let the facts get in the way of that tasty pie-spinning metaphor.

    5. Re:I still don't understand OLPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, so? In a few years if not now there will be greater penetration of actual sub 100 laptops instead of the OLPC initiative. The OLPC has great software though. Now, if they could only use the guts of used cell phones to base hardware on that is better than OLPC. Economy of scale is still not as cheap as scavenging and one day soon some clever bastard in the third world will out engineer the first world attempts at crap like this. OLPC is about as sophisticated as a speak and spell to what will be coming in countries that 100's of dialects and need to make sense out of people that are a mere 10 km away today will be next door neighbors tommorow.

    6. Re:I still don't understand OLPC by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      None of these other laptops are made for the African market. They all have terrible battery life and assume you have regular access to electricity, fast internet, etc, etc. The OLPC doesn't compare up to these other offerings if you're in a western country. There's plenty of better gadgets you can buy. But if you're a kid in Africa and your government is going to give you a laptop, the OLPC is the one you need.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:I still don't understand OLPC by echion · · Score: 1

      Are you trolling?

      > In a few years if not now there will be greater penetration of actual sub 100 laptops instead of the OLPC initiative.

      Penetration where? In the developed world? Sure! But 750,000 laptops (or so) shipped in two years is pretty good...or are you confusing OLPC with a consumer laptop vendor?

      > cell phones['s hardware] is better than OLPC

      It's not, and that's a pretty ridiculous statement. Oh wait, there's more:

      > Economy of scale is still not as cheap as scavenging

      You mean, paying a non-zero amount of money is more expensive than paying nothing? Please step out from your modest cloak of anonymity so I can send you money for more unique insights like this.

      > OLPC is about as sophisticated as a speak and spell

      This is false, and...

      > [rest of sentence] ...is pretty incomprehensible.

    8. Re:I still don't understand OLPC by amram9999 · · Score: 1

      Why are you referring to OLPC in the past tense? The organization hasn't lived up to it's goals, but they have shipped around half a million laptops to kids around the world. The Linux-based Sugar software continues to improve and there are many volunteers contributing to the project. The organization got a lot flak when Negroponte announced the Windows XP port, but many volunteers and employees put their bad feelings aside and continue to work on the project. Now Sugar Labs (the software spinoff) is branching out in order to incorporate their software in other Linux distributions. There are also several ports underway to put Sugar on other laptops and embedded devices.

      And it wasn't designed in some out of touch lab. It was designed for harsh environments, limited internet connectivity, intermittent electrical power, bright sunlight readability, and children with no previous knowledge of computers. I think the XO-1 is a remarkable piece of hardware.

  13. does it have a phone home feature? by axlr8or · · Score: 0

    Finally, the reds will now be able to download my life simply and easily. Point and click, just like M$!!

  14. YouTube link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who don't want to bother with DivX, or would like to savor the irony of watching a flash ad/review for a computer that won't play flash, here's the video

  15. Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by Lumenary7204 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Although the laptop is probably a great piece of engineering for something that has a sub-$100 price tag, the decision to go with a MIPS processor is probably going to relegate the device to niche markets - census taking, for example, or maybe something along the lines of inventory control.

    The lack of official (and I emphasize "official") Flash 9 and Adobe PDF support would probably be a deal breaker for Joe Average Home and Business user.

    Granted, a most of the PDF spec is now available royalty-free, and an FOSS Flash plug-in has been released (and is under continuing development), but I doubt that is going to put sway too many folk's purchasing decisions.

    The MIPS processor will probably doom it forever to the realm of Geekdom...

    1. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Whilst I agree that non-official flash is a bad thing, non-official pdf software is (IMHO) far superior to the adobe offerings.

      Foxit (which won't be on MIPS) is a great, lightweight reader. And whatever came with my linux distros (debian, ubuntu and redhat) works just as well.

      I don't think Joe average is that bothered about pdf either, personally, not bothered enough that it has to be adobe.

      MIPS is cool. My router runs on MIPS, as does my PSP. I have three linux on ARM devices, a linux on PPC and a couple of x86 machines. The x86 monopoly could be broken without too much hassle (imho). At the low end of the market anyway, nothing else has the price/performance right now 'cos of the billions poured in by AMD and Intel.

    2. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      I don't think Joe Average or any business user is going to touch this laptop. IMHO, it's meant for the low-end of the market - young kids and old folks. It's perfect for them.

    3. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MIPS processor is probably going to relegate the device to niche markets - census taking, for example

      Yep. Or intranet usage. Or somebody who only uses a computer for web surfing, email, and occasional typing.

      Can't see much of a market for that. Doesn't sound like any of the 100 or so snowbirds in the RV park next door. Nor like the receptionists in any of the 20 offices in the office building down the street. Nor like any of the HR specialists I know. School principals? Insurance adjusters? Travel agents? Refrigerator repairmen? Attorneys? Doctors? Musicians? Electricians? Flight attendants?

    4. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by ChinggisK · · Score: 1

      That it'll be just for geeks seems to be the general consensus here... I disagree. I barely fall into the geek category as far as your typical Slashdotter goes, but if these actually come out with a $98 sticker price on them, I'll buy one in a heartbeat and take it to class to take notes on. It's got a web browser, a keyboard, and word processor, what else would I need? Judging from the 2 minutes I watched of the video, it doesn't look unreasonably slow. Screw flash, 99% of flash crap is just annoying. It's not like I want it to play games on or do much of anything else, if I wanted that I'd buy a real laptop. I just need to be able to take notes, and if I'm bored read news sites and such. Ever since the EEE PC came out I've been eyeing it for that very reason, but it was just too much money to justify buying one. Something cheaper but with the minimum functionality that I need, like this, is exactly what I've been waiting for.

      The only real problem that I foresee is that apparently it doesn't have a way to read PDF files on it (someone else mentioned that); that'd be a problem because a lot of my professors like to put notes up in PDF form. Maybe I'm just ignorant, but to me that sounds like a problem that could probably be fixed by some of our local hardcore geeks fairly quickly, and without too much trouble.

    5. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by HolyCoitus · · Score: 1

      Evince is a strong offering and it is available on MIPS. It's probably my favorite PDF and postscript program for viewing.

      Link to evince on Debian package search for MIPS

      --
      That's scary.
    6. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by erikharrison · · Score: 1

      I truly doubt that. A reasonably powered ultra-cheap laptop has lots of uses in budget stripped locations - remote medical service anyone?

      Maybe you won't see white guys in western countries who can afford laptops and don't have high mobility needs AND already have a smartphone purchase these, but that hardly consigns it to purely to the realm of geekdom. Especially PDF support. With the exception of a single DRMed e-book I've yet to find a PDF I couldn't open with an open source solution in decade.

    7. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it's not perfect for my kids with no flash. Kids sites are full of flash. In particular my kids like to play the games.

    8. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As smart phones become the new laptop, you are going to see a lot more media and web-app support for non-x86 instruction set processors. Currently, ARM owns the PDA / Smartphone market. I give INtel as much chance to take over that market as they did when they tried to take over the automotive market.

      For low power consumption embedded, MIPS and ARM rule.

    9. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Granted, a most of the PDF spec is now available royalty-free, and an FOSS Flash plug-in has been released (and is under continuing development), but I doubt that is going to put sway too many folk's purchasing decisions."

      It would if said software (swfdec) came preinstalled. The common or garden home user doesn't care whether their flash support is official or not, and they wouldn't even think about it unless they hit up youtube or some other flash site only to be greeted with a nice large empty space where content is meant to be.

      If it's business as usual on flash sites I don't expect joe sixpack to give a damn.

    10. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if the whole thing costs $100. That is less than a cell phone (non-x86), less than a financial calculator (non-x86), about the cost of 2 DVD players (non-x86). You won't care about x86 compatibility. You'll only care about its price, and what a little thing like that can do. And it seems it can do a lot.

      Put that in a developing country (thinking about Latin America) and nobody will care about x86 compatibility... it will sell like hotcakes.

    11. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adobe is going to have to support because these things are gonna go like free reefer at a NORML convention.

    12. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by Johnny+Loves+Linux · · Score: 1

      Which part of the population are you talking about?

      If it's *Joe User* then all that the user needs is something that he/she can use to view webpages, read e-mail, listen to music, maybe watch video. These are all things that this device can do right now + wireless and for just $98!!! Holy crap!! It's a keeper! Joe User doesn't do much with computers, that's why.... they're called "Joe User".

      If you mean Geekdom, do you mean all *geeks* or just geeks mind melded to Microsoft?
      Linux users don't need Microsoft on this product. Apple users, well, they have Apple and they can take or leave this product. Microsoft hardcore folks would probably rather gnaw off their right arms than let go of Microsoft. Ditto, the hardcore gamers.

      So, just to give some estimates of how many people this product could potentially be useful to:

      "Geeks" (Linux, Apple, hard core Microsoft, hard core gamers): 10% of the population.
      "Joe User": 90%

      It looks to me that it's a no-brainer with a potential customer base of 90% of the population,
      that hell yeah, this is a winner!

    13. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1

      You are just one of many who say that use of the MIPS processor is going to be a deal breaker for the average consumer. I suspect you are wrong. I do not know if flash and PDF support (albeit with plenty of warts) via open source packages is to be pre-installed. Even without that, if it looks half way decent in the store, a very low price will sway many average consumers a lot more than concerns about what restrictions it might impose.

    14. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      Hah, my kids complain about all the sites that want Shockwave, of which there is no Linux version available. We're a Linux-only family. We just move on. Same things for sites that want IE/ActiveX.

    15. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1

      Although the laptop is probably a great piece of engineering for something that has a sub-$100 price tag, the decision to go with a MIPS processor is probably going to relegate the device to niche markets - census taking, for example, or maybe something along the lines of inventory control.

      The average person doesn't know - and doesn't care - what processor their computer has. The average person keeps a processor in the kitchen for slicing carrots. The average person thinks a pipeline is something that takes oil across Alaska, that architecture is those ugly new buildings up town, and that a bus has a large diesel engine. The average person is going to ask, 'does this do what I want?'; and the average person is going to find 'yes it does'.

      The proportion of computer users who use niche specialist programs which are only available on some specific processor architecture is very small. The proportion of people who run games which need more graphics performance than this device has got is fairly small. For 90% of Joe Public out there, a device like this does everything they need.

      Fear, uncertainty and doubt may be worth something, but it isn't worth the difference between a $400 laptop and a $100 laptop.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    16. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah, my kids complain about all the sites that want Shockwave, of which there is no Linux version available.

      You should try to keep your kids happy with Linux or they might turn to the dark side later.
      According to this it's really simple to run shockwave under Linux - the technique should apply to any distro.

    17. Re:Uptake Hampered by Non-x86 Architecture by Lennie · · Score: 1

      I've not seen any problems with PDF's and non-Adobe-readers on Linux since years.

      There is a Evince-package for Debian/MIPS.

      So it's probalby just fine.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
  16. MIPS will cripple this... by creature124 · · Score: 1

    I will admit now that I know next to nothing about MIPS processors. However, if it isn't compatable with x86 apps it will need quite a large repository of pre-compiled apps or MIPS will be it's downfall.

    1. Re:MIPS will cripple this... by Lennie · · Score: 1

      The Debian-project is the largest Linux-distribution available. It has compiled almost all it's packages for MIPS. I doubt you can find easily a (not-platform specific like: silo or something) package in Debian which isn't avaiable for MIPS.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
  17. where to get one? by debatem1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sooo... where are they available? A quick google search yields nothing on either the currently available models or this one.

  18. Tagged !arrived by daybot · · Score: 1

    "Sub-$100 Laptops Have Finally Arrived"

    ...has managed to create a UMPC that sells right now for $120.00. They say they have refined the manufacturing process and have learned from building this laptop how to mass produce a laptop that will sell for $98.00

    Tagged !arrived...

  19. This is the hardware stats by wlfischer · · Score: 5, Informative

    This shows on the YouTube video at 03:58:

    400MHz/32bit CPU
    128M/64M RAM
    1GB NAND Flash
    Linux or WinCE
    7" 800x480 display
    Wireless LAN 802.11b/g
    10/100M ethernet

  20. count me out by globaljustin · · Score: 0, Troll

    A Chinese firm has realized that dream

    Well, I'm out. I'll wait for something not developed by a company in that regime. Sure, I can't avoid China entirely, but I can do...well...what I can.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  21. I'll believe that they "have arrived"... by Caspian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...when there's a link to BUY ONE. Now. Right now. I have my credit card at the ready. Where can I buy one, even at the $120 price point that they are supposedly selling "right now" for?

    Well? Link or it didn't happen. Otherwise, this is just another fucking slashvertisement.

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
    1. Re:I'll believe that they "have arrived"... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      And of course having a link to a enter credit card details to buy now would make it less of a "fucking slashvertisement"?!?

    2. Re:I'll believe that they "have arrived"... by Caspian · · Score: 1

      At least it wouldn't be a VAPOURWARE slashvertisement...

      --
      With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
    3. Re:I'll believe that they "have arrived"... by edalytical · · Score: 1

      I can't decide if a link to buy one would make it more or less of a fucking slashvertisement. But yeah I'd buy one right now too.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    4. Re:I'll believe that they "have arrived"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...when there's a link to BUY ONE. Now. Right now. I have my credit card at the ready. Where can I buy one, even at the $120 price point that they are supposedly selling "right now" for?

      Well? Link or it didn't happen. Otherwise, this is just another fucking slashvertisement.

      Either way it looks like a slashvertisement to me.

    5. Re:I'll believe that they "have arrived"... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Where can I buy one, even at the $120 price point that they are supposedly selling "right now" for?

      If you're willing to pay double that, you can in fact buy practically the exact laptop they have described:

      http://www.compsource.com/pn/3KRZ40074GB/3k_Computers_2340/

      Both hardware and software appear to match the description perfectly.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:I'll believe that they "have arrived"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'd buy one right now. Where the hell is the link to someone selling them.

    7. Re:I'll believe that they "have arrived"... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Oh boy, $120 laptops have arrived*!

      *if you're willing to pay twice that.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:I'll believe that they "have arrived"... by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      Not "exactly" the same. The video describes the laptop has having much lower specs than what you've linked to (512mb of RAM vs. 128mb RAM, 4gb HDD vs. 1gb flash). Of course, for 2.5 times the price you're getting 4 times the RAM and storage.

  22. Don't count on it... by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I think it's extremely safe to say this is completely vaporware hype, with no substance at all.

    Laptops that just about exactly match the specs and description of this supposed $100 machine, currently retail for $250:

    http://www.compsource.com/pn/3KRZ40074GB/3k_Computers_2340/

    I fail to believe it's being sold at a 100% mark-up, or that any magic they can do in the next couple years is going to half the materials and production costs of a laptop.

    It looks like a decent bit of hardware, but don't count on it getting significantly cheaper while you wait. Even if the price of the chips (Flash, CPU, RAM, etc.) suddenly drop dramatically (which is highly unlikely), you've still got to deal with the base cost of NiMH batteries, plastic, lights, keyboards, touch pads, power supplies, LCD displays, assembly (man hours aren't getting any cheaper), etc., etc.

    If you want a low-end system, pay the $250. Don't wait for the vapor to clear.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Don't count on it... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Your link has half a gig instead of 128MB of RAM, and 4GB vs. 1GB of flash storage. I can't say that accounts for the entire $117 difference, but it shows that there are at least some differences.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Don't count on it... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Don't count on it... by slashmojo · · Score: 1

      That seems to be the same ($120) system according to this..

      http://www.littlelinuxlaptop.com/

      The price difference is presumably the resellers markup.. now that the cat is out of the bag on the 'real' price (and who makes it) I would think they will have to reduce their markup soon or lose sales to other cheaper resellers.

      I doubt the new one will ever be available to regular buyers for $98 though unless you can get enough people together for a bulk buy.

    4. Re:Don't count on it... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      According to Linuxdevices, the manufacturer was selling them for $180 as of 3 months ago: http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS9047481010.html

      $60 in 3 months is a big sudden price drop, and 100% seller markup is pretty hard to believe.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  23. I really don't see what the big deal is by McBeer · · Score: 0, Troll

    There have been sub $100 laptops on ebay for years. Furthermore most of them are better then the pieces of crap in these articles. Sure the batteries are sometimes shot, but most of them still work.

    --
    Hikery.net - The best hiking site ever. Made by yours truly.
    1. Re:I really don't see what the big deal is by McBeer · · Score: 1

      How in the hell is my above post a troll? It's a completely valid, on topic comment. Search ebay for $100 laptops and you will find ones more powerful then the one listed in the article. this post is a troll. L2moderate.

      --
      Hikery.net - The best hiking site ever. Made by yours truly.
  24. This is a disaster by SiliconSeraph · · Score: 1

    Now an even wider demographic of computer illiterate dullards will be able to stumble their way into our arms for inane tech help.

  25. buy it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    looks like you can get one now from geeks.com http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?invtid=ALPHA-400&cat=NBB

    1. Re:buy it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the same one, asshole!

  26. I don't believe it by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 1

    They say they have refined the manufacturing process and have learned from building this laptop how to mass produce a laptop that will sell for $98.00.

    How many times do you have to hear things like this before you realize it'll never happen. That statement couldn't have been more qualified "they say... have learned... how to... will sell..." yeah right.

    --
    We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
  27. sub $100 niche is too npecialized by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

    The sub $100 dollar notebook niche appears to be a bit too specialized for the needs of most people. They have all had a couple of good features or component choices here and there but, at least IMHO, none of them has yet hit the sweet spot. The use of the MIPS processor is an interesting play and the 1GB flash drive is also interesting but perhaps not the most appropriate choice given the current cost and rewrite performance of solid state drives. There are also the usual complaints about keyboard and screen size. I think that they could do better by increasing the screen and keyboard size a bit and substituting a good magnetic notebook disk (~80 GB would be cheap) for the flash drive. The ideal price range would probably be somewhere between $250 - $500, anything less than $100 generates too many compromises to be of general purpose use (or at least that has been true thus far).

    1. Re:sub $100 niche is too npecialized by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It's for China. The market for a sub-$100 computer in China is huge. The average income in China is about $2000 per year, so even at $100 it's a significant investment. Not running Windows isn't a bug, it's a feature - you don't kick-start an internal software market by giving a foreign company a monopoly.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:sub $100 niche is too npecialized by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Would it be politically-incorrect to say they also have smaller hands ?

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
  28. There is nothing "super" about losing freedom. by jbn-o · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Editorializing from the headline, Roman Phalanx wrote

    Now that OLPC has decided to super size their systems to run Windows XP...

    There's nothing "super" about losing one's software freedom. The XO was originally an educational project where even the computer the kids learn on could be part of the lessons. Switching to proprietary software means placing barriers on that education by telling the user that there are some things you weren't meant to know and shall be forbidden from learning, sharing, or changing to suit your needs. There's nothing good about that for the user, whose concerns outrank any proprietor. It is not society's job to placate software proprietors. The free software movement welcomes businesses that treat us as partners, not as a market to exploit. The free software community certainly gives businesses lots to work with and make money from.

    1. Re:There is nothing "super" about losing freedom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He didn't say that using XP is super, he said it was super sized (they increased the specs) so it could run XP. Saying it was super sized to run XP doesn't imply that it's a good thing.

    2. Re:There is nothing "super" about losing freedom. by LunarCrisis · · Score: 1

      Now that OLPC has decided to super size their systems to run Windows XP...

      There's nothing "super" about losing one's software freedom.

      Ever seen "Super Size Me"?

      --
      Mr. Period: Nine is the one that's right by ten!
      Nine: One day I will kill him. Then, I will be Ten.
    3. Re:There is nothing "super" about losing freedom. by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Switching to proprietary software means placing barriers on that education by telling the user that there are some things you weren't meant to know and shall be forbidden from learning, sharing, or changing to suit your needs.

      That's like giving someone a book, and complaining that it doesn't come with full instructions on how to construct a printing press and bind a book.

      Newsflash: A *very* small minority of people want to know what's going on inside a computer. Most people want to use it as the appliance that it is -- an information terminal. And that's *okay*. I just want to wear my shirt, I'm not interested in being a tailor. I just want to drink my wine, I don't need all the details of wine production.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    4. Re:There is nothing "super" about losing freedom. by dido · · Score: 1

      Given the tenor of Morgan Spurlock's celebrated 2004 documentary movie "Super Size Me", that statement of OLPC "super sizing" itself was most likely not intended as a compliment. More like they're trying to say that the OLPC is getting obese like Morgan Spurlock did after binging on McDonald's for every meal for a month (there is something of the nature of McDonalds food in Microsoft software by the way...). Nevertheless I agree with the main points of your post wholeheartedly.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    5. Re:There is nothing "super" about losing freedom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they meant the hardware dumbass, not the software

    6. Re:There is nothing "super" about losing freedom. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      There is nothing that makes you feel so free then for someone say "I am sorry you can't run this program, it is for Windows only". Freedom is not that easially defined it is far more complex. Having absolute freedom is desasterious, and will not work. But it is really a balancing act. Even GPL takes away some freedomes to grant others. Developers agree to loose some of their rights so that others can have more with use of their work, but on the stipulation that they sacrifce those freedoms if they used his code. Having the Freedom to Alter somone elses code means someone else forfited their freedom to tighly control their own code and its direction. If you choose to use Windows you gained the freedom of having the bulk of software to run on your computer (even most GNU apps have a Windows port) but you loose the freedom to do fixes on your OS, however for many this is a good tradeoff because most people even the ones who can't will not spend hours of debbuging to fix a minor issue with their OS and wait for someone else to fix it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:There is nothing "super" about losing freedom. by kuzb · · Score: 1

      And if you went to the actual company site, you'd see they offer what appears to be a choice of vista, xp, or linux (they don't specify the flavour). See: http://hvsco.com/sp_qx.asp?id=75

      http://techvideoblog.com/ifa/98-linux-laptop-the-hivision-mininote

      It's even the first *line* in this article. So the person submitting the article got it wrong, and you happily ate it up.

      HiVision makes the worlds cheapest Linux laptop at $98 using a new cheaper MIPS based processor (perhaps the Longsoon or the Ingenic)[...]

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    8. Re:There is nothing "super" about losing freedom. by Lennie · · Score: 1

      The point of the Open Source and proprietary debate is that if it's Open Source and something breaks (not hardware ofcourse !) someone can fix it.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    9. Re:There is nothing "super" about losing freedom. by Lennie · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is, the people who fix computers are moving to Linux and don't care about Windows anymore.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    10. Re:There is nothing "super" about losing freedom. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well I am assuming what you say people who fix computers you mean developers. Yes there is a trend for developers to switch to Linux now and it is possible we will have one less trade off for using Linux. However with Linux Market share at around 1% when they want to make money they often will either go via the Web Development or bite the bullet and develop for Windows.

      But I am sure as Old Fogies Programmers retire and go away more Web Applications (with their pluses and minuses) will probably dominate making the OS more and more irrelevant and become more of a support system for the web browser.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re:There is nothing "super" about losing freedom. by Lennie · · Score: 1

      That was not quiet what I had in mind, but I do agree with it.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    12. Re:There is nothing "super" about losing freedom. by BradJensen · · Score: 1

      They don't have the Mini Note on their site yet, the pc you are looking at isn't even a MIPS processor PC. And the reason the OLPC switched to a Windows compatible design is because they couldn't sell the other version to third world countries - and they tried hard to do so. Third worlders don't want their people caught in a Linux ghetto.

  29. Sub-$100 by bogidu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Which is even MORE amazing since the dollar is worth HALF what it was 5 years ago!!!

    1. Re:Sub-$100 by jo7hs2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, since it is actually more like 75%, shouldn't we be talking about $150 laptops?

    2. Re:Sub-$100 by Cigarra · · Score: 1

      Funny, yes, but actually really insightful.

      --
      I don't have a sig.
  30. Being MIPS based is good by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    because Windows CE used to exist for MIPS based mobile systems. So it can run a MIPS version of Windows CE or MIPS based Windows Mobile.

    MIPS is one of the platform targets of AROS which will help turn it into a sub$100 Amiga laptop. I think the MIPS based AROS will have 68K emulation to run the old Amiga 68K programs on it via an emulator.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  31. Re:There's better products out there /w more RAM by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At $350 per unit, It's not cost effective as a Sony PSP or Nintendo DS, but competitive to a mix between a QWERTY PDA with usable RAM/TV-out/redundant-expansion. In other words, it's a trade-off of a better Motorola A12000 CellPhone without the lock-in, more battery life, and better than the bulk of a laptop.

    Did you miss the entire freakin' point of the story or what?

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  32. Use as a OLPC? by Dwedit · · Score: 1

    So, what's stopping Sugar from running on these things?

    1. Re:Use as a OLPC? by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Very little as most of sugar is build with Python-code and it's already available for other distributions (Ubuntu, Debian, Gentoo & more). Debian unstable can already do: aptitude install sugar

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
  33. Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not impressed. When they flipped it over, you could see the specs. 400 Mhz,1 gb flash drive, 3 hour battery life, 64 or 128 mb ram. I can get the same thing by going to an electronics salvage store and buying a junked laptop with the same specs for about $20, wipe out the windows 95 installation, and install linux.

    1. Re:Not worth it by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Yes, but a junked laptop is just that: junk. A new laptop with the very same specs is going to have fewer gremlins. Not to mention that the battery will actually work rather than "used to work, but you can replace it with another one that is probably salvage from another junked laptop"

      Also, some of the components will likely be manufactured using smaller process size, so they're likely to be more power efficient.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  34. Flash sucks we dont need it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody need Flash!, It is a proprietary player, Better use Java with OpenJDK and it is GPL and it can compile for 64bit with out a problem and with the JRE6_10 have the same capabilities as Flash.

    As someone said IPhone doesn't ship with Flash player and it is twice the price so the average Joe will not get an IPhone because have no flash? hahah.

    2c.

  35. In case anyone needs it by pizzach · · Score: 1

    Here's a link to the gentoo handbook for mips: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-mips.xml

    --
    Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
  36. I call troll on this one by pizzach · · Score: 1

    Debian has a mips port, where you can likely download precompiled packages just fine. http://www.debian.org/ports/mips/

    --
    Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
  37. OLPC by the numbers by westlake · · Score: 1
    Now that OLPC has decided to super size their systems to run Windows XP, the $100 price point has slipped beyond their reach.
    .

    OLPC sold less than 700,000 units by May 29th of this year. 80,000 of those sales were give one - get one promos.

    --- almost exclusively targeting the Linux Geek.

    The third world education minister simply wasn't buying into Linux, Sugar and a constructivist philosophy of education.

    The "Give 1 Get 1" donation of $399 had a tax-deductible portion of $200 under US tax code as the XO-1 laptop delivered to the donor was valued at $199 by the OLPC Foundation."
    One Laptop per Child

    If you take OLPC at its word, then they never had a $100 Linux laptop - at least not at the "direct sale" price.

  38. Cell phone by Macman408 · · Score: 1

    Or, you could buy a cell phone. Those can be had for ~$100+ in forms that do about as much as a $100 laptop would. Plus they call people.

    In any case, it's no surprise - this has been possible for a long time. The question is whether the result is marketable. Will people want a 7-inch screen? Can they live with only 1 GB of storage? Each year, the specs of what you can buy with $100 get better - at this point, they're high enough that several companies think the product has become marketable.

    1. Re:Cell phone by FunWithKnives · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or, you could buy a cell phone.

      Yeah. As a college student, let me tell you about all those times I've typed out lecture notes in class on my cell phone. Oh, wait.

      --
      "We may face a scorched and lifeless earth, but they're accountable to their shareholders first."
    2. Re:Cell phone by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Umm, I could count the number of 100 dollar cellphones that will let me run my own standard apps without interference on one hand, even after playing "poke the landmine".

    3. Re:Cell phone by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 1

      Where can I get a $100 cell phone with wifi and a decent keyboard that doesn't require an expensive long-term contract?

      Honest question. I'd love to know.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    4. Re:Cell phone by Macman408 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I used an Apple Newton (remember those? Heck, ever even seen one?) to take notes in high school. I bought it used for $50. A friend of mine got a keyboard for his Newton to use when taking notes, and then also got an eMate - you could probably buy a half dozen of those for $100 these days. I believe somebody wrote a web browser for them a few years ago (believe it or not, development continues on an OS that has been dead 10 years - see also Amiga, C64, etc...). At the time, I used it for notes, calendars, games, and E-mail.

      If you were dedicated, you could take notes on a cell phone - hopefully one with at least a half-decent keyboard. But yeah, you'd give up a lot of usability for the price. Of course, you will give up a lot of usability for a $100 laptop, too. In any case, I doubt most students would buy a $100 laptop. Sure, us students are cheap, but are we really THAT cheap? A $100 laptop is better for a developing country, where the alternative is nothing - and even then, it's still too expensive, as food is probably more important, and wages are far lower.

  39. Re:fp by duckInferno · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ignore my retarded parents. I was adopted.

    --
    Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
  40. Keyboard thoughts by RustinHWright · · Score: 1

    I've been wondering the same thing and I suspect that I'm going to do something weird. I did a lot of looking around for portable keyboards with good action, light weight, big enough keys, etc. and having looked at everybody from Adesso on up, I've concluded that I'll probably buy a UMPC of some sort with a not-quite-good-enough keyboard, get by with that when I really want to travel light, and carry one of the new Apple keyboards when I expect to do a lot of writing. The buggers are amazingly light and the action is sweet, though I neither want to pay eighty bucks nor have to trust Bluetooth. But, realistically, at some point in the next few months I'll be gritting my teeth and giving yet more of my money to the folks in Cupertino.

    --
    It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
  41. Nice, but... by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 1

    ... can it run IRIX? :)

    --
    We apologize for the inconvenience.
    1. Re:Nice, but... by armanox · · Score: 1

      We can try =)

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
  42. OLPC was above $100 before Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how the author spins this as "now that OLPC has decided to super size their systems to run Windows XP, the $100 price point has slipped beyond their reach". OLPC has been above $100 since it began - in fact around $200, although I believe you have to pay $400 to actually get your hands on one because they want you to donate one in the process. Putting Windows on it was a business decision to make the thing more useful for actually teaching kids how to use computers, and might ultimately decease prices if it generates enough demand.

  43. Where can I buy one? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Give me a basic Laptop with wordprocessor/spreadsheet/internet access and I'm in. Add a working VGA out and I'm in heaven.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  44. OLPC about power usage, not cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While it was necessary for the OLPC to be inexpensive, the more important design decision was about its power usage and ruggedness. It uses 2W in "normal" use:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLPC_XO-1#Power_consumption

    Given that the DC draw is 15W for charging you can use small solar cells. Very handy in countries were the electrical grid infrastructure is non-existent in many cases. (And mesh network helps communication where ISPs don't exist.)

  45. They *are* shipping. by RustinHWright · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unless they're lying in the video, they've already sold over ten thousand of these puppies, or at least something that's about version 0.93 of it. That doesn't sound like vaporware to me.

    --
    It's all about the information. And what we do with it.
    1. Re:They *are* shipping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've sold them at $120, not $98.

    2. Re:They *are* shipping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The $120 version is shipping.

  46. Late, Dell's selling the Mini 9 for $99 (on sale) by Culture20 · · Score: 1
  47. PlayStation. by tepples · · Score: 1

    Although the laptop is probably a great piece of engineering for something that has a sub-$100 price tag, the decision to go with a MIPS processor is probably going to relegate the device to niche markets - census taking, for example, or maybe something along the lines of inventory control.

    Sony went with a MIPS processor for the PlayStation, PlayStation 2, and PlayStation Portable. Are they niche?

    The lack of official (and I emphasize "official") Flash 9 and Adobe PDF support would probably be a deal breaker for Joe Average Home and Business user.

    PSP has a MIPS processor and can run SWF.

    1. Re:PlayStation. by Gyga · · Score: 1

      Yes those products are niche, they are gaming only and each game is designed specifically for them.

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    2. Re:PlayStation. by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      The PS2 can run Linux.

  48. Not all software is Free by tepples · · Score: 1

    True, but all it takes is a source repository

    Not all software is Free or even available as source code. For example, what major retail video game has a Free engine?[1]

    [1] I'm talking about games that are Free upon first publication, not id Tech based games that go Free half a decade later.

    1. Re:Not all software is Free by DeathCarrot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're talking about a sub-$100 laptop here, I don't think the end user's primary concern is going to be gaming.

    2. Re:Not all software is Free by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Not all software is Free or even available as source code. For example, what major retail video game has a Free engine?[1]

      Solitaire ?
      What other kinds of games are you going to run on a $95 laptop ? Crysis ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  49. At this price, I'd buy 3 by George_Ou · · Score: 1

    1 for a server and one for each kid.

  50. x86 vs mips, vapourware, keyboard size by drwho · · Score: 1

    Answering a bunch of things in one post. Firstly, there seems to be some people on slashdot who think that x86 is required in order to be a 'usable' platform. Well, it isn't so. Makromedia flash may or may not be available for MIPS, but that doesn't mean that users will not be able to use 'the web': because of limited bandwidth and censorship, much of the 'target demographic' for this computer won't be needed such functionality anyhow. But I believe a few things: 1) it behooves Macromedia to release players for a variety of architecture, lest they be left behind. 2) proves that open-source, and its ability to be compiled for a variety of architectures, has much value. 3) Perhaps we need an INSTRUCTION SET which is completely unencumbered by "intellectual property". I guess virtual machines can handle the translation, and later be put into silicon - remind you of Java? Hrm.

    China has a lot of 'economic frontiers' left. A great portion of the country is still very primitive, left struggling in the remains of Maoism. There may be an effort in this country to refocus its efforts on internal development, and this PC might be a step towards it. I don't think it's quite there, though, as there seems to be a concentration on western (European/Roman/English) keyboards and displays. I am not saying that I want Red China to win (I actually want them to lose) but I am trying to foresee what's coming.

    Lastly, I am not sure how much further the keyboard can shrink and still be practical. Sure, for kids it can be smaller, but even kids grow - and hence their fingers grow too large for the keyboard, and then the mini-laptop they were using starts causing damage to their fingers. That's no way to be - we need full sized keyboards, even in undeveloped countries, otherwise it will be only the midgets which will be able to type effectively.

    1. Re:x86 vs mips, vapourware, keyboard size by quitte · · Score: 1

      I am not saying that I want Red China to win (I actually want them to lose)

      Huh? What are you talking about? Who do you think is at war there? Can't you just let the chinese people figure out their future themselves? Afaict we in the western countries, and possibly the whole world, benefit from their progress. And China obviously is changing it's political system.

      No need to panic just because things change

  51. nod tag? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    So what's with the nod tag that's been thrown on the past couple of articles?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:nod tag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like it, start tagging some articles "gdi".

  52. -1, Troll by marxmarv · · Score: 4, Informative

    The deranged lunacy turned ranged a long time ago.

    The core instruction set has had multiple sets of custom enhancements over the years, and can now do some pretty amazing stuff "in a single instruction."

    Any x86 CPU you can buy at retail for at least the past three years IS a RISC CPU. x86 is just a compression/encryption format for RISC instructions, and there's not a single thing you can do with an x86 that can't be done on another architecture with similar hardware, and most likely cleaner and better. $50 million worth of R&D into any CPU design, architecture or instruction set will produce a roughly equivalent speedup. Since x86 is such a Charlie Foxtrot in the first place, starting with something cleaner is likely to produce even better performance.

    It's the RISC methodology that can no longer keep up except under specific constraints to the problem set. That's why Apple switched to keep up in general-purpose and multimedia computing, and you'll find PowerPC only in embedded and HPC any more.

    The only keeping up Apple needs to do is in IA-32 emulation and price. The same principle (commodity hardware means fewer hardware engineers and lower component costs) drove the commodity-based architecture of the Sun Ultra-5. It's ALL about money. It's always about money.

    --
    /. -- the Free Republic of technology.
    1. Re:-1, Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RISC is, as far as I know, related to the instruction set architecture. So no x86 can be RISC, because the instruction set architecture is not RISC. It is quite easy. So NO x86 implementation is a RISC.

      You can argue that current implementations of a CISC can use similar techniques to those used in RISC. The internal architecture is a detail of implementation, so it does not change the "RISCness" of the instruction set architecture.

      Having said that, it could be said that CISC has some advantages over RISC. In a given implementation you can change the microinstructions so that they adapt better to the implementation (as they are not exposed to the user). Original RISCs made several design decisions that were somewhat bad (delayed branches? tying into the instruction set an implementation detail!).

      Note that RISC versus CISC is mostly a question about decoding complexity. x86 processors of today still have that complexity in.

      Note that POWER, for example, is not either a pure RISC, the E in the acronym awknowledges that fact.

    2. Re:-1, Troll by m50d · · Score: 1
      Any x86 CPU you can buy at retail for at least the past three years IS a RISC CPU.

      That's like saying anyone you can thote for these days IS a democrat, because they all adopted the dem polocies of 50 years ago. The CPU is x86; how its internals work are up to it, and in many ways are more similar to the pre-RISC microcode machines than classical RISC.

      there's not a single thing you can do with an x86 that can't be done on another architecture with similar hardware

      How about run fast?

      and most likely cleaner and better

      That doesn't matter anymore. The internals may be a mess, but only CPU engineers have to care about that. The insturction set may have some horrendous quirks, but only compiler writers have to care about that. Face it, the architecture wars are over and x86 has won.

      $50 million worth of R&D into any CPU design, architecture or instruction set will produce a roughly equivalent speedup.

      Sure, but how many million would it take to make MIPS competitive with x86, at this stage? And who's ever going to spend it?

      It's ALL about money. It's always about money.

      Of course it is. The fact is that, regardless of the cleaner, better design, non-x86 architectures are noneconomical.

      And yes I know about ARM; it's a matter of time for it too. It's just that it has a big head start from being in a market x86 didn't really compete in.

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:-1, Troll by blair1q · · Score: 1

      False.

      The "IS" in "RISC" and "CISC" is "Instruction Set."

      If the instruction set is complex, it's CISC. If the instruction set is simple, it's RISC.

      CISC saves on instruction memory and cache. The CPU keeps up. How it breaks up the instructions is irrelevant to whether it's CISC or RISC.

      Apple was running into walls trying to do things in PowerPC, and realized x86 was a better choice. The newer x86 versions are also less broken than the originals, for obvious reasons.

      They're making a ton of money at it. It's always about money.

  53. Under the Mark. by Ostracus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not certain if anyone remembers this? But I remember a Popular Science cover when the Timex Sinclair came out and people were crowing about the first "under $100" computer.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
    1. Re:Under the Mark. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      The TI 99/4a was selling for under $100 in 1983. Of course, that's like $1200 now, but still, that price point has definitely been beaten by several other computer systems.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    2. Re:Under the Mark. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Of course it was missing any mass storage or internal display. But lets not get into that whole comparing 'apples to apples' issue and just wildly toss out dollar figures.

      Timex wasn't involved when Sinclair first put out the 99 dollar units. They came around with a re-badged version after the ZX-81 called the T1000 however

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Under the Mark. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      That was the closeout price, way below cost.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  54. Sure, and when the battery dies... by gschwim · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... you don't recharge it, you buy a new one.

  55. Re:There's better products out there /w more RAM by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    There are currently NO developers using Beagleboard for MIPS development. They are using it for ARM and TIDSP development though.

    and GP Wiz with two D-pads instead of normal fire buttons is better designed as a gaming system? Pandora at least had two analog pads and normal buttons.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  56. Re:There's better products out there /w more RAM by CSMatt · · Score: 4, Informative

    .kr is South Korea (i.e: not communist).

  57. Notes on MIPS machines by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    MIPS CPUs are very simple to design, if you're willing to accept the limitation of one instruction per clock. I once met the entire design team for a midrange MIPS CPU, and it was six people. When you look at a picture of the silicon, you can barely find the instruction decode and execute logic; it's a tiny fraction of the chip.

    MIPS was overrun by the superscalar architectures, where you get more than one instruction per clock, at the cost of a huge increase in CPU logic complexity. The Pentium Pro design team was around 3000 people. (The Pentium II and III were basically Pentium Pro logic reworked for later fab processes.) It's amazing that x86 superscalar machines are even possible. (Think hard for a moment about what has to happen when you store into code just ahead of execution, which is fully supported by all x86 CPUs.) If you're willing to go superscalar, the simplicity goes away, and so does the advantage of the MIPS architecture.

    But if you're willing to accept one instruction per clock, and a 2X code bloat over x86 (making all the instructions the same length means the register-to-register instructions take more bytes than they need), it's a simple way to build a CPU.

    1. Re:Notes on MIPS machines by dkf · · Score: 2, Informative

      But if you're willing to accept one instruction per clock, and a 2X code bloat over x86 (making all the instructions the same length means the register-to-register instructions take more bytes than they need), it's a simple way to build a CPU.

      One of the main interesting things about RISC architectures is that all instructions are the same length, which means that the memory management circuitry can be much simpler. Variable length instructions add a lot of complexity. OTOH, what really got rid of the advantage of RISC was increased L1 cache sizes and the way that the memory bus didn't get faster nearly as quickly as CPUs did. (I know someone who designed a superscalar RISC processor, and the real complexity of going superscalar was dealing with register dependencies as I understand it.)

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    2. Re:Notes on MIPS machines by renoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >If you're willing to go superscalar, the simplicity goes away, and so does the advantage of the MIPS architecture.

      And so does *a part* of the advantage of the MIPS architecture: I bet than a superscalar MIPS is still much simpler than a superscalar x86..

      As for the second part, there is now a MIPS16 variant, so it's possible to have MIPS with 16/32 bit instructions, of course the decoder becomes more complex, but x86 instructions are still far more complicated (I can't remember what's the maximum size of an x86 instructions, but it's huge!).

    3. Re:Notes on MIPS machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't remember what's the maximum size of an x86 instructions, but it's huge

      11 bytes. But there is an architecture with a fancy loop instruction that can go on forever - making it all so complex that the designers dropped it for an entirely new arch called "AXP" or alpha.

    4. Re:Notes on MIPS machines by Animats · · Score: 1

      Actually, fixed length instructions have little effect on memory management. Alignment restrictions do. If an instruction can't access more than one page at a time or one cache line at a time, the MMU and cache controller can be simplified somewhat. X86 has no alignment restrictions; MIPS does. Note that alignment restrictions are visible at the source code level; you can write casts in C (typically from, say, "char *" to "int *") which result in pointers that aren't aligned on 2, 4, or 8 byte boundaries, and accessing such a pointer with a longer load will, on some CPUs, result in a machine exception.

      Also, MIPS is the other "endian" from X86, so code that doesn't take precautions to be independent of that can fail when ported. In C, this means lots of "htonl" and "ntohl" macro calls are required.

      Fixed length instructions do make instruction fetch and lookahead easier. On machines with variable length instructions, just finding the next instruction is a pain. Intel makes likely guesses and sometimes aborts a computation based on a bad guess. AMD Athlon processors unpack x86 code into a fixed-width form as a cache line is loaded. Both approaches work.

      There are several steps in superscalar processors. The first is simple lookahead without register renaming, first seen in the CDC 6600 in the 1960s and the thing that Seymour Cray was famous for. Without register renaming, the compiler has to do some work to get multiple instructions going at once; it's necessary to emit code that looks like "load, load, load, operate, operate, operate, store, store, store", using different registers for each load/operate/store sequence. The pipeline stalls as soon as there's a register conflict. MIPS, PowerPC, and especially SPARC code has to do this, and it's why RISC machines needed lots of registers. Compilers need to know how much parallelism the actual CPU has, which varies from model to model, to get the superscalar acceleration to do anything. That's why MIPS compilers tend to have many options for the specific CPU implementation targeted.

      The next step up is register renaming, where the number of programmer-visible registers is much less than the number actually inside the CPU. Modern X86 machines have about six major programmer-visible registers, but upwards of 40 in the CPU, so the same "register name" containing multiple values at different times can be internally represented as multiple registers, allowing RISC-type concurrency for an instruction set for which concurrency seems nearly impossible. This is where it gets really hard. The Pentium Pro was the first to do this. The compiler doesn't have to be explicitly aware of the details. Internally, such machines are more like data-flow engines than sequential CPUs; what's going on internally has only a vague resemblance to the programmer-visible model.

      The trouble with having lots of programmer-visible registers is that you have to save and restore them on subroutine calls and interrupts. SPARC machines had so many registers that they had to add "register windows" and "spill and fill" hardware to deal with all the saving and loading.

      A compact instruction set with a modest number of registers and extensive stack top usage, like X86, turns out to be a good input form for a superscalar engine. Intel tried two product lines of RISC machines (the i860 and i960) and a VLIW machine (the Itanium, or "Itanic"), and they were all worse than the X86 line. AMD's 64-bit version of X86 got rid of much of the legacy cruft, and that's a relatively clean architecture, although there's still emulation for 32-bit and 16-bit modes.

    5. Re:Notes on MIPS machines by evilviper · · Score: 1

      MIPS CPUs are very simple to design, if you're willing to accept the limitation of one instruction per clock. [...]
      MIPS was overrun by the superscalar architectures, where you get more than one instruction per clock, at the cost of a huge increase in CPU logic complexity.

      That may be the case with this Ingenic XBurst CPU. However the second and third revisions of the Chinese "Loongson" CPU (Dragon chip) are, in fact, superscalar.

      According to their paper in the "Journal of Computer Science and Technology", benchmarks show the chip (Godson 2E) to outperform Pentium 4 CPUs running at the same clock (ie. 1GHz). This is while the Dragon chip runs on just 4watts. Link: http://jcste.ict.ac.cn/paper/hww_071.pdf
      Of course, being ~5 years, and a CPU generation behind Intel isn't exactly a great accomplishment, but there is no doubt still a big low-end market that can be filled, particularly in China, where the chip is doing reasonably well, even being used in a modest supercomputer.

      Admittedly, Ingenic's CPU, being used here, isn't a Dragon chip. But considering the fact that the Dragon chip is the only modern CPU China is known to be able to produce domestically, I think it's fairly obvious that Ingenic's XBurst chips are a direct spin-off of the (non-superscalar) first revision of the Dragon chip, along with some added SIMD instructions which should improve performance significantly, at least for multimedia.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  58. Markup not included by KnowledgeEngine · · Score: 1

    Did anyone here consider the fact that the $98 dollar price point is the wholesale price?

    You will not be buying it for $98, the distrubutor you buy it from will be paying $98 dollars for it, and selling it to you at a markup.

    Just that this appears to be footage of a commonplace wholesaler trade show.

  59. Sign me up by motang · · Score: 1

    Me being the geek that I am, I would have one of these in my house, I just got the Eee Box and I love it, and with this being different in processor and stuff I would love to tinker with it.

  60. Tmothy, learn tense... by NateTech · · Score: 1

    "Arrived" in the title, and "Due in October" in the text.

    One of these things is not like the other... one of these things is not the same...

    --
    +++OK ATH
  61. Arrived? by Inominate · · Score: 1

    I do not think that word means what they think it does.

  62. Devolution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That culture sucks, slashdot culture is way better.

  63. Tied to the Dollar by EEBaum · · Score: 1

    Shame they're tied to US$100 for this. If, instead, at the time they made the mandate for a laptop at US$100, they actually locked the price to the equivalent Euros or GBP, they'd have a much easier time at it.

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  64. Finaly... by WoollyMittens · · Score: 1

    I was starting to wonder what could be cobbled together from all the, perfectly functional, yet slightly outdated/unwanted parts that must be floating around warehouses in Asia. My EEE PC serves me perfectly well. It's really an eye-opener how much you can do with systems that appear "limited" at first glance.

  65. in BestBuy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice, now to get it in BestBuy with a lid filling screen and full size keys. Don't need no Flash anyways.

  66. Crossdeveloper phobics jump this guy :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found your post, GT. Nice to see you. Nevermind those third-world mall walkers. They'ld go to the moon if they could save 75% off a 10 cent condomn.

    And I thought I had a crosscompiling nightmare. Back in the days of StrongARM, we were using development tools on a SGI MIPS machine that would somtimes crap out on us. The crossdevelopment software we were using was capable, just the source lost and the random nuisance bugs couldn't be corrected but workedaround.

    Don't need a desktop or laptop to be a software developer. What's with all the crosscompiler phobia today? A MIPS compiler run on a i386Wine ontop of qEMU hosted on a ARM makes my job possible right now, laughably. Perhaps the same people complaining above are the same that have lived on a steady diet of expensive development setups and expect a laptop under $100 made from a thirdworld company will makeup on their lost profits. The same also expect their software to appear without manlabor, and GPLd. Completly assinine and typical Microsoft doublespeak.

  67. soon to be the sub-$50 laptop! by DraconPern · · Score: 1

    Hey, $120 is the new $100! With the way the economy is going, it'll only take a few days for this laptop to be a sub-$50 laptop!

  68. you don't get it by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

    These are not for "general purpose" computing as we slashdotters know it, these are for email, web and writing letters to aunt betty. They're not intended to play Doom 4 or run Windows Vista.

    My mother in law is getting a netbook, and I think she's a very good example of a non-geek's perspective on these. She doesn't need to spend hundreds of pounds on a 8kg brick with 10 mins battery life and six zillion GB of storage space that claims to be a "Lap Top" - just to use the interweb, and she knows it, so as soon as she copped eyes on a netbook and found out that they were basically a portable internet thingy with a larger screen and keyboard than her mobile phone she was sold. The £100 (GBP) price range is exactly right for these machines in that respect - from the point of view who has a 19" mono CRT TV and is perfectly happy with that and doesnt see the need to fork out for a 50" 1080P HD Flat screen.

    I've said this before on slashdot, too many geeks and product reviewers see these and their laptop-like form factors and treat them like stripped down dumb machines that would sit in the corner dribbling whilst all the supposedly "proper" laptops called them names. When that's not what they are - they're much more akin to souped-up PDAs with keyboards. And as someone who still owns an 8MB Psion Revo i've been dying for this sort of thing for years!

    I already have an Xbox, Playstation, Server and Desktop. They're mainly used for watching video, playing games, developing and general-purpose computing, respectively. I don't need one of these mini-laptops to do any of that, i want it so I can check ebay from the sofa, look up recipes from the kitchen and send emails from the garden.

    As a final thought it's probably worth bearing in ming that the specs of these inparticular almost exactly match the *development* system I used to use 8 years ago, except I had 8GB of drive space there instead of 1GB - but most of that was empty or taken up with quake 2 and half life modding resources! I managed to run SUSE (5 or 6 IIRC) on it perfectly adequately and email, surf and write letters with no performance issues.

    If this is the model I think of it there's a fledgling site dedicated to it and it's siblings at littlelinuxlaptop.com - including how to get root access and such like. I can't wait to get mine!

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  69. $100 but at what cost to the planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To make a laptop this cheap, you're not going to have much money left over to responsibly deal with the industrial waste you produce are you?

    1. Re:$100 but at what cost to the planet? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      If we can get a useable 100$ laptop out of the deal, who here really cares?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  70. Now $180 by slashmojo · · Score: 1
  71. Eurp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And as always, if ever sold in europe, the price will as usual translate to about â100-150 ($144-216). Useless

  72. Who is Belco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not $98 but sounds a lot like the same device

    http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?invtid=ALPHA-400&cat=NBB

  73. DS games are PS1-class by tepples · · Score: 1

    What other kinds of games are you going to run on a $95 laptop ? Crysis ?

    Games with PS1-class graphics, such as MySims and Mario Kart DS, already run on a $130 handheld.

  74. well, what is more odd by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    is that XO HAD a chance. By trying to work with MS, they had to increase the size of everything, which brings up the costs to the same as most major companies. Now, hivision is doing on the hardware what XO was suppose to do. And I am betting that some others or even hivision will port SOME of the apps over, and then take control of XO.

    Basically, a companies willingness to work with MS is becoming a predictive value of how long the company will last.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:well, what is more odd by Lennie · · Score: 1

      There was a mistake in your sentence, I fixed it for you:

      Basically, a companies willingness to work with MS is <removed>becoming</removed> a predictive value of how long the company will last.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    2. Re:well, what is more odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant: MS F**ks everything up

  75. There's no lockout chip, right? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Yes those products are niche, they are gaming only

    PSP homebrewers would tell you that the big reason Sony computer entertainment systems are commonly considered "gaming-only" is because of the lockout chip that verifies Sony's digital signature on each executable. A jailbroken PSP can do and does a lot more than gaming. I take it that unlike the PSP, this laptop won't have the lockout chip. So what wouldn't you call "niche"?

    1. Re:There's no lockout chip, right? by Gyga · · Score: 1

      So you have to modify it to make it non niche, to the average person PS(1/2/P) are niche. True these laptops won't have artificial limits, but there will be some issues (unless they become popular enough people start programming with them in mind)

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
  76. Going to China in November by querist · · Score: 1

    I'm going to China in November, and I've already asked my friends there to try to find these. I will report back if I manage to get my hands on one.

    I think the 0890 (8.9 inch) would make a great little security testing device.

  77. 1024x600 by querist · · Score: 1

    The 8.9 inch and 10 inch models have 1024x600. It's only the 8 inch and 7 inch that have 800x480.

    The 8.9 inch model's specs are identical to the 10 inch except the physical size and the weight. Both have the same size HD, same screen layout (1024x600), 3 USB 2.0 ports, etc.

    I'll be in China in early November. I plan to pick up one of the 8.9 inch ones. I will report back when I return.

  78. Where do I buy one? by jarkun · · Score: 1

    It sez the $120 is available now. I'm willing to spend an extra $20 to play with it today. How do I get one?

  79. Tech work .... by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

    I want one of these for network tech work. I do some in-home networking work, and I would love one of these. Lighter than a laptop, running a full Linux TCP/IP stack, cheap enough to not worry about breaking it.
    From my standpoint, these are perfect for field work. Hell if I can get KIAX, SSH, and Firefox to work on it reliably, that's 95% of what I need a laptop for onsite.

  80. For (hopefully) the last time.. by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 2, Informative

    Pointing out that there is a comparable alternative available on a one-at-a-time basis is *not a valid criticism of these products.

    Pretend that GP, instead of just being a tweakhead who wants to fiddle with a UMPC, is tasked with fitting out 1200 employees with cheap laptops.

    I assume you'd suggest that he needs to make 1199 more friends with old laptops?

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:For (hopefully) the last time.. by Locutus · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the 1200 new batteries they would need. The cost of those would likely come close to the cost of these laptops.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  81. Walmarts had $290 laptop by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Older model during back-to-school sales. Standard everything, but small.

  82. Ermmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HIVLOL

  83. Re:There's better products out there /w more RAM by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    There are currently NO developers using Beagleboard for MIPS development

    Oh, I don't know. There might be some. They're probably very confused about why none of their code is working though...

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  84. How many times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, just how many fucking times am I going to see the same bloody laptop with a different name. It's a Elonex ONEt / Bestlink Alpha-400

    1. Re:How many times? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Looks like a different CPU to me. So id not consider them the 'same bloody laptop'.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  85. webcam & Flash a must for my purchase by sxmjmae · · Score: 1

    Slap a webcam (with Skype pre-loaded) and the Adobe Flash Player it seems perfect (even if it running a flavor of Linux) and put a price tag of $100-$150 and I would buy it at the drop of a hat. HEAR THAT... Do not just slap it out at sell it at $500! I will be buy a regular laptop at that point.

    --
    My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
    1. Re:webcam & Flash a must for my purchase by Lennie · · Score: 1

      My guess is, there is no Linux/Skype for MIPS ?

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
  86. Re:There's better products out there /w more RAM by korean.ian · · Score: 1

    That GP2x Wiz is from a South Korean company, actually there office is pretty close to where I work, I'll have to go check it out. It's great they're running linux, I was checking out an event that Asus put on for the eeePC and it was basically impossible to find one running Linux. The staff all said they sold them with Windows. So while this is offtopic, at least the post proved a little bit useful.

  87. re: lower resolution gaining popularity? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Interesting that you've noticed that trend....

    I've suspected the same thing, though I didn't track the visitors to any of the web sites I've put together.

    I think one big issue has been the lack of real "resolution independence" in full use in major operating systems. This was promised for OS X before 10.5 Leopard was released, but then never really materialized. And in Windows, you can change the default of 96DPI to something larger, but that amounts to magnifying EVERYTHING drawn on the display - so I'm not sure why that's really beneficial over just selecting a lower resolution (thereby achieving the same effect, while reducing the load on the video card and system - since it has fewer pixels to refresh and draw)?

    I know at my workplace, at least 1 out of 3 employees is running in 800x600 because it's the lowest resolution they can use that still fits a "usable" amount of information on the screen at one time. They want everything to look bigger, making it easier on the eyes -- and buying larger LCD displays didn't address their problem, since it just meant higher and higher native resolutions.

  88. RTFS by 2short · · Score: 1

    From your comment:

    "Is the thing not x86 compatible?"

    From the summary of the article you are commenting on:

    "They ditched x86 compatibility..."

    1. Re:RTFS by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      Oh great.

      New meme: I didn't RTFS?

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  89. Worst Interviewer of All Time by phoenixdna · · Score: 1

    The interviewer is just terrible. How is it that this is the only guy in the internets providing info on this? Anyway, the linux distro in the vid looks like xandros that comes with the asus eeepc 900. I'm not sure it is is xandros but it looks just like that. The first thing I'd do is wipe that crap and install something else on there with an 8gb sd card or something. And once again ... the interviewer was just plain horrible.

  90. Re:There's better products out there /w more RAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea those Gamepark consoles are quite good, in their first inception. Two friends of mine have opposite of eachother a GP32x and a GPx2, if I remember the models right. They each bought unreleate keyboards to attach to them, as though a PDA-sized console. Around ~USD200 to buy is not bad, and eBay has a number of vendors selling a dwindling number. GamePark was split into two companies, whereas one is government subsidized if I remember correctly. So be aware that there are two competing products of similar nature but different motives. It's kind of like Micros~1 vs Micros~2.gov. I don't know what form of law that other poster was saying about .kr being a non-comunist domain, as I assert that all internet domains outside of .com are intentionally of a nature that is of an administrative body looking for self-preservance through a quasi-civil presence initiated from a United Nations treaty for their present with ICANN.
     
    I would see http://southkorea.com a more probable avenue for a customary entrance to that province, without the confidence-building measures of any administrative body and their gleaning. I see technology subsidy as a form to be broken with anti-trust proceedings; somthing is non-competitive about it, resources being misused (and some would consider human beings to be a resource, if you know what I mean). It's the same in the agriculture industry, with "agribusiness" style farming doing more to hurt the economy as the weakening hand of their USDA GMO'd products; what with the price of corn already sky-rocket because of the anticipation that 500lbs of corn to ~20 actual gallons of Methanol produced/expected to be converted, which will allow none be able collect that stable off market. 500lbs will feed 4 men for a year. Everywhere I look there is a subsidy in an industry, driving the market value down and then inflating it disproportionate to the published money-supply of the actual value and endorsement of product to a legal tender offset to lawful money and warehouse receipts. Anyways...

    Of'course, only on SLASHDOT will those earlier posters be able to get there censure of +5 by using useless sarcasm. Did I read the article without posting, and why are they asking me to read it for them?

  91. What crap.. slashdot spin... yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    view webpages, read e-mail, listen to music, maybe watch video.
    "Joe User": 90%

    90%? Bullshit. There are many different kinds of users. 90% just want to read email, music and video? Holy FUD!

    And gamers are a sub-set of 10%? WOW. You need to get out into the real world more often man. Or lay down the crack pipe.

    You're insulting a huge chunk of the population that isn't dumb, understands there are different operating systems, but still doesnt care about linux. Is that so freaking hard to grasp?

    And if you think there cant be geeks and nerds who can grasp kernel architectur, understand programming at a deep level, understand what linux is all about but still prefer microsoft technologies, then all you are is a FOSS zealot.

  92. different guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try this one too : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBGIQ7ZuuiU

    It's not as informative, but his voice isn't quite so funny.

  93. ~100$ mips laptop? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Ok, so where can i get one, today.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  94. limitation of one instruction per clock by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Some people prefer RISC and wouldn't consider it a limitation.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  95. Re:Late, Dell's selling the Mini 9 for $99 (on sal by H3g3m0n · · Score: 1

    Its not late, that is not a sub $100 laptop.

    You know I was GIVEN an old laptop years ago.

    I guess that magically somehow invalidates the fact that they can *make* a new laptop for $100 the same way some deal that requires you to buy a several thousand dollar laptop does.

    Unless there is some mass market where people are buying these expensive laptops and reselling the $99 extra ones its not very much use.

    Its like claiming that mobile phones cost $0 to manufacture.

    --
    cat /dev/urandom > .sig
  96. No flash here, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is parent post +5 funny? I would mod it +5 insightful.

  97. The digital photo frame angle caught my eye. by ahfoo · · Score: 1

    I, like many others from what I could gather from a quick google of "digital photo frame driver", was intrigued by the recent news that there is a huge glut of digital photo frame devices and that the average selling price is in the sub-thirty dollar range for the 7" part.

    At that price point these things are getting close to the average retail price of a twenty character monochrome textmode LED display for hobbyist electronics projects. The question, of course, is the video driver and my first tentative googling didn't turn up much more than other people wondering the same thing.

    With the advent of all these new SOC platforms like the Atom and Nvidia Tegra that include integrated video hardware within the SOC package it certainly seems like we're getting very close to ultra low cost homebrew SOC systems with repurposed digital photo frame video output. These could make for some great devices.

    The trick will be in hitching the SOC chips which tend to come in fine pitched BGA packaging to spread-out boards using toaster oven SMT techniques to get to the pins and then identifying the input connections on some common digital photo frame devices. If anybody has one of these and does a teardown to see how they have wired the microcontroller/SOC to the digital photo frame please post links back to here.

  98. Ever hear of the EEE 7'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >The real question for me is the usefulness of it. >That thing looks like it's slightly larger than a >Nintendo DS,

    7 inch is the screen on the original EEE that I got last winter. So its much bigger than a DS.

    Thanks for playing.

  99. Don't reject freedom to make informed choices. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    No, it's like giving someone a book and then forbidding them from obtaining the knowledge to make their own books or modifying the book you gave them so it can suit their needs.

    You seem to misunderstand the point of freedom. Just because most computer users aren't hackers and have no desire to become hackers doesn't mean they should be prohibited from being hackers to the degree they want to be one (not all jobs require serious programming skills, some jobs like translation can be done without editing code at all). Proprietary software always prohibits one from doing what they want with their software, even simple things like sharing a verbatim copy with someone else. Protecting freedom means thinking beyond your immediate desires and your own view of the world, realizing that you can't know what you'll want to do in the future and others want different things than you so you're better off retaining freedoms even if you don't exercise them yourself. In computer software the freedoms you throw away could be the freedoms someone wants when they get software from you.

    I wouldn't trade away my freedom of speech even if I happened to agree with what my government was doing and therefore had no need to protest.

    As for needing details of food production, you probably need that more than you think. Some people want to know if there is something in the wine that shouldn't be there. This information allows them to find wine that was free of pollutants. Some people care about the plight of the workers and other customers when they buy products, so they will use their consumer power (small as it is) to help shape a better world.

  100. math by fringd · · Score: 1

    the inverse of 3/4 is 4/3 and 4/3 times $100 is $133.33...

  101. Terminal of some sort and ssh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Question: Does the unit have some sort of terminal and ssh client? If so, I'm in. I can work an entire day from the terminal with alpine, finch, and epic4 running from my personal server.

  102. CS:Source Or Crysis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    forget flash, the real important item - can it run CSS, Crysis, Cod4 - not buying..