Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Tech Accused Of Making $220K In Sex Calls On User Lines

Joseph Vaccarelli, a former Verizon Technician, has been charged with racking up $220,000 in phone-sex calls by tapping into the land lines of nearly 950 customers. Authorities say that he made approximately 5,000 calls, resulting in 45,000 minutes of call time. Verizon estimated that out of a 40-week period, Vaccarelli spent 15 weeks talking on sex lines. How in the world do you have this much phone sex, period, but especially at work, and not have anyone notice?

218 comments

  1. You can have that much... by Sinryc · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can have that much by either being very very good, or very very bad at it.

    --
    Yay, I have a sig.
    1. Re:You can have that much... by MrNaz · · Score: 4, Funny

      How in the world do you have this much phone sex, period, but especially at work, and not have anyone notice?

      He told his boss that he was only going to take a 0.002 hour break.

      --
      I hate printers.
    2. Re:You can have that much... by __aavonx8281 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "How in the world do you have this much phone sex, period, but especially at work, and not have anyone notice?"

      Lol! You work at a phone company if you don't want to get noticed spending too much time on the phone!

      Customer: "What are you doing?"
      Phone Tech: "Uh, checking the line."
      Customer: "No! With your other hand!"

    3. Re:You can have that much... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I cannot help but think of the quote from "Deep Throat", "Follow the Money". I think would explain a lot of things...

  2. uh by SuSEboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    uh.. Someone did notice. He got caught remember?

    1. Re:uh by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

      uh.. Someone did notice. He got caught remember?

      Yeah, they caught him immediately after he dialed a line that charged $45,000 a minute.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:uh by SuSEboy · · Score: 2

      The poster didn't ask why he didn't get caught immediately, the poster asked why he didn't get caught.

    3. Re:uh by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      One would assume that that's what was meant, given that he got away with it for the better part of a year.

      --
      I hate printers.
    4. Re:uh by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Which part of Germany are you from?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:uh by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      If you work in an office, then sure it would be quite hard to get away with spending hours a day on sex lines without being noticed...
      On the other hand, this guy was a phone tech, so he could well have spent lots of time in telephone exchanges on his own, or working at the end of street line boxes again on his own, and travelling between various sites...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    6. Re:uh by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Nothing gets me off quite like hanging off a telephone pole and talking on a sex line ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    7. Re:uh by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Hm. One hand holding the handset. One hand holding onto the telephone pole.

      Yep, you're doing it wrong.

    8. Re:uh by gmack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      At a previous job I had access to telephone exchanges. DSLAM firmware updates can easily take an hour or two and my diagnostic equipment included a telephone headset with a bix clip adapter.

      Given that I was alone most of the time, there are thousands of lines going into the rooms I worked in and the competition left their panels out in the open I can completely see how someone with less of a moral backbone could have caused a lot of trouble without getting caught.

      Someone working for the telco itself would have access to hundreds of thousands of lines.

    9. Re:uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could clamp the handset between shoulder and ear like a soccer mom yapping while mixing pudding.

    10. Re:uh by MPAB · · Score: 1

      I guess it gets you off ... the pole.

    11. Re:uh by gnick · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hm. One hand holding the handset. One hand holding onto the telephone pole.

      Yep, you're doing it wrong.

      That's why it took him so long. Try substituting a dry-hump on a telephone pole for your hand-of-preference. It takes much longer.

      Um... At least that's what I've heard...

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    12. Re:uh by ubrgeek · · Score: 1

      Why not the better part of 15 minutes? ;)

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    13. Re:uh by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Try substituting a dry-hump on a telephone pole for your hand-of-preference. It takes much longer.

      And then there's the problem of splinters...

      Um... At least that's what I've heard...

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
  3. Obligatory... by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Can you hear me now?"
    "Good!"
    "No, Bad! Very very bad... You have been so very bad!"

    1. Re:Obligatory... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Oh, great. That's just what I need an image of in my head. That guy with the horn-rimmed glass saying "You have been so very bad!"

      *gag*

      Now please excuse me while I go wash my brain out!

      Thx.

    2. Re:Obligatory... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I was expecting more of a "Can you hear me now?" followed by him hearing the girl on the other end shout "Yes! Oh, yes!" followed by "Oh, yeah, [optional expletive here] you like it when I talk dirty about dropouts, don't ya."

      Creepy....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  4. Money Making Scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Set up 900 premium phone service.
    Get mate at Verizon to use customers phones to call said service. ...
    Profit.

    1. Re:Money Making Scheme by draco664 · · Score: 1

      Get charged with being an accessory...

    2. Re:Money Making Scheme by justleavealonemmmkay · · Score: 1

      Also commonly used for money laundering

    3. Re:Money Making Scheme by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Go to Federal pound me in the ass prison......

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Money Making Scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is what i am thinking

      especially considering phone$ex usually goes for more like $2/min instead of the $4/min he and his collaborator in such a scheme would have pulled down (based on the figures in the OP)

    5. Re:Money Making Scheme by blantonl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Profit!

      Oh.. wait..

      --
      Lindsay Blanton
      RadioReference.com
    6. Re:Money Making Scheme by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Nah, in this case it'd be cockfit.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  5. Great picture. by Korey+Kaczor · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I think most slashdot users won't get it, because they're not used to being on top of things, if you know what I mean.

    1. Re:Great picture. by kirbysuperstar · · Score: 5, Funny

      I installed XP on top of 98 once. That's what you mean, right?

    2. Re:Great picture. by Korey+Kaczor · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll explain it to you when you're older :'(

    3. Re:Great picture. by TheP4st · · Score: 1

      Where are my modpoints when I need them? I just splurted coffee all over keyboard and monitor, good thing the pointy haired boss isn't around.

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    4. Re:Great picture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd tap that line if you know what I mean.

    5. Re:Great picture. by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      What? You mean I am supposed to squint and that disgusting, horrid, nasty image will appear? Oh wait... brb.

    6. Re:Great picture. by Telepathetic+Man · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's not all that has been splurted...

      --
      Just because you can, does not mean you should.
    7. Re:Great picture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stop slacking off and get back to work
      We will talk about this later.

      sincerely,
      Your pointy haired boss

    8. Re:Great picture. by TheP4st · · Score: 1

      Sooo... I were not being overly paranoid when the PHB had cctv's installed all over the place

      --
      "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
    9. Re:Great picture. by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would have sexual intercourse in my imagination with the person on the other end of the phone conversation, if you know what I mean.

      --
      sig?
    10. Re:Great picture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.. nowadays, internet helps you make your life easy.

    11. Re:Great picture. by hackus · · Score: 1

      Yep, I am over 40 and STILL no EXACTLY what you mean. :-)

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    12. Re:Great picture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I don't get the whole picture, no. What is that strange, flexible, checker-board patterned material in the background, underneath and behind that classic Western Electric Rotary Model 500 (blue) and equally classic Western Electric Rotary Model 701/702 Princess Telephone (pink)? I don't have anything that looks like that in my cubicle.

    13. Re:Great picture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    14. Re:Great picture. by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Thanks to digital compression...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  6. Shouldn't have turned it down by Big+Nothing · · Score: 5, Funny

    A few years ago I turned down a job offer as a Verizon Technician due to low pay - I didn't know there were these kinds of fringe benefits!

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
  7. How you have this much phone sex? by Anomalyst · · Score: 5, Funny

    How in the world do you have this much phone sex?

    I'd tell ya, but then you'd die of exhaustion.

    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    1. Re:How you have this much phone sex? by Firehed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Almost 94 continuous work days of phone sex. I feel terribly sorry for the janitor that cleans out his trash can.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    2. Re:How you have this much phone sex? by The+Dobber · · Score: 0

      Especially at that age. I mean 45, you need a couple days downtime afte each event.

    3. Re:How you have this much phone sex? by cryptodan · · Score: 1

      I'd tell ya, but then you'd die of exhaustion.

      Are you that boring?

  8. Not sex but money by moteyalpha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did he own part of the phone-sex companies. That would explain that it was just a way to steal money and hide it. Less exciting story though.

    1. Re:Not sex but money by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      For the kind of money this is going to cost him, he should have just bought one.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Not sex but money by shock1970 · · Score: 1

      The question is did he spend all that time on one number (and was there actually conversation) or was he calling multiple numbers from multiple services? If it was the latter, then he's just a stupid perv. (A smarter perv would have read book on how to seduce strippers). If it was the latter however, anyone can own a phone sex line (you don't need to own the company, just lease the line) or work out an awesome deal with someone they know who has one and make a whole boat load of money that way. I know a guy who was a heroine addict and this was how he got his money for drugs. (He too, of course, was busted eventually)

  9. slashfark by MrMista_B · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So I guess 'idle' is /.'s way to try to emulate Fark now, huh.

  10. 45000/5000 by SportyGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    9 minute average....better than your average geek. ;)

    1. Re:45000/5000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's much, much worse than your average geek. This isn't real sex where staying power matters. This is pay-per-minute phone sex where the trick is to get off and get off as fast as possible.

    2. Re:45000/5000 by thompson.ash · · Score: 1

      *groans*

      --
      I didn't say it was your fault, I said I was going blame you for it!
    3. Re:45000/5000 by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Minus the 8 minutes sex line workers take to get naked, it's about tied.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  11. Why is this on idle? by Kuroji · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Notwithstanding that I think a great number of users here think idle is a waste of space, a headline like this ought to be taken seriously, not treated as if it were a joke. This guy compromised the accounts of nearly a thousand customers, and that is a HUGE breach for Verizon's customers.

    1. Re:Why is this on idle? by interactive_civilian · · Score: 4, Funny

      You are right. Given the submitter's final question, it probably should have been an "Ask Slashdot". ;)

      --
      "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
    2. Re:Why is this on idle? by DrHackenbush · · Score: 0

      Heh heh - you said "HUGE breach".

    3. Re:Why is this on idle? by cryptodan · · Score: 1

      No the breach was in his pants.

  12. Of course.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. This would explain why I've been getting those strange bills for 1-800-HORNY :D

    1. Re:Of course.. by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      Not enough digits.

      How about 1-800-HORNY-GOAT?

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    2. Re:Of course.. by MoriaOrc · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be 1-900-HORNY-GOAT ?
      Not that I would know...

    3. Re:Of course.. by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Where's the ":" symbol on my keypad?

      Must be 1. They always put the weird stuff on 1. 1-800-467-6913. Go figure.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    4. Re:Of course.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1-900-HOT-GRITS is more like it.

    5. Re:Of course.. by newr00tic · · Score: 0

      1-900-NAT-PORTZ

      --
      A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
    6. Re:Of course.. by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      Common tactic is to get you to dial a toll-free number, which has a sexy voice convincing you to dial a 900 number.

      Not that I would know. :P

      Seriously (not that anyone's going to believe me, but this is really the way it happened), I figured, it's an 800 number, they can't charge me, what's the gimmick? So I called one out of curiousity, and got a tape telling me to call a $900 number. Typo intended.

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  13. Jerkin hard, or hardly jerkin? by ipX · · Score: 1

    Maybe both? :-P

  14. the real reason he won't tell you by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    is that the explanation would cut into valuable phone-sex time.

  15. He got adickted by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

    Now sue for ADA discrimination.... Because in a way, the company is responsible for his troubles, right?

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
  16. People can get away with a lot by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

    I used to think a certain manager where I work had a bad stomach - he would often get up and say "back in 10 minutes". Evidently people in reception thought a certain secretary had a bad stomach too.

    One day security installed a security camera in a stock room because they noticed that things "kept being moved around". Soon all became apparent.

    All I can say is he may have lacked in duration but he made up in frequency!

    1. Re:People can get away with a lot by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 5, Funny

      They were secretly tidying up the stock room? I don't understand.

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    2. Re:People can get away with a lot by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      When I worked as a security guard in college, one of the other guards was caught making phone sex calls on the company lines (I'm still not sure exactly how, since most of the lines wouldn't even call long-distance, much less to 900 numbers). He racked up over $12,000 in charges before he got caught. That was before healthier addictions like World of Warcraft. ;-)

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  17. Nope, physical access. by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He didnt compromise accounts, in the summary it says he tapped into land lines. That can be done with a $5 telephone handset and a pair of aligator clips, and was probably done using an actual linemans handset provided to him by the company. Google "beige box" for more info.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Nope, physical access. by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Handset and aligator clips for phone sex....I guess that makes this a HARD-HACK *Rimshot*

    2. Re:Nope, physical access. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm amazed this isn't common knowledge, at least on slashdot.

    3. Re:Nope, physical access. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so this could mean the guy climbed up a pole, set on his headset and jacked on while fixing (or pretending to) the lines etc.?

    4. Re:Nope, physical access. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I question their security practices
      What checks are done on employees and at what frequency are they repeated ?
      Do you want to bet that this guy had a shady or criminal past that went unchecked by them ?
      One thing is sure, ill never trust anyone from that company o EVER again.

    5. Re:Nope, physical access. by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      He didnt compromise accounts, in the summary it says he tapped into land lines. That can be done with a $5 telephone handset and a pair of aligator clips, and was probably done using an actual linemans handset provided to him by the company. Google "beige box" for more info.

      This actually happened to me once. In my area, Bell has installed boxes outside houses with phone jacks anyone can access with a standard corded phone. The purpose is to have customers use it to determine if a problem is inside or outside the residence, to save Bell unnecessary tech calls, but by adding a flagrant vulnerability to the phone service.

      So one month, $273 in phone sex charges appeared on my bill at times when I was at work. I had even requested 900 numbers blocked when I ordered the service, which apparently wasn't heeded. Once I discovered the exterior panel, it had clearly been opened, since my landlord had painted over it just after I moved in, and there was even a milk crate under it, presumably used as a chair. It was located in a narrow alley between houses which offered some privacy, but I figure it was just some kids being brats. What locking mechanism does the box use? A hex-head screw, loosened with any small pliers. I sent Bell pictures of the tampering evidence, they still refused to reverse the charges. I had to fax them a letter on my lawyer's letterhead before they did (he lets me do that).

      By installing these exterior access points, nobody can prove who places any calls from anyone's service, so by allowing 3rd parties to directly charge a customer's bill, Bell is engaged in willful negligence tantamount to racketeering. The boxes are installed without asking permission of the customer (done at time of installation when permission is obtained to drill holes etc) or even informing them of the access point. They're only informed of them if a problem arises, and they say it's a feature to save the customer technician charges for interior problems.

      Best of all, when I demanded they remove the box, even after they reversed the charges, they refused. Thank God VOIP had recently arrived in my area. Even still, when a VOIP adapter is connected to the internal jacks, the external jack becomes active. You have to find where it enters the interior and cut the line there.

      Like Ma Bell I got the ill communication indeed.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    6. Re:Nope, physical access. by cizoozic · · Score: 1

      Google "beige box" for more info.

      I don't get it. It just took me to a page on the emachines website.

    7. Re:Nope, physical access. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What locking mechanism does the box use? A hex-head screw, loosened with any small pliers.

      7/16" socket wrench. We used to call this beige boxing. Usually done from the distribution box, not the side of a house, so you wouldn't have a clue until the bill arrived and then bell would (hopefully) drop the charges.

      Alliance teleconference anyone?

    8. Re:Nope, physical access. by cryptodan · · Score: 1

      You do realize that at t he demarcation point is where the teleco service ends and the customer service begins. They don't need permission to install the box on the outside of your house. However, they would need permission to install stuff inside your house since that is where the premise is.

  18. Nuttin like nutting in nutley! by ipX · · Score: 1
    OMG DID ANYONE READ TFA?!@^%

    Joseph Vaccarelli, 45, of Nutley...[New York]

    1. Re:Nuttin like nutting in nutley! by draco664 · · Score: 1

      Hello? This is slashdot! What sort of question is that to ask here?

  19. 1/3 the year on sex lines? by zakezuke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Presuming a 40 hr work week, that works out to be 1/3 of the year on phone sex lines.

    That's pretty unbelievable, considering that one still needs time to jack into the lines in the first place.

    I've done some slack things at work, and it's pretty easy to get distracted and find out you spent most of the day goofing off. But this would take a real concerted effort to not work.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:1/3 the year on sex lines? by Konster · · Score: 5, Funny

      I gather that he spent a lot of time jacking into those lines!

    2. Re:1/3 the year on sex lines? by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I gather that he spent a lot of time jacking into those lines!

      Well, you have that, or perhaps there were many jack-offs working for the phone company.

      Seriously, that is a a hell of a lot of time dialing phone sex lines. 14.4 hours/week? 2.9 hours/day?

      I'm really skeptical one person did this.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    3. Re:1/3 the year on sex lines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conference calls! Have an orgy of phone sex. You rack up time quicker that way.

  20. Verizon Techs work? by metotalk · · Score: 1

    This is just more prof that Verizon techs do not work, while at well work.

  21. someone dropped a dime on him. by infonography · · Score: 1

    Ok that's an old reference to how much a call used to cost. in getting snitched out to the cops.

    Perhaps he was caught by deep packet inspection (or is it call Verizon's Market oriented wiretapping).

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  22. I read that wrong by iced_773 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Virginia Tech Accused Of Making $220K in Sex Calls

    I was ready to explode with laughter until I realized what it really said. Dammit.

    -- A UVA student

    1. Re:I read that wrong by Joebert · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How did you get Vagina tech from that ?

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    2. Re:I read that wrong by Joebert · · Score: 1

      How is a comment about vagina offtopic in a sex line story ?!

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  23. Maybe.... by madbawa · · Score: 1

    ...Slashdot was down. So he resorted to the next best thing!

  24. FFS! by Psychotria · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I have been pretty tolerant of Idle, and thought that the Hate Mail stuff was mildly amusing (well, so long as I'm bored out of my brains). But, do we have to have this drivel on the front page? This idle CRAP gets more coverage (i.e. it's a fully 'expanded' headline) than many Programming or Games stories (which are often 'collapsed' abbreviated headlines). What is the purpose of diluting the front page of /. with these stupid stories? If I feel like a laugh I will go to The Onion. Thanks.

    1. Re:FFS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you don't like it, turn it off on your front page... you can do so.

    2. Re:FFS! by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd have to be logged in to do that wouldn't I? What about new people coming here and seeing that crazy stuff? Or what if I just wanna quickly check /. from work without logging in. I can understand your point, and to an extent agree, but forcing Idle on people is a bit odd. The only thing that I can think of is that it's an odd way of enforced beta testing (i.e. idle is a place where the /. people are testing new ideas and they need as many eyes as possible).

    3. Re:FFS! by lantastik · · Score: 1

      Boo hoo, then don't click it. Maybe we should censor the front page to protect the children.

      Keep talking though, self-righteous pithiness gets me all hot. More about the drivel...yeah, that's it. Wait, what the TFA about again?

    4. Re:FFS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...do we have to have this drivel on the front page

      Perhaps you should start your own /.
      With hookers and booze.

      Or 900 numbers and booze.

      In fact forget the /. and booze and just go to work for Verizon.

    5. Re:FFS! by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      It's about hacking and it's also hilarious. What the hell got up your ass?

    6. Re:FFS! by Duckie01 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd have to be logged in to do that wouldn't I?

      You are logged in. What's the problem?
       

      What about new people coming here and seeing that crazy stuff?

      Yeah, what about them.... do *you* know what they're thinking? Or are you trying to be helpful to do the thinking for them and conveniently decide what they need?
       

      Or what if I just wanna quickly check /. from work without logging in

      You should be working at work, I suppose, and you're worried about a story about a tech guy while reading slashdot *anyways*? Perhaps you've got something else to worry about!
       

      I can understand your point, and to an extent agree, but forcing Idle on people is a bit odd.

      Nobody's forcing anything on anyone.
       

      The only thing that I can think of is that it's an odd way of enforced beta testing (i.e. idle is a place where the /. people are testing new ideas and they need as many eyes as possible).

      Nod, to think of 'nother thing you'd need a sense of humor in the first place.

      Most of us like a geek related laugh every once in a while apparently. It gets there through the firehose like everything else.

      But... you're reading a site with the word "Sex' on it! How embarrassing!

  25. Open office environment by Staur · · Score: 0

    Now this is a good argument for an open office environment. Kind of hard having phone sex without the guy next to you eavesdropping, especially for 15 weeks :D

    1. Re:Open office environment by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Unless you're into that sort of thing...

  26. But why so long? by skidisk · · Score: 1

    Okay, this is too easy to make fun of, but I do wonder why this took so long to figure out. Surely 900 numbers showing up on a bill would cause at least some of the customers to report the false charges and demand they be removed. Since these were all in the same region, the losses should have mounted quickly and the pattern detected. I realize we don't know the timing of these calls, but why did it take nine months? Or maybe given Verizon's chaotic internal accounting processes, I should simply be amazed Verizon figured it out at all.

    1. Re:But why so long? by green1 · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for Verizon specifically, however most phone companies have as a general policy to not believe people when they claim not to have dialled a 1-900 number. Because let's face it, who actually ADMITS to that sort of behaviour? even if the person calling in to make the complaint didn't make the calls, their husband, boyfriend, teenage son, uncle, or someone else in the house probably did, and isn't likely to admit it to their wife/girlfriend/mother/niece.

      I work as a phone tech (not for Verizon) , and I have been out to quite a few calls where people claim someone else is using their line... in all this time I've only ever found one that had any likelihood of being true (and a padlock on the phone panel solved that one) the rest were either raw paranoia ("I thought I heard a click!!") or someone else in the house, including a few 1-900 complaints, you can usually tell when you meet the family which person it was, it's the one looking really guilty and trying to hide...

      Some people have asked how this could happen... lack of supervision, I work unsupervised and all over town all day every day, my performance metrics prove that I'm actually working during that time, however in a unionized company even those whose performance is abysmal still keep their job.

      The real question in this whole mess is not how they missed it, but rather how they ended up catching him, and how they linked all the calls back to him.

  27. I thought I had a problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Slashdot,
    It's nice to know there is someone who jacks off more than me.

    Sincerely,
    David Duchovny

  28. PLEASE STOP by u38cg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thanks.

    --
    [FUCK BETA]
  29. Maybe he was in on the business by Britz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe he was in on the calls business. And he thought if those bills turn up the customers would be too embarressed to compain.

    Imagine how many divorces that guy most have caused.
    How would you explain such a bill to your significant other and how would they react?

    1. Re:Maybe he was in on the business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot readers have significant others?

      Oh, you meant Mom.

    2. Re:Maybe he was in on the business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would you explain such a bill to your significant other

      Well, if it wasnt you, and wasnt me, it must've been somebody else?

      and how would they react?

      I hope not like a freaking bitch with a lack of confidence...

  30. This sentence should be taken out and shot by jimdread · · Score: 5, Funny

    He didnt compromise accounts, in the summary it says he tapped into land lines.

    He should have tapped in somewhere later in the system, so his calls wouldn't get charged to a customer. But hey, maybe he wanted to get caught.

    Also I wish to complain about this sentence from the summary. This sentence should be taken outside and shot:

    How in the world do you have this much phone sex, period, but especially at work, and not have anyone notice?

    It's a bad idea to start spelling out your punctuation. As you can see in the above sentence, the author has ended up with the word "period' surrounded by commas. "Period" is supposed to end a sentence. And it is supposed to be written as "." not spelled out with letters. Spelling out "period" in the middle of a sentence, and surrounding it with commas, is madness exclamation mark. See question mark? It's stupid. Please don't spell out the word "period", use the popular abbreviation: .

    1. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant it as in "how does anyone have this much phone sex *at all* let alone at work". He was using the word period to mean "in any case at all".
      Silly I know, but it seams acceptable in spoken american-english, why not written?

    2. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Helix666 · · Score: 5, Informative

      He *isn't* spelling out his punctuation.

      "period (mostly North America) And nothing else; and nothing less; used for emphasis."

      Please don't try and grammar/spelling/etc nazi without engaging brain, it makes you look silly.

      --
      Oh, the irony... "Anonymous Coward: If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear!"
    3. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh i want to mod you up so bad, exclamation mark exclamation mark exclamation mark exlamation mark

    4. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      uppercase oh i want to mod you up so bad comma exclamation mark exclamation mark exclamation mark exlamation mark

    5. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your final comma should be a semicolon!11!1!oneone!1!eleven!1!

    6. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      It's common in certain parts of the world to use the word 'period' (or the phrase 'full-stop') to emphasise a statement like that. It indicates and strengthens the fact that there's nothing else to consider.

      The statement :
        "How in the world do you have this much phone sex, period?"

      Is relatively acceptable. The "period" indicates that to have this much phone sex, you must have to do it to the exclusion of everything else - sleeping/eating/bathing/etc.

      But it's a terrible abuse of sentence structure to tack the remainder on like that.

      Possibly you could get away with:

      "Especially to do it all at work, and not have anyone notice?"

      Those two sentences would really highlight the fact that phone-sex must have taken up the bulk of his day.

      Either that or he was multitasking with six girls on hold.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    7. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      one one eleven

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    8. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shift-One Shift-One Eleven

    9. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      I love the fact that you can't stop using punctuation comma even when you're spelling it out period You're doubling up comma and you even used an exclamation mark and followed it up with a period period I'd also like to point out that my primary school teachers always told me that using and as the first word in a sentence was bad form period I certainly agree with your observation about the linesman's entry into the system comma i can think of better ways of pulling a scam like this period

      I wonder if they had such a thing as 'telegram sex' in olden days ?

      FILL ME WITH YOUR LOVE JUICE STOP DONT STOP STOP OH YEAH BIG BOY STOP KEEP GOING STOP

      --
      Squirrel!
    10. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Eg0Death · · Score: 1

      Is this a transcript from 1-900-HotGrmr?
      Mmmm, I want to form a contraction with your dangling participle!

      --
      Why is this thus? What is the reason for this thusness?
    11. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author wasn't spelling out the punctuation, he was instead using a popular term of expression. It's as if he said, How in the world do you have this much phone sex at all, but especially at work, and not have anyone notice?

    12. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What else makes you look silly? Being a dick when someone is making a joke and being rated informative for it.

    13. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Otter · · Score: 1

      Please don't try and grammar/spelling/etc nazi without engaging brain, it makes you look silly.

      He's being pedantic, but he is nonetheless correct. That sense of "period" derives from the punctuation mark.

    14. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still incorrect to place it in the middle of a sentence.

    15. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To his defense, the word "period" still made me trip over myself given it's location.

    16. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Burpmaster · · Score: 1

      What's the punctuation symbol for 'woosh'?

    17. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bold uppercase oh i want to mod you up so bad bold comma exclamation mark exclamation mark exclamation mark exclamation mark

    18. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by jimdread · · Score: 1

      He *isn't* spelling out his punctuation. "period (mostly North America) And nothing else; and nothing less; used for emphasis." Please don't try and grammar/spelling/etc nazi without engaging brain, it makes you look silly.

      He is spelling out punctuation. Look at your definition: "And nothing else". You mean like "end of sentence"? And what punctuation mark is often used to end a sentence? It's a period, isn't it? That's what "period" means, "end of sentence". The best way to represent this concept is by using the symbol "." because that's how it is commonly written, and therefore many people understand it.

      Even using your definition of period meaning "and nothing else", the sentence is still atrocious, because after saying "and nothing else", he goes on to say something else. If you want to use period as emphasis, then the meaning will be "and nothing else", with the sense of "end of sentence". To continue your sentence after that is abominable. It'd be like if Forrest Gump would say "And that's all I have to say about that", but then continue talking about the same thing. Shutup Forrest shutup!

      I think that this sentence is awful: "How in the world do you have this much phone sex, period, but especially at work, and not have anyone notice?". Are you seriously saying that you think that is a good sentence? It's horrible! Possibly I may have been too harsh in suggesting that the sentence should be taken outside and shot. But if nobody says anything, how will people ever improve their writing?

      Spelling out period in a sentence for emphasis is like waggling your fingers around to represent quote marks while speaking. It's pretty silly. I'd recommend avoiding both those things. Period exclamation mark.

    19. Re:This sentence should be taken out and shot by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      Duck!  The joke missed you.

  31. Ask slashdot? by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 1

    How in the world do you have this much phone sex, period, but especially at work, and not have anyone notice?

    Shouldn't this article be filed in the 'Ask Slashdot' section?

  32. Not difficult to achieve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Technical wise. It is as simple as driving up to a cabinet, cracking open a pit or walking into an MDF/IDF room, finding a pair that has tone and dialing. If that one doesn't work, go to the next pair.

    I used to make calls on customers lines all the time but never anything that would cause them to get billed (local calls for support, cable pair information, etc).

  33. Re:I;m thinking about gay oral sex - aren't you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do you have a beard? I want to jizz in your beard

    WTF? This is Slashdot, he's a Unix hacker. Of course he has a beard!

  34. That averages out to: by Viperpete · · Score: 1

    That averages out to: $4.8888888888888888888888888888889 per minute.

    --
    loose: not fitting closely or tightly != lose: to suffer the deprivation of
    1. Re:That averages out to: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That averages out to: $4.8888888888888888888888888888889 per minute.

      THANK you so much for the 31 places of accuracy i would have been really curious about that thank you again

    2. Re:That averages out to: by Viperpete · · Score: 1

      That averages out to: $4.8888888888888888888888888888889 per minute.

      THANK you so much for the 31 places of accuracy i would have been really curious about that thank you again

      I'm glad you found it entertaining to count them.

      --
      loose: not fitting closely or tightly != lose: to suffer the deprivation of
  35. Follow the money by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 3, Informative

    This guy wasn't after 45,000 minutes of phone sex. Don't be surprised if soon a follow-up article appears explaining he actually operated some of those lines himself, or is in another way affiliated.

  36. Did anybody think the pink phone was a dildo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did anybody think the pink phone was a dildo?

    1. Re:Did anybody think the pink phone was a dildo? by Xhris · · Score: 1

      Yes!

  37. those cameras... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    link to torrent plz?

  38. After 40 weeks by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He got caught after 40 weeks, or almost 10 months of it. During which he spent 15/40 = 37.5% of his time talking to sex lines.

    So maybe the question "why didn't he get caught?" is technically wrong, it practically begs for the question, "why did it take them so long?"

    I mean, seriously, is stuff like, "hur hur hur, I want to pull down your panties and stick it in your ass" something you'd normally hear around the office when people are talking on the phone? Well, I guess I've had worse tech support before, but never that explicit ;)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:After 40 weeks by kannibal_klown · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The way I read the story, it seems he wasn't a "tech" as in tech support script-reading monkey that asks if your computer is turned on.

      It seems that he was a tech that was out in the field, and able to tap into land lines with their special little widget. So if he's in a quiet suburb in the middle of the day, it's plausible nobody would notice what he was really doing unless he was making motions.

      Then again I could be wrong.

    2. Re:After 40 weeks by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Well, nothing says he was using that time to actually have phone sex. He could have just been using the lines because there was a girl on the other end who he could pretend was interested in him.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    3. Re:After 40 weeks by Sox2 · · Score: 1

      at roughly 9 minutes per session, this guy can sure last. most men would have only taken 4 minutes...

    4. Re:After 40 weeks by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Did he work in an office? If he was a phone tech he could have been on the road, or working unattended in comms rooms...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    5. Re:After 40 weeks by rekoil · · Score: 1

      More than likely the latter - there are a lot of unmanned exchange rooms were it's trivial to physically tap into landlines. Not to mention a lock on the door...I'll also bet he worked the overnight shifts, where there's a ton of downtime outside of maintenance windows.

    6. Re:After 40 weeks by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was selling it on through his own (or a pal's) premium rate number?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:After 40 weeks by jason.sweet · · Score: 1

      They must have a really big comms room.

      from TFA:

      Vaccarelli placed the calls in about 30 municipalities in Bergen County

    8. Re:After 40 weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's plausible nobody would notice what he was really doing unless he was making motions.

      well if he's calling phone sex lines, he's probably making motions...

    9. Re:After 40 weeks by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      They must have a really big comms room.

      from TFA:

      Yes, Verizon probably do have very big comms rooms, and lots of them too.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    10. Re:After 40 weeks by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      it's plausible nobody would notice what he was really doing unless he was making motions.

      well if he's calling phone sex lines, he's probably making motions...

      Here's how you get away with it:
      1. Go to the nearest phone box on the corner of the street
      2. Pitch your work-tent
      3. Grab your testset
      4. Grab your...well..you know.

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    11. Re:After 40 weeks by Noexit · · Score: 1

      This is what I'm guessing. The article doesn't say he was whacking it, just using the lines. He could easily have just been talking to the girl, guy, whatever while he was working, without the actual sex part of the deal.

      --

      Never argue with a man carrying a water buffalo

    12. Re:After 40 weeks by JargonScott · · Score: 1

      It's all in how you say it.

      It may have been more like "take out my tone probe, and use it with your buttset. Wait, let me get a filter on that first."

      --
      Nuke Gay Whales for Jesus.
    13. Re:After 40 weeks by Blokus · · Score: 1

      Bad to be under the telephone pole during one of these calls."Crap! Damn bird!"

    14. Re:After 40 weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they pick up the phone

    15. Re:After 40 weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all this, I don't want his special little widget anywhere near my landlines, thank you very much.

    16. Re:After 40 weeks by panaceaa · · Score: 1

      You don't need a special widget to tap into land lines. If you're at a box, they all have regular phone jacks you can plug a regular phone into. There's only the legal system stopping someone from going to your house, finding your phone box outside, opening it with a screw driver, and making all the calls they want. Or they can listen to your calls if they'd prefer (but it takes special equipment to do this without putting a click on the line.)

      I lived in an apartment complex in college, 20 units, and the phone box was completely insecure. Which was great when I wanted to figure out how they wired our 2nd line, but very worrying from a security standpoint.

    17. Re:After 40 weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt He worked in an office. In the telecom world, techs are the people who are out in the field doing service. I bet he put the alligator clips from his butt set onto a random line whenever he opened up an interface device.

  39. Please stop this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fark is another website.

  40. Each call began with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put on my robe and my wizard hat... :)

  41. How in the world? by Mensa+Babe · · Score: 2

    How in the world do you have this much phone sex, period, but especially at work, and not have anyone notice?

    And how in the world do you have (sic) twice as much blog reading or solitire playing time? Don't ask me but somehow the usual office drone manages to achieve that. The problem here is not stealing money from the customers or even the immoral consequences of having this so called phone sex (which should better be called phone masturbation as I'm sure anyone here knows that sex involves a direct contact of exactly two people, not one). The problem is more subtle, yet much more important. It is doing something that one shouldn't be doing during the work time - be it sending sms text messages, smoking cigarettes, talking, playing online poker, changing the screen saver's wallpaper or flirting with a slutty assistant who has no self respect. And as rewarding as exposing this pervert from the story and his immoral behaviour may be, we should ask ourselves how can we force people to work instead of wasting time that we pay for - by taxes, phone bills, buying gasoline etc. Is there any way the average Joe can be forced to understand that he should be doing what we pay him to do and that doing anything else is basically theft from the ethical point of view? This is the question that we need to address in this age where it isn't always obvious that someone is wasting his time. The times are changing and so should our understanding of moral obligations to paying customers.

    --
    Karma: Positive (probably because of superiour intellect)
    1. Re:How in the world? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      You don't pay him, the company pays him. You are buying a service, not renting a slave.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:How in the world? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I'm sure anyone here knows that sex involves a direct contact of exactly two people, not one.

      Pfft. Self-limiting amateur.

  42. As he was making money from the phone lines? by drunkenoafoffofb3ta · · Score: 1

    Much like the malware that was doing the rounds when everybody used dial-up modems, where it dialled phone sex lines in small island countries thousands of miles away and racked up a massive phone bill for you (and big profits for the sex line owners [who also had the malware written])... he might have been doing that so that he could cream (poor choice of words here, but...) a large chunk of revenue from it.

  43. the funnest thing about it is by FudRucker · · Score: 2, Funny

    He has no idea who is on the other end, it could be some fat hairy old man with a girly voice,,,

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:the funnest thing about it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I stick to hitting on women on IRC - they can't fool me with their girly voices.

    2. Re:the funnest thing about it is by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      if not the FBI then it will be someone like this...
      http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/perv.htm

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    3. Re:the funnest thing about it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNdgLIDTEv4

      Indeed

    4. Re:the funnest thing about it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He has no idea who is on the other end, it could be some fat hairy old man with a girly voice,,,

      Or maybe an AT&T technician!

  44. depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, seriously, is stuff like, "hur hur hur, I want to pull down your panties and stick it in your ass" something you'd normally hear around the office when people are talking on the phone?"

    Maybe if you were working for a gay phone sex company...

  45. and not have anyone notice? by CrashandDie · · Score: 0

    How in the world do you have this much phone sex, period, but especially at work, and not have anyone notice?

    Easy, you work for Verizon.

  46. Where was the network? by ff1324 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You'd think with all those people in "the network" following him while he was doing this, he'd get stage fright or someone would have said "I can SEE you now!"

    1. Re:Where was the network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's why they didn't catch him, faster

      The network doesn't know that i the employees Beige box was making the call .
      When hooked on the line, The Network makes 'No distinction' from a regular telephone in the subscribers home.
      Maybe they need to make it so that it does .
      Phone companies get thousands of false claims of calls to sex lines every day .
      Sometimes it is false, but most of the time, someone in the subscribers home made the call. .The last thing Verizon would ever think is that its an employee .
      Now, they better make make yearly employee criminal background checks and make security Job 1,
      In light of this and as a Verizon subscriber , for one, will never trust them as before ..

    2. Re:Where was the network? by drummerboybac · · Score: 1

      You got it all backwards, he is in the back of the group tapping the customers phone.....yeah.....phone

  47. Did anyone else notice.... by vampire_baozi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Based on the summary, I thought the submitter was asking for advice on how to get away with doing the same thing.

  48. ow.. by kris.montpetit · · Score: 1

    oh man.. all I can think of is the friction burns D:

  49. His work machine must have Vista Installed... by DJRumpy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Leaves you with a LOT of idle time on your hands

  50. No life by Friendly+Pyro · · Score: 1

    Wow. This guy mus have a really sad life to spend that much time doing that. I understand working at verizon is probably really boring but come on. Thats gotta be about 3/4 of his day every day on the line, the other quarter was probably spent tapping the line

  51. well, he is from Nutley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :)

  52. I told my wife by theverylastperson · · Score: 2, Funny

    It wasn't me making those calls....well that's what I told her anyway.

    --
    ed duval the very last person
  53. I just spent 15 weeks... by studlyhungwell · · Score: 0

    ... masturbating at work and boy are my arms tired!

  54. New meaning to the term ... by bizitch · · Score: 3, Funny

    butt set ...

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  55. Dead beats are common in American Business by Nelson · · Score: 1

    Surely you've worked at a medium sized or larger company and seen a number of people that seem to do no job. It's like a psychosis or something, they all develop similar mechanisms to kind of cope and survive. I've even seen start-ups with people totems; just guys that contribute very little but make someone in management feel secure.

    I currently work at a networking company, we're not going out of business but we're not rich. We have a dead beat we tried to fire, turns out since it's a larger public company he goes on "program." It's going to take 2 years to fire a do-nothing, short of him committing a crime at work or a massive RIF, he's going to get paid for 2 years and do maybe 2 months worth of work, probably $100k in salary and another $50k in taxes, insurance and benies, you're looking at $300-400k just wasted... Not to mention the morale costs and the losses in the market place because the team is that much less effective. And if I was a betting man, we'll be on the hook for some unemployment when he does finally get let go. The worst thing you can do is develop feelings and opinions about it because that just makes you angry or starts to give you an excuse to stop working so most people just ignore it. I'd wager that in some companies, maybe 30% of the work force is a drain rather than doing real work. A company like Verizon? It's a phone company, they've built a whole industry on top of the 10% actual workers, what might be more shocking is that they actually did catch the guy; someone probably had to "cut red tape" somewhere and actually go out of their way to pull it off.

    He was probably funding his own business, maybe calling lines he owns.

    1. Re:Dead beats are common in American Business by QuantumHobbit · · Score: 1

      Dead time is common even for productive workers. We are on slashdot aren't we?

    2. Re:Dead beats are common in American Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah it usually isn't measured in months though, is it?

  56. Just Think of the Poor Teenagers... by BigAssRat · · Score: 2, Funny

    who got in so much trouble because of this guy. "Mom, Dad, I didn't make those calls, I swear!!!"

  57. Re: by Neoaikon · · Score: 1

    Ok, he couldn't have been on the phone for 45k minutes, or he couldn't have been doing this for 15 out of 40 weeks. 15 * 7 = 105 days 105 * 24 = 2,520 hours 2,520 * 60 = 151,200 minutes So he was either spending 3 times more time on the phone then what is said, or he was only doing this for 5 out of 40 weeks which is ALOT more reasonable (and believable! I mean, 15 weeks is a lot of wacking!). I hate to nit-pick at the math, but I do.

  58. Re:Where was the network? - ONLY WIRELESS by BigAssRat · · Score: 1

    The guys only follow the wireless people.

  59. That's what I get for RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Joseph Vaccarelli, 45, of Nutley, made approximately 5,000 calls..."

    Nutley. He had to be from Nutley.

  60. Re: by danzona · · Score: 1

    I didn't read TFA, but the summary implies that he did it during work time. So the day is 8 hours, not 24. Plugging that information into your formula yields 15 weeks.

  61. It wouldn't be hard by lewp · · Score: 1

    I'm sure, like all monkeys, Verizon phone monkeys play with themselves all the time. You know, in between grooming each other and flinging poo.

    There's probably no way to tell the difference between one acting natural and one having phone sex. Unless you can communicate with them somehow...

    --
    Game... blouses.
  62. How many phone sex companies did he call? by chadmg · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many different companies/numbers he called and how many phone sex agents he spoke to ... if it were the same company or even just a hand-full, wouldn't someone have noticed? My gut tells me whom ever owns the phone sex companies was in on this. I mean, eventually the girls would've been like, "Oh it's that guy again." They probably would've know him by name and probably at some point someone would've asked the question, "Just how much does this guy spend with us?" At which point they would've realized that he was always calling from a different number. That would've made them at least negligent - and yes, if families were broken up over this, these companies should be liable for their suffering as well.

  63. Give a new meaning to butt set... by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    "Hello? Is someone already using this line?"

    "Oh yeah, put your tongue right there."

    "Where?"

    "Who is this?"

    You'd expect him to be interrupted at this more.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  64. posting here, for instance by toby · · Score: 1

    it's pretty easy to get distracted and find out you spent most of the day goofing off

    Uh wait, I'm posting here too...

    --
    you had me at #!
  65. There is always one by moankey · · Score: 1

    Comes from the same group of the guy in the tech dept that surfed the web all day, ebay'd, sudoku, or youtubed.
    Equally useless and draining on resources as well as loss in perceived cost and real costs.

    I dont see this to be any different.

  66. Re: moderators smoking the doobie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would have been +5 funny if it had been posted 30 minutes sooner.

    Further proof that Slashdot jumped the shark.

  67. Just the logistics of it are amazing by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Does bring to mind another point: I wonder if there is a such a thing as terminal tennis elbow. From TFB:

    Verizon estimated that out of a 40-week period, Vaccarelli spent 15 weeks talking on sex lines.

    Holy crap! He's gotta look like the guy from Idiocracy's masturbation network commercial by now. Too bad there isn't an Olympic sport that requires you to have one really strong arm. If Air Hockey ever becomes an Olympic sport I believe we have our gold medal locked down.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  68. hmmm by Tippu · · Score: 1

    Most of the replies change depending on, if he is talking to a men or women on phone!!

  69. How does anyone NOT notice? He's union. by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

    And I'm not making a joke. A close relative of mine has worked for Verizon for 20 years and I'm amazed at the stories he tells about the union employees. Probably the laziest, immature, uneducated bunch of morons on the planet (besides the Bush Admin). Take a look at news archives what these scumbags do during strikes: vandalize buildings and equipment, sabotage critical data and phone lines, cut off 911 service, etc. They are petty beyond belief and go running to their supervisors and unions heads any time they have a gripe. God forbid you ask them to move something and it's "not in their job description." That's an immediate grievance. I'm actually surprised this guy got in trouble. Most of the time, the union will go to GREAT lengths to protect these guys, even when they cut those 911 lines or start fires at company locations.

  70. Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to applaud the man for the massive balls it takes to do something like this. No doubt he was fired, but talk about going out in a blaze of glory.

    Well done sir.

  71. Retroactive immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I seriously hope he also gets retroactive immunity for tapping phones. People would get much more incensed with a single, sexual deviant listening in on their phone calls than a massive conspiracy starting at the top position of our government, and they might actually start giving a crap about illegal wiretapping.

  72. So .. by SlashDev · · Score: 1

    that's what the guy on the pole was doing all day! I was wondering what the rubbing was all about...

    --

    TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
  73. wow... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    He must have forearms like Popeye...

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  74. Could have been anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't have to be in the Central Office to do this - he could have been anywhere between the frames in the Central Office to a customer's house... He could have been up on a telephone pole, down in a manhole, sitting outside in front of a distribution frame panel, in the woods somewhere next to a small distribution pedestal...

    All you need is a 7/8" socket wrench, and a butt set (or hack a phone w/some 'gator clips vis a vis Beige Box). This is precisely the reason why if the phone company claims that YOU made a call that they can't conclusively prove it. Phone lines are inherently unsecure - anywhere between the premises and the Central Office one can tap into a line, and make a call from that line. If they know the number, they can clip the line at that point (so your premises don't ring (ok, no dial tone either)) and then get someone to call them back so they can take the call there... From the phone company's switch, it looks like you're on the line talking, but you're not!

    Even caller ID is bullshit - just tap into a line, and make the call from there - it looks like the calls is coming from 312-222-2222 but in reality, it's not the Chicago Tribune Classified Ad line, just some schmuck up on a pole somewhere...

    All you need is to look like you know what you're doing and no one is going to bother you. Get a van, put some magnetic signs on it that say "ABC Telecommunications Contractors" - get a flashing light, a safety vest and hard hat... Add a safety cone if you really want to... Crack open the box, and have at it... You ever stop to actually ask anyone in those boxes if they're really supposed to be there? Yeah, I thought so - neither do the cops...

    Next up: Read on lock picking - you might just have the phone disconnected and never leave your house!

  75. Here's his pic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's his pic from the presuctors office release.

    http://www.bcpo.net/bcpo/blog/index.php

    He looks the part.

  76. mod parent up by Bored+MPA · · Score: 1

    nt

  77. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, you are right, i assumed he was some sort of sexual robot

  78. New Union Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the CWA worked this into the employee benefits during contract renewal.