Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Erase Specific Memories In Mice

Ostracus writes "It sounds like science fiction, but scientists say it might one day be possible to erase undesirable memories from the brain, selectively and safely. After exposing mice to emotionally powerful stimuli, such as a mild shock to their paws, the scientists then observed how well or poorly the animals subsequently recalled the particular trauma as their brain's expression of CaMKII was manipulated up and down. When the brain was made to overproduce CaMKII at the exact moment the mouse was prodded to retrieve the traumatic memory, the memory wasn't just blocked, it appeared to be fully erased."

320 comments

  1. Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How long until ethically underfunded governments decided to "offer relief" from "dangerous memories" to their political detractors? Happy shiny people, indeed.

    1. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Aranykai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps its already happening and no one remembers?

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    2. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by JuzzFunky · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps its already happening and no one remembers?

      --
      Unexpect the expected!
    3. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by ionix5891 · · Score: 3, Funny

      ethically underfunded governments

      that about describes them all

    4. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Futile+Rhetoric · · Score: 1

      Doublespeak is intended to confuse or deceive. In this instance it's neither. There is nothing wrong with rhetorical flourish per se, poor execution notwithstanding.

    5. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it's not happening. That's insane. Besides, I'm sure there would be some after effects like brain damage.

      No, it's not happening. That's insane. Besides, I'm sure there would be some after effects like brain damage.

      No, it's not happening. That's insane. Besides, I'm sure there would be some after effects like brain damage.

    6. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Aphoxema · · Score: 4, Funny

      What did you just say?

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    7. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by kesuki · · Score: 0, Redundant

      what did yooooooooo aaaa .... *drools over kybord having forgotten how to type*

    8. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently it's not as specific as they claim... it also erases basic grammar skills.

    9. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Interesting


      There has already been research done (I think in the US) on ways to prevent short term memory formation as a means to reduce trauma for soldiers. I.e. If the drug is taken before an attack, they wont feel guilty or traumatised by the things they do.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    10. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by njko · · Score: 1

      Because i have several undesired memories

      --
      \n.\n
    11. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Funny

      what did yooooooooo aaaa .... *drools over kybord having forgotten how to type*

      Patrick Starfish, is that you?

    12. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by kesuki · · Score: 1

      the only thing i can find on google is that SSRI's are in trials for use with PTSD and that statins can cause memory loss by depriving the brain of cholesterol.

      i'm really not seeing any 'magic pill' to make a marine forget all the people he just blew up with a grenade. i do know the military focuses hard on conditioning people to being ready to handle killing another human being, especially when they learned that in world war 1 only 30% of troops ever fired a bullet.

      other than this research on mice, there doesn't seem to be any info on a magic pill to make people forget.

    13. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      The Pentagon has tested Viagra to help prevent impotence in My Lai type situations.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    14. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by VShael · · Score: 1

      Well that explains AOL.

      Oh look! A free AOL CD! Back in a minute...

    15. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by scubamage · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, technically it is a form of brain damage. Though I'm sure it'd be on par with, say, a night of heavy drinking.

    16. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by neokushan · · Score: 1

      Did I leave the Oven on?

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    17. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Where is the "+1 Really Scary" mod when you need it?

    18. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, there are more than a few memories I wouldn't mind to forget.

    19. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    20. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 appropriate username.

      Personally, though, I prefer the term "morally bankrupt"

    21. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by temcat · · Score: 1

      Why, he just believes that underfunding governments is an ethical thing to do.

    22. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      That fun? Sign me up!

    23. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ugh. I can't believe that I'm bothered enough to comment on this.

      But it's Patrick Star, who is a starfish. Not Patrick Starfish.

    24. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Goatse, Tubgirl, My brothers wedding, that chick in 8th grade who weighed about 200pounds...

      BRING ON THE UNDER FUNDED UNETHICAL GOVERNMENTS!

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    25. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by txoof · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is the most amazing and terrible idea I have ever heard. How wonderful would it be to help soldiers not feel guilty about doing their duty and yet so utterly terrifying. Part of what makes war a "last resort" option is the horror that it causes. If we removed the pain of war, perhaps it would become far to easy to wage it.

      While I do not wish PTSD upon any person, and wish that no person should ever fight in a war ever again, I cannot condone taking the sting out of war. Contraptions like remote bombing drones, cruise missiles and robotic fighters remove one side from the killing and take away the reality and the horror of war. War is terrible, awful, hellish and traumatic. The trauma and horror are what make us abhor it. Every time we remove one of those elements, we make it easier for us to wage war. It also makes it easier for us to kill them, whomever they may be.

      Anything that makes it easier for us to kill them takes away a little bit of our humanity. Robotic killing machines, remorseless soldiers and supid ideas like Rods From God all take the killer too far away from their victim. It's significantly easier to maim and kill when it's a glob of pixels on the screen. Seeing and knowing the person you are killing makes it much more difficult. War should remain messy and terrible; it's the mess and the horror of it that makes us think twice about waging it.

      --
      This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
    26. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or 5 minutes on a cell phone.

    27. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      No, most memories I'd like to erase occurred immediately after a night of heavy drinking.

    28. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The scientists in the report have denied being involved in research to do with wiping out memories.

      Quote "I think if I'd been working on this for the last few years that I'd remember....."

    29. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      Maybe on 30% remembered firing a bullet?

    30. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Funny what's the first thing that springs to the mind of a Slashdotter. The first thing I thought about was PTSD.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    31. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or 10 seconds of using a cell phone

    32. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Part of what makes war a "last resort" option is the horror that it causes. If we removed the pain of war, perhaps it would become far to easy to wage it.

      Unfortunately, this has already happened. There was a time when the leaders didn't "send" soldiers off to war, they "led" them. Today, no leader will ever see a battlefield, so the pain and horror of war no longer deters leaders from starting wars.

      War hasn't been a "last resort" for a very long time. All too often it's the first resort.

    33. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      When you're just reading one or two sentences, proper punctuation and capitalization can be ignored. However, beyond that, it gets painful reading your comments.

      Please take the time to familiarize yourself with your keyboard. On the far left, you will see a button labeled "Shift". If you hold it while typing a letter, that letter will become capitalized.

      If you need further assistance in capital letter use, please see:
      http://specialed.about.com/od/grammar/p/CapitalRules.htm

      Thank you.

    34. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by DittoBox · · Score: 3, Funny

      by Anonymous

      I see what you did there.

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    35. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, thanks to Slashdot, I have a ton of 'em.

      goatse.cx
      lemon party
      CowboyNeal jokes in the poll

      Well, I guess that's just 3 that come to mind. But you can understand the trauma.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    36. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Shift."--you put the closing quote after the period.

      also, you forget to end your 2nd-to-last sentence with a period.

      and here's a third sentence just to make it painful.

    37. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by tbns05 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.... Your tin foil hats appear to be malfunctioning.

    38. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Shift."--you put the closing quote after the period.

      Only if the phrase in quotes is a complete sentence. Of course, you could be illiterate or an American.

    39. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by TheInsaneSicilian · · Score: 1

      What happens if we fight them and they have the same weapons? What if no human life was at risk? There have been movies (though I can't remember the specific names right now) spawned from this very topic. Remember the PC game MechWarrior doing something like this? That was a "fun game"...

      I agree with you completely that each time a "horrible factor" is taken away from something horrible then it will some day cease to be horrible and begin to be tolerable. War should never get to the point of being tolerable. Most horrible things shouldn't ever get to that point. But, some should. It would be nice to erase some memories, but as you said, part of what make memories important is the pain they bring... or the elation.

      But, what if this was used to remove debilitating memories? Ones such as sexual abuse or violence?

      This opens up a whole big can of worms, for sure.

      Would it really be so bad if we had full wars with robots that would decide things such as territory, technological rights, and so forth? If that does become the case, the United States loses its current "advantage".

    40. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      The remote-controlled bombing drones are not the problem: the military found out that one of the advantages of the drone, the control or recording of the bomb right up until impact, has the most psychological impact. A jet pilot gets to a coordinate, drops the cargo, and scurries out of there. The drone-operator gets to see what he/she it - which can be ugly on occasion.

      But point taken on the robotic armies. If you don't sacrifice anything in war, you will not consider it a last resort anymore.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    41. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by wootest · · Score: 1

      Or 5 minutes on a cell phone.

    42. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, technically it is a form of brain damage. Though I'm sure it'd be on par with, say, a night of heavy drinking.

      ...or 15 minutes on a cell phone.

    43. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by sexconker · · Score: 1

      That's the grammarian's way of doing it.

      The nerd's way of doing it is to use quotes exactly, and non-greedily.

      I told my friend "Hit the "I forgot my password" link , then type in your e-mail address and click on the link that says "Go" or "Submit" or "Send" or whatever. Then, check your e-mail for a link or temporary password. Click the link, or copy and paste the temporary password and use it to log in. Then, change your password. Dipshit."

    44. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Benfea · · Score: 1

      The moral implications of this research are truly terrifying. I'm not just worried about governments, but almost any unscrupulous and well-funded organization (e.g. corporations, organized crime, etc.).

    45. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not so sure the whole "robotic war" scenario holds up to reality... As an example let's say that in the year 2500 Techno-Hitler raises a cylon army and decides to follow in his great-great-(etc)-grandfather's footsteps. If we lose enough robo-troops that we can no longer effectively fight that way, I'm not going to just roll over and say "welp, we lost, guess I better start my life as a slave. Time to start mining Dilithium for the glory of Space-Germany!" In my opinion the losing side of a war will usually end up suffering real human casualties even if both sides do have robotic fighters.

    46. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps its already happening....

    47. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better still:

      I told my friend "Hit the 'I forgot my password' link , then type in your e-mail address and click on the link that says 'Go' or 'Submit' or 'Send' or whatever. Then, check your e-mail for a link or temporary password. Click the link, or copy and paste the temporary password and use it to log in. Then, change your password. Dipshit."

    48. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by hierophanta · · Score: 3, Informative

      and as a follow up -- most air fighters do not get PTSD because the dont see the people they are killing-- just as you said

      here is an study [from National Institute of Health] on the factors that cause PTSD http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18226287

    49. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long until ethically underfunded governments decided to "offer relief" from "dangerous memories" to their political detractors? Happy shiny people, indeed.

      Sounds like something Scientology would do.

    50. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by HiThere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I understand your point, but programmers generally don't include the period within the quotes unless they intend it to be a part of the string.

      I'll agree that this doesn't agree with the practice recommended by English teachers, and that when writing for such a teacher one should remember that the period goes before the terminal quote, even when the quoted fragment doesn't include a sentence termination. But this rule is logically inconsistent, and therefore should be replaced. The time I experience dissonance is when I am terminating both a quote and a sentence, e.g.: He said "That's not what I said.".

      Note the '.".' construction. That seems excessively awkward, but is the only consistent was that I can determine to punctuate it.

      Remember, the rules of grammar were largely written based upon Latin. They don't actually fit English all that well. Sometimes they need to be updated. For programmers, a quoted selection is a string, and everything within the quotes is a part of the string. (There seems to be no generally accepted rule as to how to escape quotes within a string, but \" would generally be recognized. Some double the quotes, but that rapidly becomes unintelligible whenever even a slight amount of internal quoting exists.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    51. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by kesuki · · Score: 1

      I take pride in my randomly generated sentence structure, and i'm a daily abuser of the firefox spell checker.

      in fact i know about 11 misspellings that the corrector doesn't add the right corrections for. but i am too lazy to submit them for inclusion in the correction dictionary.

      yeah Sometimes i capitalize, but i consider that, and proper punctuation and even real grammar to be a royal pain for an organic computer that believes it is sentient. in im i rarely correct misspellings because most people don't need help understanding the words. and i'm like someone needs to test this feature of firefox.

      so i use spell checking, grammar checking is always in those damn dialogues and is a real pain. i won't use spell checkers that aren't right click menus. off topic i know, but it's been more than 11 minutes since i last posted slow down cowboy

    52. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never killed anyone in a war, and therefore I don't have PTSD. But I still think (and feel) that war and senseless killing of people is horrible and unacceptable in a sane society.

      I do not think it ought to be necessary to use the whip of PTSD to "discourage" war, nor do I think it would work, because, well, it hasn't so far. If we were to make soliders remorseless, would that cause wars to become that much more prevalent? No. There are many other factors, such as economics, at play.

      What I would like to see are therapeutics for people who have trouble just living their short finite lives because of a past trauma, like rape victims or victims of car accidents, etc., who keep reliving the horrors that befell them. They don't deserve to have the rest of their lives so compromised because of these terrible events, and if there are neurotherapeutics that can help them, for god's sake, help them.

    53. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by riceboy50 · · Score: 1

      Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain

      If you're referring to the similarly titled movie starring Jim Carrey and Kate Winslet, I think you mean Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.

      --
      ~ I am logged on, therefore I am.
    54. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      It's a double-edged sword. You can help soldiers after a war. You can help a rape victim over the painful memory of the act. Maybe, though, you can make the soldier forget the war crime his commanding officer committed. Maybe you can make the rape victim forget that it was a powerful public figure who raped her.

      Making people forget the parts they'd rather remember would be a very bad thing. Forcing them to go under this treatment and preventing them from remembering the treatment itself would be even worse.

    55. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes PTSD is not war related. My wife suffers from PTSD. It is a result of her stepfather molesting her. When I saw this article that was the first thing I thought about. How could that help her. Then I thought about me and the absolute hell I have been put through because of her PTSD and related issues. If the memory was erased would I have to keep my mouth shut when something reminded me of one of the past horrors in our marriage? Would you have to wipe my memories too? All the bad decisions and all the pain caused by the events of her childhood, man, they are many. Would new problems develop? Would she remember something she did in her past that was a result of the PTSD and have no reference? How can the past be explained if the root cause is wiped away? How can you move forward if you don't know why all these problems are here?

    56. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 1

      I'd guess you're thinking it's just people repeating each other, as seen in the other threads, but that is not the case here. Here, several people have made the same Futurama joke, but apparently only 3 people are in on it :(

    57. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by wootest · · Score: 1

      Although I'd deduct points for the initial "a night of heavy drinking". It's "a week of binge drinking".

    58. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Perhaps its already happening and no one remembers?

      I forgot. What did you post?

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    59. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Beats assassinating the persons in question to "erase" their memory ;-).

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    60. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There was a time when the leaders didn't "send" soldiers off to war, they "led" them.

      And yet, that never seemed to deter them. In fact, many of them appeared to have enjoyed it immensely. Note that even in that era, the leader would have the best armor, the best weapons, and be surrounded by a unit of his most elite troops. Getting yourself killed or seriously injured was not completely unknown, but was pretty rare.

      War hasn't been a "last resort" for a very long time.

      War has never been a "last resort". I'd argue that it's actually as a general rule less lightly entered into today than at any time before in history. Although one can certainly say that there are a lot of people who still find it the preferred option.

    61. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by ellenbee · · Score: 0

      I was thinking the same thing.

    62. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Violence is the last resort of a fool.

    63. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Note that even in that era, the leader would have the best armor, the best weapons, and be surrounded by a unit of his most elite troops.

      Not only that, they didn't have shit all over 'em.

    64. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      I cannot condone taking the sting out of war

      The sting felt by those responsible is approval ratings going downwards throughout both of your terms.

      I'm all for easing the soldiers' lives; that is, the ones lucky enough to survive. When you're in the trench [not speaking from experience], you know that you have to do what you're ordered to, no matter how much it stings. You most likely didn't end up there by choice.

      [long pause]

      Dammit. I'm angry now. Please don't read the next paragraph. Bush should be charged with high treason for attacking American ideals and values (balance of power between the three, increased surveillance; you can probably add more). He should be charged with violating the constitution. He should be charged with reckless endangerment (of the lives of soldiers). He should be charged with human rights violations for allowing waterboarding to take place, and not giving people a fair trial. He should be charged with violating the Geneva convention regarding the handling of war prisoners.

      [continue reading from here]

      Bush, not the soldiers, should feel the sting of war.

      If you've watched Fahrenheit 911, you may remember the scene where Moore walks around in DC asking politicians whether they want to send their sons and daughters off to die^W^H fight in Iraq.

      That, to me, captured the problem: the worst happening to those in power, when they misuse it, is that they lose it. That is, the very worst position they can be put in is the one everybody is in all the time.

    65. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by Cowmonaut · · Score: 1

      In MechWarrior you were inside the Mech controlling it through a neural interface. Also, there were still regular armies. Mechs just supplemented them and ripped them apart really, but they were still there. You also forget that in the MechWarrior series there was a lot of Urban combat. You don't want a 100 ton 8 story weapons platform shooting up your neighborhood...

    66. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but some people say certain things are worse than death. Some of those people probably consider having their minds tampered with this way one of those things.

      I'm not sure which side of that choice I'd fall. I hope I never have to make it, or at least never remember having to make it. ;-)

    67. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by ultranova · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but some people say certain things are worse than death.

      Since the people saying this are usually alive, how would they know ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    68. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by sarkeizen · · Score: 1

      [Citation Needed]

    69. Re:Everlasting Sunlight of the Spot-Free Brain by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      That's a good point.

  2. I 4 1 by Mipoti+Gusundar · · Score: 0

    I 4 1 am welcomming our new selectively amnesiac rodent overloads.

    --
    Will code for new sig.
    1. Re:I 4 1 by aproposofwhat · · Score: 1

      In other news, the Magritheans are complining that they haven't been paid because the mice have forgotten why they wanted to build the Earth in the first place.

      --
      One swallow does not a fellatrix make
  3. There's really only one question to be asked. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Funny

    When do I get my own flashy-little-memory-messer-upper-thing?

    1. Re:There's really only one question to be asked. by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      We gave you your session last week.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:There's really only one question to be asked. by G-forze · · Score: 1

      When you grow up.

      --
      "There's someone in my head but it's not me." - Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon
    3. Re:There's really only one question to be asked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe yours is defective, it keeps erasing your memory of having bought it before...

    4. Re:There's really only one question to be asked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't we see this article last week? And the week before that...and before that...

    5. Re:There's really only one question to be asked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you grow up

    6. Re:There's really only one question to be asked. by street+struttin' · · Score: 1

      Actually, you had a session 2 weeks ago, and you don't remember the session you gave him 3 weeks ago.

    7. Re:There's really only one question to be asked. by street+struttin' · · Score: 1

      Actually, you had a session 2 weeks ago, and you don't remember the session you gave him 3 weeks ago.

      Why would I write this? How would I know such a thing?

    8. Re:There's really only one question to be asked. by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      If you log in, they can take care of that. You won't recognize it as a dupe next week either, even.

  4. erase undesirable memories by cosmocain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    [...]erase undesirable memories[...]

    undesirable for whom? While this might positively applicaple for e.g. victims of rape there are tons of possible missuses which really should be feared.

    1. Re:erase undesirable memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i knew something was up and there's the examaple:

      "When the brain was made to overproduce CaMKII at the exact moment the mouse was prodded to retrieve the traumatic memory"

      so doesn't that mean that to cure some one of a bad memory you have reproduce the stimulus?

      i'm sure a rape victim would be down with that.

    2. Re:erase undesirable memories by ideonode · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While this might positively applicaple

      I tell you where else this would be a positive thing - in erasing the memory of good books/films/video games, so that you can experience them all again as if for the first time. I would love to be able to re-experience the magic of reading some of my favorite fiction as if for the first time.

    3. Re:erase undesirable memories by Emb3rz · · Score: 1

      There is nothing to indicate you have to recreate the environment in which the memory originally happened. It says only to 'retrieve' that memory. I can easily retrieve some bad memories in my past; having identical stimulus not required.

    4. Re:erase undesirable memories by PotatoFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tell you where else this would be a positive thing - in erasing the memory of good books/films/video games, so that you can experience them all again as if for the first time. I would love to be able to re-experience the magic of reading some of my favorite fiction as if for the first time.

      Holly: I've just finished reading everything. I've now read everything that's been written by anyone ever.
      Lister: Would you go away?
      Holly: You know what the worst book ever written by anyone ever was?
      Lister: I don't care!
      Holly: "Football, It's a Funny Old Game" by Kevin Keegan.
      ...snip...
      Holly: Well, only if you're not busy. Would you mind erasing some of my memory banks?
      Lister: What for?
      Holly: Well, if you erase all the Agatha Christie novels from my memory bank, I can read 'em again tonight.
      Lister: How do I do it?
      Holly: Just type, "Holmem. Password override. The novels Christie, Agatha." Then press erase.
      Lister: I've done it.
      Holly: Done what?
      Lister: Erased Agatha Christie.
      Holly: Who's she, then?
      Lister: Holly, you just asked me to erase all Agatha Christie novels from your memory.
      Holly: Why should I do that? I've never heard of her.
      Lister: You've never heard of her because I've just erased her from your smegging memory.
      Holly: What'd you do that for?
      Lister: You asked me to!
      Holly: When?
      Lister: Just now!
      Holly: I don't remember this.

      --
      "Liberty may be endangered by the abuses of liberty as well as the abuses of power." -- James Madison
    5. Re:erase undesirable memories by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 1

      It might not be so positive for the rape victim. If she can't remember being raped, then how the hell did she get pregnant? Where did those bruises come from? And why does she now have HIV?

      Also, why do people from the district attorney's office keep coming by and asking her to testify? Testify to what?

    6. Re:erase undesirable memories by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would love to be able to re-experience the magic of reading some of my favorite fiction as if for the first time.

      I'd much rather experience the magic of something genuinely new.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    7. Re:erase undesirable memories by harry666t · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > While this might positively applicaple for e.g. victims

      My life was far from painless, but I regret no single decision and want no memory to definitely fade away. I treat every unpleasant moment, every "evil" done to me as a lesson, and forgetting what I've learned would be like... devolution. It's my personal point of view, but I believe that everything that ever happened to someone, had happened for a reason.

    8. Re:erase undesirable memories by noundi · · Score: 1

      Well you have to think about it. Who can decide if a memory is "undesirable"? Unease is, amongst others, an effect that we humans feel when we realise we have to stay absent from something, such as dark small parks in the middle of a wednesday night, in order not to get hurt, or raped/robbed as in the example above. Aren't you more likely to end up in the same scenario twice if you don't remember the first one and can therefore avoid it a second time?

      --
      I am the lawn!
    9. Re:erase undesirable memories by Techguy666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Another "positive" application?

      Once this gets into pill or injectable form, I'd imagine governments and military organizations will have spotless human rights records.

    10. Re:erase undesirable memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After you've seen a really awesome movie, like The Dark Knight. Don't you kinda want to erase it from your head and watch it again?
      'New' is exciting.

    11. Re:erase undesirable memories by Thiez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not remove the middle-man and take a pill that makes you happy? Let's be honest that is what your suggestion is all about.

    12. Re:erase undesirable memories by Grave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And this is precisely why nobody should want to have a memory erased. No matter how painful, each thing that has happened to us has shaped us into who we are today. Change one thing in your past, even the memory of one thing, and you can become a totally different person. The lessons you learn from bad experiences are very valuable, and are worth far more than relieving the pain of that memory.

    13. Re:erase undesirable memories by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      I don't even see a use for this for rape victims.

      If a victim took this then it could be taking away the only evidence against someone. Even if they know who has done it, why would you want to forget that just to have the same guy or go to the same place and get raped again?!

    14. Re:erase undesirable memories by temcat · · Score: 1

      IMHO it's not that straightforward. OK you've learned the lesson from some memory and incorporated it in your behavior - do you really need the memory itself now? The answer is not obvious to me.

    15. Re:erase undesirable memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm all for science, and I understand it's not like there's a neuralizer available on the market yet... but this sort of research, while important for understanding how the brain works, has a high potential for misuse, if if ever gets more practical. Who would you trust to keep it in the "good" side ? Governments? Law enforcement? Private companies ? The people ? ....

      Ok so rape victims... or any other crime done to you that you might want to forget about.

      Let's say you're a rape victim. You might want to forget it. But should you really ? Wouldn't you want to know that it happened ? There are moral implications here...

      Let's say you want to forget it and don't mind about not knowing about it anymore. What happens if someone in your surroundings, that knows that it happened, accidentally or intentionally lets it out ? Maybe you'll hate yourself for taking that decision earlier. Will we also have to erase the memories of everyone that knows, so that this sort of revelation never happens ?

      Couldn't perpetrators use it as a twisted defence ? "My victim doesn't remember anymore, so it's like it never happened." After all, the main witness has been "erased". So there were traces of sperm/blood/whatever as evidence ? Well, since it's been erased, who's to tell it wasn't consensual ? Maybe the victim was trying to frame the alleged perpetrator before having his/her memories erased, making it quite difficult for the victim to confess the framing afterwards, since he/she has no recollection of it.

      What if the perpetrator has his/her memories erased ? Spend time in jail for no reason... so law enforcement could put you in prison for a crime that never happened, but they say it was erased from your memory. How would you know if it's true or not ?

      Let's say this method becomes "relatively" accessible (like on the black market). Let's say you're a raper. Rape someone, make him/her forget. How will you be caught ? There's no witness. This is already sort of happening with the "rape drug".

      Hmm I just wrote a bunch of arguments there, have fun destroying them. ;P

      Ahhh, science... always two-sided. But believe me, I'm all for science.

    16. Re:erase undesirable memories by mqsoh · · Score: 1

      "The incidence of rape is up."

      "Big deal. Fire up the machines."

    17. Re:erase undesirable memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel your pain, let me help you with that.

    18. Re:erase undesirable memories by mqsoh · · Score: 1

      I love reading books for the second time (or the third time...or the ninth time). I get a lot more out of them on subsequent readings.

    19. Re:erase undesirable memories by db32 · · Score: 1

      Victims of rape seem to be one of the possible misuses. How tough would it be to get a conviction if the victim doesn't even remember it happened. Be it through treatment, or an erasing done by the rapist.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    20. Re:erase undesirable memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm sure a rape victim would be down with that.

      And I humbly accept this duty, for betterment of my fellow man.

    21. Re:erase undesirable memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or erase the memory of a very bad movie you just saw.

    22. Re:erase undesirable memories by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      Nothing here to destroy. All of your concerns are quite relevant. The biggest threat is not from criminals, but as usual from the "authorities". Everyone in Gitmo could be wiped, anyone abused by the police or OGA's could be erased. And yes, it is pain and bad experiences that make us grow and change. "Pain is the scalpel of God..." and all that. What would happen to us as a society if we could all erase the memories of our mother's death? It absolutely would be a criminal defense, if the victim's memories have been erased a conviction would be difficult and an argument could be made that if there is no memory, than in some cases, there would be no "harm" no crime. Oh, it's a brave new world alright.

    23. Re:erase undesirable memories by fprintf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      They are already doing this. It is called "Fluoridation of the public water supply". It hasn't been perfected yet, but looking at the mindless drones that I live and work with, it seems to have had some effect. They are even starting to think that Jimmy Carter was actually a good President.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    24. Re:erase undesirable memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something to think about, though:

      "When the brain was made to overproduce CaMKII at the exact moment the mouse was prodded to retrieve the traumatic memory, the memory wasn't just blocked, it appeared to be fully erased."

      The clause in question here is 'the mouse was prodded to retrieve the traumatic memory.' This means at the moment, what is happening is the mouse was given the same stimuli a second time, and the mouse was monitored to see if it made the connection with the previous stimuli (or, was presented with the same pre-traumatic scenario, like looking at the prod, as it weighed whether or not the prod was safe).

      Yes, this could be helpful in some cases, as often incorrect or over-valued associations are linked to the traumatic event (in the case of a rape, any dark hallway could incite irrational and paralyzing fear). This could certainly be a good thing, or a bad thing, but both only in the hands of a skillful and intentional individual. The liklihood of this causing mass... ...what was I saying?... ...is very unlikely.

    25. Re:erase undesirable memories by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      Some of the date rape drugs already do something like this.
      They don't so knock you out, they do make you compliant and remove your ability to form new memories while they affect you.
      Girl wakes up next morning wondering why her clothes are torn and how she got hurt.
      No memories exist of the event even though she was awake if somewhat out of it at the time.

      Just because a guy doesn't actually have the girl over his shoulder best not to assume he hasn't drugged her.

    26. Re:erase undesirable memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats the difference?

    27. Re:erase undesirable memories by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      I'v been wishing for that pill for as long as I can remember. If I could take a pill that made me happy then maybe I would not mind getting up every day going to my boring job.

    28. Re:erase undesirable memories by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      At the time, I didn't understand how this could be modded insightful, but now it's starting to make sense...

    29. Re:erase undesirable memories by DamienRBlack · · Score: 1

      I think walking through parks at night doesn't exactly lead to rape. In actuality, it is quite rare. If you happened to be unlucky enough to be a victim, you will probably be more paranoid about things than is reasonable given the statistics. If you could erase those memories you may be able to live a carefree life again without having a panic attack anytime you have to walk after dark or need to get into your car or want to form a relationship with someone.

      Sure our memories teach us how to act, what to avoid and how to get by in life. But in cases like rape victims where the experience was significantly more traumatic than the chances of it ever happening again, it "teaches" the victim paranoia and fear that isn't realistically necessary. This usually hurts their life, not helps it.

      You seem to be implying that the victim was doing something "wrong". Which is why he/she got raped. So after the fact, they'll learn not to do that "wrong" action anymore. That is a little over the top for me. I can't imagine any situation where it is the victim's fault. Accept for maybe those fuzzy non-violent rape situations where the victim didn't ever actually say no. But I assume we're all talking about violent rape?

    30. Re:erase undesirable memories by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      There are rape victims who have come to use the experience positively and setup charities etc, so even in those cases (agreeing that they seem the most suitable of many), I think there is no such thing as "undesirable" memories --- only unwise reactions to those memories.

    31. Re:erase undesirable memories by icebrain · · Score: 1

      What if the memory is so painful that the person is just unable to function? It's one thing to keep memories to hold on to the lessons, but that doesn't do you much good if you're stuck in a psych ward or unable to leave the house at all.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    32. Re:erase undesirable memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was was raped 25 years ago. I *do* want to forget. ALL OF IT.

    33. Re:erase undesirable memories by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The difference is that if you forget the things you have previously enjoyed, then you have lost the joy that they brought to you. You won't know what you've lost, so you won't know where to search, or even why you should.

      And the next time you do experience one of them, you won't be starting from the same place that you did last time. It might well not seem anywhere nearly as good. For many things a part of their value is the context within which they are encountered. Often, even if that isn't the major component, it is a significant enough component that without it, you would lack the enjoyment.

      E.g., remember the title of a book that you enjoyed as a child, but which you can't recall in detail at the moment. Now search it out and read it again. It may well seem totally inane.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    34. Re:erase undesirable memories by jcr · · Score: 1

      I've never understood why conspiracy nuts latched onto fluoridation as some kind of diabolical crowd-control scheme. Fluoride is good for your teeth. If your local water utility doesn't fluoridate the water, then use a fluoride toothpaste and get professional fluoride applications from your dentist twice a year.

      I'm sure I've ingested as much flouride as anyone else, and I'm certainly no fan of the government.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    35. Re:erase undesirable memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or erase the memory of a very bad movie, like saw.

      There gocrf yjsy got upi-

    36. Re:erase undesirable memories by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      It's not that simple. Some people become so traumatized they can't function normally and require years of therapy and medication. If the trauma could go away and it actually allowed them to function without the flashbacks, then a radical treatment like this might actually be beneficial. There are downsides and ethical issues, but the idea does have merit in some cases.

    37. Re:erase undesirable memories by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I think they're planning on it being more selective than that. Wait until after the guy's convicted, for one. Then don't erase memories of his face or of the place it happened.

      Just erasing the specifics of the attack is probably what they have in mind. Rape victims often say they'll never forget what the attacker said, exactly what he did to them, the feel of his body, and other details. Being able to later say, "I was raped and that's a horrible thing, but I don't remember the specifics of the event" would be a wonderful thing for some women.

      Abused children, victims of war crimes, robbery victims, car crash victims, soldiers, victims of animal attacks, and more people often don't want the knoeldge of what happened to them to go away. They just want to block out the details.

    38. Re:erase undesirable memories by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Alternately, give a man a good and defensible reason to kill someone and erase his memory. Collect the forensic evidence against him, and convict. He doesn't remember killing anyone or why he did it. It doesn't matter now that it was self-defense of defense of an innocent third party. All you have is a dead guy and a guy who killed him. It's a perfect frame-up. "I don't recall" is not likely to be enough of a defense.

    39. Re:erase undesirable memories by db32 · · Score: 1

      One of my favorite stories was how you could extract one of those date rape drugs from a specific toy bead thing available at any Toys R Us. You know the sales people were concerned about why suddenly there were so many guys buying up those bead kit things.

      Just goes to show why the whole memory erase thing is probably a bad thing.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    40. Re:erase undesirable memories by noidentity · · Score: 1

      [...]erase undesirable memories[...]

      undesirable for whom?

      Her, for one

    41. Re:erase undesirable memories by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      No, forgetting would not be devolution - it would be perfectly normal. In fact, you could even say that we evolved to be forgetful. ;)

    42. Re:erase undesirable memories by BobearQSI · · Score: 1

      Also positively applicable for rapists, to wipe their victim's memory. Or doctors who wish to rape their patients coming in for memory-erasure procedure. Either way, the following applies:

      Guy: I thought you said you were a virgin!
      Girl: I am!
      Guy: Then how did you give me crabs, herpes, and the clap?!

    43. Re:erase undesirable memories by noundi · · Score: 1

      The term "wrong" is relative and certainly not what I mean. I'm talking about cause and effect and statistics. Of course there's nothing "wrong" with walking anywhere in the middle of anything. However in certain scenarios you're more exposed to dangers such as others that want to do "wrong". And this goes beyond rape of any sort. It's unrealistic to think that your experiences don't prevent/affect future unwanted events. You learn from your own experiences, not only your mistakes.

      --
      I am the lawn!
    44. Re:erase undesirable memories by Yakasha · · Score: 1

      Now I'm picturing scammers spamming invoices for services rendered... "1 erased memory $1500".

    45. Re:erase undesirable memories by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      The difference is that my experience of that genuinely new thing is informed by all my previous experience.

      If I hadn't seen (or couldn't remember) Star Trek and Star Wars, I'm not sure I'd realize just how good Firefly was. And if I hadn't seen Star Wars, I'd completely miss the contractor rant in Clerks.

      That leaves aside the issue of whether I would rather know or not know, even if knowing is less pleasant.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  5. so now when us paranoids rant wbout your memories by kesuki · · Score: 3, Funny

    being wiped by the cia, the nsa or homeland security, we've got the link to prove it.

    ah, i feel vindicated. one of my paranoid thoughts is that people have their memories wiped of certain things they've done, knowing that science has reproduced it in mice means time travelers from the future could easily have been doing it for years now.

    well, just as soon as the time machine gets proved to be possible. quantum physics is dangerously close to that with 'particles being everywhere all at once, until observed.' how can a quantum particle like a photon be everywhere all at once, until observed, unless time travel is also possible on the quantum level.

  6. My Wife... by Smivs · · Score: 4, Funny

    has the ability to selectively forget anything inconvenient!

    1. Re:My Wife... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      But what you failed to mention is that she has transferred that part of the brain to remembering all the stupid crap you do, forever! In 30 years from now, that stupid thing you did, that caused her to be really pissed off last week, will raise its ugly head as you argue about something completely unrelated.

      AND she'll remember it in VIVID detail recounted each second perfectly.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:My Wife... by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      That's why we need this device, so that she can forget to forget it. One should be issued to you when you get married, along with your marriage certificate.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  7. Lots of potential uses by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It sounds like science fiction, but scientists say it might one day be possible to erase undesirable memories from the brain, selectively and safely.

    Screw that. I want to erase desirable memories from people's brains. Think how easy it would be to make office workers stay later when they can't remember any of the good stuff that happens when they leave the office?

    Or for shits and giggles, how about removing all traces of memories of sex for the unwed father of a child? Would make the paternity suit industry tons of coin, I bet.

    But enough of the super-villain type stuff.

    How abvout erasing the memory of the first time you had warm apple pie? Then, you get to try it for the first time every night.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:Lots of potential uses by Spazztastic · · Score: 2, Funny

      How abvout erasing the memory of the first time you had warm apple pie? Then, you get to try it for the first time every night.

      I was thinking of something a little different... but whatever floats your boat, man.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    2. Re:Lots of potential uses by kesuki · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Or for shits and giggles, how about removing all traces of memories of sex for the unwed father of a child? Would make the paternity suit industry tons of coin, I bet."

      the 1990's called, we use DNA to figure out who isn't cleaning up their dog poophttp://idle.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/17/160246&from=rss, paternity suits likewise are solved with DNA tests.

      perhaps if you time traveled back to the 1950's in a time machine with 3 other scientists and crash landed in new mexico, you would find a use for the drug in paternity suits. but how to market something that scientifically can't be proven to work? since the science that makes it possible makes it obsolete (for paternity tests at least)?

      or perhaps after the 1970's that failed time travel experiment from the 1950's would result in a government using the super secret modern tech needed to make such a drug possible that they retrieved from a 'weather balloon' and would widely use it to control the nation and wind up with a huge massive government that has to tax everyone and is still ten trillion dollars in debt, because mass producing all that memory wiping drug is expensive so more an more memories need to be wiped, and perhaps people become resistant to the drug after being flooded with it all their lives...

    3. Re:Lots of potential uses by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      the 1990's called, we use DNA to figure out who isn't cleaning up their dog poophttp://idle.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/17/160246&from=rss, paternity suits likewise are solved with DNA tests.

      Who cares how it's solved? The point is that if the fathers don't remember having sex with the mother, there are likely to be more paternity suits than there are now, since the fathers will deny responsibility... which means more coin for the paternity suit industry.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Lots of potential uses by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was thinking of something a little different... but whatever floats your boat, man.

      Ah, so you caught the allegory. It wasn't unintended.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    5. Re:Lots of potential uses by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 5, Funny

      I could get excited about The Phantom Menace all over again!

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    6. Re:Lots of potential uses by kesuki · · Score: 1

      ahh, i didn't see the lawyer connection, in there. so the idea is to make load of money for lawyers by having men refuse to be dna tested in paternity suits.

      so how do lawyers find these guys? go to bars and instead of slipping em extasy slip them a little 'forget me' pill and then goad them into recalling the babe they got in the sack last night?

      perhaps you should have stuck to the

      step 1: become a paternity lawyer
      step 2: find a one night stander in a bar
      step 3: give him a forget recalled memory pill in his beer
      step 4: get him to recall the babe he laid last night
      step 5: represent him in his paternity suit
      step 6: Profit!

      format, although there is no ellipse

    7. Re:Lots of potential uses by Emb3rz · · Score: 1

      Child's play. We could all forget Jar-Jar!

    8. Re:Lots of potential uses by Meumeu · · Score: 1

      perhaps if you time traveled back to the 1950's in a time machine with 3 other scientists

      Good idea ! I'm starting this right away, who wants to join me?

    9. Re:Lots of potential uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How abvout erasing the memory of the first time you had warm apple pie? Then, you get to try it for the first time every night.

      I want to do that for times I have sex with my wife. It'll be like doing a new chick every night without the fuss! Sweeeeeeeet.

    10. Re:Lots of potential uses by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      I was thinking it'd be a better idea to use it on the mothers.... ;)

    11. Re:Lots of potential uses by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I could get excited about The Phantom Menace all over again!

      Think of all the potential disappointment which could await you in life if you could re-experience the let down of that movie new every week or so!!

      We could erase all memory of Uwe Boll and his movies and let you experience the suck all over again.

      I figure the absolute best use for it is to make kids fall for "pull my finger" more often. Send 'em to bed, scramble their brains, wake 'em up in the morning, bam -- hit 'em when they don't expect it!! :-P

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:Lots of potential uses by VShael · · Score: 1

      Or erasing all those Agatha Christie stories, so that you could re-read them again?

    13. Re:Lots of potential uses by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind having this for movies. If you see a really, great, awesome movie that blew you away, you can erase your memory of it, watch it again and get blown away again!

      HOLY SHIT! He's Kaiser Soze?!?!?!?!?

      I would be more willing to watch trailers if I knew I could erase all memories of them before watching the actual movie. Right now I religiously avoid trailers for movies I want to see because they spoil plot points, ruin funny moments, etc, etc. But if it was "here's a good summary of the movie. Would you like to experience it? If so, make yourself a note and press FUDGE MY MIND to continue".

      Ironically, I wouldn't want to erase bad movies. I wouldn't want to risk seeing them again.

    14. Re:Lots of potential uses by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      You want to be unpracticed, unlearned, and untutored in the fine arts at every single performance!? What's wrong with you?

    15. Re:Lots of potential uses by sam0737 · · Score: 1

      Did you say they are bringing making the kiddie porn legal again?

    16. Re:Lots of potential uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, you get to try it for the first time every night.

      What the Hell are you talking about ???

      Oh wait ... apple pie ?

    17. Re:Lots of potential uses by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Or for shits and giggles, how about removing all traces of memories of sex for the unwed father of a child? Would make the paternity suit industry tons of coin, I bet.

      Or for shits and giggles, how about removing all traces of memories of sex for the unwed mother of a child? Would make for a pretty interesting religion.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    18. Re:Lots of potential uses by txoof · · Score: 1

      How abvout erasing the memory of the first time you had warm apple pie? Then, you get to try it for the first time every night.

      That's the saddest thing I think I've ever heard. If I lost my "apple pie" memories, I'd loose all the great moments of sitting at my grandparents house at thanksgiving, tasting warm pie on a brisk fall day and all the other wonderful associated memories. Memories are amazing things and tied to so many different parts of our being.

      All this talk about removing great movies, books, events etc. fails to realize what makes those things so great. It's not just that the book is wonderful to experience, but rather your interaction with the book. Harry Potter was fun to read, but I've already gone and erased it naturally. It was entertaining but had no depth. It didn't stay with me for a reason. To Kill a Mocking Bird, on the other hand is so fantastic because I've read it half a dozen times and it stays with me. I think about the characters, I imagine what it would be like to talk to them, what they look like, how they would react. They become almost real to me. If I lost that book, I would loose all the depth and beauty that I have created on top of what Harper Lee brought to me.

      Perhaps I love the book so much because of the moment that it entered my life. If I had read it at another time, perhaps it wouldn't have been so special. I'm pretty sure that if I watched Star Wars for the first time at 30, with no knowledge of the SW universe and mythos, I would think (rightly so) that Mark Hammil is a hack, Kerri Fisher can't act and that the screen play was written by a sixth grader. I now choose to overlook those short comings because I grew up with Star Wars. It rocked my world as a little kid. I loved the ewoks, played with my AT-AT for hours, desperately wanted a light saber, and refused to go into the basement until my dad took down the scary-ass poster of Darth Vader (I thought he was going to reach out of the poster and choke me). If I lost all that, Star Wars would just be another over hyped piece of 70s junk that got stuck to my shoe.

      Our memories are fragile complex things, erasing or losing even a few of them has potentially drastic effects on who we are and how we think. I don't want nobody touchin' my brain!

      --
      This one's tricky. You have to use imaginary numbers, like eleventeen... --Hobbes
    19. Re:Lots of potential uses by Ragzouken · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you make a List-er all the Agatha Christie stories you ever read.

    20. Re:Lots of potential uses by kesuki · · Score: 1

      you know, dads who wanted to disappear and make a paternity suit vanish might be willing to pay more than the lawyers giving the drug to dads, but if recalling the events are key to forgetting them, then it's easier to target the lower profit marks of dads willing to go to court over a paternity suit. since guys love to brag about the one they bagged last night.

      man especially if you're the paternity lawyer for all these 'buddies' in bars who sleep with women, and they forget who the lawyer was who represented them last time too. as long as their money holds out you can rinse repeat.

    21. Re:Lots of potential uses by funkyfantom · · Score: 0

      Those bastards erased my memory of sleeping with Natalie Portman!

    22. Re:Lots of potential uses by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Man, the DeLorean will be really cramped already with four.

    23. Re:Lots of potential uses by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Seeing some movies or reading some books more than once allows you to pick up on additional subtleties and to interpret things in multiple possible ways. I'm not sure it'd be worth forgetting those particular ones to experience them as fresh material again.

    24. Re:Lots of potential uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean the first time you had apple pie?

      or the first time you "had" apple pie?

  8. This just gives me warm fuzzy feelings... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

    "But memory in a human is much more complex than a memory in a mouse," Verghese added. "So, this experimental model, while it brings to mind all sorts of possible applications, is many steps removed from any human application."

    Imagine if they got this stuff working for humans. They could really erase a criminals memory of an event and all the stuff that makes him bad. Now say in order to preserve law and order you need to make sure the family of the victim he killed is "conditioned" to not take revenge.

    Say you don't like people voting for Obama or McCain? Now you can erase certain things to sway people towards voting for you in the election.

    Don't like what the whistle blower in your company is about to do even though you may be poisoning the local population by doing something less then ethical or just stealing from them with extra fees? Clean that whistle blowers whistle so he/she can't remember the facts.

    Yeah this will be good down the road if they ever get it perfected for humans and especially in an easy to transport size.

    --
    ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    1. Re:This just gives me warm fuzzy feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then it's a thing good that we've already started twitering, blogging and logging our lives. Once the day is over and everybody is done with your brain, you sit down and read back what happened.

    2. Re:This just gives me warm fuzzy feelings... by kesuki · · Score: 2

      "Imagine if they got this stuff working for humans. They could really erase a criminals memory of an event and all the stuff that makes him bad."

      you assume that criminal activity isn't caused by how the brain is wired, or how their genetic code is coded, and which codes are active, and which are repressed.

      but yeah, you could reduce a criminal to a drooling idiot, the problem is he'll eventually relearn how to be a criminal, and there are going to be people saying no you can't do this to criminals. albeit in a world where a forget me pill exists some of those problems can go away by themselves, at least if information is tightly controlled.

    3. Re:This just gives me warm fuzzy feelings... by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      They could really erase a criminals memory of an event and all the stuff that makes him bad.

      Memory isn't what makes the criminal. Their whole mind and experiences are what make the criminal. Removing the memories doesn't remove the criminal. The foundation is still in place.

      And I think it is important to notice that (if I RTFS correctly) the scientists didn't remove a memory that was already ingrained into the brain. They prevented the memory from being recorded. Still pretty scary if found to work with humans, but not as far reaching as what is implied. This could show insight into how people black out and forget horrible things that happened to them or things they have done.

    4. Re:This just gives me warm fuzzy feelings... by 1800maxim · · Score: 1

      And yet another case of blame the genes, not me! Wake everyone up when the defense "your honor, i'm wired for committing crime, it's not my fault" holds up in court. As of present, courts operate on the assumption of willful action, which itself is not caused by genes.

      Erasing memory is not going to solve the problem, and on that issue you are correct. A criminal is shaped by various factors, environmental being approximately 50%. The only way he will relearn to be a criminal is if he's subjected to the same environmental conditions that shaped him in the first place. It can be argued that he has a far lesser chance of becoming a criminal if he is rehabilitated in a rather different and opposite environment.

    5. Re:This just gives me warm fuzzy feelings... by bdenton42 · · Score: 1

      Say you don't like people voting for Obama or McCain? Now you can erase certain things to sway people towards voting for you in the election.

      Or W can get on national TV and flashy-thing the entire country into believing he still has 3 years left on his term.

    6. Re:This just gives me warm fuzzy feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you also assume that criminal activity is anything but pure chance geared with good old fashioned human greed. The Worlds full of criminals, for every innocent person in 1 Country they're guilty in several others for something.

      How many guilty for piracy here of any kind?

      You're a criminal

      Had 3 beers before driving home?

      You're a criminal

      Took a copy of a CD from a mate?

      You're a criminal

      Did I do that because of how my brain was wired? Or will this be just when I pick stupid laws? Or could you say it's the legal systems that are the problem and not the people being caught in them. The same way it's not the fish caught in the net that is the problem, it's the fisherman using it.

      One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter and all that malarkey!

    7. Re:This just gives me warm fuzzy feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah well, but you couldn't justify a police state where 1 in ten people are in law enforcement without enough crimes on the books, and enough criminals, and enough 'wars on drugs' 'terrorism etc' hell, we even have laws against destroying the world environment, it's called the EPA. and laws against releasing unsafe drugs, which spawned the FDA, as well as prescription vs legal drugs.

      it's not about changing the system, change doesn't equal fixing the system. you really have to step back and think 'does this fix the system?' if you want to focus on change, focus on practical change, that everyone can live with, that makes people's lives better. how many scientists have turned photovotaics from a floundering infant technology, into the 'next big gold rush' in places like gemany and california. photovotaics is the perfect example of a technology that can be mass produced, create tons of money and jobs, and replace dirty energy during peak hours of sunlight, while having less energy lost to efficiency losses through transmission. did you realize that 66% of the energy generated in the united states is lost to transmission losses? 66% if every wal-mart in america installed enough panels on it's roof, and over the parking lot as artificial trees, to cut it's power consumption by 50% it would cut the total power consumed by the USA by 3% because 2% of that energy was lost on transmission lines to wal-mart. and guess what, the total cost to society for that energy? it would be slightly less to wal-mart by the time enough solar cell production for wal-mart could be ramped up. and in the short term it would give wal-mart a big green thumb everyone could see, and would drive the production costs of photovotaics down to the point where it cost society less than coal. who loses here? not atomic power, we still need that, not petrolium, we still need that to ship all those photovotaics although they weigh less than coal and get moved less often, petrol pproducts are key to 20+ year longevity of photovotaics without the pertol based protective layer, there is no way they'd survive hail or that dust would wash right off in the rain, no need for cleaning, hell it's the coal industry that looses. and the power grid people, but they still have to sell power and move power if wal-mart only uses half their PV current. and people still need a grid, or else PV cost soars way too high.

      watch a few documentaries about the civil rights movement in the late 60's the one i saw last night about 'the Chicago 10' was a classic, yippies, hippies oh my. even spawned a 'yippie' soda company! that generation was too focused on taking over the system, through non violent protest, the yippies believed that willful violent protesters and non violent protesters could share ideas, and hide the violent protesters, and simply by talking about protesting, would garner tear gas and an army of soldiers with bayonets, and prove what a police state america was. and this was before copyright applied to anything you rubber stamped with $0.05 cents, before LSD and pot were illegal, before we had a war on terror, and before recording telephone calls without a judge rubber stamping it, was illegal.

      yeah a lot of great thing the hippies did for us, they taught the establishment just what people could and would not tolerate! slippery slope there. sure, a black man can vote, a black man can hire a lawyer, or even refuse a lawyer. things really changed, but 1 in three black men will go to prison for breaking a law because there is no law saying cops have to be black, there is affirmative action, they do have to hire blacks, if they qualify, and can pass police academy. we even have blacks in our army and they're not segregated to the 'bullet absorption division' but hell, did that fix things? with rappers teaching black they need to be gangsta and fight the man, and break the law for the sake of breaking the law? and to never snitch, unless they want a bullet in the head.

      did greed go away as a result of the 60's? did racial equality ha

    8. Re:This just gives me warm fuzzy feelings... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      That would be a dangerous defense. The premise that even criminals deserve dignity and a certain level of treatment is based in large part on the idea that we are unique creatures and not automatons. Take that away, and the criminal who is hardwired to commit crime is just a faulty part to be recycled. The judge and jury could just claim to be hardwired to kill criminals and not consider the circumstances or anything else.

      If you're just hardwired and not capable of free will, then are you even worthy of a trial in the first place? Why not just toss out all the possible problems? They're nothing special after all. They're just a bunch of randomly wired networks of tissue. Destroy all the suspects so that the properly wired naked apes can remain unbothered.

    9. Re:This just gives me warm fuzzy feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tl; dr

    10. Re:This just gives me warm fuzzy feelings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could really erase a criminals memory of an event and all the stuff that makes him bad.

      How could you demolish a man like that?!

    11. Re:This just gives me warm fuzzy feelings... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      And yet another case of blame the genes, not me!

      Your genes are a part of you, and an important part at that. After all, they're what separates you from monkeys, or from ameobas for that matter. It would be rather foolish to discount their effect on your behaviour.

      A criminal is shaped by various factors, environmental being approximately 50%. The only way he will relearn to be a criminal is if he's subjected to the same environmental conditions that shaped him in the first place. It can be argued that he has a far lesser chance of becoming a criminal if he is rehabilitated in a rather different and opposite environment.

      A criminal is someone who breaks the law. It is not a (simple) property of an individual, like muscle strength or mathemathical skill, but rather a matter of interaction between a particular individual's personal value system and the legal system of the surrounding society. Consequently, "learning to be a criminal" is a meaningless statement unless it is also specified what laws are broken, in what circumstances, and on what level of stress; otherwise, you'll end up including thieves, murderers, the people who download music from the Internet, and guy's who grow pot for their own consumption in the same category, resulting in a meaningless mess.

      There isn't anyone on this planet who holds the law to be the highest value in all circumstances, or at least I certainly hope there isn't. Crime isn't such a simple matter as it might at first seem.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  9. The brittlestar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone remind me what a brittlestar is?

  10. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind by Daryen · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else find this scarily similar to how it worked in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind?

    Also, it isn't "welcoming our new selectively amnesiac rodent overloads." It's "I for one am welcoming our memory-erasing government sponsored scientist overlords."

    1. Re:Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      you haven't watched that movie recently, have you?

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    2. Re:Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind by Sebilrazen · · Score: 1

      I don't remember.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    3. Re:Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      What's a movie? ooooh just looked it up. Sounds interesting. I may have to try and find one and try it out.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    4. Re:Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Does anyone else find this scarily similar to how it worked in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind?

      I don't know, maybe just everyone who has RTFA which specifically points out the similarity?

  11. Re:so now when us paranoids rant wbout your memori by Scutter · · Score: 1

    ah, i feel vindicated. one of my paranoid thoughts is that people have their memories wiped of certain things they've done

    How do you know it hasn't already been done to you?

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  12. Goatse by mfh · · Score: 5, Funny

    undesirable for whom? While this might positively applicaple for e.g. victims of rape there are tons of possible missuses which really should be feared.

    All memory of Goatse could be erased! That has to count for SOMETHING.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Goatse by cosmocain · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All memory of Goatse could be erased! That has to count for SOMETHING.

      Jup. It does.

      Being shocked by goatse the same amount as if seeing it for the first time. Great. Hooray.

    2. Re:Goatse by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and then you'd likely be rickrolled to it again and again. Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

    3. Re:Goatse by halcyon1234 · · Score: 2, Funny

      All memory of Goatse could be erased! That has to count for SOMETHING.

      In theory, yes. But not in practice. See it should have been a learning experience about protecting yourself from shock sites. Those who forget anuses are doomed to repeat them.

    4. Re:Goatse by Zerth · · Score: 1

      So what has been seen, can be unseen? < img of vomit kitten looking relieved >

    5. Re:Goatse by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      All memory of Goatse could be erased!

      Wait, wait...

      Are you saying that every time I get rickrolled could be the first time?

      WE NEED THIS NOW.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    6. Re:Goatse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      All memory of Goatse could be erased! That has to count for SOMETHING.

      You have just given me a great idea!

      1. Open clinic for erasing memories.
      2. Create bot that spams links to Goatse.
      3. Profit!

    7. Re:Goatse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      if satan is real i think that might be a good form of eternal torment. the endless rick roll, it cannot be stopped.

    8. Re:Goatse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All memory of Goatse could be erased! That has to count for SOMETHING.

      Spoilsport.

    9. Re:Goatse by ignavus · · Score: 1

      All memory of Goatse could be erased! That has to count for SOMETHING.

      Provided it was done to the Goatse website administrator.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
  13. handy for interogation by Sarin · · Score: 1

    basicly you can get all information out of someone with this technique.

    you "just" torture them to get the information and wipe their memories of the interogation and do whatever you want with the aquired information. you can even let the subject loose and observe some more, knowing what you've learned from interogating the subject.

    1. Re:handy for interogation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The tortured person may wonder how their fingernails got ripped off though.

    2. Re:handy for interogation by Thiez · · Score: 1

      Yes, let's pretend it is impossible to torture someone without causing long-term damage.

    3. Re:handy for interogation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boating accident. when you were five. don't you remember?

    4. Re:handy for interogation by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Torture has long been known to be an ineffective way of extracting information from people. There are other, more psychological, methods that give you much better information. Sensory deprivation, etc. You'd be better off creating a fake environment and convincing the guy that he's really with you and that the *other* side had erased his brain to try and turn him into a criminal or whatever.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  14. My balls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can finally forget all those times I got kicked in the balls.

  15. Re:so now when us paranoids rant wbout your memori by kesuki · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ah but that's the thing, i lost about 6 months all told of memory.

    the doctor wasn't really up on his paranoid schizophrenia, and he said that the memories were probably repressed. no, no they weren't they were gone completely.

    the last time it happened i only lost 3 days, i was on a different medicine then though, and there are some files of what i said and did that are very weird. my explanation for what happened was hackers broke into my computer and used the wifi connection to directly control my thoughts. i don't bring that up to my doctor of course. wifi is everywhere, and hacked computers are a dime a dozen. which lead to my going all hard wired internet with hardened firewalls that are half-open and have specific configurations settings for each pc and each os that connects to the hardened firewalls, and oh i don't run my computers at night.

    but the doctor just thinks i am a computer hypochondriac, in addition to being paranoid schizophrenic.

  16. not applicable to humans by thermian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What with humans being rather complex, mentally, Information may not be stored only once, or it could be fragmented.

    The only way to selectively destroy memory would be to track down all instances of it, which I would say is pretty unlikely in the human brain. Same goes for most other primates.

    Amnesiacs typically have a non uniform memory loss. Some things they can recall, but not others. Two people with identical brain damage can easily experience different levels of amnesia. Producing a reliable general method for memory deletion is almost certainly impossible.

    Short term memory disruption, and the prevention of moving short term memories into long term memory is easier to achieve.

    If you want to experience it, dislocate your elbow and go to hospital. They'll give you a nice pill, you'll scream while they manhandle your arm back into position, and five minutes later you won't remember any of it. I've not experienced it, but I've relocated a fair few arms. Its funny when the people wake up and ask when your going to start.

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    1. Re:not applicable to humans by sckeener · · Score: 1

      On the positive side, it might possible to smudge or blur a memory.

      I know I'd like to make a few memories less painful such as my divorce.

      Though I have to wonder if blurring or wiping bad memories is enough as in my case with a divorce. The bad memories of the divorce could be erased, but then I'd have the longing of why such a positive marriage ended.

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    2. Re:not applicable to humans by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      How are they going to deal with all associated memories also?

      Say I want to forget an ex. Bamn, 'her' memory is gone. But what about the memory of who I watched a certain movie with? Would I remember:
      1) Not ever seeing the movie
      2) Not ever seeing the movie with someone
      3) Not ever remember seeing the movie with her
      4) Not remember that the person I saw the movie with was my ex.

      Smells, Sounds, Sights can all trigger memories in humans, what is going to happen when the 'interrupt' is still there but there's nothing to call?

    3. Re:not applicable to humans by Kirth+Gersen · · Score: 1

      thermian:

      They'll give you a nice pill, you'll scream while they manhandle your arm back into position, and five minutes later you won't remember any of it

      Yeah. That works well for general anaesthesia too. It's dangerous to give you enough morphine for you to really sleep through surgery: it'll kill you most of the time. So they give you inadequate morphine, plus curare so you can't move, and the date-rape drug so you don't remember the pain. But you *experience* the pain, every second of it, helpless and immobile.

    4. Re:not applicable to humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the nice pill? Do you mean something int the class like rohypnol?

    5. Re:not applicable to humans by iammani · · Score: 1

      If you want to experience it, dislocate your elbow and go to hospital. They'll give you a nice pill, you'll scream while they manhandle your arm back into position, and five minutes later you won't remember any of it. I've not experienced it, but I've relocated a fair few arms. Its funny when the people wake up and ask when your going to start.

      The drug the parent is taking about is commonly called propranolol. Visit http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/neuro/memory_drugs_sd.html for an interesting read about how exactly it works and its long term effects (minus the journalist bullshit)

    6. Re:not applicable to humans by zacronos · · Score: 1

      What with humans being rather complex, mentally, Information may not be stored only once, or it could be fragmented.

      The only way to selectively destroy memory would be to track down all instances of it, which I would say is pretty unlikely in the human brain. Same goes for most other primates.

      While I agree with the spirit of your conclusion (that in general, this will be much harder to pull off than with their test), I don't think I agree that it is "not applicable to humans". Memory is a stimulus-response (in humans as well as mice). The problem is not so much in tracking down instances of the memory, it is in tracking down (and reproducing) the set of stimuli which trigger the memory.

      In the test, they trigger overproduction of a certain protein while the target memory is stimulated -- they are essentially "deleting" the memory response to the current stimulus. In the case of a very strong and singular stimulus (like the tests described in the article), I would expect this will work similarly on humans as on mice. Perhaps it will be a little harder to make a human perceive the reproduced situation as exactly the same, but I would expect fairly decent results.

      The problem I foresee is triggering an arbitrary memory -- one that isn't so strongly or uniquely responsive to particular stimuli. For example, context makes a huge difference in memory recall (see state-dependent learning) -- if you can't generate the same context as when the memory was created, it seems likely you couldn't fully erase it. In their test, triggering the exact memory would have been easy to do, because they could easily replicate the (important) circumstances under which it occurred. In reality, if you were to erase a memory based on a partially-duplicated stimulus, I'm guessing the non-duplicated parts might still trigger the memory. I think this problem will exist for mice as well as humans, though I would expect humans to have more complex stimulus sets than mice, which would make the problem significantly more pronounced when using the technique on humans.

    7. Re:not applicable to humans by FoFP · · Score: 1

      The hospital people tell you the little pill makes you forget, but they lie. I get a telescope shoved down my throat every three years. They inject me, wait five minutes, and have at it. I gag and gag and gag. I tell them I remember. They tell me I can't, I must have dreamt it. I tell them about their saying I'm turning blue and that I should breathe, and I'm thinking there's something important to do for these lovely people, but i can't remember what it is. Then they're slapping me. They look shocked at this and then allow as how my brain must have acquired considerable experience at operating under chemical duress. I smile.

    8. Re:not applicable to humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brother was getting a gastroscope. For some reason the Poles gave him one of these pills. Except they mis-timed it. He remembers the gastroscope perfectly, its what he did after that he forgot. He assaulted nurses, other patients and even our mother.

      P.S. I dislocated my elbow. Thanks for laughing.

  17. Obligatory spoof transcript by stoofa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scientist: "Here, mouse, have some cheese."
    [Mouse eats cheese]
    Scientist: "Right, now forget about it completely."
    [Waits 5 minutes]
    Scientist: "Say, mouse, how was that oak-smoked camembert with chive and onion?"
    Mouse: "Chive?"
    Scientist: "Wow, it works."

  18. You have never been to mars. by chrispatch · · Score: 2, Funny

    You do not want a vacation on mars. You want to stay here and keep doing Sharon Stone.

  19. Enforceable NDA's by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So soon we will have truly enforceable NDA's.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Enforceable NDA's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when you finish a job just to find out you've signed away your payment for an envelope full of trinkets, man are you going to be pissed.

    2. Re:Enforceable NDA's by StreetStealth · · Score: 1

      "Yes, we were going to bring you a report from the private unveiling of the new Metal Gear Solid spinoff, but strangely we can't remember a thing. At least Konami served us some delicious wine and pastries, though!"

      --
      Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
  20. Its not science... by rodney+dill · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...its the Haitian

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
  21. Re:so now when us paranoids rant wbout your memori by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nod and smile, nod and smile.

  22. Used on /, already by oodaloop · · Score: 1

    Because everyone's forgotten we were discussing this not too long ago. I specifically rememeber someone saying they wanted to erase their first sexual experience.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:Used on /, already by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Re:Used on /, already

      Oh, I'm sorry, this is slash dot. Slash comma is down the hall on your left.

      Stupid git. ;-P

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Used on /, already by harry666t · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think this is how all the dupes get into the front page.

    3. Re:Used on /, already by trongey · · Score: 1

      ...I specifically rememeber someone saying they wanted to erase their first sexual experience.

      I suspect the conversation was more like, "I'm sure I must have had a sexual experience, but someone erased my memory of it."

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    4. Re:Used on /, already by oodaloop · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashcomma,org is actually a great site with well-written summaries, intelligent comments, and working CSS. Heaven knows how I mixed it up with this site.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    5. Re:Used on /, already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they were talking about your mom. ...and frankly I can't blame them. tons of fun != TONS of fun.

  23. I have my own flashy-memory-messer-upper-thingy by rodney+dill · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... I call it Glenfiddich

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
    1. Re:I have my own flashy-memory-messer-upper-thingy by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      no, that's too memorable. Try Tesco value Scotch instead...

  24. Old tech by Pompatus · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can already erase memories. It's called whiskey.

    --

    ----
    Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
    1. Re:Old tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny ... whiskey is the reason I have memories that I want to erase

    2. Re:Old tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and it was even funnier the first time someone said it at 8:42 AM

    3. Re:Old tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's the cause of ...specific memories. As in

      "I did what with my SISTER??!"

    4. Re:Old tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the real experiment! They just got a bunch of drunken mice...

  25. Self-amputation? by Big+Nemo+'60 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe I am just grouchy but...

    Even for traumatic memories, I would choose healing and closure over forgetfulness anytime. I may like it or not, but I am the sum of all the things I experienced, and I am not looking forward to self-amputation.

    On the other hand, I understand that achieving healing and closure is a very inefficient process - just being able to erase unpleasant experiences would probably set us free to pursue more worthy achievements, like making the current global economic breakdown ever worse...

    Again, sorry for ranting.

    --
    In the long run we are all dead. - John Maynard Keynes (1883 - 1946)
    1. Re:Self-amputation? by Crookdotter · · Score: 1

      Does the same apply to a cancerous limb? Do you want to live with that eating at your body and try to like it? Some traumatic memories eat away at your mental health.

    2. Re:Self-amputation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While for the most part I could understand how a more natural healing process would be, well, healthier. One is better able to cope with future disagreeable moments after similar previous experiences.

      However, it is certainly possible for there to be situations that could merit a (selective) memory wipe. Being the sum of one's experiences isn't worth much if he or she is extremely depressive and commits suicide. Even if the individual doesn't commit suicide, being forever haunted isn't exactly worth it either. These are extreme cases, mind you, but not impossible or unheard of.

    3. Re:Self-amputation? by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure, the fathers who are currently paying child support, would love to forget his now ex-wife/troubles and forget the lessons about trusting a person first in a relationship, and do it all over again... and again.. and again...

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    4. Re:Self-amputation? by mdielmann · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder how many crusaders, people spending their lives to right the injustices of the world, there would be if they could just remove those troublesome memories and go on with their lives. Would there be anything left to motivate us to make the world a better place?

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    5. Re:Self-amputation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Even for traumatic memories, I would choose healing and closure over forgetfulness anytime. I may like it or not, but I am the sum of all the things I experienced, and I am not looking forward to self-amputation."

      I used to think that way for a long time as I delt with the hell of the first 8 years of my life. But here I am, 37, and those first 8 years have hobbled me. They still haunt me. They still impact and invade everything I do and am.

      If a limb is gangrene, wouldn't you want it amputated to save the greater whole? Those 8 years of my life hold me back and handicap me in ways that most can't even begin to comprehend. And the pain, the god awful pain, the deep soul hollowing pain.

      I would give all my material posessions to be freed of that pain and the misery, despair, and anxiety that eat me up inside, that keep me from me being happy.(before someone suggests counseling or other treatment, believe me, I have been there, I have done that, I am there, I am doing that, and there is no healing or closure in sight)

      I'm sorry for sounding emo, but I'm trying to be honest. We need a technology like this. I know it sounds nice and idealistic to naturally heal and find closure and all that, but I'm not interested in trying to live up to someone's ideals. Here in my real life, the quality of my real life could be greatly enhanced by this technology. There are some things that happen to people, that is unreasonable to ask them to forgive and forget, to just heal naturally. There are some wounds that can never be healed. Some memories that can never have closure.
       
      Please, if it ever comes down to an ethical decision on the part of our society whether to allow this, please consider what I've said here. I appreciate if you wouldn't use it for yourself, but if this technology ever becomes possible for human use, don't deny me or others like me, those among the most abused and most traumatized in society, the opportunity to be freed. The opportunity to wake up and not have to remember, not have those things wounding us every day, like splinters that go deeper with every movement.

      Sometimes the sum of all things experienced, isn't a good thing. Just ask any number of the people I've hurt and let down in life because of what it means to be the sum of those experiences.

    6. Re:Self-amputation? by Big+Nemo+'60 · · Score: 1

      Does the same apply to a cancerous limb? [...] Some traumatic memories eat away at your mental health.

      You raise a good point. Now I feel bad for choosing that metaphor :-)

      Nowadays, amputation is mostly used as a last resort, when other treatments failed, or were not applied properly, or the cancer/gangrene/infection spreads so fast there is no time to do otherwise.

      Every rule has exceptions, so I guess there would be some circumstances where erasing an especially traumatizing memory would be the last viable option. I am rather concerned that, like other practices, this one could become a choice of mere convenience.

      There are other considerations, that bring us further away from the "medical" metaphor. Let's consider a crime: the victim could have his/her memory erased, but what about the culprit? The perpetrator would remember the crime - and the victim - while the victim would have no memory of either.

      Would that be fair? Should the memory of the culprit be erased too, provided that he/she were apprehended? Before or after the punishment? If both the victim and the perpetrator have no memory of the crime, did the crime really happen?

      Then, again: what if several people share the same traumatic experience, but some of them do *not* want their memory removed? How would that affect both the "erased" and the "not-erased" ones?

      IMHO if this were to become a common practice, it is going to raise a lot of debate.

      --
      In the long run we are all dead. - John Maynard Keynes (1883 - 1946)
    7. Re:Self-amputation? by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      I was a perfectly good person before I went off to war. The people who didn't go off to war are still perfectly fine, yet every day is a waking nightmare for me. There are things that a person doesn't need to experience to be a good person. I daresay I'd be a *better* person without the effects of PTSD destroying my life and my relationships.

      But I'm sure you've had a ton of traumatic experiences too, so we'll just cope our own separate ways.

      I'd pay a year's salary to have this memory treatment. The argument that without bad memories of war, we will go to war more often is doubly ironic because it's coming from mostly pacifist nerds who've never BEEN to war in the first place. You guys don't have any memory of war, and yet you're against using it. And yet if I remove my memories, I'll turn into a warmonger? Please.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    8. Re:Self-amputation? by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      >>Would there be anything left to motivate us to make the world a better place?

      If nothing hurt, what would be left to improve?

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    9. Re:Self-amputation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many who would prefer the "self amputation" approach.

      Take me, for instance. I've had a severe mood disorder most of my life. Since about age 6, I've had a continuous, low-grade, treatment-resistant form of depression called dysthymia. Around age 8, I started having Major Depressive episodes (lack of energy, suicidality, that whole bit). At 20 those transitioned into Bipolar-II. That's when I finally got the right diagnoses and treatment, although the dysthymia always persists.

      Looking back on my childhood, I see little more than an unpleasant grayish haze. If I could take a pill and forget the first two decades of my life, would I? In a heartbeat. At the very least, it would save me the effort of repressing all that crap.

    10. Re:Self-amputation? by W3ird_N3rd · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many crusaders, people spending their lives to right the injustices of the world, there would be if they could just remove those troublesome memories and go on with their lives. Would there be anything left to motivate us to make the world a better place?

      We can't fix this world anyway. I would love these pills, and also want some that make me accept all injustice and make me feel good about everything just the way it is. It would be a huge improvement for me.

    11. Re:Self-amputation? by W3ird_N3rd · · Score: 1

      I'd pay a year's salary to have this memory treatment.

      Maybe you should watch "How does your memory work?": http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/broadband/tx/memory/ and especially this part: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/broadband/tx/memory/wiped/. Note that the video on the BBC website only shows a very small part of the actual documentary. In the full version, it explains an experimental way to make memories "softer". A memory would be saved in two parts: what actually happened and what you felt. It explains that when you recall a memory, the emotional memory becomes "fluid" and is re-stored, just like, in geek terms, your RAM needs to refresh to keep it's contents. Now the trick is they use a drug, ironicly I don't remember which one, that prevents the memory from storing properly again after it became "fluid". It's a regular drug that was made for another purpose but this is a side effect. So you take the drug, think of your bad memory, and the emotion connected to it fades a bit. But you need to go through that procedure several times, and it gets weaker every time. If I understood it correctly, the memory of what actually happened does not fade. It's only experimental, but it might be interesting for you to see if you can become a test subject if you feel it's worth a shot.

  26. Nothing to see... by PinkyDead · · Score: 2, Funny

    Brewers have been doing this for centuries.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  27. National Security Threat by spruce · · Score: 1

    How long until terrorists attack by removing all one's memories except for Goatse? shudders

    1. Re:National Security Threat by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      If it's the only thing familiar to you, Goatse might become your comfort zone. Anytime you were without an image of it, you might start to panic.

  28. Lori by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "THAT'S for making me come to Mars. You know how much I HATE this fucking planet."

  29. At last! by InspectorGadget · · Score: 1, Informative

    I look forward to the removal of goatse, tubgirl and 2 Girls 1 Cup from my poor tortured mind.

  30. I can't remember anything anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This would be a waste on me. I couldn't remember anything for them to trace what to erase anyhow.

    Heck, I can't even remember my login.

  31. I'd totally steal Kate Winslet's panties. by scubamage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just sayin. Clementine was farking hot.

    1. Re:I'd totally steal Kate Winslet's panties. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, Juvenile -1, "Just sayin'" meme -1, Fark reference +1, 2 out of 3 proper uses of the apostrophe

  32. Dupe! by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

    This article has been posted every day this week, then deleted at the end of day!

    What, you don't remember that? Hummm.....

  33. Be careful with lab mice by murphyd311 · · Score: 1

    "Gee Brain, what do you want to do tonight?" "The same thing we do every night, Pinky--try to take over the world."

  34. Psychological issues caused by trauma by sorak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It will be interesting, to one day see if removal of a traumatic memory can help with psychological issues that may stem from it.

    For example, can erasing war-time memories lessen PTSD, and to what extent? Or would said person simply exhibit the same symptoms and have no idea why?

    1. Re:Psychological issues caused by trauma by genner · · Score: 1

      It will be interesting, to one day see if removal of a traumatic memory can help with psychological issues that may stem from it.

      For example, can erasing war-time memories lessen PTSD, and to what extent? Or would said person simply exhibit the same symptoms and have no idea why?

      Since the symptoms revolve around reliving those experiences I wouldn't think it would be possible if you don't remember them.

    2. Re:Psychological issues caused by trauma by eulernet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Such technique already exists, and is used for heavy trauma, like plane crash.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_Movement_Desensitization_and_Reprocessing

      The trick is pretty simple, just move your eyes from left to right, then right to left, continuously.

      It seems to relieve the traumatic pains, and is widely known. For example, Carlos Castaneda describes this trick in his books.
      No idea why it works, though !

    3. Re:Psychological issues caused by trauma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      War is one activity from which the suffering shouldn't be removed. "It is well that war is so terrible, or we would grow too fond of it."

    4. Re:Psychological issues caused by trauma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is what will the implications to society be with a similar machine. The human race has learned to grow and expand learning from the past; with this machine, people can erase "unpleasant" things, which with extreme use can erase most of their lives. If people can always take the easy way out, we won't grow and expand as a species.

    5. Re:Psychological issues caused by trauma by sorak · · Score: 1

      It will be interesting, to one day see if removal of a traumatic memory can help with psychological issues that may stem from it.

      For example, can erasing war-time memories lessen PTSD, and to what extent? Or would said person simply exhibit the same symptoms and have no idea why?

      Since the symptoms revolve around reliving those experiences I wouldn't think it would be possible if you don't remember them.

      Well, I am not a neurologist, but I am curious as to how much of PTSD is caused by habit (which i assume is completely different from memory), how much is caused by the brain developing overly sensitive fight-or-flight responses, in reaction to the situation, and how much of it is purely a response to the memory.

    6. Re:Psychological issues caused by trauma by Oksander · · Score: 1

      No idea why it works, though!

      EMDR is a very interesting technique. It doesn't have to be eye movement. you can use ear phones that beep in the right ear, the left ear, the right ear, etc. Or you can hold a little doodad in each hand that will gently vibrate (for a few seconds in one hand, then a few seconds vibrating on the other side, and then back to the first hand, etc.). The idea is to stimulate alternating sides of the body.

      I was treated for PTSD with this technique. Even just 30 minutes of it was absolutely exhausting. My therapist explained that EMDR works by getting the brain to jump from right brain to left brain and back repeatedly (because you are processing input from left and right sides of the body). This left-right dominance swapping helps get both sides of the brain listening to each other, allowing emotion and reason to coexist better. So you can process emotional experiences with reason, or apply some emotion to something your brain is entirely too locked into reason over.

      EMDR does not erase memories, it helps you cope with memories and put them in proper perspective.

  35. Kristallnacht by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.local6.com/politics/17784129/detail.html

    How long until lack of support for the Messiah becomes deadly?

  36. My Geass Works far better. by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    Plus I can command people to do just about anything.

    Mwahahaha time to take over the world.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  37. replace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    s/undesirable //g

  38. It really does already happen by ashtophoenix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Call it nature, call it whatever, but there exists already a mechanism that erases memories selectively, or moves them to the sub-conscience. Many times, things that we've seemingly forgotten resurface after many years. Painful as well as happy memories diminish over time. Isn't this a mechanism that is in place already? Who is to say that the individual can select better what he/she needs to remember or needs to forget? Most people would screw themselves up if given such a power. We don't understand the mind, psyche enough, leave alone sub-conscience and such.

    --
    Life is about being a Phoenix!
    1. Re:It really does already happen by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree. Since when are bad memories necessarily bad life lessons? I mean who would not be tempted to erase the memory of an ex-girlfriend. But can you imagine how many teens would be committing suicide if every break up was the first real break up?

      But thankfully it's going to be really hard for this to ever work well on humans. Some reasons were mentioned earlier... memories are stored in different places, fragmented, etc. And I wonder just how easy it would be to have humans recall the memory they want to erase. Someone with really good concentration may just keep thinking about other things. At least for a while, until there isn't much left.

    2. Re:It really does already happen by ashtophoenix · · Score: 1

      All good points. I think it comes down to how less we understand about thoughts, memories etc.

      --
      Life is about being a Phoenix!
    3. Re:It really does already happen by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      What if we could totally erase all memories from a person brain? Would we have killed the person without killing the body? Would we than create a new person when we again teach them everything that person needs to know? Could this be used as a replacement of capital punishment? It makes me think about what I am. If I were to lose all my memories and have to relearn everything would I not be a totally new person? Maybe we could leave some memories intact like the ability to talk and walk so we would not have an adult baby to reteach over again.

    4. Re:It really does already happen by ashtophoenix · · Score: 1

      It depends, if you believe that a person is more than just memory cells, that is there are other unknown layers of the being, sub-conscient, super-conscient or any other form of consciousness, or what some people call a soul. If you believe that then the memory erasure by no means erases a person. On the other hand, if you think a person is just matter, then that might work.

      --
      Life is about being a Phoenix!
  39. Re:so now when us paranoids rant wbout your memori by Xest · · Score: 5, Funny

    You are the scariest person I've ever encountered on Slashdot, that is an achievement beyond all other achievements.

    After reading your posts I see why people would want the option to have traumatic memories erased.

  40. 4chan by chikanamakalaka · · Score: 1

    I wish I could have this after seeing somethings on 4chan. What has seen CAN be unseen.

  41. Finally! by jbezorg · · Score: 1

    I can throw away these useless goggles.

    --
    I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
  42. what's goatse.cx? by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are many memories that I would like to erase but I would like to also retain my memory of what it is I don't want to look at. What's the use of eradicating the distended anus from my mind if I go and innocently follow a goatse.cx link again? I'd rather it be like 2 girls 1 cup, I found out what that was before I ever clicked on it, thank Cthulhu.

    Maybe we could implant a post-hypnotic warning in our brains, like when Gandalf tried to touch the One Ring and got the warning flash of evil in his brain? So if I mouse over to a link leading to 4chan I'll feel a cloud of evil pass over my mind and know not to click.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  43. I hope I didn't brain my damage by pheared · · Score: 1

    Radiolab recorded a good show that featured this work more than a year ago. Check it out:
    http://www.wnyc.org/shows/radiolab/episodes/2007/06/08/segments/71872

  44. Or, say by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 1

    five minutes on a cell phone..

    1. Re:Or, say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a night of heavy drinking.

  45. What a job. by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 2, Funny
    Torturing Mice. Great.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  46. Thoughtcrime Dectection Alert by MindKata · · Score: 1

    Scanning: "Where is the "+1 Really Scary" mod when you need it"

    [Ministry of Truth Infosearch Webbot Alert]

    1. Status: Online comment profile indicates political decent.

    2. Reaction: Ministry of Love drugs appear to be ineffective.

    3. ???

    4. Newspeak: Your comment has been reported to the Thought Police and Room 101 is being prepared from your arrival.

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
  47. um they have known for YEARS by Technopaladin · · Score: 1

    Shock Therapy and Torture has a well known memory loss side effect.
    See Dr Ewan Cameron.

    1. Re:um they have known for YEARS by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      I find that a senatorial comitee subpoena is much more effective. Oliver North demonstrated this to great effect!

  48. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be great, I could play my entire video game collection over again.

  49. Conditioning not Memory by pavon · · Score: 1

    This experiment was checking the response that mice have to certain objects and environments which they have encountered in the past. We have no way of knowing how their memory was actually affected. The recall of events is different than the emotional response to situations caused by conditioning, and uses different parts of the brain. It's possible they can remember the event just fine but no longer associate pain or fear with it. Furthermore, at least with humans, they way we remember things is very strongly tied with the language portions of the brain, and we really don't know how similarly mice experience memory beyond simple conditioning.

  50. Computer Mouse's memory? by grodzix · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else first think it was about computers mouse?

    --
    My Windows is NOT slow, it's special!
  51. Yes, but... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    It's the things that didn't happen which she spontaneously "remembers" that cause just as much trouble.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Yes, but... by Smivs · · Score: 1

      Are you married to my wife as well? Funny, she 'forgot' to mention it!

  52. Another possible value. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of this Men In Black talk is fun, but it misses another aspect of this research. Might this be the mechanism behind Alzheimers for example? Perhaps it will lead to a better understanding of normal memory function...

  53. Scary by kellyb9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not to quote Star Trek too much, but painful memories are just as important as happy ones. They help shape who we are, and removing those painful memories, probably diminish the happy ones we do have. "The sweet is never as sweet without the sour." We're slowly becoming a society that simply wants to take the easy way out. It just doesn't work that way. There are always consequences to our actions, 100% of the time.

    1. Re:Scary by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Several people in this thread have mentioned negative memories being so important you shouldn't get rid of them. But you all seem to neglect the fact that we humans naturally forget negative things about ourselves or that we have experienced.

    2. Re:Scary by kellyb9 · · Score: 1

      we humans naturally forget negative things about ourselves or that we have experienced.

      There's a key word in there somewhere. I'll let you know when I find it.

    3. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The sweet is never as sweet without the sour." We're slowly becoming a society that simply wants to take the easy way out. It just doesn't work that way. There are always consequences to our actions, 100% of the time.

      What a bunch of dogmatic, unsubstantiated, hand-waving, binary-thinking bullshit. Push it all back up your ass until it's fully baked.

      Sloganeering != debating.

  54. Been done on humans by the military by debrain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mind control and induced memory loss was part of a (now famous) CIA project apparently involving dozens of universities, called Project MK-ULTRA. See also William Sargant and Donald Cameron.

  55. Erasing Specific Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EPROM

  56. Re:so now when us paranoids rant wbout your memori by FoFP · · Score: 1

    "well, just as soon as the time machine gets proved to be possible" HUH??? Time machines already Oh.

  57. Damn Haitians by Microsift · · Score: 1

    Next they'll be blocking our powers too.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  58. Hmm... by myxiplx · · Score: 1

    If overproduction of CaMKII is enough to stop mice remembering, does limiting the production have the opposite effect?

    I've always had a terrible memory, stuff like this makes you wonder if it's just that my brain's running a mix of chemicals that impair that particular functionality.

  59. Yeah, but... by sac13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did they attempt to see if it still worked if the mice were wearing sunglasses?

  60. Exact moment? by descalco · · Score: 1

    "When the brain was made to overproduce CaMKII at the exact moment the mouse was prodded to retrieve the traumatic memory, the memory wasn't just blocked, it appeared to be fully erased." So we aren't really selectively erase memories, we're just blocking the ability to recall a specific memory at a specific time. I couldn't find any reference to this in the article...

  61. too bad by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    I guess it's just a matter of time before this guy is standing in the unemployment line.

  62. Confabulation already erases memories by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

    http://www.boingboing.net/2006/10/05/confabulation-and-br.html Confabulation is the process, of creating and erasing our own fabricated memories, and we all do it; usually to make the memory more favorable to us. So called "eyewitness" testimony where people do the "can you show the court" the man who...? thing is wrong about half the time. The only solution is video cameras - EVERYWHERE.

  63. Simple - memory SQL! by omuls+are+tasty · · Score: 1
    DELETE FROM memories WHERE memory='ex' ON DELETE CASCADE;

    (OK, not correct SQL, but it's funny! Funny, I tell you!)

  64. Interesting but can it... by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    ...erase her memory of me not telling her that I loved her when she said it first? God, I'm a moron. Can it erase that too?

  65. Re:so now when us paranoids rant wbout your memori by sssmashy · · Score: 1

    the doctor wasn't really up on his paranoid schizophrenia, and he said that the memories were probably repressed. no, no they weren't they were gone completely.

    but the doctor just thinks i am a computer hypochondriac, in addition to being paranoid schizophrenic.

    But what does he know? And why has he been living under my porch for the last six months?

  66. Sobering by UnixUnix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, we joke about it, recall (!?) "Total recall" or "Men in black"... but if this is or becomes truly possible for humans it would be unimaginably dangerous and frightening. Our memory IS us, much more than a foot, a leg or an eye. Removing it is indeed "crippling" in the worst way imaginable, and it is no consolation that the victim might not be aware after the deed of what happened. It is indeed abstractly equivalent to no less than murder.

    1. Re:Sobering by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen Ghost in the Shell? I think it's time to make tinfoil hats mandatory.

  67. For those who want the actual article by apokruphos · · Score: 2, Informative

    The full journal article is available free from Neuron right now via ScienceDirect, for those who prefer to read what the study actually says versus what the popsci reporter decided to interpret it as.

    --
    "I defy the second law of thermodynamics."
    "The hell you do. Get back in the box."
  68. 1-2 ounces of alcohol does it for me by peter303 · · Score: 1

    A beer or shot greatly dampens the emotional content of my memories formed under the influence. They are still there, but dont have the impact. Thats why I'm guarded about combing drinking and doing something important.

  69. shifty eyes by slew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps that's why we are conditioned to view people with shifty eyes with mistrust. Perhaps they are self medicating their psyche after being involved with (or having done) things that they'd rather forget and humans evolved a way to detect this.

  70. Wrong on two counts by DynaSoar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They did not erase anything. They PREVENTED.

    What they prevented was an association of the memory for the event and the "trauma", which is pain. They tested for reactions associated with the pain. Some say there is no memory for pain, only for painful events. I disagree in that some people retain some memory of pain, and a few retain it well, while most retain memory of the event and have an association to an implicit (non-conscious) memory of pain. They managed to prevent more so what often doesn't happen anyway.

    The only thing they *could* have tested was association to the pain. To test for the memory of the event they'd have had to ask the mice what they recalled. I'm pretty sure they didn't. Doing so would imply they expected the mice to answer.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:Wrong on two counts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh damn. You just ruined my hope I could watch Bush on TV and then zap all memory of him.

      Bummer. Maybe good, though, I wouldn't know how the world got into such a terrible state then.

    2. Re:Wrong on two counts by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      Darn, I was hoping for an Eternal Sunshine-like breakthrough...

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
  71. I'd do it in a heartbeart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd do it in a heartbeat. Memories that make you crawl into a little ball and cry on a pretty regular basis are the kinds of memories I would love to remove from my brain. I'd be sure to leave myself a note as to "be sure not to enter this kind of situation again, or else severe trauma will occur." As for what other posters may have suggested, whiskey does no good on getting rid of memories of years ago, at least not rapidly. I should know, I try regularly.

  72. Re:so now when us paranoids rant wbout your memori by Urger · · Score: 1

    I know all those words but for the life of me can't figure what they are doing together in one sentence.

  73. My experience with severe head trauma by $lingBlade · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to be into BMX bike riding, I stress "used to". Anyway, one day at the track I was riding, went off a jump, lost control and came down on my face. I was wearing a helmet but NOT a full face helmet.

    Anyway, I lost that day almost completely from my memory banks. I can't remember going to work or being in a bad mood there (apparently I was exceptionally grouchy... serves me right) I can't remember going to the track and most disturbing to me, I cannot remember the jump I did or what exactly went wrong. Some kids said they saw me and told my friend about it. They said when I went off the jump I lost my balance mid-air and started coming down wrong. I landed on my face and put my two front teeth through my upper lip, knocked myself out cold and actually wet myself (pissed my pants).

    My girlfriend at the time came to the track and took me to the hospital where I got stitched up. So that day was like I said, almost completely wiped from my memory. Oh and incidentally, when asked at the ER what year it was, I was convinced it was 2002 when in fact it was 2003.

    Anyway, just my antectodal story, and after that I rode again but my wheels were shot and I lost all courage to try and do jumps, etc. I still ride but it's *chill style* and the most I'll do is jump little curb cuts. What irritates me most about it is NOT remembering what exactly went wrong. Yes those kids telling my friend helped but losing my balance mid-air? Just never happened to me up till that point so it never sat well with my mind. Usually when you bail, you KNOW what you did or were doing wrong (in this activity anyway) but since I couldn't remember it I was never the same on the bike thereafter.

    1. Re:My experience with severe head trauma by karo_80 · · Score: 1

      I have a TBI from a car wreck and I think memory is very important you don't know who people are, and if you don't want the memory you can block it out other ways. It also is a gift to have it.

  74. Re:so now when us paranoids rant wbout your memori by kesuki · · Score: 2, Interesting

    well you're lucky you caught me on an all nighter. usually my paranoid thoughts aren't on topic, so i go anonymous with them. and when i don't take my meds to stay up all night the paranoia flows easier and i'm more likely to post with this account. this morning i happened to be on topic and on an all nighter.

    my blog explains why i was up all night. debugging kubuntu which is my primary net use OS.

    windows is only for a games, and only when i don't have money to rent console games and have a decent console system.

    although i'm +5 funny i seriously at times believe what i've posted and worse, it really depends how much weird shit has happened. you know, like the stock market plunging 5% but only on days i'm mad, and in a place where i've set up the computers on their security, while my home systems are turned off...

    or like me making a mistake on my food stamps, despite the fact i keep every single receipt. i mean who expects their food stamps to suddenly arrive on the 27th of the previous month? when they normally go on the 14th? that's a big enough gap for a human to make the mistake, and think they have too much money. and waste their money on say coke products.

    this actually happened to me, and the day i realized it had happened to me the stock market fell 500 points. i mean i know stuff about computers, a lot, but i don't do anything with that knowledge. working on computers gets really hard for me, especially debugging, but the ideas, some days they flow a mile a minute of what the capabilities of computers are.

    if the world was just a model and there were lots of people like myself and you could say get them to post their ideas in a blog posted on the internet, and spot a gem from a mile a way... i mean administration would prevent you from reading memory just like on unix you cant' read someone else's memory... but what about dreams? would the system prevent you from dreaming someone elses dream? would the system stop you from posting information through a computer to a blog? would the system reward you with golden ideas and punish you with bad ones? these are questions i worry about when i'm not reading up on tech, news, politics(as long as it's not ads) the environment, or playing video games etc...

    just so you know, i don't dream either. not usually i mean my mind does stuff when i sleep, but whatever it does, for all i know some famous writer or painter is getting the read and store dream my mind is working on.... because i've always had a problem writing stories and being creative on my own. but i still try once in a while, but i crave variety. i get bored thinking of the same things, except for a crack like addictions to real time strategy. i don't like to brag, but i'm level 25 on battle.net and know ever unit and every race, and i'm starting to know which units are really imbalanced and which are super weak... i still suck at figuring out what the other team is doing, but i'm pretty spot on on detecting bsers and i'm fairly good at telling when my team are rush/tech alternators with no communication skills (thus reducing the chances of winning my over 50%) btw i was a rush tech alternator for like 6 months before i learned real skill, but real skill gets weaker when you take a break from it, and i took a less stressful approach to gaming on battle.net the playing the odds, game, trying to figure out the odds of winning and which loser strat or which winning strat to play. if you do it right, the matching code makes your wins easier to predict, and thus less stress is there in games where careful strategy is required. close games drive a lot of gamers, i know it, but i have to calm down after a tight game where i had to adapt my units to theirs all game.

    no karma bonus because this is really tangential.

  75. Heroes by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

    Were they... Hatian scientists?

    Just asking.

  76. The ultimate anesthesia by jcr · · Score: 1

    Heinlein described an approach to anesthesia which was to remove the memory of pain.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  77. Re:so now when us paranoids rant wbout your memori by ghrom · · Score: 1

    Time travel *is* possible on a quantum level, electrons do this all the time. Photons are 'beyond' time, time doesn't exist for a photon because it moves at the speed of light and everything is constant for it. Time travel is also possible on 'macro' level and involves time-space warping huge masses.

  78. Lethe feild by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember reading a scifi story quite some time ago wherein they performed surgery under a field that would cause the patient to immediately forget what just happened. The idea was that anesthesia has detrimental effects, however, the human mind cannot survive the trauma of surgery without it. It seems to me that this specific test is directly applied to this function as you need to be under the influence of the CaMKII at the moment of trauma. Not really applicable to the beast you nailed in Jr. High. Of course I didn't read the article so I could be wrong.

    I can remember the book but I think it was Heinlein, possibly _The Number of the Beast_ or one of the other Lazurus Long books.

  79. What if we don't *like* who we are?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have plenty of memories that I would love to erase if I could. They don't make me "better" in any way--on the contrary, they negatively impact my day-to-day life. Sure, a shrink *might* help, after many years of therapy, but I'd still be stuck with the memories after that anyway.

    And it's not completely true that the painful memories in any way make the happy memories better. Sometimes the bad memories just take away from the good memories too.

    I think I'm mature enough to choose for myself which memories I'd like to get rid of. If the option ever becomes a reality, my vote will be for choice.

  80. Bob Shaw wrote about a device like this by multiplexo · · Score: 1

    In his novel Night Walk. In it a government agent of a repressive theocracy uses it to torture one of his victims, asking him to recall happy moments from his life and then erasing them as they're recalled. After each erasure the victim knows that he's lost something precious and valuable but doesn't know what it was. It's an absolutely frightening scene and I for one hope that this technology doesn't work on any mammal more complex than a mouse.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  81. DMCA by LingNoi · · Score: 1

    Soon it'll be mandatory use in cinemas, wouldn't want you making an unauthorised copy of that movie in your brain now would we?

  82. The tech interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your application for employment at Digicorp in an IT role has been successful.
    Please sign the employment contract here, here and here.

    Please note while you are working for us any experience / memories you have
    while at work are legally ours and will be removed when your employment
    terminates.

    Congratulations! I enjoyed working with you the last time. It's a shame we will have to send
    you on that IT course again.

  83. How much? by markass530 · · Score: 1

    I would gladly pay about 100 bucks to erase the memory of the time I woke up on the wrong side of the Island in Hawaii, in the back seat of an old ford taurus with a 300LB Samoan girl asking to me wack off so she could watch.

  84. New memory (shock) takes place of old? by skeftomai · · Score: 1

    Perhaps after the shock, whenever one of the mice tries to recall the old memory, the memory of the shock is returned instead of the old memory? Since (AFAIK) memory-recall is based on weight, the new one (shock) may be more easily accessible than the old.

    What do you people think about this idea?

  85. Bad Memories by juancnuno · · Score: 1

    Bad memories keep us from making the same mistakes.

  86. Nice hook by kettlechips · · Score: 1
    the memory wasn't just blocked, it appeared fully erased

    I'd like to know how how they could tell the difference.

    So they did something to the brain of the mouse and it didn't remember something subsequently.
    Do they know what else the mouse didn't remember? No.
    Do they understand this effect? No.
    Hitting the mouse over the head with a rock might induce the same effect, is there a meaningful way to tell these two procedures apart? No.
    Did they find a nice hook to get publicity for their research by talking of selectively removing distinct memories? Yes.
    Would we be somewhat fuzzy-brained ourselves if we bought into this? Yes.

  87. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind by juan2074 · · Score: 1

    I already saw that in a movie.

  88. Re:so now when us paranoids rant wbout your memori by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear ya. I'm also paranoid schizophrenic, and my family will often complain about how I obsess over the computer. I also lost a big portion of my memory over a space of years when I was first diagnosed.

    My biggest curiosity about this is whether a full model of memory can lead to memories being evoked and erased with sound or light. Some things I have been thinking are:

    *evoking the memory and using a ising spin glass model (random connectivity) converted to a signal to erase our hebbian-wired brains

    *relating two different fields of view/positions in auditory space with concentric circles for the amount of focus. Then, relating the focus over time and unraveling it. This may cancel it out like with the functions here: http://www.neiu.edu/~mrsabino/signal-commutativity.html.
    Happy face + sad face = no memory. I think some of these signals also relate to losing/gaining a dimension, such as what happens to a world line near a singularity.

    *using simulated annealing or some kind of optimization technique to find sequences of words, based on what the person has observed before, that block out the memory of the other words based on some new model.