Slashdot Mirror


Battlestar Galactica Gets Spinoff Prequel Series

It was recently announced that sci-fi remake series Battlestar Galactica is getting a whole new spinoff prequel series called "Caprica." Signed on for twenty hours worth of finished product, including a two-hour pilot, the new series is to be set 50 years prior to Battlestar Galactica, and will focus on two rival families, the Graystones and the Adamas. "Enmeshed in the burgeoning technology of artificial intelligence and robotics that will eventually lead to the creation of the Cylons, the two houses go toe-to-toe blending action with corporate conspiracy and sexual politics. 'Caprica' will deliver all of the passion, intrigue, political backbiting and family conflict in television's first science fiction family saga."

297 comments

  1. So... by wtansill · · Score: 4, Funny

    It'll be like "Dallas" or "Knot's Landing", but with spaceships? Wow!

    --
    The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
    1. Re:So... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It'll be like "Dallas" or "Knot's Landing", but with spaceships? Wow!

      No, that was V

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:So... by Bazzargh · · Score: 2, Informative

      It'll be like "Dallas" or "Knot's Landing", but with spaceships? Wow!

      You mean exactly like The Colbys?

    3. Re:So... by owlnation · · Score: 2, Interesting

      or worse... Like Galactica 1980.

      They already said there will be less spaceships -- thus, motorcycles is the way to go!

      Seriously though, hopefully the writing quality of this is superior to the remake of Battlestar. In that it has far fewer gaping plotholes and some sense of forward momentum. I gave up with this show during the hendrix jumping the shark moment. The scripts had poor dramatic tension up to that point, but hendrix was the final straw.

    4. Re:So... by idontgno · · Score: 2, Informative
      And, if The Register and its headline on this story can be believed, without spaceships either.

      And no hawt skinjob Cylons either. Why, exactly, would I watch this?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    5. Re:So... by eos3fan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Overheard in the green room: "When you go to shoot J.R., make sure the laser's set to stun, not kill..."

    6. Re:So... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "It'll be like "Dallas" or "Knot's Landing", but with spaceships? Wow!"

      I was thinking more like "Dynasty" for this decade (the 00's?). I can see them using Joan Collins as a proto Cylon...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:So... by Windows_NT · · Score: 2, Funny

      Darn .. for a second i was thinking spaceballs ...

      --
      Go go Gadget Nailgun!
    8. Re:So... by Ender+Wiggin+77 · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just do another 2 seasons of BSG? It probably costs more per episode versus this family drama but will do much better in re-runs/syndication and Bluray sales.

    9. Re:So... by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      It'll be like "Dallas" or "Knot's Landing", but with spaceships?

      Exactly! Except, without the spaceships.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    10. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I gave up with this show during the hendrix jumping the shark moment. The scripts had poor dramatic tension up to that point, but hendrix was the final straw.

      You sure it wasn't the Bob Dylan moment?

    11. Re:So... by SilverJets · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. :(

    12. Re:So... by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Makes sense. Joan Collins' body is mostly made up of synthetics at this point. Once she gets the new hip, it'll be pretty much a done deal.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    13. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. It's like Battlestar Galactica *without* the spaceships.

    14. Re:So... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And, if The Register and its headline on this story can be believed, without spaceships either. And no hawt skinjob Cylons either. Why, exactly, would I watch this?

      I totally agree. Really, who cares what happened 50 years before the current series? Back biting and family bullshit is why I stopped watching BSG. I want to see space ships, hints of 13th tribe, and cylons getting their ass kicked. I don't care if Tye drunk off his ass 90% of the time, apollo is fucking starbuck or his old man. And I really really don't give a rats ass about baltars love cult.

      More spaceships, more ass kicking, and more story about earth. Fuck the rest.

      Now if they did a series about the first cylon war, that might be worth my time.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    15. Re:So... by eleuthero · · Score: 2

      I found the whole series a bit strained and quit watching after two episodes--it made me go back and re-watch a couple of the old ones and I've discovered that just like star trek, old sci fi in general is good for a few laughs. You can now revoke my geek card for having a low opinion of Galactica.

    16. Re:So... by glock22ownr · · Score: 1

      The first season was a bit weak I thought, but still pretty interesting. The rest were pretty good, the show had some success, until they went all soap opera on me... I did not watch most of the last season, or know if it is still broadcast somewhere... I for one am a nerd, so to some respect their target audience, I want to see spaceships, battles and things blowing up in cool new sci-fi ways! I don't want to sit there and watch a f*ing love story! The whole Starbuck, whatever the little Asian chicks name was, and so on type love story was booooooring! If this new Caprica show is the same I think I'd rather watch reruns of Biggest Loser or Yes Dear....

      --
      Eye for an eye and half of the world will have just one eye!
    17. Re:So... by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Thanks, those links were informative.

      I miss the 80's with their UFO's, Repressed memories, and abandoned mines filled with Stolen Nazi gold.

      Nowadays the best we can hope for is the occasional time travel story "...As Rex and Gigi's feelings for one another continue to grow, Rex gets a warning from Madame Delphina that Bo Buchanan is headed towards danger, with major consequences. Saying goodbye to Gigi, Rex heads to Texas, where he fails to help Bo. The two are struck by lightning, and transported back to 1968. Teaming up with Delphina, Gigi makes her way back into time to rescue Rex before it is too late.

      Of course the plot devices are certainly straight out of the 80's (now where's my darn DeLorean?)

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    18. Re:So... by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Less spaceships doesn't mean it will be bad, just that it probably will have a more terrestrial plot than the remake could have had (having your home blown up and fleeing an armada kinda limits the amount of ground time).

      Personally, my peeve with the remake was bad medicine - it was even worse than 60s Star Trek (he's dead Jim... well f*cking try to revive him already, you ninny!). The second time they focused on a medical event that was pre-21th century medicine I wanted to punch the screenwriters. The tech in the original BSG had rejuvenation centers - what the hell happened to them in the remake?

      I also didn't buy all the Democracy crap and terrorism - if I were Adama, I'd say submit to military rule or get shot down. Problems on board ships that are following can be dealt with using a civilian police of some kind. The Galactica is top dog - if they don't want to follow, they can leave and fend for themselves.

          And no cure for cancer in a society with advanced robotics and giant spaceships is preposterous (if all medical ships that could treat cancer were destroyed, I'd say OK, I can buy that, but no cure or even decent treatment is silly and that's the way it was portrayed).

      And the reimagining had no excuses for bad plot and limited tech like Galactica 1980, which had its 1 million dollar per episode budget slashed to a fraction of that and they couldn't even get most of the original cast to re-sign on (iirc, they got Lorne Green and that was about it). Galactica 1980 was originally written to be a time-travel episodic format but the studios disliked that in the pilot and made it the hastily written crap we know and remember (the time travel part was then used as the basis for Quantum Leap).

    19. Re:So... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Even worse, if you read the synopsis, it doesn't even have spaceships. The entire thing takes place on one planet. Must save in production costs. It's about the struggle between two competing families in the time leading up to the cylon war or somesuch. You can see the zany possibilities immediately. There is a literary necessity for there to be a boy from one family, and a girl from t'other...

      Personally, I was having trouble staying interested in the soap opera that was the main series. This spinoff sounds like all the things I hated about Battlestar Galactica without, you know, the cool stuff.

      Oh well, I didn't need any more TV to watch anyway.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    20. Re:So... by nasch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do fields of study have to proceed at the same relative paces we're familiar with? What is it about building robots and giant spaceships that necessitates a cure for cancer?

    21. Re:So... by Kelbear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think a boy from one family and a boy from the other family would get more ratings from the shock value and resulting media frenzy.

      If you want really high ratings, use a girl from one family and a girl from the other...

    22. Re:So... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Or Deep Space 9 with spaceships. Oh wait....

    23. Re:So... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > If you want really high ratings, use a girl from one family and a girl from the other...

      Copy that. 'S the only reason I would watch it. Did I say that out loud?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    24. Re:So... by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To be fair - the version they played was the Hendrix version, and yes, for me that was also the shark-jumping moment.

      Spoiler alert: If you haven't yet watched the end of season 3, skip the rest of my post. I've got some bitching to do that I'm not going to hold in for the sake of what I'm presuming is a very small subset of /.ers who care about BSG, but not enough to be caught up at this point.

      It's bad enough that a few "people" are apparently hearing Dylan/Hendrix. Never mind that we're light-years away from 1960's Earth, and they're apparently not hearing it through radio waves since nobody else can detect it. I can understand some sort of "signal" waking up the last remaining Cylon models, maybe even a musical signal, but a song from earth?

      But the identity of the 4 just pissed me off. Sam and What's-her-name, who even cares? I never did like Sam's character anyway, and Roslin's aide was never an interesting character until after she was revealed as a Cylon. Tyrol didn't really surprise me, though it does mean that his and Cally's baby is another "hybrid", meaning that Hera isn't quite as unique as most of the series has made her out to be. (The other obvious possibility is that Cally was cheating on Tyrol, and I'm surprised that possibility hasn't been dragged up and had the angst wrung out of it.)

      But Tigh? What? An old guy with a well-established history from back before the first Cylon war? At what point was this skinjob planted? How can they possibly explain this?

      I'll be honest, I thought the show had jumped the shark when they first landed on New Caprica, though they did eventually manage to redeem themselves. I didn't hate the Baltar trial as much as I thought I would, but Lee's involvement still annoys me. I really like the concept of dissension among the Cylons, particularly about whether the humans should be wiped out. But the whole "Final Five" frenzy just seemed to come out of nowhere, and then it's suddenly the main conflict in the show. The show as a whole has gotten worse, the scheduling and constant hiatuses make it hard to follow, and the constant inexplicable new plot elements make my head and stomach spin.

      For all my complaints, when the show starts back up, I will likely keep watching. Partly out of a sheer stubbornness - I hate to quit. But partly to see if the writers can manage to resurrect anything coherent out of this mess. In other words, there had better be a damn good explanation for what's happened.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    25. Re:So... by glittalogik · · Score: 1

      I got worried about shark-jumping too, which hurts, since I *want* to love this show.

      However, All Along The Watchtower is a new arrangement by composer Bear McCreary, and neither the Dylan nor the Hendrix version. From Wikipedia:

      A somewhat Indian-themed version of the 1967 Bob Dylan song "All Along the Watchtower" features prominently in the third season... McCreary's arrangement utilizes the electric sitar, harmonium, duduk, yayli tanbur, electric violin and zurna, and features McCreary's brother Brendan "Bt4" McCreary and former Oingo Boingo guitarist Steve Bartek.

    26. Re:So... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Why do fields of study have to proceed at the same relative paces we're familiar with? What is it about building robots and giant spaceships that necessitates a cure for cancer?

      It's a stupid nitpick. It'll only manage to get a little less stupid if we manage to cure cancer before we build big spaceships.

      Sci-fi fans are notoriously bad about thinking they understand things like logic and physics. There are a lot of them that are blissfully unaware that their nitpick about the two ships getting stuck together in Nemesis is wrong. There are others that will battle to the death a nitpick about Episode III's portrayal of ships chased by stupid little buzzsaw droids. Heck, I one of these twerps. What kills me, though, is all this technical criticism... but somehow I must have been sheltered from the nitpick about Johnny 5's CPU magically being able to operate like a human brain. That's acceptable, but there's no cure for cancer in a society that can magically teleport their ships great distances? *shrug*

      I wish we could all just settle down.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    27. Re:So... by Fweeky · · Score: 3, Informative

      Never mind that we're light-years away from 1960's Earth, and they're apparently not hearing it through radio waves since nobody else can detect it. I can understand some sort of "signal" waking up the last remaining Cylon models, maybe even a musical signal, but a song from earth?

      Nope, it's not a song from Earth:

      I learned that the idea was not that Bob Dylan necessarily exists in the charactersâ(TM) universe, but that an artist on one of the colonies may have recorded a song with the exact same melody and lyrics. Perhaps this unknown performer and Dylan pulled inspiration from a common, ethereal source. Therefore, I was told to make no musical references to any âoeEarthlyâ versions, Hendrix, Dylan or any others. The arrangement needed to sound like a pop song that belonged in the Galactica universe, not our own.

    28. Re:So... by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      You can now revoke my geek card for having a low opinion of Galactica
      Not at all. We've all taken a vote and you get to keep it. I stopped watching after about the 3rd episode when it dawned on me that the whole series was going to be about "Who's a Cylon and Who's Not". I could immediately see 9 seasons of this coming up with the inevitable conclusion that they are all cyborgs.

      The old series was far superior in that it was the first to use effects that would be later used in Star Wars and, the story was 'original'.
      Reminded me of Eric Von Daniken a bit..... you know, Aliens visiting the Earth, 2001 A Space Odyssey, The Story of Jesus and so on.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    29. Re:So... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      That comes around to a problem I had with the series all along -- it's not clear what the framework is supposed to be. Galactica (the ship) is old -- like, WWII old -- I get that -- but higher tech than anything we could aspire to for another 100 years or so. Ok, so it's in the future, at least Star Trek future, probably further.

      But the weapons were strictly 20th century (that is not a typo -- we have better stuff now than what they have in the show) and the clothes were right out of Men's Warehouse circa 1999. The question I'd have is, what kind of society would not have developed treatments of cancer we currently have, but *would* develop the blue-and-white diagonally striped necktie that was current last Wednesday, tied in an independently developed Windsor knot. What are the chances. I mean you can get in your car and DRIVE to places that have substantially different clothing than what was worn in the courtroom scenes. Do you really expect to travel hundreds of light years, visit an alien culture, and see the exact same clothes you'd see in the L.A. financial district, a whopping 7 miles from the studio?

      So, maybe Galactica is not an independently developed culture, but is in our far future, there was a breakdown, technology was lost, and they're building back up. This would explain the erratic technology, high tech in the bridge but low tech in sick bay, but would not explain why they're still using a dry erase board commonly available at Target for $19.99 in the President's cabin, and you'd still have to postulate that the culture would have inexplicably decided to revive fashions hundreds of years old, like we all suddenly decided to dress up in Renaissance gear. (Ok, with this audience that's probably a bad example.) The whole framework of the show was a hodge-podge of technologies that wouldn't fit together in any reasonable premise. This kept drawing me out of the experience.

      Parenthetically, as silly as the clothes were in the old series (dig those crazy capes) they were at least plausible for an independently developed culture. Well, a culture with really bad taste that had independently developed 1970's disco fabrics, but nevertheless.

      I suspect that the producers used off-the-rack clothes and props in the remake because it was cheaper and they thought nobody would notice. This is just one example of the inattention to detail that makes the difference between a memorable experience, and a jarring and unsatisfactory experience.

      Oh, that, and it was a stinkin' SOAP OPERA. "Oooh Starbuck, Let meee express my feeeeelings." Retch.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    30. Re:So... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      If you want nothing than context-free explosions, go watch the latest Bond movie. No, they're not in space, but stuff blowing up is stuff blowing up. While I certainly can't speak for anyone else here, I find the moments that aren't just "Oh shit, horde of Cylons coming, where are my grenades?!" usually well-done and engaging. Not all of them, of course, but half of the story would fall apart without the whole Baltar/#6 sub-plot which is typically explosion-free.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    31. Re:So... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      And no cure for cancer in a society with advanced robotics and giant spaceships is preposterous (if all medical ships that could treat cancer were destroyed, I'd say OK, I can buy that, but no cure or even decent treatment is silly and that's the way it was portrayed).

      Come on, now. We have some pretty big spaceships and I've seen some pretty damn impressive work done in the field of robotics, yet we're nowhere near the cure for the common cold, let alone cancer. Sure, neither are exactly military-grade today, but with the exception of the FTL drives (which as far as I'm aware violate all laws of existing in this universe) we could have all of Galactica's tech within five to ten years if we focused our efforts on it - the research is mostly done, it's mostly a matter of scalability. How many diseases have been cured (rather than having better treatments) in the last 10 years? 20? 50? Unlike spaceships, viruses and other forms of disease mutate over time, and even as a fixed target are stupidly difficult to address. Space flight is just physics on a very large scale, and robotics is largely programming. While I don't intend to find out firsthand, I expect that programming a heat-sensing camera to aim a gun isn't an exceptionally difficult task, especially when it's not too discerning about its targets.

      Look how much progress we made during the space race when we were using slide rules instead of supercompters. And look how not cured cancer is, despite having been around probably nearly as long as life itself. You're certainly entitled to your own opinion about it, but them not having cured cancer is probably the most plausible thing on the show in my eyes.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    32. Re:So... by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 1

      Backward notion there. Star Wars (1977) predates Battlestar Galactica (1978). Kindly surrender your geek card.

    33. Re:So... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      If you want really high ratings, use a girl from one family and a girl from the other...

      And sell the show to Cinemax...

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    34. Re:So... by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Really...

      I thought season one was the best.

      Multiple stories actually being held together and getting to slowing learn about the Galactica universe.

      Not to mention the conflict between the military and the politicians was spellbinding (even if they ended it to simplistically.)

      It just seemed to get better and better.

      I'll watch next season since it's the last and I have 4 years already invested (plus a scifi season seems only be 10 or 12 episodes nowadays so it's not much an investment.)

      I have no interest in a sequel or prequel. Or even worse, to do like B5 and have a bunch movies take place in between already established time lines.

    35. Re:So... by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Didn't she blow up a ship with a nuke?

      Hard to make a bigger bang :)

    36. Re:So... by Whiteox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Damn you! I had to look that up and there goes another 5 mins of my life.
      You're right of course.
      I'm now humbled by your magnificence!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    37. Re:So... by WCLPeter · · Score: 1

      Now if they did a series about the first cylon war, that might be worth my time.

      If the second Cylon war hasn't been worth our time since the end of Season Two, what makes you think the First Cylon war would be any better?

      The way Ron Moore handles this show we'd probably hear all about how the other Battlestars are winning the battles, while we watch Husker and Random Marine #2 play cards on the mess deck talking about their feelings.

      They should have just given Richard Hatch the go ahead to do his continuation series, rather than try to reboot it. I'd seen his self-produced trailer three times and I cried every time over how good, and faithful to the original source material, it was. Now I just cry out of sheer boredom over a remake that was once good but now spends so much time on character development, at the expense of the original premise of the story, that I keep falling asleep while watching it.

      The *only* thing still keeping me watching this sad excuse for a show is that I hate to walk away without knowing how it's going to end and my secret hope that perhaps, like Lucas with Episode III, this sub-par remake will end with something that doesn't completely suck.

    38. Re:So... by pseudochaos · · Score: 0

      I applaud your good taste. Perhaps it's because I haven't seen the original series, but I for one love BSG. Keep 'em coming!

      --
      "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
    39. Re:So... by tpz · · Score: 1

      "found the whole series" ... "quit watching after two episodes"

      No offense, but I don't think that after watching two episodes you could have "found the whole series" _anything_ in _any way_.

    40. Re:So... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      It'll be like "Dallas" or "Knot's Landing", but with spaceships? Wow!

      This should be awesome. I hope it has musical acts ! A musical SciFi series would be an unforgettable experience. Especially with tap-dancing.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    41. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more like Bonanza spaceships and gunfights

    42. Re:So... by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      Anyone that is going on about the possibility or probability of particular kinds of tech existing or co-existing has not understood the point of Science Fiction. Period.

      The End of Eternity (Asimov) is basically a book about human character. We go extinct because we're too sheltered and without struggle we can't live. The Star Trek series always talked about socio-political issues, like in the episode about the culture that had mandatory Euthanasia at ~60. Fahrenheit 451 (Bradbury) is about censorship. Censorship is bad, m'kay? And likewise all good science fiction really talks about philosophical topics like morals, culture, identity, life and the universe.

      Having said that, BSG is a series which deals with human character. The drive for self-realization vs survival of the flock/species is quite central in it all, along with various other psychological traits we have. The first season of BSG was excellent and it being excellent had nothing to do with "cool stuff blowing up in space". Dune wasn't about ornithopters either. It was about politics and religion, if it's even possible to separate the two.

    43. Re:So... by slipangle · · Score: 1

      Looking at this and the rest of this thread, and the threads about ST:E, and all the others, makes me glad that I quit thinking several years ago. I realized that if I actually thought about what was happening on these TV shows and applied critical reasoning that I couldn't possibly enjoy them. So I just turn off my brain and become willfully ignorant. You should try it sometime. It not always easy. ST:V was such an appalling pile of shit that I had to stop watching. Of course, this doesn't apply to Firefly which was awesome.

    44. Re:So... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Be that as it may, I think where they jumped the shark is in thinking that more angst, and painfully complex interaction, combined with people making stupid, unrealistic mistakes to fuel maudlin conflict, is what makes a good story. It's the degree to which the story is contrived for the purpose of jerking you around emotionally that makes it a soap opera. If the plausibility of the framework isn't important to you, and all you're really interested in is the conflict, watch Days Of Our Lives. Or, apparently, Caprica when it comes out.

      Agreed, cool explosions don't make a series either. Having an interesting framework and compelling characters and a story worth telling is what makes a series. Galactica was weak in all of these areas.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    45. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a cup.

    46. Re:So... by tru24rm · · Score: 1

      Nah, it'll be more like a mix of "Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman," "Passions," and "The Last Starfighter"- minus Jane Seymour and Alex's little brother (with his cleverly nicknamed friend), but including the creepy doll that comes to life. Unfortunately, another actor will have to play the creepy doll, because the talented little person from "Passions" has gone to Nirvana to spend the rest of his eternity with the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Too bad there isn't anyone left who is as hot as Jane Seymour was when the "original" (read: stolen idea) Battlestar was released who can star as a female lead and become a role model for women the world over. I guess they'll have to dig up Roseanne Barr or Rosie O'Donnell for the role. ...my brain just farted (this entire idea has been invented, manufactured, and distributed by Shampoo & Associates, LLC.)

    47. Re:So... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Good point. We should just bury this mess and forget it ever happened.

      I've heard lots of things about the Richard Hatch's trailer but I refuse to watch it. I don't think I could handle what could have been over what we have. I've walked away from the series a few times only to get drug back into because one of the trailers looked good. Only to find out the trailer was the best thing about that episode.

      It's like watching a couple of passenger trains collide in slow motion. The first impact is awesome then the guts and gore start to fly. We know how its going to end, in tragedy, but we can't take our eyes off it because we want to see how it ends.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    48. Re:So... by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      You missed the whole point. The idea is that the Galactica universe is very similar to our own, having many familiar things, but that it is at a fundamental level a different reality. The fashion is part of that, and is a little more complex than you make it out to be. Developing new technology is largely going to be independent of what the fashion world is doing.

      Basically, the whole core of the show is that "all of this has happened before and all of it will happen again" and that is communicated in many many ways, the clothing being one of them.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    49. Re:So... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I didn't miss the point, I fundamentally disagree with that particular point. You don't portray "what goes around comes around" by buying all your gowns off the rack at Saks. There are much more subtle ways of getting that point across, but they require thought and ingenuity.

      I'm familiar enough with allegory and parable. We saw Wall-E last night, which has more problems with the plot than I can enumerate here. But it was clear from the beginning that the story was intended to be a parable, not to be taken seriously in detail. So although I didn't get particularly drawn in, I could still enjoy the film for what it was. Battlestar clearly wanted you to get drawn in deeply, but they didn't have the wit or energy to create a believable framework in which to achieve that. What they ended up with is a classic soap opera with expensive special effects. With Caprica, it looks like they think it's the soap opera that's the real appeal, and that there must be a market for another nighttime soap without all those expensive sets and rendering farms. Watch -- it'll look exactly like 90210 (because expensive mansions are just a few blocks away from the studio, which makes location shooting cheap) except they'll keep calling it "Caprica" instead of "west Hollywood". I wish them luck.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    50. Re:So... by nasch · · Score: 1

      Mostly my thoughts have been covered in other replies, but one thing that I think wasn't mentioned is that this is explicitly not a completely unrelated society. The 12 colonies and Earth, the 13th colony, came from the same place, Kobol. Whether that helps you cope with the projectile weapons and suits and ties I don't know, but there it is.

      Of course a big (so far) unresolved question is, if we came here in spaceships from some other planet, what happened to the spaceships and all our advanced technology?

    51. Re:So... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Of course a big (so far) unresolved question is, if we came here in spaceships from some other planet, what happened to the spaceships and all our advanced technology?

      Right. It would have to have been in our very distant past -- say, the time of the emergence of cro-magnon, 40,000 years ago. That would give it a plausible historical connection and perhaps be enough time to have lost a small, high tech colony, assuming some kind of event that destroyed the tech and scattered a few survivors. Some word-of-mouth could have been the basis of early Egyptian mythology, which was part of the original (1978) idea.

      Were it, say, even 10,000 years ago, there would be too many clues for us not to know this. And for our society to match theirs right down to the cuff links and dry erase markers, it would have to have happened no earlier than... oh... 1985.

      Where they screwed up -- and it's a jarring screwup that's in your face each and every episode -- is trying to save a few bucks in conceptual art by using modern human... no wait, modern American no that's not right, modern Hollywood ...no that doesn't quite cover it... modern Rodeo Drive props and fashions. Yeah, I suppose that would look alien... to someone from Mumbai.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    52. Re:So... by nasch · · Score: 1

      I don't mind. I'd rather they save a few bucks on wardrobes (and really it's probably more than a few bucks given the number of civilians they have in some episodes) rather than pretty much any other place.

      And modern 21st century clothing is less jarring and distracting than some of things they might have come up with instead. Imagine what you could get if you gave the wardrobe director the instruction, "just make sure it doesn't look like anything Earthlings wear."

    53. Re:So... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > And modern 21st century clothing is less jarring and distracting than some of things they might have come up with instead. Imagine what you could get if you gave the wardrobe director the instruction, "just make sure it doesn't look like anything Earthlings wear."

      Ok, I'm trying not to get hysterical here. What you SAY is "This is a highly evolved society from which we parted company before the dawn of human history. They look like us, and we may share some ancient legends, but they've had an hundred centuries to develop a completely different culture. Now, with some ancient Egyptian visual cues, come up with something imaginative and plausible in architecture, tools, clothing and weapons." THIS ISN'T HARD. There are bright, imaginative people in the industry who's JOB it is to do this. Just because it sounds hard to the geeks in slashdot doesn't mean it's hard to the people who do this for a LIVING. To a Hollywood costume designer, your ability to write a device driver would be so much incomprehensible magic. What gives you the audacity to believe it doesn't work the other way?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    54. Re:So... by nasch · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was impossible or hard. What I said is that you could end up with something really kooky and distracting, kind of like some of the plot elements that actually made it into the show. Maybe it would be fantastic and maybe it would be terrible. Most likely some people would think it's fantastic and some would think it's terrible. Either way, the costumes they picked 1) probably saved quite a bit of money and 2) personally do not distract me from the story. Obviously your experience is different.

      I mean, please, is it hard to come up with a secure computer to count the number of times people press a button? There are people in the industry whose JOB it is to do this, and look at the crap voting machines we have in this country. Just because something is perfectly possible and has been done before doesn't mean it will be done right next time. As we can see, it was their job to come up with good wardrobe selections for the show, and in your opinion they screwed it up, despite the fact it is not hard to do. Or maybe it's actually quite difficult to please all the viwers...

  2. Recently announced? by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They've been talking about Caprice since season 2 or 3. I suppose this is more a case of 'it's now got budget/go ahead' than anything that's going to surprise any fan that's been paying attention.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Recently announced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was actually confirmed and budgeted about a year ago. I'm not sure why this is news.

    2. Re:Recently announced? by Fallingcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I even thought I saw a trailer for the series as much as a year ago.

      As I recall, it was entirely impossible to tell from watching the trailer that it was in any way related to BSG, aside from the title. Looked boring.

    3. Re:Recently announced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've been talking about Caprice...

      Uh, they're not talking about a car here.

    4. Re:Recently announced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sci-Fi has been almost completely scraped off! How is this supposed to inspire BSG fans? If I watch the Sci-Fi channel, I expect halfway decent Sci-Fi - not a slightly futuristic soap opera of politics, business and sex. If I want that, all I have to do is turn on the news.

      Not even interested in the premiere.

  3. then what happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and will focus on two rival families, the Graystones and the Adamas.

    Hmm. I wonder if one of them survives the Cylon attack.

    1. Re:then what happens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One from each family dies at some point the an Adama & a Graystone build the first cylons.

    2. Re:then what happens? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      ...and will focus on two rival families, the Graystones and the Adamas.

      Hmm. I wonder if one of them survives the Cylon attack.

      You mean instead of Romeo and Juliet? So you reckon that Adamas will come up trumps? That's a bit of a stretch isn't it?

      Episode 1: Graystones rustle a herd of Adamas' R2D2 bots and grind off the branding..
      Episode 2: In the gunfight McCoy Greystone gets fragged by Martin Adamas.
      Episode 3: Dolores Adamas gets raped by imbecile Graystone son.
      Episode 4: Intrigue builds as Old Granpappy Adamas soils himself and is sent to a home - but he's got a secret he's not going to tell!
      Episode 5: Cydonia {grin} the capitol city of the Knights gets attacked by mutating nanobots creating the first Cylon overlord.
      Episode 6: Hey maybe I should be writing these series. I'm starting to interest myself....

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    3. Re:then what happens? by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      I'd watch that.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  4. Not good... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This probably should wait until George Lucas is dead, just to be safe.

    1. Re:Not good... by clickclickdrone · · Score: 5, Funny

      >This probably should wait until George Lucas is dead, just to be safe.
      1. GreyStones Wars
      2. Revenge of the Adamas
      3. The Greystones Strike Back
      4. Profit!
      Shudder.....

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    2. Re:Not good... by cashman73 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If this new series involves a dagget with big, floppy ears, that talks like a Jamaican, I can no longer be a BSG fan. See ya!

    3. Re:Not good... by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Everybody knows that "bears beats battlestar galactica" anyway. They should just skip straight to a show about bears.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    4. Re:Not good... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      All the proto Cylons will talk like Twiki from Buck Rogers in the 25th Century:
      "biddi-biddi-biddi"

    5. Re:Not good... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      He'd rework it so the Cylons shot first.

    6. Re:Not good... by genner · · Score: 4, Funny

      This probably should wait until George Lucas is dead, just to be safe.

      Good, idea......I'll be right back.

    7. Re:Not good... by genner · · Score: 1

      Everybody knows that "bears beats battlestar galactica" anyway. They should just skip straight to a show about bears.

      Exactly because bears are freinds with sharks. Who doesn't want to see a show about bears and sharks? I certainly don't but I'm the exception that proves the rule.

    8. Re:Not good... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind watching a remake of Buck Rogers. Just with less disco and no roller skates. Maybe be a little more like the original newspaper series too.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    9. Re:Not good... by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
      United Athiest Alliance(AAA) for the win!

      I wouldn't mind watching a remake of Buck Rogers. Just with less disco and no roller skates. Maybe be a little more like the original newspaper series too.

    10. Re:Not good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we keep the hot babes in the spandex?

      Okay ... you can get rid of the spandex but keep the skimpy outfits (a'la Six's wardrobe :D )

    11. Re:Not good... by borg_cube · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure the quote is actually "bears, beets, battlestar galactica". You know, because he grows beets.

      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.

      Also, beets and beats. ;)

    12. Re:Not good... by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I could honestly never decide whether he was just pausing for emphasis or whether he was saying "beets" - as you suggested. In this particular case "beats" served my purposes best so I chose to use that one. Now I'm curious if the show's writers have ever answered that authoritatively...

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
  5. Really? by Wolfmandan72 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FRACK!

  6. Remember 1980 by Templar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Presumably they're doing this because the last Galactica spinoff went so well? Invisible ships and flying motorcycles. How ever can they top that?

    1. Re:Remember 1980 by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Both have something already in common. They're both being sold to their networks as cheaper-to-produce versions of their predecessors. SciFi is probably thinking "If we set it on a planet and forgo all the FX, it will attract the same old Galactica audience but be a lot cheaper to make." Unfortunately for them, that is exactly what NBC execs told themselves about Galactica 1980. The audience won't follow over if the material is crap, Galactica name or not.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Remember 1980 by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

      I never knew about this series... I may actually have to get it (or atleast rent it).. I am curious now.. I imagine it will be horrendous... but hey its just TV.. maybe a bad TV series night and make a drinking game out of it...

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    3. Re:Remember 1980 by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

      How do you explain season 3?

      Bender: WhooooOOOOOooooooo!

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Remember 1980 by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

      The First Rule of BSG Fan Club Is You Don't Talk about 1980. The second rule is WE DO NOT TALK ABOUT 1980! It never happened. That series doesn't exist. It vanished into a black hole like disco okay? Eye bleach, neeeeeeed! It's the BSG fan equivalent of Nemesis. It didn't happen, okay? Did. Not. Happen.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    5. Re:Remember 1980 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real dedication means claiming you are a year younger than you actually are. Well, probably not for you, I'm guessing you were born after THE YEAR THAT MUST NOT BE MENTIONED. But for us old guys.

    6. Re:Remember 1980 by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Morbid curiosity and obsessive-compulsive need for closure.

      At least, that explains it in my case. I'll probably ride the "BSG re-imagined" train to its final bitter end.

      Did I ever mention that I'm the kind of guy who won't drop quests in MMORPGs, even after they're worthless for experience or faction reputation or anything, because I hate to be a quitter? Thank God I never took up any destructive habits; if, for instance, I started smoking I'd probably drop dead with a cig in my lips rather than be a quitter.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    7. Re:Remember 1980 by vidarh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You might find yourself drinking profusely for weeks to forget all about it.

    8. Re:Remember 1980 by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      No shit. Season 1 & 2 -- Capital. Glorious. Tight. Everything fit. Then the rescue off new caprica where I think the most awesome cut scene in the bloody history of scifi/drama has ever happened, and then...

      The suck monsters descended. The series didn't just jump the shark right then and there, it jumped over the shark and into an anime-styled suck hole, to the screams of Kaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhn!

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    9. Re:Remember 1980 by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      It's the BSG fan equivalent of Nemesis. It didn't happen, okay? Did. Not. Happen.

      You mean it's the BSG equivalent of Highlander 2:The Quickening?

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    10. Re:Remember 1980 by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, but I have a friend who's dad is a BSG fan too; Has all the DVDs, so we went over and I found 1980. So I borrowed it. I'm soooo sorry. It was worse than eating three chili cheese burritoes and a Vault while on the rag. It just... omg.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    11. Re:Remember 1980 by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      You mean it's the BSG equivalent of Highlander 2:The Quickening?

      Worse. The plot actually makes sense for that movie, even if the acting is so horrible that it would drive you to an evening with Jack and the boys. u_u

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    12. Re:Remember 1980 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disco's not dead - it just got too cool for you!

    13. Re:Remember 1980 by maxume · · Score: 1

      The only thing that I see as being up in the air is whether Starbuck dies, ascends and comes back to life once more, or twice more.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    14. Re:Remember 1980 by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      You might find yourself drinking profusely for weeks to forget all about it.

      If not a full frontal lobotomy. Seriously, GP, forget about it and simply consider yourself lucky that you never saw it. It's easily one of the worst sci-fi shows I've ever the displeasure of watching.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    15. Re:Remember 1980 by pluther · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does that seem more like a challenge than anything else?

      If I hadn't watched it when it first came out, I'd be running out to get it now based on that description.

      But, I have already watched it. Yeah, it's bad. Really, really, bad. Especially so if you liked the original.

      But, that said, definitely worth watching. But make sure you do so with a group of friends who like the whole making snarky comments at bad TV thing.

      And definitely liquor. Lots of liquor.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    16. Re:Remember 1980 by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      we'reeeeee goiiiiiinnnnng the wrong waaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyy!

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    17. Re:Remember 1980 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original was better. The clear feminist agenda in the new series is deplorable.

    18. Re:Remember 1980 by Tyr_7BE · · Score: 1

      It's stored in a vault next to the Star Wars Christmas Special.

    19. Re:Remember 1980 by Samus · · Score: 1

      There is one episode that is worth something. It was an episode where Starbuck is stranded on a desolate planet with a Cylon. It is a total rip off of Enemy Mine but it is worth watching. Note that this is Starbuck's only appearance in the new series. Most of the original cast did not appear in the second series.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    20. Re:Remember 1980 by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I'd rate it more like Star Trek V: The Final Frontier or Jaws III. So bad that it causes mental blocks, and makes you wish you hadn't seen it. Eye bleach definitely required. The only way Galactica 1980 should be seen is if you have an iron will and never seen any of the Battlestar Galactica shows, being fully aware that it gets WAY, WAY better.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    21. Re:Remember 1980 by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Simple. Season 3 was good, and people are just whiners.

      The show has, imnsho, been extremely high quality from start to finish. I never have understood, and probably never will understand, where people get this idea that the show has gone downhill.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    22. Re:Remember 1980 by Arcady13 · · Score: 1

      How can a TV episode from 1980 be a ripoff of a movie from 1985?

    23. Re:Remember 1980 by genner · · Score: 1

      I imagine it will be horrendous... but hey its just TV.. maybe a bad TV series night and make a drinking game out of it...

      With that can do attitude you too can be a network executive.

    24. Re:Remember 1980 by genner · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's easily one of the worst sci-fi shows I've ever the displeasure of watching.

      Worse than the Star Wars Christmas Special?

    25. Re:Remember 1980 by genner · · Score: 1

      It's the BSG fan equivalent of Nemesis. It didn't happen, okay? Did. Not. Happen. You mean it's the BSG equivalent of Highlander 2:The Quickening?

      A sequel..but....but there can be only one.....must...supress..memories....GAHHHHH!!!!!

    26. Re:Remember 1980 by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      How can a TV episode from 1980 be a ripoff of a movie from 1985?

      It's clearly because Samus watched the show in 2002. Duh!

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    27. Re:Remember 1980 by Samus · · Score: 1

      Because it was a novella first in 1979.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    28. Re:Remember 1980 by sl0ppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hulu has it:

      http://www.hulu.com/galactica-1980

      may you forget quickly and are able to heal.

    29. Re:Remember 1980 by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Simple. Season 3 was good, and people are just whiners.

      The show has, imnsho, been extremely high quality from start to finish. I never have understood, and probably never will understand, where people get this idea that the show has gone downhill.

      The show went downhill when they changed the show from science fiction to fantasy. When cancer started being cured by miracles. When Starbuck could "feel" the way to Earth. When Balthar became a religious figure. But for me most of all it was when Roslin refused to die. We are told in the first episode that she has three months to live but she just would not go away.

      --

      Enigma

    30. Re:Remember 1980 by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Reading the Wikipedia entry for "The Return of Starbuck", I read about an unproduced script for a follow up episode titled "The Wheel of Fire" which has brought closure and healing. I always wanted to know what happened to Starbuck.

    31. Re:Remember 1980 by sabs · · Score: 1

      More like the BSG Fan equivalent of Highlander 2: the Sickening.

    32. Re:Remember 1980 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Invisible ships? I love it! That would really hold down the special effects costs!

    33. Re:Remember 1980 by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      None of these are fantasy elements. The only one that you cited that's somewhat unreasonable was Roslin's cancer going into remission. That was quite the stretch. However, it's still not a fantasy element, and was quite rooted in the realm of sci-fi, ludicrous though it might have been.

      And Baltar being a religious figure? Are you serious? Since when does being the leader of a cult solely belong to the realm of fantasy?

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    34. Re:Remember 1980 by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Most people don't know about it because it was never officially called "Galactica 1980" until recently. When it originally aired, it was just called "Battlestar Galactica" as if the series had returned from cancellation. Fans of the REAL series didn't buy the ruse though, and it was put out of its misery pretty quickly.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    35. Re:Remember 1980 by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      There is an episode of Galactica 1980 (the one where the Galactica superkids become a Bad-New-Bears-esque little league team) that makes the Star Wars Christmas Special look like Citizen Kane.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    36. Re:Remember 1980 by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      No, it's the BSG equivalent of the \i{Star Wars Holiday Special}.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    37. Re:Remember 1980 by squallbsr · · Score: 1

      Star Trek V: The Final Frontier

      Jaws III

      What are you talking about? There are no such movies, there never was. Stop going around and trying to lie to these people.

      --
      Sleep: A completely inadequate substitution for Caffeine.
    38. Re:Remember 1980 by el_gordo101 · · Score: 1

      Oh, man. You just woke up a neuron in my brain that had been successfully repressing the memory of that episode for 25+ years. Thanks. A lot.

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    39. Re:Remember 1980 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's stored in a vault next to the Star Wars Christmas Special.

      You mean the "Star Wars Holiday Special".

      Don't forget to turn in your nerd card at the door on your way out.

    40. Re:Remember 1980 by fwarren · · Score: 1

      In a word...yes

      It may have been hokey to have Itchy look at porn on that little box. Or for Nala to watch the cooking show with Harvey Corman playing a woman with four arms. Most of the original cast at least phoned in performances.

      But the level of disappointment at seeing Galactica 1980. Invisible ships, flying motorcycles into space. Apollo and Starbuck gone.

      Face it, the show sucked and blows at the same time

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    41. Re:Remember 1980 by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Then the rescue off new caprica where I think the most awesome cut scene in the bloody history of scifi/drama has ever happened, and then

      I know the scene. Your talking about where the Galactica jumped in to the atmosphere, fell like a fucking rock while launching vipers, then jumped back out before it hit the ground. God damn that was sweet. WTF happened?

      If I want drama and space with out space ships I'll watch reruns of the first few seasons of SG-1. At least you could count on Jack Oneal to fire off something funny every now and then. "For the record I voted we blow it up."

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    42. Re:Remember 1980 by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      Well, at least there haven't been any people lying about any mythical sequels to the Matrix.

    43. Re:Remember 1980 by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      like an idiot, I actually watched a screening of "The Source" six months prior to release. It was worse than all the rest

    44. Re:Remember 1980 by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      Intolerant bastards. There were a couple good episodes.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    45. Re:Remember 1980 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes.. Embrace the DOUBLETHINK.

    46. Re:Remember 1980 by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      This series has always been referred to as Galactica 1980.

      If you ever knew anything about it, you would recognize that name.

      NO ONE ever confused/conflated the two.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    47. Re:Remember 1980 by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter - SciFi is crap now. They had a great show: Eureka, that has been completely ruined. They literally dedicated an entire episode where the heroes save the day by, get this: using ultra-strength Degree deodorant. Seriously. The product placements *all over* SciFi's shows have gotten to the point of absolute annoyance.

    48. Re:Remember 1980 by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Ummm, sorry to break this but the original Galactica sucked balls too.

    49. Re:Remember 1980 by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      So... a robot that is so close to being human that it is nigh impossible to distinguish it from a human, yet is clearly still a machine that can be programmed or have its memory downloaded to a distant ship when it dies, and is biologically capable of being fertilized by a human, and carrying the resulting offspring to term, resulting in a half-human/half-cyborg baby, that's all good ol' sci-fi.

      But when that baby's blood somehow cures cancer, that's a miracle?

      Kay. Some people's lines of suspension of belief don't make sense to me; seems to me that if that's a miracle, then there were about a dozen pre-requisite miracles earlier in the show. Is it really that you just thought she should die on schedule?

      I was more annoyed that the cylon-killing virus that could be downloaded to their resurrection ships was actually a normal biological virus humans were now immune to. Okay so the "bio-electric" effect that kills them may get downloaded to the resurrection ship, but without the actual virus around how would it infect other cylons? Zomg, you're right, it's fantasy. This show sucks.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    50. Re:Remember 1980 by DoubleReed · · Score: 1

      That virus episode was the last one I watched. I remember Ronald Moore in the commentary to the Battlestar Galactica mini-series DVD explaining how he always hated the "technobabble" plot holes in Star Trek. He explained that one of their goals with BSG was not to go down that route.

      I don't think it is so much that the show got less believable, as that the rules started changing from episode to episode. So you end up with REALLY weird arbitrary shit resolving plots. Another example, Boomer cuts her wrist and sticks some random wire into her arm, and stops an entire Cylon fleet cold. Yet, apparently nobody considers trying to do this ever again.

    51. Re:Remember 1980 by Iced_Eagle · · Score: 0

      That's a dangerous question you're asking! It's almost a challenge to them to find a way to top that and screw it up. I mean, they may just say that the "toasters" got their start when the UFOs stole them in Batteries Not Included!

    52. Re:Remember 1980 by WCLPeter · · Score: 1

      flying motorcycles

      I don't know, seven year old me thought the Flying Motorcycles were cool!

      In fact, I still do. Somebody else must of thought so too, they used them a few years later in Megaforce!

      When you think about it, out of all the crap that came out of the craptastic show that was Galactica 1980 the *only* good thing was the flying motorcycles... and the Halloween episode. ;-)

    53. Re:Remember 1980 by WCLPeter · · Score: 1

      I never have understood, and probably never will understand, where people get this idea that the show has gone downhill.

      Battlestar Galactica has always been, original and remake, about the last great Battlestar. Her ongoing fight, and flight, from a superior enemy with the sole focus of wiping out the last remnants of humanity. The peoples of the fleet are united against this goal. They are driven, literally and figuratively, to great physical, mental, and emotional depths in order to survive against their superior enemy.

      These people are on the run, constantly. They are ruthlessly hunted. They are always dogged. They are always under attack. Every loss is a tragedy. Every win, fleeting. They can pause, sometimes, they can never stop. They can have fun, sometimes, they can never relax. They must *always* move. Constantly. For if they don't, their enemies will destroy them and all will perish.

      Speed, stealth, cunning, bravery, camaraderie, brother/sister-hood, trust, ingenuity and blind luck are the only things that separate them from extinction.

      The strong pacing and sense of constant fear for the life of the characters from the mini-series and first two seasons has been replaced with endless melodrama.

      The strong, ruthless, enemy has been replaced with whiners that second guess, bicker, and argue over every decision.

      The previously tough, interesting, flawed people, of the human fleets have been replaced with whiners that second guess, bicker, and argue over every decision.

      And in the midst of all this endless bickering, endless whining, endless soul searching, endless talk about people's feelings, and endless romantic triangles, Ron Moore has changed the show from Battlestar Galactica we all fell in love with to a cheesy bastardized soap opera version of All My Children with Starships.

    54. Re:Remember 1980 by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      No shit. Season 1 & 2 -- Capital. Glorious. Tight. Everything fit. Then the rescue off new caprica where I think the most awesome cut scene in the bloody history of scifi/drama has ever happened, and then...

      The network decided they wanted more control and "episode-a-day" format stuff so people didn't have to follow the previous seasons to know what's going on.

      --
      this is my sig
    55. Re:Remember 1980 by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      This series has always been referred to as Galactica 1980.
      Not in all countries.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    56. Re:Remember 1980 by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      Hehehehe.... That rebuttal was a classic! Instant Classic, I tell ya.

      If I had the mod points I'd say Mod that up +5 Funny / Informative, +5 Best-Bitch-Slap-Ever and give Samus a Hot-dog and a hummer.

      Seriously.

      Delicious.

    57. Re:Remember 1980 by instarx · · Score: 1

      LOL. I guess re-writing history isn't just for the Bush Administration. I remember when the new BSG was announced there were screams of outrage that the original BSG was being desecrated and that nothing could be as good as the original 1980 series (I kid you not). It would be sacrilege to remake such a classic, and with a female Starbuck no less.

      I was relentlessly flamed when I pointed out the 1980 version was recognized as pure junk even when it was on the air, and ANYTHING would be better.

      I TOLD YOU SO!

    58. Re:Remember 1980 by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      Worse than the Star Wars Christmas Special?

      No. Not worse than the Christmas special. Nothing is worse than the Christmas special.
      Nothing.

      Unless Jar Jar does a Christmas special with Ewoks circa 1982.

      Caprica needs to be shot down. Recover the money and maybe start something
      worthwhile.

      Once we go down the spinoff path, forever will it dominate your programming
      like it did Roddenberry's apprentice.

    59. Re:Remember 1980 by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      More like the BSG Fan equivalent of Highlander 2: the Sickening.

      We affectionately refer to it as Highslander2: the Sickening.

    60. Re:Remember 1980 by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with produc--this comment brought to you by Toyota, Moving Forward!--t placement?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    61. Re:Remember 1980 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Season 1 was awesome. Season 2 was pretty good,. Season 3 bore everyone out of their skulls. Season 4 tried to get the series back into track (and I'd say succeeded).

      Seriously, how many memorable moments in season 3 can you remember?. Galactica jumping out of hyperspace and into the atmosphere in New Caprica?. OK. That's one. What else? Apollo and Starbuck cheating on their respective SOs and getting drunk together? Oh, come on!

  7. How faithful to the 1970s series will it be? by Ex-Linux-Fanboy · · Score: 1
    I understand the new Battlestar Galactica series is a reboot of the original series. That said, as I understand it, the new series has shown critters that look like the original 1970s series Cylons, saying they were an "older model" of the Cylons.

    Now that we are in the past of the series, I wonder if we will get to see more of these Cylons that are faithful to the original series, and whether scenes like the destruction of the planet will be like the pilot to the original series.

    1. Re:How faithful to the 1970s series will it be? by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Informative

      watch the pilot again- first minute.

      The colonial officer is perusing plans of the original cylon model-- that looks like the original series model.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    2. Re:How faithful to the 1970s series will it be? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      There's also a shot of one in a display case in the "gift shop" before the attacks.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:How faithful to the 1970s series will it be? by idontgno · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obvious "hark-backs":

      • Older-model Centurions in older-model Raiders ("manned", not cyborg) guarding the "First Hybrid" in Razor
      • Mark II Viper is a visual dead-on clone of the original series one (although, not fitted with those nifty laser weapons)
      • Pegasus and other later-model battlestars are styled more like original series ones than Galactica (see http://en.battlestarwiki.org/wiki/Image:Pegasus-Comparison.png)

      That's just off the top of my head.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    4. Re:How faithful to the 1970s series will it be? by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Probably not.

      Ever notice how the Enterprise in Enterprise looked way more advanced that the Enterprise in Star Trek (I'm not enough of a fanboy to remember the ship model numbers.)

      You can tell the story, and even pay a small homage to the old designs, without being stuck to 1970s special effects and set design. A few die-hard fans might bitch, but you'll be way more likely to attract new viewers by making things more modern.

      Also, it's not completely clear that BSG2003 was a reboot. Lots of fans postulate that the show is set either long before or long after the original series, and that the time line is cyclical with lots of the same characters and events replaying over and over. This has all happened before; it will happen again.

    5. Re:How faithful to the 1970s series will it be? by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ever notice how the Enterprise in Enterprise looked way more advanced that the Enterprise in Star Trek.

      It got to be embarrassing. The original Star Trek bridge now looks like an outdated comm center for mall security.

      The original Battlestar Galactica bridge from the 1970s was powered by Tektronix, and many of the controls actually did something visible. This was a real problem for the actors, who had to learn how to operate the systems.

      "2001" was more futuristic. An AI took care of the details, and the crew just chatted with the AI.

    6. Re:How faithful to the 1970s series will it be? by Arcady13 · · Score: 1

      In the pilot when they fly the Vipers around the "museum" as a demonstration, the theme music from the original series plays for a bit.

    7. Re:How faithful to the 1970s series will it be? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Don't forget how they cloned Dirk Benedict's cheesy smile from the original and grafted it onto Katee Sackhoff.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    8. Re:How faithful to the 1970s series will it be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obvious "hark-backs":

      • Older-model Centurions in older-model Raiders ("manned", not cyborg) guarding the "First Hybrid" in Razor
      • Mark II Viper is a visual dead-on clone of the original series one (although, not fitted with those nifty laser weapons)
      • Pegasus and other later-model battlestars are styled more like original series ones than Galactica (see http://en.battlestarwiki.org/wiki/Image:Pegasus-Comparison.png)

      That's just off the top of my head.

      It's a spinoff of the original BSG! Just so great. Really.

    9. Re:How faithful to the 1970s series will it be? by bjwest · · Score: 1

      Weren't the Cylons in the original series created by a reptilian-like race due to the "superiority" of the bipedal human form? Am I totally loosing my mind, or am I remembering correctly?

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    10. Re:How faithful to the 1970s series will it be? by transwarp · · Score: 1

      You're remembering correctly. And the devil was the one who told the reptilian Cylons to make them (well, the Imperious Leader had the devil's voice, so that was implied).

  8. Spinoff + Prequel by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Spinoff + Prequel all we need is an alien life form or a ghost that only the main character can see and talk to who only heckles the main character to make it a truly horrible idea.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Spinoff + Prequel by SputnikPanic · · Score: 1

      Mr. Snuffleupagus and an Adama grand-pere would indeed make quite a team.

    2. Re:Spinoff + Prequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's the Love-Matic Cylon..."

      Great, now you've given them ideas...

    3. Re:Spinoff + Prequel by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      What they really need is a cute, precocious kid to offer funny quips and one-liners. Everyone loves a cute kid.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Spinoff + Prequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a minute, doesn't the main BSG already have this in the form of head-Six?

  9. Late in the game by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Honestly, it's hard for me to drum up any interest in this at this point. The new BSG was one of my favorite TV shows of all time. It was truly amazing and I have loved it. HOWEVER, the Sci-fi channel has done almost everything in their power to crush my interest in the show. The between season and mid-season breaks since season 2 ended have just been utterly ridiculous. It's an exaggeration, but I swear it feels like I'm watching the last 2 seasons of this show at a rate of 3-4 episodes per year. I'll finish out what's left of the show at this point because I'm already embroiled. I'm not sure I want to endure getting involved in another series that Sci-fi controls though.

    Personally, I'm far more interested in sticking with Terminator: TSCC so long as it maintains sufficient ratings to avoid cancellation. I only have room in my schedule to keep up with a few shows at a time anyways.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    1. Re:Late in the game by budcub · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. Too bad they can't turn over the show to HBO or Showtime and have them do it right.

    2. Re:Late in the game by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I only have room in my schedule to keep up with a few shows at a time anyways.

      I can keep up with about 20 different shows. I use mythtv and export a lot to my ipod itunes auto-magically picks up the episodes from my server and all is well. nothing like watching Colbert report on the way in to work...

      Plus I watch everything on my terms. It's a refreshing change to TV.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Late in the game by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      I agree. Too bad they can't turn over the show to HBO or Showtime and have them do it right.

      I agree. I tried to get my wife interested in the show, but after the third or fourth "Frak You!", she said, "That's it, I'm out."

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    4. Re:Late in the game by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      I disagree with that sentiment. I'd rather have quality than speed. If it takes them a long time to finish, then so be it. If I want to watch them back to back then that's what DVD/iTunes is for.

    5. Re:Late in the game by Xelios · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It seems like sci-fi shows get mishandled by their networks more often than not, then they blame the show when it gets mediocre ratings. The few episodes of BSG in season 3 that seemed like one-offs came about because the network decided the long story arc made it too hard for people to get into the show. The producers were pressured to create one-off episodes (like Star Trek used to be) and look what happened. Those episodes were by far the worst episodes in BSG (The Woman King?).

      Lets not even get into what FOX did to Firefly...

      --
      Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
    6. Re:Late in the game by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Why'd you marry a non-geek?

      Life's too short.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    7. Re:Late in the game by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

      nothing like watching Colbert report on the way in to work

      And to think people complain about just texting while driving! Thank ${DEITY} I work from home and don't have to share the road with the likes of you.

      --
      I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
    8. Re:Late in the game by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      Some people live in places where there is good public transit, and they are able to watch a show on their iPod while they ride the bus or train in. :P

    9. Re:Late in the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And to think people complain about just texting while driving! Thank ${DEITY} I work from home and don't have to share the road with the likes of you.

      Fuck you. I ride the train.

    10. Re:Late in the game by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      You can thank the WGA or World Canadian Bureau for this latest gap.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    11. Re:Late in the game by theilliterate · · Score: 1

      My wife had to train me to stop saying "frak" in front of our kid. I grudgingly agreed that it was probably not a good thing for him to be repeating outside the home.

    12. Re:Late in the game by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Personally, I'm far more interested in sticking with Terminator: TSCC

      TSCC is the new BSG. They even have Bear McCreary doing the score.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    13. Re:Late in the game by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? The last episodes have been filmed and in the can ready to go since late August. Now they're just stretching it out to string along as much advertising $$$ to as few episodes of the show as possible.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    14. Re:Late in the game by Manchot · · Score: 1

      While I hate network executives as much as the next guy, you can hardly blame them for the bifurcation of the final season. The writers' strike necessitated that.

    15. Re:Late in the game by mattbee · · Score: 1

      Agree totally - great show, but it does seem like glacial progress compared to anything else I'm watching, and my interest is fading into a sortof nostalgia right now.

      My wife suggested a solution though - wait 45 years until they've finished making them for definite, *then* start watching (like we're doing with Doctor Who - glossy new Who doesn't count ;) ).

      --
      Matthew @ Bytemark Hosting
    16. Re:Late in the game by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      If BSG had been on HBO, it probably wouldn't have made it past the second season. With rare exceptions like The Sopranos, HBO has a long history of canceling great shows at about the 2nd season mark. They're still a lot better than Fox (where a typical show is lucky if it even gets to air more than 4-7 episodes before getting the axe), but not the kind of place where BSG would have gotten 5 seasons.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    17. Re:Late in the game by Snydley+Whiplash · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they lost me with the scheduling as well. I have no clue when it's on or even which episode I saw last. At this point I'm going to wait until they are done and buy the whole freaking thing on DVD so I can watch it all at once.

    18. Re:Late in the game by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Lets not even get into what FOX did to Firefly...

      "Our friend was raped! And we let it happen!"
      "Dude! There was nothing you could do!"

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    19. Re:Late in the game by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I got called into the principals office the other day to discuss my kids use of the word "frell" all the time.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    20. Re:Late in the game by servognome · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If BSG had been on HBO, it probably wouldn't have made it past the second season. With rare exceptions like The Sopranos, HBO has a long history of canceling great shows at about the 2nd season mark.

      HBO is all about pushing subscription sales. Yes they have really awesome shows, but unless they are "mainstream" enough to convince new subscribers it just isn't worth it for them. Deadwood and Rome were awesome, but they didn't have the same kind of audience appeal as Entourage and Sopranos where you're left out of the water cooler conversation on monday unless you have a subscription.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    21. Re:Late in the game by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Were they concerned about him using a swear word, or a word they didn't understand? :)

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    22. Re:Late in the game by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Besides which, didn't the Sopranos have HUGE delays between seasons? (which is what the GP was complaining SciFi did with BSG)

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    23. Re:Late in the game by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      a swear word. It doesn't take much to figure out what frak or frell mean. Now feltercarb. That takes a little imagination.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    24. Re:Late in the game by F1re · · Score: 1

      I agree. I tried to get my wife interested in the show, but after the third or fourth "Frak You!", she said, "That's it, I'm out."

      You mean she only lasted 36 seconds?

      --
      ...there is no sig...
    25. Re:Late in the game by Arterion · · Score: 1

      Is this like a fortune cookie? Are we supposed to add "...in bed" to the end of that?

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    26. Re:Late in the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of a story a friend told me.

      They called a parent into Kindergarten because his kid told the teacher to "Go Frell themselves" (word replaced for a public forum ;) ).

      Parent told the teacher "Well, at least he used the word correctly in the sentence."

      Teacher just KNEW this wasn't going to go their way. :)

    27. Re:Late in the game by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm far more interested in sticking with Terminator: TSCC so long as it maintains sufficient ratings to avoid cancellation.

      Did that get better or something? I remember watching a few episodes when it just started, and it was pretty dreadful.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    28. Re:Late in the game by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      To keep standards reasonably high.

    29. Re:Late in the game by entrylevel · · Score: 1

      It certainly did. The entire first season I found virtually intolerable, but near the beginning of the second, it seems like they got all new writers or something. Still not a "great" show IMHO, but quite enjoyable.

      --
      Karma: Incomprehensible (Mostly affected by posting at +5, reading at -1, and metamoderating everything unfair.)
    30. Re:Late in the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think I remember this episode...

    31. Re:Late in the game by Cyner · · Score: 1

      I with you on this one. BSG has just been a slide down hill these last few seasons. Seems like SciFi took a page or two from Disney (specifically the "milking it for all it's worth" chapter).

      The show has changed a lot over the seasons. Remember season 1, with the fleet and the whole 'survival' theme? The show has become so obsessed with character development that the overarching plot seems to have take a back seat to 'this episode's drama'. Someone watching just season 4 might think there's only two or three dozen people in the whole show; not almost 40,000 refugees.

      Bottom line, SciFi needs to worry less about sucking every last nickle and dime out of a good idea. They need to concentrate on what they do best, find good ideas; then leave it alone, don't try to change it.

      --
      FreeBSD.org - The power to serve
    32. Re:Late in the game by Cyner · · Score: 1

      Um, no. The final episode has been filmed, edited, and ready to air since August 2008.

      --
      FreeBSD.org - The power to serve
    33. Re:Late in the game by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      To each his own, but I've found it to be one of the best series I've seen in the last 10 years or so.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    34. Re:Late in the game by budcub · · Score: 1

      Good point. I'm just now watching the DVD set for "Carnivale" and it only survived two seasons. I think part of the problem is competition with the other shows out there (on HBO that is).

      Now that Sopranos and Six Feet Under are over and gone, there's room for new shows like True Blood to draw in viewers. Hmmm, now I sound like a HBO salesman.

    35. Re:Late in the game by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Well I guess it bit you on the ass didn't it?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  10. oh hell. by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's reality TV from the fuuuuuuture. I can haaardly wait.

    Episode 1: It begins with a street fight between the Adamas and the Capule--I mean Capricas. They try to marry off the young future commander adama but is turned down for not being gay enough for Baltar's grandfather.

    Episode 2: Adama is asked to wait a few years and then go to a bar, where he'll meet his future lover, Tye, who unfortunately is also a Caprican. Angst results.

    Episode 3: Adama professes his love while standing on a balcony having a conversation with his mother about toaster studels. Tye overhears this, and they agree to a civil union. The rest of the Adama family hears of this and declare war on the Capricas. They're so distracted that they fail to realize the toasters have become sentient. A trail of burnt strudel leads to the outskirts of town.

    *six month break due to writer strike -- online commentary -- this plotline SUCKS!!! It has a political agenda! Doom upon the soothsayers* ...
    Yeah, I can see it now. Now watch me get modded "-6000, damn slash fan"

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:oh hell. by Krondor · · Score: 1

      I'm in agreement, but not for your reasons.

      To me this sounds uninteresting. Caprica is toast, and any kind of day to day drama will always have this overtone of futility. How much of the day to day drama and plot points will be completely irrelevant given how the future plays out in BSG proper.

      I mean the show kind of set itself up as a, oh crap starting over, thing. Do the day to day trials and tribulations of the show's Montague and Capulet equivalents even matter to fans?

    2. Re:oh hell. by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's reality TV from the fuuuuuuture. I can haaardly wait.

      Episode 1: It begins with a street fight between the Adamas and the Capule--I mean Capricas. They try to marry off the young future commander adama but is turned down for not being gay enough for Baltar's grandfather.

      Yes yes, it's the Jets versus the Sharks-with-lasers. And a cylon officer Krupke tries to keep the peace.

      Jebeezus, how many people know what the hell we're talking about! Funny thing is, it's 90% of all TV.

      your sly post cracked me up,

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    3. Re:oh hell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's reality TV from the fuuuuuuture. I can haaardly wait.

      Episode 1: It begins with a street fight between the Adamas and the Capule--I mean Capricas. They try to marry off the young future commander adama but is turned down for not being gay enough for Baltar's grandfather.

      Yes yes, it's the Jets versus the Sharks-with-lasers. And a cylon officer Krupke tries to keep the peace.

      Jebeezus, how many people know what the hell we're talking about! Funny thing is, it's 90% of all TV.

      your sly post cracked me up,

      Alas poor Starbuck, I knew him/her well....

    4. Re:oh hell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when they finally admit they have no new ideas, they'll turn the channel and borrow plot ideas from Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, where they investigate the foundations of Skynet and it's various robots.

  11. Ummm, Soooooooo . . . by turbopunk · · Score: 1

    Romeo and Juliet . . . ? Seriously, I mean, it's a spin off of a remake of an old show, but due they have to use a description that makes it sound like there is NOTHING original about it?

  12. "recently"?! by toby · · Score: 1

    This is old, old news... 3.5 years old, in fact.

    --
    you had me at #!
  13. Whose sponsoring this crap, KY? by tjstork · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This thing sounds so gay it makes my rear hurt. Whatever happened to the simple concept of a bunch of people in space and scantily clad women blowing up a bunch of fracking toasters. Give me some liberal preaching and moralizing every now and then, that's cool over a drink, but at the end, I don't want to watch a tv show about someone else's mental problems. I vote for Bush twice and I have enough of my own!

    --
    This is my sig.
  14. Creativity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ultimate anti-thesis to creativity. A prequel to a remake of an existing IP.

    It happens way too often for my tastes. Watered down entertainment from chicken writers not willing to go out on a limb.

    1. Re:Creativity? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Actually, the ultimate antithesis to creativity is the standard television series. The theory is if you like a show, you tune in week after week to see more of the same thing. Do something different, and you piss the fans off.

      Faced with the challenge of adapting each and every episode to the fans' expectations, the creative challenges of adapting an entire series isn't so daunting. It's like getting the regular customer who always buys the curry to try the saag paneer; that's much less risky than tweaking your curry recipe.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  15. I've seen this before... by yttrstein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "the two houses go toe-to-toe blending action with corporate conspiracy and sexual politics"

    I wonder if it's going to be as good as when it was the Harkonnens and the Atreideses.

    1. Re:I've seen this before... by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      If only the people in BSG had learned the lessons of the Butlerian Jihad...

  16. And In Today's News... by BigBlueOx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Another brain-damaged gaggle of entertainment industry parasites have rehashed an old idea in the hopes of inflicting it on a witless populace.

    The Day The Earth Stood Still?
    King Kong?
    Star Wars XI:A New Source Of Revenue?

    No, Battlestar Galactica: The Prequel.

    pfft.

  17. Parallels by Mad-Bassist · · Score: 1

    From Battlestar Galactica to the new series and Caprica...

    This reminds me of the transition from Star Trek to Next Generation to Deep Space Nine.

    --
    "The only legitimate use of a computer is to play games." - Eugene Jarvis
  18. when now? by revxul · · Score: 1

    Define "recently." We've been hearing about Caprica for a year now. Anywho, it should be interesting.

    --
    Truth, Just Us, And Hatred For All Mankind!
    1. Re:when now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I thought it sounded ridiculously old. Turns out this recent announcement is going on two years old. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Caprica_(TV_series)&diff=50655391&oldid=50569116

  19. The squish bits and only the squishy bits by Aceticon · · Score: 0, Troll

    The single most boring thing about the new Battlestart Galactica series were all the philosophical / internal-conflict / interpersonal-power-play scenes which were used as cheap filler (no FX = cheap) in between the action scenes.

    Now they want to do a series which consists almost entirely of cheap filler scenes???

    The 1980s are calling and they want their Dallas clone back ...

    1. Re:The squish bits and only the squishy bits by owlnation · · Score: 1

      The single most boring thing about the new Battlestart Galactica series were all the philosophical / internal-conflict / interpersonal-power-play scenes which were used as cheap filler (no FX = cheap) in between the action scenes.

      Not necessarily. It simply that Moore and the show's directors know how to choreograph and direct action. Zoic's excellent FX help enormously. However, Moore has no idea how to use drama and discovery over a long arc. Hence much of the show is tedious, disoriented and lacking drive. Which is a shame because the camerawork and effects are very good, some of the acting is also very good, and some individual scenes are well written. The lack of vision and control of the whole story deeply lets the show down.

      It is -- for someone who has better skills working with arc storylines -- very possible to create drama and excitement in dialogue-based scenes. However, that person is not Moore.

    2. Re:The squish bits and only the squishy bits by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was boring to *you*, but all that power-/interpersonal play is what garnered it many awards for sci-fi with brains. And, it strongly commented on the "war" (parenthetically, i write it) without necessarily taking sides. It did so MUCH better than even the original Star Trek. BSG is a lot more visceral, kills off liked or likeable characters...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    3. Re:The squish bits and only the squishy bits by solios · · Score: 1

      However, Moore has no idea how to use drama and discovery over a long arc.

      The best example of this is the "eye of jupiter" and the "final five" popping up OUT OF NOWHERE in Season Three, and the series from that point forward depending completely on those events. While the "models of cylons" bit is certainly foreshadowed right from the get-go, the way bits of Holy Text have a tendency to appear late in the game with no foreshadowing to speak of is a pretty clear indicator that the writers are making it up as they go along.

      People talk about how great the story of the new BSG is - and by and large, they aren't people who've watched Babylon 5. B5 had serious foreshadowing, buildup, and laying-the-groundwork scenes (and entire episodes) straight out of the gate. By the middle of season 2 the show was beginning to seriously build on itself and by season 3 it was a fantastic piece of storytelling that wasn't pulling Story Defining MacGuffins out of its ass with no prior context.

      BSG is a decent, fairly entertaining (and at times tedious and infuriating) show - one that obviously wasn't outlined in detail before shooting began.

    4. Re:The squish bits and only the squishy bits by swilver · · Score: 1

      The camera work is very good? ROFL, it is the reason I stopped watching BSG, because they couldn't keep the bloody camera still.

    5. Re:The squish bits and only the squishy bits by SlashBugs · · Score: 1

      Yes, Star Trek always seemed to deal in well-defined Good Guys and Bad Guys, while BSG is much happier to skulk around in the grey areas: Rosalin trying to steal an election in order to prevent the New Caprica disaster, the Resistance using suicide bombers, Gaeta lying in court about Baltar's actions as President, etc.

      Everyone has their own adgendas and will work together well when they align, but are all willing to do very questionable things in the name of what they believe is right. There aren't really any charaters like Picard who'll predictably fall into the "hero" role and do the unambiguously right and honourable thing.

      I love all this, ut my complaint is that it isn't actually handled as well as it could be. It might just be the long breaks between and in seasons, but I get the impression the characters' motivations and allegiences are much less well-defined than in, say, Babylon 5. Some of the character twists -- Baltar suddenly acquiring cult members was the biggest -- that seem to come out of absolutely nowhere, with no explantation.

      Even if you all disagere with me, plese tell me: why the hell did all those women suddenly start worshipping Baltar? I genuinely cannot figure out how he got from "most hated human alive" to being asked to bless babies while stuck in that cell not speaking to anyone. Help? Please?

    6. Re:The squish bits and only the squishy bits by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      That might have been them falling prey to the typical demographics satisfaction they have to meet for studios, to gratify the hormones of the 17-35 male, i suppose. Sucks when shows overdo it.

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    7. Re:The squish bits and only the squishy bits by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      For all the baiting on his post i agree with the basic point of the parent poster:
      - The original series was better than the sequel

      I'm old enough to have seen it during my early teens when it first came out, and even though the special effects now look dated, for the time it was a great SciFi action series that really made you want to be there and fly space fighters with the rest of them.

      The sequel on the other hand is not at all quite as exciting: the thrilling sequences of action are fewer that the long drawn sequences of intrigue and/or inner-conflict and to add insult to injury the action sequences are frequently interrupted by shots of the faces of some or other "intrigue" character standing in the bridge of Battlestar Galactica with the look of somebody fighting an internal conflicts.

  20. Debate by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

    Once the last cylon is revealed, the first season of the new spinoff will be a lengthy debate about what the definition of "Not in your fleet" means.

    1. Re:Debate by JackassJedi · · Score: 1

      lol! Out of mod points but someone needs to mod this up Funny.

      --
      Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many.
  21. Yes! by lewp · · Score: 1

    ... with sexy results.

    --
    Game... blouses.
  22. Sounds like... by argent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like a cross between Dune and Star Wars Episode 1.

    With all the fast-moving action of the former and all the rich storytelling of the latter.

  23. Re:"recently"?! Sure is. by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apparently, Slash articles need to have pre-posting supplemental research/vetting/URL-add-ons before going into the wild:

    http://www.galacticawatercooler.com/

    Then, it might have read:

    "Previously-announced BSG-Prequel 'Caprica'green-lighted"

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  24. Only 50 years by fracai · · Score: 1

    Anyone else think the whole BSG storyline would have been a lot more interesting if the time between the 1st Cylon war and the current series had been something like a few hundred years? Maybe even a few thousand?

    --
    -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    1. Re:Only 50 years by robertjw · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about that, but I do think it is fairly reasonable for a sentient cybernetic race to evolve and an extremely fast rate. Look how far we've come in the last 50 years.

    2. Re:Only 50 years by theilliterate · · Score: 1

      Define "first".. apparently there have been wars for thousands of years.. it's the first one that anyone remembers..

      I'm just itching to find out how the human race is separate from the clone people anymore.. if there are hybrids during each cycle, then the humans are going to be part hybrid, all of them, right?

    3. Re:Only 50 years by arthurp · · Score: 1

      It actually looks like the cylons gained sentients quite recently. Roughly 55 years before the series it looks like. The war 40 years before really was the first cylon war, cause they didn't exist before that.

      And although I think the idea of repeated hybridization is cool it's not applicable to the show.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cylon_(reimagining)#History

    4. Re:Only 50 years by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      "We?" Dude, the whole point is that you're not supposed to tell people you're a Cylon.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  25. Do they have a plan? by transami · · Score: 1

    Yea right.

    They still can't make sense of the last series b/c they messed it up so bad -- they kept telling us they had a plan, oh really? what "plan"? it was a random mess.

    And Boomer and clones got so "fraked-up" I don't think it's even possible to square it with any logical consistency.

    BSG no longer falls under SciFi, it's FrakedFi.

    --
    :T:R:A:N:S:
  26. Old, Old news. by solios · · Score: 1

    io9 has been reporting on Caprica since at least January, if not earlier. The real news here is that SciFi's ordered up a full season, even though it hasn't aired the pilot yet.

    This could be a rash decision on their part - the series pitch is loudly devoid of anything that's made the rebooted series interesting (namely, spaceships and explosions), instead loudly billing itself as Dynasty in spaaaaaace.

    I don't know about you, but my gut reaction to this is a bored "next!"

    If the story gets over its pretentious pretext and goes somewhere interesting - like, say... the first Human/Cylon war, then I'm in. Otherwise... what's to distinguish it from the umpty other dramas out there, aside from (one would hope) an sfx budget?

    1. Re:Old, Old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first Human/Cylon war?

      Wasn't that over in like, 7 minutes?

      I suppose they could make _maybe_ one episode about it, but tit would have to be so incredibly chock full of pointless filler as to make it unbearable to watch...

    2. Re:Old, Old news. by solios · · Score: 1

      It would, but for me, "family drama" is just a shorter way of saying "42 minutes of filler."

    3. Re:Old, Old news. by thermian · · Score: 1

      I suspect they are going for the daytime soap watching audience, including, yes, the kind of people who watched Dallas. That is a pretty hefty and reliable market, there are millions of people with time to watch these things, so if they could get it, the advertising space revenue would be good.

      However, without a helluva loads of advertising, they just won't reach their target audience, since last I checked, people who don't normally watch SF don't even look at the SciFi channel.

      It sounds pretty boring to me too.

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    4. Re:Old, Old news. by solios · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The pitch as I understand it sounds like a show that would really rake it in on Lifetime or maybe AMC. Any net that doesn't "specialize" in Sci-Fi.

      (of course, SciFi runs wrestling, so who knows what they're thinking...)

    5. Re:Old, Old news. by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      At first, I read that as "42 minutes of Helfer

      Yes Please!

    6. Re:Old, Old news. by solios · · Score: 1

      Oh, we could only wish!

  27. WOW!!! First science fiction family saga!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am so excited I could hardly care less!!!!

  28. television's first science fiction family saga by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What about Thunderbirds (1965)? Jeff Tracy and his five sons...

    Lost in Space (also 1965) -- John Robinson, his wife and three kids.

    Plenty of "families" in SF, depends how you define "saga", which on TV usually means "multi-generational soap opera". If so, not really a drawcard, I think.

  29. Actual editorial activity? by toby · · Score: 1

    Apparently, Slash articles need to have pre-posting supplemental research/vetting/URL-add-ons before going into the wild:

    Then it just wouldn't be Slashdot ...

    --
    you had me at #!
  30. BSG doesn't air in "Seasons." by solios · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sure, they CALL them seasons, but if you think about it what we're really getting are UK-length series* of the show, mislabeled.

    Think about it.

    Series 1 : 13 episodes, Jan-April 2005

    Series 2 : 10 episodes, July-September 2005

    Series 3 : 10 episodes, Jan-March 2006 # called "season 2.5" for the DVDs and considered to be "second half" of season 2.

    Series 4 : 20 episodes, October 2006 - January 2007 # called "season 3," the only time the new BSG has run in anything approximating a traditional TV "season" form.

    Series 5 : 10 episodes, April-June 2008 # called "the first half of season 4"

    Series 6 : 10 episodes, January-?? 2009 # called "the second half of season 4"

    * UK TV shows don't run in seasons, they run in "series" (eg series 1, series 2, etc. as listed above), typically of 1-10 episodes... though for British comedies, 4-6 episodes is considered a "series" - compare to the US "season," which typically consists of 18-22 episodes. Imagine waiting 46 weeks to get your weekly dose of Red Dwarf (or No Heroics or The IT Crowd or whatever).... it kinda makes the several-month gap between BSG series look positively brief.

  31. Tag this one Flying Motorcycles. by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    next up buck rodgers. bee dee bee dee bee dee

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  32. In other news... by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    The Harkonnens still hate the Atreides, Reverend Mother Gaius (Gaius? Hmm...) Helen Mohiam keeps her gom jabbar close and her pain box closer, CHOAM controls a whole lotta shit, the Spacing Guild refuses rides to people who aren't freer with their spice, and they still make many machines on Ix.

    Maybe THIS is the way they intend to bring a passable Dune movie to the screen when everything that has come before is stunningly and embarrassingly opus fail. Call it BSG and get rid of all the internal monologues and the sandworms.

  33. Happened it did, yeeesss... by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    Happened it did, embarrassing it was. Search your feelings, young Skywalker... you know it to be true.

    *self realization hits*

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

    Hey, does anyone know if they dismantled the flight-capable motorcycles that they borrowed out of the CHiPs prop room?

  34. Clueless Network by StormReaver · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "One of the network's frustrations with [Battlestar Galactica] has been its dark and increasingly complex mythology."

    If *that's* why the network was frustrated by the show, then the network is run by morons. The dark, complicated mythology is part of what made the show so good. Multidimensional characters with complex motivations were a great added bonus to high quality, space-based visual effects.

    The frustrations that *should* have been keeping network executives up at night involved huge downtime between seasons. That, above all else, is what caused viewership to decline. People simply lost interest in a show that appeared, for all intents and purposes, to be canceled every year. People were actually surprised when the next season began, and had already decided to watch something else.

    Granted, season 3 lost a lot of credibility when the space opera turned soap opera (that season sucked really bad), but the main problems came from scheduling mismanagement by the network.

    1. Re:Clueless Network by SlashBugs · · Score: 1

      I can see some logic there, though. These latter episodes are quite dark and very complex - if you can't remember the whole backstory, there's no way you'll be able to follow what the hell is going on.

      This makes it really, really hard for new viewers to drop into the series, even if they're not immediately put off by the geeky and depressing atmosphere.* No matter how good the timeslot is, any show like that will have a really hard time replacing the audience members that are lost through natural attrition.

      From a fan's perspective it makes for a much better show (even if the insace season-breaks mean I can barely remember what the hell is going on), but making it intimidating to newcomers is bad for the network.

      * slashdotters, insert comparisons to your "trendy bachelor pad" here!

  35. But... by Burnhard · · Score: 1

    But no occassionally naked Trisha Helfer, so I won't be watching.

  36. I'm still in mourning for Pushing Daisies by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Now if they could get all the hot women from that show to be on Caprica, I'd be a very happy fellow.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:I'm still in mourning for Pushing Daisies by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      It seems plausible that the Cylons chose the form for their human evolution from a set of real humans that they revered. So maybe we will see those original humans, with a dozen story arcs that try to explain why.

  37. New series? Let's finish the current one first... by rtobyr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Spoiler alert... So they got to Earth and it was nuked and uninhabitable. I thought that was only the first half of season 4. They said that "everything will be revealed." Where the hell are those last 10 episodes?

  38. Great by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Great, twenty more hours of shakey cam to get dizzy to.

    It's too bad they didn't apply this film-school-grade technique in post-production digitally, so they could later re-release a collectors edition, minus the crappy shakey cam. I was so excited about BSC, but can't watch the show, the shakey cam is too distracting. Let your actors and your plot wow your viewers and set the atmosphere, not your wobbly camera. Sigh...

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Great by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      The shakey-cam is intentional, for one. For two, it is a professional technique and has been used in other series such as Firefly. Three, and there's a lot of action scenes in it and it's rather difficult to convey the feeling of motion by just having the actors sway in place and say "ooh". Sorry if you can't handle anything that isn't shot like the evening news but that's really a perception problem -- there's nothing wrong with the technique.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    2. Re:Great by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      The problem with the technique is it does not add anything to the story while alienating people like myself who have a hard time watching that sort of thing. I have the same problem with Band of Brothers, Saving Private Ryan, Romeo + Juliet, etc. I end up not watching because it's distracting and difficult to focus on what's going on.

      $0.02USD,
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    3. Re:Great by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      The problem with the technique is it does not add anything to the story while alienating people like myself who have a hard time watching that sort of thing. I have the same problem with Band of Brothers, Saving Private Ryan, Romeo + Juliet, etc. I end up not watching because it's distracting and difficult to focus on what's going on.

      The camera doesn't add anything to the story either, as long as we're on about that. You rather answered the real reason to your critique however -- you're overly sensitive to rapid changes in visual scenery. You probably get frustrated with a lot of video games or first person shooters. Nothing to be ashamed of, a lot of people (especially the 40+ crowd) have that issue.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    4. Re:Great by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      You probably get frustrated with a lot of video games or first person shooters.

      And nothing of value was lost!

      I'm just being facetious. I play video games, though not first person shooters cause they're boring. Mainly I watch movies for character anyway so this crappy "let's make the action more intense through a very fake looking camera shaking" doesn't add anything for me. I don't like it because it detracts from the action, IMO. This is independent of my dealing with it, which is poorly, because it irritates me and is a little disorienting. Not disorienting in a good way like when you see 2001 for the first time, but disorienting in a "I *was* watching a movie but now there's all this annoying shaking breaking my suspension of disbelief".

      The other problem with it is it can be done more or less tastefully. Usually, it's waaaaay over the top. Then they make it worse with some fake looking color scheme (like that white-out look in Saving Private Ryan and Band o Brothers). It just makes for an over-the-top, anesthetized look.

      $0.02USD,
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    5. Re:Great by catchy_handle · · Score: 1

      Wait, I went to film school, and we were encouraged to use tripods. Shakey was bad. That was the late eighties, though. I think it was the tv show NYPD Blue that popularized the shakey technique. Looked like the camera was mounted on a tripod or dolly but the camera assistant went nuts with the pan and tilt. Drove me nuts, watched only a few episodes.

      Haven't seen Blair Witch Trial or last Summer's monster movie (all shot hand held?) because of this. Did watch Saving Private Ryan at home, which was intense enough, can't imagine sitting through the opening scene (Omaha beach) in the theater.

      BSG doesn't bother me as much, it much more subtle, and I am 40.

    6. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is something to be said for the slow and steady style of Star Trek I.

  39. Except Deep Space 9 had Babylon 5 to compete with by markdowling · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When B5 got into its stride, DS9 got into the story arc business and largely out of the NG inherited planet of the week plot.

    While not a classic series - how could it be with the incessant mood swings of Avery Brooks and almost everything involving Quark or Jake Sisko - it had some periods approaching greatness (Improbable Cause/The Die Is Cast, Call To Arms/A Time to Stand). But then Babylon 5 disappeared onto TNT and DS9's writers had several brain farts (such as Ezri Dax and Vic Fontaine) and that was that.

    Who's going to keep Moore and Eick from making Caprica a Bionic Woman sized disaster?

  40. Watch it on Hulu.com by SilverJets · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you are in the States, watch BSG on hulu.com

  41. Frack!! Don't read parent before seeing Season 4! by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    Spoiler alert... Darth Vader is Luke's Father (NB: Actual spoiler changed to protect the innocent - but you get the gist)

    Thanks - I'm in the UK, don't have Murdochvision and had 'negotiated' the Season 4 DVDs for Xmas.

    Generally, the idea of writing "spoiler alert" is to at least put a fracking blank line between the "spoiler alert" (or maybe, you know, put it in the fracking subject line) and the actual fracking spoiler so those of us who can read without pointing at each fracking word in turn can avert our fracking eyes in time.

    Frack frack frackity-frack!

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  42. Re:New series? Let's finish the current one first. by karstux · · Score: 1

    Dude... put some fucking newlines between "Spoiler alert" and the actual spoiler. People usually scan a couple of words ahead before they register their meaning, and by then it's too late to block the spoiler. I would have liked to see the season before knowing the conclusion. Thanks a fucking lot.

    --
    Don't whistle while you're pissing.
  43. recently announced? by neubsi · · Score: 1

    i remember reading about this months ago... slow news, slow news indeed...

  44. I would've liked to watch it, but... by Sicily1918 · · Score: 1

    BSG has become crap. Sure, the story's great and I want to know what's happened, but the characters are so flawed (and *only* flawed) that they're not worth a shit... it's so sad that I couldn't care less if all of them die. The only character worth anything is Helo -- the single character that has some principles and sticks to them. The rest are annoyingly arrogant, self-centered, self-serving morons.

    Now they want to do more of the same, but without spaceships and explosions?

  45. Couldn't agree more by denzacar · · Score: 1

    I've managed to hold out until mid second season, but then I had to give up. My head was starting to hurt.

    Turning it into "Religious Fanatics in Space" didn't really help either.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  46. this is the problem with spin-offs by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you want to do a spin-off right, it should really have something to do with the original show. Now there have been exceptionally successful spin-offs, mostly American comedies. (I say successful in that they ran a long time, making no judgment on quality.) In fact, it's often surprising to find out which show they spun off from. Frasier came from Cheers, Jeffersons came from some other show that you wouldn't have thought of, Laverne and Shirley spun off of something else, Mork and Mindy was based on something else. But then there's also all of the really crappy spin-offs that simply could not stand on their own two feet, just like a band that works because of all of the members coming together and the solo acts never have that same magic after they split.

    The thing that's always funny to see is when something is spun off in a completely nonsensical way. She-Ra was a spin-off of He-Man. What were they thinking? No boy worth his salt is going to play with a girl's toy and why would the girls want to play with something tied in to a boy's toy? And as far as this goes, we're taking a spaceships and robot scifi story and spinning it off into a soap opera? I mean yeah, there are some soapy elements to BSG already but this really does sound like Dallas in Space (except they never travel off-planet.)

    I don't get it. The Paramount suits said they'd never do a show on a space station becuase that's like taking the wheels off the cart, you never go anywhere interesting and it would require a lot of contrivances to get interesting things to come to you. I think the more appropriate complaint would be setting a show in the Star Trek universe in a restaurant in a backwater town on Earth that doesn't get much traffic from offworlders. Yeah, look at this big neat universe we're not seeing!

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:this is the problem with spin-offs by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, The Jeffersons was a spin-off of All In The Family.

      I couldn't remember the name of the Laverne and Shirley spin-off, and I didn't even know that Mork & Mindy was a spin-off. A quick check of Wikipedia shows that Laverne and Shirley had a 2-season animated version, but I doubt that was the spin-off that you were thinking of.

      Apparently, Laverne and Shirley and Mork and Mindy are both Happy Days spin-offs. And a final little trivia bit to bring us in a full circle - when the original Battlestar Galactica was canceled, Mork and Mindy was moved into its old time slot.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    2. Re:this is the problem with spin-offs by tqft · · Score: 1

      Set the show at "The Captains Table"

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
    3. Re:this is the problem with spin-offs by instarx · · Score: 1

      Jeffersons - All in the Family
      Lavern and Shirley - Happy Days
      Mork and Mindy - also Happy Days (I think)

      HOwever, given the hatred that most scifi fans showed toward BSG before it aired, you never can tell what Caprica will be like. Most thought that BSG couldn't possibly be any good, and now the same folks think Caprica can't possibly be any good.

      Maybe it will be bad, but people should stop deciding that it stinks before they've even seen a single episode.

  47. They had to wait by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    until the final five got revealed.

    We will see human personalities downloaded into a human like Cylon after Zoe Graystone dies in a terrorist attack. Then Zoe-R will be the prototype for the human Cylons. 50 years before the fall of the Twelve Colonies.

    The Adamas will most likely be opposed to the creation of the new Cylons and feud with the Graystones who created them, but they have Graystones involved in relationships with the Adamas to make it more complex.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  48. Sounds stupid by Orig_Club_Soda · · Score: 0

    Who cares about two families fueding?

  49. TH by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Without Tricia Helfer what is really going to be worth watching?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  50. Oh God... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...please no... BSG2K(c) was bad enough.

  51. The Sci-Fi channel should be nuked by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

    In the context of the cancellation of Stargate Atlantis and it's replacement with Space: 90210, Sci-Fi can shove Caprica and Sanctuary where the 3 suns of Tatooine don't shine.

    --
    Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
  52. Oh great by Wabbit+Wabbit · · Score: 1

    'Caprica' will deliver all of the passion, intrigue, political backbiting and family conflict in television's first science fiction family saga.

    In other words, all the boring parts.

    Wonderful.

    If I wanted Desperate Housewives in Space, I'd...well...I...

    The new series started out with such a bang, and devolved into some kind of retro-90s self-indulgent pseudo-moralistic narcissistic tripe. This we need more of?

    Let's get back to the basics guys: less red dress, more red blood.

    --
    Nothing is inexplicable; only unexplained -Tom Baker, Doctor Who
  53. Or you could watch "Terminator" by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    and get all this today: "all of the passion, intrigue, political backbiting and family conflict in television's first science fiction family saga".

    In "Terminator", you've got a half-crazed mother, a rebellious teenager, a scheming uncle from the future - and a female robot who wants to seduce the teenager. Currently, you also have said teenager running around with a girl who happens to be a plant being run by a rogue Resistance fighter from the future who's trying to off the female robot and who's screwing the uncle. Bad news coming down! Somebody's gonna die!

    Can't beat that for fun.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  54. Original series references by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the pilot when they fly the Vipers around the "museum" as a demonstration, the theme music from the original series plays for a bit.

    In the show, it's the Colonial anthem. When Adama tells everyone about Earth, he recites a line from the opening narration and identifies it as the first words of their scriptures.

  55. First War? by olddotter · · Score: 1

    As a Sci-Fi fan I think it would be interesting to see the time leading up to and including the first war with the Cylons. Not just the development of the Cylon technology, but the action of the battle. If it just becomes a Sci-Fi Soap, then I'm not sure who the audience is....

  56. Re:'Dallas in Space' by macraig · · Score: 1

    Yep, that was my immediate first reaction, too. How could we not think that, though, considering the way the announcement was worded? Suppose they might have even plagiarized some of the old copy for Dallas when they sat down to write that?

  57. Should call it by Inv8r+Zim · · Score: 1

    Caprica 90210

  58. Cool, we finally get to see the reptiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the Cylon race of reptiles that created the cybernetics of the same name. The reptiles went extinct, but the machines carried on.

  59. slober warning by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    Putting the words or phrases "Polly Walker, sexual politics, grappling with love sex and politics" in one article... Excuse me I have to go to the bathroom.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  60. finally. by tisch · · Score: 1

    finally. something to watch.

  61. Re:Bears? by Macrat · · Score: 1

    Like BJ and the Bear?

  62. Re:Season 3? by Macrat · · Score: 1

    What? There was a third season? I thought the series ended when they settled New Caprica!

  63. I saw this - man did it suck! by K8Fan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was walking through the mall connecting two Las Vegas hotels with my brother a few months ago when a someone asked if we have "a few minutes to watch a program". After signing up, we were in a room with two TV sets, holding a pair of buttons on cords - press the green one when you liked what you were seeing, the red one when you didn't. That red button got quite a work-out. After the sucking stopped (nearly an hour later!), we answered an electronic questionaire where we could explain why we thought it sucked, and in what ways. I took it as the opportunity to mention other non-dreadful SF programming like the new Doctor Who. In brief, I hated every character in this show and didn't much care for the actors playing the characters. If I ever see an episode of it again, it will be far too soon./pP

    --
    "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    1. Re:I saw this - man did it suck! by instarx · · Score: 1

      The new Dr. Who is surprisingly good. By "new" I mean the NEW new, with the latest Doctor. I couldn't understand a word the previous two new Doctors said, much less any of their side-kicks. It was like they were all speaking a foreign language! At least they are all now speaking a form of English where closed-captioning isn't necessary.

      I had to use CC for some of Primeval, but after a promising start, that show devolved into major suckiness. Problem solved - I don't have to CC it because I no longer watch it.

  64. Old news!... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This series has been shooting in Vancouver, BC since the summer. They shut down some streets around where I worked for some shooting.

    I'm not sure why this is being posted now. But the public needs to know!

  65. Re:Except Deep Space 9 had Babylon 5 to compete wi by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

    I actually liked DS9, and consider it generally the best of the ST series. Not that it wasn't guilty of some heinous violations (like Vic Fontaine), but some of the episodes were among the best written and performed of any ST series, and could even get me to tear up. (I'm thinking of the show, "The Visitor." A very moving episode.)

  66. Galactica suxx0rs by Crass+Spektakel · · Score: 1

    What are people liking about Galactica NT?

    It is a series about a bunch of spaceships full of retarded idiots, so stubborn, unpleasant, unfocused, no planning, blind and arrogant that I would join the cylons in the instance to whipe out that insult to intelligent life.

    The old Galactica had its moments, was fancy and had surprises, but Galactica NT is just a remake of a brasilian telenovela which added spaceships.

    --
    "Life is short and in most cases it ends with death." Sir Sinclair
  67. Comparing BSG with B5 by jesterzog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think it is so much that the show got less believable, as that the rules started changing from episode to episode.

    I think this is definitely true. I don't watch a lot of TV and I bought the first 3 seasons of BSG after a friend recommended it. I've enjoyed it, mostly for the drama, and I'll probably buy S4 when it's finally available just so I can see how it ends, but there have also been a lot of inconsistencies that I've found irritating or confusing.

    This isn't exactly a new thing, though. It goes right back to the first season when we were shown that Cylons were clearly biologically different from humans (glowing read spine, etc), yet creating a "cylon detector" is such a difficult thing. I never really understood the whole Cylon Detector plot, which at the time seemed like an excuse to give Baltar something to do and create conflict with other characters. After seeing season 3, I now think that's probably exactly all that it was... lazy design of the details and hoping that things would make more sense later on. Baltar's a really fun character and it's interesting seeing him weasel his way around everything, but early on the character didn't really have much to work with so they just made up something empty.

    I think the plot problems are because the writing team never really figured out any solid rules or boundaries or what would happen to begin with. The writing of the drama and character development is often pretty interesting and it's what keeps me watching the show, but the plots and details often seem as if they were just tied together to create an excuse to be able to have something fail or work as the writers want it to. As you've said (I think), it's like technobabble solving the problem, but with all the extra meaningless dialogue to go with it. Instead, they just let crazy and irrational details get in and don't even try to explain them.

    If you compare BSG to something like Babylon 5, I think B5 would easily come out on top (at least for the first 4 seasons), despite having been one of the first series of its kind to actually experiment with a major story arc. B5 had all the strong drama and character development of BSG, but JMS also put so much effort into defining much of the relevant stuff about his universe to a needle's-width before he even produced the first episode. He knew what the rules were from the beginning, and 4-5 years in advance, he knew how all the main parts of his story would fit into the rules.

    1. Re:Comparing BSG with B5 by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Yes you are right. B5 had depth, but more importantly was inclusive of all the elements that humanity has believed in, even an explanation of angels.
      There wasn't too much that fell into technobabble or techno-fantasy, except maybe the time-travel plotline.
      I wish JMS/Harlan had more money and support for a continuation - maybe a few hundred years into the future?

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  68. Re:Except Deep Space 9 had Babylon 5 to compete wi by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

    DS9 started to lean serial at a time when it was a big no-no to do so. Now we have these kind of shows (Lost, Prison Break, BSG, etc.) left and right. I always thought the serial nature of the latter half of DS9 was its strength. Many people hate shows like this - I love them and hate "episode of the week" plots. Consequently, DS9 is my favorite Star Trek. Maybe it's because I like reading books and heavily serialized TV shows are like having a story read/acted to you.

    I was disappointed when Season 3 of BSG went episodic at the behest of SciFi. Straying from the serial nature of Seasons 1 and 2 was retarded; after all, how did they think it got where it did in ratings, magic? It's too bad they broke its momentum. Season 4 starts to get away from some of that BS, and hopefully it'll finish out they way it started. I can't really understand the hate so many people seem to have for new BSG and their undying love of the original.

    --
    this is my sig
  69. what you really mean is! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this story was reported 3 years ago, but still hasn't come to fruition

  70. Close, but not quite... by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    >This probably should wait until George Lucas is dead, just to be safe.
    1. GreyStones Wars
    2. Revenge of the Adamas
    3. The Greystones Strike Back
    4. Profit!
    Shudder.....

    More like:
    4. GreyStones Wars
    5. The Greystones Strike Back
    6. Revenge of the Adamas
    7. Profit!
    1. Make up some cheesy name and add in some REALLY annoying characters, which results in angering all current fans
    2. Somehow STILL Profit! ...

    --
    Karma: NaN
  71. Re:Frack!! Don't read parent before seeing Season by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You wait? You actually _wait_??? Have you ever heard of EZTV?

  72. Re:Frack!! Don't read parent before seeing Season by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    You wait? You actually _wait_???

    Yeah, see, when something as high-quality as BSG comes along I do actually believe that the makers deserve some money in return. Crazy, I know.

    If the GP had actually had something insightful to say about the end of 4.1, rather than gratuitously dropping a big frackin' spoiler-bomb for no adequately explored reason, then I might have been more sympathetic...

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.