Slashdot Mirror


Brand Names Take On Generics In PSU Showdown

The Raindog writes "The power supply is perhaps the most overlooked element of a modern PC, and yet it's the one component that can irreparably damage the rest of a system. The market is littered with generic PSUs that are often much cheaper than name-brand alternatives, but can you trust them? The Tech Report aims to find out in its latest power supply round-up, which compares the performance, efficiency, and noise levels of a collection of reputable PSUs with some budget, no-name competition. As it turns out, any money you save on a generic PSU purchase will likely cost you more in the long run."

223 comments

  1. Also check your UPS by suso · · Score: 5, Informative

    And before you think that all your PSUs are failing because you bought them on the cheap, you should also check your UPS. I had 13 PSUs die at Suso and thought it was just horrible luck with power supplies, until I realized that the 5 year old UPS that those servers were on was having issues. Since I replaced it, haven't had any problems since. *knock* *knock*

    1. Re:Also check your UPS by gnick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Plug in a Kill-A-Watt. $24.99 on Amazon. It'll tell you your line voltage (with or without load), power consumption, and energy usage for the duration it's plugged in. If nothing else, you can figure out where your electricity is going, how much energy your computer(s) is/are using, and how well your UPS is living up to its promises (unplug it and watch its performance).

      I don't work for them or anything, it's just a good way to see what your UPS is up to and learn a little about your household energy usage.

      Of course, if your problem really is your PSU rather than your UPS, all this unit does is narrow down the problem rather than solve it... Still, I consider it worth my $25.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    2. Re:Also check your UPS by amirulbahr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *knock* *kno
      ... would have been so much funnier.

    3. Re:Also check your UPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Where would one get a European version of that?

    4. Re:Also check your UPS by weirdo557 · · Score: 1, Funny

      i guess even backup power has its UPS and downs.

    5. Re:Also check your UPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost any hardware store will sell you one.

    6. Re:Also check your UPS by BlackCreek · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Ok, I reckon this is in Dutch but this is the only shop I know selling this. I have one, and I love it.

      It will even transfer the measurements to a SD card. It comes with a English text. manual. Continental Europe socket.

      Voltcraft ENERGY LOGGER 3500

      If you search for this stuff in amazon.de you will find one that claims to have ranked 2nd in a German magazine testing of energy measuring devices. This is the new version of the one who got first.

      I have no relation to this shop, or manufacturer, I just love the gadget.

    7. Re:Also check your UPS by rvw · · Score: 1

      Google for Energy Monitor 3000 or Brennenstuhl PM230. I believe the EM3000 is the better option.

    8. Re:Also check your UPS by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It looks like most UPSes make systems *less* reliable on balance. How frequent is a power failure compared to a UPS failure?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    9. Re:Also check your UPS by berend+botje · · Score: 1

      Excuse the Dutch language

      De link werkt niet voor anderen omdat deze afhankelijk is van je sessie-cookie. Als je aan de rechterkant van het artikelinfo schermpje kijkt zou je daar als het goed is een boxje hebben moeten staan met "directe produkt link". Die doet het altijd.

      Anyway, we now return you to your scheduled programme.

    10. Re:Also check your UPS by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I got mine in LIDL. Wait for them to come around again...

      --
      No sig today...
    11. Re:Also check your UPS by kv9 · · Score: 1

      It looks like most UPSes make systems *less* reliable on balance.

      that seems to be true. I had an el cheapo UPS that wasn't very stable. at times, shit hooked up to it just froze. then I sprung for a nice rackable MGE which has been running like a champ for 8 months now. no more freezes.

      How frequent is a power failure compared to a UPS failure?

      my logs tell me theres about 2-4 minutes of power loss every few months. and I had an UPS last for about 4 years before it croaked. YMMV.

    12. Re:Also check your UPS by stupido · · Score: 1

      Practically any UPS that costs more than $100 will report power consumption as well, these days via USB. No need spend extra for that Kill-A-Watt.

    13. Re:Also check your UPS by BlackCreek · · Score: 2, Informative
      My original link does not work. here is the proper one:

      ENERGY LOGGER 3500

    14. Re:Also check your UPS by Casharelle · · Score: 1

      Power failure are very frequent depending on where you live in the country, and it only takes a brief sag in voltage to take down your system/rack/entire data center if you are unprotected by a UPS.

      A good, solid UPS is very reliable as long as you keep it maintained. The major issue is keeping the batteries good, not continually exposing them to deep discharges, etc.

      There is a reason that the Microsofts, Googles and other huge users of data centers spend millions of dollars on critical infrastructure like UPSs in order to protect their investments.

    15. Re:Also check your UPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you suspect that your UPS may be faulty, do you want to trust a report from your UPS to diagnose it? You're not in calibration, are you?

    16. Re:Also check your UPS by Kaboom13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dual power supplies are your friend. 1 plug goes to the UPS, the other to an independent UPS or the wall. That said, UPS failures are rare if you perform regular maintenance (AKA replace batteries etc BEFORE they fail on you). I suppose it depends a lot on the individual area, but in an are alike mine where severe thunderstorms are common, power outages happen a couple times a year minimum, vs UPS failure that are very rare. Not to mention, you get what you pay for. Office Supply store brand UPS are not going to be reliable.

    17. Re:Also check your UPS by suso · · Score: 1

      A good, solid UPS is very reliable as long as you keep it maintained. The major issue is keeping the batteries good, not continually exposing them to deep discharges, etc.

      Actually, the UPS in question had just recently had its battery pack replaced. And this was an APC 1400VA rack mount UPS, nothing cheap. I know another sysadmin that said he had the same problem once as well. So apparently something else very critical can fail inside UPSes besides the battery.

      For more information, this is in a data center with diesel generator that kicks in after 30 seconds, so the UPSes generally only see 30 seconds of action maybe once a month.

    18. Re:Also check your UPS by NSIM · · Score: 1

      Frequency of power failure is going to depend a lot on where you are. According to the logging software on my UPS, it has switched to battery 38 times in the last 24 weeks, so it has saved my system an average of 1.5+ times/week. The UPS cost me about $100 bucks, so it seems like a pretty solid investment!

    19. Re:Also check your UPS by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      For this home user (work is a different issue) I've got through 1 UPS in 8 years. I replaced it with a similar machine a couple of years ago, and so far so good. We typically get some 3 or 4 fairly serious power cuts in summer when the heat hits (Perth, Western Australia gets fairly warm from time to time), and everybody's air-conditioning takes out the grid. So I guess the small investment is worthwhile.

      Since I started doing the bulk of my work from home on a laptop, leaving the desktop machines for more "heavy haulage" tasks, I have stopped running any computers off my UPS.

      I now just use it to drive low-voltage things like modem/router, wireless, phones and suchlike. So far, not even the worst of the power cuts we've had have run the UPS down, so we get to keep the net connection and phone running (since we're on naked DSL) with no impact.

      If something happens that's serious enough to knock out the ISP's end, we have mobile access if we need it.

    20. Re:Also check your UPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *knock* *knock*

      Who's there?

    21. Re:Also check your UPS by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Did your system really go down every few days before you got the UPS? I'd say the manufacturer's logging software has an incentive to over-report how many times it has 'saved your system'. A faulty UPS unit that switched to battery several times a day even though it didn't need to would 'save your system' even more!

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    22. Re:Also check your UPS by Gnavpot · · Score: 4, Funny

      t looks like most UPSes make systems *less* reliable on balance. How frequent is a power failure compared to a UPS failure?

      One of the more ironic examples:

      The truck delivering a new UPS unit to a Danish ISP accidentally hit the electric installation on the street outside the server center and cut off the power supply to the server center.

      Of course, the old UPS was disconnected at that time to make room for the new unit.

    23. Re:Also check your UPS by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      I don't know about "software" but the management cards you can put in to the higher end units don't lie. It actually doesn't catch power bumps under a second; only after 2 or 3 seconds. I have and older SmartUPS 700 on my computer because the power quality at home is horrible - the lights regularly go bright/dim several times a day - and it'll switch to battery briefly, but it's not in the event log unless it's over a second. If I didn't have the UPS, I'd probably be in a fit of range from daily power interruptions. (APC SNMP/Web cards)

      --
      this is my sig
    24. Re:Also check your UPS by NSIM · · Score: 1

      I've run my systems on UPS for about the last 15 years, so it's hard to say for sure. However, when I've been at my PC and the UPS has switched, I've noticed lights flicker or go out momentarily, so my guess is that the interruption in those cases would have been sufficient to bring the system down.

    25. Re:Also check your UPS by dingleberrie · · Score: 1

      If it were a UPS truck making the delivery then I would mod it +1 redundant.

    26. Re:Also check your UPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A well built PSU should work with typcial swings and changes in the line supply. If you have to have a filtered supply though a UPS to keep the PSU safe, you have a crappy PSU. We have about 750 desktops running 24x7, they are not on a UPS, we diagnose maybe 1 faulty PSU a year.

    27. Re:Also check your UPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How frequent is a power failure compared to a UPS failure?

      That depends on the quality of both the UPS and your local power. If you buy the cheapest UPS you can find, don't be surprised when it doesn't last.

      My mother was burning out a TiVo every 4-6 months due to all the brown/black-outs where she lives--since putting it on a low-end UPS (APC Back-UPS 350), no problems for two years and counting.

      Where I live I get power glitches a few times a month, and significant outages (enough to drain the UPS) a few times a year. I fry low-end UPSs in a year or two. Once I coughed up the money for decent ones (APC Smart-UPS 1000), I've only had one failure in the past five years (and that one was replaced for free).

      Well worth the money to me.

    28. Re:Also check your UPS by Lord+Kestrel · · Score: 1

      I lose power several times a year. The most recent outage was 3 days ago on Sunday. High wind speeds combined with way too many trees make for frequent power failures.

  2. Antec is the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's about it. Buy Seasonic.

    1. Re:Antec is the worst by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, some friends of mine had a no-name PSU explode, literally. One of the electrolytic caps decided it had had enough. I replaced it with an Antec and no problems for as long as they used it.

      Oh, and the Antec PSU in my personal machine died one day, possibly because it was plugged into an 11-year-old surge protector. I got a free replacement (minus shipping), and the replacement is a nicer unit and handles more power.

      Say what you will, but their service is nothing to complain about.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    2. Re:Antec is the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Antec is one of the best brands out there. They tested their "low end" line that Antec just started a few years ago. In fact, they didn't even really test a "generic" one, pretty much every one was either high end or a good brand. Go troll elsewhere.

    3. Re:Antec is the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have literally 6 dead Antec PSUs in my closet, all were refused any sort of replacement, and all have obviously bulging capacitors. Several of them also took out several sticks of RAM, 2 motherboards, and a hard drive, spread across various computers of my own and friends. All of the computers with Antec PSUs (purchased all from newegg.com over ~5 years) eventually stopped turning on reliably, starting making funny squealing noises from the PSU, and/or starting crashing randomly. All of the Antec PSUs have been replaced with Seasonic now, and no computer has has a single hardware problem since its PSU was replaced (and in some cases, other hardware which was replaced at the same time as listed above).

    4. Re:Antec is the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Right. Bose is one of the best brands of speakers, and neon lights make your computer go faster. Sorry, but Antec is all marketing and no quality. All the ricer overclockers want to believe that Antec PSUs make their computers +0.2% faster, but the truth is, Antec uses some of the lowest quality parts in their PSUs and if you check something like badcaps.net, you'll realize that Antec is one of the most commonly reported brands in the PSU category, and most widely complained about brand in the forums.

    5. Re:Antec is the worst by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Really? Most reviews of their PSUs have them with pretty good ratings, and their PSUs are pretty power efficient too. I have their EarthWatts 500 PSU and it's really good, my GPU technically requires 550W but it's fine. I've never heard of any bad things about Antec before, the worst ones are the ones from Best Buy et al that have some random company you've never heard of.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    6. Re:Antec is the worst by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      It sure is interesting that they chose to test the only antec psu that doesnt have a pci-e connector. The 380W and 420W earthwatts have one, and the 500w basiq has one.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    7. Re:Antec is the worst by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      I use Antec or Thermaltake, both are great. I don't know what GP is crying about.

      Yet another case of "I got a defective unit, noone should buy this product" crap. Get warranty, if they keep failing, then start posting on slashdot with the facts, not "it's bad, buy what I've been told is good".

    8. Re:Antec is the worst by Ungulate · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except, of course, for the Antec EarthWatts. And the TruePower series. Both of which are... made by Seasonic.

    9. Re:Antec is the worst by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      If that were true, that might explain both GP's bad experience (if he's not trolling) and my (mostly) good experience with Antec PSU's. Do you have a source for that info?

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    10. Re:Antec is the worst by floodo1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      jonnyguru.com is probably the best site for power supply reviews. the guy does FULL disassembly, even removing rectifiers and diodes and stuff. Because of this he is able to determine what OEM manufactured every power supply he tests, and also gives you comments that, if you payed enough attention, would allow YOU to determine the layouts typical of each OEM. He's also the guy that started using an actual load tester to test power supplies, instead of testing them by placing them in systems. The ORIGINAL hard core power supply test site!

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    11. Re:Antec is the worst by sa1lnr · · Score: 1

      I wonder who made their Smartpower range? I had one of those fail last year, I took it appart to see if it was just the internal fuse that had blown. What I found inside was one of the worst examples of electronics manufacture I have ever seen. (I worked in this area for 17 years).

      The live and neutral mains wiring got reversed by the time it was connected to the pcb so the neutral was fused and the soldering on the underside of the pcb looked like it was done with a red hot poker. The cable looms were like spagetti, individual cables in them were all different lengths

      You can hide a multitude of sins behind one of those "Warranty void if broken" paper seals. ;)

      I've also had problems recently with two Hiper PSU's, Hiper appear to have used some really low quality fans on both these units.

    12. Re:Antec is the worst by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, seriously? I was about to come in swinging since I've never had an Antec fail on me or any of my end users... but I only install Earthwatts series.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    13. Re:Antec is the worst by eric-x · · Score: 1

      I did a lot of research before buying my PSU and I can confirm your statement. I have a truepower and the only thing that slightly worries me is the low air flow. I assume that they know what they're doing and that there is enough flow for the psu but be prepared to install a casefan if you don't have one already.

    14. Re:Antec is the worst by jps25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except, of course, for the Antec EarthWatts. And the TruePower series. Both of which are... made by Seasonic.

      Not entirely true.
      The older EarthWatts were made by Seasonic, the newer ones are made by Delta.
      Source: http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story&reid=110

    15. Re:Antec is the worst by borizz · · Score: 1

      For PSU's yes. But antec does make some good stuff too. I'm very pleased with the cases I bought from them.

    16. Re:Antec is the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Uhm. Maybe they're knock-off PSUs just labelled Antec. Seriously, I've never had an issue with antec supplies. I get nesteq or zalman ones now because of quiet-pc-addiction, but never had an issue with antec.

    17. Re:Antec is the worst by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      After you had 2-3 fail why did you buy 3-4 more?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    18. Re:Antec is the worst by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I second the use of Thermaltake. I've never had a problem with anything they make.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    19. Re:Antec is the worst by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      I don't know what they're power supplies are like, but their cases are excellent.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    20. Re:Antec is the worst by MojoStan · · Score: 1

      Except, of course, for the Antec EarthWatts. And the TruePower series. Both of which are... made by Seasonic.

      Not entirely true.
      The older EarthWatts were made by Seasonic, the newer ones are made by Delta.
      Source: http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php?name=NDReviews&op=Story&reid=110

      Argh. I've got nothing against Delta (don't know much about them), but I think the "EarthWatts" model name earned its good reputation by using Seasonic. It's like when LCD models change panel suppliers (and sometimes panel technology), but keep the same model name.

      For decent value-priced PSUs, I guess I'll just go with OEM models from Seasonic and FSP Group, which are made by... Seasonic and FSP Group.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    21. Re:Antec is the worst by dropadrop · · Score: 1

      Actually, some friends of mine had a no-name PSU explode, literally. One of the electrolytic caps decided it had had enough. I replaced it with an Antec and no problems for as long as they used it. Oh, and the Antec PSU in my personal machine died one day, possibly because it was plugged into an 11-year-old surge protector. I got a free replacement (minus shipping), and the replacement is a nicer unit and handles more power. Say what you will, but their service is nothing to complain about.

      We had a lot of Antec and Fortron PSU's at the company I work for. Almost all the Antec's have died, and they where replaced with Fortron. I have not yet seen a Fortron die. They where all the same model which probably had something to do with it, but bought within a timespan of 2 years.

    22. Re:Antec is the worst by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      I bought an Antec case (Tx1050b) maybe 3 years ago for a media server I built. It has 10 built in drive bays, but I've added an Icy Dock 4 drive (in 3 bays) enclosure with SATA II and hot swap goodness. After about 6 months the 500W PSU died, which I replaced with a 400W by a firm I had never heard of called Xion. That replacement is still purring along quite happily, and I still have the brand new replacement 500W Antec sent me as a spare. Both PSUs have decent cable management. The case is excellent though, whatever you think about the PSU. Guess I'll have to wait a while to find out if the replacement Antec sent is any good. It's currently still in its cellophane wrap.

      It's interesting looking back at the invoices now. I paid around £70 for a seagate 250GB SATA-I drive at the same time I bought the case. 6 months later (when buying the replacement PSU - 30 quid) I bought another 250GB seagate with SATA-II for around £55. A similar drive now, 2.5 years later with double the cache, is costing £35.

    23. Re:Antec is the worst by jps25 · · Score: 1

      Yea, I only buy Seasonic and you're right, EarthWatts have their good reputation because they were made by Seasonic.
      I bought an Antec NSK 4480, which comes with one, and am happy with it.
      The case, on the other hand, is..well, it was considerably cheaper (150EUR at the time) than an Antec P182 + a Seasonic PSU.

      Once had a bequiet! which was neither quiet nor any good, so I don't trust them anymore.

    24. Re:Antec is the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which should be interpreted in the context of their popularity. Given a constant "crappiness" factor, one would expect the volume of complaints to rise in step with the number of people that us Antec products. I don't think you can say Antec is garbage based solely on the fact that they are the "most widely complained about" brand.

    25. Re:Antec is the worst by sholsinger · · Score: 1

      I have had nothing but good experiences with Antec. I had heard that a few years ago, they were having trouble with the quality of their PSUs, but I have also heard that the problems with them have dropped off since early 2007.

    26. Re:Antec is the worst by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Uhm. Maybe they're knock-off PSUs just labelled Antec. Seriously, I've never had an issue with antec supplies. I get nesteq or zalman ones now because of quiet-pc-addiction, but never had an issue with antec.

      Nope, GP is correct. Antec puts out a lot of crap power supplies. I've had similar experiences with them myself, and will never buy another PSU from them.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    27. Re:Antec is the worst by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I stick with SeaSonic. Good combination of quiet and reliable.

    28. Re:Antec is the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they were staggered purchases for me and/or friends over a few years. The friends who turn their computer's off at night have had the PSUs last a bit longer than myself and others who leave them on 24/7. When I realized the pattern, I posted a bunch of pictures to badcaps.net and the best advice from several people was Seasonic was one of the better brands now. Antec quality has greatly declined in the last few years.

    29. Re:Antec is the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. As the same AC who posted a few times about 6+ dead Antec PSUs, I have to admit, I DO own quite a bit of Antec cases, and some of them are the best designed ones I've ever had. I love the rubber spacers to dampen hard drive noise, and the easy access/removal sections to mount the 3.5" devices in.

    30. Re:Antec is the worst by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

      Agreed, Seasonic is good stuff, very efficient, very quiet, very solid.

      --
      simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
    31. Re:Antec is the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the truth is, Antec uses some of the lowest quality parts in their PSUs.

      Not the ones which are rebranded Seasonics, like my Earthwatts 500.

    32. Re:Antec is the worst by Molochi · · Score: 1

      All the Antecs I use are Seasonics.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    33. Re:Antec is the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SmartPower, TruepowerII, and Phantoms were Channelwells. The Basiq line is FSP.

      Hiper = Andyson

    34. Re:Antec is the worst by godefroi · · Score: 1

      As opposed to your post, which is a case of "I didn't have a problem, so obviously no-one else will."

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    35. Re:Antec is the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't buy another Antec - I have read too many supportive stories from fans, just like you, who had their Antec die before it was supposed to.

      My Antec (430?) died on me, too, despite me choosing what was supposed to be one of their best models for providing constant power. It only lasted about a year - maybe less - and while they did warranty it, I couldn't wait so I bought some other PSU, at a lower wattage rating that is doing very well, and never used the Antec.

      Truthfully, as a company who I want to deal with, Antec might be nice people, but they won't have me investing time in their foils again.

    36. Re:Antec is the worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bose, better sound through marketing

    37. Re:Antec is the worst by Walter+Carver · · Score: 1

      Strange, all the Antec PSUs that reached my hands had excellent quality. Maybe because I'm in Europe?

  3. In other news... by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

    Buying cheap crap that's pumping out power to sensitive electronics can damage the things it's connected to can make things go horribly wrong!

    In other news, your computer is not a good thing to use as a coffee table, puppies should not be left unsupervised near cabling, and you should not leave your cell phone in your pocket while washing your clothing.

    Is this surprising anyone?

    --
    To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    1. Re:In other news... by Kagura · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm genuinely curious, what parts are different or better in a more expensive PSU? Or is it just a combination of confirmation bias and shelling out too many bucks to say it's not worth it? Not really an accusation, I'm more curious about what parts in a PSU can be "better", considering all the parts are mass manufactured, anyway.

    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a big difference in the quality of the parts that go into PSUs. The best example is really that low quality Taiwanese capacitors are very prone to bulging and/or exploding after ~1 year of use, while the slightly more expensive Japanese capacitors will last longer than you'll ever use your computer.

    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What cheap PSU's are often made of:
      1. MOSFETS with lower voltage and/or current ratings.
      2. Smaller heat sinks.
      3. Lower quality or undersized electrolytic capacitors (they leak and/or dry out resulting in poor regulation).
      4. Cheap sleeve bearing fan instead of ball bearing (if there's even a fan at all).
      5. Undersized inductors.
      6. No fuse to prevent it from going "BOOM!" in the event of a component failure.
      7. Inadequate overvoltage protection on the 3.3/5/12V outputs in the event of a component failure or excessive input voltage (causing computer parts to fry).
      8. Inadequate overcurrent protection on the input and output side.
      9. Little or no RTV or glue used under heavy components to keep them secured to the PCB (to prevent them from breaking off).
      10. Little or no post production inspection/final test prior to packaging and shipment.

      That's not to say all cheap PSUs are created equal. I've ordered some very well built PSU's that were $10-$20 after rebate. I've also bought some rather expensive ones that only lasted 1-2 years.

    4. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So if the difference in the price of the capacitors is slight, then where does the large difference in the price of the PSU come from?

    5. Re:In other news... by Malekin · · Score: 1

      Electrolytic capacitors are one obvious place cost can be cut.

      There are a couple of topologies that are applicable. Most computer powersuuplies are (I think) single-switch forward converters. The topologies with more switches provide better performance, but more switches means more expensive transistors.

      Higher frequency switching generally provides more stable output, but requires "faster" transistors and transistor drivers, which again, are more expensive than "slower" ones.

    6. Re:In other news... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Not an expert, but I'm guessing it has partly to do with the quality of capacitors, and probably more importantly with general design principles and quality control.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:In other news... by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1

      In my experience, a "decent" PSU usually costs anywhere from 40% to 200% more than a generic one and I have found that after many installations of generic PSUs, none have exploded, some have died after about 18 months and most have lived for the life of the machine dying for some other reason or being put out of commission.

      I never treat the PSU as something that should be kept waiting for the next generation of CPU to give it.

      New box, new PSU - cheapest is fine, like HD's, a small portion die in the first month where any shop will replace it for free regardless of price. Another small portion will die at an unexpected time a year or so later - annoying, but I can live with it. The rest will be put out of commission when the box is filled with dust years later.

      My experience shows that a price hike of no more than around 20% would make it worthwhile.

      Even then, no guarantee either way, which is why a decent PSU is no substitute for a decent backup system. It's hardware, be prepared for its unexpected death.

    8. Re:In other news... by mcrbids · · Score: 3, Informative

      Funny.

      I've been "doing" computers since the early 90s. I've never had much problem with power supplies. And I do mean *never*.

      I took an ancient, generic 286 computer, and upgraded it through 386SX, 486 DX/2, Cx 6x86, and AMD Athlon motherboards before finally switching to ATX. It was a cheezy, god-only-knows-who-made it power supply that came from a 'not-quite-aluminum-foil' AT case.

      And I've done plenty of computers since. I've *always* bought the cheapest, craptastic cases and power supplies, and generally had years of excellent service before dying. I'd say my average life expectancy for a power supply is over 5 years, and I say that because I generally give up on the computer before the power supply dies.

      What makes a computer last a long, LONG time?

      1) Under-clock the CPU. Really. 10-20% makes a significant difference in reliability because it runs cooler, but almost never makes enough difference to notice for real-world, day-to-day usability. As you approach the thermal limits of our CPU, the longevity drops off sharply. 10% makes a *huge* difference.

      2) Dust out the computer every year or so. Dust is an insulator, which causes heat "hot spots" that play hell with components.

      3) Replace the fans regularly. I keep servers running for years on years on years by replacing the fans every other year or so. Along with dusting out the server, they keep on ticking far longer than you ever thought possible. I've had systems last well over 10 years with decent reliability by doing this when performance simply wasn't an issue.

      4) Don't turn it off! Computers that are turned on/off every day last a few years. Servers that are babysat, running 24x7 at a consistent temperature run damn near forever. This costs money, so run the numbers to see what uptimes vs power consumption really costs you.

      I've never noticed power supplies (cheap, expensive) being much of an issue. I've seen craptastically cheap hardware run under heavy loads for a very long time without complaint, and I've seen plenty of expensive, "high end" hardware die well before it's expected life time. /shrug/

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    9. Re:In other news... by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The main things you'll see in a high end PSU:

      1) Voltage stabilizing in case the power coming to the PSU is not very good

      2) Quieter fans

      3) Output voltage/watts and efficiency stay within reason at higher load

      4) Some generic heat up quite a bit.

      Don't forget power factor correction (PFC). Especially in a datacenter.

    10. Re:In other news... by genik76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Research and development is costly, to find out which components are good. Additionally, each part in the supply chain adds their profit margin to the product, so adding value in the early levels of the supply chain (as in manufacturing) can easily add a significant amount of cost to the end price.

    11. Re:In other news... by theaveng · · Score: 1

      I don't know.

      But I do know that 2 of my eMachines had bad power supplies - they died after just 1.5 years. The first time was no big deal, but the second time damaged my hard drive causing me to lose all my nudist beach pho..... er, data.

      The $100 replacement supply has lasted 4 years so far with no sign of quitting.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    12. Re:In other news... by N1AK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've never underclocked a CPU, don't replace fans unless they break or get noisy and turn my computer off an average of two times a day. Never, ever has a computer broken even though I'm ignoring 3 of your rules.

      The thing is my above observation means absolutely nothing as the sample is far to small to be of any statistical significance. I expect the same is true for your experience with PSUs. If someone has done testing on a reasonable scale, in monitored condition then it would be of real use to people buying 100s of units who want to minimise TCO.

      I tend to buy reasonably good PSUs but mainly because I'm after energy efficiency (which is also why I power down twice a day).

    13. Re:In other news... by confused+one · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's a partial list:

      • Capacitor quality
      • capacitor sizing
      • inductor sizing
      • power factor correction
      • Switching transistor sizing
      • switching PS topology
      • fan quality
      • temperature based fan control
      • heat sink design
      • output crowbar protection

      I've seen companies use components rated at or just below their stated current rating in order to save money (using 8 amp transistors in a 10 amp supply, for example). They'll often work right out of the box, but, since there's no margin built in they will run hot and eventually fail. As to component quality, take it from someone who designs and manufactures precision instrumentation, I can tell you that there can be an enormous difference in quality from one manufacturer to another. "considering all the parts are mass manufactured, anyway" is not a valid argument.

    14. Re:In other news... by Grym · · Score: 1

      I've only built a few computers, so I may not be as experienced as you, but here's how I approached the quality issue on a parts by part basis:
      "What is the worst that can happen?"

      • With cheap RAM, I get less performance, maybe a bad stick or two which I can weed out during stress testing.
      • With a cheap GPU, I get less performance, the thing craps out in a year--no problem it was going to get replaced in two to three years anyway.
      • With a cheap PSU, on the other hand, a catastrophic failure could literally have me buying all new parts and starting from scratch.

      The computers I've built have been for myself and family and I personally found that risk unacceptable. As an aside, for the past couple of computers I've built, I've used PC Power and Cooling PSUs and have never had a problem with it. As always, YMMV.

      -Grym

    15. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, god, yes. And the idiot who designed a power supply whose transformer turned 120 Volt to 12 Volt, which worked well on paper, but failed to notice that when no load is on it, the voltage went up to 18 Volts and fried the $50 part in the custom design.

      I had to rewire all of the custom medical hardware using this, but it was exactly why I wanted to use a pre-built commercial solution, not design our own.

    16. Re:In other news... by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      I think you get such a long life out of your components is because you are under clocking everything.

      In my case I'm overclocking everything. I kick more power through all of my components than is technically safe, to get the most out of it.
      Which is why I use a nicer PSU

    17. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of those recommendations except the dusting out one doesn't have anything to do with PSUs. I would say that you were just lucky with the power supplies.

      Since the 286 days I had 2 PSUs fail. The first one was some cheap one that killed everything in the computer except the wireless card and hard drive. The second one only only got weak and could support my graphics card after 2 years. Those 2 failed within the last 5 years. Before that I never had a problem, only a dead PSU at purchase time for a 486.

    18. Re:In other news... by Rary · · Score: 1

      I've been "doing" computers since the early 90s. I've never had much problem with power supplies. And I do mean *never*.

      Give it time. It's possible that you'll never experience problems with a cheap PSU, but likely that you will.

      My personal experience: I've been "doing" computers for a bit longer than you have, and the only components I've had fail on me (so far) were: ultra cheap motherboard (two of them, the same brand and model, both died within a year), and ultra cheap PSU (three of them, various brands). The difference between the dead motherboards and the dead PSUs was that when the PSUs died, they took the hard drive with them.

      I'm no longer willing to take that chance with my data.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    19. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't turn it off! Computers that are turned on/off every day last a few years.

      Rationale?

      Turning off the computer when not in use simply eliminates all those bad things from happening, for the entire duration it's turned off. It's that much less dust, less heat, and less wear and tear. Can you explain the benefits of leaving it on and how they trump the benefits of turning it off?

    20. Re:In other news... by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't turn it off! Computers that are turned on/off every day last a few years. Servers that are babysat, running 24x7 at a consistent temperature run damn near forever. This costs money, so run the numbers to see what uptimes vs power consumption really costs you.

      Lots of problems with this statement:

      1. On modern hardware, I believe the best evidence is that leaving the machine on continuously doesn't increase its longevity. In any case, the correlation has always been extremely tenuous, to the point where its existence is extremely difficult to detect.
      2. A server left on 24 hours a day may maintain a fairly constant temperature, but a desktop machine will not. While you're not using the computer, it cools off.
      3. Your advice to run the numbers doesn't make sense, because there is no reliable data quantifying the supposed cost savings from leaving it on in hopes of making it live longer. Those cost savings are probably within error bars of zero.
      4. Your advice to run the numbers also ignores the environmental damage you're doing.
      5. Most people replace desktop machines within about 3 years. The mean time to failure is much longer than 3 years. Therefore even very high-value maintenance, like dusting, is unlikely to make the difference between failing before replacement and failing after replacement.

      Another problem is with your advice to buy cheap power supplies. Cheap power supplies are made out of less environmentally friendly materials, and are also less efficient. The lower efficiency is both an environmental issue and a money issue.

    21. Re:In other news... by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1

      I know reputable places that sell cheap PSU's that were not wired up by a 2 year old.

      Tell you what, you help pay for my cheaper hardware by giving people more money than its worth.

      You seriously think you are going to fry your motherboard if you pay less for a standard designed product that may possibly have a slightly shortly life due to lower grade components ?

      I think the only way you could feed a damaging current to the motherboard is if the PSU was assembled by a moron - I guess that's possible, but I wouldn't say there was any difference in likelyhood by paying more for higher quality components that could be assembled by a moron.

      Sorry to get a bit heavy about it, I just hate it when I see people being sucked in by such paranoia. Its the same with modern hardware RAID, a dying protection industry creates paranoia to save itself.

    22. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you about the generic power supply and never turning your computer off. I too have been maintaining, building and developing for PCs for a very long time (back to the days of the 8086). I have always bought the cheapest power supplies that met my power requirements at the time and I have never had a single one die. To me an expensive power supply is like buying an expensive pair of Nike shoes. They aren't any higher quality (possibly lower quality even), you only pay for a name.

      People who turn their computers on and off are clueless. Computers are designed to be used in continuous operation. Enable power savings to turn off the display and drives after some idle time if you are really cheap/poor, but turning the thing on and off a lot is just going to shorten its life.

    23. Re:In other news... by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      • output crowbar protection

      I'm more worried about crowbar input. That damn PFY just came around talking about "forced upgrades".

      --
      -
    24. Re:In other news... by Patersmith · · Score: 1

      I took an ancient, generic 286 computer, and upgraded it through 386SX, 486 DX/2, Cx 6x86, and AMD Athlon motherboards before finally switching to ATX. It was a cheezy, god-only-knows-who-made it power supply that came from a 'not-quite-aluminum-foil' AT case.

      I call shenanigans. As I recall, and from what I read on this old Anantech Athlon motherboard review, Athlon motherboards were never produced in an AT form factor, partially due to the fact that AT PSUs were not expected to be able to handle the draw from power hungry athlons.

      I also recall #4 having been debunked. Letting the moving parts run 24/7 causes more wear overall than power-up/power-down cycling. You may notice failures more often during a reboot but there's no causal relationship there. In fact, periodic restarts are a good practice to test startup and shutdown routines. 300-day uptimes are wonderful and all but good luck figuring out which of the last 78 changes broke the startup script.

    25. Re:In other news... by Grym · · Score: 1

      I should probably add that I have had a power-supply fail in the past. It wasn't a computer I built myself but rather a cheapo HP Pavilion. You're right, it didn't explode or fry any of my components, but the experience left me with one distinct impression: As a hobbyist without access to testing equipment, intermittent PSU failures can be a very frustrating diagnosis of exclusion.

      So, yeah, the chances of a catastrophic failure may be remote. And sure, maybe I do end up paying more for that one component, but overall, I'm paying at lot less than I would for a similar computer in a store, no?

      -Grym

    26. Re:In other news... by operagost · · Score: 1

      EMachines, unsurprisingly, had some bad, cheap power supplies. I salvaged a 2.6 GHz eMachine from the trash two years ago. It had obviously suffered a power supply failure (there was a still a warning note to DO NOT USE! affixed to the side). I rebuilt it anyway, because at the time the replacement motherboard (the CPU was still good) plus the HD and RAM they removed was still much cheaper than an entire new system of that performance level.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    27. Re:In other news... by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      I call shenanigans. As I recall, and from what I read on this old Anantech Athlon motherboard review, Athlon motherboards were never produced in an AT form factor, partially due to the fact that AT PSUs were not expected to be able to handle the draw from power hungry athlons.

      Call away, but the motherboard had power connectors for both types of power supply. The case was ATX form factor.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    28. Re:In other news... by operagost · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you've spent as much money replacing working fans and running your PC 24/7 (not to mention buying more CPU than you need so that you can underclock it) as you would have by simply using a better PS.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    29. Re:In other news... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      You sure you're not thinking of the AMD K6-2? I saw that situation (AT form factor board that would fit into either case, with both AT and ATX power connectors) many times for Super Socket 7 boards that ran AMD K6-2's, but never did I ever see an Athlon board of that type, and I was deep into the "hardware scene" back then.

      Particularly noteworthy is that the early Athlon motherboards were slot boards (sockets came much later). The heatsinks hung off the side, and were fairly large. On a true ATX board, those would be positioned in the board space right of the expansion slots (looking from the front of the case), where there's extra room. On an AT motherboard (and all the "hybrid" AT/ATX) boards, the socket when behind the expansion slots. If there was a slot there, the heatsink/fan would have interfered with either the expansion slots or the drive bays.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    30. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy, power spikes and thermal stress. Power spikes tend to happen most often during the initial surge when a computer is turned on. Thermal stress occurs when computer components are switched on and off a lot, causing them to heat and cool many times. The first problem can be eliminated by using a good UPS and ensuring that you have properly grounded outlets.

      In addition, things like hard drives experience head crashes most often when powering up/down while the head(s) has to move from/to its landing zone. Stiction used to be a severe problem with certain brand drives (ie. Seagate and Quantum) due to the lubricant used on the spindle going from hot to cold a lot and eventually turning into a gummy substance.

      If you are concerned about power use, configure your computer to use power saving features rather than turn it on and off.

    31. Re:In other news... by nolife · · Score: 1

      That is a marketing answer. What is actually different internally or design wise?

      1) WHAT DESIGN OR FACTORS MAKE BETTER Voltage stabilizing in case the power coming to the PSU is not very good
      2) WHAT MAKES A Quieter fan
      3) WHAT DIFFERENCES TO MAKE THE Output voltage/watts and efficiency stay within reason at higher load
      4) WHAT CHANGES TO PREVENT heat up?

      There are way too many generalizations and FUD in the PSU market to sort out the crap from real performers.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  4. What does HP use??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have owned several HP/Compaq machines and NEVER have lost a PSU. And all of the ones I have built myself with parts (Antec) have had a PSU fail multiple times...

    1. Re:What does HP use??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No doubt. Antec PSU = exploding/bulging capacitors! And here we all thought that was a problem limited to crappy motherboards! I stick to Seasonic now.

    2. Re:What does HP use??? by setagllib · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have had two PSUs fail on me. One was in an expensive Dell workstation and it exploded overnight, leaving a very interesting smell. The other was an Antec provided with a case, and it just stopped working for no reason. I didn't think PSUs could suck so badly, but I've learned my lesson.

      --
      Sam ty sig.
    3. Re:What does HP use??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ones in HP's I've seen use Delta, Aztech, Lite-On and a few others that I can't remember.

      I have never, ever seen a HP/Compaq business PC PSU die. Not only that they usually have pretty decent PFC for a desktop.

      I can't be bothered building nowdays simply because the build quality and reliability of HP and Dell business machines is pretty hard to beat, and it takes up too much time to find decent custom parts that all get along properly.

    4. Re:What does HP use??? by Xest · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've always bought whatever was cheapest for the wattage I needed and have never had a PSU fail or a PC fail as a result of anything I can really guess was power related (Well, I suppose technically, it's impossible to know but hard drive failures for example when they don't die outright i.e. crashing heads seem unlikely to be power related).

      The only exceptions where I have spent a bit more on a PSU I've found they offered me no notable advantage other than that described (quieter, more cables maybe). Paying more for better featuresets is something you'd expect in most product lines, for example the one I used in my latest machine which I paid a little more for will turn itself back on to let the fans spin and cool down the system once I've already turned it off, this isn't much use unless your PC crashes due to overheating and the system needs to be cooled down quicker, which mine hasn't- so I suppose it just wastes power over letting it just cool naturally after a shut down.

      I'm not really convinced there's any more risk with budget PSUs, I just think you're paying for brand name and features, if you need those features, pay for them, if you don't then budget PSUs don't seem to bring any harm.

      There is only one exception I've seen to this when I was working in tech support where one supplier used PSUs that all failed within about 6months to a year, but this strikes me more as a problem with that individual product line than an inherent product with cheap PSUs- it's not like we haven't seen expensive named brands such as Fujitsu hard drives, Microsoft XBox 360 have their faulty batch product lines too.

      Having worked in support for 7 years in a place where we had over 5000 users and machines from all sorts of suppliers including some from non-big name brands that put together some pretty cheap hardware, and having also built many machines for myself and others over the years I'm convinced if this was an issue then it would be one that was much more prominent. I found things like Maxtor hard drives being the biggest bain back then if anything with a much higher failure rate than any other vendor (ignoring the Fujitsu MPG3 drive line screw up) but then it was telling that they dropped their warranty from 3 to 1 year whilst Seagate and Western digital upped theirs from 3 to 5 years- if anything talks volumes about product confidence that does!

      Have others really seen a higher failure rate in systems with cheaper PSUs as a running trend as opposed to a one off?

    5. Re:What does HP use??? by Alioth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We've had the opposite experience of HP power supplies, we just had to replace 70 HP supplies. When machines started failing in the field, I found that there was massive amounts of ripple on the 12v and 5v lines. When I disassembled the PSU it wasn't hard to tell why - bulging and leaking capacitors.

    6. Re:What does HP use??? by TypoNAM · · Score: 1

      You had to replace 70 PSUs at the same time or rather short amount of time to one replacement after another? If so I would look into the UPS those systems were using (if one or so many was used) or have the power feed checked coming off the outlets you're using because that's just a damn near impossability to have so many PSUs die at once or you've had one really horrible batch.

      --
      This space is not for rent.
    7. Re:What does HP use??? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. The bulging capacitor problem tends to come in clusters. Frex, all the motherboards I had die of the bogus capacitor issue died within a couple months of one another, and some were in storage, others were in use, and none had similar situations or history otherwise, but the one thing they had in common was capacitors from roughly the same manufacturing era (and lack of stabilizer).

      The PSUs I've seen in OEM machines have been very bottom end, marginal capacity that are on the edge of overloaded all the time. I think this is one reason why OEM mobos seldom live past age 3.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:What does HP use??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I disassembled the PSU it wasn't hard to tell why - bulging and leaking capacitors.

      Damaged caps can be a symptom, just like the ripple.

      I appreciate it's not worth your time to investigate farther than R&R, just pointing out that seeing leaking caps doesn't mean you've found the source problem. They can be the result of component or design flaw(s) farther upstream.

    9. Re:What does HP use??? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      These machines were in 35 different locations, not all in the same place...and other machines didn't have a problem. It was only the HP desktop machines. This is actually the second "bad caps" issue we've had with these machines, all the motherboards were replaced under warranty, as they started failing (with bulging caps) within 6 months of being installed. The power supplies started failing 2.5 to 3 years after the machines were put into service.

      The capacitors were (according to the rating printed on the can) adequately sized, they were just crap.

  5. I've gotta agree. by palegray.net · · Score: 5, Funny

    Generic power supplies are an awful plague upon our fair world. Why, just last week I was using my homebrew PSU rack to power my uncle's hospice life support system. Now I'm going to his funeral this weekend. Tragic, just tragic...

    1. Re:I've gotta agree. by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1

      Windows Life Support System (TM).

      How much is his will worth again ?

    2. Re:I've gotta agree. by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      In a cruel twist of fate, he left all his money the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

  6. Teenishness by Ninjaesque+One · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is there any hope that we will get a non-schizoid titling scheme? This one seems more worthy of a Seventeen or a Teen People than of a Slashdot.

    --
    Ninjas and pirates. How piquant.
  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. These days, you can't really be sure by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...As it turns out, any money you save on a generic PSU purchase will likely cost you more in the long run..."

    To such statements, I say "Ohh puhleeze!" I use generic power supplies for all my PCs, which I never switch off by the way. Apart from increased noise after about 3 years of constant humming, I have no complaints for a product that costs me about 18 dollars.

    I heard Google uses the same stuff too.

    1. Re:These days, you can't really be sure by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      To such statements, I say "Ohh puhleeze!" I use generic power supplies for all my PCs, which I never switch off by the way. Apart from increased noise after about 3 years of constant humming, I have no complaints for a product that costs me about 18 dollars.

      Your experience is clearly different to mine, since I have replaced many generic power supplies that had failed. Some of those failed power supplies also took out the motherboards they were attached to.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:These days, you can't really be sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similar experience here as well - after the second generic PSU of mine to take out almost every component of my system (the last one spared my CD drive and the 2 RAM modules... that's it), I'm not even going to think about using one again.

      Sure, the PSU only cost about $20, but replacing the equipment cost over $500, and I wasted a day or two setting everything back up again.

    3. Re:These days, you can't really be sure by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Google may use cheap shit, but they can do so because their reliability comes in the form of redundancy. When you have a lot of systems, you can set them up so that no one failure has any real impact on your service. It's like a RAID-5 array. The disks themselves may not be that reliable but the overall array is because if one fails, you lose nothing you just replace it. Likewise a RAID-6 is more reliable since two can fail, and so on.

      However, people at home don't have that luxury. I have one main computer. If it fails, I'm SOL until I get replacement parts. If a bad PSU takes out other components, I'm more screwed. So I have to go through reliability of the components themselves, get better components so they fail less often.

    4. Re:These days, you can't really be sure by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Same here, although I tend to stick to the $30-40 range, as the super cheapos tend to crap out on me after about a year. As for the other posters and the PSU taking out the whole board, it really depends on what you are going to be doing with the machine. For the gamers I spend the extra because of the strain the GPU and CPU put on the PSU during heavy play, but if a box is just going to be a basic netbox it doesn't hurt IMO to go with the cheapo.

      The box I am typing this on now is going on 8 years old running a cheapo 150 watt and it has never had a bit of trouble despite running for 24/7/365 all this time. Of course it is also only being used as a netbox and rarely hits above 50% usage, so it isn't likely to ever strain the PSU. But in my exp if you make sure there is enough headroom there really isn't too many problems running cheapos. My 5 year old game PC ran a 450 watt $35 special until this year when I upgraded to a $35 550 to give extra breathing room for the graphics card. But since I am only running a 7600AGP with a 3.6GHz P4 I figure I'm only hitting about 350 watt max so I have plenty of headroom to spare.

      In my exp running a machine too close to the PSU max output tends to blow them more often than whatever the make or model is. I always try to keep 150-250 watts of headroom and have never had any trouble, nor has any of my customers. Of course I won't say these are absolute rules, because after building and fixing PCs for nearly 15 years I've found PC parts are often a crap shoot no matter WHO made them, as bad batches are inevitable when parts are cranked out in such numbers. So as always YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:These days, you can't really be sure by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      I heard Google uses the same stuff too.

      With the risk of sounding cliche, I'd like a citation for that.

      To such statements, I say "Ohh puhleeze!" I use generic power supplies for all my PCs, which I never switch off by the way. Apart from increased noise after about 3 years of constant humming, I have no complaints for a product that costs me about 18 dollars.

      Generic PSU's do not undergo the same rigorous testing that "brand" name ones do. You might get a good batch. You might not. PSU's that a company is willing to put their brand name against perform consistantly. The voltage stays within a given spec. The load and wattage stays within a spec. A "spec". Yes, the better PSU's have specs that they adhere to. Not to mention the often better cable management which can lead to overall cooler systems.

    6. Re:These days, you can't really be sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto. My PSU took out the motherboard, CPU, and *melted/fused* the plastic motherboard-PSU connector.

    7. Re:These days, you can't really be sure by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I've not had the same experience. From cheap power supplies I've had (and these were all separate cheapos):

      1. A system refuse to boot up at all. It would boot with nicer power supplies I had, and that power supply would run some of the lower power systems, but that power supply wouldn't power on that one motherboard.

      2. A hard drive refuse to spin up correctly (it'd try to start but then would stop and the system would report an error). I thought the drive had died. The system wouldn't recognize it for anything. I put in a second drive though and it did the same thing which made me curious, at which point I swapped the PSU and it started humming along just fine.

      3. General system instability. Blue screens, data corrupted, lockups, etc. Replaced the PSU and all was fine.

      These days the only reason I even have any cheapos on hand is that sometimes when you buy a case they come along with it. I stick those aside, but don't use them for anything important. For as long as a GOOD quality PSU lasts (I have some heading towards 8 years old that are still working), it's well worth the money for me to get one that's decent. These days if I'm doing a fresh build, if it's a "normal" system I usually budget about $60 for the PSU. If it's a "power" system I'll usually budget a little over twice that.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    8. Re:These days, you can't really be sure by adisakp · · Score: 1

      FWIW it *WILL* cost you more in the long run for that cheaper PSU. If, as you claim, you *NEVER* power down your PC over a 3 year period of use, you will actually save money with a $50 PSU that is 80-90% efficient compared to a $18 PSU that is 60-70% efficient.

    9. Re:These days, you can't really be sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is slashdot. Everyone has at least five spare computers.

  9. No surprise at all by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

    There aren't very many factories that actually make PSUs. You'll find that a great many PSUs share designs. So you can have cheapies that look like brand name PSUs. Ok so what's the money difference? Parts quality. The company making generics says "Ya give me the cheapest caps, fan controls, etc. I need lowest cost no matter what." The good brands say "Give us higher temperature parts, better quality, etc." Just because they look the same, doesn't mean they are built ot the same standard.

    The difference between good and crap in electronics can often be as simple as the parts used. However, good parts cost more money so you are going to pay more for the finished product.

    Personally, I'm a Corsair fanboy. They seem to spec really high grade electronics in to their powersupplies and those things do a great job.

    1. Re:No surprise at all by floodo1 · · Score: 0

      Generally speaking Corsair does have very good power supplies. The HX line is really top notch stuff, in pretty much all aspects. They don't make the best PSU's, but they're right there with the best.

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    2. Re:No surprise at all by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Then there are the adherents of the "Mad Man" Muntz school of engineering. As it was described to me, he would randomly remove components from a prototype television set. Anything that could be removed without causing an immediate and obvious problem stayed removed. This allowed him to cut the component count and cost by a substantial margin. It also resulted in a television that was a POS.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:No surprise at all by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

      For my RAM, PSUs, etc I usually go for Corsair, Crucial, or Mushkin. Never had a problem with any of them. Been on a Mushkin run lately...

      But all, for me, have never had issues. I've had some crappy PSUs in pre-built machines just die on me and when I'm spending $2000+ on a high-end system, I'm not going to save $40 on a cheap PSU. I'll spend the $100-$150 on a good PSU. I know it's worth it.

      --
      -SaNo
    4. Re:No surprise at all by Reziac · · Score: 1

      A simple way to evaluate PSUs:

      How much does it weigh? Good ones have big capacitors, big rails and heatsinks, and heavier wiring, so they weigh more. Cheap ones have tiny capacitors, light rails and small or no heatsinks, and lighter-gauge wiring, so they weigh less.

      The difference can be pretty radical -- a good one can easily weigh 5 pounds, while a cheapie can weigh as little as 12 ounces.

      Marginal-capacity PSUs are probably one of the reasons that OEM systems' motherboards are so short-lived compared to clones (such a PSU is always on the edge of being overloaded, what do you think that does to the components that depend on it?) And crap PSUs are a known cause of random bad spots on hard disks, due to microspiking.

      Aside from the impact on the lifespan of other components, a good PSU will usually last longer too. This message is brought to you by a 300W PSU that I bought in *1994* (at the time, 300W was a server-class PSU, and hard to come by) which has been running 24/7 almost its entire life, in a fully-loaded system.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  10. Check for UL approval by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    They should have checked each power supply for a UL marking, and an entry in the UL Certification Database. Things seem to be getting better, though; the power supplies tested did not blow up or catch fire at full load. That's a big improvement from a few years ago.

    The basic UL requirements are 1) no overload problems at full load, 2) no explosion or fire under output overload/short conditions, and 3) no single component failure can cause a fire (i.e. there should be a fuse of some kind in there.) It's permitted for an overloaded unit to fail and never work again; that's not a safety issue. Some no-name power supplies had real problems meeting those basic conditions.

    1. Re:Check for UL approval by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can't tell, is that one in with all the other fancy logos on the side of This Allied branded Deer PSU that exploded when jonnyguru tested it?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  11. Much better reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    This site has some really detailed stuff: http://jonnyguru.com

  12. you know what helps by sirmonkey · · Score: 1

    haveing a good UPS... or two. one set on low sense, and the 2nd set on high sense... keeps my machines running. :-) but i also live in a 1950's neighborhood where i can tell when my neighbor's dryer turns on.

    --
    bored? try this http://jadmadi.net/blog/2005/01/27/linux-wine-how-to-running-windows-viruses-with-wine/
  13. Overlooked by pauloncall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why does every article on power supplies feel the need to remind us that power supplies are probably the most overlooked component? Judging by the number of online reviews and by the 560 (!) power supplies available at Newegg, I think it's safe to finally retire the "overlooked" cliche.

    1. Re:Overlooked by feepness · · Score: 2, Funny

      Judging by the number of online reviews and by the 560 (!) power supplies available at Newegg,

      They just overlooked those.

  14. With the economy in the crapper... by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    You can get the best brands for the least amounts of money. Seriously, the prices for PSUs and other computer components have dropped drastically, as long as you are smart enough to stay away from dying retail stores with their aged inventory at horrible pre-Recession prices, and do your due diligence on online price engines you can score some insane bargains. Newegg and a bunch of other onliners kick Frys and Best Buys ass every time.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  15. Stay away from Bestec by TheBlunderbuss · · Score: 1

    I've noticed a few computers that had a Bestec PSU fry their motherboard. I'm not sure if they're sold stand-alone, but they used to be found in HP and eMachines.
    Granted, they might have been vastly underrated for upgrades, but still, two machines! That has to be, like, common?

    *shrug* It's soured me on the brand, and pre-built computers, at least.

    1. Re:Stay away from Bestec by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a PC repairman I have run into the Bestec brand a few times, even built a few machine with them, and I can tell you it ain't the brand, although they are cheap and I tend not to use them(they have lousy fans if they even bother to have a fan at all) except in the occasional "granny" machines that are only doing basic web stuff. I can tell you the problem with both the HP and the eMachine you describe, because I have ran into it in the shop, and the problem is this:

      For awhile there both HP and eMachine would put in VASTLY underpowered PSUs in their machines, which would naturally strain the living hell out of the PSU and cause it to blow, taking out the PC with it in many cases. I have actually seen fairly modern machines from HP and eMachine(a few years maybe 3 old) that had a Bestec PSU with a MAX rating of 200 watts! for any modern machine that is simply unacceptable. And woe be to anyone that actually tried to upgrade anything in one of those machines without yanking the PSU first, because with that little headroom it was bye bye PC.

      As I put in an earlier post with the cheap PSUs you need to have at LEAST 150 watts of headroom ABOVE what you machine uses under max load. For example when my PC used 300 watts max ( figured using a calc like this) I used a 450 watt cheapo(NOT Bestec because I require a fan in my PC) and when I upgraded my PC and its power usage went to 350 I changed it out for a 550 watt PSU. So don't really blame Bestec. I have used them in a few ultra low power HTPC and ultra quiet desktops and they still work fine. Blame HP and eMachine for building a PC that used 200 watts and putting a 200 watt PSU in it instead of spending an extra dollar and getting one with a little more juice. That IMHO is the big difference between the cheapos and the big brands, with the cheapos you really need a LOT more headroom IMHO than you do with the big brands. But of course YMMV and everyone seems to have preferences when it comes to PC parts.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:Stay away from Bestec by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      Granted, they might have been vastly underrated for upgrades, but still, two machines! That has to be, like, common?

      The big OEMs have some shitty PSUs, second highest failure rate (after the system boards) when I was at Dell.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    3. Re:Stay away from Bestec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I put in an earlier post with the cheap PSUs you need to have at LEAST 150 watts of headroom ABOVE what you machine uses under max load.

      It's a nice rule of thumb, but incomplete in my opinion: you should strive to have a system load of 50%-80% of the power output of the PSU (-10% for cheap-ass crap). That way you will have a power supply that has a decent power-conversion ratio (i.e. mainline efficiency), and you are not taxing it by overpowering its output lines.

      For example when my PC used 300 watts max (...) I used a 450 watt cheapo

      67% load. That's well within the target zone.

      and when I upgraded my PC and its power usage went to 350 I changed it out for a 550 watt PSU.

      63% load. If your calculations were really worst-case (as in: your PC will never reach or go over the 350W), you could have gone with a 500W PSU and have slightly higher efficiency. Then again, if you would have used a quality PSU, you would not have had to switch to a larger PSU at all.

      Disclaimer: this is all my personal opinion; yes I am an EE, but I don't deal with power supplies on a regular basis.

    4. Re:Stay away from Bestec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I hate x86 technology. 150w headroom on top of the 300w the machine actually needs... other architectures run on less than 50w and do everything I need, but I can't buy one because you idiots insist on backwards compatibility with 30 years of shit.

    5. Re:Stay away from Bestec by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Interesting... as I say (several times :) above, I've noticed the underpowered PSUs in OEM systems, and that the PSU is the single component most likely to fail in an OEM box -- followed by the motherboard. I've long suspected this is because the underpowered PSU is stressing the other electronics, and the mobo suffers the most.

      Conversely, PSU and mobo are very unlikely to fail in clones -- which even at their cheapest, usually have more PSU capacity than an average or even high-end OEM.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:Stay away from Bestec by TheBlunderbuss · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, I agree. I remember being surprised to see the 100W rating on mine, and doing some quick math on the power demands of the computer. It was all so disappointing.

      The PSU is still useable for hobby use as a steady voltage source, but I'm not sure if it would be ok to place back into a computer.

  16. Stephane Charpentier's review of 105 PSUs by Anonymous+Cowherd+X · · Score: 1, Informative

    This techreport.com round-up is a joke. If you really want to read a detailed review check out Stephane Charpentier's review of 105 PSUs. Each of his reviews includes everything you'd expect plus a complete assessment of the electronics used in the PSU with very detailed explanations.

    1. Re:Stephane Charpentier's review of 105 PSUs by Cerium · · Score: 1

      It may be superior, but considering it was originally written in French and the translator is interpreting whatever "power supply" is in French as "food" is making it incredibly hard to follow.

      Also: everything else that is wrong with the English version.

    2. Re:Stephane Charpentier's review of 105 PSUs by mattytee · · Score: 1

      the translator is interpreting whatever "power supply" is in French as "food" is making it incredibly hard to follow.

      Switch food to 240V for European countries. May need to attach mains adaptor to food in UK. Do not expose food to water or other liquids. Please do not daisy-chain cables from this food. Voltage drop on food normal when brownout occurs.

  17. Another important thing by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    Is better capacitors. Good PSUs use higher quality ones, and often ones with a higher thermal rating. This is important since electrolytic capacitors degrade over time. If you have crappy ones, they can degrade faster. At some point, their performance drops to the point where the PSU doesn't work right or at all. Good caps are well worthwhile in a power system.

  18. Hmmm.. by comm2k · · Score: 1

    my generic cheap PSU I bought 5 or 6 years ago (rated 300W) still works fine. It sometimes gets noisy for a 10-15 seconds but then goes back to 'normal'. It powered my Duron 650, then XP 2000+ / 2600+ and now X2 4400+. I must be very lucky.

    1. Re:Hmmm.. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Luck happens as often as shit :)

      I've got good PSUs and cheapo PSUs in service, mainly because I run mostly on salvage, and that's whatever-comes-along. I've seen both ends die. But the cheapos die more often.

      OEM systems use very cheap PSUs. In my experience, the most commonly dead component in OEMs is the PSU, followed by the mobo... which I think has such a high death rate, compared to clone mobos, because the weak PSU stresses all the other electronics.

      If I'm going to BUY one, I prefer to load the dice in favour of quality, because odds are the better-made one will outlast the crappy one. Maybe not, but usually so. -- The first really good one that I bought is now over 14 years old, running 2/47 in a fully loaded system for nearly its whole life. It cost about double what the cheapies did back then... and I don't regret one cent of it. Sometimes being cheap is a false economy:

      Meanwhile, a friend who buys the cheapest of everything has been thru 3 or 4 PSUs, and over the same timeframe has spent about double what I did.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  19. If you have any interest by linzeal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Taking an old 300 watt atx power supply apart to make a variable 0-5v and 0-12v bench power supply for electronics projects will teach you what you will need to know about quality of components if you have a decent DMM, or better a USB scope to see the difference when you switch out caps and other components. An often overlooked problem with cheap power supplies is that bad soldering and cheap PCBs cause the capacitors to work harder to move the same amount of charge. This effects voltage as it relates to capacitance's formula C = Q/V and its integral (dammit give me MathML) sigh read Wikipedia's definition. Doesn't matter how good your caps are if the circuit was soldered by someone being paid slave wages working 14 hour shifts. The real cost of the plenitude of cheap electronics is going to be an interesting story. Besides the obvious horrors of the places of manufacture in Asia and the dumping grounds in Africa where similar autoimmune disorders, cancers and genetic abnormalities are rampant is the story of what happens between those two places. It is not just the disposable aspect that technology plays in our culture that fascinates me but how little knowledge of the design and manufacture of technology is present in the people that purchase it, sell it or even repair it. PC techs without any electronics understanding are the worse, "Who needs an anti-static work area when I can use any flat surface including a pizza box?" and than wonder why they have half a dozen motherboards laying around the house that won't work. /rant If I have the time before Xmas I will post my pics and schematics on my blog. Did it for an EE project. Working on LCDs and circuitry to display voltage and amperage (currently have 4 lobotomized dmm pcb w/ attached backlit lcd doing a reading each.

    1. Re:If you have any interest by thephydes · · Score: 1

      Yes! Only yesterday I made a bench PS using, one from and old laser printer (built like a friggen battleship, but the pinouts were a bit strange) and a 5V / 12V one from an old PC. Works a treat, and will do me for most of the electronics stuff that I do.

    2. Re:If you have any interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm interested.

      eric AT-AT milestonerdl dot com

  20. Re:W00t 74 by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

    Nobody panic, it's just a pumpkin this time.

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  21. Generic rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    buy a generic for $15 that might fail...
    Or
    buy an expensive one for $60+ that might fail...

    So far i've had better luck with the total generic ones that come with cheap cases. Most of them are still around and still working too. All the way back to the original xt supplies i can't seem to throw away.

    Yet the few times i've actually bought "good" expensive well known brands.. FAIL. And no. i don't count just the fan dying as a failure. It's always something major.

    Name brand is for suckers in this case. The price diffrence isn't worth it at all.

    Maybe it's that all my computers run 24-7. Or i've been damm lucky. But i've never had a plain ol generic supply fail.

  22. Though not in EU, of course by Kupfernigk · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There are numerous EU certification bodies, but basically any supply has to be CE marked. From experience with both kinds of approvals, and work on IEC electrical safety committees, I would say that there is nothing to choose between them. But can you actually buy a psu nowadays that is not UL and CE marked?

    I think most problems would be with older equipment made in the days when both the US and the EU countries were trying to make inroads in the Chinese suppliers. For a time the certification bodies seemed to go a little crazy and let the Chinese get away with murder because they all wanted to be the primary Chinese certification body. One of the best incidents I remember was an auditor going around a Chinese plant with ISO 9002 certification. All the documentation was there, all the procedures written up. In English. And no-one in the entire factory spoke English. I doubt this is the case with electricals any more.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Though not in EU, of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CE marking is meaningless nowadays, as there are no strong enforcement bodies or certification orgs.

      Any electronics importer/rebrander can (and will, believe me) slap a 'CE' sticker on their Chinese-made POS.

  23. AngryTec is the worst. by Ostracus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "You can hide a multitude of sins behind one of those "Warranty void if broken" paper seals. ;)"

    Slashdot has one of those.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  24. No, it isn't UL approved by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you look, that supply is only "UR" component recognition, i.e. it is not UL approved as a standalone item. UR just means that, if a UL tester finds it inside a computer being tested as a whole, he does not test the PSU individually but treats it as a single component. Replying to my own post, below, I should clarify that this seems to be a loophole that I have encountered before. Nobody should sell a UR assembly to an end user, it should only be sold to an OEM to replace an identical item in a UL piece of equipment. I hope this clarifies things.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:No, it isn't UL approved by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Well, all things considered I'm pretty sure that it being prone to failure by means of exploding makes it undesirable regardless of it's status elsewise.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  25. Spotting a winner. by Ostracus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "We've narrowed our focus on PSUs in the 350-500W range, which should be enough power for most budget and mid-range systems."

    This isn't quite true. The more important question is the amps on the +12V Rails? Even better if yours has a monorail design were all the power-hungry parts can get what they need. Also sustained rating is important. Not peak. And last even the better brands can be/go bad. My PC Power & Cooling 750 silencer was recieved DOA. It happens even to the best...much like hard drives.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  26. Need one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need a new PSU for an old P2-450 SCSI server, could anyone recommend me a not-so-expensive one?
    The current one still works, but the fan makes some annoying loud clicking noise for the first 5-10 minutes it's turned on, which is why the server is down at the moment, it doesn't sound trustworthy.

    1. Re:Need one by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It's probably a standard 80mm fan in the power supply. So you can pull the power supply out of the computer, open it up, and put a standard 80mm case fan in there. You may have to make some minor wiring modifications as fan in the power supply probably uses a non standard plug or is soldered to the board directly. Alternatively, you could pull the fan out, peel back the sticker, and put a few drops of a light machining oil or general lubricant (not WD40) on the brushing/bearings, then put the sticker back on and tape it in place. This is typically good for a few months or a year or so before it starts getting noisy again.

  27. Biased? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the conclusions of this report, but I feel compelled to point out that The Tech Report probably doesn't get a whole lot of advertising revenue from the makers of generic power supplies. If their tests found that some generic no-name unit performed just as well as the more expensive name brands, would they necessarily report it?

  28. My two cents... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

    I just checked and my box (2.4Ghz Athlon 64, 1GB 533Mhz ram, one pata hard drive, nvidia 7300gt video card) uses a 400W Duro supply. I've had this thing for about 5 years or so with no problems. It looks more like the $20 models than the expensive ones.

    So, uh, go Duro...

  29. I agree with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I definitely agree with the last part

    "As it turns out, any money you save on a generic PSU purchase will likely cost you more in the long run."

    On my last creation I had to change PSU three times because the cheap one failed, the store wasn't too happy when I got in for the third time and asked for a refund. I ended up with a Corsair PSU. It was much quieter and I havent had any PSU related problems ever since.

  30. Duh by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

    Well, I mean really, there is no other component in your PC that touches everything as much as your PSU does and there is hardly a component that gets less attention (for many the case gets less but that is OK). As such there is a market for cheap PSU's. A bad PSU can ruin *any* component in your PC (including itself), not even your motherboard can boast that.

    We know that there can be HUGE differences between top and bottom end if for nothing more than quality of soldering. Next we know that that both skill and time are needed to make high quality joints and skill and time are not cheap. We also know margins have to be kept such that the company turns a profit. Therefore we can pretty much assume that high end PSU's will be expensive and low end ones cheap (though, of course, expensive doesn't necessarily mean high end), especially given that there are places where the high end are are a *requirement* and thus people will spend whatever is needed, that is where margins are made so that the low end stuff can still be sold and mostly work.

    *shrug* having been bit once in the past (around 2001 or so) by some cheap PSU's in a small-medium (64 node) computational cluster I know what bad ones can do. We had our server room (halon fire suppression system) call us one day that one of the nodes was smoking and what should they do: "umm that big red button? Push it, then run". It was all nice and melty when I took it apart (halon system didn't deploy thankfully so it was just an amusing story), I used to have a nifty picture of it and the scorch marks but I can't find the picture anymore - however it was obviously it had an actual flame.

    Later on when we moved to large clusters then MTB of all the components started to become important. Even then the PSU was one of the higher failure rate parts, I always assumed that this had something to do with the few nodes we had with redundant hardware always had more PSU's than they really should need (other components being just as important yet not having a main and three backups).

    --
    ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
  31. No PC Power and Cooling? by Xabraxas · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The review isn't even worth reading because they don't compare a PC Power and Cooling PSU. I don't trust anything else because even the other big name brands use a bunch of gimmicky crap in their PSUs.

    --
    Time makes more converts than reason
    1. Re:No PC Power and Cooling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sadly, PC Power & Cooling is no longer an independent company, but was bought by OCZ last year. I'm not sure how this might affect quality in the future, but I still buy PC P&C PSUs for now.

    2. Re:No PC Power and Cooling? by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      Damn that sucks. I haven't built a desktop in a while so I haven't bought a PSU in a couple of years and didn't know that. I hope the quality doesn't suffer.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    3. Re:No PC Power and Cooling? by Carbon016 · · Score: 1

      No, PC P&C licenses their PSUs from Seasonic, which also builds the Corsair 450.

  32. Not necessarily by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    A good example is zinc oxide surge absorbers. A big enough surge causes them to explode, but provided the equipment is designed to absorb the explosion, there is no problem. So the suppressor could be UL recognised, used in a UL approved enclosure where it is surrounded by metal, no problem. Used in a homebrew piece of equipment in a plastic box, it could be a serious fire hazard.

    This PSU could be perfectly safe mounted in the top of a steel PC chassis, but dangerous in a plastic chassis. That's why it should not be sold to end users.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  33. no sparks by Chris+Snook · · Score: 1

    After several bad experiences, even with UPSs, I have adopted the superstition of avoiding power supplies made by companies with "spark" in their names. Since this decision several years ago, the worst failure I've suffered is a drive that spewed SMART warnings for months -- but kept working -- until I finally RMAd it.

    --
    There's no failure quite as dissatisfying as a complete and total solution to the wrong problem.
  34. Check for country of origin by GomezAdams · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Among other things granted to the Chinese during the Clinton administration was the relaxation of having to meet FCC part 15 subpart B for electronics. Some Chinese power supplies put out tremendous amounts of RF all across the spectrum. Might check that too if you are having problems with radio reception. When I can get them I always buy Taiwan made power supplies because #1 they are better engineered and built, and #2 they do not radiate RF. They have to meet the RF emissions requirements. So far I've had a large failure rate of Chinese power supplies because of being under engineered and the poorly made components. Electronics are like everything else being made in China today. They cut corners and mismanage and put out crap clothes, electronics, baby food, pet food, toys, medicines, and every body just keeps letting them get by with it. Most of my Chinese made shirts don't come with pockets anymore, the thread count of the cloth is lower, the sewing thread is smaller diameter and of poorer quality. The seams are sewn right up against the edges so they rip out in the washing machine and buttons disappear after a few washings too. And if you take medicines ask your pharmacist what the country of origin is. It might surprise the hell out of you. Almost everything I take now (blood pressure and kidney meds) are made in India. That scares the bejesus out of me too but not nearly as much as Chinese made meds.

    --
    Too lazy to create a sig...
    1. Re:Check for country of origin by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Hear hear... I'm about fed up with cheap Chinese junk. Have got to where I do without rather than buy tools or rubber goods made in China. The tools are pot metal and did they not hear about Vulcanizing rubber??

      Not to mention the suspected lead-poisoning I got off a Chinese-made garden tool. :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  35. branded psu by yaiba · · Score: 0

    I would like to recommend these brands:

    Enermax (http://www.enermax.com)
    Hec (http://www.hec-group.com.tw)
    Acbel (http://www.acbel.com)

    Our HP servers uses Acbel.

  36. (OT) don't worry about Indian medicines by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    Indian pharmaceuticals are up to 1st world standards. The major manufacturer recruited a British CEO years ago to make sure of it. India has a long tradition of civil law and administration (in fact the legal system was overhauled by Lord Macaulay, of all people, at the start of the 19th century.) China (excluding Taiwan and Hong Kong) is only just starting to develop a civil law system. That's the key difference. The Bhopal scandal is not about a failure of Indian civil law, it's about the (disgraceful?) failure of the US government to return Union Carbide execs to India for trial. The Chinese product safety scandals have been about Chinese business as usual. Let's just hope the economic downturn does not slow the rate of improvement in China.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  37. wel i bought something by PermanentMarker · · Score: 1

    I bought a REAL PSU, one with no fan at all inside.
    It has cooling ribons and doesnt make any sound.
    okay it had cost me some bucks.. but in return i got a lot more silent PC

    Its from silverstone, it even has logic inside to protect angainst short circuits.
    And that actualy helped a few times.

    --
    I know you're out there. I can feel you now. I know that you're afraid. You're afraid of us. You're afraid of change.
  38. Generic PSU + Good UPS = Good PS by Unsung+Bovine+Herd · · Score: 1

    As it turns out, any money you save on a generic PSU purchase will likely cost you more in the long run.

    The money I saved buying a generic PSU, I spent buying a midrange UPS. Come on, any benefit that expensive PSU is supposed to bring you will likely be negated by bad power from the wall. Think of the PSU as a bullet-proof vest, and the UPS as an armored car. I would feel more secure inside an armored car without a bullet-proof vest, than wearing a bullet-proof vest outside an armored car.

    1. Re:Generic PSU + Good UPS = Good PS by redxxx · · Score: 1

      A UPS won't help with noise, heat, efficiency or a low wattage rating. Depending on your requirements, it's not an area where you can skimp on one and make it up with the other.

  39. Contrasting the good and the bad -Build Quality- by vinnybobdog · · Score: 1

    Heres a good contrast between a high quality build and results you get from such, and a VERY poor quality build:

    The Good
    vs
    The Very Bad

    My personal favorite is when they compare one to the "showgirl" that everyone knows... lol

  40. Wow. What do you people do to your PSUs ? by drsmithy · · Score: 2

    After ~20 years in the industry, through thousands (probably tens of thousands) of PCs - everything from no-name dsektops to high-end IBM blade servers, I think I've witnessed (or received direct reports of) 3 or 4 PSU failures ever.

    Heck, if someone asked me to rank the components most likely to fail in a computer, the PSU would probably be sitting just above screw holes and mounting posts.

    WTF are you people doing to your computers ? Is the power supply in Australia really that much better than the rest of the world ?

  41. Nexus by hb253 · · Score: 1

    I've always used Nexus power supplies mainly for their silence, but they look to be decent quality as well.

    --
    Self awareness - try it!
  42. silentpcreview.com nicely complements jonnyguru by stupido · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, I agree that jonnyguru.com is the best review source for PSU stability (noise and transients are measured with oscilloscope and compared with ATX specs) and build quality (inside pics and commentary on components used). If you additionally care about the noise your PSU is making at various loads, silentpcreview.com has those measurements. I bought a couple of power supplies based on the review on to those two sites, and never had issues stability or noise wise.

  43. Cereal by Gman14msu · · Score: 1
    Anyone else reading this article think it was going to be a study of the quality of generic food products vs. name brands (like Frosted Flakes vs. Crunchy Wafers Coated with Sugar?), and the study would be done by Penn State University?

    I need my coffee. Shaxwell House brand coffee.

  44. Re:Antec is the worst -- it depends by stupido · · Score: 1

    I had a (350W?) PSU that came with the Sonata case (1st version), which made an annoying high-pitched noise with Radeon 9800 from the get go. It eventually started to exhibit instability after three years or so, and then would not even power off properly.

    I also have a 430W Antec that comes with NSK 6500. This one is a Seasonic OEM (hat tip silentpcreview.com). No issues with this one in a couple of years of service.

    So, like with other rebranded OEM products, it depends who built the PSU for Antec.

  45. Too soft with the testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in this brand vs generic PSU showndown the generic PSUs fail horribly.

  46. Re:Wow. What do you people do to your PSUs ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    over the last 10 years, I've killed 4 different PSU. One system with a dual CPU alone caused 3 PSU's to fail. I attribute it heat, but that's just my guess. The other was due to the fan dying twice. The first time the PSU fan died, I replaced the fan. The second time I didn't bother and got a new one. I've bought cheap PSU and expensive units. could be I just had bad luck.

  47. Re:Wow. What do you people do to your PSUs ? by CompMD · · Score: 1

    I've also been working on computers for about 20 years, and I agree with you. For PCs, I've only ever seen one or two PSU failures, and in the enterprise world, I had 3 of 12 PSUs fail in a big Sun rack. None of my personal machines have ever had a PSU failure.

  48. Suggestions on no "power hum"? by British · · Score: 1

    Is there a recommended brand/model of PSU that emits no/little/minimal RF interference for clean audio? I'd love a power supply I can't hear(fan), but also can't hear in my system's audio output or recording. Surely there's some better PSU that has the modular power cables(oh that is nice).

    1. Re:Suggestions on no "power hum"? by borizz · · Score: 1

      Even if you got a clean PSU, the motherboard will spit so much RF noise that you'll end up with it anyway. If you want as little as possible hum or hiss, go buy an external sound card, because the inside of a PC is going to be noisy.

    2. Re:Suggestions on no "power hum"? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I have no idea if it would help, but there are computers out there with external power supplies such as the Mac Mini and some of the Shuttles. It would seem obvious to me that getting the power supply out of the case would help, but I could be wrong.

  49. isn't the golden egg either! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    I've had 2 SilentPSU's from Yesico before, they were "ok" but not perfect at all.

    • Both of them died "silently" .. left a nasty aftershock too; this for a very known brand silent PSU in Europe. Reason? They just ran too hot...
    • I'm running a cybercafe for over 10 years where we've had a lot of dead fans & PSU's.
    • Generally the rule of thumb is whenever you buy a case: either replace it or face the wrath in 2-3yrs maximally.
    • If you are lucky, only the PSU is dead;
    • when unlucky; your graphics card or other components might be fried too!

    Be aware, your silentpsu might still do the same while thinking different ...

    Over the 10 years we've had to replace EVERY case PSU we've bought and we've had many cases in stock ;) and we've had to replace only a few of the higher price range.

    Maybe it's superstition although I've had best result with the high range series of Chieftec; they even got a supersilent PSU with large fan which is as good as the SilentPSU for me.
    I'm only hearing my pump of my watercooled system and that's about it .. bliss compared to these vacuum cleaners nowadays!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  50. Keep usage pattern in mind when choosing by Fearless96 · · Score: 1

    Let's say your typical uses are web forms, reading/composing emails or documents, and not turning the computer off until the end of the day. You want a PSU that is effient when idle. You may even want the one TFA says is too expensive because that one has the best efficiency at low power draw. On the other hand, the PSUs which are efficient during load are great if you tax the computer for some significant part of the uptime. The PSU review is great but I don't know why the conclusion didn't include a blurb like this.

  51. First real PSU reviev i've seen by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    kudos to the site for actually going to the trouble of building a test rig that can actaully load down PSUs in controlled increments.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    1. Re:First real PSU reviev i've seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hardocp.com also uses commercial testing equipment and a full tear down in their reviews.

  52. I agree on all but one ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    The pizza box works sometimes. I've got a dump here of mainboards, graphics cards and other stuff; they didn't die on the pizzabox but before.

    My three holy rules:

    • I'm aware of statics and will always touch ANY ground before I'll open a case
    • When working in my workplace, I'll be touching a ground continuesly.
    • I'll be always using an antistatic sheet under the mainboard.
    • Not a holy rule but just an advice to anyone who reads: testers can be holy too! They save time sometimes with hours.

      Had a few times a bad PG every 4-5 restarts of a PSU which drove me crazy until I've used a tester .. You will have to pry it from my dead cold hands !

    Look at the prices like everything dropped ; budget cases won't have high-quality PSU's.
    Over the last 10 years it was needed to replace every PSU in every case to a higher grade PSU in our cybercafe and office.
    Most problems started at the PSU, of some which even made a professional Martin smoke-fog-machine jealous!
    Some were even that witty to kill a videocard together with a few other components...
    Of all of these PSU's the soldering is awfully done; some PSU's even died just because of bad soldering connections!
    Best is to not mix pizza with electronics .. it just doesn't look good all that green&blue with red sause! ;)

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  53. not a fair review? by bananaquackmoo · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice the Enermax PSU they chose? They could easily have had about a dozen ones that would be better made by the exact same company for the same amount or less money. They intentionally went out of their way to make Enermax look bad. (I do not work for them, I'm just a happy longterm customer)

  54. Come on now. by haelduksf · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else annoyed that every power supply review written in the last ~5 years has started with some variation on "The power supply is perhaps the most overlooked element of a modern PC, and yet it's the one component that can irreparably damage the rest of a system"?

    Enough! I get it!

  55. Good start...BUT by MpVpRb · · Score: 1

    Good article. They covered actual vs advertised power, efficiency, noise, ripple etc. But they only tested the performance of the units for a short time.

    They did not test MTBF or useful life.

    Yes, I know that most MTBF ratings are actually calculations and estimates, but they still have value.

    My concern with cheepo power supplies is component quality.

    Electrolytic capacitors can be very troublesome. Even the good ones are nowhere near as reliable as semiconductors, and the bad ones are truly awful.

    Fans are another problem. Semiconductors tend to follow a decaying exponential reliability curve. After the initial "infant mortality" period, the longer they run, the less their chance of failure. But mechanical devices wear out. And cheepo fans were out quickly

  56. Re:Wow. What do you people do to your PSUs ? by Kent+Recal · · Score: 2

    It probably depends on the quality of your powergrid, too.
    I've heard the american grid, on average, delivers much more fragile and "dirty" electrons than, for example, the european grid.

    I guess it makes a difference whether your PSU has to deal with spikes and brownouts on a daily/weekly basis or whether it's just humming along on nominal line voltage.

  57. Re:Contrasting the good and the bad -Build Quality by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    Wow. I think I could do a better solder job with a torch and 1/4" plumbers solder.

  58. This is a mislabeled 230V supply. by Animats · · Score: 1

    The image on that site isn't good enough to allow reading the certification number below the UR symbol. After some enhancement in Photoshop, it looks something like "E??430?", but I can't be sure.

    Product reviewers: please provide a clear photo of the nameplate on anything you review.

    The UL database does have an entry for this item.

    • Class: Power Supplies, Information Technology Equipment Including Electrical Business Equipment - Component
    • UL certification: E214301
    • ALLIED LEADER INTERNATIONAL LTD E214301
      1ST FL
      18 WU CHUN 7 RD, WU GU INDUSTRY AREA
      WU GU SHIANG, TAIPEI TAIWAN
    • Model: AL-D500EXP
    • Input voltage: 230VAC.

    The UL certification database has UL's test numbers, and they're above the ones from "jonnyGURU.com". But the UL database lists this as a supply intended for 230V power only. They list all the other Allied power supplies as "115/230VAC", but not this one. JonnyGuru reported that the primary side blew out, not the secondary side. Running on 115V, the primary side has to draw twice the current required at 230V. (Yes, that's how switching power supplies work.)

    So this thing is mislabeled, or was submitted for testing with a different label. It went through UL testing as 230V only, and won't work on 115V.

  59. When a power supply blows up, tell UL by Animats · · Score: 1

    If a UL-rated power supply blows up on you, UL wants to know. There's a form for reports. They accept pictures (.JPG or .GIF). If you're willing to ship the failed product to UL, they'll send you mailing instructions.

  60. PC Power and Cooling bought by another company by Reziac · · Score: 1

    They mention in the article that PC Power & Cooling was bought by one of the companies whose product they DID test. I don't recall which brand it was. You'll have to actually RTFA to find out. (I know, I know -- how embarrassing! :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  61. Re:Wow. What do you people do to your PSUs ? by Reziac · · Score: 1

    My experience here in America is exactly the reverse -- in OEM systems, the single most failure-prone component is the PSU (followed by the mobo, I think partly due to stress from the OEM's very crappy PSUs).

    OTOH, in *clone* systems, failed PSUs are pretty rare. Not coincidentally -- so are failed mobos.

    Dunno about how dirty our grid is, but I make my clients invest in a UPS or at least a good surge protector, and funny thing, none has ever suffered a major component failure. :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  62. Generic PSU + Good UPS = silence and acrid smoke. by Behrooz · · Score: 1

    That's a good analogy...until your bulletproof vest explodes while you're wearing it inside the armored car.

    No-name PSUs are built cheap-- lowest-bidder capacitors, heatsinks, fans, and circuitry. Even getting 100% solid voltage from a UPS, they have trouble staying within spec'd voltage ranges, especially under sudden loads.

    Under any real loads, budget PSUs will fail out with a good chance of killing your system, it's only a matter of time. Even before they go up in smoke you're, likely to face a nightmare of unexplainable system freezes and data corruption.

    Compare that with a high-quality PSU guaranteed to run off of AC input 100V-240V while supporting full rated load. Active power-factor correction implemented properly brings everything you get from a UPS except the battery. Mine runs happily through minor voltage problems-- lights dim for a second, my computer continues to run, roommates with weaker PSUs and an old half-dead UPS go down.

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  63. Yes. Bad PSUs are not reliable. by Behrooz · · Score: 1

    You seriously think you are going to fry your motherboard if you pay less for a standard designed product that may possibly have a slightly shortly life due to lower grade components ?

    Yes. Buy a cheap generic PSU, and you don't know what you'll end up with. It may work. It may not. It may be so deficient that catastrophic failure fries components downstream. "Lower quality" works against you in two ways-- lower rated performance specifications for the components, and greater allowable variance within the components supplied. The problem is that you have no information about what you are actually getting.

    Your system is spinning up a HDD and suddenly wants 20 amps of current for a short time. Your cheap PSU is rated to handle 16A on that rail, but a temporary spike just stresses it a bit and heats things up. Normally it would survive, but one of the capacitors running that rail is on the lower end of the reliability curve and shorts. *POP*, acrid smoke, a series of short circuits, and depending on the layout and where in the AC input cycle that happened, you have either a dead PSU or a dead PSU that sent out a voltage spike and took something else with it.

    Sure, that's a worst-case scenario, and it's remarkably bad enough that our minds are wired to see that as a much lower-probability event than it actually is. So, I'll say that it doesn't take catastrophic failure to dissuade me from purchasing a cheap power supply.

    All it takes is the knowledge that even minor variations in output voltage are like little gremlins in your computer. Transient under-voltage to your RAM? Oops, some of the bits may have flipped! Hopefully that wasn't anything important, like a HDD write queue order or the handle for core operating system components.

    Slightly wonky power supplies are the #1 cause of untraceable system instability. You get what you pay for, and spending $30 more on a name-brand PSU with quality components and active power-factor correction instead of putting that money toward another 5% CPU speed jump just makes sense.

    --
    "We have to go forth and crush every world view that doesn't believe in tolerance and free speech." - David Brin
  64. How about efficiency and quietness!!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THat's what I look for in my PS, anmd so I tend to use Seasonic (Made in Taiwan? I think)
    Very power efficient,
    Very quiet.
    The current one I've been using, has been on for about 5 years now.

  65. Recycling radioactive metal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add to this the practice of recycling metal which should be classified as low level radioactive waste. I have heard that some metal products are slightly radioactive. Not highly radioactive but enough to set off a radiation meter.

    1. Re:Recycling radioactive metal. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      An AC responds with this frightful information:

      "Add to this the practice of recycling metal which should be classified as low level radioactive waste. I have heard that some metal products are slightly radioactive. Not highly radioactive but enough to set off a radiation meter."

      'Nuf said!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  66. Re:How are you quantifying reliability? by colinnwn · · Score: 1

    Depends on how you measure reliable. I probably have 3 power outages a year due to storms. I have probably 5 days a year with brownouts significant enough to cause my UPS to kick on one or more times that day (sometimes it jackhammers on and off).

    I've had one UPS fail on me causing no further damage, and one UPS not provide power due to an old battery. So far in 8 years I have never had a UPS cause damage to equipment.

  67. Re:Generic PSU + Good UPS = silence and acrid smok by godefroi · · Score: 1

    I've replaced a lot of PSUs in my day, mostly since I can buy a lot of $20 PSUs that each last me a year for what someone else would spend on a "nice" PSU.

    Oh, and I've never had a failing PSU damage anything else. Replace the PSU, and on I go.

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
  68. Re:Yes. Bad PSUs are not reliable. by godefroi · · Score: 1

    Except it's not $30 more, it's $130 more. Because I only paid $90 for the motherboard, the $20 PSU I bought could completely take it out and I would STILL be saving money over the name-brand PSU.

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
  69. Re:Yes. Bad PSUs are not reliable. by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1

    The problem is that you have no information about what you are actually getting.

    Yes, I see... would you like to buy this reputable brand PSU from me ? its only got a markup of 200% and you can finally sleep at night.

    Actually, we have another model here that is encased with rubber - latest secure fashion, only costs another $50

    Sarcasm aside, the designs are the same, all PSUs I have used work until they fail. Your paranoia is not held up by stats, you are also attributing untraceable hardware issues to fluctuations in the PSU, which is akin to writing books on string theory.

    Even if it were true that standard PSU current fluctuations affect that accuracy of RAM, you would still have no idea when you buy a black box, what you are actually getting. Did you get 1 of the lucky 2-5% that fail too soon, or maybe you got the moron built one.

    I don't think paying more money will protect you from such unknowables that afflict all PSU manufacturers.

  70. I'll only buy Corsair Power Supplies by tyrione · · Score: 1
  71. The other way around... by nobaloney · · Score: 1

    For me it's always been the other way around. First, let's examine the irreparably damage the rest of a system: I've never had a system failure before I had to pull the system before it was too ancient to work well for us. So in our case the PSUs aren't causing catastrophic failure.

    In fact our oldest running systemn, which we keep running (but not on the 'net) because it runs the version of PageMaker we still use for print and pdf materials, is about eight years old. While I no longer have receipts, the case and power supply together cost us under $40 then.

    Now lets' move on to the power supplies themselves:

    For many years we bought the cheapest PSUs we could find, until about two years ago. They all ran as long as did the computer in which they were installed.

    Then about four years ago we started buying cheap private-label systems from Frys for our staff. We still do. The entire system generally costs us about us$200, less than some good power supplies. They're all still running. Including two I gave new to family as gifts. I just checked with them, and neither are connected to UPS systems at all; both to really cheap (circa us$20) 'surge protectors' (I put that in quotes because I understand they're really not effective at surge protection at that price point)

    For myself I build state of the art systems. My last one was built about three years ago; a state of the art (when built) system can easily last that long. It's gone through two PSUs, and is now on it's third. The first one came with the (circa us$60) case. The second, installed about a year ago, not because there was anything wrong with the first but because I wanted something quieter; I paid also circa us$60, and got one with an adjustable speed 120mm fan positioned right over the processor. It lasted, with the fan running at full speed (still vey quiet) until a few weeks ago.

    Then after the system shut down twice becaue of heat problems within two weeks (almost a month ago), I took a look at it and discovered the fan was no longer running. Rather than replacing the fan, I replaced the entire power supply, with a cheap one from a friend's stack of extras. Let's see how that one lasts.

    Now I'm building my system for the next three years and I've bought for that one an Antec Neopower 500. Let's see how long that one lasts.

    We run our systems behind APC SmartUPS systems; perhaps they're better at keeping our power clean than cheaper units from other vendors.

    While I realize this isn't a scientific review by any means, it might at least be interesting to some slashdotters.

  72. Re:Wow. What do you people do to your PSUs ? by zoomes · · Score: 1

    Dust is the big PSU killer (and UPSs too). I know that in the hospitals plaster room the PC's PSU is replaced about every 6 months. And twin PSUs have problems too, the other day one blew and tripped out the UPS. Well at least all I had to do is boot, recover filesystem and then database. This 5 yr old server has had 3 'new' PSUs in the last year! Are there PSUs designed for dusty environments?

  73. Re:Yes. Bad PSUs are not reliable. by dangitman · · Score: 1

    Because I only paid $90 for the motherboard, the $20 PSU I bought could completely take it out and I would STILL be saving money over the name-brand PSU.

    Right. So you build crap computers out of junk parts. Good for you. But many people have standards and don't want to put up with that shit. Yay, you'll be saving money! But what about the hassle (and potential data loss) of having your system die? It's worth money to avoid such headaches.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  74. Re:Yes. Bad PSUs are not reliable. by dangitman · · Score: 1

    Sarcasm aside, the designs are the same,

    Except that they aren't. Where did you get this idea from?

    all PSUs I have used work until they fail

    Well there's an informative comment. All cars go until they stop, so therefore all cars are the same, right?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  75. Re:Yes. Bad PSUs are not reliable. by PiSkyHi · · Score: 1

    Sarcasm aside, the designs are the same,

    Except that they aren't. Where did you get this idea from?

    Oh sorry, I forgot about the all important rubber encased model.

    all PSUs I have used work until they fail

    Well there's an informative comment. All cars go until they stop, so therefore all cars are the same, right?

    Well, some moron had the idea that their PCs RAM reliability was most likely due to the amount of cash forked out for their model PSU, hence running of the engine, so to speak. I quite seriously have had nil issues related to power supplies other than it works or it doesn't.

    I strongly believe that a faulty PSU can be found in any batch and most likely fairly quickly. If it works at all once, it has no reason to change other than wear. They all wear. Your experience maybe different, I really doubt it was anything other than luck.

    Still, we've probably both being doing this for years, I've been diagnosing faulty SCSI cables, close to dead HD's, loose connections, not once have I seen RAM that could not be fixed by replacing it, nor Have I seen my computer's screen suddenly refresh differently due to some bits flipping out over a varied voltage - if a voltage is going to flip out of range of the system, the system will freeze - never has this happened to me due to a PSU, heat - yes but PSU, if the PSU dies, it dies, get it ?

    Wake up and smell that statistics.

  76. Re:Yes. Bad PSUs are not reliable. by godefroi · · Score: 1

    If you're not backing up your important data, the quality of your PSU is the least of your worries...

    --
    Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)