Slashdot Mirror


Students Call Space Station With Home-Built Radio

Pizzutz writes "Four Toronto college students have accomplished a technological feat that their teachers are calling a first. The Humber College seniors made contact with the International Space Station Monday with a radio system they designed and built themselves. School officials say that, to their knowledge, that's never been accomplished by students at the college level." Somewhat disappointingly, the students actually did have permission to make contact.

330 comments

  1. no kidding by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Informative

    Somewhat disappointingly, the students actually did have permission to make contact.

    No kidding. But this does open the door to prank calls to the ISS. I can't wait for some of those to get posted to YouTube. Or shown on NASA TV.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:no kidding by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Disappointingly? Heck, that makes it three times cooler, IMO :)

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:no kidding by JustinOpinion · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Somewhat disappointingly, the students actually did have permission to make contact.

      Yes, it is truly disappointing when youngsters act responsibly.

      I understand how the story would be more romantic if they contacted the ISS out of the blue (imagine how surprised those aboard the station would be!). But the fact of the matter is that living in space is precarious at the best of times. Unexpected events, especially those that tie up communication channels, are unsafe and not welcome. Thus the students did the right thing by clearing permission first, and they should be applauded for that.

      Also, the students probably wanted their signal to actually be answered, rather than ignored or (even more likely) simply not noticed!

    3. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this does open the door to prank calls to the ISS.

      Hello? This is Nicolas Sarkozy calling ... I liked that movie you did "nailin' paylin", that was real edgy.

    4. Re:no kidding by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      probably because it was on the frontpage already.

      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/02/2337207

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Somewhat disappointingly, the students actually did have permission to make contact.

      Yes, it is truly disappointing when youngsters act responsibly.

      I am much older then them but I still wouldn't call them youngsters. From TFA:

      Operation First Contact is the graduating project for 34-year-olds Gino Cunti and Paul Je of Toronto, Patrick Neelin, 25, of Welland, Ont., and Kevin Luong, 21, of Mississauga, Ont.

      They are all legal age!

    6. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's truly disappointing when Slashdotters can't detect sarcasm.

    7. Re:no kidding by atomicthumbs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's amateur radio. Anybody with a license, a radio, and a good enough antenna has permission to contact the ISS.

      --
      http://pinopsida.com
    8. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is truly disappointing when youngsters act responsibly.

      Actually, yes it kinda is.

      There really is some value to rebelling against authority. All youngsters should do it. Being responsible is a burden that comes after graduation.

    9. Re:no kidding by zappepcs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, I read that part too and I'm trying to figure out what kind of radio they had to build that was 'way over their heads' kind of technology? Freq-hopping with 1024 bit encryption digital radio? If ham operators normally talk with the ISS and their story sounded like it was HAM radio they used, why was it such a feat? Is there something special we need to know about students in Canada? Did anyone find a link to technical details of the radio system they built?

    10. Re:no kidding by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Guess what I can contact the ISS WITHOUT PERMISSION. and do it regularly. I also talked to astronauts on the Columbia Shuttle, and cosmonauts in the Mir when it was in the sky. all on my home made radio. You don't need permission.

      It's called HAM RADIO. and I designed and built my own 2 meter radio and antennas when I was 16. I also built a radio from my own design and talked to people on the OTHER SIDE OF THE PLANET!

      If these "college kids" are extra special then we as a nation are completely and utterly doomed.

      College level should be designing stuff that a kid with some surplus electronics in his basement cant do.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm...I believe the youngsters in questions here are both 34 years of age.

    12. Re:no kidding by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

      But... They're art majors.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    13. Re:no kidding by jabithew · · Score: 1

      Legal age for what?

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    14. Re:no kidding by Richy_T · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is there something special we need to know about students in Canada?

      That they're Canadian?

    15. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and get off my lawn!!!

    16. Re:no kidding by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Technically, your amateur radio license is the "permission".

      You DO have a license from the FCC (or equivalent regulatory body in your country), right?

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    17. Re:no kidding by insomniac8400 · · Score: 1

      Please, get over yourself. If Nasa does not encrypt their communication, that is their problem. The only reason these kids needed to involve Nasa was to get access to the necessary encryption and to set up the interview time.

    18. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i often visited a few buddies of mine at a tech college that ends in -IT (not MIT).

      they had a sign above the toilet paper in one of the men's stalls: "art degree dispenser"

    19. Re:no kidding by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Funny

      That they pronounce "about" as "a boot"?

      (With apologies to South Park)

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    20. Re:no kidding by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. People have been building radios at home for over 100 years now. It's not that big of a deal. Even frequency hopping radios have been built by ham operators in the last 20 years. I haven't read any QST in over a decade, but the last time I glanced through one, they still had plans and schematics for some homebrew gear.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    21. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ring, ring."

      "Hello?"

      "Can you see Uranus from there?"

    22. Re:no kidding by JavaManJim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amen to zappecs! When I was a teenager, I think a good number of us built a) crystal whisker receivers, b) diode receiver radios, c) transmit and receive radios.

      Its no big deal. Wait a minute, nothing big for a kid to do. It might be special for a college student twice a kid's age in today's non magic world. A world that has never heard of the venerable ARRL (American Radio Relay League).

      Like others, I wonder why no one thought about "ARISS". http://www.arrl.org/ARISS/

      And zappecs is right so many times about the lack of specifications. They might have done it the hard way and made their own resistors and capacitors out of regional minerals (i.e dirt). The video had the students using an oscilloscope. Oscilloscopes help greatly to tune your antenna.

      Cheers,
      Jim

    23. Re:no kidding by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Age of consent (like, you can have sex) Was 14, raised to 16 effective May 01, 2008

          Driving age - 16

          Military service age - 16

          Smoking age - 19

          Drinking age - 19

          I can't think of any other age specific restrictions that he could be referring to. As far as I know, there isn't an age limit on using a radio. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    24. Re:no kidding by NickW1234 · · Score: 1
      The door's been open for a long time.

      If you actually look into it, it's not a "Home-built radio" any more than I'm typing this on a "Home-built computer"

      The guys bought a radio, antenna, and rotator.

      They bought some cables and hooked them up.

      They called the ISS through the space station's amateur radio program, where they got a 10 minute slot to talk to an astronaut, just like tons of other schools.

      It's not anything special, unfortunately. They weren't talking on NASA's comm channels or anything.

      It's not any kind of technological first.

      The sad part is that Canada's Telecommunications hall of fame is recognizing them too.

      Doesn't anyone do any fact checking?

    25. Re:no kidding by NickW1234 · · Score: 2, Informative
      And they didn't actually build their radio. They bought a radio, antenna, and rotator.

      They "built" the "radio station"

      AKA bought stuff based on specs, and plugged it all in.

    26. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JustinOpinion said:

      Yes, it is truly disappointing when youngsters act responsibly.

      From the article:

      Operation First Contact is the graduating project for 34-year-olds Gino Cunti and Paul Je of Toronto, Patrick Neelin, 25, of Welland, Ont., and Kevin Luong, 21, of Mississauga, Ont.

      Even my 85 year old grandfather doesn't call 34 year olds "youngsters".

      Sorry, I'm not impressed, especially considering these are graduating college seniors. High school kids then sure, it would be neat.
      In programming terms, this is like a 4th year Computer Science major bragging because he wrote a telnet client.

      Chances are the people who designed the actual radio systems NASA uses everyday were younger than these people.

    27. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anal Sex - 19 :P

    28. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ring, ring."

      "Hello?"

      "Can you see Your anus from there?"

    29. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more than legal age in canada! hell you can drunk dial at 19 there.

    30. Re:no kidding by Daeward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      (With apologies to South Park)

      What about apologies to Canadians? >:[

    31. Re:no kidding by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Ahhh, a topic I don't even want to think about... Some exit ports should remain designated only as such. :)

          Well, that and dating anyone substantially younger than me again. It was nice dating a 21 year old (she was pretty), but ... ok, we'll leave it at that.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    32. Re:no kidding by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      You don't need permission. It's called HAM RADIO.

      Actually, don't you need a license to do that? That sounds like a form of permission to me.

    33. Re:no kidding by natet · · Score: 1

      If these "college kids" are extra special then we as a nation are completely and utterly doomed.

      Fortunately, the nation in question is Canada...

      --
      IANAL... But I play one on /.
    34. Re:no kidding by BoogeyOfTheMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      We Americans will apologise to Canada for trying to steal all your good hockey players when you guys apologise for Celine Dion and Bryan Adams.

      We would like to thank you, however, for Mike Meyers and The Kids In The Hall.

      Also, after everyone apologises, will you help us out with the whole metric system thing? And show us the secret of how you keep your country so litter free?

      Also, send more beer pls ;)

    35. Re:no kidding by j4s0n · · Score: 1

      (With apologies to South Park)

      What about apologies to Canadians? >:[

      Not until they apologize for Brian Adams. Fair is fair.

    36. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why so serious? It's a joke.

    37. Re:no kidding by vhfer · · Score: 1

      Indeed, one can purchase a few vital components (boards) and create a SDR (software defined radio) and from there, you write your own radio, as in code. Here's one http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS3911104852.html for US $85k. Too much? Try this: http://www.flex-radio.com/ where you'll find lots of options.

    38. Re:no kidding by CSHARP123 · · Score: 1

      What about apologies to Canadians? >:[ NONE Given

    39. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it was yesterday's news. It didn't get yanked off. (Check right hand side menu).

    40. Re:no kidding by imess · · Score: 2, Funny

      Advanced Radio Transmission majors?

    41. Re:no kidding by v1 · · Score: 1

      was gonna say hey that's kinda neat if they were in high school, (or BONUS for gradeschool I suppose) but college?

      Ham radio operators have been doing this sort of thing for years, and the ISS is known to converse with ham radio operators frequently. I would hope that if radio and electronics is your thing, by the time you get to college, you can accomplish this. Why is this so amazing?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    42. Re:no kidding by Eil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I knew that hams speak to astronauts occasionally, but I always wondered:

      Doesn't NASA get nervous that anyone with the right equipment can talk to the astronauts?

      What exactly do you talk to an astronaut about? Is it all small talk? ("Hi, how's the weather up there?")

    43. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is truly disappointing when youngsters act responsibly.

      I think "youngster" is relative. Two of them were in their mid-thirties!

    44. Re:no kidding by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now, now. The Canadian government has apologized for Bryan Adams on several occasions.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    45. Re:no kidding by davester666 · · Score: 1

      We are sorry for producing Celine Dion and Bryan Adams, but sorry, we don't accept returns after 30 days.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    46. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it sounds like something that any old school ham could do.

    47. Re:no kidding by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      What about apologies to Canadians? >:[

      Not unless you can make an oval smiley :p

    48. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you DO NEED permission (from the FCC if you're in the US or any territory regulated by the FCC, like a US ship in the middle of the ocean), and other entities elsewhere (ITU and others). In the US you need to have at least "Tech level" license for HAM radio. Once you have the license, you have permission to contact the ISS (or a lot of other stuff), provided you behave according to the rules of your license.

    49. Re:no kidding by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      We Americans will apologise

      You are not American.

      Also, send more beer pls ;)

      Okay, maybe you are.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    50. Re:no kidding by diagonal_mambo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm wondering what's so special about this, other than that they got permission to do it.

      I mean, it'd have to be a relatively powerful radio compared to what students would regularly build, but other than that, I can't see any real issues here.

      I'd definitely like to know what technical feats these students achieved. Sounds to me like they made a high-quality radio with a good antenna.

    51. Re:no kidding by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I built guitar amps. It's the same thing really, yours just uses a little modulator/demodulator (modem) circuit and higher carrier frequencies. Banks of 6L6 or EL34 tubes will go pretty high without distorting if the plates are charged to capacity; there's better tubes out there for keeping a clean signal though, 300B costs $300 bucks >_> Banks of push-pull pairs work pretty well. And you need an antenna, I need a loudspeaker.

    52. Re:no kidding by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Terrorist: We make deal with you. Al'Qaida has billions of oil dollars to make you very rich--

      American astronaut: We're not interested in dealing with terrorists! Our government will find you, you can't destroy the heart of America, you towel-headed bast--

      Russian astronaut: GIVE ME THAT! Hey! HEY YOU! This is a RUSSIAN SPACE STATION! You COWARD always fighting from behind other peoples' backs NO SPINE! I kill you! I kill you drunk! You want to fight with ME?! My VODKA kick harder than you! My MOTHER would wrap towel around your FACE!

    53. Re:no kidding by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      "Ring, ring."

      "Hello?"

      "Can you see Ur anus from there?"

    54. Re:no kidding by mysidia · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what this is. An amateur radio contact.

      If you watch the video linked by the article, you see the person making contact identifies himself as VA3JUV

      If you search amateur callsign databases for it, it actually shows up in the database.

    55. Re:no kidding by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Actually, don't you need a license to do that? That sounds like a form of permission to me.

      You need a license (permission) to use the radio to make any contact with anyone at all.

      But if you otherwise have permission to operate the readio through the license, you don't need special permission to make contact with the ISS.

    56. Re:no kidding by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      After reading the article and getting some more information from the comments, it has become clear that this whole thing is basically Ralph Wiggum declaring "I dress myself."

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    57. Re:no kidding by netcrusher88 · · Score: 1

      Actually, contacting the ISS out of the blue is fine. You can prearrange it too, turn it into a kind of publicity thing - like they did here - but you can track the ISS on a site like Heavens Above and then just use any Amateur Radio set on the right frequencies to talk to them when they're above - search for ARISS (Amateur Radio on the ISS) for details. It takes a bit of luck to catch them when they're awake and chatting though, and you only have a short window every 90 minutes or so.

      --
      There's an old saying that says pretty much whatever you want it to.
    58. Re:no kidding by GodlikeDoglike · · Score: 1

      Publicity thing? They did it in a lab next to mine, and there really wasn't a ton of publicly announced propaganda around it other than fliers at the school.

    59. Re:no kidding by AikonMGB · · Score: 1

      And maybe that they also know how to build and launch an entire satellite, including the radio communications sub-system. Currently operating on-orbit:

      Currently under construction/testing:

      We also have our own ground-station which is capable of communicating in UHF, VHF, L-band, and S-band.

      Aikon-

    60. Re:no kidding by denttford · · Score: 1

      oh please, it's obvious this would never happen, as the FCC prohibits the use of ham bands to further commercial interests.*


      *yes, i know. exceptions ruin the joke.

      --

      Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
    61. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, the Technician Class Amateur Radio license is all that's required to make contact with other licensed Astronauts.

      The test for the license is pretty easy since there is no morse-code requirement...I am still working toward getting my Extra Class license.

    62. Re:no kidding by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I was more playing on the idea of Vodka Drunkenski having a conversation with terrorists....

    63. Re:no kidding by denttford · · Score: 1

      I see; you are right. Now it seems perfectly feasible.

      --

      Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
    64. Re:no kidding by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Where did you get your information from? All the articles I read on this said they built it from scratch.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    65. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. It's the Irish that pronounce it that way.

      *cue an Irish comment*

    66. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are you gentlemen! All your base are belong to us. You are on the way to destruction. You have no chance to survive make your time. Ha ha ha ha.

    67. Re:no kidding by rxan · · Score: 1

      I apologize for Celine Dion.

    68. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i once made a radio and talked to a guy on the other side of the universe.

    69. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fiddlededee potatoes

    70. Re:no kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that simple. The astronauts are often too busy to talk on the radio. And usually there are dozens of people trying to talk to them at any one time and the station passes overhead very quickly so there is some luck in getting YOUR signal in, when they are overhead, and not busy working. Kinda like being a sperm going for that egg. Anyway anyone with a ham license and a $100 ham radio can *try* to talk to them.

      Less if you settle for a Chinese uncertified radio. Basically what these college students did was incredibly mundane. It's about as much of an accomplishment as putting up DirecTV dish -omg tv from the sky! Yet they want accolades over this?

      big fucking deal.

    71. Re:no kidding by NickW1234 · · Score: 1
      http://www.operationfirstcontact.com/blog/episode1.htm

      It's their blog.

      That's the problem. All the articles i've seen either say or imply they built it from scratch. "Home-Built" radio etc.

      1 bad article, and everybody else who wrote one poached it for (bad) info.

    72. Re:no kidding by talldean · · Score: 1

      Same question. Boy Scouts have built ham radio sets. If you built a DX radio and used the 20 meter band to talk to the ISS, the only thing special here is that it's relatively archaic, not new.

    73. Re:no kidding by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      It's still permission, albeit blanket permission to perform a class of activities. The average person does not have that permission and can't do it legally.

  2. Still it's awesome. by Dyinobal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Somewhat disappointingly, the students actually did have permission to make contact.

    I imagine one could get in a lot of trouble prank calling the ISS. Though it it some what difficult to come up with space themed prank calls akin to "Is your refrigerator running". Still though, they got a good grade in the class I'm sure and likely had a lot of fun doing it. I'd say that's a grand accomplishment even if they did have permission to do it.

    1. Re:Still it's awesome. by EvolutionsPeak · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Is your toolbag secure?"

      I guess it doesn't really work. :(

    2. Re:Still it's awesome. by LanMan04 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Is your CO2 scrubber running? Better go catch it!"

      Har har har.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    3. Re:Still it's awesome. by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Funny

      Though it it some what difficult to come up with space themed prank calls akin to "Is your refrigerator running".

      I suppose calling them and telling them to stay up there since Earth has been wiped out would be in bad taste ;)

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    4. Re:Still it's awesome. by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      It would of been better if they didn't get "permission" to contact them, and instead pretended to be a pizza delivery guy and ask for directions.

      Now that would of been awesome.

    5. Re:Still it's awesome. by germ!nation · · Score: 1

      students: i'll have a half and half texmex and anchovy and tuna. and don't mess up the crust like you did last time you hear me?
      space station: uh... you realise you just called the international space station...
      students: oh, so now you're going to tell me you don't even deliver south of the river?

    6. Re:Still it's awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prank calling the ISS is simple. Just tell them that you're Xzargan of the planet Arcon 6 and that you've come to enslave mankind, but first you need to eat the ISS for energy.

    7. Re:Still it's awesome. by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they just, like, look out the window?

      If it were in a geostationary orbit, yeah, you could just tell them that something on the opposite side of the planet got blown to smithereens, but... yeah. As it stands, you'd have to figure out where they can't see at all.

    8. Re:Still it's awesome. by swarsron · · Score: 1

      They kinda can see up there if the earth has been wiped out ... but other than that great idea, lets contact them and tell them of a horrible combination of SARS and mad cow disease ;)

    9. Re:Still it's awesome. by clyde_cadiddlehopper · · Score: 1

      "Do you have Prince Albert in a can?"

      --
      Obi-Wan: "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were sudden
    10. Re:Still it's awesome. by skeeto · · Score: 1
      That reminded me of the prank we were supposed to do to John Glenn when he got back.

      Pssssst. This is a secret. When John Glenn returns from space, everybody dress in Ape Suits. Pass it on.

    11. Re:Still it's awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the best prank of all: send them a series of beeps that corresponds to a series of a few prime numbers. Repeat. Enjoy.

    12. Re:Still it's awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is your CO2 scrubber running? Better go catch it!"

      Har har har.

      Aliens ahead RUN!

    13. Re:Still it's awesome. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      This is mission control to ISS. ISS we are detecting zombies approaching your vicinity, please be on the lookout. Repeat, ISS we are detecting zombies approaching your vicinity, please be on the lookout.

    14. Re:Still it's awesome. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      they can see that the black plague has turned everyone into zombies?

    15. Re:Still it's awesome. by syousef · · Score: 1

      I imagine one could get in a lot of trouble prank calling the ISS. Though it it some what difficult to come up with space themed prank calls akin to "Is your refrigerator running".

      There's always the classic of pretending to order a pizza. I'm sure the astronauts would appreciate that, what with their schedules being so full of free time to deal with idiots.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    16. Re:Still it's awesome. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I doubt it, so long as the caller doesn't break any regulations, they probably think it's funny. They're in space for goodness sakes... probably bored out of their mind, as there's no slashdot available.

      Also, they know where you live, so to speak, because HAM radio operators are required by law to identify their communications.

      If an operator becomes too disruptive or creates enough abuse for people to file complaints, there's a danger of enforcement action, license revokation, etc. Nasty prank calls just aren't too likely.

    17. Re:Still it's awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more like this...

      1st prankster: Hey guys, I have a friend with a science question.
      Astronaut: Sure, I'm not too busy right now. Go ahead.
      2nd prankster: Yeah, I was wondering about those bacteria samples and - *cue mp3 player* NEVER GONNA GIVE YOU UP!

      I wouldn't be terribly suprised if someone tried to Rick-Roll at one point or another.

  3. Not a first by scsirob · · Score: 5, Informative

    HAM radio amateurs including students have been in contact with ISS many times over, using voice and digital connections (Packet Radio)

    Many of the astronauts on board are HAM radio operators and make frequent contact with schools, institutions and individual amateurs. On the ground, many of these individual amateurs have designed built their own rig.

    --
    To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    1. Re:Not a first by malloc · · Score: 1

      I think the emphasis was "with a radio system they designed and built themselves".

      --
      ___________________ I want to be free()!
    2. Re:Not a first by wjh31 · · Score: 4, Funny

      HAM SPAM?

    3. Re:Not a first by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Informative

      Indeed, it's sad how little knowledge there is of amateur radio among nerds these days. Part of that is the medium itself, where you're often essentially talking with bored middle-aged men about nothing (international regulations arguably forbidding interesting discussions). However, there's no better way to gain an understanding of electronics than through studying for an amateur radio license. If you start with a guide like the ARRL intro , electronic gadgets become a lot less mysterious and it gets better as you proceed up the license classes. You can diagnose television or mobile phone problems, repair simple devices, or build your own for cheap like audio amplifiers. I haven't used amateur radio in over a decade now, but I'm still really happy that I got into it.

    4. Re:Not a first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "ham" (or "Ham" if the first word in a sentence). "HAM" is NOT an acronym, but a nickname for 'amateur'.

      And this whole article is nothing but ignorant sensationalism. There is a lot of information online that the original article author could have studied if s/he could have been bothered to use her/his journalism skills in a meaningful way.

    5. Re:Not a first by tist · · Score: 1

      34 year old college seniors doing a capstone project of building a radio?

    6. Re:Not a first by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Funny

      Part of that is the medium itself, where you're often essentially talking with bored middle-aged men about nothing

      So it's basically like IRC was back in the day? ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    7. Re:Not a first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was going to point out that myself! And most likely this was also via amateur radio. Ham radio operators have been doing this for about 26 years now, it's definitely not a "first".

      The SAREX (Space Shuttle Amateur Radio EXperiment)Program started in 1983 when Mission Specialist Owen Garriott W5LFL operated from the shuttle for the first time. Since then there's been an established program of scheduling contacts with school students and the astronauts. First on the shuttles and now on the ISS.

      Also, Mir was quite active on amateur radio as well. They would be on voice from time to time and there was also a packet radio system aboard Mir.

      Any amateur radio operator in the world is free to attempt a contact with the ISS. In fact, NASA even has a page about amateur radio aboard the ISS.

      http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/station/reference/radio/

      In fact, any school can apply to have a chance of a scheduled contact between students and the ISS.

    8. Re:Not a first by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      Designed and built themselves. Did you miss that part?

      -Peter

    9. Re:Not a first by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking. This is news to a degree but to call it a first is a bold and unsupported claim. What radio tech did they use that is so unique? What band, what encoding, etc did they use? They mention it is in fact amateur radio but not HAM. That could be anything.

      A little more detail would actually make the article more news worthy for /. Not just "ZOMG they made a l337 radioz and talked to space men." Details please, we aren't retarded.

    10. Re:Not a first by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      Allow me if you will, to pick you brain.
      When I was about 10, I was graced the friendship of a local ham. I setup an ancient FT-7 transceiver, a long wire antenna in a semi-random direction, and was fascinated by the world that it opened up.

      Sadly, at the time, my brain couldn't wrap around the requisites to get a license, and it all fell into obscurity.
      Now, I live in a city, so my dreams of building vast antennas is kind of over.

      To get to the point: I've still got a large attraction to the world of ham and packet radio.
      What are, do you [or anyone else] consider the best/better resources to get a starting point on everything again.

      I'd love to get a simple rig up, if possible. I've got a very solid computing background, but not much of an electronics background. I know the difference between and NPN and a PNP transistor, if that counts.

      Thanks in advance!

    11. Re:Not a first by nedlohs · · Score: 2, Funny

      "we aren't retarded."

      Do you only read with a +8 comment threshold or something?

    12. Re:Not a first by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I think the emphasis was "with a radio system they designed and built themselves".

      Not really. It's pretty easy to design and build a VHF transceiver that will allow you to talk to people on the ISS.

    13. Re:Not a first by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      A little more detail would actually make the article more news worthy for /. Not just "ZOMG they made a l337 radioz and talked to space men." Details please, we aren't retarded.

      Maybe we aren't, but the general public (for whom TFA was written) are probably quite impressed that someone who isn't a professional space radio engineer can actually do something like this.

      Which is kind of sad.

      Too many people have forgotten that making something with your own 2 hands is extremely rewarding, and not that daunting. Most seem to want to consume mass quantities of whatever the magic box tells them they need.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    14. Re:Not a first by JoeMerchant · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think the emphasis was "with a radio system they designed and built themselves".

      Define "designed and built themselves"... did they mine the copper ore using handbuilt tools and smelt it into wire using fire struck from flint? Was the design derived in a "clean" environment from first principles?

      I thought not... posers ;-)

    15. Re:Not a first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone is interested, you can read their blog which details their project.

      http://www.operationfirstcontact.com/blog.htm

      Sadly the Globe and Mail got the story very wrong. They didn't even build the equipment, they bought much of it off the shelf.

      As you can see in this entry they bought a common commercially made 2m mobile transceiver.

      http://www.operationfirstcontact.com/blog/episode16.htm

      "Today, Mr. Rector, Paul, and I went out to Radioworld and purchased a transceiver. After much research, we decided to go with the ICOM Ic-V8000. For the cost, it has exactly what we need. On Friday, we're going to be integrating it into our setup, and doing all the necessary testing."

    16. Re:Not a first by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Go check the ARRL website. Lots of ways to get into Amateur radio - even in cities. On low budgets. Only downside is you do have to talk to boring middle age men most of the time. Can't have everything.

      The FCC even dropped the Morse code requirement for General class, so if that was the kicker for you, it's gone.

      73, KL1SA

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    17. Re:Not a first by CaptainAx · · Score: 1

      But, they (SAREX) want you to have an "Oscar class" station when you participate on these prearranged events. I think it would be much cooler if I could use a small portable radio that costs $400 to make the contact rather than the $3000 "Oscar class" station.

    18. Re:Not a first by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I tried to get some kids interested in ham radio.

      Problem was, when I started teaching theory and rules I lost half the class when they found out you could not swear or use profanity.

      Tell them they have to self censor themselves and they lose interest.

      saying SHIT is more important than knowledge to them.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:Not a first by meatmanek · · Score: 1

      They could try, but they'd be caught within a week, I'm sure. The FCC is very serious about their airwaves, and Hams are too.

      The local hams would just make it into a Fox hunt game.

    20. Re:Not a first by LandDolphin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only downside is you do have to talk to boring middle age men most of the time.

      That boring middle aged man is probably thinking the same thing when he talks to you too.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    21. Re:Not a first by TheJediGeek · · Score: 1

      If anyone is interested, you can read their blog which details their project.

      http://www.operationfirstcontact.com/blog.htm

      Sadly the Globe and Mail got the story very wrong. They didn't even build the equipment, they bought much of it off the shelf.

      As you can see in this entry they bought a common commercially made 2m mobile transceiver.

      http://www.operationfirstcontact.com/blog/episode16.htm

      "Today, Mr. Rector, Paul, and I went out to Radioworld and purchased a transceiver. After much research, we decided to go with the ICOM Ic-V8000. For the cost, it has exactly what we need. On Friday, we're going to be integrating it into our setup, and doing all the necessary testing."

      Whiskey Tango Foxtrot? OK, so these guys BOUGHT a radio OFF THE SHELF and then made contact through a scheduled program for the ISS to contact schools? Scheduled contact

      The ARISS program is a program to schedule the ISS to make contact with your school via amateur radio. Roughly half a dozen schools are contacted every week in this manner. This is even more non-news than it seemed before. The fact that this is college students trying to claim this is a major project for graduation is absurd. Sounds like they did too much partying and needed to come up with something quick.

    22. Re:Not a first by rk · · Score: 1

      "To build a ham radio from scratch, you must first create the universe." -- Apologies to Carl Sagan.

    23. Re:Not a first by diskofish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Honestly, the idea of getting a ham license just for the fun probably isn't going to interest many except the most hardcore geeks.

      I am sure it was more interesting back in the old days before the internet where the only thing around was long distance telephone. There is a slew of other technology that is accessible and easy to use for casual communication.

      Only reason I am thinking about getting my license is because some of my activities involve the use of radios.

    24. Re:Not a first by chazd1 · · Score: 1

      It is a dissapointment that the frequency and mode were not described in the article, esp. since it was a science article. The frequency, mode, power and antenna certainly provide "a never been done before" criteria.

      Ham radio was and still is at the forefront of comunications technology. This article describes a simple publicity stunt to promote a particular school.

      73's N2TYQ

    25. Re:Not a first by director_mr · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why it would be sad that nerds don't know a lot about amateur radio. The most interesting thing about shortwave radio and ham radios was opening up the opportunity to tune into foreign broadcasts and communicate with people who were far away. There is a system in place that does those things far more efficiently now. Its called the internet.

      People wax eloquent about dying technologies, but technologies die for a reason. We no longer have large groups of people who know how to repair steam engines, service vacuum tube radios, take care of horses and the list can go on. The reason is there are far more relevant things to learn and know. I don't mourn the loss of knowledge about properly attending to a horse who has a sliver lodged in its foot on the road, and I don't really mourn the loss of amateur radio enthusiasts either.

    26. Re:Not a first by Perf · · Score: 1

      They mention it is in fact amateur radio but not HAM. That could be anything.

      HAM radio is Amateur radio.

    27. Re:Not a first by 0x000000 · · Score: 1

      I got a HAM license, and I am definitely a hardcore geek. I also got it because at the time I was doing near space balloon launches (http://nearspace.0x58.com). It is surprising how much fun it can be to talk to random people on the radio.

      I have been thinking of adding APRS to my car, anyone have any experience with this?

      --
      cat /dev/null > .signature
    28. Re:Not a first by operagost · · Score: 1

      I tried to contact the Challenger with a transmitter I built using my Radio Shack 200 in 1 kit. Something went wrong, I guess.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    29. Re:Not a first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, I have managed to contact isis with a commercial radio, and a year or so later designed and built my own VHF transceiver that could, even though I haven't managed to yet. do i get a medal too?

    30. Re:Not a first by 0x000000 · · Score: 1

      Not interesting, they used standard off the shelf components and build a radio shack. Then they used the default voice/data channel for ISS which has been posted online and contact ISS. They may or may not respond when you talk to them, most of the time you can leave messages on their packet radio computer.

      --
      cat /dev/null > .signature
    31. Re:Not a first by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Not many people, even nerds, build their own PCs any more.

      My first ham set was Heathkit. I built it from piles of parts. The final amp I built was so good my ham friends had me building others for them. Turns out soldering isn't as simple as I thought it was, and my buddies weren't that good at it sometimes. But then again I was taught in the military, and had much practice...

      Imagine getting a motherboard kit with just the surface-mount stuff on it, and piles of parts to tack on. that's building a PC, sort of. A kit with a SMD station would be too expensive.

      Getting started in QRP is not a lot of money, and since Morse Code is no longer required, you can get started and find out why code is so much more useful in QRP.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    32. Re:Not a first by Perf · · Score: 1

      "We don't need electronics, we have video games."
      /sarc

      73s

    33. Re:Not a first by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I'm thinking more like BBS's and FidoNet.

          I can still whistle connect tones well enough to get faxes and modems to connect. Ahh, there's a talent that's lost on most people today.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    34. Re:Not a first by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Same here, I almost never use my license or radio equipment any more, but ham radio is what got me started on the path to becoming an RF engineer, and I still use that knowledge gained from being a ham on a regular basis as part of my job duties.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    35. Re:Not a first by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      buy radio, TNC, aprs adapter and GPS. plug all together and turn it on.

      Incredibly easy. problem is that unless you live in a very APRS friendly community it's a waste of time. Here in Michigan I did this for 3 months. ripped it all out for other uses as I was the only one.
        we also have no APRS friendly repeaters.
      it's no fun monitoring yourself.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    36. Re:Not a first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the emphasis was "with a radio system they designed and built themselves".

      Define "designed and built themselves"... did they mine the copper ore using handbuilt tools and smelt it into wire using fire struck from flint? Was the design derived in a "clean" environment from first principles?

      I thought not... posers ;-)

      Wow, that actually sounds like an awesome challenge. Starting from metal age and working up until you can contact the human-placed outpost perpetually floating 300 miles above the earth.

    37. Re:Not a first by zerospeaks · · Score: 1

      Well....shit.

      --
      http://wwww.zerospeaks.com
    38. Re:Not a first by TigerNut · · Score: 1
      That kind of thinking may burn us all later. At our house we have cable Internet, a home Wi-Fi hub, and cordless phones. Unfortunately, all that stuff goes down when the power fails. It's not like I don't know how to work around it, but so far I haven't actually done anything about it, other than also having a couple of old-school line-powered phones wired up. However, the time may come when the local ISP's equipment suffers a lightning strike or there is a substantial infrastructure problem in town. Instantly, the internet is no more in our neck of the woods. At that point, having an alternate wireless packet network would be a good thing...

      To comment on the article itself: What is really the problem is that the college instructors are convinced this is high technology and on the limits of what a student might achieve. I was a student project judge for our local deVry school a few years back, and they were designing amplifiers for EMG signals using that cutting-edge op-amp, the uA741. They didn't even know that there might be other, better opamps, simply because their instructors have no clue and can't even tell their students where to go look for stuff.

      --

      Less is more.

    39. Re:Not a first by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      That talent was ALWAYS lost on most people. But, sadly, such is the world we live in.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    40. Re:Not a first by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      Morse was never the problem really - I was 10 at the time, and eager to learn something new.
      It was more wrapping my head around the electronics etc.

      Totally unresearched question: Are licenses portable? I live in France [but am Australian]. I doubt my french is good enough to take an exam in. Are they generally transferable, or do I just have to suck it up? :)

    41. Re:Not a first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the emphasis was "with a radio system they designed and built themselves".

      Whoopie, a team of college seniors in their 20's and mid 30's managed to design, build, and use a radio.

      In related news, a Canadian PHD has managed to succesfully create a directional wifi antenna which he designed himself, and connect to an access point! Hooray Canada!

      Seriously, call me when a Jr. High or high school class does this, maybe I'll be more impressed.

    42. Re:Not a first by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      Designed and built themselves. Did you miss that part?

      No, you missed the history of amateur radio over almost the last century. "Homebrew" equipment is an integral part of it. Hams at the college level were designing equipment, building it, and communicating by bouncing signals off the bleeping MOON fifty years ago.

      rj

    43. Re:Not a first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell them they have to self censor themselves and they lose interest.

      saying SHIT is more important than knowledge to them.

      Maybe you lost them when you exposed how utterly condescending you are. I have moderated on this article.

    44. Re:Not a first by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Not really. It's pretty easy to design and build a VHF transceiver that will allow you to talk to people on the ISS.

      Oh? Have you?

      QSL card, or it didn't happen.

    45. Re:Not a first by phulegart · · Score: 1

      Apparently it isn't easy enough for college students to build one. They are being nationally acknowledged for the ability to purchase the right off-the-shelf equipment and follow the instructions in how to use it.

      There are lots of things I find easy. But, I'm not blind enough to assume that these things are easy for everyone else. If what I thought was easy, was *actually* easy, I'd be out of a job.

      Glad you find it easy to build a radio powerful enough to talk to the space station. Where is the news article about you? Because if 4 college students can get this kind of attention for doing something that has been done before, and building a radio was too hard for them... then you should be all over the news considering your skills are greater than theirs, and thus you must have accomplished more than they have.

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
    46. Re:Not a first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: Did you know that Christa McAuliffe was blue eyed?
      A: One blew left and one blew right.

      Q: What were Christa McAuliffe's last words?
      A: "What's this button do?"

      Q: What were Christa McAuliffe's last words to her husband?
      A: "You feed the kids - I'll feed the fish."

      Q: Did you know why there was only one black crew member on Challenger?
      A: They didn't know it was going to blow up.

      Q: Did you know that NASA has a new space drink?
      A: Ocean Spray - It was their second choice because they couldn't get 7-UP.

      Q: When the next shuttle launches into space, what will the senior controller say?
      A: "72, 73, 74 BOOM! - Just kidding guys!"

      Q: What do Playtex tampon users and Christa McAuliffe have in common?
      A: They both should have stayed on the pad.

      Q: What do Christa McAuliffe and Donna Rice have in common.
      A: They both went down on the challenger.

      Q: Did you hear that they are sending up another teacher on the next shuttle mission?
      A: She's going to be a substitute.

    47. Re:Not a first by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Glad you find it easy to build a radio powerful enough to talk to the space station. Where is the news article about you? Because if 4 college students can get this kind of attention for doing something that has been done before, and building a radio was too hard for them... then you should be all over the news considering your skills are greater than theirs, and thus you must have accomplished more than they have.

      It's easier to just walk into a shop and buy one for £140. I built the aerial that I use to communicate with the ISS, that took about an hour. Frankly I'd be embarrassed if there was a news article about it - I point an aerial at the right part of the sky, at the right time, and I can talk to people on the ISS. Lots of people do it, every day. Part of the requirement for having an amateur radio licence is knowing how to set something like this up.

      Here are some pictures sent from the ISS, received at my house, from when Richard Garriot was up there.

    48. Re:Not a first by RAM_Doubler · · Score: 1

      ungrateful little fuckers...

    49. Re:Not a first by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      Maybe we aren't, but the general public (for whom TFA was written) are probably quite impressed that someone who isn't a professional space radio engineer can actually do something like this. Which is kind of sad.

      No, what is REALLY sad is that "school officials" are so stupid to believe that it was a special accomplishment. That's a very large condemnation of the school they attend.

    50. Re:Not a first by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Why didn't you build your own APRS gateway? Even an old scanner would have done the trick (and don't tell me you don't have something laying around that will pickup VHF.) Where I live you can hardly use APRS because there are too many beacons on, esp. during drive-time. That's why my ham club (tribalhams.net) is going D-Star with the GPS mods.

      Anyway Lumpy, hope to hear you on the air sometime. Send me an email with your call and maybe we can sched something.

      73 om,

      Joe w7com

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    51. Re:Not a first by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Particularly when they can hop on something infinitely more complicated and swear all they like... like XBox Live.

    52. Re:Not a first by Niris · · Score: 1

      Is it bad that I was searching out how to get licensed before I read that? . IIRC, Art Bell still uses his ham radio, too!

    53. Re:Not a first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Censorship really is a barrier to entry.

      If one has to concern themselves with esoteric ideas of "bad words" while enjoying themselves in a conversation with another like minded individual, because someone's precious little snowflake might hear the word "shit", it really does put a damper on how you can use the technology.

      It's all about practicality, right? If you can't use the technology how you want, what's the point?

      Right or wrong, that's how the world works. If it doesn't seem practical, it's not interesting or "worth it".

    54. Re:Not a first by mr_stinky_britches · · Score: 1

      that's cool! never knew it was possible...

      --
      Censorship is obscene. Patriotism is bigotry. Faith is a vice. Slashdot 2.0 sucks.
    55. Re:Not a first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, it's sad how little knowledge there is of amateur radio among nerds these days.

      Yeah, kids today. Back in MY day... now git off my lawn!

    56. Re:Not a first by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          It was more entertaining when we ran BBS's. We usually had it set up so we could see the connect string. Some people shared the BBS with their voice line, so you'd have to yell for them over the modem tone. Sometimes I'm yell first, and then start whistling to make the connect. :)

          If I remember right, the fastest I got was something like 24000 baud. It was one of those oddball speeds. 9600 got to be pretty easy to do. :) Of course, I was just emulating the handshake, when we got to the data part, there was no way in hell I could emulate that. :) I just made a hissing sound, and it'd think it was garbled data, but try to correct. :)

          It helps to whistle while breathing in (it takes practice). That'll keep you from blowing on the handset, and making your own line noise. :)

          It was educational though. I got to know the tones very well, so I could tell you what speed someone connected at. It wasn't just the tones either, part is the duration, and when the tones change. It also helped us diagnose problems. I could usually say if a connection would handshake too slow, and disconnect before it finished. :)

          I almost miss the BBS days. Stupid door games. freq'ing files. Arguing with people all around the world.... But, I met a lot of people through them. We'd drag our computers to each other's houses, connect via null modem, and copy our crap around.. :) Now we have the Internet for all that.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    57. Re:Not a first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not usually so much QRM on 2
      jr

    58. Re:Not a first by syousef · · Score: 1

      I tried to get some kids interested in ham radio.

      Problem was, when I started teaching theory and rules I lost half the class when they found out you could not swear or use profanity.

      That's why you should introduce them to CB radio first.

      saying SHIT is more important than knowledge to them.

      They're kids. They want to rebel. It's part of growing up, and testing your boundaries and it's ingrained into the human species. It's not so easy to rebel when things are tightly regulated. They're at that stage of development. Therefore they lose interest.

      If you think the lack of interest in dry rules and regs of HAM radio is depressing, what about the fact that most kids have no interest in physics or astronomy - aka the strange way the world works and how small we are and how we fit in.

      It's difficult. You have to get their interest first THEN you can teach them stuff.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    59. Re:Not a first by greenlead · · Score: 1

      Getting into Amateur Radio is easier than ever. The license tests are simple multiple-choice exams. The question pools are public. You can memorize all of the answers, which is standard practice. The test is much easier than most college-level exams. You can also take practice tests at QRZ.com, which is really helpful.

    60. Re:Not a first by edward2020 · · Score: 1

      Oh - Art Bell. Quite a powerful endorsement there. I bet that's how he talks to lycanthropic-vampires and our reptilian overlords from planet x.

      --
      Don't worry about the mule, just load the wagon.
    61. Re:Not a first by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Because I dont have room on my tower for one, and APRS over 2 meters only works for a 15 mile range unless I get the antenna up to the 50 foot level and then I only get 25 miles.

      Most of the time I'm out of range of my home location. Digipeaters are scarce around here, and those that do operate complain about you if you use aprs and regular reporting on them. (Grumpy old men run these things)

      Back in the day when we used to caravan to Dayton Hamvention with 3-5 other cars of guys, we used to set up an APRS net and in the RV did tracking and comms to practice for CAP exercises. IT was fun to get wierd looks from people when you stopped at a rest area and erected a 20 foot tower off the back of the RV for some lunch time DX.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    62. Re:Not a first by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Licenses are sort of portable. You can operate internationally with most licenses. You have to follow the rules and regs of the country you're located in. There are various treaties in place for specifics. You might want to look at the ARRL site for a better explaination.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  4. Disappointing? by whisper_jeff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Somewhat disappointingly, the students actually did have permission to make contact. "

    And why is that disappointing? I think it's incredibly cool that they had permission to do something like this and would love to see officials (both school and space) take similar steps to encourage students to push the boundaries. I don't see how this is disappointing at all.

    1. Re:Disappointing? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      It was tongue and cheek in that he was hoping it was a prank call. Look at the "from the x dept." line.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:Disappointing? by furby076 · · Score: 1

      Yea I don't get it, why would this be bad? Why would we be proud/happy if they didn't have permission and contacted them anyhow? Life in space, while cool, is very dangerous. The people up there need to know who they are speaking with - especially IF it is a prank caller trying to make themselves come off as NASA.

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    3. Re:Disappointing? by xch13fx · · Score: 0

      Yea I don't get it, why would this be bad? Why would we be proud/happy if they didn't have permission and contacted them anyhow? Life in space, while cool, is very dangerous. The people up there need to know who they are speaking with - especially IF it is a prank caller trying to make themselves come off as NASA.

      because they didn't claim to be God or aliens. ...that's what I would have done.

    4. Re:Disappointing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why is that disappointing?

      Maybe because it's a bunch of senior level college students, two of whom are in their mid 30's.
      And they are bragging because they built a radio.

      This is like a car mechanic bragging because after 4 years of mechanic school, he managed to design, build, and install a chrome exhaust pipe.

  5. Not one to be one upped... by Fx.Dr · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Cap'n Crunch responded by saying "tweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet", and subsequently found out that, yes, the fridge on the ISS is in fact running.

    1. Re:Not one to be one upped... by genner · · Score: 1

      ...Cap'n Crunch responded by saying "tweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet", and subsequently found out that, yes, the fridge on the ISS is in fact running.

      But do they have prince albert in a can?

    2. Re:Not one to be one upped... by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      Fantastic... not many of today's kids would understand that reference! Thanks for the memory!

      Makes me wish modern cereal boxes had good toys like back then!!!

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    3. Re:Not one to be one upped... by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Makes me wish modern cereal boxes had good toys like back then!!!

      Naw, don't want the little brats choking on a piece of plastic and their parents suing everybody in sight. Though one could make an argument that it's merely Darwinian selection at work...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    4. Re:Not one to be one upped... by powerlord · · Score: 1

      But do they have prince albert in a can?

      No, they let him out.

      Now they are watching to see how long he can survive without a space suit.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    5. Re:Not one to be one upped... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Cap'n Crunch responded by saying "tweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet", and subsequently found out that, yes, the fridge on the ISS is in fact running.

      *DON'T* whistle into a telephone! You could launch a nuculear missile-thingie and start World War III!!!

    6. Re:Not one to be one upped... by Niris · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of sad that I only have my dad's cap'n crunch whistle... Stupid companies and not giving my generation cool toys. *damns being 20*

  6. Nothing new here - A School PR Stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ARISS (Amateur Radio on the International Space Station) program has been around for years. Probably hundreds of schools have built radios to talk to the space station for 10 minutes and ask whatever questions they want. If any of you want to talk to the space station here is the link. http://www.arrl.org/ARISS/ I think it is mostly a high school program though, I am glad to see Humber students are doing what high school students around the world are accomplishing.

    1. Re:Nothing new here - A School PR Stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, relating your post to earlier comments in the thread, from the ARISS website:

      "CAN HAMS MAKE AN UNSCHEDULED ARISS CONTACT?
      Yes. The ISS crew has not lost sight of why ARISS has been so successful. It is the Amateur Radio community that has brought astronauts voices into schools. Crew members make random contacts with earth-bound hams. They make contacts during their breaks, pre-sleep time and before and after meal-time. Astronauts have contacted thousands of hams around the world. Computer software allows the crew to operate the 2-meter packet gear radio in unattended mode, and hams can make contacts when the crewmembers are working."

      So... while it's good that the students got permission, and consequently a guaranteed person waiting on the other end, it's apparently not a big deal. The ISS doesn't give a crap if you radio them up without warning.

    2. Re:Nothing new here - A School PR Stunt by Arivia · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is that Humber is the college attached to my university. This is really embarrassing: we should be able to do better, y'know?

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
  7. Wayback Machine... by Cadallin · · Score: 1
    Jeepers.

    Students built some sort of radio which they used to communicate with someone at distance?

    Will the wonders of this modern era ever cease?

  8. Your first radio by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's going to be considerably more difficult for the next generation to build their first radios, once it's all gone digital.

    There won't be much left to listen to on a simple crystal set.

    1. Re:Your first radio by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      It's going to be considerably more difficult for the next generation to build their first radios, once it's all gone digital.

      People can build their own digital equipment. I hear some people even build their own computers.

      Of course, if the digital format is proprietary, that makes things take a different turn. But that's because the format is proprietary, not because it's digital.

    2. Re:Your first radio by Muad'Dave · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's going to be considerably more difficult for the next generation to build their first radios, once it's all gone digital.

      You mean "write their first radios", since the era of hardware radios is essentially over? With the availability of very high speed/very high dynamic range ADCs and FPGAs capable of doing MPEG-4 decoding on the fly, I doubt you'll see much "building" and a lot more "writing" going on. Wanna get involved? Start Here.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    3. Re:Your first radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first amateur communication was digital (CW morse code) over 100 years ago.

      Then we regressed to voice. Now were back to all sorts of digital hotness.

      http://www.hamsexy.com/cms/?page_id=75

    4. Re:Your first radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Software-defined radio is still too expensive for widespread adoption.

    5. Re:Your first radio by dwm · · Score: 1

      You mean "write their first radios", since the era of hardware radios is essentially over?

      *Snort*
      Let me know when lines of code can pluck a signal from the air and mix it with the IF. There's more to making a radio than signal processing.

    6. Re:Your first radio by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      What is this thing "IF"? 8-)

      Seriously, the only limiting factor to having an antenna connected directly* to an A/D is dynamic range. Picking out a tiny little SSB signal on 40m with multi-megawatt broadcast stations a few kHz away isn't something you can easily do with a 16 or 20 bit A/D. You realize that the VFO's of yore are now NCO's, and that mixers are available that span nearly DC to light, right? The only 'radio hardware' (which could be a single 8 pin DIP) would be an optional variable gain amp, the mixer, the NCO, and maybe an IF filter. Let's see - two antenna pins, two power pins, two output pins, and two serial control pins for the VGA and NCO. Yep, that's 8.

      * For certain values of 'directly'. I admit that a LP filter would be good to prevent Nyquist aliasing from transmitters above half the sampling frequency.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    7. Re:Your first radio by netcrusher88 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they're expensive. I can build a tuna tin transmitter from a kit for less than the price of a single FPGA.

      --
      There's an old saying that says pretty much whatever you want it to.
    8. Re:Your first radio by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I loved those! Small transistors overshadowed by this enormous military surplus crystal in a mammoth holder (at least on mine). They worked, though, and went a long way toward teaching radio theory to my (dare I say 'our') generation.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  9. Unlicensed Broadcasts by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Somewhat disappointingly, the students actually did have permission to make contact.

    You shouldn't be encouraging readers to attempt broadcasts without permission. Unlicensed broadcasts with power sufficient to reach the International Space Station can be a safety hazard; potentially interfering with or jamming legitimate transmissions. At the very least, one might distract the ISS crew during an important maneuver/space walk when the entire crew needs to be focused.

    (Think of it a bit like having the phone ring when you're in the middle of moving heavy furniture. Not exactly opportune.)

    These kids did the right thing by having official permission to make the broadcast. Especially because it meant that there was an astronaut available to speak with them. If it was an unlicensed transmission without prior approval, they would have gotten "hung up" on. ;-)

    1. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by fotbr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Slight nit-pick. It doesn't take a whole lot of power to do VHF/UHF line-of-sight to (or from) low-earth-orbit. Especially if the receiving end has a) a good receiver b) a good antenna (or antenna system) or c) some combination of both, which, IIRC, the ISS does.

    2. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by BigGar' · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit on this. The power required to reach the ISS is fairly low and easily within what is the allowed Maximum transmitting power (Typically 1500 Watts, but depending on the frequency may be lower). In any event you can bounce a transmission off the Moon and pick it up on about 100Watts on the low end.

      Depending on the antenna they probably wouldn't have required any more than 5-10 watts to do the transmission. Though with a smaller antenna power power would have been required.

      An unlicensed transmission is an FCC, or the Canadian equivalent, violation and would have gotten them in trouble with that organization.

      Here's a guide from the AARL on contacting the ISS http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2004/10/06/1/

      --


      Shop smart, Shop S-Mart.
    3. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
      I was going to pounce on the same point (that of the fact that there's no RF danger at typical Earth-to-LEO power levels), but then I realized he was thinking along the lines of jamming/busting in on NASA comms with a fake message and making them lose their concentration.

      Slightly off-topic: there was an article about a guy at Arecibo that was going to attempt to radar map an asteroid. The article provided the power level, frequency, and gain of the dish. I plugged those numbers into an RF exposure limit calculator and found that the uncontrolled exposure zone extended past low Earth orbit! I warned him to take that into account before he nuked the astronauts on the shuttle and/or ISS.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    4. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      An unlicensed transmission is an FCC, or the Canadian equivalent, violation and would have gotten them in trouble with that organization.

      Is there some part of this I was unclear on? Why do you think the FCC doesn't like unlicensed transmissions if not because they can interfere with other public transmissions?

      My presumption is that if they're transmitting without permission to the ISS, they're doing so without proper licensing. Which is a relatively safe assumption considering that the ISS does not (to my knowledge) normally monitor ham radio bands except when expecting ARISS communications. Thus in order to contact ISS, you'd need to transmit on one of NASA or Russia's frequencies. Which I'm fairly certain is going to require a bit more power than the ARISS transmissions. (Though I could be wrong on that point.)

    5. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit on this. The power required to reach the ISS is fairly low and easily within what is the allowed Maximum transmitting power

      I've not spoken to the crew of the ISS, but I have used their radio as a repeater when it was in that mode. I needed around 5W transmit power into a simple homebrewed aerial that took about an hour to make. It's not exactly difficult.

    6. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Contacting a receiver that's only 200-300 miles away with clear line of sight is not a major feat, nor does it require "dangerous" levels of power. There's a little doppler-shift trickery if you want to be slick about it, but the ISS is a relatively easy target for a radio signal.

      And, yeah, if they didn't have permission no one would know about it because the receiver would have ignored them.

    7. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      distract the ISS crew? are you insane? its' not like doctor evil and you override all the speaker volume controls and scream over all speakers ,"HELLO! I HAXORED YOU!!!!! BWAHAHAHAHAHA!"

      anyone can legally contact the ISS without permission, just get a Ham radio license and the required gear.

      as for the uninformed crack you make....

      Unlicensed broadcasts with power sufficient to reach the International Space Station can be a safety hazard

      5 watts is not a hazard unless you shove the antenna into someones brain. you cant disrupt "emergency communications" with it either.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between having a license for these frequencies and having permission from NASA to talk to the astronauts. I have a license. (It doesn't take that much power if you use a high gain antenna, since it's straight line of sight) I don't have any special permission to talk with the people on the ISS. I haven't tried, as I would expect no-one to be listening on those frequencies if it wasn't set up in advance.

      I don't see that there would be any danger if you were talking using licensed frequencies and powers.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    9. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, as other posts say, the power needed isn't that high. Also, you would not be distracting the crew - most of the time their HAM radio is probably turned off. The official mood of communication from ground to the station is through the TDRS system.

    10. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone can legally contact the ISS without permission, just get a Ham radio license and the required gear.

      Throwing radio waves at them isn't the same as "contacting" them. I can "contact" any cell phone by calling the right number, but no one is going to pick up if it's turned off.

      Now if I override a local television station to force "contact" with an individual through other means, I'm going to be in a whole heap of trouble...

    11. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't even need permission to contact the ISS. They have an amateur (ham) radio station setup on the ISS. These students used commercially made off the shelf amateur radio equipment to make this contact. The amateur radio station on board the ISS has nothing to do with the primary communications systems aboard the ISS.

      Anyone with an amateur radio license can attempt to contact the ISS. Thousands of Hams all over the world have, and continue to do so.

    12. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're wrong, there's a dedicated amateur radio station on the ISS. That's all it's used for. Sure there's not someone always there, but the station is always on. And you don't require any sort of permission at all to contact the ISS. Any amateur radio operator can.

      Here's the FAQ about the ARISS program.

      http://www.rac.ca/ariss/oindex.htm

      You'll notice this question:

      "CAN HAMS MAKE UNSCHEDULED ARISS CONTACTS?

              Yes. The ISS crew has not lost sight of why it has been so successful. It is the Amateur Radio community that has brought astronauts voices into schools. Crew members make random contacts with earth-bound hams. They make contacts during their breaks, pre-sleep time and before and after mealtime. Astronauts have contacted thousands of hams around the world. Computer software allows the crew to operate the 2-meter packet gear radio in unattended mode, and hams can make contacts when the crewmembers are working."

    13. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      In which case I concede the point. My argument was entirely about unlicensed transmissions, not ones within the standard ham bands.

    14. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that when close to an antenna, there is a phenomenon known as "near field gain reduction".

      The inverse square law only applies when the antenna can be approximated as a point source. When you are close enough to the antenna that it no longer can be approximated as a point source to the observer, gain calculations go wacky.

      (You can think of it as protection against the 1/R^2 term in the Friis transmission equation causing Pr to be greater than Pt, which would violate the law of conservation of energy - At a certain point, Gr and Gt decrease with decreasing R.)

      I don't remember the exact number, but the near field boundary for Arecibo is insanely far from the dish. I think it's at least in the stratosphere. I'm fairly certain that you could even be standing on the surface of the dish and be safe during many operations.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    15. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Actually at the right time, I believe you can run EME using only around 5 watts.

      Of course, this means hooking a 70cm handheld ham radio to Arecibo's 432 MHz line feed. One of the other members of Cornell's ham radio club did a stint at Arecibo and during some downtime when they weren't using the dish they supposedly let him hook his HT up to the 432 MHz line feed to run some EME.

      This was a LONG time ago so I could be wrong here.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    16. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the hardest part of communicating with the ISS is:

      Arranging a prescheduled contact so you don't have competition.

      Busting through the pileup during non-prescheduled operation.

      If you have a prearranged contact without interference, there is no technical challenge. If you're competing with the pileup, that's a whole other story...

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    17. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      They usually have prearranged times when someone is at the station operating. Most of the time it's for scheduled contacts, but sometimes it's just an unscheduled free-for-all. Usually this translates to "massive DX pileup".

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    18. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Interesting phenomenon - I'll have to check that out.

      From wikipedia: The telescope has three radar transmitters, with effective isotropic radiated powers of 20TW at 2380 MHz, 2.5TW (pulse peak) at 430 MHz, and 300MW at 47 MHz.

      I'm not standing on that dish, no way, no how!

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    19. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by vlm · · Score: 1

      I'm not standing on that dish, no way, no how!

      Your figures are far field after antenna gain "effective" power levels. Since the output of that dish is practically as pointy as a laser, the "effective isotropic" levels are immense with just a few KW of power.

      In the near field, your exposure would be roughly equal to the total transmitter power (probably a couple KW) * your illuminated surface area (probably a couple square feet) / the antenna illuminated surface area (couple acres? maybe a quarter million square feet). That multiplies out to about 50 milliwatts or so. Roughly a tenth of a full power hand held cell phone.

      I would advise not standing on the dish because you're likely to bend the panels to a significant level at the highest frequencies. So, if you're working in the 20 cm wavelength band, bend it a tenth of a wavelength (2 cm) and that panel is screwed up...

      Also I have heard the panels are in some spots quite high above ground, so falling off (or thru) would be... painful to fatal. But I have no real info on panel height above ground just vague claims that some are pretty high above the ground.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    20. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by oldave · · Score: 1

      Somewhat disappointingly, this was modded informative.

      Not a ham, are ya?

      There's no need for very much power to make the trip of 220 miles or so in a direct line. I've done it with 25 watts.

      Second... distract the crew? Heh... it's not like they hear a voice and have to stop to listen and see if it's for them. Except when they're actively using the amateur radio station on board, you can be sure it's not making a sound, even when it's in repeater mode, that they'd hear on board the station.

      The kids did do the right thing by scheduling the contact, so they could be sure someone would be listening.

      Most of us just have to take our chances when we notice that there will be a time the station is in range (which is anytime it's above the horizon from any given location)... and most of the time, we don't get to actually talk to the astronauts.

      I was lucky... I talked to the crew on the old Russian Mir station back in 1995.

    21. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Good point. Standing on this dish surface would only involve the gain of the feedhorn, not the dish. IIRC, the dish has about 60dB of gain - a factor of 1 million. For 430 MHz, that's 2.5TW peak / 1e6 = 2.5MW at the antenna. At 2380 MHz, it's 20TW / 1e6 = 20 MW. Another source claims approximately 70dB, so that knocks it down another factor of ten. Depending on the illumination pattern of the feedhorn, I would bet that you'd be over the limits near the axis. 2MW @ 2380 MHz sounds an awful lot like the world's largest microwave oven to me.

      I yearn for that sort of gain - could you imagine the EME potential with 2.5TW EIRP @ 430MHz?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    22. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by fotbr · · Score: 1

      With that much power and gain, are you talking Earth-Moon-Earth or Earth-Mars-Earth?

      I know which one I'd want to try, although the trick would be finding a similarly gainful antenna that can see Mars at the same time.

    23. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      The wikipedia article on the Arecibo Observatory claims that it can "...view all of the planets in the solar system, though the round trip light time to objects beyond Saturn is longer than the time the telescope can track it, preventing radar observations of more distant objects."

      You could do EMercuryE, EVE, EmoonE, EMarsE, EJE, etc.

      According to my crude calculations, if they had enough power they could image Sedna since the round-trip light time is about one sidereal day. That boggles the mind - send a pulse, wait a whole day for the Earth to revolve, and receive the echo!

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    24. Re:Unlicensed Broadcasts by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Waiting a full day would drive me nuts. I'd be checking my watch/clock/phone/whatever constantly to see if it was time to find out if it worked. It'd be worse than expecting something via UPS/FedEX -- at least with those you can check the tracking number to find out approx. progress.

      Sigh.

      Neat idea though.

  10. its a radio!!! by mcarp · · Score: 1

    Oh Em Gee! College students built a radio?!? What a surprise. What is the world coming to when some news article thinks building a radio is amazing. Is everybody that stupid?

    1. Re:its a radio!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --- -- --. slashdot filter error won't let me post a sentance written entirely in Morse code.

      So much for the humor factor.

    2. Re:its a radio!!! by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Oh Em Gee! College students built a radio?!? What a surprise. What is the world coming to when some news article thinks building a radio is amazing. Is everybody that stupid?

      It's a sign of a dying era. These days, everyone gets all worked up over "wireless Internet technologies," without having the slightest clue about the 150 years of radio history behind it. I'm lucky to be 28 years old and know a fair bit about the topic; this is partly because my father is an AT&T engineer, and partly because comms are my job in the Navy. Today's college kids don't get nearly the education in applied sciences they used to.

  11. I'm sorry to say... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yawn. While not just anyone can do what they've done, I'm saddened by the fact that an Amateur Radio hobbyist making a simple FM transceiver is considered news-worthy by the masses. What happened to the spirit of 'Experimentation and Advancement of The Radio Art'? Have we as a species lost our curiosity and drive to learn about and then do new things? I guess the TV has won. 8-(

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    1. Re:I'm sorry to say... by mikewren420 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Indeed... I was able to contact the ISS twice using low power (10 watts) and a simple vertical antenna. This is hardly newsworthy, as any Amateur Radio operator with a 2 meter radio (they start at $100) and a small vertical antenna can make contact, with a little luck.

      Audio from my contact and others, as well as digital stills received from the ISS are at my website: http://mikewren.com/iss-21oct08

    2. Re:I'm sorry to say... by JustinOpinion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm saddened by the fact that an Amateur Radio hobbyist making a simple FM transceiver is considered news-worthy by the masses.

      A fair point. But on the other hand, what better way is there to ignite enthusiasm for amateur radio among the masses than by showing them what it can do?

      What happened to the spirit of 'Experimentation and Advancement of The Radio Art'? Have we as a species lost our curiosity and drive to learn about and then do new things?

      Evidently these students have curiosity aplenty, which is what drove them to build their system and try to call the ISS. If this is the behavior we want to see more of, then we need to encourage said behavior: by applauding it and publicizing it, which is what this news item is doing.

      I understand your point, which is that this kind of experimentation should be so commonplace that we take it for granted (hence not newsworthy). On the other hand, if we want to encourage curiosity, experimentation, and a "hands-on" approach to using technology, then any news or publicity is a good thing.

    3. Re:I'm sorry to say... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I know you can't RTFA, but can you at least RTFS? They didn't just build a kit.

    4. Re:I'm sorry to say... by vitaflo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, add to that the fact that they didn't even build their own radio. Here's their website:

      http://www.operationfirstcontact.com/blog/episode16.htm

      They bought an ICOM Ic-V8000 as the transceiver. Basically all they did was build an antenna.

    5. Re:I'm sorry to say... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1
      You're correct about needing to encourage curiosity - perhaps I'm a bit pessimistic about the future. I'd love for it to be part of a 'real' science and technology curriculum in high school instead of teaching to the SOL test (such a deliciously ironic acronym).

      Don't kids these days wonder at all how the world around them works? I couldn't read/experiment enough when I was young; hell, I still can't find enough time to investigate everything I want to. I want to know how everything works from the electrons up.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    6. Re:I'm sorry to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to the spirit of 'Experimentation and Advancement of The Radio Art'?

      The internet, and cell phones.

      You can send a radio signal from point A to point B? Cool. I can send a video transmission, without any knowledge about how it works even.

    7. Re:I'm sorry to say... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      It's getting relatively hard to advance the art after so many decades of development. Today's ham spirit lives on in P2P network protocols and similar experiments on the global network.

    8. Re:I'm sorry to say... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Informative

      They didn't just build a kit.

      No, they perpetrated a worse blasphemy than building a kit - according to their website, they purchased a friggin' tranceiver!

      Many, many hams have the brains and skill to actually DESIGN AND BUILD something as opposed to following cookbook designs and solder pre-supplied parts down and call it a miracle. If their website is correct, they did neither wrt the radio.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    9. Re:I'm sorry to say... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I chatted with an [astro|cosmo]naut on MIR once from the radio in my car while standing in a parking lot in NJ watching them fly overhead. After seeing them fade into shadow, I asked the [astro|cosmo]naut if that was a pretty sunset. He was shocked that I knew he'd just gone into shadow. I told him I was watchin', so he'd better behave.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    10. Re:I'm sorry to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't even make the transceiver -- read the article, they bought a ICOM Ic-V8000 transceiver from RadioWorld.

      This is just a bullshit article and a sad example of our educational system setting amazingly low standards for people who are not 'kids' -- they are college trained and should be ready for the workforce.

    11. Re:I'm sorry to say... by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      It's WORSE. They didn't even build a kit. They BOUGHT a working radio from Icom and then connected it to an antenna they assembled. Ok so technically they "built a radio station"

      This is far worse than the kid who says he "built" a computer when all he did has install a working logic board into a metal case. These guys didn't even do that much.

    12. Re:I'm sorry to say... by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Lots of people buy transceivers.

      Lots of people buy rotors and controllers.

      At least they claim to have built the antenna...

      Sure, it'd be cooler if they etched their own circuit boards, mined and refined their own copper wires, and then grew their own silicon for the final amplifier transistors (or at least built their own vacuum tubes), but it looks like these are a few people with no experience who said "We wanna talk to space", and then did it.

      I agree that by the standards of the radio amateur community, this is "no big deal", but by comparison to their peers who are sitting around and playing with their Wii's, this is a pretty good step forward.

      Being able to build an antenna is a relevant, practical skill in the radio world. They're exposed to the weather, they break, they need repair (or replacement) from time to time.

    13. Re:I'm sorry to say... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to knock any/all of their accomplishments, even if it was only building an antenna - my angst is directed at the news article that claims something novel and/or unique. For Pete's sake, a little research would've gone a long way.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    14. Re:I'm sorry to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the latest entry on their site. Canada has a Telecommunications Hall of Fame??? /scratches head in amusement

    15. Re:I'm sorry to say... by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

      Mainstream media, from now on, you must not try and explain things you don't understand to people who also won't understand them, lest those people get interested in things.

      Yes, the article could have been better. To the "average person", it's probably pretty neat to learn that the people down at the college put some stuff together, and talked to those nice folks on the space station.

      I think that all the national radio clubs will agree that showing the general public that people still play radio is probably a good thing... a "We are here!" a la Horton Hears a Who is more likely to get a new person interested than an hour long lecture on E-Skip.

      I believe that lesson 1 in writing class was "Know your audience". It seems to ring a bell here... the typical reader of the article is more likely to know nothing about radio ("wow! I had no idea you could just go to the store and get a radio and talk to space!"), rather than an RF engineer curious about what kind of mixers and amplifiers they put together, why they happened to use that particular MMIC, which software they used to lay out the striplines on the PCB to connect all the pieces, if they came up with some novel interstage coupling technique based on memristors...

    16. Re:I'm sorry to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm saddened by the fact that an Amateur Radio hobbyist making a simple FM transceiver is considered news-worthy by the masses.

      It's even worse. These guys weren't Amateurs, they were going to college. And it was the final project. So they were one piece of paper from being "Professionals".

      Now I know why people say the colleges in Canada suck.

    17. Re:I'm sorry to say... by smchris · · Score: 1

      Sure, it was an Icom -- but they "integrated it into their setup."

      College has taught them something.

  12. Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...While school contacts with the space station are routinely made through the Amateur Radio on the International Space Station program, many of those contacts are made using a traditional ham radio.
    They did not use HAM radio.

    1. Re:Read TFA by fotbr · · Score: 1

      They didn't use an off-the-shelf Yaesu/Icom/Kenwood/Alinco/whatever, but it still could have been amateur radio.

    2. Re:Read TFA by Muad'Dave · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yes, they did. They did not use a commercially manufactured radio, however. From TFA:

      While school contacts with the space station are routinely made through the Amateur Radio on the International Space Station program, many of those contacts are made using a traditional ham radio.

      They made their own radio that used Amateur Radio frequencies (nitpick: Amateur Satellite Service freqs) as opposed to using a Yaesu or Kenwood radio on Amateur freqs. To hams like me, this isn't a big deal. Designing software-defined radios and protocols that can span Virginia->New Zealand using 1W of power is cool, but making an 5W VHF or UHF radio is so 1970's.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    3. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well, no.

      According to their blog (http://www.operationfirstcontact.com/index.html) they purchased the radio (Icom IC-V8000 2M ham transceiver) the antenna (Hy-Gain Oscar yagi) and the antenna rotator (Yaesu G-5500). The blog is kinda sketchy but they may have designed and built a microcontroller-based rotator controller to keep the antenna pointed at the ISS. The frequencies used are smack in the middle of the 2 meter ham band (~145 Mhz). The students put together off-the-shelf, commercial ham gear and contacted the ISS.

      My issue isn't with the students, it's with the disparaging way Ham radio is presented in TFA: the student's contact with the ISS was not only PURELY using "a traditional ham radio", but a commercial ham radio at that. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but some of us hams still enjoy homebrewing our own equipment and TFA specifically says the radio was "home-built" and implied it was somehow different and superior to "tradtional ham radio".

      Here's hoping the students will go on to be active hams!

      73!

    4. Re:Read TFA by awehttam · · Score: 4, Informative
      Sounds more like they built a station, not the radio.

      http://www.operationfirstcontact.com/blog/episode16.htm

      Today, Mr. Rector, Paul, and I went out to Radioworld and purchased a transceiver. After much research, we decided to go with the ICOM Ic-V8000. For the cost, it has exactly what we need. On Friday, we're going to be integrating it into our setup, and doing all the necessary testing.

      The story is pretty hyped up but good on them anyway.

    5. Re:Read TFA by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm getting conflicting info. First they built the radio, then they didn't. Then they build the antenna, then they didn't. Are they getting press for screwing on N-connectors?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    6. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm getting conflicting info.

      So, first you RTFS, then you RTFA?

    7. Re:Read TFA by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they're getting press for being able to turn it on. And this takes an art degree how?

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    8. Re:Read TFA by awehttam · · Score: 1
      I think that rig has a SO259 ;)

      I dunno, but I wish I had the funds to setup a rotor. Manually aiming an Arrow II is pretty mundane.

      There's a fair bit of flack over the article and I hope it doesn't dissuade any of the project team from hacking on more projects or getting involved with the hobbyist scene. As much as I find it odd they're being paid tribute for doing something many folks, over a wide range of ages, have done before - I'm sure most of us can appreciate how it felt for them to have accomplished this and don't want to put their ISS virginity back in the box.

      It's pretty awesome to work your first space box!

    9. Re:Read TFA by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      In which case, Cornell's W2CXM station had the same capability back in 2002.

      http://w2cxm.mae.cornell.edu/clubstation.html

      The only thing CXM didn't have back then was automatic antenna rotator control for tracking satellites, which was added in subsequent years by undergrads to support Cornell's ICE CubeSat project - http://www.mae.cornell.edu/cubesat/.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    10. Re:Read TFA by SynMonger · · Score: 0

      That'd be a PL-259. The male is the SO-239 :)

    11. Re:Read TFA by SilverJets · · Score: 1

      So they bought a radio and an antenna, plugged them in and they worked. Is that what constitutes post-secondary education these days?

    12. Re:Read TFA by awehttam · · Score: 1
      Really? I always thought the PLug-259 was the thing on the cable and the SOcket-259 was the thingy on the radio dohicky.

      Damn, I must be blind! ;)

    13. Re:Read TFA by SynMonger · · Score: 0

      Must be.

    14. Re:Read TFA by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Turning it on with your penis is art.

    15. Re:Read TFA by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      The plug was originally designated PL-259. The mating socket was an SO-239. These are US Army Signal Corps designators.

      When introduced commercially, they were called "UHF" connectors by the manufacturer, Amphenol. They are actually pretty lousy connectors for anything near the UHF band, though...

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    16. Re:Read TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They used a fucking Icom? Then what the hell did they BUILD? The desk it sat on? The antenna? Was the act of PLUGGING IT ALL IN considered building it?

      Geezus, what a bunch of self important liars. They didn't build jack shit. They bought a radio -wow I can buy the same one- and used it.

      Wow. Slow news day.

  13. The project's blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.operationfirstcontact.com/blog.htm

  14. I wiash I still had mod points by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because you are just too right. Forty years ago before personal computers, to get any brownie points for this kind of thing at school you had to wind the coils yourself or bake your own resistors, because hobbyist magazines were full of designs. Ah, the great days of acorn tubes and bending aluminum chassis plates. Or the day I accidentally jammed the TV signal in a quarter mile radius, owing to the amazing bandwidth of some ex-mil tubes and misreading a capacitor value. But, sadly, that's why the authorities discourage experimentation nowadays. It's so much easier to cause problems.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:I wiash I still had mod points by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you're trying to be sarcastic or not.

      The general populace 'back then' actually had to have a little smarts to replace tubes in their TVs and radios. Every drug store had a tube tester and usually sold tubes. With the advent of 'black box' transistorized appliances, the need to know anything about what's going on inside went the way of the vacuum tube - into history.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  15. NB... Designed and Built Their Radio by codesmith.ca · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ummm, folks? They're Canadian college students, tech school level, not university. They designed and built a 2m band 5 watt transceiver.

    When I was in college in the 90's, designing and building a low power FM transceiver from the ground up was considered a good third year project. I'm guessing that they had to design everything from power supply to antenna, and probably fabricate it themselves.

    Good on you, guys!! I'm da*ned proud of you. especially the adult student who went back for more schooling.

    1. Re:NB... Designed and Built Their Radio by furby076 · · Score: 1

      Ummm, folks? They're Canadian college students, tech school level, not university. They designed and built a 2m band 5 watt transceiver.

      Dude..."They're Canadian" is enough. All they have to do to impress the world is manage to breathe!

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    2. Re:NB... Designed and Built Their Radio by codesmith.ca · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oops, my bad. They didn't design or build the transceiver. But....

      1) They did mod and deploy an antenna with homebrew tracker to keep alignment to the ISS

      2) They're first year students. Not at the end of the program, the very beginning.

      So, my praise still stands. Good work guys!

    3. Re:NB... Designed and Built Their Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends upon whether the designed it using vacuum tubes, transistors or nowadays
      a couple of IC chips! More difficult if they used vacuum tubes besides the difficulty
      in finding them. It's pretty simple to connect the (dots) pins between a few
      analog and digtial logic chips. Just connect the read pin of IC1 to the read pin of IC2
      etc. No designing required..... They didn't mention if they bought off the shelf
      transmitters, receivers, FM/AM modulators/oscillators, antennaes
      and just connected them together.

    4. Re:NB... Designed and Built Their Radio by Perf · · Score: 1

      2) They're first year students. Not at the end of the program, the very beginning.

      From the summary:

      The Humber College seniors

      From the article:

      Operation First Contact is the graduating project...

      Oops

    5. Re:NB... Designed and Built Their Radio by pilot-programmer · · Score: 1
      In my second year of high school I built my own 8 element Yagi antenna and used it to contact MIR. Contact was shortly after sunset, all I had to do was point my antenna at the right dot of light moving across the sky and move the antenna to track. When the space station entered Earth's shadow I just did my best to continue earlier movement.

      The radio was something I had built myself from a kit in the summer before my freshman year at high school.

      Doing something new or unique for your project is praiseworthy; something people have done for decades with mostly off the shelf parts, not so much.

    6. Re:NB... Designed and Built Their Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't even even need a Yagi to do it. A half a watt of power on a rubber ducky antenna will do the trick.

    7. Re:NB... Designed and Built Their Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both posts that fail to show understanding of the summary both gained +5 Insightful? Should probably read things twice before praising/showing compassion for something.

    8. Re:NB... Designed and Built Their Radio by JK_the_Slacker · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I passed the General written at 14 without studying. There're two local kids I can think of with their license, one 9, one 12, and the 12 year old used an aluminum canoe as an antenna. Call me when a group of fifth graders do this, THEN I'll be impressed.

      --
      I'm waiting for a "-1 somepeoplejustshouldn'tgetmodprivileges" meta-moderation.
  16. What is ISS? by Terrorwrist · · Score: 0

    ISS= International Space Suckers

  17. It's called Amateur Radio... or "Ham Radio" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you talking about?

    Many people build the own radios, have since the turn of the last century. www.arrl.org will help you understand how to do that, and how to get a license. The very sad thing is that Humber doesn't realize just how many Amateur Radio clubs there are, of students organized by the university or college, even in Toronto. There is nothing special about what has been done here, at all.

    "Broadcast" is not what we are talking about, that's something else.

    1. Re:It's called Amateur Radio... or "Ham Radio" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people build the own radios, have since the turn of the last century.

      Last I checked, they still have to be licensed.

      (Unless they're in a public band, broadcasting below a specific power, blah, blah, blah.)

  18. Slow learners by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    "The Humber College seniors made contact with the International Space Station Monday with a radio system they designed and built themselves."
     
    Ummm... so what? It's not like radios are hard to build, or the information to build them is hard to find, or the parts are hard to obtain.

  19. Bad article by vitaflo · · Score: 5, Informative

    These kids did not build their own radio. The bought an Icom Ic-V8000 radio and a Yaesu G-5500 rotator and built their own antenna. One of the kids got a ham license and they were able to get some time with the IIS.

    http://www.operationfirstcontact.com/blog/episode16.htm

    The only thing they did was build an antenna basically. I'm happy for them (we could use more kids getting into Ham radio) but this story is sensationalizes on something that many people have done before.

    1. Re:Bad article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean they "built their own" antenna... that looks like an antenna kit they assembled to me.

      There is nothing at all interesting about that. I started doing that when I was 17. Wake me up when they actually Build something. Hell, even when someone gives them a copy of the ARRL handbook and they build a simple circular polarized antenna from it or something.

      Kids->Amateur Radio, sure. But there are supposed to be Engineering Seniors.

    2. Re:Bad article by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      These kids did not build their own radio. The bought an Icom Ic-V8000 radio and a Yaesu G-5500 rotator and built their own antenna. One of the kids got a ham license and they were able to get some time with the IIS.

      http://www.operationfirstcontact.com/blog/episode16.htm

      The only thing they did was build an antenna basically. I'm happy for them (we could use more kids getting into Ham radio) but this story is sensationalizes on something that many people have done before.

      Yeah, but that reporter had never heard of it before (and obviously can't be bothered to do any research that might spoil their headline.)

    3. Re:Bad article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $3K for a simple crossed Yagi-Uda? I didn't realize it was a government contract! They should have used a non-conductive cross boom. If the instructor fell for this, I fear Canadian higher education is following the lead of us Luddites to the south.

  20. Wow, college-level engineers can build a radio? by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FTA: "While school contacts with the space station are routinely made through the Amateur Radio on the International Space Station program, many of those contacts are made using a traditional ham radio."

    Seriously people - We should feel pretty damned scared that this counts as some sort of "achievement" to crow about on the Slashdot FP. These guys built a home-brew shortwave radio as their senior project?

    Sorry if this sounds like "playa-hatin'", but gimme a break! Even as a "first", this doesn't sound like anything to brag about.

    1. Re:Wow, college-level engineers can build a radio? by atomicthumbs · · Score: 1

      It's a VHF radio, not a shortwave radio. Anyway, lots of amateur operators do this all the time. I'm surprised that this was accepted as their senior project, let alone a news story. Hey, maybe I could build radios for credit when I get out of high school.

      --
      http://pinopsida.com
    2. Re:Wow, college-level engineers can build a radio? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Get in the right program and they will give you credit for weaving baskets, hardly groundbreaking technology, but a worthy endeavor if you want to spend your life hawking wares at craft-show booths.

    3. Re:Wow, college-level engineers can build a radio? by Paul+Carver · · Score: 1

      Sorry I haven't been paying close enough attention. What did you say your senior project was? I assume it was a lot more impressive, but I just don't recall what you said it was.

    4. Re:Wow, college-level engineers can build a radio? by pla · · Score: 1

      Sorry I haven't been paying close enough attention. What did you say your senior project was? I assume it was a lot more impressive, but I just don't recall what you said it was.

      I don't need to have won seven Olympic gold medals to scoff at someone bragging about running a 6 minute mile "for the first time ever in Crocks".

      But since you ask, I built a "soft" RS485 protocol analyzer and a (fairly simple) hardware dongle to multiplex four 485 channels into one ECP connection. Not rocket science, but you don't see me bragging about it, either.

    5. Re:Wow, college-level engineers can build a radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it might not have been a big deal in 1980, or even 1990, but nowadays amateur radio is quickly becoming a lost art.

    6. Re:Wow, college-level engineers can build a radio? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    7. Re:Wow, college-level engineers can build a radio? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      FTA: "While school contacts with the space station are routinely made through the Amateur Radio on the International Space Station program, many of those contacts are made using a traditional ham radio." Seriously people - We should feel pretty damned scared that this counts as some sort of "achievement" to crow about on the Slashdot FP. These guys built a home-brew shortwave radio as their senior project? Sorry if this sounds like "playa-hatin'", but gimme a break! Even as a "first", this doesn't sound like anything to brag about.

      They built a rig that could track the ISS, which according to the project lead required an antenna assembly that could accurately track 180 degrees in 10 minutes. Furthermore their rig met all NASA requirements and specifications for the link. (I had the impression that some digital protocol was involved, but the interview I heard was very non-technical.) While the core radio was a HAM, this is far more than "just" a ham rig.

      Pray tell, what's your great contribution to the space race?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    8. Re:Wow, college-level engineers can build a radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satellite communications are done on a daily basis using amateur radio, as well as worlwide communications. it can be a really fun hobby.

    9. Re:Wow, college-level engineers can build a radio? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, and Humber is a community college. These guys are right out of High School. Think of it as a first year University project. Certainly beats the crap out of anything I did in first year.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    10. Re:Wow, college-level engineers can build a radio? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      The required setup is documented here.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    11. Re:Wow, college-level engineers can build a radio? by GRYBmadsci · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, they didn't even '[build] a home-brew shortwave radio', they picked up an ICOM 2m radio and a yagi antenna and installed them.

    12. Re:Wow, college-level engineers can build a radio? by wkk2 · · Score: 1

      I would be impressed if they picked up one of the 250mW signals from a space suit, interfaced with TDRSS or even decoded the spread spectrum downlink. I've heard the ham equipment with only a hand held.

  21. Freedom to learn by internerdj · · Score: 1

    For my parents' generation:
    They got free time in high school if they were well behaved and interested to play with this kind of stuff. Maybe they didn't go at this level but it was available. My generation: For us we didn't get that level of freedom till senior level courses in college, and that was obviously slipping towards graduate courses. Otherwise it is really up to the kids on their own or with their parents help to pursue hands-on learning. Of course, I don't blame any school offical for being extra-careful when everyone has a lawyer at their hip.

  22. while neat, not really new.. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    While school contacts with the space station are routinely made through the Amateur Radio on the International Space Station program, many of those contacts are made using a traditional ham radio.

    Well, hams contacted Skylab when Owen Garriott was onboard (he's a ham) and many hams build there own radios. So while it's a neat project for college students and they deserve a round of applause for doing it, it's not like people haven't built their own radios to contact astronauts in space.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  23. Got put on hold... by tjstork · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, the Iranian kids called first. We have to put you on hold.

    --
    This is my sig.
  24. slashdot: news for anal-retentive twits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    man, i qualify as old, but i think a
    prank call to the iss would be pretty funny.

    you have to be one uptight corporate tool
    to not find a harmless prank with high
    humor value ... well, funny.

    uh, get off my lawn?

  25. Re:Hey you BALL LICKING MODERATOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry. The metamods should pick it up.

  26. Embarassing project by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This project is embarrassing. It took five college seniors ("Wireless and Telecommunications Technology" majors, no less) a whole year to build and use a pointable ham VHF antenna comparable to a fringe-area TV antenna. That's all they built; the transceiver was a stock ICOM Ic-V8000, which is a ham mobile radio that's basically a CB radio with higher power (75W) and fewer restrictions built in. This is not exotic technology. NASA has a program devoted to doing this in high schools.

    From their blog, the only big problem was getting permission to go on the roof of a building (a large flat roof) to put up the antenna. If they'd just headed out to an open field (they're using a radio intended for car installation, after all), mounted the antenna on a tripod, and aimed it by hand, they probably could have completed the project in a week.

    Hams talk to the ISS all the time. When it's visible, it's only a few hundred miles away, after all. The only real problem is booking some astronaut time. If you don't want to bother with that, the ISS has an open packet repeater hams can use. It's only 9600 baud, using an old TNC. This technology is so old it was on Mir.

    Their blog is like reading Twitter output:
    Of course, we've been busy for real lately. There's a whole bunch of new stuff going on. Exciting stuff! For instance, we soldered the connectors to the control wires for our antenna's rotor. After all that was said and done, we were able to control the movement of our antenna from inside room N214. Here's a few pictures of us working on that.

    1. Re:Embarassing project by noidentity · · Score: 1

      This project is embarrassing. It took five college seniors ("Wireless and Telecommunications Technology" majors, no less) a whole year to build and use a pointable ham VHF antenna comparable to a fringe-area TV antenna. [...] From their blog, the only big problem was getting permission to go on the roof of a building (a large flat roof) to put up the antenna. If they'd just headed out to an open field (they're using a radio intended for car installation, after all), mounted the antenna on a tripod, and aimed it by hand, they probably could have completed the project in a week.

      But apparently mounting it on a tripod and connecting the radio to the car battery would have added a year to the project. Since they were seniors, they didn't have that long.

    2. Re:Embarassing project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree 100%!! They didn't even build the antenna. They bought a commercial antenna and assembled it. I might be impressed if this were a group of middle-school students...

  27. Good grief, Heathkit by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    In 1962 you could shell out $29.95 for a Heathkit "Two'er", a 5-tube 2-meter transceiver, quite capable of contacting another Two'er 100 miles away with just a coathanger for an antenna. And you did not make headlines for having assembled the kit or pressed the mike button.

  28. Oh for crying out loud by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    They built a Yagi. Woopie!

    1. Re:Oh for crying out loud by Shadyman · · Score: 1

      And a 5W transciever. And dealt with doppler shift, and hopefully even built a servo-controlled directional antenna controller.

      Though, TFA doesn't specify.

      And yes, I have hit the ISS repeater with a 5W Handheld and a yagi. I even got a few APRS packets bounced off of the ISS, too. It was interesting to say the least.

  29. Their claim to fame is that they bought a radio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Purchase radio, rotor, and antenna.
    2. Connect coax to radio and antenna.
    3. Connect power to radio.
    4. Connect rotor to power and control and research how to point antenna at moving satellite on Internet.
    5. Arrange contact with ISS beforehand.
    6. Receive kudos on Slashdot?

    I have the equipment at home to do this. Anyone want to come over and see if we can get the astronauts to answer without arranging contact first? Hams do it all the time.

    This would be great for someone in middle school. For someone in college... pick up a soldering iron. My only hope is that they didn't submit this to Slashdot themselves.

  30. Coming soon to your iPhone... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    • Want to call the International Space Station?
    • There's an app for that.
    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  31. Do not call list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, you expected the ISS to answer to just answer anybody who called ? Of course they needed some technical information, like their phone number. :-)

  32. Amateur radio is more or less self-sufficient.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    , whereas the internet, cellphones, and other "modern" communications systems rely on a shitload of pre-existing infrastructure before they will work.

    Ham radio just needs a radio and antenna at each end, and it works. No telephone companies, backhoe fade, DDOS attacks, etc.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  33. Calling from internet service providings.... by TurinX · · Score: 1

    Do you think they need free RingDings on the ISS?

  34. First? Not by almost 50 years! by AYeomans · · Score: 1

    Kettering Grammar School were doing this in the 1960s. See the links in Wikipedia for more information.

    --
    Andrew Yeomans
  35. This is NOT a big deal by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

    The ISS caries a simple 2 meter FM radio. When over head the station is about 200 miles away, not very far.

    Ham radio has a 100 year tradition of "home brewing". Hams (radio amateurs) have been building equipment at home in large numbers for about 100 years now. It's a very common world wide hobby. There are about 1/2 million people with amateur radio licenses living in the USA right now. A lot of these people build radio equipment and the radio used in ISS is NOT what you'd call "high tech" A couple hundred dollars worth of gear is all that is needed to make contact. Well that and the some free computer software that will tell you when the station is over your location and where to aim the antenna.

    As for designing your own radio. That was a big deal in the 1930's back when we used tubes and slide rules. But now the parts are so easy to use. Some really nice integrated circuits are available that make designing almost like building a with Lego blacks.

  36. Not very remarkable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The electronics instructor/technician at the Colorado School of Mines made radio contact with the ISS more than four years ago.

  37. Next week on Slashdot. . . by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    Students at the University of Nitwitshire make history by transmitting digital data wirelessly using a radio transmitter and receiver they built themselves.

  38. Nostalgic by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    Sarcastic? Hardly. I was making a straight observation. You could get away with making 2-meter transmitters in those days because there was very little around to interfere with. Nowadays, there is so much damage that you can do, that we need FCC certification and the rest.

    But the "need to know anything about what's going on inside" - is it healthy for society that for most of the population electronics is a form of magic?

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Nostalgic by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      I apologize for misreading sarcasm. I agree that there's more damage possible today, but so far Amateur radio equipment is not required to have FCC type acceptance unless you sell it. I can still cobble together my own tube AM 2m rig, if I want to, as long as it meets the appropriate spectral purity requirements (a relatively low bar). Whether or not there's anyone else out there to talk to on AM on 2m is another story. I guess 10 GHz/47 GHz/241 GHz/etc are today's 2m/70cm of yesteryear.

      As for knowing what's going on, I'd love for more kids to think they have a chance at understanding (and contributing to) something akin to magic. My father understands electricity, but has no idea of what's going on inside of computers. People of my generation understand computers from the AC cord up because we built them from tubes/transistors/LSI chips. The current generation understands computers as modular board-level appliances, but in general does not understand the inner workings of the boards. Some day, computers will be 'closed' appliances, like today's microwave, that will be worshipped as the 'magic' appliance you mention.

      73 de k4det

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  39. Ham Radio Community is ROFLIAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid article...
    Come on Slashdot, stop wasting my time.

    1. Re:Ham Radio Community is ROFLIAO by Wapiti-eater · · Score: 1

      No Kidding!!

      And a "tech news" site gets all wet over this? Talk about being out of step with current technologies. Real shame when a 'tech news' site looses touch with the foundations of technology. This really does make /. look - well, rather quaint.

      My son was making contacts via satellite and chatting with the ISS crew years.ago. He was 8 then. Maybe I should've submitted that to /. Who thinks it would've made front page then?

      This is "Entry Level" stuff for most any ham that can breathe and talk at the same time.

      --
      Senior NCO in the fight against entropy. I've seen things, man. Things no one should have to see.....
  40. Physics and fads by jeko · · Score: 1

    "making an 5W VHF or UHF radio is so 1970's"

    Yeah, my daughter's middle school class was going to make model rockets until they realized that third-law propulsion was so 1680s.... :-)

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:Physics and fads by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Don't diss the attraction of FIRE! High-speed, Eye-poking FIRE!

      Seriously, making model rockets is a great way to demonstrate propulsion. Making a radio yourself is a great way to understand electronics. HAVING SOME NEWS NERD CLAIM IT'S THE FIRST TIME EVAAAR is just sad.

      If your daughter's class was on national news as having made the first 'Rockety-thing' ever, I'd have the same attitude of the press and masses - nothing against your daughter's (or these Canadian's) accomplishments, but neither is revolutionary, or even unique.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  41. This opens a new door for... by amoeba1911 · · Score: 1

    Telemarketers! I look forward to ISS crew having to screen their calls to prevent annoying junk peddlers.

  42. College ham club contacts space station...? by GRYBmadsci · · Score: 1

    The article is grossly inaccurate, but what these guys did is still pretty neat. (I'm not convinced it's worthy of a college level graduating project, but luckily for them, it's not up to me.) They didn't really 'build' anything; they bought the antenna and the radio. Calling it (correctly) a 'transceiver' doesn't mean they put any more effort into it than the guy who strolled into best buy to pick up a new radio for his car.

    Still, they set up the rig and went through all the red tape to get the school to let them do it, and they did get to talk to someone on the space station. It's certainly not new (did the people who wrote the article do *any* background research?), but it's still pretty cool.

    Also, looks to me like they were just on the 2m band, so does "getting permission" really just mean "someone will be at the 2m radio on the space station to respond"? Last I knew, anyone with a ham license can hop on 2m any time...

  43. Hello McFly... this is VHF ham radio by n4djs · · Score: 1

    Folks, this was for an amateur radio contact. It was done with an off the shelf VHF transceiver from Icom. Amazing what happens with the PR folks get ahold of something... If you are interested in this sort of thing, I would suggest www.amsat.org and www.arrl.org as resources.

  44. Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fail to see why this is even news. It's trivial to talk to the space station on a radio. When it comes over the horizon, it's line of sight. You can talk to it with a whip antenna and a half a watt of power. It's not rocket science at all as long as you know when it's going to come over the horizon.

  45. Somewhat disappointingly by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

    Why ?!? It seems to me that at least one of the guys involved has a regular ham radio license What is disappoining is the smugness demonstrated by some slashdotters about what the canadian guys actually did. If you read the story and their blog, they had to understand how the whole thing works, to built antennas, to learn how to track the bird and to operate. It isn't rocket science, but it is not easy to do. After all, this can be the beginning of a career, just like it happened to me about twenty years ago, when through ham radio I got involved into science and signal processing. I am now a senior scientist for a Fortune100 company, but I am no more involved into ham radio: just a few years after my graduation I stared smelling into ham radio this kind of smugness that appears in some of the answers to this story, and I quitted. I had nothing more to learn, and people I met through the hobby were too proud of themselves to be interested in learning something new from me. Maybe the fault is not with young people, isn't it ?!?

  46. No, this hapens all the time by default+luser · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anyone do any fact checking?

    Nope. Just watch Southpark's second episode. Cartman cheats, badly. When the cheating is uncovered, nobody cares, because the media spotlight is upon them.

    It's as true today as it was ten years ago.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  47. Can we say materialistic? Give them a break! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Look at the comments, A lot of people are telling this project sucks because it's made of existing technology ...

    .. What you people often forget is what they need to DO with it; or are you too materialistic only looking at what one can build and not do with it?
    .. They were first years, give them a break
    .. They also found out how to calibrate in with the ISS, with that material
    .. They learned how to work with it, succesfully!

    Why not give them a break? When I was able to fix my first TV, I was HAPPY! Because I could do it!

    You didn't really need to expect I'd be assembling it from zero!

    I've learned things are also good outside our hacker/creating-mentality ...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  48. nice standards by xianthax · · Score: 1

    proposing a HAM radio for a senior design project at my school would have gotten you laughed out of your advisor's office, you should be able to design and build one from scratch during non-linear electronics class freshman or sophomore year...or at age 13 if you can read a book.

  49. Just tell them somewhere where you -aren't- by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1

    The ISS is only 240 miles up. The astronauts can only see a small amount of Earth's surface at any given time. This was mentioned once on Astronomy Cast - which I highly recommend, and you can get it straight from the horse's mouth here:
    http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/station/crew/exp7/luletters/lu_letter5.html

    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
  50. Sad commentary on our times, by mattt79 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    that this is news. I don't know how much they've dumbed down the test since then, but in the days when you still had to learn code at 5wpm for a novice license - ANYONE who passed the written exam had enough knowledge to build an antenna. Hell, anyone who could get a tech or general class license (the minimums that allowed voice communication) could have designed the transmitter as well! Get off my lawn! 73 de n2auz

  51. Tang? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So do they know where to get some Tang? How did I get this number? Shut up!

  52. Re:You screwed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will you and the rest of the GNAA come after me?

    If you are worried about that, try thinking about baseball.

  53. not the students so much... by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    I do think it tells us something about their school officials...

  54. Not That Impressive by reallocate · · Score: 1

    I'm happy for them, but I'm not impressed.

    Amateur radio folks have been building their own hardware for decades. They've been bouncing signals off the Moon and meteor trails for almost half a century.

    ISS is less that 300 miles away when it is overhead.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  55. Big deal...Mir had a ham usenet feed... by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1

    ...from University of Hawaii, in the early 1990s. A colleague of mine was a postdoc there and introduced me to the guys that did it. They had set it up pretty much for kicks, after a long string of voice contacts ith the cosmonauts (who must have been pretty bored up on their end too...)

  56. No Permission Needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you don't necessarily need permission to contact the station. If your a HAM radio operator you can get in touch with the Space Station. Astronauts and Cosmonauts are usually talking on the radio during their free time.

  57. Damn dirty apes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though it it some what difficult to come up with space themed prank calls akin to "Is your refrigerator running".

    I suppose calling them and telling them to stay up there since Earth has been wiped out would be in bad taste ;)

    Better yet: Call them and say that apes have taken over the planet and enslaved the human race.

  58. Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, this is a cool project, and it's interesting and different these days.... BUT
    having read the blog, here was there plan.

    The student design involves two fully redundant back-up radiocommunication systems, each of which is comprised of a power system, a VHF transceiver, tracking station software, an azimuth and elevation gimbal device, a PIC micro-controller interface unit and an antenna system. The radiocommunication systems use 2 VHF frequencies for carriers, a 100W transmitter and an ultra-sensitive receiver coupled to a Circular Polarized satellite antenna mounted on a fully articulated system, with 180 degrees of rotation in elevation and 360 degree rotation in azimuth.
      Sounds good eh? well, they didn't build the radio, they bought a ICOM Ic-V8000, and they didn't build the antenna they bought a Hy-Gain OSCAR-style Yagi, and they didn't build the rotor for it, they bought a Yaesu G-5500 rotor.
    I hope they wrote the tracking software... or at least built the backup radio and antenna, but so far from my reading it's not looking good.

        So a bunch of college radio students hooked up a radio they bought, one of them took a course somewhere else to get his amateur radio license, obtained permission from ARISS (The primary purpose of ARISS is to allow students engaged in a science and technology curriculum to speak with an astronaut orbiting the Earth on the International Space Station. Using amateur radio, students ask questions about life in space or other space-related topics... yes it happens enough that this organization does just that)

    Now just to clarify for America and the rest of the world, these college students aren't the equivalent of MIT grads, College here in Canada is not like College in the states, we use the term College for 2-3 year course trade school, you graduate with a diploma for a specific job, American's use the term College for what we call University, you take intellectual courses that further your education and specialize your education, but you end up with a BA or a PHD etc.
    But that said, this sounds more like it should have been a grade 11 science fair project, not a college radio communications project in Humber's Wireless and Telecommunications Technology course.

    So either the quality of education is severly dropping or it sounds like I'm missing how hard this is.
    when i was looking for more info on this story i found another one here's somebody else who also has contacted the station http://www.universetoday.com/2008/10/27/ham-radio-operator-communicates-with-space-station/

    So considering they are even receiving a 2009 Telecom Laureate Awards at the Canadian Museum of Civilization, I hope this was more difficult then it is beginning to sound. Hmmm

  59. Um, what did they design and build? Nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, but this is embarrassing. These students didn't DESIGN anything -- they just bought and assembled a ham radio station using commercial components. As far as I can tell from reading their blog, nothing was "home built".

    It's like saying I DESIGNED a computer because went to Best Buy and bought a CPU, monitor, keyboard, and mouse -- and I hooked them up together, all by myself!! What a joke!

    They BOUGHT the antenna, rotor, and radio. They did not even DESIGN or BUILD the antenna, they ASSEMBLED it!! They took the pieces out of the box, followed the instructions included in the box, and screwed the pieces together together.

    It's not like they bought metal conduit pipe and welding rods, cut the pieces to the correct length, and put them together to make the antenna. I'm sorry, but there is a book called the "ARRL Handbook" that has been published every year for ham radio operators for DECADES, and it walks you through the very simple steps of designing and building an antenna like what they bought. I would know, I built a few of these when I was 12 years old back in the late 80's!

    The sad thing is that 20 years ago, most colleges had an amateur radio club that did projects like this on a regular basis. It was not news, it was basic electronics and radio communications.